Sunday, April 23, 2006

[political-research] Bloglines - Open Letter to Thomas Eagar on Molten Metal at WTC

Bloglines user bill.giltner@gmail.com has sent this item to you.


9/11 Blogger - Blogging 9/11 Related Alternative News
All comments are welcome! but please avoid hate speech and profanity, and use references when possible.

Open Letter to Thomas Eagar on Molten Metal at WTC

By somebigguy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. Where's the part about them running away and hiding from you???

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?noframes;read=87929
To: Thomas W. Eagar
tweagar@MIT.EDU
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Re: Professor Steven E. Jones Paper on Molten Metal at World Trade Center

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

Dear Professor Eagar,

I was quite shocked when you refused to read the scientific paper by Professor Steven E. Jones of BYU dealing with the unanswered questions about the large amounts of molten metal that were seen cascading from the 81st floor of South Tower of the World Trade Center immediately before it began to collapse.

I was equally amazed when you said that there was no evidence of molten metal flowing from the 81st floor of the South Tower prior to the collapse and that this is some sort of hearsay.

And I was most disappointed when you suddenly hung up the phone on me.

Why are you unwilling to discuss the evidence of molten metal at the World Trade Center - before and after the "collapses?" It certainly appears that you were unable to answer my questions and decided to run away.
...
Professor Jones' webpage is here:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/

His paper on the molten metal is here:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
...
What kind of scientist are you anyway?

Rather than running from the research of Professor Jones, you should welcome and embrace such efforts to answer the questions of 9-11. As Jones says, "The data stands on its own."

What is this seriously-flawed "official version" of 9-11, which you seem to support, a religious myth that cannot be challenged?


Signed,

Christopher Bollyn
American Free Press
Thanks Michael for the great submission!




Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/

Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




No comments: