Friday, February 10, 2006

Re: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Request for Critique from Group: Blog Post about Michael B. Green

We know that F16's  were sent out to sea which has never really been explained. In fact it seems such a stupid thing to do. Or else too obvious  sending them on a wild goose chase as if to get them away from where they might hinder the "inside job". NORAD say that every defence system was pointing outwards towards an external threat. What forms of external threat is there? Well, many speak of missiles. Missiles have to be lauched from somewhere. Also why was the US Navy made ready soon after 9/11 was all but over? What was the Navy going to do that the airforce couldn't and apparently didn't on the day? The threats, we are told were purely domestic flights. The atc's, the FAA and all other agencies were concentrating of domestic flights. So NORAD sends out the F16's out to sea [and Lord knows where the F15's got to] sounds very stupid, right. Do you think the pilots would have been so silent if they knew they had been sent on a fools' errand?   
 
IMO F16's were not sent on a wild goose chase and the Navy wasn't made ready for a "domestic" inside job that was all but over. You can speak of missiles but they had to come in from somewhere. And F16's sent up must have been sent up with a purpose and that wasn't surely to get them out of the way. The threat was "in your face" domestic. The military are not dumb. That fits in too conveniently with the case of negligence that gets the admin off the hook. You think the airforce F16's would have done a "victory" flyover at the Pentagon if they had just come back from a wild goose chase. 
 
You see, it looks too obviously an inside job although that is not to say assistance had to be obtained from insiders. This goes to the point and the question - why if it was an purely an inside job wouldn't 767's from their graveyard in the desert have been used. If they had we wouldn't be here today engaged in our search for the truth.   
----- Original Message -----
From: alexldent
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 3:04 AM
Subject: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Request for Critique from Group: Blog Post about Michael B. Green

>>> I've never been convinced of an inside job although I have an open
mind.<<<

Wha?????  If it wasn't an inside job, what were they covering up?


--- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "ron_winn" <ron_winn@...> wrote:
>
> Your link doesn't work.
> Unfortunately the other one does.
> Interesting statement because if two real 767's or substitutes were
in the plan then "11" would have been a scheduled flight. And so would
"77". Or both flights would have been reported to be private charters.
>
> Something flew into the north tower and to hastily cover up what it
was flight "11" was used.
>
> I've never been convinced of an inside job although I have an open
mind. So far there is enough to support a hasty cover up. The Pentagon
attack being the most speedily concocted one, I believe. Although 93
is running a close second.
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Bill Giltner
>   To: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 7:19 PM
>   Subject: [911InsideJobbers] Request for Critique from Group: Blog
Post about Michael B. Green
>
>
>   Check out my blog post here:
>

http://bgtruth.blogspot.com/2006/02/we-believe-that-senior-government.HTML
>
>   Here's my main point:
>
>   Additional Commentary by this Blogger:
>
>   Where Dr. Green goes horribly wrong: (is this on purpose?)
>
>   "To put matters plainly: any substitute plane would be an exact
duplicate of
>   AA11 or UA175. To do anything else would be inviting disaster. "
>
>   http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/green/loose_change.html
>
>
>   SPONSORED LINKS Government procurement  Government leasing
Government grants for women 
>         Government lease  Government contract  Government money 
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>     a..  Visit your group "911InsideJobbers" on the web.
>      
>     b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>      911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>      
>     c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>






SPONSORED LINKS
Government procurement Government leasing Government grants for women
Government lease Government contract Government money


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




No comments: