Tuesday, March 28, 2006

Re: [political-research] Personal Attacks on Those Who Disagree with the No-Planes Theory

If the towers were under threat of falling sideways from the impact of the hijacked planes, then why conceal an operation to force them to fall straight downwards?  Why the necessity for secrecy?
 
Also, wouldn't some of the firefighters have spoken up about the operation by now?
 
Does this scenario pass the test of common sense?


MrOsario <mrosario@rgv.rr.com> wrote:
The Twin Towers were to fall sideway and have a domino effect on the other buildings thereby
killing around 140,000. So the decision was made to send in 200 firemen with bombs to set them
at strategic places so that the towers would fall the way a building is supposed to fall when it
is being demolished.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 5:59 PM
Subject: [political-research] Personal Attacks on Those Who Disagree with the No-Planes Theory

Sorry -- I am not interested in posting any more of that material.  I find it extremely destructive for the overall effort to uncover the truth about 9/11.  The people who have come under attack over this issue rank among the best minds in the 9/11 research community.  The personal attacks are disgusting and despicable, and I find it incomprehensible why they keep coming.
 
I am still very interested in any fresh and useful information, analysis or theories about how the towers fell that is expressed in a succinct, reasonable and civil way, and which isn't designed to stir up division and hatred among serious 9/11 researchers.
 
Morgan Reynolds just published some remarks on this controversy which are quite interesting.  That's how to do it.
 
 



Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/

Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




No comments: