Wednesday, May 17, 2006

[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1291

There are 25 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. Right to petition lawsuit update
From: "JP Liggett" JP@JPLiggett.com
2. Gov't will release photos of Pentagon hit...
From: "reggie501" reggie501@optonline.net
3. Judicial Watch to Obtain September 11 Pentagon Video at 1 p.m. Today
From: "S Miles Lewis" yahoolists@elfis.net
4. 9/11 Pentagon video goes public for first time
From: "S Miles Lewis" yahoolists@elfis.net
5. 9/11 update.... important news.....tvnl
From: "reggie501" reggie501@optonline.net
6. Alert! Pentagon Will Release New 9/11 Images in about ten minutes.o
From: "Debi Clark" debiclark@sbcglobal.net
7. Pentagon releasing alleged 9/11 security videotape today
From: "Total Information" totalinfo@gmail.com
8. A Day in the Life: 5/16/6
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
9. Re: 9/11...NEW PHOTO'S FLIGHT 77
From: "APFN" apfn@apfn.org
10. Videos of United Flight 77 striking the Pentagon on September 11, 20
From: "S Miles Lewis" yahoolists@elfis.net
11. Re: FLIGHT 77
From: "APFN" apfn@apfn.org
12. Fw: Pentagon clips: they led us on with the fake five pictures of M
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
13. [Fwd: Flight 77] YES I SAW A BIG F**KING ASS BOEING JET HIT IT! --
From: "APFN" apfn@apfn.org
14. Re: FLIGHT 77
From: "JP Liggett" JP@JPLiggett.com
15. Released pictures contradict 911 Commission report that admits there
From: "Judy Cunningham" drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com
16. Wall St big wig, inadvertently states that Cheney owns Haliburton.
From: "Judy Cunningham" drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com
17. Who has seen this new DoD 9-11 videotape? Someone describe it put i
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
18. New Pentagon "Footage"
From: "S Miles Lewis" yahoolists@elfis.net
19. Re: Who has seen this new DoD 9-11 videotape? Someone describe it p
From: "S Miles Lewis" yahoolists@elfis.net
20. Video: 9/11 Pentagon crash video
From: "yahoolists@elfis.net" yahoolists@elfis.net
21. Pentagon Video - Alex Jones says be Careful!
From: "botalerts" botalerts@yahoo.ca
22. Pentagon Strike Video on DOD site
From: "Debi Clark" debiclark@sbcglobal.net
23. Judicail Watch Web Site up & running...
From: "Debi Clark" debiclark@sbcglobal.net
24. Re: Pentagon Video - Alex Jones says be Careful!
From: "goat!" goat@moag.2y.net
25. Freedom of the Press Under Attack: Government Begins Tracking Phone
From: "advokris@aol.com" advokris@aol.com

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 1
From: "JP Liggett" JP@JPLiggett.com
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 7:54am(PDT)
Subject: Right to petition lawsuit update

The right to petition is one of our important rights, and could possibly
serve the 911 truth movement. The update has some interesting
constitutional information that many patriots would find interesting.

http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Update2006-05-15.htm

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 2
From: "reggie501" reggie501@optonline.net
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 9:07am(PDT)
Subject: Gov't will release photos of Pentagon hit...

"Succumbing to pressures from prosecutors" - they're going to release
the photos. Huh? Why suppress the photos for all these years and NOW
release them? DUH>

They've had nearly five years to come up with their own
films....fabricated and digitalized and whatever it takes to create
another lie..... (assuming it corroborates their version of events).

Should be fun time ahead.

http://TvNewsLIES.org

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 3
From: "S Miles Lewis" yahoolists@elfis.net
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 9:44am(PDT)
Subject: Judicial Watch to Obtain September 11 Pentagon Video at 1 p.m. Today

Judicial Watch to Obtain September 11 Pentagon Video at 1 p.m. Today
For Immediate Release / May 16, 2006 Contact: Press Office / 202-646-
5188
[img]http://images.google.com/images?
q=tbn:czyNFQ8IvbRPlM:investigate911.bravehost.com/3.JPG[/img]
Department of Defense Responds to Judicial Watch Freedom of
Information Act Request and Related Lawsuit

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that
investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today
that Department of Defense will release a videotape to Judicial Watch
at 1:00 p.m. this afternoon that allegedly shows American Airlines
Flight 77 striking the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. The
Department of Defense is releasing the videotape in response to a
Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act request and related
lawsuit.

"This is in response to your December 14, 2004 Freedom of Information
Act Request, FOIA appeal of March 27, 2005, and complaint filed in
the United States District Court for the District of Columbia," wrote
William Kammer, Chief of the Department of Defense, Office of Freedom
of Information. "Now that the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui is over,
we are able to complete your request and provide the video…"

Judicial Watch originally filed a Freedom of Information Act request
on December 15, 2004, seeking all records pertaining to September 11,
2001 camera recordings of the Pentagon attack from the Sheraton
National Hotel, the Nexcomm/Citgo gas station, Pentagon security
cameras and the Virginia Department of Transportation. The
Department of Defense admitted in a January 26, 2005 letter that it
possessed a videotape responsive to Judicial Watch's request.
However, the Pentagon refused to release the videotape because it
was, "part of an ongoing investigation involving Zacarias
Moussaoui." Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit on February 22, 2006
arguing that there was "no legal basis" for the Defense Department's
refusal to release the tape.

"We fought hard to obtain this video because we felt that it was very
important to complete the public record with respect to the terrorist
attacks of September 11," said Judicial Watch President Tom
Fitton. "Finally, we hope that this video will put to rest the
conspiracy theories involving American Airlines Flight 77. As
always, our prayers remain with all those who suffered as a result of
those murderous attacks."

A copy of the video will be made available on Judicial Watch's
Internet site, www.judicialwatch.org.

Judicial Watch is a non-partisan, educational foundation organized
under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue code. Judicial Watch
is dedicated to fighting government and judicial corruption and
promoting a return to ethics and morality in our nation's public life.


<http://www.judicialwatch.org/5772.shtml>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 4
From: "S Miles Lewis" yahoolists@elfis.net
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 10:02am(PDT)
Subject: 9/11 Pentagon video goes public for first time

9/11 Pentagon video goes public for first time

Video showing a plane crashing into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001,
will be seen publicly for the first time today, a judicial watchdog
said. The Department of Defense will release tapes showing American
Airlines Flight 77 striking its headquarters outside Washington to
Judicial Watch, a public interest group that requested the video, the
group said.

FULL STORY
<http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/16/pentagon.video/index.html>

Aftermath of the attack on the Pentagon <javascript:cnnVideo
('play','/video/us/2006/05/16/vo.pentagon.911.wusa','2006/05/23');>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 5
From: "reggie501" reggie501@optonline.net
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 10:05am(PDT)
Subject: 9/11 update.... important news.....tvnl

9/11 News : http://www.tvnewslies.org/news/#911

· Why NORAD Interceptors Couldn't Catch Those 911 Boeings - Equally
suspicious, NORAD fighter pilots were either rerouted AWAY from the
Boeings, or commanded to fly at such slow speeds they could not
intercept a commercial plane, even if given a week to do so. Why?
Because fighter pilots could NOT be allowed to see into the cockpit.

· The CRIME That Covered-Up The Coup - There is a key to this entire
quagmire that can no longer be ignored, which is, the mega-crime
committed on 911. So long as this government along with others in
Europe and the wider world continue to spew lies about what happened
on that day ­ then nothing can ever be changed!

· Spies `hid' bomber tape from MPs - MI5 is being accused of a
cover-up for failing to disclose to a parliamentary watchdog that it
bugged the leader of the July 7 suicide bombers discussing the
building of a bomb months before the London attacks.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 6
From: "Debi Clark" debiclark@sbcglobal.net
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 10:18am(PDT)
Subject: Alert! Pentagon Will Release New 9/11 Images in about ten minutes.o


Alert! Pentagon Will Release New 9/11 Images in about ten minutes.on CNN,
MSNBC, etc


Judicial Watch to Obtain September 11 Pentagon Video at 1 p.m. Today

Department of Defense Responds to Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act
Request and Related Lawsuit

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that
investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that
Department of Defense will release a videotape to Judicial Watch at 1:00 p.m
this afternoon that allegedly shows American Airlines Flight 77 striking
the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. The Department of Defense is releasing
the videotape in response to a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act
request and related lawsuit.

“This is in response to your December 14, 2004 Freedom of Information Act
Request, FOIA appeal of March 27, 2005, and complaint filed in the United
States District Court for the District of Columbia,” wrote William Kammer,
Chief of the Department of Defense, Office of Freedom of Information. “Now
that the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui is over, we are able to complete your
request and provide the video…”

Judicial Watch originally filed a Freedom of Information Act request on
December 15, 2004, seeking all records pertaining to September 11, 2001
camera recordings of the Pentagon attack from the Sheraton National Hotel,
the Nexcomm/Citgo gas station, Pentagon security cameras and the Virginia
Department of Transportation. The Department of Defense admitted in a
January 26, 2005 letter that it possessed a videotape responsive to Judicial
Watch’s request. However, the Pentagon refused to release the videotape
because it was, “part of an ongoing investigation involving Zacarias
Moussaoui.” Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit on February 22, 2006 arguing
that there was “no legal basis” for the Defense Department’s refusal to
release the tape.

“We fought hard to obtain this video because we felt that it was very
important to complete the public record with respect to the terrorist
attacks of September 11,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
“Finally, we hope that this video will put to rest the conspiracy theories
involving American Airlines Flight 77. As always, our prayers remain with
all those who suffered as a result of those murderous attacks.”

A copy of the video will be made available on Judicial Watch’s Internet site
www.judicialwatch.org.

Judicial Watch is a non-partisan, educational foundation organized under
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue code. Judicial Watch is dedicated
to fighting government and judicial corruption and promoting a return to
ethics and morality in our nation's public life.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/5772.shtml

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 7
From: "Total Information" totalinfo@gmail.com
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 10:49am(PDT)
Subject: Pentagon releasing alleged 9/11 security videotape today

TOTAL 911 INFO <http://www.total911.info/> Tuesday, May 16, 2006
http://www.total911.info/2006/05/pentagon-releasing-alleged-911.html
Pentagon releasing alleged 9/11 security videotape
today<http://www.judicialwatch.org/5772.shtml>

UPDATE: FoxNews is reporting that the tape to be released today is
from about the same angle, but a different camera, of the five frames
released in early 2002. This footage is at 2 frames per second. FoxNews
whore "reporter" Brett Baieir reports that the "nose cone" is visible
but the footage is so blurry that "conspiracy theorists" won't buy the new
video as conclusive.

*Judicial Watch* <http://www.judicialwatch.org/5772.shtml>:

" Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and
prosecutes government corruption, announced today that Department of Defense
will release a videotape to Judicial Watch at 1:00 p.m. this afternoon
that allegedly shows American Airlines Flight 77 striking the Pentagon on
September 11, 2001. The Department of Defense is releasing the videotape in
response to a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act request and related
lawsuit.
-----

9/11 Cover-up Commissioner Jim Thomson is on Fox News @ 1308 ET
attacking conspiracy theorists; while admitting they never considered any
narrative except for the official one during their deliberations.

.....---
.....| Posted by Total at 1:33 PM |
PERMA-LINK<http://www.total911.info/2006/05/pentagon-releasing-alleged-911.html>|
Feedback?<http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8204390&postID=114779950741952109>|
(0) comments<http://www.total911.info/2006/05/pentagon-releasing-alleged-911.html>

--
www.total411.info
www.total911.info

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 8
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 10:53am(PDT)
Subject: A Day in the Life: 5/16/6

GOVERNMENT OF THE USA IN EXILE
Free Americans
Reaching Out to Amerika's Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free

Via <prez@usa-exile.org>

May 16, 2006

From: "Mark R. Elsis | Lovearth.net" <mark@lovearth.net>
Date: May 15, 2006 1:09:12 AM EST
To: "Mark R. Elsis" <mark@lovearth.net>
Subject: The Crime That Covered-Up The Coup by Jim Kirwan | A Full
Blown Dictatorship (Video) by Jack Cafferty

LOVEARTH ® NETWORK
The Most Important Independent News On Earth
3491 News Links Published And Archived In 2006
http://Lovearth.net/News.php

A Full Blown Dictatorship (Video)
by Jack Cafferty
[A Veteran Mainstream Newsman]
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/05/11.html#a8245

----------------------------------

The Crime
That Covered Up the Coup

by Jim Kirwan, May 14, 2006

There’s a corporate dagger that has been leveled at the very heart of
all that matters in the USA and the world today. The fact is that the
role of government’s around the world have been nullified by those
corporate powers that have taken control over the most pivotal points
of life and promise within the global community. There is a key to this
entire quagmire that can no longer be ignored, which is, the mega-crime
committed on 911. So long as this government along with others in
Europe and the wider world continue to spew lies about what happened on
that day – then nothing can ever be changed!

The enemy of the United States of America is located in Washington
D.C., in Tel Aviv and to a lesser degree in London. This cabal has used
and abused the events of 911 to create tyrannies and to advance murder
and torture on a grand scale, while they continue to act as
intermediaries for the Corporatocracy that is the real power hiding
behind most governments. It is these essentially private and protected
corporate interests, that are using governments worldwide, to crush
whatever remains of those freedoms and laws that were supposed to
protect people from exactly this kind of take-over. What has happened
is that governments everywhere have largely become superfluous, because
the real power now lies with the multi-national corporate giants of the
Corporatocracy.

911 was an attack upon the Constitution and the people of the United
States, carried out by forces that had far greater designs for their
private interests than could have ever been allowed under the US
Constitution. Without the chaos of 911 that essentially stripped people
of all the protections of law, and that turned all discussions into
nothing more than fear mongering and terror warnings that we now know,
were used to justify the immediate targeting of the entire US
population, as potential terrorist sympathizers.

This began with the stolen election that put Bush in office. The
Congress and the Courts have both shown themselves to be complicit in
furthering those lies that the Bush administration has been spewing
from the day they took office. The “Democrats” have proven that they
will not offer any resistance to the hundreds of illegal and criminal
acts committed by this government during these last five years: Bush
alone proudly claims to have violated 750 laws, and this doesn’t count
Cheney or Rumsfeld and all the others who have done the same thing.

If citizens of the USA have to abide by the laws of the nation – then
how can government not be forced to abide by those same laws? 911 is
and was a crime – not the bogus act of “terror” that is being used to
justify a new dictatorship of privatized authority. What we have now is
a fascist group that ignores the laws that limit them – while trying at
the same time to enslave the population. Their goal is to enforce the
dictates of private interests whose only goals are total power and
complete control. The circumstance cannot be changed until the public
accepts the fact that the 2000 election was a Coup and that the 911
cover story was created to redirect the public’s focus; while the true
criminals finished killing off the protections of the Constitution: in
order that no real questions could ever be asked because of National
Security concerns.

The theft of this nation was a very shabby affair carried out by
amateurs whose true motives are just beginning to unravel – big-time!
Of course had there been a media to cover what was happening, while
this was going on – none of this could have continued! Had the media
asked real questions – the Supreme Court could not have appointed Bush
as “president.” If congress had stepped into the Florida vote count, as
was their duty under the Constitution, then the court would have had no
jurisdiction; but congress remained silent and the Court broke with the
Separation of Powers Act – that’s how the USA got its first Dictator!

The people didn’t understand what happened, so they kept silent. Then
on September 11th the Dictator pulled off his first direct attack
against the people of the United States, and to date – he’s still not
been asked to explain his actions on that day. No one who was
responsible for things like military defense, intelligence failures, or
preparedness has even been fired – and apparently at least a third of
the public is still fine with that! We’ve even allowed blatant
fabrications about Flight 93 to appear in theaters; posing as a fact,
when too much evidence exists that contradicts every facet of that
fairy-tale.

People who will not even demand answers from their so-called leaders
get exactly what they deserve. In a time of war, it is imperative that
the public question everything that leadership does. The American
public seems to be otherwise occupied. The public chose to deal with
their government from a distance, when that government was supposedly
democratic and free. But today there is a full blown dictatorship –
where the Republic used to be: If that doesn’t matter to you – then
just delete this, and get on with your very important life.

For those to whom the questions matter – it appears that things are
still continuing to change despite the schemes and plans of the
privateers still masquerading as the Corporatocracy. This is “Mother’s
Day,” a Sunday, and none of the Sunday morning talk shows even
mentioned the fact that Puerto Rico is now bankrupt, or that the US has
sent more troops and ships to the Gulf of Arabia. Apparently we’re
planning to attack Iran sometime around the first of June; Bush is
simply waiting for the necessary excuse to “Open Fire.” (It won’t take
much, as apparently Americans will believe almost anything because they
tend to trust their dictator whenever “wars” are happening). There was
no mention of Karl Rove’s indictment that also happened Saturday.
There was no in-depth discussion about anything but the illegal use of
US troops on the southern borders, another presidential edict – neither
congress nor the governors were consulted. The president the
vice-president and Rummy need to hold a joint two hour press conference
in prime time and let alternative reporters and interested people
question what they’ve done – as well as why they’ve acted as they have.
If these three criminals can’t manage to accommodate the public, then
at least give us Cheney directly, and leave out the middle men!

The public needs to change the subject, as it’s clear that neither the
congress nor the courts will ever actually investigate 911. Popular
Television and film have been making propaganda for this government at
a rate that surpasses all that was ever done previously for any other
war. Why? Because they want to keep the fear alive, they want to keep
the public terrified and insecure – which is exactly the opposite of
what a government is supposed to do. Look at New Orleans; they did
exactly what no one wanted along the entire Gulf coast. No relief, no
help, no food, no shelter – and still they have failed to act in the
majority of cases. Where is that investigation, now that the next
hurricane season is almost upon us? ‘Brownie’ quit, but no one was
fired – and nothing has changed except that now FEMA has proven to be
completely incompetent, along with our Jewish run Homeland Security –
that too is apparently worthless – the largest agency in the federal
government composed of 22 separate agencies, that had to cost hundreds
of billions, and already it’s completely worthless – brilliant strategy
– again!

Police departments around this country have taken on the look of
Marines in combat – security personnel of every flavor use every
opportunity to insult and interrogate the people they are supposed to
be protecting – the same people that are also paying for their gruff
existence. Look at all the secret and illegal acts the White House and
the Department of Defense committed both on and after 911. The PATRIOT
acts are blatantly illegal, and were written well before 2001, by those
who created this deadly and criminal charade. The public never
questioned this. Why hasn’t the entire national intelligence
bureaucracy been dismantled and reformed, why haven’t the FBI, the CIA
and the NSA been totally reshuffled? What about the Department of
Defense and all those career generals, admirals and staff in the
Pentagon. We’re losing the wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan, and yet
Bush is keeping the idiots throughout government, those same people
that made failure the order of the day! Of course he hasn’t fired them,
because they're his idiots, they’re his loyal fools, and he can’t do
much if he begins to lose his loyal thugs – and Bush knows that – all
too well!

Now we are told that the president decided to monitor all our calls –
trillions upon trillions of calls in four years of spying on the
public: During all that time how many were arrested or charged for
anything like the kind of security breach that would have involved 300
million people in ‘plotting against their own government’? All of the
above and more was possible, because people bought the idea that 911
was an act of war by foreign forces and NOT a mega-crime against the
people of the USA.

There was an attack alright, but what happened on 911 was home grown
treason designed to capture Americans by using bogus terror tactics to
get us to relinquish all our freedoms, for a type of “safety” that no
person on this planet has any right to expect. The USA has become the
premier rogue nation in the world today, under false pretenses, that
were dipped in innocent blood and the criminally of outrageous lies.
Look at the levels of criminality within the government, the scandals,
the complicity, the lies that underpin the bribery, the insider trading
(on 911 as well as after): the patterns of collusion, cover-ups,
embezzlement, and fraud on a grand scale as well as outright treason.
All of this is written large for all to see – yet still – too few even
notice what has happened.

The government of the United States seems to be following orders from
the State of Israel. Israel demanded that Iraq be defanged and we
obliged! Now Israel wants to crush Iran – and we’re in the process of
doing that, despite the fact that there is no justification for our
interference there. Americans have died for these polices, and even
more will die in Iran – not for American interests but for those
policies of private corporate business interests who want to silence
any opposition to Capitalism at any cost. Iraq and Iran are both
left-over policy failures from the Western power’s decision to insert
the Jews into Palestine at the end of the Second World War.

Peace in Palestine is the key to everything else in the Middle East –
yet almost every compliant act of ours, that continues to favor Israel
in that effort, has only further inflamed the region and the world. Now
there is no dialogue, no hope for a viable settlement, and only more
death and destruction on-tap for the Palestinians. In that illegally
brutal occupation of a conquered and unarmed population, the United
States has managed to undo a hundred years of integrity and leadership,
in order to appease the desires of a State that is not one of ours.
Israel does not adhere to human rights, to UN resolutions, to nuclear
oversight, or indeed to the needs or rights of any other nation but
their own. The US has backed Israel against the world, at a tremendous
cost to US taxpayers, for virtually no return on that investment, and
without any justification whatsoever for continuing to do so. Some say
‘blackmail’ is involved, but that hardly seems credible given all the
degrees of competing interests in the world today. . .

Yet - like some third world puppet-state the USA is going to again
defend the State of Israel, and again jeopardize the peace of the
world, while again sacrificing even more American lives – simply to
appease Israeli Lobbies in Washington and elsewhere? What happened to
American interests – because what is good for Israel is not necessarily
good for the United States! If this president had any balls he would
aid the Palestinians for humanitarian reasons, insist that Israel tear
down that wall, and negotiate an end to the dispute over Palestine by
enforcing a return (with American troops) to the original borders
originally agreed to. If Bush were a true leader, instead of just
another an impatient politician drunk with power - he would prove his
power by assisting the people of Palestine to feed and house
themselves, while demanding that the Jews withdraw from all the illegal
settlements they built on stolen land.

As for the American congressional puppets, those imposters that have
illegally accepted so much money from AIPAC and others – these are
those who parrot the party line on terror and keep the lies in place.
If they really wanted to know about 911, then they need to look no
further than 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue – if as they say – they really
want to know the TRUTH!

kirwan

kirwanstudios@sbcglobal.com

Links below, to clarify this article.

911

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&pl=true

The Corporation

http://informationclearinghouse.info/article12998.htm

In the 1980s there were about 3,000 SWAT team deployments

Annually, across the US -- Now there are at least 40,000 per year.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4803570.stm

The History of Rummy & Cheney

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_R._Ford

Iran

http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/2006/05/839133.shtml

Letter from the President of Iran to President Bush

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12984.htm

----------------------------------

Bill Of Rights
http://BillOfRights.net

----------------------------------

Save The Internet
http://SaveTheInternet.com

----------------------------------

Be Humane For Free
In Three Minutes A Day
http://Humane.net

----------------------------------

Strawberry Fields

Keeping The Spirit Of John Lennon Alive

Through Songs And Interviews Filmed

At Strawberry Fields In NYC Over 5 Years

Including A Photographic Biography

Release Date: Friday, July 6, 2007

(The 50th Anniversary Of John And Paul First Meeting)

http://StrawberryFields.net

----------------------------------

Stop Rearranging Deck Chairs On The Titanic

"The time is now for each and every one of us to

fully understand and recognize that if we do not

radically change our corporate driven consumptive

and destructive way of life, we will go extinct."

Love Is The Answer

Mark R. Elsis

http://MarkElsis.com

----------------------------------

LOVEARTH ® NETWORK

To Subscribe or Unsubscribe from our email list:

Send us an email: CreatingAwareness@Lovearth.net

Please write Subscribe or Unsubscribe in the Subject line

We Publish Hundreds Of Progressive Articles | Links Weekly
We Have Thousands Of Progressive Articles | Links In Our Archive

Connect With Us Through 1000+ Eco-Humane-Political-Spiritual Websites

To Pass On An Equitable, Peaceful, And Sustainable Earth To Future
Generations
http://LoveEarth.net | Our Network List Of 1000+ Websites:
http://Network.Lovearth.net

========================================================================
=================================================================



"Israeli Plans for Ballistic Missile Strike on Iranian Nuclear
Facilities"

http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20060511
-082820-9117r

Nightmare

By Arnaud de Borchgrave THE WASHINGTON TIMES Published May 12, 2006

All indications are that Israel does not plan to rely on either the
U.N. or the
United States. Vice President Dick Cheney said 18 months ago, "The
Israelis may
well decide to act first and let the rest of the world worry about
cleaning up
the diplomatic mess afterwards."

At Israel's National Day reception in Washington last week, an Israeli
official,
speaking privately and not for attribution said he believed Israel
would strike
first in the next "month or two or three" and that fighter bombers
would not be
involved as they were to take out Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor before
it went
critical in 1981. For Osirak, Israel used 14 F-15s and F-16s. This
time, the
Israeli said, it will be missiles. Cruise missiles?, we inquired. No, he
replied, with a gesture of his hand that went up and down again.

What about pinpointing tunnel entrances to widely scattered Iranian
nuclear
facilities? The Israeli responded Israel has its own geo-stationary
spy-in-the-sky satellite taking constant pictures of Iran with a
resolution down
to 70 centimeters: "We know far more than anyone realizes."

Israel has developed some 100 Jericho-II medium-range ballistic
missiles (which
entered service in 1989). Jericho II's range varies from 1,500 to 3,500
kilometers, depending on payload weight. They are deployed in
underground caves
and silos.

Israel has several satellites in orbit -- Ofeq-1 through Ofeq-5 -- that
were
launched by Shavit space launch vehicles (SLV). The first two stages of
the
Shavit were Jericho II missiles. There are unconfirmed reports of an
upgraded
Jericho-3 missile with a range of over 3,000 kilometers.

For world opinion, rightly or wrongly, Israeli action against Iran
could not
take place without a green light from the White House. This wasn't the
case when
Israel vaporized Iraq's Osirak reactor June 7, 1981, at the height of
the
Iran-Iraq War. The Reagan White House said, "The U.S. government
condemns the
Israeli air strike... the unprecedented character of which cannot but
seriously
add to the already tense situation in the area." Most other countries
denounced
Israel. It was the world's first air strike against a nuclear plant.

Ten years later, then-Defense Secretary Cheney gave Israeli Air Force
chief a
satellite picture of the destroyed Osirak reactor inscribed, "For Gen.
David
Ivry, with thanks and appreciation for the outstanding job he did on
the Iraqi
Nuclear Program in 1981, which made our job much easier in Desert
Storm."

Nonproliferation expert Joseph Cirincione reminds us the raid was also
controversial in Israel. Half the Cabinet opposed bombing. The chief of
Israeli
Defense Force intelligence, Yehoshua Saguy, argued Israel should
continue to
seek a nonmilitary solution as it would take Iraq five to 10 years to
produce
the material for a nuclear weapon. Prime Minister Menachem Begin
finally opted
for the worst-case estimate of one-year and gave the order to bomb.

Interestingly enough, the raid did not retard but actually accelerated
Saddam
Hussein's program. Iraqi scientists debriefed since Saddam was
overthrown say he
had planned to slowly divert plutonium from the reactor, which was under
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards. The diversion
plan,
explain the specialists, might have escaped detection but would have
taken even
longer than the 10 years estimated by Mr. Seguy.

Following the Israeli raid, Saddam, now obsessed, launched a secret
underground
program with some 7,000 assigned to produce weapons-grade uranium. Even
the 43
days of U.S. bombing of Iraq in January and February 1991, that
preceded the
liberation of Kuwait, did not destroy Saddam's hardened underground
nuclear
sites. That was achieved after the Gulf war -- by U.N. teams. Since the
mid-1990s, there was nothing left to destroy. But Saddam kept on
equivocating as
he wanted Iran to believe he still had some nukes to discourage his
rival from
settling scores in his moment of weakness.

The strategic deception worked ? in Washington.

This time Iran has clearly signaled a casus belli to Israel. When
President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declares he intends to wipe Israel off the map and
then goes
to sea in a sieve by declaring the Holocaust a fiction, it is hard to
escape the
conclusion he wants Israel to bomb Iran.

A religious fanatic who believes the return of the 12th imam to Earth
will be
preceded by global death and destruction in his own lifetime, Mr.
Ahmadinejad
presumably sees an Israeli and/or U.S. attack against Iran closing
Muslim ranks
the world over against the imperialist infidels.

The State Department's top proliferation official said the
administration is
determined to ensure "not one centrifuge spins in Iran." Israel is
certainly
poised to stop the spinning.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert called Mr. Ahmadinejad a "psychopath
who
speaks like Hitler before taking power." And Israel is not about to
succumb to
the appeasement of the 1930s. Or allow a suddenly conciliatory letter
from Mr.
Ahmadinejad to Mr. Bush to alter Israel's view of mortal peril to its
survival.

Arnaud de Borchgrave is editor at large of The Washington Times and of
United
Press International.

=======================================================================
==================================================================

From: Henri the Celt <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Date: May 15, 2006 3:36:56 PM EST
To: AAAHenri <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Subject: Buying Gas From Citgo

For Monday, May 15, 2006 From: feenyite1@yahoo.com

Buying Gas From Citgo

I've noticed, in letters to the editor, a number of people suggesting
that big oil companies be boycotted. Well, that's pretty hard to do,
since they control so much of the nation's oil business.

But, if you object to your hard-earned dollars enriching the already
rich who control British Petroleum, Exxon Mobil and Royal Dutch Shell,
there is a solution. Buy your gasoline from Citgo.

Citgo is owned by the Venezuelan government, and yes, I know that the
Bush administration has launched a campaign to demonize Venezuelan
President Hugo Chavez. If you believe that band of liars in Washington,
then by all means continue to enrich the rich who put that crowd in
office. Their fortunes and future depend on Americans being saps and
suckers for cheap propaganda.
You have a choice. You can help pay for corporate jets and obscene
bonuses, or you can buy from Citgo and help provide medical care, food,
housing and education for the poor of Venezuela.

Hugo Chavez has never said he hated the United States, much less
threatened it. He is opposed to U.S. foreign policy in Latin America,
and with good reason. He said down with the U.S. "empire." I'm for
that. We should abandon imperialism and return to our republican roots.
The empire and the United States are not the same thing. U.S. foreign
policy has one goal: to make the world safe, comfortable and profitable
for America's largest multinational corporations.

Last winter, Chavez and Citgo made low-cost heating oil available to
Americans in the Northeast. Do you object to that?
He has traded oil to Cuba for doctors and nurses to set up health
clinics for the poor. Do you object to the poor receiving medical care?

He has set up a chain of grocery stores that sell food to the poor at
cost. Do you object to the poor eating?

He has declared war on illiteracy and is providing education for people
who previously had no hope of escaping ignorance. Do you think the poor
should remain barefoot and illiterate?

When the Bush people publicly insult Chavez, he publicly insults them
back. That is how a man should be. It was obscene for the arrogant
Donald Rumsfeld to compare Chavez to Adolf Hitler. There is nothing,
absolutely nothing, in the man's life, words or deeds that remotely
relates to Hitler. Hitler, however, does share one characteristic with
Rumsfeld. Hitler thought he knew better than his generals how to fight
a war, and like Rumsfeld, he was dead wrong.

I've researched Chavez. I've listened to his speeches. Yes, he's
long-winded, but he's much more entertaining than Bill Clinton or Fidel
Castro. I've read profiles by honest foreign journalists who
interviewed his critics and his supporters. I've yet to find anything
he has said, done or proposed to do that any decent American could
object to.

Chavez is not a dictator. He was elected. He survived a coup and he
survived a recall election, both of which you can bet the CIA had a
hand in. He's human. He might fail. But he has shown by his actions and
his words that his intentions are much more decent than George Bush's.
As for his concern about an American invasion, that is not
unreasonable. We invaded Panama and Grenada and Santo Domingo to
dislodge leaders we didn't like, and that's just in my lifetime.
America has a long history of military intervention in Central and
South America.

When did it become a sin for a foreign leader to disagree with an
American president? And when did Americans, free and sovereign citizens
of a republic, decide to surrender their brains to the hired help
temporarily occupying the White House?

So, if you are disgusted by big oil, then you have a choice. Buy Citgo.
That way, you will make not only the big oil companies mad, but George
Bush as well. And don't forget that Citgo has 14,000 American
employees.

© 2006 by King Features Syndicate, Inc.
=======================================================================
================================================

From: Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com>
Date: May 15, 2006 2:24:53 PM EST
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] Taking Aim Special Tues. 5/16 - "From 9/11 to
Creating the Next Pandemic: A System in Terminal Decay"

On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:12:24PM -0700, Ralph Schoenman wrote:

Mya Shone and Ralph Schoenman of Taking Aim will present a Special Fund
Raiser Program on Tuesday, May 16 from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. New York
time
on WBAI.

http://www.wbai.org

The Special is entitled "From 9/11 to Creating the Next Pandemic: A
System
in Terminal Decay".

The Special will offer as a Premium for a contribution of $100 a 3 1/2
hour
DVD of Ralph's standing room only talk at St. Mark's Church in New York
on
April 23, 2006.

Please alert your friends and associates.

Many thanks

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: Tim Barton <tim_decenter@yahoo.com>
Date: May 16, 2006 7:08:10 AM EST
To: _BlueGreenEarth Forum <bluegreenearth@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [bluegreenearth] New figures reveal scale of industry's
impact on climate
Reply-To: bluegreenearth@yahoogroups.com

New figures reveal scale of industry's impact on climate
Five biggest polluters in UK produce more CO2 than all motorists
combined

David Adam and Rob Evans
Tuesday May 16, 2006
The Guardian

Five companies in Britain produce more carbon dioxide pollution
together than all the motorists on
UK roads combined, according to new figures which reveal heavy
industry's contribution to climate
change.

A league table compiled by the Guardian identifies EON UK, the
electricity generator that owns
Powergen, as Britain's biggest corporate emitter of greenhouse gases.
It produced 26.4m tonnes of
carbon dioxide last year - slightly more than Croatia did.

The figures, which have prompted new calls for tighter restrictions on
corporate pollution, show
that efforts by individuals and households to cut their carbon
footprints will make little
difference unless accompanied by greater action by industry. A 1%
increase in the efficiency of
the giant Drax power station in North Yorkshire - the largest in Europe
and the single biggest
polluting site in the UK - would save the typical carbon emissions of
21,000 households. Drax
alone produced 20.8m tonnes of carbon dioxide last year.

The top five companies (EON UK, RWE Npower, Drax, Corus, and EDF)
produced between them more than
100m tonnes of carbon dioxide in 2005. On average, the country's 26m
private cars produce 91m
tonnes each year.

The carbon dioxide emissions of more than 700 industrial sites across
Britain are contained in
figures released yesterday by the European commission. They detail the
UK's participation in the
first phase of a Europe-wide scheme intended to tackle climate change
by capping the amount of
carbon the heaviest polluters can emit. Companies failing to hit a
target - applying to emissions
from onsite activities such as combustion only - must buy permits to
pollute from rivals that have
successfully cut emissions. Critics said the first phase of the trading
scheme has made global
warming worse by giving European companies more permits than needed.

Britain was an exception, however. Its participating companies, which
had lobbied for laxer
targets, produced together more than 242m tonnes of carbon dioxide -
they had permits to emit only
209m.

Germany negotiated to produce 495m tonnes of carbon dioxide, but its
companies emitted only 474m.
France produced 131m tonnes, but had permits for 151m.

A spokeswoman for EON said: "We are one of the leading green generators
and invest more per
customer in green energy than any other major supplier in the UK." A
spokesman for RWE Npower
said: "We're one of the UK's biggest power generators, so of course
we're going to have more
emissions than, say, a single power station somewhere. The test of
'green-ness' is how much you
are changing."

Hundreds of UK companies are excluded from the scheme - because they
are not classed as big
polluters or because they participate in a parallel system run by the
government. Figures from
these firms have been obtained by the Guardian under freedom of
information laws. They show that
dozens of household names produce more than many small countries.

British sites operated by Tesco, Walkers, Ford, Unilever, Kellogg's,
Allied Bakeries, Nestle and
Cadbury Trebor Bassett are among those that emitted more than 100,000
tonnes of CO2 in 2004 - more
than that of Vanuatu, the Pacific state where 100 people became the
first official climate
refugees when they were moved from their coastal village in December.

The full emissions report
Download it from Europa
http://ec.europa.eu/comm/environment/ets/allocationComplianceMgt.do

http://www.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,1775689,00.html

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: Rick Davis <rdavis@yin.or.jp>
Date: May 16, 2006 4:40:40 AM EST
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: Bush Demands That Iran Halt Production of Long Letters

Days after receiving an 18-page letter from Iranian president Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, President George W. Bush called the lengthy missive "an
act of war" and demanded that Iran halt its production of long letters
at once.

Bush Demands That Iran Halt Production of Long Letters

May 13, 2006
By Andy Borowitz (and others)

Days after receiving an 18-page letter from Iranian president Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, President George W. Bush called the lengthy missive "an
act of war" and demanded that Iran halt its production of long letters
at once.

At the White House, aides said that writing a letter of such length to
President Bush, who is known for his extreme distaste for reading, was
the most provocative act Mr. Ahmadinejad could have possibly committed.
They said they were waiting for Israel to tell them how to respond.

"Everyone knows that the last book the president read was 'My Pet
Goat,'" one aide said. "Expecting him to read an 18-page letter is
really asking for it, and that Iranian dude must have known that."

According to those close to Mr. Bush, the president was infuriated upon
receipt of the 18-page letter and asked aides if it was some kind of
joke.

The president then demanded that the letter be boiled down to a one- or
two-page format, or possibly adapted to a DVD version, just as he had
ordered for news reports on Hurricane Katrina.

In Tehran, President Ahmadinejad said he was "taken aback" by Mr.
Bush's refusal to read an 18-page letter, but said that all his future
communications to the U.S. president would be in short, easy-to-read
instant-messaging format.

In his first IM to President Bush, released to the press today,
President Ahmadinejad writes, "Am building nukes. R U angry? LOL."

Elsewhere, Air Force Gen. Michael V. Hayden vowed today that as
director of the CIA he would push the agency to find more and better
sources of false intelligence and would be flying to Tel Aviv at once.

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: "S Miles Lewis" <yahoolists@elfis.net>
Date: May 16, 2006 11:43:28 AM EST
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] Judicial Watch to Obtain September 11
Pentagon Video at 1 p.m. Today

Judicial Watch to Obtain September 11 Pentagon Video at 1 p.m. Today
For Immediate Release / May 16, 2006 Contact: Press Office / 202-646-
5188
[img]http://images.google.com/images?
q=tbn:czyNFQ8IvbRPlM:investigate911.bravehost.com/3.JPG[/img]
Department of Defense Responds to Judicial Watch Freedom of
Information Act Request and Related Lawsuit

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that
investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today
that Department of Defense will release a videotape to Judicial Watch
at 1:00 p.m. this afternoon that allegedly shows American Airlines
Flight 77 striking the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. The
Department of Defense is releasing the videotape in response to a
Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act request and related
lawsuit.

"This is in response to your December 14, 2004 Freedom of Information
Act Request, FOIA appeal of March 27, 2005, and complaint filed in
the United States District Court for the District of Columbia," wrote
William Kammer, Chief of the Department of Defense, Office of Freedom
of Information. "Now that the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui is over,
we are able to complete your request and provide the video…"

Judicial Watch originally filed a Freedom of Information Act request
on December 15, 2004, seeking all records pertaining to September 11,
2001 camera recordings of the Pentagon attack from the Sheraton
National Hotel, the Nexcomm/Citgo gas station, Pentagon security
cameras and the Virginia Department of Transportation. The
Department of Defense admitted in a January 26, 2005 letter that it
possessed a videotape responsive to Judicial Watch's request.
However, the Pentagon refused to release the videotape because it
was, "part of an ongoing investigation involving Zacarias
Moussaoui." Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit on February 22, 2006
arguing that there was "no legal basis" for the Defense Department's
refusal to release the tape.

"We fought hard to obtain this video because we felt that it was very
important to complete the public record with respect to the terrorist
attacks of September 11," said Judicial Watch President Tom
Fitton. "Finally, we hope that this video will put to rest the
conspiracy theories involving American Airlines Flight 77. As
always, our prayers remain with all those who suffered as a result of
those murderous attacks."

A copy of the video will be made available on Judicial Watch's
Internet site, www.judicialwatch.org.

Judicial Watch is a non-partisan, educational foundation organized
under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue code. Judicial Watch
is dedicated to fighting government and judicial corruption and
promoting a return to ethics and morality in our nation's public life.

<http://www.judicialwatch.org/5772.shtml>

---------------------------------------------

From: "reggie501" <reggie501@optonline.net>
Date: May 16, 2006 11:06:51 AM EST
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] Gov't will release photos of Pentagon hit...

"Succumbing to pressures from prosecutors" - they're going to release
the photos. Huh? Why suppress the photos for all these years and NOW
release them? DUH>

They've had nearly five years to come up with their own
films....fabricated and digitalized and whatever it takes to create
another lie..... (assuming it corroborates their version of events).

Should be fun time ahead.

http://TvNewsLIES.org

========================================================================
=================================================================
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 9
From: "APFN" apfn@apfn.org
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 11:06am(PDT)
Subject: Re: 9/11...NEW PHOTO'S FLIGHT 77

Judicial Watch
RE: 9/11...NEW
PHOTO'S FLIGHT 77
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=101194;title=APFN

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 10
From: "S Miles Lewis" yahoolists@elfis.net
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 11:48am(PDT)
Subject: Videos of United Flight 77 striking the Pentagon on September 11, 20

Videos of United Flight 77 striking the Pentagon on September 11, 2001

Video 1 <rtsp://media.dtic.mil/defenselink/pubs/foi/fl77-
1_11094135.mpg>
Video 2 <rtsp://media.dtic.mil/defenselink/pubs/foi/fl77-
2_11094237.mpg>

<http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/foi/index.html>

I have not yet been able to get these to download. Apparently there is
only 1 new frame revealing a plane's "nose cone".

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 11
From: "APFN" apfn@apfn.org
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 0:02pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: FLIGHT 77

Richard Lozano
Flight 77
Tue May 16, 2006 15:52
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Flight 77
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:59:28 -0500
From: Richard Lozano rlozano@lozanolaw.com
To: apfn@apfn.org
You're about to look like a real dumbass even to your tinfoil hat
cronies.
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495;article=101199
==========
We are Not saying, that was was NO plane, Flight 77 that crashed
into the Pentagon.
We are saying, Where IS Flight 77, at the CRASH SITE?
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flight77.htm
=================================
RE:
9/11...NEW PHOTO'S FLIGHT 77 Judicial
Watch, Tue May 16 14:43
Judicial
Watch page here (mirrored) brad,
Tue May 16 15:06
Flight
77 Richard Lozano, Tue May 16 15:52
################

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 12
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 0:41pm(PDT)
Subject: Fw: Pentagon clips: they led us on with the fake five pictures of M

From: Dick Eastman
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 11:47 AM
Subject: Pentagon clips: they led us on with the fake five pictures of March 2002, knowing anti-gov activism would build around them.

they led us on with the fake five released pictures of March 2002, knowing anti-gov activism would build around it -- which could later be knocked down -- but is the wrecking ball itself genuine? (I don't know yet.)

I have not yet seen the clips -- but this is how I feel about it.

Many people warned me that the five pictures released March 2002 were a set up -- false information to ensure that the anti-Administration sentiment would be built on a false pillar that could then be knocked down at any time -- like today.

But as I say -- I haven't seen the clips yet to match them against what we know about the wall damage , the lampposts. the witness accounts, and the five pictures of March 2002. I assume that they are more credible than the bin Laden interviews.

Note: I see that the media is making out like we the citizen investigators did not want the videos released -- this is of course exactly the opposite of the truth. We did not enjoy working on information limited by the government.

Dick Eastman

Yakima, Washington

=============================

From: Dick Eastman
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 10:23 AM
Subject: Fw: Pentagon releases one security cam recording of 9-11 crashbombing of the Pentagon

WorldNetDaily
Pentagon to release film
of Sept. 11 plane attack
Videotape not made public before shows flight plowing into building

May 16, 2006
11:39 a.m. Eastern

© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

In response to a Freedom of Information lawsuit, the Pentagon indicated it would release a videotape today of American Flight 77 slamming into the famed office building on Sept. 11, 2001.

Government watchdog Judicial Watch filed suit against the Defense Department in February, hoping to force the Pentagon to release the video to shed light on various conspiracy theories about what happened there on 9-11. Theories have been put forth alleging a government drone or missile hit the Pentagon rather than a hijacked airliner.

According to Judicial Watch, the legal group originally filed a Freedom of Information Act request Dec. 15, 2004, seeking all records pertaining to camera recordings from the Sheraton National Hotel, the Nexcomm/Citgo gas station, Pentagon security cameras and the Virginia Department of Transportation. The Department of Defense admitted in a Jan. 26, 2005, letter that it possessed a videotape responsive to Judicial Watch's request. However, the Pentagon advised that the video is exempt from release because it is "part of an ongoing investigation involving Zacarias Moussaoui."

Judicial Watch noted in March that the Moussaoui investigation was complete and that the terrorist pleaded guilty in April 2005. This month, Moussaoui was sentenced to life in prison for his part in the 9-11 terror attacks.

William Kammer, chief of the Department of Defense, Office of Freedom of Information wrote to Judicial Watch: "Now that the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui is over, we are able to complete your request and provide the video. …"

"We fought hard to obtain this video because we felt that it was very important to complete the public record with respect to the terrorist attacks of September 11," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "Finally, we hope that this video will put to rest the conspiracy theories involving American Airlines Flight 77. As always, our prayers remain with all those who suffered as a result of those murderous attacks."

WND columnist Jack Cashill recently rebutted the idea that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon:

"As to why the government had to launch a missile into the Pentagon a half hour after destroying the World Trade Center, there can be no sane answer. In his absurdly influential book 'The Big Lie,' French author Thierry Meyssan argues that a satellite-guided missile struck the Pentagon, not American Flight 77 as all real evidence suggests. 'This attack,' he writes, 'could only be committed by United States military personnel against other U.S. military personnel.' Sure, OK Thierry, whatever."

The video reportedly will be released at 1 p.m. Eastern time.

/ / /

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 13
From: "APFN" apfn@apfn.org
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 0:52pm(PDT)
Subject: [Fwd: Flight 77] YES I SAW A BIG F**KING ASS BOEING JET HIT IT! --

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/336 - Release Date: 5/10/2006

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 14
From: "JP Liggett" JP@JPLiggett.com
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 1:23pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: FLIGHT 77

its interesting to watch how CNN and specifically Janie mcintyre (from his
embedded office in the pentagon) try to dance around this so-called
footage. Some of the statements I heard him make were "I was there on
9/11/01, and I saw and took pictures of thousands of shards of plane
wreckage", "This footage is not that clear, and probably won't satisfy the
conspiracy theorists, but its almost a minute long" and "proves once and
for all, its common sense, that flight 77 definitely crashed into the
pentagon"

Did you see the sweat, the signs of desperation? The nervous look in his
eyes?

The new video does not prove anything to me.

All the other evidence is overwhelming.

Lets keep up the pressure people. When they squirm, we can identify them.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 15
From: "Judy Cunningham" drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 1:40pm(PDT)
Subject: Released pictures contradict 911 Commission report that admits there

The newly released photos contradict the 9/11 Commmission Report that admits that there was no debris, and states that the 767 incinerated in the air when it hit, entirely. The fire burst in the picture is not big enough to enclose a 767, also. judy

Dick Eastman <olfriend@nwinfo.net> wrote: From: Dick Eastman
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 11:47 AM
Subject: Pentagon clips: they led us on with the fake five pictures of March 2002, knowing anti-gov activism would build around them.

they led us on with the fake five released pictures of March 2002, knowing anti-gov activism would build around it -- which could later be knocked down -- but is the wrecking ball itself genuine? (I don't know yet.)

I have not yet seen the clips -- but this is how I feel about it.
Many people warned me that the five pictures released March 2002 were a set up -- false information to ensure that the anti-Administration sentiment would be built on a false pillar that could then be knocked down at any time -- like today.

But as I say -- I haven't seen the clips yet to match them against what we know about the wall damage , the lampposts. the witness accounts, and the five pictures of March 2002. I assume that they are more credible than the bin Laden interviews.

Note: I see that the media is making out like we the citizen investigators did not want the videos released -- this is of course exactly the opposite of the truth. We did not enjoy working on information limited by the government.

Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
=============================
From: Dick Eastman
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 10:23 AM
Subject: Fw: Pentagon releases one security cam recording of 9-11 crashbombing of the Pentagon


WorldNetDaily
Pentagon to release film
of Sept. 11 plane attack
Videotape not made public before shows flight plowing into building


May 16, 2006
11:39 a.m. Eastern


© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com In response to a Freedom of Information lawsuit, the Pentagon indicated it would release a videotape today of American Flight 77 slamming into the famed office building on Sept. 11, 2001. Government watchdog Judicial Watch filed suit against the Defense Department in February, hoping to force the Pentagon to release the video to shed light on various conspiracy theories about what happened there on 9-11. Theories have been put forth alleging a government drone or missile hit the Pentagon rather than a hijacked airliner.
According to Judicial Watch, the legal group originally filed a Freedom of Information Act request Dec. 15, 2004, seeking all records pertaining to camera recordings from the Sheraton National Hotel, the Nexcomm/Citgo gas station, Pentagon security cameras and the Virginia Department of Transportation. The Department of Defense admitted in a Jan. 26, 2005, letter that it possessed a videotape responsive to Judicial Watch's request. However, the Pentagon advised that the video is exempt from release because it is "part of an ongoing investigation involving Zacarias Moussaoui." Judicial Watch noted in March that the Moussaoui investigation was complete and that the terrorist pleaded guilty in April 2005. This month, Moussaoui was sentenced to life in prison for his part in the 9-11 terror attacks. William Kammer, chief of the Department of Defense, Office of Freedom of Information wrote to Judicial Watch: "Now that the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui is over, we are able to
complete your request and provide the video. …" "We fought hard to obtain this video because we felt that it was very important to complete the public record with respect to the terrorist attacks of September 11," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "Finally, we hope that this video will put to rest the conspiracy theories involving American Airlines Flight 77. As always, our prayers remain with all those who suffered as a result of those murderous attacks." WND columnist Jack Cashill recently rebutted the idea that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon: "As to why the government had to launch a missile into the Pentagon a half hour after destroying the World Trade Center, there can be no sane answer. In his absurdly influential book 'The Big Lie,' French author Thierry Meyssan argues that a satellite-guided missile struck the Pentagon, not American Flight 77 as all real evidence suggests. 'This attack,' he writes, 'could only be committed by United States
military personnel against other U.S. military personnel.' Sure, OK Thierry, whatever." The video reportedly will be released at 1 p.m. Eastern time.





/ / /

SPONSORED LINKS
United state flag Trademark united state United state military United state patent United state grant United state citizenship

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 16
From: "Judy Cunningham" drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 1:49pm(PDT)
Subject: Wall St big wig, inadvertently states that Cheney owns Haliburton.

ON the Jay Leno show, Jim Cramer, Wall St. big wig analyst, inadvertently stated that Cheney owns Haliburton. Leno asked what stocks, looked good, and Cramer replied, " Well, Hal, Haliburton, Cheney's company, is always great."

Judy Cunningham <drjudyforjustice@yahoo.com> wrote: The newly released photos contradict the 9/11 Commmission Report that admits that there was no debris, and states that the 767 incinerated in the air when it hit, entirely. The fire burst in the picture is not big enough to enclose a 767, also. judy

Dick Eastman <olfriend@nwinfo.net> wrote: From: Dick Eastman
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 11:47 AM
Subject: Pentagon clips: they led us on with the fake five pictures of March 2002, knowing anti-gov activism would build around them.

they led us on with the fake five released pictures of March 2002, knowing anti-gov activism would build around it -- which could later be knocked down -- but is the wrecking ball itself genuine? (I don't know yet.)

I have not yet seen the clips -- but this is how I feel about it.
Many people warned me that the five pictures released March 2002 were a set up -- false information to ensure that the anti-Administration sentiment would be built on a false pillar that could then be knocked down at any time -- like today.

But as I say -- I haven't seen the clips yet to match them against what we know about the wall damage , the lampposts. the witness accounts, and the five pictures of March 2002. I assume that they are more credible than the bin Laden interviews.

Note: I see that the media is making out like we the citizen investigators did not want the videos released -- this is of course exactly the opposite of the truth. We did not enjoy working on information limited by the government.

Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
=============================
From: Dick Eastman
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 10:23 AM
Subject: Fw: Pentagon releases one security cam recording of 9-11 crashbombing of the Pentagon


WorldNetDaily
Pentagon to release film
of Sept. 11 plane attack
Videotape not made public before shows flight plowing into building


May 16, 2006
11:39 a.m. Eastern


© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com In response to a Freedom of Information lawsuit, the Pentagon indicated it would release a videotape today of American Flight 77 slamming into the famed office building on Sept. 11, 2001. Government watchdog Judicial Watch filed suit against the Defense Department in February, hoping to force the Pentagon to release the video to shed light on various conspiracy theories about what happened there on 9-11. Theories have been put forth alleging a government drone or missile hit the Pentagon rather than a hijacked airliner.
According to Judicial Watch, the legal group originally filed a Freedom of Information Act request Dec. 15, 2004, seeking all records pertaining to camera recordings from the Sheraton National Hotel, the Nexcomm/Citgo gas station, Pentagon security cameras and the Virginia Department of Transportation. The Department of Defense admitted in a Jan. 26, 2005, letter that it possessed a videotape responsive to Judicial Watch's request. However, the Pentagon advised that the video is exempt from release because it is "part of an ongoing investigation involving Zacarias Moussaoui." Judicial Watch noted in March that the Moussaoui investigation was complete and that the terrorist pleaded guilty in April 2005. This month, Moussaoui was sentenced to life in prison for his part in the 9-11 terror attacks. William Kammer, chief of the Department of Defense, Office of Freedom of Information wrote to Judicial Watch: "Now that the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui is over, we are able to
complete your request and provide the video. …" "We fought hard to obtain this video because we felt that it was very important to complete the public record with respect to the terrorist attacks of September 11," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "Finally, we hope that this video will put to rest the conspiracy theories involving American Airlines Flight 77. As always, our prayers remain with all those who suffered as a result of those murderous attacks." WND columnist Jack Cashill recently rebutted the idea that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon: "As to why the government had to launch a missile into the Pentagon a half hour after destroying the World Trade Center, there can be no sane answer. In his absurdly influential book 'The Big Lie,' French author Thierry Meyssan argues that a satellite-guided missile struck the Pentagon, not American Flight 77 as all real evidence suggests. 'This attack,' he writes, 'could only be committed by United States
military personnel against other U.S. military personnel.' Sure, OK Thierry, whatever." The video reportedly will be released at 1 p.m. Eastern time.





/ / /


---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 17
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 1:55pm(PDT)
Subject: Who has seen this new DoD 9-11 videotape? Someone describe it put i

Let's have someone's first impressions. Please.

Is there some URL where you can actually see these pics? (Judicial Watch is unavailable.)

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 18
From: "S Miles Lewis" yahoolists@elfis.net
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 2:08pm(PDT)
Subject: New Pentagon "Footage"

Internet traffic from the 'New Pentagon "Footage"' seems to be causing
Judicial Watch / 911 Truth Action / PrisonPlanet (and other sites) to
be loading slowly or not at all.

In other words, to put it as a bad pun:

"Judicial Watch has 'crashed and burned' over this supposed new
footate."

sMilos

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 19
From: "S Miles Lewis" yahoolists@elfis.net
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 2:12pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Who has seen this new DoD 9-11 videotape? Someone describe it p

I have yet to see any actual "footage" ... just two frames that are
nearly identical to the previously released 5 frames:

<http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/160506giantpsyop.htm>

<http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/may2006/160506_mystery_pentagon.jpg>
<http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/may2006/160506_plane77_contrast_adj.
jpg>

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@...>
wrote:
>
> Let's have someone's first impressions. Please.
>
> Is there some URL where you can actually see these pics? (Judicial
Watch is unavailable.)
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 20
From: "yahoolists@elfis.net" yahoolists@elfis.net
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 2:13pm(PDT)
Subject: Video: 9/11 Pentagon crash video

*Please note, the sender's email address has not been verified.

This is from CNN's front page.


********************

If you are having trouble with any of the links in this message, or if the URL's are not appearing as links, please follow the instructions at the bottom of this email.

Title: Video: 9/11 Pentagon crash video


Copy and paste the following into your Web browser to access the sent link:
http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=794974511&pt=Y

Copy and paste the following into your Web browser to SAVE THIS link:
http://www.savethis.clickability.com/st/saveThisPopupApp?clickMap=saveFromET&partnerID=89487&etMailToID=794974511&pt=Y


Copy and paste the following into your Web browser to forward this link:
http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=forward&etMailToID=794974511&partnerID=89487&pt=Y



********************

Email pages from any Web site you visit - add the EMAIL THIS button to your browser, copy and paste the following into your Web browser:
http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=browserButtons&pt=Y"

*********************

Instructions:
-----------------------------------------
If your e-mail program doesn't recognize Web addresses:
1. With your mouse, highlight the Web Address above. Be sure to highlight the entire Web address, even if it spans more than one line in your email.
2. Select Copy from the Edit menu at the top of your screen.
3. Launch your Web browser.
4. Paste the address into your Web browser by selecting Paste from the Edit menu.
5. Click Go or press Enter or Return on your keyboard.

********************



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 21
From: "botalerts" botalerts@yahoo.ca
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 2:19pm(PDT)
Subject: Pentagon Video - Alex Jones says be Careful!

Alex Jones has now decided that this is probably a trap:

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/160506giantpsyop.htm

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 22
From: "Debi Clark" debiclark@sbcglobal.net
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 2:31pm(PDT)
Subject: Pentagon Strike Video on DOD site



http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/foi/index.html#911video
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 23
From: "Debi Clark" debiclark@sbcglobal.net
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 2:42pm(PDT)
Subject: Judicail Watch Web Site up & running...


http://www.judicialwatch.org/flight77.shtml
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 24
From: "goat!" goat@moag.2y.net
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 2:43pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Pentagon Video - Alex Jones says be Careful!

botalerts wrote:
> Alex Jones has now decided that this is probably a trap:
>
> http://prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/160506giantpsyop.htm

While I agree the pentagon may be a trap (or more likely a way
to cause devision) I think he may have jumped the gun again,
not that it happens very often.
--
Goat (Generalist of all Trades)!

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 25
From: "advokris@aol.com" advokris@aol.com
Date: Tue May 16, 2006 2:46pm(PDT)
Subject: Freedom of the Press Under Attack: Government Begins Tracking Phone

( advokris@aol.com )
sent you this story from democracynow.org

Police State is Here.

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Freedom of the Press Under Attack: Government Begins Tracking Phone Calls of Journalists
| http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/16/145201
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

ABC News reported on Monday that a senior federal law enforcement had revealed that the government is now tracking phone calls made by journalists from the New York Times, Washington Post and ABC News. We speak with Brian Ross, chief investigative reporter at ABC News. [includes rush transcript]
This story continues at:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/16/145201

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

No comments: