Tuesday, February 07, 2006

off-topic Re: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Able Danger

This is the extraordinary and personal true story of the Japanese
MAHIKARI cult ex-member, Garry Greenwood. Journey with Greenwood into a
mysterious and hidden world of intrigue, mysticism, the occult, and
conspiracies of unimaginable proportions - a world few have visited, and
even fewer have returned able to recount their ghastly ordeals. Uncover
hitherto unknown facts regarding the origins of modern day
bio-terrorism, cults of gold, and the forces which drive and justify
such deadly idealism. Visit King Solomon's Temple rebuilt, and discover
the whereabouts of the Ark Of The Covenant! For conspiracy buffs, and
all students of religion, this manuscript is a must!

Discover what connects Aum Shinrikyo's nerve-gas attack on the Tokyo
subway, the notorious anti-Semitic document called the Protocols, the
lost continent of Mu, the tomb of Jesus, the Star of David, fabulous
caches of buried treasure and the 'Rape of Nanking' in 1937! Learn of
MAHIKARI'S secret plans for world domination under the Emperor of
Japan. Garry Greenwood, a former top sect leader from Canberra, unravels
the dark secrets of this mysterious Japanese cult.
http://au.geocities.com/mahikari2002/emperor/emperor.html

http://au.geocities.com/mahikari2002/index.html
A cornerstone belief of both Mahikari factions is the arrival of a
well-overdue Armageddon. And as Protocol # 23 explains "Then it will be
possible for us to say to the peoples of the world: Give thanks to god
and bow the knee before him who bears on his front the seal of the
predestination of man, to which god himself has led his star than none
other but him might free us from all the before mentioned forces of
evil."

Interestingly SM's main seal or symbol is the Star of David and it is
emblazoned upon their golden temple and at several places on their 45
meters in height pyramid.

Does this mean that these are amongst the chosen ones as prophesied in
the Protocols of The Learned Elders Of Zion waiting patiently for major
currency collapses - their signal to take up their rightful place -
being the bearers of the seal of the predestination of man who are to
free us from the forces of evil?
http://au.geocities.com/mahikari2002/index.html

alexldent wrote:
> Wow, thanks. This is the first time I've read something that really
> explains what Moon is up to. Never heard of oriental zionsim before...
>
> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable <webfairy@...>
> wrote:
>
>> Take a good look at Tarpley's Able Danger coverage.
>> Curt Weldon is a Sun Myung Moon supporter.
>>
>> http://www.reason.com/hitandrun/2005/06/congressman_koo.shtml
>> He was Front And Center at the Washington DC "Coronation of Sun Myung
>> Moon as Messiah".
>> http://www.howestreet.com/story.php?ArticleId=839
>>
>> This wouldn't be so dangerous except for Moon's connections to the Red
>> Chinese Secret Police, and the fact he's bought up most of the
>> "Christian" Right. That his "religion" is first cousin to Aum Shirokio
>> doesn't make me feel like waving a flag in relief.
>>
>>
> http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/wint02-03/Moonification.html
>
>> *Moonification of the Sciences
>> The Russell-Wells `No-Soul' Gang Behind the Moonie Freak Show
>>
>> The Unholy Alliance -
>> Christianity & The NWO
>> Part I
>> http://www.rense.com/general20/unholy.htm
>>
>> We don't hear nearly enough about Moon.
>> I've noted previously that the most powerful Illuminati players are
>> always the quietest ones.
>> Alito, the new Supreme, belongs to the Federalist Society, one of the
>> Moon sponsored Iran Contra Retirement Homes.
>> Moon represents Oriental Zionism. Their plan is to nuke Israel so the
>> Solomon's Temple already built on the Island on Honshu (along with
>> graves of "jesus and his brother") will take over as the New Jerusalem.
>> While Mao TsuTung passed as "Communist", he was actually Oriental
>> Zionist as was Pol Pot. North Korea has become a shrine of Oriental
>>
> Zionism.
>
>> I'm sorry that creeps like Kaminski have done so much to promote the
>> Zionist=Jew mind meme to the point that oriental zionism can pass
>>
> invisably.
>
>> The King of Japan is a "God on Earth" of oriental zionism, and this is
>> why the Americans kept the king on power and even hid atrocities
>>
> against
>
>> American prisoners of war. The Soong sisters married Sun Yat Sen and
>> Chang Kai Shek. During World War 2 they came to the University of Cairo
>> where the Islamic Brotherhood had earlier had been set up by
>>
> Lawrence of
>
>> Arabia with rituals designed by Alestir Crowley, in order to carve
>>
> up Asia.
>
>> Moon is from North Korea. Any one there who does not have direct ties
>> with oriental zionism is being systematically starved to death
>> currently, as shown on a current PBS special on North Korea. Their
>> Eternal Fearless Leader cult represents perfect accomplishment on
>>
> behalf
>
>> of the God of a Thousand Names.
>>
>> alexldent wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> Able Danger is recast as an excuse where Police State, done
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> earlier and thoroughly, would of protected us from Hijackers Ramming
>>> Planes into Buildings.<<<
>>>
>>> My thoughts exactly. I wonder if this was the whole point of bringing
>>> up Able Danger last summer.
>>>
>>> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable <webfairy@>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> http://www.waronfreedom.org/synth/synter2ed.pdf
>>>> middle of page 7
>>>>
>>>> " In other words, Able Danger might represent the case officers and
>>>> terrorist controllers for a group of government-run terrorists
>>>>
> (double
>
>>>> agents, plus dupes, fanatics,
>>>> and criminal energy types) used to play the roles of terrorists
>>>>
> in the
>
>>>> various anti-terror drills. "
>>>>
>>>> I agree with this sentence wholeheartedly. Perps disguising
>>>>
> themselves
>
>>>> as trying to expose perps while actually covering up and distancing
>>>> themselves from the crime.
>>>> This is another repeated pattern seen throughout history, two recent
>>>> examples being the 911 Commission and the Iran Contra commission.
>>>>
>>>> The very next paragraph brings us Curt Weldon, Sun Myung Moon's
>>>>
> man in
>
>>>> congress.
>>>>
>>>> Able Danger is recast as an excuse where Police State, done
>>>>
> earlier and
>
>>>> thoroughly, would of protected us from Hijackers Ramming Planes into
>>>> Buildings.
>>>>
>>>> Tarpley is planehugging. He is playing for the Larouche faction,
>>>>
> which
>
>>>> is Grand Orient Masons, Continental as opposed to English
>>>>
> freemasonry.
>
>>>> Templar One Worlders.
>>>> I could tell from his statement that "Flight 93" jumped into an old
>>>>
>>>>
>>> mine
>>>
>>>
>>>> and covered itself up.
>>>> His Able Danger Boosterism is just more evidence I was right.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Folks, there is no volunatry backpedalling from the official 9/11
>>>>> narrative. Why do you think they panicked and slammed the lid shut
>>>>> on able danger? Tarpley goes into what Able danger was really
>>>>>
> about
>
>>>>> here in the new preface to his 9/11 Synthetic Terror.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.waronfreedom.org/synth/synter2ed.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You better believe the official fiction is meant to stay. Anybody
>>>>> thinking that they are ready to voluntarily concede to controlled
>>>>> demolition is literally out of their mind.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: SV: Re: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?]

"I really respect your work, although I´m sad that I simply can´t show
it to people who´re new to 9/11 Truth."

At least let them know that so called alleged "911 Truth" is just a
different brand of really big lie.

There shouldn't be a difference between "911 truth" and the everyday
plain kind.

Telling people an NSA approved subset of lies that have to be unlearned
before they can confront real facts just buys time for the frameup.

Peter Kofod wrote:
> I´d love to, but I must confess that I´m having a hard time even
> grasping the implications. The easy reason why, would be that I´m just
> an idjut, and a better answer would be, that I haven´t spent 1000 of
> hours studying this.
>
> I know why you wrote what you just did, and I DO think that you´ve
> been unfairly critisized(abused) over the years, but I´m not one of
> those who´s been doing that!
>
> I really respect your work, although I´m sad that I simply can´t show
> it to people who´re new to 9/11 Truth.
>
> I think it deserves to be made easier accessible! (not technically,
> but in terms of understanding to the NOT so experienced mind)
>
> And I think your name is pretty cool :-)
>
> Peter Kofod, Denmark
>
> */Rosalee Grable <webfairy@thewebfairy.com>/* skrev:
>
> I would certainly volunteer you for a hard hitting and easy to
> understand overview!!
>
> It has been MORE THAN FOUR YEARS since I noticed there was no
> plane in
> the first hit footage that allegedly shows a plane.
> Four Years!!
>
> If I had it to do over again I'd of picked some more "serious" a
> moniker
> than "Webfairy", but I was expecting to make a career of webdesign
> and
> hands-on computer care for small businesses.
> 911 turned my clientele to dust too., figuratively.
>
> I didn't know there was such a thing as UAV drones back then.
> I thought I was seeing one object, not a flock close together.
> I am at least as sick of the word "whatzit" as you are.
> It was the best I could do to identify a non-plane non-ufo
> unrecognizable object.
>
> I still don't have a better word than "Butterplane" for the
> apparently
> melting second hit cartoons.
> Professor Cornflake posits that the Pentagon "Plane" melted in midair.
> This gave us the idea learned professors believe that planes are made
> out of dairy products.
> Since Professor Cornflake is from Perdue, maybe it's actually corn
> oil
> margarine.
>
> Peter Kofod wrote:
> > I agree with alex here.
> > To just step in front of a camera and say "no plane hit the towers"
> > would be idiotic. But if someone would care to present an
> hardhitting
> > and easy-to-understand overview of the argument, it would be a
> totally
> > different case.
> >
> > Personally I would avoid terms like butterplanes and whatitz,
> since my
> > PERSONAL experience is, that these terms make people NOT want to
> look
> > at the evidence, just like screaming IDIOT at someone, probably
> isn´t
> > the best way to make them consider your point, but I guess this is
> > a matter of taste?
> >
> > Best,
> > Peter Kofod, Denmark
> >
> > */alexldent <alexldent@yahoo.com>/* skrev:
> >
> > Obviously I'm not Rosalee, and you asked her-- but, I
> wouldn't mind if
> > he did this and backed it up with a proper analysis. If you
> just SAY
> > that "there was no plane crash and that the planes hitting
> the towers
> > were faked" of course it sounds crazy. But if one presented it
> > properly, I think it could be a very effective argument.
> The more I
> > look at these pictures of the WTC and the planes and then the
> > plane-shaped holes, the more bogus it looks.
> >
> > The truth is the truth, and I don't like the idea of hiding
> the truth,
> > no matter how crazy it might initially sound.
> >
> > > Do you really want Professor Jones to
> > > go on national TV and say that there was no plane crash
> and that
> > the
> > > planes hitting the towers were faked and edited in later on
> > > videotape? What praytell would be the result of him
> taking that
> > > action? What good would it do our truth movement if people of
> > Jones
> > > stature started doing things like that?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > Government procurement
> >
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+procurement&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=S_3-2zVK9QQjTwxHvO91yw
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+procurement&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=S_3-2zVK9QQjTwxHvO91yw>>
>
> > Government leasing
> >
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+leasing&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=ZAuP_XFQBkNiVw-hPWWJ-Q
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+leasing&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=ZAuP_XFQBkNiVw-hPWWJ-Q>>
>
> > Government grants for women
> >
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+grants+for+women&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=R7KVvqXEVqN0Ct9WGPhKwg
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+grants+for+women&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=R7KVvqXEVqN0Ct9WGPhKwg>>
>
> >
> > Government lease
> >
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+lease&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=FM8lkJddvatAkQNo00D_Cw
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+lease&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=FM8lkJddvatAkQNo00D_Cw>>
>
> > Government contract
> >
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+contract&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=fTrsbvxC-m39UjtOdMcT-Q
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+contract&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=fTrsbvxC-m39UjtOdMcT-Q>>
>
> > Government money
> >
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+money&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=HB73LsQrRnXy-2WkBh3LyA
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+money&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=HB73LsQrRnXy-2WkBh3LyA>>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > * Visit your group "911InsideJobbers
> > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers>" on the web.
> >
> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> <mailto:911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
> >
> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Government procurement
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+procurement&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=S_3-2zVK9QQjTwxHvO91yw>
> Government leasing
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+leasing&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=ZAuP_XFQBkNiVw-hPWWJ-Q>
> Government grants for women
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+grants+for+women&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=R7KVvqXEVqN0Ct9WGPhKwg>
>
> Government lease
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+lease&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=FM8lkJddvatAkQNo00D_Cw>
> Government contract
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+contract&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=fTrsbvxC-m39UjtOdMcT-Q>
> Government money
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+money&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=HB73LsQrRnXy-2WkBh3LyA>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "911InsideJobbers
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

SV: Re: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?]

I´d love to, but I must confess that I´m having a hard time even grasping the implications. The easy reason why, would be that I´m just an idjut, and a better answer would be, that I haven´t spent 1000 of hours studying this.
 
I know why you wrote what you just did, and I DO think that you´ve been unfairly critisized(abused) over the years, but I´m not one of those who´s been doing that!
 
I really respect your work, although I´m sad that I simply can´t show it to people who´re new to 9/11 Truth.
 
I think it deserves to be made easier accessible! (not technically, but in terms of understanding to the NOT so experienced mind)
 
And I think your name is pretty cool :-)
 
Peter Kofod, Denmark

Rosalee Grable <webfairy@thewebfairy.com> skrev:
I would certainly volunteer you for a hard hitting and easy to
understand overview!!

It has been MORE THAN FOUR YEARS since I noticed there was no plane in
the first hit footage that allegedly shows a plane.
Four Years!!

If I had it to do over again I'd of picked some more "serious" a moniker
than "Webfairy", but I was expecting to make a career of webdesign and
hands-on computer care for small businesses.
911 turned my clientele to dust too., figuratively.

I didn't know there was such a thing as UAV drones back then.
I thought I was seeing one object, not a flock close together.
I am at least as sick of the word "whatzit" as you are.
It was the best I could do to identify a non-plane non-ufo
unrecognizable object.

I still don't have a better word than "Butterplane" for the apparently
melting second hit cartoons.
Professor Cornflake posits that the Pentagon "Plane" melted in midair.
This gave us the idea learned professors believe that planes are made
out of dairy products.
Since Professor Cornflake is from Perdue, maybe it's actually corn oil
margarine.

Peter Kofod wrote:
> I agree with alex here.
> To just step in front of a camera and say "no plane hit the towers"
> would be idiotic. But if someone would care to present an hardhitting
> and easy-to-understand overview of the argument, it would be a totally
> different case.

> Personally I would avoid terms like butterplanes and whatitz, since my
> PERSONAL experience is, that these terms make people NOT want to look
> at the evidence, just like screaming IDIOT at someone, probably isn´t
> the best way to make them consider your point, but I guess this is
> a matter of taste?

> Best,
> Peter Kofod, Denmark
>
> */alexldent <alexldent@yahoo.com>/* skrev:
>
>     Obviously I'm not Rosalee, and you asked her-- but, I wouldn't mind if
>     he did this and backed it up with a proper analysis.  If you just SAY
>     that "there was no plane crash and that the planes hitting the towers
>     were faked" of course it sounds crazy.  But if one presented it
>     properly, I think it could be a very effective argument.  The more I
>     look at these pictures of the WTC and the planes and then the
>     plane-shaped holes, the more bogus it looks.
>
>     The truth is the truth, and I don't like the idea of hiding the truth,
>     no matter how crazy it might initially sound.
>
>     > Do you really want Professor Jones to
>     > go on national TV and say that there was no plane crash and that
>     the
>     > planes hitting the towers were faked and edited in later on
>     > videotape?  What praytell would be the result of him taking that
>     > action?  What good would it do our truth movement if people of
>     Jones
>     > stature started doing things like that?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Government procurement
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+procurement&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=S_3-2zVK9QQjTwxHvO91yw>
>       Government leasing
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+leasing&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=ZAuP_XFQBkNiVw-hPWWJ-Q>
>       Government grants for women
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+grants+for+women&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=R7KVvqXEVqN0Ct9WGPhKwg>
>
> Government lease
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+lease&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=FM8lkJddvatAkQNo00D_Cw>
>       Government contract
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+contract&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=fTrsbvxC-m39UjtOdMcT-Q>
>       Government money
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+money&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=HB73LsQrRnXy-2WkBh3LyA>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>     *  Visit your group "911InsideJobbers
>       <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers>" on the web.
>       
>     *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>        911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>       <mailto:911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>       
>     *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>





SPONSORED LINKS
Government procurement Government leasing Government grants for women
Government lease Government contract Government money


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Re: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?]

I would certainly volunteer you for a hard hitting and easy to
understand overview!!

It has been MORE THAN FOUR YEARS since I noticed there was no plane in
the first hit footage that allegedly shows a plane.
Four Years!!

If I had it to do over again I'd of picked some more "serious" a moniker
than "Webfairy", but I was expecting to make a career of webdesign and
hands-on computer care for small businesses.
911 turned my clientele to dust too., figuratively.

I didn't know there was such a thing as UAV drones back then.
I thought I was seeing one object, not a flock close together.
I am at least as sick of the word "whatzit" as you are.
It was the best I could do to identify a non-plane non-ufo
unrecognizable object.

I still don't have a better word than "Butterplane" for the apparently
melting second hit cartoons.
Professor Cornflake posits that the Pentagon "Plane" melted in midair.
This gave us the idea learned professors believe that planes are made
out of dairy products.
Since Professor Cornflake is from Perdue, maybe it's actually corn oil
margarine.

Peter Kofod wrote:
> I agree with alex here.
> To just step in front of a camera and say "no plane hit the towers"
> would be idiotic. But if someone would care to present an hardhitting
> and easy-to-understand overview of the argument, it would be a totally
> different case.
>
> Personally I would avoid terms like butterplanes and whatitz, since my
> PERSONAL experience is, that these terms make people NOT want to look
> at the evidence, just like screaming IDIOT at someone, probably isn´t
> the best way to make them consider your point, but I guess this is
> a matter of taste?
>
> Best,
> Peter Kofod, Denmark
>
> */alexldent <alexldent@yahoo.com>/* skrev:
>
> Obviously I'm not Rosalee, and you asked her-- but, I wouldn't mind if
> he did this and backed it up with a proper analysis. If you just SAY
> that "there was no plane crash and that the planes hitting the towers
> were faked" of course it sounds crazy. But if one presented it
> properly, I think it could be a very effective argument. The more I
> look at these pictures of the WTC and the planes and then the
> plane-shaped holes, the more bogus it looks.
>
> The truth is the truth, and I don't like the idea of hiding the truth,
> no matter how crazy it might initially sound.
>
> > Do you really want Professor Jones to
> > go on national TV and say that there was no plane crash and that
> the
> > planes hitting the towers were faked and edited in later on
> > videotape? What praytell would be the result of him taking that
> > action? What good would it do our truth movement if people of
> Jones
> > stature started doing things like that?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Government procurement
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+procurement&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=S_3-2zVK9QQjTwxHvO91yw>
> Government leasing
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+leasing&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=ZAuP_XFQBkNiVw-hPWWJ-Q>
> Government grants for women
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+grants+for+women&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=R7KVvqXEVqN0Ct9WGPhKwg>
>
> Government lease
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+lease&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=FM8lkJddvatAkQNo00D_Cw>
> Government contract
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+contract&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=fTrsbvxC-m39UjtOdMcT-Q>
> Government money
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+money&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=HB73LsQrRnXy-2WkBh3LyA>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "911InsideJobbers
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[911InsideJobbers] [Fwd: Holmgren Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 18:05:39 +1100
From: Gerard Holmgren <holmgren@iinet.net.au>

Inphoman 911 asked

[[Why risk exposing such
> technology on 9/11 and not just use high powered explosives or
> mininukes instead? IOW why does the false flag destruction of a
> building require secret microwave technology? Are they trying to
> hide this technology from only us or from foreign powers as well?
> Using the secret raygun on 9/11 wouldn't have been too smart in the
> latter case now would it?]]

The answer to this is in two parts. Part 1 deals with a fundamental
reasoning problem in the way the question was asked.

Part 2 addresses the question more literally.

Part 1.

If this question was asked in the context in which I think it was, then the
very asking of it is nonsensical. If one accepts or is open to being shown
direct evidence that it was used, and as a consequence is also curious about
*why * they used it, then it's a reasonable question.

But if one is using speculative musing, presenting a pre-conceived
assumption that there would be no reason, and using this as an excuse to
rebut or refuse to consider such evidence, then this is very poor reasoning.

To analogize. Suppose you were a detective investigating the murder of a
woman. All evidence leads irrefutably to her husband, which is very
surprising to everyone because everyone thought they had a loving and happy
relationship.

Would such evidence be dismissed, simply because you couldn’t think of a
motive ? Of course not. The fact that it was surprising would of course
incite you to look the evidence over very carefully, in case you had missed
something, or in case there was some alternative explanation. But if the
evidence stood up to such suspicious examination and couldn’t be faulted,
you wouldn't then throw it out, simply because it was surprising in the
context of your pre-existing world view. What you would do is make
appropriate alterations to that world view based on the evidence before you.

Having satisfied yourself that he did it, you might then wonder about why.
You may or may not find an answer to that, but even if you didn't, it still
wouln't change the fact that he did it.

Inphoman may think that he's being enlightened in calling an inside job in
the general sense-, more enlightened than those who dismiss the notion
simply because their pre-existing world view doesn’t allow for such a thing
to be imaginable. But there's actually no difference in the two approaches.

Speculative musing, on the basis of what we *imagine* to be plausible is
only reasonable if there is no direct evidence of any kind on the question.
If there is direct evidence, then such musing is completely irrelevant and
illogical.

It's like Chomsky defending the official story of the JFK assassination.
Chomsky goes to great speculative lengths, musing about the political
implications of an inside job and concludes that it's not plausible. The
problem with this approach is the magic bullet. The science of ballistics
doesn’t change itself for the sake of perceived political plausibility.
Perceptions of political plausibility must adapt themselves to what the
science of ballistics tells us.

Our world view, our fundamental assumptions about what we think is plausible
or not plausible should be formed on the basis of the pattern we have
observed from established irrefutable facts. A world view which assumes that
that there would be no motivation to use such weapons may be reasonable on
the basis of a previously known set of facts. But if new facts emerge, which
make that world view inconsistent with the known facts then it becomes
irrational to try to fit the facts around the old fundamental assumptions,
rather than update one's fundamental assumptions in the light of new facts.

What we are seeing here from Inphoman is the same irrationality which for so
long denied the demolition evidence itself. Let me tell you about an
encounter I had with some socialist gatekeepers regarding Sept 11 in early
2002.

We were at a "justice for refugees" rally. Naively thinking that I was in
the company of people who were skeptical of official lies, I started talking
about S11. They all burst out laughing the moment I said it was inside job.
One of them, with a curl of his lip called me "fuckin loony". I started
explaining the physics of the WTC collapse but was interrupted with guffaws
of laughter. The most aggressive one asked, "why would the govt demolish its
own buildings, you idiot ?"

An illogical question, since I had been trying to explain the physics.( Note
the similarity to what is being discussed here - "why would they do it...?)

And clearly a question to which he actually didn’t actually want to hear the
answer anyway. Because I said. "Good question. Let me explain to you the
finances and legal problems surrounding those buildings and why they had to
be demolished -"

I didn’t get any further because I was interrupted by more guffaws, which
started to turn to threatening body language and they walked off, casting
back extremely unfriendly looks.

Having finally overcome such irrationality on the demolition question, it is
ironic to see the very same techniques of irrationality now being used to
claim that only the demolition is worth talking about.

Inphoman should take a look in the mirror, the next time he tries to tell
someone about the demolition and is met with this kind of behavior. In fact
he will be looking in the mirror.

Part 2.

Remember that the founding parameters of this question "why would they?" are
speculative, so in the absence of finding a CIA memo saying "this is why we
wanted to use high tech weapons", any answer must by definition be
speculative. So having asked a question which demands speculation, I don’t
then want to hear any complaints that the answer was speculative.

If the end game is a faked alien invasion, using high tech in full view and
passing it off as alien technology, then such a huge undertaking is not the
kind of thing to do without a rehearsal.

The rehearsal involves many aspects. One is the smaller scale testing of the
weaponry itself in a real world situation. The second is a test to see how
gullible the public is about swallowing whatever is fed to them - how
capable of failing to look behind the curtain.

Most likely, the moon hoax was an even lower key rehearsal for how
successfully a movie could be passed off as a real event. You wouldn’t want
to try something like Sept 11 without a rehearsal. The object is not
necessarily to cover things up with any great alacrity. It's more to test
out whether people have been made so brain dead, that the clues are right in
front of them and they still can't see it.

Consider the WMD debacle. And the Iraq- AQ connection farce. Nobody could
say that they made any serious attempt to provide a cover story for the
invasion of Iraq. The attempt to link Iraq and AQ were pathetic. So pathetic
that it can only be interpreted as a test. How many people will believe this
garbage no manner how obviously stupid and phony it is ? And of those who
don’t believe it, how many of them are going to fundamentally change their
view as a result ? As in refusing to vote for either of the Reps or dems
again and going into fundamental rejection of *everything* that we tell
them?

The WMD debacle was even more obvious. It was *designed* to be a debacle.
They didn’t even try to make it credible. If they can pull off something
like Sept 11, then at least a reasonable effort to plant WMD in Iraq -
either literally or metaphorically - was child's play. They didn’t even try.
They deliberately made it as clear as daylight that their story was 100% BS.

The only reasonable conclusion is that were testing how truly anesthetized
the public is. If you imagine public awareness as a ferocious and dangerous
beast, like a huge crocodile which has been shot full of tranquillizer
darts, then they were just making sure that it was truly asleep before they
approaching it more boldly.

WMD was like they were shouting into our faces "Wake up ! We're lying to
you! Can you hears us ? Has anybody noticed ? Does anybody care ? Yoo-hoo !
We're lying ! Wake up ! " and then turning to each other and saying. "Yep it
looks like they're out cold."

Here in Australia, *nobody* believes the WMD story. But it hasn’t changed
anyone's ability to turn on the TV and believe that what's being shown to
them is basically a real event, even if a few porkies are being told about
it. Here in Australia, the public mind is still alive to some degree, but
its no longer connected to the will or to any recognition of patterns.
Everyone knows that they lied about WMD, but all it means to people is that
they lied about WMD. Most people think they were after the oil, which is
about as close as they go to fitting it to any pattern, or drawing any
bigger conclusions from it. So there's one test successfully completed. It
deosn't even matter if they find out about a lie like that, because people
don’t connect it to anything.

By contrast , in the USA ,people tell me that something like 50% of
Americans believe that WMD were actually found in Iraq even though there was
*no attempt* of any kind to sell such an idea. Test even more successful.
The crocodile is in deep sleep.

This means that more ambitious things can be done in plain view without
anyone noticing or caring.

Sept 11 makes a great rehearsal for an alien invasion. If you can actually
show people avideo of a UAV hitting the tower and get them to believe that
its giant plane, if you can show people a cartoon of a plane and get them to
believe its real, if you can show then a 16 ft hole in a wall and get them
to believe that a 125 ft plane went through it, they'll believe anything.

If you can turn 30 stories of tower to dust in mid air, and have pools of
molten steel still underground a month later, and get people to believe that
only conventional technologies were used, then they'll believe anything. It
doesn’t really matter whether they believe the BS about Jet fuel or the BS
about conventional explosives only. Their minds are like putty. If you have
to make a concession somewhere along the way and concede that it was a
controlled demolition - although that's huge scandal on the normal scale of
things, its all controllable, if the crocodile is still so asleep that it
believes in cartoon planes and conventional explosives which do what
happened on Sept 11. Making such a slick story that all of the facts seem to
fit to even the most careful investigators would do a better job of selling
the official story, but it wouldn’t be much use for testing out how people
react to something which is a bad fake.

The assumption that all they wanted to do was start the war on terror and
conduct the very best fake they could construct ignores a lot of other
possibilities and really doesn’t fit the facts very well.

Using real planes was impractical as explained here

http://911closeup.com/

But if they had to use missiles, then why not sell a story about Arabs
firing missiles ? No terrified passengers which reduced the drama a bit, but
on the other hand, the cover up is better, and its easier to blame on a
rouge stste. So there's grounds for exploring a scenario that bigger things
are at stake here, than simply selling the whole official story package as
best they can.

If the next stage involves selling an even bigger movie than Sept 11 -
passed off as real event, with lots of use of hitherto secret high tech
weapons on full display, then it makes perfect sense to first rehearse the
many different aspects of the scenario in a lower key way first.

If the world settles down to believing that a real plane flew into the
tower, and then it was demolished, then we don't have the truth. We just
have a new lie. The fact that this lie contains an element of truth which
was lacking from the previous lie, doesn’t change the fact that it’s a lie.

And if the whole world believes a lie, then they are still under the spell.
If people are deluded, then you can do whatever you like with them. And
having a cartoon as one of the most defining historical images of the past
century certainly qualifies as mass delusion.

If they're going to sell an alien invasion, then people absolutely *have* to
believe that what they see on their TV is real, even if they dispute the
finer points of what it means. Everyone agrees that the buildings going down
was real. If people only argue about how and why the buildings went down,
and assume that the plane is real, simply because they saw it on TV, then
are missing the main point of the deception - if that main point is simply
the reinforcement that the TV might lie about who did it, but it never lies
about what you're actually seeing.

That needed to be tested. Think outside the box a bit.

[[alexldent claims the government may be ready to concede to
> conventionally demolishing the towers and cremating thousands of
> civillians alive in side. He thinks they can get away with it by
> claiming they wanted to save additional lives in the streets of
> lower manhattan, even though they didn't evacuate the towers
> beforehand, but rather told people to remain inside. He also thinks
> they can get away with the fact that they designed their controlled
> demolition to simulate a building pancaking after a plane had hit it
> by claiming they wanted to keep their preplanted explosive
> countermeasures secrets from the terrorists!
>
>
> Folks, there is no volunatry backpedalling from the official 9/11
> narrative. ]]

Not true. In Dec 2001, I wrote an article presenting evidence - although it
at that stage it still fell short of conclusive proof - that the invasion of
Afghanistan had already been planned prior to sept 11. It was met with howls
of derision from the debunkers. A few months later, full proof emerged and
the Whitehouse actually admitted it. Within hours,instead of saying "you
were right", the debunkers were smirking - " well of course they were
planning to invade Afghanistan, you idiot. Nobody ever denied that. They
knew OBL was dangerous and wanted to take him out, but he got in first."
Months of howling derision at the ridiculous idea that the invasion had been
pre-planned was instantly flushed down the memory hole.

How about the melting steel debacle ? If you deride the melting steel story
now you'll get howls of derision that nobody ever claimed that the steel
melted.

How about the "missed warnings" scandal ? After months of denying that govt
or intelligence services ever had even the faintest clue that such an attack
might be in the planning, then we got the "missed warnings scandal". It was
only a scandal for a short time. It quickly got incorporated into an excuse
for more of a police state. "We had all these clues, but we couldn’t connect
the dots because of damned civil liberties obstructions". Months of
strenuous denials that they had *any idea* that it was coming got flushed
down the memory hole almost instantly and the busting of that particular lie
actually made the bigger lie stronger.

Years of the WMD debacle has been flushed down the memory hole because it
was actually all about making Iraq a democracy.

Inphoman is correct in saying that the original official story as a full
package can't be gone back to. But it doesn’t need to be. It's not the only
lie in town.

The official story of Sept 11 contains so many different lies, that it
creates endless potential for disinformationists to make up new lies which
are sold with the attractive veneer of admitting carefully selected parts of
the truth. The original story as told by the Bush regime and the media was
never going to stand up for very long. It has too many holes. But it doesn't
need to. As the original story crumbles, it is creating intense competition
amongst the different varieties of spin off lies for the title of “truth”.
One which is gaining increasing popularity amongst the “truthlings” - the
self styled “truth movement” - is to admit the demolition of WTC 1,2 and 7
while keeping most of the rest of the story intact.

The most crucial elements of the rest of the story are that

· Four commercial flights were supposedly hijacked.

· Three planes hit buildings and one crashed in PA.

Both claims are false. Within these false claims, we have every conceivable
possible spin off being put forward.

· Hijackings by Arab terrorists as claimed by the Bush regime or electronic
hijacking by the regime itself.

· The actual flights claimed by the Bush regime hitting the various targets
or substitute planes of some kind.

Any of these lies can be successfully worked into a limited hangout which
still protects most of the main architects of the original event and cover
up.

What all of those scenarios above avoid is the full involvement of the media
in showing a cartoon of a fake plane hitting the WTC and passing it off as a
real event. Because this cannot be incorporated into any replacement lie
which protects the essential infrastructure of the criminal elite which
planned and carried out and covered up the attacks, then it is the main
target for attack by those are attempting to use partial Sept 11 truth as
the platform from which to spin new lies. Limited hangouts are analogous to
cheering a revolution because a new bloodthirsty dictator has overthrown the
old one.

All that's needed is a show trial of the few more visible and more
expendable perps. And such a show trial can easily be presented as a major
cleanout. That's what happened to the Nazis. Show trials of a few of the
more public figures, while the rest settled comfortably into their new homes
at the CIA, the Pentagon, NASA and the US weapons program. The Nazis didn’t
lose the war. They won it. The corpse of the Hitler regime was kicked all
the way down the street to make people think that justice had been done and
that the evil doers were no longer in power. It was all a script.

In 1941 with the German Nazis at the full height of their power, it would
have been inconceivable that in 6 years a) Germany would be a smouldering
wreck b) That in spite of that the Nazis had just set up shop somewhere
else, using the illusory defeat of Nazism to make themselves even stronger.

The illusion was so strong that most people still don't even know that part
b) happened. It was a limited hangout on a scale every bit as audacious as a
limited hangout involving the demolition. It can happen again.

Any new lie which maintains that the plane we saw on TV was real will be
cheered because the exposing of such a monstrous crime as the demolition and
deliberately allowing the attacks to happen, or even facilitating them with
substitute flights and remote control technology, will understandably seem
to many like a breath of fresh air after years of stupid stories about
mythical Arab hijackers and intelligence “failures”.

But the apparent breath of fresh air is an illusion. Just as the defeat of
Nazism was an illusion.

Maintain the central illusion—that a real plane flew into the Sth tower and
we know it’s a real plane because we saw it on TV - and nothing really
changes. The same media which showed us the cartoon plane to begin with, and
then lied and covered up for the original official story for years, will
then suddenly assume an heroic role of exposing the “truth” of Sept 11,
joining forces with scientists who looked the other way for years—like
Jones— who will suddenly emerge as fearless heroes to give us a new set of
lies to cheer. These lies will be disguised as truth because they will bust
carefully selected aspects of the old lie. Politicians who looked the other
way for years will suddenly make heroes of themselves, thundering
imperiously about impeachment and “investigations” to find out the “truth”.
And people will be so shocked at the treachery and howling for Bush and co
to pay, that they wont notice that same old trick as the illusory defeat of
Nazism is being pulled all over again.

Expose that it was a “war of the worlds” con job—a movie, passed off as
news, - and (hopefully) people will never again believe anything on their TV
sets. Thus you destroy not only the lie, but the main infrastructure for
selling whatever replacement lie becomes convenient in the wake of the
limited hangout. The would-be new dictators will have no tools with which to
spin their new lies and nowhere to hide from their involvement in the
original lie.

The truthlings want to keep the infrastructure of the lie machine intact.
They want to remove the more obvious perpetrators of the original lie, such
as Bush, who have now outlived their usefulness. The “truth movement” is
analogous to the revolution which seeks not to end the injustices of the old
regime but merely take possession of the power and its benefits and give
them a different appearance.

[[Do you really want Professor Jones to
> go on national TV and say that there was no plane crash and that the
> planes hitting the towers were faked and edited in later on
> videotape?]]

Yes. Because this is what happened.

Of course, mainstream TV wont let him. So be it. I'd rather talk truth on
the underground than bullshit in the mainstream.

[[What praytell would be the result of him taking that
> action? What good would it do our truth movement if people of Jones
> stature started doing things like that?]]

Inphoman really needs to clarify what he means by "truth" here. I am
intrigued by the idea that telling the truth might damage the truth
movement.

Now, if Inphoman thinks that telling the truth is not a good idea, then that
position can be clearly stated and debated on its own merits. But is
difficult to think of anything more Orwellian than claiming that the good of
the truth movement depends upon not telling the truth.

Truth is one thing. Political expediency is a completely different thing.
When the two happen to coincide, then it’s a happy day. If they conflict and
one must choose one over the other, I would appreciate it if people didn't
then try to justify choosing political expediency by calling it truth. Let's
converse in English please. Do I need to pull out the dictionary and quote
the definition of the word "truth" ?

Of course, if Inphoman genuinely believes that the claim that no planes hit
any buildings is not the truth, then he's welcome to argue that case on the
basis of facts and reasoning. But arguing whether or not something is
expedient doesn’t contribute anything to the discussion of whether it's
true.

A truth movement should be interested in truth for its own sake. If that is
not what Inphoman is interested in, then call it something else.

[[if people of Jones stature ]]

Jones' stature ? What "staure" does this idiot have ? A physics professor
who took four years to work out that the law of gravity still works ? Well
... he thinks it does, but he want the Govt to hold an inquiry into itself,
to see if its guilty, just to make sure that gravity is still what it used
to be. An idiot who declared boldly that the official story that 757s hit
the towers was true and he knew it to be so because he had conducted a
careful study of the undercarriage of one and compared it with the 757 which
hit the tower.

Except that it's supposed to be a 767 ! Jones is still trying to wash the
red off his face from that one. Stature ?

[[Controlled demolition means
> we've got the goods on the criminals. ]]

Not so. See above.

[[Making the general public
> aware of Controlled demolition (the deliberate cremation of fellow
> citizens, and then automatic realistion that there was a
> hypocritical manipulative coverup afterward.) is precisely what we
> need to get the blood boiling for public outrage and subsequent mass
> mobilization. Everything else, NO MATTER HOW TRUE IT MAY BE is a
> waste of our time, and a diversion from nailing the crooks.
> Wouldn't they just love for us to voluntarily marginalize controlled
> demolition to advance other theories that are even harder for the
> general public to swallow than controlled demolition itself?]]

One could say exactly the same thing about any particular aspect of the
evidence. The lack of air force response. Bush in the class room. No plane
at the pentagon. No planes at the WTC. No such flights as AA11 and 77. No
Arab hijackers. Why not just promote all of it?

Its not a difficult thing to do.

http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/manufactured.html

http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/truth.html

A truth movement should be interested in nothing except that which is true.

[[we need to get the blood boiling for public outrage and subsequent mass
> mobilization.]]

Actually , people don't think very well they're angry. Which is probably
part of the plan. They'll be so angry that they won't care what happens as
long as someone swings from a rope. What we actually need to do is to teach
people how to think again, so they don’t get fooled again. If people are
stupid enough to think that cartoon 175 is a real plane, then they'll also
be stupid enough to think that as long as someone swings from a rope then
everything is OK again. There must be an underlying commitment to good
ethics, and a certain amount of anger is inevitable, but thinking that the
anger itself is actually what we need is poor thinking. Getting angry is
easy. Usually its also useless. At an individual level, many of us battle
for much of our lives which anger coming out the wrong way towards the wrong
people. It works the same at a collective level. The whole idea of Sept 11
was to make people so angry that they couldn’t think any more. Once that
happens, then the perps behind the curtain don't really care whether you're
angry at OBL or angry at Bush. Angry people are stupid people, and stupid
people can be manipulated. The worst and most stupid things I've written
during my four plus years of S11 activism have been when I'm angry.

I am also puzzled by the clamouring to be able to speak on mainstream TV -
even if it's at the cost of having to talk bullshit. If the TV will allow us
to speak the truth, then that's exciting, because it reaches so many people.

But if the cost of using the medium is that you have to talk bullshit, then
who wants it ?

Part of this is about figuring out how to break the power of the mass media
and find other ways to reach people. That isn’t helped by swooning over the
fact that someone got on to TV, even if they had to talk bullshit to do it.

This is another reason why it's important to understand that the media is as
big a player in this as Bush. In fact, bigger. It was the media who sold us
the hijacking story by their shock and awe campaign of the cartoon 175
footage. So of course they're not going to let anyone speak about that.
When someone starts getting mainstream coverage, that means that you have to
start wondering why. When that person appears suddenly having done no
research whatsoever on sept 11 - like Jones - spouting factually incorrect
garbage - like Jones - and with no history of even distributing the research
of others - like Jones- and suddenly jumps the queue to become a media hero,
one has to wonder why.

What makes you think that the Jones cult is anything to do with truth ?

I would be far more tolerant of selective truth if the person presenting it
at least had a record of original research, and having at least at one time
having been at the cutting edge.

For example Jared Israel had the courage to post an article on Sept 15 2001,
when no one had any way of knowing what the personal consequences might have
been, alleging that it was inside job, and having already dug up a fair bit
of documentation for it.

With a record like that, if he was to get mainstream media coverage putting
forward a lIHOP view, then while I would still disagree and argue the
evidence, I would at least concede that he's earned the right for some
personal respect in that he was there at the cutting edge, at the beginning
risking his life to bring out new information.

Jones looked the other way - on everything - for more than four years- and
then , just when its becoming fashionable, suddenly arrives from nowhere,
plagiarizing what's useful to him and attacking or ignoring the rest, and
we're supposed to be excited because he's on mainstream media, mixing up
bullshit with things which would have been cutting edge in 2002, but are now
in the realm of gatekeeper stuff.

I smell spook or opportunist puppet dancing on spooker strings.

If Inphoman is new to Sept 11 research and activism, that might seem like a
strong and impetuous accusation, but it takes time to develop a proper
understanding of both the researched facts and who did them, and when they
did them and how they've been used by other people.

Because I've been in this almost from the very beginning, because I've done
a lot of original research myself, and a lot of distribution and argument
in favour of other people's research, I've seen the spooks come and go and
can pick them pretty quickly now.

Every piece of research I've done has earned me hysterical attacks from the
"movement". Being the first person to actually advance the free fall
argument - back in March 2002, 1 year before Hoffman suddenly arrived and
called it his own research, 3 1/2 years before Jones suddenly arrived and
called it his own research, then I happen to know a bit about this.

I got attacked for my demolition research just as much as I'm, now getting
attacked for the no planes research. Ironically, some of the people who are
now shouting " *only* controlled demolition" at me, are the same people who
were attacking me for promoting demolition back when it was still
controversial.

At the same time as pinching my research, Hoffman started attacking me for
"distracting" from it.

The very first thing Jones did when he appeared in public was to start using
my research as his own and also attacking me. They both did exactly the same
thing to Rosalee. They both did exactly the same thing to Jeff King. They
both did exactly the same thing to Nico.

Those who don’t learn from history are condemned to repeat it. Let me tell
you a little story. In the early 60's my parents were anti- Vietnam war
activists. In 1964, when they organized the first demonstration against the
war in Perth, only 10% of the population was against the war. They began the
West Australian anti -war movement with a meeting of 8 people in their
house.

Through 1964 to 1969, the opposition Labor party opposed conscription but
supported the war.(At that time Australians were being conscripted by the
liberal Govt - here, the Libs are the conservatives, which might be a bit
confusing for Americans).

As they nutured the movement in the early years, my parents suffered social
and political isolation. Ignoring this, they hammered and hammered the Labor
party that simply opposing conscription was not enough. The war was wrong
and Australia shouldn’t be in it at all. Grass roots opposition grew, but
the Labor Party still supported the war, and relied on their anti
conscription stance to curry favour with people.

By 1970, opposition to the war had reached 70 %. Then the Labour party
suddenly jumped on the bandwagon, making thundering speeches about how they
were not going to be part of any imperialist US war. They won Govt in 1972,
ended conscription and pulled Australia out of the war - and became heroes
for it.

The efforts of early campaigners such as my parents, were of course flushed
down the memory hole in 1970. Labor was against the war. Labor had always
been against the war. Labor was the hero. Labor politicians who had
supported the war right up until 1970 went down in history as the heroes who
had opposed it.

In 2002 (Labor is in opposition again now) I wrote to a labor member of
Parliament who is a survivor from the 72 to 75 govt. Obviously he was a
young back bencher, you had just come into parliament at the time. Of course
he is seen as a good anti-war hero, having been a part of that heroic
anti-war govt.

I sent him a whole lot of Sept 11 evidence. He called me a mad conspiracy
theorist without even reading it. I replied that he had been around long
enough to remember the lies told to justify the Vietnam war, and he had an
obligation to look closely at the evidence that the US and the Australian
Libs were up to their old tricks.

He replied that he's been around long enough to know a mad conspiracy theory
when he saw one.

And when he says he believes the official story of sept 11, people trust
him, because after he's one of those old Labor "heroes" who stood up so
bravely against the Vietnam war. Groundhog day !

This is what happens, when Johnny-come -lately's become heroes by pinching
other people's research and jumping on the bandwagon once it's fashionable.

The foundations are being laid for the next lie. And you can bet that the
public "heroes" of the busting of the old lie will be at the forefront of
selling the new lie.

First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. Then they threaten you. Then
they take the credit for (some of) your work. Then they use it to sell the
next lie.

Only the *full* truth is acceptable. Nothing less.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rosalee Grable [mailto:webfairy@thewebfairy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2006 1:52 PM
To: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com; Gerard Holmgren
Subject: Re: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?

Thanks for taking the arguement to the next level and pretty much
articulating my position better than I have done.

The gang behind the Frameup on Humanity is not a direct correllation to
"the government."
The gang behind the Frameup on Humanity splits up and plays both sides.
Always.
They have followed this pattern for humdreds of years, it has always
worked, and they're not going to rock the boat.

The gang behind the Frameup on Humanity is into One World Rule,
Universal Planetary rule ala Star Wars.
Singular Dictator, nowhere to hide, Orwellian.

Unfortunately they have had a lot of time to stack the deck, until
seemingly reasonable people like you are content to shoot for a more
palatible lie, cos it's easier and not a big deal.
I do not compromise because ONLY the full unabridged truth will defeat
them, and bankrupt them instead of us.
They've steered us this far by making us acceptive of pallative fiction
doubletalk doublestory that makes you see a walk in the park when it's
really a cliff.

I'm sending this onto Holmgren, since you have raised some interesting
questions that deserve a fair answer.

I had to change exactly one word to make this accurate:

"Rosalee Grable claims the Frameup is ready to concede to
conventionally demolishing the towers. A defacto admission that the
NIST reports and the 9/11 Commission were elaborate hoaxes. This
unprecedented sacrifice/total loss of credibility is to cover up
secret microwave weapon technology, they are saving for a False Flag
Alien invasion that is not yet fully set up."

Yep. I'd rather see this technology used for off-grid perpetual energy as
Tesla intended.

http://missilegate.com/rfz
http://missilegate.com/rfz/swaz

inphoman911 wrote:
> Disclaimer: I am not a supporter/defender of Hoffman, and I am not
> really up to speed on who is suspected of being compromised and who
> is not, but commonsense wise something is ringing terribly wrong to
> my ears.
>
>
> Rosalee Grable claims the government is ready to concede to
> conventionally demolishing the towers. A defacto admission that the
> NIST reports and the 9/11 Commission were elaborate hoaxes. This
> unprecedented sacrifice/total loss of credibility is to cover up
> secret microwave weapon technology, they are saving for a False Flag
> Alien invasion that is not yet fully set up.
>
> Why do I find that so hard to believe? Why risk exposing such
> technology on 9/11 and not just use high powered explosives or
> mininukes instead? IOW why does the false flag destruction of a
> building require secret microwave technology? Are they trying to
> hide this technology from only us or from foreign powers as well?
> Using the secret raygun on 9/11 wouldn't have been too smart in the
> latter case now would it?
>
>
> alexldent claims the government may be ready to concede to
> conventionally demolishing the towers and cremating thousands of
> civillians alive in side. He thinks they can get away with it by
> claiming they wanted to save additional lives in the streets of
> lower manhattan, even though they didn't evacuate the towers
> beforehand, but rather told people to remain inside. He also thinks
> they can get away with the fact that they designed their controlled
> demolition to simulate a building pancaking after a plane had hit it
> by claiming they wanted to keep their preplanted explosive
> countermeasures secrets from the terrorists!
>
>
> Folks, there is no volunatry backpedalling from the official 9/11
> narrative. Why do you think they panicked and slammed the lid shut
> on able danger? Tarpley goes into what Able danger was really about
> here in the new preface to his 9/11 Synthetic Terror.
>
> http://www.waronfreedom.org/synth/synter2ed.pdf
>
>
> You better believe the official fiction is meant to stay. Anybody
> thinking that they are ready to voluntarily concede to controlled
> demolition is literally out of their mind.
>
>
> Question for Rosalee Grable. Do you really want Professor Jones to
> go on national TV and say that there was no plane crash and that the
> planes hitting the towers were faked and edited in later on
> videotape? What praytell would be the result of him taking that
> action? What good would it do our truth movement if people of Jones
> stature started doing things like that? I ask because you don't
> sound like a stupid person and maybe you just havent thought these
> things through. My position is simple. Controlled demolition means
> we've got the goods on the criminals. Making the general public
> aware of Controlled demolition (the deliberate cremation of fellow
> citizens, and then automatic realistion that there was a
> hypocritical manipulative coverup afterward.) is precisely what we
> need to get the blood boiling for public outrage and subsequent mass
> mobilization. Everything else, NO MATTER HOW TRUE IT MAY BE is a
> waste of our time, and a diversion from nailing the crooks.
> Wouldn't they just love for us to voluntarily marginalize controlled
> demolition to advance other theories that are even harder for the
> general public to swallow than controlled demolition itself?
>
>
>
> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "Nico Haupt"
> <nicohaupt@...> wrote:
>
>>> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
>>> Von: "alexldent" <alexldent@...>
>>> An: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
>>> Betreff: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited
>>>
> Hangout?
>
>>> Datum: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 23:15:50 -0000
>>>
>>>
>> He claimed it by himself.
>> On you other point i would also agree.
>> Many institutes receive military- or intel money.
>>
>> But this in the mix increases the case.
>> Also, i personally believe he's more brainwashed and manipulated
>> than really payrolled, but i wouldn't rule out more.
>>
>> nico
>>
>>
>>>>> How do
>>>>>
>> we know Jack Hoffman is Jim Hoffman's uncle? I can't find
>>
> anything on the
>
>> web...<<<
>>
>> --
>> 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
>> +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1114

There are 9 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. Cartoon editor Fleming Rose and the tentacles of PNAC
From: Total Information <totalinfo@gmail.com>
2. RE: Re: Roland Croteau ....... typical COINTELPRO trash...
From: "Scott Peden" <scotpeden@cruzio.com>
3. Re: Re: Hello
From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com>
4. Re: sending a formal delegation from Scholars for 9/11 Truth to Silicon Valley
From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com>
5. Re: Steel Industry FUMING
From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com>
6. Re: Re: Hello
From: Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com>
7. "Target Texas City" follow-up w/ NY Times Thom Shanker (Disruptors Beware!)
From: Eric May <captainmay@prodigy.net>
8. Talk Live to Mark Crispin Miller - Noon E.T. Today!
From: "reggie501" <reggie501@optonline.net>
9. US Election Trickery
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." <prez@usa-exile.org>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 02:49:13 -0500
From: Total Information <totalinfo@gmail.com>
Subject: Cartoon editor Fleming Rose and the tentacles of PNAC

< http://www.total411.info/2006/02/cartoon-editor-fleming-rose-and.html >

It turns out the editor who originally publshed the "offensive" Muslim
cartoons is a disciple of Daniel Pipes and the "clash of civilizations"
theory put out by Project for a New American Century. PNAC is the outfit
that called for a "Pearl Harbor event' in order to initiate a global war
against the Muslim world. *American Free Press*, Feb.
4<http://mathaba.net/0_index.shtml?x=508448>:

"Under the guise of free speech, a leading Danish newspaper published a
dozen provocative anti-Islamic cartoons clearly designed to offend Muslims.
The predictable result has greatly increased the possibility of violence and
left Denmark in a costly and dangerous predicament.

Four months after Jyllands-Posten (JP), Denmark's most widely read morning
paper, published 12 anti-Islamic cartoons, Danes woke up to the fact that
there is a very high price to be paid for promoting the "clash of
civilizations."

The fact that the editors behind the anti-Islamic images claim to be
exercising free speech while refusing to address Europe's strict censorship
laws regarding discussion of the Holocaust and the ongoing imprisonment of
historical revisionists reveals the existence of a more sinister agenda
behind the provocative cartoons.

"Agents of certain persuasion" are behind the egregious affront to Islam in
order to provoke Muslims, Professor Mikael Rothstein of the University of
Copenhagen told the BBC. The key "agent" is Flemming Rose, the cultural
editor of JP, who commissioned cartoonists to produce the blasphemous images
and then published them in Denmark's leading morning paper last September.

The International Herald Tribune, which reported on the offensive cartoons
on January 1, noted that even the liberalism of Rose had its limits when it
came to criticism of Zionist leaders and their crimes. Rose also has clear
ties to the Zionist Neo-Cons behind the "war on terror."

Rose told the international paper owned by The New York Times that "he would
not publish a cartoon of Israel's Ariel Sharon strangling a Palestinian
baby, since that could be construed as 'racist.'" [...]

Rose traveled to Philadelphia in October 2004 to visit Daniel Pipes, the
Neo-Con ideologue who says the only path to Middle East peace will come
through a total Israeli military victory. Rose then penned a positive
article about Pipes<http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_philosophy&Number=294401445&page=&view=&sb=&o=&vc=1&t=1#Post294401445>,
who compares "militant Islam" with fascism and communism.

In April 2003, President George W. Bush nominated the rabid anti-Muslim
Pipes to the board of the United States Institute of Peace, a
congressionally sponsored think tank

[...]
-----

More background<http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_news&Number=294399338&page=&view=&sb=&o=&vc=1&t=1#Post294399338>

--

--
www.total411.info
www.total911.info

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 01:03:39 -0800
From: "Scott Peden" <scotpeden@cruzio.com>
Subject: RE: Re: Roland Croteau ....... typical COINTELPRO trash...

Yup.

WE are using history like the Germans didn’t.

Not In My Country you f..n fascists and multi national corporations that
only benefit off of other people misery and deaths.

-----Original Message-----
From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Naveed
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 2:51 PM
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Re: Roland Croteau ....... typical COINTELPRO
trash...

this is a battle for the minds of the american public,

9/11 was designed to create a paradigm shift to legitimize the police state,
we aim at reversing. we are not a bunch of typical "anti-war" activists who
petition the very criminals who carried out such horrible acts against
humanity............

we, are paradigm shattering activists!

Roland Croteau <rolandcro@earthlink.net> wrote:
To All,

I hope this finds you well and in good spirit.

To this post I must respond; so this is this groups idea of FREEDOM OF
SPEECH?

This woman doesn't like my position so I should therefore be banned?
What a typical bunch of wannabe hypocrites.

Should people like this woman ever come to power.., even God won't help
us.

You people ALREADY KNOW T! HE TRUTH about 9-11. Question is; WHAT ARE YOU
GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?? Petition the very people that are at the root of
this crime? And you don't SEE the insanity of that??

Indeed.., it is time for me to move along.

LLTF,
Roland

On Feb 6, 2006, at 5:15 PM, Lynn Ertell wrote:

Dear Moderators,

Please filter out this SPAM .
Here is a sample of what follows..
Clearly intended to waste our time ...

"...  This is The End Time. They are as The Days of
Noah....WHERE are all the supposed God-fearing MEN? The
Great and Dreadful day is nigh at hand and NO ONE will escape what is
coming due. NO ONE."

.....

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, Roland Croteau <rolandcro@...>
wrote:
>
> Dear Naveed,
>
> Good afternoon.
>
>! I hope this finds you well and in good spirit.
>
> Respectfully I would argue.., it has ALL been theater. The entire
world
> has been duped. ESPECIALLY we [supposed] Amerikans. We were used [and
> ARE being used] as the "thrust". It is even on our script, fiat
> currency "money" given us by the NWOor elite. I am well aware of the
> [supposed] struggle to keep the federal reserve central banking
scheme
> out of this [supposed free] country.
>
> As I once read.., there is none worse off than the slave who
> BELIEVES/THINKS he is free. That is us [as a collective people]. I
hope
> you are aware you CANNOT own anything. All any of us get is the
> ILLUSION of "owning".
>
> If indeed we are TRULY "sovereigns"..? then WHY didn't the people
then
> stop the passing of the Federal Re! serve Act [which I have completely
> read - YEARS ago], THEN?
>
> I submit, we were a spiritually spineless people then and are even
> worse today. MUCH worse. This is The End Time. They are as The Days
of
> Noah. People didn't listen then to the simple Truth and they aren't
now
> either. Choice. We are collectively choosing our own deaths.
>
> The time is coming SOON where ALL who would not listen [and who have
> flippantly and arrogantly rejected every warning.., including this
> warning about disregarding "THE PLAN"] will rue these days [of
> warning].
>
> I continue to ask..? WHERE are all the supposed God-fearing MEN? The
> Great and Dreadful day is nigh at hand and NO ONE will escape what is
> coming due. NO ONE.
>
> Most of the so-called "patriot commu! nity" has been given these
warnings
> over and over. I personally may not have hit them all.., but word
does
> travel. "Patriots", at large know who I am and my history and prefer
to
> label me a nut because I condemn their "revered CON-stitution". As I
> have said.., fair enough.
>
> I'll pop in and out of groups "fishing" to see if there any there who
> "have an ear to hear" and like me..? finally got tired of all the
talk.
> Doesn't look very good so far in this group. It will soon be time for
> me to move along and none of you will have to hear anymore from me.
>
> LLTF,
> Roland
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2006, at 2:03 PM, Naveed wrote:
>
> the other thing i'd like to throw into the mix roland is that america
> was strong because she res! isted the inbred satanist central banksters
> move to prop up a central bank on the united states. they weren't
> successful in capturing america until 1913......
>
>
> janet phelan <jcphelan10@...> wrote:
> > lt should be obvious to all of us that the engine running the show
at
> > this time is operating off of a very dark force. There is no
> > religious system in the world that I am aware of that advocates
> > torture in the name of any deity. Not to mention the other
atrocities
> > being perpetrated across our beleaguered globe. Personally, I
think
> > it behooves us to be tolerant of those who interpret these events
in a
> > Biblical manner. Once again, we are attacking each other at the
very
> > time we need to come together.
> >Â
> > "Why can't we all just get along?"
> >Â
> > Peace,
> >Â
> > Janet
> >
> > greg nixon <nxngrg@...> wrote:
> >> Sorry,
> >>Â
> >> A secular Republic is what made America great. Theocracy is
another
> >> form of tyranny.
> >>
> >> Roland Croteau <rolandcro@...> wrote:
> >>> Hello Greg,
> >>>
> >>> I am the author of that post.
> >>>
> >>> Want to attack me? Why not do it head to head rather than as an
> >>> anonymous post?
> >>>
> >>> Having watched the NON-moving freedom movement [including this
one
&! nbsp; > >>> aspect group{s} regarding the 9-11 issue] I could much more
easily
> >>> accuse you of the same thing. Why? Because people like you keep
> >>> promoting putting off the inevitable. And what is the
inevitable..?
> >>> look at American history and you MIGHT get a clue.
> >>>
> >>> But with that said..? consider yourself and this group as being
> >>> "noticed". You will not be able to say you weren't told.
> >>>
> >>> The solution is OBVIOUS; return to God's Laws - NOT the U.S.
> >>> CON-stitution.
> >>>
> >>> I believe you are not only a fool..? but a coward.
> >>> Roland
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 4, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Greg Nixon wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Totally,
> >>>
> >>>Â Â Attn: Mods Perhaps go to membership approval for a brief
period?
> >>>
> >>>Â Â Also ask Jolly to add more moderators (people we know) to
increase
> >>>Â Â the the ability to catch in the act.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Â Â --- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Lynn Ertell"
> >>>Â Â <lynnertell@> wrote:
> >>>Â Â >
> >>>Â Â >
> >>>Â Â > The posting below (and the individual responsible) are
perfect
> >>>Â Â > examples of what needs to me moderated OUT of this group.
> >>>Â Â >
> >>>Â Â > Expect to be deluged with more of this kind of
pseudo-Biblical
> >>>Â Â > snake-oil "prophecy" and fake religious mumbo-jumbo.
> >>>Â Â >
> >>>Â Â > It's intended to muddy the waters, turn off and drive away
> >>> rational
> >>>Â Â > people and bog us down with a lot of crap.....
> >>>Â Â > Transparently obvious as COINTELPRO...
> >>>Â Â >
> >>>Â Â >
> >>>Â Â >
> >>>Â Â > --- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, Roland Croteau
> >>> <rolandcro@>
> >>>Â Â > wrote:
> >>>Â Â > >
&! nbsp; > >>>Â Â > > Greetings,
> >>>Â Â > >
> >>>Â Â > > I hope this finds all well and in good spirit.
> >>>Â Â > >
> >>>Â Â > > As a serious student and activist for more than 25 years I
hope
> >>>Â Â I can
> >>>Â Â > > offer something of value to this group.
> >>>Â Â > >
> >>>Â Â > > I believe anyone who has "done the work" knows the U.S.
> >>>Â Â government was,
> >>>Â Â > > at the very least, complicit in 9-11. And "we the sheople"
are
> >>>Â Â hoping
> >>>Â Â > > they will admit it publicly??
> >>>Â Â > >
> >>>Â Â > > I see government as force and force is power. In all of
> >>> recorded
> >>>Â Â > > history I have NEVER seen force/power relinquish just by
> >>>Â Â > > asking/petitioning.
> >>>Â Â > >
> >>>Â Â > > Does it make any sense that government will this time?
> >>>Â Â > >
> >>>Â Â > > In my studied/activist opinion.., 9-11 is merely a part of
a
> >>>Â Â global
> >>>Â Â > > scheme to forward the global agenda of the elite to create
> >>>Â Â global
> >>>Â Â > > governance.
> >>>Â Â > >
> >>>Â Â > > The links below offer information that ties it all
together and
> >>>Â Â then at
> >>>Â Â > > "THE PLAN" link, offers the ONLY solution out of this mess.
> >>>Â Â > >
> >>>Â Â > > Of course you will need to decide for yourself. Should you
> >>>Â Â decide to do
> >>>Â Â > > the work/study.., I would NOT recommend "skip reading" for
each
> >>>Â Â > > sentence in each presentation builds/lays a foundation for
the
> >>>Â Â next,
> >>>Â Â > > offering fullest comprehension for the reader the first
time
! ; > >>>Â Â through
> >>>Â Â > > [as it is recommended they be read more than once].
> >>>Â Â > >
> >>>Â Â > > Regards,
> >>>Â Â > > Roland
> >>>Â Â > >
> >>>Â Â > > http://thewayhomeorfacethefire.info
<http://thewayhomeorfacethefire.info/>
> >>>Â Â > > http://i.am/jah/plan.htm
> >>>Â Â > > http://360.yahoo.com/rolandcro
> >>>Â Â > >
> >>>Â Â >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
! > >>>
> >>> SPONSORED LINKS
> >>> United state bankruptcy court western district of texas
> >>> United state life insurance
> >>> Moving to the united state
> >>> United state patent
> >>> United state patent search
> >>> United states patent office
> >>>
> >>> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >>>
> >>>      Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢‚¬"ª      Ã‚ Visit your group
"911TruthAction" on the
web.
> >>> Â
> >>>      Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢‚¬"ª      Ã‚ To unsubscribe from
this group, send an
email to:
> >>> Â 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >>> Â
> >>>      Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢‚¬"ª      Ã‚ Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to
the
Yahoo!
> >>> Terms of
> >>> Service.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://thewayhomeorfacethefire.info
<http://thewayhomeorfacethefire.info/>
> >>> http://i.am/jah/plan.htm
> >>>
> >>
> >>Â Brings words and photos together (easily) with
> >> PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.
> >Â Brings words and photos together (easily) with
> > PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail. >
>
> In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave,
> and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him,
for
> then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
> - Notebook, 1904
>
> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> United state bankruptcy court western district of texas
> United state life insurance
> Moving to the united state
> United state patent
> United state patent search
> United states patent office
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>      â–ª      Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the
web.
>Â
>      â–ª      To unsubscribe from this group, send an
email to:
>Â 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>Â
>      â–ª      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
the Yahoo!
Terms of
> Service.
>
>
>
> http://thewayhomeorfacethefire.info
<http://thewayhomeorfacethefire.info/>
> http://i.am/jah/plan.htm
>

SPONSORED LINKS
United state bankruptcy court western district of texas
United state life insurance
Moving to the united state
United state patent
United state patent search
United states patent office

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

â–ª Â Visit your group "911TruthAction" on ! the web.
Â
â–ª Â To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Â
â–ª Â Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
Service.

http://thewayhomeorfacethefire.info <http://thewayhomeorfacethefire.info/>
http://i.am/jah/plan.htm

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and
hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it
costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904
_____

Brings words and photos together (easily) with
PhotoMail
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/PMDEF3/*http://photomail.mail.yahoo
.com> - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.
SPONSORED LINKS
United state bankruptcy court western district of texas
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+bankruptcy+court+western+d
istrict+of+texas&w1=United+state+bankruptcy+court+western+district+of+texas&
w2=United+state+life+insurance&w3=Moving+to+the+united+state&w4=United+state
+patent&w5=United%20>
United state life insurance
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+life+insurance&w1=United+s
tate+bankruptcy+court+western+district+of+texas&w2=United+state+life+insuran
ce&w3=Moving+to+the+united+state&w4=United+state+patent&w5=United+state+pate
nt+search&w6=Unit%20>
Moving to the united state
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Moving+to+the+united+state&w1=United+st
ate+bankruptcy+court+western+district+of+texas&w2=United+state+life+insuranc
e&w3=Moving+to+the+united+state&w4=United+state+patent&w5=United+state+paten
t+search&w6=Unite%20>
United state patent
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+patent&w1=United+state+ban
kruptcy+court+western+district+of+texas&w2=United+state+life+insurance&w3=Mo
ving+to+the+united+state&w4=United+state+patent&w5=United+state+patent+searc
h&w6=United+state%20>
United state patent search
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+patent+search&w1=United+st
ate+bankruptcy+court+western+district+of+texas&w2=United+state+life+insuranc
e&w3=Moving+to+the+united+state&w4=United+state+patent&w5=United+state+paten
t+search&w6=Unite%20>
United states patent office
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+states+patent+office&w1=United+s
tate+bankruptcy+court+western+district+of+texas&w2=United+state+life+insuran
ce&w3=Moving+to+the+united+state&w4=United+state+patent&w5=United+state+pate
nt+search&w6=Unit%20>

_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

* Visit your group " 911TruthAction
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .

_____

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 03:15:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Hello

A suggestion. We could always send some of them certified receipt requested letters and read them AT Ground Zero to the places we wish to go but it is too far. Yes, I have been thinking the walk is far. I would rather walk all around Wall Steet myself, and make sure that people look out their windows when they hear noise below on the streets..... Maybe some will come downstairs and walk with us. The fact that all of those wealthy business persons are not organizing about what happened in their own work neighborhood is, to me? UnF'ingreal.

Jolly Roger <slicingthroats@yahoo.com> wrote: Ground zero to times square is about two miles. How would we cancel ANSWER?
I don't know where Giuliani and Spitzer are located.


greg nixon <nxngrg@yahoo.com> wrote:
Luke is Luke Rudkowski and is 19 years old but a serious "street" activist w/NY911.

Jolly we need to fine tune the route and cancel the ANSWER appearance. too far. Some question even GZ to Times Square. Suggestions welcome. The gist is Spitzer and Giuliani and the damn gatekeepers.


Jolly Roger <slicingthroats@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sherry will probably help, but I'm not sure I know who Luke is at the moment. Yes, I too have had my doubts about many in that organization, but I think that we have to work under the assumption that every group is thoroughly infiltrated (has the troll traffic here ever slowed down?) This is why I'm always suggesting individual actions. I'll ask around, and I'm sure we'll be able to rustle up some support. I'll talk to the crew at the ground zero vigils (circumventing the leadership)

greg nixon <nxngrg@yahoo.com> wrote: http://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/132464/index.php

I have talked with Sherry Bender and Luke.

NY911 truth i think is another front like truthorg. or else they simply believe in a top down heirarch approach and WILL NOT SUPPORT the actions of other groups.

Jolly Roger <slicingthroats@yahoo.com> wrote:
Excellent chance. Did you talk to anyone else from NYC? Enough of the
movement is here for us to spread out and cover a lot of terretory.
Where can I download the flyer?

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, greg nixon <nxngrg@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks Jolly,
>
> Any chance of you helping flyer for 2/20 NYC. I wil try to come
in this week for some
> prep work too.
>
> Greg
>
> Jolly Roger <slicingthroats@...> wrote:
> Sure, Greg -- but I'm not exactly sure which one she's talking
about.
>
> http://www.rense.com/general61/dwe.htm
> http://rense.com/general63/jolly.htm
> http://www.rense.com/general61/tvv.htm
> http://www.rense.com/general63/newam.htm
>
> Greg Nixon <nxngrg@...> wrote:
> Got a link on that Rense article Mr Roger?
>
> --- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, Jolly Roger
> <slicingthroats@> wrote:
> >
> > I'm very flattered by this, Amy, and I'm glad you liked the
> article, but I have to respectfully decline because I don't deal in
> conspiracy theories -- only scientific evidence, and documented
> facts. I also suspect that your film project is just another
attempt
> to discredit the 9-11 Truth Movement.
> > Instead of making a film about conspiracy theories, why don't
> you investigate what actually transpired on 9-11, and make a film
> that might actually be important to saving this nation, rather than
> one that will undoubtably mock all who question the lies being
> spewed by our government and the media?
> >
> >
> > Amy Manchester <amym@> wrote:
> > st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
> Hello,
> >
> > My name is Amy Manchester and I work for a production company
> out in Los Angeles. We are developing a show based on
investigating
> modern day conspiracy theories. I enjoyed your article on
> www.rense.com and wondered if you would be interested in talking
> some time? I could call you or you could call me, just let me know.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Amy Manchester
> > Director of Development
> > Pilgrim Films & Television
> > 818-728-8819 office
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "There comes a time when every man feels the urge to spit on his
> hands, hoist the black flag, and start slitting throats." -- H.L.
> Mencken
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "There comes a time when every man feels the urge to spit on his
hands, hoist the black flag, and start slitting throats." -- H.L.
Mencken
> ---------------------------------
> Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> United state bankruptcy court western district of texas
United state life insurance Moving to the united state United
state patent United state patent search United states patent
office
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!
>


---------------------------------
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.

"There comes a time when every man feels the urge to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and start slitting throats." -- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.


---------------------------------
Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!

"There comes a time when every man feels the urge to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and start slitting throats." -- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.

SPONSORED LINKS
United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance Moving to the united state United state patent United state patent search United states patent office

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------

The world can only be redeemed through action--movement -- motion. Uncoerced, unbribed and unbought, humanity will move toward the light.
Alice Hubbard's introduction to An American Bible (1912)


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 03:40:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: sending a formal delegation from Scholars for 9/11 Truth to Silicon Valley

Benjamin, I applaud your efforts at trying to reach the two organizations and Silicon Valley.

I also think you are "onto" something. Yes, the copies of Loose Change 2 need to be given out as freely as advertisements placed atop windshield. The film is that good and is damning beyond belief.

benjamin pritchard <ben@benjaminpritchard.name> wrote:
FYI: I sent the following note to various members of Scholars for 9/11 Truth today:
2/6/06

Members of Scholars for 9/11 Truth -

My name is Benjamin Pritchard; I am an associate member of your organization, and have an idea concerning how it might be possible to bypass the controlled corporate media in disseminating 9/11 Truth.

I believe the business model usually employed by the ruling classes throughout history has been one of contriving wars, and then – by controlling the means of information – getting the lower classes to actually fight them. Further, I also believe that we are on the cusp of the Internet -- and the freedom of information that it affords -- breaking that business model once and for all. (If it hasn't already!)

So what's my idea? What if we tried get the help of various Internet-based companies in Silicon Valley to actively help us disseminate 9/11 truth. What if we sent a group of people ("a formal delegation from Scholars for 9/11 Truth") out to Silicon Valley to approach the CEOs of the various Internet companies?

I have been working in this direction myself; the two companies that I have been focusing on are Skype (the Internet telephony company) and Google.

If a mover-and-shaker (i.e. founder/owner/etc.) at even one company like this came on board, I think we could get the word out practically overnight. (The user-base of Google, for example, is in the 10s or 100s of millions. Additionally, all it would really take is for them to put a link to the Scholar's for 9/11 Truth press release on their homepage.)

At this point, I think all it would take to "wake up" a few CEOs would be to strap them in and get them to watch Loose Change or friends.

(Remember: said CEOs represent intelligent, paradigm-shifting people who are trying to use the Internet to "change the world.")

We need to give them the ammunition ("9/11 Truth") that will allow them to do so. (I think we should frame our whole current situation in terms of the Internet companies vs. the establishment, possibly creating something like "Coalition of Internet Companies for 9/11 Truth" or similar.)

I have personally organized protesters from around the United States to go stand naked in the parking lots of NPR stations, demanding that they cover 9/11. If something like that doesn't get the attention of the MSM, I doubt anything will. (Getting the MSM to cover this issue basically amounts to getting them to admit that they were complicit in it; its not like they don't know about it -- I think they are actively suppressing it!)

Therefore, I think it is time to at least consider alternative approaches.

The Internet has brought us this far.

Why not send a delegation to Silicon Valley?

Feedback appreciated.

Thank you for your time,
Benjamin Pritchard
-- "Hear me, my chiefs, I am tired; my heart is sick and sad. From where the sun now stands I Will Fight No More Forever". — Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce http://benjaminpritchard.name http://911truthemergence.com/ http://daily911.info http://nakedfor911truth.com

SPONSORED LINKS
United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance Moving to the united state United state patent United state patent search United states patent office

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------

The world can only be redeemed through action--movement -- motion. Uncoerced, unbribed and unbought, humanity will move toward the light.
Alice Hubbard's introduction to An American Bible (1912)


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 03:46:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Steel Industry FUMING

YES, Naveed, exactly! All the steel workers, all of the Unions, too, as in Bethlehem Steel...

Hmmmm...gives me an idea. The copy of this article taped to a copy of Loose Change... Wakin' up the blue collar union world... Apparently, this drivel about "weakened steel" will affect many families' livelihoods - and it would be another thing altogether if 3 buildings actually *did* collapse the way that they said they did.

Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com> wrote:
we gotta foment these guys into action!


like stir up their sense of patriotism

of HOW dare you knock on american steel!?

Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com> wrote:
This MIGHT be a boon to 9/11 truth !!! Much Better to read at website (because some words are missing when I cut and pasted).

Here is link:

http://enr.ecnext.com/coms2/summary_0271-24663_ITM

Post 9/11 Steel-Bashing Called Unfounded and Unfair
Steel-bashing, after jarring 9/11 experience, called unfounded and unfair

(enr.construction.com - 02/06/06)
By Nadine M. Post

Enlarge + Of the many horror stories born in New York City on 9/11, the one that belongs to Herbert Margrill serves as the genesis of an ongoing storm between boosters of structural concrete and structural steel. Although New York's building market has become the battleground, the tempest has spread beyond, fueled in part by articles and advertisements published in the business press. Charges of steel-bashing are flying and steel interests are fighting back. Even structural engineers are incensed over what they say are blatantly false claims by publicist Margrill that concrete framing is inherently safer than steel.

It all started on Sept. 11, 2001, when Margrill, now 81 years old, was knocked out of bed by the ear-drum-splitting sound wave produced by the hijacked plane that terrorists crashed into the 110-story One WTC. The industrial public relations and advertising veteran fled his home-office near Ground Zero and didn't return for three weeks. "To me, it was a numbing experience," he says.

In 2002, still-traumatized, Margrill decided to do his bit to help make the world safer. He called an old friend, Alfred G. Gerosa, a six-decade veteran of concrete construction, to discuss a plan. They decided "to educate people about the safety aspects of cast-in-place reinforced concrete so that terrible disasters don't happen again," says Margrill.

GEROSA By January 2003, the long-dormant Concrete Alliance, with Gerosa as president and Margrill as vice president of communications, was incorporated with safety as its new mission. Or more specifically, safety as it relates to concrete behavior in calamities, such as fires, terrorist acts, earthquakes, hurricanes and floods.
The promotional group is supported by New York City-area concrete contractors and construction unions. This fall, the alliance plans to launch an initiative that would offer a "safety seal of approval" to owners of concrete-framed buildings, which they could use for marketing purposes.

In the group's marketing brochure, Gerosa says, "Concrete is the best material to use for safety, blast resistance, durability, flexibility....A cast-in-place, reinforced concrete structure is safer than any other commercial building type." He adds: "Structural steel is fine. We don't object to a steel structure if it is fireproofed properly," with cast-in-place concrete.
Enlarge + But the alliance lacks any scientific evidence, research or statistics to substantiate its claims that concrete is safer than steel. "It's our educated opinion, based on over 50 years of experience," says Gerosa.

Structural engineers say alliance claims are not only without merit, they are out of bounds. "Their assertion that concrete structures are safer than steel is based not on facts but on their greed to build concrete structures...," says Clifford Schwinger, quality assurance manager with Cagley Harman & Associates Inc., King of Prussia, Pa. "That they are trying to profit from the 9/11 tragedy by claiming concrete construction is safer is worse than obscene."

The alliance now is pushing concrete office towers, a building type long dominated in New York City by structural steel. "Before 9/11, we pretty much felt concrete itself was not practical for commercial highrises...," says Gerosa.
OAS_AD('Middle'); The alliance has infuriated steel interests. The American Institute of Steel Construction Inc., Chicago, calls the group's "steel-bashing" tactics, "negative and unprofessional." AISC maintains that concrete does not offer better fire resistance, blast resistance or structural robustness. "These are all characteristics of well-designed buildings, which can be provided in buildings of any material," says Charles J. Carter, AISC chief structural engineer. "But our work on fire, blast, progressive collapse and related topics," continuing with various publications and design guides, "began well before the events of Sept. 11, 2001," he adds.

Structural engineers who work with both concrete and steel systems agree. David Scott, the new chairman of the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat and a principal in the New York City office of Arup, calls the alliance's message about fire, nonsense. "What the building community has learned...is that tall office buildings that have no sprinklers and no fire protection on columns will not perform well in a fire," he says.

Even veteran concrete promoters are distancing themselves from the alliance. George Barney, senior vice president for market development and technical services at Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Ill., says: "PCA's 90-year reputation is built on technical excellence and integrity. That's our culture. We do not indulge in negative promotional tactics, nor do we disparage competing materials."


Best of Both. Convention center has steel roof and concrete framing below. The alliance's message "is a source of confusion," says Michael Mota, PCA's New York regional structural engineer. "There's a place for both materials."

The alliance began fomenting the brouhaha as far back as April 2004, when Margrill sent out a press release via e-mail promoting a New York City Concrete Promotional Council seminar, on 505 Fifth Avenue. The building was touted as the first concrete commercial highrise in New York City—one initially designed in steel. "New York skyscrapers used to be built of steel," said the release. "Not anymore!

From now on, cast-in-place reinforced concrete will be the material of choice in the Big Apple."

The claim was spurious. There are at least seven structural steel or hybrid (steel and concrete) office towers recently completed, under way, out for bid or in planning in New York City, reports AISC.

Still, the message was repeated in various industry publications, taking the local debate national. "It is critical that owners, architects, structural engineers, and developers make informed decisions based on accurate information, not misrepresentations spread by representatives of competing systems," replied AISC's then-president, H. Louis Gurthet.


The straw that broke the camel's back for AISC was the alliance's marketing blitz after a recent highrise fire in Madrid. The campaign included a full-page magazine ad. It began: "A demonstration of cast-in-place reinforced concrete over steel construction was the recent fire at Madrid's Windsor Tower."

Scott Melnick, AISC's vice president of communications and editor and publisher of AISC's Modern Steel Construction, shot back with an editorial: "Their latest fairy tale tells the story of the Windsor Tower in Madrid and how it was consumed by a fire that raged for 36 hours. In their story, they report how the building had a concrete frame below the 21st floor and it remained intact, while the building's steel frame from floors 22 to 30 collapsed. There are just a few problems with this story, however. The steel in the building was simply an unprotected steel perimeter framing system primarily supporting the cladding. Second, both the unprotected perimeter framing system and the concrete beams and columns experienced a similar collapse...."To further dispel such stories, AISC's Carter notes a survey of fire-induced collapses in buildings worldwide, performed for the National Institute of Standards and Technology. "The majority of buildings that suffered fire-induced collapse were
in fact reinforced concrete," he says.

The alliance's push for concrete cores is self-serving at best, he adds. If society prioritizes hardening of cores, it can be done with steel frames with masonry infill, concrete shear walls or steel plate shear walls.

Choice of framing is not about safety, say designers. "You can provide adequate safety using either material, following a proper design and performance standard," says Ahmad Rahimian, president of WSP Cantor Seinuk, New York City.
And for many projects, such as convention centers, stadiums, airports and skyscrapers, the solution is often a hybrid system. "The question is not whether the building should be in concrete or steel but how to use the two most effectively," says Rahimian.

http://enr.ecnext.com/coms2/summary_0271-24663_ITM


• • • • •

OAS_AD('Bottom');

OAS_AD('Right1');

OAS_AD('Right2');

take me to About Us Advertising Information Architectural Projects Bid Management Bookstore Building Codes BuyLine Career Opportunities Constructionmail Contact Us Continuing Education MHC Analytics Dodge Plans Dodge Reports ENR Next Equipment Listings Equipment Values Industry Events Industry Headline News Industry Resources Links to the Industry Local Resources MHC Events MHC Network News Archives Online Courses Online Directory People and Firms Product News & Reports Regional News Sweets Directory Sweets Product Search Technology Newswire Top News Story Top Ranked Firms Turner University
.

=0)document.write(unescape('%3C')+'!-'+'-') //--> (dLst.getTime()+1800000))||(dCur.getTime()>(dSes.getTime()+28800000))){ dSes.setTime(dCur.getTime()); WT.vt_f_s="1"; } if ((dCur.getDay()!=dLst.getDay())||(dCur.getMonth()!=dLst.getMonth())||(dCur.getYear()!=dLst.getYear())){ WT.vt_f_d="1"; } } else{ var tmpname=name+"_TMP="; document.cookie=tmpname+"1"; if (document.cookie.indexOf(tmpname)!=-1){ document.cookie=tmpname+"; expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:01 GMT"; if ((typeof(gWtId)!="undefined")&(gWtId!="")){ WT.co_f=gWtId; } else if ((typeof(gTempWtId)!="undefined")&(gTempWtId!="")){ WT.co_f=gTempWtId; WT.vt_f="1"; } else{ WT.co_f="2"; var cur=dCur.getTime().toString(); for (var i=2;i "); } //--> 3){ if ((navigator.appName=="Microsoft Internet Explorer")&document.body){ WT.bs=document.body.offsetWidth+"x"+document.body.offsetHeight; }
else if (navigator.appName=="Netscape"){ WT.bs=window.innerWidth+"x"+window.innerHeight; } } WT.fi="No"; if (window.ActiveXObject){ for(var i=9;i>0;i--){ try{ var flash = new ActiveXObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash."+i); WT.fi="Yes"; WT.fv=i+".0"; break; } catch(e){ } } } else if (navigator.plugins&navigator.plugins.length){ for (var i=0;i0){ for (var i=0;i0)){ gImages[gIndex].onload=gImages[gIndex].onerror=dcsLoadHref; } gImages[gIndex].src=dcsSrc; gIndex++; } else{ document.write(''); } } function dcsMeta(){ var elems; if (document.all){ elems=document.all.tags("meta"); } else if (document.documentElement){ elems=document.getElementsByTagName("meta"); } if (typeof(elems)!="undefined"){ for (var i=1;i2048&navigator.userAgent.indexOf('MSIE')>=0){ P=P.substring(0,2040)+"&WT.tu=1"; } dcsCreateImage(P); } function dcsFunc(func){ if (typeof(window[func])=="function"){ window[func](); } }
// BEGIN ADDED CODE FROM MANTA EVENT TRACKING JS var gTrackClickDownload = true; var gTrackClickOffSite = true; var gLinkMatch = "\.(pdf)|(mp3)|(doc)|(xls)|(txt)|(csv)|(zip)"; var gLinkRegex = new RegExp(gLinkMatch); var gThisHost = "ecnext.com|manta.com"; var gHostRegex = new RegExp(gThisHost); var gHref=""; function dcsIsHttp(e){ return (e.href&e.protocol&(e.protocol.indexOf("http")!=-1))?true:false; } function dcsSaveHref(evt){ if (evt.preventDefault&evt.target.href){ evt.preventDefault(); gHref=evt.target.href; } } function dcsLoadHref(evt){ if (gHref.length>0){ window.location=gHref; gHref=""; } } function dcsEvt(evt){ var e=evt.target||evt.srcElement; if (e.tagName&(e.tagName=="IMG")){ e=e.parentElement||e.parentNode; } return e; } function dcsBindClicks(event,func){ var lTemp = false; if (gTrackClickOffSite == true & gTrackClickDownload == true){ lTemp = gTrackClickOffSite; gTrackClickOffSite = false; } if (typeof (window[func]) ==
"function"){ for (i = 0; i

The world can only be redeemed through action--movement -- motion. Uncoerced, unbribed and unbought, humanity will move toward the light.
Alice Hubbard's introduction to An American Bible (1912)

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904
---------------------------------
Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!

SPONSORED LINKS
United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance Moving to the united state United state patent United state patent search United states patent office

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------

The world can only be redeemed through action--movement -- motion. Uncoerced, unbribed and unbought, humanity will move toward the light.
Alice Hubbard's introduction to An American Bible (1912)


---------------------------------
Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 03:49:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Hello

just wanted to say its good to have you back jolly, you and your damn vacation!

Jolly Roger <slicingthroats@yahoo.com> wrote: Ground zero to times square is about two miles. How would we cancel ANSWER?
I don't know where Giuliani and Spitzer are located.


greg nixon <nxngrg@yahoo.com> wrote:
Luke is Luke Rudkowski and is 19 years old but a serious "street" activist w/NY911.

Jolly we need to fine tune the route and cancel the ANSWER appearance. too far. Some question even GZ to Times Square. Suggestions welcome. The gist is Spitzer and Giuliani and the damn gatekeepers.


Jolly Roger <slicingthroats@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sherry will probably help, but I'm not sure I know who Luke is at the moment. Yes, I too have had my doubts about many in that organization, but I think that we have to work under the assumption that every group is thoroughly infiltrated (has the troll traffic here ever slowed down?) This is why I'm always suggesting individual actions. I'll ask around, and I'm sure we'll be able to rustle up some support. I'll talk to the crew at the ground zero vigils (circumventing the leadership)

greg nixon <nxngrg@yahoo.com> wrote: http://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/132464/index.php

I have talked with Sherry Bender and Luke.

NY911 truth i think is another front like truthorg. or else they simply believe in a top down heirarch approach and WILL NOT SUPPORT the actions of other groups.

Jolly Roger <slicingthroats@yahoo.com> wrote:
Excellent chance. Did you talk to anyone else from NYC? Enough of the
movement is here for us to spread out and cover a lot of terretory.
Where can I download the flyer?

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, greg nixon <nxngrg@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks Jolly,
>
> Any chance of you helping flyer for 2/20 NYC. I wil try to come
in this week for some
> prep work too.
>
> Greg
>
> Jolly Roger <slicingthroats@...> wrote:
> Sure, Greg -- but I'm not exactly sure which one she's talking
about.
>
> http://www.rense.com/general61/dwe.htm
> http://rense.com/general63/jolly.htm
> http://www.rense.com/general61/tvv.htm
> http://www.rense.com/general63/newam.htm
>
> Greg Nixon <nxngrg@...> wrote:
> Got a link on that Rense article Mr Roger?
>
> --- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, Jolly Roger
> <slicingthroats@> wrote:
> >
> > I'm very flattered by this, Amy, and I'm glad you liked the
> article, but I have to respectfully decline because I don't deal in
> conspiracy theories -- only scientific evidence, and documented
> facts. I also suspect that your film project is just another
attempt
> to discredit the 9-11 Truth Movement.
> > Instead of making a film about conspiracy theories, why don't
> you investigate what actually transpired on 9-11, and make a film
> that might actually be important to saving this nation, rather than
> one that will undoubtably mock all who question the lies being
> spewed by our government and the media?
> >
> >
> > Amy Manchester <amym@> wrote:
> > st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
> Hello,
> >
> > My name is Amy Manchester and I work for a production company
> out in Los Angeles. We are developing a show based on
investigating
> modern day conspiracy theories. I enjoyed your article on
> www.rense.com and wondered if you would be interested in talking
> some time? I could call you or you could call me, just let me know.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Amy Manchester
> > Director of Development
> > Pilgrim Films & Television
> > 818-728-8819 office
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "There comes a time when every man feels the urge to spit on his
> hands, hoist the black flag, and start slitting throats." -- H.L.
> Mencken
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "There comes a time when every man feels the urge to spit on his
hands, hoist the black flag, and start slitting throats." -- H.L.
Mencken
> ---------------------------------
> Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> United state bankruptcy court western district of texas
United state life insurance Moving to the united state United
state patent United state patent search United states patent
office
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!
>


---------------------------------
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.

"There comes a time when every man feels the urge to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and start slitting throats." -- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.


---------------------------------
Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!

"There comes a time when every man feels the urge to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and start slitting throats." -- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.

SPONSORED LINKS
United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance Moving to the united state United state patent United state patent search United states patent office

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

---------------------------------
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 7
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 05:48:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Eric May <captainmay@prodigy.net>
Subject: "Target Texas City" follow-up w/ NY Times Thom Shanker (Disruptors Beware!)

Identifying Disinformants / Disruptors

Yo Thom, Ghost Troop has been passing around your work lately, and it made me think that I should catch you up on the situation at Texas City, where my Holy Horde has just now interfered with a Bush Boyz attempt to blow the place up! The story and links are below. Please spread the word that we're on guard against any resumption of plant to target Texas City, and would appreciate it if the Bush Boyz would knock off the false terror stuff.

The folks in the CC's below your name are associates of Tim White / Larry Lawson, a duo of disinformation agents who have been working at causing disruption in the Ghost Troop scenario proximate to the time of the attempt at a Texas City strike. Along with them are dupe Sherry Shiner, who has apparently been personally engaged as a friend, and FBI Agent Ted Gunderson. Given your areas of interest in military/government interface, and psychological operations, I would think that you would find them to be of interest. I'll be publishing an article on the way these "disruptors" (our internet word for 'em) work, but you can get a pretty good idea by just figuring that they infiltrate discussion groups and email lists with the promise of good information -- which they provide, for a while -- then gradually begin to act like bill collectors, abusing folks they don't like (i.e., folks who are helping get the truth out about the Bush Boyz).

As an example, White infiltrated Ghost Troop Group when if first started, and tried to make it so that the group wouldn't start at all! Here's the first message (of some 6000 messages to date) from Ghost Troop Group: http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop/message/1. You'll note when you read the short note that it causes as much anxiety as possible for the group of folks starting Ghost Troop Group. Had I been in touch with the group named after my unit, Ghost Troop, I would have straightened White out then; as it was he generally impeded the group until I took control of it myself, then I kicked him out for insulting, threatening and publishing the personal information of other Ghost Troops. These are the kinds of tactics he employs to this day, sometimes tag-teaming with Larry Lawson, sometimes throwing out the name of Ted (FBI) Gunderson, sometimes begging assistance from dupes like Sherry Shiner. Sometimes he even forwards information to his friends in the FBI while
we are in the middle of a mission, as you can see from a page of our summer mission log: http://www.spiritone.com/~pazuu/pow-mia/GhostTroopCaptMay3.htm. Given that Houston FBI agaents Midcap and Stult were trying to shut down Ghost Troop's warning to Texas City at the time, this is a most important and revealing record.

Given that these disinformation folks have been attempting to stop vital work by an officer on a mission of conscience who was trying to prevent a nuclear 911, I believe they should all be examined by an investigation as possible participants in high treason, and make that recommendation formal whenever I can. I'm currently receiving support and encouragement for my mission from active duty officers as well as veterans, so I'm quite hopeful that my information, part of an ongoing report to several congressional folks, will figure in the final reckoning. It is my opinion that the 911 Cabal should be dealt with by either military or peoples tribunal, as it is clear that the Congress and Courts have acquiesced in allowing Dictator Bush to nuke a US city.

When the infowar is over, there must be inquiries and tribunals, which won't be controlled by the people who have authorized disinformation/disruption activities. Given that I'm describing what these folks are doing here to you, with an interested crowd of a hundred in the BCC's, I don't think anyone is going to be able to make the statement: "I didn't know what I was doing." Thom, my friend, they know exactly what they're doing.

Last things: The folks in the TO line with you were all witnesses to the Ghost Troop interdiction of an attempt to sabotage Texas City on 7/28/2005, and are listed with you in a real-time cyber-publication from the time: http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2005/week29/. I don't think any of you can claim that you didn't know what Ghost Troop was doing, either.

Take care of yourself, Thom -- and be assured that folks are starting to Google "Captain May Thom Shanker" with interest! Shucks, given that we corresponded about the Battle of Baghdad Cover-up and the Bush Boyz repressions for half of 2003, folks are sure to begin to use our exchanges when they write the history of our times!

Captain Eric H. May, MI / PAO, USA
CO, Ghost Troop, 3/7 Cybercav+
Mission of Conscience / Patriots in Action

PS: What's below is dynamite, so keep passing it along!

Eric May <captainmay@prodigy.net> wrote:
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:29:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Eric May <captainmay@prodigy.net>
Subject: Ghost Troop & Captain May begin the "Target Texas City" Nuclear 911 Investigation
To: newsroom@galvnews.com
CC: Ambassador Chase Untermeyer <untermeyercg@state.gov>

Those who have been aware of the Ghost Troop interest and intervention in the matter of Texas City, where we predicted and have prevented an attempt to blow the place up, will be interested to hear my most recent briefing, given today: http://www.monksmedia.com/tvnews.php (scroll down to interviews).

Ghost Troop has been heavily engaged in this infowar campaign, at all levels, in all places. As usual, individual Ghost Troops show themselves to be personally brave, as in the case of Jon Watkins, a Texas City resident who made as much trouble -- and in as many official places -- as he could.

Today I have spoken with Heber Taylor, who is the editor of the Galveston County Daily News, which published the story on our "Target Texas City" scenario by its reporter, TJ Aulds: http://galvestondailynews.com/story.lasso?ewcd=f9c4071e30759dda. We spoke for around a quarter hour of shared acquaintances in the Houston media scene, and of the Ghost Troop public affairs campaign to explain just why it is that Texas City has so many major explosions, especially at British Petroleum, and why it is that Ghost Troop has such a good record of predicting them in advance.

Mr. Taylor has given me a link to the Daily News, which will own the TO line for these "Texas City Letters" that I'm writing now. He has assured me that a reporter familiar with security issues, Scott Williams, will contact me today to continue to investigate our Ghost Troop analysis.

Ghost Troop will continue to investigate and analyse the events associated with it's "1/31 Target Texas City" scenario, in accordance with its function as a unit on an official mission of conscience.

Best regards,

Captain Eric H. May, MI / PAO, USA
CO, Ghost Troop, 3/7 Cybercav+
Mission of Conscience / Patriots in Action

PS: Below is a brief exchange between me and a Ft. Hood captain that shows we're a topic of interest in military circles.

Eric May <captainmay@prodigy.net> wrote:
To: Randall Pendland <drrcpen@sbcglobal.net>
CC: ghosttroop@yahoogroups.ca
From: Eric May <captainmay@prodigy.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 12:53:47 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [ghosttroop] Re: Thanks (a brother officer offers encouragement)

Dear Captain Penland,

I am most gratified to read an email like yours coming from a brother officer, and believe that there is a significant increase in those of us who can see where things are leading. I believe our collective training as American Citizens and servants of the Constitution will overcome the attempt to subvert us, by high treason, into inviting high tyranny.

Please allow me to share your encouraging note with Ghost Troop, my most irregular group of cybercavalry, which has accompanied me down some very strange paths and with me discovered some very strange truths. We have blocked the attempt at the Nuclear 911 for the present, but I believe the Houston Metro area is still in the crosshairs for the event. After that, everywhere will come under the same heavy oppression of a contrived police/military state, the "Homeland" scenario greatly advnaced.

Again, my heartfelt thanks for your note. As you and I are both servants of the same national constitution, it is fitting that we should be making contact, honorable officer to honorable officer. My best regards, CPTMAY

PS: My initial complaint to the IG's office over the Battle of Baghdad Cover-up (BOBCUP) went through III Corps IG, and is now before the Ft. Stewart IG, DAIG and DAPA as well. Let's hope that the with time more and more comrades will wake up and join in to our cause.

Randall Pendland <drrcpen@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Thanks for your great work at preparing the people with the truth. As an administration officer for III Corps and Ft. Hood, I understand the probabilities you have exposed. In fact, I understood the codes you mentioned before I heard you. I have visited the Ghost Troop site and listened to you.

I do not know how I can help you, but would like to try. Resources are short and my health is not the best; however, my duty to God and country never end. The least I will do is pray for you.

Thanks, Captain May.

Captain Pendland

<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><STRONG>Randall Pendland</STRONG>, ThD, DCPC-AC, PhD(s), MhT, NLP</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="comic sans ms" color=#0000ff size=4>CISM Certified</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>Servant of the<FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff"> <STRONG><FONT color=#ff0000>Lord Jesus Christ</FONT></STRONG></FONT></DIV></DIV></DIV>


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ghosttroop-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.ca

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 8
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:12:43 -0000
From: "reggie501" <reggie501@optonline.net>
Subject: Talk Live to Mark Crispin Miller - Noon E.T. Today!

TVNL RADIO... LIVE....CALL IN, EMAIL, or AOL IM

Tuesday, February 7th: The Bush Administration, Stolen Elections & The
Media..

Guest: Mark Crispin Miller – Author of "Boxed In : The Culture of TV",
"The Bush Dyslexicon" and "Cruel and Unusual: Bush/Cheney's New World
Order"

Mark will be discussing his new book, "Fooled Again, How the Right
Stole the 2004 Election and Why They Will Steal the Next One Too",
accuses George W. Bush and his "theocratic militants" of orchestrating
electoral fraud to "hijack" the 2004 presidential race.

http://tvnewslies.org/html/radio_show.html

SCROLL DOWN BELOW GRAPHIC TO
CLICK HERE TO LISTEN!

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 9
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:32:46 -0500
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." <prez@usa-exile.org>
Subject: US Election Trickery

Forwarded with Compliments of Free Voice of America (FVOA): Accurate
News and Interesting Commentary for Amerika's Huddled Masses Yearning
to Breathe Free.

----------


Election... Democratic or Oppressive Tool?

By Dr. Elias Akleh
February 5, 2006
Amin.org

Many believe that election is a sign of democracy. Yet it is few, who
understand that election is in fact a double-edge sword, and could also
be used as an oppressive tool to pacify opposition and dissent into
conformity. Election is a tool often used to foment competition and
violence among different groups (political, ethnic and religious)
within the same people. Political capitalism uses money, military
power, and disinformation to determine the results of elections. 
Through money votes could be bought, through military power people
could be terrorized to vote for a certain group, and through fraud and
misinformation the votes of “free” people could be easily prejudiced
towards a specific direction.

Election is considered the ultimate expression of free sovereign
democratic nations. Freedom is the essential component for any
sovereign country to be democratic so that its people would exercise
election. Without freedom a nation could be coerced to “elect” its
government. Political capitalism uses military power (local or foreign)
to terrorize people and force them to elect certain leaders. Many
tyrant and corrupt regimes had been elected this way. We had seen this
form of election in the old Soviet Union, in South American countries
which had US military bases on their soil, in South African countries,
and in the Arab world.

The ugliest form of militarily enforced election is that “exercised”
under foreign occupation. The American new concept of exporting
democracy through war is a flagrant form of this militarily enforced
election. This is obviously seen in the Afghani and Iraqi elections
under American occupation. It is also seen in the Palestinian election
under Israeli occupation. These elections are characterized by terror,
violence, restriction of movement, and control over the electoral
process to elect a government loyal to or at least conforming to the
occupying power. Many of the “undesired” candidates are assassinated or
imprisoned. The American administration understands this very
well--that is why it demanded an end to “Syrian occupation” of Lebanon
and that Syrian troops withdraw from Lebanon before the Lebanese could
have their own election.  Unfortunately this democracy-encouraging
administration did not similarly demand the end of Israeli occupation
of Palestine before Palestinians could have their own election.

Political capitalism uses money to sway the results of election. This
is the “modern” form of “political occupation”. Votes can be bought.
Political parties can be bribed and controlled through political
monetary contributions. The American administration favors this type of
intervention through its USAID programs to control elections in foreign
countries as it did in South America throughout the last two decades.
The latest such intervention was in Venezuela when the administration
financed the opposition to demand a recall of the election. American
campaign money ($2 million) was also spent in Russian Georgia during
2004 election to get rid of Shevardnadze. Campaign money is also being
poured into Haiti to influence its coming election and its political
future.

The American administration (the exporter of democracy) buys elections
with its USAID program. It ties the economy of poor countries with its
aid so that they become so dependent on it and would conform to
American dictates for fear of losing this aid that keeps their economy
going. Usually this money is used for projects that greatly benefit the
ruling elite of that country, and becomes a leash to curb them.

The American administration, recently, has hastened to spend $2
million in the form of USAID projects before the start of the
Palestinian Parliamentary election to boost Fatah’s chance of winning.
 The money is designed to improve the image of the Palestinian
Authority (PA) and its Fatah party. Their image had suffered
tremendously in the eyes of Palestinians due to their incompetence,
corruption, and collusion with the Israeli government. To maximize its
credit PA’s name alone was written on these projects as a proof of its
effectiveness. A consulting firm (Strategic Assessment Initiative ASI)
has been subcontracted to plan and to run daily events in the name of
the PA during the election week. Such events included street cleaning,
food and water distribution on border crossings, youth sport
activities, and donating computer systems to organizations.

Some of the money was paid directly into bank accounts of Fatah
candidates and their campaign organizers. The Palestinian Information
Center had published on its website a letter that has the official
stamp of the American Embassy in Tel Aviv sent to PA Information
Minister Nabeel Amr in response to a letter he sent to the embassy
dated October 9th of last year asking for financial support for Fatah’s
electoral campaign. The official letter states that US is ready to
support Fatah against Hamas, and asks Mr. Amr to provide 30 bank
accounts in Israeli banks for Fatah’s members in order to deposit the
money.

Withholding aid money is a form of intimidation and coercion to effect
changes in the election results. The American administration had
threatened to stop its aid money to Palestinians if Hamas (labeled as a
terrorist group by the administration) enters or wins the election.
American resources warned that the administration would “review” its
financial aid to Palestinians due to American prohibitions on providing
any “material support” to groups on Washington’s terrorist list. The US
reserves the sole authority to establish such a terrorist list and
force it on the world. David Welch, Assistant Secretary of State,
warned that “there should be no place in the political process for
groups and individuals who refuse to renounce terror and violence or
refuse to recognize Israel’s right to exist or refuse to disarm.”  

EU officials had expressed similar reservations (threats) if any group
who advocates violence might win election. They threatened that donor
countries might withhold their monetary donations if Hamas wins the
election. It is worth mentioning here the fact that those donor
countries had withheld much of their money to Palestinians due to
Fatah’s PA corruption. The donated money is supposed to be spent on
humanitarian and economical projects and not to be politicized.
Palestinians considered these threats as a clear attempt of the Western
countries to buy their conscious and their freedom of choice and to
dictate the results of election. They wonder what kind of democracy
these so-called democratic countries are trying to spread when they try
to buy the electoral votes.   

After the unexpected landslide Hamas’ victory in the election (total of
80 seats out of 132) European countries followed the American lead and
jumped on Hamas’ back demanding that it acknowledge Israel’s right to
exist, renounce terror (resistance) and disarm in order to be
recognized as a legitimate government and to enter peace negotiations
with Israel. It seems that they have ignored the fact that Israel is
the real terrorist state; Israel is the occupier of Palestinian land,
the murderer of civilians, the destroyer of civilian homes, and the
breaker of international laws (Israel has violated at least 429 UN
resolutions against it).  Successive Israeli government calls for
“Greater Israel” that means the annihilation of Arabs from the Nile to
the Euphrates. The fact is Hamas sprang out of the Israeli occupation
of Palestine. Hamas did not invade another country; rather it is
fighting to free its own country from the Israeli ruthless occupation.
Hamas does not consider peace negotiation as an end result as presented
by the US and Israel; rather as means to an end. Hamas believes that
negotiations without power do not yield good results and cites the last
ten years of Fatah’s negotiation with Israel as a proof.

Hamas is a real obstacle to the Israeli expansion. The Israeli
government tried uselessly to remove this obstacle through force. Its
use of the military force, including tanks, helicopter gun ships and
F-16 bombers against Palestinians inside heavily populated areas, its
imposition of collective punishment measures such as closures, its
checkpoints and restriction of movements, its continued build-up of the
Israeli colonies in the occupied West Bank, and its building of the
jailing wall and barbed-wire fences had failed to eliminate resistance.
On the contrary, the more oppressive measures the Israeli army inflicts
on Palestinians the more determined the Palestinians to resist, and the
more ingenious they become in their methods of resistance.

Since Hamas is not a political body, international political pressure
has no effect on it. Israel and the US resorted to election as a way to
contain Hamas. Becoming part of a Palestinian government, it is hoped,
Hamas would be bound by all the past political agreements PA had signed
on, and Israel would be able to apply all the international political
pressure against it, and eventually would be vindicated when it
completely destroys the Palestinian Authority since it would have a
“terrorist” element within it.

Hamas had entered the election to revolutionize the Palestinian
political system. Hamas claims it wants to turn the system from a
single to a multi-party rule, where all factions would share in
decision-making. It wants to end corruption, curb expenditure, and
maintain public money. Reforming Palestinian Liberation Organization to
really defend Palestinian rights is another goal of the organization.
Most importantly it wants to draw attention to the fact that the core
of the problem is the Israeli occupation, and that its resistance to
this occupation is a legitimate right.

Many state that Hamas’ immediate problem is money to manage the daily
affairs of the people, in particular to pay wages of government
employees--especially those within the Palestinian Security Forces. The
American-donated money to the PA has been designated to pay the wages
of the Security Forces. When this money is withheld it is expected that
the mostly Fatah Security Forces would revolt against Hamas’
government. Hamas is planning to bring the PA out of its isolation back
to the Arab and Islamic countries for financial and political support.
Many of the Arab countries (Egypt, Jordan, and the rich Gulf countries)
are close partners within the American war against terrorism and have
close economic ties with the US, thus they would not be able to extend
any support to a Hamas government (a terrorist government according to
the American standards). We have to wait and see if Hamas have plans to
get out of this Israeli/American “democratic electoral” trap.

---------------------------------------------------

* Dr. Elias Akleh is an Arab writer from a Palestinian descent, born
in the town of Beit-Jala and lives in the US.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole
responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
the Centre for Research on Globalization.

To become a Member of Global Research

The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at
www.globalresearch.ca grants permission to cross-post original Global
Research articles in their entirety, or any portions thereof, on
community internet sites, as long as the text & title are not modified.
The source must be acknowledged and an active URL hyperlink address to
the original CRG article must be indicated. The author's copyright note
must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print
or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact:
crgeditor@yahoo.com

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available to our readers under the provisions
of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of
political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to
use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must
request permission from the copyright owner.

To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at Global
Research's News and Discussion Forum

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

© Copyright Elias Akleh, Amin.org, 2006

The url address of this article is:
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?
context=viewArticle&code=AKL20060205&articleId=1892

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------