| By culhavoc on 9/11 Research May 3rd, 2006
by Culhavoc Deconstructing a False-Flag Operation Another update to:
Part I: “10-5 the message about the remote controlled plane”!
Part II: Tan Ford Alpha Van at Holland Tunnel Exit
Part III: “Remote Controlled Plane” transmission confirmed as having occurred on 9/11
Part IV: Tan Ford Alpha Van License Plates Resemble a U.S. Government Registered Aircraft
Part V: “Gas Lines”, “Car Bombs”, and “Overheated Cars that Explode” - Enumerating Erroneous Explosions in Lower Manhattan In this update we will examine recognition of the exploding-mural-van incident by the Mineta Transportation Institute and compare their documentation to the NYPD “remote controlled plane” transmission. To my knowledge, this incident has only been documented by two sources, the NYPD radio transmissions and by the MTI. These are clearly conflicting accounts. 
Above: the location of the exploding-mural-van incident on King Street
Let’s compare our sources… NYPD radio: officer: “I got a message on that uh plane, it’s a big truck with a mural painted of a of a airplane diving into New York City and exploding [inaudible] know what’s in the truck, the truck is in between 6th and 7th on King Street“ officer: [inaudible] are you holding those two guys [inaudible] (kay?) multiple voices/commotion: [inaudible] fucking beat the shit out of him. [..] multiple voices/commotion: [inaudible] fucking shit out of him [inaudible] officer: all right listen you need any [inaudible] on those two guys over there? you all right over there kay? officer: “we got both suspects under kay, we have the suspects who drive…drove in the van and that exploded we have both of them under kay let’s get some help over here”
(source)
By examining the NYPD transmissions we learn that two suspects detonate a mural-van-bomb and were captured. It’s clear that both were beaten by police and arrested. MTI Report of 02/06: In February of 2006, the Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies (MTI) published their report entitled: “Saving City Lifelines: Lessons Learned in the 9-11 Terrorist Attacks”. “There were continuing moments of alarm. A panel truck with a painting of a plane flying into the World Trade Center was stopped near the temporary command post. It proved to be rented to a group of ethnic Middle Eastern people who did not speak English. Fearing that it might be a truck bomb, the NYPD immediately evacuated the area, called out the bomb squad, and detained the occupants until a thorough search was made. The vehicle was found to be an innocent delivery truck.”
(source: MTI Report 02/06)
The MTI quote makes absolutely no mention of the truck exploding. This report states that the truck was rented. Doesn’t the MTI find it interesting that middle eastern men rented a truck and painted it with a mural depicting an attack currently taking place blocks away? Why would someone paint a mural of WTC being attacked by planes on a rented van? The fact that NYPD evacuated the area substantiates my hypothesis proposing there were numerous incidents occuring in lower Manhattan on 9/11; all designed to help clear the area of witnesses/cameras. In my next update, I will focus on this van/truck, along with other suspicious vehicles in and around lower Manhattan on 9/11. -Culhavoc | 
No comments:
Post a Comment