I think Xymphora (and Cannonfire, also) is unusually weak on the controlled demolition issue -- that is why I made two argumentative points preceding the quoted passage:
1. The towers may have been rigged for demolition long before 9/11.
2. A classified technology may have been used to bring down the buildings.
Overall, however, Xymphora has one of the more interesting minds on the net.
Did you notice in another post that William Rodriguez did in fact claim that the basement explosion *preceded* the explosion from the impact of the the plane in the north tower? His testimony is supported by other eyewitnesses. The 9/11 Commission and the mainstream media have gone to extraordinary lengths to bury the Rodriguez story.
Bill Giltner <bill.giltner@gmail.com> wrote:
Sean,
I respect that that you think this worthy of posting. I've referenced the
xymphora blog myself.
However, I think the blogger commits one of the blunders that you have
argued against, in the way his language goes over the top, without the
detail and logical connection of point A to point B, etc.
For example, he totally ignores the "no planer" viewpoint. He mentions
things likes "removing the insulation". I don't think the person is
qualified to insist the issues that he is pointing to are necessarily the
critical issues.
More than anything this makes me move xymphora lower on my list as a
reliable source.
-------Original Message-------
From: Sean McBride
Date: 03/28/06 03:44:08
To: political-research
Subject: [political-research] The Controlled Demolition of WTC1 and WTC2?
What if the cutting charges had been systematically placed in the towers
years before 9/11, and after the World Trade Center bombing of 1993?
Alternatively, what if the towers were brought down by a classified
technology which didn't require conventional cutting charges?
http://xymphora.blogspot.com/2006/03/demolition-control.html
[excerpt]
In order for the controlled demolition to knock out the joint supports in a
way which would satisfy the 9–11 skeptics, there would have had to be
cutting charges placed on nearly every floor all the way up the building.
Since the buildings were finished, and had interior walls, the installers of
the explosives would have had to remove the walls, remove the insulation,
place the charges in various places symmetrically around the core of each
tower, on almost every floor of a continually occupied building, without
anyone seeing anything. Not just impossible. Preposterous.
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo
com/group/political-research/rss
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/
Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "political-research" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
No comments:
Post a Comment