reply to
911_truth_DFW@yahoogroups.com, cross posted to
political-research@yahoogroups.comNancy,
It looks like you are doing a lot of good work and you are an honest
advocate for truth about 9/11.
I have spent several hours considering whether I should send the following
post. By posting this, I'm throwing myself into the firing line to some
degree and will be ridiculed for what I'm going to say. I don't intend to
mount of strong defense of my contention, so those of you who want a debate
will not get one from me. However, consider the following.
Kyle Hense is a distractor. My list of alleged distractors is published
here:
http://911truth.wetpaint.com/page/Speculation+on+Diversionary+AgentsThe contents of the above link is there on a web page to be debated, so
don't hestitate to have at it, wiki style.
What's my point, what do I mean? I mean that ther are agents who inject
themselves into the stream of communications and by their actions they
muddly the clarity needed to create a legitimate groundswell of outrage
throughout the American population.
Vanity Fair Magazine has had articles that serve to distract. Also, the
article about the 9/11 Commission and the criminal referral published in
the Wash Po. was a distractor. Many of the agents working as distractors
are very sophisicated.
Let me point out just how powerful, integrated, and cunning the manipulators
are:
It's my contention that the Mel Gibson DUI episode was a carefullly scripted
psyop. I think Mel was acting. (I'm not saying he's wasn't drinking. I'm
not saying that is didn't have tequila open in his car. I am saying he
wasn't drunk enough to be caught red handed, and to make the whole scene the
way he did). I don't think the police had to have been "in on it" for the
plan to work. I think Zionist forces hatched an incredible plan to
manipulate the debate about Jews and Israel to immobilize the huge sentiment
about the US support and handling of the current War / Crisis.
If you think I'm crazy to speculate about such a things, I honestly ask any
of you whether a blood alcohol content of .12 turns anyone into a lunitic
who not only would have a great deal of unburdening to do related to Wars
being caused by Jews, but also Gibson was alleged to have called a female
deputy "sugar tits". The Gibson DUI incident was a script written for our
particular time in history, and it was a fairly unchallenging role for an
actor of Gibson's capability to have carried off.
For those who follow Wingtv.com , I would recommend today's (8/3) audio
commentary, as I believe Victor Thorn and Lisa Guiliani are a strong voice
for getting at the truth about 9/11 and other aspects of the Neocon regimes
and it's international infrastructure.
Bill Giltner
Austin, TX
On 8/3/06, Nancy Cunningham <
cunningb@flash.net> wrote:
>
> *Eleven (11) Questions Avoided by the Media in Recent Reporting of
> Department of Defense Violations of Law*
>
>
> Kyle F. Hence
> Executive Director 9/11 CitizensWatch
> Co-Founder UnansweredQuestions
.org
> http://www.911citizenswatch.org
>
> /Washington Post/
> **9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon*
> Allegations Brought to Inspectors General*
>
>
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101300_pf.html
>
> /Vanity Fair/
> **9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes**
>
>
> http://www.vanityfair.com/features/general/060801fege01
>
> /The New York Times/
> **New Tapes Disclose Confusion Within the Military on Sept. 11**
>
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/03/us/03norad.html
>
>
> Recent articles in corporate media examine deception and lying by the
> Department of Defense relative to the attacks of September 11th 2001. They
> shed light on an effective cover-up by the 9/11 Commission in its refusal to
> bring Government deception to the American people by way of their
> discredited 9/11 Report. Links to these articles follow as do 11 questions
> which these revelations and NORAD tapes beg to be asked and which must be
> answered:
>
> =======================================
>
> The real and problematic confusion and fog is one which is seemingly
> preventing the corporate media from grappling with any of the following
> pressing questions which have been advanced for years by the 9/11 families,
> advocates and independent researchers.
>
> Here are* Eleven Questions* that the corporate media have thus far refused
> to raise or attempt to answer in their examination of the NORAD tapes and
> related issues:
>
> 1. *Who was responsible for scheduling multiple war games and terror
> exercises involving aircraft for Sept. 11th
>
> 2. Who moved "Global Guardian" normally scheduled for October to
> September?
>
> 3. Who designed the war games to involve 'hijackings'?
>
> 4. Who planned and scheduled the movement of Air force aircraft north to
> Canada, Alaska and Greenland?
>
> 5. Who planned the terror exercise at the NRO (National Reconnaissance
> Office) involving an evacuation in response to threat from the air?
>
> 6. Who was "hands-on" responsible for coordinating all the war games the
> morning of September 11th?
>
> 7. Who would have been responsible for turning off the war games to enable
> a timely real world response to the attacks?
>
> 8. How were as many as 21 false radar blips or possible targets (per Jane
> Garvey) inserted into FAA radar screens?
>
> 9. Who was responsible for the identification of ghost flight 11 which
> allegedly continued to fly south past Manhattan and which may have caused
> NORAD's Langley intercept jets to vector North toward NYC rather than D.C.?
> * [NOTE: John Farmer of the 9/11 Commission said to me personally that the
> 9/11 Commission was never able to identify the individual for this
> information--to resolve this anomaly.]*
>
> 10. Why was there no reference to the pattern of 9/11 Commission cover-up
> including that of Able Danger as revealed by Capt. Scott Philpott?
>
> =================
>
> * 11. The bottom line question that corporate media refuse to answer and
> which the 9/11 Commission ignored is *who, specifically, would have been
> responsible for creating the circumstances that led to the confusion or fog
> the morning of 9/11 and who should have immediately ceased any and all war
> gaming activity and deceptive radar data?*
>
> To begin to answer these questions journalists intent on getting answers
> to questions long asked by the families and others should visit:
>
> *Center for Cooperative Research: Essay -- "U.S. Military Exercises up to
> 9/11"*
>
> http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&before_9/11=militaryExercises
>
> *Randi Rhodes interview with Complete 9/11 Timeline author, Paul Thompson
> on Air America*
>
> http://www.911podcasts.com/files/audio/RandiRhodes_PaulThompson_NORAD_080206.mp3
>
> Enough with excusing those responsible by pointing to 'confusion' or
> 'fog'. The real and dangerous 'fog' here is that which prevents journalists
> from doing their jobs and asking and answering the hard questions about 9/11
> including those posed above and those surrounding the growing evidence for
> controlled demolition of the World Trade Center towers and WTC #7. [Google
> Dr. Steven Jones & World Trade Center]
>
> ********************
>
>
>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment