[political-research] Re: [thinktheunthinkable] 9/11-Why didn't they show us the wreckage?

A couple sad chunks was all they had.
http://911foreknowledge.com/debris/bigjunk.htm
http://911foreknowledge.com/debris/blockwalk.htm
http://911foreknowkledge.com/debris/tire.htm

These chunks were all preplaced, ready, waiting, disguised as
construction debris or cartons, before the first hit even happened.
People planned this and knew in advance, and were even willing to kill
people to make sure their propaganda hit all the right notes to tug our
heartstrings.
What turned up in 2003 as the first hit "pavel" footage was really from
a Naudet subplot that got cut.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pavel
http://thewebfairy.com/911/presentation
Behind the cover story, the "Pavel" footage was taken from a firetruck.
This is why it so quickly disappeared from circulation, as if a czech
peasant could really force ABC to return his footage under copyright law
in the real world, nah, they made the embarrassment disappear, but not
in time.
Both my archive and terrorize.dk 's managed to obtain this rare footage.

reggie501 wrote:
> The 9/11 Pentagon Attack: Planes Simply Do Not Vaporize - Why Didn't
> They Show Us the Wreckage?
>
> As each day passes, more and more Americans are becoming aware of the
> startling evidence that clearly contradicts the official explanation
> of Sept.11th, 2001 offered by the Bush administration. In fact, as
> more and more evidence comes to light, incongruities in the official
> explanation become increasingly and undeniably apparent.
>
> Ironically, the growing number of people new to these unexplained
> discrepancies poses a new problem for those of us who have been
> researching 9/11 for many months or years. We will have to find a way
> to explain the many complexities related to the attacks to those who
> now doubt the official version of events. We are faced with the
> overwhelming task helping great numbers of people understand the many
> contradictions in the 9/11 story they were fed by their government.
>
> Obviously, that is not an easy assignment, even when the great
> majority of truth seekers agree that the official explanation is
> little more than a pre-written cover story designed to herd the
> American public into supporting an agenda that would otherwise horrify
> and outrage them. However, it becomes far more complicated in light of
> a topic that causes a great deal of confusion within the research
> community itself. That disparity relates to the strike on the Pentagon.
>
> Many questions still remain about what actually took place at the
> Pentagon on September 11th 2001. That's fine, because the goal of the
> 9/11 truth community is to raise these questions for further
> investigation. The problem arises when researchers feel that it is
> their responsibility to explain what happened at the Pentagon. It is
> NOT. Rather, it is their charge to highlight the doubts that have
> been legitimately raised regarding what exactly hit that building.
>
> Some researchers claim that a 110,000 ton Boeing 757 hit the building,
> leaving only a 16 foot hole in the facade (prior to its collapse some
> 22 minutes after the initial impact.) Others claim that an A-3
> Skywarrior fighter jet was the actual aircraft. Some say it was an
> unmanned Global Hawk armed with depleted uranium missiles, and still
> others claim that the Pentagon was hit by another type of military
> missile. We can argue each of these theories forever, and accomplish
> absolutely nothing.
>
> We really have to put and end the internal dispute that is getting us
> nowhere and work together to bring information rather than more
> uncertainty to the public that is now just entering the 9/11
> discussion. To that end, I am posing ONE pertinent question about the
> strike on the Pentagon: Why didn't they show us the wreckage?
>
> Planes do not simply vaporize. Never in the history of aviation
> disasters has an aircraft ever totally disintegrated. Even exploding
> space shuttles did not vanish into thin air. Therefore, it stands to
> reason that whatever hit the Pentagon had to leave some recoverable
> debris in its wake. Surely, there had be enough identifiable rubble
> remaining from a 110,000 ton aircraft to satisfy the skeptics?
>
> Read the full blog here:
> http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=355
>
>

Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/

Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/