Discussion about 09/11/2001: [911TruthAction] Digest Number 1191

Saturday, March 25, 2006

[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1191

There are 25 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. A Day in the Life: 3/24/6
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." <prez@usa-exile.org>
2. Student Member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth Shot Dead ! tvnl news
From: "reggie501" <reggie501@optonline.net>
3. Alex to be on CNN again tonight?!
From: "S Miles Lewis" <yahoolists@elfis.net>
4. Amazing letter about 9/11 from a pro-war Republican!
From: "reggie501" <reggie501@optonline.net>
5. Jones on CNN, whistling past his grave?
From: APFN <apfn@apfn.org>
6. [Fwd: CNN: Overwhelming Response to 9/11 Cover-up Story, More Coverage Given]
From: APFN <apfn@apfn.org>
7. VOTE NOW: US Gvmt covered up real events of 9/11???
From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com>
8. Off of the Entertainment Page and Onto the News Page
From: "botalerts" <botalerts@yahoo.ca>
9. Re: attn. Bruce Tanner -- Answers to Holmgren ...
From: "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@nwinfo.net>
10. Re: Amazing letter about 9/11 from a pro-war Republican!
From: "mojo_j_2000" <mojo_j_2000@yahoo.com>
11. Re: Student Member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth Shot Dead ! tvnl news
From: "mojo_j_2000" <mojo_j_2000@yahoo.com>
12. MOSSAD MONEYCHANGER SPILLS
From: "mojo_j_2000" <mojo_j_2000@yahoo.com>
13. "Peering into Darkness" radio water project interview up on the web
From: janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com>
14. We ain't out of the woods yet people!
From: Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com>
15. Too Many Chips on the Old Block?
From: janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com>
16. Re: Re: Zionist Domination
From: Patrick BURNAND <pburnand@yahoo.com>
17. ***Action Alert***This is it>>>Phenomenal Response to Charlie Sheen speaking out
From: "Marsha" <Mofmars3@wmconnect.com>
18. Re: VOTE NOW: US Gvmt covered up real events of 9/11???
From: Chris Bell <somebigguy88@yahoo.com>
19. Re: VOTE NOW: US Gvmt covered up real events of 9/11???
From: Chris Bell <somebigguy88@yahoo.com>
20. Alex Jones, Charlie Sheen, Webster Tarpley broadcasts
From: John Leonard <jpleonard@verizon.net>
21. Re: Re: Zionist Domination
From: Patrick BURNAND <pburnand@yahoo.com>
22. Mind Reading Devices?
From: janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com>
23. Alex Jones/Charlie Sheen on CNN Headline News 5 PM EST+ Links to Info
From: ranger116@webtv.net
24. Re: Zionist Domination
From: "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@nwinfo.net>
25. Re: Mind Reading Devices?
From: Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:15:42 -0500
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." <prez@usa-exile.org>
Subject: A Day in the Life: 3/24/6

GOVERNMENT OF THE USA IN
EXILE
Free Americans
Reaching Out to Amerika's Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free
��
Via <prez@usa-exile.org>

March 24, 2006

From: "Nico Verhagen" <nico.verhagen@t-online.de>
Date: March 24, 2006 3:41:30 AM EST
To: <ViaCampesina-info-english@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [ViaCampesina-info-english] La V�a Campesina says no to the
Legalization of Death

La V�a Campesina Says
No to the Legalization of Death

(Curitiba, March 21, 2006) The international peasant movement
reaffirmed that natural resources (seeds, land, water, forests and
others) are life itself and are the patrimony of humanity. They must be
at the service and under the care of the communities that venerate,
protect, use and improve them.
The neoliberal model commodifies and monopolizes the natural wealth
with technologies and legal instruments like the system of intellectual
property rights. This economic and ideological model denies the
knowledge and culture of our ancestors and farmers, which are the bases
of humanity�s food supply since women initiated the practice of
agriculture thousands of years ago.
The "modernization" of agriculture, since the "Green Revolution", with
pesticides, biotechnology, monocultures, GMO�s, nano and terminator
technology, is destroying the rural world, the environment, forcing out
millions of farming families and generating an industrial food
production that far from eliminating hunger it is deepening it.
In this system, terminator technology, which prevents farmers to
conserve their seeds and forces them to buy new seeds for each sowing,
is an immoral and unacceptable technology. It creates seeds of murder
for farmers and only benefits the agro-chemical corporations like
Monsanto, Syngenta and Dupont.
La V�a Campesina denounces that in this 8th Conference on the Parts of
the Biological Diversity Agreement (BDA-8), there is a proposal
promoted by the U.S.A., Canada, New Zealand and Australia to undermine
the moratorium that exists in the Convention on Biological Diversity
against field testing and the commercialization of terminator seeds.
La V�a Campesina denounces the collaboration between many of the
underdeveloped nations� governments with the industrial countries to
impose this model, legalizing it through diverse international legal
instruments and national legislations.
Thousands of peasant women and men of La V�a Campesina have come to
Curitiba to make our voice heard against the COP-8.
�We demand that the absolute prohibition of GMO�s in agriculture, as
well as other technologies controlled by transnational corporations. We
are against patents on life and demand that all governments of the
world prohibit terminator technology.
We propose Food Sovereignty which feeds life itself and establishes the
right of people to decide - on the basis of their knowledge and
cultures - how they want to feed themselves, how they want to produce
their food and how they want to share it. It is the producers and the
rural communities - and not private capital - that have the full rights
to the access, use and control of the land, seeds and the natural
resources so that they can continue to serve humanity.
La V�a Campesina ratifies the right of people to feed themselves with
nutritious and healthy products, without any type of political,
economic or military repression. The fundamental principle that life
cannot be privatized is sustained.
We demanded the total respect of our right to continue reproducing,
taking care of, curing and preserving seeds in order to continue
providing the base, not only of our subsistence, but also of the
agricultural diversity, on which the food supply of the world depends.
Our movement, which unites millions of� peasant women and men around
the world will continue its emphatic opposition to the privatization of
life and will continue developing an agriculture that is respectful of
the values, the cultures and the necessities of human communities.

Information:
Solange Engelmann : +�55- 41 8411 9794
Igor Felipe Santos :� + 55-11 72124874

--------------------------------
Isabelle Delforge
La Via Campesina
International Operative Secretariat
Jakarta - Indonesia
Office: + 62-217991890
Mobile in JKT: +62-81513224565 (in Belgium: +32498522163)
Home: +62-217946029
Website :http://www.viacampesina.org
Jln. Mampang Prapatan XIV No. 5
Jakarta Selatan 12790 - Indonesia

========================================================================
========================================================================
==============

From: "Nico Verhagen" <nico.verhagen@t-online.de>
Date: March 24, 2006 3:45:57 AM EST
To: <ViaCampesina-info-english@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [ViaCampesina-info-english] Statement from La Via Campesina in
support to the women from Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil)
Reply-To: ViaCampesina-info-english-owner@yahoogroups.com

La V�a Campesina

Movimento internacional campon�s

International farmers' movement

Movimiento campesino internacional

Secretaria operativa/ Operative secretariat:� Jln. Mampang Prapatan XIV
No. 5 Jakarta Selatan 12790
Tel/fax: +62-21-7991890/+62-21-7993426� Email:
viacampesina@viacampesina.org Website�:http://www.viacampesina.org
________________________________________________________________
Statement from La Via Campesina in support to the women from Rio
Grande do Sul (Brazil)
(Curitiba, March 22nd 2006) We, peasants from the international
movement La V�a Campesina, wish to express our indignation before the
violent police action of search and seizure, which was carried out on
March 21st, in the National and State Operational Secretariat of the
Association of Peasant Women in Passo Fundo� (Rio Grande do Sul state �
Brazil). This violent action by the Civil Police of Camaqu� and police
agents from Barra do Ribeiro and Passo Fundo is another example of
physical and psychological aggression against women rural workers � who
have been historically the main victims of the system.
The action started around 2:00PM, when police officers carrying guns
and without identifying themselves, broke the lock of the gate and
entered the actual space of the association, threatening women and
children with guns. Only after the action, a mandate just for the
inspection of the state Association was produced. Police agents took
computers, information material of the association, documents, money,
check books, among other things. Women were warranted for questioning
in the same evening, which was concluded only in the following morning.
The police was searching for supposed evidences in connection with the
action carried out by 2,000 Via Campesina women against monocultures,
on March 8th.
It was a clear violation of human rights, with no regard to the fact
that there were children and women in the place, who had denied even
the right to contact a lawyer. No country, under any circumstance can
allow such practices, since they are a serious attempt against human
dignity.
We denounce the abuse of power and authority of the police, who
continue using the legal apparatus, to carry out illegal action
methods. There is no doubt, that this is another example of the
criminalization of social movements which peasants all over the world
have been suffering.
For all that, La Via Campesina states that it will continue the
struggle in defence of natural resources, for land, water, seeds,
forests, life and for the protection, care and improvement of
biological and cultural diversity.

Information : Igor Felippe Santos + 55 41 84119769
��Solange Engelmann +55 �41 84119794
========================================================================
================================================================

From: Michelle Sura <michellesura@mac.com>
Date: March 23, 2006 3:45:04 PM EST
To: Lynn Woolsey <lynn.woolsey@mail.house.gov>
Cc: Boxer Barbara <senator@boxer.senate.gov>
Subject: INFLUENCE

"March 23, 2006 --White House insiders report that an influential group
of extreme right-wing gay Latino power brokers has been given almost
total control over U.S. foreign and business policy decisions affecting
Latin America. A number of members of the Young Hispanic Republican
Association report that they have been sexually preyed upon by members
of the influential Latino power brokers after accepting administration
appointments, including positions on the White House staff.�

"The gay Latino group, led by an individual nicknamed "El Padrino" the
godfather) and which has close ties, including gay relationships, with
top GOP officials in the Republican National Committee, Small Business
Administration, the Department of State, State of Texas, and Executive
Office of the President, has been tasked with the sale of Univision,
the largest Spanish language TV network in North America. Senior White
House officials have provided hundreds of millions of dollars, through
CIA and State Department conduits, to the Latino group to ensure that
Chavez does not gain control of Univision.

"The group has also prevailed upon the government of Panama and
particularly senior gay members of the Panamanian government, to ensure
that President Martin Torrijos backs out of a regional energy treaty
signed between Panama, Venezuela and Colombia. The deal would see
Panama's transisthmian Petroterminales de Panama (PTP) pipeline between
Puerto Armuelles on the Pacific to Chirique Grande on the Carribean
reverse its flow from east to west to permit the export of Venezuelan
oil to China. However, since the Panamanian government only owns a 30
percent stake in the pipeline, the GOP Latino power brokers have
applied pressure on a New York-based family-owned firm that own 60
percent of the pipeline to sink the deal. The law firm that represent
the interests of the New York family is reportedly owned by the family
of the Panamanian ambassador to the United States and Panama's
ambassador to the United Nations. Ten percent is owned by a shadowy
Swiss-based firm, the shares of which are held by anonymous parties,
that is reportedly connected to the CIA and senior members of the
Panamanian government.�

"The other part of the Venezuelan-Columbian-Panamanian deal that is
being targeted by the GOP Latino group for cancellation is a natural
gas pipeline from Columbia through Panama and Central America to
southern Mexico.

"Katin Vasquez, Panama's Economic and Finance Minister and former
Panama Canal Commissioner, is also being lobbied heavily by
GOP-connected Wachovia to ensure the bank gets the contract to handle
the funding for the $7 billion Panama Canal Expansion Project. The
canal expansion is tied to the fact that with the increased use of
supertankers, which cannot currently transit the canal, the canal must
quickly be expanded to handle what are known as "Post-Panamax" vessels.
"Panamax" is standard code for the maximum size vessel that can
currently transit the canal. With the thirty day advance payment
requirement, Panama could easily issue bonds to finance the expansion.
However, the gay Latino group tied to the Bush administration is using
its influence with senior Panamanian officials, sweetened with cash
payments, to ensure that Wachovia gets the financing and
Halliburton/Kellogg, Brown & Root gets the lion's share of construction
contracts for the canal's expansion.�

"Vasquez has reportedly been flown to North Carolina in Wachovia's
private corporate jet for golf outings. However, observers point out
that Panama does not require Wachovia's involvement in the canal
expansion project since the canal expansion project since the canal is
a virtual cash cow. Ships are required to pay thirty days in advance
prior to� transiting the canal.�

"The gay Latino group reportedly has particularly close ties to the
Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice and her public diplomacy assistant
Karen Hughes. Interestingly, Hughes is the daughter of Maj. Gen. Harold
Parfitt, the last U.S. Governor of the Panama Canal Zone.�

"The GOP group has been tasked by the White House to work on reversing
the leftist tide that is sweeping Latin America. Currently, the Bush
administration can only count on three Latin American nations to fully
carry out U.S. policy: El Salvador, Panama and Columbia. With
pro-Chavez leftist victories likely in Mexico, Nicaragua, Ecuador and
Peru, the GOP Latino powerbrokers are expected to use their influence
to generate support for pro-U.S. right-wing political leaders and
parties. "

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: "Amy Sasser" <amysasser@gmail.com>
Date: March 23, 2006 11:27:40 AM EST
To: bloggerbrigade@lists.riseup.net, World_Politics@googlegroups.com
Subject: cnn webster tarpley and Charlie Sheen , 911 truth and a Wanker
from National Geographic talk about 911 Questions and the Offical Myth.

RBN'S WEBSTER GRIFFIN TARPLEY AND
CHARLIE SHEEN HIT THE MAINSTREAM
It was a first for America's mainstream media on Wednesday night
(3/22/06). CNN Headline aired an interview with "9/11 Truth" author
Webster Griffin Tarpley on Showbiz Tonight.

VIEW CNN'S SHOWBIZ TONIGHT INTERVIEW HERE

Tarpley commented on Sheen's remarks and sized up the various schools
of "9/11 conspiracy" thought on CNN. The new edition of Tarpley's
"Synthetic Terror" points out the different viewpoints on 9/11, which
range from the Bush administration version, to the "bungling
negligence" theory partly espoused by the 9/11 commission, to the "Let
It Happen on Purpose" or LIHOP theory, a compromise popular among
liberal intellectuals like Michael Moore.

CNN's move comes in the wake of a far-reaching article in New York
Magazine on the 9/11 controversy this week at
http://www.nymag.com/news/features/16464/index.html , which cited
Tarpley, plus hard-hitting comments by actor Charlie Sheen on the Alex
Jones talk radio show, infowars.com, on Monday, see prisonplanet.com

Tarpley's book, "9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA" presents the
radical view of no hijackers, controlled demolition of the WTC, and an
inside job by a "rogue network esconced in key nodes of the
establishment." His Tarpley's publisher, John Leonard of Progressive
Press, is adamant that "LIHOP" is useless because it leaves intact the
story of Arab attackers, and thereby the pretext for war on the Middle
East. He and Tarpley subscribe to the "MIHOP" or "Made it Happen on
Purpose - from A to Z" explanation.

The precedent is Operation Northwoods, a 1962 plan by the Joint Chiefs
of Staff to fabricate an atrocity and blame it on Cuba. The plot was
nixed by Kennedy. Northwoods documents were released under the FOIA act
before Bush took power.

According to Alex Jones' website, "Actor Charlie Sheen has joined a
growing army of other highly credible public figures in questioning the
official story of 9/11 and calling for a new independent investigation
of the attack and the circumstances surrounding it.

"Over the past two years, scores of highly regarded individuals have
gone public to express their serious doubts about 9/11. These include
former presidential advisor and CIA analyst Ray McGovern, the father of
Reaganomics and former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury Paul
Craig Roberts, BYU physics Professor Steven Jones, former German
defense minister Andreas von Buelow, former MI5 officer David Shayler,
former Blair cabinet member Michael Meacher, former Chief Economist for
the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term
Morgan Reynolds and many more....

"The star of current hit comedy show Two and a Half Men and dozens of
movies including Platoon and Young Guns, Sheen.... agreed that the
biggest conspiracy theory was put out by the government itself... It
seems to me like 19 amateurs with box cutters taking over four
commercial airliners and hitting 75% of their targets, that feels like
a conspiracy theory. It raises a lot of questions."

Tarpley's message to people of good will: "If you want to stop the war
in iraq, and prevent the attack on Iran, the only way to do it is to
put 9/11 truth on the front page everywhere. Make the official version
explode, or the bombs will."

Released By:
John Leonard
�
http://www.rbnlive.com/sheen_tarpley.html
�
�
Building 7 which has been talked about in this video can be viewed @
www.wtc7.net�even Peter Jennings and others says some powerful
statements.. But it seems that the offical version can't explain the
collapse of this building which housed FBI, SEC, CIA and contained many
files of corruption. Giuliani's bunker was there with bullet proof
windows.� ask your self why the officials can't talk about building 7..
IT IS A COVER UP! The officials story is bogus
� and for you EOD folks out there you know how they do it!
....
Operation Northwoods for us old farts we remember the Cuban Missile
Crisis and not long after Kennedy was murdered and the official Warren
report was a whitewash/
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/�read the document. they
were going to unleash false flag operations !
�
by way of deception thou shalt do war ...Mossad Motto. And we know the
CIA is in bed with the Mossad.

========================================================================
================================================================

BBC:

Climate change 'harms world poor'

The poorest people in the world in Asia and Africa will be worst hit
by climate change, a UK government report says.

It says droughts and floods fuelled partly by carbon emissions from
countries such as the UK will hurt the same people targeted by overseas
aid.

The report was obtained by BBC News under the Freedom of Information
Act.

It says emissions are making natural disasters worse and warns that
rising sea levels could undo more than half the development work in
Bangladesh.

The internal report at the Department for International Development
reveals the depth of concern shared by officials about climate change.

Rising seas

It warns that the cost of rising greenhouse gas emissions will fall
predominantly on the poorest people who will be unable to cope.

Global warming, it forecasts, threatens to reduce India's farm output
by as much as a quarter.

And half of the $1bn (�0.58bn) in aid given by rich nations to
Bangladesh is at risk as sea levels rise.

In Africa, it says the number of people at risk from coastal flooding
could rise from one million to 70 million by 2080.

It points out that natural disasters already cost donors $6bn
annually, says BBC environment correspondent Roger Harrabin, and as 73%
are climate-related, this bill is set to soar.

In a separate development, a study in the US journal Science suggests
Earth could be headed for catastrophic increases in sea levels in the
next few centuries.

If greenhouse gases continue to rise at present rates, it said,
Greenland could be as warm by 2100 as it was 130,000 years ago, when
melting ice raised sea levels by 3-4m.

========================================================================
===============

----------

What�s Become of Americans?

By Paul Craig Roberts
March 23, 2006

LewRockwell.com

Imagine knocking on America�s door and being told, "Americans don�t
live here any longer. They have gone away."

But isn�t that what we are hearing, that Americans have gone away? Alan
Shore told us so on ABC�s Boston Legal on March 14:

When the weapons of mass destruction thing turned out not to be true, I
expected the�American people to rise up. They didn't.�

Then, when the Abu Ghraib torture thing surfaced and it was revealed
that our government�participated in rendition, a practice where we
kidnap people and turn them over to r�gimes who specialize�in torture,
I was sure then the American people would be heard from. We stood
mute.�

Then came the news that we jailed thousands of so-called terrorist
suspects, locked them up without�the right to a trial or even the right
to confront their accusers. Certainly, we would never stand for that.
We�did.�

And now, it's been discovered the executive branch has been conducting
massive, illegal, domestic�surveillance on its own citizens. You and
me. And I at least consoled myself that finally, finally the�American
people will have had enough. Evidently, we haven't.�

In fact, if the people of this country have spoken, the message is
we're okay with it all. Torture,�warrantless search and seizure,
illegal wiretappings, prison without a fair trial or any trial, war on
false�pretenses. We, as a citizenry, are apparently not offended.�

There are no demonstrations on college campuses. In fact, there's no
clear indication that young�people even seem to notice.�. . .

The Secret Service can now declare free speech�zones to contain,
control and, in effect, criminalize protest.�Stop for a second and try
to fathom that.�At a presidential rally, parade or appearance, if you
have on a supportive t-shirt, you can be there. If�you�re wearing or
carrying something in protest, you can be removed.�

This! In the United States of America.

Readers tell me that Americans don�t live here any more. They ask what
responsible American citizenry would put up with the trashing of the
Bill of Rights and the separation of powers, with wars based on
deception, and with pathological liars in control of their government?
One reader recently wrote that he believes that "no element of the U.S.
government has been left untainted" by the lies and manipulations that
have driven away accountability. So-called leaders, he wrote, "talk a
great story of American pride and patriotism," but in their hands
patriotism is merely a device for "cynical manipulation and fraud."

The Bush regime acknowledges that 30,000 Iraqi civilians, largely women
and children, have been killed as a result of Bush�s invasion. Others
who have looked at civilian casualties with greater attention have come
up with numbers three to six times as large. The Johns Hopkins study
accounted for 98,000 civilian deaths. Andrew Cockburn, using more
sophisticated statistical analysis, concluded that 180,000 Iraqis died
as a result of Bush�s invasion. The former prime minister Iyad Allawi
says that Iraqi sectarian violence alone is claiming 50�60 deaths per
day, or 18,000�22,000 annually, a figure that could quickly worsen.

Some were killed by "smart bombs" that weren�t very smart and dropped
on hospitals, schools, and weddings. Others were mistaken for
resistance fighters and killed. Still others were killed by spooked,
trigger-happy U.S. troops. And many died due to the breakdown of the
Iraqi health system.

Now comes a report in the online edition of Time magazine that U.S.
Marines went on a rampage in the village of Haditha and deliberately
slaughtered 15 unarmed Iraqis in their homes. The Iraqis were still in
their bed clothes, and 10 of the 15 were women and children.

The Marines turned in a false report that the civilians were killed by
an insurgent bomb. But the evidence of wanton carnage was too powerful.
Pressed by Time�s collection of evidence, U.S. military officials in
Baghdad opened an investigation. Time reports that "according to
military officials, the inquiry acknowledged that, contrary to the
military�s initial report, the 15 civilians killed on Nov. 19 died at
the hands of the Marines, not the insurgents. The military announced
last week that the matter has been handed over to the Naval Criminal
Investigative Service, which will conduct a criminal investigation."

If this story is true, under Donald Rumsfeld and George Bush�s
leadership, proud and honorable U.S. Marines have degenerated into the
Waffen SS. Those of us raised on John Wayne war movies find this very
hard to take.

A fish rots from the head. Clearly, deception in the Oval Office is
corrupting the U.S. military. One reader reported that on March 19 his
local PBS station aired a program which discussed the deaths of two
young American soldiers in friendly fire incidents similar to Pat
Tillman�s death. In each case, he reports, "elements within the
military falsified reports and attempted to shift blame to either enemy
combatants or allied (Polish) forces."

The neocons have yet to tell us the real reason for their assault on
Iraq, which has so far produced 20,000 dead, maimed, and wounded U.S.
soldiers, between 30,000 and 180,000 (and rising) dead Iraqis, and
demoralized U.S. Marines to the point that they commit atrocities on
women and children.

Would real Americans accept these blows for the sake of an undeclared
agenda? Perhaps it is true that Americans don�t live here any longer.

-------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Roberts is Chairman of the Institute for Political Economy and
Research Fellow at the Independent Institute. He is a former associate
editor of the Wall Street Journal, former contributing editor for
National Review, and a former assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury.
He is the co-author of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole
responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
the Centre for Research on Globalization.

To become a Member of Global Research

The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at
www.globalresearch.ca grants permission to cross-post original Global
Research articles in their entirety, or any portions thereof, on
community internet sites, as long as the text & title are not modified.
The source must be acknowledged and an active URL hyperlink address to
the original CRG article must be indicated. The author's copyright note
must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print
or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact:
crgeditor@yahoo.com

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available to our readers under the provisions
of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of
political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to
use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must
request permission from the copyright owner.

To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at Global
Research's News and Discussion Forum

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

� Copyright Paul Craig Roberts, LewRockwell.com, 2006

The url address of this article is:
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?
context=viewArticle&code=ROB20060323&articleId=2158

========================================================================
================================================

March 23, 2006

GlobalResearch.ca
Published on Thursday, March 23, 2006 by the Independent / UK

Chernobyl Disaster Linked to Higher Rate of Infant
Mortality in Britain

By Ian Herbert and Deborah Linton

�
The debate over the health effects of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in
Britain reopens today with research which suggests that infant deaths
were higher in areas where rain fell as the plume of fallout passed
overhead.

A study by the epidemiologist John Urquhart, to be presented at a
conference at City Hall in London marking the 20th anniversary of the
disaster, suggests that infant deaths may have risen by 11 per cent
between 1986 and 1989 in those areas compared with 4 per cent in other
areas, a correlation that Mr Urquhart describes as very significant.

Mr Urquhart - the author of a previous study which suggested that 2,000
more children than normal died before their first birthday between 1986
and 1989 - obtained infant death figures from 1983 to 1992 for 200
hospital districts across Britain. Areas across which cloud passed such
as Liverpool, Bradford, Leicestershire, and Bristol, showed higher than
average infant mortality which, he suggests, cannot entirely be
explained by social factors.

The study also suggests that a downwards infant mortality trend was
interrupted in the four years after the disaster at the Ukrainian power
station and continued to rise until 1992 in the most contaminated
areas.

Mr Urquhart argues that a plume of fallout from Chernobyl arrived near
the Isle of Wight and passed over Bristol into south Wales. Another
plume clipped the coast of Kent and then covered most of East Anglia
and part of Essex. Another worked its way from east London to
Hertfordshire, resurfacing in parts of Northamptonshire and
Leicestershire.

Parts of West Yorkshire and most of the West Midlands, Wales,
Merseyside, Lancashire, and Cumbria were significantly affected.

Mr Urquhart, who gave evidence in the 1980s to the Government
investigation led by Sir Douglas Black into evidence of a leukaemia
cluster near Sellafield, Cumbria, said: "Previous research has
established that there has been an increase in thyroid cancers in the
young in the north of England for which Chernobyl is the probable
cause.

"This new study shows that the infant mortality trend, which was
otherwise downwards, rose for a period of four years in England and
Wales after Chernobyl. The results based on such a large population
suggest that the effect of radioactive fallout could be two orders of
magnitude greater than previously suspected."

� 2006 Independent News and Media Limited

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole
responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
the Centre for Research on Globalization.

To become a Member of Global Research

To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at Global
Research's News and Discussion Forum

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

� Copyright , GlobalResearch.ca, 2006

The url address of this article is:
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?
context=viewArticle&code=20060323&articleId=2159

========================================================================
===============================================

----------

National
Impeachment Movement Ignored by Corporate Media

By Peter Phillips
March 23, 2006

GlobalResearch.ca

If a national movement calling for the impeachment of the President is
rapidly emerging and the corporate media are not covering it, is there
really a national movement for the impeachment of the President?

Impeachment advocates are widely mobilizing in the U.S. Over 1,000
letters to the editors of major newspapers have been printed in the
past six months asking for impeachment. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette letter
writer George Matus says, "I am still enraged over unasked questions
about exit polls, touch-screen voting, Iraq, the cost of the new
Medicare�who formulated our energy policy, Jack Abramoff, the Downing
Street Memos, and impeachment." David Anderson in McMinnville, Oregon
pens to the Oregonian, "Where are the members of our congressional
delegation now in demanding the current president's actions be
investigated to see if impeachment or censure are appropriate actions?"
William Dwyer's letter in the Charleston Gazette says, "Congress will
never have the courage to start the impeachment process without a
groundswell of outrage from the people."

City councils, boards of supervisors, and local and state level
Democrat central committees have voted for impeachment. Arcata,
California voted for impeachment on January 6. The City and County of
San Francisco, voted Yes on February 28. The Sonoma County Democrat
Central Committee (CA) voted for Impeachment on March 16. The townships
of Newfane, Brookfield, Dummerston, Marlboro and Putney in Vermont all
voted for impeachment the first week of March. The New Mexico State
Democrat party convention rallied on March 18 for the "impeachment of
George Bush and his lawful removal from office." The national Green
Party called for impeachment on January 3. Op-ed writers at the St.
Petersburg Times, Newsday, Yale Daily News, Barrons, Detroit Free
Press, and the Boston Globe have called for impeachment. The Nation
(1/30/06) and Harpers (3/06) magazines published cover articles calling
for impeachment. Garrison Keillor, and Richard Dreyfuss both have come
out for impeachment. As of March 16, thirty-two US House of
Representatives have signed on as co-sponsors to House Resolution 635,
which would create a Select Committee to look into the grounds for
recommending President Bush's impeachment.

Polls show that nearly a majority of Americans favor impeachment. In
October of 2005, Public Affairs Research found that 50% of Americans
said that President Bush should be impeached if he lied about the war
in Iraq. A Zogby International poll from early November 2005 found that
53% of Americans say, "If President Bush did not tell the truth about
his reasons for going to war with Iraq, Congress should consider
holding him accountable through impeachment." A March 16, 2006 poll by
American Research Group showed that 42% of Americans favored impeaching
Bush.

Despite all this advocacy and sentiment for impeachment, corporate
media have yet to cover this emerging mass movement. The Bangor Daily
News simply reported on March 17 that former US Attorney General Ramsey
Clark has set up the website Votetoimpeach.org and that other groups
are using the internet to push impeachment. The Wall Street Journal, on
March 16, editorialized about how it is just "the loony left" seeking
impeachment, but perhaps some Democrats in Congress will join in
feeding on the "bile of the censure/impeachment brigades."

The corporate media is ignoring the broadening call for impeachment -
wishing perhaps it will just go away. Television news and talk shows
have mentioned impeachment over 100 times in the past 30 days, mostly
however in the context of Senator Russ Feingold's censure bill and the
lack of broad Democrat support for censure or impeachment. Nothing on
television news gives the impression that millions of Americans are
calling for the impeachment of Bush and his cohorts.�

The Bush Administration lied about Iraq, illegally spied on US
citizens, and continues war crimes in the Middle East. Despite
corporate media's inability to hear the demands for impeachment, the
groundswell of outrage continues to expand.

-------------------------------------------
Peter Phillips is a Professor of Sociology at Sonoma State University
and Director of Project Censored a media research organization. He is
co-editor with Dennis Loo from Cal Poly Pomona of the The Case for
Impeachment of Bush and Cheney scheduled for release this summer by
Seven Stories Press.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole
responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
the Centre for Research on Globalization.

To become a Member of Global Research

To express your opinion on this article, join the discussion at Global
Research's News and Discussion Forum

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

� Copyright Peter Phillips, GlobalResearch.ca, 2006

The url address of this article is:
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?
context=viewArticle&code=PHI20060323&articleId=2160

========================================================================
==============================================

The New Iron Curtain
- What do Columbus, Jean Paul Sartre,
Margaret Mead and
John Kaminski have in common?

Prologue to John Kaminski's interesting analysis - link below*

''It is not anti-Semitic to criticize the policies of the state of
Israel.'' - US Secretary Colin Powell�s Remarks at 'The Conference on
Anti-Semitism of The Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe' - April 28, 2004 - German Ministry of Foreign Affairs Berlin,
Germany - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/22p6c

About people and continents bled like a kosher slaughtered sheep.

The Netherlands - March 23d - 2006 - The problem with this analysis, is
the raw reality that 'USA' also stands for the names of all other PNAC*
colonies, like Germany, France, England or The Netherlands for
instance. In Europe it is principally a treacherous trio that fits as a
hand in a glove, and now when ''the gloves are off' as they proclaimed,
the iron fist can be seen that Kaminski describes. The 'PNAC-motors'
Israel, 'The Group' with it's 'Board of Directors' in England, and
since August 1492, The Netherlands.

When forced to leave Spain - [http://tinyurl.com/3wlmw ] - part of
'The Group' financed Christopher Columbus and conquered among others
America, while many bankers went to Holland and later on to England.
The Jewish Virtual Library has the following on this medieval 'Project
for a New America': ''Judaic Treasures of the Library of Congress'' -
Columbus Sets Sail - The Exodus August 3,1492 -
[http://tinyurl.com/l7dha]

Most people in the world hardly know anything about The Netherlands -
#5 on the list of 'richest' countries on the globe (for 'The Group' and
it's collaborators) and 'Holland' for short - apart from the name of
football player Johan Cruyff, the tulips, windmills or Gouda cheese.
And even the ill informed, nearly brainwashed 16 million people
inhabiting Holland, hardly know about the American nuclear bombs at
Dutch bases - making Holland a target in an armed conflict - or who
runs their lives while robbing them.

Like in most PNAC colonies they've now also been robbed of their health
service, with today criminal collaborator minister Hoogervorst saying
that the ambulance services should be 'privatized' - another word for
'profitable'. The extra thousands of lives this heist is going to
result in, does not matter to him nor 'The Group': it's just some more
profit to them. In their global factory people - like you and me - are
not human beings: we are just throw-away sources of income to them.
Just look around you.

BLED LIKE A KOSHER SLAUGHTERED SHEEP

For instance: after Sweden now the Dutch sheeple pay the highest taxes
in the world, and on average work six months a year for 'the managers'.
At present sixty-one percent of the workers has sleepless nights they
said in a poll, because they do not know how to pay the bills. And the
number five richest country in the world has eleven percent of the
people living in poverty, according to their own - always faked -
figures. So the shame is probably bigger. A shame too on all who don't
react against it and let the crimes go on.

The introduction of the Euro currency measured two years ago - has made
life 49.1 % (fourty-nine-dot-one percent) more expensive. They had been
told and 'warned' beforehand that half a percent might be possible...
And the wages keep going down. The workers are bled like a kosher
slaughtered sheep, having ninety percent lobotomized by the mass
propaganda media, especially NOS state radio and TV. With very few
exceptions still alive, saying what's really happening, as done by The
Group's 'Jackals' killing for profit as explained by ex-IMF/World
Bank-man Perkins - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/4p5yo

ONE OF 'THE GROUP'S BIGGEST AIRPORTS IN EUROPE

Most people do not know that The Netherlands is one of the biggest
US-NATO centers for the PNAC, and also one of the biggest PNAC
airports. Amsterdam as the European Gateway and London a half hour
flight away. It's an El Al / Mossad airport which never ever is
controlled by the Dutch 'authorities'. Nobody would dare to. Dutch
Attorney General Vrakking testified on Jan. 29, 1999, that the El Al
security detachment at the main dutch airport Schiphol was a branch of
Mossad. All and every form of goods, including whatever kind of
contraband for the making of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons
too, fell on Amsterdam when an El Al plane crashed. - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/yurk6

What Kaminski much better formulated describes, is the malignant
influence of what I call 'The Group' - this racket of cruel inhuman
figures not knowing any decency, compassion, civilization, limits,
country, god nor law - 'running' the global horror show at the expense
of the rest: we, their victims. I have looked and compared all over the
world, and based on my life long experiences I can not see any other
conclusion: this 'Group' that should have been stopped a long, long
time ago. By any and all means.

The abuse of all and everything which is valuable to human beings, is
incredible when one sees it. In my four decades as a foreign
correspondent, I have covered and honestly as an independent journalist
described some of their wars, coups, killings and globally the
unbelievable misery of which 'The Group' mostly is the origin.

JUST LOOK WHO PROFITS. FOLLOW THE MONEY AND YOU'LL FIND THE CROOKS

And I've followed the advice offered to me by Jean Paul Sartre, who -
like me - in May 1967 was at the Russell Vietnam Tribunal in Sweden
thirty years ago, where I was based as correspondent for Scandinavia.
Sartre's was the same advice as given to me in Stockholm by
anthropologist Margaret Mead; both with their life long experiences
saying: ''Just look who profits. Follow the money and you'll find the
crooks.''

Which I did. Remembering always what 'Grand Old Lady' Margaret Mead
also said: "Never doubt that a small group of dedicated individuals can
change the world, indeed, it's the only thing that ever has" - She
definitely did not mean 'The Group' however, which proves again and
again to be the root of most evil. Hence the saying; "Money is the root
of all evil."

I've been brought up in a classical catholic family, and as a child
I've initially �been stuffed with the same propaganda and lies about
the world as many of us, until I went to see for myself what, where,
why, what for and who was the origin, and what was the clear result.
That's why I like to forward Kaminski's analysis, expecting the readers
of the FPF to think, understand, and not to be victims of the new
'Electronic Iron Curtain' in thinking, as spread by The Group's
'messmedia'. - (Pun intended).

The openly advertised Animal Farm plans - as described in the PNAC
text, in reality unveil the global nightmare called the "Project for a
Nefarious America'. An 'empire' and colossus on clay feet.

A nightmare that will not end before the creatures doing this to
mankind are 'neutralized'... �

Henk Ruyssenaars

FPF-fwd.:KAMINSKI�S LATEST ESSAY:

The New Iron Curtain

WHAT�S THAT SHADOW IN YOUR MIND, AND HOW LONG HAS IT BEEN THERE?

* Find the whole story at - Url.:
http://warfolly.vzz.net/newironcurtain.html

FPF: STRONGLY RELATED REFERENCES:

* Former U.S. PNAC-Secr. of State Madeleine Albright-Korbel, in her
comment on the at least HALF A MILLION dead children in Iraq: "WE
THINK IT'S WORTH IT" - On CBS '60 Minutes' - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/2vmc8

* Remember the small Vietnamese girl running? The 'US democracy'-napalm
burning her back? - Url.: �http://tinyurl.com/o3gm7

* PNAC HOLOCAUST: UNICEF reports that the under-5 infant mortality for
2003 was 110,000 in occupied Iraq, 292,000 in occupied Afghanistan.
Gideon Polya: 'Non-reportage of US-linked infant mass mortality' -
December 23, 2004 - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/rb3rx

* NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST for you too - Depleted Uranium for Dummies - Url.:
http://www.notinkansas.us

* The despicable war criminal and the US/PNAC's agent at the UN:
'Bulldozer BOLTON's way of working, bringing deadly 'democracy'
everywhere. A very short soundbite - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/5u98v

* ANOTHER HOLOCAUST: THIS IS ONE OF MANY BY THEIR CIA: John Stockwell,
former CIA Station Chief in Angola in 1976, working for then Director
of the CIA, George Bush. ''How 6 million People Were killed in CIA
secret wars against Third World countries'' - Before 1986! - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/gpcg

* Who - for centuries already - has been doing this to the rest of us,
the world's population? - The Global Elite: ��Who are they? - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/c5xv5

* Who's financing and profiting from all the wars and the killing of
millions of people in wars based on lies and greed? - The 'Federal
Reserve' and it's usurers is the absolute biggest crime against all
humanity ever. - Url.: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm

* "Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we
Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets
and lynched." �- �George Bush Senior speaking in an interview with
Sarah McClendon in December 1992. - And here's why: 'George Bush: The
Unauthorized Biography' - by Webster G. Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin -
Chapter - II - The Hitler Project - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/57qxk

* Global Predators - �Frauds-R-Us� - The Bush Family Saga - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/elarx

* YANKEES GO HOME! - Tomdispatch Interview with Chalmers Johnson - The
Empire: "Iraq before we invaded had a GDP the size of the state of
Louisiana and Afghanistan was certainly one of the poorest places on
the planet. And yet these two places have stopped us." - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/nshjd

* This is a running total of the U.S. taxpayer cost of the Iraq War.
The through taxes extorted $billions, squandered on the sick dreams of
'world power' - killing millions of people and filling the PNAC pack's
pockets - The number is based on US Congressional appropriations. -
Url.: http://tinyurl.com/cfsrc

* The 9/11 drama was the 'trigger' used by the PNAC Group, killing
Americans to further their inhuman goals: Anybody who after seeing this
video - '9/11 revisited' - still believes the version from the 'PNAC
pack' �- the Washington cabal - is beyond all professional help - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/r5sx4

* Nebraska Republican Hagel sits on the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee and supported the October 2002 resolution authorizing
military action against Iraq. He helped Bush on the bloodied PNAC
throne in the White 'Haus': "If You Want To Win An Election, Just
Control The Voting Machines" - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/xd0f

* Anti-propaganda: On the Net - Reporters Committee - Url.:
http://www.rcfp.org/

* US War & Propaganda machine: Rumsfeld Declares War on Bad Press -
Url.: http://tinyurl.com/loxqy

* Bush interview. ABC: No WMD's but many killed: "It was worth it". -
Url.: http://tinyurl.com/6bal9

* 'Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one' � A.J.
Liebling - The infamous US 'Lie Factory' - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/8ncal

* The 9/11 WTC drama was by the PNAC criminals planned 'false flag'
terror, to 'trigger' their own global war of terror now ravaging the
world - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/b7ygk - It was an inside job - Google
- Url.: http://tinyurl.com/7tj9d

* Nobel Literature Prize Laureate and 'Gulag Holocaust' survivor
Alexander Solzjenitsyn investigated the origin of the 'Russian
Revolution' and the concentration camps: he published and was damned -
Url.: �http://tinyurl.com/qth6z

* MSNBC - Live Vote - Concerning the "Project for a Nefarious American
Century" (PNAC) - ''Do you believe President Bush's actions justify
impeachment?'' - YES: 86% - Url.:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904/

*Read the Fightin' Cock Flyer - Url.:
http://fightincockflyer.blogspot.com/

* THE ONLY SOLUTION? - Help all the troops - of whatever nationality -
to come back from abroad! - AND WITH ALL THEIR WEAPONS, WHICH WE ARE
FORCED TO PAY FOR BY TAXES - [http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm] -
We need them badly at home in many countries to fight with us against
our so called 'governments' and their malignant managers - Url.:
http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/

* It's very unlikely, but if you indeed would prefer to unsubscribe
from the FPF-list: just send an email in return with the word
'unsubscribe'.

FOREIGN PRESS FOUNDATION
http://forpressfound.blogspot.com/
Editor: Henk Ruyssenaars
http://tinyurl.com/amn3q
The Netherlands
fpf@chello.nl

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: Rick Davis <rdavis@yin.or.jp>
Date: March 24, 2006 1:34:26 AM EST
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: FBI memo, photo link Bush Sr. to JFK Dallas murder scene

FBI memo, photo link Bush Sr. to JFK Dallas murder scene

A November 29, 1963 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit memo
unearthed in 1977-78 proves that former President George H. W. Bush was
a member of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the recipient of
a full briefing on the day after the assassination of President John F.
Kennedy on November 22, 1963 when Bush was 39 years old, despite his
protestations to the contrary.

Additional evidence linking Bush 41 directly to the scene of the crime
is available and is circulating the internet over the past few days in
the form of a U.S. intelligence-leaked photo taken just after the JFK
assassination at the door of the Texas Book Depository in Dealey
Plaza...

http://www.tomflocco.com/fs/FbiMemoPhotoLinkBushJfk.htm

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: Henri the Celt <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Date: March 24, 2006 3:13:37 AM EST
To: AAAHenri <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Subject: CNN Poll: Now it's 81%, going up!

CNN Poll: Now It's 81%, Going
Up!
�
�Do you agree with Charlie Sheen that the U.S. government covered up
the real events of the 9/11 attacks?

Yes 81%
5672 votes

No 19%
1371 votes

Total: 7043 votes

========================================================================
=================================================================

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:54:00 -0000
From: "reggie501" <reggie501@optonline.net>
Subject: Student Member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth Shot Dead ! tvnl news

9/11 News : http://www.tvnewslies.org/news/#911

� Student Member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth Shot Dead - Police said
Zebuhr was walking to a parked car with family members, when robbers
approached them and demanded his mother's purse. She gave it to the
gunmen without any resistance. One of the men then shot Zebuhr.

� 9/11 - Sheen Covered on FOX News! - Exposure is the key!

� Showbiz Tonight Follows Up Sheen Coverage With Alex Jones - Video
Download - Alex Jones is so fast with his points, he got a lot out
there in the short time allotted.

� Google Caught Censoring Charlie Sheen 9/11 Story - Google is again
embroiled in a censorship scandal after being caught blocking
information about Charlie Sheen's 9/11 comments, despite the fact that
every other major search engine had indexed the pages.

� Spitzer On The Spot - 35 activists gathered in front of Spitzer's
office with banners and signs for a public speakout to bring attention
to his negligence and obstruction of justice. Thousands of passers-by
saw us and over a thousand received literature, many of which gave the
thumbs up and thanked us for being there. - We made such a scene that
a representative from his office who was watching our action must have
arranged to have us come into the building to hear our concerns.

� Fly Into a Building? Who Could Imagine? - On Sept. 10, 2001, Mr.
Samit confided to a colleague that he was "desperate to get into
Moussaoui's computer." He never heard back from the F.B.I.'s bin Laden
unit before 9/11 -- what did the unit have to do that was more
pressing than catching bin Laden? And he was obstructed by officials
in F.B.I. headquarters here, whom he labeled "criminally negligent."

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:43:16 -0000
From: "S Miles Lewis" <yahoolists@elfis.net>
Subject: Alex to be on CNN again tonight?!

Alex will appear again on CNN Headline News Tonight March 24, 2006
during the Program Showbiz Tonight at 6pm CST. Be sure to tune in and
check it out!

CNN Showbiz Tonight Website
<http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight/>
<http://www.infowars.com>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:23:29 -0000
From: "reggie501" <reggie501@optonline.net>
Subject: Amazing letter about 9/11 from a pro-war Republican!

This is for real....written after seeing LOOSE CHANGE 2!

23-March-2006:

"Saw the video on Google.........really angered, saddened, and then
depressed me.

What can we do ? Geez..........I cried after watching it again.
How could our country do this to our people ? Are they Nazis ? The
ends justify the means ? This is facism. I can't get my head around
this. I am a conservative, pro-war, Republican...........not anymore.

I am just stunned. Never in my lifetime, I am 51, would I have
considered our government capable of carrying out this subversion and
MURDER to our own people. The shame is unbearable.

Thank you for lifting the veil and opening my eyes. I am forever
changed by this video. My innocence has been lost and I consider
myself an informed individual. While I have always been proud to be an
American, I feel nothing but shame now."

For the editor's reply..... and/or a preview of LOOSE CHANGE 2:
http://tvnewslies.org/html/loose_change_dvd.html

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 5
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:31:56 -0700
From: APFN <apfn@apfn.org>
Subject: Jones on CNN, whistling past his grave?

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.6/287 - Release Date: 3/21/2006

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 6
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:45:28 -0700
From: APFN <apfn@apfn.org>
Subject: [Fwd: CNN: Overwhelming Response to 9/11 Cover-up Story, More Coverage Given]

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.6/287 - Release Date: 3/21/2006

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 7
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:22:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com>
Subject: VOTE NOW: US Gvmt covered up real events of 9/11???

http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight/

QUICKVOTE [input] Do you agree with Charlie Sheen that the U.S. government covered up the real events of the 9/11 attacks? Yes [input] No [input] [input] or View Results
NEWSLETTER Sign up to receive the "Showbiz Tonight" newsletter.

TRANSCRIPTS Read show transcripts

AIRS: 7 p.m. ET, Monday-Friday
Friday's show Charlie Sheen
The response to Charlie sheen's charges of a government cover up on what really happened on 9/11. Find out who's praising him for speaking up. "Showbiz Tonight" airs live on Headline News at 7 p.m. and replays at 11 p.m. (All times Eastern.)

EW review: A great 'Inside Man' As

The world can only be redeemed through action--movement -- motion. Uncoerced, unbribed and unbought, humanity will move toward the light.
Alice Hubbard's introduction to An American Bible (1912)

---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 8
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 20:28:30 -0000
From: "botalerts" <botalerts@yahoo.ca>
Subject: Off of the Entertainment Page and Onto the News Page

Everyone should call and write to thank CNN's showbiz tonight for
cover 9/11, and demand that the news division cover it also!

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 9
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:01:15 -0800
From: "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@nwinfo.net>
Subject: Re: attn. Bruce Tanner -- Answers to Holmgren ...

----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Tanner
To: 911-disc@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 8:19 AM

....
Regarding the purported "facts," I'm sure we all have particular pieces of what we consider evidence from the images and remaining artifacts of the events, that each of us gives weight to on subjective bases.

That said, I know that, for me, some of the most persuasive factoids are:

* The whatever it was that hit the North tower, filmed by the "Naudet Brothers," flashed as it penetrated the building, following which anomalous explosions broke out over the face of the building, including one up at the parapet of the building, several hundred feet from the impact.

The Naudet Bros. film lacks detail -- some people are 100 percent certain that the object captured is not a jetliner. I see where it could be a jetliner. The argument goes nowhere. Therefore I say let us concentrate on the South Tower event to test the "no planes" contention.

* The "plane" that hit the South tower appeared entirely unnatural and was surrounded by an anomalous haze as it approached the building, but changed into a more realistic image, with completely different lighting on it, in the last few hundred yards of approach.

You need to operationally define "completely unnatural" and "completely different lighting" -- but I gather you are telling me that there was a haze around the plane during some of the clip and no haze for the rest of the clip -- and from this you suspect that there never was a plane. Did you consider all the things that might cause this haze in the image? If the haze is the result of tampering with the video, then must you not accept the portion of the clip that does not show haze as real? Could the haze have been actual haze, rather than a by-product of inept photoshopping? I admit the haze raises questions, but I don't think it has yet raised any answers.

* The outer 1/3 of the starboard wing of the STP (South tower "plane") VANISHES for several frames perhaps 100 yards from the video in at least three videos of the event taken from commercial sources.

It's not the wing that vanishes, its the contrast between the image the sky of the image of the image of the wing vanishes.

* There was a hovering point of light that kept pace with the STP as it approached the building, visible in at least three videos, that ended up hovering near the building as the plane "entered."

Yes, other objects in the sky were captured on video as the crash took place. I too have put out this information and long before Webfairy swtiched from Holograms to "no planes" Other aircraft were either recording the event or guiding it -- guiding the remote controlled jetliners, that is.

* The STP vanished into the face of the building, leaving an unbroken surface of glass (!) for at least two or three frames in every video of the penetration I have seen, before the explosions on the building develop in the same anomalous manner that those on the North tower did.

I would like to see this one. Can you provide a URL? I want to see if I interpret the image the same way you do -- I want to see what you are looking at when you identify "an unbroken surface of glass"

* A flash also appears at the nose of the STP immediately before it "penetrates" the face of the building.

This I have seen -- I do not know the cause -- a possibility is that glass has exploded from the shockwave ahead of the plane -- and you see the fragments in the sunlight -- or it may be an explosive device attached to the jetliner -- or something else -- but this problem does not lead me to conclude that the plane was not really there, rather that there was something that caused that bright light picked up by the camera. Again this is a problem that deserves investigation, but not from the pre-judged "no-plane" doctrine which the evidence does not support.

* One of the "Naudet Brothers" also happens to be in place with his camera to capture the impact of the STP (imagine how lucky these guys to get images of both planes just by chance) as he films a man talking on the street below the building from below the man (why he chose that camera angle is certainly puzzling) - and the man talking doesn't look up AT ALL as the plane enters the frame and penetrates the building, only reacting as the explosion above blossoms out.

Believe me, I too suspect the Naudet Brothers may have been on assignment to capture the crash for posterity -- just like the laughing Mossad agents. But that possibility does not buy you the "no-plane" conclusions.

I would appreciate it if you don't take my posting as a personal attack, and try to slice, dice and attack my observations, which are an expression of my subjective truth. We're on the same page as far as what should matter is concerned. Further fragmentation of what's left of the "9/11 truth movement" only benefits You-Know-Who.

You tell me that my answering Webfairy and Holmgren "no plane" has "worn thin" -- i.e., that I should stop posting on the subject. Then you proceed to give out several arguments for the "no-plane" position yourself. Then you tell me not to "slice and dice" your arguments.

Sure, everyone is entitled to their subjective truth. My only interest is a grad jury getting objective evidence and people not being deluded or turned off by deliberately absurd and outrageous explanations made up by false-opposition operatives like Webfairy, Haupt, Homgren. Believe me, it is not me who is out to fragment the truth or to hinder investigation and communication of the evidence -- just the opposite. You see, the conclusion that no-Boeing-crashed-at-the-Pentagon is very compelling -- see http://bedoper.com/eastman -- and it is the absurd no-planes-hit-the-WTC-towers that -- as I have seen over and over again -- turns people away from any consideration of the best evidence -- You see the perpetrator's propaganda (mainstream media and operatives on the internet) want the hard-evidence 9/11 investigators to be rejected with Webfairy and Haupt -- that is what Webfairy and Haupt are working for -- I have been watching and interacting with them for a long time, my appraisal of them did not come right away, it did not come cheaply either. No planes is a deliberate constructed "straw man" that invites any cover-up operative to knock it down -- and they do, every day.

Be well, keep expressing YOUR truths, find your new heaven, look for A New Earth.
Out,
Bruce

Dick Eastman wrote:

> From: Gerard Holmgren <holmgren@iinet.net.au>
> Subject: Duck vs WTC Core
> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 >
>
>
> Patrick Burnand writes
>
> [[The kinetic energy is proportional to the mass and the square of the
> speed.

> Even if it were possible for a jet to easily pierce the outer wall, it
> cannot do so making a cartoon shape of itself *and* destroy itself in the
> process.

The plane penetrated the outer wall. It was stopped by the inner core. The hole made in the South Tower wall roughly fits the shape of the plane. The same of the hole fits the shape of the object that pushed through it.

> That's simple conservation of energy.

The engery of the moving plane was transferred to the core and to tearing up the plane after it hit the core.

> An object cannot exhibit in
> relation to the other object, both overwhelming strength and fragility at
> the same time.

The outer wall was not massive enough to absorb the energy of the plane at that velocity -- the core was. The wall was penetrated by the force of the projectile-plane, the core was not.

As explained in more detail by my forensic article and also
> that by Morgan Reynolds. This simply does not happen in the real world. If
> it did, then arrows would disintegrate after they pass through the target.

Depends on what the target is made of and how fast the arrow is going.
>
> 2. Plane wings and tails are not battering rams. They are engineered such
> that the aircraft is considered safe if they break at stresses 1.5 times the
> normal operating stresses.

Your little factoid is being overplayed, don't you think? Portions of wing were either massive enough to penetrate the wall at that high speed or they were not. The shape of the how indicates that much of the length of wing penetrated, but the tips of the wings perhaps did not. It's that simple.

>
> I'd say that having the fuselage that they are attached to destroyed and
> then having the wings and tailed rammed against steel construction beams
> built to hold up one of the world's tallest buildings is more than 1.5 times
> the normal operating stress.

Like I say, you are overplaying your factoid. At that velocity (faster than a bullet fired from a handgun) when hitting the wall parts of the plane are either going to penetrate, disintegrate or bounce off -- most of the plane penetrated the wall. The plane was stopped by the core, except for the starboard engine which went flying out through the other wall. All what one would expect, your meaningless factoid notwithstanding.
>
> Planes get holes put in them by hitting birds. They don't slice steel
> construction beams like a guillotine ! Get real, you guys !

Sorry -- if birds can bust through metal cockpits at high enough speeds, than a full size airliner can penetrate thin steel and glass walls.

> There are similar examples. A MD jet in 1999, which landed hurriedly
> trying to avoid a thunderstorm, overshot the runway, and collided with a
> lightly built steel lighting tower. The tower was virtually undamaged and
> the plane's wings broke off and the fuselage broke into three pieces and
> scattered all over the place.

You ignore the fact that the plane was trying to land -- that it was going very slow. Planes are flimsy and they break apart easily. But as the speed increases the force increases geometrically -- so that the force increases much more by added speed than by added mass. As Burnand the kinetic energy increases so much that the two cases are not comparable.

Remember, jetliners hit the twin towers, but not the Pentagon.

Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington

SPONSORED LINKS Politics

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "911-disc" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911-disc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 10
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:18:04 -0000
From: "mojo_j_2000" <mojo_j_2000@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Amazing letter about 9/11 from a pro-war Republican!

Amen...welcome

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "reggie501" <reggie501@...>
wrote:
>
> This is for real....written after seeing LOOSE CHANGE 2!
>
> 23-March-2006:
>
> "Saw the video on Google.........really angered, saddened, and then
> depressed me.
>
> What can we do ? Geez..........I cried after watching it again.
> How could our country do this to our people ? Are they Nazis ? The
> ends justify the means ? This is facism. I can't get my head around
> this. I am a conservative, pro-war, Republican...........not
anymore.
>
> I am just stunned. Never in my lifetime, I am 51, would I have
> considered our government capable of carrying out this subversion
and
> MURDER to our own people. The shame is unbearable.
>
> Thank you for lifting the veil and opening my eyes. I am forever
> changed by this video. My innocence has been lost and I consider
> myself an informed individual. While I have always been proud to
be an
> American, I feel nothing but shame now."
>
> For the editor's reply..... and/or a preview of LOOSE CHANGE 2:
> http://tvnewslies.org/html/loose_change_dvd.html
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 11
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:20:27 -0000
From: "mojo_j_2000" <mojo_j_2000@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Student Member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth Shot Dead ! tvnl news

phd in bioengineering? another virus expert added to the list...

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "reggie501" <reggie501@...>
wrote:
>
> 9/11 News : http://www.tvnewslies.org/news/#911
>
> � Student Member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth Shot Dead - Police said
> Zebuhr was walking to a parked car with family members, when
robbers
> approached them and demanded his mother's purse. She gave it to the
> gunmen without any resistance. One of the men then shot Zebuhr.
>
> � 9/11 - Sheen Covered on FOX News! - Exposure is the key!
>
> � Showbiz Tonight Follows Up Sheen Coverage With Alex Jones - Video
> Download - Alex Jones is so fast with his points, he got a lot out
> there in the short time allotted.
>
> � Google Caught Censoring Charlie Sheen 9/11 Story - Google is
again
> embroiled in a censorship scandal after being caught blocking
> information about Charlie Sheen's 9/11 comments, despite the fact
that
> every other major search engine had indexed the pages.
>
> � Spitzer On The Spot - 35 activists gathered in front of Spitzer's
> office with banners and signs for a public speakout to bring
attention
> to his negligence and obstruction of justice. Thousands of passers-
by
> saw us and over a thousand received literature, many of which gave
the
> thumbs up and thanked us for being there. - We made such a scene
that
> a representative from his office who was watching our action must
have
> arranged to have us come into the building to hear our concerns.
>
> � Fly Into a Building? Who Could Imagine? - On Sept. 10, 2001, Mr.
> Samit confided to a colleague that he was "desperate to get into
> Moussaoui's computer." He never heard back from the F.B.I.'s bin
Laden
> unit before 9/11 -- what did the unit have to do that was more
> pressing than catching bin Laden? And he was obstructed by
officials
> in F.B.I. headquarters here, whom he labeled "criminally
negligent."
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 12
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:35:32 -0000
From: "mojo_j_2000" <mojo_j_2000@yahoo.com>
Subject: MOSSAD MONEYCHANGER SPILLS

Mar 24 1:52 PM US/Eastern
Email this story

By CURT ANDERSON
Associated Press Writer

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla.

A judge has approved subpoenas for former lobbyist Jack Abramoff and
an ex-business partner to answer questions about the mob-style
slaying of the owner of a gambling fleet they bought.

Abramoff and Adam Kidan have insisted, through their attorneys, that
they know nothing about the slaying of Konstantinos "Gus" Boulis,
who was ambushed in his car by a gunman in Fort Lauderdale a few
months after the pair bought SunCruz Casinos from him.

A lawyer for Anthony "Big Tony" Moscatiello, one of three men
charged in the 2001 slaying, wants to question Abramoff and Kidan,
according to court documents. Circuit Judge Michael Kaplan approved
the request Thursday, but the subpoenas had not been issued by
Friday morning.

The SunCruz purchase is "at the heart" of the murder case,
Moscatiello attorney Dave Bogenschutz said in court papers.

Abramoff and Kidan are not charged in the slaying but are scheduled
to be sentenced Wednesday in federal court after pleading guilty
earlier this year to fraud charges stemming from the purchase. Their
lawyers did not return telephone calls or e-mails seeking comment
Friday.

Abramoff, once a prominent Republican lobbyist and political
fundraiser, has also pleaded guilty to federal charges in a
Washington corruption investigation that threatens several powerful
members of Congress and their staff members.

As part of their federal plea deals, Abramoff and Kidan are required
to cooperate with prosecutors in any state or federal investigation.

Moscatiello, 67, allegedly has ties to New York's Gambino crime
family and worked as a consultant for Kidan at SunCruz.

Kidan paid companies linked to Moscatiello about $145,000 while he
ran SunCruz. Prosecutors have said they believe Boulis was slain in
a battle for control of the gambling fleet out of concern that those
payments might dry up.

Moscatiello is charged along with Anthony "Little Tony" Ferrari, 49,
and 28-year-old James "Pudgy" Fiorillo in the Boulis killing. All
three have pleaded not guilty and could face the death penalty if
convicted.

Investigators have testified that records show that cell phones
belonging to Ferrari and Fiorillo were within 500 feet of the Boulis
murder scene moments after the killing and that one was used to call
Moscatiello.

Kaplan was scheduled to hear testimony Friday on a motion by
Moscatiello and Fiorillo claiming the prosecution's case isn't
strong enough to warrant keeping them in custody without bail.
Ferrari has not joined in that motion.

Abramoff and Kidan face prison sentences of just more than seven
years in the Florida fraud case. They admitted fabricating a fake
wire transfer to make it appear they were putting a sizable chunk of
their own money into the $147.5 million purchase of the gambling
fleet.

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/03/24/D8GI3VVO0.html

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 13
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:00:35 -0800 (PST)
From: janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com>
Subject: "Peering into Darkness" radio water project interview up on the web

It has been posted in three separate files, each section approximately twenty minutes long.

http://peeringintodarkness.com.nyud.net:8090/radio/pidradio032106.mp3

http://www.peeringintodarkness.com.nyud.net:8090/radio/pidradio032206.mp3

http://peeringintodarkness.com.nyud.net:8090/radio/pidradio032396.mp3

---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC for low, low rates.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 14
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:00:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com>
Subject: We ain't out of the woods yet people!

http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Sheen.html

Back to The French Connection

Charlie Sheen exposes 9-11 Is the truth finally coming out? Or is this more deception? 23 March 2006
On Monday, 20 March 2006, Charlie Sheen was interviewed on the Alex Jones radio show. He is the first famous person -- and the first Hollywood star -- to expose 9/11.
That interview is attracting attention all over the world. For example, two days later CNN broadcast excerpts of that interview, and they invited two people on the show to add details to Sheen's comments. Furthermore, CNN selected the prime evening hours for this expos�, not the middle of the night.
CNN exposed the world to the 9-11 issue on their Showbiz Tonight program. You can watch the video at this site:
http://www.911blogger.com/
Even the Boston Herald reported the Charlie Sheen interview:
http://thetrack.bostonherald.com/moreTrack/view.bg?articleid=131750 Although their article makes a snide remark about Sheen's �affinity for prostitutes and gambling�, the article exposed a lot of people to the fact that the World Trade Center towers were demolished with explosives.

Thank you, Alex Jones! It would seem as if Alex Jones, CNN, Charlie Sheen, and others are finally exposing the 9/11 scam. This is truly a time to rejoice and thank these courageous Truth Seekers. Or is it? Why the rapid response? Thousands of people around the world have been struggling for years to expose 9/11, often at a significant personal expense, but CNN and all other "mainstream" media companies ignored and suppressed us. On Monday, 20 March 2006, Charlie Sheen is interviewed on the Alex Jones radio show, and only two days later CNN broadcast some excerpts of that interview. Why did CNN react so quickly to the Sheen interview? People have been interviewed by Alex Jones, and numerous other radio shows, for years. Why did CNN ignore all of us for all of these years and then suddenly promote Charlie Sheen? More importantly, why is CNN -- and the other media companies -- continuing to ignore us? If CNN is sincere about exposing 9/11, wouldn't they move beyond Charlie
Sheen and bring out some real 9/11 investigators?

Why Showbiz Tonight? CNN selected Showbiz Tonight -- a program about Hollywood gossip -- to expose 9/11. Why didn't they select a more serious news show? You might assume that the reason they selected Showbiz Tonight is because Charlie Sheen is an entertainer, in which case Showbiz Tonight seems to be an appropriate venue. However, this brings us back to the issue of why they selected Charlie Sheen as the expert on 9/11. If you were going to expose 9/11 on prime time television, would you select Charlie Sheen?
Why Charlie Sheen? Many people may assume that CNN selected Charlie Sheen to expose 9/11 because he was the first (and only) famous Hollywood entertainer to talk about 9-11. This implies that CNN doesn't care about the research of engineers, scientists, professors, architects, carpenters, machinists, or other people. It also implies that the reason CNN has not bothered to expose the attack on the USS Liberty -- or any other crime -- is because no Hollywood star has come forward to expose it.

Why excerpts of Sheen's interview? CNN did not interview Charlie Sheen. Rather, they played some audio excerpts of an interview he did with Alex Jones. If they were truly interested in what Sheen had to say about 9/11, why didn't they send a television crew to interview him? Why did they play audio excerpts from a radio show that is unknown to most people? Is there budget too small to allow a real interview?
Why interview Webster Tarpley and Mike Berger? CNN selected two people to bring on the show as 9/11 experts: Webster Tarpley and Mike Berger.
Webster Tarpley wrote the book �9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in the USA�, in which he implies that a few American government officials are responsible for 9/11. CNN sent a car to the Maryland suburbs to pick up Webster Tarpley and take him to the CNN studios in Washington, DC. They put only 15 seconds of his interview on television. Since they can afford to drive the almost unknown Tarpley to the studio for only 15 seconds of television exposure, why couldn't they afford to send a camera crew to interview the star of their show, Charlie Sheen?
Mike Berger appeared on the show live to discuss Sheen's remarks. Mike Berger is one of the members of 911truth.org, which for years has been trying to suppress the evidence that the World Trade Center towers and Building 7 were demolished with explosives. Why did CNN select these two particular men as experts on 9/11? Before you try to answer that question, please take a look at some of our documents in which we explain that Tarpley and everybody in 911truth.org should be investigated as possible members of the criminal network. For example, try these:
� The Deception Dollar
� To get away with crimes
National Geographic defended the government Nicole Rittenmeyer also appeared on the show live, but her role was to defend the official government story.
Nicole Rittenmeyer was the supervising producer for a National Geographic television show about 9/11 called �Inside 9/11: Zero Hour� This show supported the official story.
Rittenmeyer was probably selected to defend the official story of 9-11 because she is involved with the criminal network, as are most of the management of National Geographic.

What is going on?
Our guess about what is happening is that the truth about 9/11 is spreading quickly around the world, and the criminals are panicking. Charlie Sheen was never involved in the research or exposure of 9/11. During his interview with Alex Jones, he merely mimicked information he picked up from web sites, videos, or books. Jones could have gotten this type of low quality interview by telling a high school student to look at Hufschmid's book and video and then give a report on it. Charlie Sheen fits the profile of a Useful Idiot, not an intelligent researcher. The reason is that Charlie Sheen seems to have a lot of problems with drugs, sex, pornography, relationships, and gambling. For example, Sheen is wasting $150,000 per week on gambling, according to this report:
http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_27264116.shtml He is trying to use Heather Locklear to spy on his ex-wife, according to this report:
http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_27263710.shtml Charlie Sheen's real name is Carlos Irwin Estevez. The Sheen family may be Crypto Jews. Some biographical information about him is here:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000221/bio Kay Griggs describes how the criminal network looks for people with emotional disorders, and tries to take advantage of their problems. The people who turn out to be controllable are put into important positions. (You can find her interview at the bottom of our Einstein article.) Charlie Sheen and his father are probably working with the criminal network. Or course, Charlie is probably one of their Useful Idiots who follows orders, rather than a manager who makes decisions.
Who is Alex Jones? Charlie was probably told by the criminal network to contact Alex Jones. This implies that Alex Jones is somehow connected with the crime network, which we suspected for a long time. But what is his connection? Some people have noticed that Alex Jones is somehow involved in an organization called "RSICC". The heading at the page for Jones has this:
Remnant Saints Inter-Continental Congress
Toward the Establishment of the Government of God on Earth http://www.rsicc.org/Members/AlexJones/index.html

Look at heading at the main page:
Remnant Saints
For the Triumph of the Lord's People Providing tools and contacts to prepare for difficult times, that the remnant might survive these calamities and establish Zion.
http://www.remnantsaints.com/index.html

What do they mean by �establish Zion�? What do they mean by �Toward the Establishment of the Government of God on Earth�? Why is their web site so vague and mysterious? How do we know this is not just another variation of the Project for a New American Century?
http://www.newamericancentury.org/ Why should we trust any of these people or their organizations? Getting back to the interview Alex Jones did with Charlie Sheen, they probably wanted to let Alex Jones do the interview in order to bring Jones some publicity because his popularity is decreasing as people realize that he is suppressing a lot of important information about Zionism, pedophilia, and Israel. Two articles with more information about Jones and his deception:
� Crypto Zionists
� myspace The CNN employees were undoubtedly told by top management to broadcast excerpts of the Jones interview on their Hollywood gossip show rather than send a camera crew to interview Charlie Sheen because Sheen is not a real 9/11 investigator, so they did not want to waste money interviewing him. It would be as silly is sending a camera crew to interview a high school student who read Hufschmid's book. Webster Tarpley and Mike Berger were selected as 9-11 experts because they are also part of this network of criminals. You should also notice that these criminals are also pushing the videos Loose Change, In Plane Site, and 911 Eyewitness, and ignoring Painful Deceptions. Coincidence? The evidence suggests that this is a big crime network, and they are promoting each other.

Update!
Alex Jones was invited on Showbiz Tonight! On 23 March 2006 Alex Jones was invited on the show and given virtually free reign. You can watch the video at this site:
http://www.911blogger.com/

Why would criminals expose their own crime? The criminals want to expose 9/11 because they want to be in the role of hero, investigator, truth seeker, and savior when 9-11 is finally exposed to the public. They want to push aside the truly honest investigators so that the criminal network can remain in control. They may have to sacrifice a few of their team members, such as George Bush, Dick Cheney, and possibly even Larry Silverstein, but it is better to sacrifice a Useful Idiot and a few old men rather than let the entire crime network go down. The lower level criminals, such as Nicole Rittenmeyer, can fake stupidity when 9-11 is exposed, or they can claim that they were just low level workers who were following orders.
The criminals may fight with each other For the past several years both CNN and National Geographic were suppressing 9/11. However, if 9/11 is exposed, the criminals may start fighting with each other over which of them is sacrificed, and which of them gets control of America. Actually, the fight may already be occurring. The people at National Geographic may be fighting with the people at CNN. Why did CNN select a Hollywood gossip show to expose 9-11? Probably because they consider the viewers of such a show to be easier to manipulate compared to the viewers of a news show. CNN may be trying to deceive the tens of millions of people who idolize Hollywood stars into thinking that Charlie Sheen, Alex Jones, Webster Tarpley, Mike Berger, and 911truth.org are the honest 9-11 investigators. This would give the criminals at CNN a very large support base. What will the criminals at Fox, ABC, BBC, the New York Times, and other groups do? Will they join with CNN? Will they
help National Geographic? Or will they select some other members of the criminal network to expose 9/11? Will fights break out among the criminals?

Will Americans be fooled again? The American people have allowed this criminal network to assassinate many of their political leaders, military leaders, scientists, and other citizens. The American people have also allowed the USS Liberty to be attacked, and they have done nothing yet about the attack on September 11. They ignored the mysterious breaking of the New Orleans levees, and they have done nothing about the mysterious Oklahoma City bombing. The American people have also ignored the strange massacres at schools, such as Columbine, which appear to be much more than just a couple of teenagers on a rampage. The American people have also ignored the mysterious burnings of churches, and mysterious explosions at oil refineries, and numerous mysterious forest and grassland fires. It now appears that the information about 9/11 is coming out, and it appears that the criminal network is selecting some of their members to expose 9/11. Will the Americans and Europeans be
fooled by this deception? If the criminals can fool most of the Americans and Europeans into believing that George Bush is responsible for 9/11, and that Charlie Sheen, Webster Tarpley, Alex Jones, and Mike Berger are heroes, then the criminals will remain in control of the media of Europe and North America, our schools, the Federal Reserve, our banking system, our military, and the European Union. The only way to fight back at this criminal network is to bypass their control of information. They dominate the media, including the Internet. It is up to each of us to spread information to our friends, relatives, neighbors, and coworkers. We must ignore their deceptive web sites, television programs, and magazines.
Investigate the Truth Seekers If 9/11 is exposed, we must investigate everybody involved, not just George Bush. All of the 9/11 investigators need to be investigated. Don't be intimidated by these people! Here is an article about this issue:
http://www.EricHufschmid.net/InvestigateTheTruthSeekers.htm
Watch out for the deceptive web sites There are not many web sites that provide honest information. Here are a few that we can recommend: � http://www.iamthewitness.com
� http://www.HugeQuestions.com
� http://www.EricHufschmid.net
� http://judicial-inc.biz/1_master_supreme.htm
Information is the only way to counteract their propaganda, so please take a look at the articles on these sites, and put pressure on your friends, relatives, co-workers, and neighbors to join us as we face the corruption and try to make a better world.

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2�/min or less.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 15
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:21:21 -0800 (PST)
From: janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com>
Subject: Too Many Chips on the Old Block?

EU withdraws proposal for biometric chips in visas
The technological problems associated with introducing biometric chips into visas have proved insurmountable, forcing the Commission to drop the proposal altogether. Background: At a conference organised by the Centre for European Policy Studies on 21 and 22 of March, Marc Meznar of the US Mission to the EU and Kristian Bartholin from the Commission discussed this issue in the context of a discussion on EU-US cooperation and border management. Issues: Biometrics The problem with chips in visas, which would normally be inserted into passports, is that these clash with any biometric chip contained in the passport itself, preventing both from working. Since no technological solution has been found, the proposal has been dropped. A modified proposal, published by the Commission on 10 March 2006, concerning residence permits, whereby the insertion of chips will be optional, makes public the decision to drop the chip requirement for visas.

EurActiv.com Justice & Security
Date: 2006-03-23

---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 16
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:24:57 +0100
From: Patrick BURNAND <pburnand@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Zionist Domination

> On Thursday 23 March 2006 23:27, S Miles Lewis wrote:
> --- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, Patrick BURNAND <pburnand@...>
>
> wrote:
> > What have the chinese to do with this ??
> > Patrick BURNAND <pburnand@...>
>
> NewsMax isn't the best news source but ... for what it's worth:

NewsMax is mostly propaganda..

> China's Military Planners Took Credit for 9/11
> John O. Edwards
> Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2002
>
> Soon after the horrific attacks on the World Trade Center and
> Pentagon, two high-ranking Chinese military planners took credit for
> the 9/11 attacks � and were even hailed as national heroes in China.

A few people are reported to have claimed it to gain popularity in China.
This is already very suspicious. I think the people who carried out 9/11
will never tell it.

> In fact, three years before 9/11, the Chinese colonels had proposed
> the attacks and cited Osama bin Laden by name in their
> book "Unrestricted Warfare." (Click Here for more info on book.)

I know a little about this book. It mostly argues for tactics like the ones
used in Vietnam, to defeat a technologically superior enemy.

> The authors of "Unrestricted Warfare" are Senior Cols. Qiao Liang and
> Wang Xiangsui, and in 1999 they wrote that an attack by bin Laden on
> the World Trade Center would be just the type of "unrestricted
> warfare" that could bring down America.

And then the US govt says: we have never thought that terrorists could crash
an airplane into a building :-)

> The book was published by China's People's Liberation Army and had
> the endorsement of the Chinese government.
>
> "Unrestricted Warfare" makes clear its purpose: offering China and
> other "weak" countries a strategy to destroy the U.S. without a full-
> scale invasion, using unusual or "asymmetrical" warfare.

Right, but I don't think that this is meant to attack.

> NewsMax has recently obtained the CIA translation of this astounding
> book and has made it available with an introduction by Al Santoli,
> editor of the prestigious China Reform Monitor.

A CIA translation -> propaganda...
Obviously most of the people in the west can't read anything in chinese and
the few who can most probably will read something else. Unless someone
else is able to translate, it's no credible evidence at all...

When an intelligence / covert-action agency publishes a book, it's never to
inform objectively, but rather to put out propaganda.

This reminds me another story. After the invasion of Afghanistan, the US
govnerment pretended to have conviniently found a "Bin Laden" audio tape in
Afghanistan. The CIA immediately pretended that it was authentic and proof
Bin Laden was plotting other attacks against the US.
But french reporters from the France 2 television were not so convinced and
wanted to check out themselves. So they mandated a swiss university
specialised in forsenics in Lausanne to analyze the audio recording. This
university is worldwide recognized and specialists from the whole world
come in to study there. Their verdict was clear: the "Bin Laden" tape had
a 90% probability to be fake. They couldn't tell "100% fake" because the
sound quality of the tape was so (deliberately) bad with lots of parasites
and interruptions. After this, there are reports of pressure on this
university and they were ordered to stop authenticating "Bin Laden" tapes.

So if this chinese book has been translated by the CIA, it's certainly not a
positive sign, given their record of systematically attempting to deceive
the people. Since elements from the CIA were the main suspects for 9/11,
the CIA is clearly interested to spread disinformation.

> The importance of this book was highlighted soon after 9/11, when the
> Chinese colonels were treated as national heroes.
>
> In one interview with the Chinese government-owned Ta Kung Pao
> newspaper in Hong Kong, the colonels offered little sympathy for the
> Americans killed in 9/11.
>
> They told the paper, "The series of attacks taking place in the
> United States were very dreary and terrifying, but they must not be
> viewed from a single perspective" � that is, the U.S. as victims. The
> colonels then added coldly that the Americans "were victims of U.S.
> foreign policy."

So the colonels were partly pointing toward an inside job for 9/11.
Else it would be difficult to understand how the Americans were victims of
their foreign policy.

> The colonels were quick to take credit for the attacks on the World
> Trade Center, telling the paper their strategy had worked and
> that "September 11, 2001 very likely is the beginning of the decline
> of the United States, as a superpower."

Right, but probably because of oil depletion and the rise of the Euro, not
because of some buildings destroyed some thousands of people killed.

> Qiao and Wang offer in "Unrestricted Warfare" several new methods for
> destroying the U.S. � from manipulating U.S. media, to homicide-
> suicide bombing, to using immigrants as a fifth column, and even
> employing cyber attacks to destroy America's critical infrastructure.

CIA propaganda...
This the CIA that manipulates the medias.

And the cyber attacks is a hoax.. Obviously black hat hackers can damage
Windows servers, conduct a DOS attack (which would require more bandwidth)
on the internet or whatever. But this happens constantly and this is no
threat for anyone... (Except some percent loss of revenue for online
companies). Actually some sites that were victims of DOS attack were
actually attacked by the US govnerment, not by chinese attackers...

> Both colonels agreed that the unconventional attacks of 9/11 were
> right from the pages of their book, and they demonstrated their
> theory works. "The attacks demonstrated the United States' fragility
> and weakness and showed that essentially it is unable to stand
> attacks. ... The United States, a giant tiger, has been dealing with
> mice; unexpectedly, this time it was bitten by mice � it has been
> wielding a large hammer but has been unable to find the flea.

So here chinese and US propaganda...

> "From a short-term perspective, the attacks in the United States will
> very likely have some effect on China's economy � they might affect
> China's economic growth. However, from a long-term viewpoint, they
> could be favorable to China."

Bullshit... Terrorism is the ideal pretext to put protectionist measures in
place disguised "anti-terror fight" and "national security". Certainly not
to the advantage of the chinese economy.

> "Unrestricted Warfare" has set off alarm bells among several high-
> ranking U.S. officers.
>
> Adm. Thomas Moorer, former chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff,
> warns, "'Unrestricted Warfare' reveals China's game plan in its
> coming war with America." He adds ominously, "China thinks it can
> destroy America by using these tactics."
>
> Maj. Gen. John K. Singlaub, former chief of staff of U.S. Forces
> Korea, shares Adm. Moorer's view.
>
> "The 9/11 attacks may just be the beginning. Many terrorist nations
> and groups will try to imitate this operation," Gen. Singlaub said,
> noting "China's war book 'Unrestricted Warfare' will be their text."
>
> Editor's Note: The translation of "Unrestricted Warfare" made for the
> CIA is not available in print elsewhere � you can get it by Clicking
> Here. Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
> China/Taiwan
> War on Terrorism

--
Patrick BURNAND <pburnand@yahoo.com>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 17
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:39:28 -0000
From: "Marsha" <Mofmars3@wmconnect.com>
Subject: ***Action Alert***This is it>>>Phenomenal Response to Charlie Sheen speaking out

***Action Alert***This is it>>>Phenomenal Response to Charlie Sheen
speaking out...Watch Showbiz Tonight, 7pm Eastern time...I believe
Alex Jones is on again tonight...Don't quote me...I believe I heard
this, though

Saluting Alex Jones for his tireless efforts...Thanking him also for
allowing us to copy his documentaries and pass them out

Do you agree with Charlie Sheen that the U.S. government covered up
the real events of the 9/11 attacks?

Phenomenal Response...Add Yours

http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight/

# Send your questions and comments to "Showbiz Tonight"
http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5c.html?23

Why the Official Story on 9/11 is Going to Collapse

The official story on 9/11 is so absurd and ridiculous on its face,
in so many different but consistent ways, that one would have to have
a room temperature IQ to believe it. The story is indefensible
because whatever group that was behind this operation severely
bungled the job, in ways which make the Lavon Affair, the USS Liberty
attack and Iran-Contra look relatively like works of genius.

In fair and open debate on the Internet, the official story has been
thoroughly demolished. Defenders of the official story for the most
part are now afraid to raise their heads, and have been sent running
for the tall grass. Only a single force is holding the official story
in place: brutal and systematic censorship by the mainstream media of
discussion of nearly all aspects of 9/11. Eventually we are going to
see an open revolt from within the journalistic establishment by
people with better than room temperature IQs who can no longer bear
the bullshit being promoted by the tiny cabal of billionaires which
owns CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, the New York Times, the Washington Post,
the Wall Street Journal and the rest of the thoroughly discredited
mainstream media.

The cabal which is protecting the official lies about 9/11 is the
very same cabal which drove America into the disastrous Iraq War. The
collapse of the war effort in Iraq will help foster the collapse of
the official story on 9/11. The individuals behind these crimes have
placed themselves in a perilous position. Committing further crimes --
including a nuclear 9/11 Part II -- will only make their position
much worse. No member of the American power elite and national
security community who is sane will want to have anything to do with
any more of their bright ideas, and will be on a maximum state of
alert to prevent them from committing further damage.

What would be a suitable punishment for crimes of this magnitude?
Perhaps a group public hanging on international television?

Sean McBride
Why the Official Story on 9/11 is Going to Collapse
Fri Mar 24, 2006 02:21
64.140.158.21

Do you agree with Charlie Sheen that the U.S. government covered up
the real events of the 9/11 attacks?
http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight/

Yes 79% 4960 votes
No 21% 1306 votes
Total: 6266 votes
This QuickVote is not scientific and reflects the opinions of only
those Internet users who have chosen to participate. The results
cannot be assumed to represent the opinions of Internet users in
general, nor the public as a whole. The QuickVote sponsor is not
responsible for content, functionality or the opinions expressed
therein.
Related:

# Send your questions and comments to "Showbiz Tonight"
http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5c.html?23

The U.S. government's pursuit of the death penalty against al-Qaeda
operative Zacarias Moussaoui has inadvertently shown that even a
mildly competent George W. Bush could have headed off the attack that
killed almost 3,000 people and sent the nation off on a dangerous
mission of revenge. If Bush had reacted aggressively to the CIA's
Aug. 6, 2001, warning, he could have energized the FBI and CIA to put
together the final pieces of the puzzle. Instead, he went fishing and
called no meetings until after Sept. 11.

For the full story on this fateful case of government "negligence,"
go to Consortiumnews.com at http://www.consortiumnews.com

--------------------------------

AM - Calls for Donald Rumsfeld resignation

[This is the print version of story
http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2006/s1599837.htm]

AM - Friday, 24 March , 2006 08:16:00
Reporter: Michael Rowland
TONY EASTLEY: As the war in Iraq enters its fourth year, there's an
increasing amount of political crossfire in Washington over the way
the operation has been conducted.

And the man dodging the most bullets is Defence Secretary, Donald
Rumsfeld.

Calls are mounting for Mr Rumsfeld to step down, with some of the
most pointed criticism coming from within military ranks.

Washington Correspondent, Michael Rowland, reports.

MICHAEL ROWLAND: Donald Rumsfeld is both a chief architect of the war
in Iraq and now its key salesman, fronting yet another Pentagon media
conference today to defend the increasingly unpopular operation.

DONALD RUMSFELD: We can, we must and we will see it through to
completion, the mission for which these young Americans and their
families have sacrificed.

MICHAEL ROWLAND: But in the week the US marks the third anniversary
of the invasion, just as many questions are being asked about Mr
Rumsfeld's future as there are about just how long American troops
will stay in Iraq.

The Defence Secretary's facing renewed criticism for not putting
enough troops on the ground in the first place, and for severely
underestimating the strength of the insurgency.

Newspaper editorials have been calling for his resignation.

The widely read New York Times columnist, Maureen Dowd, quoted a
senior administration official this week as saying Mr Rumsfeld does
not hold the same sway in meetings anymore, that he's treated as an
eccentric old uncle, who's ignored.

The Democrats too are making their predictable calls for Mr Rumsfeld
to go, but some of the more pointed condemnation this week has come
from the army Major General in charge of training Iraqi security
forces from 2003 to 2004.

In a New York Times opinion piece, Paul Eaton, now retired, said of
Mr Rumsfeld:

"�He has shown himself incompetent strategically, operationally and
tactically, and is far more than anyone else responsible for what has
happened to our important mission in Iraq. Mr Rumsfeld must step
down."

MICHAEL ROWLAND: It's a view shared by Flynt Leverett, a former CIA
Middle East Analyst, who served on the National Security Council
during President Bush's first term.

FLYNT LEVERETT: By any reasonable standard of accountability,
Secretary Rumsfeld would've been gone a long time ago, but I think
it's difficult for the President to do that, because for him to do
that would mean at least implicitly, that he is admitting that some
very, very fundamental strategic mistakes have been made.

MICHAEL ROWLAND: Mr Rumsfeld still has his defenders.

There's the President, of course, who earlier this week declared that
Mr Rumsfeld had done a fine job conducting the wars in both Iraq and
Afghanistan.

James Woolsey, the CIA Director under President Bill Clinton and who
now advises Donald Rumsfeld admits that while the Defence Secretary
has made some mistakes, he shouldn't be forced to quit.

JAMES WOOLSEY: I think that he, on the whole, has done a good job of
transformation in the Pentagon and I think he is someone who is�works
very hard at trying to bring about a positive results in this war and
I think we have a reasonable chance of doing it � winning. No I
wouldn't ask him to resign.

MICHAEL ROWLAND: And Mr Rumsfeld's view of those calls for him to go?

DONALD RUMSFELD: Those kinds of calls have been going on for five
plus years and the President has asked me not to get involved in
politics and that's politics.

TONY EASTLEY: US Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld.
http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2006/s1599837.htm

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 18
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:45:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Chris Bell <somebigguy88@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: VOTE NOW: US Gvmt covered up real events of 9/11???

The "NO"s are fighting back, make sure you vote if you haven't already:

http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight/

Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady@yahoo.com> wrote: http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight/

QUICKVOTE [input] Do you agree with Charlie Sheen that the U.S. government covered up the real events of the 9/11 attacks? Yes [input] No [input] [input] or View Results
NEWSLETTER Sign up to receive the "Showbiz Tonight" newsletter.

TRANSCRIPTS Read show transcripts

EW review: A great 'Inside Man' As

The world can only be redeemed through action--movement -- motion. Uncoerced, unbribed and unbought, humanity will move toward the light.
Alice Hubbard's introduction to An American Bible (1912)

---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2�/min or less.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 19
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:45:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Chris Bell <somebigguy88@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: VOTE NOW: US Gvmt covered up real events of 9/11???

The "NO"s are fighting back, make sure you vote if you haven't already:

http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight/

TRANSCRIPTS Read show transcripts

EW review: A great 'Inside Man' As

The world can only be redeemed through action--movement -- motion. Uncoerced, unbribed and unbought, humanity will move toward the light.
Alice Hubbard's introduction to An American Bible (1912)

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2�/min or less.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 20
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:55:49 -0800
From: John Leonard <jpleonard@verizon.net>
Subject: Alex Jones, Charlie Sheen, Webster Tarpley broadcasts

March 24, 3 p.m. Alex Jones the second night in a row on CNN Headline
News - Showbiz Tonight at 7 and 11 p.m.

# Dam Break for "9/11 Truth?" - Webster Tarpley and Charlie Sheen hit
the Mainstream - Continued
http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200603/1143065487.html

Charlie Sheen and Webster G. Tarpley on the Alex Jones show discuss
the current turning point in the struggle for 9/11 truth, replay
tonight at 9 to 11 p.m. Central, will be archived on web,
www.infowars.com and on short wave.
Charlie Sheen and Alex Jones support Webster's idea of an
International Independent Truth Commission.
Alex Jones reports on that covert operatives keep trying to buy up
his entire stock of Webster's book, 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in
USA using fake credit cards. Similar scams were directed at Webster's
publisher ProgressivePress.com.

Tomorrow Saturday 3-5 p.m. Central Webster Tarpley on World Crisis
Radio, RBNLive.com. Webster Tarpley interviews the avant garde of the
9/11 Truth Movement Dr. Jeff King (aka plaguepuppy) and Nico Haupt.

March 24. 1 a.m.
The other day, Wednesday, March 22nd (my son's birthday) I got a call
around midday from a woman at CNN in New York who asked if I had an
author they could put on the air that very evening. They wanted an
"objective and balanced" survey of the various schools of 9/11
conspiracy thought for a story on Charlie Sheen. Of course, my heavy
hitter on 9/11 is Webster Tarpley, and he even wrote a preface about
Lihop and Mihop in the 2nd edition of 911 Synthetic Terror. She'd
heard of him through the New York magazine article. I put them in
touch, and reminded him they were looking for something neutral. He
reminded me that no matter what you say, they will cut and edit it
into the shape they want.

On the show, it was Sheen and Hammer leaning to the radical side,
with the blonde spinning the government yarn, so maybe they wanted
somebody more wishy-washy in the middle?

Webster says they taped him for 15 minutes and only played 30 seconds
(and even that was Lihop, mentioning the Zogby poll in NYC where half
the people believed top officials had foreknowledge). A fellow 9/11
publisher wrote us to say "I think they may have cut your interview
because it was 'too good.'" I don't know what was in his outtakes -
let's hope they may be used by CNN in future. In fact, we can write
to CNN and suggest that.

My take was that they were only ready for "cover up" and "unanswered
questions" so far - the media want to chew on this a while before
getting around to answers. The big difference between Tarpley and
much of the 9/11 intelligentsia is that he deals in answers, not just
questions, and in political scope rather than minutiae - 9/11 is just
part of his devastating challenge to the ruling oligarchy.

Yet last night, CNN gave full play to the pugilistic Alex Jones' hard
punches on 9/11 truth, as the man who broadcast the original,
explosive Sheen interview (see CNN transcripts,
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/sbt.html ).

Alex has been hitting the media very hard on their censorship of the
Sheen story, and they felt it. Under pressure, the corporate media
must look out for #1 - especially newscaster CNN, as the alternative
Internet lures more and more of the flock away.

After the New York magazine article hit the web on Monday 3/20,
Tarpley called it a warning shot by another faction of the elite
across the bow of the Cheneyac neo-cons (see
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarOnFreedom/message/2863).
Interestingly, the same issue carries an article reviling Larry Silverstein.

And after Alex Jones, the second story on Thursday's Showbiz Tonight
was about the accidenting of Princess Diana. A coincidence? Or does
the undertone - one anti-Silverstein, the other pro-Muslim boyfriend
- signal the lines have been drawn for a counteroffensive against the neocons?

MARCH 22. IT WILL BE A FIRST FOR AMERICA'S MAINSTREAM MEDIA TONIGHT.
CNN Headline News will air an interview with "9/11 Truth" author
Webster Griffin Tarpley on Showbiz Tonight (7-8 p.m., replay at 11).

Tarpley will comment on Sheen's remarks and size up the various
schools of "9/11 conspiracy" thought on CNN. The new edition of
Tarpley's "Synthetic Terror" points out the different viewpoints on
9/11, which range from the Bush administration version, to the
"bungling negligence" theory partly espoused by the 9/11 commission,
to the "Let It Happen on Purpose" or LIHOP theory, a compromise
popular among liberal intellectuals like Michael Moore.

CNN's move comes in the wake of a far-reaching article in New York
Magazine on the 9/11 controversy this week at
http://www.nymag.com/news/features/16464/index.html , which cited
Tarpley, plus hard-hitting comments by actor Charlie Sheen on the
Alex Jones talk radio show, infowars.com, on Monday, see
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/200306charliesheen.htm

Tarpley's book, "9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA" presents the
radical view of no hijackers, controlled demolition of the WTC, and
an inside job by a "rogue network esconced in key nodes of the
establishment." His Tarpley's publisher, John Leonard of
www.ProgressivePress.com, is adamant that "LIHOP" is useless because
it leaves intact the story of Arab attackers, and thereby the pretext
for war on the Middle East. He and Tarpley subscribe to the "MIHOP"
or "Made it Happen on Purpose - from A to Z" explanation.

The precedent is Operation Northwoods, a 1962 plan by the Joint
Chiefs of Staff to fabricate an atrocity and blame it on Cuba. The
plot was nixed by Kennedy. Northwoods documents were released under
the FOIA act before Bush took power.

According to Alex Jones' website, "Actor Charlie Sheen has joined a
growing army of other highly credible public figures in questioning
the official story of 9/11 and calling for a new independent
investigation of the attack and the circumstances surrounding it.

"Over the past two years, scores of highly regarded individuals have
gone public to express their serious doubts about 9/11. These include
former presidential advisor and CIA analyst Ray McGovern, the father
of Reaganomics and former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury Paul
Craig Roberts, BYU physics Professor Steven Jones, former German
defense minister Andreas von Buelow, former MI5 officer David
Shayler, former Blair cabinet member Michael Meacher, former Chief
Economist for the Department of Labor during President George W.
Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds and many more....

"The star of current hit comedy show Two and a Half Men and dozens of
movies including Platoon and Young Guns, Sheen.... agreed that the
biggest conspiracy theory was put out by the government itself... It
seems to me like 19 amateurs with box cutters taking over four
commercial airliners and hitting 75% of their targets, that feels
like a conspiracy theory. It raises a lot of questions."

Tarpley's message to people of good will: "If you want to stop the
war in iraq, and prevent the attack on Iran, the only way to do it is
to put 9/11 truth on the front page everywhere. Make the official
version explode, or the bombs will."

P.S. www.911blogger.com wrote:
Tarpley got a very short clip, but the piece was a major hit for 9/11
skeptics, great stuff... we will have a version up shortly so you can
check it out.
The CNN website is http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight/ .
We hope a transcript of the show will be posted tomorrow.
Video clips have been posted at:
http://www.911blogger.com/files/video/911truthCNN.mov
http://www.stoplying.ca/media/showbiz1.wmv
http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/ShowbizTonight20060322.wmv
http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/ShowbizTonight20060322.rm

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 21
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:14:10 +0100
From: Patrick BURNAND <pburnand@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Zionist Domination

> On Thursday 23 March 2006 23:44, Naveed wrote:
> it doesn't take into account that the "terrorists" were useful
> idiots/patsies for the entire operation, the morons who planned 9/11 were
> stupid enough to have the alleged hijackers show up alive, i think 6 of
> the 19 were alive..... all terrorists are controlled/funded by
> intellegence agencies to create a problem and bring about a "solution"
> which really was the implimintation of a authoritarian policy w/o the
> opposition.

I perfectly agree.

From the information I've got, Mohammed Attah was paid 100'000 US $ by the
ISI to take flying lessons in the USA to prepare the cover story...

There also were Mossad agents at the same locations, who were probably there
to plant Kurans, passports and other documents, as if Mohammed Attah looses
everything when he goes somewhere...

From what I know, there is no evidence that Attah was anyhow involved in any
terrorist activity...

--
Patrick BURNAND <pburnand@yahoo.com>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 22
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:15:43 -0800 (PST)
From: janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com>
Subject: Mind Reading Devices?

MIND READING DEVICES �Alan Yu, a former lieutenant colonel in the Taiwan National Defence Department, says that the United States has not only developed an operational mind control machine, but has also distributed models for use by allied countries. Yu states that such machines pose a great threat to human rights and the American way of life. He calls the device the �Mind Reading Machine� (Mind Machine).
�In the spring of 1984, Yu was a lieutenant colonel serving in the National Defence Department of Taiwan. At that time, Yu read a classified document from the department that he serviced under. The document said the Military Police Department of Taiwan had purchased several of the Mind Reading Machines from the United States (In Taiwan, it was called Psychological Language Machine).
Yu reports that before he left, this machine had become the most effective weapon for the security departments of Taiwan �
�Demonstrations of this equipment have shown encouraging results after exposure of less than one minute and have produced the ability to alter behavior on unwilling subjects.�
(Richard A. Miller, �Conciousness Technologies Conference�, July 2001)

---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 23
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:15:57 -0500
From: ranger116@webtv.net
Subject: Alex Jones/Charlie Sheen on CNN Headline News 5 PM EST+ Links to Info

Alex Jones/Charlie Sheen on CNN Headline News 5 PM EST+ Links to Info

CNN.com -
Address:http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight/ Changed:2:29 PM
on Friday, March 24, 2006

(All the information possible on the Charlie Sheen story "Past, Present
& Future" is located here - Pass it on to media)
Alex Jones' Website
Address:http://www.infowars.com/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Charlie Sheen is just an actor, The important thing here is that he like
Cindy Sheehan is a focus point where tens of millions of Americans can
show interest and support and get media coverage and get the Americans
who are afraid to even consider what really happened on 9/11 to feel
free to think for themselves and realize Who Actually Did It !
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Charlie Sheen on The Alex Jones Show
Address:http://www.infowars.com/video/clips/news/september_11/032006_charlie_sheen_911_wm.htm

No Longer The Minority: 82% Plus Support Charlie Sheen
Address:http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/sheen_cnn_poll_shows_82_percent_support.htm
Changed:

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Bush shuns Patriot Act requirement - The Boston Globe

Address:http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/03/24/bush_shuns_patriot_act_requirement/

````````````````````````````````````````````````````
CNN.com - Poll Quick Vote on Is Charlie Sheen Correct ? 83% Yes Som Far
!
Address:http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

George Noory announced that Charlie Sheen will be appearing on his
network Coast to Coast radio program of 500+ stations soon.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 24
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:16:33 -0800
From: "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@nwinfo.net>
Subject: Re: Zionist Domination

From: "Patrick BURNAND" <pburnand@yahoo.com>
>
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Re: Zionist Domination

> On Wednesday 22 March 2006 23:31, Dick Eastman wrote:
> > The Zionists and the Chinese are allied. The Mideast Wars are to
> > distract us and to exhaust us for the attack we are not expecting. 9/11
> > was Zionism (Mossad); organized crime Jewish Mafia and Chinese Triads);
> > Anglo-American ruling elite crime families -- structurally represented
by
> > big finance and big (multi-national corps) business -- masterminded by
> > the PLA. There is no better educated guess than that. And no, no one
> > more believable than I is going to confirm this for you. You have to
> > reach a decision on your own. I suggest you be quick about it. -- Dick
> > Eastman
>
> What have the chinese to do with this ??

You are aware how American corporations are controlled by the American
power elite -- the criminal "globalist" ruling elite. In the same way the
Chinese People's Liberation Army is a giant corporation also run by
ruling families -- Triad crime families -- cho control the communist state
apparatus. The ruling families of East and West are allied in their plans
for global domination -- world-class aristocracy over a broken and docile
servant class. Their enemy is middle-class culture, the rights of the
common
man, government for the people rather than for the plutocratic families.

>
> According to the evidence I've got (These are not proofs like laws of the
> physics but it's worth considering it), it was about 80 % the CIA and 15%
> the Mossad. (probably the MI6 and the ISI were involved also)

The CIA and Mossad and MI6 are merely branch offices of capitalism's
secret services -- when the power elite was a job done they call on Mossad,
because they can be trusted. Mossad has infiltrated the CIA and MI6 and
the Pentagon -- what do you think "neo-cons" really are? -- Yes this is my
opinion, but I am convinced this is how it is -- this is the explanation
that
fits the facts.
>
> >From the evidence I've got, it's clear that it was a covert operation
done
> by intelligence agencies.

The idea was born of men like Wolfowitz and Richard Perle and Kissinger
and nameless merchant bankers. Mossad was assigned to capture the centers
of control within the CIA, NSA, FBI, FAA, Pentagon, Media, Congress,
Corporations to execute the false-flag operation. During the Bush I and
Clinton
administrations the machinery was put in place -- Clinton was a month in
China
planning 9-11 with the Israelis during his presidency. Israel and Red China
have
been allies since Zhou Enlai first recognized Israel in 1949 -- Israel has
provided
CHina with a steady stream of U.S. military secrets -- including the neutron
bomb.
Israel is allied with China against the U.S. -- the economic "ties"
(chains) between
U.S. and China is part of a long-term deception strategy.
>
> Such a huge covert operation could not have been done by some private
group.
> This seems to completely exclude organizations like mafias, triads.

Zhou Enlai untied the Chinese Communist Party with the Triads during the
Conflict with Chang Kai-shek (Republic of China on Taiwan) to undermine
Chang. The Chinese Communists have always been opium and heroin
dealers -- look at the Maoist F.A.R.C. revolutionaries in Columbia etc.
and the earlier Shining Path Maoists in Peru.
>
> And I really don't see how the chinese govnerment would benefit from 9/11.
> 9/11 could in the contrary be used as a pretext to impose protectionist
> tarifs on chinese goods disguised as "anti-terrorism" and "national
> security".

The CHinese have been bent on conquest for 50 years -- they have just kept
it to themselves. They view the economic ties as a way to capture American
economic power for themselves -- they view it as an act of war against an
unsuspecting enemy. THey seek to defeat their enemy indirectly -- to
exhaust
and confuse him -- to bribe and corrupt our "princes" -- to make us
dependent
and easy to cut off from life support.

After Nixon "opened China" in that famous visit -- David Rockefeller arrived
the
very next week with Kissinger and met with Zhou Enlai and the great transfer
of knowledge and industrial capital to China was settled upon -- Big
FInance
would stop investing in the U.S. and would finance slave-labor super
factories
in China -- to replace as leader of the world a "free" pro-middl-class
culture,
with a definite ruling-class servant-class totalitarian model -- where
ruling families
would be forever supreme and never again challenged by middle-class
interests --
by Jeffersonain principles, by the rights of man, by bourgeois justice, by
liberalism.

> Patrick BURNAND <pburnand@yahoo.com>

Dick Eastman < olfriend@nwinfo.net >

=v= =v=
=v=

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 25
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:21:09 -0800 (PST)
From: Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Mind Reading Devices?

this is NOTHING compared to the remote influencing technologies

janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com> wrote:
MIND READING DEVICES �Alan Yu, a former lieutenant colonel in the Taiwan National Defence Department, says that the United States has not only developed an operational mind control machine, but has also distributed models for use by allied countries. Yu states that such machines pose a great threat to human rights and the American way of life. He calls the device the �Mind Reading Machine� (Mind Machine).
�In the spring of 1984, Yu was a lieutenant colonel serving in the National Defence Department of Taiwan. At that time, Yu read a classified document from the department that he serviced under. The document said the Military Police Department of Taiwan had purchased several of the Mind Reading Machines from the United States (In Taiwan, it was called Psychological Language Machine).
Yu reports that before he left, this machine had become the most effective weapon for the security departments of Taiwan �
�Demonstrations of this equipment have shown encouraging results after exposure of less than one minute and have produced the ability to alter behavior on unwilling subjects.�
(Richard A. Miller, �Conciousness Technologies Conference�, July 2001)

---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

SPONSORED LINKS
United state army United state citizenship United state flag United state patent United state grant United state government grant

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discussion about 09/11/2001

Saturday, March 25, 2006

[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1191

No comments:

About Me

Last posts