There are 19 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. The Poodle turns into Pit Bull ! Blair Refuses to Back Iran Str
From: "ranger116@webtv.net" ranger116@webtv.net
2. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "Leslie Schwartz" lhs_emf@pacbell.net
3. 9/11 - Why didn't they show us the wreckage?????
From: "reggie501" reggie501@optonline.net
4. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "Naveed" flanker12k@yahoo.com
5. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "scol202" yahooboxx@ntlworld.com
6. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "Leslie Schwartz" lhs_emf@pacbell.net
7. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "Leslie Schwartz" lhs_emf@pacbell.net
8. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
9. Re: 9/11 - Why didn't they show us the wreckage?????
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
10. Leslie Schwartz -- the 9-11-investigator-basher -- a jewish suprem
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
11. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "kenny318east3" kenny318east3@yahoo.com
12. Fw: The generals calling for Rumsfeld's resignation are four years t
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
13. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "Naveed" flanker12k@yahoo.com
14. Re: [catapult] Fw: read this stuff from Australia
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
15. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
16. STRIKE..MAY 1st 2006
From: "NoRedCoats@aol.com" NoRedCoats@aol.com
17. Retired colonel claims U.S. military operations are already 'underwa
From: "ranger116@webtv.net" ranger116@webtv.net
18. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "scol202" yahooboxx@ntlworld.com
19. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "scol202" yahooboxx@ntlworld.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 1
From: "ranger116@webtv.net" ranger116@webtv.net
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 4:03pm(PDT)
Subject: The Poodle turns into Pit Bull ! Blair Refuses to Back Iran Str
The Poodle turns into Pit Bull !
Blair Refuses to Back Iran Strike !
(Tell Them You Agree Here !
Leslie.Slocum@fco.gov.uk
and pass it on )
Blair refuses to back Iran strike
Address:http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=577092006
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 2
From: "Leslie Schwartz" lhs_emf@pacbell.net
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 4:49pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
Bugs,
Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with people who think its all a Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are deranged, I just read one of their histories, Hitler you know was a good
guy, Jews forced him to carry out the holocaust.
Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad control the world along with Jewish international bankers, etc.
Etc. etc, etc.
Jews
Etc. etc, etc.
Zionists
Etc. etc, etc.
Mossad
Etc. etc, etc.
Sharon
Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.
Just plain demented hate.
_____
From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bugs
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:30 AM
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
TRY RUMSFELD FOR TREASON
The oath is to stand against all domestic and foreign enimies and
what Rumsfeld has done to the American Troops is a crime in and onto
itself.
Uraium dust has been spread all over Iraq due to the Uranium used in
Penatrator Bombs and Bullets.
Villages and the City of Fulluja have been razed to the ground.
100,000 Iraqi civillians mostly women and children have been killed
as collateral damage.
All of this has occured because Rumsfeld and Bush elected to lie the
American Soldiers into an unnecessary war.
Why did Bush and Rumsfeld do this ?
They did it to steal the Iraqi oil sell it to china and put the cash
into Chinese banks.
And they are perpetuating the occupation by not having enough troops
so they can stay in Iraq an keep on stealing the oil forever.
The Maritine Ship movement logs will prove this.
It is an OPEN and Shut Case.
or in other words a "REAL SLAM DUNK"
Bush's Brother and Uncle have been in and out of China for years
lining up this traitorous deal.
----- Original Message -----
From: Naveed <mailto:flanker12k@yahoo.com>
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Greg Palast Still DOESNT GET IT !
didn't know paul bremer was a kissinger stooge.......
mann david <dmann51@yahoo.com> wrote:
Read that piece in a hurry but didn't notice mention
of 9-11. Wow, pathetic trivial trip indeed.
--- JIM <justpasenthru2012@att.net> wrote:
> Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
> Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
> The Guardian - Comment
> Friday, April 14, 2006
> By Greg Palast
>
> Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the
> gaggle of generals,
> safely
> retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week,
> six of them
> have called for
> the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
>
> Well, according to my watch, they're about four
> years too late --
> and they still
> don't get it.
>
> I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
> that the
> bemedalled boys in
> crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the
> rump, in public.
> But to me, it
> just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
> straight.
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up
> in front of the
> UN and
> identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons
> labs, was it,
> General
> Powell?
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us
> our next warning
> from Saddam
> could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
> that Al Qaeda
> and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
>
> Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
> arrogance, a
> duplicitous
> chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and
> Tinker-Toy Napoleon --
> but he didn't
> appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
>
> Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of
> Defense you didn't
> read in the
> New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner,
> the man our
> president
> placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion
> viceroy.
>
> Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
> under the
> mistaken notion
> that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq,
> the President
> meant the
> Iraqis could choose their own government.
> Misunderstanding the
> President's true
> mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold
> elections within
> 90 days and
> for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the
> cities to a desert
> base. "It's
> their country," the General told me of the Iraqis.
> "And," he added,
> most
> ominously, "their oil."
>
> Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
> Garner a 101-page
> plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons
> at the State
> Department, Treasury
> and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e.
> the sale)
> of "all state
> assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting
> industries."
> The General
> knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where
> the Iraqi sun
> don't shine.
> Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting
> of Iraqi tribal
> leaders to
> plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their
> own multi-ethnic
> government --
> and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were
> on talking
> terms -- knew he
> could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a
>
> welcomed "liberation"
> turned into a hated "occupation."
>
> But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition
> government would mean
> the
> death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets
> privatization grab.
>
> On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the
> very night
> General Garner
> arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington.
> It was Rumsfeld
> on the line.
> He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack,
> Jack, you're
> fired."
>
> Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of
> on-the-ground experience
> in Iraq,
> with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director
> of Kissinger
> Associates.
> Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
> postponed
> elections for a
> year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot
> pasha, selling
> off Iraq's
> economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
> Rumsfeld's neo-con
> clique had
> desired.
>
> Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the
> six generals' call
> for
> Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
>
> For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't
> shoot straight.
> They're
> wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've
> gunned down the
> puppet instead
> of the puppeteers.
>
> There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked
> General Garner from
> Baghdad
> without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or
> breathes or spits
> in the Bush
> Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
> approval. And
> ultimately, it's
> the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
>
> Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
> give them
> enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the
> cowboy from
> Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that
> we lacked
> troops -- the
> problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy
> this nation. A
> million
> troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would
> just have more
> targets.)
>
> President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
> today on the
> intercom with
> Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up."
> And Cheney
> replies, "Hey,
> just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until
> he's taken all
> their ammo."
>
> When Bush and Cheney read about the call for
> Rumsfeld's resignation
> today, I can
> just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission
> Accomplished."
>
> Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
> choosing a target:
> It's the
> President, stupid.
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com <http://mail.yahoo.com/>
In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join
him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904
www.fightthenwo.org
_____
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman1/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com> PC-to-Phone Calls to
the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
_____
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/312 - Release Date: 4/14/2006
SPONSORED LINKS
United
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+military&w1=United+state+military&w2=United+state+grant&w3=United+state+coin&w4=Un
ited+state+government+grant&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=Trademark+united+state&c=6&s=167&.sig=40ToKyF7T9yByKOxju7I9g> state
military United
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+grant&w1=United+state+military&w2=United+state+grant&w3=United+state+coin&w4=Unite
d+state+government+grant&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=Trademark+united+state&c=6&s=167&.sig=_TICVwLymSfxKOzLD9zLuw> state grant
United
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+coin&w1=United+state+military&w2=United+state+grant&w3=United+state+coin&w4=United
+state+government+grant&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=Trademark+united+state&c=6&s=167&.sig=zL9aU23UKD3wKgRB_NGRxg> state coin
United
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+government+grant&w1=United+state+military&w2=United+state+grant&w3=United+state+co
in&w4=United+state+government+grant&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=Trademark+united+state&c=6&s=167&.sig=5xApWXncFYoPo7qr6c-Vgg>
state government grant United
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+citizenship&w1=United+state+military&w2=United+state+grant&w3=United+state+coin&w4
=United+state+government+grant&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=Trademark+united+state&c=6&s=167&.sig=2FLZhB84HOvAww1Gb-yvXQ> state
citizenship Trademark
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Trademark+united+state&w1=United+state+military&w2=United+state+grant&w3=United+state+coin&w4=U
nited+state+government+grant&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=Trademark+united+state&c=6&s=167&.sig=3Po9IEt8iHMd0--FnGmucg> united
state
_____
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
* Visit your group "911TruthAction <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction> " on the web.
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <mailto:911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
_____
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 3
From: "reggie501" reggie501@optonline.net
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 5:25pm(PDT)
Subject: 9/11 - Why didn't they show us the wreckage?????
The 9/11 Pentagon Attack: Planes Simply Do Not Vaporize - Why Didn't
They Show Us the Wreckage?
As each day passes, more and more Americans are becoming aware of the
startling evidence that clearly contradicts the official explanation
of Sept.11th, 2001 offered by the Bush administration. In fact, as
more and more evidence comes to light, incongruities in the official
explanation become increasingly and undeniably apparent.
Ironically, the growing number of people new to these unexplained
discrepancies poses a new problem for those of us who have been
researching 9/11 for many months or years. We will have to find a way
to explain the many complexities related to the attacks to those who
now doubt the official version of events. We are faced with the
overwhelming task helping great numbers of people understand the many
contradictions in the 9/11 story they were fed by their government.
Obviously, that is not an easy assignment, even when the great
majority of truth seekers agree that the official explanation is
little more than a pre-written cover story designed to herd the
American public into supporting an agenda that would otherwise horrify
and outrage them. However, it becomes far more complicated in light of
a topic that causes a great deal of confusion within the research
community itself. That disparity relates to the strike on the Pentagon.
Many questions still remain about what actually took place at the
Pentagon on September 11th 2001. That's fine, because the goal of the
9/11 truth community is to raise these questions for further
investigation. The problem arises when researchers feel that it is
their responsibility to explain what happened at the Pentagon. It is
NOT. Rather, it is their charge to highlight the doubts that have
been legitimately raised regarding what exactly hit that building.
Some researchers claim that a 110,000 ton Boeing 757 hit the building,
leaving only a 16 foot hole in the facade (prior to its collapse some
22 minutes after the initial impact.) Others claim that an A-3
Skywarrior fighter jet was the actual aircraft. Some say it was an
unmanned Global Hawk armed with depleted uranium missiles, and still
others claim that the Pentagon was hit by another type of military
missile. We can argue each of these theories forever, and accomplish
absolutely nothing.
We really have to put and end the internal dispute that is getting us
nowhere and work together to bring information rather than more
uncertainty to the public that is now just entering the 9/11
discussion. To that end, I am posing ONE pertinent question about the
strike on the Pentagon: Why didn't they show us the wreckage?
Planes do not simply vaporize. Never in the history of aviation
disasters has an aircraft ever totally disintegrated. Even exploding
space shuttles did not vanish into thin air. Therefore, it stands to
reason that whatever hit the Pentagon had to leave some recoverable
debris in its wake. Surely, there had be enough identifiable rubble
remaining from a 110,000 ton aircraft to satisfy the skeptics?
Read the full blog here:
http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=355
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 4
From: "Naveed" flanker12k@yahoo.com
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 5:50pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
for the last time
all JEWS ARE NOT ZIONISTS!
ALL ZIONISTS ARE NOT JEWS!
There is a ZIONIST ELEMENT to the 9/11 conspiracy!!! Maybe you can't handle that............
did you even read the damn post i posted about ISRAELI spy rings awash in america? I POSTED IT TWICE.......
this below come from my friend ryan!
'A Clean Break' JINSA/PNAC Neocons associated with AIPAC espionage:
washingtonpost.com
Leak Inquiry Includes Iran Experts in Administration
By Robin Wright and Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, September 4, 2004; Page A04
FBI counterintelligence investigators have in recent weeks questioned current and former U.S. officials about whether a small group of Iran specialists at the Pentagon and in Vice President Cheney's office may have been involved in passing classified information to an Iraqi politician or a U.S. lobbying group allied with Israel, according to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
In their interviews, the FBI agents have also named two Israeli diplomats stationed in Washington and asked whether they would be willing recipients of sensitive intelligence, the sources added.
The investigators have asked questions about personnel in the office of Pentagon Undersecretary for Policy Douglas J. Feith as well as members of the influential Defense Policy Board, an advisory panel for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, according to former U.S. officials who have been questioned and others familiar with the case.
Investigators have specifically asked about a group of neoconservatives involved in defense issues, including Feith, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, Iraq and Iran specialist Harold Rhode and others at the Pentagon. FBI agents also have asked current and former officials about Richard Perle of the defense board and David Wurmser, an Iran specialist and principal deputy assistant for national security affairs in Cheney's office, according to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
"The initial interest was: Do you believe certain people would spy for Israel and pass secret information?" said one source interviewed by the FBI about the defense officials.
It remains unclear, however, how specific investigators' suspicions have become. And one official, a Feith ally, has said the investigation is an effort by some intelligence officials to discredit Pentagon hawks.
The sources interviewed for this article requested anonymity because it involves classified information or because of the ongoing investigation.
Perle, Rhode and Wolfowitz did not return telephone calls placed to their homes and offices late Friday. Reached at home, Feith declined comment, citing the ongoing investigation.
But Pentagon officials insisted yesterday that FBI questions about key policymakers did not mean they were the subjects of the intelligence leak investigation. Senior Pentagon officials have said they were told by the FBI that the investigation is focused on just one suspect in the Defense Department, Lawrence A. Franklin, an Iran specialist in Feith's office.
The FBI investigation first came to light last week with reports of a probe into whether Franklin passed a draft presidential directive on Iran to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and whether the directive was then passed to Israel, sources have said. AIPAC has strongly denied any involvement in espionage.
A federal grand jury in Alexandria may take up the Franklin case as early as next week, law enforcement sources said.
The questioning of Franklin is a recent part of an investigation that dates back more than two years and includes diverse threads, U.S. officials and people close to the case said. One aspect of the probe concerns AIPAC and another looks at whether intelligence on Iran ended up in the hands of Iraqi National Congress leader Ahmed Chalabi, a longtime Pentagon favorite once considered a possible replacement for Saddam Hussein.
Iran has been a particularly controversial issue within the Bush administration, which still does not have a formal policy more than 3 1/2 years after taking office. A small group of Pentagon neoconservatives opposed a draft directive because it did not support a change of governments in Tehran, which they advocated, current and former U.S. officials said.
The officials whose names came up during questioning have strong ties to Israel. They also share a long-standing position on Iran and other radical regimes. Wurmser, Feith and Perle were co-authors of a 1996 policy paper for then-Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm." It called for removing Hussein from power in Iraq as part of a broad strategy to transform the region and remove radical regimes.
But current and former U.S. officials, including some who were interviewed by the FBI, are still puzzled by the nature of the investigation involving Israel, because its profoundly close ties with the United States date back six decades and have involved sharing sensitive intelligence. Yet officials also concede that Israel is one of the three countries most active in spying on the United States. Israel denies conducting espionage in the United States.
Also yesterday, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee demanded that a new prosecutor be assigned to investigate the alleged leaks, questioning the "political leanings" of the U.S. attorney in Alexandria who is handling the criminal portion of the case.
In a letter to Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) said the role of U.S. Attorney Paul J. McNulty in the case has "obvious political implications" in an election year, and Conyers cited anonymous allegations in a news report that McNulty had "put the brakes on" the probe.
"While I have no reason to question Mr. McNulty's integrity, he is not a career prosecutor, but instead is a political appointee whose previous employment was principally with Republican politicians," Conyers wrote.
Conyers suggested that either a special counsel or U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald of Chicago, who is overseeing a separate probe into the disclosure of CIA operative Valerie Plame, should take over the Pentagon probe.
Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo declined to comment on the specifics of Conyers's allegations. "We will review the congressman's letter and give it the attention it is due," Corallo said. A spokesman for McNulty also declined comment, referring a reporter to Corallo's statement.
Several law enforcement officials have said in recent days that the FBI had initially considered making rapid arrests in the Franklin probe when it became clear that news of the investigation was about to become public last week. But, these officials said, prosecutors urged caution, arguing that investigators needed more time to gather evidence and assess the case.
Franklin has been cooperating in the probe for several weeks, officials familiar with the investigation said. He has not responded to numerous requests for comment at his office and his home in West Virginia.
All in the Neocon Family By Jim Lobe, AlterNet
Posted on March 27, 2003, Printed on April 16, 2006
http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/ What do William Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, and Robert Kagan have in common? Yes, they are all die-hard hawks who have gained control of U.S. foreign policy since the 9/11 attacks. But they are also part of one big neoconservative family -- an extended clan of spouses, children, and friends who have known each other for generations.
Neoconservatives are former liberals (which explains the "neo" prefix) who advocate an aggressive unilateralist vision of U.S. global supremacy, which includes a close strategic alliance with Israel. Let's start with one of the founding fathers of the extended neocon clan: Irving Kristol. His extensive resume includes waging culture wars for the CIA against the Soviet Union in the early years of the Cold War and calling for an American "imperial" role during the Vietnam War. Papa Kristol, who has been credited with defining the major themes of neoconservative thought, is married to Gertrude Himmelfarb, a neoconservative powerhouse on her own. Her studies of the Victorian era in Britain helped inspire the men who sold Bush on the idea of "compassionate conservatism."
The son of this proud couple is none other that William Kristol, the crown prince of the neoconservative clique and editor of the Rupert Murdoch-owned Weekly Standard. In 1997, he founded the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a front group which cemented the powerful alliance between right-wing Republicans like Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, Christian and Catholic Right leaders like Gary Bauer and William Bennett, and the neocons behind a platform of global U.S. military dominance.
Irving Kristol's most prominent disciple is Richard Perle, who was until Thursday the Defense Policy Board chairman, is also a "resident scholar" at the American Enterprise Institute, which is housed in the same building as PNAC. Perle himself married into neocon royalty when he wed the daughter of his professor at the University of Chicago, the late Alfred Wohlstetter -- the man who helped both his son-in-law and his fellow student Paul Wolfowitz get their start in Washington more than 30 years ago.
Perle's own protege is Douglas Feith, who is now Wolfowitz's deputy for policy and is widely known for his right-wing Likud position. And why not? His father, Philadelphia businessman and philanthropist Dalck Feith, was once a follower of the great revisionist Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky, in his native Poland back in the 1930s. The two Feiths were honored together in 1997 by the right-wing Zionist Organization of America (ZOA).
The AEI has long been a major nexus for such inter-familial relationships. A long-time collaborator with Perle, Michael Ledeen is married to Barbara Ledeen, a founder and director of the anti-feminist Independent Women's Forum (IWF), who is currently a major player in the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill. Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and another neo-con power couple -- David and Meyrav Wurmser -- co-authored a 1996 memorandum for Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu outlining how to break the Oslo peace process and invade Iraq as the first step to transforming the Middle East.
Though she doesn't focus much on foreign-policy issues, Lynne Cheney also hangs her hat at AEI. Her husband Dick Cheney recently chose Victoria Nuland to become his next deputy national security adviser. Nuland, as it turns out, is married to Robert Kagan, Bill Kristol's main comrade-in-arms and the co-founder of PNAC.
Bob's father, Donald Kagan, is a Yale historian who converted from a liberal Democrat to a staunch neocon in the 1970s. On the eve of the 2000 presidential elections, Donald and his other son, Frederick, published "While America Sleeps," a clarion call to increase defense spending. Since then, the three Kagan men have written reams of columns warning that the currently ballooning Pentagon budget is simply not enough to fund the much-desired vision of U.S. global supremacy.
And which infamous ex-Reaganite do the Kagans and another leading neocon family have in common? None other than Iran-contra veteran Elliott Abrams.
Now the director of Near Eastern Affairs in Bush's National Security Council, Abrams worked closely with Bob Kagan back in the Reagan era. He is also the son-in-law of Norman Podhoretz, long-time editor of the influential conservative Jewish publication Commentary, and his wife, Midge Decter, a fearsome polemicist in her own right.
Podhoretz, like Kristol Sr., helped invent neo-conservatism in the late 1960s. He and Decter created a formidable political team as leaders of the Committee on the Present Danger in 1980, when they worked with Donald Rumsfeld to pound the last nail into the coffin of detente and promote the rise of Ronald Reagan. In addition to being Abrams' father-in-law, Norman Podhoretz is also the father of John Podhoretz, a columnist for the Murdoch-owned New York Post and frequent guest on the Murdoch-owned Fox News channel.
As editor of Commentary, Norman offered writing space to rising stars of the neocon movement for more than 30 years. His proteges include former U.N. ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and Richard Pipes, who was Ronald Reagan's top advisor on the "Evil Empire," as the president liked to call the Soviet Union. His son, Daniel Pipes, has also made a career out of battling "evil," which in his case is Islam. And to tie it all up neatly, in 2002, Podhoretz received the highest honor bestowed by the AEI: the Irving Kristol award.
This list of intricate, overlapping connections is hardly exhaustive or perhaps even surprising. But it helps reveal an important fact. Contrary to appearances, the neocons do not constitute a powerful mass political movement. They are instead a small, tighly-knit clan whose incestuous familial and personal connections, both within and outside the Bush administration, have allowed them grab control of the future of American foreign policy.
© 2006 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
Home : WRH Store : WRH Index : Reader Letters : Archives : Advertise : Donate
On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good…….Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)"
The Five Dancing Israelis
Arrested On 9-11
As the world watched in disbelief and asked the question... ...Mossad operatives were seen dancing with joy.
A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-11.
The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and trained them on the twin towers. (1)
Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery. (2) "They were like happy, you know … They didn't look shocked to me" said a witness. (3)
[T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in front of the wreckage. (4)
Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot. (6)
"It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (7)
One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led them to close down all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the 9-1-1 dispatcher that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:
Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like Palestinians and going around a building.
Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the Holland tunnel, I see the guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.
Dispatcher: He has what?
Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (8)
(*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller specifically say that these "Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians usually dress in western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")
Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-the-Lookout" alert for a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from New Jersey. When a van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing into New York, the suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the surprise of the police officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis! According to ABC’s 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers:
"We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (9)
Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD? The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (10)
The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture. (11)
The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:
American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (12)
TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down with tonnes of explosives (13). What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (14), the New York Post (15), and the New Jersey Bergen Record (16) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel. But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (17), and Yediot America, (18) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.
It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in so many different locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five. Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while the other was meant to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New Jersey? If a van was to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland Tunnel- which was where the police had originally been directed to by
that anti-Palestinian 9-1-1 "mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.
From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.
The employee, who declined to give his name said: "I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were like, "Now America knows what we go through." (19)
A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's Israeli owner, Dominick Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was in such a hurry to flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left with their furniture stranded in storage facilities (20). It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis were in fact Mossad agents (21). They were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released. Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40 days. (22)
[S]everal of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home. Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event." (23)
How did they know there would be an event to document on 9-11? It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:
1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to celebrate the successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled off in history. 2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel. 3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with this phone call, the Israeli bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where they will drop off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices. 4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move inadvertently foils the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and 40 day torture. 5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice Department rounds up over 1000 Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York area jails. The Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as
the government and media can now claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in the same dragnet as many other Arabs. 6. After several months, FBI and Justice Department "higher-ups" are able to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis quietly.
Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9-11 attacks even though he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale. Immediately after the Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin Laden's fingerprints all over it." (24) The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the Israeli connection. Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with stories linking the attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers of every stripe spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most outrageous propaganda imaginable. We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA was because he hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval" and they wanted to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter about the Crusades, and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all over the place! But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that Zionists orchestrated the
9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of denial in which he said:
"I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States." (25)
You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did you?
[A] number of intelligence officials have raised questions about Osama bin Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he's running this operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't have done it alone." A senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other documentation needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major foreign intelligence service might also have been involved. (26)
Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of the 9-11 attacks by the FBI:
USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7, 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA, AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD. (27)
To date, the only shred of “evidence” to be uncovered against bin Laden is a barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened to find "lying around" in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake. (28) There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to link the Al Qaeda "terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a mountain of evidence, both hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been very busy framing Arabs for terror plots against America.
One final point - at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the attacks (29). This claim was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said it had always opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the occupied territories." (30) 9-11 CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a Palestinian claim of responsibility
Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less than 500 people (31) make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for the attacks?
Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to fulfill what the goals of the political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century ago: to turn all of historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central tenet of the Zionist ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people for a people without a land." (32)
The implication of Palestinians in the 9-11 attacks would have handed Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all Palestinians would have been labelled terrorists.
---------------------------------
"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information." US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring.
"By way of deception, thou shalt do war"
Motto of the Mossad
---------------------------------
See also: Israel and 9/11 - Index of What Really Happened
Zionist Circles Benefit From WTC Collapse
---------------------------------
What Really Happened
Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@pacbell.net> wrote:
Bugs,
Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with people who think its all a Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are deranged, I just read one of their histories, Hitler you know was a good guy, Jews forced him to carry out the holocaust.
Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad control the world along with Jewish international bankers, etc.
Etc. etc, etc.
Jews
Etc. etc, etc.
Zionists
Etc. etc, etc.
Mossad
Etc. etc, etc.
Sharon
Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.
Just plain demented hate.
---------------------------------
From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bugs
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:30 AM
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
TRY RUMSFELD FOR TREASON
The oath is to stand against all domestic and foreign enimies and
what Rumsfeld has done to the American Troops is a crime in and onto
itself.
Uraium dust has been spread all over Iraq due to the Uranium used in
Penatrator Bombs and Bullets.
Villages and the City of Fulluja have been razed to the ground.
100,000 Iraqi civillians mostly women and children have been killed
as collateral damage.
All of this has occured because Rumsfeld and Bush elected to lie the
American Soldiers into an unnecessary war.
Why did Bush and Rumsfeld do this ?
They did it to steal the Iraqi oil sell it to china and put the cash
into Chinese banks.
And they are perpetuating the occupation by not having enough troops
so they can stay in Iraq an keep on stealing the oil forever.
The Maritine Ship movement logs will prove this.
It is an OPEN and Shut Case.
or in other words a "REAL SLAM DUNK"
Bush's Brother and Uncle have been in and out of China for years
lining up this traitorous deal.
----- Original Message -----
From: Naveed
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Greg Palast Still DOESNT GET IT !
didn't know paul bremer was a kissinger stooge.......
mann david <dmann51@yahoo.com> wrote: Read that piece in a hurry but didn't notice mention
of 9-11. Wow, pathetic trivial trip indeed.
--- JIM <justpasenthru2012@att.net> wrote:
> Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
> Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
> The Guardian - Comment
> Friday, April 14, 2006
> By Greg Palast
>
> Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the
> gaggle of generals,
> safely
> retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week,
> six of them
> have called for
> the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
>
> Well, according to my watch, they're about four
> years too late --
> and they still
> don't get it.
>
> I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
> that the
> bemedalled boys in
> crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the
> rump, in public.
> But to me, it
> just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
> straight.
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up
> in front of the
> UN and
> identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons
> labs, was it,
> General
> Powell?
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us
> our next warning
> from Saddam
> could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
> that Al Qaeda
> and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
>
> Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
> arrogance, a
> duplicitous
> chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and
> Tinker-Toy Napoleon --
> but he didn't
> appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
>
> Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of
> Defense you didn't
> read in the
> New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner,
> the man our
> president
> placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion
> viceroy.
>
> Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
> under the
> mistaken notion
> that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq,
> the President
> meant the
> Iraqis could choose their own government.
> Misunderstanding the
> President's true
> mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold
> elections within
> 90 days and
> for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the
> cities to a desert
> base. "It's
> their country," the General told me of the Iraqis.
> "And," he added,
> most
> ominously, "their oil."
>
> Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
> Garner a 101-page
> plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons
> at the State
> Department, Treasury
> and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e.
> the sale)
> of "all state
> assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting
> industries."
> The General
> knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where
> the Iraqi sun
> don't shine.
> Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting
> of Iraqi tribal
> leaders to
> plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their
> own multi-ethnic
> government --
> and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were
> on talking
> terms -- knew he
> could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a
>
> welcomed "liberation"
> turned into a hated "occupation."
>
> But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition
> government would mean
> the
> death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets
> privatization grab.
>
> On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the
> very night
> General Garner
> arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington.
> It was Rumsfeld
> on the line.
> He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack,
> Jack, you're
> fired."
>
> Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of
> on-the-ground experience
> in Iraq,
> with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director
> of Kissinger
> Associates.
> Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
> postponed
> elections for a
> year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot
> pasha, selling
> off Iraq's
> economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
> Rumsfeld's neo-con
> clique had
> desired.
>
> Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the
> six generals' call
> for
> Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
>
> For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't
> shoot straight.
> They're
> wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've
> gunned down the
> puppet instead
> of the puppeteers.
>
> There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked
> General Garner from
> Baghdad
> without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or
> breathes or spits
> in the Bush
> Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
> approval. And
> ultimately, it's
> the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
>
> Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
> give them
> enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the
> cowboy from
> Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that
> we lacked
> troops -- the
> problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy
> this nation. A
> million
> troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would
> just have more
> targets.)
>
> President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
> today on the
> intercom with
> Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up."
> And Cheney
> replies, "Hey,
> just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until
> he's taken all
> their ammo."
>
> When Bush and Cheney read about the call for
> Rumsfeld's resignation
> today, I can
> just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission
> Accomplished."
>
> Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
> choosing a target:
> It's the
> President, stupid.
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904
www.fightthenwo.org
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
---------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/312 - Release Date: 4/14/2006
SPONSORED LINKS
United state patent United state military United state coin United state grant United state citizenship Trademark united state
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904
www.fightthenwo.org
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 5
From: "scol202" yahooboxx@ntlworld.com
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:02pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
I agree with Leslie. Jews never do anything wrong, they are always
the victims. That is why Jews always violently defend other Jews no
matter the circumstances.
Let's not forget the holocaust. Everyone who says anything against
Jews supports Hitler and wants to gas all the Jews again. The Jews
were totally within their right to kill the Arabs and take their
land. Jews are white. Israel is a democracy. The British are all anti-
semitic, the Jews had to kill them too. The Jews are G-d's chosen
people. So is jerry Falwell, the Jews gave him a private jet.
It was Pilate who killed Jesus not the Jews.
--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Leslie Schwartz"
<lhs_emf@...> wrote:
>
> Bugs,
>
> Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with people who
think its all a Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
>
> Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are
deranged, I just read one of their histories, Hitler you know was a
good
> guy, Jews forced him to carry out the holocaust.
>
> Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad control the
world along with Jewish international bankers, etc.
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Jews
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Zionists
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Mossad
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Sharon
>
> Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.
>
> Just plain demented hate.
>
> _____
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 6
From: "Leslie Schwartz" lhs_emf@pacbell.net
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:24pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
I read that story a dam long before you ever posted it.
When you all use the terms Jew, Zionism, Mossad, Israel neocon interchangeably and all as one or another form of an epithet, you
discredit yourself, and further your are going to discredit the 9/11 truth movement if you keep it up and I sincerely hope that does
not happen.
Zionism has several definitions, didn't you pay attention when I told you about that? You hate Zionism that is clear and there are
forms of Zionism that are despicable, but not all forms of Zionism are despicable. You use the term as an epithet, when you use the
word it is the same as a conviction of something evil in your mind.
If Mossad was involved with the attacks you didn't prove that with your post or with anything any of you birds have referred me to.
I came to the understanding that Mossad may have been involved on my own well before I knew this list existed. They knew it was
going to happen, but that does not prove they made it happen and it sure as hell does not prove that they commandeered the CIA, M5,
etc. to make it happen - that assertion is ridiculous, and referring me to the same story I read long ago does not prove your
assertions either.
Also, as I told you before while there are Jewish neocons most neocons are not Jewish.
PNAC if you know what the acronym stands for is about making AMERICA dominant, its not about Israel no matter how much you try to
distort the facts.
The 9/11 attacks were not about aiding Israel in any way, if Israel benefited it was incidental with the plan and the intent of the
attack.
If Israel didn't exist and you all had your wish and had already killed every Jew, this attack would have still taken place because
its about dominating the middle east, its about making money off the war industry its about putting martial law into effect to make
it easier for fascists to rule. Its about raiding the US treasury. Its about no-bid oil service contracts and construction contracts
for Halliburton and Kellogg-Brown and Root, its about investment income for the Carlyle Group, its about GW Bush's lack of manhood,
the last thing on earth it is about is benefiting Jews or Israel.
_____
From: Naveed [mailto:flanker12k@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 7:50 PM
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Cc: lhs_emf@pacbell.net
Subject: RE: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
for the last time
all JEWS ARE NOT ZIONISTS!
ALL ZIONISTS ARE NOT JEWS!
There is a ZIONIST ELEMENT to the 9/11 conspiracy!!! Maybe you can't handle that............
did you even read the damn post i posted about ISRAELI spy rings awash in america? I POSTED IT TWICE.......
this below come from my friend ryan!
'A Clean Break' JINSA/PNAC Neocons associated with AIPAC espionage:
washingtonpost.com
Leak Inquiry Includes Iran Experts in Administration
By Robin Wright and Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, September 4, 2004; Page A04
FBI counterintelligence investigators have in recent weeks questioned current and former U.S. officials about whether a small group
of Iran specialists at the Pentagon and in Vice President Cheney's office may have been involved in passing classified information
to an Iraqi politician or a U.S. lobbying group allied with Israel, according to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
In their interviews, the FBI agents have also named two Israeli diplomats stationed in Washington and asked whether they would be
willing recipients of sensitive intelligence, the sources added.
The investigators have asked questions about personnel in the office of Pentagon Undersecretary for Policy Douglas J. Feith as well
as members of the influential Defense Policy Board, an advisory panel for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, according to former
U.S. officials who have been questioned and others familiar with the case.
Investigators have specifically asked about a group of neoconservatives involved in defense issues, including Feith, Deputy Defense
Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, Iraq and Iran specialist Harold Rhode and others at the Pentagon. FBI agents also have asked current
and former officials about Richard Perle of the defense board and David Wurmser, an Iran specialist and principal deputy assistant
for national security affairs in Cheney's office, according to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
"The initial interest was: Do you believe certain people would spy for Israel and pass secret information?" said one source
interviewed by the FBI about the defense officials.
It remains unclear, however, how specific investigators' suspicions have become. And one official, a Feith ally, has said the
investigation is an effort by some intelligence officials to discredit Pentagon hawks.
The sources interviewed for this article requested anonymity because it involves classified information or because of the ongoing
investigation.
Perle, Rhode and Wolfowitz did not return telephone calls placed to their homes and offices late Friday. Reached at home, Feith
declined comment, citing the ongoing investigation.
But Pentagon officials insisted yesterday that FBI questions about key policymakers did not mean they were the subjects of the
intelligence leak investigation. Senior Pentagon officials have said they were told by the FBI that the investigation is focused on
just one suspect in the Defense Department, Lawrence A. Franklin, an Iran specialist in Feith's office.
The FBI investigation first came to light last week with reports of a probe into whether Franklin passed a draft presidential
directive on Iran to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and whether the directive was then passed to Israel, sources have
said. AIPAC has strongly denied any involvement in espionage.
A federal grand jury in Alexandria may take up the Franklin case as early as next week, law enforcement sources said.
The questioning of Franklin is a recent part of an investigation that dates back more than two years and includes diverse threads,
U.S. officials and people close to the case said. One aspect of the probe concerns AIPAC and another looks at whether intelligence
on Iran ended up in the hands of Iraqi National Congress leader Ahmed Chalabi, a longtime Pentagon favorite once considered a
possible replacement for Saddam Hussein.
Iran has been a particularly controversial issue within the Bush administration, which still does not have a formal policy more than
3 1/2 years after taking office. A small group of Pentagon neoconservatives opposed a draft directive because it did not support a
change of governments in Tehran, which they advocated, current and former U.S. officials said.
The officials whose names came up during questioning have strong ties to Israel. They also share a long-standing position on Iran
and other radical regimes. Wurmser, Feith and Perle were co-authors of a 1996 policy paper for then-Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin
Netanyahu titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm." It called for removing Hussein from power in Iraq as part
of a broad strategy to transform the region and remove radical regimes.
But current and former U.S. officials, including some who were interviewed by the FBI, are still puzzled by the nature of the
investigation involving Israel, because its profoundly close ties with the United States date back six decades and have involved
sharing sensitive intelligence. Yet officials also concede that Israel is one of the three countries most active in spying on the
United States. Israel denies conducting espionage in the United States.
Also yesterday, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee demanded that a new prosecutor be assigned to investigate the
alleged leaks, questioning the "political leanings" of the U.S. attorney in Alexandria who is handling the criminal portion of the
case.
In a letter to Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) said the role of U.S. Attorney Paul J. McNulty in
the case has "obvious political implications" in an election year, and Conyers cited anonymous allegations in a news report that
McNulty had "put the brakes on" the probe.
"While I have no reason to question Mr. McNulty's integrity, he is not a career prosecutor, but instead is a political appointee
whose previous employment was principally with Republican politicians," Conyers wrote.
Conyers suggested that either a special counsel or U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald of Chicago, who is overseeing a separate probe
into the disclosure of CIA operative Valerie Plame, should take over the Pentagon probe.
Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo declined to comment on the specifics of Conyers's allegations. "We will review the
congressman's letter and give it the attention it is due," Corallo said. A spokesman for McNulty also declined comment, referring a
reporter to Corallo's statement.
Several law enforcement officials have said in recent days that the FBI had initially considered making rapid arrests in the
Franklin probe when it became clear that news of the investigation was about to become public last week. But, these officials said,
prosecutors urged caution, arguing that investigators needed more time to gather evidence and assess the case.
Franklin has been cooperating in the probe for several weeks, officials familiar with the investigation said. He has not responded
to numerous requests for comment at his office and his home in West Virginia.
All in the Neocon Family
By Jim Lobe, AlterNet
Posted on March 27, 2003, Printed on April 16, 2006
http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
What do William Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, and Robert Kagan have in common? Yes, they are all die-hard hawks who have
gained control of U.S. foreign policy since the 9/11 attacks. But they are also part of one big neoconservative family -- an
extended clan of spouses, children, and friends who have known each other for generations.
Neoconservatives are former liberals (which explains the "neo" prefix) who advocate an aggressive unilateralist vision of U.S.
global supremacy, which includes a close strategic alliance with Israel. Let's start with one of the founding fathers of the
extended neocon clan: Irving Kristol. His extensive resume includes waging culture wars for the CIA against the Soviet Union in the
early years of the Cold War and calling for an American "imperial" role during the Vietnam War. Papa Kristol, who has been credited
with defining the major themes of neoconservative thought, is married to Gertrude Himmelfarb, a neoconservative powerhouse on her
own. Her studies of the Victorian era in Britain helped inspire the men who sold Bush on the idea of "compassionate conservatism."
The son of this proud couple is none other that William Kristol, the crown prince of the neoconservative clique and editor of the
Rupert Murdoch-owned Weekly Standard. In 1997, he founded the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a front group which
cemented the powerful alliance between right-wing Republicans like Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, Christian and Catholic Right
leaders like Gary Bauer and William Bennett, and the neocons behind a platform of global U.S. military dominance.
Irving Kristol's most prominent disciple is Richard Perle, who was until Thursday the Defense Policy Board chairman, is also a
"resident scholar" at the American Enterprise Institute, which is housed in the same building as PNAC. Perle himself married into
neocon royalty when he wed the daughter of his professor at the University of Chicago, the late Alfred Wohlstetter -- the man who
helped both his son-in-law and his fellow student Paul Wolfowitz get their start in Washington more than 30 years ago.
Perle's own protege is Douglas Feith, who is now Wolfowitz's deputy for policy and is widely known for his right-wing Likud
position. And why not? His father, Philadelphia businessman and philanthropist Dalck Feith, was once a follower of the great
revisionist Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky, in his native Poland back in the 1930s. The two Feiths were honored together in
1997 by the right-wing Zionist Organization of America (ZOA).
The AEI has long been a major nexus for such inter-familial relationships. A long-time collaborator with Perle, Michael Ledeen is
married to Barbara Ledeen, a founder and director of the anti-feminist Independent Women's Forum (IWF), who is currently a major
player in the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill. Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and another neo-con power couple -- David and
Meyrav Wurmser -- co-authored a 1996 memorandum for Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu outlining how to break the Oslo peace process
and invade Iraq as the first step to transforming the Middle East.
Though she doesn't focus much on foreign-policy issues, Lynne Cheney also hangs her hat at AEI. Her husband Dick Cheney recently
chose Victoria Nuland to become his next deputy national security adviser. Nuland, as it turns out, is married to Robert Kagan, Bill
Kristol's main comrade-in-arms and the co-founder of PNAC.
Bob's father, Donald Kagan, is a Yale historian who converted from a liberal Democrat to a staunch neocon in the 1970s. On the eve
of the 2000 presidential elections, Donald and his other son, Frederick, published "While America Sleeps," a clarion call to
increase defense spending. Since then, the three Kagan men have written reams of columns warning that the currently ballooning
Pentagon budget is simply not enough to fund the much-desired vision of U.S. global supremacy.
And which infamous ex-Reaganite do the Kagans and another leading neocon family have in common? None other than Iran-contra veteran
Elliott Abrams.
Now the director of Near Eastern Affairs in Bush's National Security Council, Abrams worked closely with Bob Kagan back in the
Reagan era. He is also the son-in-law of Norman Podhoretz, long-time editor of the influential conservative Jewish publication
Commentary, and his wife, Midge Decter, a fearsome polemicist in her own right.
Podhoretz, like Kristol Sr., helped invent neo-conservatism in the late 1960s. He and Decter created a formidable political team as
leaders of the Committee on the Present Danger in 1980, when they worked with Donald Rumsfeld to pound the last nail into the coffin
of detente and promote the rise of Ronald Reagan. In addition to being Abrams' father-in-law, Norman Podhoretz is also the father of
John Podhoretz, a columnist for the Murdoch-owned New York Post and frequent guest on the Murdoch-owned Fox News channel.
As editor of Commentary, Norman offered writing space to rising stars of the neocon movement for more than 30 years. His proteges
include former U.N. ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and Richard Pipes, who was Ronald Reagan's top advisor on the "Evil Empire," as the
president liked to call the Soviet Union. His son, Daniel Pipes, has also made a career out of battling "evil," which in his case is
Islam. And to tie it all up neatly, in 2002, Podhoretz received the highest honor bestowed by the AEI: the Irving Kristol award.
This list of intricate, overlapping connections is hardly exhaustive or perhaps even surprising. But it helps reveal an important
fact. Contrary to appearances, the neocons do not constitute a powerful mass political movement. They are instead a small,
tighly-knit clan whose incestuous familial and personal connections, both within and outside the Bush administration, have allowed
them grab control of the future of American foreign policy.
© 2006 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
<http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wrh2.gif>
Home <http://whatreallyhappened.com/> : WRH Store <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/store/> : WRH Index
<http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/quickindex/> : Reader Letters <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/letters/> : Archives
<http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/archives/> : Advertise <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/advertise/> : Donate
<http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/donate/> Babel Fish Translation <http://babelfish.altavista.com/static/i/af/trans_en.gif>
On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for
US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good…….Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for
Israel)"
<http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/netanyahu.jpg>
The Five Dancing Israelis
Arrested On 9-11
As the world watched in disbelief and asked the question...
<http://www.newseum.org/frontpages/911/images/oh_abj.jpg> Click for full size image
...Mossad operatives were seen dancing with joy.
A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-11.
The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and trained them on the twin towers. (1
<http://archives.tcm.ie/breakingnews/2001/09/13/story23625.asp> )
Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the
disaster with shouts of joy and mockery. (2 <http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/01/09/WTC.html> )
"They were like happy, you know … They didn't look shocked to me" said a witness. (3
<http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0622-05.htm> )
[T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to
photograph themselves in front of the wreckage. (4 <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/arrested_israelis.html> )
Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact (5
<http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/01/12/WTC_Mysteries3.html> ). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken,
and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot. (6
<http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/03/WTC/spies10.html> )
"It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State
Park." (7 <http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/01/12/WTC_Mysteries3.html> )
One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led them to close down all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery
caller told the 9-1-1 dispatcher that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white van headed for the Holland
Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:
Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like Palestinians and going around a building.
Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the Holland tunnel, I see the guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those
sheikh uniform.
Dispatcher: He has what?
Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (8 <http://www.wnbc.com/news/1315651/detail.html> )
(*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller specifically say that these "Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that?
Palestinians usually dress in western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")
<http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/whitevan.jpg> Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-the-Lookout" alert for
a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from New Jersey. When a van fitting that exact description was stopped
just before crossing into New York, the suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the surprise of the police officers
when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!
According to ABC’s 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan
Kurzberg, told the officers:
"We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (9
<http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0622-05.htm> )
Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?
The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters
(the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the
Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (10
<http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/01/12/WTC_Mysteries3.html> )
The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the
smouldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture. (11 <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/arrested_israelis.html> )
The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the
ethnicity of the suspects was not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:
American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was
stopped on an approach ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main crossing between New
Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (12 <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/jpost.html> )
TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down with tonnes of explosives (13
<http://archives.tcm.ie/breakingnews/2001/09/12/story23429.asp> ).
What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (14 <http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0622-05.htm> ), the New York Post (15
<http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/forget.html> ), and the New Jersey Bergen Record (16
<http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/01/12/WTC_Mysteries3.html> ) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was
intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel.
But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (17 <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/forget.html> ), and Yediot
America, (18 <http://www.gothamgazette.com/citizen/jan02/7.shtml> ) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white
van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.
It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the
conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-witnesses all saw
celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in so many different locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve
Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five.
Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while the other was meant to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back
into New Jersey? If a van was to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would need to have a
"get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland
Tunnel- which was where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-Palestinian 9-1-1 "mystery caller". A classic
misdirection play.
From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving
Systems. An American employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority of his co-workers were
Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.
The employee, who declined to give his name said: "I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were
like, "Now America knows what we go through." (19 <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/sears.html> )
A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's Israeli owner, Dominick Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for
Israel. He was in such a hurry to flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left with their furniture stranded
in storage facilities (20 <http://www.state.nj.us/lps/ca/press/storage.htm> ).
It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis were in fact Mossad agents (21
<http://www.forward.com/issues/2002/02.03.15/news2.html> ). They were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released.
Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40 days. (22 <http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0622-05.htm> )
[S]everal of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home.
Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming
from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event." (23
<http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0622-05.htm> )
How did they know there would be an event to document on 9-11?
It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:
1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to celebrate the successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever
pulled off in history.
2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for
the Holland Tunnel.
3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with this phone call, the Israeli bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge
instead, where they will drop off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.
4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This
move inadvertently foils the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and 40 day torture.
5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice Department rounds up over 1000 Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in
New York area jails. The Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and media can now claim that the Israelis were
just immigration violators caught in the same dragnet as many other Arabs.
6. After several months, FBI and Justice Department "higher-ups" are able to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the
Israelis quietly.
Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9-11 attacks even though he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale.
Immediately after the Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin Laden's fingerprints all over it." (24
<http://www.billstclair.com/911timeline/2002/abcnews091402.html> )
The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the Israeli connection. Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was
filled with stories linking the attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers of every stripe spoon-fed a
gullible American public a steady diet of the most outrageous propaganda imaginable.
We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA was because he hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were
"medieval" and they wanted to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter about the Crusades, and were offended by
Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all over the place!
But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that Zionists orchestrated the
9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of denial in which he said:
"I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a
government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks
within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret
government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first
priority is Israel, not the United States." (25 <http://www.public-action.com/911/oblintrv.html> )
You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did you?
[A] number of intelligence officials have raised questions about Osama bin Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in
Afghanistan and he's running this operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't have done it alone." A senior
military officer told me that because of the visas and other documentation needed to infiltrate team members into the United States
a major foreign intelligence service might also have been involved. (26 <http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?011008fa_FACT> )
Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of the 9-11 attacks by the FBI:
USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7, 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA,
AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT
THE WORLD. (27 <http://www.fbi.gov/mostwant/topten/fugitives/laden.htm> )
To date, the only shred of “evidence” to be uncovered against bin Laden is a barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon
just happened to find "lying around" in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake. (28
<http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html> )
There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to link the Al Qaeda "terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a
mountain of evidence, both hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been very busy framing Arabs for terror plots
against America.
One final point - at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility
for the attacks (29 <http://www.rte.ie/news/features/oneyearon/timeline.html> ). This claim was immediately denied by the DFLP
leader Qais abu Leila who said it had always opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the occupied
territories." (30 <http://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/09/11/trade.centre.reaction/> )
9-11 <http://www.cnn.com/video/us/2001/09/11/brown.ensor.cnn.low.ram> CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a Palestinian claim of
responsibility
Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less than 500 people (31
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Front_for_the_Liberation_of_Palestine> ) make the suicidal move of immediately claiming
responsibility for the attacks?
Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to fulfill what the goals of the political Zionist movement have been since its origin a
century ago: to turn all of historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central tenet of the Zionist ideology is
expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people for a people without a land." (32
<http://www.workers.org/ww/2003/palestine0109.php> )
The implication of Palestinians in the 9-11 attacks would have handed Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all
Palestinians would have been labelled terrorists.
_____
"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified
information."
US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/spyring.html> .
Mossad Logo <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/mossadlogo.gif>
"By way of deception, thou shalt do war"
Motto of the Mossad
_____
See also:
Israel and 9/11 <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/israel_9-11_index.html> - Index of What Really Happened
Zionist Circles Benefit From WTC Collapse <http://www.americanfreepress.net/Censored/26_Zionist_Circles_Benefit_From.htm>
_____
<http://whatreallyhappened.com/> What Really Happened
Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@pacbell.net> wrote:
Bugs,
Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with people who think its all a Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are deranged, I just read one of their histories, Hitler you know was a good
guy, Jews forced him to carry out the holocaust.
Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad control the world along with Jewish international bankers, etc.
Etc. etc, etc.
Jews
Etc. etc, etc.
Zionists
Etc. etc, etc.
Mossad
Etc. etc, etc.
Sharon
Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.
Just plain demented hate.
_____
From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bugs
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:30 AM
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
TRY RUMSFELD FOR TREASON
The oath is to stand against all domestic and foreign enimies and
what Rumsfeld has done to the American Troops is a crime in and onto
itself.
Uraium dust has been spread all over Iraq due to the Uranium used in
Penatrator Bombs and Bullets.
Villages and the City of Fulluja have been razed to the ground.
100,000 Iraqi civillians mostly women and children have been killed
as collateral damage.
All of this has occured because Rumsfeld and Bush elected to lie the
American Soldiers into an unnecessary war.
Why did Bush and Rumsfeld do this ?
They did it to steal the Iraqi oil sell it to china and put the cash
into Chinese banks.
And they are perpetuating the occupation by not having enough troops
so they can stay in Iraq an keep on stealing the oil forever.
The Maritine Ship movement logs will prove this.
It is an OPEN and Shut Case.
or in other words a "REAL SLAM DUNK"
Bush's Brother and Uncle have been in and out of China for years
lining up this traitorous deal.
----- Original Message -----
From: Naveed <mailto:flanker12k@yahoo.com>
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Greg Palast Still DOESNT GET IT !
didn't know paul bremer was a kissinger stooge.......
mann david <dmann51@yahoo.com> wrote:
Read that piece in a hurry but didn't notice mention
of 9-11. Wow, pathetic trivial trip indeed.
--- JIM <justpasenthru2012@att.net> wrote:
> Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
> Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
> The Guardian - Comment
> Friday, April 14, 2006
> By Greg Palast
>
> Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the
> gaggle of generals,
> safely
> retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week,
> six of them
> have called for
> the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
>
> Well, according to my watch, they're about four
> years too late --
> and they still
> don't get it.
>
> I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
> that the
> bemedalled boys in
> crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the
> rump, in public.
> But to me, it
> just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
> straight.
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up
> in front of the
> UN and
> identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons
> labs, was it,
> General
> Powell?
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us
> our next warning
> from Saddam
> could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
> that Al Qaeda
> and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
>
> Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
> arrogance, a
> duplicitous
> chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and
> Tinker-Toy Napoleon --
> but he didn't
> appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
>
> Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of
> Defense you didn't
> read in the
> New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner,
> the man our
> president
> placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion
> viceroy.
>
> Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
> under the
> mistaken notion
> that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq,
> the President
> meant the
> Iraqis could choose their own government.
> Misunderstanding the
> President's true
> mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold
> elections within
> 90 days and
> for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the
> cities to a desert
> base. "It's
> their country," the General told me of the Iraqis.
> "And," he added,
> most
> ominously, "their oil."
>
> Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
> Garner a 101-page
> plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons
> at the State
> Department, Treasury
> and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e.
> the sale)
> of "all state
> assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting
> industries."
> The General
> knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where
> the Iraqi sun
> don't shine.
> Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting
> of Iraqi tribal
> leaders to
> plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their
> own multi-ethnic
> government --
> and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were
> on talking
> terms -- knew he
> could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a
>
> welcomed "liberation"
> turned into a hated "occupation."
>
> But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition
> government would mean
> the
> death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets
> privatization grab.
>
> On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the
> very night
> General Garner
> arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington.
> It was Rumsfeld
> on the line.
> He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack,
> Jack, you're
> fired."
>
> Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of
> on-the-ground experience
> in Iraq,
> with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director
> of Kissinger
> Associates.
> Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
> postponed
> elections for a
> year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot
> pasha, selling
> off Iraq's
> economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
> Rumsfeld's neo-con
> clique had
> desired.
>
> Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the
> six generals' call
> for
> Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
>
> For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't
> shoot straight.
> They're
> wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've
> gunned down the
> puppet instead
> of the puppeteers.
>
> There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked
> General Garner from
> Baghdad
> without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or
> breathes or spits
> in the Bush
> Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
> approval. And
> ultimately, it's
> the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
>
> Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
> give them
> enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the
> cowboy from
> Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that
> we lacked
> troops -- the
> problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy
> this nation. A
> million
> troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would
> just have more
> targets.)
>
> President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
> today on the
> intercom with
> Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up."
> And Cheney
> replies, "Hey,
> just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until
> he's taken all
> their ammo."
>
> When Bush and Cheney read about the call for
> Rumsfeld's resignation
> today, I can
> just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission
> Accomplished."
>
> Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
> choosing a target:
> It's the
> President, stupid.
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com <http://mail.yahoo.com/>
In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join
him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904
www.fightthenwo.org
_____
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman1/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39663/*http://voice.yahoo.com> PC-to-Phone Calls to
the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
_____
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/312 - Release Date: 4/14/2006
SPONSORED LINKS
United
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+patent&w1=United+state+patent&w2=United+state+military&w3=United+state+coin&w4=Uni
ted+state+grant&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=Trademark+united+state&c=6&s=157&.sig=Sf670PrGxy8YC2XNIdt7Iw> state patent
United
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+military&w1=United+state+patent&w2=United+state+military&w3=United+state+coin&w4=U
nited+state+grant&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=Trademark+united+state&c=6&s=157&.sig=ip3XiTzcQNsod3lpQaTGHA> state military
United
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+coin&w1=United+state+patent&w2=United+state+military&w3=United+state+coin&w4=Unite
d+state+grant&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=Trademark+united+state&c=6&s=157&.sig=Y_PxdSSryO2VI4XMZU8dXg> state coin
United
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+grant&w1=United+state+patent&w2=United+state+military&w3=United+state+coin&w4=Unit
ed+state+grant&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=Trademark+united+state&c=6&s=157&.sig=iKJISXfurUsmJlfiWCNmAA> state grant
United
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+citizenship&w1=United+state+patent&w2=United+state+military&w3=United+state+coin&w
4=United+state+grant&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=Trademark+united+state&c=6&s=157&.sig=Piq3D0C50sjkGSzIZUZQMA> state citizenship
Trademark
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Trademark+united+state&w1=United+state+patent&w2=United+state+military&w3=United+state+coin&w4=
United+state+grant&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=Trademark+united+state&c=6&s=157&.sig=TeC4c18JWNu0M_Iso-8Htw> united state
_____
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
* Visit your group "911TruthAction <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction> " on the web.
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <mailto:911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
_____
In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join
him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904
www.fightthenwo.org
_____
Yahoo! <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman3/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39666/*http://beta.messenger.yahoo.com>
Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 7
From: "Leslie Schwartz" lhs_emf@pacbell.net
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:24pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
That drew a laugh. thanks!
_____
From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of scol202
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 8:02 PM
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
I agree with Leslie. Jews never do anything wrong, they are always
the victims. That is why Jews always violently defend other Jews no
matter the circumstances.
Let's not forget the holocaust. Everyone who says anything against
Jews supports Hitler and wants to gas all the Jews again. The Jews
were totally within their right to kill the Arabs and take their
land. Jews are white. Israel is a democracy. The British are all anti-
semitic, the Jews had to kill them too. The Jews are G-d's chosen
people. So is jerry Falwell, the Jews gave him a private jet.
It was Pilate who killed Jesus not the Jews.
--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Leslie Schwartz"
<lhs_emf@...> wrote:
>
> Bugs,
>
> Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with people who
think its all a Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
>
> Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are
deranged, I just read one of their histories, Hitler you know was a
good
> guy, Jews forced him to carry out the holocaust.
>
> Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad control the
world along with Jewish international bankers, etc.
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Jews
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Zionists
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Mossad
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Sharon
>
> Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.
>
> Just plain demented hate.
>
> _____
>
>
_____
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
* Visit your group "911TruthAction <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction> " on the web.
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <mailto:911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
_____
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 8
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:32pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
There are Jews who will excuse Zionists of any crime because they are Zionists or because the crime was committed to further or protect Zionism.
My great disappointment was the Jews who attacked me because of the Pentagon evidence proving the false-flag black-op attack -- who then, after learning the truth following long and drawn out discussion on my part -- resorted to attacking my sanity and calling me an anti-Semite.
There are many many Jews, who protect the Zionist perpetrators of 9-11 -- whose loyalty to fellow Jews, even mass murders, is so great that they will defend them knowing they are wrong. They discover the true guilt of the Zionist neo-cons and Mossad yet they pretend they do not believe it -- I'd say 90 percent of Jews who are in any way involved with 9-11 discussion are at this stage. They are defending their people from justice -- all other people be damned.
I suspect Leslie Schwartz is going to be like that. I've seen too many not to think so -- and that is the extent to which I have become a collective-Jewish guilt-until-proven-innocent-on-an-individual-basis "anti-Semite" -- literally a man suspicious of Jews in general. It is unjust -- but my instinct for survival overrides my higher impulses.
Dick Eastman
----- Original Message -----
From: Naveed
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Cc: lhs_emf@pacbell.net
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 5:50 PM
Subject: RE: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
for the last time
all JEWS ARE NOT ZIONISTS!
ALL ZIONISTS ARE NOT JEWS!
There is a ZIONIST ELEMENT to the 9/11 conspiracy!!! Maybe you can't handle that............
did you even read the damn post i posted about ISRAELI spy rings awash in america? I POSTED IT TWICE.......
this below come from my friend ryan!
'A Clean Break' JINSA/PNAC Neocons associated with AIPAC espionage:
washingtonpost.com
Leak Inquiry Includes Iran Experts in Administration
By Robin Wright and Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, September 4, 2004; Page A04
FBI counterintelligence investigators have in recent weeks questioned current and former U.S. officials about whether a small group of Iran specialists at the Pentagon and in Vice President Cheney's office may have been involved in passing classified information to an Iraqi politician or a U.S. lobbying group allied with Israel, according to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
In their interviews, the FBI agents have also named two Israeli diplomats stationed in Washington and asked whether they would be willing recipients of sensitive intelligence, the sources added.
The investigators have asked questions about personnel in the office of Pentagon Undersecretary for Policy Douglas J. Feith as well as members of the influential Defense Policy Board, an advisory panel for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, according to former U.S. officials who have been questioned and others familiar with the case.
Investigators have specifically asked about a group of neoconservatives involved in defense issues, including Feith, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, Iraq and Iran specialist Harold Rhode and others at the Pentagon. FBI agents also have asked current and former officials about Richard Perle of the defense board and David Wurmser, an Iran specialist and principal deputy assistant for national security affairs in Cheney's office, according to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
"The initial interest was: Do you believe certain people would spy for Israel and pass secret information?" said one source interviewed by the FBI about the defense officials.
It remains unclear, however, how specific investigators' suspicions have become. And one official, a Feith ally, has said the investigation is an effort by some intelligence officials to discredit Pentagon hawks.
The sources interviewed for this article requested anonymity because it involves classified information or because of the ongoing investigation.
Perle, Rhode and Wolfowitz did not return telephone calls placed to their homes and offices late Friday. Reached at home, Feith declined comment, citing the ongoing investigation.
But Pentagon officials insisted yesterday that FBI questions about key policymakers did not mean they were the subjects of the intelligence leak investigation. Senior Pentagon officials have said they were told by the FBI that the investigation is focused on just one suspect in the Defense Department, Lawrence A. Franklin, an Iran specialist in Feith's office.
The FBI investigation first came to light last week with reports of a probe into whether Franklin passed a draft presidential directive on Iran to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and whether the directive was then passed to Israel, sources have said. AIPAC has strongly denied any involvement in espionage.
A federal grand jury in Alexandria may take up the Franklin case as early as next week, law enforcement sources said.
The questioning of Franklin is a recent part of an investigation that dates back more than two years and includes diverse threads, U.S. officials and people close to the case said. One aspect of the probe concerns AIPAC and another looks at whether intelligence on Iran ended up in the hands of Iraqi National Congress leader Ahmed Chalabi, a longtime Pentagon favorite once considered a possible replacement for Saddam Hussein.
Iran has been a particularly controversial issue within the Bush administration, which still does not have a formal policy more than 3 1/2 years after taking office. A small group of Pentagon neoconservatives opposed a draft directive because it did not support a change of governments in Tehran, which they advocated, current and former U.S. officials said.
The officials whose names came up during questioning have strong ties to Israel. They also share a long-standing position on Iran and other radical regimes. Wurmser, Feith and Perle were co-authors of a 1996 policy paper for then-Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm." It called for removing Hussein from power in Iraq as part of a broad strategy to transform the region and remove radical regimes.
But current and former U.S. officials, including some who were interviewed by the FBI, are still puzzled by the nature of the investigation involving Israel, because its profoundly close ties with the United States date back six decades and have involved sharing sensitive intelligence. Yet officials also concede that Israel is one of the three countries most active in spying on the United States. Israel denies conducting espionage in the United States.
Also yesterday, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee demanded that a new prosecutor be assigned to investigate the alleged leaks, questioning the "political leanings" of the U.S. attorney in Alexandria who is handling the criminal portion of the case.
In a letter to Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) said the role of U.S. Attorney Paul J. McNulty in the case has "obvious political implications" in an election year, and Conyers cited anonymous allegations in a news report that McNulty had "put the brakes on" the probe.
"While I have no reason to question Mr. McNulty's integrity, he is not a career prosecutor, but instead is a political appointee whose previous employment was principally with Republican politicians," Conyers wrote.
Conyers suggested that either a special counsel or U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald of Chicago, who is overseeing a separate probe into the disclosure of CIA operative Valerie Plame, should take over the Pentagon probe.
Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo declined to comment on the specifics of Conyers's allegations. "We will review the congressman's letter and give it the attention it is due," Corallo said. A spokesman for McNulty also declined comment, referring a reporter to Corallo's statement.
Several law enforcement officials have said in recent days that the FBI had initially considered making rapid arrests in the Franklin probe when it became clear that news of the investigation was about to become public last week. But, these officials said, prosecutors urged caution, arguing that investigators needed more time to gather evidence and assess the case.
Franklin has been cooperating in the probe for several weeks, officials familiar with the investigation said. He has not responded to numerous requests for comment at his office and his home in West Virginia.
All in the Neocon Family
By Jim Lobe, AlterNet
Posted on March 27, 2003, Printed on April 16, 2006
http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
What do William Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, and Robert Kagan have in common? Yes, they are all die-hard hawks who have gained control of U.S. foreign policy since the 9/11 attacks. But they are also part of one big neoconservative family -- an extended clan of spouses, children, and friends who have known each other for generations.
Neoconservatives are former liberals (which explains the "neo" prefix) who advocate an aggressive unilateralist vision of U.S. global supremacy, which includes a close strategic alliance with Israel. Let's start with one of the founding fathers of the extended neocon clan: Irving Kristol. His extensive resume includes waging culture wars for the CIA against the Soviet Union in the early years of the Cold War and calling for an American "imperial" role during the Vietnam War. Papa Kristol, who has been credited with defining the major themes of neoconservative thought, is married to Gertrude Himmelfarb, a neoconservative powerhouse on her own. Her studies of the Victorian era in Britain helped inspire the men who sold Bush on the idea of "compassionate conservatism."
The son of this proud couple is none other that William Kristol, the crown prince of the neoconservative clique and editor of the Rupert Murdoch-owned Weekly Standard. In 1997, he founded the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a front group which cemented the powerful alliance between right-wing Republicans like Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, Christian and Catholic Right leaders like Gary Bauer and William Bennett, and the neocons behind a platform of global U.S. military dominance.
Irving Kristol's most prominent disciple is Richard Perle, who was until Thursday the Defense Policy Board chairman, is also a "resident scholar" at the American Enterprise Institute, which is housed in the same building as PNAC. Perle himself married into neocon royalty when he wed the daughter of his professor at the University of Chicago, the late Alfred Wohlstetter -- the man who helped both his son-in-law and his fellow student Paul Wolfowitz get their start in Washington more than 30 years ago.
Perle's own protege is Douglas Feith, who is now Wolfowitz's deputy for policy and is widely known for his right-wing Likud position. And why not? His father, Philadelphia businessman and philanthropist Dalck Feith, was once a follower of the great revisionist Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky, in his native Poland back in the 1930s. The two Feiths were honored together in 1997 by the right-wing Zionist Organization of America (ZOA).
The AEI has long been a major nexus for such inter-familial relationships. A long-time collaborator with Perle, Michael Ledeen is married to Barbara Ledeen, a founder and director of the anti-feminist Independent Women's Forum (IWF), who is currently a major player in the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill. Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and another neo-con power couple -- David and Meyrav Wurmser -- co-authored a 1996 memorandum for Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu outlining how to break the Oslo peace process and invade Iraq as the first step to transforming the Middle East.
Though she doesn't focus much on foreign-policy issues, Lynne Cheney also hangs her hat at AEI. Her husband Dick Cheney recently chose Victoria Nuland to become his next deputy national security adviser. Nuland, as it turns out, is married to Robert Kagan, Bill Kristol's main comrade-in-arms and the co-founder of PNAC.
Bob's father, Donald Kagan, is a Yale historian who converted from a liberal Democrat to a staunch neocon in the 1970s. On the eve of the 2000 presidential elections, Donald and his other son, Frederick, published "While America Sleeps," a clarion call to increase defense spending. Since then, the three Kagan men have written reams of columns warning that the currently ballooning Pentagon budget is simply not enough to fund the much-desired vision of U.S. global supremacy.
And which infamous ex-Reaganite do the Kagans and another leading neocon family have in common? None other than Iran-contra veteran Elliott Abrams.
Now the director of Near Eastern Affairs in Bush's National Security Council, Abrams worked closely with Bob Kagan back in the Reagan era. He is also the son-in-law of Norman Podhoretz, long-time editor of the influential conservative Jewish publication Commentary, and his wife, Midge Decter, a fearsome polemicist in her own right.
Podhoretz, like Kristol Sr., helped invent neo-conservatism in the late 1960s. He and Decter created a formidable political team as leaders of the Committee on the Present Danger in 1980, when they worked with Donald Rumsfeld to pound the last nail into the coffin of detente and promote the rise of Ronald Reagan. In addition to being Abrams' father-in-law, Norman Podhoretz is also the father of John Podhoretz, a columnist for the Murdoch-owned New York Post and frequent guest on the Murdoch-owned Fox News channel.
As editor of Commentary, Norman offered writing space to rising stars of the neocon movement for more than 30 years. His proteges include former U.N. ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and Richard Pipes, who was Ronald Reagan's top advisor on the "Evil Empire," as the president liked to call the Soviet Union. His son, Daniel Pipes, has also made a career out of battling "evil," which in his case is Islam. And to tie it all up neatly, in 2002, Podhoretz received the highest honor bestowed by the AEI: the Irving Kristol award.
This list of intricate, overlapping connections is hardly exhaustive or perhaps even surprising. But it helps reveal an important fact. Contrary to appearances, the neocons do not constitute a powerful mass political movement. They are instead a small, tighly-knit clan whose incestuous familial and personal connections, both within and outside the Bush administration, have allowed them grab control of the future of American foreign policy.
© 2006 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
Home : WRH Store : WRH Index : Reader Letters : Archives : Advertise : Donate
On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good...Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)"
The Five Dancing Israelis
Arrested On 9-11
As the world watched in disbelief and asked the question...
...Mossad operatives were seen dancing with joy.
A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-11.
The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and trained them on the twin towers. (1)
Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery. (2)
"They were like happy, you know . They didn't look shocked to me" said a witness. (3)
[T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in front of the wreckage. (4)
Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot. (6)
"It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (7)
One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led them to close down all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the 9-1-1 dispatcher that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:
Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like Palestinians and going around a building.
Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the Holland tunnel, I see the guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.
Dispatcher: He has what?
Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (8)
(*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller specifically say that these "Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians usually dress in western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")
Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-the-Lookout" alert for a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from New Jersey. When a van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing into New York, the suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the surprise of the police officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!
According to ABC's 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers:
"We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (9)
Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?
The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (10)
The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture. (11)
The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:
American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (12)
TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down with tonnes of explosives (13).
What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (14), the New York Post (15), and the New Jersey Bergen Record (16) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel.
But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (17), and Yediot America, (18) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.
It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in so many different locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five.
Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while the other was meant to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New Jersey? If a van was to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland Tunnel- which was where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-Palestinian 9-1-1 "mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.
From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.
The employee, who declined to give his name said: "I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were like, "Now America knows what we go through." (19)
A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's Israeli owner, Dominick Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was in such a hurry to flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left with their furniture stranded in storage facilities (20).
It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis were in fact Mossad agents (21). They were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released. Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40 days. (22)
[S]everal of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home.
Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event." (23)
How did they know there would be an event to document on 9-11?
It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:
1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to celebrate the successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled off in history.
2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel.
3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with this phone call, the Israeli bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where they will drop off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.
4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move inadvertently foils the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and 40 day torture.
5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice Department rounds up over 1000 Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York area jails. The Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and media can now claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in the same dragnet as many other Arabs.
6. After several months, FBI and Justice Department "higher-ups" are able to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis quietly.
Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9-11 attacks even though he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale. Immediately after the Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin Laden's fingerprints all over it." (24)
The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the Israeli connection. Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with stories linking the attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers of every stripe spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most outrageous propaganda imaginable.
We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA was because he hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval" and they wanted to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter about the Crusades, and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all over the place!
But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that Zionists orchestrated the
9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of denial in which he said:
"I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States." (25)
You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did you?
[A] number of intelligence officials have raised questions about Osama bin Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he's running this operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't have done it alone." A senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other documentation needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major foreign intelligence service might also have been involved. (26)
Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of the 9-11 attacks by the FBI:
USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7, 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA, AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD. (27)
To date, the only shred of "evidence" to be uncovered against bin Laden is a barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened to find "lying around" in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake. (28)
There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to link the Al Qaeda "terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a mountain of evidence, both hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been very busy framing Arabs for terror plots against America.
One final point - at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the attacks (29). This claim was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said it had always opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the occupied territories." (30)
9-11 CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a Palestinian claim of responsibility
Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less than 500 people (31) make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for the attacks?
Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to fulfill what the goals of the political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century ago: to turn all of historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central tenet of the Zionist ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people for a people without a land." (32)
The implication of Palestinians in the 9-11 attacks would have handed Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all Palestinians would have been labelled terrorists.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."
US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring.
"By way of deception, thou shalt do war"
Motto of the Mossad
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
Israel and 9/11 - Index of What Really Happened
Zionist Circles Benefit From WTC Collapse
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Really Happened
Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@pacbell.net> wrote:
Bugs,
Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with people who think its all a Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are deranged, I just read one of their histories, Hitler you know was a good guy, Jews forced him to carry out the holocaust.
Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad control the world along with Jewish international bankers, etc.
Etc. etc, etc.
Jews
Etc. etc, etc.
Zionists
Etc. etc, etc.
Mossad
Etc. etc, etc.
Sharon
Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.
Just plain demented hate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bugs
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:30 AM
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
TRY RUMSFELD FOR TREASON
The oath is to stand against all domestic and foreign enimies and
what Rumsfeld has done to the American Troops is a crime in and onto
itself.
Uraium dust has been spread all over Iraq due to the Uranium used in
Penatrator Bombs and Bullets.
Villages and the City of Fulluja have been razed to the ground.
100,000 Iraqi civillians mostly women and children have been killed
as collateral damage.
All of this has occured because Rumsfeld and Bush elected to lie the
American Soldiers into an unnecessary war.
Why did Bush and Rumsfeld do this ?
They did it to steal the Iraqi oil sell it to china and put the cash
into Chinese banks.
And they are perpetuating the occupation by not having enough troops
so they can stay in Iraq an keep on stealing the oil forever.
The Maritine Ship movement logs will prove this.
It is an OPEN and Shut Case.
or in other words a "REAL SLAM DUNK"
Bush's Brother and Uncle have been in and out of China for years
lining up this traitorous deal.
----- Original Message -----
From: Naveed
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Greg Palast Still DOESNT GET IT !
didn't know paul bremer was a kissinger stooge.......
mann david <dmann51@yahoo.com> wrote:
Read that piece in a hurry but didn't notice mention
of 9-11. Wow, pathetic trivial trip indeed.
--- JIM <justpasenthru2012@att.net> wrote:
> Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
> Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
> The Guardian - Comment
> Friday, April 14, 2006
> By Greg Palast
>
> Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the
> gaggle of generals,
> safely
> retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week,
> six of them
> have called for
> the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
>
> Well, according to my watch, they're about four
> years too late --
> and they still
> don't get it.
>
> I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
> that the
> bemedalled boys in
> crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the
> rump, in public.
> But to me, it
> just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
> straight.
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up
> in front of the
> UN and
> identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons
> labs, was it,
> General
> Powell?
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us
> our next warning
> from Saddam
> could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
> that Al Qaeda
> and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
>
> Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
> arrogance, a
> duplicitous
> chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and
> Tinker-Toy Napoleon --
> but he didn't
> appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
>
> Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of
> Defense you didn't
> read in the
> New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner,
> the man our
> president
> placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion
> viceroy.
>
> Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
> under the
> mistaken notion
> that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq,
> the President
> meant the
> Iraqis could choose their own government.
> Misunderstanding the
> President's true
> mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold
> elections within
> 90 days and
> for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the
> cities to a desert
> base. "It's
> their country," the General told me of the Iraqis.
> "And," he added,
> most
> ominously, "their oil."
>
> Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
> Garner a 101-page
> plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons
> at the State
> Department, Treasury
> and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e.
> the sale)
> of "all state
> assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting
> industries."
> The General
> knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where
> the Iraqi sun
> don't shine.
> Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting
> of Iraqi tribal
> leaders to
> plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their
> own multi-ethnic
> government --
> and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were
> on talking
> terms -- knew he
> could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a
>
> welcomed "liberation"
> turned into a hated "occupation."
>
> But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition
> government would mean
> the
> death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets
> privatization grab.
>
> On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the
> very night
> General Garner
> arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington.
> It was Rumsfeld
> on the line.
> He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack,
> Jack, you're
> fired."
>
> Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of
> on-the-ground experience
> in Iraq,
> with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director
> of Kissinger
> Associates.
> Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
> postponed
> elections for a
> year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot
> pasha, selling
> off Iraq's
> economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
> Rumsfeld's neo-con
> clique had
> desired.
>
> Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the
> six generals' call
> for
> Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
>
> For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't
> shoot straight.
> They're
> wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've
> gunned down the
> puppet instead
> of the puppeteers.
>
> There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked
> General Garner from
> Baghdad
> without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or
> breathes or spits
> in the Bush
> Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
> approval. And
> ultimately, it's
> the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
>
> Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
> give them
> enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the
> cowboy from
> Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that
> we lacked
> troops -- the
> problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy
> this nation. A
> million
> troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would
> just have more
> targets.)
>
> President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
> today on the
> intercom with
> Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up."
> And Cheney
> replies, "Hey,
> just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until
> he's taken all
> their ammo."
>
> When Bush and Cheney read about the call for
> Rumsfeld's resignation
> today, I can
> just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission
> Accomplished."
>
> Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
> choosing a target:
> It's the
> President, stupid.
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904
www.fightthenwo.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/312 - Release Date: 4/14/2006
In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904
www.fightthenwo.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.
SPONSORED LINKS United state government grant United state coin United state patent
United state flag United state army United state grant
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
a.. Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 9
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:38pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: 9/11 - Why didn't they show us the wreckage?????
Why didn't they show us the wreckage, but also why didn't they show us the
security camera recordings from the other cameras on Pentagon property as
well as from cameras at the Citgo gas station and the Sheraton hotel?
One point where I disagree. There is division on what the killer jet
as -- but there is no disagreement on the fact that the Boeing did not
crash there. People tend to ignore the vast common ground -- ample evidence
for any impartial grand jury -- of what is proven -- while having different
theories in what the smaller aircraft might have been.
And of course those who say there were no airplanes at all at the WTC are
disinformationalists or groupie pinheads and nothing else.
Go with the Pentagon evidence.
http://bedoper.com/eastman and the many other Pentagon hard-evidence sites.
----- Original Message -----
From: "reggie501" <reggie501@optonline.net>
To: <911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 5:24 PM
Subject: [911TruthAction] 9/11 - Why didn't they show us the wreckage?????
> The 9/11 Pentagon Attack: Planes Simply Do Not Vaporize - Why Didn't
> They Show Us the Wreckage?
>
> As each day passes, more and more Americans are becoming aware of the
> startling evidence that clearly contradicts the official explanation
> of Sept.11th, 2001 offered by the Bush administration. In fact, as
> more and more evidence comes to light, incongruities in the official
> explanation become increasingly and undeniably apparent.
>
> Ironically, the growing number of people new to these unexplained
> discrepancies poses a new problem for those of us who have been
> researching 9/11 for many months or years. We will have to find a way
> to explain the many complexities related to the attacks to those who
> now doubt the official version of events. We are faced with the
> overwhelming task helping great numbers of people understand the many
> contradictions in the 9/11 story they were fed by their government.
>
> Obviously, that is not an easy assignment, even when the great
> majority of truth seekers agree that the official explanation is
> little more than a pre-written cover story designed to herd the
> American public into supporting an agenda that would otherwise horrify
> and outrage them. However, it becomes far more complicated in light of
> a topic that causes a great deal of confusion within the research
> community itself. That disparity relates to the strike on the Pentagon.
>
> Many questions still remain about what actually took place at the
> Pentagon on September 11th 2001. That's fine, because the goal of the
> 9/11 truth community is to raise these questions for further
> investigation. The problem arises when researchers feel that it is
> their responsibility to explain what happened at the Pentagon. It is
> NOT. Rather, it is their charge to highlight the doubts that have
> been legitimately raised regarding what exactly hit that building.
>
> Some researchers claim that a 110,000 ton Boeing 757 hit the building,
> leaving only a 16 foot hole in the facade (prior to its collapse some
> 22 minutes after the initial impact.) Others claim that an A-3
> Skywarrior fighter jet was the actual aircraft. Some say it was an
> unmanned Global Hawk armed with depleted uranium missiles, and still
> others claim that the Pentagon was hit by another type of military
> missile. We can argue each of these theories forever, and accomplish
> absolutely nothing.
>
> We really have to put and end the internal dispute that is getting us
> nowhere and work together to bring information rather than more
> uncertainty to the public that is now just entering the 9/11
> discussion. To that end, I am posing ONE pertinent question about the
> strike on the Pentagon: Why didn't they show us the wreckage?
>
> Planes do not simply vaporize. Never in the history of aviation
> disasters has an aircraft ever totally disintegrated. Even exploding
> space shuttles did not vanish into thin air. Therefore, it stands to
> reason that whatever hit the Pentagon had to leave some recoverable
> debris in its wake. Surely, there had be enough identifiable rubble
> remaining from a 110,000 ton aircraft to satisfy the skeptics?
>
> Read the full blog here:
> http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=355
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 10
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 7:02pm(PDT)
Subject: Leslie Schwartz -- the 9-11-investigator-basher -- a jewish suprem
Leslie knows now -- yet she attacks the 9-11 investigators anyway
From: Leslie Schwartz
When you all use the terms Jew, Zionism, Mossad, Israel neocon interchangeably and all as one or another form of an epithet, you discredit yourself, and further your are going to discredit the 9/11 truth movement if you keep it up and I sincerely hope that does not happen.
...
its about GW Bush's lack of manhood, the last thing on earth it is about is benefiting Jews or Israel.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 11
From: "kenny318east3" kenny318east3@yahoo.com
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:22pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@...> wrote:
<< There are many many Jews, who protect the Zionist perpetrators of 9-11 --
whose loyalty to fellow Jews, even mass murders, is so great that they will defend
them knowing they are wrong. They discover the true guilt of the Zionist neo-cons
and Mossad yet they pretend they do not believe it -- I'd say 90 percent of Jews who
are in any way involved with 9-11 discussion are at this stage. They are defending
their people from justice -- all other people be damned. >>
it doesn't matter how much I am horrified by the behavior of Israel, I am still
a Jew.
Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to oust these
criminal Zionists from our midst.
Israeli refusnik soldiers are just the tip of the iceberg.
The Arabs are human beings and they deserve to be treated as such.
Ken, the grandson of Samuel and Charlotte Goncharow. I am a former student
at the Flatbush Jewish Center on Church Avenue and Ocean Parkway, and I was
a recipient of the book "Vocabulary of Jewish Life," by Rabbi Abraham M. Heller.
> > I suspect Leslie Schwartz is going to be like that. I've seen too many not to think
so -- and that is the extent to which I have become a collective-Jewish guilt-until-
proven-innocent-on-an-individual-basis "anti-Semite" -- literally a man suspicious
of Jews in general. It is unjust -- but my instinct for survival overrides my higher
impulses.
>
> Dick Eastman
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Naveed
> To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: lhs_emf@...
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 5:50 PM
> Subject: RE: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
>
>
> for the last time
>
> all JEWS ARE NOT ZIONISTS!
>
> ALL ZIONISTS ARE NOT JEWS!
>
> There is a ZIONIST ELEMENT to the 9/11 conspiracy!!! Maybe you can't handle
that............
> did you even read the damn post i posted about ISRAELI spy rings awash in
america? I POSTED IT TWICE.......
>
> this below come from my friend ryan!
>
> 'A Clean Break' JINSA/PNAC Neocons associated with AIPAC espionage:
>
> washingtonpost.com
> Leak Inquiry Includes Iran Experts in Administration
>
> By Robin Wright and Dan Eggen
> Washington Post Staff Writers
> Saturday, September 4, 2004; Page A04
>
>
> FBI counterintelligence investigators have in recent weeks questioned current and
former U.S. officials about whether a small group of Iran specialists at the Pentagon
and in Vice President Cheney's office may have been involved in passing classified
information to an Iraqi politician or a U.S. lobbying group allied with Israel, according
to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
>
> In their interviews, the FBI agents have also named two Israeli diplomats stationed
in Washington and asked whether they would be willing recipients of sensitive
intelligence, the sources added.
>
> The investigators have asked questions about personnel in the office of Pentagon
Undersecretary for Policy Douglas J. Feith as well as members of the influential
Defense Policy Board, an advisory panel for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld,
according to former U.S. officials who have been questioned and others familiar with
the case.
>
> Investigators have specifically asked about a group of neoconservatives involved
in defense issues, including Feith, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, Iraq
and Iran specialist Harold Rhode and others at the Pentagon. FBI agents also have
asked current and former officials about Richard Perle of the defense board and David
Wurmser, an Iran specialist and principal deputy assistant for national security affairs
in Cheney's office, according to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
>
> "The initial interest was: Do you believe certain people would spy for Israel and
pass secret information?" said one source interviewed by the FBI about the defense
officials.
>
> It remains unclear, however, how specific investigators' suspicions have become.
And one official, a Feith ally, has said the investigation is an effort by some
intelligence officials to discredit Pentagon hawks.
>
> The sources interviewed for this article requested anonymity because it involves
classified information or because of the ongoing investigation.
>
> Perle, Rhode and Wolfowitz did not return telephone calls placed to their homes
and offices late Friday. Reached at home, Feith declined comment, citing the ongoing
investigation.
>
> But Pentagon officials insisted yesterday that FBI questions about key
policymakers did not mean they were the subjects of the intelligence leak
investigation. Senior Pentagon officials have said they were told by the FBI that the
investigation is focused on just one suspect in the Defense Department, Lawrence A.
Franklin, an Iran specialist in Feith's office.
>
> The FBI investigation first came to light last week with reports of a probe into
whether Franklin passed a draft presidential directive on Iran to the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee, and whether the directive was then passed to Israel,
sources have said. AIPAC has strongly denied any involvement in espionage.
>
> A federal grand jury in Alexandria may take up the Franklin case as early as next
week, law enforcement sources said.
>
> The questioning of Franklin is a recent part of an investigation that dates back
more than two years and includes diverse threads, U.S. officials and people close to
the case said. One aspect of the probe concerns AIPAC and another looks at whether
intelligence on Iran ended up in the hands of Iraqi National Congress leader Ahmed
Chalabi, a longtime Pentagon favorite once considered a possible replacement for
Saddam Hussein.
>
> Iran has been a particularly controversial issue within the Bush administration,
which still does not have a formal policy more than 3 1/2 years after taking office. A
small group of Pentagon neoconservatives opposed a draft directive because it did
not support a change of governments in Tehran, which they advocated, current and
former U.S. officials said.
>
> The officials whose names came up during questioning have strong ties to Israel.
They also share a long-standing position on Iran and other radical regimes. Wurmser,
Feith and Perle were co-authors of a 1996 policy paper for then-Israeli Prime Minister
Binyamin Netanyahu titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm." It
called for removing Hussein from power in Iraq as part of a broad strategy to
transform the region and remove radical regimes.
>
> But current and former U.S. officials, including some who were interviewed by the
FBI, are still puzzled by the nature of the investigation involving Israel, because its
profoundly close ties with the United States date back six decades and have involved
sharing sensitive intelligence. Yet officials also concede that Israel is one of the three
countries most active in spying on the United States. Israel denies conducting
espionage in the United States.
>
> Also yesterday, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee
demanded that a new prosecutor be assigned to investigate the alleged leaks,
questioning the "political leanings" of the U.S. attorney in Alexandria who is handling
the criminal portion of the case.
>
> In a letter to Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.)
said the role of U.S. Attorney Paul J. McNulty in the case has "obvious political
implications" in an election year, and Conyers cited anonymous allegations in a news
report that McNulty had "put the brakes on" the probe.
>
> "While I have no reason to question Mr. McNulty's integrity, he is not a career
prosecutor, but instead is a political appointee whose previous employment was
principally with Republican politicians," Conyers wrote.
>
> Conyers suggested that either a special counsel or U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald
of Chicago, who is overseeing a separate probe into the disclosure of CIA operative
Valerie Plame, should take over the Pentagon probe.
>
> Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo declined to comment on the specifics
of Conyers's allegations. "We will review the congressman's letter and give it the
attention it is due," Corallo said. A spokesman for McNulty also declined comment,
referring a reporter to Corallo's statement.
>
> Several law enforcement officials have said in recent days that the FBI had initially
considered making rapid arrests in the Franklin probe when it became clear that news
of the investigation was about to become public last week. But, these officials said,
prosecutors urged caution, arguing that investigators needed more time to gather
evidence and assess the case.
>
> Franklin has been cooperating in the probe for several weeks, officials familiar
with the investigation said. He has not responded to numerous requests for comment
at his office and his home in West Virginia.
>
>
>
> All in the Neocon Family
> By Jim Lobe, AlterNet
> Posted on March 27, 2003, Printed on April 16, 2006
> http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
> What do William Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, and Robert Kagan have
in common? Yes, they are all die-hard hawks who have gained control of U.S. foreign
policy since the 9/11 attacks. But they are also part of one big neoconservative family
-- an extended clan of spouses, children, and friends who have known each other for
generations.
> Neoconservatives are former liberals (which explains the "neo" prefix) who
advocate an aggressive unilateralist vision of U.S. global supremacy, which includes a
close strategic alliance with Israel. Let's start with one of the founding fathers of the
extended neocon clan: Irving Kristol. His extensive resume includes waging culture
wars for the CIA against the Soviet Union in the early years of the Cold War and
calling for an American "imperial" role during the Vietnam War. Papa Kristol, who has
been credited with defining the major themes of neoconservative thought, is married
to Gertrude Himmelfarb, a neoconservative powerhouse on her own. Her studies of
the Victorian era in Britain helped inspire the men who sold Bush on the idea of
"compassionate conservatism."
> The son of this proud couple is none other that William Kristol, the crown prince
of the neoconservative clique and editor of the Rupert Murdoch-owned Weekly
Standard. In 1997, he founded the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a
front group which cemented the powerful alliance between right-wing Republicans
like Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, Christian and Catholic Right leaders like Gary
Bauer and William Bennett, and the neocons behind a platform of global U.S. military
dominance.
> Irving Kristol's most prominent disciple is Richard Perle, who was until Thursday
the Defense Policy Board chairman, is also a "resident scholar" at the American
Enterprise Institute, which is housed in the same building as PNAC. Perle himself
married into neocon royalty when he wed the daughter of his professor at the
University of Chicago, the late Alfred Wohlstetter -- the man who helped both his
son-in-law and his fellow student Paul Wolfowitz get their start in Washington more
than 30 years ago.
> Perle's own protege is Douglas Feith, who is now Wolfowitz's deputy for policy and
is widely known for his right-wing Likud position. And why not? His father,
Philadelphia businessman and philanthropist Dalck Feith, was once a follower of the
great revisionist Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky, in his native Poland back in the
1930s. The two Feiths were honored together in 1997 by the right-wing Zionist
Organization of America (ZOA).
> The AEI has long been a major nexus for such inter-familial relationships. A long-
time collaborator with Perle, Michael Ledeen is married to Barbara Ledeen, a founder
and director of the anti-feminist Independent Women's Forum (IWF), who is currently
a major player in the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill. Richard Perle, Douglas
Feith, and another neo-con power couple -- David and Meyrav Wurmser -- co-
authored a 1996 memorandum for Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu outlining how to
break the Oslo peace process and invade Iraq as the first step to transforming the
Middle East.
> Though she doesn't focus much on foreign-policy issues, Lynne Cheney also
hangs her hat at AEI. Her husband Dick Cheney recently chose Victoria Nuland to
become his next deputy national security adviser. Nuland, as it turns out, is married
to Robert Kagan, Bill Kristol's main comrade-in-arms and the co-founder of PNAC.
> Bob's father, Donald Kagan, is a Yale historian who converted from a liberal
Democrat to a staunch neocon in the 1970s. On the eve of the 2000 presidential
elections, Donald and his other son, Frederick, published "While America Sleeps," a
clarion call to increase defense spending. Since then, the three Kagan men have
written reams of columns warning that the currently ballooning Pentagon budget is
simply not enough to fund the much-desired vision of U.S. global supremacy.
> And which infamous ex-Reaganite do the Kagans and another leading neocon
family have in common? None other than Iran-contra veteran Elliott Abrams.
> Now the director of Near Eastern Affairs in Bush's National Security Council,
Abrams worked closely with Bob Kagan back in the Reagan era. He is also the son-in-
law of Norman Podhoretz, long-time editor of the influential conservative Jewish
publication Commentary, and his wife, Midge Decter, a fearsome polemicist in her
own right.
> Podhoretz, like Kristol Sr., helped invent neo-conservatism in the late 1960s. He
and Decter created a formidable political team as leaders of the Committee on the
Present Danger in 1980, when they worked with Donald Rumsfeld to pound the last
nail into the coffin of detente and promote the rise of Ronald Reagan. In addition to
being Abrams' father-in-law, Norman Podhoretz is also the father of John Podhoretz,
a columnist for the Murdoch-owned New York Post and frequent guest on the
Murdoch-owned Fox News channel.
> As editor of Commentary, Norman offered writing space to rising stars of the
neocon movement for more than 30 years. His proteges include former U.N.
ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and Richard Pipes, who was Ronald Reagan's top
advisor on the "Evil Empire," as the president liked to call the Soviet Union. His son,
Daniel Pipes, has also made a career out of battling "evil," which in his case is Islam.
And to tie it all up neatly, in 2002, Podhoretz received the highest honor bestowed by
the AEI: the Irving Kristol award.
> This list of intricate, overlapping connections is hardly exhaustive or perhaps even
surprising. But it helps reveal an important fact. Contrary to appearances, the
neocons do not constitute a powerful mass political movement. They are instead a
small, tighly-knit clan whose incestuous familial and personal connections, both
within and outside the Bush administration, have allowed them grab control of the
future of American foreign policy.
> © 2006 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
> View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
>
>
> Home : WRH Store : WRH Index : Reader Letters : Archives : Advertise : Donate
>
> On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick
reply was: "It's very good...Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate
sympathy (for Israel)"
>
>
>
> The Five Dancing Israelis
> Arrested On 9-11
>
>
>
>
> As the world watched in disbelief and asked the question...
>
> ...Mossad operatives were seen dancing with joy.
>
>
>
> A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-
11.
> The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and trained them on the
twin towers. (1)
>
> Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming
"middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of
joy and mockery. (2)
> "They were like happy, you know . They didn't look shocked to me" said a
witness. (3)
> [T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the
World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in
front of the wreckage. (4)
>
> Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial
impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken,
and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City
parking lot. (6)
>
> "It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what
was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (7)
>
> One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led them to close down
all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the 9-1-1 dispatcher
that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white van headed for the
Holland Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:
> Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
> Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like
Palestinians and going around a building.
> Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the Holland tunnel, I see the guy
by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.
> Dispatcher: He has what?
> Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (8)
>
> (*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller specifically say that these
"Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians usually dress in
western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")
>
> Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-the-Lookout" alert for
a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from New Jersey. When a
van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing into New York, the
suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the surprise of the police
officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!
> According to ABC's 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis
was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers:
>
> "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our
problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (9)
>
> Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?
> The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps
of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the
hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports.
Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van
and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (10)
> The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan
Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering ruins in an apparently
celebratory gesture. (11)
>
> The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped
as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was
not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:
> American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George
Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach
ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main
crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (12)
>
> TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down with tonnes of
explosives (13).
> What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (14), the New York Post (15), and
the New Jersey Bergen Record (16) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a
white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly
to the Lincoln Tunnel.
> But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (17), and Yediot
America, (18) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with
Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is
several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.
> It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one
stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to
the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-
witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in so many different
locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5
Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the
total to five.
> Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while the other was meant
to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New Jersey? If a van was
to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would
need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van
(or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland Tunnel- which was
where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-Palestinian 9-1-1
"mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.
>
> From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked
for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American
employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority
of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.
> The employee, who declined to give his name said: "I was in tears. These
guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were like, "Now America knows
what we go through." (19)
>
> A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's Israeli owner, Dominick
Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was in such a hurry to
flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left with their
furniture stranded in storage facilities (20).
> It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis were in fact Mossad
agents (21). They were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released.
Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40 days. (22)
> [S]everal of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an
Israeli talk show after their return home.
> Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the
morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that
experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event." (23)
>
> How did they know there would be an event to document on 9-11?
> It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli
Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:
> 1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to celebrate the
successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled off in history.
> 2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to
report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel.
> 3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with this phone call, the Israeli
bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where they will drop
off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.
> 4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL
bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move inadvertently foils
the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and 40 day torture.
> 5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice Department rounds up over 1000
Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York area jails. The
Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and media can now
claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in the same dragnet as
many other Arabs.
> 6. After several months, FBI and Justice Department "higher-ups" are able
to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis quietly.
>
> Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9-11 attacks even though
he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale. Immediately after the
Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
> CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin Laden's fingerprints all
over it." (24)
> The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the Israeli connection.
Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with stories linking the
attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers of every stripe
spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most outrageous
propaganda imaginable.
> We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA was because he
hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval" and they wanted
to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter about the Crusades,
and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all over the place!
> But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that
Zionists orchestrated the
> 9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of denial in which he
said:
> "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor
did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government
within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of
these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a
century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be
asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control
of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States." (25)
>
> You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did you?
> [A] number of intelligence officials have raised questions about Osama bin
Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he's running this
operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't have done it alone." A
senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other documentation
needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major foreign intelligence
service might also have been involved. (26)
>
> Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of the 9-11 attacks by the FBI:
> USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7,
1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA,
AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN
LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD. (27)
>
> To date, the only shred of "evidence" to be uncovered against bin Laden is a
barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened to find "lying
around" in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake. (28)
> There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to link the Al Qaeda
"terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a mountain of evidence, both
hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been very busy framing
Arabs for terror plots against America.
>
> One final point - at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that the Democratic Front
for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the attacks (29). This claim
was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said it had always
opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the occupied
territories." (30)
> 9-11 CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a Palestinian claim of
responsibility
>
> Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less than 500 people (31)
make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for the attacks?
> Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to fulfill what the goals of the
political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century ago: to turn all of
historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central tenet of the Zionist
ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people for a people
without a land." (32)
>
> The implication of Palestinians in the 9-11 attacks would have handed
Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all Palestinians would
have been labelled terrorists.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
> "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about
evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."
> US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring.
> "By way of deception, thou shalt do war"
> Motto of the Mossad
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
> See also:
> Israel and 9/11 - Index of What Really Happened
> Zionist Circles Benefit From WTC Collapse
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
> What Really Happened
>
>
> Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@...> wrote:
> Bugs,
>
> Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with people who think its all a
Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
>
> Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are deranged, I just read
one of their histories, Hitler you know was a good guy, Jews forced him to carry out
the holocaust.
>
> Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad control the world along
with Jewish international bankers, etc.
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Jews
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Zionists
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Mossad
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Sharon
>
> Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Just plain demented hate.
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bugs
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:30 AM
> To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
>
>
> TRY RUMSFELD FOR TREASON
>
> The oath is to stand against all domestic and foreign enimies and
> what Rumsfeld has done to the American Troops is a crime in and onto
> itself.
>
> Uraium dust has been spread all over Iraq due to the Uranium used in
> Penatrator Bombs and Bullets.
>
> Villages and the City of Fulluja have been razed to the ground.
>
> 100,000 Iraqi civillians mostly women and children have been killed
> as collateral damage.
>
> All of this has occured because Rumsfeld and Bush elected to lie the
> American Soldiers into an unnecessary war.
>
> Why did Bush and Rumsfeld do this ?
>
> They did it to steal the Iraqi oil sell it to china and put the cash
> into Chinese banks.
>
> And they are perpetuating the occupation by not having enough troops
> so they can stay in Iraq an keep on stealing the oil forever.
>
> The Maritine Ship movement logs will prove this.
>
> It is an OPEN and Shut Case.
>
> or in other words a "REAL SLAM DUNK"
>
> Bush's Brother and Uncle have been in and out of China for years
> lining up this traitorous deal.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Naveed
> To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:01 AM
> Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Greg Palast Still DOESNT GET IT !
>
>
> didn't know paul bremer was a kissinger stooge.......
>
> mann david <dmann51@...> wrote:
> Read that piece in a hurry but didn't notice mention
> of 9-11. Wow, pathetic trivial trip indeed.
>
> --- JIM <justpasenthru2012@...> wrote:
>
> > Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
> > Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
> > The Guardian - Comment
> > Friday, April 14, 2006
> > By Greg Palast
> >
> > Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the
> > gaggle of generals,
> > safely
> > retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week,
> > six of them
> > have called for
> > the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
> >
> > Well, according to my watch, they're about four
> > years too late --
> > and they still
> > don't get it.
> >
> > I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
> > that the
> > bemedalled boys in
> > crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the
> > rump, in public.
> > But to me, it
> > just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
> > straight.
> >
> > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up
> > in front of the
> > UN and
> > identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons
> > labs, was it,
> > General
> > Powell?
> >
> > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us
> > our next warning
> > from Saddam
> > could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
> >
> > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
> > that Al Qaeda
> > and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
> >
> > Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
> > arrogance, a
> > duplicitous
> > chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and
> > Tinker-Toy Napoleon --
> > but he didn't
> > appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
> >
> > Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of
> > Defense you didn't
> > read in the
> > New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner,
> > the man our
> > president
> > placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion
> > viceroy.
> >
> > Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
> > under the
> > mistaken notion
> > that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq,
> > the President
> > meant the
> > Iraqis could choose their own government.
> > Misunderstanding the
> > President's true
> > mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold
> > elections within
> > 90 days and
> > for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the
> > cities to a desert
> > base. "It's
> > their country," the General told me of the Iraqis.
> > "And," he added,
> > most
> > ominously, "their oil."
> >
> > Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
> > Garner a 101-page
> > plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons
> > at the State
> > Department, Treasury
> > and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e.
> > the sale)
> > of "all state
> > assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting
> > industries."
> > The General
> > knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where
> > the Iraqi sun
> > don't shine.
> > Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting
> > of Iraqi tribal
> > leaders to
> > plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their
> > own multi-ethnic
> > government --
> > and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were
> > on talking
> > terms -- knew he
> > could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a
> >
> > welcomed "liberation"
> > turned into a hated "occupation."
> >
> > But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition
> > government would mean
> > the
> > death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets
> > privatization grab.
> >
> > On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the
> > very night
> > General Garner
> > arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington.
> > It was Rumsfeld
> > on the line.
> > He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack,
> > Jack, you're
> > fired."
> >
> > Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of
> > on-the-ground experience
> > in Iraq,
> > with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director
> > of Kissinger
> > Associates.
> > Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
> > postponed
> > elections for a
> > year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot
> > pasha, selling
> > off Iraq's
> > economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
> > Rumsfeld's neo-con
> > clique had
> > desired.
> >
> > Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the
> > six generals' call
> > for
> > Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
> >
> > For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't
> > shoot straight.
> > They're
> > wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've
> > gunned down the
> > puppet instead
> > of the puppeteers.
> >
> > There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked
> > General Garner from
> > Baghdad
> > without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or
> > breathes or spits
> > in the Bush
> > Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
> > approval. And
> > ultimately, it's
> > the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
> >
> > Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
> > give them
> > enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the
> > cowboy from
> > Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that
> > we lacked
> > troops -- the
> > problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy
> > this nation. A
> > million
> > troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would
> > just have more
> > targets.)
> >
> > President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
> > today on the
> > intercom with
> > Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up."
> > And Cheney
> > replies, "Hey,
> > just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until
> > he's taken all
> > their ammo."
> >
> > When Bush and Cheney read about the call for
> > Rumsfeld's resignation
> > today, I can
> > just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission
> > Accomplished."
> >
> > Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
> > choosing a target:
> > It's the
> > President, stupid.
> >
> === message truncated ===
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated
and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to
be a patriot.
> - Notebook, 1904
>
> www.fightthenwo.org
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+
countries) for 2¢/min or less.
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/312 - Release Date: 4/14/2006
>
>
>
>
> In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and
scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be
a patriot.
> - Notebook, 1904
>
> www.fightthenwo.org
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.
>
> SPONSORED LINKS United state government grant United state coin United state
patent
> United state flag United state army United state grant
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 12
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:26pm(PDT)
Subject: Fw: The generals calling for Rumsfeld's resignation are four years t
This article seems to blame Cheney rather than Rumsfeld.
I say the real power in the Pentagon was the Wolfowitz, Perle,
Kissinger Military Policy group -- Rumsfeld was the man
who what the Perle group decided. -- DE
From: Apollo
April 16, 2006
Desert Rats Leave The Sinking ShipWhy Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
By Greg Palast
Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the gaggle
of generals, safely retired, to lay siege to Donald
Rumsfeld. This week, six of them have called for the
Secretary of Defense's resignation.
Well, according to my watch, they're about four years
too late -- and they still don't get it.
I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
that the bemedalled boys in crew cuts are finally ready
to kick Rummy in the rump, in public. But to me, it
just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
straight.
It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up in
front of the UN and identified two mobile latrines as
biological weapons labs, was it, General Powell?
It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us our
next warning from Saddam could be a mushroom cloud, was
it Condoleezza?
It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
that Al Qaeda and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr.
Cheney?
Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
arrogance, a duplicitous chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied
bully-boy and Tinker-Toy Napoleon -- but he didn't
appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of Defense
you didn't read in the New York Times, related to me by
General Jay Garner, the man our president placed in
Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion viceroy.
Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
under the mistaken notion that when George Bush called
for democracy in Iraq, the President meant the Iraqis
could choose their own government. Misunderstanding the
President's true mission, General Garner called for
Iraqis to hold elections within 90 days and for the
U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the cities to a
desert base. "It's their country," the General told me
of the Iraqis. "And," he added, most ominously, "their
oil."
Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
Garner a 101-page plan for Iraq's economy drafted
secretly by neo-cons at the State Department, Treasury
and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e. the
sale) of "all state assets ... especially in the oil
and oil-supporting industries." The General knew of
the plans and he intended to shove it where the Iraqi
sun don't shine. Garner planned what he called a "Big
Tent" meeting of Iraqi tribal leaders to plan
elections. By helping Iraqis establish their own multi-
ethnic government -- and this was back when Sunnis,
Shias and Kurds were on talking terms -- knew he could
get the nation on its feet peacefully before a welcomed
"liberation" turned into a hated "occupation."
But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition government
would mean the death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-
assets privatization grab.
On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the very
night General Garner arrived in Baghdad, he got a call
from Washington. It was Rumsfeld on the line. He told
Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack, Jack, you're
fired."
Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of on-the-
ground experience in Iraq, with green-boots Paul
Bremer, the Managing Director of Kissinger Associates.
Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
postponed elections for a year; then he issued 100
orders, like some tin-pot pasha, selling off Iraq's
economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
Rumsfeld's neo-con clique had desired.
Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the six
generals' call for Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't shoot
straight. They're wasting all their bullets on the
decoy. They've gunned down the puppet instead of the
puppeteers.
There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked General
Garner from Baghdad without the word from The Bunker.
Nothing moves or breathes or spits in the Bush
Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
approval. And ultimately, it's the Commander-in-Chief
who's chiefly in command.
Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
give them enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of
the cowboy from Crawford. (And by the way, the problem
was not that we lacked troops -- the problem was that
we lacked moral authority to occupy this nation. A
million troops would not be enough -- the insurgents
would just have more targets.)
President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
today on the intercom with Cheney: "Well, pardner,
looks like the game's up." And Cheney replies, "Hey,
just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until he's
taken all their ammo."
When Bush and Cheney read about the call for Rumsfeld's
resignation today, I can just hear George saying to
Dick, "Mission Accomplished."
Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
choosing a target: It's the President, stupid.
________
Read more about the untold story of General
Garner and the secret war plans in ARMED MADHOUSE, by
Greg Palast, to be released June 6 (US) and July 6
(UK). View Palast's interview with Garner for BBC
Television at www.GregPalast.com
------------------------------
--
"No sage or savior has ever endorsed greed and gluttony as a path toward social justice or personal fulfillment. These sane and enlightened people come to us from all cultures and all eras, sometimes knowing of each other but more often not. Socrates and Jesus, Lao Tzu and Tolstoi, Gandhi and Martin Buber -- no one can find in their lives and words a jot of support for a political and economic regime that encourages the acquisition of wealth far beyond what is needed for the necessaries -- or even the restorative pleasures -- of life while consigning the masses to live and work in squalor."
-Stephen J. Fortunato, Associate Justice, Rhode Island Supreme Court.
"Music is prophecy, its style and economic organization are ahead of the rest of society. It makes audible the new world that will gradually become visible."
-Jacques Attali in his seminal text "Noise"
SPONSORED LINKS Movement disorder Clock movements Quartz movements
Debate Government Film movement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
a.. Visit your group "anti-capitalism" on the web.
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
anti-capitalism-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 13
From: "Naveed" flanker12k@yahoo.com
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:33pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
mr. eastman, i kindly request you stay away from broad statements. I beleive it has a tendency to create animosity.
Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to oust these
criminal Zionists from our midst.
I agree that with this totally, I don't think richard perle, wolfowitz, and feith speak for the jewish people as a whole. Couple of bad apples doesn't mean the whole batch is bad....
Sherman Skolnick (who happens to be jewish) has written an awful lot about the Bush criminal syndicate AND mossad connections to the klinton crime syndicate....
That's like saying all germans are nazis.
kenny318east3 <kenny318east3@yahoo.com> wrote: --- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@...> wrote:
<< There are many many Jews, who protect the Zionist perpetrators of 9-11 --
whose loyalty to fellow Jews, even mass murders, is so great that they will defend
them knowing they are wrong. They discover the true guilt of the Zionist neo-cons
and Mossad yet they pretend they do not believe it -- I'd say 90 percent of Jews who
are in any way involved with 9-11 discussion are at this stage. They are defending
their people from justice -- all other people be damned. >>
it doesn't matter how much I am horrified by the behavior of Israel, I am still
a Jew.
Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to oust these
criminal Zionists from our midst.
Israeli refusnik soldiers are just the tip of the iceberg.
The Arabs are human beings and they deserve to be treated as such.
Ken, the grandson of Samuel and Charlotte Goncharow. I am a former student
at the Flatbush Jewish Center on Church Avenue and Ocean Parkway, and I was
a recipient of the book "Vocabulary of Jewish Life," by Rabbi Abraham M. Heller.
> > I suspect Leslie Schwartz is going to be like that. I've seen too many not to think
so -- and that is the extent to which I have become a collective-Jewish guilt-until-
proven-innocent-on-an-individual-basis "anti-Semite" -- literally a man suspicious
of Jews in general. It is unjust -- but my instinct for survival overrides my higher
impulses.
>
> Dick Eastman
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Naveed
> To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: lhs_emf@...
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 5:50 PM
> Subject: RE: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
>
>
> for the last time
>
> all JEWS ARE NOT ZIONISTS!
>
> ALL ZIONISTS ARE NOT JEWS!
>
> There is a ZIONIST ELEMENT to the 9/11 conspiracy!!! Maybe you can't handle
that............
> did you even read the damn post i posted about ISRAELI spy rings awash in
america? I POSTED IT TWICE.......
>
> this below come from my friend ryan!
>
> 'A Clean Break' JINSA/PNAC Neocons associated with AIPAC espionage:
>
> washingtonpost.com
> Leak Inquiry Includes Iran Experts in Administration
>
> By Robin Wright and Dan Eggen
> Washington Post Staff Writers
> Saturday, September 4, 2004; Page A04
>
>
> FBI counterintelligence investigators have in recent weeks questioned current and
former U.S. officials about whether a small group of Iran specialists at the Pentagon
and in Vice President Cheney's office may have been involved in passing classified
information to an Iraqi politician or a U.S. lobbying group allied with Israel, according
to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
>
> In their interviews, the FBI agents have also named two Israeli diplomats stationed
in Washington and asked whether they would be willing recipients of sensitive
intelligence, the sources added.
>
> The investigators have asked questions about personnel in the office of Pentagon
Undersecretary for Policy Douglas J. Feith as well as members of the influential
Defense Policy Board, an advisory panel for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld,
according to former U.S. officials who have been questioned and others familiar with
the case.
>
> Investigators have specifically asked about a group of neoconservatives involved
in defense issues, including Feith, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, Iraq
and Iran specialist Harold Rhode and others at the Pentagon. FBI agents also have
asked current and former officials about Richard Perle of the defense board and David
Wurmser, an Iran specialist and principal deputy assistant for national security affairs
in Cheney's office, according to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
>
> "The initial interest was: Do you believe certain people would spy for Israel and
pass secret information?" said one source interviewed by the FBI about the defense
officials.
>
> It remains unclear, however, how specific investigators' suspicions have become.
And one official, a Feith ally, has said the investigation is an effort by some
intelligence officials to discredit Pentagon hawks.
>
> The sources interviewed for this article requested anonymity because it involves
classified information or because of the ongoing investigation.
>
> Perle, Rhode and Wolfowitz did not return telephone calls placed to their homes
and offices late Friday. Reached at home, Feith declined comment, citing the ongoing
investigation.
>
> But Pentagon officials insisted yesterday that FBI questions about key
policymakers did not mean they were the subjects of the intelligence leak
investigation. Senior Pentagon officials have said they were told by the FBI that the
investigation is focused on just one suspect in the Defense Department, Lawrence A.
Franklin, an Iran specialist in Feith's office.
>
> The FBI investigation first came to light last week with reports of a probe into
whether Franklin passed a draft presidential directive on Iran to the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee, and whether the directive was then passed to Israel,
sources have said. AIPAC has strongly denied any involvement in espionage.
>
> A federal grand jury in Alexandria may take up the Franklin case as early as next
week, law enforcement sources said.
>
> The questioning of Franklin is a recent part of an investigation that dates back
more than two years and includes diverse threads, U.S. officials and people close to
the case said. One aspect of the probe concerns AIPAC and another looks at whether
intelligence on Iran ended up in the hands of Iraqi National Congress leader Ahmed
Chalabi, a longtime Pentagon favorite once considered a possible replacement for
Saddam Hussein.
>
> Iran has been a particularly controversial issue within the Bush administration,
which still does not have a formal policy more than 3 1/2 years after taking office. A
small group of Pentagon neoconservatives opposed a draft directive because it did
not support a change of governments in Tehran, which they advocated, current and
former U.S. officials said.
>
> The officials whose names came up during questioning have strong ties to Israel.
They also share a long-standing position on Iran and other radical regimes. Wurmser,
Feith and Perle were co-authors of a 1996 policy paper for then-Israeli Prime Minister
Binyamin Netanyahu titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm." It
called for removing Hussein from power in Iraq as part of a broad strategy to
transform the region and remove radical regimes.
>
> But current and former U.S. officials, including some who were interviewed by the
FBI, are still puzzled by the nature of the investigation involving Israel, because its
profoundly close ties with the United States date back six decades and have involved
sharing sensitive intelligence. Yet officials also concede that Israel is one of the three
countries most active in spying on the United States. Israel denies conducting
espionage in the United States.
>
> Also yesterday, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee
demanded that a new prosecutor be assigned to investigate the alleged leaks,
questioning the "political leanings" of the U.S. attorney in Alexandria who is handling
the criminal portion of the case.
>
> In a letter to Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.)
said the role of U.S. Attorney Paul J. McNulty in the case has "obvious political
implications" in an election year, and Conyers cited anonymous allegations in a news
report that McNulty had "put the brakes on" the probe.
>
> "While I have no reason to question Mr. McNulty's integrity, he is not a career
prosecutor, but instead is a political appointee whose previous employment was
principally with Republican politicians," Conyers wrote.
>
> Conyers suggested that either a special counsel or U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald
of Chicago, who is overseeing a separate probe into the disclosure of CIA operative
Valerie Plame, should take over the Pentagon probe.
>
> Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo declined to comment on the specifics
of Conyers's allegations. "We will review the congressman's letter and give it the
attention it is due," Corallo said. A spokesman for McNulty also declined comment,
referring a reporter to Corallo's statement.
>
> Several law enforcement officials have said in recent days that the FBI had initially
considered making rapid arrests in the Franklin probe when it became clear that news
of the investigation was about to become public last week. But, these officials said,
prosecutors urged caution, arguing that investigators needed more time to gather
evidence and assess the case.
>
> Franklin has been cooperating in the probe for several weeks, officials familiar
with the investigation said. He has not responded to numerous requests for comment
at his office and his home in West Virginia.
>
>
>
> All in the Neocon Family
> By Jim Lobe, AlterNet
> Posted on March 27, 2003, Printed on April 16, 2006
> http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
> What do William Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, and Robert Kagan have
in common? Yes, they are all die-hard hawks who have gained control of U.S. foreign
policy since the 9/11 attacks. But they are also part of one big neoconservative family
-- an extended clan of spouses, children, and friends who have known each other for
generations.
> Neoconservatives are former liberals (which explains the "neo" prefix) who
advocate an aggressive unilateralist vision of U.S. global supremacy, which includes a
close strategic alliance with Israel. Let's start with one of the founding fathers of the
extended neocon clan: Irving Kristol. His extensive resume includes waging culture
wars for the CIA against the Soviet Union in the early years of the Cold War and
calling for an American "imperial" role during the Vietnam War. Papa Kristol, who has
been credited with defining the major themes of neoconservative thought, is married
to Gertrude Himmelfarb, a neoconservative powerhouse on her own. Her studies of
the Victorian era in Britain helped inspire the men who sold Bush on the idea of
"compassionate conservatism."
> The son of this proud couple is none other that William Kristol, the crown prince
of the neoconservative clique and editor of the Rupert Murdoch-owned Weekly
Standard. In 1997, he founded the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a
front group which cemented the powerful alliance between right-wing Republicans
like Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, Christian and Catholic Right leaders like Gary
Bauer and William Bennett, and the neocons behind a platform of global U.S. military
dominance.
> Irving Kristol's most prominent disciple is Richard Perle, who was until Thursday
the Defense Policy Board chairman, is also a "resident scholar" at the American
Enterprise Institute, which is housed in the same building as PNAC. Perle himself
married into neocon royalty when he wed the daughter of his professor at the
University of Chicago, the late Alfred Wohlstetter -- the man who helped both his
son-in-law and his fellow student Paul Wolfowitz get their start in Washington more
than 30 years ago.
> Perle's own protege is Douglas Feith, who is now Wolfowitz's deputy for policy and
is widely known for his right-wing Likud position. And why not? His father,
Philadelphia businessman and philanthropist Dalck Feith, was once a follower of the
great revisionist Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky, in his native Poland back in the
1930s. The two Feiths were honored together in 1997 by the right-wing Zionist
Organization of America (ZOA).
> The AEI has long been a major nexus for such inter-familial relationships. A long-
time collaborator with Perle, Michael Ledeen is married to Barbara Ledeen, a founder
and director of the anti-feminist Independent Women's Forum (IWF), who is currently
a major player in the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill. Richard Perle, Douglas
Feith, and another neo-con power couple -- David and Meyrav Wurmser -- co-
authored a 1996 memorandum for Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu outlining how to
break the Oslo peace process and invade Iraq as the first step to transforming the
Middle East.
> Though she doesn't focus much on foreign-policy issues, Lynne Cheney also
hangs her hat at AEI. Her husband Dick Cheney recently chose Victoria Nuland to
become his next deputy national security adviser. Nuland, as it turns out, is married
to Robert Kagan, Bill Kristol's main comrade-in-arms and the co-founder of PNAC.
> Bob's father, Donald Kagan, is a Yale historian who converted from a liberal
Democrat to a staunch neocon in the 1970s. On the eve of the 2000 presidential
elections, Donald and his other son, Frederick, published "While America Sleeps," a
clarion call to increase defense spending. Since then, the three Kagan men have
written reams of columns warning that the currently ballooning Pentagon budget is
simply not enough to fund the much-desired vision of U.S. global supremacy.
> And which infamous ex-Reaganite do the Kagans and another leading neocon
family have in common? None other than Iran-contra veteran Elliott Abrams.
> Now the director of Near Eastern Affairs in Bush's National Security Council,
Abrams worked closely with Bob Kagan back in the Reagan era. He is also the son-in-
law of Norman Podhoretz, long-time editor of the influential conservative Jewish
publication Commentary, and his wife, Midge Decter, a fearsome polemicist in her
own right.
> Podhoretz, like Kristol Sr., helped invent neo-conservatism in the late 1960s. He
and Decter created a formidable political team as leaders of the Committee on the
Present Danger in 1980, when they worked with Donald Rumsfeld to pound the last
nail into the coffin of detente and promote the rise of Ronald Reagan. In addition to
being Abrams' father-in-law, Norman Podhoretz is also the father of John Podhoretz,
a columnist for the Murdoch-owned New York Post and frequent guest on the
Murdoch-owned Fox News channel.
> As editor of Commentary, Norman offered writing space to rising stars of the
neocon movement for more than 30 years. His proteges include former U.N.
ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and Richard Pipes, who was Ronald Reagan's top
advisor on the "Evil Empire," as the president liked to call the Soviet Union. His son,
Daniel Pipes, has also made a career out of battling "evil," which in his case is Islam.
And to tie it all up neatly, in 2002, Podhoretz received the highest honor bestowed by
the AEI: the Irving Kristol award.
> This list of intricate, overlapping connections is hardly exhaustive or perhaps even
surprising. But it helps reveal an important fact. Contrary to appearances, the
neocons do not constitute a powerful mass political movement. They are instead a
small, tighly-knit clan whose incestuous familial and personal connections, both
within and outside the Bush administration, have allowed them grab control of the
future of American foreign policy.
> © 2006 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
> View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
>
>
> Home : WRH Store : WRH Index : Reader Letters : Archives : Advertise : Donate
>
> On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick
reply was: "It's very good...Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate
sympathy (for Israel)"
>
>
>
> The Five Dancing Israelis
> Arrested On 9-11
>
>
>
>
> As the world watched in disbelief and asked the question...
>
> ...Mossad operatives were seen dancing with joy.
>
>
>
> A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-
11.
> The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and trained them on the
twin towers. (1)
>
> Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming
"middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of
joy and mockery. (2)
> "They were like happy, you know . They didn't look shocked to me" said a
witness. (3)
> [T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the
World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in
front of the wreckage. (4)
>
> Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial
impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken,
and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City
parking lot. (6)
>
> "It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what
was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (7)
>
> One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led them to close down
all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the 9-1-1 dispatcher
that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white van headed for the
Holland Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:
> Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
> Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like
Palestinians and going around a building.
> Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the Holland tunnel, I see the guy
by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.
> Dispatcher: He has what?
> Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (8)
>
> (*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller specifically say that these
"Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians usually dress in
western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")
>
> Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-the-Lookout" alert for
a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from New Jersey. When a
van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing into New York, the
suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the surprise of the police
officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!
> According to ABC's 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis
was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers:
>
> "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our
problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (9)
>
> Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?
> The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps
of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the
hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports.
Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van
and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (10)
> The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan
Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering ruins in an apparently
celebratory gesture. (11)
>
> The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped
as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was
not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:
> American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George
Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach
ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main
crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (12)
>
> TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down with tonnes of
explosives (13).
> What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (14), the New York Post (15), and
the New Jersey Bergen Record (16) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a
white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly
to the Lincoln Tunnel.
> But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (17), and Yediot
America, (18) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with
Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is
several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.
> It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one
stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to
the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-
witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in so many different
locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5
Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the
total to five.
> Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while the other was meant
to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New Jersey? If a van was
to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would
need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van
(or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland Tunnel- which was
where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-Palestinian 9-1-1
"mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.
>
> From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked
for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American
employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority
of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.
> The employee, who declined to give his name said: "I was in tears. These
guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were like, "Now America knows
what we go through." (19)
>
> A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's Israeli owner, Dominick
Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was in such a hurry to
flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left with their
furniture stranded in storage facilities (20).
> It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis were in fact Mossad
agents (21). They were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released.
Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40 days. (22)
> [S]everal of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an
Israeli talk show after their return home.
> Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the
morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that
experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event." (23)
>
> How did they know there would be an event to document on 9-11?
> It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli
Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:
> 1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to celebrate the
successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled off in history.
> 2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to
report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel.
> 3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with this phone call, the Israeli
bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where they will drop
off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.
> 4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL
bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move inadvertently foils
the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and 40 day torture.
> 5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice Department rounds up over 1000
Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York area jails. The
Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and media can now
claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in the same dragnet as
many other Arabs.
> 6. After several months, FBI and Justice Department "higher-ups" are able
to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis quietly.
>
> Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9-11 attacks even though
he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale. Immediately after the
Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
> CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin Laden's fingerprints all
over it." (24)
> The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the Israeli connection.
Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with stories linking the
attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers of every stripe
spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most outrageous
propaganda imaginable.
> We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA was because he
hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval" and they wanted
to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter about the Crusades,
and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all over the place!
> But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that
Zionists orchestrated the
> 9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of denial in which he
said:
> "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor
did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government
within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of
these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a
century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be
asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control
of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States." (25)
>
> You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did you?
> [A] number of intelligence officials have raised questions about Osama bin
Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he's running this
operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't have done it alone." A
senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other documentation
needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major foreign intelligence
service might also have been involved. (26)
>
> Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of the 9-11 attacks by the FBI:
> USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7,
1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA,
AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN
LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD. (27)
>
> To date, the only shred of "evidence" to be uncovered against bin Laden is a
barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened to find "lying
around" in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake. (28)
> There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to link the Al Qaeda
"terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a mountain of evidence, both
hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been very busy framing
Arabs for terror plots against America.
>
> One final point - at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that the Democratic Front
for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the attacks (29). This claim
was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said it had always
opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the occupied
territories." (30)
> 9-11 CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a Palestinian claim of
responsibility
>
> Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less than 500 people (31)
make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for the attacks?
> Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to fulfill what the goals of the
political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century ago: to turn all of
historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central tenet of the Zionist
ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people for a people
without a land." (32)
>
> The implication of Palestinians in the 9-11 attacks would have handed
Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all Palestinians would
have been labelled terrorists.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
> "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about
evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."
> US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring.
> "By way of deception, thou shalt do war"
> Motto of the Mossad
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
> See also:
> Israel and 9/11 - Index of What Really Happened
> Zionist Circles Benefit From WTC Collapse
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
> What Really Happened
>
>
> Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@...> wrote:
> Bugs,
>
> Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with people who think its all a
Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
>
> Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are deranged, I just read
one of their histories, Hitler you know was a good guy, Jews forced him to carry out
the holocaust.
>
> Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad control the world along
with Jewish international bankers, etc.
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Jews
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Zionists
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Mossad
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Sharon
>
> Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Just plain demented hate.
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bugs
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:30 AM
> To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
>
>
> TRY RUMSFELD FOR TREASON
>
> The oath is to stand against all domestic and foreign enimies and
> what Rumsfeld has done to the American Troops is a crime in and onto
> itself.
>
> Uraium dust has been spread all over Iraq due to the Uranium used in
> Penatrator Bombs and Bullets.
>
> Villages and the City of Fulluja have been razed to the ground.
>
> 100,000 Iraqi civillians mostly women and children have been killed
> as collateral damage.
>
> All of this has occured because Rumsfeld and Bush elected to lie the
> American Soldiers into an unnecessary war.
>
> Why did Bush and Rumsfeld do this ?
>
> They did it to steal the Iraqi oil sell it to china and put the cash
> into Chinese banks.
>
> And they are perpetuating the occupation by not having enough troops
> so they can stay in Iraq an keep on stealing the oil forever.
>
> The Maritine Ship movement logs will prove this.
>
> It is an OPEN and Shut Case.
>
> or in other words a "REAL SLAM DUNK"
>
> Bush's Brother and Uncle have been in and out of China for years
> lining up this traitorous deal.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Naveed
> To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:01 AM
> Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Greg Palast Still DOESNT GET IT !
>
>
> didn't know paul bremer was a kissinger stooge.......
>
> mann david <dmann51@...> wrote:
> Read that piece in a hurry but didn't notice mention
> of 9-11. Wow, pathetic trivial trip indeed.
>
> --- JIM <justpasenthru2012@...> wrote:
>
> > Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
> > Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
> > The Guardian - Comment
> > Friday, April 14, 2006
> > By Greg Palast
> >
> > Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the
> > gaggle of generals,
> > safely
> > retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week,
> > six of them
> > have called for
> > the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
> >
> > Well, according to my watch, they're about four
> > years too late --
> > and they still
> > don't get it.
> >
> > I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
> > that the
> > bemedalled boys in
> > crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the
> > rump, in public.
> > But to me, it
> > just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
> > straight.
> >
> > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up
> > in front of the
> > UN and
> > identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons
> > labs, was it,
> > General
> > Powell?
> >
> > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us
> > our next warning
> > from Saddam
> > could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
> >
> > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
> > that Al Qaeda
> > and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
> >
> > Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
> > arrogance, a
> > duplicitous
> > chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and
> > Tinker-Toy Napoleon --
> > but he didn't
> > appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
> >
> > Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of
> > Defense you didn't
> > read in the
> > New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner,
> > the man our
> > president
> > placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion
> > viceroy.
> >
> > Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
> > under the
> > mistaken notion
> > that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq,
> > the President
> > meant the
> > Iraqis could choose their own government.
> > Misunderstanding the
> > President's true
> > mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold
> > elections within
> > 90 days and
> > for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the
> > cities to a desert
> > base. "It's
> > their country," the General told me of the Iraqis.
> > "And," he added,
> > most
> > ominously, "their oil."
> >
> > Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
> > Garner a 101-page
> > plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons
> > at the State
> > Department, Treasury
> > and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e.
> > the sale)
> > of "all state
> > assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting
> > industries."
> > The General
> > knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where
> > the Iraqi sun
> > don't shine.
> > Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting
> > of Iraqi tribal
> > leaders to
> > plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their
> > own multi-ethnic
> > government --
> > and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were
> > on talking
> > terms -- knew he
> > could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a
> >
> > welcomed "liberation"
> > turned into a hated "occupation."
> >
> > But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition
> > government would mean
> > the
> > death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets
> > privatization grab.
> >
> > On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the
> > very night
> > General Garner
> > arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington.
> > It was Rumsfeld
> > on the line.
> > He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack,
> > Jack, you're
> > fired."
> >
> > Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of
> > on-the-ground experience
> > in Iraq,
> > with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director
> > of Kissinger
> > Associates.
> > Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
> > postponed
> > elections for a
> > year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot
> > pasha, selling
> > off Iraq's
> > economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
> > Rumsfeld's neo-con
> > clique had
> > desired.
> >
> > Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the
> > six generals' call
> > for
> > Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
> >
> > For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't
> > shoot straight.
> > They're
> > wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've
> > gunned down the
> > puppet instead
> > of the puppeteers.
> >
> > There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked
> > General Garner from
> > Baghdad
> > without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or
> > breathes or spits
> > in the Bush
> > Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
> > approval. And
> > ultimately, it's
> > the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
> >
> > Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
> > give them
> > enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the
> > cowboy from
> > Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that
> > we lacked
> > troops -- the
> > problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy
> > this nation. A
> > million
> > troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would
> > just have more
> > targets.)
> >
> > President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
> > today on the
> > intercom with
> > Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up."
> > And Cheney
> > replies, "Hey,
> > just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until
> > he's taken all
> > their ammo."
> >
> > When Bush and Cheney read about the call for
> > Rumsfeld's resignation
> > today, I can
> > just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission
> > Accomplished."
> >
> > Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
> > choosing a target:
> > It's the
> > President, stupid.
> >
> === message truncated ===
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated
and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to
be a patriot.
> - Notebook, 1904
>
> www.fightthenwo.org
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+
countries) for 2¢/min or less.
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/312 - Release Date: 4/14/2006
>
>
>
>
> In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and
scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be
a patriot.
> - Notebook, 1904
>
> www.fightthenwo.org
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.
>
> SPONSORED LINKS United state government grant United state coin United state
patent
> United state flag United state army United state grant
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
SPONSORED LINKS
United state flag United state military United state government grant United state coin United state grant United state army
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904
www.fightthenwo.org
---------------------------------
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 14
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:38pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: [catapult] Fw: read this stuff from Australia
I do not support the author who was accused under the racial discrimination act.
That man said that growth of black population in Austrailia means more crime.
If I was black would I want my son or daughter reading that? Hell no. I would protest. I would demand a law.
And as a white American I say that crime is committed by individuals and individuals are responsible for them, not the groups to which the individuals belong.
Criminals must be stopped, crimes must be prevented -- but not by blaming a whole race -- not by blaming a man and a woman for "contributing to crime" just because they have a baby.
Some Jewish Zionists did 9-11, but that does not mean we fire up the ovens for all Jews, now does it? It's the same principle -- whether you are black, or Jewish or German.
----- Original Message -----
From: Bugs
To: a ; democratic_witches@yahoogroups.com ; USDemocrat-National@yahoogroups.com ; freedom_revolution2005@yahoogroups.com ; ImpeachBushNOW@yahoogroups.com ; catapultthepropaganda@yahoogroups.com ; TennesseeDemocrat@yahoogroups.com ; know
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 7:42 PM
Subject: [catapult] Fw: read this stuff from Australia
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:41 AM
Subject: read this stuff from Australia
I am sending you this because I think it is important to note where else this is happening. Also Aren't we somehow connected to Austrailia in some of the things that go on. What is our connection there, I have forgot, but know it is a fact.
Professor Andrew Fraser's Letter to the Parramatta Sun Unlawful
> Report; Posted on: 2006-04-01 16:45:51
>
> Freedom going down Down Under
>
> Andrew Fraser
>
> In a stunning blow to freedom of expression in Australia, the President
> of
> the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Mr John von Doussa,
> QC,
> today declared that a letter to the editor written by Associate
> Professor
> Andrew Fraser and published in the Parramatta Sun on 6 July 2006 was an
> unlawful breach of the Racial Discrimination Act.
>
> In that letter Professor Fraser observed that "[e]xperience practically
> everywhere in the world tells us that an expanding black population is
> a
> sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and a wide range of
> other
> social problems."
>
> The letter was the subject of a complaint submitted on behalf of Mr
> Safi
> Hareer, General Secretary of the Sudanese Darfurian Union, by George
> Newhouse of Newhouse Lawyers, with the assistance of David D Knoll,
> President of the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies and Ms Anna Katzmann, SC.
>
> No complaint has been received by the HREOC in relation to the article
> by
> the editor of the Parramatta Sun, Charles Boag, also in the July 2006
> issue.
> In that opinion piece, Mr Boag categorically asserted that "the
> violence
> in
> America's deep south.was caused by whites." To emphasize his anti-white
> message, Mr Boag went on to accuse "white settlers" of committing
> "murder
> and mayhem on a great scale in Australia."
>
> Apparently, in contemporary Australia, people of white, European
> ancestry
> can be identified routinely as the root of all evil while it is
> forbidden
> for whites ever to mention publicly the social pathologies associated
> with
> black Africans, even if they are well-known to any informed person and
> openly acknowledged by reasonable black people themselves.
>
> The President of the HREOC has just endorsed that double standard.
> Along
> with his two submissions to the Commission, Professor Fraser provided,
> inter
> alia, an article by a black journalist thoroughly disgusted by the
> behaviour
> of African-Americans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in New
> Orleans
> last year. Leighton Levy wrote that "I am beginning to believe that
> black
> people, no matter where in the world they are, are cursed with a
> genetic
> predisposition to steal, murder, and create mayhem."
>
> The President of the HREOC also disregarded the rest of the copious
> evidence
> provided by Professor Fraser detailing the nature and scope of the
> crime,
> violence and other social problems associated not just with the black
> African diaspora in the West but with the post-colonial societies of
> sub-Saharan Africa itself.
>
> The upshot of the Human Rights Commission decision is clear. Whenever
> any
> person of black African ancestry declares that he has been "offended,
> insulted, humiliated or intimidated' by the public mention of such
> unsavoury
> truths, the freedom of white Australians to speak openly and freely
> about
> black African immigration in particular and non-white immigrants
> generally
> will be suppressed.
>
> The Commission has also flatly rejected Professor Fraser's submission
> that
> his Letter was not unlawful because, under s18D of the RDA, it was a
> "statement, publication, discussion or debate made or held for [a]
> genuine
> academic .purpose or any other genuine purpose in the public interest;
> or.a
> fair comment on any.matter of public interest if the comment is an
> expression of genuine belief held by the person making the comment."
>
> For all practical purposes, the decision of the Commission has rendered
> nugatory, the assurances of the politicians who assured Australians
> that
> the
> passage of the racial vilification laws would not threaten our historic
> liberties.
>
> Even before the Commission's decision, Deakin University had refused to
> publish a peer-reviewed article by Professor Fraser on the subject of
> race
> and immigration while Macquarie University has forbidden him to teach
> in
> any
> subject area.
>
> The freedom of academics to dissent from the official policy of
> transforming
> Australia into a colony of the Third World is now officially dead and
> buried-unless patriotic Australian rally to resist this blatant assault
> on
> their ancestral freedoms.
>
> Indeed, on a personal level, the Commission's decision is more worrying
> still to Professor Fraser. The Commission's proposed resolution of this
> matter echoes the methodology employed during the show trials in
> Stalinist
> Russia where defendants were compelled to confess their thought crimes
> and
> beg public forgiveness.
>
> Newhouse Lawyers demanded that Professor Fraser "should cause to be
> published at his expense an advertisement in the Parramatta Sun (of a
> size
> no smaller than the Letter and no less prominent) acknowledging that he
> engaged in unlawful conduct by means of the Letter and Comments,
> unreservedly apologising for the hurt thereby caused to the Sudanese
> people
> who live in the Parramatta-Blacktown area, promising not to repeat such
> conduct and retracting on the public record all of the imputations."
>
> Mr von Doussa has invited Professor Fraser to submit to this
> neo-Stalinist
> ritual of self-abasement.
>
> Professor Fraser will not accept that invitation. But, in all
> likelihood,
> that will not be the end of the matter. It can be assumed that, if this
> "conciliation" proposal is rejected, Newhouse Lawyers will pursue
> Professor
> Fraser into the Federal Court, in an effort to ruin him financially by
> winning an order of costs against him.
>
> Andrew Fraser
> Associate Professor
> Department of Public Law
> Macquarie University
> Sydney, NSW
> AUSTRALIA 2109
> dfraser@humn.mq.edu.au <mailto:dfraser@humn.mq.edu.au>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No
Yahoo! Groups Links
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
a.. Visit your group "catapultthepropaganda" on the web.
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
catapultthepropaganda-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 15
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:53pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
I am very happy to see Kenny has proved me wrong. Thank you, Kenny.
SOme time good men need a fool like me making unjust statements so that their goodness (and sanity) can be seen when they give answer.
Maybe I'm wrong about Leslie too. We will see.
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
----- Original Message -----
From: Naveed
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
mr. eastman, i kindly request you stay away from broad statements. I beleive it has a tendency to create animosity.
Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to oust these
criminal Zionists from our midst.
I agree that with this totally, I don't think richard perle, wolfowitz, and feith speak for the jewish people as a whole. Couple of bad apples doesn't mean the whole batch is bad....
Sherman Skolnick (who happens to be jewish) has written an awful lot about the Bush criminal syndicate AND mossad connections to the klinton crime syndicate....
That's like saying all germans are nazis.
kenny318east3 <kenny318east3@yahoo.com> wrote:
--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@...> wrote:
<< There are many many Jews, who protect the Zionist perpetrators of 9-11 --
whose loyalty to fellow Jews, even mass murders, is so great that they will defend
them knowing they are wrong. They discover the true guilt of the Zionist neo-cons
and Mossad yet they pretend they do not believe it -- I'd say 90 percent of Jews who
are in any way involved with 9-11 discussion are at this stage. They are defending
their people from justice -- all other people be damned. >>
it doesn't matter how much I am horrified by the behavior of Israel, I am still
a Jew.
Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to oust these
criminal Zionists from our midst.
Israeli refusnik soldiers are just the tip of the iceberg.
The Arabs are human beings and they deserve to be treated as such.
Ken, the grandson of Samuel and Charlotte Goncharow. I am a former student
at the Flatbush Jewish Center on Church Avenue and Ocean Parkway, and I was
a recipient of the book "Vocabulary of Jewish Life," by Rabbi Abraham M. Heller.
> > I suspect Leslie Schwartz is going to be like that. I've seen too many not to think
so -- and that is the extent to which I have become a collective-Jewish guilt-until-
proven-innocent-on-an-individual-basis "anti-Semite" -- literally a man suspicious
of Jews in general. It is unjust -- but my instinct for survival overrides my higher
impulses.
>
> Dick Eastman
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Naveed
> To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: lhs_emf@...
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 5:50 PM
> Subject: RE: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
>
>
> for the last time
>
> all JEWS ARE NOT ZIONISTS!
>
> ALL ZIONISTS ARE NOT JEWS!
>
> There is a ZIONIST ELEMENT to the 9/11 conspiracy!!! Maybe you can't handle
that............
> did you even read the damn post i posted about ISRAELI spy rings awash in
america? I POSTED IT TWICE.......
>
> this below come from my friend ryan!
>
> 'A Clean Break' JINSA/PNAC Neocons associated with AIPAC espionage:
>
> washingtonpost.com
> Leak Inquiry Includes Iran Experts in Administration
>
> By Robin Wright and Dan Eggen
> Washington Post Staff Writers
> Saturday, September 4, 2004; Page A04
>
>
> FBI counterintelligence investigators have in recent weeks questioned current and
former U.S. officials about whether a small group of Iran specialists at the Pentagon
and in Vice President Cheney's office may have been involved in passing classified
information to an Iraqi politician or a U.S. lobbying group allied with Israel, according
to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
>
> In their interviews, the FBI agents have also named two Israeli diplomats stationed
in Washington and asked whether they would be willing recipients of sensitive
intelligence, the sources added.
>
> The investigators have asked questions about personnel in the office of Pentagon
Undersecretary for Policy Douglas J. Feith as well as members of the influential
Defense Policy Board, an advisory panel for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld,
according to former U.S. officials who have been questioned and others familiar with
the case.
>
> Investigators have specifically asked about a group of neoconservatives involved
in defense issues, including Feith, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, Iraq
and Iran specialist Harold Rhode and others at the Pentagon. FBI agents also have
asked current and former officials about Richard Perle of the defense board and David
Wurmser, an Iran specialist and principal deputy assistant for national security affairs
in Cheney's office, according to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
>
> "The initial interest was: Do you believe certain people would spy for Israel and
pass secret information?" said one source interviewed by the FBI about the defense
officials.
>
> It remains unclear, however, how specific investigators' suspicions have become.
And one official, a Feith ally, has said the investigation is an effort by some
intelligence officials to discredit Pentagon hawks.
>
> The sources interviewed for this article requested anonymity because it involves
classified information or because of the ongoing investigation.
>
> Perle, Rhode and Wolfowitz did not return telephone calls placed to their homes
and offices late Friday. Reached at home, Feith declined comment, citing the ongoing
investigation.
>
> But Pentagon officials insisted yesterday that FBI questions about key
policymakers did not mean they were the subjects of the intelligence leak
investigation. Senior Pentagon officials have said they were told by the FBI that the
investigation is focused on just one suspect in the Defense Department, Lawrence A.
Franklin, an Iran specialist in Feith's office.
>
> The FBI investigation first came to light last week with reports of a probe into
whether Franklin passed a draft presidential directive on Iran to the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee, and whether the directive was then passed to Israel,
sources have said. AIPAC has strongly denied any involvement in espionage.
>
> A federal grand jury in Alexandria may take up the Franklin case as early as next
week, law enforcement sources said.
>
> The questioning of Franklin is a recent part of an investigation that dates back
more than two years and includes diverse threads, U.S. officials and people close to
the case said. One aspect of the probe concerns AIPAC and another looks at whether
intelligence on Iran ended up in the hands of Iraqi National Congress leader Ahmed
Chalabi, a longtime Pentagon favorite once considered a possible replacement for
Saddam Hussein.
>
> Iran has been a particularly controversial issue within the Bush administration,
which still does not have a formal policy more than 3 1/2 years after taking office. A
small group of Pentagon neoconservatives opposed a draft directive because it did
not support a change of governments in Tehran, which they advocated, current and
former U.S. officials said.
>
> The officials whose names came up during questioning have strong ties to Israel.
They also share a long-standing position on Iran and other radical regimes. Wurmser,
Feith and Perle were co-authors of a 1996 policy paper for then-Israeli Prime Minister
Binyamin Netanyahu titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm." It
called for removing Hussein from power in Iraq as part of a broad strategy to
transform the region and remove radical regimes.
>
> But current and former U.S. officials, including some who were interviewed by the
FBI, are still puzzled by the nature of the investigation involving Israel, because its
profoundly close ties with the United States date back six decades and have involved
sharing sensitive intelligence. Yet officials also concede that Israel is one of the three
countries most active in spying on the United States. Israel denies conducting
espionage in the United States.
>
> Also yesterday, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee
demanded that a new prosecutor be assigned to investigate the alleged leaks,
questioning the "political leanings" of the U.S. attorney in Alexandria who is handling
the criminal portion of the case.
>
> In a letter to Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.)
said the role of U.S. Attorney Paul J. McNulty in the case has "obvious political
implications" in an election year, and Conyers cited anonymous allegations in a news
report that McNulty had "put the brakes on" the probe.
>
> "While I have no reason to question Mr. McNulty's integrity, he is not a career
prosecutor, but instead is a political appointee whose previous employment was
principally with Republican politicians," Conyers wrote.
>
> Conyers suggested that either a special counsel or U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald
of Chicago, who is overseeing a separate probe into the disclosure of CIA operative
Valerie Plame, should take over the Pentagon probe.
>
> Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo declined to comment on the specifics
of Conyers's allegations. "We will review the congressman's letter and give it the
attention it is due," Corallo said. A spokesman for McNulty also declined comment,
referring a reporter to Corallo's statement.
>
> Several law enforcement officials have said in recent days that the FBI had initially
considered making rapid arrests in the Franklin probe when it became clear that news
of the investigation was about to become public last week. But, these officials said,
prosecutors urged caution, arguing that investigators needed more time to gather
evidence and assess the case.
>
> Franklin has been cooperating in the probe for several weeks, officials familiar
with the investigation said. He has not responded to numerous requests for comment
at his office and his home in West Virginia.
>
>
>
> All in the Neocon Family
> By Jim Lobe, AlterNet
> Posted on March 27, 2003, Printed on April 16, 2006
> http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
> What do William Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, and Robert Kagan have
in common? Yes, they are all die-hard hawks who have gained control of U.S. foreign
policy since the 9/11 attacks. But they are also part of one big neoconservative family
-- an extended clan of spouses, children, and friends who have known each other for
generations.
> Neoconservatives are former liberals (which explains the "neo" prefix) who
advocate an aggressive unilateralist vision of U.S. global supremacy, which includes a
close strategic alliance with Israel. Let's start with one of the founding fathers of the
extended neocon clan: Irving Kristol. His extensive resume includes waging culture
wars for the CIA against the Soviet Union in the early years of the Cold War and
calling for an American "imperial" role during the Vietnam War. Papa Kristol, who has
been credited with defining the major themes of neoconservative thought, is married
to Gertrude Himmelfarb, a neoconservative powerhouse on her own. Her studies of
the Victorian era in Britain helped inspire the men who sold Bush on the idea of
"compassionate conservatism."
> The son of this proud couple is none other that William Kristol, the crown prince
of the neoconservative clique and editor of the Rupert Murdoch-owned Weekly
Standard. In 1997, he founded the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a
front group which cemented the powerful alliance between right-wing Republicans
like Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, Christian and Catholic Right leaders like Gary
Bauer and William Bennett, and the neocons behind a platform of global U.S. military
dominance.
> Irving Kristol's most prominent disciple is Richard Perle, who was until Thursday
the Defense Policy Board chairman, is also a "resident scholar" at the American
Enterprise Institute, which is housed in the same building as PNAC. Perle himself
married into neocon royalty when he wed the daughter of his professor at the
University of Chicago, the late Alfred Wohlstetter -- the man who helped both his
son-in-law and his fellow student Paul Wolfowitz get their start in Washington more
than 30 years ago.
> Perle's own protege is Douglas Feith, who is now Wolfowitz's deputy for policy and
is widely known for his right-wing Likud position. And why not? His father,
Philadelphia businessman and philanthropist Dalck Feith, was once a follower of the
great revisionist Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky, in his native Poland back in the
1930s. The two Feiths were honored together in 1997 by the right-wing Zionist
Organization of America (ZOA).
> The AEI has long been a major nexus for such inter-familial relationships. A long-
time collaborator with Perle, Michael Ledeen is married to Barbara Ledeen, a founder
and director of the anti-feminist Independent Women's Forum (IWF), who is currently
a major player in the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill. Richard Perle, Douglas
Feith, and another neo-con power couple -- David and Meyrav Wurmser -- co-
authored a 1996 memorandum for Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu outlining how to
break the Oslo peace process and invade Iraq as the first step to transforming the
Middle East.
> Though she doesn't focus much on foreign-policy issues, Lynne Cheney also
hangs her hat at AEI. Her husband Dick Cheney recently chose Victoria Nuland to
become his next deputy national security adviser. Nuland, as it turns out, is married
to Robert Kagan, Bill Kristol's main comrade-in-arms and the co-founder of PNAC.
> Bob's father, Donald Kagan, is a Yale historian who converted from a liberal
Democrat to a staunch neocon in the 1970s. On the eve of the 2000 presidential
elections, Donald and his other son, Frederick, published "While America Sleeps," a
clarion call to increase defense spending. Since then, the three Kagan men have
written reams of columns warning that the currently ballooning Pentagon budget is
simply not enough to fund the much-desired vision of U.S. global supremacy.
> And which infamous ex-Reaganite do the Kagans and another leading neocon
family have in common? None other than Iran-contra veteran Elliott Abrams.
> Now the director of Near Eastern Affairs in Bush's National Security Council,
Abrams worked closely with Bob Kagan back in the Reagan era. He is also the son-in-
law of Norman Podhoretz, long-time editor of the influential conservative Jewish
publication Commentary, and his wife, Midge Decter, a fearsome polemicist in her
own right.
> Podhoretz, like Kristol Sr., helped invent neo-conservatism in the late 1960s. He
and Decter created a formidable political team as leaders of the Committee on the
Present Danger in 1980, when they worked with Donald Rumsfeld to pound the last
nail into the coffin of detente and promote the rise of Ronald Reagan. In addition to
being Abrams' father-in-law, Norman Podhoretz is also the father of John Podhoretz,
a columnist for the Murdoch-owned New York Post and frequent guest on the
Murdoch-owned Fox News channel.
> As editor of Commentary, Norman offered writing space to rising stars of the
neocon movement for more than 30 years. His proteges include former U.N.
ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and Richard Pipes, who was Ronald Reagan's top
advisor on the "Evil Empire," as the president liked to call the Soviet Union. His son,
Daniel Pipes, has also made a career out of battling "evil," which in his case is Islam.
And to tie it all up neatly, in 2002, Podhoretz received the highest honor bestowed by
the AEI: the Irving Kristol award.
> This list of intricate, overlapping connections is hardly exhaustive or perhaps even
surprising. But it helps reveal an important fact. Contrary to appearances, the
neocons do not constitute a powerful mass political movement. They are instead a
small, tighly-knit clan whose incestuous familial and personal connections, both
within and outside the Bush administration, have allowed them grab control of the
future of American foreign policy.
> © 2006 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
> View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
>
>
> Home : WRH Store : WRH Index : Reader Letters : Archives : Advertise : Donate
>
> On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick
reply was: "It's very good...Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate
sympathy (for Israel)"
>
>
>
> The Five Dancing Israelis
> Arrested On 9-11
>
>
>
>
> As the world watched in disbelief and asked the question...
>
> ...Mossad operatives were seen dancing with joy.
>
>
>
> A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-
11.
> The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and trained them on the
twin towers. (1)
>
> Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming
"middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of
joy and mockery. (2)
> "They were like happy, you know . They didn't look shocked to me" said a
witness. (3)
> [T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the
World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in
front of the wreckage. (4)
>
> Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial
impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken,
and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City
parking lot. (6)
>
> "It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what
was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (7)
>
> One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led them to close down
all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the 9-1-1 dispatcher
that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white van headed for the
Holland Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:
> Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
> Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like
Palestinians and going around a building.
> Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the Holland tunnel, I see the guy
by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.
> Dispatcher: He has what?
> Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (8)
>
> (*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller specifically say that these
"Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians usually dress in
western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")
>
> Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-the-Lookout" alert for
a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from New Jersey. When a
van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing into New York, the
suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the surprise of the police
officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!
> According to ABC's 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis
was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers:
>
> "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our
problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (9)
>
> Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?
> The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps
of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the
hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports.
Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van
and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (10)
> The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan
Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering ruins in an apparently
celebratory gesture. (11)
>
> The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped
as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was
not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:
> American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George
Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach
ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main
crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (12)
>
> TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down with tonnes of
explosives (13).
> What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (14), the New York Post (15), and
the New Jersey Bergen Record (16) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a
white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly
to the Lincoln Tunnel.
> But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (17), and Yediot
America, (18) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with
Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is
several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.
> It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one
stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to
the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-
witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in so many different
locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5
Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the
total to five.
> Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while the other was meant
to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New Jersey? If a van was
to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would
need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van
(or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland Tunnel- which was
where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-Palestinian 9-1-1
"mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.
>
> From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked
for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American
employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority
of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.
> The employee, who declined to give his name said: "I was in tears. These
guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were like, "Now America knows
what we go through." (19)
>
> A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's Israeli owner, Dominick
Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was in such a hurry to
flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left with their
furniture stranded in storage facilities (20).
> It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis were in fact Mossad
agents (21). They were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released.
Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40 days. (22)
> [S]everal of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an
Israeli talk show after their return home.
> Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the
morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that
experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event." (23)
>
> How did they know there would be an event to document on 9-11?
> It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli
Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:
> 1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to celebrate the
successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled off in history.
> 2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to
report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel.
> 3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with this phone call, the Israeli
bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where they will drop
off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.
> 4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL
bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move inadvertently foils
the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and 40 day torture.
> 5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice Department rounds up over 1000
Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York area jails. The
Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and media can now
claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in the same dragnet as
many other Arabs.
> 6. After several months, FBI and Justice Department "higher-ups" are able
to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis quietly.
>
> Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9-11 attacks even though
he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale. Immediately after the
Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
> CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin Laden's fingerprints all
over it." (24)
> The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the Israeli connection.
Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with stories linking the
attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers of every stripe
spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most outrageous
propaganda imaginable.
> We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA was because he
hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval" and they wanted
to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter about the Crusades,
and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all over the place!
> But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that
Zionists orchestrated the
> 9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of denial in which he
said:
> "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor
did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government
within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of
these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a
century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be
asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control
of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States." (25)
>
> You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did you?
> [A] number of intelligence officials have raised questions about Osama bin
Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he's running this
operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't have done it alone." A
senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other documentation
needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major foreign intelligence
service might also have been involved. (26)
>
> Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of the 9-11 attacks by the FBI:
> USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7,
1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA,
AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN
LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD. (27)
>
> To date, the only shred of "evidence" to be uncovered against bin Laden is a
barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened to find "lying
around" in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake. (28)
> There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to link the Al Qaeda
"terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a mountain of evidence, both
hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been very busy framing
Arabs for terror plots against America.
>
> One final point - at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that the Democratic Front
for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the attacks (29). This claim
was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said it had always
opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the occupied
territories." (30)
> 9-11 CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a Palestinian claim of
responsibility
>
> Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less than 500 people (31)
make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for the attacks?
> Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to fulfill what the goals of the
political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century ago: to turn all of
historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central tenet of the Zionist
ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people for a people
without a land." (32)
>
> The implication of Palestinians in the 9-11 attacks would have handed
Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all Palestinians would
have been labelled terrorists.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
> "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about
evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."
> US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring.
> "By way of deception, thou shalt do war"
> Motto of the Mossad
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
> See also:
> Israel and 9/11 - Index of What Really Happened
> Zionist Circles Benefit From WTC Collapse
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
> What Really Happened
>
>
> Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@...> wrote:
> Bugs,
>
> Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with people who think its all a
Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
>
> Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are deranged, I just read
one of their histories, Hitler you know was a good guy, Jews forced him to carry out
the holocaust.
>
> Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad control the world along
with Jewish international bankers, etc.
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Jews
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Zionists
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Mossad
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Sharon
>
> Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Just plain demented hate.
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bugs
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:30 AM
> To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
>
>
> TRY RUMSFELD FOR TREASON
>
> The oath is to stand against all domestic and foreign enimies and
> what Rumsfeld has done to the American Troops is a crime in and onto
> itself.
>
> Uraium dust has been spread all over Iraq due to the Uranium used in
> Penatrator Bombs and Bullets.
>
> Villages and the City of Fulluja have been razed to the ground.
>
> 100,000 Iraqi civillians mostly women and children have been killed
> as collateral damage.
>
> All of this has occured because Rumsfeld and Bush elected to lie the
> American Soldiers into an unnecessary war.
>
> Why did Bush and Rumsfeld do this ?
>
> They did it to steal the Iraqi oil sell it to china and put the cash
> into Chinese banks.
>
> And they are perpetuating the occupation by not having enough troops
> so they can stay in Iraq an keep on stealing the oil forever.
>
> The Maritine Ship movement logs will prove this.
>
> It is an OPEN and Shut Case.
>
> or in other words a "REAL SLAM DUNK"
>
> Bush's Brother and Uncle have been in and out of China for years
> lining up this traitorous deal.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Naveed
> To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:01 AM
> Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Greg Palast Still DOESNT GET IT !
>
>
> didn't know paul bremer was a kissinger stooge.......
>
> mann david <dmann51@...> wrote:
> Read that piece in a hurry but didn't notice mention
> of 9-11. Wow, pathetic trivial trip indeed.
>
> --- JIM <justpasenthru2012@...> wrote:
>
> > Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
> > Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
> > The Guardian - Comment
> > Friday, April 14, 2006
> > By Greg Palast
> >
> > Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the
> > gaggle of generals,
> > safely
> > retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week,
> > six of them
> > have called for
> > the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
> >
> > Well, according to my watch, they're about four
> > years too late --
> > and they still
> > don't get it.
> >
> > I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
> > that the
> > bemedalled boys in
> > crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the
> > rump, in public.
> > But to me, it
> > just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
> > straight.
> >
> > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up
> > in front of the
> > UN and
> > identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons
> > labs, was it,
> > General
> > Powell?
> >
> > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us
> > our next warning
> > from Saddam
> > could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
> >
> > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
> > that Al Qaeda
> > and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
> >
> > Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
> > arrogance, a
> > duplicitous
> > chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and
> > Tinker-Toy Napoleon --
> > but he didn't
> > appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
> >
> > Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of
> > Defense you didn't
> > read in the
> > New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner,
> > the man our
> > president
> > placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion
> > viceroy.
> >
> > Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
> > under the
> > mistaken notion
> > that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq,
> > the President
> > meant the
> > Iraqis could choose their own government.
> > Misunderstanding the
> > President's true
> > mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold
> > elections within
> > 90 days and
> > for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the
> > cities to a desert
> > base. "It's
> > their country," the General told me of the Iraqis.
> > "And," he added,
> > most
> > ominously, "their oil."
> >
> > Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
> > Garner a 101-page
> > plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons
> > at the State
> > Department, Treasury
> > and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e.
> > the sale)
> > of "all state
> > assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting
> > industries."
> > The General
> > knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where
> > the Iraqi sun
> > don't shine.
> > Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting
> > of Iraqi tribal
> > leaders to
> > plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their
> > own multi-ethnic
> > government --
> > and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were
> > on talking
> > terms -- knew he
> > could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a
> >
> > welcomed "liberation"
> > turned into a hated "occupation."
> >
> > But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition
> > government would mean
> > the
> > death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets
> > privatization grab.
> >
> > On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the
> > very night
> > General Garner
> > arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington.
> > It was Rumsfeld
> > on the line.
> > He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack,
> > Jack, you're
> > fired."
> >
> > Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of
> > on-the-ground experience
> > in Iraq,
> > with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director
> > of Kissinger
> > Associates.
> > Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
> > postponed
> > elections for a
> > year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot
> > pasha, selling
> > off Iraq's
> > economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
> > Rumsfeld's neo-con
> > clique had
> > desired.
> >
> > Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the
> > six generals' call
> > for
> > Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
> >
> > For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't
> > shoot straight.
> > They're
> > wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've
> > gunned down the
> > puppet instead
> > of the puppeteers.
> >
> > There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked
> > General Garner from
> > Baghdad
> > without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or
> > breathes or spits
> > in the Bush
> > Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
> > approval. And
> > ultimately, it's
> > the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
> >
> > Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
> > give them
> > enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the
> > cowboy from
> > Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that
> > we lacked
> > troops -- the
> > problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy
> > this nation. A
> > million
> > troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would
> > just have more
> > targets.)
> >
> > President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
> > today on the
> > intercom with
> > Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up."
> > And Cheney
> > replies, "Hey,
> > just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until
> > he's taken all
> > their ammo."
> >
> > When Bush and Cheney read about the call for
> > Rumsfeld's resignation
> > today, I can
> > just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission
> > Accomplished."
> >
> > Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
> > choosing a target:
> > It's the
> > President, stupid.
> >
> === message truncated ===
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated
and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to
be a patriot.
> - Notebook, 1904
>
> www.fightthenwo.org
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+
countries) for 2¢/min or less.
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/312 - Release Date: 4/14/2006
>
>
>
>
> In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and
scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be
a patriot.
> - Notebook, 1904
>
> www.fightthenwo.org
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.
>
> SPONSORED LINKS United state government grant United state coin United state
patent
> United state flag United state army United state grant
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904
www.fightthenwo.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
a.. Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 16
From: "NoRedCoats@aol.com" NoRedCoats@aol.com
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:34pm(PDT)
Subject: STRIKE..MAY 1st 2006
A NATION WIDE AND INTERNATIONAL MOVEMENT IS NOW UNDERWAY TO NOT WORK, SHOP,
GO TO SCHOOL, ETC AS A PROTEST ON THE MEAN SPIRITED IMMIGRATION ISSUE. WHAT'S
HAPPENING NOW IS THAT ALL GROUPS ARE UNITING AND ADDING TO THIS PROTEST THE
ADGENDAS OF 9-11,ANTIWAR, GLOBALIZATION, WOMEN'S RIGHTS, CIVIL RIGHTS, GAY
RIGHTS, CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ETC.
UNIONS AND WORKERS IN OTHER COUNTRIES ARE CLIMBING ON BOARD.
MILLIONS OF PEOPLE TOOK TO THE STREETS MARCH 25, 2006 AND THIS IS A GOLDEN
OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL PROGRESSIVE MOVEMENTS TO UNITE AS NEVER BEFORE. WE'VE ALL
TALKED ABOUT IT AND TRIED IT ON VARIOUS OCCASIONS WITH LIMITED SUCCESS. THIS
IS THE TIME MY FRIENDS. IN YOUR LIFETIME!
"JUST DO IT!"
STRIKE! STRIKE!
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 17
From: "ranger116@webtv.net" ranger116@webtv.net
Date: Sun Apr 16, 2006 11:20pm(PDT)
Subject: Retired colonel claims U.S. military operations are already 'underwa
Retired colonel claims U.S. military operations are already 'underway'
in Iran
The Raw Story | Retired colonel claims U.S. military operations are
already 'underway' in Iran
Address:http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Retired_colonel_claims_U.S._Military_operations_0415.html
Thanks to my good friend and colleague Larenzo236 for this submission,
and the article by the New York Times reporter Steven Weisman.
While the Bush administration is working together with Iranian terrorist
organizations to destabilize the Iranian regime, they are also looking
for "clean" civil society organizations that could serve them as
conduits for their misinformation and penetration campaign.
Retired colonel claims U.S. military operations are already 'underway'
in Iran
Ron Brynaert
Published: Saturday April 15, 2006
During an interview on CNN Friday night, retired U.S. Air Force Colonel
Sam Gardiner claimed that U.S. military operations are already
'underway' inside Iran, RAW STORY has found."I would say -- and this may
shock some -- I think the decision has been made and military operations
are under way," Col. Gardiner told CNN International anchor Jim Clancy
(as noted by Digby at the blog Hullabaloo).(Crooks and Liars has a video
clip of the interview)
Gardiner, who designed a war game in November of 2004 for Atlantic
Magazine ("Will Iran be next?") which simulated "preparations for
a U.S. assault on Iran," also claimed that Aliasghar Soltaniyeh, the
Iranian ambassador to the United Nation's International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA), told him a few weeks ago that units who had attacked the
Revolutionary Guard had been captured and confessed to working with
Americans.
"The secretary point is, the Iranians have been saying American
military troops are in there, have been saying it for almost a year,"
Gardiner said. "I was in Berlin two weeks ago, sat next to the
ambassador, the Iranian ambassador to the IAEA. And I said, 'Hey, I hear
you're accusing Americans of being in there operating with some of the
units that have shot up revolution guard units.'"
"He said, quite frankly, 'Yes, we know they are. We've captured some
of the units, and they've confessed to working with the Americans,'"
said the retired Air Force colonel.
Last Thursday, Raw Story's Larisa Alexandrovna reported (On Cheney,
Rumsfeld order, US outsourcing special ops, intelligence to Iraq terror
group, intelligence officials say) that, according to former and current
intelligence officials, the Pentagon has been using a right-wing
terrorist organization known as Mujahedeen-e Khalq (MEK) as an
operational asset "to create strife in Iran in preparation for any
possible attack."
"[I]nstead of securing a known terrorist organization, which has been
responsible for acts of terror against Iranian targets and individuals
all over the world â€" including US civilian and military casualties
â€" Rumsfeld under instructions from Cheney, began using the group
on special ops missions into Iran to pave the way for a potential Iran
strike," Larisa reported.
"They are doing whatever they want, no oversight at all,â€
an intelligence source told Larisa.Larisa reported that the MEK soldiers
were told to "quit" their organization and were "renamed" in accordance
with a plan conceived by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld so that
they could be "converted" into a military special ops team.
According to a UN official close to the Security Council whom Larisa
interviewed, the "newly renamed MEK soldiers" were being employed in the
place of U.S. military advance teams to commit "acts of violence in
hopes of staging an insurgency of the Iranian Sunni population."
“We are already at war,†the UN official told RAW STORY.
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Retired_colonel_claims_U.S._Military_operations_0415.html
=================================
SUBMITTED BY:
Subj:Â Â U.S. MILITARY OPERATIONS IN IRANÂ Â
Date:Â Â 4/15/06 10:41:28 PM Central Daylight TimeÂ
Â
From:  PJBscomputer Â
==================================
April 15, 2006
U.S. Program Is Directed at Altering Iran's Politics
By STEVEN R. WEISMAN
WASHINGTON, April 8 â€"
As the Bush administration confronts the Tehran government over
its suspected nuclear weapons program and accusations that it supports
terrorism, a newly created office of Iranian affairs in the State
Department is poring over applications for a rapidly expanding program
to change the political process inside Iran.
The project, which will spend $7 million in the current fiscal
year, would become many times larger next year if Congress approves a
broad request for $85 million that the Bush administration has requested
for scholarships, exchange programs, radio and television broadcasts and
other activities aimed at shaking up Iran's political system.
The effort, overseen by Elizabeth Cheney, a deputy assistant secretary
of state who is a daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney, has been
denounced by Iran's leaders as meddling in their internal affairs.
It comes at a time of escalating confrontation between Iran and the
United States over Iran's nuclear program, exacerbated by reports, which
the administration has played down, that military contingency plans are
being reviewed as well.
While the United States has marshaled international support for
diplomatic pressure on Iran, some Asian and European allies have
expressed misgivings about other avenues of pressure, which are seen as
aimed at undermining the government in Tehran.
One Asian diplomat said the effort was reminiscent of the subsidies the
United States provided to Iraqi exile groups in the 1990's. "They don't
call it 'regime change,' but that is obviously what it is," he said. But
he had to be promised anonymity before he would discuss it, not wanting
to create a public rift between his country and the United States on a
significant matter of foreign policy.
To find people to promote change in Iran, the State Department has
opened a competition for grant applications. A Web site announcement
says that applicants "must outline activities linked to reform and
demonstrate how the proposed approach would achieve sustainable impact
in Iran."
A State Department official said that numerous applications had come
in and that the department would have little trouble spending the $25
million in the next year. But he acknowledged that various groups were
squabbling over how best to promote reform and who would be most
effective in doing so.
"Iran is governed by an unelected clerical elite not accountable to
the people," the official said, speaking anonymously under ground rules
imposed by the department. "But despite considerable personal risk, we
are seeing some activists willing to step forward."
The biggest problem for the applicants is the amount of risk they
might incur. There have been reports in Iran of advocates of change
being arrested after having met with American officials at conferences,
though some experts charge that Iran has exaggerated those reports in
order to discourage contacts with the West.
Other experts said that some of the people who were stepping forward
might not be the best ones to get the money.
"It sounds good to fund civil society groups, but not when you don't
know who the groups are," said Vali R. Nasr, an Iranian-born professor
of national affairs at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, Calif.
"No real group wants a direct affiliation with the United States. It
will just get them into trouble with the government."
Administration officials said a few top American officials had been
traveling the country, particularly to Los Angeles, to meet with Iranian
exile organizations, many of them supporters of the monarchy of Shah
Reza Pahlavi, who was overthrown in 1979. Some of the Los Angeles groups
operate satellite radio and television stations that beam programs into
Iran.
But State Department officials said they were not likely to enlist
groups associated with the monarchy because, in their view, they do not
seem to have much support in Iran.
Lorne W. Craner, president of the International Republican
Institute, a foundation linked to the Republican Party, said, "There are
plenty of people out there who have a checkered past who you would not
want to work with."
The institute, which receives money from Congress and grants from the
State Department, has in the last couple of years linked up with groups
and individuals in Iran and offered them training at places outside the
country. The groups cannot be identified for fear of their safety, he
said.
State Department officials and various advocates for change consulted by
the department said that for now the money would probably be
concentrated on groups seeking to document human rights abuses and
promote women's and labor rights, rather than groups seeking direct
political change.
Recipients of such financing in the past said that in order to
operate they had to avoid the perception that they are tools of "regime
change."
"The administration has consulted many Iranians just to find out who
to talk to," said Roya Boroumand, co-director of the Abdorrahman
Boroumand Foundation, which seeks to document human rights abuses inside
Iran. "We try not to be in touch with too many people inside Iran
because we know it could be fatal."
The Iran Human Rights Documentation Center, a new group based in New
Haven, has received $1 million from the State Department and could
receive more, officials said. But leaders of the group emphasize that
while they have contacts with people in Iran, it is not for the purpose
of overthrowing the government.
"We are pro-human rights, but we are not directly seeking regime
change," said Maura Johnson, the center's executive director. "That's
not our agenda. When you look at many other countries, improved human
rights can occur without regime change, through reforms and stronger
institutions."
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/15/washington/15diplo.html?_r=4&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Day One - The War With Iran
Address:http://www.rense.com/general69/dayone.htm
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````
WCT Targeted On 1999 FEMA 'Terror' Book Cover
Address:http://www.prisonplanet.com/wtc_targeted_on_1999_fema_terror_book.htm
````````````````````````````````````````````````````
American Chronicle: 97% of Illegal Aliens Take Jobs That Americans Want
and Need
Address:http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=7801
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 18
From: "scol202" yahooboxx@ntlworld.com
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:55am(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
"Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to oust
these criminal Zionists from our midst. Israeli refusnik soldiers are
just the tip of the iceberg.
The Arabs are human beings and they deserve to be treated as such."
To be blunt, that is nowhere near good enough. Real Arabs (not
American paid for politicians) want the Jews out of the middle east
permanently and won't rest until it happens. Zionism as a philosophy
and a goal has to be relinquished. As far as I'm concerned Jews were
blackmailed into leaving Europe by a combination of American desire
to dominate the middle east and a Jewish financial elite who wanred
to set up a gangster state of their own.
I have just read my third pro holocaust book by a witness in the
Irving trial and it's a load of ridiculous nonsense. Irving might be
a racist and a closet Nazi but it doesn't mean he's wrong. I have
never read Irving just his opponents by the way, that's what has made
me a revisionist.
It's pretty clear that the Jewish lobby now has massive influence on
Anglo American foreign policy. The idea that Britain would fight such
a war (Iraq) on its own volition just isn't remotely credible.
Seventy five percent were against it.
--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "kenny318east3"
<kenny318east3@...> wrote:
>
> --- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@>
wrote:
>
> << There are many many Jews, who protect the Zionist perpetrators
of 9-11 --
> whose loyalty to fellow Jews, even mass murders, is so great that
they will defend
> them knowing they are wrong. They discover the true guilt of the
Zionist neo-cons
> and Mossad yet they pretend they do not believe it -- I'd say 90
percent of Jews who
> are in any way involved with 9-11 discussion are at this stage.
They are defending
> their people from justice -- all other people be damned. >>
>
> it doesn't matter how much I am horrified by the behavior of
Israel, I am still
> a Jew.
>
> Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to
oust these
> criminal Zionists from our midst.
>
> Israeli refusnik soldiers are just the tip of the iceberg.
>
> The Arabs are human beings and they deserve to be treated as such.
>
> Ken, the grandson of Samuel and Charlotte Goncharow. I am a former
student
> at the Flatbush Jewish Center on Church Avenue and Ocean Parkway,
and I was
> a recipient of the book "Vocabulary of Jewish Life," by Rabbi
Abraham M. Heller.
>
> > > I suspect Leslie Schwartz is going to be like that. I've seen
too many not to think
> so -- and that is the extent to which I have become a collective-
Jewish guilt-until-
> proven-innocent-on-an-individual-basis "anti-Semite" -- literally
a man suspicious
> of Jews in general. It is unjust -- but my instinct for survival
overrides my higher
> impulses.
> >
> > Dick Eastman
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Naveed
> > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > Cc: lhs_emf@
> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 5:50 PM
> > Subject: RE: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
> >
> >
> > for the last time
> >
> > all JEWS ARE NOT ZIONISTS!
> >
> > ALL ZIONISTS ARE NOT JEWS!
> >
> > There is a ZIONIST ELEMENT to the 9/11 conspiracy!!! Maybe you
can't handle
> that............
> > did you even read the damn post i posted about ISRAELI spy
rings awash in
> america? I POSTED IT TWICE.......
> >
> > this below come from my friend ryan!
> >
> > 'A Clean Break' JINSA/PNAC Neocons associated with AIPAC
espionage:
> >
> > washingtonpost.com
> > Leak Inquiry Includes Iran Experts in Administration
> >
> > By Robin Wright and Dan Eggen
> > Washington Post Staff Writers
> > Saturday, September 4, 2004; Page A04
> >
> >
> > FBI counterintelligence investigators have in recent weeks
questioned current and
> former U.S. officials about whether a small group of Iran
specialists at the Pentagon
> and in Vice President Cheney's office may have been involved in
passing classified
> information to an Iraqi politician or a U.S. lobbying group allied
with Israel, according
> to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
> >
> > In their interviews, the FBI agents have also named two Israeli
diplomats stationed
> in Washington and asked whether they would be willing recipients of
sensitive
> intelligence, the sources added.
> >
> > The investigators have asked questions about personnel in the
office of Pentagon
> Undersecretary for Policy Douglas J. Feith as well as members of
the influential
> Defense Policy Board, an advisory panel for Defense Secretary
Donald H. Rumsfeld,
> according to former U.S. officials who have been questioned and
others familiar with
> the case.
> >
> > Investigators have specifically asked about a group of
neoconservatives involved
> in defense issues, including Feith, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul
D. Wolfowitz, Iraq
> and Iran specialist Harold Rhode and others at the Pentagon. FBI
agents also have
> asked current and former officials about Richard Perle of the
defense board and David
> Wurmser, an Iran specialist and principal deputy assistant for
national security affairs
> in Cheney's office, according to sources familiar with or involved
in the case.
> >
> > "The initial interest was: Do you believe certain people would
spy for Israel and
> pass secret information?" said one source interviewed by the FBI
about the defense
> officials.
> >
> > It remains unclear, however, how specific investigators'
suspicions have become.
> And one official, a Feith ally, has said the investigation is an
effort by some
> intelligence officials to discredit Pentagon hawks.
> >
> > The sources interviewed for this article requested anonymity
because it involves
> classified information or because of the ongoing investigation.
> >
> > Perle, Rhode and Wolfowitz did not return telephone calls
placed to their homes
> and offices late Friday. Reached at home, Feith declined comment,
citing the ongoing
> investigation.
> >
> > But Pentagon officials insisted yesterday that FBI questions
about key
> policymakers did not mean they were the subjects of the
intelligence leak
> investigation. Senior Pentagon officials have said they were told
by the FBI that the
> investigation is focused on just one suspect in the Defense
Department, Lawrence A.
> Franklin, an Iran specialist in Feith's office.
> >
> > The FBI investigation first came to light last week with
reports of a probe into
> whether Franklin passed a draft presidential directive on Iran to
the American Israel
> Public Affairs Committee, and whether the directive was then passed
to Israel,
> sources have said. AIPAC has strongly denied any involvement in
espionage.
> >
> > A federal grand jury in Alexandria may take up the Franklin
case as early as next
> week, law enforcement sources said.
> >
> > The questioning of Franklin is a recent part of an
investigation that dates back
> more than two years and includes diverse threads, U.S. officials
and people close to
> the case said. One aspect of the probe concerns AIPAC and another
looks at whether
> intelligence on Iran ended up in the hands of Iraqi National
Congress leader Ahmed
> Chalabi, a longtime Pentagon favorite once considered a possible
replacement for
> Saddam Hussein.
> >
> > Iran has been a particularly controversial issue within the
Bush administration,
> which still does not have a formal policy more than 3 1/2 years
after taking office. A
> small group of Pentagon neoconservatives opposed a draft directive
because it did
> not support a change of governments in Tehran, which they
advocated, current and
> former U.S. officials said.
> >
> > The officials whose names came up during questioning have
strong ties to Israel.
> They also share a long-standing position on Iran and other radical
regimes. Wurmser,
> Feith and Perle were co-authors of a 1996 policy paper for then-
Israeli Prime Minister
> Binyamin Netanyahu titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for
Securing the Realm." It
> called for removing Hussein from power in Iraq as part of a broad
strategy to
> transform the region and remove radical regimes.
> >
> > But current and former U.S. officials, including some who were
interviewed by the
> FBI, are still puzzled by the nature of the investigation involving
Israel, because its
> profoundly close ties with the United States date back six decades
and have involved
> sharing sensitive intelligence. Yet officials also concede that
Israel is one of the three
> countries most active in spying on the United States. Israel denies
conducting
> espionage in the United States.
> >
> > Also yesterday, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary
Committee
> demanded that a new prosecutor be assigned to investigate the
alleged leaks,
> questioning the "political leanings" of the U.S. attorney in
Alexandria who is handling
> the criminal portion of the case.
> >
> > In a letter to Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Rep. John
Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.)
> said the role of U.S. Attorney Paul J. McNulty in the case
has "obvious political
> implications" in an election year, and Conyers cited anonymous
allegations in a news
> report that McNulty had "put the brakes on" the probe.
> >
> > "While I have no reason to question Mr. McNulty's integrity, he
is not a career
> prosecutor, but instead is a political appointee whose previous
employment was
> principally with Republican politicians," Conyers wrote.
> >
> > Conyers suggested that either a special counsel or U.S.
Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald
> of Chicago, who is overseeing a separate probe into the disclosure
of CIA operative
> Valerie Plame, should take over the Pentagon probe.
> >
> > Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo declined to comment
on the specifics
> of Conyers's allegations. "We will review the congressman's letter
and give it the
> attention it is due," Corallo said. A spokesman for McNulty also
declined comment,
> referring a reporter to Corallo's statement.
> >
> > Several law enforcement officials have said in recent days that
the FBI had initially
> considered making rapid arrests in the Franklin probe when it
became clear that news
> of the investigation was about to become public last week. But,
these officials said,
> prosecutors urged caution, arguing that investigators needed more
time to gather
> evidence and assess the case.
> >
> > Franklin has been cooperating in the probe for several weeks,
officials familiar
> with the investigation said. He has not responded to numerous
requests for comment
> at his office and his home in West Virginia.
> >
> >
> >
> > All in the Neocon Family
> > By Jim Lobe, AlterNet
> > Posted on March 27, 2003, Printed on April 16, 2006
> > http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
> > What do William Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, and
Robert Kagan have
> in common? Yes, they are all die-hard hawks who have gained control
of U.S. foreign
> policy since the 9/11 attacks. But they are also part of one big
neoconservative family
> -- an extended clan of spouses, children, and friends who have
known each other for
> generations.
> > Neoconservatives are former liberals (which explains the "neo"
prefix) who
> advocate an aggressive unilateralist vision of U.S. global
supremacy, which includes a
> close strategic alliance with Israel. Let's start with one of the
founding fathers of the
> extended neocon clan: Irving Kristol. His extensive resume includes
waging culture
> wars for the CIA against the Soviet Union in the early years of the
Cold War and
> calling for an American "imperial" role during the Vietnam War.
Papa Kristol, who has
> been credited with defining the major themes of neoconservative
thought, is married
> to Gertrude Himmelfarb, a neoconservative powerhouse on her own.
Her studies of
> the Victorian era in Britain helped inspire the men who sold Bush
on the idea of
> "compassionate conservatism."
> > The son of this proud couple is none other that William
Kristol, the crown prince
> of the neoconservative clique and editor of the Rupert Murdoch-
owned Weekly
> Standard. In 1997, he founded the Project for the New American
Century (PNAC), a
> front group which cemented the powerful alliance between right-wing
Republicans
> like Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, Christian and Catholic Right
leaders like Gary
> Bauer and William Bennett, and the neocons behind a platform of
global U.S. military
> dominance.
> > Irving Kristol's most prominent disciple is Richard Perle, who
was until Thursday
> the Defense Policy Board chairman, is also a "resident scholar" at
the American
> Enterprise Institute, which is housed in the same building as PNAC.
Perle himself
> married into neocon royalty when he wed the daughter of his
professor at the
> University of Chicago, the late Alfred Wohlstetter -- the man who
helped both his
> son-in-law and his fellow student Paul Wolfowitz get their start in
Washington more
> than 30 years ago.
> > Perle's own protege is Douglas Feith, who is now Wolfowitz's
deputy for policy and
> is widely known for his right-wing Likud position. And why not? His
father,
> Philadelphia businessman and philanthropist Dalck Feith, was once a
follower of the
> great revisionist Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky, in his
native Poland back in the
> 1930s. The two Feiths were honored together in 1997 by the right-
wing Zionist
> Organization of America (ZOA).
> > The AEI has long been a major nexus for such inter-familial
relationships. A long-
> time collaborator with Perle, Michael Ledeen is married to Barbara
Ledeen, a founder
> and director of the anti-feminist Independent Women's Forum (IWF),
who is currently
> a major player in the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill.
Richard Perle, Douglas
> Feith, and another neo-con power couple -- David and Meyrav
Wurmser -- co-
> authored a 1996 memorandum for Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu
outlining how to
> break the Oslo peace process and invade Iraq as the first step to
transforming the
> Middle East.
> > Though she doesn't focus much on foreign-policy issues, Lynne
Cheney also
> hangs her hat at AEI. Her husband Dick Cheney recently chose
Victoria Nuland to
> become his next deputy national security adviser. Nuland, as it
turns out, is married
> to Robert Kagan, Bill Kristol's main comrade-in-arms and the co-
founder of PNAC.
> > Bob's father, Donald Kagan, is a Yale historian who converted
from a liberal
> Democrat to a staunch neocon in the 1970s. On the eve of the 2000
presidential
> elections, Donald and his other son, Frederick, published "While
America Sleeps," a
> clarion call to increase defense spending. Since then, the three
Kagan men have
> written reams of columns warning that the currently ballooning
Pentagon budget is
> simply not enough to fund the much-desired vision of U.S. global
supremacy.
> > And which infamous ex-Reaganite do the Kagans and another
leading neocon
> family have in common? None other than Iran-contra veteran Elliott
Abrams.
> > Now the director of Near Eastern Affairs in Bush's National
Security Council,
> Abrams worked closely with Bob Kagan back in the Reagan era. He is
also the son-in-
> law of Norman Podhoretz, long-time editor of the influential
conservative Jewish
> publication Commentary, and his wife, Midge Decter, a fearsome
polemicist in her
> own right.
> > Podhoretz, like Kristol Sr., helped invent neo-conservatism in
the late 1960s. He
> and Decter created a formidable political team as leaders of the
Committee on the
> Present Danger in 1980, when they worked with Donald Rumsfeld to
pound the last
> nail into the coffin of detente and promote the rise of Ronald
Reagan. In addition to
> being Abrams' father-in-law, Norman Podhoretz is also the father of
John Podhoretz,
> a columnist for the Murdoch-owned New York Post and frequent guest
on the
> Murdoch-owned Fox News channel.
> > As editor of Commentary, Norman offered writing space to rising
stars of the
> neocon movement for more than 30 years. His proteges include former
U.N.
> ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and Richard Pipes, who was Ronald
Reagan's top
> advisor on the "Evil Empire," as the president liked to call the
Soviet Union. His son,
> Daniel Pipes, has also made a career out of battling "evil," which
in his case is Islam.
> And to tie it all up neatly, in 2002, Podhoretz received the
highest honor bestowed by
> the AEI: the Irving Kristol award.
> > This list of intricate, overlapping connections is hardly
exhaustive or perhaps even
> surprising. But it helps reveal an important fact. Contrary to
appearances, the
> neocons do not constitute a powerful mass political movement. They
are instead a
> small, tighly-knit clan whose incestuous familial and personal
connections, both
> within and outside the Bush administration, have allowed them grab
control of the
> future of American foreign policy.
> > © 2006 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
> > View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
> >
> >
> > Home : WRH Store : WRH Index : Reader Letters :
Archives : Advertise : Donate
> >
> > On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin
> Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli
relations. His quick
> reply was: "It's very good...Well, it's not good, but it will
generate immediate
> sympathy (for Israel)"
> >
> >
> >
> > The Five Dancing Israelis
> > Arrested On 9-11
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > As the world watched in disbelief and asked the
question...
> >
> > ...Mossad operatives were seen dancing with joy.
> >
> >
> >
> > A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle
of themselves on 9-
> 11.
> > The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and
trained them on the
> twin towers. (1)
> >
> > Police received several calls from angry New Jersey
residents claiming
> "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster
with shouts of
> joy and mockery. (2)
> > "They were like happy, you know . They didn't look
shocked to me" said a
> witness. (3)
> > [T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept.
11 making fun of the
> World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph
themselves in
> front of the wreckage. (4)
> >
> > Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park
after the initial
> impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a
roof in Weehawken,
> and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives
in a Jersey City
> parking lot. (6)
> >
> > "It looked like they're hooked in with this. It
looked like they knew what
> was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (7)
> >
> > One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led
them to close down
> all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the
9-1-1 dispatcher
> that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white
van headed for the
> Holland Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:
> > Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
> > Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in
there, they look like
> Palestinians and going around a building.
> > Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the
Holland tunnel, I see the guy
> by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.
> > Dispatcher: He has what?
> > Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (8)
> >
> > (*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller
specifically say that these
> "Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians
usually dress in
> western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")
> >
> > Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-
the-Lookout" alert for
> a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from
New Jersey. When a
> van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing
into New York, the
> suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the
surprise of the police
> officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!
> > According to ABC's 20/20, when the van belonging to the
cheering Israelis
> was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg,
told the officers:
> >
> > "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your
problems are our
> problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (9)
> >
> > Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?
> > The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious
when they found maps
> of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same
items that the
> hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and
foreign passports.
> Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were
brought to the van
> and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (10)
> > The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of
which shows Sivan
> Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering
ruins in an apparently
> celebratory gesture. (11)
> >
> > The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a
bomb was stopped
> as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of
the suspects was
> not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September
12, 2001:
> > American security services overnight stopped a car
bomb on the George
> Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on
an approach
> ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to
blow up the main
> crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (12)
> >
> > TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down
with tonnes of
> explosives (13).
> > What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (14), the
New York Post (15), and
> the New Jersey Bergen Record (16) all clearly and unambiguously
reported that a
> white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3,
which leads directly
> to the Lincoln Tunnel.
> > But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz
Sheva) (17), and Yediot
> America, (18) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that
a white van with
> Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington
Bridge, which is
> several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.
> > It appears as if there may actually have been two
white vans involved, one
> stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the
conflicting reports as to
> the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so
many credible eye-
> witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in
so many different
> locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon
(lawyer for the 5
> Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but
later increased the
> total to five.
> > Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while
the other was meant
> to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New
Jersey? If a van was
> to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly
the drivers would
> need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And
notice how the van
> (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland
Tunnel- which was
> where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-
Palestinian 9-1-1
> "mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.
> >
> > From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious.
The Israelis worked
> for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An
American
> employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey
that a majority
> of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the
attacks.
> > The employee, who declined to give his name
said: "I was in tears. These
> guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were like, "Now
America knows
> what we go through." (19)
> >
> > A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's
Israeli owner, Dominick
> Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was
in such a hurry to
> flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left
with their
> furniture stranded in storage facilities (20).
> > It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis
were in fact Mossad
> agents (21). They were held in custody for 71 days before being
quietly released.
> Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40
days. (22)
> > [S]everal of the detainees discussed their
experience in America on an
> Israeli talk show after their return home.
> > Said one of the men, denying that they were
laughing or happy on the
> morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from
a country that
> experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."
(23)
> >
> > How did they know there would be an event to document on
9-11?
> > It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of
the dancing Israeli
> Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:
> > 1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to
celebrate the
> successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled
off in history.
> > 2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-
1 police dispatcher to
> report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the
Holland Tunnel.
> > 3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with
this phone call, the Israeli
> bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where
they will drop
> off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.
> > 4. But the police react very wisely and proactively
by closing off ALL
> bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move
inadvertently foils
> the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and
40 day torture.
> > 5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice
Department rounds up over 1000
> Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York
area jails. The
> Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and
media can now
> claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in
the same dragnet as
> many other Arabs.
> > 6. After several months, FBI and Justice
Department "higher-ups" are able
> to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis
quietly.
> >
> > Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9-11
attacks even though
> he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale.
Immediately after the
> Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
> > CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin
Laden's fingerprints all
> over it." (24)
> > The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the
Israeli connection.
> Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with
stories linking the
> attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers
of every stripe
> spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most
outrageous
> propaganda imaginable.
> > We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA
was because he
> hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval"
and they wanted
> to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter
about the Crusades,
> and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all
over the place!
> > But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and
suggested that
> Zionists orchestrated the
> > 9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of
denial in which he
> said:
> > "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in
the United States nor
> did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government
within a government
> within the United States. The United States should try to trace the
perpetrators of
> these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the
present century a
> century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret
government must be
> asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is
totally in control
> of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United
States." (25)
> >
> > You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did
you?
> > [A] number of intelligence officials have raised
questions about Osama bin
> Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and
he's running this
> operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't
have done it alone." A
> senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other
documentation
> needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major
foreign intelligence
> service might also have been involved. (26)
> >
> > Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of the 9-11
attacks by the FBI:
> > USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE
AUGUST 7,
> 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM,
TANZANIA,
> AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN
ADDITION, BIN
> LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.
(27)
> >
> > To date, the only shred of "evidence" to be uncovered
against bin Laden is a
> barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened
to find "lying
> around" in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake.
(28)
> > There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to
link the Al Qaeda
> "terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a
mountain of evidence, both
> hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been
very busy framing
> Arabs for terror plots against America.
> >
> > One final point - at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that
the Democratic Front
> for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the
attacks (29). This claim
> was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said
it had always
> opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the
occupied
> territories." (30)
> > 9-11 CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a
Palestinian claim of
> responsibility
> >
> > Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less
than 500 people (31)
> make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for
the attacks?
> > Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to
fulfill what the goals of the
> political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century
ago: to turn all of
> historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central
tenet of the Zionist
> ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people
for a people
> without a land." (32)
> >
> > The implication of Palestinians in the 9-11 attacks would
have handed
> Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all
Palestinians would
> have been labelled terrorists.
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
> > "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I
cannot tell you about
> evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."
> > US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on
the Israeli spy ring.
> > "By way of deception, thou shalt do war"
> > Motto of the Mossad
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
> > See also:
> > Israel and 9/11 - Index of What Really Happened
> > Zionist Circles Benefit From WTC Collapse
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
> > What Really Happened
> >
> >
> > Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@> wrote:
> > Bugs,
> >
> > Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with
people who think its all a
> Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
> >
> > Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are
deranged, I just read
> one of their histories, Hitler you know was a good guy, Jews forced
him to carry out
> the holocaust.
> >
> > Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad
control the world along
> with Jewish international bankers, etc.
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Jews
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Zionists
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Mossad
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Sharon
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.
> >
> > Just plain demented hate.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ----
> > From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bugs
> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:30 AM
> > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
> >
> >
> > TRY RUMSFELD FOR TREASON
> >
> > The oath is to stand against all domestic and foreign enimies
and
> > what Rumsfeld has done to the American Troops is a crime in
and onto
> > itself.
> >
> > Uraium dust has been spread all over Iraq due to the Uranium
used in
> > Penatrator Bombs and Bullets.
> >
> > Villages and the City of Fulluja have been razed to the
ground.
> >
> > 100,000 Iraqi civillians mostly women and children have been
killed
> > as collateral damage.
> >
> > All of this has occured because Rumsfeld and Bush elected to
lie the
> > American Soldiers into an unnecessary war.
> >
> > Why did Bush and Rumsfeld do this ?
> >
> > They did it to steal the Iraqi oil sell it to china and put
the cash
> > into Chinese banks.
> >
> > And they are perpetuating the occupation by not having enough
troops
> > so they can stay in Iraq an keep on stealing the oil forever.
> >
> > The Maritine Ship movement logs will prove this.
> >
> > It is an OPEN and Shut Case.
> >
> > or in other words a "REAL SLAM DUNK"
> >
> > Bush's Brother and Uncle have been in and out of China for
years
> > lining up this traitorous deal.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Naveed
> > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:01 AM
> > Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Greg Palast Still DOESNT GET
IT !
> >
> >
> > didn't know paul bremer was a kissinger stooge.......
> >
> > mann david <dmann51@> wrote:
> > Read that piece in a hurry but didn't notice mention
> > of 9-11. Wow, pathetic trivial trip indeed.
> >
> > --- JIM <justpasenthru2012@> wrote:
> >
> > > Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
> > > Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
> > > The Guardian - Comment
> > > Friday, April 14, 2006
> > > By Greg Palast
> > >
> > > Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the
> > > gaggle of generals,
> > > safely
> > > retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week,
> > > six of them
> > > have called for
> > > the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
> > >
> > > Well, according to my watch, they're about four
> > > years too late --
> > > and they still
> > > don't get it.
> > >
> > > I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
> > > that the
> > > bemedalled boys in
> > > crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the
> > > rump, in public.
> > > But to me, it
> > > just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
> > > straight.
> > >
> > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up
> > > in front of the
> > > UN and
> > > identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons
> > > labs, was it,
> > > General
> > > Powell?
> > >
> > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us
> > > our next warning
> > > from Saddam
> > > could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
> > >
> > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
> > > that Al Qaeda
> > > and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
> > >
> > > Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
> > > arrogance, a
> > > duplicitous
> > > chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and
> > > Tinker-Toy Napoleon --
> > > but he didn't
> > > appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
> > >
> > > Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of
> > > Defense you didn't
> > > read in the
> > > New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner,
> > > the man our
> > > president
> > > placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion
> > > viceroy.
> > >
> > > Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
> > > under the
> > > mistaken notion
> > > that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq,
> > > the President
> > > meant the
> > > Iraqis could choose their own government.
> > > Misunderstanding the
> > > President's true
> > > mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold
> > > elections within
> > > 90 days and
> > > for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the
> > > cities to a desert
> > > base. "It's
> > > their country," the General told me of the Iraqis.
> > > "And," he added,
> > > most
> > > ominously, "their oil."
> > >
> > > Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
> > > Garner a 101-page
> > > plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons
> > > at the State
> > > Department, Treasury
> > > and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e.
> > > the sale)
> > > of "all state
> > > assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting
> > > industries."
> > > The General
> > > knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where
> > > the Iraqi sun
> > > don't shine.
> > > Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting
> > > of Iraqi tribal
> > > leaders to
> > > plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their
> > > own multi-ethnic
> > > government --
> > > and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were
> > > on talking
> > > terms -- knew he
> > > could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a
> > >
> > > welcomed "liberation"
> > > turned into a hated "occupation."
> > >
> > > But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition
> > > government would mean
> > > the
> > > death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets
> > > privatization grab.
> > >
> > > On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the
> > > very night
> > > General Garner
> > > arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington.
> > > It was Rumsfeld
> > > on the line.
> > > He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack,
> > > Jack, you're
> > > fired."
> > >
> > > Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of
> > > on-the-ground experience
> > > in Iraq,
> > > with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director
> > > of Kissinger
> > > Associates.
> > > Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
> > > postponed
> > > elections for a
> > > year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot
> > > pasha, selling
> > > off Iraq's
> > > economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
> > > Rumsfeld's neo-con
> > > clique had
> > > desired.
> > >
> > > Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the
> > > six generals' call
> > > for
> > > Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
> > >
> > > For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't
> > > shoot straight.
> > > They're
> > > wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've
> > > gunned down the
> > > puppet instead
> > > of the puppeteers.
> > >
> > > There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked
> > > General Garner from
> > > Baghdad
> > > without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or
> > > breathes or spits
> > > in the Bush
> > > Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
> > > approval. And
> > > ultimately, it's
> > > the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
> > >
> > > Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
> > > give them
> > > enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the
> > > cowboy from
> > > Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that
> > > we lacked
> > > troops -- the
> > > problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy
> > > this nation. A
> > > million
> > > troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would
> > > just have more
> > > targets.)
> > >
> > > President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
> > > today on the
> > > intercom with
> > > Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up."
> > > And Cheney
> > > replies, "Hey,
> > > just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until
> > > he's taken all
> > > their ammo."
> > >
> > > When Bush and Cheney read about the call for
> > > Rumsfeld's resignation
> > > today, I can
> > > just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission
> > > Accomplished."
> > >
> > > Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
> > > choosing a target:
> > > It's the
> > > President, stupid.
> > >
> > === message truncated ===
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man,
and brave, and hated
> and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then
it costs nothing to
> be a patriot.
> > - Notebook, 1904
> >
> > www.fightthenwo.org
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> --
> > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the
US (and 30+
> countries) for 2¢/min or less.
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> --
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/312 - Release
Date: 4/14/2006
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and
brave, and hated and
> scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it
costs nothing to be
> a patriot.
> > - Notebook, 1904
> >
> > www.fightthenwo.org
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously
low rates.
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS United state government grant United state
coin United state
> patent
> > United state flag United state army United state grant
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > a.. Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
> >
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message 19
From: "scol202" yahooboxx@ntlworld.com
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 5:06am(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
"Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to oust
these criminal Zionists from our midst."
Jewish people are no more (or less) good and decent than anyone else.
They won't remove the zionists because there is no such thing as
the "Jewish people". These guys represent their own criminal
interests and the best thing for individual Jews to do (in my
opinion) is disown them totally. My experience is that many Jews
support them n a spirit of solidarity which is a massive mistake. I
have no idea at all how many do and how many don't by the way.
The problem has always been that Jews behave and are seen as a group
which is MUCH more cohesive than other religions. The only comparable
group are unsurprisingly Christian Zionists who are funded by Jewish
(Israeli) money.
--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "kenny318east3"
<kenny318east3@...> wrote:
>
> --- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@>
wrote:
>
> << There are many many Jews, who protect the Zionist perpetrators
of 9-11 --
> whose loyalty to fellow Jews, even mass murders, is so great that
they will defend
> them knowing they are wrong. They discover the true guilt of the
Zionist neo-cons
> and Mossad yet they pretend they do not believe it -- I'd say 90
percent of Jews who
> are in any way involved with 9-11 discussion are at this stage.
They are defending
> their people from justice -- all other people be damned. >>
>
> it doesn't matter how much I am horrified by the behavior of
Israel, I am still
> a Jew.
>
> Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to
oust these
> criminal Zionists from our midst.
>
> Israeli refusnik soldiers are just the tip of the iceberg.
>
> The Arabs are human beings and they deserve to be treated as such.
>
> Ken, the grandson of Samuel and Charlotte Goncharow. I am a former
student
> at the Flatbush Jewish Center on Church Avenue and Ocean Parkway,
and I was
> a recipient of the book "Vocabulary of Jewish Life," by Rabbi
Abraham M. Heller.
>
> > > I suspect Leslie Schwartz is going to be like that. I've seen
too many not to think
> so -- and that is the extent to which I have become a collective-
Jewish guilt-until-
> proven-innocent-on-an-individual-basis "anti-Semite" -- literally
a man suspicious
> of Jews in general. It is unjust -- but my instinct for survival
overrides my higher
> impulses.
> >
> > Dick Eastman
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Naveed
> > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > Cc: lhs_emf@
> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 5:50 PM
> > Subject: RE: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
> >
> >
> > for the last time
> >
> > all JEWS ARE NOT ZIONISTS!
> >
> > ALL ZIONISTS ARE NOT JEWS!
> >
> > There is a ZIONIST ELEMENT to the 9/11 conspiracy!!! Maybe you
can't handle
> that............
> > did you even read the damn post i posted about ISRAELI spy
rings awash in
> america? I POSTED IT TWICE.......
> >
> > this below come from my friend ryan!
> >
> > 'A Clean Break' JINSA/PNAC Neocons associated with AIPAC
espionage:
> >
> > washingtonpost.com
> > Leak Inquiry Includes Iran Experts in Administration
> >
> > By Robin Wright and Dan Eggen
> > Washington Post Staff Writers
> > Saturday, September 4, 2004; Page A04
> >
> >
> > FBI counterintelligence investigators have in recent weeks
questioned current and
> former U.S. officials about whether a small group of Iran
specialists at the Pentagon
> and in Vice President Cheney's office may have been involved in
passing classified
> information to an Iraqi politician or a U.S. lobbying group allied
with Israel, according
> to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
> >
> > In their interviews, the FBI agents have also named two Israeli
diplomats stationed
> in Washington and asked whether they would be willing recipients of
sensitive
> intelligence, the sources added.
> >
> > The investigators have asked questions about personnel in the
office of Pentagon
> Undersecretary for Policy Douglas J. Feith as well as members of
the influential
> Defense Policy Board, an advisory panel for Defense Secretary
Donald H. Rumsfeld,
> according to former U.S. officials who have been questioned and
others familiar with
> the case.
> >
> > Investigators have specifically asked about a group of
neoconservatives involved
> in defense issues, including Feith, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul
D. Wolfowitz, Iraq
> and Iran specialist Harold Rhode and others at the Pentagon. FBI
agents also have
> asked current and former officials about Richard Perle of the
defense board and David
> Wurmser, an Iran specialist and principal deputy assistant for
national security affairs
> in Cheney's office, according to sources familiar with or involved
in the case.
> >
> > "The initial interest was: Do you believe certain people would
spy for Israel and
> pass secret information?" said one source interviewed by the FBI
about the defense
> officials.
> >
> > It remains unclear, however, how specific investigators'
suspicions have become.
> And one official, a Feith ally, has said the investigation is an
effort by some
> intelligence officials to discredit Pentagon hawks.
> >
> > The sources interviewed for this article requested anonymity
because it involves
> classified information or because of the ongoing investigation.
> >
> > Perle, Rhode and Wolfowitz did not return telephone calls
placed to their homes
> and offices late Friday. Reached at home, Feith declined comment,
citing the ongoing
> investigation.
> >
> > But Pentagon officials insisted yesterday that FBI questions
about key
> policymakers did not mean they were the subjects of the
intelligence leak
> investigation. Senior Pentagon officials have said they were told
by the FBI that the
> investigation is focused on just one suspect in the Defense
Department, Lawrence A.
> Franklin, an Iran specialist in Feith's office.
> >
> > The FBI investigation first came to light last week with
reports of a probe into
> whether Franklin passed a draft presidential directive on Iran to
the American Israel
> Public Affairs Committee, and whether the directive was then passed
to Israel,
> sources have said. AIPAC has strongly denied any involvement in
espionage.
> >
> > A federal grand jury in Alexandria may take up the Franklin
case as early as next
> week, law enforcement sources said.
> >
> > The questioning of Franklin is a recent part of an
investigation that dates back
> more than two years and includes diverse threads, U.S. officials
and people close to
> the case said. One aspect of the probe concerns AIPAC and another
looks at whether
> intelligence on Iran ended up in the hands of Iraqi National
Congress leader Ahmed
> Chalabi, a longtime Pentagon favorite once considered a possible
replacement for
> Saddam Hussein.
> >
> > Iran has been a particularly controversial issue within the
Bush administration,
> which still does not have a formal policy more than 3 1/2 years
after taking office. A
> small group of Pentagon neoconservatives opposed a draft directive
because it did
> not support a change of governments in Tehran, which they
advocated, current and
> former U.S. officials said.
> >
> > The officials whose names came up during questioning have
strong ties to Israel.
> They also share a long-standing position on Iran and other radical
regimes. Wurmser,
> Feith and Perle were co-authors of a 1996 policy paper for then-
Israeli Prime Minister
> Binyamin Netanyahu titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for
Securing the Realm." It
> called for removing Hussein from power in Iraq as part of a broad
strategy to
> transform the region and remove radical regimes.
> >
> > But current and former U.S. officials, including some who were
interviewed by the
> FBI, are still puzzled by the nature of the investigation involving
Israel, because its
> profoundly close ties with the United States date back six decades
and have involved
> sharing sensitive intelligence. Yet officials also concede that
Israel is one of the three
> countries most active in spying on the United States. Israel denies
conducting
> espionage in the United States.
> >
> > Also yesterday, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary
Committee
> demanded that a new prosecutor be assigned to investigate the
alleged leaks,
> questioning the "political leanings" of the U.S. attorney in
Alexandria who is handling
> the criminal portion of the case.
> >
> > In a letter to Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Rep. John
Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.)
> said the role of U.S. Attorney Paul J. McNulty in the case
has "obvious political
> implications" in an election year, and Conyers cited anonymous
allegations in a news
> report that McNulty had "put the brakes on" the probe.
> >
> > "While I have no reason to question Mr. McNulty's integrity, he
is not a career
> prosecutor, but instead is a political appointee whose previous
employment was
> principally with Republican politicians," Conyers wrote.
> >
> > Conyers suggested that either a special counsel or U.S.
Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald
> of Chicago, who is overseeing a separate probe into the disclosure
of CIA operative
> Valerie Plame, should take over the Pentagon probe.
> >
> > Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo declined to comment
on the specifics
> of Conyers's allegations. "We will review the congressman's letter
and give it the
> attention it is due," Corallo said. A spokesman for McNulty also
declined comment,
> referring a reporter to Corallo's statement.
> >
> > Several law enforcement officials have said in recent days that
the FBI had initially
> considered making rapid arrests in the Franklin probe when it
became clear that news
> of the investigation was about to become public last week. But,
these officials said,
> prosecutors urged caution, arguing that investigators needed more
time to gather
> evidence and assess the case.
> >
> > Franklin has been cooperating in the probe for several weeks,
officials familiar
> with the investigation said. He has not responded to numerous
requests for comment
> at his office and his home in West Virginia.
> >
> >
> >
> > All in the Neocon Family
> > By Jim Lobe, AlterNet
> > Posted on March 27, 2003, Printed on April 16, 2006
> > http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
> > What do William Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, and
Robert Kagan have
> in common? Yes, they are all die-hard hawks who have gained control
of U.S. foreign
> policy since the 9/11 attacks. But they are also part of one big
neoconservative family
> -- an extended clan of spouses, children, and friends who have
known each other for
> generations.
> > Neoconservatives are former liberals (which explains the "neo"
prefix) who
> advocate an aggressive unilateralist vision of U.S. global
supremacy, which includes a
> close strategic alliance with Israel. Let's start with one of the
founding fathers of the
> extended neocon clan: Irving Kristol. His extensive resume includes
waging culture
> wars for the CIA against the Soviet Union in the early years of the
Cold War and
> calling for an American "imperial" role during the Vietnam War.
Papa Kristol, who has
> been credited with defining the major themes of neoconservative
thought, is married
> to Gertrude Himmelfarb, a neoconservative powerhouse on her own.
Her studies of
> the Victorian era in Britain helped inspire the men who sold Bush
on the idea of
> "compassionate conservatism."
> > The son of this proud couple is none other that William
Kristol, the crown prince
> of the neoconservative clique and editor of the Rupert Murdoch-
owned Weekly
> Standard. In 1997, he founded the Project for the New American
Century (PNAC), a
> front group which cemented the powerful alliance between right-wing
Republicans
> like Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, Christian and Catholic Right
leaders like Gary
> Bauer and William Bennett, and the neocons behind a platform of
global U.S. military
> dominance.
> > Irving Kristol's most prominent disciple is Richard Perle, who
was until Thursday
> the Defense Policy Board chairman, is also a "resident scholar" at
the American
> Enterprise Institute, which is housed in the same building as PNAC.
Perle himself
> married into neocon royalty when he wed the daughter of his
professor at the
> University of Chicago, the late Alfred Wohlstetter -- the man who
helped both his
> son-in-law and his fellow student Paul Wolfowitz get their start in
Washington more
> than 30 years ago.
> > Perle's own protege is Douglas Feith, who is now Wolfowitz's
deputy for policy and
> is widely known for his right-wing Likud position. And why not? His
father,
> Philadelphia businessman and philanthropist Dalck Feith, was once a
follower of the
> great revisionist Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky, in his
native Poland back in the
> 1930s. The two Feiths were honored together in 1997 by the right-
wing Zionist
> Organization of America (ZOA).
> > The AEI has long been a major nexus for such inter-familial
relationships. A long-
> time collaborator with Perle, Michael Ledeen is married to Barbara
Ledeen, a founder
> and director of the anti-feminist Independent Women's Forum (IWF),
who is currently
> a major player in the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill.
Richard Perle, Douglas
> Feith, and another neo-con power couple -- David and Meyrav
Wurmser -- co-
> authored a 1996 memorandum for Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu
outlining how to
> break the Oslo peace process and invade Iraq as the first step to
transforming the
> Middle East.
> > Though she doesn't focus much on foreign-policy issues, Lynne
Cheney also
> hangs her hat at AEI. Her husband Dick Cheney recently chose
Victoria Nuland to
> become his next deputy national security adviser. Nuland, as it
turns out, is married
> to Robert Kagan, Bill Kristol's main comrade-in-arms and the co-
founder of PNAC.
> > Bob's father, Donald Kagan, is a Yale historian who converted
from a liberal
> Democrat to a staunch neocon in the 1970s. On the eve of the 2000
presidential
> elections, Donald and his other son, Frederick, published "While
America Sleeps," a
> clarion call to increase defense spending. Since then, the three
Kagan men have
> written reams of columns warning that the currently ballooning
Pentagon budget is
> simply not enough to fund the much-desired vision of U.S. global
supremacy.
> > And which infamous ex-Reaganite do the Kagans and another
leading neocon
> family have in common? None other than Iran-contra veteran Elliott
Abrams.
> > Now the director of Near Eastern Affairs in Bush's National
Security Council,
> Abrams worked closely with Bob Kagan back in the Reagan era. He is
also the son-in-
> law of Norman Podhoretz, long-time editor of the influential
conservative Jewish
> publication Commentary, and his wife, Midge Decter, a fearsome
polemicist in her
> own right.
> > Podhoretz, like Kristol Sr., helped invent neo-conservatism in
the late 1960s. He
> and Decter created a formidable political team as leaders of the
Committee on the
> Present Danger in 1980, when they worked with Donald Rumsfeld to
pound the last
> nail into the coffin of detente and promote the rise of Ronald
Reagan. In addition to
> being Abrams' father-in-law, Norman Podhoretz is also the father of
John Podhoretz,
> a columnist for the Murdoch-owned New York Post and frequent guest
on the
> Murdoch-owned Fox News channel.
> > As editor of Commentary, Norman offered writing space to rising
stars of the
> neocon movement for more than 30 years. His proteges include former
U.N.
> ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and Richard Pipes, who was Ronald
Reagan's top
> advisor on the "Evil Empire," as the president liked to call the
Soviet Union. His son,
> Daniel Pipes, has also made a career out of battling "evil," which
in his case is Islam.
> And to tie it all up neatly, in 2002, Podhoretz received the
highest honor bestowed by
> the AEI: the Irving Kristol award.
> > This list of intricate, overlapping connections is hardly
exhaustive or perhaps even
> surprising. But it helps reveal an important fact. Contrary to
appearances, the
> neocons do not constitute a powerful mass political movement. They
are instead a
> small, tighly-knit clan whose incestuous familial and personal
connections, both
> within and outside the Bush administration, have allowed them grab
control of the
> future of American foreign policy.
> > © 2006 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
> > View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
> >
> >
> > Home : WRH Store : WRH Index : Reader Letters :
Archives : Advertise : Donate
> >
> > On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin
> Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli
relations. His quick
> reply was: "It's very good...Well, it's not good, but it will
generate immediate
> sympathy (for Israel)"
> >
> >
> >
> > The Five Dancing Israelis
> > Arrested On 9-11
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > As the world watched in disbelief and asked the
question...
> >
> > ...Mossad operatives were seen dancing with joy.
> >
> >
> >
> > A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle
of themselves on 9-
> 11.
> > The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and
trained them on the
> twin towers. (1)
> >
> > Police received several calls from angry New Jersey
residents claiming
> "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster
with shouts of
> joy and mockery. (2)
> > "They were like happy, you know . They didn't look
shocked to me" said a
> witness. (3)
> > [T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept.
11 making fun of the
> World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph
themselves in
> front of the wreckage. (4)
> >
> > Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park
after the initial
> impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a
roof in Weehawken,
> and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives
in a Jersey City
> parking lot. (6)
> >
> > "It looked like they're hooked in with this. It
looked like they knew what
> was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (7)
> >
> > One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led
them to close down
> all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the
9-1-1 dispatcher
> that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white
van headed for the
> Holland Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:
> > Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
> > Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in
there, they look like
> Palestinians and going around a building.
> > Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the
Holland tunnel, I see the guy
> by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.
> > Dispatcher: He has what?
> > Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (8)
> >
> > (*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller
specifically say that these
> "Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians
usually dress in
> western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")
> >
> > Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-
the-Lookout" alert for
> a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from
New Jersey. When a
> van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing
into New York, the
> suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the
surprise of the police
> officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!
> > According to ABC's 20/20, when the van belonging to the
cheering Israelis
> was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg,
told the officers:
> >
> > "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your
problems are our
> problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (9)
> >
> > Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?
> > The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious
when they found maps
> of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same
items that the
> hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and
foreign passports.
> Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were
brought to the van
> and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (10)
> > The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of
which shows Sivan
> Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering
ruins in an apparently
> celebratory gesture. (11)
> >
> > The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a
bomb was stopped
> as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of
the suspects was
> not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September
12, 2001:
> > American security services overnight stopped a car
bomb on the George
> Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on
an approach
> ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to
blow up the main
> crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (12)
> >
> > TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down
with tonnes of
> explosives (13).
> > What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (14), the
New York Post (15), and
> the New Jersey Bergen Record (16) all clearly and unambiguously
reported that a
> white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3,
which leads directly
> to the Lincoln Tunnel.
> > But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz
Sheva) (17), and Yediot
> America, (18) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that
a white van with
> Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington
Bridge, which is
> several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.
> > It appears as if there may actually have been two
white vans involved, one
> stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the
conflicting reports as to
> the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so
many credible eye-
> witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in
so many different
> locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon
(lawyer for the 5
> Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but
later increased the
> total to five.
> > Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while
the other was meant
> to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New
Jersey? If a van was
> to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly
the drivers would
> need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And
notice how the van
> (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland
Tunnel- which was
> where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-
Palestinian 9-1-1
> "mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.
> >
> > From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious.
The Israelis worked
> for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An
American
> employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey
that a majority
> of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the
attacks.
> > The employee, who declined to give his name
said: "I was in tears. These
> guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were like, "Now
America knows
> what we go through." (19)
> >
> > A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's
Israeli owner, Dominick
> Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was
in such a hurry to
> flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left
with their
> furniture stranded in storage facilities (20).
> > It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis
were in fact Mossad
> agents (21). They were held in custody for 71 days before being
quietly released.
> Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40
days. (22)
> > [S]everal of the detainees discussed their
experience in America on an
> Israeli talk show after their return home.
> > Said one of the men, denying that they were
laughing or happy on the
> morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from
a country that
> experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."
(23)
> >
> > How did they know there would be an event to document on
9-11?
> > It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of
the dancing Israeli
> Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:
> > 1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to
celebrate the
> successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled
off in history.
> > 2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-
1 police dispatcher to
> report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the
Holland Tunnel.
> > 3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with
this phone call, the Israeli
> bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where
they will drop
> off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.
> > 4. But the police react very wisely and proactively
by closing off ALL
> bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move
inadvertently foils
> the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and
40 day torture.
> > 5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice
Department rounds up over 1000
> Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York
area jails. The
> Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and
media can now
> claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in
the same dragnet as
> many other Arabs.
> > 6. After several months, FBI and Justice
Department "higher-ups" are able
> to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis
quietly.
> >
> > Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9-11
attacks even though
> he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale.
Immediately after the
> Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
> > CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin
Laden's fingerprints all
> over it." (24)
> > The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the
Israeli connection.
> Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with
stories linking the
> attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers
of every stripe
> spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most
outrageous
> propaganda imaginable.
> > We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA
was because he
> hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval"
and they wanted
> to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter
about the Crusades,
> and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all
over the place!
> > But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and
suggested that
> Zionists orchestrated the
> > 9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of
denial in which he
> said:
> > "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in
the United States nor
> did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government
within a government
> within the United States. The United States should try to trace the
perpetrators of
> these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the
present century a
> century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret
government must be
> asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is
totally in control
> of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United
States." (25)
> >
> > You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did
you?
> > [A] number of intelligence officials have raised
questions about Osama bin
> Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and
he's running this
> operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't
have done it alone." A
> senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other
documentation
> needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major
foreign intelligence
> service might also have been involved. (26)
> >
> > Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of the 9-11
attacks by the FBI:
> > USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE
AUGUST 7,
> 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM,
TANZANIA,
> AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN
ADDITION, BIN
> LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.
(27)
> >
> > To date, the only shred of "evidence" to be uncovered
against bin Laden is a
> barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened
to find "lying
> around" in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake.
(28)
> > There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to
link the Al Qaeda
> "terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a
mountain of evidence, both
> hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been
very busy framing
> Arabs for terror plots against America.
> >
> > One final point - at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that
the Democratic Front
> for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the
attacks (29). This claim
> was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said
it had always
> opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the
occupied
> territories." (30)
> > 9-11 CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a
Palestinian claim of
> responsibility
> >
> > Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less
than 500 people (31)
> make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for
the attacks?
> > Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to
fulfill what the goals of the
> political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century
ago: to turn all of
> historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central
tenet of the Zionist
> ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people
for a people
> without a land." (32)
> >
> > The implication of Palestinians in the 9-11 attacks would
have handed
> Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all
Palestinians would
> have been labelled terrorists.
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
> > "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I
cannot tell you about
> evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."
> > US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on
the Israeli spy ring.
> > "By way of deception, thou shalt do war"
> > Motto of the Mossad
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
> > See also:
> > Israel and 9/11 - Index of What Really Happened
> > Zionist Circles Benefit From WTC Collapse
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
> > What Really Happened
> >
> >
> > Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@> wrote:
> > Bugs,
> >
> > Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with
people who think its all a
> Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
> >
> > Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are
deranged, I just read
> one of their histories, Hitler you know was a good guy, Jews forced
him to carry out
> the holocaust.
> >
> > Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad
control the world along
> with Jewish international bankers, etc.
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Jews
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Zionists
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Mossad
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Sharon
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.
> >
> > Just plain demented hate.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ----
> > From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bugs
> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:30 AM
> > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
> >
> >
> > TRY RUMSFELD FOR TREASON
> >
> > The oath is to stand against all domestic and foreign enimies
and
> > what Rumsfeld has done to the American Troops is a crime in
and onto
> > itself.
> >
> > Uraium dust has been spread all over Iraq due to the Uranium
used in
> > Penatrator Bombs and Bullets.
> >
> > Villages and the City of Fulluja have been razed to the
ground.
> >
> > 100,000 Iraqi civillians mostly women and children have been
killed
> > as collateral damage.
> >
> > All of this has occured because Rumsfeld and Bush elected to
lie the
> > American Soldiers into an unnecessary war.
> >
> > Why did Bush and Rumsfeld do this ?
> >
> > They did it to steal the Iraqi oil sell it to china and put
the cash
> > into Chinese banks.
> >
> > And they are perpetuating the occupation by not having enough
troops
> > so they can stay in Iraq an keep on stealing the oil forever.
> >
> > The Maritine Ship movement logs will prove this.
> >
> > It is an OPEN and Shut Case.
> >
> > or in other words a "REAL SLAM DUNK"
> >
> > Bush's Brother and Uncle have been in and out of China for
years
> > lining up this traitorous deal.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Naveed
> > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:01 AM
> > Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Greg Palast Still DOESNT GET
IT !
> >
> >
> > didn't know paul bremer was a kissinger stooge.......
> >
> > mann david <dmann51@> wrote:
> > Read that piece in a hurry but didn't notice mention
> > of 9-11. Wow, pathetic trivial trip indeed.
> >
> > --- JIM <justpasenthru2012@> wrote:
> >
> > > Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
> > > Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
> > > The Guardian - Comment
> > > Friday, April 14, 2006
> > > By Greg Palast
> > >
> > > Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the
> > > gaggle of generals,
> > > safely
> > > retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week,
> > > six of them
> > > have called for
> > > the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
> > >
> > > Well, according to my watch, they're about four
> > > years too late --
> > > and they still
> > > don't get it.
> > >
> > > I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
> > > that the
> > > bemedalled boys in
> > > crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the
> > > rump, in public.
> > > But to me, it
> > > just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
> > > straight.
> > >
> > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up
> > > in front of the
> > > UN and
> > > identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons
> > > labs, was it,
> > > General
> > > Powell?
> > >
> > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us
> > > our next warning
> > > from Saddam
> > > could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
> > >
> > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
> > > that Al Qaeda
> > > and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
> > >
> > > Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
> > > arrogance, a
> > > duplicitous
> > > chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and
> > > Tinker-Toy Napoleon --
> > > but he didn't
> > > appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
> > >
> > > Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of
> > > Defense you didn't
> > > read in the
> > > New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner,
> > > the man our
> > > president
> > > placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion
> > > viceroy.
> > >
> > > Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
> > > under the
> > > mistaken notion
> > > that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq,
> > > the President
> > > meant the
> > > Iraqis could choose their own government.
> > > Misunderstanding the
> > > President's true
> > > mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold
> > > elections within
> > > 90 days and
> > > for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the
> > > cities to a desert
> > > base. "It's
> > > their country," the General told me of the Iraqis.
> > > "And," he added,
> > > most
> > > ominously, "their oil."
> > >
> > > Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
> > > Garner a 101-page
> > > plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons
> > > at the State
> > > Department, Treasury
> > > and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e.
> > > the sale)
> > > of "all state
> > > assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting
> > > industries."
> > > The General
> > > knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where
> > > the Iraqi sun
> > > don't shine.
> > > Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting
> > > of Iraqi tribal
> > > leaders to
> > > plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their
> > > own multi-ethnic
> > > government --
> > > and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were
> > > on talking
> > > terms -- knew he
> > > could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a
> > >
> > > welcomed "liberation"
> > > turned into a hated "occupation."
> > >
> > > But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition
> > > government would mean
> > > the
> > > death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets
> > > privatization grab.
> > >
> > > On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the
> > > very night
> > > General Garner
> > > arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington.
> > > It was Rumsfeld
> > > on the line.
> > > He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack,
> > > Jack, you're
> > > fired."
> > >
> > > Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of
> > > on-the-ground experience
> > > in Iraq,
> > > with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director
> > > of Kissinger
> > > Associates.
> > > Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
> > > postponed
> > > elections for a
> > > year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot
> > > pasha, selling
> > > off Iraq's
> > > economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
> > > Rumsfeld's neo-con
> > > clique had
> > > desired.
> > >
> > > Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the
> > > six generals' call
> > > for
> > > Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
> > >
> > > For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't
> > > shoot straight.
> > > They're
> > > wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've
> > > gunned down the
> > > puppet instead
> > > of the puppeteers.
> > >
> > > There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked
> > > General Garner from
> > > Baghdad
> > > without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or
> > > breathes or spits
> > > in the Bush
> > > Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
> > > approval. And
> > > ultimately, it's
> > > the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
> > >
> > > Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
> > > give them
> > > enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the
> > > cowboy from
> > > Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that
> > > we lacked
> > > troops -- the
> > > problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy
> > > this nation. A
> > > million
> > > troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would
> > > just have more
> > > targets.)
> > >
> > > President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
> > > today on the
> > > intercom with
> > > Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up."
> > > And Cheney
> > > replies, "Hey,
> > > just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until
> > > he's taken all
> > > their ammo."
> > >
> > > When Bush and Cheney read about the call for
> > > Rumsfeld's resignation
> > > today, I can
> > > just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission
> > > Accomplished."
> > >
> > > Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
> > > choosing a target:
> > > It's the
> > > President, stupid.
> > >
> > === message truncated ===
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man,
and brave, and hated
> and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then
it costs nothing to
> be a patriot.
> > - Notebook, 1904
> >
> > www.fightthenwo.org
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> --
> > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the
US (and 30+
> countries) for 2¢/min or less.
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> --
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/312 - Release
Date: 4/14/2006
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and
brave, and hated and
> scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it
costs nothing to be
> a patriot.
> > - Notebook, 1904
> >
> > www.fightthenwo.org
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously
low rates.
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS United state government grant United state
coin United state
> patent
> > United state flag United state army United state grant
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > a.. Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
> >
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment