Tuesday, April 04, 2006

[imra] Daily digest - Volume: 2 Issue: 1363 (2 messages)

imra Tue Apr 4 00:22:42 2006 Volume 2 : Issue 1363

In this issue of the imra daily Digest:

Palestinian Suicide Bombers as Victimizers and Victims
Acting PM Olmert Receives Bank of Israel 2005
Annual Report From BOI Governor Prof. Stanley Fischer

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: imra@netvision.net.il
To: imra@imra.org.il
Subject: Palestinian Suicide Bombers as Victimizers and Victims

March 29, 2006

"Ordinary People" and "Death Work":
Palestinian Suicide Bombers as Victimizers and Victims 1

Anat Berko, PhD
International Policy Institute for Counterterrorism
Hertzliya , Israel
Edna Erez, LLB, PhD
Kent State University
Kent , OH
www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_multimedia/English/eng_n/html/psb_0406.htm

Applying criminological/victimological concepts and theories, the study
addresses the social processes involved in Palestinians' suicide terrorism
and describes Palestinians' pathways to suicide bombing. The data are
derived from in-depth interviews of 7 male and female Palestinians serving
prison sentences in Israel for attempted suicide bombing. The social
background, context, and experiences of the interviewees, including their
recruitment, interactions with the organizations that produce suicide
bombing, the tangible and intangible incentives and rewards that motivated
them to become suicide bombers, their preparation for the mission, and the
strategies employed by the organizations to sustain recruits' resolve to
conform to the plan are described and analyzed. The implications of the
findings for theory and public policy are drawn and discussed.

The "war on terrorism" [i] declared by President G.W. Bush, in the wake of
the September 11, 2001 events, has led to new laws, security regulations,
and the restructuring of government. The 19 Islamic hijackers who took their
own lives in order to kill and terrorize have left the Western world
apprehensive and bewildered. The idea that some communities would rejoice
over suicide, death and destruction has been particularly baffling.

Contentious debates about the political, social or cultural milieu that
produces candidates for suicide, the role of religious/cultural convictions
in their recruitment and willingness to die, and the conditions wherein the
ideology of martyrdom flourishes, have since engaged politicians, academics,
military personnel and public policy makers. As a unique and "extreme" form
of terrorism, suicide in the service of national causes or religious
convictions has aroused the public's fascination.
The U.S. was first victimized by suicide bombing in Lebanon in 1983, when a
suicide bomber blew himself up in the U.S. Embassy in Beirut , killing 63
people, including 17 Americans. Six months later another suicide attack
killed 241 American servicemen who were stationed at Beirut International
Airport to help keep the peace. [ii] In the context of the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, suicide terrorism has occurred for over a
decade. [iii] The phenomenon has been accompanied by a fierce debate over
definitions of suicide bombers (see Ganor, 2001; 2002), or their
presentation in the media or other forms of communication [iv] .
Palestinians and their supporters have praised suicide bombers as freedom
fighters, portraying their action as the ultimate altruism in advancing
one's religious or national interests. [v] Israelis and their allies have
referred to the act as barbaric terrorism and to its perpetrators as
cold-blooded murderers (Erez, 2005). [vi] In both camps, mystification of
the phenomenon grew, as speculations about perpetrators and their motives
flourished.

The phenomenon also initiated scholarly explorations into the roots,
organization and structure of suicide bombing. The recent
involvement of Palestinian women in suicide bombing [vii] (Beyler, 2003;
2004) has been particularly intriguing. Although women have been previously
involved in terrorism, generally, prevailing notions through history and
across cultures that women should be sheltered from participation in war
activities, and near-total exclusion of women from combat forces, have
worked against women participating in war-related activities (Goldstein,
2001). Furthermore, Islamic tradition- to which Palestinian women involved
in suicide bombing typically belong - explicitly relegate females to the
private sphere, and restricts their participation in the public domain. By
and large, national movements striving for independence (e.g. Yuval-Davis,
1997), and Palestinian leaders in particular, [viii] have emphasized the
domestic aspects of women's contribution to national causes, limiting it to
bearing and raising children and caring for the family, the basic unit of
the nation.

It is generally believed that it is difficult to study the phenomenon of
suicide bombing. Locating and interviewing those engaged in it is an
intricate process. Suicide bombers who succeeded in their mission obviously
cannot be interviewed. Some claim that terrorists in general, and those
engaged in suicide bombing in particular, for security reasons would not
grant interviews to researchers. [ix] Many do not expect state officials to
approve interviewing imprisoned suicide bombers candidates, who are kept in
the highest-security prisons. Others would question the veracity of
imprisoned suicide bombers, suspecting that their responses may be colored
by underlying political agendas, or reluctance to disclose information for
fear of further penalties (Sageman, 2004).

For these reasons, there is not much knowledge about the inner world of
suicide bombers and the circumstances that have led them to commit suicide;
so far, little research has been published on the experiences of male and
female suicide bombers who embarked on a mission. [x] Also, extant studies
have not applied criminological/victimological concepts and theories to
explain the phenomenon and highlight the nexus of criminality and
victimization in suicide bombers' lives. [xi] The arrest and imprisonment of
Palestinian male and female suicide bombers who failed, [xii] changed their
mind, or whose missions were thwarted, and who agreed to be interviewed,
provided a rare opportunity to gain insights into the suicide bombers'
experiences. In this article, we employ criminological/victimological
concepts and theories to explain pathways to suicide bombing and demonstrate
that theories that explain criminal behavior in general are also fruitful in
accounting for suicide bombing.

We analyze in-depth interviews of seven male and female Palestinian suicide
bombers to explore and identify themes that emerge in the data. Although the
sample is not representative of the population of suicide bombers, nor do
the pathways identified exhaust the possibilities of becoming a suicide
bomber, their stories provide valuable insights into their world. The
participants' own words and detailed life histories shed light on suicide
bombing "careers" from the perpetrators' own perspectives, providing answers
to some of the questions that occupied academic and practitioners alike.

The narratives of the interviewees demonstrate how suicide bombing, like any
other social behavior, reflects and reproduces underlying social structures,
institutions and prevailing value systems. The data underline the mundane
reasons for which individuals come to engage in suicide bombing, at times
employing it as a response to a personal problem that could have been
addressed in a less lethal fashion, had such an option been available or
encouraged. The narratives portray suicide bombers as "ordinary men" (and
women) (Browning, 1992), [xiii] whose actions would not have ignited the
public fascination had their own planned demise not been the expected
outcome.

This study sheds light on the social context of suicide bombing and its
production, and how men and women get involved and reach a point of "no
return" (Merari, 2004). The findings also challenge prevailing beliefs about
becoming suicide bombers, including views of perpetrators as invariably
willing participants. The narratives show that, as with other agencies
engaged in "death work" (Johnson, 1990), there is a need for a reinforcement
of the idea that suicide should be executed with "honor," if not actual
cajoling and coaxing of candidates.

The article begins with a brief background on the use of suicide in Islamic
societies, to which the study population belonged. It
then describes the social background of the men and women who were convicted
for attempting to commit suicide bombing, and the way they became involved
in suicide terrorism. We analyze their narratives, the subjective meaning of
suicide bombing and its social functions, placing them in their political,
social and cultural/religious context. Lastly, we offer suggestions for
theory and conclude with public policy recommendations.

BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW

Islam provides that involvement in Jihad (striving), or "holy war" grants
the reward of heaven to Muslims willing to sacrifice themselves in the
course of defending religion. [xiv] Orthodox Muslims endorse the idea that
the devout believer, who has a task of serving God, can accomplish the
service during one's life or through death (see for instance Ajami, 2001;
Israeli, 1997, on 'Islamikaza'). Death in the service of God is considered
holy or martyrdom (' i stishhad' ) rather than suicidal (' intihar' ) [xv] ;
it is a product of unwavering faith that leads the individual towards
self-mortification (Forman, 1988; Strenski, 2003). [xvi] Although there is a
dispute about whether Islam condones or calls for suicide in the service of
God (e.g. Hafez, 2004), in the Palestinian-Israeli context, both secular and
religious militant organizations have invoked Islamic texts and symbols on
martyrdom and jihad to motivate individuals, and to justify their recruiting
and dispatching suicide bombers (Hafez, 2004; Hassan; 2003; Israeli, 2002).

Becoming a suicide bomber is a social process; it involves socialization,
and it is subject to rules and exhibits patterns. The opportunity to engage
in it is likewise socially determined. Research has shown that suicide
bombing requires three major elements: motivated individuals, access to
organizations whose objective is to produce suicide bombing, and a community
that extols perpetrators as heroes and embraces their acts as a noble form
of resistance (Hafez, 2004; Merari, 2004; Oliver & Steinberg, 2005).

Studies addressing motivation to commit suicide have focused on the
psychology of perpetrators, inquiring whether suicide bombers exhibit
measures of psychopathology or are abnormal (e.g., Hassan; 2003; Merari,
2004; Silke, 2003). A recent review of the genesis of suicide terrorism
demonstrates, however, that ".contemporary suicide terrorists from the
Middle East .have no appreciable psychopathology and are as educated and
well-off as surrounding populations." (Atran, 2003). Most observers agree
that suicide bombers are rational individuals or "rational fanatics"
(Sprintzak, 2000), whose resort to suicide is based on reason or a result of
specific cost benefit-analysis (Hafez, 2004; Shiqaqi, 2002; Stern, 2003).
Motivations to engage in suicide bombing include national and/or religious
ideologies, and collective/altruistic and individual/fatalistic reasons
(Pedhazur, 2003; Perliger, & Weinberg, 2003; Weinberg, Pedahuzur, &
Cannetti-Nisim, 2003), although motivation is not always accompanied by
ability to perpetrate violence, on individual or organizational levels
(Ganor, 2005). Some observers have identified three major types of suicide
bombers: those who act out of religious convictions, those who have the need
to retaliate or avenge the death of a family member or loved ones by the
enemy (in this case Israel), and those who are exploited by organization,
being led to agree to perpetrate an attack for minor economic rewards or
promises for the afterlife (Kimhi & Even, 2004).

Research has also addressed the role of religious convictions or culturally
based motivation to propel suicide bombing (Argo, 2004; Hafez, 2004; Oliver
& Steinberg, 2005). Frustrations from political conditions have also been
listed as motives, referring to suicide as oppositional terrorism (Crenshaw,
2002), a measure employed to exact revenge, retaliate for group humiliation,
or restore national honor (El Sarraj, 2002a, 2002b; Rosenberger, 2003).

The role of social groups -- family, peer, ethnic, religious or national --
in shaping perpetrators' social identities, and in
internalizing collective memory of injustice, defeat or dishonor has been
noted. (Argo, 2004; Bloom, 2004, 2005; Oliver & Steinberg, 2005). Some have
suggested that resultant feelings of hopelessness, despair, shame, or
humiliation "makes living no better than dying" (El Sarraj, 2002a, 2002b;
Shalhoub-Kevorkian, 2003; Stern, 2003), particularly in the Arab culture,
which places much weight on "honor." Others have argued that suicide bombing
is not an act of desperation but of struggle (Merari, 2004), as content
analysis of the farewell messages recruits videotape prior to the mission
suggests (Hafez, 2004). Suicide bombing has been explained as a means to
achieve self-empowerment, redemption and honor for individuals who
experience powerlessness, downfall and humiliation (Hassan R., 2003;
Juergensmeyer, 2000). Others have called attention to the suicide as a
guaranteed access to worldly pleasures forbidden in this life, and a hope
for an attractive afterlife (Berko, 2002, 2004; Stern, 2003; Victor, 2003).

Exposure to and contact with facilitating organizations is critical in
becoming suicide bombers (Argo, 2004; Bloom, 2004, 2005; Merari, 2004). The
organizations that produce suicide bombing provide a complete framework:
wherewithal, finances, equipment, contacts and support personnel throughout
the journey. These resources comprise the infrastructure without which
successful missions cannot be executed. Familiarity with prospective
targets, area residents' routines, and security personnel schedules are also
important, as is access to and information about desirable targets [xvii]
including the propitious time to execute a mission. Selecting candidates
that can blend in the surrounding environment, that have language skills to
communicate with local people, exhibit confidence, wear appropriate cloths
and other amenities that provide them a Western look so as not to attract
suspicion, is also the organization's responsibility (Hassan, 2004). Without
the support network, organization and infrastructure, an individual cannot
become a suicide bomber (Merari, 2004; Moghadam, 2003). [xviii]
Interviews of recruiters/dispatchers (Berko, 2002, 2004) confirm that the
production of suicide bombing entails multiple tasks and requires a variety
of skills. The recruiter identifies potential candidates, and prepares them
for the mission. In some cases he [xix] needs to encourage candidates to
become martyrs or persuade them that the mission is important and rewards in
this and next worlds are forthcoming. Recruiters often help suicide bombers
overcome fear, and address any barriers that prevent them from carrying out
their mission. The dispatcher ascertains that recruits conform to the plan,
and that they do not have second thoughts or change of mind. Providing
candidates with the equipment, contacts, facilitating rituals associated
with the mission (for instance, producing a video of the "last famous words"
recited by the individual about to become shahid [xx] ) and driving the
prospective suicide bomber to a target, are also necessary tasks.

Recruiting and launching suicide bombers is thus a process that requires
multitasking, flexibility and adaptability. Understanding human nature, in
particular spotting weaknesses, identifying vulnerabilities, and maneuvering
social failings, emotional difficulties or personal dilemmas are all
indispensable skills in producing suicide bombing. [xxi]

The symbolic value of suicide in the service of religion or nation, and the
honor bestowed on the suicide bomber and his family
is also critical in the production of suicide bombing (Post, Sprinzak, &
Denny, 2003). Both secular and religiously based terrorist organizations
have invoked religion when launching suicide bombing (Hafez, 2004; Hassan,
2003; Israeli, 2002). Perpetrators who were dispatched through both types of
organizations referred to one's religiously based obligation to be involved
in the struggle and listed the Garden of Eden as a reward for the suicide
mission (Berko, 2004).

Executing suicide bombing is generally a military decision. A political
leader has to authorize it, the organization implements it, and a
sympathetic public embraces and rejoices the outcome. Attacks are considered
military operations, often presented as defensive actions (Juergenmeyer,
2000). Suicide bombing, employing humans as missiles or "smart bombs" is
arguably a desirable war tactic. It overcomes asymmetrical power, helping
weaker groups to equalize power differentials with strong enemies that
possess sophisticated weapons and cannot be harmed through conventional
warfare (Crenshaw, 2002). Suicide attacks are useful in this regard as they
result in high level of physical and psychological damage (Pape, 2005).
Furthermore, they are successful in reaching targets and are hard to deter.
They are also affordable or inexpensive, and do not require escape routes or
expose perpetrators to investigation. Lastly, they attract media attention,
providing the organization behind it status and acclaim (Ganor, 2002;
Hoffman & McCormick, 2004).

The review suggests that individual motivation (internally or externally
induced) to self sacrifice combined with access to or support of an
organization are necessary conditions in suicide bombing. These two elements
and the ways in which they join in the lives of the suicide bombers we
interviewed is the subject matter of this article.

METHODOLOGY AND DATA COLLECTION

Seven Palestinian security prisoners who served time for attempting suicide
bombing and who agreed to participate were interviewed for the study. [xxii]
Between June 2003 and February 2005 individual in-depth interviews were
conducted with two men and five women suicide bombers who served their
sentences in Israeli prisons. In-depth interviewing is a preferred approach
in qualitative research because it enables investigators to document, in
interviewees' own terms, their experiences, and issues or problems that
concern them (Rubin & Rubin, 1995). The interviews took place in the prisons
in which the participants were housed. [xxiii] The sample consisted of
suicide bombers who were caught (N=5), failed [xxiv] (1) or changed their
mind (1) prior to completing their mission. Dependent on the interviewee's
preference, the interviews were conducted either in Arabic, Hebrew, English,
or a mixture of these languages. Each subject was interviewed in at least
two sessions [xxv] separated by a period of a few days to 2 weeks, and each
session lasted between 4 to 5 hours. The interview consisted of open-ended
questions addressing the interviewee's childhood and growing up, landmark
events and significant others in their lives, relationships with family and
community members, and their wishes and aspirations during various stages in
their lives. In all cases, in the second or third interviewing session the
participants volunteered to describe in detail the circumstances that led
them to become suicide bombers or their reasons for participating in suicide
bombing, how they were recruited and deployed, how they felt about the
suicide plan, and their views, beliefs and expectations regarding their
mission.
Some of the participants were initially suspicious about being interviewed,
wanting to ascertain that it was not an attempt by the Israeli authorities
to interrogate them or acquire additional information on them, their mission
or contacts. Once they felt confident that the interview involved academic
research, and as they realized that the questions focused on their private
lives, social experiences and personal views, their hesitation to talk
dissipated and they opened up. [xxvi] Their stories provided insights into
their world-their life experiences, beliefs and dreams, and the
circumstances that landed them in prison.
The data resulting from the interviews were analyzed through coding
techniques described by Glaser (1992). As we read each transcript, we
searched for and identified patterns and variations in participants'
responses and we reached a set of conceptual categories or propositions. The
analysis proceeded by applying the logic of analytic induction, which
entails the search for "negative cases" that challenge the analyst to
progressively refine empirically based conditional statements (Katz, 1983) .
We revised our propositions in encountering each negative case until we
saturated the data, making the patterns identified and the propositions
offered consistent throughout the data. Once no new conceptual categories
could be added, or propositions had to be reformulated, it was assumed that
saturation has been reached.

FINDINGS

Sample Description

The participants were Muslim Palestinians who resided in cities, villages or
refugee camps in the Palestinian territories of the West Bank or Gaza .
Their age ranged between 16 and 28 years old, and all came from large
families (the average number of children in the family was ten). During most
of the interviewing sessions, all the participants except for one were
dressed in traditional Muslim dark garments. [xxvii]

The educational level of the sample extended from third grade to second year
of university studies. The women had higher educational level than the men.
At the time of their arrest, two of the interviewees were in high school,
two were university students, and the rest worked in skilled or unskilled
labor or in providing services. None of the participants were married at the
time of their arrest. One man was married (and had one child) but got
divorced prior to his involvement in suicide bombing; his wife's family
pressured him to divorce her due to marital problems.

Social Background of the Suicide Bombers

The interviewees grew up in families where the mother was a homemaker and
the father was the breadwinner. The economic situation of the interviewees
mirrored that of the rest of the Palestinian society, and in some cases was
comparatively better than the norm. The families owned a home, and there was
a steady income from a shop, from the father's employment in some
Palestinian agency or from unskilled labor.

Most of the interviewees described relatively normative family life, with a
dedicated loving mother and strict disciplinary regimen exercised by the
father. In two cases the father married a second wife, and both wives bore
children. The individuals whose father married a second wife younger than
their mother discussed some of the problems related to the second marriage.
It created tension between the two families, and generated conflict and
competition between the wives and their respective offspring for the
father's attention and family resources. The two interviewees whose father
married a second wife empathized with their mother and shared her feelings
of rejection and humiliation. They consequently felt distant from the father
experiencing ambivalence toward him.

Two of the women lost their fathers in early childhood, one died in a
traffic accident and the other from serious illness. In one case the mother,
who lived with her child in a neighboring Arab country, decided to remarry
and the daughter had to move to the Palestinian territories where the
father's family lived. [xxviii] This woman, as the child of another man,
could not live with the mother and her new husband, whom the interviewee
referred to as "a strange man that my mother favored over me." She moved to
her paternal grandmother and her unmarried aunts who raised her from the age
of 10.

The interviewees described the father as the only authority in the
household, whom they treated with respect and fear. The father was often
perceived as distant, one who could not be approached easily. Sometime to
reach him, the children had to go through the mother. All participants
described their mothers as "a warm and simple woman" who dedicated her life
to the family. The interviewees expressed deep love and affection for their
mother, whom they always wanted to please. One of the women who decided to
become a martyr ( shahida) noted that hurting her mother by committing
suicide was the most difficult thing for her to bear. One man commented that
it was extremely difficult for him to go to the court, see his mother there
and not be able to communicate with her. Another man responded to a question
about what would have made him stop from perpetrating his suicide mission,
"only my mother."

The participants' social identity as Palestinians who are dispossessed,
oppressed and humiliated was a recurrent theme in discussing their lives.
Whether they resided in cities, villages or refugee camps in the West Bank
or Gaza strip, they were raised in Palestinian homes, which continuously
exposed them to their version of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and its
history. Growing up they heard their parents' stories about houses that were
left behind, or about land that was lost when Israel was established and the
Independence War (1948) erupted. [xxix] The anger was exacerbated and the
hatred deepened during the Israeli military control of the Palestinian
territories following the Six Days War in 1967. [xxx] As one of the men
said:
For me, a Jew is not a problem. But he sits in my country, doing things that
are not acceptable. I grew up with it.

These issues were also topics of discussion in school, social activities,
cultural events and religious gatherings. The private stories, coupled with
indoctrination in mosques or over the media, and reinforced through
condemnations by Palestinian public figures, led to the interviewees'
forming hostility and resentment toward Israeli Jews from an early age.

The one participant who had personal experiences with Israeli Jews through
working in Israel explained that he did not have anything personal against
Jews [xxxi] but the determination to engage in the struggle revolved around
the feelings of loss of land and/or the occupation. [xxxii] The rest of the
participants talked about the fact that they never had any contact with
Israeli Jews prior to their imprisonment. One woman commented,

Before I came to this prison I thought that all Israelis are soldiers
shouting and yelling at Palestinians in checkpoints. Meeting here other
(Israeli) prisoners and staff, I see we have a lot in common; we have the
same life problems.

Those who had had direct or indirect contact with Israelis (or the West)
prior to imprisonment talked about cultural, social and behavioral
differences between Arabs and Jews or Westerners in general. The
participants took much pride in the closeness, warmth and loyalty of the
Arab nuclear and extended family, the friendly relationship with neighbors
and the collective efforts of their community in helping its members. They
particularly elaborated on gender differences between Arabs and Israelis,
and the barriers that Arab culture poses for interactions between Arab men
and women. Quite often the interviewees restated the fact that they live in
Arab society or are part of a culture that dictates various restrictions,
and monitors gender-appropriate behavior. They mentioned that they cannot
date or socialize unless the contact is for engagement or marriage purposes,
is approved by the family and under its supervision. [xxxiii] As the next
section suggests, the social background of the interviewees and the cultural
gender scripts that Arab society provides for men and women were reflected
in the paths the participants took in becoming suicide bombers.

Decision to Become a Martyr (Shahid)

Of the seven interviewees, four initiated contact with an organization that
produces suicide bombing; the other three were approached by activists
looking to recruit candidates. The motivation that led the ones who
initiated the contact to volunteer varied. One of the male interviewees was
a veteran of terrorism who has engaged in the past in a range of activities
ranging from stone throwing to shooting and other subversive acts. Following
problems he had with his wife's family, whom he was forced to divorce, he
decided to volunteer to become a martyr. He was well connected with a
fundamentalist Muslim organization known to produce suicide bombing and he
offered himself as a martyr (shahid) . He suggested blowing himself up in a
bus of Israelis in Jerusalem , where he used to work. His offer was accepted
and he went on this mission but the explosives failed to detonate.

One woman explained that she decided to become a shahida in order to get
back at her father, who did not allow her to marry the man of her choice.
She described how one day on the street she saw a man, whose body was
deformed, getting off a taxi. She stated: "we looked at each other's eyes
and we fell in love with each other. I was 25 years old and it was my last
chance to get married." [xxxiv] Because the man's family was unable to meet
her father's dowry demands, they could not get married. The woman was very
angry with her father that he would not compromise about the amount of money
he wanted and she decided to volunteer, "to take revenge of my father." She
then went to a town near her village, where she happened to meet a military
activist. [xxxv] She told this activist that she wanted to be a suicide
bomber, and he started to roll the operation. She went on to explain,

My life was useless, my life had no use to anyone. there are many people who
want to do that, to be shahid s and no one could prevent them from doing it.

She described what she thought was awaiting her if she was to become a
martyr ( shahida) :

The shahida is one of the 72 virgins. [xxxvi] Life in the Garden of Eden is
more than life in this reality. We do not live real life. We are just
by-passers. The real life is in the Garden of Eden. Everything is there.
Everything! All what we think about is in the Garden of Eden. There is food,
excellent cooked food.This is what was said in the (Quran's) chapter of The
Cow ( Surah Al-Baqarah ) 'do not refer to those who are killed for Allah as
dead because they are alive.'

A young woman from a refugee camp, a high school student at the time of her
arrest relayed how she and her girlfriend who was a classmate were preparing
homework assignments at her home. They both were bored and felt that "there
was nothing to do" and looked for some excitement. Living in a militant town
that produced dozens of suicide bombers, they felt they "wanted to do
something" and decided that they would volunteer to become shahidas . This
young woman contacted a man in the camp who was involved in military
endeavors. She described the interactions that followed:

At first, he (the military activist) refused my request to become a shahida
, and he said 'you are a minor and you should go to school'. Later he
offered me another type of military work, not suicide bombing. But I did not
give up. I told him I want to be a shahida .

She described how she went to a girls' school, and enjoyed studying there.
But the idea of volunteering to be a shahida was something that she and her
girlfriend got excited about and it became their shared secret. After few
more appeals to the military activist, the man agreed to send her on a
suicide mission, and they started to plan the attack. She was caught in her
home just a few days before the mission was scheduled to take place.

One of the participants was a university student at the time of her arrest.
When she was a young child, she stated, one of her brothers, whom she
referred to as a shahid , was killed by the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) as a
result of his involvement in terrorism, and three of her brothers were in
Israeli jails for similar activities. She described how during her
university years she was exposed to religious material and was engaged in
bringing women back to religious lifestyle. As part of the experience of
becoming a reborn Muslim, she visited families of shahids and eventually
decided to become a shahida to avenge the death of Palestinians. She
explained her reasons and the way she had to conceal the decision from her
mother:

I wanted to become a shahida for revenge of the Jews, my religion and the
love of the Garden of Eden. It was my own decision.If I were to tell someone
that I was going to be a shahida they would prevent me (from doing it). Thus
I preferred to keep it to myself.

This woman contacted a military activist whom she knew was involved in
dispatching suicide bombers and her preparation for the mission began
shortly thereafter.

The interviewees who did not initiate the contact with the recruiting
organization relayed the circumstances that led to their involvement in
suicide bombing. One woman explained that she wanted "to get out the house"
so she decided to pursue military training. A girlfriend, who knew activists
through her own experience with training, made the contact with the
organization. The interviewee went on to explain:

There are women who come and offer themselves. I did not volunteer. I did
not want to die. I just wanted to get trained with weapon. ... I had a
friend who introduced me to the guys ( shabab ). They told me to sign a
document that I have willingly chosen to train, so that no one says that
they (the guys) forced me to do it. I do not know if they also make men sign
such a document.

Before allowing her to get trained, the organization wanted to verify her
social background and motivation to be involved:
The guys would ask what made me work with them.they wanted to know if there
was something in the home or whether I was forced to get married.they did
not want someone who has something social but someone who is regular.
[xxxvii]

Once she passed the initial screening her training began:

Three months before the mission I started to get trained.when I asked them
to get trained they offered me an explosive belt and things like that.I said
I only came for training, I do not want to die.

To include women in operations, which require contact with men, and for
women to be able to avoid the watching eyes of the family as they venture
out, cover up is always necessary. One woman explained:

We do not live in the West. When I went to training, I told my father that I
was going to a girlfriend. My father did not prevent me from going to
girlfriends. I had freedom, even though our family is religious. It is
natural to go and see girlfriends. They did not ask too many questions.

The woman explained how she managed to avoid suspicion, overcoming the
community restrictions of social interaction between men and women:

.Thus for three months I went to training. I would go in a car that
collected me in the refugee camp.There was always a woman in the car so that
I will not be with a guy alone.

In addition to having a woman accompany another woman to the training sites,
the organization also took measures to protect its own operations:

There were times when they will cover my eyes until we came to the training
place of the Al Aksa Brigades (a militant Palestinian organization). I was
not alone; there were other women who got trained.

The woman, who merely wanted the excitement and adventures of secret contact
with men, soon realized that she got herself in a difficult situation. She
explained:

..I did not think it was going to be like that. I did not think I will die
and I did not want to die. They (the recruiters and dispatchers) planned
that I will be a suicide bomber. I did not ask for that. They offered me the
explosive belt and other things. But I did not agree. At first they did not
force me. But things developed and the situation got to where it got. I was
a spoiled child and did not plan to die. ... The dispatcher told me that I
would be going on a suicide mission 'istishhad' (self-sacrifice) on Monday.
He said to me, 'Get yourself ready, and be prepared'. I was very surprised
that he was ordering me to be a 'shahida' (a female martyr). I hadn't
planned to die in this way. At first I thought he was joking, but now, he
wasn't joking. He said - 'you prepared, you practiced, you know us, you're
active in the organization and you have to do this.
In a panic, she tried to get out of this situation, explaining why she is
not suitable for the task:

I told him that I had only come for the training, not to go on a suicide
mission like this. then we argued. I told him that I don't practice all the
religious rules like traditional dress and covered hair, nor do I observe
prayer times; sometimes I do pray and sometimes I don't. then I told him
that someone who wants to be a ' shahida' has to observe the rules of dress
and prayer. I added that I watch television and listen to songs, things that
observant Muslims don't do, and that I hadn't planned to undertake such an
operation and become a ' shahida' . If I had, I would have been more
religious.

Her demands and requests to get out of this entanglement, however, fell on
deaf ears:

I reached the point where, without realizing it, I found myself yelling at
him. 'I thought this was a prank', I said, but my girlfriend said it was for
real. I asked the man to call the whole thing off, to forget the association
between us, that I would forget them and they would forget me. They refused
and told me - 'You know everything about us, and we're not sure what will
happen when you leave this room, perhaps you will make a mistake and tell on
us.' I swore on the Quran that I would not reveal anything. They said -
'We're an 'organization', not regular people, and that (oath) doesn't work
with us.' They feared for me and for themselves, that I might reveal their
identity and training site.

In explaining his decision to become a suicide bomber, one of the male
interviewees, a high school student, described being at a friend's home with
some friends. In the presence of other youth, a classmate named Hassan
approached him, offering him 100 shekels (about $22) and asking, in the
presence of his friends, whether he wanted to become a shahid. The
interviewee replied, "Why not?" He noted that the classmate who recruited
him, and according to the interviewee received much more money for it than
he did, admitted that he himself was scared to do it. The interviewee then
added "I'm more of a man than Hassan, so I will do it." He then explained
some of the other reasons for agreeing :

Shahids' are for God, I wanted to kill many Jews and take revenge. I would
have sold my parents and the whole world for the Garden of Eden.

In responding to why he needed the 100 shekels he received for agreeing to
be a suicide bomber, the interviewee stated that if he were to feel hunger
on his way to the suicidal mission, he could go to a restaurant and eat. He
also said that he used the money to buy a cooking pot for his mother. He
then went on to explain:

All that is forbidden in this world is permitted in the Garden of Eden. The
Garden of Eden has everything - God, freedom, the Prophet Mohammed and my
friends, the 'shahids'. There are 72 virgins. There are lots of things I
can't even describe. I'll find everything in the Garden of Eden, a river of
honey, a river of beer and alcohol.

A young woman described a combination of reasons and life events that led
her to agree to become a suicide bomber. She was fond of a young man who was
killed by the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) while being involved in terrorist
activities. In a social gathering she was approached by an activist who knew
about her affection for the young deceased man. This activist asked her
whether she wanted to avenge his death. She thought about the idea and
eventually decided to accept the offer, as she believed she would meet the
deceased man in heaven. At the time she started wearing traditional Muslim
clothes. Her uncle, who was concerned about some of the changes he noticed
in her behavior and appearance, inquired about what had transpired. She
responded, allaying his worries:

Do not worry about me. People who commit suicide do not think about their
own families, only about themselves and their lives. I am not going to do it
as I care about you.

Her family believed her and did not approach her any more about this issue.
Two days after the activist approached her, she began to prepare for the
mission.

Most of the interviewees reported feeling spiritually uplifted when they
decided to become shahids. One man expressed it as "I felt like a groom."
Another interviewee described it as "the happiest day of my life." One of
the women described how she felt once she arrived at her decision to be a
martyr:

It took me a long time to make this decision. It was wonderful to say
good-bye to life, I felt I was in the clouds from the moment I knew I was
going to be a shahida.

Preparing for the Suicide Bombing and on the Way to the Target

The interviewees described the last days before their scheduled departure
for the mission as days of reflection and self-imposed isolation. They were
withdrawn, avoided any conversation with household members, and would not
divulge to concerned parents, siblings or relatives what was on their mind.
They did not share their plan with anyone, and made up various excuses for
their withdrawal or unusual behavior. They also avoided questions about
their well-being or provided elusive answers to such inquiries.

The interviewees explained that they did not want to hurt their loved ones
by revealing to them their imminent suicide. One woman who was supposed to
participate in a double suicide mission described her feelings about the
young person who was to be her partner in the mission:

They prepared us separately. We met just two hours before the mission. I did
not know the youngster before. When I saw him, he looked much younger than
his age, just like a child. I could not stop thinking about his young age,
that he had no time as yet to live, and that he may not understand what he
is doing to himself and his family.

The female interviewees had also to conceal the suicide plan for additional
reasons. As one of the women explained:
I was scared to go and tell my father, to ask for help, because then he
would know that I had been to military training with the guys, without
permission.

This woman went on to describe what transpired in the days before the
mission:

I began counting the days till my death, because they forced me to. I hate
death. I love life. I was very spoiled.When they
told me that I was to go on the 'mission,' I cried so much, I almost
fainted, everything looked black. I begged the 'adult' who was in charge of
the military trainees, to release me from it. He told me 'Halas ya-binti'
(enough, my daughter). I repeated my claim that I am not religious, that I
don't pray, and he replied, 'when you die, you will be closer to God. God
will forgive you and allow you into the Garden of Eden, in spite of not
praying.' That was that. He refused to release me.

Most of the interviewees went to the mission from their homes. On the day of
the mission or at some point near the scheduled day [xxxviii] a
representative of the organization picked them up. They were taken to an
apartment, which contained a decorated room, where they were videotaped
reciting what they described as their farewell, their commitment to follow
through with their mission and their final will. [xxxix] The will often was
a letter to the family containing requests such as pay a debt the person
making the will owes or rejoice his or her becoming a shahid .

One of the interviewees described how on the morning scheduled for the
mission he got up and kissed his sleeping mother's hand, recited prayers and
went on his way. In an apartment in his Palestinian town, the interviewee
was videotaped with the Quran, two rifles, hand grenades and a green
bandanna marked with Quranic quotations. During the interview, this man
relayed this experience with enthusiasm and demonstrated with much pride the
courageous posture he assumed for the videotaping.

After the videotaping the interviewees received the equipment necessary for
the suicide mission. In some cases the explosive belt was placed on their
body while they traveled to the target. An organization member, who was
familiar with the area and knew how to reach the target, escorted the
interviewees to the designated site, bypassing checkpoints and other
security measures. [xl]

The interviewees described their feelings and conduct on the way to the
target. They spoke of "robotic behavior" and of being emotionally detached.
They focused on the mission, tried not to be distracted by any thoughts or
concerns related to their family or friends. One participant explained
during the interview how he felt during the ride to the target:

When I sit with you and want to drink water, I think of how I will get the
water and get it and drink. But if I want to blow myself up, I don't think
about anything.

During the travel to the target, some of the interviewees reported being
told by those who escorted them how the community cherishes their actions,
and how they will bring honor to themselves and their families. Several
interviewees noted that they were asked to think only about the operation
and were continuously encouraged to execute the mission, being reminded of
the rewards that await them and their families following their death. In
other cases, the interviewees reported carrying mundane conversations with
the people in the car to get their mind off their imminent suicide; in other
cases they discussed various details related to the mission.

The interviewees who failed or were caught prior to executing the mission
reported that they were deeply disappointed. They described their feelings
after the mission was thwarted as being down, disillusioned or depressed.
They regretted missing the opportunity to perpetrate the act and receive the
attractive afterlife rewards they anticipated. Many lamented that they have
to be in prison instead. As one of the women said "I never thought that I
would end up in prison."

The woman who reached the target with the explosive belt on her body but
changed her mind before detonating it explained her reasons for changing her
mind:

I thought about many things that time. I saw a woman with a little boy in
the carriage, I thought, why do I have to do it to this woman and her boy.
The boy was cute and I thought about my nephews. I looked up to heaven and I
thought about God. Something from inside told me-No, you should not do
that.I thought about the people that love me and the innocent people in the
street who did not do any crime. It was a difficult moment, and I had to
make a decision. I did not want to die. I did not think in a deep way... I
even thought I may go to hell. I decided to change my mind as I thought I
would not get out of this hell as I may kill innocent (Israeli) people, and
cause the death of regular people who just happen to walk in the street. I
know that God prohibits this kind of action.

Following her change of heart, she wanted to return home. Her decision to
withdraw at the last minute and not to follow through with the mission was
not favorably received by the organization:

I called those who sent me to come and take me back. In the meantime, there
was a suicide bombing (perpetrated by the young man who was driven with her
to the target for the planned double suicide mission). There was a lot of
mess. They (the dispatchers) hung up the phone on me. They told me that a
lot of people are waiting for me to blow myself up, so I better do it. I
cried and begged them to come and take me back to my village. I was in the
middle of an Israeli city, and the youngster that came with me already blew
himself up. I did not know what to do. So I called them three times, until
they finally picked me up. The one who dispatched me said, 'perhaps God
chose this for you, to live, and perhaps it is better than death.' I went
back home and experienced depression. After one week I was arrested.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Suicide bombing is a discrete act executed by pushing a button. Yet, the
data presented, although based on a small sample and thus should be
interpreted with caution, portray suicide bombing as a social process
amenable to criminological/victimlogical analyses. The recruit's background
and social context, including associations (e.g. Sutherland & Cressy, 1960),
motivation (e.g. Agnew, 1992), membership in subcultures that endorse
violent responses to perceived social problems or indignation (e.g. Wolfgang
& Ferracuti, 1982) and available opportunity structures (e.g., Cloward &
Ohlin, 1960; Merton, 1938) -- all play a role in individuals embarking on a
suicide bombing "career." [xli]

In many cases the process begins with a motivated individual approaching an
organization's representative about his or her interest in becoming a shahid
. In others, a person identified as a potential candidate -- someone who can
be persuaded to commit an attack -- comes to the attention of an
organization that produces suicide bombing. Recruitment commonly occurs
through one's social network; it often involves friends, classmates, or
neighborhood acquaintances.

Individual motivation to become suicide bombers varies; it ranges from
ideological persuasion, through desire to avenge the death of a loved one or
fellow Palestinians, to enhancement of one's social status or augmenting
one's prospects of a gratifying afterlife. But whether the decision to
commit suicide bombing emanates from an ideology of struggle, despair or
hope for better life of afterlife, it is often triggered by mundane reasons,
such as proving one's manhood, retaliation at an uncompromising father,
search for excitement or ways to relieve boredom.

In some cases, individuals who are identified as vulnerable, or disenchanted
with their personal lives or family situation, are swayed to become shahids,
thereby ending their difficulties. Cajoling and persuading hesitant
candidates with what awaits them if they comply, or enumeration of the
rewards they and their families will receive, ascertain that recruits do not
change their mind, or deviate from the plan.

Once a decision to volunteer is made, finding an organization that will
implement one's wish to become a shahid is straightforward (see also Berko,
Wolf & Addad, 2005). In most areas where candidates reside, information on
who is involved in military operations is common knowledge. Easy access to
suicide-facilitating organizations, beliefs in impending rewards for
martyrs, together with ever-present communal exaltation of shahids , create
an environment which produces a steady supply of candidates, emboldens
hesitant recruits and persuades initially reluctant individuals to join the
suicide industry.

The contact with the organization embarks the recruit on a journey, which in
the normal course of events cannot be aborted. The contact itself becomes a
"non-sharable problem" (Cressey, 1973), which leads to the recruit's
isolation and withdrawal from family and relatives, whom the candidate does
not want to upset. [xlii] This isolation, in turn, makes the recruit more
susceptible to the organization's pressures to follow through, as he or she
is further distanced from the only persons who can stop this journey -
father, siblings, other significant others, and above all the mother.

Preparation for suicide bombing can extend over several weeks or even months
but may also be as short as a few days or several hours. [xliii] In making a
suicide bomber, the organization that recruits and trains candidates employs
various strategies to maintain the recruit's interest: its strengthens his
or her resolve to go forward with the mission, as it alleviates any fear or
anxiety that may arise. The candidate receives constant reminders of the
reasons for which one has volunteered or has been recruited. The contact and
interaction with the organization leads recruits to a point of "no return."
For men, it is often associated with the wish not to lose face and "to be a
man." For the female recruit, the association with male organizations
tarnishes her reputation, blocking her return to her family. In a culture
that restricts social interaction between the sexes, it seals her fate as "a
loose woman," [xliv] making the alternative -- death as a shahida -- more
appealing, if not worthwhile (see also Victor, 2003).

The findings demonstrate that for Palestinian men and women recruits, the
path to martyrdom through suicide is, by and large, a one-way street. Social
structures, value systems, and the collective memory of a group combine to
produce a steady supply of motivated candidates, exert pressures on hesitant
candidates and persuade reluctant recruits to go forward with the act. In
designing ways to curb suicide bombing, policy makers should consider the
social, cultural and religious contexts that create "push and pull" forces
and attempt to address or ameliorate them in order to bring about change.
[xlv]

Special attention should be paid to identifying and supporting those who
have the capability and power to inhibit motivation to commit suicide, or
dissuade recruits from following through with their mission. The data
indicate that family members, particularly mothers, can detect in their
offspring or relatives behavioral precursors to suicide, such as changes in
routines, unusual or out of character conduct, sudden absences, withdrawal,
or increased religiosity. Although it has been argued that mothers of
shahids are powerless in Palestinian society (Shalhoub-Kevorkian, 2003), in
suicide bombing cases, mothers or other close relatives may hold the key to
detecting suicide plans as well as the power to dissuade their loved ones
from carrying them out. Concerned parents or relatives need to report
behavioral changes to authorities. [xlvi] Officials, in turn, should take
such reports seriously and investigate them promptly and thoroughly.
Authorities should also facilitate open communication with parents or other
concerned family members, making them willing to report suspicions or appeal
for help.

The Palestinians pathways to suicide bombing, as discerned in the data,
highlight a well-established criminological/victimological fact -- the
overlap between crime and victimization, between being a criminal and being
a victim. [xlvii] Since the onset of the second intifada (uprising) in
September 2000, suicide bombers have been responsible for the killing of the
largest numbers of Israelis. Israelis have defined suicide bombers as
heinous criminals and barbaric murderers; Palestinians view them as heroes
and martyrs. Examination of the narratives presented in this article,
however, reveals that Palestinian suicide bombers are as much victims as
they are victimizers. Recognition of this overlap may help in bringing both
sides of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict closer together, constituting a
step forward in reviving the peace process.

NOTES

[1] The article was first published in Violence and Victims , Volume 20,
Number 6, December 2005.
[i] For analysis of the metaphor of war as it is applied to terrorism and
crime see Steinhert, 2003).
[ii] This incident resulted in the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Lebanon .
[iii] Suicide bombing in Israel occurred since the early 1990s. The first
wave occurred between 1993 and 1996. The number of suicide bombing increased
dramatically with the onset of the second Intifada (uprising) that started
in September 2000. From September 2000 to September 2005 there were 144
completed suicide bombings. Altogether during this time period there were
35,927 terrorist attacks, including suicide bombings, knife attacks,
shootings, bombings, being run over with cars, lynchings, car bombs, mortar
bombs, rocket attacks, stone throwing, and home intrusions. Although suicide
bombings comprise only 0.5% of all terrorist attacks, they have caused about
50% of the fatalities and injuries in Israel (as of February 2005 there have
been over1100 people who were killed in terrorist attacks).
[iv] Suicide bombing has been a topic of heated discussion following two
recent representations of suicide bombers -- the photograph found in Gaza of
a baby wearing an explosive belt, and the object displayed in an museum in
Stockholm, showing a picture of a female suicide bomber who killed dozens of
Israelis, including whole families and numerous children, in a pool of
blood.
[v] The exaltation of suicide bombers as freedom fighter is expressed by the
Palestinian national poet, Mahamud Darwish, who states in one of his famous
poems "The shahid (martyr) teaches me: there is no beauty except for
freedom" On the general claim that suicide bombers are freedom fighters see
also Sageman, 2004.
[vi] Palestinians and their supporters claim that the occupation and
political oppression of the Palestinian people by the Israelis has been the
reason behind young Palestinians volunteering to commit suicide, embracing
it as a noble form of resistance or martyrdom (i stishahad). Israelis and
their supporters emphasize the barbarian nature of suicide bombing,
perpetrated for the sole purpose of killing and maiming as ma ny Jews (or
Westerns) as possible (Erez, 2005). They highlight the distorted and morally
corrupt society that encourages its youngsters to become martyrs (
shahids ). Palestinian mothers that were shown on TV to rejoice their
children's death as martyrs were criticized for being uncaring or
"unnatural" mothers, although research has challenged the notion that
Palestinian mothers want their children to become martyrs. Recent studies
have documented how Palestinian male leadership and authorities compel
mothers to deny their grief in the media. Women have been prevented from
seeing the bodies of their children or were drugged before the funeral, and
generally were prevented and prohibited from demonstrating in public their
loss and trauma resulting from the death of a child (Berko, 2004;
Shalhoub-Kevorkian, 2003; Victor, 2003).
[vii] Palestinian women have been involved in acts of protest for a long
time. They were active in the first intifada (uprising), which took place
around 1987 , and they were also involved in the second intifiada that began
in September 2000. The first case of female suicide bomber operating against
Israeli military forces in Lebanon was Loula Abboud, a 19-year-old secular
Christian Lebanese girl, who commanded a small leftist resistance cell in
southern Lebanon against the Israeli invaders. The first case of a female
suicide bomber in Israel occurred in 2002.
[viii] Yassar Arafat, for instance, have often referred to the womb of the
Palestinian woman as "the best weapon of the Palestinian people," praising
the role of women in preserving the family, producing children who become
soldiers that fight Israel , and changing the demographic structure of
Israel . Sheik Ahmad Yasin, the former leader of Hamas (a fundamentalist
Moslem organization operating worldwide), who was assassinated by the IDF in
March 2004 commented, with regard to female suicide bombers, that there were
enough men for the job of exploding; women, he stated, should realize their
special potential to bear children. According to Yassin, women should have
babies and not deal with military matters (see also personal interview with
Yassin in Berko, 2004). However, in January 2002, Arafat had a mass meeting
with Palestinian women and promised full equality between men and women in
Palestine . He called for women to take part in the armed struggle. Arafat
proclaimed that women are not just the "womb of the Nation." Rather, he
stated, women are "my army of roses that will crush Israeli tanks." (see
Kimmerling, 2003; Victor, 2003). In January 2004, Hamas has joined the Fatah
stream of Palestinian resistance in condoning women suicide bombing.
[ix] Hassan N. (2004) provides details about the difficulties she
encountered in getting access to those involved in terrorism in Gaza , and
the secrecy she has to follow in order to meet with her interviewees. See
also Sageman, 2004, Hafez, 2004.
[x] Several researchers have addressed suicide bombing as a social
phenomenon, including Hassan's (2003, 2004) research on Palestinians in the
Palestinian territories who aspired to become suicide bombers; Bloom's
(2005) study on suicide bombers in Sri Lanka, Turkey and the Middle East;
Victor's (2003) study of Palestinian female suicide bombers and Stern's
(2003) study, which examined suicide bombing as part of terrorists' strategy
in a wide range of contexts, from the Middle East and South Asia to the
United States. However, these studies by and large did not analyze in-depth
interviews of suicide bombers who were actually engaged in a suicide
operation, but for various reasons their mission could not be implemented or
failed.
[xi] For an application of criminological/victimological theories to analyze
victimization related to suicide bombing in Israel see Erez, 2005. For a
call to study terrorism from a criminological perspective, see Rosenfeld,
2002.
[xii] In most cases failure is due to equipment malfunction.
[xiii] Sari Nusseibeh, the President of Al Quds University in East Jerusalem
, a peace activist and advocate of nonviolence, when asked about the use of
terrorism by Palestinians has often responded by referred to the
Palestinians as "ordinary people seeking our freedom." (See for instance,
the Radcliffe Quarterly , Winter 2005, Harvard University ; retrieved
September 7, 2005 from www.radcliffe.edu/print/?pid=755&print_parameters = ;
see also The Oberlin Review , April 2005).
[xiv] Other options include an offensive jihad or the world jihad associated
with Bin Laden.
[xv] In a recent suicide bombing in Israel (February 25, 2005), for the
first time, the newly elected leader of the Palestinian people, Mahmoud
Abbas (Abu Maazen), who is a political rather than religious figure, has
referred to the suicide bombing as Istihar (suicide) rather than istishhad
(martyrdom) , sending a signal that the act is no longer condoned by the
Palestinian Authority. It has been argued that such a message from a
religious figure (fatwa) may be critical for sending a message that,
according to Islam, suicide bombing is not martyrdom, thereby preventing
future acts of suicide terrorism.
[xvi] The belief in an attractive afterlife, in the Garden of Eden, has been
listed as a motive by the overwhelming majority of the recruits. The
interviewees stated that the message about the unique type of death
experienced by a martyr was conveyed to them during their recruitment, and
most discussed death as a martyr as a factor in their decision to commit
suicide terrorism.
[xvii] Most often a target consists of a crowded bus or a place where
people, preferably young persons or better yet, soldiers, congregate,
including discotheques, cafes, restaurants, and particularly during special
events or holidays in Israel .
[xviii] This does not mean that suicide bombers belong to a specific
organization, or that a suicide bomber's identity is tied to a particular
organization. Some individuals exhibit mobility between organizations, and
their organizational affiliation or identification changes over time.
[xix] We use the masculine form as no woman has been known to serve as a
dispatcher. As will be discussed later in the article, some women may
recruit other women or facilitate their involvement in terrorism, but they
do not serve as dispatchers. [xx] Shahid (male martyr) or shahida (female
martyr) is generally a person who is killed by, or dies in a struggle
against the enemy, attempting to defend or preserve religious or national
values.
[xxi] Berko (2004) reports that one dispatcher she interviewed described how
in recruiting candidates he was particularly looking for "sad young men,"
approaching them with promises about the Garden of Eden that awaits those
who commit suicide bombing. Another described how he approached individuals
who were suspected for collaborating with Israel , suggesting that a suicide
mission would erase the blemish that they have caused themselves and their
families. In yet other cases, suicide bombing was offered as a way to erase
the shame and "dishonor" that a rumor about suspected female sexual
misbehavior caused the woman's family. Offering to become a shahid and
commit suicide to restore the tarnished family reputation was a strategy
that recruiters used to recruit candidates. In January 2004 the first Hamas
female suicide bomber, a mother of two small children from Gaza who was
suspected for an extra marital affair, was driven by her husband to the
checkpoint where she blew herself up.
[xxii] Men carried out the overwhelming majority of the suicide bombing that
took place in Israel . Women only began to be involved in suicide bombing in
2002. As of May 1, 2005 there were only eight (out of a total of 144)
completed suicide bombing carried out by women; an additional 20 attempts by
female suicide bombers were thwarted. There are currently (March 1, 2005)
about 250 individuals in prison for different degrees of involvement in
suicide bombing. Examination of the narratives of the participants to whom
access was available suggest that the circumstances in which they got
involved in suicide bombing are not unique; they reflect respectively other
male and female suicide bombers' experiences, although they do not exhaust
the universe of such circumstances. Circumstances known to be present among
suicide bombers, for instance, men and women who were required "to
volunteer" because they were suspected of collaboration with the Israelis,
or women who were pressured to perpetrate suicide bombing because they were
suspected for adultery, or there was a rumor to the effect that they had a
premarital relationship with a man, are not present in the current sample.
We thus submit that the stories of the interviewees are representative of
some men's and women's suicide bombing related experiences. We suggest that,
according to their proportion in the population of suicide bombers, the
current study has over-sampled women and under sampled men; thus the data
presented do not exhaust the type of situations that lead individuals to
engage in suicide.
[xxiii] The participants served sentences that ranged from 7 years to life
sentence.
[xxiv] The suicide bomber who failed actually pressed the detonation button
but it malfunctioned.
[xxv] The female interviewees felt a greater need to talk and therefore more
interviewing sessions were conducted with them.
[xxvi] The first author conducted individual interviews with the
participants in a locked room in the prisons that housed the participants.
Huamn Subjects Protection protocols of the Israeli Prison Authorities and
the institution of higher education with which the first author was
affiliated were followed throughout the data collection. The identity of the
interviewer as a daughter of Iraqi Jewish refugees -- one who is familiar
with Arab customs and the Arabic language -- has helped in relieving the
initial anxiety of the participants (see also Hassan, 2004 for the value of
being female with Muslim/Arab background for increasing the willingness of
individuals who have been involved in terrorism to grant interviews and talk
to strangers). At the end of each interview session, the participants told
the interviewer that they looked forward to further interviewing time with
her. They noted that they felt she was a caring person, and that they sensed
her genuine concern for their well-being. In some cases, the participants
were crying during the interviews, falling on the interviewer's shoulder or
tightly holding her hands. The interviewer comforted the participants, and
handed tissues to those who wept during the session. In some cases she held
them until they regained composure and could continue with the interview.
Prison staff was available in case the interviewees required professional
assistance, but such services were not needed . Some of the participants
requested to maintain contact with the interviewer outside prison, when they
be released. The factual portions of the data collected through the
interviews were validated by information in the interviewee's court case
materials and prison files.
[xxvii] The women except for one wore a veil (hijab) and a long dress
(jilbab). Because the interviewing session extended over a period of several
months, three women who at first wore Western clothes changed their attire
and in later interviews wore traditional Muslim garments.
[xxviii] A woman is generally not permitted to bring children from a
previous marriage to the new husband. The children belong to their father's
family. One male interviewee told how he had to run away from the home of
this father's parents to see his mother, whom the father divorced. Also,
female children cannot live in a house with a man who is not their father
(or male sibling).
[xxix] The establishment of the state of Israel in 1948 led to a declaration
of war against it by the surrounding Arab countries. This war resulted in
concentration of Palestinian refugees in Gaza and the West Bank areas. The
study participants came from these areas, although not all were residents of
refugee camps.
[xxx] The Six Day War of 1967 was the result of the collective decision of
neighboring Arab countries to annihilate the state of Israel . Israel , in a
preemptive strike, then took over parts of Jordan (the West Bank) and of
Egypt (the Gaza strip). These areas, which include Palestinian cities,
villages as well as refugee camps established in 1948, are referred to as
the Palestinian territories.
[xxxi] Throughout the interviews the participants referred to Israelis as
Jews.
[xxxii] Generally, the contact that Palestinian men had with Israelis was
mostly through work. Before the September 2000 uprising ( intifada ) and the
resultant closure of the borders Palestinians had permission to enter Israel
for work purposes. Women from the territories generally were not allowed by
their families to travel for work into Israel . For Palestinians and female
Palestinians in particular, there are hardly any opportunities for social
interactions with Israeli Jews.
[xxxiii] Some of the interviewees commented that in a modern society there
are ways to circumscribe these restrictions and communicating through
unconventional means, particularly the Internet, thus managing to escape
their parents' control. Some of the women talked about corresponding with
men from various Arab countries, thereby bypassing the supervising eyes of
the family.
[xxxiv] In Arab society (as in other cultures), where women get married at a
relatively young age, being 25 is considered old.
[xxxv] Most of the interviewees stated that it is common knowledge who are
the people involved in military operations, and who are the ones to be
approached if one wants to engage in terrorism.
[xxxvi] As will be discussed later, the description of the rewards that
awaits the men who reach the Garden of Eden is that they will have all the
pleasures that are prohibited in this world, including 74 virgins that will
serve their pleasure.
[xxxvii] In light of rumors that Palestinian terrorist organizations have
used women who are marginal and possess social blemishes to serve as
shahidas , organizations involved in suicide bombing want to appear
legitimate and respectful in the eyes of the community as well as over the
media. This seems the reason for their attempt to verify whether the woman
is motivated to join because of some problematic situation. In some cases
organizations want to avoid conflict and confrontation with woman's family,
thus inquiring about any problematic background, making the women sign a
document that they volunteered rather than were forced to engage in the
suicide. This document may also protect organization members against
retaliation for taking the woman out of her family, thereby tarnishing her
reputation as a "pure woman," which in turns reflects negatively on her
family's honor.
[xxxviii] The organizations generally tried to complete all the necessary
steps on the day of the mission so that the candidates do not have time to
reflect on their actions or have a change of heart. In some cases, the final
arrangements, such as the videotaping of the will, were conducted a few days
or hours before the scheduled mission.
[xxxix] The parties consider the video recording of the will a
quasi-contract that ascertains that the recruit will follow up with the
mission and will not renege.
[xl] In most cases, suicide bombers are driven by collaborators who have
cars that carry Israeli license plates, or in such cars that were stolen for
that purpose. Having Israeli license plates avoids suspicion and
questioning.
[xli] For a detailed discussion of the application of these theories to
terrorism in Israel see Erez (2005).
[xlii] Parents, however, often sense some changes in their children's
routines or behavioral patterns, or notice that their children exhibit
unusual conduct or withdrawal. The implications of this awareness are
discussed in the conclusion section.
[xliii] The organization often would try to shorten the time between the
recruit's decision to perpetrate suicide bombing and the time of the
execution of the mission to prevent detection by parents, or change of mind
by the recruit. Also, the number of suicide bombing planned may affect the
time dedicated to preparing a suicide bomber as efficiency is important.
[xliv] A woman in such circumstances will most likely be killed by a male
blood relative to preserve "family honor." Having unsupervised contact with
men results in rumors, gossip and imputes looseness that will not be
tolerated the males of the family, as it tarnishes the family reputation.
[xlv] One issue that is not addressed in this article is the pivotal role of
political leadership in cultivating an atmosphere that exalts suicide
bombing and praises its perpetrators. The interviews reported here were
aimed at eliciting personal experiences, views and thinking modes of the
participants. Unless an interviewee brought up these issues, the interviewer
did not explore topics of political considerations or influences. In their
interviews, however, a few participants made references to the honor that
awaits them and their families once they perish, and the role of prevailing
political structures and figures in the becoming suicide bombers.
[xlvi] In the London suicide bombing of July 7, 2005, the parents of one of
the suicide bombers reported to the police the disappearance of their child.
This information eventually helped authorities to resolve the case and
identify it perpetrators.
[xlvii] In the case of suicide bombers, victimization arises due to both
external (or between-group) and internal (within-group) factors, the latter
include cases such as those documented in this study, where organizations
exploit candidates' personal problems, or pressure vulnerable individuals to
commit suicide and become martyrs. For a discussion of the use of victim
status in the contest of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict see Erez (2005).

REFERENCES
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and
delinquency. Criminology 30: 47-87.
Ajami, P. (2001). The Arab predicament . Tel Aviv: Maskel (in Hebrew).
Argo, N. (2004, March). Understanding and defusing human bombs: The
Palestinian case and the pursuit of a martyrdom complex . Paper presented at
the International Studies Association Annual Convention, March, Montreal ,
Quebec .
Atran, S. (2003). Genesis of Suicide Terrorism. Science, 299 , 1534-1539.
Berko, A. (2002). The moral infrastructure of chief perpetrators of suicidal
terrorism: Cognitive and functionalist perspectives . Unpublished
dissertation, Bar Ilan University . (in Hebrew)
Berko, A. (2004). The Path to the Garden of Eden: The world of female and
male suicide bombers and their dispatchers. Tel Aviv: Yedioth Ahronoth
Press. (in Hebrew)
Berko, A., Wolf Y., & Addad M. (2005). The moral infrastructure of chief
perpetrators of suicidal terrorism: Israel Studies in Criminology , 9, 10-47
.
Beyler, C. (2003). Messengers of death: Female suicide bombers . Retrieved
February, 112, 2005, from
http://www.ict.org.il/articles/articledet.cfm?articleid=470.
Beyler, C. (2004). Female suicide bombers: An update . Retrieved March 7,
2005, from http://www.ict.org.il/articles/articledet.cfm?articleid=508.
Bloom, M. (2004). Palestinian suicide bombing: Public support, market share,
and outbidding. Political Science Quarterly, 199 , 61-88.
Bloom, M. (2005) Dying to kill: The allure of suicide terror . New York :
Columbia University Press.
Browning, C. (1992). Ordinary men: Police battalion 101 and the final
solution in Poland . New York : Harper.
Cloward, R. & Ohlin, L. (1960) Delinquency and opportunity. New York : The
Free Press.
Crenshaw, M. (2002). "Suicide" terrorism in comparative perspective. In
Countering suicide terrorism (pp. 21-19) . Herzilya , Israel : The
International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism.
Cressey , D. (1973). Other people's money: A study in the social psychology
of embezzlement. Montclair , N.J. : Patterson Smith.
El Sarraj, E. (2002a). Suicide bombers: Dignity, despair, and the need of
hope. Journal of Palestine Studies, 4 , 71-76 .
El Sarraj, E. (2002b). Wounds and madness: Why we've become suicide bombers.
PeaceWork. Retrieved February 12, 2005 from
http://www.afsc.org/pwork/0205/020506a.htm.
Erez, E. (2005). Protracted war, terrorism and mass victimization: Exploring
victimological/criminological theories and concepts in addressing terrorism
in Israel . In K. Turkovic & U. Ewald (Eds.), Humanistic victimology and
terrorism. Amsterdam , The Netherlands : Nomen NESCIO, IOS Press.
Forman, A. (1998). The illusion of the waning Islamic flag. Maarahot, 57 ,
356-357. (in Hebrew)
Ganor, B. (2001). Defining terrorism: Is one man's terrorist another man
freedom fighter? Retrieved March 8, 2005, from
http://www.ict.org.il/articles.
Ganor, B. (2002). "Suicide Attacks in Israel ." In Countering suicide
terrorism (pp.140-252) . Herzilya , Israel : The International Policy
Institute for Counter-Terrorism.
Ganor B. (2005) The c ounter terrorism puzzle - A guide for decision makers,
Piscataway , New Jersey : Transaction.
Glaser , B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley , CA :
Sociology Press.
Goldstein, Joshua S. (2001) War and gender : How g ender s hapes the w ar s
ystem and v ice v ersa . New York : Cambridge University Press.
Hafez, M. (2004, October). Manufacturing human bombs: Strategy, culture, and
conflict in the making of Palestinian suicide terrorism . Paper presented at
the National Institute of Justice conference, Washington , DC .
Hassan, N. (2001, November 19). An Arsenal of Believers: Talking to the
Human Bombs, The New Yorker , pp. 36-41.
Hassan, R. (2003). Suicide bombing driven more by politics than religious
zeal. YaleGlobal Online. Retrieved February 10, 2005 from:
http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/article.print?id=3749
Hassan, R. (2004, April). Suicide bombing: A Perspective. The Daily Times .
Retrieved March 1, 2005 from
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_29-4-2004_pg3_3.
Hoffman, B. & McCormick, G. (2004). Terrorism, signaling, and suicide
Attack. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism , 27 , 243-281.
Israeli, R. (1997). Islamikaza: Suicide terror. Nativ, 1-2 , 69-76.
Israeli R. (2002). A manual of Islamic fundamentalist terrorism", Terrorism
and Political Violence , 14 (4): 23-40.
Johnson, R. (1990). Death work : A study of the modern execution process.
Belmont , CA : Wadsworth .
Juergensmeyer, M. (2000). Terror in the mind of God: The global rise of
religious violence . Berkeley , CA : University of California Press.
Katz, J. (1983). A theory of qualitative methodology. In R. Emerson (Ed.),
Contemporary field research (pp. 127-148). Boston : Little, Brown.
Kimhi S. &, Even S. (2004). Who are the Palestinian suicide bombers?
Terrorism and Political Violence , 16 (4): 815-840.
Merari, A. (2004, October). Suicide terrorism in the context of the Israeli
Palestinian conflict . Paper presented at the Suicide Terrorism Research
Conference, National Institute of Justice, Washington D.C.
Merton, R. (1938) Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review
3: 672-682. Moghadam A. (2003). Palestinian suicide terrorism in the second
Intifada: Motivations and organizational aspects. Studies in Conflict and
Terrorism , 26(2): 65-92.
Oliver, A., & Steinberg, F. (2005). The road to martyrs' square: A journey
into the world of suicide bomber , New York : Oxford University Press.
Pape, R. (2003). The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. American
Political Science Review, 97 , 343-361.
Pape, R. (2005). Dying to win: the strategic logic of suicide terrorism ,
New York : Random House.
Pedahzur, A., Perliger, A., & Weinberg, L. (2003). Altruism and fatalism:
The characteristics of Palestinian suicide terrorists. Deviant Behavior, 24,
405-423.
Post, J., Sprinzak, E, & Denny, L. (2003). The terrorists in their own
words: Interviews with 35 incarcerated Middle Eastern Terrorists. Terrorism
and Political Violence, 15 , 171-184.
Rosenberger, J. (2003). Discerning the behavior of the suicide bomber: The
role of vengeance. Journal of Religion and Health, 42 (1): 13-20.
Rosenfeld, R. (2002, November/December). Why criminologists should study
terrorism. The Criminologist, 19, 34-35 .
Rubin, H. & Rubin, I. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing
data . Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
Sageman, M. (2004). Understanding terror networks . Philadelphia :
University of Pennsylvania Press.
Shalhoub-Kevorkian, N. (2003). Liberating voices: The political implications
of Palestinian mothers narrating their loss. Women's Studies International
Forum , 26(5): 391-407.
Shiqaqi, K. (2002). The views of Palestinian society on suicide terrorism.
In Countering suicide terrorism (pp.155-164) . Herzilya , Israel : The
International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism.
Silke, A. (2003). The psychology of suicide terrorism. In A. Silke (Ed.),
Terrorists, victims, and society: Psychological perspectives on terrorism
and its consequences . West Sussex, England : Wiley.
Sprinzak, E. (2000). Rational fanatics. Foreign Policy, 120 , 66-73.
Steinhert, H. (2003). The indispensable metaphor of war: On populist
politics and the contradictions. of the state's monopoly of force.
Theoretical Criminology , 7(3), 265-291.
Stern, J. (2003), Terror in the name of God: Why religious militants kill .
New York : Harper Collins.
Strenski, I. (2003). Sacrifice, gift, and the social logic of Muslim 'human
bombers.' Terrorism and Political Violence, 15 , 1-34.
Sutherland, E. & Cressy, D. (1960). Principles of criminology. (6th
Edition.) Philadelphia : Lippincott.
Victor, B. (2003) Army of roses: Inside the world of Palestinian women
suicide bombers. Emmaus , PA : Rodale.
Weinberg, L., Pedahzur, A., & Cannetti-Nisim, D, (2003). The social and
religious characteristics of suicide bombers. Terrorism and Political
Violence, 15 , 139-153.
Wolfgang, M., & Ferracuti, F. (1982) The Subculture of violence: Towards an
integrated theory in criminology . Beverly Hills : Sage.
Yuval-Davis, N. (1997) Gender and nation . London : Sage.

Acknowledgements. We wish to thank the Israeli prison authorities for
facilitating the interviews of the participants. Sufia Jamal provided
research assistance.

Offprints. Requests for offprints should be directed to Edna Erez, LLB. PhD,
Center for Research in Justice Issues, Kent State University , Kent , OH
44242. E-mail: eerez@kent.edu

------------------------------

From: imra@netvision.net.il
To: imra@imra.org.il
Subject: Acting PM Olmert Receives Bank of Israel 2005
Annual Report From BOI Governor Prof. Stanley Fischer

Acting PM Olmert Receives Bank of Israel 2005 Annual Report From BOI
Governor Prof. Stanley Fischer
(Communicated by the Prime Minister's Media Adviser)

Sunday, 02 April, 2006

Acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert met this morning (Sunday), 2.4.06, with
Bank of Israel Governor Prof. Stanley Fischer and received from him the Bank
of Israel Annual Report for 2005.

Acting Prime Minister Olmert emphasized: "The Government of Israel will
maintain the parameters that have characterized the economy. There will be
no deviation in expenditures; we will not increase the deficit beyond the
parameters and the line that have guided economic policy. We will have to
change priorities regarding social issues and this is of utmost importance
for economic stability. We want to bring about a reduction in social gaps,
an increase in employment and a reduction in the number of people in
distress. We will continue to act with monetary responsibility and fiscal
discipline." The Acting Prime Minister added that he is completely
committed to finalizing legislation of the Bank of Israel Law.

------------------------------

From: imra-owner@imra.org.il
Subject: IMRA Subscription Info

--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website: www.imra.org.il

For free regular subscription:
Subscribe at no charge: imra-subscribe@imra.org.il
Unsubscribe: imra-unsubscribe@imra.org.il

For free daily digest subscription:
Subscribe at no charge: imra-subscribe-digest@imra.org.il
Unsubscribe: imra-unsubscribe@imra.org.il

For a copy of all reports distributed for a given day please send a
message to:

monday@imra.org.il tuesday@imra.org.il wednesday@imra.org.il
thursday@imra.org.il friday@imra.org.il
saturday@imra.org.il sunday@imra.org.il
--------------------------------------------

------------------------------

End of [imra] Daily digest - Volume: 2 Issue: 1363 (2 messages)
**********

No comments: