Wednesday, May 31, 2006

[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1311

There are 18 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. A Day in the Life: 5/29/6
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
2. Civilian Inmate Labor Program
From: "Joe Stokes" joestokes@sbcglobal.net
3. American Scholars Symposium: On 9/11 Coverup +War Profiteers killed
From: "ranger116@webtv.net" ranger116@webtv.net
4. THE IRAQ WAR: What We Don't See On TV
From: "Bugs" brawny@twlakes.net
5. Fwd: LaRouche Warns of Cheney Plan to Launch Iran Strike in June
From: "jewish_from_brooklyn" jewish_from_brooklyn@yahoo.com
6. AUDIO: information to set the 9/11 movement on fire
From: "APFN" apfn@apfn.org
7. AUDIO: information to set the 9/11 movement on fire
From: "Joe Stokes" joestokes@sbcglobal.net
8. No Smoking in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania
From: "goat!" goat@moag.2y.net
9. Re: 9/11 - FLIGHT 77
From: "APFN" apfn@apfn.org
10. Re: AUDIO: information to set the 9/11 movement on fire
From: "Jarrett Smith" Jarret.Smith@ntlworld.com
11. 9/11 news update - 5/30 tvnl news
From: "reggie501" reggie501@optonline.net
12. A Day in the Life: 5/30/6
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
13. Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
14. Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
15. R.Dreyfuss: Liz Cheney, Dad's enforcer
From: "Ronald" bleier.r@gmail.com
16. 9/11 - HOME VIDEO MISSLE FLIES PAST WTC
From: "APFN" apfn@apfn.org
17. Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
18. 911 dvd's for $1 each
From: "linelites@mindspring.com" linelites@mindspring.com

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 1
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
Date: Mon May 29, 2006 9:33am(PDT)
Subject: A Day in the Life: 5/29/6

GOVERNMENT OF THE USA IN EXILE
Free Americans Reaching
Out to Amerika's Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free
��������
Via <prez@usa-exile.org>

May 29, 2006

NOTE: Almost certainly this Afghan event will lead swiftly to a
quantum leap in the size of the anti-American underground. -- kl, pp

Riot Erupts after
Kabul Traffic Accident

By RAHIM FAIEZ, Associated Press Writer

KABUL, Afghanistan - U.S. and Afghan security forces fired on
protesters in the Afghan capital after a riot erupted Monday because of
a deadly traffic accident involving U.S. troops, police and
eyewitnesses said. At least four people were killed.

Witnesses said the incident began when a convoy of at least three U.S.
Humvees came into the city from the outskirts and hit several civilian
cars in rush-hour traffic jam.

"The American convoy hit all the vehicles which were in their way. They
didn't care about the civilians at all," said Mohammad Wali, 21, a
shopkeeper who said he saw several dead bodies.

Three people were killed and 16 wounded in the crash, which sparked a
riot by stone-throwing Afghans who shouted "Down with America," said
Sher Shah Usafi, a Kabul police chief. U.S. forces then fired on the
crowd, killing one person and wounding two, he said.

A commander with the city's traffic police who was at the scene said he
also saw U.S. forces firing on protesters. He spoke on condition of
anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media.

A U.S. military spokesman, Lt. Col. Paul Fitzpatrick, confirmed U.S.
troops were involved in the accident but said the military had "no
indication that U.S. forces fired any shots." He said an investigation
was continuing.

AP Television News footage showed hundreds of angry young men hurling
rocks at what appeared to be three U.S. military trucks and three
Humvees as they sped from the area after the crash, their windscreens
cracked by the stones.

A center-mounted machine gun on one of the Humvees was seen firing into
the air over the crowd as the vehicle sped away.

An AP reporter at the scene said he saw about 10 Afghan police firing
into a crowd of about 50 demonstrators, and that U.S. troops had
already left the area. The protesters scattered when the firing
erupted, but later regrouped.

Two helicopters belonging to a NATO-led peacekeeping force hovered over
the area.

State television cut transmission of a live broadcast of parliament
when one angry lawmaker interrupted the proceedings to protest the
incident.

"I have seen the incident. ... I come from that area and I have to tell
you," Taj Mohammed Mujahid shouted before the house speaker ruled him
out of order and the screen went black.

Transmission resumed minutes later and parliamentary speaker Yunus
Qanooni called for calm.

"We call on the people to be tolerant because there is the risk this
could be exploited by our enemies," he said, referring to Taliban
rebels who are waging a fierce insurgency in the country's southern and
eastern regions.

He said the Cabinet was discussing the matter.

Afghans often complain about what they call the aggressive driving
tactics of the U.S. military. Convoys often pass through crowded areas
at high speeds and sometimes disregard road rules. The U.S. military
says such tactics are necessary to protect the troops from attack.
___

Associated Press correspondents Amir Shah, Daniel Cooney and Edward
Harris contributed to this report.
========================================================================
=================================================================

From: Henri the Celt <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Date: May 28, 2006 8:20:42 PM ES
Subject: Conspiracy and Closed Minds on 9/11


Conspiracy and Closed Minds on 9/11
By Morgan Reynolds
March 2006
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=closed_minds_on_911

While more Americans doubt the 9/11 story every week, evidence abounds
that many have a mental block against rational examination of the
evidence about 9/11. The possibility that it was an inside job is a
non-starter for them. Programmed �cut outs� insure that 9/11 doubts are
consigned to the �conspiracy� closet.

Last June I was explaining the fuss over my 9/11 article to a family
member who shall remain anonymous and he interrupted and said, �I don�t
want to talk about it.� Millions join him in that sentiment. By
implication they might as well say: �I�d rather cling to the official
9/11 myth� = �If mass murderers run free, I�m fine with that� = �If
9/11 was an inside job, then I�m ruled by monsters and I might have to
do something about it, I�d rather watch Paris Hilton.�

Where does this passive attitude come from? Causes are many but
American indoctrination has two sides that figure prominently in the
explanation:

� Belief in �American Exceptionalism�
� Disbelief in conspiracy

The first belief massages the American ego that we are heroes, always
the good guys in history, and we can trust our government to be the
same. The second steers us clear of subversive theories and thwarts
connecting the dots. American exceptionalism is Civics 101, the
Disneyfication of U.S. history, the �we�re so good� formula, �those
stupid romances commonly called history.� Like no other nation in
history, we are an unparalleled success, goes the story. With American
self-esteem unrivalled, denial about 9/11 is hardly surprising.
Conventional wisdom, in effect, says Yes, criminal gangs have ruled in
other nations from time to time, perhaps always, but it has never
happened here and cannot happen here. Evidence to the contrary is
bogus, I do not have to even look at it. For one thing, I vote. We are
the world�s greatest duh-mocracy. In fact, I voted for Bush-Cheney (or
that other skull-and-bones candidate from Yale, I forget). I am fully
invested with the regime and I�m not a criminal or traitor, so
Bush-Cheney must not be either. After all, we the people are the
government. Criminals and traitors do not look like us either, they
look like Arabs, Germans, Japanese, Chinese.
Besides, conspiracy theories are little more than a symptom of a
mental disease. Such asinine theories stem from delusion and paranoia,
not objective reality. On its face, it is preposterous to believe that
the U.S. government would attack its own people. History is about
accidents, bungling, lone nuts, chaos and coincidence, not planning,
cause-and-effect, execution and cover-ups.

False Flag Terrorism

Americans know a great deal that just is not so. The hidden history of
false-flag terrorism is key, followed by trained aversion to
conspiracy. When bad things happen on a large scale, chances are that
an important group of people wanted them to happen and made them
happen.
Governments throughout history have provoked or staged attacks on
their own people to serve the powers behind the throne (�the money
power�), glorify themselves, engage in vast government spending, reward
friends, exert domestic control, stimulate the juices of war, annex
neighbors and pursue vast geostrategic rearrangements (the �global
domination project�). A few examples:

� Nero burned Rome to blame the Christans A.D. 64
� US provoked Mexican-American war 1846
� USS Maine sinking 1898
� Lusitania sinking 1915
� Reichstag fire 1933
� Hitler�s staged attack on the Gleiwitz radio station 1939
� The �surprise attack� at Pearl Harbor 1941
� Bay of Pigs conspiracy 1961
� Operation Northwoods 1962
� LBJ�s Gulf of Tonkin conspiracy 1964
� Kuwaiti baby incubator hoax 1991
� Bush Jr.�s 9/11, yellow cake and WMD scams

Ruthless though plotters be, the basic principle �is as mundane as
insurance fraud,� as Webster G. Tarpley writes (9/11 Synthetic Terror,
2005, p. 104), and nicely illustrated by the obscure hoax that started
World War II. Hitler wanted to invade Poland but knew the German
majority did not support war, so a group of hapless German convicts was
dressed up in Polish army uniforms (by Tarpley�s account, also see
these variations), marched to the Gleiwitz radio station, machine
gunned to death, arranged as if storming the building, and Nazi agents
read an anti-German statement in Polish declaring Polish forces had
invaded Gleiwitz and taken over the radio station. With this farce and
related border stunts, Hitler invaded Poland the next day, September 1,
1939. �Wag the dog� anyone?

Errors about Conspiracy

Many Americans know that the JFK, RFK, MLK and other assassinations
were inside jobs, and Nixon�s Watergate and Reagan�s Iran-Contra are
proven conspiracies with criminal convictions. Blatant government
murder of U.S. citizens occurred at Waco, Ruby Ridge and the Oklahoma
City bombing. Yet fools and liars argue that the scale of 9/11 was too
big to be an inside job because it would involve so many people. A
conspirator would surely squeal and we would hear about it, goes the
argument, and that has not happened.

JFK�s triangulation murder involved hundreds and nobody �ratted� that
out in any substantial way, although Jack Ruby was close before he was
found dead in his cell and dozens of deaths surrounded the case. Here�s
how large, inside conspiracies work:

� Conspiracies�partnerships in crime�are common: a corner drug deal is
a conspiracy and one in four federal prosecutions include a conspiracy
charge.

� Hundreds rather than thousands probably were necessary to pull off
the 9/11 psychological operation.

� Many conspirators are ideologues committed to the idea that the 9/11
hoax would serve the interests of the nation. Worthy ends justify
murderous means to this crowd. The human cost of 9/11 turned out to be
�only� a month�s highway fatality toll and served the magnificent ends
of starting a global war on terror, two invasions and more to come,
billions more in defense spending, torture, new agencies, �Patriot�
controls, domestic spying, enormous new contracts, more debt and many
other attractive consequences.

� Many participants are cunning sociopaths (amoral) with the mindset of
stone cold killers. They wear a suit or military uniform but have no
respect for the lives of the �little people.� They are ruthless,
witness the fool in the White House: �But all in all, it�s been a
fabulous year for Laura and me,� a tone-deaf president declared in a
December, 2001 interview.

� Only the trustworthy are at the center of the hub-spoke-and-wheel
compartmentalization necessary in a complex conspiracy. Only the
arrogant few at the hub know the big picture before hand.

� The most secretive regime in U.S. history puts a huge premium on
personal loyalty and gets it.

� Most participants did not know in advance how �over-the-top� the twin
tower demolitions were going to be. That job probably was contracted
out to ruthless foreigners. Once done, it�s too late to get out.

� Any participant would hesitate to squeal after the event because
disbelief, disgrace and grief would follow, at a minimum, anyway. The
major media, inside 9/11 from the start, would discredit squealers, as
necessary.

� Risk-taking behavior is always greater in groups than for lone
individuals (psychology 101).

� Once involved in the plot, everyone is �in for good.�

� Conspirators face no threat of arrest, prosecution and punishment by
the government�s justice system, a proven fact since government and
media obstructed and trashed New Orleans district attorney Jim
Garrison�s JFK investigation and prosecution.

� Controllers discipline participants through $billions in black
budgets and drug money, death threats, assassination and black mail.

� Blatant and repeated resistance against truthful investigations,
aided by obstruction of justice and abetted by media silencio, prove
there is a lot to hide.

Consider one control technique among many: a very high CIA official
died a few years ago and on good authority I know that he had a 7/24
CIA presence to protect against a deathbed confession in front of
Hospice personnel. �I�m not into conspiracy theories,� says filmmaker
Michael Moore, �only those that are true.�

The fundamental difficulty is not really disbelief about the ability to
keep conspiracy secrets but disbelief that U.S. government officials
could really collaborate in attacking America and take all those
innocent lives at the World Trade Center. This is na�ve. First,
government is the instrument of social compulsion. Organized force is
what government does. The belief that soft-hearted people rise to the
top in government is akin to the belief that softies were whipping
masters on slave plantations. Second, setting WTC bombs could easily
have been contracted out to Mossad, otherwise known as �executioner to
the world.� Killing? It�s what we do (because this is �life or death
for Israel,� blah, blah). Third, people are taught that they control
their government and live in a duh-mocracy but all governments are run
by insiders, usually permanent and dominated by the paymasters. When
policy or personnel really matter, international bankers call the tune
for modern governments daily dependent on them for new loans and
refinance of the old. These financiers look out for themselves and
believe in a New World Order, a one-government world, and have no
allegiance to America or its founding principles. Fourth, the U.S.
military oath requires an oath-taker to �support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic.� The enemy within the gate is key today, whether called
conspiracy or not, not the enemy outside.

Skepticism about conspiracy, small or large, is somewhat beside the
point in the case of 9/11 because the official
Osama-and-Nineteen-Young-Arabs (ONYA) conspiracy tale is so farcical
and impossible. Nearly everyone in America has easy access to the
internet and hundreds of websites expose the 9/11 fraud. The analysis
is out there and in a few dozen books, although the mainstream media
ignores it all. Only government could have pulled off a psy-op this
big, not a rag-tag band of Arab incompetents with no visible means of
support repeatedly running afoul of law enforcement in the field. All
the other intelligence services and governments know the real story
about who did 9/11. It is like an elephant in the living room,
studiously ignored by insiders who keep quiet about it. After thorough
exposure via the Downing Street memo and other irrefutable evidence
about the Bush-Cheney lies to justify invading Iraq, it takes a lot to
remain ignorant about 9/11. It is not about a conspiracy too large to
work. Ignorance increasingly has to be willful.

Copyright Morgan Reynolds 2006+ unless otherwise specified.
Distribution of and linking to the articles on this website is strongly
encouraged, as long as the content is not manipulated or distorted in
any way.

========================================================================
================================================================

From: Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com>
Date: May 28, 2006 10:01:15 PM EST
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Fw: NYT (1993): FBI allowed the WTC
bombing to happen

�Clinton,� Who was and IS a dope-dealing partner with bush sr and Larry
Silverschmuck I mean Silverstein had FOUR MAJOR events during his
admin.� 3 of them false flag type stuff.� First was waco which i guess
really technically was not a false flag,� second was the 93 bombing
which by the way was covered up by none other than Fitzgerald who is
supposedly prosecuting the neocons. third was OK city which was 100
PERCENT an INSIDE JOB to further the agenda of the Illuminati/NWO and
annihilate parts of the bill of RIGHTS and constitution,�and last but
not least was yugoslavia and the dumping of TONS of depleted uranium in
the Balkans which has caused THOUSANDS of cases of cancer in that
region.� is he a slithering, slimy satanic culprit?!� I think so.
Kevin

Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com> wrote:
FBI gave a million dollars and furnished the explosives to
the�ex-egyptian army officer and told him to carry out the "drill"

john antecif was his name the FBI regional chief

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave,
and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for
then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

http://www.fightthenwo.org/

----- Original Message ----
From: Ronald <bleier.r@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:48:36 PM
Subject: [911TruthAction] Fw: NYT (1993): FBI allowed the WTC bombing
to happen

Ralph Schoenman was recently in NYC for some lectures, parts of which
were broadcast on local, soon to be gone, community access cable.�In
connection with �false flag operations,�Schoenman mentioned the 1993
WTC bombing and gave the documentation regarding the Times account
which blew the whistle on the FBI operation.

So the truth comes�out in plain sight (excuse the pun), but it doesn't
matter, since it's never repeated and certainly not part of the
official story, the only story that is allowed.

In his lecture Schoenman�laid�out his theory that the Blind Sheik was
brought in to this country against Egypt's protests to serve as a patsy
in these false flag operations and was aided by the CIA while in Egypt
as part of a larger operation�to destabilize secular Arab governments.

This reminder from 1993 brings up again the question of Clinton's
involvement�in these shadow operations. This false flag operation was
intended to jump start the war against the Muslim community in the
CIA/FBI creation of an Islamic� villain and permanent war that is their
mission.

Did Clinton know in advance? After the incident, what effort if any
did he make to get to the bottom of it? In all likelihood, the best
that can be said is that he kept a hands-off approach.�� --Ronald

�The FBI allowed the 1993 WTC bombing to happen

THE NEW YORK TIMES
* * * * *
Thursday October 28, 1993 Page A1
"Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart
Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast"
By Ralph Blumenthal
Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building
a bomb that was eventually used to blow up the World Trade Center,
and they planned to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting
harmless powder for the explosives, an informer said after
the blast.
The informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb
and supply the fake powder, but the plan was called off by
an F.B.I. supervisor who had other ideas about how the informer,
Emad Salem, should be used, the informer said.
The account, which is given in the transcript of hundreds of
hours of tape recordings that Mr. Salem secretly made of his
talks with law-enforcement agents, portrays the authorities as
being in a far better position than previously known to foil
the February 26th bombing of New York City's tallest towers.
The explosion left six people dead, more than a thousand people
injured, and damages in excess of half-a-billion dollars.
Four men are now on trial in Manhattan Federal Court
[on charges of involvement] in that attack.
Mr. Salem, a 43-year-old former Egyptian Army officer, was used
by the Government [of the United States] to penetrate a circle
of Muslim extremists who are now charged in two bombing cases:
the World Trade Center attack, and a foiled plot to destroy
the United Nations, the Hudson River tunnels, and other
New York City landmarks. He is the crucial witness in the
second bombing case, but his work for the Government was
erratic, and for months before the World Trade Center blast,
he was feuding with the F.B.I.
Supervisor `Messed It Up'
After the bombing, he resumed his undercover work. In an
undated transcript of a conversation from that period,
Mr. Salem recounts a talk he had had earlier with an agent
about an unnamed F.B.I. supervisor who, he said,
"came and messed it up."
"He requested to meet me in the hotel,"
Mr. Salem says of the supervisor.
"He requested to make me to testify, and if he didn't
push for that, we'll be going building the bomb with
a phony powder, and grabbing the people who was
involved in it. But since you, we didn't do that."
The transcript quotes Mr. Salem as saying that he wanted to
complain to F.B.I. Headquarters in Washington about the
Bureau's failure to stop the bombing, but was dissuaded by
an agent identified as John Anticev.
Mr. Salem said Mr. Anticev had told him,
"He said, I don't think that the New York people would
like the things out of the New York Office to go to
Washington, D.C."
Another agent, identified as Nancy Floyd, does not dispute
Mr. Salem's account, but rather, appears to agree with it,
saying of the `New York people':
"Well, of course not, because they don't want to
get their butts chewed."

The result of the explosion:
6 civilians killed Over 1,000 injured 105 firefighters injured - 5
admitted to local hospitals reinforced floors almost 30 inches think
blasted away on 3 levels below grade, plus a concourse level floor,
leaving a crater about 150 feet in diameter at it's largest point. On
the B1 level, the operations control center of the Port Authority
Police Department (and the fire command station forthe complex) was
heavily damaged and rendered out of service. On the B2 level, various
walls of elevator shafts and freshair plenums severely damaged,
allowing smoke to enter and rise through the cores of both towers.
Numerous concrete walls destroyed or damaged. 200,000 cubic feet of
water poured into the lowest grade from damaged refrigeration unit
supplies (from the Hudson River), sewer lines, fresh domestic water
lines, steam pipes, and condensate return. Water 1.5 feet deep across
the B6 level. 124 parked cars destroyed, 102 damaged. Partition walls
blown out onto PATH train mezzanine. Numerous telephone conduits
collapsed from ceiling onto cars (but phone service was not cut,
miraculously). Fire alarm and public address systems out of service.
Elevators out of service. Water cooled emergency generators shut down
due to overheating when their water supply was cut. This disabled the
emergency lighting. Sprinklers & standpipes out of service. 2,500 tons
of rubble removed. Clean up effort involved 2,700 workers per day, plus
a total of 160,000 gallons of cleaning fluid and 200,00 gallons of
detergent. Restoration cost: $250,000,000.

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: "reggie501" <reggie501@optonline.net>
Date: May 29, 2006 10:24:19 AM EST
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] 9/11 update - 5/29

9/11 News : http://www.tvnewslies.org/news/#911

� AFTER SIX YEARS, BIN LADEN SUDDENLY DECIDES TO TAKE A DIVE FOR
911? - Apparently the Bush Regime seems to think very little of the
mental "prowess" of the American people. They claim to have a
thoroughly "authentic" tape from Bin Laden who, despite the fact could
have said a limitless number of things, decided to take credit for 911.

� Petrified of the ramifications, Americans adopt denial as primary
strategy to ignore 9/11 Scam - Psychologists call it cognitive
dissonance when there are beliefs that threaten your previous beliefs
that you find it impossible to reconcile, and denial becomes the role
that you adopt.

� Turn 911 Rubble Into A Killing Machine? Hello? - Whoever said that
irony was dead in America clearly hadn't heard about the assault ship
USS New York

� Business as usual -- 9/11 and the fall of America - Under the guise
of business as usual, consider the huge improprieties in the
securities markets that went unnoticed before and immediately after
9/11/2001, contributing to the attacks' awful success and America's
subsequent decline.

========================================================================
================================================================

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_8727.shtml

Bush's
'Candor' Was Scripted Response to Planted Question

By Amanda Moran
Capitol Hill Blue Staff Writer
May 28, 2006, 07:34

President George W. Bush's highly-publicized admission of "regrets" and
"moment of candor" during a joint press conference with British Prime
Minister Tony Blair this past week was actually a scripted response to
a planted question with a British journalist.

Capitol Hill Blue has learned that the question was among a list of
"proposed questions" given to British reporters by Blair and that both
the British Prime Minister and President Bush knew the question was
coming and had prepared responses.

Newsweek correspondent Richard Wolffe says it was obvious to the press
corps assembled for the press conference that Bush knew the question
was coming and had a response ready.

"Of course, it was very rehearsed, everything from the mannerisms you
saw, the upwards glance up at the ceiling for inspiration," Wolffe
says. "And for me, the big giveaway was at the end of that answer-I
don't know if you could see it on camera, but the president flashed a
big grin to those of us sitting in the front rows. It didn't seem that
he was quite as contrite as his performance."

According to multiple sources, Blair planted the question with British
reporters leaving England and informed the White House. Both Blair and
Bush had scripted responses to the question and it was pre-determined
that the question would be recognized so he could ask the question.

"It was a setup from start to finish," says a member of the press crew
that covers Blair on a regular basis. "We knew the question was coming
and we knew Blair had a response ready. As for Bush, we didn't know if
he had been briefed but we suspected he had."

Two sources within the White House confirm Bush knew the question was
coming and was ready with his scripted response.

Blair set the tone with this comment in the closing moments:

"You guys, come on, I want you to -- the British delegation, ask a few
serious questions."

The setup came in the second question:

Mr. President, you spoke about missteps and mistakes in Iraq. Could I
ask both of you which missteps and mistakes of your own you most
regret?

Bush was ready:

Sounds like kind of a familiar refrain here -- saying "bring it on,"
kind of tough talk, you know, that sent the wrong signal to people. I
learned some lessons about expressing myself maybe in a little more
sophisticated manner -- you know, "wanted dead or alive," that kind of
talk. I think in certain parts of the world it was misinterpreted, and
so I learned from that. And I think the biggest mistake that's happened
so far, at least from our country's involvement in Iraq is Abu Ghraib.
We've been paying for that for a long period of time. And it's --
unlike Iraq, however, under Saddam, the people who committed those acts
were brought to justice. They've been given a fair trial and tried and
convicted.

Wolffe says Bush has to go the regret route because his other trite
phrases just don't work any more.

"I don't think those cliches actually work so much anymore," he says.

� Copyright 2006 by Capitol Hill Blue

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: Henri the Celt <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Date: May 28, 2006 12:29:49 PM EST
Subject: Wall-to-wall lies of the mass media mafia...

What the below headline really means to say is that NINE people have
plead guilty to falsifying�the circulation figures of two fishwraps put
out by the Chicago-based Tribune Company in order to cheat advertisers�
by pretending these publications were popular... if they'll do that,
just how trustworthy is the "news" they print?��� Hunh?

6
Plead Guilty in Newsday Circ. Scandal


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/N/NEWSDAY_CIRCULATION?
SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-05-27-11-56-32

NEW YORK (AP) -- Six people accused of taking part in a scheme to boost
the circulation figures at Newsday and the Spanish-language publication
Hoy pleaded guilty to federal conspiracy charges.

The pleas, entered on Friday and Monday, bring to nine the number of
people who have pleaded guilty so far in the scandal.

Newsday has acknowledged that, from 2000 to 2004, it inflated its
circulation by nearly 100,000 copies on weekdays and Sundays. Hoy
doubled its reported circulation, prosecutors said.

Chicago-based Tribune Co., which owns both Newsday and Hoy, has set
aside $90 million to reimburse advertisers who were overcharged on the
basis of the inflated circulation figures.

The six who pleaded guilty included four managers who worked in sales,
circulation, distribution and home delivery. Two men with companies
that distribute papers also pleaded guilty. They face four to 20 years
in prison.

Three executives who previously pleaded guilty include Louis Sito, vice
president for Hispanic media at Tribune Co.; Robert Brennan, former
Newsday vice president for circulation; and Ed Smith, an independent
consultant for Newsday circulation.

"We have cooperated with the authorities in every way possible from the
outset of their investigation and will continue to do so," Newsday
spokeswoman Deidra Parrish Williams said in a statement.

� 2006 The Associated Press.
========================================================================
================================================
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 2
From: "Joe Stokes" joestokes@sbcglobal.net
Date: Mon May 29, 2006 10:25am(PDT)
Subject: Civilian Inmate Labor Program

http://www.army.mil/usapa/epubs/pdf/r210_35.pdf

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 3
From: "ranger116@webtv.net" ranger116@webtv.net
Date: Mon May 29, 2006 0:49pm(PDT)
Subject: American Scholars Symposium: On 9/11 Coverup +War Profiteers killed

American Scholars Symposium: On 9/11 Coverup +War Profiteers killed

American Scholars Symposium: On 9/11 + The Neo-Con Agenda

Address:http://69.93.122.250/%7Eamerican/

In June 2006 researchers, scholars,
journalists, media personalites, and average
folks will come together from all over the
USA to gather in Los Angeles to invite the
rest of the world to examine the facts of 9/11.

Through powerful & insightful presentations
from prominent guest speakers & riveting
documentary screenings we will examine
the Neo-Con Agenda and 9/11 as the pretext
for the brutal on-going war in Iraq as well
as the establishment's future plans.
This is guaranteed to be unlike any other conference of its kind -
the first one ever presented by Alex Jones, a progenitor of the 9/11
Truth Movement who was the first speak out and challenge the
government's official story of what happened on 9/11.
Come and experience the biggest ever 9/11 conference - More highly
respected speakers than any other, more amazing films than any other,
plus special surprise guests. Come to learn, come to share and come to
help each other create new strategies to defend the constitution and
save the republic from the grip of its greatest enemy.
Participation in this event is not limited to those who are
already awake to the truth of 9/11, but is open to all who have
questions about the official story. We also invite the mainstream media
to join us as fellow truth seekers and face the facts about the events
surrounding September 11th, 2001.
If you ever only attend one 9/11 event, make sure this is it.
RAY MCGOVERN
McGovern was one of President Ronald Reagan's intelligence briefers
in charge of preparing daily security briefs for the President, the Vice
President, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Cabinet and National Security
Advisor. Later, McGovern he prepared intel briefs for George HW Bush.
McGovern has become an outspoken critic of the current Bush
administration, and together with other former CIA employees, founded
the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity or VIPS. The
organization is dedicated to exposing what these former Intelligence
professionals believe to be the mishandling of important intelligence,
specifically relating to the War in Iraq.... [More]
ALEX JONES DOCUMENTARY PREMIERE
We are proud to announce that among the many incredible
politically-charged documentaries being screened at the American
Scholars Symposium, we will be featuring the PREMIERE of the newest and
most powerful film by documentary filmmaker and radio broadcaster Alex
Jones.
Jones has been quietly working on this newest documentary for months
in his production studio in Austin, Texas keeping even the title under
wraps until the premiere at the American Scholars Symposium conference
in June 2006. [More]
Tickets for both days of the conference will be available for
purchase online on May 5, 2006. Group discounts are available with
savings of over 40% off the single ticket price.
Click here to get your tickets online now
Or Call Toll-Free 1-888-253-3139 to order via telephone.
SHERATON DOWNTOWN LA
The conference will be held in the Sheraton's Grand Ballroom capable of
accomodating up to 1000 attendees. The hotel is also adjacent to a
modern shopping center full of shops, restaurant restaurants... [ More ]
The complete schedule will be released as the conference draws near,
until then, check out this partial list of speakers, presentations, and
film screenings. [ More ]
Don't want to stay at the Conference Venue? Just minutes from the
Sheraton are a dozens of hotels at various price ranges. Check out some
other hotel and accomodations options and make your reservations today.
[ More ]
Click URL at the top
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Re: Two CBS Journalists Killed in Iraq Too Bad ??

Maybe if they weren't war profiteering they wouldn't be dead ?

(after all no one ever accused them of reporting the true news from
Afghanistan and Iraq !)

They are part of the invading army in Iraq and Afghanistan
They deserve what they get along with the Illegal American soldiers in
other people's sovereign countries.
Power to the Citizens of all sovereign countries against any invading
occupying criminal force.

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````

40% think 9/11 report Was a Coverup !

Address:http://www.timesherald.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=16703919&BRD=1672&PAG=461&dept_id=33380&rfi=6

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Bush Bans Military Funeral Protests

Bush presses anti-terror war - Politics - MSNBC.com

Address:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13018894/

```````````````````````````````````````````````````
More reported election machine Manipulation of Votes in Elections

Address:http://www.wanttoknow.info/060527electionsvotesmanipulations

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Unity 08 -- New Political Party

Address:http://www.unity08.com/index.html

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Universal National Service Act
All Men and Women 18 to 42

(You still may get drafter Ladies & Gentleman ?)

GovTrack: H.R. 4752: Text of Legislation

Address:http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h109-4752

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
American cops taped torturing drug suspect - LISTEN! : Indymedia Radio

Address:http://radio.indymedia.org/news/2006/05/9797.php?gonnabarf

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Bush Administration Seeks to Block Suits on Spying

Address:http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/052806Z.shtml

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
globeandmail.com : CUPE Ontario supports campaign against Israel

Address:http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060527.wcupe0527/BNStory/National/home

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Border Fence Project

Address:http://www.borderfenceproject.com/

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 4
From: "Bugs" brawny@twlakes.net
Date: Mon May 29, 2006 1:45pm(PDT)
Subject: THE IRAQ WAR: What We Don't See On TV

Does,anyone know How many soldiers have kill themselves?
I Have never seen a number for this.
Bugs

What We Don't See on TV
President George W. Bush raised nearly half a million dollars for Representatives Jim Gerlach and Mike Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania last Wednesday at a $1000-per-ticket fund-raiser. Here is what he said.
A battlefront in the war on terror is, of course, Iraq. And people in our country are unsettled because of the war, and I understand that. I fully understand why people in America are disquieted about what they're seeing on their TV screens. There's a concern about whether or not we can win. There's no doubt in my mind we will win...
The enemy cannot defeat us on the battlefield, but what they can do is put horrible images on our TV screens.

It is not what we are seeing on TV screens that disquiets us.
Three years ago this month, we saw the President make a tailhook landing on an aircraft carrier before a sign that read, "Mission Accomplished."

We did not see the nearly 2,500 US military coffins returned home since then.

We did not see prisoners being tortured and killed at Abu Ghraib.

And we did not see the methodical slaughter of 24 Iraqi civilians including a 3-year-old girl and a 76-year-old man shot in their homes, killings that Republican Representative John Kline called "not an accident... an atrocity."

Worst of all, we have not seen the US command, including Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, held accountable. That disquiets us.

Last fall, Hurricane Katrina brought horrible images to our TV screens. We saw people behave like animals. We saw dead humans fill the streets. We saw desperation and poverty unfit for this country -- for any country. But what we didn't see was worse.

We didn't see a President in command.
We didn't see a President prepared to lead.

We saw a President eating birthday cake with Senator John McCain as water flowed over the New Orleans levees, a President who went to bed ignoring Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco's request for federal assistance, and a President play guitar with country star Mark Wills in San Diego the day after the levees breached and as 36,000 evacuees in the New Orleans Superdome ran out of food and water. That was disquieting.

This month, we turned on our TVs and we saw the President of the United States in the Oval Office, the setting from which he addressed us after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and the Iraq invasion of March 19, 2003, and we saw him present a plan for a $2-billion wall to stop Mexicans entering the US illegally.

But we didn't see the President two days later, at the funeral for Army 1st Sergeant Carlos Saenz and Army Staff Sergeant David Veverka, both killed in Iraq. Saenz was born in Mexico. Veverka was born in Pennsylvania. They both went to fight for the US, and were killed one day apart in Iraq, and they were laid in the ground the same Wednesday afternoon in Arlington National Cemetery. The President was not there. He was not there for the funerals of at least 15 other troops of Mexican descent killed in Iraq. He has not been there for the funerals of any other troops from Pennsylvania. He has not been there for any funerals, at all.

There are horrible images on our TV screens, but that is not what disquiets us.
It is the horrible scenes in real life. It is the needless death, brutal torture, and cold-blooded massacres in Iraq. It is the poverty, desperation, and suffering in New Orleans. It is the empty spaces and unending grieving that those deaths bring at home. That is what makes us unsettled. That is what makes us concerned.

And it is a President who goes on vacation but not into service.
A President who goes to photo-ops and not to a city that is dying.
A President who goes to half-million-dollar fundraisers but not to funerals.

That is what makes us mad as hell.

The Next Hurrah - May 28, 2006 at 11:32 --
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/4981442

Sir, No Sir! http://punkasscrusade.cf.huffingtonpost.com/

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 5
From: "jewish_from_brooklyn" jewish_from_brooklyn@yahoo.com
Date: Mon May 29, 2006 2:25pm(PDT)
Subject: Fwd: LaRouche Warns of Cheney Plan to Launch Iran Strike in June

Begin forwarded message:

> LaRouche staff thinks they can steer off this attack by reporting
> it right away. Please forward. LaRouche doesn't do hoaxes,
> folks. This is strategy, and quite brilliant, on closer
> examination. It took me a long time to get this...and to even
> determine what was real and what was a hoax.
> Time to do your homework!
> Regards. RB
>
> Lyndon LaRouche PAC
> P.O. BOX 6157
> LEESBURG, VA 20178
>
> 800-929-7566
>
> www.larouchepac.com
>
> LaRouche Warns of Cheney Plans to Launch Iran Strike in June
> http://www.larouchepac.com/pdf_files/060524_iran_strike.pdf
> Democratic Party statesman Lyndon LaRouche has issued a new
> statement on the danger represented by an ever-more desperate
> Cheney-Bush government and its Synarchist backers. As Special
> Prosecutor Fitzgerald zeroes in on Cheney's role in the center of
> the Libby case and the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame, there is
> more motivation than ever to launch a preventive military strike
> against Iran sometime between now and early July.
>
> LaRouche warns, "They are seeking a Reichstag Fire or 9/11-type
> incident to give them the psychological leverage to launch their
> pre-planned attack on Iran. That can only be prevented by placing a
> very powerful public spotlight on their schemes, in advance." The
> World Cup soccer matches in Germany during June may be a target of
> such a Synarchist-run terrorist pretext for war.
>
> Read and circulate this press release to stop Cheney's plans for a
> new war.
>
>
> Next LaRouche Webcast on Friday, June 9
> http://www.larouchepac.com/pages/press_releases_files/
> 2006/060609_webcast_announ ce.htm <http://www.larouchepac.com/pages/
> press_releases_files/2006/060609_webcast_announce.htm>
> The next live webcast address from Washington, DC by LaRouche will
> be on Friday, June 9, beginning at 1:00 pm Eastern Time (12:00
> noon, Central; 11:00 am Mountain; 10:00 am Pacific). He will
> present the latest developments in the increasingly obvious
> meltdown of the world financial system, as seen in the
> hyperinflationary explosion of raw materials prices. He will also
> discuss his proposed emergency legislation to save and use the
> machine-tool capacity in the auto industry and how Americans can
> mobilize to get their congressmen and senators to support his
> proposal.
>
> Mark June 9 on your calendar and organize everyone you know to
> watch LaRouche's webcast address. Forward this e-mail widely to
> your family, friends and elected officials and bring together
> people to watch the webcast with you, either live or later when it
> has been archived.
>
> New Postings on the Website:
> The Governments are Collapsing: The Cities of the Plain
> http://www.larouchepac.com/pdf_files/060521_cities_plain.pdf
> The Empire Versus the Nations: Synarchism, Sport Iran
> http://www.larouchepac.com/pages/writings_files/
> 2006/060527_synarchism_sport.htm
> Paid for by the Lyndon LaRouche PAC
> and Not Authorized by Any Candidate or Candidate's Committee
>
> This message is sent to you as someone who has requested, either
> through personal contact with a representative of Lyndon LaRouche
> PAC or who requested through e-mail on our website, to receive
> information by e-mail about our activities and website. It was
> composed using special e-mail software. If you wish to be removed
> from our future mailings, please click on the following link to
> fill out and submit a removal request: http://www.larouchepac.com/
> pages/admin/remove_email_form.html <http://www.larouchepac.com/
> pages/admin/remove_email_form.html> . If the link does not work,
> copy and paste it into the address field in your browser to go to
> this page, then fill out the form and submit it. Once you have
> submitted the request, the software will automatically block you
> from any future mailings. Due to the high volume of e-mail we
> receive, following the above directions is the only way to ensure
> prompt removal.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 6
From: "APFN" apfn@apfn.org
Date: Mon May 29, 2006 5:45pm(PDT)
Subject: AUDIO: information to set the 9/11 movement on fire

Meria Heller
AUDIO: information
to set the 9/11 movement on fire
Mon May 29, 2006 20:59
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=101664;title=APFN
LISTEN - REAL PLAYER
Okay.
It's Memorial Day and I've been working all day. I want you to go to
the free show link (eventually it will be in the archives, and in about
an hour at the Ipod download). I have a two hour show that will blow
your mind on 9/11. This man Richard Andrew Grove, a whistleblower who
worked for the big boys and money people behind 9/11 has come out with
information to set the 9/11 movement on fire.
http://subscribe.streamguys.com/meriaheller_od_free/todaysshow.wma
Information to set the 9/11 movement on fire.
-----Original Message-----
From: Meria Heller [ mailto:Meria@npgcable.com ]
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 11:18 PM
Subject: Urgent - trust me on this one Meria
http://www.meria.net/freeshow.html
(you need Windows Media Player, OR you can listen at
http://www.Meria.net by right-clicking
and downloading to your pc)
Okay.
It's Memorial Day and I've been working all day. I want you to go to
the free show link (eventually it will be in the archives, and in about
an hour at the Ipod download). I have a two hour show that will blow
your mind on 9/11. This man Richard Andrew Grove, a whistleblower who
worked for the big boys and money people behind 9/11 has come out with
information to set the 9/11 movement on fire.
Although many have
rejected his work (too busy, big egos, whatever) including the IRS,
Treasury Dept and SEC, what he exposes on Marsh & McLennan, AIG,
Dyncorp, Spitzer, Stewart Air Force Base, Fitzgerald, Bremer, missing
gold and bucks of 9/11, software that predicts the future and more will
ASTOUND YOU as it did me. I will be having him live on the show in
June, but wanted you to hear this urgent information immediately. That
is why I worked on it all day.
If you are a journalist, blogger,
etc., DO NOT think this is a ruse. I expect you to LISTEN intently to
what this man is presenting and act on it.
If you are a friend,
subscriber, past guest, listen and then relisten. Pass it on to every
outlet and every email list, group you have. This information is
EXPLOSIVE. The more of us that know this information, the greater the
chances I won't be killed for presenting it, and the greater the
chances for a real revolution in America's thinking processes.
Go
beyond the explosions, destruction of evidence, etc., and learn who
BENEFITTED and HOW on 9/11 to find out who the Corporate
Fundamentalists are that were behind it all.
Thank you for trusting me with this one, it's well worth it.
Love,
Meria
"We're mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore".
"THE MERIA HELLER SHOW"
http://www.Meria.net
Soon in it's 7th year!
"Meria is the best weapon of mass instruction we have ; the inventor of
internet radio reality"-
Greg Palast , Investigative Journalist
MERIA WILL BE A KEYNOTE SPEAKER AT THE 911 "RECLAIMING OUR FUTURE"
Conference in
Chicago, June 2-4. Check out http://www.911Revealingthetruth.org
for more information.
NOTICE:
Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may
have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do
this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no
recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of the current
President.
======================================================
RADIO YOUR WAY;
http://www.apfn.net/pogo.htm
====================
9/11 INFO AND LINKS:
HTTP://WWW.APFN.ORG/APFN/WTC.HTM
Only when the men and women who've served so nobly are
at last honored with decent care as well as words can there
be a meaningful Veterans Day.
***
Http://www.hackworth.com
is the address of
R.I.P. David Hackworth
Click
here to receive daily updates

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 7
From: "Joe Stokes" joestokes@sbcglobal.net
Date: Mon May 29, 2006 9:07pm(PDT)
Subject: AUDIO: information to set the 9/11 movement on fire

Meria Heller
AUDIO: information to set the 9/11 movement on fire
Mon May 29, 2006 20:59
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=101664;title=APFN


LISTEN - REAL PLAYER
Okay. It's Memorial Day and I've been working all day. I want you to go to the free show link (eventually it will be in the archives, and in about an hour at the Ipod download). I have a two hour show that will blow your mind on 9/11. This man Richard Andrew Grove, a whistleblower who worked for the big boys and money people behind 9/11 has come out with information to set the 9/11 movement on fire.
http://subscribe.streamguys.com/meriaheller_od_free/todaysshow.wma

Information to set the 9/11 movement on fire.

-----Original Message-----
From: Meria Heller [mailto:Meria@npgcable.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 11:18 PM

Subject: Urgent - trust me on this one � Meria


http://www.meria.net/freeshow.html (you need Windows Media Player, OR you can listen at http://www.Meria.net by right-clicking and downloading to your pc)

Okay. It's Memorial Day and I've been working all day. I want you to go to the free show link (eventually it will be in the archives, and in about an hour at the Ipod download). I have a two hour show that will blow your mind on 9/11. This man Richard Andrew Grove, a whistleblower who worked for the big boys and money people behind 9/11 has come out with information to set the 9/11 movement on fire.

Although many have rejected his work (too busy, big egos, whatever) including the IRS, Treasury Dept and SEC, what he exposes on Marsh & McLennan, AIG, Dyncorp, Spitzer, Stewart Air Force Base, Fitzgerald, Bremer, missing gold and bucks of 9/11, software that predicts the future and more will ASTOUND YOU as it did me. I will be having him live on the show in June, but wanted you to hear this urgent information immediately. That is why I worked on it all day.

If you are a journalist, blogger, etc., DO NOT think this is a ruse. I expect you to LISTEN intently to what this man is presenting and act on it.

If you are a friend, subscriber, past guest, listen and then relisten. Pass it on to every outlet and every email list, group you have. This information is EXPLOSIVE. The more of us that know this information, the greater the chances I won't be killed for presenting it, and the greater the chances for a real revolution in America's thinking processes.

Go beyond the explosions, destruction of evidence, etc., and learn who BENEFITTED and HOW on 9/11 to find out who the Corporate Fundamentalists are that were behind it all.

Thank you for trusting me with this one, it's well worth it.

Love,

Meria

"We're mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore".

"THE MERIA HELLER SHOW"

http://www.Meria.net Soon in it's 7th year!

"Meria is the best weapon of mass instruction we have ; the inventor of internet radio reality"-
Greg Palast , Investigative Journalist
MERIA WILL BE A KEYNOTE SPEAKER AT THE 911 "RECLAIMING OUR FUTURE" Conference in
Chicago, June 2-4. Check out http://www.911Revealingthetruth.org for more information.

NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of the current President.
======================================================

RADIO YOUR WAY;
http://www.apfn.net/pogo.htm

====================

9/11 INFO AND LINKS:
HTTP://WWW.APFN.ORG/APFN/WTC.HTM

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 8
From: "goat!" goat@moag.2y.net
Date: Mon May 29, 2006 10:22pm(PDT)
Subject: No Smoking in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania

I guess it all has to hit you all in the head real hard. This isn't
about US empire, it is about world empire. The US is just the biggest
stick and market to effect that change best. Thus why all the policies
are so uniformly being implemented the same in all the, well, world,
except for the rebel countries that will not play ball, that we seem
intent on exterminating or marginalizing, at the very least, at present.

"Our" elite aren't interested in US interest, they are interested in
world control (and they are certainly more elaborate then those that we
are presented on the stage for our attentions in this US, i.e. those
presented for internal consumption, and the ones presented to us aren't
even middle management, just flunky administrators of the banker's
assets, i.e. all the world the bankers believe by "law" they own), not
that they aren't above making a buck along the way, as the more "money"
that one can accumulate, the more one can manipulate the system and
further one's tribe's status, not that most of us, if any, will ever
make enough money to earn a station in the underground facilities,
unless we band together and create our own economic engine, in a very
big way, and dig in to the earth or lift off to the stars for our own
survival (if indeed they will let us, much as happened during Katrina,
just like they will not let us off this rock, till they are ready, and
that certainly will not be till the population is manageable, both size
wise and mental wise, if indeed they don't already have sustainable
cultures in place in space at present already, which may indeed be why
they will also not let us off this rock, that they don't want their pure
cultures contaminated with the idea of freedom), but certainly don't
expect any trickle down economics for us expendable slaves.

We in the US (and the rest of the once first world, and ultimately
perhaps, once earth) have already had our turn, and now it is Asia, and
as we used them for a market, they will now hump us dry, and that very
large sector of the economic part of the agenda, represents more then
any other system, mercantilism, with the US (and the other once "first"
world countries) being the colony, and the producing countries
representing the mother countries, as far as the analogy confers, though
certainly this is only one nuance of the NWO, though a large one. Such
structured economic growth of the chosen part of the world that they are
interested in at certain times in history, is right out of the play book
of the Trilaterlist, and is as far from free markets as capitalism, and
is at the expense of the market countries. Though certainly communism,
which is what it is, using the lessons learned from mercantilism, is
just the opposite side of capitalism, of the coin of monopoly.

In other words, they are using the vast capital engine only made
possible through a corrupt monitory system, to socialize / communize the
world, one region at a time. i.e. bring the peoples of the world up to a
fairly on par level, that being everybody as slaves, housed in compact
cities under complete economic, social, environmental (including
population limits that they consider way way to high at present and
almost everything in mainstream orthodoxy is designed to effect that end
of reduction, and some may have noticed a trend of anti expanded age in
some of the propaganda as of late, like Aeon Flux, though it was pretty
well presented, by intertwining it with a freedom message,
the main agenda of Aeon Flux was not freedom, but population control.
Life extension will only be for the "elite", not you and I) and medical
control (may have missed something, but it looks like a pretty complete
list), though the medical control, could be classified under
environment, as it is also used as a means of slow burn population
control, without being to obvious. That is agenda 21 in a nutshell.

It is interesting that Firefly has been so well received in the
"libertarian" community (and to think some took offense when I suggested
interesting uses for the bodies of the dead, if that is what it took to
complete a mission and save my crew to fight for freedom. In fact, I
can't think of a whole lot that I've suggested in the past that the good
guys didn't do in Firefly or Serenity, lol, right down to some of the
language, like, err, hump. Kick ass series and movie and gotta love them
whores), yet they refuse to see that we have the same thing happening in
real time now, though perhaps several degrees more corrupt with this
present bunch steering the globe, right down to controlling different
populations by adding pacifiers to the environment, but our elite have
taken that one step further, and put population reduction at the top of
the list, not that the pacifiers aren't there as well, not only
physical, but as well, walls in the mind, carefully crafted just like
River's, albeit without mostly any physically intrusive means, and
certainly quite multi layered, and not just bipolar (i.e. left and
right, but as well some of even the "libertarian" dogma included).

I know that it is hard for some to get their heads around so supposedly
diametrically opposed ideologies being used in concert to bring about
the above described agenda (and certainly they depend on that, and
certainly not only limited too), but it is imperative for the freedom
and survival of the human species that you awake from your slumbers and
study the issues, instead of being willfully ignorant. Those who have
studied the issues, the world at present makes almost perfect sense,
though certainly none of us wish that we were right.

As I listening to Jones right now, he has nailed it right on the head,
Malthusian social Darwinism. The immigration issue viewed in such light,
is now more about more equal distribution of the population, and even
hopes of a good way to thin out a good part of the herd (if they can get
their way by having us at each other's throats), then anything else.

I suspect though that most reading this that don't already get it,
will continue to be dupes.

As always, there are only two agendas in the human sphere of existence,
that of freedom and everything else, and at present, it is matter of
survival so that the fight for freedom will not die (freedom being the
the essence of humanity).

Stop masturbating the tiger (see analogy below), or make sure you have a
tarp in the other hand (so you don't make a mess for them, when they
shoot you in the back of the head, all over their new carpet that you
gave them when you refused to stand up like real freedom partisans,
though perhaps they will just take your spouse, daughters, or sons to
have their way with, and keep you as a pet, at least till they get done
playing with you like a cat does a mouse).

Prepare, because there really are Reavers, and in the real world, they
are in charge (another interesting similarity to the analogy below,
if one substitutes Reevers for tiger)! I think Joss Whedon
gets it.

Goat

little boys, tigers and jungles... oh, my...
by Goat

There was once a little boy playing in the jungle, and
a tiger came upon him and gave chase to the little boy,
the little boy remembered he had some candies in his pocket,
stopped, turned around to offer the tiger one, and was promptly
invited to dinner.

There was another little boy playing in the jungle, and a tiger
came upon him, the little boy started to run as the tiger gave chase,
the little boy saw another boy with a spear. He ran up to the little boy
with the spear, and offered him a candy that he had in his pocket, to
help with the tiger, and they both managed to lay slay to the tiger.

The two little boys built wonderful cities in the trees, away from the
tigers.

Then there was a third little boy "playing" in the jungle, and yes
another tiger came upon him and gave chase.

Having long ago ate any candies in a fit of immediate gratification,
this little boy reached down and plucked away his own manhood and threw
them at the tiger. The tiger licked his lips after greedily eating the
morsels and demanded more from the little boy. Not wanting to spend more
then he already had to, the little boy remembered seeing two little boys
nearby building some odd thing, and led the tiger to the two little
boys, and the little boy sat down with the tiger for a nice dinner of
the two other little boys. The supply of free little boys soon ran out,
and with it, the torch of liberty and humanity's hope to build wonderful
cities in the sky, for humanity itself was no more.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 9
From: "APFN" apfn@apfn.org
Date: Mon May 29, 2006 11:06pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: 9/11 - FLIGHT 77

5/20/06
- 9/11 - Final Rebuttles
http://www.sunjambooks.com/Pentaback2.jpg

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 10
From: "Jarrett Smith" Jarret.Smith@ntlworld.com
Date: Tue May 30, 2006 4:16am(PDT)
Subject: Re: AUDIO: information to set the 9/11 movement on fire

Hi,

Do you have a link for subscribing to the Podcasts? I've looked
everywhere, maybe its right in front of me but I can't see it.

thanx,

Jarrett

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 11
From: "reggie501" reggie501@optonline.net
Date: Tue May 30, 2006 8:03am(PDT)
Subject: 9/11 news update - 5/30 tvnl news

9/11 News : http://www.tvnewslies.org/news/#911

� DEMS Covered Up The Deep Complicity In The 9/11/01Attack -
Obviously, our nation is in very deep trouble. All citizens must unite
and take back our nation from the corporate oligarchs!

� An Open Letter to the 9/11 Commission - It is the enormity of those
that oppose the government's account of 9/11 that has prompted me to
draw the line in the sand, to pick a date, time, and location to have
a public debate on 9/11.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 12
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
Date: Tue May 30, 2006 9:57am(PDT)
Subject: A Day in the Life: 5/30/6

GOVERNMENT OF THE USA IN EXILE
Free Americans Reaching
Out to Amerika's Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free
��������
Via <prez@usa-exile.org>

May 30, 2006

From: "Amy Sasser" <amysasser@gmail.com>
Date: May 29, 2006 10:02:56 PM EST
To: "President, USA Exile Govt." <prez@usa-exile.org>
Subject: Fwd: The Meria Heller Show Newsletter Message

wow stuff. gets really good in about the 1/2, names companies, please
send around, copy it if you can

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The Meria Heller Show Newsletter <news@meria.net>
Date: May 28, 2006 8:24 PM
Subject: The Meria Heller Show Newsletter Message
To: amysasser@gmail.com

Okay. It's Memorial Day and I've been working all day. I want you to go
to the free show link (eventually it will be in the archives, and in
about an hour at the Ipod download). I have a two-hour show that will
blow your mind on 9/11. This man Richard Andrew Grove, a whistleblower
who worked for the big boys and money people behind 9/11 has come out
with information to set the 9/11 movement on fire.
Although many have rejected his work (too busy, big egos, whatever)
including the IRS, Treasury Dept and SEC, what he exposes on Marsh &
McLellan, AIG, Dyncorp, Spitzer, Stewart Air Force Base, Fitzgerald,
Bremer, missing gold and bucks of 9/11, software that predicts the
future and more will ASTOUND YOU as it did me. I will be having him
live on the show in June, but wanted you to hear this urgent
information immediately. That is why I worked on it all day.
If you are a journalist, blogger, etc., DO NOT think this is a ruse. I
expect you to LISTEN intently to what this man is presenting and act on
it.
If you are a friend, subscriber, past guest, listen and then relisten.
Pass it on to every outlet and every email list, group you have. This
information is EXPLOSIVE. The more of us that know this information,
the greater the chances I won't be killed for presenting it, and the
greater the chances for a real revolution in America's thinking
processes.
Go beyond the explosions, destruction of evidence, etc., and learn who
BENEFITTED and HOW on 9/11 to find out who the Corporate
Fundamentalists are that were behind it all.
Thank you for trusting me with this one, it's well worth it.
Love,
Meria

"We're mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore".
"THE MERIA HELLER SHOW"

www.Meria.net������Soon in it's 7th year!

"Meria is the best weapon of mass instruction��we have ; the inventor
of internet radio reality"-
Greg Palast , Investigative Journalist

MERIA WILL BE A KEYNOTE SPEAKER AT THE 911 "RECLAIMING OUR FUTURE"
Conference in
Chicago, June 2-4. Check out www.911Revealingthetruth.org for more
information.

NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security
Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice.
They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You
have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of the
current President.

From New World Order globalists to our endangered environment to
emerging spirituality, The Meria Heller Show shines the light of truth
on our troubled planet.��Listen to a FREE recent show here:
http://www.meria.net/freeshow.html (Windows Media Player
required).��For just $20.00 per month, you can hear the live show and
interact with Meria using Yahoo Messenger, browse through the
thousand-plus shows in the archives, AND you'll receive Meria's
exclusive breaking news e-mail updates.��Find a subscription option to
fit your budget here: http://www.meria.net/subscribe.html

� 2005 Meria Heller. All Rights Reserved. Feel free to forward this
entire message with copyright included, for nonprofit use only.

--
The Meria Heller Show - The Mouth That Roars!
http://www.Meria.net
--
NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security
Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice.
They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You
have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of the
current President.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

From: APFN <apfn@apfn.org>
Date: May 29, 2006 7:04:22 PM EST
To: APFN Yahoogroups <apfn-1@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [911TruthAction] AUDIO: information to set the 9/11 movement
on fire
Reply-To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com

Meria Heller
AUDIO: information to set the 9/11 movement on fire
Mon May 29, 2006 20:59
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=101664;
title=APFN

========================================================================
================================================================

----------


Impact of Possible Military Attack on Iran

An Iranian Perspective

By Sa'id Davar
May 30, 2006
Kayhan, Tehran

The arrangement of effective elements in the debate over Iran's nuclear
case has now entered a new phase. The new round that has started
chiefly between Iran and America is almost unprecedented in nearly the
past three decades. Iran is planting defensive mines around itself and
strongly resisting the political pressures, the psychological warfare
and the military threats of the West and particularly America, and is
making defensive threats.

Under the current circumstances, the Americans are taking special
measures in Iraq by using the atmosphere of diplomatic tension in the
region. They have been directing the movements of the Kurds in Iran's
border areas in a way that suits America's interests.

There are whispers that they are trying to deploy troops in Georgia and
the Republic of Azerbaijan with the intention of using the space of
these two southern Caucasian republics against Iran. However, their
request to use the Incirlik base and Turkey's space against Tehran was
apparently turned down by Ankara.

America's presence in Afghanistan for a few years has provided a rather
strong position against Iran. In Faw, Iraq, the United States has been
giving the local people notices for population relocation, so that they
could build a permanent military base there next to Khorramshahr and
the Iranian borders. Britain's presence beside America, in spite of the
diplomatic denials in London's Downing Street, takes the United States
to the days before the war on Saddam Husayn.

The United States is showing with its political behaviour that it is
trying to accept and even demonstrate the reality. By making nuclear
threats against Iran, America has made it clear that it truly sees Iran
as a serious opponent, because during the history of the Cold War and
after that, the Soviet Union and China were the only two cases against
which America suggested the possibility of nuclear conflict. All of the
games of the past few years and especially the past few months have put
the United States in a position from which it can reach a unique
analysis of the issues. America is now considering and weighing the
possibility of a military assault on Iran. The demonstration of Iran's
naval and air force armaments and Tehran's proven advances in uranium
enrichment up to over 3 per cent, which the Atomic Energy Agency
confirmed as 3.6 per cent, have placed new circumstances before the
United States.

The general feeling in Iran is not fear of war. Despite the strong
traditional and internal desire for peace in Iran, studying Iran's
society shows that the Iranian people forcefully respond to any kind of
threat or aggressive action and any effort to humiliate the Iranian
nation. Iran has achieved true confidence in its technological
potential in different scientific areas, especially in nuclear
technology, which further strengthens its resolve to protect its
independence. Obviously, everyone has noticed that the circumstances in
the Middle East and even the balance of power have changed in favour of
Iran. The importance of this matter is that the new circumstances,
while consolidating Tehran's positions in every aspect, undermine the
positions of other countries like Pakistan and Israel and destabilize
the special roles that certain countries like Egypt and Turkey have in
the regional system and among the Middle Eastern governments.

To draw a final conclusion from the dispute between a country that is
afraid of losing its military and economic power and a country that
striving to survive among different elements and powers that are mainly
accustomed to the rule of jungle, we can see that a confrontation
between these two forces will endanger the national interests of many
other countries and cause serious and great concerns for them. Right
now the Russians are worried that the NATO is going to move its bases
near the Iranian borders. Any development in favour of America will
permanently undermine Russia's position in the controversial and very
attractive region of the Middle East. This means that Moscow, after
having gone through the 80s, in its worst psychological state will have
to deal with the United States and the global developments. Considering
Islamabad's unstable and agitated background and some pages of Iran's
nuclear dossier, the situation wouldn't be very favourable to the
Pakistanis either. The Chinese will lose a lucrative market and New
Delhi will further realize the futility of the abrupt changes in its
diplomacy vis-a-vis Iran and siding with the United States. From a
security standpoint, the circumstances would not be favourable to
Turkey either, because disruption of security in Iranian territory and
confrontation with America will further deepen the lack of security in
Turkey's border areas and some parts of its internal geography. In
Iraq, the new circumstances will basically speed up the developments,
of course in a negative way.

Controlling this state of affairs would be much more difficult than
messing up the security puzzle of the region, and this is exactly the
conclusion that everyone has reached in Tehran and Washington. For this
reason, they are trying not to lose control.

Iran's national and international prestige is one issue and America's
desire to retain the traditional statue of "superior America" is
another. What we see is a state of deep mistrust, which of course is
understandable.

Iranian and American logics are defending and attacking, each based on
their own data and attributes. Iran is relying on national unity,
technological motives and a broad and strategic geography that provides
control over extremely crucial passageways of energy, whereas America
is counting on European allies, modern weapons and leaders riding a
white-headed eagle.

Source: Keyhan website, Tehran, in Persian 21 May 06, p2, translation
BBC.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole
responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
the Centre for Research on Globalization.

To become a Member of Global Research

The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at
www.globalresearch.ca grants permission to cross-post original Global
Research articles in their entirety, or any portions thereof, on
community internet sites, as long as the text & title are not modified.
The source must be acknowledged and an active URL hyperlink address to
the original CRG article must be indicated. The author's copyright note
must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print
or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact:
crgeditor@yahoo.com

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available to our readers under the provisions
of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of
political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to
use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must
request permission from the copyright owner.

To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at Global
Research's News and Discussion Forum

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

� Copyright Sa'id Davar, Kayhan, Tehran, 2006

The url address of this article is:
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?
context=viewArticle&amp;amp;code=DAV20060530&articleId=2528

========================================================================
===============================================

http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=9056

May 29, 2006

The
Evil Is in Our Government
By Paul Craig Roberts

Is the Bush Regime a state sponsor of terrorism?

A powerful case can be made that it is.

In the past three years, the Bush Regime has murdered tens of thousands
of Iraqi civilians and an unknown number of Afghan ones.

U.S. Marines, our finest and proudest military force, are under
criminal investigation for breaking into Iraqi homes and murdering
entire families. In an unprecedented event, Gen. Michael Hagee, the
Marine Corps commandant, has found it necessary to fly to Iraq to tell
our best-trained troops to stop murdering civilians.

Gen. Hagee found it necessary to tell the U.S. Marines: "We do not
employ force just for the sake of employing force. We use lethal force
only when justified, proportional, and most importantly, lawful."

The war criminals in the Bush Regime have dismissed the murders as
"collateral damage," but they are in fact murders. Otherwise, there
would be no criminal investigations, and the Marine commandant would
not be burdened with the embarrassment of having to fly to Iraq to
lecture U.S. Marines on the lawful use of force.

The criminal Bush Regime has now murdered more Iraqis than Saddam
Hussein. The Bush Regime is also responsible for 20,000 U.S. casualties
(dead, maimed for life, and wounded).

Bush damns the "axis of evil." But who has the "axis of evil"
attacked? Iran has attacked no one. North Korea has attacked no country
for more than a half century. Iraq attacked Kuwait a decade and a half
ago, apparently after securing permission from the U.S. ambassador.

Isn't the real axis of evil Bush-Blair-Olmert? Bush and Blair have
attacked two countries, slaughtering their citizens. Olmert is urging
them on to attack a third country � Iran.

Where does the danger to the world reside? In Iran, a small, religious
country where the family is intact and the government is constrained by
religious authority and ancient traditions, or in the U.S. where
propaganda rules and the powerful executive branch has removed itself
from accountability by breaking the constitutional restraints on its
power?

Why is the U.S. superpower orchestrating fear of puny Iran?

The U.S. government has spent the past half century interfering in the
internal affairs of other countries, overthrowing or assassinating
their chosen leaders and imposing its puppets on foreign peoples. To
what country has Iran done this, or Iraq, or North Korea?

Americans think that they are the salt of the earth. The hubris that
comes from this self-righteous belief makes Americans blind to the evil
of their leaders. How can American leaders be evil when Americans are
so good and so wonderful?

How many Serbs were slaughtered by American bombs released from high
above the clouds, and for what reason? Who even remembers the
propagandistic lies that the Clinton administration told us about why
we absolutely had to drop bombs on the Serbs?

Wasn't it evil for the U.S. to bomb Iraq for a decade and to embargo
medicines for children? When U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright
was asked if she thought an embargo that resulted in the deaths of
500,000 Iraqi children was justified, she replied, "yes."

The former terrible tyrant ruler of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, is on trial
for killing 150 people. The U.S. government murdered 500,000 Iraqi
children prior to Bush's invasion. When the U.S. government murders
people, whether Serbs, Branch Davidians at Waco, or Iraqi women and
children, it is "collateral damage." But we put Saddam Hussein on trial
for putting down rebellions.

Gentle reader, do you believe that the Bush Regime will not shoot you
down in the streets if you have a rebellion?

========================================================================
===============================================================

From: Stephen Lendman <lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net>
Date: May 30, 2006 8:15:02 AM EST
Subject: ONE MORE NEW ARTICLE

Hello to all again -

Sending article written before weekend but was delayed
sending out. This one on depleted uranium (DU) that's
created calamitous situation where it's been used and
to some degree affects everyone as winds carry
irradiated atmospheric dust everywhere.

It's a huge problem and one covered up by Pentagon and
VA. I wrote it specifically to defend a distinguished
man I know (named in article) whose work on DU was
attacked by emailer to one web site.

Hope not sending too much too quickly. Would love
more feedback.

Steve

The Threat of Depleted Uranium Exposure - It's Real,
Deadly and Covered up by the Pentagon and VA - by
Stephen Lendman

The Pentagon must surely believe the old but very
foolish saying that what you don't know won't hurt
you. To prove it they nearly always go to great
lengths to conceal what they do know so we won't find
out. That's especially true when what they know is
bad news or hazardous to our health or that of our
troops. That's certainly the case regarding the real
and deadly threat from exposure to the toxic effects
of depleted uranium (DU) poisoning. The public has
precious little information about this crucial issue
because it's been willfully and deliberately
suppressed to conceal just how potentially great and
irreversible a threat it is.

Is it any wonder then that most of those people who've
heard about DU have been seduced by the Pentagon
cover-up and stream of lies and are taken in enough by
them to believe what little information they hear and
read in the mainstream. I know those individuals
never heard of one of the two greatest and most highly
esteemed US print journalists of the last century.
His name was I.F. Stone, and I've read nearly all his
important books. Stone once told a class of aspiring
journalists always to remember "All governments are
run by liars and nothing they say should be believed."
Another time he simply said "All governments lie."
If I were asked to address a group of students, I'd be
even more emphatic than Stone and say governments only
lie and never tell the public the truth, especially
about the most important issues affecting us all. I'd
also quote Stone and recommend the students paste his
maxim to their bathroom mirrors so they never forget
it.

Government propaganda, lies and deception are more
extreme and sophisticated now than in Stone's day.
Those unaware of it remind me of a poker player
looking around the table to assess the competition.
He doesn't realize when he can't find who the mark is
it's him. But in a real life game of high stakes
poker when it's you against the "power structure" and
their corporate media allies, unless you know how the
game is played, you surely are their mark and they'll
eat you alive.

I know of nothing more dangerous to a free society
than a deficit of real information on the most vital
issues affecting everyone. It's impossible getting it
from government sources or the dominant corporate
media in league with them because supplying us with it
would subvert their interests. It's true on all
important issues without exception. So, if the public
knew the full truth about the potentially nightmarish
effects of exposure to DU munitions that will only
likely get worse unless exposed and stopped, it would
be impossible for the Pentagon to continue using them.
Only their cover-up has allowed them to be able to
recklessly and criminally use them in four wars since
1991 including the two of them ongoing now. And they
couldn't possibly ever consider raising the stakes
further, as they now have claimed the exclusive right
to do, to fight future wars with industrial strength
nuclear weapons that could lead to a nuclear
holocaust.

What we already know about the deadly effects of DU
munitions use alone is clear and growing, unreported
in the dominant media, and thus largely concealed from
the public. Those unaware of it, taken in by Pentagon
propaganda, or choosing to ignore the few facts about
it they do know should welcome and praise the
impressive work done on this issue by Irving Wesley
Hall. He's a man I personally know and have had
contact with. I've also collaborated with him as he
was preparing his extremely important series of
articles on this growing menace that may eventually
affect everyone. Irving has made an important
contribution, and I respect and admire him greatly for
it. His articles should be widely read and those
doing it should encourage others to read them as well
for their own safety and welfare. Having written on
this subject myself, I know from my own research how
valuable Irving's work is to expanding the knowledge
base about DU and its harmful effects.

What Depleted Uranium Is and How It's Being Used

Depleted uranium is a derivative of the uranium
enrichment process required to produce fuel for
commercial reactors. This process is then followed by
gaseous diffusion in two streams - one is enriched and
the other depleted. Before a use was found for it, DU
was just stored in vast amounts as a byproduct. All
that changed when it was discovered that solid "dense
metal" DU projectiles (in all forms) greatly increased
their ability to penetrate and destroy a target. That
was irresistible to the Pentagon that wanted to use
them in bullets, bombs, shells and missiles and now
has done so freely in four wars since they were first
used in the Gulf war in 1991 (except for one test in
the 1973 Yom Kippur war).

There's a problem with these weapons, however - a
serious downside never discussed and which great pains
are taken to conceal. These weapons in all their
forms leave in their wake an irremediable irradiated
and chemically toxic landscape far more deadly than
the death and destruction to the targets struck. How
deadly and toxic the fallout is varies only with the
amount of these weapons used. Hundreds of tons of
them were used beginning for the first time in the
Gulf war in 1991. A likely similar amount was used
again in Yugoslavia in 1999 and up to 1,000 or more
tons so far in Afghanistan since 2001. Any use of
these weapons is reckless and was effectively banned
by common consent (and common sense) and never used
until 1991 in Iraq (except for that one test).
However, their usage ballooned in successive wars to
over 3,000 tons so far since the US introduced them on
a large and sustained scale again in Iraq in March,
2003.

Put in perspective, since first used in 1991, the US
military has willfully and criminally spread deadly
toxic radiation across a vast area of three countries
as well as everywhere else affected by the fallout.
It's caused permanent irremediable contamination with
a half-life of 4.5 billion years or forever by my
reckoning.

One more important fact is these numbers increase
daily as since last December US forces have been
conducting four to six daily bombings of target sites
in Iraq alone that we know about using DU munitions
and an unknown likely less frequent number in
Afghanistan. We also have a new terror weapon we
claim the right to use routinely called "bunker-buster
mini nukes" that aren't mini but sure are nukes.
These are industrial strength nuclear bombs that can
be produced to any desired potency but are likely to
be used in strengths of between one-third to
two-thirds the destructive force of a Hiroshima bomb.
Pentagon propaganda falsely says these are little more
than king-sized hand grenades that are perfectly safe
when used as designed. They're supposed to penetrate a
target site deeply before exploding on the false
theory that their radiation will be contained
underground and thus are environmentally safe.
Testing of these bombs are planned in the Nevada
desert and may be now underway, but at least one
already carried out and observed proves otherwise.
What was seen on explosion is hardly reassuring that
the toxic fallout will be contained when used in
combat. Clearly visible was a huge black
mushroom-shaped cloud (sound familiar) that rose
thousands of feet in the air and was shown to be
deadly and toxic when ground radiation measurements
were taken following at least this one test. There
may have been others as well we haven't heard about.

The Pentagon always deliberately spreads false and
misleading information on its controversial
activities, but especially something as outrageous as
the lingering, spreading and deadly effects from DU
contamination which never end. Those exposed to it and
their loved ones with whom they have intimate contact
and their offspring are henceforth vulnerable to a
vast menu of virtually any illness, disease or
disability imaginable often leading to early death or
at the least a lifetime of pain, suffering and great
expense. It's no exaggeration to say that DU is the
deadly and unwelcome gift that keeps on giving,
disabling and killing.

DU weapons aren't just toxic and deadly, they're
illegal according to the standards and binding
international law under the Hague Convention of 1907
and 1925 Geneva Protocol and other succeeding Geneva
Weapons Conventions that specifically outlaw the use
of any chemical and biological agents in any form for
any reason in war as well as any poison or poisoned
weapons. DU weapons in all their forms are
radioactive and chemically toxic and clearly fit the
definition of poisonous weapons banned under these
binding international laws to which we are
signatories. As such, the US, having used them in
four wars, has violated our sacred treaty obligations
which are the supreme law of the land and is guilty of
repeated war crimes. That minor detail doesn't bother
the Bush administration that considers the Geneva
Conventions and all other international laws
inconvenient to its plans just "quaint" and
"obsolete."

The Public Is Largely Unaware of the DU Threat Or
Prefers to Believe Pentagon Propaganda Instead of
Known Scientific Fact

Most people get their so-called news and information
from the dominant corporate media mostly on TV which,
as everyone by now should know, never gives them what
they tune in for. Instead they get state approved
propaganda, lies and deception cleverly disguised as
the real thing. It's almost always true that what
they don't report is lots more important than what
they do. Of course, the reason this goes on is that
if the public knew and understood what our government
was up to, they'd never stand for it. So it's all
kept under wraps, and most people are never the wiser.
It's very easy to be influenced by the slick state
and corporate-friendly messages because they're
transmitted effectively ad nauseam round the clock on
air and in print. The repetition has a powerful
effect. It clouds the mind, blocks out the truth and
distracts enough to prevent those mesmerized by it
from seeking it. Why would you not want to believe
the friendly news anchors you've grown to know and
love over the years. Would they ever lie to you?
Darned right they would if they want to keep their
high-paying jobs.

I comment on this often for one reason. It's the most
important of all issues I know. Unless people know
and understand the truth about what's happening around
them on the vital issues affecting their lives,
they're defenseless against the onslaught of fraud and
deceit delivered through the dominant media. It
allows government to get away with the most egregious
acts as agents for giant corporations and the "money
changers" who buy and pay for their services. This
alliance is hostile to the public interest as it
allows these corporations and financial institutions
(including the US Federal Reserve which is a private
for-profit entity and not a government run one as
commonly believed) free reign to pursue their
predatory quest for greater profits and world
dominance and do it at our expense.

The Disturbing Truths about DU the Pentagon and VA Are
Taking Great Pains to Conceal

Those truths are emerging slowly and convincingly, but
emerging they are. It's quite true we don't have all
the answers yet, and there's still much more to be
learned before we know for certain just how harmful DU
is in all respects and how widespread its
contamination has spread. However, all the new
evidence coming out points in one direction and leads
to an increasingly clear conclusion. It's the same
one I first heard told me by an eminent man in a
required college natural science course I took in
1953. The man was George Wald, distinguished
professor of biology and later a nobel laureate in
1967. Dr. Wald had many admirable qualities I admired
greatly, but I still remember verbatim the dramatic
statement he made one day in class. He told his young
students that "there is no such thing as a safe amount
of radiation." He understood what Albert Einstein did
even earlier, and both these men spoke out forcefully
against the genie out of the bottle that emerged once
the atom was first split in 1938 in a Berlin
laboratory. From that time to now, it's been known
beyond dispute how dangerous and deadly radiation is
in all its forms and in any amount to all those coming
in contact with it even for short periods of time.
However, for those exposed to it daily like our troops
in Iraq and Afghanistan where it's contaminated a vast
area, it's a possible death sentence or at the least a
lifetime of likely misery from the poisoning that
increases each day.

Some Documented Facts On the Effects of DU Poisoning

The greatest damage from DU comes from the radiation
residue after its use. When a DU weapon strikes a
target, it penetrates deeply and aerosolizes into a
fine spray which then contaminates the air, soil and
water around the target area. The residue is
permanent, and its microscopic and submicroscopic
particles are then swept into the air from the tainted
soil and are carried by winds to distant areas as a
radioactive component of atmospheric dust. That dust
falls indiscriminately everywhere over the area it
reaches. It causes radiation contamination that
affects every living thing and cannot be remediated.
As mentioned above, the poisoning from the
contamination causes every imaginable illness and
disease from severe headaches, muscle pain and general
fatigue, to major birth defects, infection,
depression, cardiovascular disease, many types of
cancer and brain tumors. It also causes permanent
disability and death. Months ago I personally alerted
my own medical providers to be on the lookout for any
unexplainable symptoms in their patients, especially
if they had served in the military in the Middle East,
Afghanistan or Yugoslavia.

I reported all this in a major, detailed article I
wrote on this subject a few months ago and available
on my blog site - sjlendman.blogspot.com. In it I
went on to explain that all military and civilian
personnel at or near target areas were and are most
adversely affected by DU contamination, especially if
they remained in those areas for an extended time.
During the six week Gulf war about 150 of our forces
were killed and 467 were reported injured. However,
the real effects of that war weren't apparent until
years later. We're beginning to get lots of
information on it now but not without great difficulty
to make it as complete and accurate as possible.

Because of that problem, there's great variance in the
numbers I've seen. But somewhere between about 30 -
75% of the 696,841 military personnel who served in
the Gulf from August 2, 1990 to end of July, 1991 have
filed claims for or have been reported by the
Veteran's Administration (VA) to be on some form of
disability in 2004. It's likely the true number is
closer to the lower percentage, but I've chosen to
report the range in case later on we learn things were
far worse than we now can imagine. We do know an
additional 11,910 vets have died as of early this
year. There's a problem compiling accurate data
because the VA has been complicit with the Pentagon in
the cover-up about DU and has said very little about
the true number disabled or how many of the disability
total were the result of DU poisoning. They could
easily find out by administering blood tests and doing
other proper examinations. Instead they've done as
little as possible just as for years in the 1990s they
denied the existence of "Gulf war" syndrome (most
likely from DU poisoning) and told suffering vets it
was all in their heads. They certainly were there if
any of those heads were afflicted with brain tumors or
their early stages.

We can only speculate about how many of our military
personnel post 2001 are now the victims of DU
poisoning, but it's likely the number is large and
growing with more coming down with disturbing symptoms
daily. We know many returning vets are already
seeking treatment for health problems, and that
medical professionals in hospitals and other
facilities providing it have been threatened with
$10,000 fines and even jail if they speak out about
what those problems are. Think how outrageous this is
- that a nation that sent hundreds of thousands of its
young men and women to fight in two illegal wars of
aggression, then turns its back on them when they
return home with serious illnesses they may never
recover from or that may kill them. And making
matters even worse, the Pentagon and VA are complicit
in a cover-up and denial a problem even exists. They
might as well be saying "let 'em suffer and die." So
think of it. This is the "model democracy" we hold up
to the world to emulate. In fact, it's a deadly and
sinister model all nations should reject and condemn.

Documented Evidence On Recent DU Fallout

In February, 2006, after I wrote my article on DU,
Irving Wesley Hall wrote his carefully researched and
extremely important series on DU and its harmful
effects. His findings were widely posted, and all of
it is available on his web site - notinkansas.us.
Irving's work is so important, readers should visit
his site, review his series carefully and likely learn
for the first time how serious and deadly a threat DU
contamination is to everyone coming in contact with
it.

Here's a sample of the information included in the
series which needs as much resonance as possible.
I've added some of my own comments to it. Irving has
made an important contribution, and I'm proud to be
associated with him and his work. He wrote that Dr.
Chris Busby, scientific secretary of the European
Committee on Radiation Risk, reported on official UK
radiation levels in the wake of the "shock and awe"
assault against Iraq in 2003. Dr. Busby documented
that uranium particles traveled 2,400 miles in nine
days from Iraq to Aldermaston, England. The invisible
cloud quadrupled Europe's atmospheric radiation
clearly showing that despite Pentagon denials, DU
contamination spreads far beyond the target sites
struck. Once again the Pentagon's mendacity and
indifference to its forces and the rest of us is
revealed in plain sight for all to see if they'll
bother to look.

The widespread contamination is even more dangerous
and deadly than formerly believed. But apparently one
emailer in particular, with little knowledge to
support what he wrote, attacked Irving's findings and
shamed and embarrassed himself in the process. I read
his response and know the facts. They clearly
contradict virtually everything he said and his
conclusions overwhelmingly. The emailer not only put
his ignorance on public display, but he also
arrogantly and insolently attacked the honesty, honor
and integrity of a man of the highest stature.

His shameless act reminded me of a "show-stopping"
moment I saw on US TV in June, 1954. It was during
the so-called Army - McCarthy hearings when chief Army
counsel Joseph Welch gave his famous retort to the
soon to be disgraced US senator, who became infamous
from his witch-hunting, self-serving search for
communists in government without ever finding any.
Welch and his reply are still remembered to this day,
and I clearly recall him making it. In defense of his
client under McCarthy's malicious attack he asked the
senator on national TV: "Have you no sense of decency,
sir, at long last? Have you no sense of decency." Not
long after that memorable moment the McCarthy hearings
ended inconclusively, the senator's reputation was
shattered, he was censured by the Senate, and he died
a disgraced man a few years later. We can only hope
for a similar denouement for the band of rogues in
charge of US policy today who are making so many
people around the world the worst for it.

I won't try to match Joe Welch, but I'll just ask the
emailer: aren't you ashamed enough to flaunt your
ignorance to a world audience without compounding it
by shamelessly attacking a distinguished man of the
highest integrity and honor. Like "Tail-Gunner" Joe
(a moniker referring to one more dark side of the
tainted senator), have you no sense of dignity, or
just plain no sense at all?

Additional Expert Scientific Commentary Reported by
Irving Wesley Hall

Here's more from Irving's articles on the DU threat.
He learned about the work of Leonard Dietz who's a
retired physicist from the Knolls Atomic Power
Laboratory in New York state. Dietz pioneered the
technology to measure uranium isotopes, and Irving
quoted what he said: "Anyone, civilian or soldier, who
breathes these particles has a permanent dose, and
it's not going to decrease very much over time....In
the long run....veterans exposed to ceramic uranium
oxide have a major problem."

Irving reported an even more dire assessment that came
from another study of the materials currently in the
DU munitions used in Iraq and Afghanistan. The study
found that in addition to U-238, today's DU weapons
contain plutonium (the most toxic of all known
substances), neptunium, and the highly radioactive
uranium isotope U-236. According to a 1991 study by
the UK Atomic Energy Authority, these elements are
100,000 times more dangerous than the U-238 in DU. It
only takes the most minute, nearly unmeasurable amount
of this substance in one's body to be fatal.

One other expert must be mentioned as well. His name
is Dr. Doug Rokke who was the director of the
Pentagon's Depleted Uranium Project. He was assigned
by the US Army to be their chief biological, chemical
and nuclear weapons safety officer and expert in the
Gulf war. Irving interviewed Doug, and I, too, spoke
to and corresponded with him. Doug's extensive work
as director of the project led him to conclude that
"Uranium munitions must be banned from the planet, for
eternity, and medical care must be provided for
everyone - those on the firing end and those on the
receiving end." Rokke understands the problem well
from his extensive study of it and his own personal
and tragic experience. He and his staff of 100 were
all devastated by exposure to DU contaminated dust.
Thirty of them have since died, and Rokke now suffers
from serious health problems including brain lesions,
lung and kidney damage, reactive airway disease,
permanent skin rashes, neurological damage and
cataracts. It's quite clear Dr. Rokke didn't contract
this nightmarish stew of mostly very serious health
problems from an unhealthy life style, bad diet or
lack of exercise.

A Grim Assessment the Evidence Points To

So what can we make from all this. From the Gulf war
in 1991, at a minimum many tens of thousands of the US
military forces sent there for a short period of time
have had health problems or are now on some form of
disability. But the worst is yet to come. In the
Afghanistan war beginning in late 2001 and the Iraq
war from March, 2003, about 1.3 million US military
forces have served in combat and occupation in these
countries. They were all assigned long tours of duty
and most of them have served two or three deployments
to what are beyond question the most dangerous and
toxic environments on earth. Somewhere between 30 -
75% of Operation Desert Shield and Desert Storm are
now on some kind of disability or have died. If those
percentages are applied to the 1.3 million of our
military now serving or having served in Iraq and
Afghanistan since 2001, between 390,000 - to 975,000
vets may end up on disability or die from exposure to
the far more toxic DU munitions used in these wars,
the many other poisonous pollutants they've been
exposed to, and the much longer and multiple tours of
duty they've had to undergo.

In simple terms, it's likely we can expect an eventual
catastrophic human disaster of epic proportions and
one being covered up because of its enormity. And
it's in addition to the far greater one we've
inflicted on 26 million innocent Iraqis discussed
below. Should the truth about all this come out
fully, what sane young men and women would ever
volunteer for military service knowing they were
either signing their death warrants or at the least
likely assuring themselves a lifetime of devastating
and/or debilitating health problems. And add to that
the mass outrage by the US public and the people of
other nations that joined with the US in sending
contingents of their military to be part of an illegal
occupying force.

The effect of all this has finally reached the US
Congress, but it's unlikely anything meaningful will
emerge there to reveal how dangerous and deadly
exposure to DU contamination really is. Still on May
11, the House passed legislation that includes an
amendment by Rep. Jim McDermott (himself an MD and
once a practicing psychiatrist) ordering a
comprehensive study of possible health effects from DU
exposure on US military forces and their children.
It's almost certain this amendment will never get
through the Senate or certainly won't ever be signed
into law by George Bush. Still kudos and an A for
effort to Rep. McDermott even though it's almost
certain it will all be for naught.

The Devastating Toll on Iraqis Since 1991

As bad as it's been and still is for our troops and
their families, try to imagine the nightmare 26
million innocent Iraqis have been living through since
January, 1991. The Gulf war began the malicious
destruction of a once modern state. It caused 100,000
or more Iraqi deaths in just weeks and destroyed
essential infrastructure like electricity and clean
water facilities vital to the health, welfare and the
safety of the people. It also began the spread of
deadly toxic radiation across the country from the
first use of DU munitions in combat as well as a
harmful stew of other pollutants responsible for
rampant illness and disease. This living hell is what
US illegal aggression based on lies and deceit brought
to this most highly developed and well-functioning of
all states in the Middle East now unable to cope
against a brutal occupier determined to destroy and
control it for its own imperial purpose and gain.

The sacking and plunder of Iraq began in January,
1991. But although the war formally ended after six
weeks of one-sided fighting, the bombing and brutality
against the people never did. Air attacks continued
sporadically throughout the 1990s (ordered by Bill "I
feel your pain" Clinton) destroying more
infrastructure, causing more deaths and adding to the
spread of deadly pollutants including the toxic
radiation from the DU weapons used. What also
followed the formal end to hostilities was a dozen
years of brutal economic sanctions that ravaged a
population helpless to cope with their horrific
effects. The result was a humanitarian disaster of
epic proportions that never ended. Besides the
physical and human toll, the economy was destroyed as
is evident from the following data. The per capita
annual income of Iraqis declined from a 1979 level of
$2,313 to $255 in 2003 and $144 in 2004. Further, the
college of economics at Baghdad University estimated
that unemployment rose to a level of 70%. Even the
so-called "oil for food" program did little to relieve
the crisis prior to the 2003 invasion. In fact, it
was never intended to as the US planned all along to
inflict the greatest possible hardship on the people
hoping their misery would encourage them to rise up
and topple Saddam. It turned out it had the opposite
effect despite the severity of the toll. Instead of
blaming Saddam, Iraqis relied on him for whatever
relief they could get. It wasn't much or nearly
enough because the US allowed him little to give.

The combination of war and economic sanctions caused
widespread illness and disease that was devastating
and still is. Even by conservative estimates, it
likely caused the death of at least one million Iraqis
including 500,000 children. Some estimates put the
number as high as 1.5 million and some others far
higher still. When Denis Halliday resigned in 1998 as
UN head of Iraqi humanitarian relief he said he did so
because he believed he'd been instructed to implement
a policy of genocide and refused to do it. He added
that 5,000 Iraqi children were dying needlessly every
month. Hans Von Sponek, who took on the UN relief job
after Halliday, also resigned in frustration and
disgust in 2000 voicing similar sentiments when he
left.

But bad as conditions were then, they got far worse
following the US illegal aggression beginning in
March, 2003. The daily toll of death and destruction
since then is unknown precisely, but even conservative
estimates are appalling and shocking. The British
Lancet earlier reported by their "conservative
assumptions" an Iraqi toll of about 100,000 "excess
deaths" post March, 2003. They recently updated their
initial estimate (three years later) to a now likely
300,000 and rising daily as we all should know. Other
estimates place the number far higher, up to 500,000
in one estimate I saw a few months ago. Whatever the
true number is, the US inflicted disaster on Iraq and
its people for over the past 15 years is truly of epic
proportions. It clearly warrants the label genocide
and makes all those in the US at the highest levels of
three administrations responsible for it guilty of
egregious war crimes and crimes against humanity.

What May Lie Ahead

Iraq and Afghanistan are in ruins, and the US is
hopelessly embroiled in two wars it has no possibility
of winning. Both of them will go on without end as
long as we remain occupiers in countries where we're
not wanted and will never be tolerated. Further, both
countries have a long history of expelling invaders
regardless of how long it took them to do it. It will
be no different this time, but it's shocking to
imagine the human toll that will result on all sides
before they finally do end, the final tally is
estimated years later, and the many years it will then
take to rebuild these shattered countries.

So with two out-of-control wars ongoing, it would seem
unthinkable the US would now be planning one or two
more. How can that be possible, and what sane
planners would ever contemplate such an irrational
course? We don't have the troop strength, and our
military budget (on and off the books) is off the
charts and running up huge deficits even the new Fed
chairman is alarmed about. Logic and fiscal sanity
should indicate it would be folly to compound the
current mess with a still greater mess. But that's
exactly what appears to be in the works, and the
preliminary and softening up stage of a planned attack
against Iran is already underway just as it was
leading up to the March, 2003 "shock and awe" assault
against Iraq.

For many months, Iran has known the US has been flying
unmanned aerial surveillance drones to help select
target sites. There have been some scattered but
unconfirmed reports that one or more of these
intruders have been shot down. It's also a not so
hidden secret we've sent special forces or combat
personnel into Iran under cover along with
reconnaissance teams to collect similar information on
the ground as well as link up with anti-government
elements we hope will help our efforts. The Iranians
know all this, and you can bet they're trying to snare
a few of them, but if they have neither side is
letting on. I wouldn't want to be one of the illegal
infiltrators and get caught in the act. I don't think
the Iranians will be very hospitable or understanding
nor should they be. So what's likely to happen next
and when.

I have no timetable, but it's been responsibly
reported, and I believe the reports, that George Bush
has signed off on a "shock and awe" attack against
Iran and is intending to do it using industrial
strength nuclear weapons. They're deceptively called
"bunker-buster mini-nukes" which I explained above are
nukes but not mini ones - they're likely to be from
one-third to two-thirds as powerful as a Hiroshima
bomb. But they can be produced to any potency and
some likely will be and used. I also explained that
the Pentagon has lied (do they ever do anything else)
that the radiation emitted from these
earth-penetrating munitions will be contained below
ground and thus are safe to use. Not so, and the
Pentagon knows it.

Our apparent intentions toward Iran are also based on
more lies and deception as we accuse that country of
violating international law by having a secret nuclear
weapons program. There's no evidence whatever Iran
has one, but they'd be irresponsible not to be taking
every measure possible to defend itself against a
hostile US intending to bring down its government by
any means including nuclear war. Iran is a signatory
to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), and so
far as known is in full compliance with it. As such
it has every legal right to enrich uranium for its
commercial nuclear industry as does every other
country following NPT rules.

US hostility to Iran has nothing to do with its
enrichment policy or even its form of government.
It's the result of Iran's intent to remain independent
of US dominance and go its own way. It's been that
way since the uprising that overthrew the repressive
and US installed and supported Shah in 1979 after
which Iran no longer was willing to continue
relinquishing its sovereignty and remain subservient
to US interests. The result has been continued
hostility between the two countries that may now be
culminating with a US planned attempt to oust the
country's leadership forcibly since we've given up
trying to achieve that goal by other means short of
war. The strategy won't be any more successful in
Iran than it's been in Iraq. What US planners may
succeed in doing is engulfing the whole Middle East in
flames without a realistic notion of what the outcome
of that may be. It certainly won't be a good one, but
that never before deterred an administration that's
often wrong but never in doubt.

The US way of doing things is to engage other nations
like a schoolyard bully. It's especially true in our
dealings with the developing world where we generally
treat the countries in it on the basis of an "our way
or the highway" policy. We can't unleash our full
force bullying against most developed ones in the
Global North, but we do that freely and often,
directly or through proxies, against all others that
forget "who's boss." When that happens, that
"highway" is usually strewn with unwarranted economic
sanctions, coup attempts, political assassinations, or
death and destruction from war. The US follows this
hostile course to bring "outlier" nations in line with
our policies, but also to deter others from deviating
from them as well. It's a bloodstained legacy that
puts to rest the myth that the US is a peace loving,
benevolent democracy only wanting to spread those
principles to other nations that don't practice them.
But let me state clearly something I haven't said
elsewhere before but should have. By the US I don't
mean the people. I mean the leadership of both major
political parties and their corporate and elitist
allies all of whom work against the public interest
everywhere and only for their own.

The US and Iranian public interest won't be served by
what our present leadership apparently has in mind for
that country - regime change the hard way. It looks
like the plan is to make it extra hard by upping the
ante to send a clear and decisive message to the
Iranians and all other nations going their own way
that we will nuke you into submission unless you come
around willingly. So far we've only used nuclear
weapons below the radar with DU munitions that alone
have caused unspeakable harm. But should the US go
further and attack Iran with industrial strength
nuclear bombs, we will have crossed an inviolable
threshold, moved the nation one step closer to tyranny
and brought the world a lot closer to a possible
eventual nuclear holocaust. In my judgment, that's
what's now at stake unless a way is found to stop this
aggressive juggernaut before it goes further and it's
too late to act.

Iran is First in the US Target Queue Followed by
Venezuela

Unimaginable as it may seem, high-level leadership and
planners in Washington may have in mind not just a
third conflict but a fourth one as well. I've written
about this several times, and recently wrote a feature
article titled "The US Now Planning A Fourth Attempt
to Oust Hugo Chavez." Based on my knowledge and ear
to the ground observing and listening to the steady
and intensifying drumbeat of anti-Chavez rhetoric
coming from top US officials through the corporate
media (all of it the usual litany of lies and
deception only), I have no doubt whatever a fourth
attempt to oust President Chavez and his government is
planned and likely now being implemented under the
radar. Precisely how and what will be unleashed won't
be known until the fireworks begin. But make no
mistake about it, they will begin, and this time they
may include attempted assassinations and open conflict
with DU munitions or even full-scale nuclear bombs if
that's part of the plan. If that happens, the nuclear
nightmare will have arrived in the Americas and come
ever closer to the US Southern border.

By whatever means the US has in mind in its latest
attempt to unseat Hugo Chavez, its intentions toward
him and his government are clear, unmistakable and
written in stone. The US will settle for nothing less
than full control of his country's vast hydrocarbon
reserves and a government willing to hand them over to
us. Those reserves are far more vast than once
thought as the best estimates of the country's oil
reserves (including the extra-heavy kind more
expensive to refine) are thought to be about 350
billion barrels or even higher. That compares to
Saudi Arabia's estimated reserves of about 262 billion
barrels of (at least mostly) the preferred and more
easily refined "light sweet" crude. It takes no
mental exertion to see the two countries at the head
of the US target queue have vast amounts of the
essential commodity the US wants most and is willing
to go to war if necessary to secure control over
everywhere it feels it's worth the cost and effort.
There's no doubt the US feels that way about Iran and
Venezuela just as it did about Iraq.

The US decided Saddam had to go not because of his
oppressive rule or his "now you see 'em, now you
don't" WMDs. It was because of his unwillingness to
surrender his nation's sovereignty to the US. Same
old story, and it's the same again in Iran and most of
all in Venezuela that has to be the greatest prize of
the three. It's especially tricky for the US there as
that nation happens to have a democratic leader loved
by the great majority of his people. It's because
Hugo Chavez is fiercely and proudly independent, as he
has every right to be, and puts the needs of his
people ahead of the US and its Big Oil interests.
Chavez was twice democratically elected and then
prevailed in an August, 2004 recall referendum (the
third coup attempt by ballot box means) that was a
contrived act of desperation cooked up by his right
wing opposition in league with US corporate interests.
It was a flop as Chavez's supporters flocked to the
polls giving him a decisive victory. He deserved and
earned it and his other electoral victories as he
proved he's the rarest of political leaders who
actually delivers on his promises to the people. Try
finding a US politician who's done that, especially
one with any power to follow through. You'll need a
high-powered version of that lamp Diogenes once used
used looking for an honest man.

It's Hugo Chavez's intention to serve the interests
and needs of his own people and not those of his
dominant Northern neighbor that has him once again
high on its target list for elimination. Hugo Chavez
will remain there until the US finds a way to remove
him which it certainly will keep trying to do. Chavez
is well aware of it and so are the Venezuelan people
who love and support him and are likely to fight to
keep him in office. They know what their lives were
like before he became their president and what a vast
difference he made once he came into office. He
promised to serve the people and proved it by
instituting a vast array of social programs the
majority of the US public might only dream about if
they knew what's available now to the Venezuelan
people.

They include free, comprehensive and high-quality
health and dental care for all as well as free
education through the university level to all those
who wish it and can qualify. Compare that to what's
available in the US - a health care system available
only to those who can afford its high and fast-rising
cost and a deliberately degraded inner-city public
education system as well as a costly one at the
university level unavailable to lower income families
that can't afford it for their children. Now try to
imagine what the US has in mind for Venezuelans. It
won't tolerate a developing nation's leader who'll
institute such essential social services for the
people and will try to end them even if it takes
nuclear war to do it. Try to think of appropriate
language to describe the leader of a nation who would
unleash such an attack and do it for power and profit.
Do the words tyrant and war criminal come to mind?

Get Ready for the Long Knives, the Marines Again in
Action to Go Along with A Little Or Maybe A Lot of
"Shock and Awe."

The plans for two "outlier" countries are set, the
wheels are in motion, and we now must wait and see
what will unfold in the next chapter of the ongoing
drama of an aggressor and imperial US against the
world with Iran and Venezuela numbers one and two in
the US target queue.

Several times before I spelled out in some detail what
I feels lies ahead unless a way is found to stop it.
I fear two more conflicts are ahead for starters to
add to the ones now ongoing in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Still others will follow against other countries to be
named later and by whatever timetable and means we
have in mind. The result may be that the US is near
to crossing an inviolable Rubicon in two deadly and
dangerous ways - first by unleashing the nuclear genie
in an industrial strength way, and second by
suspending the Constitution and declaring martial law
at home in the wake of a likely inevitable second
major terror attack that may be as much an inside job
as was the first one on September 11.

Unless the US public awakens to these very real
threats, we face the same fate as did the Germans who
lost their model democratic state after the ascension
of Adolph Hitler. Good German people let him steal it
from them while they weren't paying attention or
bought into his false rhetoric that he was serving
their interests and protecting them from an outside
threat - that never existed. We also have no outside
threat from any other nation, but we've been
effectively scared to death and conned by the false
rhetoric that's made us feel we do. The result is
we're getting too close for comfort to the point of no
return. There's still time to act if we're bold
enough to do it. Think of the choice I think we face.
Act together in our collective self-interest or do
nothing and see us pass from a once proud but now
tattered republic
to tyranny. It can happen here as it has elsewhere
unless we act to prevent it.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at
lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog
site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

========================================================================
================================================================

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 13
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
Date: Tue May 30, 2006 0:14pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!

Thanks, Just doin me job though.

Scott Legere <sledger911@yahoo.com> wrote: Great Job Kev :)

Kevin Lee Hammond <exposethenewworldorder@yahoo.com> wrote: As I was on my way out the door from work fri eve. my boss stopped me and asked if I knew where he could get a copy of loose change! Could it be perhaps because I have given a copy to each of my co-workers and made sure that they watched it?! Could it be also, That I have woken up damn near every shop owner and worker on the block where I work?! With copies of not only Loose Change, but also of martial Law and other such dvds!. One woman in turn took them to her church and woke up her entire congregation! Please do not take this as boasting bu t as just informing you all of the fact that folks are WAKING UP!

Kevin
www.fightthenwo.org


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2�/min or less.


---------------------------------
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2�/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

SPONSORED LINKS
Trademark united state United state government grant United state citizenship United state coin United state patent United state flag

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org

---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 14
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
Date: Tue May 30, 2006 0:15pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!

I believe so my friend. It is I believe only a matter of financial resources.

"President, USA Exile Govt." <prez@usa-exile.org> wrote: Great work, Kevin. I wonder if we're together enough now to take this
a step farther and get into two-person Truth Teams going door-to-door
with "Loose Change" and several other relevant videos and CDs--not all
of them necessarily on the 9/11 theme. Greenpeace used to do this
extensively (I was one of their canvassers briefly around 15 years ago)
in a manner which not only spread their word rather effectively but
also provided livelihoods (austere ones, though) for hundreds of
extremely well-intentioned people. --- Regards, Pondo

On May 28, 2006, at 10:27 PM, Kevin Hammond wrote:

> Thank you my brother.� It is the thought of� NOT doing so that
> unnerves me.
>
> DOUGLAS CLARK wrote:
> BOAST...BRAG...AND MAY "GOD" BLESS YOUR EFFORTS!!
>
> Kevin Hammond wrote:
> Awe geee shux!
>
> Jamie Welsh wrote:
> it's ok boast away kevin! you make me proud.
> -jamie
>
>
> On May 28, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Kevin Lee Hammond wrote:
>
>
> As I was on my way out the door from work fri eve. my boss stopped me
> and asked if I knew where he could get a copy of loose change!� Could
> it be perhaps because I have given a copy to each of my co-workers and
> made sure that they watched it?!� Could it be also, That I have woken
> up damn near every shop owner and worker on the block where I work?!�
> With copies of not only Loose Change, but also of martial Law and
> other such dvds!.� One woman in turn took them to her church and woke
> up her entire congregation!� Please do not take this as boasting bu t
> as just informing you all of the fact that folks are WAKING UP!
> �
> � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Kevin
> � www.fightthenwo.org
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and
> 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
>
> United state army
> United state grant
> United state government grant
>
> United state patent
> United state flag
> United state citizenship
>
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
>
> ▪ � Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
> �
>
> ▪ � To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> � 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> �
>
> ▪ � Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org
> Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com. It's not radically different.
> Just radically better.
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
>
> United state grant
> United state patent
> United state flag
>
> Trademark united state
> United state coin
> United state citizenship
>
>
>
>
> PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT MY WEBSITE (911again.tripod.com) TO OTHER
> GROUPS AND INDIVIDUALS.
> �
> AS ALWAYS, THE BEST OF HEALTH AND TIMES TO YOU AND YOURS.
> �
> DOUGLAS CLARK
> 7320 HERMITAGE ST
> PITTSBURGH PA 15208
> How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call
> rates.
>
>
>
> Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org
>
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+
> countries) for 2¢/min or less.
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
>
> United state military
> United state army
> United state coin
>
> United state government grant
> United state flag
> United state patent
>
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> ▪ � Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
> �
> ▪ � To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> � 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> �
> ▪ � Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
>
>

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org

---------------------------------
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2�/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 15
From: "Ronald" bleier.r@gmail.com
Date: Tue May 30, 2006 0:34pm(PDT)
Subject: R.Dreyfuss: Liz Cheney, Dad's enforcer

Here's another in Dreyfuss' extraordinary exposes of Cheney's control of government. His daughter Liz, turns out to inherit her father's imperiousness, not to mention his extreme radical ideology. In an unprecedented promotion for someone with no Middle East experience, she gets to be the top gatekeeper at State's Middle East desk, riding roughshod even over ambassadors -- with a very occasional comeuppance as detailed below.As Dreyfuss documents, it's the Cheneys who are leading the charge for regime change in Syria and Iran. --RB

The Commissar's in Town
T@P Very little happens at State regarding the Middle East without the knowledge and approval of Cheney -- not Dick, but Liz, his powerful, secretive daughter.
http://www.prospect.org/web/printfriendly-view.ww?id=11540
By Robert Dreyfuss
Issue Date: 06.06.06

At the very heart of U.S. Middle East policy, from the war in Iraq to pressure for regime change in Iran and Syria to the spread of free-market democracy in the region, sits the 39-year-old daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney. Elizabeth "Liz" Cheney, appointed to her post in February 2005, has a tongue-twisting title: principal deputy assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs and coordinator for broader Middle East and North Africa initiatives. By all accounts, it is an enormously powerful post, and one for which she is uniquely unqualified.

During the past 15 months, Elizabeth Cheney has met with and bolstered a gaggle of Syrian exiles, often in tandem with John Hannah and David Wurmser, top officials in the Office of the Vice President (OVP); has pressed hard for money to accelerate the administration's ever more overt campaign for forced regime change in both Damascus and Teheran; and has overseen an increasingly discredited push for American-inspired democratic reform from Morocco to Iran. With the unspoken support of her father, Cheney has kept a hawk's eye on Iraq policy within the department, intimidating opponents of the neoconservative axis within the administration. And, less visibly, according to former officials who've worked with her, she has made her influence felt in choosing officials, selecting (or blocking) the appointment of ambassadors and other foreign service officers, and weighing in on other bureaucratic battles at the department.

Now, according to the Financial Times of London, Cheney is coordinating the work of a new entity called the Iran-Syria Operations Group. The unit was established "to plot a more aggressive democracy promotion strategy for those two 'rogue' states," reported the Times. In February, the State Department announced that Cheney would oversee a $5 million program to "accelerate the work of reformers in Syria," providing grants of up to $1 million each to Syrian dissidents. And in the current fiscal year, she will oversee a similar, $7 million regime-change grant program for Iran, though funding for that effort is expected to grow to at least $85 million soon, to include both a propaganda program and support to Iranian opposition groups.

"She came in knowing very little about the Middle East," says Marina S. Ottaway, senior associate and co-director of the Democracy and Rule of Law Project at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, who has worked with Liz Cheney on democratic reform issues. "She had a mandate to do democracy promotion, but she had very little familiarity with the subject. . They deliberately picked a person who was not a Middle East specialist, so that the conventional wisdom, well, let me rephrase, so that real, actual knowledge of the issues in the region wouldn't interfere with policy."

Liz Cheney catapulted into her current job after a rather undistinguished career that leapfrogged from public to private life and back again. In her early 20s, she did a stint at the State Department while her father was secretary of defense in the first Bush administration, and then headed to law school at the University of Chicago and worked for Armitage Associates, a firm run by Richard Armitage. As an attorney, she worked for the International Finance Corporation of the World Bank, and served briefly as a U.S. Agency for International Development (AID) officer in Hungary and Poland. Her Middle East experience was, well, limited.

Asked about Liz's familiarity with the Middle East, a former staffer at the Middle East Institute, a Washington, D.C., think tank, says that she dabbled in the Institute's Arabic language classes. "And she'd come to our annual conference," she said. That's it.

That was, however, apparently enough to get her named deputy assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs (NEA) in 2002.

* * *

In an administration in which policy toward Iraq and the Middle East was mostly guided by know-nothings and the inexperienced, perhaps it isn't surprising that Liz Cheney got herself named to a top position at Near Eastern Affairs. How, exactly, she ended up at NEA in the first place is something of a mystery, although no one interviewed doubted that it was at the behest of the vice president. One former deputy assistant secretary at NEA said that the bureau was offered the choice of either Liz Cheney or Danielle Pletka, a neoconservative hard-liner who is the vice president for foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute. Pletka, a sharp-elbowed insider who helped write the Iraq Liberation Act in the 1990s, was reportedly seen by Secretary of State Colin Powell and NEA as the greater of two evils, and so Cheney got the job.

During the preparations for the Iraq War, Cheney had a back seat at NEA, with a portfolio covering Middle East economic issues, including oil. However, according to insiders, her real importance was to serve as an ace-in-the-hole at the State Department for the vice president's office. Her presence had a sobering effect on many of the department's Arabists, most of whom were known as opponents of the war and were considered suspect by neoconservatives. "All during that year, you had the vice president's daughter sitting there at State Department meetings," says Chas Freeman, a former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia. Says another former U.S. ambassador to several key Middle East countries otherwise known for his tough-minded ability to stand up to Arab strongmen: "I would find it confining, if not intimidating."

In 2003, she left the State Department to take a role in the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign and to give birth to her fourth child. (Her husband is Philip Perry, general counsel for the Department of Homeland Security.) But after the election, in 2005, she was back -- this time with an important, and telling, promotion to the far more senior post of principal deputy assistant secretary, making her the No. 2 official on Middle East policy. Known by its acronym, PDAS (pronounced "pee-dass"), it is a bureaucratic post known for its power inside NEA. It was an appointment that certainly got the attention of the State Department's Middle East hands.

"There has always been a political appointee in every bureau at State," says Ambassador Philip Wilcox, a former assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs. But usually the political appointee, who serves as a sort of commissar, would be placed in a low rank within NEA, he says. "The idea that the pdas would be that political appointee is just unprecedented, since she serves as the alter ego of the assistant secretary."

Wayne White, who served as deputy director of the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research and who headed that unit's Iraq team during the war, left the State Department in 2005. "The thing we all said among us, in chit chat, when she moved up to be PDAS after being the deputy assistant secretary, was, 'Ah, now we see the plan,'" he says. "First, she gets her training wheels as deputy assistant secretary . where she'd get softer assignments, sort of training, which happens to people in that position who don't have a Middle East background, and she doesn't -- and then boom! right up to PDAS . She is in a position to stop anything from going forward -- as in the form of a memo, a recommendation -- that she pretty much wants."

In her job as PDAS, Cheney is responsible for nearly all of the management and administration of the bureau, says White. "In one way, the PDAS is like Stalin in the early 1920s communist party, controlling personnel, able to promote, not promote, put people in key positions. This is an extremely powerful position."

David Welch, the assistant secretary of state for NEA, is nominally Liz Cheney's boss. But her connection to her father, plus her pipelines directly up to more senior State Department officials such as Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick, make it easy for her to eclipse Welch. (Like Armitage, who also served as a top State Department official for George W. Bush, Zoellick is a signatory to the statements of the Project for a New American Century in the 1990s, which charted the administration's bellicose course.) "David Welch is in an impossible position on anything she takes an interest in," says a former top NEA official. "And she takes an interest in the big issues -- Iraq, Iran, and so on. They have to be very careful, if they want to do anything that protects the national interest, because it has to coincide with what Liz Cheney thinks is in the national interest." One of the few reporters in Washington to look into Liz Cheney's role at the State Department, Timothy Phelps of Long Island's Newsday, reported in April that she operates what is essentially a "shadow Middle East policy" against the more mainstream policy promoted by Welch, typical of the neoconservative versus realist divisions that have plagued the Bush administration since 2001.

Cheney has not shied away from throwing her weight around. During her frequent trips to the Middle East, she often operates independently of the department and of the U.S. ambassador in whatever country she is visiting. She has been known to insist on seeing a head of state without inviting the American ambassador to accompany her, in violation of protocol, often threatening the ambassador with the power of her contacts. On at least one occasion, however, an ambassador called her bluff. "Liz Cheney comes out to this country, and she tells the ambassador -- and she doesn't outrank him -- she tells the ambassador, 'You're not going in the meeting with me,'" recalls Larry Wilkerson, who served as Colin Powell's assistant during his tenure as secretary of state. "And he says, 'I'm sorry, I'm going in the meeting with you. You're not going into a meeting with the head of state without me.' And she says, 'Nope -- would you like a telephone call?'" In this case, says Wilkerson, the department's bosses backed up their ambassador, who accompanied a chastened Cheney into the meeting. But that has not always been the case. "It's not just that she is imperious in dealing with our ambassadors," notes a corporate lobbyist who is deeply involved in Middle East policy. "She's got her own foreign policy, her own agenda, and so of course she wouldn't want the ambassador to know what she is talking about when she meets a head of state."

* * *

Soon after her return to the State Department in March 2005, Liz Cheney made news when she convened a controversial meeting with a handful of exiled Syrian activists to talk about regime change in Damascus. Leading the pack at the time was Farid al-Ghadry, a paradoxically pro-Israeli Syrian who's maintained ties to neoconservatives in Washington and who is close to Wurmser and his wife, Meyrav Wurmser, the director of Middle East affairs for the Hudson Institute. According to Arab sources, it was Meyrav Wurmser who helped to arrange al-Ghadry's t�te-�-t�te with Liz Cheney, Hannah, and other Bush administration officials.

Al-Ghadry, a Virginia businessman who founded the Reform Party of Syria, is widely seen in Arab circles as a lightweight with no credibility inside Syria. Mourhaf Jouejati, a professor of political science at George Washington University and an expert on Syrian politics, calls al-Ghadry a "mini-me of Ahmed Chalabi," adding that Liz Cheney, Hannah, and the Wurmsers "are the backbone for Farid Ghadry's movement. The question is, are they just seeking leverage with Syria, or is it a serious option? If it is the latter, I would be scared, because that means that they don't know what they are doing." One of the Syrians who took part in the meeting with Cheney and Hannah is Najib Ghadbian, an activist, author, and professor at the University of Arkansas. "Ghadry doesn't have much following inside Syria," Ghadbian admits. "Why are they behind him so much? Maybe they are following the Iraqi model, but al-Ghadry doesn't even have the clout of Chalabi." Perhaps another reason that al-Ghadry had the inside track with Cheney, Hannah, and Wurmser is that he is a member of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee who has spoken at meetings of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a think tank whose board of advisers includes Richard Perle, Jeane Kirkpatrick, and James Woolsey. (Since the meeting with Cheney a year ago, al-Ghadry has lost favor even in Syrian exile circles. A new group, calling itself the Syrian National Council, has emerged, elbowing al-Ghadry out of a leading role.)

Since then, and with the emergence of the reported Iran-Syria Operations Group, Liz Cheney has taken a leading role in the Bush administration's campaign for regime change in both countries. While continuing to press Syria, the State Department has launched a campaign against Iran, separately from any military confrontation being worked on at the Pentagon. "It looks so d�j� vu," says Sergei Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, who compares the effort to America's actions before war in Iraq. In addition to pressing the United Nations to impose tough new sanctions against Iran, Liz Cheney is coordinating an effort to rouse Iranian exiles to spark revolution inside the country. Besides seeking $75 million in additional funds for anti-Tehran activities, the State Department has created a brand new Office of Iranian Affairs, which sounds suspiciously like the Defense Department's Office of Special Plans that was set up to coordinate pre-war planning for Iraq. And, according to a recent State Department planning document, the United States is setting up anti-Iranian intelligence and mobilization centers in Dubai, Istanbul, Ankara, Adana, Tel Aviv, Frankfurt, London, and Baku to work with "Iranian expatriate communities."

Having set into motion much of this activity, Liz Cheney's role in once again up in the air. Many at the State Department may breathe a sigh of relief this summer, when Cheney will once again likely take a leave of absence for the birth of her fifth child, expected in July. Even so, she will remain part of her father's inner circle. And as the United States lurches toward a confrontation with Iran -- October Surprise anyone? -- Liz and Dick will be hand in hand.

Robert Dreyfuss is a Prospect senior correspondent.
� 2006 by The American Prospect, Inc.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 16
From: "APFN" apfn@apfn.org
Date: Tue May 30, 2006 2:13pm(PDT)
Subject: 9/11 - HOME VIDEO MISSLE FLIES PAST WTC

AUDIO:
information to set the 9/11 movement on fire Meria Heller, Mon
May 29 20:59
beverly
propst
HOME VIDEO MISSLE
FLIES PAST WTC
Tue May 30, 2006 17:40
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=101696;title=APFN
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: HOME VIDEO MISSLE FLIES PAST WTC
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 13:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: beverly propst bevjpropst@yahoo.com
To: apfn@apfn.org
conspiracy domumentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1xx_fz0_W8&search=conspiracy
this video is about the NWO but FF to the end and
there is a
home video of someone inside a helicopter taking pics of the
WTC a missle flies past them clearly, this is 13 mo before 911
=================================================
04/28/06 Audio: History Channel re: Grounded 9/11
Grounded on 9/11
Friday, April 28 @ 9pm ET/PT
http://www.historychannel.com/
In
response to the attacks on September 11, 2001, the FAA orders all
planes out of the air. US and Canadian air traffic controllers face a
calamity of epic proportions--how to safely re-route and land 6,500
planes carrying close to a million people. For individual air traffic
controllers, the work is chaotic, intense, and deceptively simple: pick
a new route for each flight; radio instructions to turn; listen for
pilot confirmation; hold traffic to keep airways from overcrowding.
>From Cleveland, Ohio to Gander, Newfoundland, controllers on
September 11th searched for alternate airports to land large jets even
as their traumatized colleagues stream back from break rooms after
watching the attacks on TV.
AUDIO:
http://www.apfn.net/pogo/M001I060428210311GROUNDED-1-11-4-28-06.MP3
(10.01MB) 44Min 21 Sec
02/23/06 Coast to Coast re: 9/11
Part 1 http://www.apfn.net/audio/A001I06022400053600550-911a.MP3
(2.34MB) 10 min 15 sec
Part 2 http://www.apfn.net/audio/A002I06022400182400550-911b.MP3
(6.78MB) 29 min 38 sec
Part 3 http://www.apfn.net/audio/A003I06022401055200550-911c.MP3
(5.21MB) 22 Min 46 Sec
Part 4 http://www.apfn.net/audio/A004I06022401305400550-911d.MP3
(4.56MB) 19 Min 55 Sec
Part 5 http://www.apfn.net/audio/A005I06022402065000550-911e.MP3
(4.41MB) 19 Min 16 Sec
Part 6 http://www.apfn.net/audio/A006I06022402334200550-911f.MP3
(4.49MB) 19 Min 39 Sec
9-11 Attack on America
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC.htm
PowerPoint Presentation/Movies:
9/11 Attack on America Part 1
The Irregularities of 9/11 10.5MB
http://www.apfn.org/movies/911.ppt
9/11 Attack on America Part 2
Omissions & Distortions (David Ray Griffin)13.9MB
http://www.apfn.org/movies/911-2.ppt
9/11 Revisited (Movie)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psP_9RE0V2I
9/11 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
UnAnsweredQuestions.org is an on-line community of concerned
citizens, researchers,
independent investigators and journalists asking and exploring
unanswered questions. Our
intention is to add energy to those who participate in a spirit
of independent, non-partisan
and useful inquiry. We believe that good questions can lead to
answers and
solutions. We believe in transparency that supports people and
possibilities with
uncommon sense.
http://www.unansweredquestions.org/audio.php
*Listen to the June 10, 2002 press conference. 911 Unanswered
Questions.
PART I
http://clients.loudeye.com/imc/mayday/2002-06-11-part1.mp3
PART II
http://clients.loudeye.com/imc/mayday/2002-06-11-part2.mp3
PART III
http://clients.loudeye.com/imc/mayday/2002-06-11-part3.mp3
THE HIJACKERS?
http://www.unansweredquestions.org/background_61.php
4/01/06 Andreas von Buelow, Top German 9/11 Expert on RBN Live
World Crisis Radio with Webster Tarpley
Von Blow was State Secretary at the German Ministry of Defense
from 1976-1980 and Minister
for Research and Technology from 1980-1982. As a member of
Parliament, he sat on the oversight
commission for the German secret services, and is thoroughly
familiar with the workings of intelligence agencies.
Audios:
#1 http://www.apfn.net/audio/L001I060401141708-ground0A.MP3
(4.83MB)
#2 http://www.apfn.net/audio/L002I060401144500-ground0B.MP3
(3.87MB)
#3. http://www.apfn.net/audio/L003I060401150825-ground0C.MP3
(4.32MB)
#4 http://www.apfn.net/audio/L004I060401153707-ground0D.MP3
(4.47MB)
Andreas von Blow
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreas_von_B%C3%BClow
Kate
Smith: God Bless America (Song)
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/KayeSmithGodBlessAmerica.mp3
RADIO YOUR WAY...
http?/www.apfn.net/pogo.htm
# # #
AUDIO:
information to set the 9/11 movement on fire Meria Heller, Mon
May 29 20:59

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 17
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
Date: Tue May 30, 2006 3:13pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Well oh my golly my GOSH!

How much money would it take to get it going? -- pondo

On May 30, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Kevin Hammond wrote:

> I believe so my friend. It is I believe only a matter of financial
> resources.
>
> "President, USA Exile Govt." <prez@usa-exile.org> wrote:
> Great work, Kevin. I wonder if we're together enough now to take this
> a step farther and get into two-person Truth Teams going door-to-door
> with "Loose Change" and several other relevant videos and CDs--not all
> of them necessarily on the 9/11 theme. Greenpeace used to do this
> extensively (I was one of their canvassers briefly around 15 years
> ago)
> in a manner which not only spread their word rather effectively but
> also provided livelihoods (austere ones, though) for hundreds of
> extremely well-intentioned people. --- Regards, Pondo
>
>
> On May 28, 2006, at 10:27 PM, Kevin Hammond wrote:
>
> > Thank you my brother. It is the thought of NOT doing so that
> > unnerves me.
> >
> > DOUGLAS CLARK wrote:
> > BOAST...BRAG...AND MAY "GOD" BLESS YOUR EFFORTS!!
> >
> > Kevin Hammond wrote:
> > Awe geee shux!
> >
> > Jamie Welsh wrote:
> > it's ok boast away kevin! you make me proud.
> > -jamie
> >
> >
> > On May 28, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Kevin Lee Hammond wrote:
> >
> >
> > As I was on my way out the door from work fri eve. my boss stopped me
> > and asked if I knew where he could get a copy of loose change!Â
> Could
> > it be perhaps because I have given a copy to each of my co-workers
> and
> > made sure that they watched it?! Could it be also, That I have
> woken
> > up damn near every shop owner and worker on the block where I
> work?!Â
> > With copies of not only Loose Change, but also of martial Law and
> > other such dvds!. One woman in turn took them to her church and
> woke
> > up her entire congregation! Please do not take this as boasting
> bu t
> > as just informing you all of the fact that folks are WAKING UP!
> > Â
> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Kevin
> > Â www.fightthenwo.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and
> > 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> >
> > United state army
> > United state grant
> > United state government grant
> >
> > United state patent
> > United state flag
> > United state citizenship
> >
> >
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >
> >
> > â–ª Â Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
> > Â
> >
> > â–ª Â To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Â 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Â
> >
> > â–ª Â Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org
> > Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com. It's not radically different.
> > Just radically better.
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> >
> > United state grant
> > United state patent
> > United state flag
> >
> > Trademark united state
> > United state coin
> > United state citizenship
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT MY WEBSITE (911again.tripod.com) TO
> OTHER
> > GROUPS AND INDIVIDUALS.
> > Â
> > AS ALWAYS, THE BEST OF HEALTH AND TIMES TO YOU AND YOURS.
> > Â
> > DOUGLAS CLARK
> > 7320 HERMITAGE ST
> > PITTSBURGH PA 15208
> > How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger̢۪s low PC-to-Phone
> call
> > rates.
> >
> >
> >
> > Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org
> >
> > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and
> 30+
> > countries) for 2¢/min or less.
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> >
> > United state military
> > United state army
> > United state coin
> >
> > United state government grant
> > United state flag
> > United state patent
> >
> >
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >
> > â–ª Â Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
> > Â
> > â–ª Â To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Â 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Â
> > â–ª Â Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org
>
> Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just
> 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
>
> United state military
> Trademark united state
> United state coin
>
> United state citizenship
> United state patent
> United state army
>
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> ▪ Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
>
> ▪ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> ▪ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 18
From: "linelites@mindspring.com" linelites@mindspring.com
Date: Tue May 30, 2006 3:20pm(PDT)
Subject: 911 dvd's for $1 each

...If anyone wants a copy of this Loose Change or another passaroundable
dvds, I supply them for $1 each - labeled and with envelope. Though they may not be 'IN' the envelope and you may have to insert them.....Price is 75 cents each if you get 100 or more.......shipping is extra. can do paypal....just enter in my email address....add for postage.....$1 for 1-2, $2 for 3-5, $3 for 6-10, $4 for 11-20, $5 for 21-30, $6 for 30-50, $7 for 51-100
can do paypal....just enter in my email address.. linelites@mindspring.com
or mail checks to:
JEREMY LYNES
815 ANGIER SPRINGS ROAD
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30306

Informing others is our best means of stopping this nightmare. Here is the selection.....

1. LOOSE CHANGE 2ND EDITION with Federal Reserve addendum
2. PROFESSOR STEVEN JONES OF BYU lecture on collapse and other 911 truths
3. 911 MARTIAL LAW by Alex Jones
4. 911 ROAD TO TYRANNY by Alex Jones
5. PAINFUL DECEPTIONS AND DAVID RAY GRIFFIN 911 LECTURE ON CSPAN2
6. AEROSOL CRIMES.....dvd on chemtrails
7. BOHEMIAN GROVE by Alex Jones
8. DVD DATA DISC...Hours of 911 and related video shows, audio shows and 1,000's of saved websites, viewable on computer only.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

No comments: