Friday, August 04, 2006
"9/11 Blogger - Blogging 9/11 Related Alternative News " - 16 new articles
First up is John Gibson, who says that the 1/3 of Americans who believe in U.S. Government involvement in 9/11 do so because 'they hate Bush'. I'm kind of surprised his 'word' isn't 'because they hate our freedoms'.
Next up is Fox & Friends, the bastions of honest and educated reporting, having a go with Kevin Barrett.
Thanks Frank for the heads up!
On July 31, 2006, Alex Jones interviewed Nafeez Mossadeq Ahmed, author of The War on Freedom, Behind the War on Terror: Western Secret Strategy, and the Struggle for Iraq, The War on Truth and The London Bombings: An Independent Inquiry .
"It has no existence as an independent concrete entity. It designates a highly developed category of Western covert operations designed to secure destabilization through the creation, multiplication, mobilization, and manipulation of disparate mujahideen groups. The evidence suggests that this was certainly the case on 9-11."
31.3MB MP3 (Ahmed's interview begins at 56:34 and is followed by an informative interview with Dahr Jamail.)
We already posted Paul Thompson's brief interview, but here is the full 9/11 segment from the 8/2/2006 show.
Thanks to Michael Wolsey for scanning these and Jon for sending them in. Click for full size, beware, the full size images for each of these are over 2MB in size.
The black box data from Flight 77 has allegedly been released in response to a Freedom of Information Act request.
The following email from Kyle Hence includes a good list of 10 questions which we should demand answers to. [Editor: We edited the numbering to make it more readable.]
Recent articles in corporate media examine deception and lying by the Department of Defense relative to the attacks of September 11th 2001. They shed light on an effective cover-up by the 9/11 Commission in its refusal to bring Government deception to the American people by way of their discredited 9/11 Report. Links to these articles follow as do 10 questions which these revelations and NORAD tapes beg to be asked and which must be answered . . . .
I declare August to be National Reading Month
Wisconsin State Representative Steve Nass has called for the University of Wisconsin to fire professor Kevin Barrett for his belief that 9/11 was an inside job, but hasn't looked at any of the facts concerning 9/11 for himself.
Poll: Do you believe the US Government attacked itself on 9-11?
Another Poll: Do you think federal officials either participated in the 9/11 attacks or took no action to prevent them because the U.S. wanted to go to war in the Middle East?
Condi Rice on Larry King:
Submit your comments/suggestions for tonights show here:
Tarpley and Thompson on Air America Today (hopefully more information to follow)
According to John Leonard, Paul Thompson will be on the Randi Rhodes show again today at 3 EST and Tarpley will be on Mike Malloy at 10:30 tonight.
This is a long-awaited break for MIHOP 9/11 Truth onto major talk radio, and our first break onto Air America.
Update, here is a link to Paul Thompson on Randi Rhodes, not sure if there is another show at 3:00 or if this is the show that was mentioned above:
A book published by the denominational press of the Presbyterian Church (USA) poses provocative questions about Sept. 11 and has raised the hackles of church conservatives.
Thanks to FHB.
Given the mihop versus lihop war that the new Norad revelations have stirred up, I've updated this essay.
Norway's Le Monde Diplomatique continues its 9/11 investigation in the August, 2006 issue, "Was the FBI investigation blocked?" ("Ble FBI hindret i etterforskningen?")
...It appears that several agents and other FBI staff believed that opportunities for good police work and investigation were lost in the months before the 11th of September. This was what lawyer David Schippers, (also known for having brought a case against President Bill Clinton before the Court of Impeachment) experienced when he was contacted by several FBI agents who claimed that they knew about dates, targets, financial transactions and names of the perpetrators involved in the impending terrorist attacks. Schippers claims that armed with this information, he tried to warn John Ashcroft six weeks in advance that a terrorist attack would be launched in lower Manhattan. But the FBI threatened to sue their agents if they revealed what they knew. In order to allow the information to be publicised before a terrorist attack took place, the agents agreed with David Schippers that he would represent them in a federal courtroom, supported by Judicial Watch, an organisation offering free legal assistance. In this way they would have the opportunity to be heard if they were called as witnesses. That the agents were in possession of the type of information Schippers claims they were was also confirmed by William Norman Grigg in The New American . He interviewed three FBI agents who claimed that the information to which Schippers had access was common knowledge to the FBI before the 11th of September – and that everyone knew that it was simultaneously being ignored in Washington ...
Nothing new here, but it's undoubtedly brand new to a significant # of Norwegians.
Complete text here.
US government and 9/11 Commission are covering up - 42%
Half (49.3%) of New York City residents and 41% of New York citizens overall say that some of our leaders "knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001.
Contact Popular Mechanics and tell them The Veterans for 9/11 Truth are looking for them.
To: Popular Mechanics Writers of "Debunking 9/11 Myths"
The evidence is now so strong that the 9/11 Commission was a whitewash, that even imperial lapdog Tucker Carlson is saying we may need a new investigation. Sorry . . . but the time for investigation is OVER.
Messages In This Digest (25 Messages)
- Hizbullah's attacks stem from Israeli incursions into Lebanon From: tim_howells_1000
- Bush Adminsitration Wants Soviet Style Show Trials for Non-Terrorist From: Sean McBride
- Christian Zionists Lobbying for Armageddon From: Sean McBride
- Troll-trick ..Re: [ctrl] No Time To Wait On - Bobby Kennedy and Gr From: RoadsEnd
- Greg Palast, the Neocons and World War III From: Sean McBride
- Re: Greg Palast, the Neocons and World War III From: LeaNder
- Re: Greg Palast, the Neocons and World War III From: Sean McBride
- E-mail from Steven Jones to Gerard Holmgren From: better_off_said
- Re: E-mail from Steven Jones to Gerard Holmgren From: Sean McBride
- Member's article: 61 Years Ago Today: The Real Reason For The Nuclea From: Brian Mitchell
- On the Dangers of Conspiracy Psychosis From: Sean McBride
- Re: On the Dangers of Conspiracy Psychosis From: tim_howells_1000
- Re: On the Dangers of Conspiracy Psychosis From: Sean McBride
- Fwd: HRW: Israel Guilty of War Crimes Human Rights ... - Rmail From: Sean McBride
- The Neocons' Next War From: Sean McBride
- Another Bewildered "Conspirator" Weighs in on Millegan From: Sean McBride
- The Neocons' Next War (Full Text) From: Sean McBride
- Re: [911_truth_DFW] 11 Questions Avoided by the Media On NORAD Tapes From: Bill Giltner
- Finding your search buddies From: Sean McBride
- Introduction to 90 Online File Storage Services - lifehack.org From: Sean McBride
- The Neocon Attack on Libertarians (Including Jewish Libertarians) From: Sean McBride
- Deep Web Diving From: Sean McBride
- Bob Weighs in on Greg Palast and the Neocons From: Sean McBride
- Democrats on the Neocon Road to Armageddon From: Sean McBride
- Billmon on Lebanon as Prelude to U.S. War with Iran; and Why Democra From: Sean McBride
Posted by: "Bill Giltner" email@example.com bgiltner
Thu Aug 3, 2006 8:29 pm (PST)reply to 911_truth_DFW@
yahoogroups., cross posted to com
It looks like you are doing a lot of good work and you are an honest
advocate for truth about 9/11.
I have spent several hours considering whether I should send the following
post. By posting this, I'm throwing myself into the firing line to some
degree and will be ridiculed for what I'm going to say. I don't intend to
mount of strong defense of my contention, so those of you who want a debate
will not get one from me. However, consider the following.
Kyle Hense is a distractor. My list of alleged distractors is published
wetpaint. com/page/ Speculation+ on+Diversionary+ Agents
The contents of the above link is there on a web page to be debated, so
don't hestitate to have at it, wiki style.
What's my point, what do I mean? I mean that ther are agents who inject
themselves into the stream of communications and by their actions they
muddly the clarity needed to create a legitimate groundswell of outrage
throughout the American population.
Vanity Fair Magazine has had articles that serve to distract. Also, the
article about the 9/11 Commission and the criminal referral published in
the Wash Po. was a distractor. Many of the agents working as distractors
are very sophisicated.
Let me point out just how powerful, integrated, and cunning the manipulators
It's my contention that the Mel Gibson DUI episode was a carefullly scripted
psyop. I think Mel was acting. (I'm not saying he's wasn't drinking. I'm
not saying that is didn't have tequila open in his car. I am saying he
wasn't drunk enough to be caught red handed, and to make the whole scene the
way he did). I don't think the police had to have been "in on it" for the
plan to work. I think Zionist forces hatched an incredible plan to
manipulate the debate about Jews and Israel to immobilize the huge sentiment
about the US support and handling of the current War / Crisis.
If you think I'm crazy to speculate about such a things, I honestly ask any
of you whether a blood alcohol content of .12 turns anyone into a lunitic
who not only would have a great deal of unburdening to do related to Wars
being caused by Jews, but also Gibson was alleged to have called a female
deputy "sugar tits". The Gibson DUI incident was a script written for our
particular time in history, and it was a fairly unchallenging role for an
actor of Gibson's capability to have carried off.
For those who follow Wingtv.com , I would recommend today's (8/3) audio
commentary, as I believe Victor Thorn and Lisa Guiliani are a strong voice
for getting at the truth about 9/11 and other aspects of the Neocon regimes
and it's international infrastructure.
On 8/3/06, Nancy Cunningham <cunningb@flash.
> *Eleven (11) Questions Avoided by the Media in Recent Reporting of
> Department of Defense Violations of Law*
> Kyle F. Hence
> Executive Director 9/11 CitizensWatch
> Co-Founder UnansweredQuestions
> /Washington Post/
> **9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon*
> Allegations Brought to Inspectors General*
onpost.com/ wp-dyn/content/ article/2006/ 08/01/AR20060801 01300_pf. html
> /Vanity Fair/
> **9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes**
ir.com/features/ general/060801fe ge01
> /The New York Times/
> **New Tapes Disclose Confusion Within the Military on Sept. 11**
com/2006/ 08/03/us/ 03norad.html
> Recent articles in corporate media examine deception and lying by the
> Department of Defense relative to the attacks of September 11th 2001. They
> shed light on an effective cover-up by the 9/11 Commission in its refusal to
> bring Government deception to the American people by way of their
> discredited 9/11 Report. Links to these articles follow as do 11 questions
> which these revelations and NORAD tapes beg to be asked and which must be
========= ========= =========
> The real and problematic confusion and fog is one which is seemingly
> preventing the corporate media from grappling with any of the following
> pressing questions which have been advanced for years by the 9/11 families,
> advocates and independent researchers.
> Here are* Eleven Questions* that the corporate media have thus far refused
> to raise or attempt to answer in their examination of the NORAD tapes and
> related issues:
> 1. *Who was responsible for scheduling multiple war games and terror
> exercises involving aircraft for Sept. 11th
> 2. Who moved "Global Guardian" normally scheduled for October to
> 3. Who designed the war games to involve 'hijackings'
> 4. Who planned and scheduled the movement of Air force aircraft north to
> Canada, Alaska and Greenland?
> 5. Who planned the terror exercise at the NRO (National Reconnaissance
> Office) involving an evacuation in response to threat from the air?
> 6. Who was "hands-on" responsible for coordinating all the war games the
> morning of September 11th?
> 7. Who would have been responsible for turning off the war games to enable
> a timely real world response to the attacks?
> 8. How were as many as 21 false radar blips or possible targets (per Jane
> Garvey) inserted into FAA radar screens?
> 9. Who was responsible for the identification of ghost flight 11 which
> allegedly continued to fly south past Manhattan and which may have caused
> NORAD's Langley intercept jets to vector North toward NYC rather than D.C.?
> * [NOTE: John Farmer of the 9/11 Commission said to me personally that the
> 9/11 Commission was never able to identify the individual for this
-to resolve this anomaly.]*
> 10. Why was there no reference to the pattern of 9/11 Commission cover-up
> including that of Able Danger as revealed by Capt. Scott Philpott?
> * 11. The bottom line question that corporate media refuse to answer and
> which the 9/11 Commission ignored is *who, specifically, would have been
> responsible for creating the circumstances that led to the confusion or fog
> the morning of 9/11 and who should have immediately ceased any and all war
> gaming activity and deceptive radar data?*
> To begin to answer these questions journalists intent on getting answers
> to questions long asked by the families and others should visit:
> *Center for Cooperative Research: Essay -- "U.S. Military Exercises up to
iveresearch. org/timeline. jsp?timeline= complete_ 911_timeline& before_9/ 11=militaryExerc ises
> *Randi Rhodes interview with Complete 9/11 Timeline author, Paul Thompson
> on Air America*
sts.com/files/ audio/RandiRhode s_PaulThompson_ NORAD_080206. mp3
> Enough with excusing those responsible by pointing to 'confusion' or
> 'fog'. The real and dangerous 'fog' here is that which prevents journalists
> from doing their jobs and asking and answering the hard questions about 9/11
> including those posed above and those surrounding the growing evidence for
> controlled demolition of the World Trade Center towers and WTC #7. [Google
> Dr. Steven Jones & World Trade Center]
www.uruknet.info: a site gathering daily information concerning occupied Iraq: news, analysis, documents and texts of iraqi resistance available in Italian and English.
You receive this newsletter because you subscribed it. If you think it was an abuse, or simply if you don't want to receive it any more,
click here to unsubscribe from the newsletter.