Tuesday, February 07, 2006

Re: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?]

Tell you what. If we put all our eggs in one basket and argue the twin towers controlled demolition and your government cares to give a limited hangout and confirm that then almost everything we have achieved so far collapses. Except of course the no planes scenerio. And how will that then get (re)launched?
 
We have to go back to why WTC7 collapsed exactly the same as the twin towers. Not on the basis it was not hit bu a plane because that supports the view that the towers were and that led to their collapsing. The question has to be framed - why did WTC7 collapse the same as the twin towers. This building wasn't pulled, how could it in the time available. Just think. A team would have had to do a survey on the then state of the building and then determine what was required to fetch what was standing down in a controlled way. Then it would have required wiring. The thing is that the whole building was, as viewed from the outside, structurally intact. So what was so dangerous that it had to be pulled. Who would have thought a 47 story building had to be pre-wired in case it was attacked by terrorists and such a big way as to breach its integrity? No plane was going to be flown into a 47 story building. Short of terrorists picking this building out for a major suitcase nuclear bomb [how likely was that?] was it ever dreamed that a pre-wiring was necessary on WTC7?    
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 3:57 AM
Subject: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?]

Controlled Demolition means you've got the goods on a particular subset
of the criminals.

Other equally dangerous 911 criminals get a free pass to set the agenda
and direct the course of the future.

We went to war over Cartoons.

The flight simulator origin of much of the second hit coverage is beyond
refute by anybody who actually believes in laws of nature like
conservaton of energy.
Professor Jones finds Laws of Nature to be arbitrary and situational and
is at least ready to ask the government to investigate whether gravity
is practical.

Wrong question false dichotomy timewaster.

Excuse to rebuild hatered toward arabs and islamics, since the planes
and hijackers part of the story is always assumed and perpetual excuse
for police state tactics.

I think Fetzer should go on national TV and tell people that the second
hit closeups have all proven to be cartoon footage of flight simulator
origin.
He's the guy with the reputation for video exploration.
Instead he stays tight on the Hoffman Trail, sticking to the rational
respectable but false hangout to keep the schnookies in thrall til
they're dead, or wishing they were.



From Infohman911:

Question for Rosalee Grable.  Do you really want Professor Jones to
go on national TV and say that there was no plane crash and that the
planes hitting the towers were faked and edited in later on
videotape?  What praytell would be the result of him taking that
action?  What good would it do our truth movement if people of Jones
stature started doing things like that?  I ask because you don't
sound like a stupid person and maybe you just havent thought these
things through.  My position is simple.  Controlled demolition means
we've got the goods on the criminals.  Making the general public
aware of Controlled demolition (the deliberate cremation of fellow
citizens, and then automatic realistion that there was a
hypocritical manipulative coverup afterward.) is precisely what we
need to get the blood boiling for public outrage and subsequent mass
mobilization.  Everything else, NO MATTER HOW TRUE IT MAY BE is a
waste of our time, and a diversion from nailing the crooks. 
Wouldn't they just love for us to voluntarily marginalize controlled
demolition to advance other theories that are even harder for the
general public to swallow than controlled demolition itself?



--- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "Nico Haupt"
<nicohaupt@...> wrote:
>
> > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> > Von: "alexldent" <alexldent@...>
> > An: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> > Betreff: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited
Hangout?
> > Datum: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 23:15:50 -0000
> >
>
> He claimed it by himself.
> On you other point i would also agree.
> Many institutes receive military- or intel money.
>
> But this in the mix increases the case.
> Also, i personally believe he's more brainwashed and manipulated
> than really payrolled, but i wouldn't rule out more.
>
> nico
>
> >>>How do
> we know Jack Hoffman is Jim Hoffman's uncle?  I can't find
anything on the
> web...<<<
>
> --
> 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
> +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
>







Yahoo! Groups Links












SPONSORED LINKS
Government procurement Government leasing Government grants for women
Government lease Government contract Government money


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




No comments: