Wednesday, April 05, 2006
[september_eleven_vreeland] Digest Number 1335
There are 7 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. audio - Former Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect
From: "smacko" <smacko9@comcast.net>
2. Mayan Priests Purify Bush's "Demons & Evil" on Mexico Visit During Bu
From: ranger116@webtv.net
3. " U.S. to create a bird flu virus mutation "
From: w r <three_judges@yahoo.com>
4. clg : "Defence secretary calls for Geneva conventions to be redrawn (UK) "
From: w r <three_judges@yahoo.com>
5. Money doesn't talk
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
6. Fool me once
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
7. Springtime for Atta
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 16:03:32 -0700
From: "smacko" <smacko9@comcast.net>
Subject: audio - Former Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect
Former Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect
April 4, 2006 - The former head of the Star Wars missile defense program under Presidents Ford and Carter has gone public to say that the official version of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory and his main suspect for the architect of the attack is Vice President Dick Cheney. Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, ret. flew 101 combat missions in Vietnam. He is the recipient of the Eisenhower Medal, the George F. Kennan Peace Prize, the President's Medal of Veterans for Peace, the Society of Military Engineers Gold Medal (twice), six Air Medals, and dozens of other awards and honors. His Ph.D. is in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from Caltech. Dr. Bowman chaired 8 major international conferences, and is one of the country's foremost experts on National Security. Read More
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/april2006/040406mainsuspect.htm
Listen To Interview
http://prisonplanet.tv/audio/030406bowman.htm
www.RMBowman.com
Bowman's a candidate for Congress:
www.Bowman2006.com
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 02:00:24 -0400
From: ranger116@webtv.net
Subject: Mayan Priests Purify Bush's "Demons & Evil" on Mexico Visit During Bu
Mayan Priests Purify Bush's "Demons & Evil" on Mexico Visit
During Bush's visit to Mexico four Mayan Priests performed a
Purification Ceremony to rid Bush of "Demons and Evil" They probably
exorcised their city also.
See Below Highlighted Area
They are smarter than the U. S. Congress !
Reuters Business Channel | Reuters.com
Address:http://today.reuters.com/business/newsarticle.aspx?type=tnBusinessNews&storyID=nN30290438
(Mayan purification ceremony)
By Matt Spetalnick and Adriana Barrera
CANCUN, Mexico, March 30 (Reuters) -
U.S. President George W. Bush reassured Mexican President Vicente Fox on
Thursday he was committed to getting the U.S. Congress to approve broad
immigration reforms, including a guest-worker program.
Speaking after talks with Fox in the Mexican resort of Cancun, Bush told
reporters, "I'm confident we can get a bill done." He made no prediction
on the timing of such legislation, which the U.S. Senate started
debating on Wednesday.
Bush also praised Fox for pledging to do more to police the U.S.-Mexican
border, the crossing point for most illegal immigrants entering the
United States.
"I'm committed to having a comprehensive immigration bill on my desk,
and by comprehensive I mean not only border security ... a bill that has
security enforcement in it, but a bill that has a worker permit program
in it," Bush said.
Hosting a North American summit, Fox said border security was a shared
responsibility and Mexico would do its part.
Mexicans account for more than half of the estimated 12 million illegal
immigrants in the United States.
"We want a safe border. We want it for the good of our people and also
for our relationship with the United States," Fox said.
Joining the two leaders was new Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper,
a fellow conservative who wants to improve relations with Washington
after friction during the government of his Liberal predecessor, Paul
Martin.
Despite an increase in anti-U.S. feeling in Latin America in recent
years, there were few protests in the resort, which is far from major
Mexican cities and too expensive for most Mexicans to stay in.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
! ! ! --> PURIFICATION CEREMONY
Four priests of the ancient Mayan religion held a purification
ceremony to rid Bush of "demons and evil" in a square in downtown
Cancun, some 10 miles (16 km) from the plush hotel strip where the
leaders met.
"We do not agree with the visit of this person. We see on television
how many people he has killed,"
Said priest Romualdo May, dipping herbs into water and sprinkling it
into the air.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Republicans are split over whether to back Bush's call for sweeping
reforms to create a guest worker program and put several million illegal
immigrants on the path to citizenship.
Conservatives in Bush's party, normally his allies, reject that as a
form of amnesty and seek instead to erect a fence along a third of the
U.S.-Mexican border and make illegal immigration a felony. The issue has
brought out tens of thousands of mostly Hispanic protesters in major
U.S. cities.
With his job approval ratings at a low ebb, immigration is a new test of
Bush's political strength.
Fox, who has failed for five years to convince Washington to let more
Mexicans get jobs in the United States legally, is making one more push
before leaving office in December.
He said Mexico would extradite 24 drug suspects sought by U.S. law
enforcement within a few weeks as part of a new program to send cartel
members to the United States for trial.
Bush, Fox and Harper toured hot, dusty ruins at the Mayan archeological
site of Chichen Itza ahead of their meetings.
But the leaders climbed only a few of the 91 steps of the impressive El
Castillo pyramid.
It was a rare sightseeing detour for Bush, who usually keeps to a tight
diplomatic schedule, and raised speculation he was trying to revive a
back-slapping relationship with Fox that saw them dubbed "the two
amigos" at the start of their administrations.
Bush and Harper agreed to open talks on a long-running trade dispute
over Canadian exports of softwood lumber and the Canadian leader spoke
frankly about past diplomatic discord.
"Iraq in particular has been a source of some disagreement, some
tensions," Harper said. But he praised the role of the U.S. and British
military in the recent freeing of Canadian hostages in Iraq, saying:
"This reminds us that when the chips are down, we all come together to
support each other."
Mexicans once had high hopes for Bush, who took office promising to make
America's southern neighbor a priority but pushed the region to a back
burner after the Sept. 11 attacks.
(Additional reporting by Steve Holland, Greg Brosnan and Lorraine
Orlandi)
© Reuters 2006. All Rights Reserved.
Reuters.com Help & Info | Contact Us | Feedback | Advertise |
Disclaimer | Copyright | Privacy | Corrections | Partner Newspapers |
Interactive TV | Mobile | RSS
About Reuters | Products & Services | Customer Zone | Careers
Reuters journalists are subject to the Reuters Editorial Handbook which
requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 22:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: w r <three_judges@yahoo.com>
Subject: " U.S. to create a bird flu virus mutation "
surprise..
^
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050324-030452-8400r.htm
" U.S. to create a bird flu virus mutation "
Atlanta, GA, Mar. 24 (UPI) -- The U.S. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention has begun a series of
experiments to see how likely the bird flu virus could
result in a human pandemic.
The six-month series of experiments seeks to simulate
the mixing and matching of genes from the H5N1 avian
flu virus that has plagued Asia and a common human flu
virus that public-health experts fear could turn avian
flu into a pandemic, the Wall Street Journal reported
Thursday.
CDC scientists inside an ultra-secure laboratory have
started swapping the genes of the H5N1 avian virus
with the genes of an H3N2 virus, the strain behind
most recent human flu outbreaks.
The goal is to substitute the eight genes of each
virus, one by one, with the eight genes from the other
virus to see which of more than 250 possible
combinations create flu viruses that could spread
easily among humans.
The work responds to fears by global public health
experts that the bird flu virus could mutate to form
one that could spawn a global outbreak of the disease.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 23:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: w r <three_judges@yahoo.com>
Subject: clg : "Defence secretary calls for Geneva conventions to be redrawn (UK) "
http://www.legitgov.org/index.html#breaking_news
http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,1746322,00.html
^
http://www.legitgov.org/#subscribe_clg
for this ( where i found it ) and ongoing posting of
news items of likely interest .. subscribe..
^
From: "CLG News" <clg_news@legitgov.org>
Subject: " Defence secretary calls for Geneva
conventions to be redrawn " (UK)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 03:43:02 -0400
http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,1746322,00.html
" International laws hinder UK troops - Reid
Defence secretary calls for Geneva conventions to be
redrawn "
Richard Norton-Taylor and Clare Dyer
Tuesday April 4, 2006 The Guardian
John Reid demanded sweeping changes to international
law yesterday to free British soldiers from the
restraints of the Geneva conventions and make it
easier for the west to mount military actions against
other states.
In his speech, the defence secretary addressed three
key issues: the treatment of prisoners, when to mount
a pre-emptive strikes, and when to intervene to stop a
humanitarian crisis. In all these areas, he indicated
that the UK and west was being hamstrung by existing
inadequate law.
Mr Reid indicated he believed existing rules,
including some of the conventions - a bedrock of
international law - were out of date and inadequate to
deal with the threat of international terrorists.
"We are finding an enemy which obeys no rules
whatsoever", he said, referring to what he called
"barbaric terrorism".
The conventions, he said, were created more than half
century ago "when the world was almost
unrecognisable". They dealt with how the sick and
injured and how prisoners of war were treated, "and
the obligations on states during their military
occupation of another state", he said.
Given the big changes undertaken by the military over
the past 50 years, he added, "serious questions" must
be asked about whether "further changes in
international law in this area are necessary".
Mr Reid declined to say whether he had come round to
the US view that detainees at Guantánamo bay should
not be allowed the protection of the conventions or
the courts. Similarly, he would not say if he thought
Britain should support the US practice of
extraordinary rendition, the transferring of prisoners
to secret camps where they risk being tortured.
However, he said, it was not "sufficient just to say
[Guantánamo] is wrong".
Mr Reid said yesterday that while domestic laws had
been introduced to deal with new threats - he referred
to the new offence of "glorifying terrorism" -
international law had not changed.
He also spoke of the "concept of imminence" - the
circumstances when a state could strike without
waiting for an attack.
It was a principal issue during the debate over the
invasion of Iraq and has clear implications for any
possible future action against Iran.
Mr Reid noted that last year Lord Goldsmith, the
attorney general, advised that force could be used
only against imminent attack, that it must only be
used as a last resort, and that it must be
proportionate.
"But what if another threat develops?", Mr Reid asked.
"Not al-Qaida. Not Muslim extremism. Something none of
us are thinking about at the moment." Terrorist groups
were trying to acquire weapons of mass destruction, he
said.
The Liberal Democrat defence spokesman, Nick Harvey,
said: "After the disaster of Iraq, the idea that the
doctrine of pre-emptive strike should be expanded will
be met with incredulity in the west and alarm in the
ministries of Tehran."
Sir Adam Roberts, professor of international relations
at Oxford University, said: "Some of the biggest
coalition problems in both Afghanistan and Iraq have
come from failures of the coalition to observe basic
norms on certain matters, especially with regard to
treatment of prisoners.
"Dr Reid is certainly right to raise the question of
whether we need new rules in face of imminent attack.
This problem above all requires confidence in
government and coalition decision-making processes -
confidence that has sadly been undermined by Iraq."
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 07:36:54 -0400
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: Money doesn't talk
Tuesday, April 04, 2006
Money doesn't talk
Money doesn't talk, it swears - Bob Dylan
You want some 9/11 truth? You won't find it in the accretions of increasingly absurd conjecture and the tail-chasing diversions of no evidentiary value. The hard-ass, 9/11 truth has the colour of money and the sweet stink of opium, and plenty of both.
How's this for a headline, and from Institutional Investor, even:
Mystery N.Y. Bank Allegedly Funnels $3B In Funds To Terrorists
A bank identified only as being one of the largest and most prominent in New York has been caught allegedly funneling an estimated $3 billion in profits from drug deals and other illegal activities to Mideast terrorists, The New York Post reports. Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau, the paper says, plugged the profits pipeline as part of an ongoing investigation of suspected funds flowing through local banks.
In the most recent scheme, according to The Post, the money originating from the so-called "tri-border region" of Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay, was transferred to an account at the New York bank through a money-transfer company in Uruguay and then on to accounts in the Mideast, where they were distributed over the past two years to the likes of Al-Qaeda, Hamas and Hezbollah. "I can't go out and arrest Osama bin Laden," the 84-year-old Morgenthau told The Post. "But I can try to cut off his money."
"Tri-border region" sound familiar? "Chiggerbit" notes on the RI board that it's a territory in which Sun Myung Moon has recently planted his Unification flag, acquiring the land atop the Guarani aquafer. Moon's 600,000 hectares also happens to be "an enormously strategic point in both the narcotics and arms trades," according to Paraguay's former drug czar, who adds that "the available intelligence clearly shows that the Moon sect is involved in both these enterprises." And "Starroute" adds that Khalil bin Laden, Osama's brother, has business connections in the nearby Brazilian province of Minas Gerais, "an alleged center for training terrorists."
The Post today discloses the identity of the "mystery bank." And guess who:
The Manhattan DA is pursuing a settlement with the Bank of America in a major money-laundering probe of more than $3 billion that flowed from Latin America through one of the bank's accounts to Mideast fanatics, sources said yesterday.
Sources familiar with the case - reported in yesterday's Post - revealed that DA Robert Morgenthau is close to reaching a settlement with the nation's second largest bank. The bank is not being accused of complicity with money-launderers or terrorists, but is facing possible penalties for dealing with an unlicensed money transmitter from Uruguay, sources said.
The bank will be permitted to settle, like Jonathan Bush's Riggs Bank, because to find such institutions complicit would mean the Apocalypse of All Safe Assumptions. It's why September 11th's insider trading scandal, once reported by Bloomberg as "the worst case ever," was made to dry up and blow away, and the data recovery project of "dirty doomsday dealings" made on World Trade Center computers disappeared into the belly of the beast it was intended to investigate.
The money's swearing, and it's swearing at us. Over the fractious din of arguments for missile strikes, demolition and holograms, can you hear it?
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2006/04/money-doesnt-talk.html
--------
Jeff said...
Jeff, you're lumping demolition in with holograms now?
Holograms would be an example of what I called in the first paragraph "increasingly absurd conjecture," and demolition a "tail-chasing diversion."
What I mean here by diversion is what I meant a year ago when I quoted JFK assassination researcher Vincent Salandria:
I'm afraid we were misled. All the critics, myself included, were misled very early. I see that now. We spent too much time and effort microanalyzing the details of the assassination when all the time it was obvious, it was blatantly obvious that it was a conspiracy.
------
Bismillah said...
Great post, Jeff, as is the earlier one you link to.
The insider-trading "investigation" was buried without military honors when the trail ended at "American institutional investors" who were allegedly above suspicion.
R.I.P.
Also sadly deceased is CONVAR's investigation of the data on the WTC hard drives. CNN reported, on Dec. 20, 2001:
"When Convar discovers encryption keys on a drive, indicating a financial record, it saves the information and hands it over to its U.S. clients, who are in turn cooperating with the FBI, he said. [Which FBI? Colleen Rowley or Dave Frasca? No prizes.]
The company has completed processing 39 drives; another 42 have arrived, and a further 20 drives are expected in early January, Wagner said.
Convar's German facility, in the town of Pirmasens near the NATO air base Ramstein, is one of the few civilian data recovery centers to be certified for military purposes as a "high security zone," the company said.
"
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/TECH/industry/12/20/wtc.harddrives.idg/
Then there's the bizarre conduct of the nation's Leaders on That Fateful Day, and the entirely-unmentionable wargames.
The corporate media have successfully killed and buried all discussion of these serious issues for the last four-and-a-half years. Now, suddenly, Charlie Sheen gets three nights on CNN to speculate to his heart's content about controlled demolition. Has CNN suddenly joined the revolution? Or are some alarm bells ringing yet?
A serious 9/11 Truth movement would be concentrating on the serious issues and trying to get this stuff properly publicised and investigated instead of spending an eternity poring over sexy photos of pyroclastic clouds.
------
Jeff said...
I should refine my comment above. My issue is not with absurdity but with the distractions of unresolvable pissing matches that bring us no closer to justice. Following the money and the drugs have already uncovered smoking guns, though they're largely neglected for the Rorschach of the smoking towers.
------
Kris Millegan said...
ThePistol44 said...
A quick note about the value of "sexy photos" and videos from the Pentagon and WTC collapses: it is much, much easier to introduce someone to the 9/11 Truth movement with visible evidence as opposed to discussions about insider trading and the nefarious history of the Bush/Cheney team.
For better or worse, people believe their eyes.
Yes and the octopus through several of their arms have spent so much money on uncovering how we "tick" and "what buttons to push." They know and it is accepted science that people believe what they see. That is precisely why the false meme of no-Boeing at the Pentagon has the "legs" that it does. That is the why In Plane Site and other flash propaganda pieces are being used to sell that false meme. TPTB(The Powers that Be) knew that there would be Internet head scratching about 9-11, there has even been "trial-run ops" to get the lay of the land (TWA 800). The tactics learned and developed there were then planned for and used in response to 9-11 deconstruction.
Three basic false memes were developed to hang the "hats of contention" upon; 1. No Plane at Pentagon (Effect: To divide researchers and to make 9-11 conspiracy research look "nuts" to folks within the highly charged and very "influential" DC Beltway crowd.) 2. No Planes in NY (Effect: To upset folks in NY on 911 conspiracy research{that is where a big crime occurred-jurisdiction for justice} and thoroughly disgust any survivors' family members from adding their gravitas to uncovering truths) 3. The "Jews" did it. (Effect: A blanket tainting that repells many without any perusal of the issue and allows the "official" story to label its critics as anti-semetic bigots with and agenda not facts and reasoned argument, etc.)
Then these memes help to cover up obvious conspiratorial facts leading to countles hours of blather, emotion, etc. Personally, I am sure that that there was demolition, remote controll technology and patsies involved in the op. And as with any large op, those with their noses in the right place or someone that directs them there, uses the op for their own personal purpose some maybe contrary to the ops planner. For with any action there is always possiblity. No chessmaster wins everytime. There are many editions of SunTzu, etc.
And yes has Jeff said if you follow the money follow the drugs there are smoking guns aplenty. And if you read history you even find that some of the guns have been discovered before, covered-up and then erupt again, go away again, etc.
Now is the time for all good men and women to come to the aid of their country.
Peace,
Kris Millegan
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 07:27:42 -0400
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: Fool me once
Monday, April 03, 2006
Fool me once
"O Fool! begetter of both I and Naught, resolve this Naughty Knot!"
- Aleister Crowley, The Book of Lies
I hate April 1st. I always have, but more so in recent years, because it might as well be every day now. So much news, both reported and suppressed, seems tailored to make us look like fools for believing we live in a world where such things are possible. But this is our world, or at any rate mine now: a concretization of formerly ungrounded fears into an eff-you reality that parodies what used to pass for paranoia. And since it's a truism of comedy that there are diminishing returns for satirizing a self-parody, what's to become of April 1st?
This Register story, for instance, which now carries the byline April Fool: "Bush Preps Historic Third Term - Memo." While I didn't fall for this one - a term limit serves some still necessary fictions, perhaps the most important being that real power resides in the presidency - it's not surprising that so many, apparently, did. A "draft proposal for a future Executive Order establishing a Continuity Presidency" is no more absurd than Bulldog Gannon's press credentials, or the Vice President shooting a man and joking about it afterwards.
The Register owned up to its prank, but Cannonfire's still playing this one straight: Was Barbara Bush's real father Aleister Crowley?
A sixth-level initiate within the OTO (the Ordo Templi Orientis, the mystical society that Crowely came to head in the 1920s) first set me down this research path by revealing that [Barbara Bush's mother] Pauline Robinson had befriended an woman named Nellie O'Hara, an American adventuress who, at some point during her European travels, met the famed writer Frank Harris. Despite his advancing years, Harris still maintained a reputation for sexual excess that rivaled Crowley's. During this period (1919-1927), Nellie and Frank Harris lived as man and wife, although they could not actually wed because Harris' second wife was still alive and would not grant a divorce.
..
Nellie's friend Pauline no doubt scandalized her social circle by traveling to France on her own and leaving two very young children in the care of nursemaids. However, her correspondence with her friend -- whose life in France with a famous literary figure must have seemed quite glamorous -- can only have inspired a sense of wanderlust. Her husband, increasingly bound to his duties with the McCall Corporation, did not share this spirit of adventure.
Thus it was that four individuals came together: Frank Harris, Nellie O'Hara, Pauline Pierce [formerly Robinson], and Aleister Crowley. Anyone who has studied Crowley's life will understand that what happened next was, in a sense, inevitable.
..
Pauline returned to America in early October of 1924. On June 8, 1925, she gave birth to a girl named Barbara. Barbara Pierce married George H.W. Bush, who eventually became the 41st President of the United States.
Many of the details check out, but I haven't found anything yet outside of Cannon's story supporting a link between Barbara's mother Pauline and Nellie O'Hara, let alone between Pauline and Crowley.
I'm not saying it's not true. I'm just saying it sounds too perfect, like a good hoax should. This piece stands out for Joseph Cannon since he doesn't usually pick at the occult aspects of power, and he's also a solid researcher not given to extraordinary claims. So I suppose what I'm really doing is adding the caution that before we repeat "Barbara Bush may be the daughter of Aleister Crowley" we should have more than the word of Cannon's annonymous OTO initiate as reported on April 1st.
Since we've already slipped into a time of attenuated reality in which anything - or at least anything bad - seems possible, we should take particular care about distinguishing fantastic fact from fantasy. For example, I still see The Onion gag from 2000 "Bush 'Refuses To Dignify' Mass-Murder Allegations" sited as a legitimate news story because "highly-regarded independent investigator Sherman H. Skolnick" cribbed from it in 2004. Whatever their previous merit, "investigators" like Skolnick and Tom Flocco seem little more than schlock artists now, serving product to the niche of paranoid entertainment by fabricating elaborate Black Iron Prisons in the air. It's poison to the legitimate inquiry of forbidden subjects, but consumers of conspiracy would rather have the thrill of being scared by a lie than be challenged by the terrible truth, because the truth demands more than our goosebumps.
But damn. I really hate April 1st.
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2006/04/fool-me-once_03.html
Jeff said...
"I meant gobble-de-gook like..."
And after I quoted the Art Bell clip, I wrote , in the aftermath of Katrina:
It can still give me goosebumps, especially because it accords with my own tentative conclusions, but it can't rise much above the caution "For entertainment purposes only." The hyperdimensional hypothesis can be explored by physicists like Michio Kaku and UFOlogists like Jacques Vallee, and the "infiltration of the military establishment" may be considered in a study of the Pentagon's occult pursuits (that "earlier precursor of the space program" sounds like Jack Parsons and friends), but the caller's claim of special knowledge is beyond verification.
I thought of this tonight because I sense we're approaching a time of flowering for great evil. This shouldn't shock us, but it is still going to surprise us by unfolding itself in unexpected ways. Things are accelerating, events are overtaking us, and the goosebumps are giving way to nervous tension. What's different? Then the theory, now the praxis.
There's a thrill of discovery, even of dark discoveries, and a certain joy at exercising critical thought in America's great Forbidden Zone. But now the game changes. "They want the major population centers wiped out." The entertainment value of an apocalyptic warning is compromised when it begins to fulfill itself.
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 07:13:52 -0400
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: Springtime for Atta
Friday, March 31, 2006
Springtime for Atta
You think they're so dumb, you think they're so funny
Wait until they've got you running to the Night Rally - Elvis Costello
A recurring and seemingly fabulist theme in the literature of cult and mind control survivors is the perseverence of a criminal Nazi underground in America, surviving on bonds of blood and symbology and enjoying the protection of high power. Eight-year old Rhonda, drawing pictures of her torture depicting swastikas and ceremonial daggers. Kathleen Sullivan writing in Unshackled of being shuffled between porn shoots and "secret Nazi meetings" by her father and grandfather. It's all a bit too rich for most palates, even now, when the Nazi is little more than a stock villain or comic foil. It's hard to get exercised about an enemy if you believe him buried beneath 60 years of history.
We know of Paperclip and the Ghelen Org, and how Nazis came to guide US government science and intelligence (and unacknowledged yet no less real, the covert trafficking of arms and drugs), finding the patronage of their stateside fellow travellers and eugenicists. Not as well known is how many others came to follow.
Between 1948 and 1952, America's Displaced Persons Commission arranged for nearly a half-million Europeans to emigrate to the United States. For two years it barred those who had been members of organizations sympathetic or collaborative to the Nazis. In 1950 that began to change, when first the "Baltic Legion" was removed from the list of "hostile" movements, though the Baltic Legion was also known as the Baltic Waffen SS.
The change of policy was strategic: the CIA was subsidizing the immigration of European Nazis and fascists in order to build a far-right power bloc as a hedge against communism. Its primary vehicle became the Republican Party. In the year the Commission completed its work, the Republican National Committee formed an "Ethnic Division" to mobilize for elections, which became the permanent standing body called the Republican Heritage Groups Council in 1969.
In his 1988 book Old Nazis, the New Right, and the Republican Party, Russ Bellant writes that "it eventually became clear that it wasn't an accident or a fluke that people with Nazi associations were in the Republican Heritage Groups Council. In some cases more mainstream ethnic organizations were passed over in favor of smaller but more extremists groups. [And] the Republican National Committee knows with whom they are dealing."
The leaders of the Republican "heritage" groups included men like Nicholas Nazarenko, who fought as an officer in an SS Cossack unit before going to work for the US Army's Counter Intelligence Corp. The evening after a Reagan speech praising the heritage groups, Nazarenko insisted on opening for Bellant his huge suitcase of political materials, filled with German war memorabilia and literature on the "Jewish problem." He said he was still "in touch" with various "Nazi" organizations: "They respect me because I was a former German army officer. Sometimes when I meet these guys, they say 'Heil Hitler.'"
Bellant again: "in a sense...the foundation of the Republican Heritage Groups Council lay in Hitler's networks into East Europe before World War II. In each of those Eastern European countries, the German SS set up or funded political action organizations that helped form SS militias during the war."
The heritage groups accounted for 86,000 volunteers in the 1988 election of George HW Bush, though several of their leaders were compelled to resign from campaign positions on account of collaboration. One was Romanian priest and member of the pro-Nazi Iron Guard Florian Galdau, who boasted of having files on 15,000 Romanians he helped emigrate in the US with the aid of CIA-linked resettlement groups the Tolstoy Foundation and the International Rescue Committee. Candidate Bush insisted they were all honourable men and innocent of all charges.
These old ratlines are of more than historical curiosity, and for more reason than that they suggest an embedding of Nazism in the Republican Party that goes beyond metaphor. They ratlines also appear to continue to function. Mohammed Atta participated in a German-American exchange program, jointly overseen by the State Department and the German Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development and linked to both David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger. (The Carl Duisberg Society, named after a senior official of IG Farben.) According to Atta's stripper girlfriend Amanda Keller, he called his German associates in Florida his "brothers." One of then, Wolfgang Bohringer, belonged to the "Flying Club of Munich," which was owned by his father. "Such clubs were popular with "postwar German neo-Nazis to circumvent that countrys anti-Nazi laws."
Daniel Hopsicker further observes:
From what has been learned so far, the backgrounds of Atta's German associates seem strikingly similar to that of another German national, Andreas Strassmeir, whose possible relationship with Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh was in the news a decade ago. Strassmeir was at one point named in a lawsuit by families of the victims as a "US federal informant with material knowledge of the Oklahoma City bombing." Strassmeir's father was once a top aide to German Chancellor Helmut Kohl; Atta's German friends are all children of the German elite.
"Sometimes when I meet these guys, they say 'Heil Hitler.'" Sixty years - what's that?
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2006/03/springtime-for-atta_31.html
V for Vengeance said...
Jeff wrote: "A recurring and seemingly fabulist theme in the literature of cult and mind control survivors is the perseverence of a criminal Nazi underground in America, surviving on bonds of blood and symbology and enjoying the protection of high power. Eight-year old Rhonda, drawing pictures of her torture depicting swastikas and ceremonial daggers."
Nazis and Satanists go together like Bush and fascism. Where you find one you will invariably find the other, because their agendas and goals are the same. Control through fear and indoctrination, victim degradation, symbolism and fetish totems, pagan ritual and sacrifice for power, and world domination in the service of Lucifer.
-----
nordron said...
If readers are interested in these ties, they should check out Dave Emory. His shows are downloadable:
Recent shows at: http://www.spitfirelist.com/RA/
Older shows at: http://archive.wfmu.org:5555/archive/DX/
A listener posts summaries of the shows at
http://ftrsummary.blogspot.com/
Of course, we're all speculators, so it's hard to agree with his point of view entirely. But he is certainly informative, been quite predictive. The theorty of a Nazi Fifth Column takedown of the United States of America really fills in a number of the missing puzzle pieces. At least it helps to answer the question: why are George Bush's policies designed to destroy the Land of the Free and (at least once upon a time) Home of the Brave?
----
starroute said...
Here's that summary of "Exposing the Nazi International" from Secret and Suppressed: Banned Ideas & Hidden History:
According to the introduction, the article purports to be a transcript of four conversations taped in 1981 between an investigative reporter and a man claiming to be a Nazi operative. The reporter found it too hot to handle and passed it along to a publisher, who spoke to the original informant, was able to verify one of his visits to Otto Skorzeny, but otherwise made no judgment about how much of it was true and how much of it fabricated out of whole cloth.
The subject of the interview describes himself as having been a liaison for the International Nazi Party for ten years, connecting the central headquarters with its field operatives. He says that the core of the organization consisted of former SS officers and Nazi Party members and that there was a second section of German industrialists and businessmen who provided financial support. He says they were involved with such groups as the IRA and the PLO, but also with "top level individuals in the Reagan administration" and with the Western German government.
He says his involvement began when his interest in war memorabilia led to an introduction to Otto Skorzeny. Over a period of a couple of years Skorzeny asked him to do a few minor tasks, gradually building confidence in him. He says he then got involved in a number of financial operations. One eventually involved sabotaging DC-10 airplanes by means of ultrasonic equipment in order to benefit Airbus. Another had to do with taking over corporations through various individuals or organizations as fronts. He refers to Dean Witter/Reynolds as being actually controlled by Arabs, who were in turn controlled by Germans, and says that the Germans and British had been vying for influence over leading Arabs for decades, with the Americans pretty oblivious to the whole thing. There was also speculation in gold. His own payoff came through the insider knowledge he gained of these transactions.
About 1975, he says, Skorzeny faked his own death, surfacing again at a compound in Paraguay in 1977. When they met in Paraguay, they discussed using Hawaii as a base, because the governor at the time was on the take, as well as other corporations they might take over.
He says this about the Reagan administration:
They decided in '79 that Reagan was going to be elected. A meeting was held, those attending being Alexander Haig, George Bush, Steve Bechtel, Dave Packard, Henry Kissinger and Helmut Schmidt at Bohemian Grove, in which policy was decided for future election of Ronald Reagan and possible events to follow thereafter. This was merely a preliminary meeting to decide basic goals and to structure the campaign as these American corporate officers would desire to have it structured.
Mr. Bechtel at that time was not in total agreement with certain objectives. To keep him in line a very minor object lesson was made by an attack on Bechtel's holdings in Central America. At that time General Haig wished to have more input, particularly regarding his possible nomination, but acquiesced when told that was not possible at this time. When he continued to balk at his position he was given an objectlesson, the attempted bombing of his staff car, which was never meant to explode. . . .
Shortly thereafter, it was in the final planning stages of the election campaign, it was determined that Reagan was pliable, and could be worked with and dealt with, that there would be no problem. As time grew closer Mr. Reagan was evidently asserting himself in such a way that it was felt that he could not be depended on to follow advice of his subordinates who, in effect, were to be the heads of government. It was determined that he was to be removed. The first operation planned was for January 11, 1981 at a dinner held as a farewell to close friends in the Los Angeles area. Information was pased through my sources and the operation was stopped. . . . My contact was able to prebvent this particular contract from being carried out, this is not to say that the contract will not be tried again, as happened in Washington recently.
He then gives other examples of "Organization influence." One involved faking the origin of Iranian oil on behalf of the large oil companies. Another had to do with the Hunt brothers' attempt to corner the silver market in 1979-80 (together with the ben Mafouz family and Ghaith Pharaon of later BCCI notoriety.) He says, "[The Hunts] thought they were screwing the Arabs. It was Arab money that did the buying. So when the bath came, it was the Arabs took the bath. The Hunts got a nice profit for themselves, the Organization got a fantastic profit for themselves, and the Arabs were left sucking eggs. Who took the rap? The Hunts."
When asked about the Rockefellers, he says that Nelson "was one of the bitterest enemies of the Organization," who "worked long and hard" to root them out of South America, but that David was working with the Organization and was responsible for Nelson's death. He adds cryptically, "[Nelson] was probably connected to the Organization, but what's important is that he was one of the few men in a position to hurt the Organization and insulate himself from retaliation. And Kissinger was his advisor, and Kissinger reported to David."
And he says this of the 1979 plan to elect Reagan (in effect, backdating the October Surprise by a year):
You must remember that the Shah, the one who died, his father was very pro-Nazi. The German industrial element has very carefully, for many years, cultivated the Middle East countries. . . . So we're getting back to Iran, and how Iran could help Reagan. . . . Information was fed from the Organization to Helmut Schmidt to David Rockefeller to Henry Kissinger. Creating friction leading to an incident and feeding the incident. Very simply, the incident was created by bringing the Shah to the United States. The people in Iran looked at it very simply. Their reaction was predictable.
He also speaks of airplane hijackings involving Carlos the Jackal and the PLO. And he says that the massacre at the 1972 Munich Olympics was an Organization operation. His final statement is that the younger generation in the Organization is more ruthless and less concerned with keeping a low profile than the original-era Nazis.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
What do I make of all this? As I said in the brief post above, the idea of a Nazi underground pulling the strings of these kinds of events behind the scenes seems ludicrous on the face of it -- but the piece itself has no obvious loopholes and in fact seems more convincing today, in light of everything that has come out about the Bush family and BCCI and so forth, than when I first read it. If it was actually written in 1981, it is extraordinary for its focus on exactly the topics that preoccupy us in 2006, rather than on the Soviet Union or other concerns of its own time. Even if it was concocted in 1993, which is the publication date of the book in which I have it, it was unusually forward-looking.
Also, the people it names are exactly those you might suspect of having Nazi, or at least fascist,connections. For example, Barbara Honegger's October Surprise is quoted in various places online as saying, "When the Italian police raided (P2 Lodge founder) Gelli's home in March 1981, it was Michael Ledeen who, at the instigation of Alexander Haig and Henry Kissinger, offered to buy the list of 953 P2 members in an apparent attempt to keep it from becoming public. Henry Kissinger had also reportedly sent Ledeen to Italy to try to squash an investigation into his and Haig's involvement in the founding of P2."
And there is an Alex Constantine piece on Adnan Kashoggi, Barrick Gold, and related matters, which concludes:
Another Nazi entrusted with the postwar wealth of the SS was Francois Genoud. In 1992, the Observer identified Genoud as "one of the world's leading Nazis." Authorites suggest that he "transferred the defeated Nazis' gold into Swiss bank accounts." Genoud underwrote the postwar Odessa organization. On March 12, 2002, the San Franciso Chronicle let on that Swiss police "believe Genoud founded al Taqwa Bank and allocated its resources to support international terrorists such as Vladimir Ilich Ramirez, alias Carlos the Jackal, and bin Laden." A few days later, Salon reported that Osama bin Laden had received funding from Al Taqwa, with shareholders that include prominent Arab figures from numerous countries in the Middle East. Among the shareholders are the grand mufti of the United Arab Emirates and prominent families in the UAE and Kuwait. Two sisters of Osama bin Laden are also on the list, undermining the bin Laden family's claim that it separated itself from his terrorist pursuits after he was expelled from Saudi Arabia in 1994."
With all this subterfuge in the background, the Khashoggi-Lockheed bribery scandal begs reappraisal. Marcos, Yoshia and Iran-contra's John Singlaub were all charter members of the World Anti-Communist League (WACL), a para-fascist organization of old guard Nazis, death squad leaders, spooks and propagandists. WACL provides further right-wing context; the CIA and WACL were arguably symbiotic.
David Guyatt reports that a letter from Henry Kissinger dated February 21, 1986 was sent to Marcos, ordering the sale of 63,321 tons of gold to 2000 US and European banks. Marcos stubbornly refused and was dethroned.
So there's no doubt at all in my mind that much of what the article points to is real -- that there were a lot of fascists of various stripes active in the politics of the late 70's and early 80's, and that the 1980 election was a pre-planned coup in which Kissinger, Haig, and George H.W. Bush were centrally involved.
But whether there were really a bunch of old Nazis pulling *their* strings or whether that's merely a colorful rhetorical device, I have no idea.
I also have no opinion on whether David Rockefeller really murdered Nelson.
-----
Anonymous said...
I will supply the third Dave Emory link for Jeff's latest post. I don't know what people on the board think of Emory, but I have listened to his radio shows on and off since the mid-Eighties and find him is one of the most insightful and prescient speculators on our recent past and present moment. In some of his latest shows he has been refering to the following historical,mostly out of print, books on Fascism's roots and shoots. Download them,bind them and be sure to pass a copy to friends family,countryman,and of course your local library because its probably doubtful that any of these in their collections.
http://spitfirelist.com/Books/books.html
Other Worthwhile Books are below. Although I have read many but not all of these selections. I welcome any input on other books that helps
us all unwrap our recent and presently hopefully presently unraveling historical mystery.
Unholy Alliance: A History of the Nazi Involvement With the Occult -Peter Levenda (Also Levenda's Sinister Forces Trilogy is highly
recommended.)
The Occult Roots of Nazism: Secret Aryan Cults and Their Influence on Nazi Ideology-Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke
Black Sun: Aryan Cults, Esoteric Nazism and the Politics of IdentityNicholas Goodrick-Clarke
Unholy Trinity : The Vatican, The Nazis, & The Swiss Banks-John Loftus
The Belarus Secret by John Loftus
U.S. Intelligence and the Nazis by Richard Breitman
Prelude to Terror: the Rogue CIA, The Legacy of America's Private Intelligence Network the Compromising of American Intelligence -Trento
Please post others books that have helped you start to unravel the recent historicalhistorical/mystery!
Anonymous said...
Ok here is the the 4th Dave Emory referenced post. Per my previous post on influential books, I feel compelled to post this excellent introduction that Dave Emory has written regarding the "out of print" books he has archived on his website. I think this is provides an fitting corollary to Jeff's excellant article.
INTRODUCTION
By Dave Emory
Its a good thing we didnt lose World War II. If we had, all our public officials would be named Shultz, Weinberger and Kissinger, and everybody would be driving German and Japanese cars.Popular joke that made the rounds in the early 1980s.
In the decades since the end of the Second World War, much has been written about the war and fascism, the driving force behind the aggression that precipitated that conflict. Unfortunately, much of what has been said and written has failed to identify and analyze the causes, nature and methodology of fascismGerman National Socialism or Nazism in particular. A deeper, more accurate analysis was presented in literature published before, during and immediately after World War II. The SPITFIRE web site is pleased to present a number of books published during that period. All more than 50 years old, these works embody a more complete, profound analysis of the historical forces that dominated the events of that time and, more importantly, our own.
Whereas much contemporary literature on the subject presents fascism (and Nazism in particular) as an aberration, the phenomenon was an outgrowth of major political forces and dynamics that dominate and control contemporary events and processes. Some of the books presented here illustrate the extent to which fascism (Nazism in particular) was an outgrowth of globalization and the construction of international monopolies (cartels). [FTR#s 99, 361, 426, 511 and 532 present an overview of the reinvestment of the wealth generated by the American industrial boom of the 1920s in German and Japanese strategic heavy industry. It was this capital that drove the engines of conquest that subdued both Europe and Asia during the conflict.]
Germanys Master Plan (1943) by Borkin and Welsh analyzes how the Nazis took advantage of the budding globalized economy to restrict their enemies strategic production, as well as their access to critical raw materials. Treasons Peace (1947) by Howard Watson Ambruster highlights how the I.G. Farben chemical firm manipulated trade relationships to the advantage of the Third Reich. In addition, the book illustrates how corporations, businessmen and politicians beholden unto the firms non-German cartel partners assisted that manipulation, as well as the postwar rehabilitation and exoneration of both I.G. and its most important personnel. Those personnel and the vast reach of I.G. Farben and its cartel partners are also the subject of Josiah Du Boiss The Devils Chemists. James Stewart Martins All Honorable Men (1950) documents the manner in which powerful economic interests in the United States frustrated attempts at de-cartelization and thereby ensured the postwar perpetuation of globalized business as usual. As Martin points out, these commercial interests were able to successfully manipulate the networks through which government operates, and direct it to their own nefarious ends. The lone title in the collection less than 50 years old, Paul Mannings Martin Bormann: Nazi in Exile (1981) chronicles the postwar underground perpetuation of the Nazi political and business hierarchy and its dominant role in both the international corporate economy and the contemporary political landscape.
The Third Reichs elaborate plans for postwar underground survival and continuity were predicated on the certainty that the multinational corporate community would preserve the Nazi infrastructure as a bulwark against communism during the (then) imminent Cold War. This Underground Reich was foreseen and analyzed in Curt Reisss The Nazis Go Underground, published in early 1944. In addition to the powerful corporate economic interests allied with Nazi business centers, the process of underground perpetuation was greatly aided by Fifth Column movements abroad. Composed of ideological supporters of the fascist philosophy, these Fifth Column movements were instrumental in realizing Nazi blueprints for military conquest during the war, as well as postwar continuation and enlargement of those plans. Written on the eve of World War II, Gollombs Armies of Spies correctly anticipated the enormous scope and effectively successful activities of the Fifth Columnists in nations slated for Nazi invasion. Triumph of Treason (1944) by Pierre Cot is a remarkable first-hand account of the subversion of France by powerful domestic interests, who saw political control by their ideological allies (and cartel business partners) in Germany as preferable to power-sharing with their own democratically-minded citizens. [Cot had been the French Minister of Aviation in the immediate pre-war period, and witnessed the deliberate, successful attempts at weakening Frances ability to resist the Nazis militarily. The traitors who subverted French democracy then blamed the French collapse on their patriotic political opponents.]
In developing their Fifth Column movements abroad, the Nazis (and the Japanese) proceeded in a geopolitical manner. Because they saw Spain as the key to the domination of several continents (Europe, North Africa, Latin America), the Nazis and their allies in the general staff groomed the Spanish Falange as the fascist movement of choice. Writing of this in Falange (1943), Alan Chase notes how the Reich then used political control of Spain to advance their agenda in Latin America and the Spanish-speaking world. The reader is invited to address Chases research in light of the relatively well-documented postwar operation and perpetuation of fascist interests in Latin America.
For the Nazis, geopolitics dictated a profound interest in the Muslim peoples of what they called The Earth Island.--a giant, contiguous land mass that encompasses all of Europe, much of the Middle East, the former Soviet Union, India (including Pakistan at the time), and China. Stretching from the Straits of Gibraltar to the Pacific coasts of China and Russia, this land mass contains most of the worlds territory, population and natural resourcesoil in particular. Control that land and you control the world. Accordingly, the Nazis built alliances with the various Muslim populations (Arabs in particular) that are indigenous to many of the most important petroleum-producing regions. Writing in 1951, John Roy Carlson witnessed and chronicled the postwar Nazi recrudescence in the Middle East in Cairo to Damascus, a work that has particular importance for students of the events of 9/11/2001.
In an earlier workUndercover (1943)Carlson infiltrated and wrote about the vigorous Axis underground that existed in the United States before and during World War II. Michael Sayers and Albert E. Kahn penned Sabotage in 1942, documenting the violent and treasonous nature of many of the American Fifth Columnists, who committed acts of assassination and sabotage in support of the Axis powers. These tactics were used to good effect in Germany and Japan, where potential political opponents to the rise of fascism were eliminated through a deliberate program of political murder.
It is in that context that we may view Government by Assassination (1942), Hugh Byass riveting account of the assassinations committed by the Japanese patriotic and ultra-nationalistic societies. Culminating in the May 15th Incidentthe assassination of the Japanese Prime Minister on 5/15/1932these murders were instrumental in the accession to power of the Japanese militarists and the corporate and imperial elements behind them.
Two other books available here provide valuable insights into the contemporary period. T.H. Tetens Germany Plots with the Kremlin (1953) treats the pivotally important German Ostpolitik, which German power structure has traditionally exploited in order expand and develop its influence. The German threat to either remain neutral during the Cold War, or to ally with the USSR was a significant factor in persuading conservative American power brokers to go along with the return to power in Germany of the Nazi elements that prosecuted World War II. Under the circumstances, some of these conservatives felt that permitting Nazi elements to return to power behind a democratic façade was the lesser of two evils, although many would have preferred a more traditionally conservative German political establishment. This German Ostpolitik, in turn, is characteristic of the geopolitical foresight and cynicism with which Pan-Germanists have successfully pursued their goal of world domination through the centuries.
Paul Winklers The Thousand-Year Conspiracy traces the origins of German chauvinism to the ascent of the Teutonic Knights within Germanic society. Winkler labels the enablers of the dark side of the German character Prusso-Teutonics and notes that, in their pursuit of Pan-German goals, they do not hesitate to deal in a cynical and ruthless manner with their own citizens. Of particular note for contemporary Americans is the deliberate, Machiavellian manipulation of the German economy by Hjalmar Horace Greeley Schacht, the American-born financier who eventually became the finance minister of the Third Reich. Take note of Winklers account of how Schacht re-structured the German economy with an eye toamong other thingsdriving the citizenry to such a point of hysteria that they would willingly follow the likes of Hitler. Compare Winklers analysis with what is taking place today in the United States. Writing in 1943, Winkler foresaw that the Prusso-Teutonics would realize their goals through the creation of a German-dominated central European economic union (bearing a striking resemblance to todays European Monetary Union.)
Those Who Forget the Past Are Condemned to Repeat ItGeorge Santayana
. . . We cannot turn over our future economic policy to private groups without public responsibility, as we have in the past. . . . U.S. Attorney General Thurman W. Arnold, writing in the Introduction to Germanys Master Plan
-----
starroute said...
Another piece that's well worth reading in connection with all of the above is Steve Kangas's "The Origins of the Overclass," about the CIA as the basis of the ongoing right-wing takeover of the US since 1970. Although it doesn't explicitly identify this movement as fascist, it forms a perfect match with others that do.
Pick any thread of the contemporary right and try to trace back where it came from and how it got its power, and you will almost certainly wind up with the CIA.
One major line of transmission goes through Bill Buckley (CIA) and particularly his Young Americans for Freedom. Some of YAF's leaders of the 60's and early 70's got channelled into associations with essentially fascist groups like the American-Chilean Council and the World Anti-Communist League, or with the related operations of Reverend Moon. Others followed the path of fundraising scams and political dirty tricks.
A second line goes through Ray S. Cline (OSS and CIA) and his Center for Strategic and International Studies, founded in 1962. Cline and his network of both former and active CIA agents were a major force behind George H.W. Bush's abortive presidential bid in 1979 and then were involved in the darker aspects of Reagan's 1980 campaign. Even though Cline died in the 90's, CSIS continues to be a hotbed of Nazi-style geostrategic thinking mentioned in the long Dave Emory quote above -- Kissinger, Brzezinski, all that bunch -- and is behind much of the insane US dream of ruling the world by dominating the 'stans and Central Asia.
There are a couple of other avenues of CIA influence that I haven't explored as deeply as those two. One involves Scaife and the other funders who have pumped so much cash into right-wing operations since the 70's. Another is the religious right, whose origins seem not to lie in anything genuinely religious but rather in the extreme anti-communist groups of the 50's, behind which lie the overt fascist groups of the US in the 30's.
And then, of course, there are the Gladio/Stay-behind type operations in places like Italy and Turkey. And on. And on.
It's a vast, tangled web -- and I've only explored a few small corners of it. Between 1950 and 1990, most of it was able to pass as "anti-communist" and thus obscure its true nature. But once we consider it as not only explicitly fascist, but as the direct heir of the fascism of the 30's and 40's, certain figures and events are highlighted and the whole takes on greater coherence.
As one example, the close relationships among various strains of fascists in Italy, Latin America, and Taiwan in the 70's and 80's start to appear as a main theme, and not merely a sidebar to the US struggle against the Soviet Union. In fact, the entire Cold War begins to appear as an elaborate diversion from what was really going on in those years, a myth or cover story to justify actions and affiliations that would otherwise have been unthinkable.
And the CIA, as a covert vehicle for the reinforcement of elite dominance, was at the heart of most of it.
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/september_eleven_vreeland/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
september_eleven_vreeland-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Read more!
U.S. Newswire : Releases : "Media Matters for America President, CEO David..."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL: http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=63580
Media Matters for America President, CEO David Brock to Moderate Forum: Why Media Matters - Progressive Voices and the Media
4/5/2006 9:01:00 AM
To: National Desk, Political and Media Reporter
Contact: Daniela Colaiacovo, 202-756-4124 or dcolaiacovo@mediamatters.org; Jeremy Funk, 202-756-4109 or jfunk@mediamatters.org, both of Media Matters for America
WASHINGTON, April 5 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Today, Media Matters for America will host an all-star panel discussion on progressive voices and the media........
>>>>>>> Read more!
DailyOM: A Place For Worries
This is the text version of DailyOM
To see it with graphics, click:
http://www.dailyom.com/articles/2006/2630.html
Today's DailyOM brought to you by: Whole Body Cleanse - Click here for a free brochure & coupon
http://www.dailyom.com/cgi-bin/display/sponsorlink.cgi?iid=39
April 5, 2006
A Place For Worries
Surrender Box
There are times when our minds become too full. Our to-do lists, worries, plans, and dreams may be so crowded together in our heads that we don't have room to think. We may believe that we are somehow taking care of our desires and concerns by keeping them at the forefront of our minds. In maintaining our mental hold on every detail, however, we may actually delay the realization of our dreams and the resolution of our worries because we won't let them go. At times such as these, we may want to use a surrender box.
A surrender box allows us to let go of our worries and desires so the universe can take care of them for us. We write down what we want or need to happen and then place the note into a box. By writing and placing our thoughts in the box, we are taking action and letting the universe know we need help and are willing to surrender our feelings. We give ourselves permission to not concern ourselves with that problem any longer and trust that the universe is taking care of it. You may even want to decorate your box and place it in a special place. Your surrender box is a sacred container for your worries. Not only do you free up space in your mind by letting go of our worries and desires and dropping them into your surrender box, but you are giving your burden over to a higher power. Once we drop our worries and desires into the surrender box, we free our minds so we can be fully present in each moment.
Surrendering our worries and concerns and placing them in the hands of the universe doesn't mean that we've given up or have been defeated. Instead, we are releasing the realization of our desires and the resolution of our worries and no longer concerning ourselves with their outcomes. It's always fun to go back and pull the slips of paper out of the box once your requests have been granted. And it's amazing how quickly problems go away and dreams come true when we finally let go and allow a higher power to help us.
Click for your free DailyCD:
http://www.dailycd.com/cgi-bin/userinfo/settings.cgi?subscribe=1&from=dailyom
Share the OM: To email this to a friend, click:
http://www.dailyom.com/cgi-bin/email/emailfriend.cgi?articleid=2630
To discuss this article, click:
http://discuss.dailyom.com/cgi-bin/discuss/displaytopic.cgi?tid=673
Friend of OM:
OmStream.com � the place to download music of a higher vibration. Featuring Yoga, Meditation and World Music for a holistic lifestyle, the selection at this oasis is growing every day.��For a limited time, sign up for the OmStream Update and receive a free song coupon (new members only).
For more information visit: http://www.dailyom.com/cgi-bin/display/linktofriend.cgi?fid=529
DailyOM Website: http://www.dailyom.com/
Subscribe: http://www.dailyom.com/cgi-bin/userinfo/settings.cgi?subscribe=1
Unsubscribe: http://www.dailyom.com/cgi-bin/userinfo/settings.cgi?unsubscribe=1
Email Settings: http://www.dailyom.com/cgi-bin/userinfo/settings.cgi?settings=1
Copyright 2004-05 DailyOM - All rights reserved
No portion of this email can be reprinted without express permission.
>>>>>>> Read more!
[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1210
There are 17 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. another celeb ?? 9/11 that slipped throught the cracks
From: Scott Legere <sledger911@yahoo.com>
2. Re: another celeb ?? 9/11 that slipped throught the cracks
From: Scott Legere <sledger911@yahoo.com>
3. Re: MANDATORY AIDS TESTING -Clinton's Slippery Slope
From: amy dalzell <amydalzell@yahoo.com>
4. Iran is inevitable - the Sunday Telegraph of London
From: Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com>
5. Re: Reframing 9/11 Truth
From: linelites@mindspring.com
6. 9/11: a 7-Man Job
From: "botalerts" <botalerts@yahoo.ca>
7. Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect ! tvnl news
From: "reggie501" <reggie501@optonline.net>
8. Bush 41 Main 9/11 Suspect !
From: "stoelting1981" <fiat@sofnet.com>
9. Ben Stein on the State of the "Union"
From: janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com>
10. The Liberal Progressive Two-Step
From: janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com>
11. [Fwd: 9/11 UN International Independent Investigation Commission]
From: APFN <apfn@apfn.org>
12. What would you do? by Paris (song about 9/11
From: APFN <apfn@apfn.org>
13. Tarpley on TV tomoro at 9 a.m.
From: John Leonard <jpleonard@verizon.net>
14. Re: Reframing 9/11 Truth
From: Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com>
15. Help defend Sheen
From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com>
16. Homeland Security Deputy Press Secretary Arrested....GOPedophile bites the dust
From: Moondancermom@aol.com
17. Injustices of the West Against The Arab World
From: APFN <apfn@apfn.org>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 06:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Scott Legere <sledger911@yahoo.com>
Subject: another celeb ?? 9/11 that slipped throught the cracks
She's a mid level personality but she did say a few things a while back
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=707605
She'll be in the new flick comming out in Aug. She took a lot of flack for saying what she said.
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC for low, low rates.
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 06:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Scott Legere <sledger911@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: another celeb ?? 9/11 that slipped throught the cracks
A few more with this interesting :phrase
The 27-year-old actress, who stars in a new film about the 2001 terror attacks on the World Trade Center, said in an interview last week that the United States "is responsible in some way" for the attacks.
http://film.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,12589,1471340,00.html
http://entertainment.msn.com/movies/article.aspx?news=189305>1=6428
Scott Legere <sledger911@yahoo.com> wrote:
She's a mid level personality but she did say a few things a while back
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=707605
She'll be in the new flick comming out in Aug. She took a lot of flack for saying what she said.
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC for low, low rates.
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 06:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: amy dalzell <amydalzell@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: MANDATORY AIDS TESTING -Clinton's Slippery Slope
Really? That's interesting. I have no hard evidence about the origins of AIDS, but I sure it's out there.
Maybe we can hope that 9/11 will be the catalyst that will eventually undermine the mountain of lies told to the American people just since 1955 (my birth).
Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com> wrote:
A few years, ago, The Guardian Newspaper of England, (Greg Palast), printed an article stating that aids developed in Africa in areas, where the U.S. just happened to distribute "small pox vaccines."
amy dalzell <amydalzell@yahoo.com> wrote: I think, perhaps, we should be worrying more about where AIDS came from in the first place. Let's see - c. 1979 - hmmmm - monogamy, hypocrisy, and marriage (and religion) being challenged on every front in the U.S. and the general Western world...
hmmmmmm....women getting out of line.....What do we need to keep these people in their place?
hmmmm...
A heterosexual WHITE hegemonic culture being challenged by people who want to live their own lives and LOVE each other...
What to we need? hmmmmm...
'How 'bout an incurable, sexually transmitted disease that originated in AFRICA from MONKEYS that (initially) affects HOMOSEXUALS!!
hmmmmmm........
Whom do you think...Dupont? Monsanto?
Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com> wrote:
MANDATORY AIDS TESTING - Clinton's Slippery Slope
30 March 2006
Bill Clinton has called for mandatory testing for HIV/AIDS in nations that have high infection rates.
Clinton (as in I did not inhale, I did not have sex with that woman in the stained navy dress) is hereby telling the impoverished nations of the world that they must be tested for AIDS, for their own good.
Mandatory testing for one country, soon to be many more. Woops! Live in the wrong country? Sorry. You will soon be tested for AIDS.
Continued: http://mytown.ca/garger/
The world can only be redeemed through action--movement -- motion. Uncoerced, unbribed and unbought, humanity will move toward the light.
Alice Hubbard's introduction to An American Bible (1912)
---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.
---------------------------------
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 07:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com>
Subject: Iran is inevitable - the Sunday Telegraph of London
At our 9/11 flyering event, I talked to an Army Officer who just returned from Iraq, and he said that it is all propaganda, to gain control of Iran, about Iran developing missles. Israel has enough missles aimed at Tehran to level it, within minutes, if Israel really suspected Iran was developing missles.
Dick Eastman <olfriend@nwinfo.net> wrote:
DEBKAfile, Political Analysis, Espionage, Terrorism Security
British military chiefs believe a US-led strike against Iran is inevitable - the Sunday Telegraph of London
April 2, 2006, 6:32 AM (GMT+02:00)
The paper reports the prospect will be aired at a secret high-level UK defense ministry meeting Monday.
DEBKAfiles military sources report: British generals will examine Irans successful test of a Fajr-3 multiple warhead missile that can reach Israel, that was carried out undetected by US or Israel radar Friday, March 31. It was launched on the first day of a large-scale Iranian exercise in the Persian Gulf and Sea of Oman.
Those sources add that the Israeli Arrow anti-missile system has no answer for multiple warhead ballistic missiles.
The US hopes for a multinational military operation to destroy Irans ability to develop a nuclear bomb - if Tehran fail to comply with the UN security council demand to freeze uranium enrichment. But British defense chiefs believe that failing international support, the Bush administration would go it alone or with Israels assistance.
DEBKAfile adds: Last month, former Israel chief of staff Moshe Yaalon estimated that a strike of this kind would be phased, suggesting that each phase would be undertaken by a different armed force.
In Blackburn, northwest England, Saturday, US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice said all negotiating options including the use of force remained open for resolving the Iran crisis. Last month, foreign secretary Jack Straw took the opposite stance saying a military attack was inconceivable.
According to the Sunday Telegraph, British military chiefs believe an attack would be limited to a series of air strikes against nuclear plants rather than a land assault - tactical Tomahawk cruise missiles fired from US navy ships and submarines in the Gulf, followed by B2 stealth bombers equipped with 8 4,500lb enhanced BLU-28 satellite-guided bunker-busting bombs flying from Diego Garcia, the RAF base in Gloucestershire in the UK and Whiteman USAF base in Missouri.
At least eight nuclear sites are known within Iran but there are many more secret ones.
The London paper reports Washington fears an Iranian nuclear weapon could be used against Israel or US forces in the region as well as destabilizing the Middle East with Egypt, Syria and Saudi Arabia opting for nuclear weapons programs.
Steve
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 10:45:37 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
From: linelites@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: Reframing 9/11 Truth
I'VE BEEN FRAMED......
Good work, Donald.
I sadden to think the human species has to wade through such bull for such simple truths.
But if we gotta play this game, so be it. From now on...."the towers were pulverized"
(and so will be our opponent's argument)
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
>From: Donald Stahl <politicstahl@hotmail.com>
>Sent: Apr 3, 2006 9:25 PM
>To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [911TruthAction] Reframing 9/11 Truth
>
>
>
>
>It is no secret to 9/11 activists that it's difficult to get the
>truth across. We need to recognize that we are not alone here, and
>that "progressives" and "liberals" have the same problem. They are
>beginning to come up with some answers, and we need to know what they
>are.
>
>I'm speaking of George Lakoff and his Rockridge Institute:
>http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/ .
>
>Reframing isn't everything, as William A. Gamson and Charlotte Ryan
>point out,
>http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v19n2/gamson_elephants.html but it
>is something, and it's a tool 9/11 Truth has much use for. This is
>because every time someone, whether Truther or Bush-backer, says that
>the WTC buildings "collapsed," they use vocabulary that frames and
>supports the official story. This is not a habit we want to be
>copying from the Democrats.
>
>On p. 73 of Don't Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame
>the Debate, (White River Junction, VT, 2004) Lakoff says:
>
>"One of the fundamental findings of cognitive science is that people
>think in terms of frames and metaphors¾conceptual structures like
>those we have been describing. The frames are in the synapses of our
>brains, physically present in the form of neural circuitry. When the
>facts don't fit the frames, the frames are kept and the facts ignored.
>
>"It is a common folk theory of progressives that `the facts will set
>you free.' If only you can get all the facts out there in the public
>eye, then every rational person will reach the right conclusion. It
>is a vain hope. Human brains just don't work that way. Framing
>matters. Frames once entrenched are hard to dispel." (73).
>.
>Every 9/11 activist will admit this.
>
>Here is Doug Thompson answering responses to his anti-9/11 Truth
>rant, "9/11 Conspiracy Theories Don`t Pass the Smell Test":
>
>To answer some questions:
>--I've watched "Loose Change." Didn't convince me. Lots of
>speculation.
>--Striking The Washington Monument didn't have enough kill potential.
>The plane would have crashed short of the Pentagon.
>--As a journalist, I based my conclusions on facts from experts, not
>speculation from others with an agenda. The facts, as I see them,
>don't support the theories. As someone who loves a good story I wish
>they did. But they don't.
>Doug
>Posted by Doug Thompson at March 31, 2006 10:10 AM
>
>Now here is Lakoff again:
>
>"When we negate a frame, we evoke the frame." (3).
>
>"Remember, don't just negate the other person's claims; reframe. The
>facts unframed will not set you free. You cannot win just by stating
>the true facts and showing that they contradict your opponent's
>claims. Frames trump facts. His frames will stay and the facts will
>bounce off. Always reframe." (115).
>
>Note that Lakoff is not suggesting that you ignore facts.
>
>As examples of framing Lakoff gives the phrases `tax
>relief', `permission slip' and `wasteful spending` (as in Bush's
>State of the Union speech), 'rogue states', 'friendly nations'
>and `family values'.
>
>"When the word tax is added to relief, the result is a metaphor:
>Taxation is an affliction. And the person who takes it away is a
>hero, and anyone who tries to stop him is a bad guy. This is a
>frame. It is made up of ideas, like affliction and hero. The language
>that evokes the frame comes out of the White House, and it goes into
>press releases, goes to every radio station, every TV station, every
>newspaper. And soon the New York Times is using tax relief. And it is
>not only on Fox; it is on CNN, it is on NBC, it is on every station
>because it is `the president's tax-relief plan.' And soon the
>Democrats are using tax relief¾and shooting themselves in the foot."
>(4).
>
>An example of framing relevant to 9/11 Truth is saying that the WTC
>Towers collapsed.
>
>The official story has it that the three buildings of the World Trade
>Center did what they did because they were on fire, but no one says
>that the buildings "burned down." That would be ludicrously
>inappropriate, even though they did turn into a kind of "ashes." The
>official story has to use the term `collapse' because that term is so
>general it conceals what really happened to the buildings. Buildings
>collapse in earthquakes, but they don't turn into what the WTC
>buildings turned into. Firefighter Joe Casaliggi, in the DVD 9/11,
>created by Jules and Gedeon Naudet, says, "The building collapsed TO
>DUST. [His emphasis.]" But he was only using the word that had been
>given to him by the media. He knows as well as you or I that
>nothing "collapses to dust." That is as silly as saying that
>they "collapsed to smithereens."
>
>Lakoff himself is misled into misdescribing what happened to the
>Towers.
>
>"Metaphorically, tall buildings are people standing erect. As each
>tower fell, it became a body falling.
when we see a plane coming
>toward the building and imagine people in the building, we feel the
>plane coming toward us; when we see the building toppling toward
>others, we feel the building toppling toward us.
If we see the
>plane going through the building, and unconsciously we evoke the
>metaphor of the building as a head with the plane going through its
>temple, then we sense¾unconsciously but powerfully¾being shot through
>the temple. If we evoke the metaphor of the building as a person and
>see the building fall to the ground in pieces, then we sense¾again
>unconsciously but powerfully¾that we are falling to the ground in
>pieces." (54).
>
>Anyone who watched the news during VietNam, as Lakoff did, has seen a
>person being shot in the temple and falling to the ground; and they
>know that the person does not fall to the ground in pieces, much less
>disintegrate from the top down.
>
>This is what happened to the WTC buildings: they didn't topple; they
>disintegrated. When something falls down, it doesn't disintegrate, it
>just falls down, or collapses. When something burns up, it may
>disintegrate, but not in ten seconds. The only way to disintegrate
>massive concrete and steel buildings is by means of explosives, and
>that fact is apparent even to very frightened people.
>
>It was good to have Hoffman and S.P.I.N.E. showing that what the
>official story alleges is physically impossible; in fact, it was
>necessary in the beginning because people are often unwilling to
>trust their own judgment when it seems to be contradicted by experts
>and authorities.
>
>In the 1950s a psychology professor, Solomon Asch, did some
>experiments on college students. He told them that he wanted to test
>visual perception, but that was a lie. He had them sit in a classroom
>with other students and showed them all some lines, asking which
>lines looked like they were the same length, but only one student was
>really being tested. The others were conspirators along with
>Professor Asch, and they deliberately gave wrong answers. The student
>being tested was always asked last, after having heard all the others
>say that it looked to them like the wrong lines were the same length.
>The experiment was really to find out how many people,
>percentagewise, could be made to say that they saw what they didn't
>see, just to go along with the crowd. The answer was: about one third.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asch_conformity_experiments
>
>Note that the pressure came only from their equals, other
>undergraduates, not from any authority figure such as the teacher.
>Suppose some crafty professor told his class that he was going to
>illustrate the nature of some visual illusions for them, and then
>showed them some unequal lines, saying that the appearance of
>inequality was an illusion¾the lines were really equal. He then puts
>out a bogus, but detailed, explanation of why the lines look unequal
>when they're not. How many of the class will be fooled? Probably
>quite a few; a majority, surely, if not all. What happened to the
>Towers looked like a controlled demolition, but of course it really
>wasn't. It couldn't have been, because the authorities, that is, the
>government and the $1.3 trillion media industry, said it wasn't. It
>may have looked like a missile hit the Pentagon and the abandoned
>strip mine in Pennsylvania, but of course what really happened was
>that a giant airliner, a Boeing 757 weighing 128,730 lbs. empty, hit
>those places and disappeared, according to some highly convoluted
>explanation.
>
>"Even though the facts which prove this to be so [that is, that they
>were lied to] may be brought clearly to their minds, they [the
>people] will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that
>there may be some other explanation."
>
>Hitler was certainly right when he said this. Bring the facts clearly
>to their minds, or even to their eyes; when the obvious is also the
>unthinkable, what are they to do? The function of
>government "experts" is to provide that "other explanation,"
>those "facts as we (would like to) see them" which will allow people
>to continue to think what they want to think, what they need to
>think, in spite of their own eyes.
>
>The point is that it is obvious that the Towers were exploded. Saying
>that they collapsed obscures this and shoots us in the foot. The
>Towers didn't "fall," or "come down," or "topple." They disintegrated
>from the top down, as anyone with eyes can see. Shock and awe are
>over now. It's time to start reframing the obvious as obvious.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:46:59 -0000
From: "botalerts" <botalerts@yahoo.ca>
Subject: 9/11: a 7-Man Job
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/04/911-7-man-job.html
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:10:57 -0000
From: "reggie501" <reggie501@optonline.net>
Subject: Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect ! tvnl news
9/11 News : http://www.tvnewslies.org/news/#911
· Former Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect - The
former head of the Star Wars missile defense program under Presidents
Ford and Carter has gone public to say that the official version of
9/11 is a conspiracy theory and his main suspect for the architect of
the attack is Vice President Dick Cheney.
· Oprah911.com - Here is the idea - have Oprah Winfrey do a show or
ultimately a series of shows on the events surrounding 911.
TVNL Comment: Our original idea is getting some attention and support!
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:19:21 -0000
From: "stoelting1981" <fiat@sofnet.com>
Subject: Bush 41 Main 9/11 Suspect !
Google Search: "Arrest Bush 41"
The FBI uses polygraphs to eliminate suspects.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 10:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com>
Subject: Ben Stein on the State of the "Union"
If they know of him at all, many folks think Ben Stein is just a quirky actor/comedian who talks in a monotone. He's also a very intelligent attorney who knows how to put ideas and words together in such a way as to sway juries and make people think clearly.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The following was written by Ben Stein and recited by him on CBS Sunday Morning Commentary, Sunday, 12/18/05.
Herewith at this happy time of year, a few confessions from my beating heart: I have no freaking clue who Nick and Jessica are. I see them on the cover of People and Us constantly when I am buying my dog biscuits and kitty litter. I often ask the checkers at the grocery stores. They never know who Nick and Jessica are either. Who are they? Will it change my life if I know who they are and why they have broken up? Why are they so important?
I don't know who Lindsay Lohan is either, and I do not care at all about Tom Cruise's wife.
Am I going to be called before a Senate committee and asked if I am a subversive? Maybe, but I just have no clue who Nick and Jessica are.
If this is what it means to be no longer young. It's not so bad.
Next confession:
I am a Jew, and every single one of my ancestors was Jewish. And it does not bother me even a little bit when people call those beautiful lit up, bejeweled trees Christmas trees. I don't feel threatened. I don't feel discriminated against. That's what they are: Christmas trees.
It doesn't bother me a bit when people say, "Merry Christmas" to me. I don't think they are slighting me or getting ready to put me in a ghetto. In fact, I kind of like it. It shows that we are all brothers and sisters celebrating this happy time of year. It doesn't bother me at all that there is a manger scene on display at a key intersection near my beach house in Malibu. If people want a creche, it's just as fine with me as is the Menorah a few hundred yards away.
I don't like getting pushed around for being a Jew, and I don't think Christians like getting pushed around for being Christians. I think people who believe in God are sick and tired of getting pushed around, period. I have no idea where the concept came from that America is an explicitly atheist country. I can't find it in the Constitution, and I don't like it being shoved down my throat.
Or maybe I can put it another way: where did the idea come from that we should worship Nick and Jessica and we aren't allowed to worship God as we understand Him?
I guess that's a sign that I'm getting old, too.
But there are a lot of us who are wondering where Nick and Jessica came from and where the America we knew went to.
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 10:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com>
Subject: The Liberal Progressive Two-Step
The Liberal-Progressive Two-Step
(set to the Rabbinical Rag)--dedicated to Steve Rodhe (head of the ACLU of Southern California)
The music is starting
grab your partner
and dance
as if your life
depended on it
Do si do
to 911
but very carefully
dance around
the Reichstag Fires similarity
and do not approach
impending genocide
do not approach
massive/ imminent/ domestic /carnage
or this dance
will prove your last
Swing your partner
round and round
but sidestep
targetting
sidestep
death squads
and don't even mention
the water!
If your partner
is a mole
if your partner
is a plant
smile sweetly
curtsy
and move on down the line
Dance to anti-war
protest marches
dance to letter writing campaigns
dance to Vote Democrat
in 2008
and other completely ineffective gestures
Dance to no WMD?
Must be the oil!
Dance to Iraq/
Afghanistan/Haiti
But do not dance
to the dirge of America
Ignore the disappeared
Ignore the quote unquote suicides
Ignore the quote unquote accidents
Dance around the truth
as if it were on fire
cause you want to dance
the next round
Don't you?
Janet C. Phelan
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:09:08 -0700
From: APFN <apfn@apfn.org>
Subject: [Fwd: 9/11 UN International Independent Investigation Commission]
[This message is not in displayable format]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 12
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:57:48 -0700
From: APFN <apfn@apfn.org>
Subject: What would you do? by Paris (song about 9/11
[This message is not in displayable format]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 13
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 19:04:05 -0700
From: John Leonard <jpleonard@verizon.net>
Subject: Tarpley on TV tomoro at 9 a.m.
Webster Tarpley TV Interview on 9/11 Truth Breakthru Airs
in Manhattan, on Internet, Wed. April 5th
Author shares iconoclastic views on 9/11 and "War on Terrorism."
Tarpley's publisher files shareholder motion today urging
insurance giant to investigate WTC demolition charges.
An interview with Webster Tarpley will be aired on the Public Access
Network in New York City on Wed. April 5th on MNN (Manhattan
Neighborhood Network) on 9 to 10 a.m. EDT on Channel 67 and will be
simulcast on www.MNN.org at the same hour.
To watch the simulcast you only need a broadband internet connection.
Just click on Channel 34 once you are on the MNN.org website.
The interview will be on Tina Tarryk's show, "Making Known The
Unknown." It was taped on March 29th.
Molly Cheshire interviews Mr. Tarpley, and the focus is the startling
release of the article in New York Magazine and the unexpected
appearance of Charlie Sheen on CNN the week of March 20th. These new
developments show that it is possible for these radical ideas to be
recognized by the mainstream. We also discuss the destruction of WTC
Building 7 as the incontrovertible evidence that defies the
authorized explanation.
In a separate development, Tarpley's publisher, John Leonard of
Progressive Press in California, is campaigning to highlight the
negligence of the big insurance companies in failing to investigate
suspect damage claims filed against them for the destruction of the
NY World Center. He has purchased shares in two large German
reinsurance companies, Allianz and Munich Re, in order to make
shareholder motions at their annual general meetings. Today, April
4th, he filed a motion to withhold approval of the Munich Re board of
directors, which should be published on the firm's website. The text
may be viewed at www.waronfreedom.org/press/mumotion.txt
Home URL of this release: www.waronfreedom.org/press/MNN-MU-4406.txt
or http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200604/1144202072.html
Progressive Press Home: www.progressivepress.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 14
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 19:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Reframing 9/11 Truth
All I have to say is to point them to Prof Steven Jones. let the morons argue with HIM.
linelites@mindspring.com wrote: I'VE BEEN FRAMED......
Good work, Donald.
I sadden to think the human species has to wade through such bull for such simple truths.
But if we gotta play this game, so be it. From now on...."the towers were pulverized"
(and so will be our opponent's argument)
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
>From: Donald Stahl <politicstahl@hotmail.com>
>Sent: Apr 3, 2006 9:25 PM
>To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [911TruthAction] Reframing 9/11 Truth
>
>
>
>
>It is no secret to 9/11 activists that it's difficult to get the
>truth across. We need to recognize that we are not alone here, and
>that "progressives" and "liberals" have the same problem. They are
>beginning to come up with some answers, and we need to know what they
>are.
>
>I'm speaking of George Lakoff and his Rockridge Institute:
>http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/ .
>
>Reframing isn't everything, as William A. Gamson and Charlotte Ryan
>point out,
>http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v19n2/gamson_elephants.html but it
>is something, and it's a tool 9/11 Truth has much use for. This is
>because every time someone, whether Truther or Bush-backer, says that
>the WTC buildings "collapsed," they use vocabulary that frames and
>supports the official story. This is not a habit we want to be
>copying from the Democrats.
>
>On p. 73 of Don't Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame
>the Debate, (White River Junction, VT, 2004) Lakoff says:
>
>"One of the fundamental findings of cognitive science is that people
>think in terms of frames and metaphors¾conceptual structures like
>those we have been describing. The frames are in the synapses of our
>brains, physically present in the form of neural circuitry. When the
>facts don't fit the frames, the frames are kept and the facts ignored.
>
>"It is a common folk theory of progressives that `the facts will set
>you free.' If only you can get all the facts out there in the public
>eye, then every rational person will reach the right conclusion. It
>is a vain hope. Human brains just don't work that way. Framing
>matters. Frames once entrenched are hard to dispel." (73).
>.
>Every 9/11 activist will admit this.
>
>Here is Doug Thompson answering responses to his anti-9/11 Truth
>rant, "9/11 Conspiracy Theories Don`t Pass the Smell Test":
>
>To answer some questions:
>--I've watched "Loose Change." Didn't convince me. Lots of
>speculation.
>--Striking The Washington Monument didn't have enough kill potential.
>The plane would have crashed short of the Pentagon.
>--As a journalist, I based my conclusions on facts from experts, not
>speculation from others with an agenda. The facts, as I see them,
>don't support the theories. As someone who loves a good story I wish
>they did. But they don't.
>Doug
>Posted by Doug Thompson at March 31, 2006 10:10 AM
>
>Now here is Lakoff again:
>
>"When we negate a frame, we evoke the frame." (3).
>
>"Remember, don't just negate the other person's claims; reframe. The
>facts unframed will not set you free. You cannot win just by stating
>the true facts and showing that they contradict your opponent's
>claims. Frames trump facts. His frames will stay and the facts will
>bounce off. Always reframe." (115).
>
>Note that Lakoff is not suggesting that you ignore facts.
>
>As examples of framing Lakoff gives the phrases `tax
>relief', `permission slip' and `wasteful spending` (as in Bush's
>State of the Union speech), 'rogue states', 'friendly nations'
>and `family values'.
>
>"When the word tax is added to relief, the result is a metaphor:
>Taxation is an affliction. And the person who takes it away is a
>hero, and anyone who tries to stop him is a bad guy. This is a
>frame. It is made up of ideas, like affliction and hero. The language
>that evokes the frame comes out of the White House, and it goes into
>press releases, goes to every radio station, every TV station, every
>newspaper. And soon the New York Times is using tax relief. And it is
>not only on Fox; it is on CNN, it is on NBC, it is on every station
>because it is `the president's tax-relief plan.' And soon the
>Democrats are using tax relief¾and shooting themselves in the foot."
>(4).
>
>An example of framing relevant to 9/11 Truth is saying that the WTC
>Towers collapsed.
>
>The official story has it that the three buildings of the World Trade
>Center did what they did because they were on fire, but no one says
>that the buildings "burned down." That would be ludicrously
>inappropriate, even though they did turn into a kind of "ashes." The
>official story has to use the term `collapse' because that term is so
>general it conceals what really happened to the buildings. Buildings
>collapse in earthquakes, but they don't turn into what the WTC
>buildings turned into. Firefighter Joe Casaliggi, in the DVD 9/11,
>created by Jules and Gedeon Naudet, says, "The building collapsed TO
>DUST. [His emphasis.]" But he was only using the word that had been
>given to him by the media. He knows as well as you or I that
>nothing "collapses to dust." That is as silly as saying that
>they "collapsed to smithereens."
>
>Lakoff himself is misled into misdescribing what happened to the
>Towers.
>
>"Metaphorically, tall buildings are people standing erect. As each
>tower fell, it became a body falling.
when we see a plane coming
>toward the building and imagine people in the building, we feel the
>plane coming toward us; when we see the building toppling toward
>others, we feel the building toppling toward us.
If we see the
>plane going through the building, and unconsciously we evoke the
>metaphor of the building as a head with the plane going through its
>temple, then we sense¾unconsciously but powerfully¾being shot through
>the temple. If we evoke the metaphor of the building as a person and
>see the building fall to the ground in pieces, then we sense¾again
>unconsciously but powerfully¾that we are falling to the ground in
>pieces." (54).
>
>Anyone who watched the news during VietNam, as Lakoff did, has seen a
>person being shot in the temple and falling to the ground; and they
>know that the person does not fall to the ground in pieces, much less
>disintegrate from the top down.
>
>This is what happened to the WTC buildings: they didn't topple; they
>disintegrated. When something falls down, it doesn't disintegrate, it
>just falls down, or collapses. When something burns up, it may
>disintegrate, but not in ten seconds. The only way to disintegrate
>massive concrete and steel buildings is by means of explosives, and
>that fact is apparent even to very frightened people.
>
>It was good to have Hoffman and S.P.I.N.E. showing that what the
>official story alleges is physically impossible; in fact, it was
>necessary in the beginning because people are often unwilling to
>trust their own judgment when it seems to be contradicted by experts
>and authorities.
>
>In the 1950s a psychology professor, Solomon Asch, did some
>experiments on college students. He told them that he wanted to test
>visual perception, but that was a lie. He had them sit in a classroom
>with other students and showed them all some lines, asking which
>lines looked like they were the same length, but only one student was
>really being tested. The others were conspirators along with
>Professor Asch, and they deliberately gave wrong answers. The student
>being tested was always asked last, after having heard all the others
>say that it looked to them like the wrong lines were the same length.
>The experiment was really to find out how many people,
>percentagewise, could be made to say that they saw what they didn't
>see, just to go along with the crowd. The answer was: about one third.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asch_conformity_experiments
>
>Note that the pressure came only from their equals, other
>undergraduates, not from any authority figure such as the teacher.
>Suppose some crafty professor told his class that he was going to
>illustrate the nature of some visual illusions for them, and then
>showed them some unequal lines, saying that the appearance of
>inequality was an illusion¾the lines were really equal. He then puts
>out a bogus, but detailed, explanation of why the lines look unequal
>when they're not. How many of the class will be fooled? Probably
>quite a few; a majority, surely, if not all. What happened to the
>Towers looked like a controlled demolition, but of course it really
>wasn't. It couldn't have been, because the authorities, that is, the
>government and the $1.3 trillion media industry, said it wasn't. It
>may have looked like a missile hit the Pentagon and the abandoned
>strip mine in Pennsylvania, but of course what really happened was
>that a giant airliner, a Boeing 757 weighing 128,730 lbs. empty, hit
>those places and disappeared, according to some highly convoluted
>explanation.
>
>"Even though the facts which prove this to be so [that is, that they
>were lied to] may be brought clearly to their minds, they [the
>people] will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that
>there may be some other explanation."
>
>Hitler was certainly right when he said this. Bring the facts clearly
>to their minds, or even to their eyes; when the obvious is also the
>unthinkable, what are they to do? The function of
>government "experts" is to provide that "other explanation,"
>those "facts as we (would like to) see them" which will allow people
>to continue to think what they want to think, what they need to
>think, in spite of their own eyes.
>
>The point is that it is obvious that the Towers were exploded. Saying
>that they collapsed obscures this and shoots us in the foot. The
>Towers didn't "fall," or "come down," or "topple." They disintegrated
>from the top down, as anyone with eyes can see. Shock and awe are
>over now. It's time to start reframing the obvious as obvious.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 15
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 20:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com>
Subject: Help defend Sheen
Can anyone come to defend Sheen on this outrageously horrendous blog?
http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/charlie-sheen/charlie-sheen-talks-911-conspiracy-161961.php
Thanks!
Cathy
The world can only be redeemed through action--movement -- motion. Uncoerced, unbribed and unbought, humanity will move toward the light.
Alice Hubbard's introduction to An American Bible (1912)
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 16
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 02:41:55 EDT
From: Moondancermom@aol.com
Subject: Homeland Security Deputy Press Secretary Arrested....GOPedophile bites the dust
News Update from Citizens for Legitimate Government
04 April 2006
_http://www.legitgov.org/_ (http://www.legitgov.org/)
_http://www.legitgov.org/index.html#breaking_news_
(http://www.legitgov.org/index.html#breaking_news)
_Homeland Security Deputy Press Secretary Arrested_
(http://www.legitgov.org/index.html#breaking_news) 04 Apr 2006 Brian J. Doyle, the Deputy Press
Secretary for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Office of Public Affairs
in Washington, D.C., was arrested this evening at his residence in Silver
Springs, Maryland, on 23 Polk County charges related to the use of a computer
to seduce a child and transmitting harmful materials to a minor. [Another
GOPedophile bites the dust!]
Address to receive newsletter: _http://www.legitgov.org/#subscribe_clg_
(http://www.legitgov.org/#subscribe_clg)
Please write to: _signup@legitgov.org_ (mailto:signup@legitgov.org) for
inquiries. lrp/mdr
CLG Newsletter editor: Lori Price, General Manager. Copyright © 2006,
Citizens For Legitimate Government ® All rights reserved. CLG Founder and Chair is
Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D.
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 17
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:28:47 -0700
From: APFN <apfn@apfn.org>
Subject: Injustices of the West Against The Arab World
[This message is not in displayable format]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Read more!
Bloglines - Latest Posts
| |||||
|
>>>>>>> Read more!
[political-research] Bloglines - Saint Noam has a posse
Good cop/bad cop con game.
Excerpt:
Watching a Chomskowitz ‘debate’ about Israel is like watching a Harlem Globe Trotters game. Chomsky will always win, and prove how open-minded Zionists really are by criticizing the details of the ethnic cleansing. Dershowitz plays the Washington Generals and gracefully loses. It’s entertainment in aid of controlling debate. Left unsaid is whether the project of Greater Israel should really be proceeding. Just like the average American, Israel is off the hook for the atrocities as it is all really the work of the evil, but vaguely defined, American Empire. It’s a neat trick, but it is a trick.
| |||||
|
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>>>>>>> Read more!
[political-research] Bloglines - The Universe is Trapped in its Own Web
| |||||
|
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>>>>>>> Read more!
[political-research] Bloglines - The Israeli end game
The likeliest endgame: Samson Option, self-fulfilling Armageddon, planetary Jonestown, possible end of the human race.
| |||||
|
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>>>>>>> Read more!
[political-research] Chomsky Turns Over His Cards
Wednesday, April 05, 2006
Chomsky turns over his cards
Blankfort on Chomsky:
He would have us believe that Israels occupation and harsh actions against the Palestinians, its invasions and undeclared 40 years war on Lebanon, and its arming of murderous regimes in Central America and Africa during the Cold War, has been done as a client state in the service of US interests. In Chomskys world view, that absolves Israel of responsibility and has become standard Chomsky doctrine.
Continuing my theme that Chomskys ill-advised political act in getting into the Lobby debate on the side that protects the Lobby, thus making Chomsky personally and directly responsible for the slo-mo genocide against the Palestinian people (and putting the lie to his entire lifes work: American beating up on Nicaraguan peasant bad; Israeli beating up on Palestinian peasant not so bad, because it is all the Americans fault), I wonder if this summarizes, in a nutshell, the deep problem with Chomskian anti-Americanism. Has anything gotten better since Chomsky started telling us about the problems with the American Empire? No. Everything has gotten much worse. Why? Because Chomskys information is directed at vague intangible bad guys that Americans cant do anything about. Short of revolution, which aint gonna happen, how do you wage war against a class? On the other hand, it you are made aware that there are certain identified people like, ahem, the Lobby that are causing the problem, you can actually do something about it.
Chomskys bizarre blindness about Israel is starting to look like the pattern of his lifes work. Americans are no more responsible for what happens than are Israelis, as everything is the fault of the American Empire. He provides reams of carefully-edited facts, but the sum total of what he does amounts to what we could call controlled dissent. He seems to be complaining, but he is no real threat to the Empire, as the only road out left by him is Revolution. Acting on his writings is hopeless, which is why things continue to become worse. Ironically, this criticism of Chomsky is the main political criticism leveled by the left against conspiracy theory.
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>>>>>>> Read more!
[political-research] "Defence secretary calls for Geneva conventions to be redrawn (UK) "
http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,1746322,00.html
From: "CLG News" <clg_news@...>
Subject: " Defence secretary calls for Geneva
conventions to be redrawn " (UK)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 03:43:02 -0400
http://www.legitgov.org/index.html#breaking_news
http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,,1746322,00.html
" International laws hinder UK troops - Reid
Defence secretary calls for Geneva conventions to be
redrawn "
Richard Norton-Taylor and Clare Dyer
Tuesday April 4, 2006 The Guardian
John Reid demanded sweeping changes to international
law yesterday to free British soldiers from the
restraints of the Geneva conventions and make it
easier for the west to mount military actions against
other states.
In his speech, the defence secretary addressed three
key issues: the treatment of prisoners, when to mount
a pre-emptive strikes, and when to intervene to stop a
humanitarian crisis. In all these areas, he indicated
that the UK and west was being hamstrung by existing
inadequate law.
Mr Reid indicated he believed existing rules,
including some of the conventions - a bedrock of
international law - were out of date and inadequate to
deal with the threat of international terrorists.
"We are finding an enemy which obeys no rules
whatsoever", he said, referring to what he called
"barbaric terrorism".
The conventions, he said, were created more than half
century ago "when the world was almost
unrecognisable". They dealt with how the sick and
injured and how prisoners of war were treated, "and
the obligations on states during their military
occupation of another state", he said.
Given the big changes undertaken by the military over
the past 50 years, he added, "serious questions" must
be asked about whether "further changes in
international law in this area are necessary".
Mr Reid declined to say whether he had come round to
the US view that detainees at Guantánamo bay should
not be allowed the protection of the conventions or
the courts. Similarly, he would not say if he thought
Britain should support the US practice of
extraordinary rendition, the transferring of prisoners
to secret camps where they risk being tortured.
However, he said, it was not "sufficient just to say
[Guantánamo] is wrong".
Mr Reid said yesterday that while domestic laws had
been introduced to deal with new threats - he referred
to the new offence of "glorifying terrorism" -
international law had not changed.
He also spoke of the "concept of imminence" - the
circumstances when a state could strike without
waiting for an attack.
It was a principal issue during the debate over the
invasion of Iraq and has clear implications for any
possible future action against Iran.
Mr Reid noted that last year Lord Goldsmith, the
attorney general, advised that force could be used
only against imminent attack, that it must only be
used as a last resort, and that it must be
proportionate.
"But what if another threat develops?", Mr Reid asked.
"Not al-Qaida. Not Muslim extremism. Something none of
us are thinking about at the moment." Terrorist groups
were trying to acquire weapons of mass destruction, he
said.
The Liberal Democrat defence spokesman, Nick Harvey,
said: "After the disaster of Iraq, the idea that the
doctrine of pre-emptive strike should be expanded will
be met with incredulity in the west and alarm in the
ministries of Tehran."
Sir Adam Roberts, professor of international relations
at Oxford University, said: "Some of the biggest
coalition problems in both Afghanistan and Iraq have
come from failures of the coalition to observe basic
norms on certain matters, especially with regard to
treatment of prisoners.
"Dr Reid is certainly right to raise the question of
whether we need new rules in face of imminent attack.
This problem above all requires confidence in
government and coalition decision-making processes -
confidence that has sadly been undermined by Iraq."
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>>>>> Read more!
[UrukNet] - [Daily Information from Occupied Iraq] - [newsletter 04 Apr 2006 - Part two]
| uruknet.info |
www.uruknet.info: a site gathering daily information concerning occupied Iraq: news, analysis, documents and texts of iraqi resistance available in Italian and English.
You receive this newsletter because you subscribed it. If you think it was an abuse, or simply if you don't want to receive it any more, click here to unsubscribe from the newsletter. |
>>>>>>> Read more!
[UrukNet] - [Daily Information from Occupied Iraq] - [newsletter 04 Apr 2006 - Part One]
| uruknet.info |
www.uruknet.info: a site gathering daily information concerning occupied Iraq: news, analysis, documents and texts of iraqi resistance available in Italian and English.
You receive this newsletter because you subscribed it. If you think it was an abuse, or simply if you don't want to receive it any more, click here to unsubscribe from the newsletter. |
>>>>>>> Read more!
[political-research] 'Israel Lobby' No Joke
|
'Israel Lobby' no joke
Was the Trib's scathing denunciation of the research paper "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" (by University of Chicago and Harvard University political science professors John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, respectively) an April Fools' Day joke ("'The Israel Lobby,'" April 1 and TribLIVE.com)? I am not usually impressed with research papers generated by normally left-wing universities, but the Trib's slander of the authors prompted me read the 82-page paper online (ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/rwp/RWP06-011). The Trib's casual dismissal of the well-documented (42 pages of keynotes) research paper by two well-respected professionals as "blatantly anti-Semitic" is a insult to not only the professors but to careful readers who have been wondering for 2 1/2 years how the United States got sucked into the Iraq disaster. Does the Trib's knee-jerk editorial indicate that it also is a member of the Israel Lobby? Gerald Schiller |
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>>>>>>> Read more!
[imra] Daily digest - Volume: 2 Issue: 1365 (11 messages)
imra Wed Apr 5 02:21:09 2006 Volume 2 : Issue 1365
In this issue of the imra daily Digest:
Excerpts: Palestinians ununified.
Cooling down on "Cartoons". 4 April 2006
The Israeli Elections: Initial Reflections
["less ideological and more pragmatic"]
1 Palestinian Citizen Dead and 2 Injured in
Incidents Involving the Mishandling of Weapons
First Ever Chartered Flight of British
Olim Expected in Summer 2006:
Nefesh B'Nefesh Expands to the UK
Iran exploits Israeli retreat from Lebanon-
monitoring stations hugging Israeli border,
spy planes over Northern Israel
[Human shields indifferent]Children Play Soccer
Indifferent to Israeli Missiles North Beit Hanoon
Saudi ambassador salutes 1981
strike on Iraqi nuclear reactor
Almost cigar - Qassam almost hit cache of
inflammable materials, could have caused disaster
Film Clip: Israeli Star Aviv Gefen Wants Pollard
US says Saudi individuals still funding terrorism
ZOA Criticizes Brandeis Univesity For
Relationship With Al-Quds University
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: imra@netvision.net.il
To: imra@imra.org.il
Subject: Excerpts: Palestinians ununified.
Cooling down on "Cartoons". 4 April 2006
Excerpts: Palestinians ununified.Cooling down on "Cartoons". 4 April 2006
+++JORDAN TIMES 4 April '06
Turning Palestine into another Nicaragua? by Ramzy Baroud
QUOTES FROM TEXT:
"Palestinian government is now officially isolated, as many Palestinians
cannot see beyond their wn narrow ... ideological differences"
"turning Palestine into another Nicaragua"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXCERPTS:
What is currently transpiring in the occupied territories is by far a
worst-case scenario, ironically one made possible with the direct help of
many Palestinians themselves.
The democratically elected Palestinian government is now officially
isolated, as many Palestinians cannot see beyond their own narrow - and
frankly irrelevant - ideological differences and immaterial factionalism.
Others cannot resist their total reliance on foreign, mostly European, funds
to run their mostly self-exalting NGOs, whose tangible contribution to
Palestinian life is still disputed. The final outcome is that turning
Palestine into another Nicaragua is working.
That was the intent from the moment Hamas was declared victorious in the
parliamentary elections .... US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice ...
leading a campaign of defamation and coercion aimed at politically and
financially isolating the democratically elected Palestinian legislators,
further solidifying with the former corrupt political elite.
In the same way, Nicaragua of the 1960s and 70s seemed of little concern ...
.
The Palestinian case is, more or less, being handled the same way: ..that
same ... scenario which is hoped to eventually lead to diplomatic deadlock,
regional and international isolation and further deterioration in the
already unstable (read non-existing) Palestinian economy.
On the external front, the new Palestinian government was met almost
immediately with unfair demands of unilateral renunciation of violence and
the unconditional recognition of Israel. ... .
... Rather than coming together in the face of danger, Fateh intentionally
impeded Hamas' attempt to join the new government and the socialists failed
to see through their ideological constrictions.
Unfortunately, Hamas was forced to form a government and to seek its
legislative approval alone.
. . .
While a religious ideology is not the most helpful formula for any
Palestinian polity and suicide bombings were the single most tainting act
employed by Palestinians in recent years, I believe all Palestinians must
recognise that the impending fight is of greater consequence than the
dialectics of religion and politics.
... Israeli plot of denying Palestinians any say in the shaping of their
future, which is sadly growing dimmer by the day.
===
The writer, veteran Arab American journalist ...teaches mass communication
at Australia's Curtin University of Technology, Malaysia Campus. ... .
+++ARAB NEWS (Saudi) 4 April '06:"Products of Danish Dairy Company Return to
Supermarket Shelves" by M. Ghazanfar Ali Khan,
: QUOTES FROM TEXT:
"Products of the Danish dairy conglomwerate Aela Foods ... will be back
on the supermarket shelves in Saudi Arabia from tomorrow"
" had issued an apology to Muslims worldwide ... pledged to disseminate
awareness about Islam and make donations to charity groups"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXCERPTS:
RIYADH, 4 April 2006 - Products of the Danish dairy conglomerate Arla Foods
... will be back on the supermarket shelves in Saudi Arabia from tomorrow.
...
... . "The unofficial boycott has been lifted and this is only for Arla
products,"... .
The move comes following a recommendation made by five Islamic organizations
...which participated in an Islamic conference in Bahrain last month to
debate the issue surrounding the blasphemous cartoons ... ..
Arla Foods had issued an apology to Muslims worldwide ... pledged to
disseminate awareness about Islam and make donations to charity groups.
Arla has a major dairy plant in Riyadh ... A new production facility planned
for Saudi Arabia has been indefinitely put on hold, ... .
"We have deferred plans to set up the multimillion dollar production plant
because of the boycott of Danish products and its adverse impact on our
sales in the region," said Pedersen.
Arla had already invested $70 million to build the new plant in cooperation
with Danya Foods of Saudi Arabia. . . .
Sue Lerner, Associate - IMRA
------------------------------
From: imra@netvision.net.il
To: imra@imra.org.il
Subject: The Israeli Elections: Initial Reflections
["less ideological and more pragmatic"]
The Israeli Elections: Initial Reflections
[IMRA: It has been an going theme for retreat supporters to term a vote in
favor of retreat to be a move putting "pragmatism" over "ideology". One can
readily argue that the opposite is the case.
Is the implementation of a retreat that can be expected to leave the area
under the control of a sovereign Hamas terror state out of a desire to
immediately end the "occupation" at all costs so that at some future point
in time Israel will not find itself forced to allow the Palestinians in the
West Bank to vote in the Knesset (the "demographic threat") "pragmatism" or
the expression of an extreme of "ideology"?
Is the belief that if Israel unilaterally retreats to a line that this line
will enjoy international recognition as a final border "pragmatism" or the
wishful self-deception of an extreme "ideology"?]
Tel Aviv Notes No. 164
April 4, 2006
The Israeli Elections: Initial Reflections
Yehuda Ben Meir
Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies
The Israeli national elections held on March 28 did not yield a clear-cut
outcome and one should therefore be cautious in drawing conclusions before
all the results, including breakdowns by various criteria, have been
properly digested, analyzed and understood. However, it is already possible
to venture several observations.
The first concerns the low voter turnout - about 64% -- which represents a
decrease of 5% from three years ago and is the lowest turnout rate in Israel's
history (for Knesset elections). Voter apathy reflects a growing
disillusionment with the current political parties in particular and with
the political process in general. This disillusionment was also
demonstrated in the surprise of the election - the astonishing achievement
of the Pensioners' Party, which won seven seats (more than half of the seats
won by the Likud). The support for this party, whose political platform and
candidates were totally unknown to the Israeli electorate, can only be seen
as a massive protest vote against all the political parties represented in
the outgoing Knesset. Indeed, the party's remarkable and totally
unpredicted success may well be attributed precisely to the fact that it was
not represented in the previous Knesset and that its candidates were not
politicians. At the same time, it should be noted that growing voter
apathy, especially among young age groups, is endemic in Western democracies
and thus may be a sign - albeit not a positive one - of a growing normalcy
in the Israeli political environment. Given improved security and an upbeat
economy, many Israelis saw no real threat and felt that they could stay home
or vote for the Pensioners' Party.
As for the results themselves, two key observations are in order. First of
all, there has been a clear short-term shift in the balance of power from
center-right to center-left. The right-religious bloc has dropped from 69
seats to 50 seats - a loss of over twenty five percent. The center-left
bloc, including the Arab parties, controls 63 seats, with the remaining
seven going to the new Pensioners' Party. The political leanings of this
party remain a mystery, although there is reason to believe that it, or at
least a majority of its Knesset members, lean towards the center-left bloc.
If so, that would effectively give the bloc a total of 70 seats. No less
important, the center-left bloc, assuming the support of the Pensioners'
Party, has 60 seats even without the Arab parties. Not since before the
first Likud victory in 1977 has the center-left bloc been in such a strong
position. The significance of these numbers is that Kadima Leader Ehud
Olmert can muster a majority in the Knesset for his convergence plan even if
the Arab parties (which together have ten seats) abstain. Nevertheless, the
victory of Olmert, Kadima and the center-left bloc is far from a landslide,
and the results remain subject to different interpretations.
In the long-term point of view, however, there are two contradictory trends,
both of which may have far-reaching ramifications and consequences for
Israeli politics and for Israeli society. On the one hand, we see an
electorate far less ideological and more pragmatic. At the same, however,
we have also seen a sharp increase in sectarianism.
These elections reflect the demise of the ideological parties. Meretz on
the left and the National Union-National Religious Party on the right
suffered losses at the polls, and the Likud was all but demolished. Many
have termed these elections "the death of ideology." It would seem that the
Israeli voter has freed himself at last from a binding commitment to a given
party - be it because of ideology or a "label." Party loyalty has been
greatly weakened and there may well be wide-ranging shifts in future voting
patterns, reflecting a more pragmatic and situation-dependent approach on
the part of the Israeli electorate.
Indeed, perhaps the most dramatic and obvious result of this election is the
complete redrawing of the political map compared to that of three years ago.
Kadima, a party which did not exist six months ago, received the votes of
almost one out of every four Israelis and is now the largest party in the
Knesset, with 29 seats. Shinui, a party which had won 15 seats in 2003 and
had over 300,000 votes, vanished into thin air. The Likud lost close to 75%
of its votes and went from 38 seats in 2003 (making it the largest party,
twice as big as Labor) to just 12 seats, by far its worst showing ever. All
in all, only 17% of the voters (according to one exit poll) voted this time
for the same party they had voted for in the previous elections. In short,
political parties and their leaders can no longer take the loyalty of their
voters for granted.
Many had expected that the reconfiguration of Israeli politics would produce
a strong center party - Kadima - which would be able, with relative ease, to
form a strong and stable coalition government which could implement
clear-cut and far-reaching political, diplomatic and economic policies.
This expectation did not fully materialize. Instead, there has been a
remarkable rise in the support for sectarian parties. Shas, United Torah
Judaism, and especially the Russian immigrants' party of Avigdor Lieberman
made strong gains, and the Pensioners' Party - a classic special interest
party - is the great surprise of the elections. The Arab parties and the
National Union-NRP are also, for all intents and purposes, sectarian
parties. One single number can tell the whole story. The three major
parties which presented candidates for Prime Minister - Kadima, Labor and
Likud -- altogether could muster only 60 seats. This is the first time in
Israel's history that the three largest parties together are unable, even
hypothetically, to form a government.
Ehud Olmert now faces the formidable task of putting together a stable
coalition in a Knesset in which twelve parties are represented but none is
truly dominant. And Israel as a whole will have to grapple with the
consequences of growing sectarianism, with all the inherent dangers that
poses for a healthy democracy and a strong cohesive society.
___________________________________________________________________
Tel Aviv Notes is published by
TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY
The Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies www.tau.ac.il/jcss/
& The Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies
http://www.dayan.org/
through the generosity of Sari and Israel Roizman, Philadelphia
KEYWORD: Israel
------------------------------
From: imra@netvision.net.il
To: imra@imra.org.il
Subject: 1 Palestinian Citizen Dead and 2 Injured in
Incidents Involving the Mishandling of Weapons
PCHR
Palestinian Centre for Human Rights
Security Chaos and Proliferation of Small Arms
Misuse of Weapons by Armed Groups and Security Personnel
Field Update
4 April 2006
1 Citizen Dead and 2 Injured in Incidents Involving the Mishandling of
Weapons
Hisham Ahmad Mohammad Jaber, a 30-year-old resident of the Sheikh Radwan
neighborhood of Gaza City, shot himself, after injuring his brother
(Mohammad, 24), when he mishandled a firearm.
According to the family's testimony to the police, given in Shifa Hospital
in Gaza City, the incident took place at approximately 16:00 on Sunday, 2
April 2006. At the time, Hisham Jaber, a taxi driver, was handling a weapon
at his house in the Sheikh Radwan neighborhood. A bullet was accidentally
fired, hitting his brother Mohammad in the leg. According to the testimony,
Hisham then shot himself in the head and died instantly. Medical sources at
Shifa Hospital stated that Hisham was killed by a bullet to the head, while
Mohammad's injury was classified as moderate.
In another incident, Hani Jaber Khalil, a 27-year-old resident of Jabalia
refugee camp, was injured when he mishandled a weapon. PCHR's initial
investigation indicates that at approximately 20:20 on Sunday, 2 April 2006,
Hani Khalil was injured by a bullet to the right leg, which was fired when
he mishandled a rifle in his house. He was taken to Kamal Odwan Hospital in
Beit Lahya, where his injury was classified as moderate.
PCHR is very concerned over the continued number of deaths and injuries
resulting from the misuse of weapons, which is has become a prominent
feature of the ongoing security chaos in the region. The Centre stresses
the importance of protecting civilians and ensuring their safety in
accordance with international humanitarian law.
Public Document
**************************************
For more information please call PCHR office in Gaza, Gaza Strip, on +972 8
2824776 - 2825893
PCHR, 29 Omer El Mukhtar St., El Remal, PO Box 1328 Gaza, Gaza Strip.
E-mail: pchr@pchrgaza.org, Webpage http://www.pchrgaza.org
-----------------------------------
If you got this forwarded and you want to subscribe, send mail to
request@pchrgaza.org
and write "subscribe" in the subject line.
------------------------------
From: imra@netvision.net.il
To: imra@imra.org.il
Subject: First Ever Chartered Flight of British
Olim Expected in Summer 2006:
Nefesh B'Nefesh Expands to the UK
(4 APRIL 2006 / JERUSALEM) - Nefesh B'Nefesh ( www.nefeshbnefesh.org ), the
organization committed to the revitalization of North American immigration
to Israel, working in close cooperation with the Jewish Agency for Israel,
will be launching its Aliyah (immigration to Israel) related services in the
UK this month.
Since its inception in 2002, Nefesh B'Nefesh (NBN) has been dedicated to
providing Aliyah assistance services to Jews from the U.S. and Canada. This
strategic expansion of services to the UK move has come as result of an
overwhelming number of requests by British Jews of NBN for assistance in
moving to Israel. NBN's headquarters will remain in Jerusalem while
providing on - site informational support throughout the UK.
At present, NBN is coordinating a specially chartered flight of British Olim
during the summer of 2006. Prior to the flight, NBN will send specially
trained Aliyah professionals to the UK to provide informational seminars,
slated to address employment, housing, governmental and numerous other
Aliyah oriented issues. The events will assist anyone seeking comprehensive
information on Aliyah planning stages.
"England is the most natural expansion for Nefesh B'Nefesh's services,
especially as result of the high interest that has been expressed from the
wonderful Jewish community there, said NBN Co-Founder and Executive
Director, Rabbi Yehoshua Fass. "The Israeli government, Chief Rabbi Sir
Jonathan Sacks and additional key British figures have given us their
blessings and together we hope to achieve great success there as well."
Nefesh B'Nefesh has built its success on removing and/or minimizing the
financial, professional, logistical and social obstacles for (North
American) immigrants to Israel. Their Olim are offered informational
seminars, pre and post Aliyah social events, employment placement services,
help assistance centers, Aliyah advocacy and a helping hand with general
adjustment issues. In addition, the organization heavily assists in removing
nearly all the 'red tape' bureaucracy before and after Aliyah. To date, 99%
of NBN's 7,000 newcomers have remained in Israel and over 94% of those
seeking employment are gainfully employed. Over 250 "Sabras" (native born
Israelis) were born and 63 weddings have been celebrated within the Nefesh
"family," including three couples who met on NBN chartered flights.
------------------------------
From: imra@netvision.net.il
To: imra@imra.org.il
Subject: Iran exploits Israeli retreat from Lebanon-
monitoring stations hugging Israeli border,
spy planes over Northern Israel
[IMRA: Retreat supporters pointed to the "successful" retreat from Lebanon
to defend retreat from Gaza.]
Iran's spies watching us, says Israel
By Con Coughlin Defence and Security Editor, on Israel's northern border
Daily Telegraph (UK) 4 April 2006
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/04/04/wiran04.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/04/04/ixworld.html
Iran has set up a sophisticated intelligence gathering operation in southern
Lebanon to identify targets in northern Israel in the event of a military
confrontation over its controversial nuclear programme.
Senior Israeli military commanders say Iran has spent tens of millions of
pounds helping its close ally, Hizbollah, the Shia Muslim militant group
that controls southern Lebanon, to set up a network of control towers and
monitoring stations along the entire length of Israel's border with south
Lebanon.
Some of the new control towers, which are made of reinforced concrete and
fitted with bullet-proof reflective glass, are less than 100 yards from
Israeli army positions and are clearly visible for long stretches along
Israel's border.
"This is now Iran's front line with Israel," a senior Israeli military
commander said. "The Iranians are using Hizbollah to spy on us so that they
can collect information for future attacks. And there is very little we can
do about it."
The Israeli military has reported a significant increase in Hizbollah
activity in southern Lebanon since Syria came under intense international
pressure to withdraw its forces from the area last year following the
assassination of the Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri.
Israeli military officers report that teams of Iran's Revolutionary Guards
travel regularly to southern Lebanon to help train local Hizbollah fighters
in terrorist tactics. Tensions between Iran and Israel have intensified
dramatically since the election last summer of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
as Iran's new leader. Israel has repeatedly threatened to take military
action to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, and the new Iranian
government has responded by calling for Israel's destruction.
Senior Israeli military officers believe Iran is deliberately exploiting the
power vacuum caused by Syria's withdrawal to intensify pressure on Israel's
northern border.
Hizbollah is aware that Israel is keen to maintain friendly relations with
the new government in Lebanon and believes it can act freely in southern
Lebanon without provoking retaliatory strikes from Israel.
Officers report a sharp increase in border incidents between Hizbollah
fighters and Israeli units on the northern border, with the main flash
points located at the disputed Druze village of Ghajar, which is divided by
the border between Israel and Lebanon, and Mount Dov, which Hizbollah also
claims should be part of Lebanon.
The situation is now regarded as so serious that many senior Israeli
officers openly admit to missing the restraining influence of Syria over
Hizbollah.
"When the Syrians were in Lebanon it was easy for us to control Hizbollah,"
said an officer with Israel's northern command. "If things got too tense we
could put pressure on Damascus and the Syrians would act quickly to calm
things down."
Although the Lebanese government technically controls the border area, its
military is not considered strong enough to control Hizbollah, which takes
its orders directly from Teheran.
"Iran is playing a very dangerous game of cat and mouse on our northern
border and it could easily spiral out of control at any moment," said the
officer.
In recent weeks Hizbollah sent unmanned aircraft on reconnaissance missions
over the border to photograph sensitive Israeli military installations. The
spy planes returned to base before being detected by air defence systems.
In addition to providing intelligence-gathering and communications
equipment, Iran has also equipped Hizbollah with improved weapons and
ammunition to launch attacks against Israel, including heavy mortars and
rockets with a range of up to 30 miles.
------------------------------
From: imra@netvision.net.il
To: imra@imra.org.il
Subject: [Human shields indifferent]Children Play Soccer
Indifferent to Israeli Missiles North Beit Hanoon
Children Play Soccer Indifferent to Israeli Missiles North Beit Hanoon
www.ipc.gov.ps/ipc_new/english/details.asp?name=15023
BEIT HANOON, Palestine, April 04, 2006 (IPC) [Official PA website]- -Soccer
team of teens continued indifferently playing football just meters away the
thunderous boom of missiles by the Israeli tanks noisy roaming in the scene
simultaneously a crew of journalists were gearing up in a hurry to set their
cameras on rooftop of one of the houses located next to the northern
borderline of Gaza Strip, fortified with bullet proofs.
Ostensible absurd scene is previewed; uncaring children of the echo of
missiles explosions and people who mostly often are victims of such missiles
practicing their routine daily life heading no attention to danger in the
offing.
Mohammed Shabta, resident of north Beth Hanoon town, found the scene normal
as the population there used to wake up and sleep on the resonance of
missiles and whoosh of choppers and drowns overheads.
"The households and farmers did not flee their places, when the occupation
soldiers had occupied the area and played havoc," Shabat said, adding that
people insisted on keeping steadfast in their lands despite of the daily
missiles.
Tracing in finger to the vast areas opposite to the northern eastward
borders of Beit Hanoon nestled with Green Line lands; Sahabt explained "the
occupation troops aimed to empty this area from its indigenous population in
a prelude to convert it into a buffer zone totally open to their tanks and
convoys able to monitor the area round the clock."
Though hundreds of scattered houses stretching along the borders with the
green line until reaching Beit Hannon crossing " Eretz", the area is
seemingly almost bleak. Prior to the evacuation of the settlers from Gaza
Strip, the Israeli occupation forces caterpillar bulldozers conducted a
whirlwind military campaign in Beit Hanoon, destroying everything even the
citrus groves that once a day the town famed with but now craving it.
A 13 year-old Hussein was continuing his soccer adamantly said "if we fear,
we will not play, read or even get out our homes, no place for fear in our
heart any more."
He went onto saying " come and live with us a week, you will be like us,
careless to missiles and live routine life despite probable death rears its
head at any moment."
Two farmers were wounded from Beit Lahia north the Strip yesterday before by
the sprinkled shrapnel as well as a number of parking cars were grossly
damaged let alone the material damages inflicted to the houses.
Hussin's father marked out the deep holes and fissure in lands came under
firing missiles saying "the Israeli special soldiers fortified in the dark
behind tiny embankments which believed to be used by the fighters to ambush
them."
Resident Hamed Abu Harbeed, 27, sounded more willpower "life on the harmony
of missiles explosion brining anticipated killing become normal for the
population here, determined to continue normality with life semblances. The
kids whose dreams filled with violence and fear also continue to play soccer
and heed off to their classes paying no attention to the continuous firing
of missiles as de facto have to be forgettable.
------------------------------
From: imra@netvision.net.il
To: imra@imra.org.il
Subject: Saudi ambassador salutes 1981
strike on Iraqi nuclear reactor
Saudi ambassador salutes Israeli 1981 strike on Iraqi nuclear reactor
www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3236054,00.html
Turki al-Faisal, speaking in San Francisco, says Israel's 1981 strike on
Iraqi nuclear reactor was 'certainly a positive move'
Itamar Eichner YNET 4 April 2006
Saudi Arabia's ambassador to the United States Turki al-Faisal expressed
support for Israel's strike on the Iraqi Osirak nuclear facility in 1981.
Al-Faisal said that the destruction of the Iraqi nuclear reactor by Israel
was certainly a positive step, during a speech on foreign relations in San
Francisco.
The prince said that a region clear of nuclear weapons would also serve
Israel and increase its security. He said that it was known that Israel had
nuclear weapons, and that that Arab world felt threatened by Israel, rather
than the other way around.
Faisal added that Israel possessed the best army, air force, and navy in the
Middle East, and that these have been well used in the past.
After becoming aware that Iraq was planning to construct nuclear weapons,
Israel launched a surprise aerial attack on June 7 1981 on the Osirak
facility near Baghdad, and destroyed the Iraqi reactor.
The move was initially widely condemned, but was widely supported in
subsequent years.
(04.04.06, 12:20)
------------------------------
From: imra@netvision.net.il
To: imra@imra.org.il
Subject: Almost cigar - Qassam almost hit cache of
inflammable materials, could have caused disaster
[IMRA: It remains to be seen if Israel will stray from its policy that
serious action only be taken after the Palestinians succeed in causing a
disaster. So far Israel has continued with its bombing of empty fields (and
sometimes empty structures). Curiously, if Amir Peretz does become Defense
Minister, he may actually opt for a stronger Israeli response since the
purpose of the appointment to the position of Defense Minister is to fill
out his C.V. for a run for PM in the next elections.]
5 Qassams land near Ashkelon
Rockets fired at Israel land near army base, factory in Ashkelon's
industrial zone. Employees say Qassam almost hit cache of inflammable
materials, could have caused disaster
Shmulik Hadad 4 April 2006
www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3236087,00.html
Five Qssam rockets were fired Tuesday from the northern Gaza Strip at
southern Ashkelon. Two of the rockets landed in the area of kibbutz Zikim,
one fell in kibbutz Karmiya, one in the area of the Nativ Haasara community
and the fifth landed in Ashkelon's industrial zone, just south of the town.
As of now, no injuries have been reported. In response to the attack, the
IDF shelled Qassam launching sites in the Strip.
One of the rockets that landed in the area of Zikim fell near an army base.
The rocket that landed in the Ashkelon industrial zone could have caused
heavy damages, according to employees at the place.
"A great disaster was prevented today," a source at the industrial area
stated. "The rocket landed near a stockpile of highly inflammable materials.
One flare could have caused grave damages to the entire vicinity," he added.
Employees working near the Qassam's landing site at the time of the attack
said they heard a loud explosion. The Red Dawn alert system identified the
rockets' launching, and consequently all personnel were ordered to enter
reinforced rooms.
Tuesday's shooting marks the second time this week rockets have been fired
at Israel. On Sunday, a Qassam was launched at Israel's territory and landed
in an open field in the western Negev.
Hanan Greenberg contributed to the report
(04.04.06, 13:38)
------------------------------
From: imra@netvision.net.il
To: imra@imra.org.il
Subject: Film Clip: Israeli Star Aviv Gefen Wants Pollard
Film Clip: Israeli Star Aviv Gefen Wants Pollard
Justice4JP Release - April 4, 2006
Aviv Gefen, the immensely popular Israeli singer and entertainer, was
recently interviewed on The Yair Lapid Show (Channel 2, 3 April 2006), where
he surprised the prime time TV host by speaking of his desire to meet
Jonathan Pollard. Here is how the conversation went:
Yair Lapid: Is there any Israeli that you know of, but whom you have never
met, with whom you would like to go out to dinner.
Aviv Gefen: With Pollard!
Yair Lapid (surprised): It's a little problematic for Pollard to go out to
dinner though...
Aviv Gefen (unfazed) When he gets home to Israel!
Yair Lapid (recovers): That's right...
>> CLICK HERE to view the film clip:
www.freepollard.org/5766/nisan/Aviv-Pollard.WMV
------------------------------
From: imra@netvision.net.il
To: imra@imra.org.il
Subject: US says Saudi individuals still funding terrorism
US says Saudi individuals still funding terrorism
Tue Apr 4, 2006 2:14 PM ET
By Caroline Drees
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-04-04T181412Z_01_N044564_RTRUKOC_0_US-SECURITY-FINANCIAL-SAUDI.xml&archived=False
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia must do a better job at ferreting out
major individual donors who continue to fund terrorism abroad, including in
Iraq, a top U.S. Treasury official said on Tuesday.
Stuart Levey, the Treasury's undersecretary for terrorism and financial
intelligence, said Saudi Arabia had made significant strides in
counterterrorism efforts in recent years and that the kingdom was "doing an
excellent job" fighting operatives of
Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network at home.
But he told a hearing of the Senate Banking Committee that concerns
remained, including the existence of so-called "deep-pocket donors" and the
abuse of charities to fund militants.
"Is money leaving Saudi Arabia to fund terrorism abroad? Yes," said Levey,
who has traveled to Saudi Arabia twice in the last two months. "Undoubtedly,
some of that money is going to Iraq. And it's going to Southeast Asia and
it's going to any other place where there are terrorists."
He said Saudi Arabia had taken steps to curb terrorism financing, but had
failed to set up a special charity commission to regulate the sector, as it
had pledged. He said rules implemented as a stop-gap measure in the interim
"haven't been uniformly implemented."
Levey said Saudi Arabia's fledgling Financial Intelligence Unit, set up last
year after much prodding from the United States, was still not fully
functional.
Financial Intelligence Units are government agencies that collect, analyze
and exchange financial information to help fight
money laundering and terrorism financing.
"What needs to happen is they need to do financial investigations in a
serious way in order to locate those deep-pocket donors that are still
funding terrorism abroad. And that's something which is a concern that
hasn't happened as robustly as it needs to happen," Levey said.
Banking Committee Chairman Richard Shelby, an Alabama Republican, asked
whether there was a gap between Saudi government rhetoric and the
implementation of policy.
Levey replied: "I've got to say that there's a lag. ... And we'll see if
there's a gap."
------------------------------
From: imra@netvision.net.il
To: imra@imra.org.il
Subject: ZOA Criticizes Brandeis Univesity For
Relationship With Al-Quds University
NEWS RELEASE
Zionist Organization of America
April 4, 2006
Contact Morton A. Klein at www.zoa.org
Attn: NEWS EDITOR
ZOA CRITICIZES BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY FOR RELATIONSHIP
WITH AL-QUDS UNIVERSITY, WHICH DENIES JEWISH
CONNECTION TO JERUSALEM & MORE
New York - The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) has criticized
the formal relationship that Brandeis University has developed with Al-Quds
University, a Palestinian educational institution in eastern Jerusalem,
whose website denies the Jewish historical connection with Jerusalem and
promotes other falsehoods. Brandeis is being funded as part of a $500,000
Ford Foundation Grant meant to bolster Al-Quds University through various
programs. Brandeis' International Center for Ethics, Justice and Public
Life, which has coordinated Al-Quds visitors programs, also includes Al-Quds
University President Sari Nusseibeh on its advisory board. Nusseibeh is
often falsely presented as a Palestinian moderate but, as ZOA revealed in
October 2002, Nusseibeh has actually demonized Israelis, praised jihad
fighters and justified the killing of so-called Palestinian "collaborators."
He has also explained that purely tactical reasons he once signed a petition
calling for a halt to Palestinian terrorist attacks on Israeli civilians.
Moreover, Nusseibeh was arrested by Israel in January 1991 for collecting
security information for Iraqi intelligence.
A perusal of Al-Quds University website page dedicated to 'Jerusalem
History' indicates that the university publicizes propaganda aimed at
denying Jewish history and especially the Jewish connection with the land of
Israel and Jerusalem, thereby fostering extremism and hatred of Israel.
The statements that appear on the Al-Quds website are similar to
claims made by Palestinian officials, including Yasser Arafat, who refused
to make peace with Israel in 20002 and told President Clinton that Jerusalem
had no connection to Judaism. Arafat also said in an October 2002 interview
that, "For 34 years [the Israelis] have dug tunnels [around the Temple
Mount].they found not a single stone proving that the Temple of Solomon was
there, because historically the Temple was not in Palestine [at all]. They
found only remnants of a shrine of the Roman Herod. They are now trying to
put in place a number of stones so that they can say 'We were here.' This is
nonsense. I challenge them to bring a single stone from the Temple of
Solomon." (Al-Hayat (London), October 5, 2002, translation courtesy of
MEMRI).
Examples of the falsehoods on Jewish history on Al Quds University's
official website include:
� The 'salem' in the name 'Jerusalem' does not come from the Hebrew
word for peace, but allegedly from 'Shalim,' a Canaanite deity associated
with the city's founding by Jebusites.
� King David never existed, except in myth and that Israeli "efforts
to connect the city with David are intended to formalize connections between
present Jews or Israelis and that idealized biblical community called
'Israelites' . [others] "now confirm that David never existed as a tribal
chief - except in the huge realm of legend . Jerusalem has no trace at all
of a person called 'King David.'"
� These facts are known among Israeli academicians, "but some are
afraid it is a threat to the legitimacy of Israel's creation."
� "Extensive Israeli excavations [under the Temple Mount] have
threatened the foundations beneath the Dome [of the Rock] complex."
� "Israel also continues to impose other changes in demography and
geography, altering facts that took millennia to accumulate. Populations are
imported and local inhabitants dislocated."
� "The 'conquest' as described in 'Joshua' never occurred."
� "The Exodus story is nothing more than Canaanite cultural memory
appropriated by 'Israelites' as their tradition."
� The Al Aqsa Mosque is not built on the ruins of the Jewish Temple.
� The First Temple never existed: " What is called the 'first
temple,' associated with the legendary Solomon, was in fact a
pre-monotheistic place where many gods were worshipped."
� The Palestinians are descended from the original Canaanites and are
thus the natives of the land: "The people of Palestine may have become more
mixed with each consecutive conquest, or may have changed religions, but
essentially (especially in villages) the population remained constant-and is
now still Palestinian, though many villagers were tragically dislocated in
the 1948 Nakba."
ZOA National President Morton A. Klein said, "We are shocked that
Brandeis University, which is named after one of the greatest Zionist
figures in this country, should wish to be associated with Al-Quds
University, which unashamedly promotes on its website denial of the history
of Israel and the Jewish people, thus undermining Jewish rights to the land.
Al-Quds University, as the quotes above show, essentially engages in the
same denial of Jewish history as Yasser Arafat and other anti-Semites. A
major Jewish university such as Brandeis should be especially sensitive to
Jewish sensibilities and be careful not to bestow respectability to a
university that promotes anti-Israel and anti-Jewish falsehoods.
"This is straightforward propaganda. It has nothing to do with
genuine scholarship and has no place on the website of a university. It is
deeply troubling that Al-Quds University has been able to maintain this
website and deepen its connections with other institutions, including
Brandeis University, without being held to account for promoting false
claims about Jewish history. Al-Quds University is basically saying on this
website that the Jews are a fraudulent people with no connection to their
historical homeland. Al-Quds University does not deserve an association with
any university that deals with genuine scholarship when it promotes
falsehood and hatred.
"Brandeis University should have been aware of the nature of the
Al-Quds University website before dignifying the university with a formal
association, and if it was aware, it should have refused to formalize the
relationship. We strongly urge Brandeis, which carries an honored name and
reputation, to review immediately its relationship with Al-Quds University.
It should be a matter of concern to all Brandeis supporters and alumni that
Brandeis University is lending credibility and respectability to Al-Quds
University.
"This is especially troubling in light of the fact that Brandeis
continues to employ Khalil Shikaki as a scholar in its Crown Center for
Middle East Studies, a man who participated in panels at anti-Israel
conferences such as the Islamic Conference for Palestine (ICP) and
co-founded the World & Islam Studies Enterprise (WISE) with the notorious
University of South Florida professor Sami Al-Arian, who brought in as
speakers such outrageous figures as Omar Abdel Rahman, later convicted in
connection with the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and Hassan Turabi, who
is generally considered the real leader of the terrorist Sudan government
and also was involved in transferring funds in the 1990s to the Palestinian
terrorist group, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, according to both the FBI and
renowned terrorism expert Steve Emerson."
------------------------------
From: imra-owner@imra.org.il
Subject: IMRA Subscription Info
--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website: www.imra.org.il
For free regular subscription:
Subscribe at no charge: imra-subscribe@imra.org.il
Unsubscribe: imra-unsubscribe@imra.org.il
For free daily digest subscription:
Subscribe at no charge: imra-subscribe-digest@imra.org.il
Unsubscribe: imra-unsubscribe@imra.org.il
For a copy of all reports distributed for a given day please send a
message to:
monday@imra.org.il tuesday@imra.org.il wednesday@imra.org.il
thursday@imra.org.il friday@imra.org.il
saturday@imra.org.il sunday@imra.org.il
--------------------------------------------
------------------------------
End of [imra] Daily digest - Volume: 2 Issue: 1365 (11 messages)
**********
>>>>>>> Read more!
PDF: 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA –2nd Edition Updates, Jan. 2006
9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA –
2nd Edition Updates, Jan. 2006
Table of Contents
Preface:
“LIHOP and MIHOP” Analyses of 9/11
THE FIFTEEN DRILLS OF 9/11
ABLE DANGER: 2.5 TERABYTES OF TREASON
SAS CAR BOMBERS IN BASRA
Appendix:
The London Explosions, The Rogue Network, Bush, and Iran
The Phony War on Terror: Time to Quarantine the Real Aggressors
(The actual book also includes new illustrations and an expanded index.)
PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION
“Why the thermonuclear mushroom cloud on the cover?” That question has come from a
number of readers of this book, who probably expected to find the more usual photographs of the
World Trade Center tragedy, or the explosions at the Pentagon which are seen on the covers of
other 9/11 books. The mushroom cloud is there to signal that this book is concerned not only
with what did happen on 9/11, but with also with larger tragedies which came close to
happening, but which ultimately did not occur. Among these was the threat of thermonuclear
escalation among the great powers. Important material which has come to light during 2005,
after the first edition of this book was published, provides decisive support for this avenue of
inquiry, and to this new material we will turn presently.
But first, a note on methodology. This book argues the rogue network MIHOP (“made it
happen on purpose”) position. That is to say, it represents the analytical point of view which sees
the events of September 11, 2001 as a deliberate provocation manufactured by an outlaw
network of high officials infesting the military and security apparatus of the United States and
Great Britain, a network ultimately dominated by Wall Street and City of London financiers. It is
our contention that any other approach not only misrepresents what actually happened in the
terror attacks, but also must tend to leave the public naïve and helpless when it comes to
identifying the present and future threat of state-sponsored, false flag synthetic terrorism, and
therefore preventing repeat performances of 9/11, including on a far larger scale.
What are the alternatives to MIHOP? There is of course the official version as codified in the
Kean-Hamilton commission report of July 2004, notoriously a tissue of lies. A demagogic
variation on this is the “official version and it serves you right” or “blowback” position, which
accepts all the crucial elements of the official version – Bin Laden, Atta and the rest of the 19
hijackers, al Qaeda, the US intelligence failure, and so forth. But here the official version is
2 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA
endorsed with its moral signs inverted: the catastrophe of 9/11 is seen as just retribution by the
victims of imperialism for the chronic crimes of the system. This is the thesis which, in
understated form, underlies the approach of Noam Chomsky and Gore Vidal, as the first edition
made clear. “Blowback” is dear to the hearts of a whole series of left gatekeepers, to the extent
that they are willing to say anything at all about 9/11. This view has been embraced in the most
grotesque form by the veteran agent provocateur Ward Churchill of the University of Colorado.
Churchill learned demolitions during his career in the Long Range Reconnaissance Patrols in
Vietnam, and upon his return from the war became associated with the terrorist Weatherman
faction, the group of police agents who systematically destroyed Students for a Democratic
Society, the largest leftist membership organization in the US in the twentieth century.
“Churchill briefly taught the Weathermen and Weatherwomen how to make bombs and how to
fire weapons,” we read in the Denver Post of January 18, 1987
(http://www.khow.com/img/churchill-scan.html) Some of these Weathermen perished when they
blew up a townhouse in Manhattan; they had not been well taught.
During the first few months of 2005, the Fox News O’Reilly Factor attempted to promote
Churchill to the status of chief spokesman for the 9/11 truth movement by paying obsessive
attention to his demagogic claims that the office workers who perished on 9/11 were war
criminals in the service of imperialism. With this, the 9/11 truth movement was demonized in the
eyes of millions. More important for our purposes here, Churchill also ranted that anyone who
rejected the attribution of the crimes of 9/11 to Atta, Bin Laden, and al Qaeda was a racist who
was really arguing that Arabs were genetically inferior and thus incapable of carrying out this
complex and spectacular attack. Churchill is thus the leading contender for the Arlen Spector
Award for the most imaginative defense of the official version so far recorded. Academics, in
particular, seemed unable to see him for what he was. His posturing, which was given lavish
attention by the corporate media, did more than anything else to discredit and disorient the 9/11
truth movement, precisely at a time when an advertising campaign by the political philanthropist
Jimmy Walter was actually beginning to educate the public about how it had been hoodwinked.
Other commentators tentatively accept the 9/11 commission report, but hasten to add that
they have unanswered questions. “Official version with unanswered questions” is the most
nondescript of views, and it has not stood the test of time. Unanswered questions were a mark of
courage in October 2001, and were still a healthy symptom in 2002. By 2004 this position had
been rendered obsolete and untenable by the progress of research, and by 2005 it had come to
embody a basic refusal to understand, whether out of fear or prejudice. But the “unanswered
questions” gambit remained popular, perhaps because it was quite compatible with the continued
receipt of foundation funding. On Judgment Day, when Gabriel blows his horn and the dead rise
from their sepulchers, this contingent will still be parading their unanswered questions as an alibi
for their political impotence and paralysis.
“Let it happen on purpose” (LIHOP) is a better analysis, although ultimately an inadequate
one. LIHOP assumes that Bin Laden, al Qaeda, Atta, and company actually have at least a semiindependent
existence and possess the will and the physical-technical capability to strike the
United States in the ways seen on 9/11. But LIHOP also posits that the al Qaeda attack could not
have been successful without the active cooperation of elements of the Pentagon and Bush
administration who deliberately sabotaged US air defenses so as to allow the suicide pilots to
reach their targets at the World Trade Center and Pentagon. The LIHOP view of things has been
vociferously and voluminously defended by Mike Ruppert, whose book features the constant
Preface 3
refrain borrowed from Delmart “Mike” Vreeland, “Let one happen. Stop the rest!” Nafeez
Ahmed’s first book also verged on LIHOP.
LIHOP is increasingly at war with masses of evidence. A more outré version of LIHOP
admits that Atta and his cohorts were working for the CIA, but only as gun-runners and drugrunners,
not terrorists. At a certain point, this view alleges, the drug-runners decided to revolt
against their arrogant CIA masters by blowing up the World Trade Center and the Pentagon! But
even this recondite scheme cannot address the absence of air defense for one hour and forty-five
minutes, nor the controlled demolition which overtook the two trade towers.
In 2002 and 2003, LIHOP represented progress beyond the unanswered questions way
station. But here too, as more new material has come to light, LIHOP has also become untenable,
as I will try to show below. A Zogby poll commissioned by Jimmy Walter in August 2004
showed that almost 50% of New Yorkers believed that US officials knew in advance that 9/11
was going to happen – a reasonable approximation of LIHOP. The statement by MI-5
whistleblower David Shayler to a London gathering in early June 2005 – “I was LIHOP; I am
MIHOP,” – is therefore coherent with the increasingly successful quest for truth. Today the
LIHOP position is increasingly unstable. Some devotees of LIHOP have a curious habit of
reverting to a very tepid unanswered questions posture as soon as a microphone or television
camera approaches.
David Ray Griffin’s New Pearl Harbor exemplified what might be called Bush-Cheney
MIHOP, although this must be qualified by Griffin’s repeated caveat that he was not advancing
an overall explanation for what happened on 9/11. The emphasis on Bush-Cheney as the possible
masterminds of 9/11 is problematic, since the rogue network has demonstrably been around since
the blowing up of the USS Maine more than a century ago – long before Bush and Cheney. In
addition, we must ask if serious plotters would ever dream of assigning an important role to a
moron, or to a man who has had multiple heart attacks, who has had a pacemaker installed and
who is living on borrowed time. These objections apply to all allegations that assign Cheney an
absolutely central role, including those of Mike Ruppert. The invisible government, in fact, will
not necessarily be defeated if its puppets of the moment – Bush, Cheney, and company – are
ousted. Griffin then turned to a detailed refutation of the Kean-Hamilton report, a task that could
easily have been left to the unanswered questions people or even relegated as fiction to literary
critics, as Griffin himself has suggested. We are left with Griffin’s basically agnostic view,
which means that we are effectively disarmed in the face of new threats of state-sponsored
terrorism as they continued to emerge, especially during the second half of 2005.
Differences among these categories are worth stressing, even though they may be blurred.
For example, a successful terrorist provocation generally has a LIHOP function built into it,
since it typically is the job of the moles in the FBI and Justice Department to make sure that
normal law enforcement does not interfere with the patsies and throw them into jail, thus
stripping the operation of its indispensable scapegoats. But this is only one part of the terror
deployment, and the presence of trained professionals who actually produce the results observed,
which the patsies could never produce, suffices to validate a MIHOP analysis for the entire
operation.
Some other commentators have, either consciously or unconsciously, advanced an outlook
which might be called Mossad MIHOP. As I show in this book, it is a well-established fact that
the Mossad meticulously observed every phase of the preparation and execution of 9/11. The
Mossad is also known to be a very nefarious organization. But what is missing is convincing
4 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA
proof of a direct operative role for the Mossad in 9/11. So far not even limited subcontracting of
specific 9/11 tasks by CIA to Mossad, a standard practice, has been established. Mossad MIHOP
would appear to appeal to a chauvinistic mentality which implicitly believes that Americans
would never do such a thing to their fellow Americans, so a foreign group, the Mossad, has to be
blamed. This is dangerous nonsense, and those who profess it need to be reminded of the
Operation Northwoods documents, which contemplate precisely the sort of killing of Americans
by Americans they think is impossible. As far as I know, MI-6 MIHOP, another possible variant,
has not been argued; here the evidence is greater, but still not enough. Therefore, my second
edition still asserts on the cover that the 9/11 terror was: “Made In USA.”
THE FIFTEEN DRILLS OF 9/11
Ruppert’s Crossing the Rubicon is aware of five exercises related to 9/11 –Vigilant Warrior,
Vigilant Guardian, Northern Vigilance, Tripod II, and the National Reconnaissance Office drill.
The first printing of my book discusses these, plus Northern Guardian, Amalgam Virgo, and a
local DC-area drill, for a total of eight. As of this writing, it has been established that there were
as many as 15 drills either ongoing on 9/11 or directly related to the events of that day. This
figure may be slightly higher or lower according to the counting criteria used.
911 WAR GAMES AND TERROR DRILLS
Amalgam Virgo Air defense against rogue state/terror cruise missiles,
hijackings
Vigilant Guardian Air defense against hijacking
Northern Guardian Air defense
Vigilant Warrior NORAD exercise
Northern Vigilance NORAD deploys fighters to Alaska, northern Canada
Amalgam Warrior Large live-fly air defense and air intercept, tracking
surveillance
Global Guardian Nuclear warfighting, “Armageddon”
Crown Vigilance Air combat command exercise
Apollo Guardian Large scale live-fly air defense and air intercept,
tracking surveillance
National Reconnaissance
Office (NRO)
Crashing planes into buildings
AWACS AWACS over Florida, Washington DC
Fort Meyer, Virginia Firemen (Pentagon), “aircraft crash refresher course”
for firefighters
TRIPOD II, Manhattan Response to biochemical attack
Timely Alert II Emergency response to bomb attack
Preface 5
Ruppert focuses exclusively on the drills which crippled air defense, the ones we may call
LIHOP drills. It is of course vital to know about these war games which moved fighter planes to
northern Canada and Alaska, which introduced fake radar blips on the screens of military
personnel, and which deployed civilian and military aircraft in the guise of hijacked airliners.
This was one way the vaunted US air defense in the northeast corridor was paralyzed for about
one hour and forty-five minutes. But even this argument has limits. Loyal military officers would
have positioned their interceptor assets in the skies over Washington DC to prevent their
recurrent nightmare, the decapitation of the national command authority by a lightning stroke.
The fact that this was not done for so many minutes is irrefutable evidence that the commanders
were not loyal. It does no good to argue that red-blooded US fighter pilots would never have
obeyed a stand-down order when this is manifestly exactly what they did, for the critical hour
and three quarters.
But there are additional 9/11 maneuvers which claim our attention. These are the MIHOP
drills, which provided cover and operational capabilities for terror operations run through the
official bureaucracy. The most obvious is the exercise that morning at the headquarters of the
National Reconnaissance Office in Chantilly, Virginia involving the simulation of an airliner
crashing into the NRO’s headquarters tower. It involved, in other words, a plane crashing into a
building. Given all we have learned about the intimate relationship between military drills and
terrorist acts, it is clear that there is a strong prima facie case here that the NRO drill in question
was in fact a control center or vehicle for crashing aircraft or other flying objects into the towers
of the World Trade Center. This is no weird happenstance, but a crucial window on the entire
operation.
Then there is the case of Amalgam Virgo, which did come up during the 9/11 commission
hearings. Thanks to cooperativeresearch.org, we know that Amalgam Virgo 01 was run on June
1-2, 2001. It was “a multi-agency planning exercise sponsored by NORAD involving the
hypothetical scenario of a cruise missile being launched by “a rogue [government] or somebody”
from a barge off the East Coast. Bin Laden is pictured on the cover of the proposal for the
exercise. [American Forces Press Service, 6/4/02] The exercise takes place at Tyndall Air Force
Base in Florida. [Global Security, 4/14/02]” Although the barge could have been located
somewhere else, this looks very much like what happened at the Pentagon, since it is clear that
no commercial airliner ever hit that building on 9/11. The 2002 edition of this exercise was set to
include “two simultaneous commercial aircraft hijackings,” with FBI agents impersonating the
hijackers – another component which may have occurred in the real world on 9/11.
These are leading examples of what may be termed MIHOP drills, since they point towards
the basic fact that the 9/11 terror operations were not just facilitated or allowed, but
manufactured and produced, by activities taking place inside the US military-security
bureaucracy, under the cover of theoretically legal and sanctioned drills.
As I showed in the original edition, the open secret about drills is that they often hide the real
thing, as illustrated by the examples of Hilex 75 (a cover for possible nuclear confrontation with
the Warsaw Pact) and Nine Lives 81 (a cover for the Hinckley hit on President Reagan). Another
excellent example is Able Archer 83, a US nuclear weapons exercise which looked so realistic
that Soviet leaders became concerned that it was a cover for a real sneak attack on their country
with nuclear missiles. They put their own Strategic Rocket Troops and related units on highest
alert, and the world found itself on the brink of an all-out nuclear exchange. (See William M.
Arkin, Code Names (Hanover, NH: Steerforth Press, 2005, p. 245, and Benjamin B. Fischer, A
6 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA
Cold War Conundrum, History Staff, Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central Intelligence
Agency, 1997, online at http://www.cia.gov/csi/monograph/coldwar/source.htm).
The principle directly at stake here is that state terrorists wishing to conduct an illegal terror
operation often find it highly advantageous to conduit or bootleg that illegal operation through
the government military/security bureaucracy with the help of an exercise or drill that closely
resembles or mimics the illegal operation. Once the entire apparatus is set up, it is only necessary
to make apparently small changes to have the exercise go live, and turn into a real hecatomb. If
there is a gas dispersion drill announced in Manhattan, as there was in August 2005, it is merely
necessary to replace the inert gas with a highly toxic one to go from drill to mass slaughter. A
drill simulating a terror attack provides the greatest possible camouflage of the criminal intent of
the perpetrators and allows the terror attack to occur through minor departures from the scenario
script. All these drills try to be as realistic as possible. But the greatest realism is an actual terror
attack. The fact that attempts at disruption, infiltration, harassment, and sabotage may be built in
simply increases the opportunities available to the plotters, as do the varying levels of awareness
of the participants, only a very few of whom need to know that a real terror attack is intended, or
what the fate of certain patsies might be. To prevent new terror attacks from providing the
pretexts for new wars, it is imperative that this mechanism be understood, but it cannot be
understood in the unanswered questions, LIHOP, and agnostic frames of reference. That is why
the apparent moderation of these theoretical points of view is so crippling and so dangerous.
Thanks to Arkin and cooperativeresearch.org, there is another 9/11 drill which can be given
the special mention it deserves. My book more than any other stresses the thermonuclear war
potentials unleashed on 9/11, and this emphasis is fully vindicated by this additional drill. In
effect, the mushroom cloud on the cover was there for excellent reasons. The heart of the matter
is Global Guardian, a nuclear warfighting or Armageddon exercise staged by STRATCOM on
9/11 from Offutt Air Force Base, where Brent Scowcroft and Warren Buffett were converging in
what might have been the nucleus of a Committee of Public Safety set to govern in case Bush
had to be ousted. Global Guardian involved land-based missiles, nuclear submarines, and B-52
and B-1 bombers loaded with live H-bombs at bases like Offutt (Nebraska), Barksdale
(Louisiana), Minot (North Dakota) and Whiteman (Missouri). The first two became destinations
for Bush that day. The Doomsday–Night-Watch–Looking Glass flying command posts were
mobilized. Another crucial aspect is pointed out by cooperativeresearch.com:
A 1998 Defense Department newsletter reported that for several years Stratcom had been incorporating a
computer network attack (CNA) into Global Guardian. The attack involved Stratcom “red team” members
and other organizations acting as enemy agents, and included attempts to penetrate the Command using the
Internet and a “bad” insider who had access to a key command and control system. The attackers “war
dialed” the phones to tie them up and sent faxes to numerous fax machines throughout the Command. They
also claimed they were able to shut down Stratcom’s systems. Reportedly, Stratcom planned to increase the
level of computer network attack in future Global Guardian exercises. [IAnewsletter, 6/98]
Here is a portal through which the rogue network could have launched nuclear missiles
without the help of Bush, as I argued in the original edition. The targets for such missiles could
have been Arab or Islamic capitals, if Bush had refused to initiate the war of civilizations in
conventional form by attacking Afghanistan. The target could also have been China, or Russia.
We must never lose sight of the Bush-Putin telephone call on 9/11, which was the central
diplomatic and strategic event of the day even though most 9/11 books do not even mention it. In
that telephone call, Bush in effect delivered an ultimatum that the United States was determined
to seize Afghanistan (where the Soviets had staged an invasion and a long war in response to a
Preface 7
grab for power by Brzezinski in 1979), plus bases in former Soviet central Asia. What if Putin’s
response to Bush’s ultimatum had been a more traditional defense of Mother Russia, coupled
with a threat to incinerate New York if Bush dared to do any such thing? The rogue network had
obviously thought of that eventuality in advance, and had evidently provided a back door
through which they could direct a confrontation
ABLE DANGER: 2.5 TERABYTES OF TREASON
Another important MIHOP issue emerges from these drills. Able Warrior, according to
Arkin’s listing, would seem to represent the big Special Forces (SOCOM) “anti-terror” defensive
drill of each fiscal year. Keeping in mind the military bureaucracy’s predilection for naming
drills in binary pairs, we might speculate as to the meaning of a drill or activity known as Able
Danger. The name would suggest that this might be the simulated attacker paired with the
defensive Able Warrior. In other words, Able Danger might represent the case officers and
terrorist controllers for a group of government-run terrorists (double agents, plus dupes, fanatics,
and criminal energy types) used to play the roles of terrorists in the various anti-terror drills.
Does the reader smell a fault?
Such suspicions materialized in August 2005 when Congressman Curt Weldon of
Pennsylvania began holding press conferences about Able Danger, which turned out to be a coproduction
of the Special Forces command with the Defense Intelligence Agency. Weldon’s
main interest was in the report from a certain Col. Schaffer and a certain Navy Captain Philpott
that Able Danger had been well aware of the presence of Mohamed Atta in the United States
during the early months of 2000, long before the Kean-Hamilton commission said he had
arrived. The Able Danger officers produced detailed accounts of how they told the 9/11
commission investigators all about this, only to see their testimony completely ignored. In a
grotesque comedy of errors, Kean, Hamilton and their hack apparatus clumsily denied these
allegations, then retracted the denial, then denied them again. The role of Philip Zelikow, the
executive director of the 9/11 commission staff, was especially slimy, which should have come
as no surprise to readers of this book. The first by-product of Congressman Weldon’s maverick
performance was thus to provide an absolutely water-tight case study in how, when dealing with
highly material information, the 9/11 commission had suppressed evidence, obstructed justice,
and deliberately and systematically lied. What else could one expect from Zelikow, the
unfortunate Miss Rice’s partner in a book venture?
But that was just the beginning. Weldon admitted that, in addition to observing and
combating the supposed terrorists, one task of Able Danger had been to “manipulate” them. With
this one word, the door was wide open to deploying terrorist counter-gangs and pseudo-gangs on
the full Frank Kitson model for real live terror operations. Able Danger were indeed the terrorist
controllers and case officers for Atta and the rest. This case was made harder to prove when Able
Danger successfully destroyed its own database and records, to the tune of an estimated 2.5
terabytes of material – according to some experts, the approximate equivalent of one quarter of
all the books and other records stored in the Library of Congress. Suddenly, all the reports of
Atta and the others living on military bases, studying on military bases, and so forth began to fit
into place.
8 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA
During 2005, the hollow demagogy and hypocrisy of the phony US-UK war on terror
emerged for all to see. Elias Achmadov, a Chechen butcher and terrorist, was living in
Washington DC, not only openly, but enjoying a generous stipend from the US State
Department, complete with an office, a secretary, a travel budget, and a public relations budget
courtesy of the American taxpayer. The State Department pays terrorists – there was no longer
any doubt, after Achmadov got his picture on the cover of the Washington Post weekly
magazine. Then there was Luis Posada Carriles, a long-serving retainer of the Bush family, most
recently attached to Jeb Bush’s Florida gun-running and drug-running apparatus. Posada had
blown up a Cuban airliner, killing upwards of 75 people. Posada was living openly in the US for
several months despite being a very illegal alien when the international heat from Cuba,
Venezuela, and other states made this CIA terror asset too compromising to be allowed to roam
free. He was accordingly detained, but not extradited to those who wanted to put him on trial.
SAS CAR BOMBERS IN BASRA
Even more dramatic were the terrorist counter-gang operations of the US and UK military in
Iraq. In September 2005 two soldiers of the British Special Air Services (SAS) were arrested for
sniping at civilians in Basra. These two, who were members of a super-elite unit called Special
Reconnaissance Regiment, were driving around in a car bomb which they doubtless intended to
set off near a Shiite school, hospital, or mosque. At this time, the US-UK terrorist countergang
leader had declared war against all Shiites – a stance so outrageous for a supposed Iraqi fighter
that it drew a reproof from MI-6’s Zawahiri. When the Iraqi police arrested this pair, the British
sent a column of tanks to break down the jail and extract them, lest they tell all. These two killer
provocateurs were living proof that the US-UK occupation of Iraq was using terrorist
countergangs and agents provocateurs in a bid to isolate and demonize the national resistance.
These techniques had been refined by UK Colonel Frank Kitson in Kenya during the early 1950s
Mau Mau era, and coifed in Kitson’s book on low intensity warfare. It was Kitson who had
coined the immensely useful term countergang (or pseudogang). If you want to discredit a
clandestine organization, then set up your own false-flag group under the same name, and have
them commit unspeakable atrocities in the name of the target group. If the SAS-SRR car bomb
had claimed its toll of Shiites, the usual Limbaugh-O’Reilly-Hannity-Savage chorus of fascist
parrots would have been on the air the next day denouncing the Sunnis as a criminal race. We
may assume that a large part of the beheadings and other spectacular atrocities coming out of
Iraq were in fact perpetrated by US-UK-Mossad, acting through these obvious countergangs.
As I argued in the first edition of this book, there was acute danger of large-scale statesponsored
terrorist provocation, followed by a wider war in the Middle East or elsewhere during
the months before the November 2004 US elections. The general outlines of this analysis were
confirmed in a conversation with the author in the shadow of the Washington monument on
September 25, 2005: Wayne Madsen reported that he had detected signs of intensive
preparations in numerous US commands during that time frame, including especially on aircraft
carriers.
May-July 2005 began a similar time of heightened risk of US aggression. In late July, an
article by former CIA agent Philip Giraldi in The American Conservative signaled that the
Cheney faction had ordered the Pentagon to prepare for the atomic bombing of Iran in the wake
of a new 9/11 terror attack. It was clear that the Cheneyacs would not wait for a new 9/11 to
Preface 9
happen, but would have it delivered on special order. In response to this, a group of activists
around the websites team8plus.org and total411.info, with help from my weekly broadcasts,
began to look forward in time to identify terror drills and war games which might lend
themselves to use as war provocations.
This was an effort to put the MIHOP lessons learned from the study of 9/11 into action to
shut down the terrorist controllers. The cover for the Kennedy assassination was Operation
Mongoose. The hit on Reagan in 1981 had been conduited through Nine Lives, a presidential
succession exercise. We have seen the drills oh 9/11. The London July 7, 2005 bombs (see
www.waronfreedom.org/777.html) were set up under Atlantic Blue, Topoff III, and Triple Play,
plus help from Visor Consultants. What would be the drill that would serve as the vehicle for
Cheney’s desired war provocation?
Activists soon discovered Sudden Response 05, based on a 10-kiloton nuclear explosion in
the harbor of Charleston, South Carolina. The websites mentioned raised such a hue and cry
about this drill, forcing an article in the main local newspaper trying to calm worried people
down. The exposure worked well enough to cause the drill to be shut down before its
completion. This was followed by a terror drill involving explosions in San Francisco Bay; a
strange blast in the financial district at the end of this drill sent a woman to the hospital in critical
condition. Then came Granite Shadow/Power Geyser in Washington DC, with weapons of mass
destruction and overtones of a military coup. All of these exercises were made more sinister by
the shift of the official US strategic nuclear posture from deterrence and retaliation to global
strike, meaning nuclear sneak attack, under CONPLAN 8022-22.
The last months of 2005 were therefore a dangerous time. By some calculations, this period
was marked by the greatest density of war game and terror drill activity since 9/11 itself. The
vaguely reassuring Global Guardian was replaced by the much more aggressive and threatening
Global Storm, presumably as a result of the shift to the global strike posture. Global Storm
embraces worldwide nuclear war using all arms. Occurring simultaneously with this were
Positive Response 06 (the drills go by fiscal years, and the US fiscal year begins on October 1), a
Joint Chiefs of Staff interoperability exercise. These were paired with Global Lightning, Vigilant
Shield, and Busy Night Seminars – a code name for nuclear warfare. Scenarios at work here
included a radiological dirty bomb detonated in Mobile Bay, Alabama, by a country or terror
network designated as Purple, but identified with the DPRK (North Korea). North Korea was
supposed to launch long-range missiles at the US, with subsequent retaliation. The Pentagon’s
primitive missile defense system was supposed to come into play. At the same time, other drills
saw the US intervening massively in Ukraine, eliciting a Russian defensive response, thus
precipitating all-out nuclear war.
Small wonder therefore that Russian President Putin had issued a blunt warning of his own
on August 17, 2005, admonishing Bush:
“I think that lowering the threshold for the use of nuclear arms is a dangerous trend,
because somebody may feel tempted to use nuclear weapons… If that happens, the next
step can be taken - more powerful nuclear arms can be used, which may lead to a nuclear
conflict. This extremely dangerous trend is in the back of the mind of some politicians
and military officials.”
Persons of good will needed to scan the websites of the Pentagon, Homeland Security, the
CIA, NATO, the British Defense Ministry, and similar organizations to identify drills and
exercises that were likely to go live. These drills and war games needed to be denounced,
10 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA
exposed, and shut down. Activists of all types, from the anti-war to the neighborhood level,
needed to join the growing movement to prevent the outrageous and illegal abuse of drills and
exercises for purposes of terrorism, among other things by contributing to the drill monitoring set
up by the Independent International Commission on 9/11 at web sites like team8plus.org.. This
kind of aggressive and pre-emptive vigilance represents MIHOP in action. The purpose of such
pre-emptive exposure and denunciation is not to gather kudos for how smart we are, but rather to
identify, shut down, and dismantle the rogue network’s illegal terror operations.
It was clearly essential that measures be taken to keep the fingers of Bush, Cheney, and the
increasingly desperate neocon fascist madmen away from the nuclear button. During Watergate,
when Nixon had called his infamous 1973 worldwide nuclear alert as a result of the October
1973 Middle East war, British Prime Minister Ted Heath had seen the entire stunt as a
manufactured diversion from Nixon’s Watergate troubles at home. As the Bush administration
disintegrates, it is clear that conditions today are similar. On October 28, 2005, when special
counsel Fitzgerald presented his indictment of the neocon fanatic Irv Lewis Libby, Bush
simultaneously made a raving speech branding Iran and Syria as outlaw states with whom his
patience was exhausted. Many cable networks showed Fitzgerald and Bush, along with Cheney,
as parts of the same split screen. There it was: wag the dog, in real time. Kissinger and Haig,
sociopaths though they were, had taken measures to supervise Nixon’s access to the football, the
briefcase containing the nuclear launch codes. In the last weeks of Watergate, Defense Secretary
Schlesinger had issued a standing order to combat commanders telling them to ignore any and all
orders by Nixon to launch attacks unless and until they were confirmed by himself or by
Kissinger. In today’s White House, there are no figures to look to who might impose similar
restraint: quite the contrary. Faced with looming indictments of many of their clique, the neocons
tended towards a mood of Götterdämmerung and apocalypse. The neocons would doubtless
prefer a new world war to life behind bars; like the SS in Berlin during the last days, they would
think nothing of letting the river water into the subway tunnels where their insufficiently martial
fellow citizens were hiding.
The impeachment of Bush and of many others could hardly wait until 2007.
Gunpowder Day, November 5, 2005
Appendix:
The London Explosions,
The Rogue Network, Bush, and Iran
By Webster G. Tarpley
Originally published in Global Outlook magazine.
Washington DC, July 11 – Last week’s London explosions carry the characteristic features of a state-sponsored, false
flag, synthetic terror provocation by networks within the British intelligence services MI-5, MI-6, the Home Office, and
the Metropolitan Police Special Branch who are favorable to a wider Anglo-American aggressive war in the Middle East,
featuring especially an early pre-emptive attack on Iran, with a separate option on North Korea also included. With the
London attacks, the Anglo-American invisible government adds another horrendous crime to its own dossier. But this
time, their operations appear imperfect, especially in regard to the lack (so far) of a credible patsy group which, by virtue
of its ethnicity, could direct popular anger against one of the invisible government’s targets. So far, the entire attribution
of the London crimes depends on what amounts to an anonymous posting in an obscure, hitherto unknown, secular
Arabic-language chatroom in the state of Maryland, USA. But, based on this wretched shred of pseudo-evidence, British
Prime Minister Tony Blair – who has surely heard of a group called the Irish Republican Army, which bombed London
for more than a decade – has not hesitated to ascribe the murders to “Islam,” and seems to be flirting with total martial law
under the Civil Contingencies Act. We are reminded once again of how he earned his nickname of Tony Bliar.
SCOTLAND YARD KNEW IN ADVANCE
That the British Government knew in advance that blasts would occur is not open to rational doubt. Within hours of
the explosions, Israeli Army Radio was reporting that “Scotland Yard [London police headquarters] had intelligence
warnings of the attacks a short time before they occurred.” This report, repeated by IsraelNN.com, added that “the Israeli
Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Foreign Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel
room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool Street train station,
where he was to address an economic summit.” This report is attributed to “unconfirmed reliable sources.” At around the
same time, the Associated Press issued a wire asserting that “British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes
before Thursday’s explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the city,” according to “a senior
Israeli official.” This wire specifies that “just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli
Embassy to say that they had received warnings of possible attacks....”
According to eyewitness reports from London, BBC claimed between 8:45 and some minutes after 10 AM that the
incidents in the Underground were the result of an electrical power surge, or alternatively of a collision. Foreign bigwigs,
presumably not just Netanyahu, were warned, while London working people continued to stream into the subway. These
reports have been denied, repudiated, sanitized, and expunged from news media websites by the modern Orwellian
Thought Police, but they have been archived by analysts who learned on 9/11 and other occasions that key evidence in
state-sponsored terror crimes tends to filter out during the first minutes and hours, during the critical interval when the
controlled media are assimilating the cover story peddled by complicit moles within the ministries. These reports are not
at all damaging to Israel, but are devastating for British domestic security organs. An alternative version peddled by
Stratfor.com, namely that the Israelis warned Scotland Yard, is most probably spurious but still leaves the British
authorities on the hook. Which Scotland Yard official made the calls? Identify that official, and you have bagged a real
live rogue network mole.
12 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA
Another more general element of foreknowledge can be seen in the fact reported by Isikoff and Hosenball of
Newsweek that, since about November 2004, the US FBI, but not other US agencies, has been refusing to use the London
Underground.
Operations like these are generally conduited through the government bureaucracies under the cover of a drill or
exercise which closely resembles the terror operation itself. So it was with Amalgam Virgo and the multiple exercises
held on 9/11, as I show in my 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA (Joshua Tree CA: Progressive Press, 2005). So it was
with the Hinckley attempt to assassinate Ronald Reagan, when a presidential succession exercise was scheduled for the
next day, as I showed in my George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography (1992; reprint by Progressive Press, 2004). An
uncannily similar maneuver allows the necessary work to be done on official computers and on company time, while
warding off the inquisitive glances and questions of curious co-workers at adjoining computer consoles.
THE COVER STORY TERROR DRILL
Such a parallel drill was not lacking in the London case. On the evening of July 7, BBC Five, a news and sports radio
program, carried an interview with a certain former Scotland Yard official named Peter Power who related that his firm,
Visor Consulting, had been doing an anti-terror-bombing drill in precisely the Underground stations and at the precise
times when the real explosions went off. Peter Power and Visor had been subcontractors for the drill; Power declined to
name the prime contractors. Small wonder that Blair, in his first official report to the Commons on July 11, went out of his
way to rule out a board of inquiry to probe these tragic events.
Tony Blair may be eyeing the advantages of emergency rule for a discredited lame duck like himself, but the British
people may have a different view. The alternative is clear: on the one hand is the American response after 9/11, marked by
submissive and credulous gullibility in regard to the fantastic official story of what had happened. On the other hand is the
militant and intelligent Spanish response after March 11, 2004, marked by powerful mass mobilization and righteous
anger against politicians who sought to manipulate the people and sell a distorted account of events. Which way will the
British people go? Straws in the wind suggest that the British response may be closer to the Spanish, although it may
develop more slowly because of the lack of mass organization and related factors. If this is the case, Tony Blair, Jack
Straw, and the rest of the malodorous “New Labor” crypto-Thatcherites will be out the window.
My thesis is that the London explosions represent a form of communication on the part of the transatlantic Anglo-
American financier faction with Bush, Blair, and the heads of state and government assembled at Gleneagles, Scotland for
the G-8 meeting on the day of the blast. The London deaths were designed to deliver an ultimatum in favor of early war
with Iran. Here a word of clarification may be necessary. The demonization of Bush by his many enemies, while
understandable, risks blurring the basic realities of power in the US and UK. Since the Bay of Pigs and the Kennedy
assassination (to go back no further than that), we have been aware of a secret team. During the Iran-contra era, the same
phenomenon was referred to as an invisible, secret or parallel government. This is still the matrix of most large-scale
terrorism. The question arises for some: do Bush and Cheney tell the invisible government what to do, or does the
invisible government treat the visible office holders as puppets and expendable assets? To ask the question is to answer it:
Bush, Cheney & Co. are the expendable puppets. The explanation of terror is not Bush “makes it happen on purpose,” or
“MIHOP,” as some seem to argue, but rather invisible government MIHOP, an altogether more dire proposition.
How then does the invisible faction communicate with the public mouthpieces? Given the violence of the power
relations involved, we can be sure that it is not a matter of sending out engraved invitations announcing that the honor of
Bush’s presence is requested at the launching of an attack on Iran. Rather, the invisible and violent rogue network
communicates with Bush, Blair, and others by means coherent with their aggressive nature – as they did on 9/11. Bush, of
course, is a weak and passive tenant of the White House whose instinct is to do virtually nothing beyond the day-to-day
routine.
We therefore need to note that the London blasts come after two months of vigorous and impatient prodding of Bush
by the invisible government. On May 11, a small plane almost reached the White House before it was turned away, while
The London Explosions, The Rogue Network, Bush, And Iran 13
the Congress, the Supreme Court, and the White House (but not the Pentagon, the Treasury, etc.) were evacuated amid
scenes of panic. The White House went to red alert, but Bush was not informed until it was all over, and was riding his
bicycle in the woods near Greenbelt, Maryland. Flares were dropped over the Brookland district and Takoma Park, MD.
The resemblance of all this to a classic coup scenario was evident. On May 18, a live hand grenade, which turned out to
be a dud, landed near Bush as he spoke at a rally in Tbilisi, Georgia.
On June 29, the approach of another small plane led to an evacuation of the Congress and the Capitol, again with
scenes of panic. On the afternoon of July 2, no fewer than three small planes came close to Bush’s Camp David retreat in
the Catoctin Mountains of Maryland; this story was suspiciously relegated to the local news page of the Washington Post.
The details of these incidents are of little interest; what counts is the objective reality of a pattern. These incidents also
provide background for Bush’s unbalanced behavior on July 5 at Gleneagles, when he crashed into a policeman while
riding on his bicycle. Then came the London blasts on July 7.
What is it that the invisible government wants Bush and Blair to do? Scott Ritter announced last January that Bush
had issued an order to prepare an attack on Iran for the month of June. According to a well-informed retired CIA analyst I
spoke with on July 3, this order actually told US commanders to be ready to attack Iran by the end of June. This project of
war with Iran is coherent with most of what we know about the intentions of the US-UK rogue faction, and thus provides
the immediate background for the London explosions. The Bush administration and the Blair cabinet have failed to
deliver decisive military action, and the invisible government is exceedingly impatient.
One way to increase the pressure on Iran would be to implicate a group of Iranian fanatic patsies in the London
bombings. This would not be difficult; in fact, as I show in 9/11 Synthetic Terror, the British capital, referred to during the
1990s as Londonistan, is home to the largest concentration of Arab and Islamic patsy groups in the entire world, in such
infamous locations as Finsbury mosque and Brixton mosque; these groups are known to have enjoyed de facto recruiting
privileges in Her Majesty’s Prisons. But perhaps an Iranian patsy group would be too obvious at this time. More likely
may be the sinking of a US warship in the Gulf by a third country, duly attributed to Iran.
In a recent speech, Dr. Ephraim Asculai of Tel Aviv University made two main points: first, that there is no military
solution to the Iranian nuclear issue, and second, that there is no such thing as a point of no return in nuclear weapons
development. Dr. Asculai showed that South Africa, Sweden, and other nations had turned away from deploying Abombs
well after having acquired the ability to produce them. Dr. Asculai is evidently arguing against widespread
tendencies in the US-UK-Israeli strategic community who are whipping up hysteria around the notion that Iran is now
indeed approaching exactly such a point of no return.
For her part, Miss Rice of the State Department has now declared that it will no longer be sufficient for Iran to turn
away from nuclear weapons production; the entire Iranian program for nuclear energy production will also have to be
dismantled, in her view. Such maximalism makes a negotiated solution impossible as long as the current Washington
group holds power.
SCO: US GET OUT OF CENTRAL ASIA
The US, UK and Israel have been on the brink of war with Iran for at least a year, and the rogue network is generally
aware that time is not on its side. There is also an important new development which threatens the ability of the Anglo-
Americans to wage war. On July 5, the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which brings together
China, Russia, Uzbekistan, Krygyzia, Kazakhstan, and Tajikistan plus new members India, Pakistan, and Iran, issued a
call for the United States to vacate the bases seized in the autumn of 2001 under the cover of the 9/11 emergency and the
looming invasion of Afghanistan. The parties to this call represent about half of the world’s population. This demand was
immediately rejected by the State Department, but veteran Russian Eurasian expert Yevgeny Primakov crowed that for the
first time a formula had been agreed to by which the US would be ejected from this region. The US presence goes back to
the Bush-Putin emergency hotwire talks of September 11, 2001, when Putin, seeing that the madmen had seized control in
14 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA
Washington, dropped Russian objections to a US intrusion into the former Soviet republics of central Asia. The US-UK
can attack Iran from Iraq in the west, from Afghanistan in the east, and from Qatar in the south, but without the Uzbek and
Kyrgyz bases, the Anglo-American ability to attack from the north as well will be severely limited.
The SCO states are also concerned about US-backed “designer color revolutions” on the recent Georgian (rose) and
Ukrainian (orange) models, traditionally known as CIA “people power” revolutions, being used to destabilize their
governments. To make matters worse for Washington and London, Kazakhstan is a few months away from opening an oil
pipeline to China, which will diminish the US-UK ability to use their Gulf presence to blackmail Beijing. Washington and
London are also dismayed by the pro-Iranian overtures in various fields being made by their Shiite puppets in Baghdad.
And what of the report in the Washington Post of July 11, which claims that US and UK planners are now
contemplating a sharp reduction in the US forces in Iraq? The most plausible explanation is that this is pure
disinformation, similar to news blips issued by both Hitler and Stalin in May and June of 1941. It should also be noted
that the British plan explicitly provides for most of the forces now at Basra to go to Afghanistan, where they would be
positioned for operations against Iran, or into central Asia.
Generally, the invisible government appears dismayed by its loss of momentum and the constant erosion of the
political position of its asset, Bush. 110,000 US factory workers lost their jobs in June, the worst total in a year and a half:
autos and textiles are collapsing. The housing bubble may also be nearing its end, with the bankruptcy of Fannie Mae on
the near-term agenda. World derivatives have officially reached $300 trillion, with JP Morgan Chase holding the largest
single portfolio. The one virtuoso performance of July 7 was that of the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, and European
Central Bank, which flooded equity and capital markets with liquidity through such vehicles as the Plunge Protection
Team (PPT), turning a big Wall Street loss into a small gain.
During the recent Reopen 9/11 tour of eight European cities, Jimmy Walter repeatedly forecast that the general
predicament of the Bush regime and the US financier faction would lead to another large-scale terror attack before the end
of 2005; this has now occurred, and there is no end in sight. The tide of US public opinion has now definitively turned
against the Iraq war and to some degree against Bush, as all major polls demonstrate. Notable is the 42% affirmative
response to the Zogby International question as to whether, if it could be proved that Bush lied to launch the Iraq war, he
should be impeached. Larry Franklin of the Wolfowitz-Feith neocon apparatus has been indicted for divulging US secrets,
and the American-Israeli Public Affairs Council has been raided twice; further indictments are expected. Karl Rove has
now been revealed as the source of the Valerie Plame leak, making Rove and perhaps other White House officials fair
game for federal indictment. The Niger yellowcake forgeries and the Chalabi state secrets cases are still pending – to say
nothing of two stolen elections and the 9/11 Septembergate itself. All these factors incline the rogue network to seek an
improvement in their situation through a flight forward to a wider war in Iran. Those who stand to lose most by such an
Iranian adventure must now mobilize to make Mr. Bush’s second term as eventful as Nixon’s second term turned out to be
in 1974.
The London Explosions, The Rogue Network, Bush, And Iran 15
Interview Transcripts
Excerpts from transcripts of interviews with Peter Power, ex-Scotland Yard, who now heads private security firm
Visor Consultants, which was running terror bombing drills in the London Underground on 7/7, followed by an interview
with John Loftus.
BBC Radio 5, July 7th, 2005
Power: At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people
in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I
still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.
Host: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened
while you were running the exercise?
Power: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons
I don’t want to reveal their name but they’re listening and they’ll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for
the first time they’d met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we
went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking
and so on.
ITV News, London, July 7th
POWER: Today we were running an exercise for a company – bear in mind now that I’m in the private sector – and
we sat everybody down in the city – 1000 people involved in the whole organization – with the crisis team. And the most
peculiar thing was, it was we based on a scenario of simultaneous attacks on a underground and mainline station. So we
had to suddenly switch an exercise from fictional to real...
INTERVIEWER: Just to get this right, you were actually working today on an exercise that envisioned virtually this
scenario?
POWER: Almost precisely. I was up to 2 o’clock this morning, because it’s our job, my own company. Visor
Consultants, we specialize in helping people to get their crisis management response, how you jump from slow time
thinking to quick time doing. And we chose a scenario with their assistance, which is based on a terrorist attack because
they’re very close to a property occupied by Jewish businessmen there in the city, and there are more American banks in
this city than there are in the whole of New York – a logical thing to do.
“He Was Working for British Intelligence”
Fox News Dayside with Linda Vester, July 29 2005:
MIKE JERRICK [FOX NEWS]: John Loftus is a terrorism expert and a former prosecutor for the Justice Department.
John, good to see you again. So real quickly here, have you heard anything about this Osman Hussain who was just
picked up in Rome? You know that name at all?
JOHN LOFTUS: Yeah, all these guys should be going back to an organization called Al-Muhajiroun, which means
The Emigrants. It was the recruiting arm of Al-Qaeda in London; they specialized in recruiting kids whose families had
emigrated to Britain but who had British passports. And they would use them for terrorist work.
JERRICK: So a couple of them now have Somali connections?
LOFTUS: Yeah, it was not unusual. Somalia, Eritrea, the first group of course were primarily Pakistani. But what
they had in common was they were all emigrant groups in Britain, recruited by this Al-Muhajiroun group. They were
headed by the, Captain Hook, the imam in London the Finsbury Mosque, without the arm. He was the head of that
organization. Now his assistant was a guy named Aswat, Haroon Rashid Aswat.
JERRICK: Aswat, who they picked up.
LOFTUS: Right, Aswat is believed to be the mastermind of all the bombings in London.
JERRICK: On 7/7 and 7/21, this is the guy we think.
LOFTUS: This is the guy, and what’s really embarrassing is that the entire British police are out chasing him, and one
wing of the British government, MI6 or the British Secret Service, has been hiding him. And this has been a real source of
contention between the CIA, the Justice Department, and Britain.
JERRICK: Hold on, John. MI6 has been hiding him. Are you saying that he has been working for them?
LOFTUS: Oh I’m not saying it. This is what the Muslim sheik said in an interview in a British newspaper back in
2001.
JERRICK: So he’s a double agent, or was?
LOFTUS: He’s a double agent.
JERRICK: So he’s working for the Brits to try to give them information about Al-Qaeda, but in reality he’s still an
Al-Qaeda operative.
LOFTUS: Yeah. The CIA and the Israelis all accused MI6 of letting all these terrorists live in London not because
they’re getting Al-Qaeda information, but for appeasement. It was one of those you leave us alone, we leave you alone
kind of things.
JERRICK: Well we left him alone too long then.
LOFTUS: Absolutely. Now we knew about this guy Aswat. Back in 1999 he came to America. The Justice
Department wanted to indict him in Seattle because him and his buddy were trying to set up a terrorist training school in
Oregon.
JERRICK: So they indicted his buddy, right? But why didn’t they indict him?
LOFTUS: Well it comes out, we’ve just learned that the headquarters of the US Justice Department ordered the
Seattle prosecutors not to touch Aswat.
JERRICK: Hello? Now hold on, why?
LOFTUS: And that’s – Well, apparently Aswat was working for British intelligence. Now Aswat’s boss, the onearmed
Captain Hook, he gets indicted two years later. So the guy above him and below him get indicted, but not Aswat.
Now there’s a split of opinion within US intelligence. Some people say that the British intelligence fibbed to us. They told
18 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA
us that Aswat was dead, and that’s why the New York group dropped the case. That’s not what most of the Justice
Department thinks. They think that it was just again covering up for this very publicly affiliated guy with Al-Muhajiroun.
He was a British intelligence plant. So all of a sudden he disappears. He’s in South Africa. We think he’s dead; we don’t
know he’s down there. Last month the South African Secret Service come across the guy. He’s alive.
JERRICK: Yeah, now the CIA says, oh he’s alive. Our CIA says OK let’s arrest him. But the Brits say no again?
LOTFUS: The Brits say no. Now at this point, two weeks ago, the Brits know that the CIA wants to get a hold of
Haroon. So what happens? He takes off again, goes right to London. He isn’t arrested when he lands, he isn’t arrested
when he leaves.
JERRICK: Even though he’s on a watch list.
LOFTUS: He’s on the watch list.The only reason he could get away with that was if he was working for British
intelligence. He was a wanted man.
JERRICK: And then takes off the day before the bombings, I understand it--
LOFTUS: Yeah, And goes to Pakistan.
JERRICK: And Pakistan, they jail him.
LOFTUS: The Pakistanis arrest him. They jail him. He’s released within 24 hours. Back to Southern Africa, goes to
Zimbabwe and is arrested in Zambia. Now the US--
JERRICK: Trying to get across the--
LOFTUS: –-we’re trying to get our hands on this guy.
JERRICK: John, hang around. I have so many questions now. [break]
LOFTUS: The US was used by Al-Muhajiroun for training of people to send to Kosovo. What ties all these cells
together was, back in the late 1990s, the leaders all worked for British intelligence in Kosovo. Believe it or not, British
intelligence actually hired some Al-Qaeda guys to help defend the Muslim rights in Albania and in Kosovo. That’s when
Al-Muhajiroun got started.
IJAZ: Which is by the way why we know so much about them right now.
LOFTUS: Yes, I’m afraid so. The CIA was funding the operation to defend the Muslims, British intelligence was
doing the hiring and recruiting. Now we have a lot of detail on this because Captain Hook, the head of Al-Muhajiroun, he
sidekick was Bakri Mohammed, another cleric. And back on October 16, 2001, he gave a detailed interview with al-Sharq
al-Aswat, an Arabic newspaper in London, describing the relationship between British intelligence and the operations in
Kosovo and Al-Muhajiroun. So that’s how we get all these guys connected. It started in Kosovo, Haroon was 31 years
old, he came on about 1995.
JERRICK: OK. Here’s another question for you.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Hello, John. With the quid-pro-quo relationship that London obviously had with these
terrorists early on, what changed that caused them to all of a sudden get away from the you leave us alone, we’ll leave you
alone situation?
LOFTUS: The Israelis say that the truce went on for years. Guys from Al-Muhajiroun for example would bring
suicide bombers to Israel to blow up Mike’s Place. There was a definite link there. And yet the trainer, Sadiki Al Kahn,
was able to go back to Britain and not be touched.
The London Explosions, The Rogue Network, Bush, And Iran 19
The Phony War on Terror: Time to
Quarantine the Real Aggressors
Speech to the Axis of Peace Conference or Axe de la Paix, held in Brussels, Belgium,
November 17th and 18th, 2005. The conference gathered political and intellectual personalities
from more than thirty nations, who are committed against the logic of war, with a view to
establishing a permanent structure that will make the voice of peace be heard.
Text of speech to the conference by Webster G. Tarpley:
400 years ago this month, the English King James’ first minister Robert Cecil unveiled his
masterpiece, the Gunpowder Plot to blow up the king and the parliament. The event was blamed
on Guy Fawkes and other plotters, who were tortured and executed. The Catholics, the Pope, the
Jesuits and the Spanish were blamed, setting up centuries of conflict and imperial expansion. But
the plot was a synthetic provocation staged by Cecil. Terrorism was a birth pang of the Anglo-
American financier faction, and terrorism accompanies that faction in its moribund senility
today.
According to today’s neocon Bush regime in Washington, the central event of world history
is the attacks of September 11, 2001. The neocons demand that world affairs be organized
around what they call the war on terrorism, supposedly waged by the United States, Great
Britain, and the other English-speaking powers against the dark powers of radical Islam. This
phony war on terrorism comes complete with preventive nuclear sneak attacks on any country
the Bush regime chooses. These can be supplemented by conventional aggression, and by the socalled
color revolutions, the new name for the traditional CIA “people power” coups.
The main premise of the war on terror is the myth of September 11 – 3,000 people allegedly
killed by a group of 19 hijackers including Mohammed Atta, all members of al Qaeda, led by
Osama bin Laden operating from a cave in Afghanistan with a laptop computer, etc. My main
point today is that this premise is a big lie, as I argue in my book, 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in
USA (Joshua Tree CA: Progressive Press, 2005). The 9/11 events were a deliberate provocation
carried out from within the US military, security, and intelligence apparatus by a deeply
entrenched faction variously called the invisible government, the secret government, the parallel
government, the rogue network, the secret team. This faction cuts across the CIA, the Pentagon,
the NSA, the FBI, the Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and other key parts of government. It is a
faction which has been operating for more than a century. It meshes with the British MI-6 and
Defence Ministry.
9/11 was a successful coup d’état designed to shift the Bush White House into the War of
Civilizations mode described by Samuel Huntington. The Arab and Islamic worlds were the first
targets, to be followed by China, and also Russia, as per the Wolfowitz doctrine. 9/11 thus joins
the tradition of self-inflicted or imaginary attacks going back to the explosion of the USS Maine
in Havana harbor in 1898, which launched the Spanish-American War, and with it US
Imperialism. The secret government tried to stage a fascist march on Washington against
President Franklin D. Roosevelt, and tried to assassinate him. They have brought us the Bay of
20 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA
Pigs, the Kennedy assassination, the fake Gulf of Tonkin incident (partly admitted in recent
weeks by the NSA), the Vietnam War, the attempted assassination of Reagan, the gun-running
and drug-running of the Iran-contra affair, the bombing of Serbia, the sinking of the Russian
submarine Kursk, and, their crowning achievement, 9/11, followed by the invasions of
Afghanistan and Iraq. US presidents are generally puppets of this rogue network, which responds
to the needs of Wall Street and the City of London.
It was the rogue network which sent Bush an ultimatum on 9/11 with the words: “Angel is
next.” The meaning was: launch the war on civilizations, or be liquidated. Bush speedily
complied, turning the US government over to the rogue network.
In the terminology of intelligence work, Bin Laden, Atta, and the rest are patsies. They are
double agents, fanatics, dupes, agents provocateurs. They operate under the umbrella of al
Qaeda, a group which can only be described as the Arab Legion of CIA and MI-6, a classic
counter-gang or pseudo-gang against Arab nationalism. Their ethnic and religious background
allows the Arab and Islamic world to be blamed for terrorist acts. They receive support from the
CIA, as typified by Bin Laden’s famous kidney dialysis. These figures have criminal intent, but
what they do not have is the physical and technical ability to produce the effects observed – just
as Lee Harvey Oswald, no matter how evil he was, could not have fired the requisite number of
shots at President Kennedy in Dallas.
The terrorist controllers and case officers for Atta and the others were evidently Able
Danger, a joint project of the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Special Forces Command.
Since Able Danger came to light, we have learned that Able Danger destroyed 2.5 terabytes of its
own records, equal to about a quarter of the Library of Congress, the largest library in the world.
Rumsfeld has forbidden Able Danger officers to testify to Congress.
The patsies could operate freely and openly, without being arrested, because of the network
of moles inside the US government. These moles are loyal to the invisible government, not to the
constitution and the laws. They make sure the patsies are available to be scapegoated, and they
destroy the evidence and organize the cover-up after the fact. The moles are responsible for
paralyzing US air defenses for one hour and forty-five minutes on 9/11, in comparison with
average intercept times of 15-20 minutes at most both before and after. No outside force could
have obtained this result.
The trained professionals, the technocrats of death, are the third group. They do possess the
physical-technical ability to crash planes and other flying objects into buildings, and to destroy
the World Trade Center with controlled demolition. Some of these professionals operate from
inside government bureaucracies, and others from private offices. They seek anonymity, not
publicity.
Recent progress in 9/11 research has focused on the role of war games, military exercises,
and terror drills in hiding and facilitating the terror actions of 9/11. So far we know of 14
separate exercises on or related to 9/11. Some were used to suppress air defenses by moving
fighter planes to northern Canada and Alaska, far from the 9/11 targets. Others paralyzed air
defense by inserting false radar blips onto the radar screens of defense personnel, and with
commercial and military aircraft which reported themselves as hijacked.
But there is another dimension. A drill staged at the National Reconnaissance Office in
Chantilly, Virginia that morning was based on the idea of flying commercial airlines into office
The London Explosions, The Rogue Network, Bush, And Iran 21
buildings. There is every reason to believe that the kamikaze aircraft were controlled from here,
the US spy satellite headquarters. Amalgam Virgo, another drill associated with 9/11, involved
firing a cruise missile against a land target from a rogue freighter in the Gulf of Mexico. This
likely prepared what was done to the Pentagon, since it is clear that no commercial airliner ever
hit that building.
Most ominous of all was Global Guardian, a 9/11 drill simulating all-out thermonuclear war
with bombers, missiles, and submarines. This drill included an attempt at outside penetration of
the nuclear command structure by a “bad” outsider with access to a key command and control
system. Here was the secret portal through which the rogue network was ready to launch nuclear
war on 9/11. On 9/11, Bush called Putin with an ultimatum: the US would seize Afghanistan,
plus bases in ex-Soviet central Asia. If Putin had rejected this, the US rogue network had the
capability to set off World War III by ordering nuclear escalation.
When state terrorists attack, they often do it under the cover of an announced, seemingly
legal drill that closely resembles or mimics the terror operation. This helps camouflage the
criminal intent of the coup plotters inside their own bureaucracy. The drill is just a drill, until it
goes live. During the Cold War, Hilex 75 and Able Archer 83 were drills that could have led to
real confrontation and war.
When President Reagan was shot in 1981, a presidential succession exercise (Nine Lives)
was scheduled for the next day, as a cover for operations. The London July 7 bombings of this
year were prepared by exercises named Atlantic Blue by the UK, Topoff III by the US, and
Triple Play by Canada, which simulated an attack on the London Underground while an
international conference was going on in the UK. On July 7 itself, Peter Power’s Visor
Associates were simulating explosions in the same stations at the same times that bombs
exploded, as BBC 5 reported.
Last summer, Cheney instructed the Pentagon to prepare the atomic bombing of Iran, to be
carried out in the wake of a new, larger-scale 9/11. It is clear this was to be state sponsored, false
flag synthetic terrorism, designed to give a pretext for the attack.
In the US and other NATO states, a citizens’ watch for these dangerous rogue drills has
been established to meet the threat. In August, Sudden Response 05 was to simulate a 10-kiloton
nuclear explosion in Charleston, South Carolina. A mobilization of concerned citizens protested
this drill and, we believe, shut it down. Then came a gas dispersion drill in New York City, and
Granite Shadow / Power Geyser, involving weapons of mass destruction in Washington DC.
These drills were denounced and protested.
Right now, in the month of November, we are in the midst of the densest concentration of
drills since 9/11 itself. First there is Vigilant Shield, a radiological dirty bomb going off in the
port of Mobile, Alabama. This is to be answered by Global Lightning, an exchange of nuclear
missiles between the US and North Korea, with US ABM missile defense engaged.
Simultaneously there is Positive Response and Global Storm, the new name for Global Guardian
under the regime of first-strike preventive nuclear attack. These involve a confrontation with
Russia over the Ukraine.. Any of these drills could be used as a cover to launch real nuclear
provocations and nuclear attacks. War planning against Venezuela continues. Worldwide
vigilance is needed to prevent the worst.
22 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA
The Bush regime is now in crisis because of the lost war in Iraq, the criminally negligent
response to hurricane Katrina, and the highest gasoline prices in history. Libby has been indicted,
and Rove, Feith, Wolfowitz and Ledeen may follow. As in the movie Wag the Dog, Bush or the
neocons are tempted to start a war to escape this crisis. During Watergate, when Nixon declared
a nuclear red alert in October 1973, British Prime Minister Edward Heath saw blatant political
motives. Whenever Nixon asked for the football, the briefcase containing the secret nuclear
launch codes, White House officials Kissinger and Haig watched him closely to keep his finger
off the nuclear button. In the summer of 1974, Defense Secretary Schlesinger told US
commanders to disregard orders for any military attack coming from Nixon unless they had been
confirmed by Schlesinger or Kissinger. Today the situation is similar, and the Democratic Party
and the NATO states must demand that the unstable Bush and the desperate neocons be placed
under special surveillance during their ouster to prevent new adventures of incalculable
dimensions.
But as long as Bush can keep his base of 30-35% of the US population, he can wage war in
Iraq indefinitely, and possibly widen that war to Syria and Iran. Bush’s hold on his base is due
largely to the power of the 9/11 myth over certain parts of the American people. Whenever Bush
is held accountable for anything, his response is to cite 9/11. His arguments for the war in Iraq
are not based on Iraq, but rather on 9/11. There is only one way to erode Bush’s hard core base,
and that is by attacking the 9/11 myth. Destroy the 9/11 myth, and the September criminals may
be called to account. Destroy the 9/11 myth, and Bush will be neutralized. Peace-loving
governments and institutions around the world must address this task, with a campaign of
denunciation, exposure, and political education on the truth about 9/11 and the nature of
terrorism. One vehicle for this would be an Independent International Truth Commission on
9/11, modeled on the Russell-Sartre Tribunal for Vietnam. The convocation of such a truth
commission for 9/11 is more urgent than ever, and should be top priority for anti-war forces well
before the Congressional elections a year from now.
On October 5, 1937, Franklin D. Roosevelt called in Chicago for a quarantine of the fascist
dictators, for the isolation and boycott of aggressors. Since then the wheels of history have
turned, and it is now the Bush-neocon regime in Washington which must be quarantined by the
forces of civilized humanity. There can be no military or security cooperation with the neocons.
Free trade pacts with the neocons are suicidal. Bush officials are guilty of international
conspiracy to wage aggressive war, a capital crime under the Nuremberg precedents. When the
US population is turning against Bush, it is tragic to see Europe and Japan continuing to support
him on so many issues. It is time for the world to quarantine the aggressor. In so doing, it will
have the support of the American people.
>>>>>>> Read more!
[political-research] Bloglines - General Anthony Zinni on the Iraq War
| |||||
|
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>>>>>>> Read more!
[political-research] Eliot Cohen Goes Mental on Mearsheimer and Walt
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>>>>>>> Read more!
Bloglines - Proof? My thesis is self-evident
| |||||
|
>>>>>>> Read more!
[political-research] Bloglines - Software Out There
| |||||
|
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>>>>>>> Read more!
[political-research] Bloglines - Karen Kwiatkowski on C-SPAN
| |||||
|
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>>>>>>> Read more!
[political-research] The Israel Lobby's Systematic Deformation of American Foreign Policy
NB: I consider the term War on Terror misleading, since it isn't war in any usual sense---and the danger has been grotesquely exaggerated. This nation is to be mortally threatened by a gang of Islamic fanatics living in caves in the border area, Afghanistan-Pakistan?
The War on Terror like the Cold War has become a public works project of gigantic dimensions (we could use instead a construction project for urban public transport and high speed rail between our cities) for a new terror-industrial complex, for charlatans of every sort like those "terror" experts who disfigure our television screens. It has also become a convenient instrument for the Israel Lobby to pursue its systematic deformation of American foreign policy in the short term interest of Israel. (Today, 4 April, the American Jewish Committee in an advertisement called for war on Iran.)
Congressman Rahm Emanuel, who served in the Israel army, has been active in trying to block the opponents of the Iraq war in the Democratic Party, and it is the support of the Israel lobby for the most aggressive and unilateralist version of American imperialism that has made figures like Senators Clinton and Lieberman and Representative Harman into allies of the President on Iraq.
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
| Business intelligence | Competitive intelligence | Market intelligence |
| Emotional intelligence | Military intelligence | Critical thinking |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>>>>>>> Read more!
Bloglines - Money doesn't talk
What you don't know can't hurt them
|
>>>>>>> Read more!
[political-research] Bloglines - Norman Solomon: When War Crimes Are Impossible
| |||||
|
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>>>>>>> Read more!
Sheep In A Spring Shower
Iraq (From BBC (AFP) Photo Credit)
[political-research] The Israel Lobby and Google News
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>>>>>>> Read more!
Floodlit Wellhouse
[political-research] Bloglines - Christian “AIPAC” Supports Palestinian Starvation
| ||
|











As if AIPAC wasn’t enough, the Christian Zionists in America have organized a new “Christian pro-Israel lobby,” a “more powerful … version of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee” that will “target senators and congressmen on Capitol Hill” and demand they show ever-increasing fealty to the tiny outlaw state of Israel, reports the Israeli newspaper