Friday, February 10, 2006

Re: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Why Electromagnetic Weaponry & Not Planted Charges?

Again, the proof that they used microwave based scalar energy is in the
h-effect directory.
ALL of the dozen or so effects are fingerprints of scalar energies, most
of which have no other explanation at all.
Particularly the melding of incompatible substances . Metal hot enough
to make pretzel shapes should burn wood, not intertwine with it.
Why were doors found, but no doorknobs?
http://thewebfairy.com/911/h-effect
How in heck would the antenna fall 100 stories and land as a
recognizable object when a thousand people never even left any body
parts for DNA?

You are starting to sound like the NSA PR department in charge of
spinning "rational" but entirely false tales of what happened.

The way you think that whatever happened has to be something you can
comprehend rationally and events, in order to be true, must adhere to
your preconceptions: this is hideous brainwash logic I'm gonna name
"PerpSpeak" that assumes that reality is whatever one imagines, and what
one cannot imagine cannot be real by godlike fiat.

Scalar weaponry isn't nearly as "exotic" as you have been lead to believe.
A microwave over uses scalar technology. Heck, the regular and normal
generation of electricity is a scalar effect as well.
All electromagnetism is measured with the scalar measuring system that
is based in the math of perspective.
This math is just as mathematical as any other, but uses geometry
instead of cardinal or ordinal numbers.
Nowadays we know a subset as fractals, which were invented by poincare
who could only see their pictures in his mind, but knew the computations
were maps of Aether, which existed as suredly as he did.

We had big chunks of mathematics stolen from us since Tesla. Whitehead
eliminated Maxwell's scalar equations, and Archimesdes Quanternions,
geometric quanternions derived from conic geometry, were replaced by
Hamiltorn's algabraic quanternions, divorcing the math of science from
the math of art..

The "missiles" of the first hit were air-fuel bombs that could qualify
as thermobaric, judging from their coloration and the similar explosion
shapes seen in Afghanistan.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/bombs

The molten metal in the basement for a month was because once a scalar
reaction starts, it is hard to stop.

nphoman911 wrote:
> Ok. What I meant was why not just use, super powerful explosives?
> Conventional, but more powerful than normal, mini nukes even? Seems
> simple enough to me.
>
> I just would not advise using any limited opportunity we have before
> the press to talk about secret invisible microwave beams. That
> would be suicide and a definite PR victory for the September
> criminals. We need to be pushing "explosives cremating Americans
> alive" and not these other issues like did a plane hit the tower or
> not, or was there a pod on it etc. Good issues to discuss and
> investigate amongst ourselves (it definately needs to be done), BUT
> SUICIDAL ISSUES to bring up in front of the press. No press is
> better than that kind of press.
>
>
> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable
> <webfairy@...> wrote:
>
>> I say they used everything but the kitchen sink, and maybe that
>>
> too.
>
>> It was like the Kennedy assasination, when they had every single
>> hit-team on the planet in Dallas that day.
>> It was an excuse to keep people arguing this one or that one for
>>
> 40
>
>> years when the answer was "All of the Above."
>>
>> Every sentence that begins with "all of us know' needs to be
>>
> checked for
>
>> accuracy.
>>
>> Nothing happens or is evident that the "collapse" in any way
>>
> mimics
>
>> pancaking.
>> Debris was thrown upward
>> http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/projectile.avi
>> 7 fell FASTER THAN FREEFALL THRU AIR
>> http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%
>>
> 20archive/911eyewitness_wtc7.wmv
>
>> No "conventional" explosive could create the effects found in my
>> h-effect directory.
>> These are from the History Channel program "Relics from the Rubble"
>> http://thewebfairy.com/911/h-effect
>>
>> "SIMPLE TASK" of making these massive buildings, designed to
>>
> withstand
>
>> earthquakes and jet crashes turn to dust??
>> http://thewebfairy.com/911/du1
>> we knew more in 2003 than you know now.
>> SIMPLE TASK??? Simple task. Cripes.
>> In your imagination making two of the largest buildings in New
>>
> York
>
>> crumple straight down into their own footprint was a "simple task."
>>
>> It is the direct evidence from video of the crime scene
>>
>>
>> inphoman911 wrote:
>>
>>> All of us know that the controlled demolition of the Twin towers
>>>
> was
>
>>> designed to mimic a pancake theory collapse resulting from the
>>>
> point
>
>>> of impact of jetliners. WTC7 was a conventional demolition
>>>
> because
>
>>> there was no jetliner crash to simulate.
>>>
>>>
>>> Question #1. Why wouldn't the desigerns of the twin tower
>>>
> demolition
>
>>> use pre planted charges, just like they did in the case of WTC7
>>>
> and
>
>>> other conventional bottom 1st demolitions? Why do you think
>>>
> they
>
>>> would want to use electromagnetic weaponry for the simple task
>>>
> of
>
>>> demolishing the twin towers?
>>>
>>>
>>> Question #2. Why was Firefighter, other 1st responder as well
>>>
> as live
>
>>> broadcast civillian eyewitness testimony consistent with
>>>
> controlled
>
>>> demolition resulting from conventional planted charges? IOW,
>>>
> why
>
>>> would electromagnetic weaponry result in the "explosions" so
>>>
> many
>
>>> witnessed?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

No comments: