Tuesday, February 14, 2006

Re: [911InsideJobbers] Re: So what is the deal with this new footage? Is this a smoking gun or not?

What is the odds on a 176 going into the tower and going literally straight  out the other side and then exploding? As opposed to exiting the adjacent east wall causing a dramatic explosion, of the kind that we saw belately after the exit explosion.
 
If we say, look the "exit" explosion ocurred before the plane got near to the south tower don't we then acknowledge there was a plane?  
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: [911InsideJobbers] Re: So what is the deal with this new footage? Is this a smoking gun or not?

>
> Rosalee,
> so what's your current conclusion on this new footage?
>
> Was it produced by an 'insider' to help us out, or by a saboteur,
> to confuse the issue?
>
> I'm still undecided here...
>
> or was it even a misproduced 'product', then leaked on purpose?
My answer is "All of the Above."
http://www.thewebfairy.com/chaos/answer.html


Nico Haupt wrote:
>> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
>> Von: Rosalee Grable <webfairy@thewebfairy.com>
>> An: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
>> Betreff: Re: [911InsideJobbers] Re: So what is the deal with this new
>> footage? Is this a smoking gun or not?
>> Datum: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 20:05:57 -0600
>>
>>    
>
> Rosalee,
> so what's your current conclusion on this new footage?
>
> Was it produced by an 'insider' to help us out, or by a saboteur,
> to confuse the issue?
>
> I'm still undecided here...
>
> or was it even a misproduced 'product', then leaked on purpose?
>
>
>  




SPONSORED LINKS
Government procurement Government leasing Government grants for women
Government lease Government contract Government money


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




No comments: