Re: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?]

There are no wings.
The UAVs have stubby wings we can't see from the distance, tho the
flashframe catches one pretty well.
http://missilegate.com/blob11
There are different kinds, extremely reminisent of the different
coloration of the orbs seen over madrid on several occasions.
They seem to have a whatzit base there.

Double Formation of Secret Sphere UFOs with Satellite Orbs - Jan. 4,
2006
<http://www.orbwar.com/double-formation-secret-sphere-ufos-satellite-orbs.htm>

Large Video Clip of Dual Formations of UFO Spheres with Orb Satellites -
Jan. 4, 2006
<http://www.orbwar.com/large-video-clip-dual-formations-ufo-spheres-orb-satellites.htm>

4 Orbs Traveling in Group Flying Across Madrid - Jan. 4, 2006
<http://www.orbwar.com/4-orbs-traveling-in-groups-flying-across-madrid.htm>

Higher Altitude Orb Paces a Line Formation of Orbs that is Trailed by a
Larger Orb - Jan. 4, 2006
<http://www.orbwar.com/higher-altitude-orb-paces-line-formation-orbs-and-larger-orb.htm>

Perfect V-Formation of Plasma Spheres with a Trailing Orb - Jan. 5, 2006
<http://www.orbwar.com/perfect-v-formation-plasma-sphere-trailing-orb.htm>

Video of UFOs Camouflaging Themselves as a Flock of Seagulls - Jan. 5,
2006
<http://www.orbwar.com/video-of-ufo-camouflaging-as-flock-of-seagulls.htm>

Numerous UFO Groups in the Skies of Madrid, Spain - Jan. 22, 2006
<http://www.orbwar.com/numerous-ufo-groups-in-the-skies-of-madrid-spain.htm>

ron_winn wrote:
> WF it will be a best seller if you sold it instead of giving it away
> for the cause. Only those who would buy it would be interested enough
> to see it.
>
> BTW http://thewebfairy.com/911/missilegate
> has got to be the best quality shot of "11" we have seen. So much so
> that I reckon we can all see that for the amount of port wing shown in
> this clip [cast in shadow] that there should be more starboard wing
> showing. What there is of this wing seems to be pointing upward. What
> is it about these starboard wings, one doesn't show, one disappears
> and another doesn't leave a impact where it hit on the Pentagon. The
> starboard wing is the right wing, isn't. Is THIS a code?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Rosalee Grable <mailto:webfairy@thewebfairy.com>
> *To:* 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 08, 2006 5:06 PM
> *Subject:* Re: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled
> Demolition Limited Hangout?]
>
> So where in the fark were you while I was getting beat up from all
> directions all alone.
> It was more than a year before anybody spoke up for me.
>
> I am effective in internet debate format but the effort to recast my
> long slog from there to here into useful essay makes me need a nap.
>
> I have the video skills now to make a DVD.
> the videos at
> http://thewebfairy.com/911/missilegate/video.htm
> It feels like baling the ocean with a teaspoon tho.
>
> I have learned that videos are unmixed into "elemental streams".
> These
> elemental streams seem to encode more information than can be
> expressed
> in the low resolution pixel grid.
> I have no other explanation for why the first hit object(s) make such
> detailed beautyshots while equal enlargement of the Pentagon Art
> Frames
> reveals flat blobs.
> http://thewebfairy.com/911/flyingpig/beautyshots.htm
> vs.
> http://thewebfairy.com/911/pentagon/frames/startribune/st5_detail.jpg
> On this detail it's particularly evident how the Art Frame has been
> stretched horizontally.
>
>
> perpetualynquisitive wrote:
> > I was in near shock watching the events that morning, the replay of
> > the 'plane' hitting WTC 2 over and over and over and over and, well
> > you get the idea.
> >
> > It was after seeing the Fairbanks interview (Diane Sawyer) and his
> > clip of the plane, when he said "it disappeared like a bad special
> > effect" that caused the light bulb in my head to start blinking
> > "Bingo, IT was a bad special effect!" For when they showed it slow
> > motion, the plane did not react when it impacted the building,
> it just
> > slipped right into it, like a hand into a glove.
> >
> > I also had a strong feeling of deja vu on 9/11, I was sure that
> I had
> > seen the WTC heavily damaged before by a big explosion that left
> a big
> > hole in the building. (it was in early 2002 that I verified that
> I had
> > indeed seen the WTC in that condition when I picked up
> "Armageddon" on
> > DVD)
> >
> > In the summer of 2002 I was watching The Simpsons one evening
> and low
> > behold the episode Sideshow Bob's Last Gleaming comes on. After I
> > heard Homer say "Let's Roll", while chasing a hijacked airplane,
> which
> > escapes a failed military intercept and then crashes into a
> building,
> > almost died as I had just had a discussion about the supposed
> failure
> > to intercept with someone the day before and had told him it was
> > red-herring disinformation to reinforce the 'plane' hoax.
> >
> > He is of the thinking that there must have been a miscommunication
> > with NORAD at best or the military was told to look the other way,
> > such as the case in Pearl Harbour at the very worst.
> >
> > This person is a total military buff, from the war of
> independence to
> > the present and can name almost every major military/battle
> statistic,
> > weapon platform, personnel, tactics etc, and he just couldn't
> > understand how the hijacked planes could fly around as long as they
> > did without getting shot out of the sky.
> >
> > As I explaned (hehe) to him, no planes = no airforce failure = no
> > standdown = no reprimands for military personnel.
> >
> > --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable
> <webfairy@...>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> You beat me to figuring out No Planes.
> >> I was intrigued by the Where's The Boeing site, back when I
> first heard
> >> of it, March 2002.
> >> I started looking at videos and noticed the plane was missing
> from the
> >> first hit right off.
> >> I thought we would have the crime solved by summer.
> >> I remember getting drunk to celebrate, and to get used to the
> notion
> >> they used indescribables, not a plane at all.
> >> There would have been no celebration if I'd been able to guess
> that
> >> people would be barely catching on in 2006, with economic crash
> and
> >> synthetic terror hard on our heels.
> >> People that stupid deserve to be slaves, is the only answer I've
> >>
> > come up
> >
> >> with.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >>> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >>>
> >>> * Visit your group "911InsideJobbers
> >>> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers>" on the
> web.
> >>>
> >>> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >>> 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> <mailto:911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
> >
> >>>
> >>> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> >>> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Government procurement
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+procurement&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=S_3-2zVK9QQjTwxHvO91yw>
> Government leasing
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+leasing&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=ZAuP_XFQBkNiVw-hPWWJ-Q>
> Government grants for women
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+grants+for+women&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=R7KVvqXEVqN0Ct9WGPhKwg>
>
> Government lease
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+lease&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=FM8lkJddvatAkQNo00D_Cw>
> Government contract
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+contract&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=fTrsbvxC-m39UjtOdMcT-Q>
> Government money
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+money&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=HB73LsQrRnXy-2WkBh3LyA>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "911InsideJobbers
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/