Thursday, February 09, 2006

SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?]

Wow, that is cool! Thanks.

--- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "perpetualynquisitive"
<perpetualynquisitive@...> wrote:
>
> I wondered why perpetualynquisitive could not capture a still of the
> scene in "Armageddon" which is referred to. Is it possible to capture
> off a DVD?
>
> Sorry about that oversight, sometimes I forget that not everyone has
> seen these, I have several dozen more from Armageddon, building
> collapsing, dust clouds chasing people, etc. I just have to dig the
> rest out of my archives.
>
> http://img143.imageshack.us/my.php?image=armageddonaftermath6yo.jpg
> <http://img143.imageshack.us/my.php?image=armageddonaftermath6yo.jpg>
>
> Same pic as above with a "meme" highlighted by green circle.
> http://img398.imageshack.us/full.php?image=copyofarmageddon8587fe.jpg
> <http://img398.imageshack.us/full.php?image=copyofarmageddon8587fe.jpg>
>
> Aftermath
> http://img267.imageshack.us/my.php?image=armageddonaftermath0ug.jpg
> <http://img267.imageshack.us/my.php?image=armageddonaftermath0ug.jpg>
>
> The beginning of the movie also contains the "Saddam did it meme"
> a cabbie played by Mark Cooper says, "Saddam Hussien is bombing us!
> We're at war!" while Manhattan is being pounded by a meteor shower.
>
> P.S. Just to give everyone an idea of the amount of material that I have
> to go through and this doesn't include several dozen CDs or archived
> harddrives. I'm like the NSA, vacuum up everything that I can and go
> over it later;
> http://img403.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sourcematerial8lw.jpg
> <http://img403.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sourcematerial8lw.jpg>
>
> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "ron_winn" <ron_winn@>
> wrote:
> >
> > I wondered why perpetualynquisitive could not capture a still of the
> scene in "Armageddon" which is referred to. Is it possible to capture
> off a DVD?
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Rosalee Grable
> > To: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 5:06 PM
> > Subject: Re: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled
> Demolition Limited Hangout?]
> >
> >
> > So where in the fark were you while I was getting beat up from all
> > directions all alone.
> > It was more than a year before anybody spoke up for me.
> >
> > I am effective in internet debate format but the effort to recast my
> > long slog from there to here into useful essay makes me need a nap.
> >
> > I have the video skills now to make a DVD.
> > the videos at
> > http://thewebfairy.com/911/missilegate/video.htm
> > It feels like baling the ocean with a teaspoon tho.
> >
> > I have learned that videos are unmixed into "elemental streams".
> These
> > elemental streams seem to encode more information than can be
> expressed
> > in the low resolution pixel grid.
> > I have no other explanation for why the first hit object(s) make
> such
> > detailed beautyshots while equal enlargement of the Pentagon Art
> Frames
> > reveals flat blobs.
> > http://thewebfairy.com/911/flyingpig/beautyshots.htm
> > vs.
> >
> http://thewebfairy.com/911/pentagon/frames/startribune/st5_detail.jpg
> > On this detail it's particularly evident how the Art Frame has been
> > stretched horizontally.
> >
> >
> > perpetualynquisitive wrote:
> > > I was in near shock watching the events that morning, the replay
> of
> > > the 'plane' hitting WTC 2 over and over and over and over and,
> well
> > > you get the idea.
> > >
> > > It was after seeing the Fairbanks interview (Diane Sawyer) and his
> > > clip of the plane, when he said "it disappeared like a bad special
> > > effect" that caused the light bulb in my head to start blinking
> > > "Bingo, IT was a bad special effect!" For when they showed it slow
> > > motion, the plane did not react when it impacted the building,
> it just
> > > slipped right into it, like a hand into a glove.
> > >
> > > I also had a strong feeling of deja vu on 9/11, I was sure that
> I had
> > > seen the WTC heavily damaged before by a big explosion that left
> a big
> > > hole in the building. (it was in early 2002 that I verified that
> I had
> > > indeed seen the WTC in that condition when I picked up
> "Armageddon" on
> > > DVD)
> > >
> > > In the summer of 2002 I was watching The Simpsons one evening
> and low
> > > behold the episode Sideshow Bob's Last Gleaming comes on. After I
> > > heard Homer say "Let's Roll", while chasing a hijacked airplane,
> which
> > > escapes a failed military intercept and then crashes into a
> building,
> > > almost died as I had just had a discussion about the supposed
> failure
> > > to intercept with someone the day before and had told him it was
> > > red-herring disinformation to reinforce the 'plane' hoax.
> > >
> > > He is of the thinking that there must have been a miscommunication
> > > with NORAD at best or the military was told to look the other way,
> > > such as the case in Pearl Harbour at the very worst.
> > >
> > > This person is a total military buff, from the war of
> independence to
> > > the present and can name almost every major military/battle
> statistic,
> > > weapon platform, personnel, tactics etc, and he just couldn't
> > > understand how the hijacked planes could fly around as long as
> they
> > > did without getting shot out of the sky.
> > >
> > > As I explaned (hehe) to him, no planes = no airforce failure = no
> > > standdown = no reprimands for military personnel.
> > >
> > > --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable
> <webfairy@>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> You beat me to figuring out No Planes.
> > >> I was intrigued by the Where's The Boeing site, back when I
> first heard
> > >> of it, March 2002.
> > >> I started looking at videos and noticed the plane was missing
> from the
> > >> first hit right off.
> > >> I thought we would have the crime solved by summer.
> > >> I remember getting drunk to celebrate, and to get used to the
> notion
> > >> they used indescribables, not a plane at all.
> > >> There would have been no celebration if I'd been able to guess
> that
> > >> people would be barely catching on in 2006, with economic crash
> and
> > >> synthetic terror hard on our heels.
> > >> People that stupid deserve to be slaves, is the only answer I've
> > >>
> > > come up
> > >
> > >> with.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >>> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > >>>
> > >>> * Visit your group "911InsideJobbers
> > >>> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers>" on the
> web.
> > >>>
> > >>> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > >>> 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
>
<mailto:911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> >
> > >
> > >>>
> > >>> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
> of
> > >>> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS Government procurement Government leasing
> Government grants for women
> > Government lease Government contract Government money
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------> ------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > a.. Visit your group "911InsideJobbers" on the web.
> >
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------> ------
> >
>


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

No comments: