A note: I've got nothing but the highest respect for competent American military professionals who respect their oath to protect the U.S. Constitution. We (we American citizens) depend upon these honorable people to defend us from would-be anti-American dictators, like the neocon cabal which presently controls the White House.
The American military at this point would be well within its right to arrest the top dozen members of this cabal for their role in numerous major crimes, and to bring them to justice. In fact, the American military establishment may well have an obligation to do this, if we (again, we Americans citizens) are not going to witness the complete destruction of the United States.
The object of any such exercise would be exactly opposite of imposing a military dictatorship: the purpose would be to restore a healthy and functioning democracy to the American people.
I am shocked that I am uttering these words. Threats from the neocons and Christian fundies in recent weeks to nuke Iran have pushed me over the edge on this issue.
Fiction writers have speculated for decades about how we would handle a situation in which one or more psychotics took control of the executive branch of government. We are probably in the middle of such a situation as we speak.
Donald Rumsfeld's dissociation from reality is so extreme as to beggar belief. At least Robert McNamara was sane enough to deal with the reality of his failures, and to analyze them in an objective way. Rumsfeld is psychologically incapable of admitting errors and mistakes of any kind, not to mention his central role in the greatest strategic blunder in American foreign policy history. These zealots are now on the verge of greatly compounding their original error by attacking Iran.
LeaNder <l.l.hahn@web.de> wrote:
Sean, I better keep out of the Israel gate keeper issue, the issue
tears me apart. I am not sure what I would find more frightening:
nuclear weapons over Iran or a conspiracy in plain site, that has a
high percentage of American Jewish protagonists. Maybe you, Wolcott
and I would agree that it somehow would be pleasant to be able to
join the happiness brigade. Vaguely reminds me of a passage in Hesse:
longing Steppenwolf.
But look here we have another "Zeitgenosse" [coeval] that ponders
about the military:
http://journal.davidbyrne.com/
4.15.06: Military revolt, back pages
The Armed forces' revolt against the Bush administration proceeds. A
whole raft of generals, most of them recently retired, but having
served in Iraq, now call for Rummy to step down. Other generals, not
named and still serving in Iraq, join the chorus. The military doesn't
dispute the war — that may come later — but its execution, which
anyone with eyes can see was not planned, thought out or performed
with any competence whatsoever. The Army's first duty is
self-preservation — save the boys — and when they see arrogant
incompetents putting the boys in harm's way unnecessarily, they
eventually rebel.
It was Army defections that dethroned Marcos in the Philippines.
I'm not a big supporter of the military or the military mindset, but
they can at least be viewed as attempting to be professional about
their job. And respected from that point of view. You may not want
Dirty Harry to make a nation's foreign policy decisions, but he or
some other thin-lipped hero is who you want at your back when things
get crazy. Not Rumsfeld, or Bush — the latter hasn't succeeded in a
single business he's been handed on a platter his whole life.
>
> [From the smartest pundit currently on planet Earth (a position once
> held by Christopher Hitchens, before he lost his mind). Visit the
> site to read the last paragraphs on Carl Bernstein's comparison of the
> Nixon and Bush 43 regimes.]
>
> Gretchen, David, and Carl
>
> Two adds to the blogroll. My friend Gretchen Rubin, the author of 40
> Ways to Look at JFK, 40 Ways to Look at Winston Churchill, and other
> books well-worth your look-see, wants to be happy. Who doesn't? But
> unlike the rest of us sad sacks, she's actually trying to do something
> about it, taking active measures to nuture and unfold the sunflower
> within. She tracks her pilgrim's progress over at the Happiness
> Project. Her first commandment is: "Be Gretchen." My first commandment
> is: "Be me." But since I'm such a mystery to myself, I'm uncertain who
> "me" is, an existential confusion that led to numerous bouts of
> amnesia, usually when a piece is due. Also, David Byrne's journal. I
> don't have to tell you who David Byrne is, and if I do, tough. Look
> him up. Learn something. Don't be one of those dum...
>
> Source: http://jameswolcott.com/archives/2006/04/gretchen_david.php
>
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
No comments:
Post a Comment