Yes, but I wonder if something like ShermanPlane would be more near to describing a plane that is indestructible going into an ice-cream building.
Sherman as in armoured tank. And even perhaps ButterBuilding.
----- Original Message -----
From: alexldentSent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:34 PMSubject: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?]I like "butterplane" myself. But I would use it towards the end of
any presentation after fully introducing the concept. *show video
again in slow motion* --"this is why we derisively call it the
'butterplane'"
--- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "Nico Haupt" <nicohaupt@...>
wrote:
>
> > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> > Von: Peter Kofod <slashkofod@...>
> > An: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> > Betreff: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition
Limited
> > Hangout?]
> > Datum: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:04:38 +0100 (CET)
>
>
> A wording can be synched in time for a presentation,
> but i don't know why butterplane sounds that silly?
> This is the decade of hiphop, reality tv and geek speak.
> No worry about strange words, puhleese....
>
>
>
> > I agree with alex here.
> > To just step in front of a camera and say "no plane hit the towers"
> > would be idiotic. But if someone would care to present an
hardhitting and
> > easy-to-understand overview of the argument, it would be a totally
> different
> > case.
> >
> > Personally I would avoid terms like butterplanes and whatitz,
since my
> > PERSONAL experience is, that these terms make people NOT want to
look at
> the
> > evidence, just like screaming IDIOT at someone, probably isn´t the
best
> > way to make them consider your point, but I guess this is a matter of
> taste?
> >
> > Best,
> > Peter Kofod, Denmark
> >
> > alexldent <alexldent@...> skrev:
> > Obviously I'm not Rosalee, and you asked her-- but, I wouldn't
mind if
> > he did this and backed it up with a proper analysis. If you just SAY
> > that "there was no plane crash and that the planes hitting the towers
> > were faked" of course it sounds crazy. But if one presented it
> > properly, I think it could be a very effective argument. The more I
> > look at these pictures of the WTC and the planes and then the
> > plane-shaped holes, the more bogus it looks.
> >
> > The truth is the truth, and I don't like the idea of hiding the truth,
> > no matter how crazy it might initially sound.
> >
> > > Do you really want Professor Jones to
> > > go on national TV and say that there was no plane crash and that
the
> > > planes hitting the towers were faked and edited in later on
> > > videotape? What praytell would be the result of him taking that
> > > action? What good would it do our truth movement if people of
Jones
> > > stature started doing things like that?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS
> > Government procurement Government leasing Government
grants
> > for women Government lease Government contract Government
money
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> >
> > Visit your group "911InsideJobbers" on the web.
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
> +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
>
SPONSORED LINKS
Government procurement Government leasing Government grants for women Government lease Government contract Government money
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "911InsideJobbers" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
No comments:
Post a Comment