Tuesday, February 07, 2006

Re: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?

Thanks for taking the arguement to the next level and pretty much
articulating my position better than I have done.

The gang behind the Frameup on Humanity is not a direct correllation to
"the government."
The gang behind the Frameup on Humanity splits up and plays both sides.
Always.
They have followed this pattern for humdreds of years, it has always
worked, and they're not going to rock the boat.

The gang behind the Frameup on Humanity is into One World Rule,
Universal Planetary rule ala Star Wars.
Singular Dictator, nowhere to hide, Orwellian.

Unfortunately they have had a lot of time to stack the deck, until
seemingly reasonable people like you are content to shoot for a more
palatible lie, cos it's easier and not a big deal.
I do not compromise because ONLY the full unabridged truth will defeat
them, and bankrupt them instead of us.
They've steered us this far by making us acceptive of pallative fiction
doubletalk doublestory that makes you see a walk in the park when it's
really a cliff.

I'm sending this onto Holmgren, since you have raised some interesting
questions that deserve a fair answer.

I had to change exactly one word to make this accurate:

"Rosalee Grable claims the Frameup is ready to concede to
conventionally demolishing the towers. A defacto admission that the
NIST reports and the 9/11 Commission were elaborate hoaxes. This
unprecedented sacrifice/total loss of credibility is to cover up
secret microwave weapon technology, they are saving for a False Flag
Alien invasion that is not yet fully set up."

Yep. I'd rather see this technology used for off-grid perpetual energy as Tesla intended.

http://missilegate.com/rfz
http://missilegate.com/rfz/swaz

inphoman911 wrote:
> Disclaimer: I am not a supporter/defender of Hoffman, and I am not
> really up to speed on who is suspected of being compromised and who
> is not, but commonsense wise something is ringing terribly wrong to
> my ears.
>
>
> Rosalee Grable claims the government is ready to concede to
> conventionally demolishing the towers. A defacto admission that the
> NIST reports and the 9/11 Commission were elaborate hoaxes. This
> unprecedented sacrifice/total loss of credibility is to cover up
> secret microwave weapon technology, they are saving for a False Flag
> Alien invasion that is not yet fully set up.
>
> Why do I find that so hard to believe? Why risk exposing such
> technology on 9/11 and not just use high powered explosives or
> mininukes instead? IOW why does the false flag destruction of a
> building require secret microwave technology? Are they trying to
> hide this technology from only us or from foreign powers as well?
> Using the secret raygun on 9/11 wouldn't have been too smart in the
> latter case now would it?
>
>
> alexldent claims the government may be ready to concede to
> conventionally demolishing the towers and cremating thousands of
> civillians alive in side. He thinks they can get away with it by
> claiming they wanted to save additional lives in the streets of
> lower manhattan, even though they didn't evacuate the towers
> beforehand, but rather told people to remain inside. He also thinks
> they can get away with the fact that they designed their controlled
> demolition to simulate a building pancaking after a plane had hit it
> by claiming they wanted to keep their preplanted explosive
> countermeasures secrets from the terrorists!
>
>
> Folks, there is no volunatry backpedalling from the official 9/11
> narrative. Why do you think they panicked and slammed the lid shut
> on able danger? Tarpley goes into what Able danger was really about
> here in the new preface to his 9/11 Synthetic Terror.
>
> http://www.waronfreedom.org/synth/synter2ed.pdf
>
>
> You better believe the official fiction is meant to stay. Anybody
> thinking that they are ready to voluntarily concede to controlled
> demolition is literally out of their mind.
>
>
> Question for Rosalee Grable. Do you really want Professor Jones to
> go on national TV and say that there was no plane crash and that the
> planes hitting the towers were faked and edited in later on
> videotape? What praytell would be the result of him taking that
> action? What good would it do our truth movement if people of Jones
> stature started doing things like that? I ask because you don't
> sound like a stupid person and maybe you just havent thought these
> things through. My position is simple. Controlled demolition means
> we've got the goods on the criminals. Making the general public
> aware of Controlled demolition (the deliberate cremation of fellow
> citizens, and then automatic realistion that there was a
> hypocritical manipulative coverup afterward.) is precisely what we
> need to get the blood boiling for public outrage and subsequent mass
> mobilization. Everything else, NO MATTER HOW TRUE IT MAY BE is a
> waste of our time, and a diversion from nailing the crooks.
> Wouldn't they just love for us to voluntarily marginalize controlled
> demolition to advance other theories that are even harder for the
> general public to swallow than controlled demolition itself?
>
>
>
> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "Nico Haupt"
> <nicohaupt@...> wrote:
>
>>> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
>>> Von: "alexldent" <alexldent@...>
>>> An: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
>>> Betreff: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited
>>>
> Hangout?
>
>>> Datum: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 23:15:50 -0000
>>>
>>>
>> He claimed it by himself.
>> On you other point i would also agree.
>> Many institutes receive military- or intel money.
>>
>> But this in the mix increases the case.
>> Also, i personally believe he's more brainwashed and manipulated
>> than really payrolled, but i wouldn't rule out more.
>>
>> nico
>>
>>
>>>>> How do
>>>>>
>> we know Jack Hoffman is Jim Hoffman's uncle? I can't find
>>
> anything on the
>
>> web...<<<
>>
>> --
>> 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
>> +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

No comments: