Discussion about 09/11/2001: [911TruthAction] Digest Number 1212

Friday, April 07, 2006

[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1212

There are 22 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. DeLay Honesty Wins: Hitler killed 1000 of his insiders he distrusted. Same???
From: Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com>
2. Re: SV: It Only Takes ONE - Vets for 9/11 Truth
From: Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com>
3. Nazi U.S. Govt. - Odessa File, Simon Wiesenthal: SS continues -wide spread to governments
From: Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com>
4. Re: It Only Takes ONE - Vets for 9/11 Truth
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." <prez@usa-exile.org>
5. Re: DeLay Honesty Wins: Hitler killed 1000 of his insiders he distrusted. Same???
From: DOUGLAS CLARK <bushsept11mastermind@yahoo.com>
6. Re: Bush Administration issued direct guidelines for programming to media outlets
From: Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com>
7. Concrete evidence of conspiracy by govt. to treasonously, cover up, and violate civil rights of free speech
From: Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com>
8. A Day in the Life: 4/6/6
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." <prez@usa-exile.org>
9. Fw: Important little video
From: "Debi Clark" <debiclark@sbcglobal.net>
10. Re: It Only Takes ONE - Vets for 9/11 Truth
From: "S Miles Lewis" <yahoolists@elfis.net>
11. Re: Bush Administration issued direct guidelines for programming to media outlets
From: "S Miles Lewis" <yahoolists@elfis.net>
12. Fwd: [WETHEPEOPLE_UNITED] [Fwd: [catapult] Jury aquits against Judge's Instruction -- juror faces 14 years as she is made an example]
From: Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com>
13. HOAX: "Bush Administration Media Collusion Memos Surface"
From: benjamin pritchard <ben@benjaminpritchard.name>
14. Unprecedented US Military Raid On Washington�s Capital Building Leads To Arrest Of Top Homeland Security Leader
From: benjamin pritchard <ben@benjaminpritchard.name>
15. Fwd: emailing: cfr
From: Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com>
16. Re: MANDATORY AIDS TESTING -Clinton's Slippery Slope
From: Matt Walch <caribbean10@yahoo.com>
17. Re: Nazi U.S. Govt. - Odessa File, Simon Wiesenthal: SS continues -wide spread to governments
From: DOUGLAS CLARK <bushsept11mastermind@yahoo.com>
18. Re: Nazi U.S. Govt. - Odessa File, Simon Wiesenthal: SS continues -wide spread to governments
From: DOUGLAS CLARK <bushsept11mastermind@yahoo.com>
19. Re: Concrete evidence of conspiracy by govt. to treasonously, cover up, and violate civil rights of free speech
From: "Cait" <ansith@gmail.com>
20. it has come to my attention that..............
From: Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com>
21. Re: it has come to my attention that..............
From: Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com>
22. Fw: AT&T Forwards ALL Internet Traffic Into NSA Says EFF
From: "Debi Clark" <debiclark@sbcglobal.net>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com>
Subject: DeLay Honesty Wins: Hitler killed 1000 of his insiders he distrusted. Same???

Please remember that in 1934, Hitler killed 1000 of his insiders, who he did not trust. Could this be something like that, or did Delay just suddenly refuse to go along with the criminal Bush Regime's corrupt murderous agenda??? I'm not convinced that honesty has won, yet.

TrueMajority <alerts@truemajority.org> wrote: BODY, P, TD, TD P, TD UL, TD BLOCKQUOTE, BLOCKQUOTE { color: black; font-family: Verdana, "Trebuchet MS" , sans-serif; font-size: 10pt } A:link { color: #003366 } A:visited { color: #003366 } A:active { color: #0000FF } .bodybold { font-weight: bold} /* this is for making body text bold */ .bodybold10px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 10px} /* this is for making body text bold at 10px */ .bodybold11px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 11px} /* this is for making body text bold at 11px */ .bodybold12px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 12px} /* this is for making body text bold at 12px */ .bodybold13px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 13px} .bodybold14px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 14px} .bodybold15px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 15px} .body8px { font-size: 8px} /* this is for making body text smaller */ .body9px { font-size: 9px} /* this is for making body text smaller */ .body10px
{ font-size: 10px} /* this is for making body text smaller */ .body11px { font-size: 11px} /* this is for making body text smaller * .body12px { font-size: 12px} /* this is for making body text smaller */ .body14px { font-size: 14px} /* this is for making body text smaller */ .body16px { font-size: 16px} /* this is for making body text smaller */ .body18px { font-size: 18px} /* this is for making body text smaller */ .bodyunderline { text-decoration: underline} .bodyitalic { font-style: italic} .none {list-style-type: none} .titleitalic { font-weight: bold; font-style: italic} .titlebold { font-weight: bold} /* this is for making title text bold */ .titlebold10px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 10px} .titlebold11px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 11px} .titlebold12px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 12px} .titlebold13px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 13px} .titlebold14px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 14px} .titlebold15px { font-weight:
bold; font-size: 15px} .titlebold16px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 16px} .titlebold17px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 17px} .titlebold18px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 18px} .titlebold19px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 19px} .titlebold20px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 20px} .titlebold21px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 21px} .titlebold22px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 22px} .titlebold23px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 23px} .titlebold24px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 24px} .titlebold25px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 25px} .titlebold26px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 26px} .titlebold27px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 27px} .titlebold28px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 28px} .titlebold29px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 29px} .titlebold30px { font-weight: bold; font-size: 30px} .flashtitle { font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 18px} /* Used for Advocacy Campaign titles */ .monospace
{ font-family: Courier, monospace;}/* monospace fonts for input forms */ .roll { text-decoration: none; font-weight: normal; color: black }/* rolling links */ a.roll:hover { text-decoration: none; font-weight: normal; color: D10000 }
DeLay Quits Congress Admitting Failure
Dear judy,
Congressmember Tom DeLay, known as "The Hammer" for his legendary ability to wield raw power, once boasted of doing whatever it takes to create a "permanent conservative Congress."
Instead, early this morning he announced that he�s resigning his House seat in disgrace, acknowledging that his misconduct has brought such scorn to his party that it could lose control of Congress this November.
President Bush, now supported by only 34% of his citizens, is shaking up his staff and hitting the road in a desperate attempt to appear competent and on a rational course.
The wheels are coming off of the conservative wagon.
And TrueMajority members are part of that story. When things looked darkest, you turned despair into action. DeLay once appeared all-powerful, and all corrupt, so you dogged DeLay at every turn. A full year ago, 75,000 TrueMajority members petitioned Congress to drop DeLay from his leadership post; when his indictment was announced, you petitioned again to have him removed from Congress entirely. And in the meantime, TrueMajority members in DeLay's home district paraded a 6-foot effigy of Uncle Sam spanking Tom DeLay for his misdeeds. After twelve months of effort, one of the worst examples of congressional misbehavior is now out the door.
And there's more. You opposed Bush�s attack on Iraq before it happened, seeing through the manipulation of public demand for action after 9/11; now the majority of Americans agree with you. You stopped the attack on Social Security and the raid on the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and pushed hard for Sen. John McCain's successful effort to ban torture by U.S. troops.
Of course we didn�t win on all these by ourselves. Progressives have come together as never before. TrueMajority sometimes led the way, sometimes worked in close coalition with other groups. But always you spoke truth to power, and in so doing helped galvanize public opinion against the corruption and hatred and selfishness that characterize the bunch that currently controls Congress and the White House.
There�ll be lots more about that, but I wanted to pass along the word that DeLay has left Congress in tatters, and his gang�s day of accountability is near. Also, please forward this message to your friends and help grow the TrueMajority team of activists. The stronger we are, the more effective we'll be in ensuring that honesty always wins in the fight against corruption.
Proud to be in this with you,
Duane Peterson
TrueMajority

---------------------------------

Please forward this message onto anyone who's interested. Thanks!
If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for TrueMajority.

---------------------------------

This message was sent to drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com. Visit your subscription management page to modify your email communication preferences or update your personal profile. To stop ALL email from TrueMajority, click to remove yourself from our lists (or reply via email with "remove" in the subject line).

---------------------------------

Contribute
If you like what you see, please click here to contribute. ...and keep these messages going to more people!

TrueMajority.org is a grassroots group of citizens who believe in America's true values of openness, fairness and compassion. We believe participating in an effective government is the best way to be mutually responsible for our community.
TrueMajority.org, 191 Bank Street, Third Floor, Burlington, VT 05401

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: SV: It Only Takes ONE - Vets for 9/11 Truth

I am a Vet. US Army, Cambodia/VN, Grenada/Legbanon, & Desert Storm. Judy

Scott Legere <sledger911@yahoo.com> wrote: Check bravocharlie911.com I've read 2-3 good letters from vets there

Peter Kofod <slashkofod@yahoo.dk> wrote: Dear Cathy.

I can think of a few... Robert Bowman... Stan Goff, and one of the guys behind loose change (www.loosechange911.com ) are veterans...

Best
Peter Kofod, Denmark

Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com> skrev:
IT ONLY TAKES ONE -

VETS FOR 9/11 TRUTH

Cathy Garger

Folks, I believe it is now (past) time to put together a group of Veterans for 9/11 Truth.

I know one or two web designers who would be more than a tad interested in bringing this effort to the attention of the American public.

But there's just one uh, little problem. In order to start this effort, we need to ask first for just ONE Veteran to stand up and announce that such a group has been formed. Once this effort has begun, others will certainly follow.

Might you be that ONE?

I would do it, but unfortunately? I am not a vet.

Granted. It almost seems unfair to ask any war veteran to do this. After all, our soldiers have already put their lives on the line once (or in some cases, multiple times, in multiple wars, in multiple tours of duty).

And c'mon, let's face it. If you are the ONE who starts the Veterans for 9/11 Truth group? You are not *exactly* going to receive a mess of Purple Hearts for saving the lives of future Americans in future US False Flag Ops Terror Attacks.

Cowards need not apply for this assignment. You're going to have to be one really brave dude or dudette to start Veterans for 9/11 Truth. But chances are, if you signed up for duty (or got drafted) you are already one awesome, courageous patriot.

And what, after all (if you really think about it) could be any more patriotic than bringing the truth to the table with regard to how we got into these bloody wars in the first place?

I wrote a few months back to a pal who's active in Vets for Peace and asked him, point blank, Why Oh Why won't the Vets start talking about 9/11 Truth (which was, as I argued, the very *basis* for these devastating killing wars upon Afghanistan and Iraq)? I could read this fellow's sigh (pretty incredible when you can "read" a sigh right through an email two states away) as he replied that the thinking at the top is that they would not entertain going into 9/11 Truth until there were some more credible experts who would come forth with more conclusive evidence that something was wrong with the 9/11 official story.

I certainly can't blame them for that. If one's national group appears to be merely another lunatic whack job bunch of crazy "conspiracy theorists," it's certainly not going to be easy to get the government to listen to them about stopping wars.

Right. Like this war-happy government is listening to the vets on the subject of peace.

And if a group is seen as marginal, how can they ever seriously consider getting funding for DU testing legislation and veterans' disability benefits to take care of the untold numbers of sick, suffering, and dying troops who are victims of Depleted Uranium (DU) poisoning and other warfare-laced cocktails of US-issued chemical, biological, and vaccination-related illnesses?

Again, right. Like this charitable, benevolent government of theirs is going to boost veterans' benefits - or even *ever* take good and proper care of their "disposable" soldiers - for any reason whatsoever.

Believe that and I have some protective gear to keep you safe from uranium radiation on the wasted battlefields of Iraq.

Keep dreaming, vets, if you think that keeping quiet about 9/11 is going to achieve anything - with the possible exception of a handsome feather in the cap of their lead "organizers" who are setting the groups' agendas and controlling how far Truth is allowed to go.

I mean, come on. Certainly with George Nelson Colonel, USAF (ret.) and Dr. Robert Bowman, USAF Lt. Col (ret.) on board already in not only dis-believing the "official 9/11 story" but also talking out in public? I can not imagine what would be the need for any more credible witnesses than a Colonel and Lieutenant Colonel to come forth...

We've already got more than enough evidence and credible sources right now to try a good number of federal employees for high crimes, misdemeanors, and yes - treason. So what's the real deal here about the refusal of the ex-soldier groups to demand that their ex-employer to do a proper criminal investigation into 9/11?

Maybe you know someone who's served in the armed forces who has their own questions about 9/11?

Maybe you'd be willing to ask them if they would become part of a national effort to investigate this entire business of this so-called "War On Terror" that began on 9/11?

Maybe you can ask vets you know if they'd be willing to stand up and join with other former brothers and sisters in arms?

Maybe together they will stand up and ask their former federal employer to explain to them precisely *why* 9/11 (a criminal mass murder of nearly 3,000 that was never properly investigated) was used as the official reason to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, effectively killing unknown thousands of our own soldiers (not to mention killing, wounding, and sickening millions of innocent Middle Eastern civilians).

All it takes is just ONE Veteran to start this effort. Maybe you will be the ONE - or know someone you can ask to be that ONE?

The formation of Veterans for 9/11 Truth is only ONE awesome ex-soldier away.

Cathy Garger
http://mytown.ca/garger/

---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1�/min.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

SPONSORED LINKS
United state patent Trademark united state United state citizenship United state government grant United state grant United state army

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com>
Subject: Nazi U.S. Govt. - Odessa File, Simon Wiesenthal: SS continues -wide spread to governments

Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com> wrote: After reviewing, the Odessa File by Frederick Forsythe, and works by Simon Wiesenthal, the Israeli Nazi hunter, there is clear evidence that the Nazi party continued after WWII. In 1963, Wiesenthal stated that the SS continued under the secret name of "Oddessa Network," and stated that they are a deadly, and cruel organization, attempting to take over the world, and were infiltrating into governments as the police, and judges, and other government officials, all over the world. It has been reported that the CIA was created in 1946, by the SS. Prescott Bush (W's grandfather) was one of the financers, defense contractors, of Hitler, that brought Hitler to power, beginning in 1922. Prescott Bush was convicted in a U.S. Senate Hearing of Aiding the Enemy, Hitler(1). It is, also, clear, that the 12 step plan to facism and to conquer the world, published by Hitler, in 1920, is being followed exactly by Bush and the
corrupt Bush administration, along with his corrupt facist corporations, especially the privatized Federal Reserve. Bush is following Hitler's plan to conquer the world, except with a few more deadly, evil, atrocious, tactics: (1)subversiveness (doing tactics secretly and against the law), (2)drugs, both illegal and legal, sold to the people of his own country, including children. Almost all children are market targeted for illegal drug sales, so that they can become mind controlled before they have developed knowledge base enough to think about, or understand what they are doing. (3)massive technology for surveiling, and killing, or character and career assasinating those who refuse to do drugs, or speak out against the corrupt facist regime that is taking over, insidiously, and subversively. (4) Fraudulating the Vote, (5) Homelessness, which is a form of concentration camps, without walls, in which people can die on the streets, or commit suicide rather than sleep on
the street, --which along with the control of media, that does not report anything, that can inform the people, keeps people unaware of what is going on, and exactly what dangers they face, or what lurks in the near future.
Reminder of the 12 steps to conquer world, published by Hiter in 1920, summarized: generate poverty and despair, make people lose their houses and businesses and land, so that everyone with have to work for and rent from the facist regime, raise taxes, collapse the economy and currency, have a catastrophic event, to make people believe there are terrorists, which will make people give up there rights, create a common enemy to unite people against and defoucus off of the facists who are taking over, make laws and courts so technical that no one can receive justice or defend themselves, make unjust laws, control the media and minds, destroy unions, and prevent people from organizing, make people be like sheep to slaughter.
This is what is happening, now!! --In the U.S.!! This is evidence that the continuing Nazi party, SS, that Simon Wiesenthal, and Frederick Forsyth described, has taken over the U.S.!!! Organize, Now!!
Judy Cunningham, RN,BSN,BA,MS(abd Ph.D.), 980 Broadway, #643, Thornwood, NY 10594, drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com
(1) Webster Tarpley, The Unauthorized Biography, John Loftus, The Guardian Newspaper of England.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 10:56:06 -0500
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." <prez@usa-exile.org>
Subject: Re: It Only Takes ONE - Vets for 9/11 Truth

Dear Cathy,
In late '65 I was one of the founders of Veterans and Reservists
to End the War in Vietnam--and of course would lend my name to any
Vets-for-9/11-Truth group. But both my health and location (Bolivia)
make it impossible for me to do any organizing--though I can help
publicize it.
Regards,
Pondo

On Apr 5, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Cathy Garger wrote:

> IT ONLY TAKES ONE -
>
> VETS FOR 9/11 TRUTH
>
> Cathy Garger
>
>
>
> Folks, I believe it is now (past) time to put together a group of
> Veterans for 9/11 Truth.
>
> I know one or two web designers who would be more than a
> tad interested in bringing this effort to the attention of
> the American public.
>
> But there's just one uh, little problem. In order to start this
> effort, we need to ask first for just ONE Veteran to stand up and
> announce that such a group has been formed. Once this effort has
> begun, others will certainly follow.
>
> Might you be that ONE?
>
> I would do it, but unfortunately? I am not a vet.
>
> Granted. It almost seems unfair to ask any war veteran to do this.
> After all, our soldiers have already put their lives on the line once
> (or in some cases, multiple times, in multiple wars, in multiple tours
> of duty).
>
> And c'mon, let's face it.  If you are the ONE who starts the Veterans
> for 9/11 Truth group?  You are not *exactly* going to receive a mess
> of Purple Hearts for saving the lives of future Americans in future US
> False Flag Ops Terror Attacks.
>
> Cowards need not apply for this assignment. You're going to have to
> be one really brave dude or dudette to start Veterans for 9/11 Truth.
> But chances are, if you signed up for duty (or got drafted) you are
> already one awesome, courageous patriot.
>
> And what, after all (if you really think about it) could be any more
> patriotic than bringing the truth to the table with regard to how we
> got into these bloody wars in the first place?
>
> I wrote a few months back to a pal who's active in Vets for Peace and
> asked him, point blank, Why Oh Why won't the Vets start talking about
> 9/11 Truth (which was, as I argued, the very *basis* for
> these devastating killing wars upon Afghanistan and Iraq)?  I could
> read this fellow's sigh (pretty incredible when you can "read" a sigh
> right through an email two states away) as he replied that the
> thinking at the top is that they would not entertain going into 9/11
> Truth until there were some more credible experts who would come
> forth with more conclusive evidence that something was wrong with the
> 9/11 official story.
>
> I certainly can't blame them for that. If one's national
> group appears to be merely another lunatic whack job bunch of
> crazy "conspiracy theorists," it's certainly not going to be easy to
> get the government to listen to them about stopping wars.
>
> Right. Like this war-happy government is listening to the vets on the
> subject of peace.
>
> And if a group is seen as marginal, how can they ever seriously
> consider getting funding for DU testing legislation and veterans'
> disability benefits to take care of the untold numbers of sick,
> suffering, and dying troops who are victims of Depleted Uranium (DU)
> poisoning and other warfare-laced cocktails of US-issued chemical,
> biological, and vaccination-related illnesses?
>
> Again, right. Like this charitable, benevolent government of theirs
> is going to boost veterans' benefits - or even *ever* take good and
> proper care of their "disposable" soldiers - for any reason
> whatsoever.
>
> Believe that and I have some protective gear to keep you safe from
> uranium radiation on the wasted battlefields of Iraq.
>
> Keep dreaming, vets, if you think that keeping quiet about 9/11 is
> going to achieve anything - with the possible exception of a handsome
> feather in the cap of their lead "organizers" who are setting the
> groups' agendas and controlling how far Truth is allowed to go.
>
> I mean, come on. Certainly with George Nelson Colonel, USAF (ret.) and
> Dr. Robert Bowman, USAF Lt. Col (ret.) on board already in not only
> dis-believing the "official 9/11 story" but also talking out in
> public? I can not imagine what would be the need for any more
> credible witnesses than a Colonel and Lieutenant Colonel to come
> forth...
>
> We've already got more than enough evidence and credible sources right
> now to try a good number of federal employees for high crimes,
> misdemeanors, and yes - treason. So what's the real deal here about
> the refusal of the ex-soldier groups to demand that their ex-employer
> to do a proper criminal investigation into 9/11?
>
> Maybe you know someone who's served in the armed forces who has their
> own questions about 9/11?
>
> Maybe you'd be willing to ask them if they would become part of a
> national effort to investigate this entire business
> of this so-called "War On Terror" that began on 9/11?
>
> Maybe you can ask vets you know if they'd be willing to stand up and
> join with other former brothers and sisters in arms?
>
> Maybe together they will stand up and ask their former federal
> employer to explain to them precisely *why* 9/11 (a criminal mass
> murder of nearly 3,000 that was never properly investigated) was used
> as the official reason to invade Afghanistan and Iraq,
> effectively killing unknown thousands of our own soldiers (not to
> mention killing, wounding, and sickening millions of innocent Middle
> Eastern civilians).
>
> All it takes is just ONE Veteran to start this effort.  Maybe you will
> be the ONE - or know someone you can ask to be that ONE?
>
> The formation of Veterans for 9/11 Truth is only ONE awesome
> ex-soldier away.
>
>
> Cathy Garger
> http://mytown.ca/garger/
>
>
>
>
>
> Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great
> rates starting at 1¢/min.
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
>
> United state flag
> United state coin
> United state military
>
> United state citizenship
> Trademark united state
> United state government grant
>
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> ▪ Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
>
> ▪ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> ▪ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
>
>

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: DOUGLAS CLARK <bushsept11mastermind@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: DeLay Honesty Wins: Hitler killed 1000 of his insiders he distrusted. Same???

PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO LOOK AT THE FACTS THAT BUSH DOESN'T WANT AMERICA TO SEE. JUST GO TO

http://911again.tripod.com

AND COMPARE WHAT THIS E-MAIL WAS ABOUT, WITH WHAT MY SITE SHOWS. ALMOST IDENTICAL.

Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com> wrote:
Please remember that in 1934, Hitler killed 1000 of his insiders, who he did not trust.

PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT MY WEBSITE (911again.tripod.com) TO OTHER GROUPS AND INDIVIDUALS.

AS ALWAYS, THE BEST OF HEALTH AND TIMES TO YOU AND YOURS.

DOUGLAS CLARK
7320 HERMITAGE ST
PITTSBURGH PA 15208

---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 6
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Bush Administration issued direct guidelines for programming to media outlets

this is a great, and significant article. Thanks!! judy

Cait <ansith@gmail.com> wrote: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 4.0 ;
This is mind blowing

http://www.fox-news.us/story/0,3566,190215,00.html

FOXNEWS.COM
Bush Administration Media Collusion Memos Surface
Monday, April 3, 2006

WASHINGTON � In a disturbing turn of events for an administration
already plagued by sagging poll numbers and waning support for the Iraq
war, Friday's revelation that the Bush Administration issued direct
guidelines for programming to media outlets is troubling even die-hard
conservatives.
Late Friday a series of memos between senior Bush Administration
officials and management at Viacom, Inc. were leaked calling for the
media giant to focus on stories and programming choices that "reinforce
the Administration's positions" and to "ignore and/or discredit points
of view in opposition to the Bush Administration's foreign policy
objectives for the purposes of National Security."
Democrats and key civil rights figures were quick to comment on this
latest chapter of alleged government malfeasance. Democratic Senator
Barbara Boxer issued a statement calling for a congressional inquiry.
"This is it. This is a smoking gun. For years we've been saying that
liberal and moderate points of view aren't being accurately reflected
in the media and this proves our point. The Bush Administration is
clearly out of touch with the American people, and Viacom should be
ashamed."
Other prominent figures were less forgiving. Rev. Al Sharpton called
the memos "treasonous" and "genocidal" and reiterated his desire for
impeachment proceedings to commence. "What we have here is a complete
disregard for the law, for what is morally correct and for the will of
the people. It's been no secret to anyone with a brain that the
majority of programming that we are exposed to by certain companies is
negative, but now it's out in the open. Look at BET. Look at the
exclusion of voices that accurately represent communities of color.
It's insidious."
Media companies have come under increasing fire as of late for their
portrayal of minorities and for inaccuracies in reporting stories of
interest to activist communities.
Most recently, estimates in the participation numbers of protesters at
anti-immigration legislation rallies were hotly disputed.
The media's alleged embracing of artists and stories depicting people
of color in a derogatory manner has become a hot-topic issue with media
watchdog groups and prominent entertainment commentators alike.
Davey D, a San Francisco-based music writer and hip-hop historian,
echoed the sentiment. "It's true, there is no balance in the media,
especially in hip-hop, where the negativity is most prevalent. All we
hear of on a commercial level is pimps, players and gangsters. That's
not all us. What about the revolutionary voices? What about artists
like The Coup? Like Public Enemy and Paris? They have a new album out
together that speaks on exactly what's going on right now, but they
don't get played on commercial radio. We've always argued that our
voices are systematically suppressed. Well, here's the proof."
Not all agree, however. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist took a more
defensive stance. "Of course it raises some concerns, but we can't let
this issue be blown out of proportion. Of course there have to be media
guidelines. Hell, if we want to plant I.D. chips in people and torture
their loved ones until they break, we will. I know the idea of
governmental control over what the media can or cannot say during
wartime may be an uncomfortable topic for some to digest, but it is a
necessary fact of life when our enemies are trying to kill us."
Debra L. Lee, president and CEO of Viacom's Black Entertainment
Television, agrees. "Even though our moniker is BET, our allegiance
lies with our government and its directives, not the African-American
community. Anyone who believes that we will endorse messages in
contrast to our government's wishes, or that express dissent, is sorely
mistaken."
Some entertainment industry insiders are becoming increasingly
concerned, however. One longtime employee of Interscope Records, a
leading record label and home to rap superstars 50 Cent and Eminem,
stated recently under the condition of anonymity that the company "has
a unique relationship with Viacom" and that it "deliberately focuses on
marketing campaigns that depict black people in the worst possible
light." When told of Rev. Sharpton's likening of the practice to
'genocide' on African-Americans, he agreed wholeheartedly, but
expressed fears of reprisal should he publicly address his concerns.
"It's beyond national security. That was the reason given at first, but
now they just tell us what we have to endorse, and what we have to
avoid." He added, "these kids eat it up. They don't know the difference
between what's real and what's fake."
An Interscope company spokesperson was unavailable for comment.
"We will get to the bottom of this," Sharpton continued, "and heads
will roll. Now that their practices of propaganda are common knowledge
even Americans with limited political awareness will demand change."

Stand up!

Speak your mind!
My weblog:

"US Constitution, The Bill of Rights 12/15/1791";
'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.'

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

---------------------------------

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 7
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com>
Subject: Concrete evidence of conspiracy by govt. to treasonously, cover up, and violate civil rights of free speech

This is firsthand concrete evidence, of the legal type that can be used in court. This prooves that the first amendment right to speech is deliberately blocked, in the papers by the government, and who does it, --and it, also, prooves that the government is a conspiracy to cover up and hide what it does. This is concrete evidence of treason!!

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

---------------------------------

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 8
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 11:50:38 -0500
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." <prez@usa-exile.org>
Subject: A Day in the Life: 4/6/6

GOVERNMENT OF THE USA IN EXILE
Free Americans
Reaching Out to Amerika's Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free

Via <prez@usa-exile.org>

April 6, 2006

From: "Graham Jukes" <grahamjukes@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: April 6, 2006 3:13:09 AM EST
Subject: Meteorologists being warned away from covering global warming

BLAIR'S ACHIEVEMENTS?
2m murdered in the Middle East in the past 10 years, pending threat of
nuclear holoocaust in Iran and a 3rd World War, taxes at home at all
time highs, National Health crisis, Pensions crisis, Elderly care
crisis, overflowing prisons, erasure of civil liberties, contempt for
democracy and peoples intelligence; lying, deceit and corruption at
unimaginable levels and total failure with Global warming. And all
controlled by an evil, fake, stupid, pathetic Media Machine, which
continually regurgitates half-truths in a constant bid to manipulate
popular-opinion. Meanwhile, Corporate profits are obscene, the
Financial Elite reward themselves like vermin and swine, as they are
and our moral fabric is being desecrated by those with no human
characteristic whatsoever. I think Britain's history and heritage would
classify all that as "Mega- Treason!" Yes ?No? GJ (UK)

----- Original Message -----
From: FPF
To: ifj@ifj.org
Cc: The New York Times Direct
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 8:44 AM
Subject: US: meteorologists being warned away from covering global
warming

US: Meteorologists Being
Warned Away from Covering Global Warming

WMR - April 5, 2006 -- Yesterday, Salon ran a story on meteorologists
being warned away from covering global warming by their corporate
bosses.* This revelation, in addition to the Bush-Cheney oilgarchy
censoring and punishing NASA scientists who wrote and spoke about
global warming, may be one of the most egregious crimes of the Bush
administration and their corporate criminal co-conspirators. -
[http://tinyurl.com/b7ygk]

THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS FINALLY, AND SLOWLY, BEGINNING TO REPORT

WMR* has received a number of e-mails regarding severe and unusual
weather conditions now plaguing the planet. We have received reports of
pilots regularly experiencing extremely high and dangerous winds and
ship crews recording some of the highest waves ever seen. Since the
mainstream media is finally, and slowly, beginning to report on the
fact of global warming and the resulting severe weather patterns cause
by it, WMR, in an effort to stay well ahead of the Katie Courics* of
the news pack, requests any pilots or marine vessel operators to
provide credible anecdotal information on unusual severe wind and wave
incidents to supplement what we've already received

Email ----> waynemadsendc@hotmail.com

Al Gore has repeatedly warned that the clock is ticking and time is
running out for the planet.

The fact that the Bush administration has engaged in a cover-up of
something as important and basic as weather information is just another
crime against humanity to charge them with at their international
tribunals.

[Pict in original art.] - "The Day After Tomorrow" may be only a few
years away.

AND THANKS TO BUSH AND CHENEY, MILLIONS MAY BE IN PERIL.

[enditem] - Wayne Madsen Report - Url.:
http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/

FPF-Extra - concerning criminal Dutch collaboration and the invasion of
Venezuela: ''Brainwashed Dutch armed forces totally at the disposal of
USA warmongers.'' - Url.:
http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=52896

STRONGLY RELATED:

* The Salon story - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/zufjq

* KATIE COURIC'S PROPAGANDA: in the PNAC's New York Times, the very
dirty pot calling the kettle black, TV critic Alessandra Stanley wrote:
"The camera fixates on Ms. Couric's legs during interviews, she
performs in innumerable skits and stunts, and her clowning is given
center stage even during news events." (April 25, 2005) - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/f6cet

* NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST for you too - Depleted Uranium for Dummies - Url.:
http://www.notinkansas.us

* THIS IS A VERY INFORMATIVE ARTICLE - AN EYEOPENER - After working
around the globe for more than forty years, I can not find anything
wrong with this eloquent description of the state of affairs: ''They
seem so harmless, so non-menacing, and yet they are the root of so much
of the present evil that mankind is facing today. Just six simple words
that carry the weight of the world upon them, six simple words that act
as the engine for so much turmoil and unrest.'' - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/gj4x5

* "Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we
Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets
and lynched." - George Bush Senior speaking in an interview with
Sarah McClendon in December 1992. - And here's why: 'George Bush: The
Unauthorized Biography' - by Webster G. Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin -
Chapter - II - The Hitler Project - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/57qxk

* Global Predators - ŒFrauds-R-Us¹ - The Bush Family Saga - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/elarx

* The 9/11 drama was the 'trigger' used by the PNAC Group, killing
Americans to further their inhuman goals: Anybody who after seeing this
video - '9/11 revisited' - still believes the version from the 'PNAC
pack' - the Washington cabal - is beyond all professional help - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/r5sx4

* Nebraska Republican Hagel sits on the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee and supported the October 2002 resolution authorizing
military action against Iraq. He helped Bush on the bloodied PNAC
throne in the White 'Haus': "If You Want To Win An Election, Just
Control The Voting Machines" - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/xd0f

* FOX: Video 49 min. - The example how viewers are brainwashed and
'outfoxed' - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/b2zzl

* Anti-propaganda: On the Net - Reporters Committee - Url.:
http://www.rcfp.org/

* US War & Propaganda machine: Rumsfeld Declares War on Bad Press -
Url.: http://tinyurl.com/loxqy

* Bush interview. ABC: No WMD's but many killed: "It was worth it". -
Url.: http://tinyurl.com/6bal9

* 'Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one' ‹ A.J.
Liebling - The infamous US 'Lie Factory' - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/8ncal

* MSNBC - Live Vote - Concerning the "Project for a Nefarious American
Century" (PNAC) - ''Do you believe President Bush's actions justify
impeachment?'' - YES: 86% - Url.: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904/

*Read the Fightin' Cock Flyer - Url.:
http://fightincockflyer.blogspot.com/

* THE ONLY SOLUTION? - Help all the troops - of whatever nationality -
to come back from abroad! - AND WITH ALL THEIR WEAPONS, WHICH WE ARE
FORCED TO PAY FOR BY TAXES - [http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm] -
We need them badly at home in many countries to fight with us against
our so called 'governments' and their malignant managers - Url.:
http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/

The Dutch author this far has lived and worked abroad for more than 4
decades for international media - when they still knew what honest
journalism was - as an independent foreign correspondent. Of which 10
years - also during Gulf War I - in the 'Arab World' and the Middle
East. Seeing worldwide that every bullet and every bomb breeds more
terrorism !

* It's very unlikely, but if you indeed would prefer to unsubscribe
from the FPF-list: just send an email in return with the word
'unsubscribe'.

FOREIGN PRESS FOUNDATION
http://forpressfound.blogspot.com/
Editor: Henk Ruyssenaars
http://tinyurl.com/amn3q
The Netherlands
fpf@chello.nl

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: Rick Davis <rdavis@yin.or.jp>
Date: April 5, 2006 5:46:00 PM EST
Subject: Japanese media help peddle 9/11 propaganda

The Japanese media are always kind and deferential to the US, nearly
always faithfully parroting the US line. I was forcefully reminded of
this once again this morning (April 6) as I walked into the living room
when the morning TV news was on. Normally I pay the TV no attention
because it is 99% propaganda and corporate flim-flam, but my attention
this morning was arrested because they were just beginning a report on
American public reactions to the controversial 9/11 film "United 93."

Predictably, the story covered only the controversy over whether it's
"too soon" to show such a film, and totally ignored the claims from
9/11 truth-seekers that it is propaganda. Interviews with a number of
Americans featured only comments on whether it's too soon; the news
spot featured not a single interviewee who challenged the movie's
premise. In one part of the news story, the camera panned over a web
page with comments from the public. Despite the obvious presence of
comments challenging the movie's premise and saying that the film
should instead be pointing out the gaping holes in Bush's story, the
news feature totally ignored this angle.

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: CherielJ@aol.com
Date: April 4, 2006 11:23:52 PM EST
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: K: VoteScam in California

Please send as far and wide as possible.

Thanks,
Robert Sterling
Editor, The Konformist
http://www.konformist.com

BradBlog.com

Blogged by Brad on 3/29/2006
DEMOCRACY CRUMBLING: New Electronic Voter Registration Database
Rejects 43% of New Los Angeles Voter Applications! 26% Rejected
State-Wide in California!
Applications That Don't Match EXACTLY With DMV Records are
Automatically Dumped by New System!
California's League of Women Voters Sends Letter of Objection to
Secretary of State

We've been dreading this. And you're not gonna like it either. It's
an entirely new can of worms in the Electronic Rape of American
Electoral Democracy. The next wave -...

We've been dreading this. And you're not gonna like it either.

It's an entirely new can of worms in the Electronic Rape of American
Electoral Democracy. The next wave -- beyond the electronic voting
machines, and perhaps even more alarming -- in the arsenal of those
out to game the system for partisan advantage.

No matter what we do, no matter how many successes, the Bad Guys --
those who hate Democracy and American Values -- are always one step
ahead of us, it seems.

The horrifically written and, of course, ironically named "Help
America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002" requires, as of January 1, 2006,
each state to implement "a single, uniform, official, centralized,
interactive computerized statewide voter registration list."

And guess who's writing the software for it, in California, Ohio and
elsewhere? That's right...our old friends at Diebold, Inc.

While we've put off reporting on much of this until now -- as
prompted by story out today (in the MSM of all places!) -- we've
been working on an extremely disturbing part of this story for some
time relating directly to all of this out in, you guessed it, Ohio.
We've yet to run the story for a number of reasons. But we hope to
have much more on it, in all its troubling detail, in the not-too-
distant future.

For today, however, we'll stick to the report coming out of
California in this morning's Los Angeles Times which says that,
since the first of year, when California's new computerized Voter
Registration Database has gone state-wide, Los Angeles County
has "rejected 14,629 people — 43% of those who registered from Jan.
1 to March 15."

The rejections occur, amongst other reasons, due to failures of
exact matching between voter applications and the state's motor
vehicle registration (DMV) database to which they are now auto-
magically compared. So, if a voter registers (or re-registers after
moving to a new location) as "Brad Friedman" but has "Bradley
Friedman" on his driver's license, he'll be auto-kicked out of the
voter registration system and may not find out until he shows up at
the polls on Election Day! That is, if he even knows where to show
up since he may no longer receive sample ballots and poll location
information etc. in the mail!...

Jacqueline Jacobberger, the president of the League of Women Voters
in California sent a letter yesterday (posted in full at the end of
this article) to California's Sec. of State Bruce McPherson -- who
is credited in the LA Times story as being behind the design and
installation of the new system -- objecting to the new Voter
Registration Database and the way it's being implemented.

In her letter, Jacobberger writes: "We must object. Our procedures
should guard against inappropriate elimination of legitimate voters
from the system. It is not enough to allow them to cast a
provisional ballot if they make it to the polls. Being excluded from
the registration list means that they will not receive a sample
ballot or a ballot pamphlet, they will not receive notice of the
location of their polling places, and they will not be permitted to
request an absentee ballot."

She goes on to explain to McPherson that the comparison between
databases was meant, by HAVA, to "supplement the information
provided by voters when they register or re-register, thereby
helping to correct an application so it can be processed and
accepted, if the applicant is eligible, instead of rejected."
(emphasis in original)

Whether or not that's what HAVA's authors (hello, Bob Ney) actually
meant when they included that provision is another matter. We'll
associate ourselves with Jacobberger's optimistic interpretation for
the moment.

With a Special Election scheduled to replace the disgraced,
convicted and resigned Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham in San Diego
just weeks away on April 11, the race to correct the problem somehow
is even more accute. The rest of the state has primaries in June and
even that timeline will likely be hard to meet if all of
the "errors" are to be corrected.

U.S. Congressional Candidate Marcy Winograd, who is running in that
primary to unseat right-leaning Democrat Rep. Jane Harman in
California's 36th District released a statement today expressing
concern as well. "If I register to vote as Marcy Winograd and my DMV
application reads Marcy A. Winograd, I may not be able to vote for
myself in this congressional race," said Winograd.

According to the Times, "McPherson's office plans to launch a
campaign in April to educate Californians about the new registration
rules." Winograd is not impressed.

"Before investing time, energy, and taxpayer money into this
misguided education program," she said, "McPherson should
acknowledge the potential for disaster and scrap the program
altogether."

State Sen. Debra Bowen, who has been a long-time champion concerning
issues of Electoral Integrity and Transparency in this state as
chair of the State Senate's election committee is also running
against McPherson for Sec. of State this year. She warns that "We're
looking at the potential for thousands and thousands of people to
lose the right to vote."

According to the LA Times coverage today...

SACRAMENTO — Thousands of Californians who register to vote or
update their records may not receive sample ballots or be able to
vote as absentees because of the state's new method of verifying
identities, election officials say.

A new statewide database designed by Secretary of State Bruce
McPherson to authenticate voter registrations has blocked otherwise
valid registrations because of computer glitches, slight
discrepancies in spelling or incomplete applications.

The problems have required registrars to contact voters — a time-
consuming process that is already taxing some counties facing
elections next month.

San Diego County is racing to rectify rejected registrations in time
for the April 11 special election to fill the seat vacated by
convicted Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham.
...
The new database system was installed to meet the requirements of
the Help America Vote Act, the 2002 federal law designed to avoid
the voting irregularities cited in the 2000 presidential race.
...
Voter information is checked against records with the federal
government and state motor vehicles department. Under an agreement
negotiated by McPherson and the U.S. Justice Department, California
is one of nine states that use the standard of an "exact match," in
which the records must be the same to the letter, according to a
national survey by the Brennan Center for Justice, a nonprofit group
in New York City. Thus, "Robert Smith" and "Rob Smith" would not be
considered a match.

Ashley Snee Giovannettone, spokeswoman for McPherson, who oversees
elections, said a sampling of statewide registrations found that 74%
were immediately verified.

As usual, McPherson's spokesholes (where do they find these
people?!) will say anything in attempt to polish McP's turds. Even
if Giovannettone's comment is taken at face value, it means that 26%
of all statewide registrations have been rejected by the new system!

...And once again, it's the voter -- who has done absolutely nothing
wrong -- who gets screwed in the bargain:

Elaine Ginnold, Alameda County's acting registrar of voters, said
she doubts her county will be able to ratify all rejected
registrations submitted near the deadline.

"These are errors that are not the fault of the voters and not
related to voters' eligibility," said Wendy Weiser, a deputy
director at the Brennan Center. "They should not prevent voters from
being able to cast votes that count."

As mentioned, we'll have much more on all of this new Voter
Registration Database mess...much more....not that we're happy about
it...in the near future.

The complete letter from, Jacqueline Jacobberger, the president of
California's League of Women Voters to Secretary of State Bruce
McPherson follows...

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF CALIFORNIA
801 12th Street, Suite 220, Sacramento, California 95814
(916) 442-7215 P Fax (916) 442-7362
Web site: www.lwvc.org E-mail: lwvc@lwvc.org

March 28, 2006

The Honorable Bruce McPherson
Secretary of State of California
1500 11th Street
Sacramento, California 95814

Dear Secretary McPherson:

The League of Women Voters of California is concerned that under new
state procedures for adding registered voters to the CalVoter state
database, it appears that a large number of registrations are being
inappropriately rejected.

The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002 requires each state to
implement, by January 1, 2006, "a single, uniform, official,
centralized, interactive computerized statewide voter registration
list." Recognizing that the state of California would not have such
a database in place by that deadline, the U.S. Department of Justice
(DOJ) and the California Secretary of State entered into a
memorandum of agreement to update and use the existing CalVoter
registration system for HAVA compliance. Emergency regulations were
adopted by the Secretary of State to implement that memorandum.

Judging from statistics compiled since the first of this year for
Los Angeles County, most of the rejected registrations and re-
registrations fall into one of two categories. One type of problem
occurs when individuals provide a driver's license number or the
last four digits of their Social Security number (SSN) on their
registration form, but their name or birth date is not exactly the
same as in the DMV records. Another type of problem occurs when
individuals do not provide a driver's license number or the last
four digits of their SSN on the registration form although their
other information can be matched with DMV or other state agency
records.

Since many registrations are in fact re-registrations prompted by a
voter's change of address, party, etc., many of these individuals
have already been on the voter registration rolls in California.
However, in both types of situation, the current system does not
allow any of those individuals to be included in the statewide
registration list.

We must object. Our procedures should guard against inappropriate
elimination of legitimate voters from the system. It is not enough
to allow them to cast a provisional ballot if they make it to the
polls. Being excluded from the registration list means that they
will not receive a sample ballot or a ballot pamphlet, they will not
receive notice of the location of their polling places, and they
will not be permitted to request an absentee ballot.

We hope that a resolution to this problem can be reached quickly. We
urge you to find alternatives to the current rules (data standards
and match criteria) for processing registrations. If possible, that
would be done by administrative procedures available to you.
However, if it proves that legislation is needed, the LWVC would
support that approach.

Under HAVA, it is intended that information provided by other
databases, such as DMV data, will supplement the information
provided by voters when they register or re-register, thereby
helping to correct an application so it can be processed and
accepted, if the applicant is eligible, instead of rejected.

It is a well-known problem that mistakes are made in database
administration and management. Applicants transpose or forget
numbers and letters, and make other noncritical errors as well.
Officials likewise inadvertently make data entry errors. Databases
themselves maintain these errors over time, compounding problems if
databases are compared and matched with each other.

A well-run system will use the wide variety of information that is
available from a number of sources to make corrections in order to
maintain an accurate system. If, for example, the applicant
transposes digits in his or her driver's license number, as
evidenced by the driver's license record, a correction is made and
the application is processed.

The corollary is that a failure to match the applicant or his/her
data with another database must not result in the rejection of the
applicant. This is important for a variety of reasons. First,
matching is not an eligibility requirement under HAVA or state law.
Second, the database information is likely to have significant
errors. The Social Security Administration acknowledges that its
data is not foolproof, data entry and other errors in DMV and voter
registration agencies are well known, and simple matching mistakes—
from the use of different forms of names to transposed or missing
numbers—are significant. Third, the absence of information does not
suggest a problem. Only positive information of a disqualifying
characteristic should result in the rejection of a voter in a
database matching system. Rejection must be based on a positive
match of the identity of the voter, and a positive match with a
disqualifying characteristic.

In the voter registration context, the failure to find a match does
not provide information that the voter is ineligible. If there is no
match, the voter registration application should be processed on its
own terms.

If the applicant is eligible to vote, then his or her name should be
entered on the list. If necessary, the applicant can be placed on
a "pending" list of individuals who receive the normal election
materials and services but must provide identification (if a first-
time voter) or swear to his or her identity in order to cast a
normal ballot.

Uniform and nondiscriminatory practices are important for any
process concerning the registration of voters. We must not go into
this election season burdened by processes that disenfranchise
voters.

Sincerely,

Jacqueline Jacobberger
President
````````````````

If you are interested in a free subscription to The Konformist
Newswire, please visit:

http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/konformist

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com>
Date: April 5, 2006 4:47:55 PM EST
To: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com>,
"progressive@yahoogroups.com" <progressive@yahoogroups.com>,
"progressivepartyusa@yahoogroups.com"
<progressivepartyusa@yahoogroups.com>,
"secularhumanist@yahoogroups.com" <secularhumanist@yahoogroups.com>,
"thetripleds@yahoogroups.com" <thetripleds@yahoogroups.com>,
"idealday@yahoogroups.com" <idealday@yahoogroups.com>,
"a_better_future@yahoogroups.com" <a_better_future@yahoogroups.com>,
"citizensforlegitimategovernment@yahoogroups.com"
<citizensforlegitimategovernment@yahoogroups.com>,
wethepeople_united@yahoogroups.com
Cc: "mgp-disc@yahoogroups.com" <mgp-disc@yahoogroups.com>,
"mike.ferner@sbcglobal.net" <mike.ferner@sbcglobal.net>,
"libertyundergroundtalk@yahoogroups.com"
<libertyundergroundtalk@yahoogroups.com>, "contact@gsfp.org"
<contact@gsfp.org>, "david@davidswanson.org" <david@davidswanson.org>,
"charles@traprockpeace.org" <charles@traprockpeace.org>,
theamericancoalition@yahoogroups.com, 911truthaction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] RE-SEND due to server: Dennis Kyne: An
Uncommon American Hero
Reply-To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com

With apologies to everyone yesterday who could not access the story as
the server to mytown.ca was down.

Dennis Kyne:
An Uncommon American Hero

By Cathy Garger
3 April 2006

When filling out standard forms, under the question “Occupation,”
people who do what I do all day long usually fill in the words
“Freelance Writer.” Imagine the look on people’s faces when they read
my stated occupation: “Truth Activist.” It’s a phrase that gets ’em
talking every time about things that one does not typically get into
with strangers.

Knowing this about me, it should come as no surprise that an activist
for truth would collect such kindred spirits as friends. So knowing
Dennis Kyne... well... just feels right...

http://mytown.ca/garger

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: James Patton <james_patton@yahoo.com>
Date: April 6, 2006 9:43:49 AM EST
To: Anti Allawi-Group <anti-allawi-group@yahoogroups.com>, Racism War
<againstracismandwar@yahoogroups.com>, NOWAR Alliance
<nowar_alliance_wa@yahoogroups.com>, NoWarInAus
<nowarinaus@yahoogroups.com>, Sea Swap <seaswap@yahoogroups.com>,
cawb@yahoogroups.com, Bangla Vision <bangla_vision@yahoogroups.com>,
911Truth Action <911truthaction@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [911TruthAction] Lookin’ for the 911 Truth
Reply-To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com

NOTE: This is a good one to pass to anybody who may not yet be
convinced that 9/11 was an Inside Job. -- kl, pp

Lookin’ for the 911 Truth
April 2006

Last week Charlie Sheen made national news (CNN Showbiz Tonight 7pm)
three nights in a row, with coverage continuing every day so far this
week
as well.
http://www.911blogger.com/2006/03/fourth-night-of-showbiz-tonights-
sheen.html

What newsworthy event prompted such coverage? Mr. Sheen has announced
that he thinks the government has been covering up the truth about 9/11.
Charlie thinks 9/11 was an inside job!
http://9eleven.info/

Maybe you don’t care what he thinks, he’s just an actor. Perhaps you
want
the opinion of an expert like Steven E Jones, professor of Physics at
BYU.
http://www.9eleven.info/911JonesPaperhtm7.htm
http://www.question911.com/linkout.php?
filename=Steven%20Jones%20Shows%20WTC%20Demolition%20Evidence.wmv

Or perhaps MIT Engineer Jeff King who also believes the WTC were
brought down by a controlled demolition.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1822764959599063248&pl=true

Maybe they’re too theoretical for you. You want someone from the
applied sciences. May I suggest Clemson mechanical engineering
professor Judy Wood.
http://www.911blogger.com/2006/03/mechanical-engineering-professor-
from.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/BilliardBalls.html

Maybe you don’t care for ’eggheads’.
http://www.st911.org/
http://physics911.net/spine.htm

You want to hear from a true patriot, a military man, like former head
of Star Wars and air force colonel, Bob Bowman.
http://benfrank.net/blog/2005/10/27/oil_mafia_treason/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/030306Evidence.htm

Maybe military types scare you. How about a lady of letters like poet
Erica Jong?
http://www.etruscanpress.org/02_september_11_2001.html

Maybe you’re not into poetry. Prose is more your style. How about
Webster Tarpley author of 9/11 Synthetic Terror made in USA?
http://www.tarpley.net/welcome.html

Or if you prefer your message in song, what about putting some
of the hard questions to music?
Les Visible: 9/11 Was An Inside Job (music)
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=97737

Maybe you don’t trust actors, authors, musicians or poets. You want
to hear from a man of God. How about David Ray Griffin theologian,
professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology?
http://911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

What could a theologian know about national security? You want to hear
from
an insider to the covert world. How about CIA analyst Ray McGovern, an
expert
on National Security who’s career spanned JFK to GHW Bush?
http://www.electricpolitics.com/podcast/2006/01/
interview_with_ray_mcgovern.html

Or how about David Shayler, the MI5 Whistleblower?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/270605insidejob.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5403286136814574974

Or former cop Michael C. Ruppert?
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/store/books.shtml#ruby

Or Michael Meacher - MP - Former UK Minister for the environment
who says "The war on terror is bogus", or Andreas Von Bulow, Former
German
Secretary Of Defense, who says "The official [9/11] story is so
inadequate
and far fetched that there must be a different one"
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11222.htm

What about another country's government, such as the Venezuelan
government under Hugo Chavez, supported by billionaire philanthropist
Jimmy Walter and WTC survivor William Rodriguez, which is set to
launch an international investigation into 9/11?
http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/83785

Maybe they're all too far left for you! You want to hear from a
Republican.
How about Paul Craig Roberts assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury
under Ronald Reagan?
http://www.tpmcafe.com/node/28070
http://www.electricpolitics.com/podcast/2006/02/post.html

OK, he’s a Republican, but that was back in the Reagan days. Maybe you
need to hear from someone in GW’s administration. How about
Morgan Reynolds professor emeritus at Texas A&M University
and chief economist for the US Department of Labor during Bush’s first
term?
http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html

Maybe you don’t want to listen to any of these individuals, but the
fact is,
a lot of Americans agree with them. Like the 83% of over 50,000 CNN
Showbiz
Tonight online poll respondents who think the government is covering up
the truth of 9/11.
http://www.911blogger.com/2006/03/fourth-night-of-showbiz-tonights-
sheen.html

Maybe you don’t care what the American people think?

Yea, we know.

[Ref. http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=11205 ]

So what can you do?

Even if you are still skeptical, but think there are too many questions
about the events of September 11 2001 that need answers, here are
a few suggestions:

Ask Oprah to host a three-part special that investigates 9/11
http://www.oprah911.com/

Sign the petition to release the 9/11 information that is currently
being held by the U.S. government to an independent review:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/929981172

You can share these links to several 9/11 investigative documentaries
with your friends:

911: In Plane Site
Hard-hitting investigative journalism.
http://unsungwar.com/videos/911InPlaneSite.wmv

Loose Change Second Edition
Well researched and very thought provoking.
http://unsungwar.com/videos/loosechange2.html
http://tinyurl.com/bzg64

Rise
Short and sweet - to the point!
http://unsungwar.com/videos/Rise.swf

9/11 Revisited
This film provides stunning evidence that pre-planted explosives
were used in the complete demolition of the WTC twin towers and WTC 7.
http://911revisited.infad.net/video.html

9/11 Eyewitness
A rigorous scientific analysis of the destruction of the WTC towers.
http://www.freedomisforeverybody.org/911Eyewitness.php

Perspective 9-11
This research will give you an insight into the story
behind the 9-11 attacks.
http://tinyurl.com/layem

Pentagon Strike
What hit the Pentagon?
http://unsungwar.com/videos/pentagonstrike.swf

Discover the Truth about the Events surrounding 9-11-01 via
Video Presentations from some of the top Scholars, Researchers,
and Analysts from the International Community.
http://911busters.com/

9/11 Special: Dutch Television Documentary (20 minutes)
Two senior government ministers express grave doubts about
the official 9/11 stories and the so-called "war on terror".
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11222.htm

Watch David Ray Griffin, professor of theology, and other speakers
who speak candidly and lucidly about the events of 911.
http://911busters.com/911_new_video_productions/index.html
. . .

And finally, if you still think it's all bunkum and you can debunk the
9/11
"tin-foil hat" conspiracy brigade, then take the million dollar
challenge!
I'm sure you could use a spare million bucks?

http://www.reopen911.org/Contest.htm

========================================================================
=================================================================

NOTE: Thanks to Peter Myers for this. -- kl, pp

China tax policy targets the wealthy & energy-wasters

Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:01:14 -0500 From: "David Chiang"
<sino.economics@verizon.net>

China to Raise Taxes on Gas Guzzlers and Chopsticks
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/22/business/worldbusiness/22cnd-
yuan.html By
KEITH BRADSHER Published: March 22, 2006

HONG KONG, March 22 — The Chinese government will increase existing
taxes and
impose new ones on April 1 for everything from gas-guzzling vehicles to
chopsticks so as to improve the country's environmental record,
conserve energy
and narrow China's wide gap between rich and poor, the official New
China News
Agency said Wednesday.

New or higher taxes will fall on vehicles with engines of over 2 liters,
disposable wooden chopsticks, planks for wood floors, luxury watches,
golf
clubs, golf balls and certain oil products.

China's finance ministry disclosed the higher taxes in a statement on
Tuesday
night, which was reported by the official New China News Agency today
morning.
The finance ministry statement offered the strongest signal yet that
some senior
Chinese officials may be having second thoughts about the rapid growth
of
privately owned family vehicles, which has pushed up sales from just
640,000 in
2000 to 3.1 million last year.

"In recent years, car ownership in China has grown rapidly and fuel
consumption
has risen considerably, and this highlights the conflict between supply
and
demand of oil resources," the statement said. "At the same time,
pollution
caused by motor cars has become the main source of pollution in big and
medium-sized cities."

The finance ministry is imposing a 5 percent tax on disposable wooden
chopsticks
and wood floor planks, citing a need to conserve timber.
Environmentalists
around the world have been warning that China's voracious demand for
wood was
contributing to the clear-cutting of many forests, especially in
Southeast Asia.

The production of disposable wooden chopsticks consumes 2 million cubic
meters
(70.6 million cubic feet) of timber each year, the ministry said.
Plastic
chopsticks, which can be washed and were reused, will not be subject to
the new
tax.

A new tax of 10 percent on yachts, golf clubs and golf balls, and a 20
percent
tax on luxury watches, is squarely aimed at China's emerging elite of
wealthy
industrialists and well-connected Communist Party officials.

China's yacht market is still in its infancy, as military restrictions
on ocean
traffic and commercial restrictions on river traffic have mostly
limited yachts
to lakes — although a few entrepreneurs have been able to get around
the rules
to cruise on the Yangtze River near Shanghai. Golf has periodically been
controversial in China, especially when villages and farms are
demolished with
little compensation to make way for new golf courses.

The biggest commercial effect of the new taxes is likely to fall on
sport
utility vehicles and luxury sedans. China is reducing slightly its tax
on
vehicles with an engine of 1 to 1.5 liters, to 3 percent from 5
percent, while
leaving the rate unchanged for slightly more powerful engines and
raising rates
for those with the most powerful engines.

The tax rate will climb to 20 percent, from 8 percent now, for vehicles
with
engines over 4 liters.

The taxes are likely to hit foreign automakers more than Chinese
automakers,
which tend to produce models with smaller engines. American automakers,
with
some of the largest models, may feel the greatest impact.

The big question for automakers is how much of the tax to pass on to
consumers,
as the tax is collected from the manufacturers. With a week and a half
remaining
until the new tax takes effect, marketing executives were scrambling on
Wednesday to assess the impact and no automaker immediately announced
price
increases.

"We are doing the calculations and assessing the impact, and on the
other hand
watching the actions of our competitors," said Kenneth Hsu, a spokesman
for
Ford's China operations, which sell everything from compact cars with
1.6-liter
engines to Lincoln Navigator full-size S.U.V.s with 5.4-liter engines.

Trevor Hale, a DaimlerChrysler spokesman, said that the company was also
assessing the taxes and noted that the company offered fuel-efficient
engines;
many Mercedes sedans are sold in China with considerably smaller
engines than
models available in the United States. Patty Zhao, a G.M. spokeswoman,
said that
G.M. was also examining the taxes and would issue a response by
Wednesday
morning.

Chinese officials had considered and rejected a tax system based on gas
mileage
instead of engine displacement, an approach that would have benefited
foreign
automakers with better technology that allows them to squeeze more
power out of
the same size of engine than purely Chinese manufacturers. Yale Zhang,
an
analyst in the Shanghai office of CSM Worldwide, a big automotive
consulting
firm based in the Detroit suburbs, said that Chinese automakers had
growing
influence in policy debates and that the new rules might lead to a
proliferation
of vehicles with engines a hundredth of a liter below the thresholds
for higher
taxes.

Chinese regulators previously imposed stringent fuel-economy
regulations that
take effect for all vehicles sold after July 1, and have said that they
are
considering a separate gas-guzzler tax for models that do not comply.
The
finance ministry's statement regarding tax increases on April 1 made no
mention
of such a gas-guzzler tax, however, and finance ministry officials
could not be
reached for elaboration.

The finance ministry also announced a modest new tax of a penny a liter
(0.1
yuan/liter) for aviation fuel and 2 cents a liter (0.2 yuan/liter) for
naphtha,
solvents and lubricants, but said that it would not collect the new
aviation
fuel tax for now and would only collect 30 percent of the new tax on
naphtha,
solvents and lubricants.

Applying taxes on oil products but not collecting them while prices are
high
could set a precedent for how China handles taxes on gasoline and
diesel.
Chinese officials have said repeatedly this winter that they would like
to raise
fuel taxes so as to encourage conservation, but do not want to act
while world
oil prices are close to record levels.

China will also lower on April 1 its tax on motorcycles with engines
displacing
fewer than 250 milliliters to 3 percent, from 10 percent, while leaving
the tax
unchanged at 10 percent for motorcycles with more powerful engines.
Western
manufacturers like Harley Davidson are trying to break into the Chinese
market
with powerful bikes, while Chinese manufacturers like Lifan mainly
produce less
powerful models.

========================================================================
=================================================================

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 9
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 11:57:01 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)
From: "Debi Clark" <debiclark@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Fw: Important little video

Video of Norman Mineta's testimony. A keeper.

http://www.911truthmovement.org/video/hamilton_win.wmv

-John Austin

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 10
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 18:28:43 -0000
From: "S Miles Lewis" <yahoolists@elfis.net>
Subject: Re: It Only Takes ONE - Vets for 9/11 Truth

Hi Cathy etal,

Cathy, I forwarded your post to local veteran activist and
acquaintance Don Darling who is among the heads of VETERANS FOR PEACE.

Really nice guy.

SMiles

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, Scott Legere <sledger911@...>
wrote:
>
> Check bravocharlie911.com I've read 2-3 good letters from vets there
>
> Peter Kofod <slashkofod@...> wrote: Dear Cathy.
>
> I can think of a few... Robert Bowman... Stan Goff, and one of
the guys behind loose change (www.loosechange911.com ) are
veterans...
>
> Best
> Peter Kofod, Denmark
>
> Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@...> skrev:
> IT ONLY TAKES ONE -
>
> VETS FOR 9/11 TRUTH
>
> Cathy Garger
>
>
>
> Folks, I believe it is now (past) time to put together a group of
Veterans for 9/11 Truth.
>
> I know one or two web designers who would be more than a tad
interested in bringing this effort to the attention of the American
public.
>
> But there's just one uh, little problem. In order to start this
effort, we need to ask first for just ONE Veteran to stand up and
announce that such a group has been formed. Once this effort has
begun, others will certainly follow.
>
> Might you be that ONE?
>
> I would do it, but unfortunately? I am not a vet.
>
> Granted. It almost seems unfair to ask any war veteran to do
this. After all, our soldiers have already put their lives on the
line once (or in some cases, multiple times, in multiple wars, in
multiple tours of duty).
>
> And c'mon, let's face it. If you are the ONE who starts the
Veterans for 9/11 Truth group? You are not *exactly* going to
receive a mess of Purple Hearts for saving the lives of future
Americans in future US False Flag Ops Terror Attacks.
>
> Cowards need not apply for this assignment. You're going to have
to be one really brave dude or dudette to start Veterans for 9/11
Truth. But chances are, if you signed up for duty (or got drafted)
you are already one awesome, courageous patriot.
>
> And what, after all (if you really think about it) could be any
more patriotic than bringing the truth to the table with regard to
how we got into these bloody wars in the first place?
>
> I wrote a few months back to a pal who's active in Vets for Peace
and asked him, point blank, Why Oh Why won't the Vets start talking
about 9/11 Truth (which was, as I argued, the very *basis* for these
devastating killing wars upon Afghanistan and Iraq)? I could read
this fellow's sigh (pretty incredible when you can "read" a sigh
right through an email two states away) as he replied that the
thinking at the top is that they would not entertain going into 9/11
Truth until there were some more credible experts who would come
forth with more conclusive evidence that something was wrong with the
9/11 official story.
>
> I certainly can't blame them for that. If one's national group
appears to be merely another lunatic whack job bunch of
crazy "conspiracy theorists," it's certainly not going to be easy to
get the government to listen to them about stopping wars.
>
> Right. Like this war-happy government is listening to the vets
on the subject of peace.
>
> And if a group is seen as marginal, how can they ever seriously
consider getting funding for DU testing legislation and veterans'
disability benefits to take care of the untold numbers of sick,
suffering, and dying troops who are victims of Depleted Uranium (DU)
poisoning and other warfare-laced cocktails of US-issued chemical,
biological, and vaccination-related illnesses?
>
> Again, right. Like this charitable, benevolent government of
theirs is going to boost veterans' benefits - or even *ever* take
good and proper care of their "disposable" soldiers - for any reason
whatsoever.
>
> Believe that and I have some protective gear to keep you safe
from uranium radiation on the wasted battlefields of Iraq.
>
> Keep dreaming, vets, if you think that keeping quiet about 9/11
is going to achieve anything - with the possible exception of a
handsome feather in the cap of their lead "organizers" who are
setting the groups' agendas and controlling how far Truth is allowed
to go.
>
> I mean, come on. Certainly with George Nelson Colonel, USAF
(ret.) and Dr. Robert Bowman, USAF Lt. Col (ret.) on board already in
not only dis-believing the "official 9/11 story" but also talking out
in public? I can not imagine what would be the need for any more
credible witnesses than a Colonel and Lieutenant Colonel to come
forth...
>
> We've already got more than enough evidence and credible sources
right now to try a good number of federal employees for high crimes,
misdemeanors, and yes - treason. So what's the real deal here about
the refusal of the ex-soldier groups to demand that their ex-employer
to do a proper criminal investigation into 9/11?
>
> Maybe you know someone who's served in the armed forces who has
their own questions about 9/11?
>
> Maybe you'd be willing to ask them if they would become part of a
national effort to investigate this entire business of this so-
called "War On Terror" that began on 9/11?
>
> Maybe you can ask vets you know if they'd be willing to stand up
and join with other former brothers and sisters in arms?
>
> Maybe together they will stand up and ask their former federal
employer to explain to them precisely *why* 9/11 (a criminal mass
murder of nearly 3,000 that was never properly investigated) was used
as the official reason to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, effectively
killing unknown thousands of our own soldiers (not to mention
killing, wounding, and sickening millions of innocent Middle Eastern
civilians).
>
> All it takes is just ONE Veteran to start this effort. Maybe you
will be the ONE - or know someone you can ask to be that ONE?
>
> The formation of Veterans for 9/11 Truth is only ONE awesome ex-
soldier away.
>
>
> Cathy Garger
> http://mytown.ca/garger/
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.
Great rates starting at 1�/min.
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> United state flag Trademark united state United state
grant United state military United state coin United state
citizenship
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 11
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 18:41:06 -0000
From: "S Miles Lewis" <yahoolists@elfis.net>
Subject: Re: Bush Administration issued direct guidelines for programming to media outlets

Even more mind-blowing (besides this being on FOX news) is that if
you put the headline into http://news.google.com ...

NO RESULTS FOUND.

But if you plug the headline into http://www.google.com ...

Tons of results, NOT from mainstream news sources, but from groups
and boards like THIS one.

Miles

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Cait" <ansith@...> wrote:
>
>
> This is mind blowing
>
> http://www.fox-news.us/story/0,3566,190215,00.html
>
>
> FOXNEWS.COM
> Bush Administration Media Collusion Memos Surface
> Monday, April 3, 2006
>
> WASHINGTON � In a disturbing turn of events for an administration
> already plagued by sagging poll numbers and waning support for the
Iraq
> war, Friday's revelation that the Bush Administration issued direct
> guidelines for programming to media outlets is troubling even die-
hard
> conservatives.
> Late Friday a series of memos between senior Bush Administration
> officials and management at Viacom, Inc. were leaked calling for the
> media giant to focus on stories and programming choices
that "reinforce
> the Administration's positions" and to "ignore and/or discredit
points
> of view in opposition to the Bush Administration's foreign policy
> objectives for the purposes of National Security."
> Democrats and key civil rights figures were quick to comment on this
> latest chapter of alleged government malfeasance. Democratic Senator
> Barbara Boxer issued a statement calling for a congressional
inquiry.
> "This is it. This is a smoking gun. For years we've been saying that
> liberal and moderate points of view aren't being accurately
reflected
> in the media and this proves our point. The Bush Administration is
> clearly out of touch with the American people, and Viacom should be
> ashamed."
> Other prominent figures were less forgiving. Rev. Al Sharpton called
> the memos "treasonous" and "genocidal" and reiterated his desire for
> impeachment proceedings to commence. "What we have here is a
complete
> disregard for the law, for what is morally correct and for the will
of
> the people. It's been no secret to anyone with a brain that the
> majority of programming that we are exposed to by certain companies
is
> negative, but now it's out in the open. Look at BET. Look at the
> exclusion of voices that accurately represent communities of color.
> It's insidious."
> Media companies have come under increasing fire as of late for their
> portrayal of minorities and for inaccuracies in reporting stories of
> interest to activist communities.
> Most recently, estimates in the participation numbers of protesters
at
> anti-immigration legislation rallies were hotly disputed.
> The media's alleged embracing of artists and stories depicting
people
> of color in a derogatory manner has become a hot-topic issue with
media
> watchdog groups and prominent entertainment commentators alike.
> Davey D, a San Francisco-based music writer and hip-hop historian,
> echoed the sentiment. "It's true, there is no balance in the media,
> especially in hip-hop, where the negativity is most prevalent. All
we
> hear of on a commercial level is pimps, players and gangsters.
That's
> not all us. What about the revolutionary voices? What about artists
> like The Coup? Like Public Enemy and Paris? They have a new album
out
> together that speaks on exactly what's going on right now, but they
> don't get played on commercial radio. We've always argued that our
> voices are systematically suppressed. Well, here's the proof."
> Not all agree, however. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist took a
more
> defensive stance. "Of course it raises some concerns, but we can't
let
> this issue be blown out of proportion. Of course there have to be
media
> guidelines. Hell, if we want to plant I.D. chips in people and
torture
> their loved ones until they break, we will. I know the idea of
> governmental control over what the media can or cannot say during
> wartime may be an uncomfortable topic for some to digest, but it is
a
> necessary fact of life when our enemies are trying to kill us."
> Debra L. Lee, president and CEO of Viacom's Black Entertainment
> Television, agrees. "Even though our moniker is BET, our allegiance
> lies with our government and its directives, not the African-
American
> community. Anyone who believes that we will endorse messages in
> contrast to our government's wishes, or that express dissent, is
sorely
> mistaken."
> Some entertainment industry insiders are becoming increasingly
> concerned, however. One longtime employee of Interscope Records, a
> leading record label and home to rap superstars 50 Cent and Eminem,
> stated recently under the condition of anonymity that the
company "has
> a unique relationship with Viacom" and that it "deliberately
focuses on
> marketing campaigns that depict black people in the worst possible
> light." When told of Rev. Sharpton's likening of the practice to
> 'genocide' on African-Americans, he agreed wholeheartedly, but
> expressed fears of reprisal should he publicly address his concerns.
> "It's beyond national security. That was the reason given at first,
but
> now they just tell us what we have to endorse, and what we have to
> avoid." He added, "these kids eat it up. They don't know the
difference
> between what's real and what's fake."
> An Interscope company spokesperson was unavailable for comment.
> "We will get to the bottom of this," Sharpton continued, "and heads
> will roll. Now that their practices of propaganda are common
knowledge
> even Americans with limited political awareness will demand change."
>
>
>
> Stand up! Speak your mind!
> My weblog:
>
>
>
> "US Constitution, The Bill of Rights 12/15/1791";
> 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or
> prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech,
> or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,
and to
> petition the government for a redress of grievances.'
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 12
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 11:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: [WETHEPEOPLE_UNITED] [Fwd: [catapult] Jury aquits against Judge's Instruction -- juror faces 14 years as she is made an example]

"J. Austin" <dogbonz@shoreline-wireless.com> wrote: To: undisclosed-recipients:;
From: "J. Austin" <dogbonz@shoreline-wireless.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 08:33:17 -0700
Subject: [WETHEPEOPLE_UNITED] [Fwd: [catapult] Jury aquits against Judge's Instruction -- juror
faces 14 years as she is made an example]

-------- Original Message --------

> > http://www.theamericanvoice.com/
> >
> > JURY ACQUITS AGAINST JUDGE'S INSTRUCTIONS
> > State of Idaho retaliates with perjury charges
> >
> >
> > by Francis Steffan
> > TheAmericanVoice.com
> > editor@theamericanvoice.com <mailto:editor@theamericanvoice.com>
> >
> >
> > Carol Asher is a 66-year old retired nun and school
> > teacher who volunteers tirelessly as an assistant to
> > Retired Phoenix, Arizona Police Officer Jack McLamb.
> > Her energies are siphoned into the organization, Aid &
> > Abet Police & Military organization. As a hard worker
> > and a caring person who strives to help others, she is
> > now facing the possibility of serving 14 years in prison.
> >
> >
> > What could a retired nun and school teacher possibly
> > do to warrant fourteen years in prison?
> >
> >
> > She committed what must be considered near blasphemy
> > among American Judges these days; in the privacy and
> > sanctity of the jury deliberation room she may have
> > told the other jurors that ultimately, she answered to
> > a Higher Authority than the judge.
> >
> >
> > In retribution for Carols alleged blasphemy against a
> > wannabe god of the Idaho judiciary, she has been
> > charged by Lawrence G. Wasden, who is the Idaho
> > Attorney General; by Stephen A. Bywater, who is Deputy
> > Attorney General, Chief, Criminal Division and by
> > Justin D. Whatcott, who is Deputy Attorney
> > General--all of whom pretend to work for the people of
> > the state of Idaho. They have charged her with felony
> > perjury for doing her duty as a juror within the
> > confidentiality of the jury deliberation room.
> >
> >
> > Am I Serious?? Sadly YES.
> >
> >
> > Here are some facts as we have them that have led to
> > this point:
> >
> >
> > A man was stopped for a traffic infraction while
> > driving a company owned truck and during the stop as
> > found to have an outstanding warrant against him. He
> > locked the company vehicle as he was to be arrested
> > for the warrant. The Officers decided to have the
> > vehicle impounded and then took the keys away from
> > him, unlocked the vehicle and conducted an "inventory
> > search," which is a necessary device to shield the
> > impounding department from being sued for stealing
> > people's things out of their car or, for less credible
> > reasons as "safety purposes." During the inventory
> > search, a small amount of an illegal drug was
> > allegedly discovered within the company vehicle.
> >
> >
> > Carol Usher was summoned for jury duty and selected to
> > sit on the case described above. She listened to the
> > evidence of the case and conscientiously the facts,
> > and American jurisprudence of the accused being
> > innocent until the State can prove guilt beyond a
> > reasonable doubt. However, the prosecutor and judge
> > must have considered this case, to be a slam-dunk,
> > young-male-minority drug conviction. Carol conducted
> > herself as a thinking, attentive, and conscientious
> > juror, who did her best to pay attention to all the
> > facts so as render a just verdict. She was one of
> > four jurors who voted "not guilty." So why, then is
> > she the only one being prosecuted?
> >
> >
> > It has been reported to The American Voice that during
> > deliberation Carol had sent a note to the judge asking
> > to clarify how the warrantless search was valid, since
> > it had not been based on any probable cause of any
> > crime being committed but under the pretext of
> > inventorying the contents of the locked company
> > vehicle could muster constitutional validity.
> >
> >
> > In reply, the judge responded that he, the prosecutor,
> > and the defense attorney had decided in the Judge's
> > chambers that the search was lawful.
> >
> >
> > Deliberation continued but Carol had additional
> > difficulties identifying any evidence that actually
> > tied the accused to the illegal drugs. As mentioned
> > previously, the accused was driving a company vehicle
> > that had been driven by others within the company
> > prior to the accused's use of it. The prosecution also
> > failed to produce any evidence of the accused's
> > fingerprints on the bag containing the alleged illegal
> > drugs. As Carol discussed this lack of evidence with
> > her fellow jurors within the supposed sanctity and
> > privacy of the jury deliberation chamber she
> > reportedly mentioned to her fellow jurors that she
> > still had a problem with the constitutionality of the
> > search in addition to the lack of evidence produced by
> > the prosecution.
> >
> >
> > The jury foreman jumped up and told Carol that she
> > shouldn't even think about the constitutionality of
> > the search because the judge had already decided that
> > it was lawful. It is further reported that Carol's
> > reply to him was that she answers to a higher
> > authority than the Judge.
> >
> >
> > At the end of their deliberation, Carol and three
> > other jurors had decided that the evidence against the
> > accused left reasonable doubt of the his guilt and,
> > therefore, he was acquitted.
> >
> >
> > Another juror, perhaps unhappy that Carol honestly
> > said what was on her mind, and looking for favor with
> > the local authorities or simply possessing a hatred of
> > God and justice, went to the prosecuting attorney and
> > reported details of the jury deliberation.
> >
> >
> > Apparently in Idaho, and perhaps where you live also,
> > the court requires jurors to sign, under penalty of
> > perjury, that they will decide a case based on the
> > facts. To some this may not read so bad at first
> > glance; however, what this accomplishes is to make a
> > jury impotent. For instance, it is a fact that illegal
> > drugs were found within a vehicle, so search was
> > conducted. But if the search was not lawful, then the
> > evidence cannot be used; likewise, if a search is
> > lawful, then the evidence can be used. Minus any
> > other considerations, the guilt or innocence of the
> > crime of illegal drugs being within the vehicle is
> > determined by a single decision concerning the
> > lawfulness of the search. If this single decision is
> > only the purview of a judge and a jury must yield to
> > the judges, well, then there is no decision left for
> > the jury to make and they are a rubber stamp for the
> > will of the state's judge.
> >
> >
> > This is arguably an extreme example; however, the
> > decision to allow certain evidence to be considered by
> > the jury and other evidence to be withheld is a common
> > tactic used by prosecutors in league with their fellow
> > state employees that judges use to control the facts
> > that only they think should be presented..
> >
> >
> > The argument made and advice given by a judge who
> > writes for "The Judges Journal," Frederic B. Rodgers,
> > states ,"The jury oath I give to jurors selected to
> > try the case makes them promise to respect and follow
> > the applicable law in finding the facts. The court's
> > job, not the jury's, is to determine what laws apply."
> > and that "Violating the jury oath may subject you to
> > prosecution for perjury."
> >
> >
> > One must ask where exactly have judges developed this
> > notion that it is the "courts" -- actually meaning
> > then, the Judge's--prerogative to decide what a law
> > written and defined by the legislature actually means.
> > One would think that a law so complicated and not
> > understandable to an average jurist would be by
> > definition void. "Courts" have ruled that ignorance of
> > the law is supposedly no defense; however, when ones
> > becomes a jurist, the "court" apparently declares them
> > incompetent and tells them what the law is. This
> > appears to be a very self severing double standard.
> >
> >
> > Nevertheless, you have a decision to make. What kind
> > of nation do you want to live in? What kind of nation
> > do you want your children to inherit? Will it be one
> > where probate judges turn disabled men and women into
> > chattel to be destroyed at their will alone? Will it
> > be one where members of the jury are required to sign
> > an oath under penalties of perjury to only rule
> > according to a judge's OPINION of what a law means?
> > Will it be one where judges (Judge Jose Cabranes, 2nd
> > U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals) sink to the level of
> > criticizing the decisions of Northern Juries prior to
> > the Civil War refusing to convict slaves on escape
> > charges that may have forced their return to their
> > owners?
> >
> >
> > Today's judges would have one believe that
> > unrestrained power of the Jury will be the destruction
> > of society and the ringing in of anarchy. Perhaps the
> > judges of King George felt the same? The Founders of
> > this nation and our long standing Supreme Court
> > rulings indicate otherwise. Whatever your view is of
> > the men who founded this nation, one thing seems
> > certain: They realized that there is a difference
> > between being guided by "feelings" and being guided by
> > conscience and they trusted the Jury.
> >
> >
> > "The jury has a right to judge both the law as well as
> > the fact in controversy." -John Jay, 1st Chief Justice
> > United States supreme Court, 1789
> >
> >
> > "The jury has the right to determine both the law and
> > the facts." -Samuel Chase, U. S. supreme Court Justice,
> > 1796, Signer of the unanimous Declaration
> >
> >
> > The jury has the power to bring a verdict in the teeth
> > of both law and fact." -Oliver Wendell Holmes, U.S.
> > supreme Court Justice, 1902
> >
> >
> > "The law itself is on trial quite as much as the cause
> > which is to be decided." -Harlan F. Stone, 12th Chief
> > Justice U.S. supreme Court, 1941
> >
> >
> > "The pages of history shine on instance of the jury's
> > exercise of its prerogative to disregard instructions
> > of the judge..." -U.S.vs Dougherty, 473 F 2nd 113,
> > 1139, (1972)
> >
> >
> > "You have a right to take upon yourselves to judge of
> > both, and to determine the law as well as the fact in
> > controversy." -(State of Georgia vs. Brailsford, et
> > al, 3 Dall 1)
> >
> >
> > "The JURY has an unreviewable and unreversible
> > power...to aquit in disregard of the instructions on
> > the law given by the trial judge..." -U. S. vs. Dougherty, 473 F. 2nd
> > 1113, 1139, (1972)
> >
> >
> > "The opinion which gives to the judges the right to
> > decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not
> > only for themselves in their own sphere of action, but
> > for the legislative and executive also in their
> > spheres, would make the judiciary a despotic branch."
> > -Thomas Jefferson
> >
> >
> > If every juror who serves on a jury must guard his or
> > her tongue in the privacy of the jury deliberation
> > room, fearful of making a statement which will be
> > reported to the prosecutor or the defense attorney or
> > judge by some jury snitch, then what happened to the
> > privacy, the sanctity, and the confidentiality of jury
> > deliberations?
> >
> >
> > Have we gone back to a time in this land where jurors
> > will be punished by the "court" for refusing to render
> > a verdict according to the demands of the government,
> > when jurors will be punished if they refuse to ignore
> > their conscience and blindly accept the orders of the
> > judge as the supreme law of the land? Have we reached
> > a time when to hold the moral and religious
> > reservations held by the majority of the people in
> > this country- those reservations which allow us all to
> > consult our own conscience, to rely upon our own
> > guiding principles and religious teachings - must be
> > ignored, set aside?
> >
> >
> > In a time when there is credible evidence of
> > widespread election rigging and blatant bribery, now
> > called lobbying, and an unprecedented level of
> > impropriety and influence of special interest groups
> > within government, not always American groups either,
> > and a frightening shift in government policy towards
> > the good of corporate interests and away from the
> > interests of the people of the several States of the
> > union we as the People need to hold on to and defend
> > our right to be impartial jurists free to decide what
> > is just by the law, the facts and our conscience.
> >
> >
> > Jurors, as the direct representatives of the people,
> > hold no personal agenda during any trial and most
> > certainly not the government's agenda. Let us not
> > forget that the prosecutors, judges, arresting
> > officers -- and the forensic investigators in most
> > cases -- are all a part of, and receive their
> > paychecks from, government, with personal power bases
> > to build and personal careers to protect through the
> > "productivity" of successful prosecutions resulting in
> > convictions. Jurors have no such stake in the outcome,
> > and are in fact, the only truly objective individuals
> > in the courtroom.
> >
> >
> > Juries were intended as the protectors against
> > government's power-hungry, expansion, and the
> > resultant rise of tyranny. The primary role of our
> > jurors remains that or serving as an independent body
> > to protect private citizens from dangerous,
> > unconstitutional government laws and actions. Many
> > existing laws erode and deny the rights of the people.
> > Jurors protect against tyranny by refusing to convict
> > harmless people. Juries are the last peaceful defense
> > of our civil liberties.
> >
> >
> > Is this a failure of government employees of the state
> > of Idaho to understand the role of the juror and the
> > law? Or is our system of justice failing, which is a
> > failing of our society as a whole?
> >
> >
> > It certainly isn't a failure on the part of Carol
> > Asher who stood up and did her duty of legitimately
> > exercising her rights of reason and conscience.
> >
> >
> > All thinking people should rise to her defense, in
> > righteous indignation, and in outrage over the
> > arrogant, despotic actions of state Attorney-General
> > Wasden, and his staff, all of whom are complicit in an
> > official conspiracy to deny God given rights, in
> > defiant opposition to the clear dictates of our
> > Constitution and long standing American jurisprudence.
> > Because if we do not stand up for Carol Asher now..we
> > are all NEXT.
> >
> >
> > Carol Asher's attorney is Wesley Hoyt at
> > hoytlaw@hotmail.com <mailto:hoytlaw@hotmail.com>, her next court
appearance is
> > scheduled for March 7th.
> >
> > "If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise
> > of fighting a foreign enemy." -- James Madison
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary
> > act." - George Orwell
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > "Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of
> > authority.
> > It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to
guard
> > the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men
in all
> > ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They
promise to be
> > good
> > masters, but they mean to be masters." -- Daniel Webster

Yahoo! Groups Links

------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

* Visit your group "catapultthepropaganda
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/catapultthepropaganda>" on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
catapultthepropaganda-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:catapultthepropaganda-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

To find our page on the net, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WETHEPEOPLE_UNITED/?yguid=119988730

nd our page on the net, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WETHEPEOPLE_UNITED/?yguid=119988730

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "WETHEPEOPLE_UNITED" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WETHEPEOPLE_UNITED-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 13
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:06:18 -0400
From: benjamin pritchard <ben@benjaminpritchard.name>
Subject: HOAX: "Bush Administration Media Collusion Memos Surface"

[This message is not in displayable format]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 14
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:15:28 -0400
From: benjamin pritchard <ben@benjaminpritchard.name>
Subject: Unprecedented US Military Raid On Washington�s Capital Building Leads To Arrest Of Top Homeland Security Leader

[This message is not in displayable format]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 15
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 13:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: emailing: cfr

Subject: emailing: cfr
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 21:32:38 -0700

EarthLink Revolves Around You.

function Go(){return} Your browser does not support Java scripts. Please use the site index to navigate.
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) from http://www.4rie.com/

Let�s start with the smoke and mirrors furnished by the CFR in several of their Annual Reports. Then we will provide the other-side-of-the-coin, as observed by quite a number of independent researchers, and writers.

The CFR�s Annual Report for July 1, 1993-June 30, 1994, page 4, states:

"The Council on Foreign Relations is a nonprofit, and nonpartisan membership organization dedicated to improving the understanding of US foreign policy, and international affairs through the exchange of ideas.

The Council was founded in 1921 shortly after the end of World War I. Several of the American participants in the Paris Peace Conference decided that it was time for more private American citizens to become familiar with the increasing international responsibilities, and obligations of the United States. This decision led to the creation of an organization dedicated to the continuous study of US foreign policy for the benefit of both its members, and a wider audience of interested Americans."

Now, the other side of the coin.

"This august body of �wise men� has effectively dominated the making of foreign policy by the United States government since before World War II. The CFR has included virtually every key national security, and foreign policy adviser of this nation for the past seventy years."
Page 96: "In government policy, the most visible expression of the Establishment is the Council on Foreign Relations, and its publication, Foreign Affairs. Out of some twenty-nine hundred members, at least five hundred are very powerful, another five hundred are from centers of influence, and the rest are influential in academia, the media, business, and finance, the military, or government. A few are token conservatives."

Page 97: "According to a man who had been a member for fifteen years, Rear Admiral Chester Ward, former judge advocate general of the navy from 1956 to 1960.
�This purpose of promoting disarmament, and submergence of US sovereignty, and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government is the only objective revealed to about 95 percent of 1,551 members [in 1975]. There are two other ulterior purposes the CFR influence is being used to promote; but it is improbable that they are known to more than 75 members, or that these purposes ever have even been identified in writing.�

The goals of the Establishment are somewhat strange, and we will discuss them in detail. At the central core is a belief in the superiority of their own skill to form a world system in which enlightened monopolistic capitalism can bring all of the diverse currencies, banking systems, credit, manufacturing, and raw materials into one government-supervised whole, policed of course by their own world army." (Could this be the army of the United Nations?)

CFR membership is made up of present, and past Presidents, Ambassadors, Secretaries of State, Wall Street investors, international bankers, foundation executives, Think Tank executives, lobbyist lawyers, NATO, and Pentagon military leaders, wealthy industrialist, media owners, and executives, university presidents, and key professors, select Senators, and Congressmen, Supreme Court Justices, Federal Judges, and wealthy entrepreneurs.

They hold regular secret meetings including members, and very select guests. Occasionally they will hold a public meeting, and invite the open press (including C-SPAN), in order to give the impression that they are a harmless group engaged only in social activities.

A number of people, when hearing about the CFR ask, "If you say that the CFR is such a secret organization, why is it that we can get a copy of their annual report, which contains a list of their members? Why should I believe you when you say that they are a secret organization?"

Webster�s New Collegiate Dictionary, states that the definition of attribute is "To ascribe by way of cause, inherent quality, interpretation, authorship, or classification..." The literal translation is "You had better not tell the outsiders what we do, or say".
The answer then comes from their own document, the Council on Foreign Relation�s 1992 Annual Report, where they emphatically state, in 20 different places, and in varying terms, that members better not tell:

Page 21: "At all meetings, the Council�s rule of non-attribution applies. This assures participants that they may speak openly without others later attributing their statements to them in public media or forums, or knowingly transmitting them to persons who will."

Page 122: "Like the Council, the Committees encourage candid discourse by holding their meetings on a not-for-attribution basis".

Page 169: Article II of the by-laws states: "It is an express condition of membership in the Council, to which condition every member accedes by virtue of his or her membership, that members will observe such rules, and regulations as may be prescribed from time to time by the Board of Directors concerning the conduct of Council meetings or the attribution of statements made therein, and that any disclosure, public, or other action by a member in contravention thereof may be regarded by the Board of Directors in its sole discretion as grounds for termination or suspension of membership pursuant to Article I of the by-laws."

Page 174: "Full freedom of expression is encouraged at Council meetings. Participants are assured that they may speak openly, as it is the tradition of the Council that others will not attribute or characterize their statements in public media or forums or knowingly transmit them to persons who will. All participants are expected to honor that commitment."

Page 175: "It would not be in compliance with the reformulated Rule, however, for any meeting participant (i) to publish a speaker�s statement in attributed form in a newspaper; (ii) to repeat it on television or radio, or on a speaker�s platform, or in a classroom; or (iii) to go beyond a memo of limited circulation, by distributing the attributed statement in a company or government agency newspaper. The language of the Rule also goes out of its way to make it clear that a meeting participant is forbidden knowingly to transmit the attributed statement to a newspaper reporter or other such person who is likely to publish it in a public medium. The essence of the Rule as reformulated is simple enough: participants in Council meetings should not pass along an attributed statement in circumstances where there is substantial risk that it will promptly be widely circulated or published."

... "In order to encourage to the fullest a free, frank, and open exchange of ideas in Council meetings, the Board of Directors has prescribed, in addition to the Non-Attribution Rule, the following guidelines. All participants in Council meetings are expected to be familiar with, and adhere to these Guidelines. ..."

Page 176: "Members bringing guests should complete a "guest notice card", and acquaint their guests with the Council�s Non-Attribution Rule governing what is said at meetings."

Later on page 176: "As a condition of use, the officers of the Council shall require each user of Council records to execute a prior written commitment that he will not directly or indirectly attribute to any living person any assertion of fact or opinion based upon any Council record without first obtaining from such person his written consent thereto."

In "A letter from the Chairman" in the 1994 Annual Report for the CFR, Peter G. Peterson states on page 7, that:

"... Members had occasion to meet in intensive off-the-record sessions with Secretary of State [Warren] Christopher, National Security Advisor [Anthony] Lake, Secretary [of State emeritus, George Pratt] Shultz, Ambassador [Mickey] Kantor, Under Secretary of the Treasury [Lawrence H.] Summers, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and other ranking officials. Next on our agenda are plans for reaching out to congressional leaders as well, an opportunity we will fashion as one component of an enhanced Washington Program."

The CFR�s 1999 Annual Report, page 5, states their three goals:

1. Add value by improving understanding of world affairs and by providing new ideas for US foreign policy.

2. Transform the Council into a truly national organization to benefit from the expertise and experience of leaders nationwide.

3. Find and nurture the next generation of foreign policy leaders and thinkers.

These are "THEIR" words, not mine. I am simply reporting these facts to you. If this is not a secret organization, then why would they be so emphatic, and state in 20 different ways that non-attribution (or you better not tell) was so important, in their very own annual report? In addition, if you are proud of what you say, and do, then you don�t care whether it becomes public knowledge, or not. The other side of this coin is: if you are doing something illegal, immoral, unethical, unpopular, and/or unconstitutional, you will do whatever is necessary to see that it is kept secret.

In his book, "The ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT", Dr. Carroll Quigley writes,

"One wintry afternoon in February 1891, three men were engaged in earnest conversation in London. From that conversation were to flow consequences of the greatest importance to the British Empire, and to the world as a whole. For these men were organizing a secret society that was, for more than fifty years, to be one of the most important forces in the formulation, and execution of British imperial and foreign policy.

The three men who were thus engaged were already well known in England. The leader was Cecil Rhodes, fabulously wealthy empire builder, and the most important person in South Africa. The second was William T. Stead, the famous, and probably also the most sensational, journalist of the day. The third was Reginald Baliol Brett, later known as Lord Esher, friend, and confidant of Queen Victoria, and later to be the most influential advisor of King Edward VII, and King George V.

The details of this important conversation will be examined later. At present we need only point out that the three drew up a plan of organization for their secret society, and a list of original members. The plan for organization provided for an inner circle, to be known as "The Society of the Elect", and an outer circle, to be known as "The Association of Helpers". Within The Society of the Elect, the real power was to be exercised by the leader, and a "Junta of Three". The leader was to be Rhodes, and the Junta was to be Stead, Brett, and Alfred Milner. In accordance with this decision, Milner was added to the society by Stead shortly after the meeting we have described."

- Quigley, Carroll (1910-1977), The Anglo-American Establishment, From Rhodes to Cliveden, 1981, Books In Focus, NY, NY pg. 3

Of the Secret Societies goals, and methods of operation Quigley writes, "The goals which Rhodes, and Milner sought, and the methods by which they hoped to achieve them were so similar by 1902 that the two are almost indistinguishable. Both sought to unite the world, and above all the English-speaking world, in a federal structure around Britain. Both felt that this goal could best be achieved by a secret band of men united to one another by devotion to the common cause, and by personal loyalty to one another. Both felt that this band should pursue its goal by secret political, and economic influence behind the scenes, and by the control of journalistic, educational, and propaganda agencies... - " Quigley, Carroll (1910-1977), The Anglo-American Establishment, From Rhodes to Cliveden, 1981, Books In Focus, NY, NY pg. 49

Between 1910-1915 the Secret Society evolved into an international group of coconspirators called Round Table Groups that were established in seven nations: Britain, South Africa, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, India, and the United States. (The British Round Table was actually created in England in Feb. 5, 1891. In the US it is called the Council on foreign Relations, in England it is the Royal Institute for International Affairs, in Canada the Canadian Institute of International Affairs, in Chile it is the Chilean Council on Foreign Relations, and so on.)

In 1920 the Secret Society evolved into the Institutes for International Affairs, and the Council on Foreign Relations. Many of the founding fathers belonged to America's first intelligence agency the INQUIRY.

Note - The above quotes were furnished by "Round Table", who has a web site at: http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807

The CFR could not accomplish their goals without complicity of the mainstream news media, which they absolutely control with an iron fist. They do this using psychological operations (PSYOPS). The RAND Corp. is one of the chief users of this technique. This is clearly explained by the following Internet message:

"Not many people have heard of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) or know how they operate. This is not an accident, the group has purposely maintained a low profile. The CFR is a branch of an international group of coconspirators called the Round Table Group. This group has been controlling public opinion throughout the world for over 100 years.

The Joint Chiefs of Staff have defined psychological operations (PSYOPS) as those that: "include psychological warfare, and, in addition, encompass those political, military, economic, and ideological actions planned, and conducted to create in neutral or friendly foreign groups the emotions, attitudes, or behavior to support achievement of national objectives." Another proposal "develops the concept of 'strategic psychological operations' as aimed at influencing, and shaping decision-makers' power to govern, or control their followers." The American people, are among the groups being targeted, and controlled.

"Tactics of Deception" are formalized psychological warfare techniques. "Tactics of Deception" build a psychological environment that differs from the material environment. "Tactics of deception" are used to create false reality worlds. In terms of perceptual psychology, "Tactics of Deception" provoke illusory precepts. To influence behavior the deception must follow three basic rules. First, the deception must be "reasonable"; second there must be no simple way of checking the facts in the case; and third the use of deception should not discredit a source which may have valuable future potential.

One way to stop this group is to expose them, and their techniques to the people they are manipulating. One "Tactic of Deception" used to achieve Council on Foreign Relations aims, is to place Council members on both sides of an issue. Another "Tactic of Deception" is to use CFR control of the legal, legislative, and court systems to create the perception that laws are being followed when in fact, Lawyers, Legislators, and Justices are committing blatant illegalities to further CFR aims. A third "Tactic of Deception" is simply to lie."

Source: roundtable�s Web Page: http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807

Another excellent example of deception and cover up is the book, "The Kennedy Tapes". Two CFR members, Ernest R. May and Philip D. Zelikow, supposedly listened to all of President John F. Kennedy audio tapes and wrote this book quoting all of the interesting facts so as to assure the public that there were no other important statements made on these tapes that the public would care to know about. There were to motives involved here: (1) to print only what the Elite wanted printed about the JFK assassination, and (2) to throw any other potential researchers off the trail. This was a very grueling task of listening to hundreds of hours of taped conversations. Therefore, other researchers should just "take their word" that they had printed all of the interesting facts from these tapes. I suspect that two non-CFR researchers would have written an entirely different book.

Historian Michael Beschloss listened to the White House tapes transcribed by Lyndon Johnson during his time in office, and wrote a book, "Taking Charge: The Johnson White House Tapes, 1963-1964". Is it not strange that this author is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations?

As Peter Grose stated in his Council on Foreign Relations Book, Continuing the Inquiry (1996) on page 5:
"They (the British) proposed a permanent Anglo-American Institute of International Affairs, with one branch in London, the other in New York."

The headquarters for the CFR is The Harold Pratt House located at 58 East 68th Street in New York City, New York 10021. Oddly enough, this building is located just across the street from the Russian (former Soviet) Embassy.

---------------------------------
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you are the owner of an article, logo, banner or
picture and want it removed, don't have a cow. Just email me and I will remove it. admin@government-propaganda.com

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2�/min or less.

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 16
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 13:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matt Walch <caribbean10@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: MANDATORY AIDS TESTING -Clinton's Slippery Slope

And isn't it interesting that there are several offers out there offering money for things like AIDS, 9\11, etc. I love all these so called "conspiracy theories". I know this is a 9\11 site but thought I would just take a sec to post some of these offers that I have come across. Michael Ruppert is offering $1000 to anyone who can disprove any of his 9\11 information. John Rappaport (nomorefakenews.com) is offering $10,000 to anyone who can prove that AIDS and HIV are related (as claimed by Dr. Robert Gallo who supposedly was the first to identify HIV\AIDS). And I can't recall who it is, but i'm sure if you have researched anything on 9\11 then one of you have heard about a German guy offering a car (don't recall exactly what car but some kind of nice 6 figure dollar car) to anyone who can prove that the "official" story is correct.

To top this article off, I will leave you with Thomas Kean's interview and lecture at a small university. And in all the questioning that he goes through, even about building 7, he totally by passes all the questions and definitely does a garbage job of not explaining at all what happened to building 7, even when a reporter SPECIFICALLY goes into detail about how building 7 was the only steel structure to have collapsed due to fire, no plane hit it, and Larry Silverstein even was on PBS telling to "pull" the building. Even after all that, Kean still made little comment on it. YET, he states that they covered all that in the 9\11 Commission Report. RED FLAG!!! Have any of you read the report??? NO MENTION OF BUILDING 7!!! Let me say that again. NOT ONE SINGLE MENTION OF BUILDING 7!! David Ray Griffin's book The 9\11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, is WAY better and definitely not only points out the facts about building 7 (which was so blatantly left
out of not only the media and gov't investigations on 9\11, but Thomas Kean's report as well) was detailed very well.

Sorry this was so long but I get very bothered when I see these interviews and these crooks just get to sit up there and blatantly lie and the only justice we see is Mossoui in a court room. Hopefully soon, some REAL justice can be done with the REAL terrorists! Start by investigating 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, D.C.!

http://jonesreport.com/images/windows_media_high.html

This is the greatest work of fiction I've ever read:

amy dalzell <amydalzell@yahoo.com> wrote:
Really? That's interesting. I have no hard evidence about the origins of AIDS, but I sure it's out there.

Maybe we can hope that 9/11 will be the catalyst that will eventually undermine the mountain of lies told to the American people just since 1955 (my birth).

Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com> wrote:
A few years, ago, The Guardian Newspaper of England, (Greg Palast), printed an article stating that aids developed in Africa in areas, where the U.S. just happened to distribute "small pox vaccines."

amy dalzell <amydalzell@yahoo.com> wrote: I think, perhaps, we should be worrying more about where AIDS came from in the first place. Let's see - c. 1979 - hmmmm - monogamy, hypocrisy, and marriage (and religion) being challenged on every front in the U.S. and the general Western world...

hmmmmmm....women getting out of line.....What do we need to keep these people in their place?

hmmmm...

A heterosexual WHITE hegemonic culture being challenged by people who want to live their own lives and LOVE each other...

What to we need? hmmmmm...

'How 'bout an incurable, sexually transmitted disease that originated in AFRICA from MONKEYS that (initially) affects HOMOSEXUALS!!

hmmmmmm........

Whom do you think...Dupont? Monsanto?

Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com> wrote:
MANDATORY AIDS TESTING - Clinton's Slippery Slope
30 March 2006

Bill Clinton has called for mandatory testing for HIV/AIDS in nations that have high infection rates.

Clinton (as in I did not inhale, I did not have sex with that woman in the stained navy dress) is hereby telling the impoverished nations of the world that they must be tested for AIDS, for their own good.

Mandatory testing for one country, soon to be many more. Woops! Live in the wrong country? Sorry. You will soon be tested for AIDS.

Continued: http://mytown.ca/garger/

The world can only be redeemed through action--movement -- motion. Uncoerced, unbribed and unbought, humanity will move toward the light.
Alice Hubbard's introduction to An American Bible (1912)

---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger�s low PC-to-Phone call rates.

---------------------------------
Blab-away for as little as 1�/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.

---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

SPONSORED LINKS
United state military Trademark united state United state government grant United state flag United state army United state coin

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

---------------------------------

Matt Walch
Patriotic Author\Researcher
www.911confidential.com

"It is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing country to danger. It works the same for any country."-- Adolf Hitler's Reischmarschall, Herman Goering

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 17
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 13:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: DOUGLAS CLARK <bushsept11mastermind@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Nazi U.S. Govt. - Odessa File, Simon Wiesenthal: SS continues -wide spread to governments

WHAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND IS WHY OVER 80% OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT THERE IS A GOVERNMENT COVERUP OF THE 9/11 FACTS, WHY THE "LIBERAL" MEDIA (THAT'S SUPPOSED TO HATE BUSH) REFUSES TO GO AFTER THE STORY.

OVER 80% IS MORE THAN A MANDATE!!

Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com> wrote:

Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com> wrote:

---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger�s low PC-to-Phone call rates.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 18
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 13:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: DOUGLAS CLARK <bushsept11mastermind@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Nazi U.S. Govt. - Odessa File, Simon Wiesenthal: SS continues -wide spread to governments

Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com> wrote:

Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com> wrote:

---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger�s low PC-to-Phone call rates.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 19
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 15:35:57 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)
From: "Cait" <ansith@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Concrete evidence of conspiracy by govt. to treasonously, cover up, and violate civil rights of free speech

I sent this through yesterday, after receiving it in email from another list
from a sender that I respect.. When I clicked on the link to verify the
story, it appeared to be a valid FoxNews website. The links on the page were
correct, the images and ads were the same, however, it is NOT a real fox
story :(

My browser did not reveal the scrolling text at the top of the page that
says this article is satire ONLY. (Missing flash plugins will kill ya every
time)

I regret sending this post through the group, and moreover, regret taking
someone else's word on its authenticity without triple checking the sources
myself.

My apologies to all,
Cait

-------Original Message-------

From: Judy Cunningham
Date: 04/06/06 11:52:52
To: Judy Cunningham; SnowFunMan@aol.com; comraderoman@yahoo.com;
tffoti@verizon.net; jazzyday@earthlink.net; Steve@bauzen.com; tffoti@hotmail
com; alan.good@earthlink.net; lakezoarian@yahoo.com; revolutionchl@yahoo.com
mcc@berryhilllodge.com; mimaldeau@yahoo.com; frm@panix.com;
reddog_15@netzero.com; Rorybmovie@nyc.rr.com; inphoman@hotmail.com;
email2jules@yahoo.com; janette007@sbcglobal.net; jf777@juno.com;
ConvertDocs@aol.com; TheRadicalEducator@hotmail.com; CarolTheArtist@aol.com;
mitchelcohen@mindspring.com; info@hillaryclinton.com; gabriel@911truth.org;
bestorandrew@hotmail.com; Sbender@nyc.rr.com; savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com;
larryeverest@hotmail.com; yipz@verizon.net; AutVsMaj@aol.com;
bob@normalbobsmith.com; cathiebell@yahoo.com; charity139@hotmail.com;
david@911Truth.org; Denright@aol.com; drifthair@yahoo.com; DSmith8100@aol
com; erickwilund@yahoo.com; Ezrabg@aol.com; francyco@earthlink.net;
GALLANT4LIFE@aol.com; gppilieri@comcast.net; jfs922b@yahoo.com;
Jewell624@aol.com; katkatkatkat@hotmail.com; KayakHerb@aol.com;
lanwanman@nyc.rr.com; leeharveyinc@yahoo.com; Lin119978@aol.com;
loonelectrics@yahoo.com; MegaWebNewYork@aol.com; MeyersJoel@yahoo.com;
Memph12@aol.com; Msldyd@aol.com; nicholas@911Truth.org; Obscene99@aol.com;
pepicellij@hotmail.com; Posrp@hotmail.com; Sept11insidejob@aol.com;
SRTHERINC@aol.com; susanwolfe@optonline.net; Talk2me24hrs@aol.com;
ThaFlash23@aol.com; info@johnkerry.com; sander@voxpopnet.net;
mruppert@copvcia.com; service@copvcia.com; subscribers@fromthewilderness.com
letters@nytimes.com; bushcommissionvolunteers@lists.re-sist.net;
911truthaction@yahoogroups.com; aclufl@aclufl.org; bear@truthlaidbear.com;
bobnhelen2@sbcglobal.net; scoop@huffingtonpost.com; letters@vf.com;
hustler@lfp.com; info@judicialwatch.org; insideinfo911@yahoo.com;
mojo_j_2000@yahoo.com; letters@nationalenquirer.com; newsdesk@wsvn.com;
webmaster@rense.com; rumormillnews@rumormillnews.com; slicingthroats@yahoo
com; lettersproblems@salon.com; lisa.l.stone@gmail.com; aperez@wsvn.com;
info@montelms.org; madcownews@gmail.com; wrh@whatreallyhappened.com;
911@email.com; Editor@rawstory.com; foxnewsonline@foxnews.com;
jcphelan10@yahoo.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] Concrete evidence of conspiracy by govt. to
treasonously, cover up, and violate civil rights of free speech

This is firsthand concrete evidence, of the legal type that can be used in
court. This prooves that the first amendment right to speech is
deliberately blocked, in the papers by the government, and who does it,
--and it, also, prooves that the government is a conspiracy to cover up and
hide what it does. This is concrete evidence of treason!!

Cait <ansith@gmail.com> wrote:

This is mind blowing

http://www.fox-news.us/story/0,3566,190215,00.html

FOXNEWS.COM
Bush Administration Media Collusion Memos Surface
Monday, April 3, 2006

WASHINGTON � In a disturbing turn of events for an administration
already plagued by sagging poll numbers and waning support for the Iraq
war, Friday's revelation that the Bush Administration issued direct
guidelines for programming to media outlets is troubling even die-hard
conservatives.
Late Friday a series of memos between senior Bush Administration
officials and management at Viacom, Inc. were leaked calling for the
media giant to focus on stories and programming choices that "reinforce
the Administration's positions" and to "ignore and/or discredit points
of view in opposition to the Bush Administration's foreign policy
objectives for the purposes of National Security."
Democrats and key civil rights figures were quick to comment on this
latest chapter of alleged government malfeasance. Democratic Senator
Barbara Boxer issued a statement calling for a congressional inquiry.
"This is it. This is a smoking gun. For years we've been saying that
liberal and moderate points of view aren't being accurately reflected
in the media and this proves our point. The Bush Administration is
clearly out of touch with the American people, and Viacom should be
ashamed."
Other prominent figures were less forgiving. Rev. Al Sharpton called
the memos "treasonous" and "genocidal" and reiterated his desire for
impeachment proceedings to commence. "What we have here is a complete
disregard for the law, for what is morally correct and for the will of
the people. It's been no secret to anyone with a brain that the
majority of programming that we are exposed to by certain companies is
negative, but now it's out in the open. Look at BET. Look at the
exclusion of voices that accurately represent communities of color.
It's insidious."
Media companies have come under increasing fire as of late for their
portrayal of minorities and for inaccuracies in reporting stories of
interest to activist communities.
Most recently, estimates in the participation numbers of protesters at
anti-immigration legislation rallies were hotly disputed.
The media's alleged embracing of artists and stories depicting people
of color in a derogatory manner has become a hot-topic issue with media
watchdog groups and prominent entertainment commentators alike.
Davey D, a San Francisco-based music writer and hip-hop historian,
echoed the sentiment. "It's true, there is no balance in the media,
especially in hip-hop, where the negativity is most prevalent. All we
hear of on a commercial level is pimps, players and gangsters. That's
not all us. What about the revolutionary voices? What about artists
like The Coup? Like Public Enemy and Paris? They have a new album out
together that speaks on exactly what's going on right now, but they
don't get played on commercial radio. We've always argued that our
voices are systematically suppressed. Well, here's the proof."
Not all agree, however. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist took a more
defensive stance. "Of course it raises some concerns, but we can't let
this issue be blown out of proportion. Of course there have to be media
guidelines. Hell, if we want to plant I.D. chips in people and torture
their loved ones until they break, we will. I know the idea of
governmental control over what the media can or cannot say during
wartime may be an uncomfortable topic for some to digest, but it is a
necessary fact of life when our enemies are trying to kill us."
Debra L. Lee, president and CEO of Viacom's Black Entertainment
Television, agrees. "Even though our moniker is BET, our allegiance
lies with our government and its directives, not the African-American
community. Anyone who believes that we will endorse messages in
contrast to our government's wishes, or that express dissent, is sorely
mistaken."
Some entertainment industry insiders are becoming increasingly
concerned, however. One longtime employee of Interscope Records, a
leading record label and home to rap superstars 50 Cent and Eminem,
stated recently under the condition of anonymity that the company "has
a unique relationship with Viacom" and that it "deliberately focuses on
marketing campaigns that depict black people in the worst possible
light." When told of Rev. Sharpton's likening of the practice to
'genocide' on African-Americans, he agreed wholeheartedly, but
expressed fears of reprisal should he publicly address his concerns.
"It's beyond national security. That was the reason given at first, but
now they just tell us what we have to endorse, and what we have to
avoid." He added, "these kids eat it up. They don't know the difference
between what's real and what's fake."
An Interscope company spokesperson was unavailable for comment.
"We will get to the bottom of this," Sharpton continued, "and heads
will roll. Now that their practices of propaganda are common knowledge
even Americans with limited political awareness will demand change."

Stand up! Speak your mind!
My weblog:

"US Constitution, The Bill of Rights 12/15/1791";
'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
petition the government for a redress of grievances.'

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 20
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 13:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com>
Subject: it has come to my attention that..............

A link that I sent comes up page not found. This is a new ploy. PLEASE just go to www.conspiracyarchive.com and scroll about halfway down the page and you will find the article on project paperclip and the 767 nazi war criminal vermin that the Illuminati/cia rescued from life in prison and gave new lives to here inn the U.S.A.! EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM Working for the government!

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 21
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 14:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: it has come to my attention that..............

OH MY GOD! The article is no longer on the front page and you will have to do a keyword search for it!

Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com> wrote: A link that I sent comes up page not found. This is a new ploy. PLEASE just go to www.conspiracyarchive.com and scroll about halfway down the page and you will find the article on project paperclip and the 767 nazi war criminal vermin that the Illuminati/cia rescued from life in prison and gave new lives to here inn the U.S.A.! EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM Working for the government!
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

---------------------------------

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2�/min or less.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 22
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 16:21:12 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)
From: "Debi Clark" <debiclark@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Fw: AT&T Forwards ALL Internet Traffic Into NSA Says EFF

-------Original Message-------

From: Jim Kirwan
Date: 04/06/06 16:03:57
To: jr@rense.com
Cc: Graham Jukes; fpf@chello.nl; apfn@apfn.org
Subject: Fw: AT&T Forwards ALL Internet Traffic Into NSA Says EFF

----- Original Message -----
From: Lajocanda@aol.com

Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:49 AM
Subject: AT&T Forwards ALL Internet Traffic Into NSA Says EFF

AT&T Forwards ALL Internet Traffic Into NSA Says EFF - Forums powered by
Reason and Principle
http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat
php?Cat=&Board=news_computers&Number=294544114#Post294544114

AT&T Forwards ALL Internet Traffic Into NSA Says EFF [ Post 294544114 ]

Category: News & Opinion (General) Topic: Computers & Internet
Synopsis:
Source: www.linuxelectrons.com
Published: April 6, 2006 Author:
For Education and Discussion Only. Not for Commercial Use.

AT&T Forwards ALL Internet Traffic Into NSA Says EFF

Thursday, April 06 2006 @ 03:13 AM CDT
Contributed by: ByteEnable

San Francisco – The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) on Wednesday
filed the legal briefs and evidence supporting its motion for a preliminary
injunction in its class-action lawsuit against AT&T. After asking EFF to
hold back the documents so that it could review them, the Department of
Justice consented to EFF's filing them under seal — a well-established
procedure that prohibits public access and permits only the judge and the
litigants to see the evidence. While not a party to the case, the government
was concerned that even this procedure would not provide sufficient security
and has represented to the Court that it is "presently considering whether
and, if so, how it will participate in this case."

"The evidence that we are filing supports our claim that AT&T is diverting
Internet traffic into the hands of the NSA wholesale, in violation of
federal wiretapping laws and the Fourth Amendment," said EFF Staff Attorney
Kevin Bankston. "More than just threatening individuals' privacy, AT&T's
apparent choice to give the government secret, direct access to millions of
ordinary Americans' Internet communications is a threat to the Constitution
itself. We are asking the Court to put a stop to it now."

EFF's evidence regarding AT&T's dragnet surveillance of its networks
includes a declaration by Mark Klein, a retired AT&T telecommunications
technician, and several internal AT&T documents. This evidence was bolstered
and explained by the expert opinion of J. Scott Marcus, who served as Senior
Technical Advisor for Internet Technology to the Federal Communications
Commission from July 2001 until July 2005.

The internal AT&T documents and portions of the supporting declarations have
been submitted to the Court under a tentative seal, a procedure that allows
AT&T five court days to explain to the Court why the information should be
kept from the public.

"The public deserves to know about AT&T's illegal program," said EFF Legal
Director Cindy Cohn. "In an abundance of caution, we are providing AT&T with
an opportunity to explain itself before this material goes on the public
docket, but we believe that justice will ultimately require full disclosure.

The NSA program came to light in December, when the New York Times reported
that the President had authorized the agency to intercept telephone and
Internet communications inside the United States without the authorization
of any court. Over the ensuing weeks, it became clear that the NSA program
has been intercepting and analyzing millions of Americans' communications,
with the help of the country's largest phone and Internet companies,
including AT&T.

"Mark Klein is a true American hero," said EFF Staff Attorney Kurt Opsahl.
He has bravely come forward with information critical for proving AT&T's
involvement with the government's invasive surveillance program."

In the lawsuit, EFF is representing the class of all AT&T residential
customers nationwide. Working with EFF in the lawsuit are the law firms
Traber & Voorhees, Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP and the
Law Office of Richard R. Wiebe.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discussion about 09/11/2001

Friday, April 07, 2006

[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1212

No comments:

About Me

Last posts