Here is a profile on them:
> Why you getting all fired up?I thought all I was doing was putting
> company, Weidlinger Associates into the frame for providing the public
> with the official story and probably cgi stuff too - along with all the
> other media sources. Nico is a master at researching companies, so who is
> behind this company? If we don't keep looking for openings we stand
> still. ----- Original Message -----
> > From: xxxx To: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 9:22 PM Subject: Re: [911InsideJobbers] Re:
> > That's all folks. Case solved.
> > So are you basically refuting the webfairy findings and the Holmgren
> > thesis and the Nico research, and all the SPOOKED blogs, and taking us
> > back to SQUARE ONE, reading the NY Times, the disinformation sheet of
> > the PTB, the NWO, the CFR, the CIA, etc. and asking us to accept this
> > POV or expecting us to refute you or are you just trying to be funny?
> > HUH? or HA,HA! Mr Ray A. in bklyn In a message dated 5/29/2006
> > 3:06:35 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
> > > This is my observations from drawings that appear in the book
> > > "102 Minutes" these drawings are from simulations done by
> > > Weidlinger Associates. They are drawings showing the planes about
> > > to enter the buildings until [I assume] the planes came to rest.
> > > The timings go up in increments of 8 seconds. Six stages are
> > > shown and the first 0 seconds is impact time.[evidently these
> > > drawings appeared in the New York Times] The only conclusion
> > > from these drawings is that the cores did not prevent the forward
> > > motion of both planes. That is how Weidlinger Associates reckon
> > > it happened. Sounds like a German company. Anyone we know?
> > > > ----- Original Message