WTC7 seems to be a classic controlled demolition. WTC 1 &2 destruction appears to have been enhanced by thermate (a variation of thermite) in addition.
Pentagon was not struck by a passenger aircraft. It was a drone or missle.
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
[political-researchp] Bloglines - Playing Games
Bloglines user email@example.com has sent this item to you.
Humint Events Online The 9/11 hijacking attacks were very likely facilitated by a rogue group within the US government that created an Islamic terrorist "Pearl Harbor" event as a catalyst for the military invasion of Middle Eastern countries. This weblog will explore the incredibly strange events of 9/11/01, and other issues of US government responsibility.
The Pentagon/DOJ/USG could easily show that flight 77 hit the Pentagon as they claimed, by releasing still photos of the tail section of the plane, the black boxes, the seats of the plane, and any other large pieces of debris that are not too gruesome due to human remains. They surely have such pictures, assuming flight 77 hit the Pentagon (which of course I doubt).
Instead they have released these crappy videos which show nothing.
Who the heck knows what this white protrusion is seen in one frame. Cruise missile? Photoshop art? Strangely malformed nose of a Boeing 757? Who can tell?
The Pentagon/DOJ/USG HAD to know that this video release would spark more questions than it answered. So why did they do it?
Was this really the BEST evidence they had?
Did they really want to perpetuate the honey pot myth to keep conspiracy theorists going and then later show the REAL evidence for flight 77??
Or is this some sort of weird official admission that the Pentagon hit was fishy??
I guess I prefer the latter explanation, since I can't see how a flight that never took off on 9/11 (and maybe never even existed) could hit the Pentagon. Plus, the fact that the approach path the huge Boeing took is almost certainly physically impossible at 500+ mph.