Tuesday, April 11, 2006

[political-research] Fwd: [ctrl] Reply to Reporter Jerry Mazza (re: Seymour Hersh / Nuclear 911 theory)


CaptainMay <captainmay@prodigy.net> wrote:
To: gvmaz <gvmaz@verizon.net>
From: CaptainMay <captainmay@prodigy.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [ctrl] Reply to Reporter Jerry Mazza (re: Seymour Hersh / Nuclear 911 theory)

Captain May, Ghost Troop Commander to
Journalist Gerry Mazza, Online Journal
 
Dear Mr. Mazza,
 
The Seymour Hersh article can't be discounted by any means, as it's the first mainstream acknowledgment of the scenario that Bush has been trying to actualize for a couple of years now:  nuclear war against Iran.  You're right in saying that it's curtains for the Bush Boyz if they don't get another event soon, and when you say that such can be inferred from a recent article by Mike Ruppert, I'm heartened to think that the boy president is running out of time and opportunity to start a world war.  Rupperts seminal Crossing the Rubicon was one of the fine reads I absorbed after the November sham elections, when I took half a year off from the infowar before the looming nuclear 911 they were setting up for the summer of 2005 brought me back onto my mission of conscience as an Army-trained intelligence officer.
 
I hope you'll keep following the situation along with Ghost Troop and me, and that you'll keep me posted on your thoughts, which I duly post along to my Holy Horde.  I'm especially concerned about the nuclear attack exercises that were being run out of Charleston during the last attempt on Texas City, upon which you focused in your article on the matter.
 
If you want to do an interview on the Texas City Inquest on the Nuclear 911, this seems like a fine time to bring the topic back up.  Even though Bush's nuclear hand has been tipped, there needs to be far more exposure of just how radical his intentions are!
 
For those who haven't read your fine work on Ghost Troop and its scenario, I refer them to the vital article you wrote before our Texas City prediction date of 1/31/2006 for the Nuclear 911, and published on 1/27/2006.  I will never know just when we had garnered enough media attention to head off that set-up, but it could well be that your work was the key, and I am most grateful.  Here's the link:  http://www.onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_459.shtml
 
Best regards, CPTMAY
 
 
gvmaz <gvmaz@verizon.net> wrote:
Captain, I must say you're the second person today who's sent me this Hersh story.  I wish I'd forwarded you the Michael Ruppert story that says Bush is toothless and rattling sabres.  He can't pay for, win or back out of the two wars he's started.  And the military, as  you well know, is dispirited.  It's a fact that officer attrition is at a high level. So I put this threat on the level of an orchestrated "fear alert."  Fear, in and of itself, has the power to cower people.  Yet, the brave, the clear-minded, the informed, should weigh these tales with a grain or two of salt.
 
Remember that Bush/Cheney have been pretty well outed by Libby on leaking info, including Plame's I.D., which is a punishable offense. And I don't think O'Neill's going away. What better way to distract everyone than with nuclear war talk.
 
Use your formidable powers to really think this one out, strategize, play chess with it, role-play, etc. And keep up the good work.
 
JM.
----- Original Message -----
From: CaptainMay
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 2:05 PM
Subject: Seymour Hersh strengthens Nuclear 911 theory (Attn: Amb. Untermeyer)

Captain Eric H. May, Ghost Troop Commander to
Ambassador Chase Untermeyer, Ghost Troop Chaplain
 
 
Dear Chase,
 
I hope life as US Ambassador to Qatar is going well, and that the ladies Untermeyer are enjoying the weather, which must shortly become oppressive, if it isn't already.  Back home in Houston it's blackberry season, and Gretchen and I shall certainly pick gallons of them when they fully ripen on the bayou.  She's fond of freezing or otherwise preserving them, so there will be plenty left over when you and yours return back home!
 
 
Seymour Hersh and Nuclear War
 
Granted, you and I have discussed the possibilities of war with Iran since before the war with Iraq, and I've been predicting that it would be a nuclear war since after the Madrid set-up of March, 2003.  Still, no one was paying me any speaking fees to come and explain nuclear geostrategy to any colleges, and none of the mainstream media -- Pravda and Al-Jazeerah.info excepted -- were publishing me.  Now the winds of change have blown from the ivory tower, and Mr. Hersh has set forth a radical scenario, fully encompassed in mine, of a rapidly-developing nuclear war strategy.
 
I've read the article, and found plenty there to alarm the American People.  Everything from Bush's delusional (Anti) Christ complex to the bellicose urgings of the Israel Lobby pushing us toward another disastrous war in the Middle East.  It appears that the Megamedia is quite ready to play the Iraq war programming over again, merely knocking out the "q" of Iraq and replacing it with the "n" of Iran, then adding the nuclear option as a kind of exclamation point!
 
According to Hersh, the Cowards Congress has developed yellow fever -- or pretends to have gotten a case of it.  It could just as easily be that they're waiting for Bush to do his will, not ready to bring up the troublesome issue of who can start a new war when they have decided that the new war would be just the sort of thing to re-energize the Patriot Act specifically, and overall government powers -- maybe even conscription -- generally.  Shucks, war -- especially nuclear war -- with Iran would be just the thing to refresh our relationship with our "special friend" Israel, which has been pushing for war with Iran for years!
 
Thankfully, I also find in the article indications that the Joint Chiefs are recalling that they aren't sworn to uphold the Monarchy of King George, but the Constitution of the United States.  The fact that military officers are beginning to think of their duty to the Constitution is the single best news I've had in a long while, and if they talk sense loudly enough, they will be heard; if they talk sense emphatically, they will be obeyed.  If it comes to that, I hope and pray that they will have the courage they need.
 
Here's the link to the article, and to a Washington Post article about it and the nuclear plans being drawn up in the Pentagon:  http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040906Y.shtml
 
 
Self-starting a Nuclear War with a Nuclear 911?
 
As you know, I based my decision to open a Texas City Inquest on your email question of early February, in which you wanted to know why I thought the explosions of 3/30/2004 and 7/28/2005 -- both of which came within 24 hours of my month-long predictions of a set-up of Texas City, were more than mere coincidence.  In addition to these "coincidence" was the story, published in the Galveston County Daily News about my January prediction that there would be a 1/31/2006 attempt to false-flag nuke Texas City, then blame it on "terror" to justify a nuclear war with Iran.
 
Here's the excerpt from our long and storied correspondence:
 
"Untermeyer, Chase G." <UntermeyerCG@state.gov> wrote:
From: "Untermeyer, Chase G." <UntermeyerCG@state.gov>
To: Eric May <captainmay@prodigy.net>
Subject: RE: Lone Star report on Texas City (near-miss for Nuke 911?)
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:50:53 +0300

ERIC: Dubious ex-reporter that I am, how can you say the bangs at Texas City were the result of illicit action rather than the sort of thing that happens in such literally explosive environments all the time?
 
We’re enjoying the balmy weather of a Middle Eastern winter. This is the conference season in Doha, so we get a lot of VIP visitors; also relatives. Diana continues to get in the sports pages (which I don’t) with her endurance (marathon) horse racing: 100-120 km in the desert, lasting upwards of 9 hours (with breaks). I still haven’t been to a camel race. The ones here use robots designed to look like jockeys, wearing the “silks” of their owners. They apply the whip accordingly to radio control. Modern high tech applied to ancient sport!
 
Best to Gretchen, CHASE.
 
Chase, here's the link to the Daily News story, from which we've extracted considerable advantage in the infowar:  http://truthdefender.homeunix.com/~hutch/Capt_May/Galveston.pdf.  Despite its attempts to assuage a concerned public, the bare facts of the story are that "day after" nuclear assets were present in the vicinity of Texas City on 2/1/2006, the day after my prediction date!
 
The four Greg Szymanski articles about our public affairs mission to forewarn the city offer much more detail on what happened to stop the attack on Texas City.  They are all accessible below my military photo at my current operational site:  http://www.spiritone.com/~pazuu/pow-mia/GhostTroopCaptMay.htm
 
 
Cassandras and the Nuclear 911
 
Since you were an important figure in both the Reagan and Bush 41 administrations -- and know just about everyone major in the current administration -- you probably know some of the conscientious former officials who are now coming forward with view that the entire 911 Event was a staged terror attack by Bush and Cheney, and their assorted helpers and enablers.
 
Morgan Reynolds was the chief economist for the US Department of Labor under Bush 43 (2001-2002), and now teaches for the Texas A & M, where some of your official papers as Assistant Secretary of the Navy (inter alia) are now an important addition.  You may not have heard it, but he is decidedly of the opinion that Bush deliberately perpetrated 911 on the American People:  http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html
 
USAF Lt. Col. Dr. Robert Bowman (Ret.), head of the Star Wars missile defense program under Presidents Ford and Carter has named George W. Bush as his chief suspect in the 911 Event, dismissing the "official story" of 19 lucky Arabs:  http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/040406mainsuspect.htm
 
Finally, Paul Craig Roberts, the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Reagan, has recently published an essay dealing with the same scenario that I have argued was the motivation for the Bush attempts on Texas City.  The analysis takes my strategic prediction of a nuclear false-flag attack and merely sanitizes it a bit, by suggesting that the false-flag nuke would indeed terrorize us into starting World War Three, but that the detonation might occur off the US coast, where there would be few casualties.  The piece is a fine one, and praiseworthy in its candor -- all except the wishful thinking that the nuke would be benign!  Here's the link:  http://vdare.com/roberts/060315_911.htm
 
Hopefully critics like these will continue to expound upon their insights and analysis, and overcome the fear that those of us engaged in the infowar deal with, that like tragic Cassandra of the Greek myths, we know what is going to happen, warn as many as we can, but are not taken seriously.
 
 
Texas City Inquest on the Nuclear 911
 
I think matters have developed considerably to justify my decision to initiate an inquest into the attempt to nuke Texas City as the "trigger event" for a nuke attack on Iran.  There's nothing in the "target Iran" part of my scenario that isn't now "news" in the mainstream media, via Pulitzer-winning Seymour Hersh.  There's nothing about the "target Texas City" part of it that isn't contained in essay of your former Reagan administration colleague, Paul Craig Roberts.
 
The Texas City Inquest on the Nuclear 911 simply examines the facts that have led me to think that the administration that is pushing for a nuclear option against Iran has been wanting that nuclear option to be justified by a terror nuke against a very specific, very focused political/economic target, Texas City, in the state owned by the Bush Dynasty, in the congressional district nicely set up by "the Hammer" Tom Delay.
 
Chase, isn't my worst-case scenario starting to seem like the most likely scenario yet?  I know you're the Professor Pangloss of our cyber-intelligence unit, Ghost Troop, but surely you don't still think that everything is above-board in a world that looks like anything but the best of all possible worlds!
 
Them's my Candide thoughts -- no kidding!
 
All the best, Eric
 
 
Captain Eric H. May, MI/PAO, USA
CO, Ghost Troop, 3/7 Cybercav+
Mission of Conscience / Patriots in Action
 
PS:  If you get the chance, Google "Texas City Inquest Nuclear 911" and find that Ghost Troop has been quite successful in spreading word of the set-up.  I'm particularly pleased that among the dozens of postings of our articles are some in Russian Pravda and Zerkolo Mira, as well as some postings in the Netherlands, German an Australia.  In case you know any folks who want to receive my regular updates (like this one), the Ghost Troop Command Archive, where they can apply for membership for the inquest readers list, is at http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/GhostTroopCommand/

Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/

Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)