Peter, I'm haveing an opposite reaction than I expected.
a) it's an easier jump from .bad planes to no planes at all. The most resistance to denial is just getting to the poing of believing one's government would attacks ut.
b) I introduce it with a narative of me wondering why there were gaps, delays in the taping that day??? What was that for? What are they hiding........ then to what's going on in the Control Room, then the trendous trust Americans have in their media---that if there's something there irregular, the press will rout it out.........
c) then "well it looks like we all got fooled again. The people on the ground saw next to nothing due to the proximity of the bldgs,, the guy in the control room sees a ready-made clip lasting only 4 seconds of a crude plane, that is never again shown after that day because it has too many whistleblower messages.........
\
d) explains all that absence of plane wreckage at all four sites, "doesn't it?"
----- Original Message -----From: Peter KofodSent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 9:11 AMSubject: SV: Re: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?]I´d love to, but I must confess that I´m having a hard time even grasping the implications. The easy reason why, would be that I´m just an idjut, and a better answer would be, that I haven´t spent 1000 of hours studying this.I know why you wrote what you just did, and I DO think that you´ve been unfairly critisized(abused) over the years, but I´m not one of those who´s been doing that!I really respect your work, although I´m sad that I simply can´t show it to people who´re new to 9/11 Truth.I think it deserves to be made easier accessible! (not technically, but in terms of understanding to the NOT so experienced mind)And I think your name is pretty cool :-)Peter Kofod, Denmark
Rosalee Grable <webfairy@thewebfairy.com> skrev:I would certainly volunteer you for a hard hitting and easy to
understand overview!!
It has been MORE THAN FOUR YEARS since I noticed there was no plane in
the first hit footage that allegedly shows a plane.
Four Years!!
If I had it to do over again I'd of picked some more "serious" a moniker
than "Webfairy", but I was expecting to make a career of webdesign and
hands-on computer care for small businesses.
911 turned my clientele to dust too., figuratively.
I didn't know there was such a thing as UAV drones back then.
I thought I was seeing one object, not a flock close together.
I am at least as sick of the word "whatzit" as you are.
It was the best I could do to identify a non-plane non-ufo
unrecognizable object.
I still don't have a better word than "Butterplane" for the apparently
melting second hit cartoons.
Professor Cornflake posits that the Pentagon "Plane" melted in midair.
This gave us the idea learned professors believe that planes are made
out of dairy products.
Since Professor Cornflake is from Perdue, maybe it's actually corn oil
margarine.
Peter Kofod wrote:
> I agree with alex here.
> To just step in front of a camera and say "no plane hit the towers"
> would be idiotic. But if someone would care to present an hardhitting
> and easy-to-understand overview of the argument, it would be a totally
> different case.
>
> Personally I would avoid terms like butterplanes and whatitz, since my
> PERSONAL experience is, that these terms make people NOT want to look
> at the evidence, just like screaming IDIOT at someone, probably isn´t
> the best way to make them consider your point, but I guess this is
> a matter of taste?
>
> Best,
> Peter Kofod, Denmark
>
> */alexldent <alexldent@yahoo.com>/* skrev:
>
> Obviously I'm not Rosalee, and you asked her-- but, I wouldn't mind if
> he did this and backed it up with a proper analysis. If you just SAY
> that "there was no plane crash and that the planes hitting the towers
> were faked" of course it sounds crazy. But if one presented it
> properly, I think it could be a very effective argument. The more I
> look at these pictures of the WTC and the planes and then the
> plane-shaped holes, the more bogus it looks.
>
> The truth is the truth, and I don't like the idea of hiding the truth,
> no matter how crazy it might initially sound.
>
> > Do you really want Professor Jones to
> > go on national TV and say that there was no plane crash and that
> the
> > planes hitting the towers were faked and edited in later on
> > videotape? What praytell would be the result of him taking that
> > action? What good would it do our truth movement if people of
> Jones
> > stature started doing things like that?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Government procurement
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+procurement&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=S_3-2zVK9QQjTwxHvO91yw>
> Government leasing
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+leasing&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=ZAuP_XFQBkNiVw-hPWWJ-Q>
> Government grants for women
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+grants+for+women&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=R7KVvqXEVqN0Ct9WGPhKwg>
>
> Government lease
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+lease&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=FM8lkJddvatAkQNo00D_Cw>
> Government contract
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+contract&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=fTrsbvxC-m39UjtOdMcT-Q>
> Government money
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+money&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=HB73LsQrRnXy-2WkBh3LyA>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "911InsideJobbers
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
SPONSORED LINKS
Government procurement Government leasing Government grants for women Government lease Government contract Government money
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "911InsideJobbers" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
No comments:
Post a Comment