What Rosalee said.
In any case, I'm not sure at all what you want here.
Greene's essays are a strange mixture of good points and outright mistakes/
misconceptions. That is, some of his critiques are dead-on, some are
completely wrong IMO and others are just sneering negativity.
I guess the strange thing is how sure Greene is that 9/11 was some covert
operation by the USG, yet he rejects almost all physical evidence. He seems
to have the same outlook as Hoffman, not too surprisingly.
So what is the point?
--- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable <webfairy@...>
wrote:
>
> So why are you repeating all the bilker claptrap nearly in full on your
> site?
> Are you agreeing with all the name calling against Meyssan?
>
> Who are you quoting?
> "My view is that the entire discussion of what hit the Pentagon is a tar
> baby designed to trap the 911 truth community in useless speculation."
> Is this your belief?
>
>
>
> Bill Giltner wrote:
> > Check out my blog post here:
> >
> > http://bgtruth.blogspot.com/2006/02/we-believe-that-senior-
government.html
> >
> > Here's my main point:
> >
> > Additional Commentary by this Blogger:
> >
> > Where Dr. Green goes horribly wrong: (is this on purpose?)
> >
> > "To put matters plainly: any substitute plane would be an exact duplicate
of
> > AA11 or UA175. To do anything else would be inviting disaster. "
> >
> > http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/green/loose_change.html
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment