Wednesday, February 08, 2006

SV: Re: SV: Re: SV: [Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?]

I don´t care for pissing contests.
 
I wasn´t referring to 9/11 Truth as in www.911truth.org
 
If someone walks up to you, believing that the govt. story is true, 19 hijackers, yada yada, (in my experience at least) you don´t open their eyes a tiny bit by simply stating "there were no planes",  end of discussion shut up true-story-believer.
 
IF there were compelling documentary, a website for people with no prior knowledge of other than the official story, or even an article like we discussed earlier that WOULD be the right approach. Maybe it IS the right approach, if you´re a huge charismatic genious, that really knows how to capture peoples attentention and get your point across. I´m not, so untill someone realizes that maybe preaching to the choir won´t do the trick, I (and a whole lot of others I suspect) will have to settle on telling people about some of the lies of 9/11, without telling other lies instead.
 
For instance you CAN talk about the demolition of the buildings, without being a planehugger! And you CAN talk about the absurd hi-jacker story, without pushing the idea that a plane melted away in midair and that´s perfectly normal, move on.
 
I CAN point out some of the things I´ve learned from looking at your site, but most of it is simply inaccesible, because people simply haven´t got a clue. They don´t understand. Maybe you´re right, that this just proves that almost everybody is a moron, who doesn´t know how to think straight. Fine. So f****** what. How is THAT going to affect positive change? So we can sit back (I can sit maybe 50 percent back), and say, I understand that planes weren´t used in the military operation of 9/11.  99.9% of people don´t. That means that we´re smart (I´m half-smart), and most people aren´t. Yeah, that seems like the right thing to do.
 
Most people HAVEN´T done what you´ve done for the past 4 years. And we (I´m just as guilty as everybody else) HAVE to present the truth as correctly as we can, without making sure that nobody understands. It´s often the case with great minds, that their achievements aren´t fully appreciated before many years after they themselves are gone. In my opinion we simply haven´t got that luxury now... time is crucial, isn´t it?
 
I´d LOVE to be able to share more of the no-plane evidence with people, but I´ve just about given up, unless someone "distills" it.
 
Anyway, this rant is going nowhere, especially when you already have decided what I´m saying without "listening". So good luck, we need it.
 
Peter Kofod, Denmark
 

Rosalee Grable <webfairy@thewebfairy.com> skrev:
"I really respect your work, although I´m sad that I simply can´t show
it to people who´re new to 9/11 Truth."

At least let them know that so called alleged "911 Truth" is just a
different brand of really big lie.

There shouldn't be a difference between "911 truth" and the everyday
plain kind.

Telling people an NSA approved subset of lies that have to be unlearned
before they can confront real facts just buys time for the frameup.



Peter Kofod wrote:
> I´d love to, but I must confess that I´m having a hard time even
> grasping the implications. The easy reason why, would be that I´m just
> an idjut, and a better answer would be, that I haven´t spent 1000 of
> hours studying this.

> I know why you wrote what you just did, and I DO think that you´ve
> been unfairly critisized(abused) over the years, but I´m not one of
> those who´s been doing that!

> I really respect your work, although I´m sad that I simply can´t show
> it to people who´re new to 9/11 Truth.

> I think it deserves to be made easier accessible! (not technically,
> but in terms of understanding to the NOT so experienced mind)

> And I think your name is pretty cool :-)

> Peter Kofod, Denmark
>
> */Rosalee Grable <webfairy@thewebfairy.com>/* skrev:
>
>     I would certainly volunteer you for a hard hitting and easy to
>     understand overview!!
>
>     It has been MORE THAN FOUR YEARS since I noticed there was no
>     plane in
>     the first hit footage that allegedly shows a plane.
>     Four Years!!
>
>     If I had it to do over again I'd of picked some more "serious" a
>     moniker
>     than "Webfairy", but I was expecting to make a career of webdesign
>     and
>     hands-on computer care for small businesses.
>     911 turned my clientele to dust too., figuratively.
>
>     I didn't know there was such a thing as UAV drones back then.
>     I thought I was seeing one object, not a flock close together.
>     I am at least as sick of the word "whatzit" as you are.
>     It was the best I could do to identify a non-plane non-ufo
>     unrecognizable object.
>
>     I still don't have a better word than "Butterplane" for the
>     apparently
>     melting second hit cartoons.
>     Professor Cornflake posits that the Pentagon "Plane" melted in midair.
>     This gave us the idea learned professors believe that planes are made
>     out of dairy products.
>     Since Professor Cornflake is from Perdue, maybe it's actually corn
>     oil
>     margarine.
>
>     Peter Kofod wrote:
>     > I agree with alex here.
>     > To just step in front of a camera and say "no plane hit the towers"
>     > would be idiotic. But if someone would care to present an
>     hardhitting
>     > and easy-to-understand overview of the argument, it would be a
>     totally
>     > different case.
>     >
>     > Personally I would avoid terms like butterplanes and whatitz,
>     since my
>     > PERSONAL experience is, that these terms make people NOT want to
>     look
>     > at the evidence, just like screaming IDIOT at someone, probably
>     isn´t
>     > the best way to make them consider your point, but I guess this is
>     > a matter of taste?
>     >
>     > Best,
>     > Peter Kofod, Denmark
>     >
>     > */alexldent <alexldent@yahoo.com>/* skrev:
>     >
>     >     Obviously I'm not Rosalee, and you asked her-- but, I
>     wouldn't mind if
>     >     he did this and backed it up with a proper analysis.  If you
>     just SAY
>     >     that "there was no plane crash and that the planes hitting
>     the towers
>     >     were faked" of course it sounds crazy.  But if one presented it
>     >     properly, I think it could be a very effective argument.
>     The more I
>     >     look at these pictures of the WTC and the planes and then the
>     >     plane-shaped holes, the more bogus it looks.
>     >
>     >     The truth is the truth, and I don't like the idea of hiding
>     the truth,
>     >     no matter how crazy it might initially sound.
>     >
>     >     > Do you really want Professor Jones to
>     >     > go on national TV and say that there was no plane crash
>     and that
>     >     the
>     >     > planes hitting the towers were faked and edited in later on
>     >     > videotape?  What praytell would be the result of him
>     taking that
>     >     > action?  What good would it do our truth movement if people of
>     >     Jones
>     >     > stature started doing things like that?
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > SPONSORED LINKS
>     > Government procurement
>     >
>     <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+procurement&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=S_3-2zVK9QQjTwxHvO91yw
>     <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+procurement&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=S_3-2zVK9QQjTwxHvO91yw>>
>
>     >       Government leasing
>     >
>     <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+leasing&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=ZAuP_XFQBkNiVw-hPWWJ-Q
>     <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+leasing&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=ZAuP_XFQBkNiVw-hPWWJ-Q>>
>
>     >       Government grants for women
>     >
>     <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+grants+for+women&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=R7KVvqXEVqN0Ct9WGPhKwg
>     <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+grants+for+women&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=R7KVvqXEVqN0Ct9WGPhKwg>>
>
>     >
>     > Government lease
>     >
>     <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+lease&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=FM8lkJddvatAkQNo00D_Cw
>     <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+lease&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=FM8lkJddvatAkQNo00D_Cw>>
>
>     >       Government contract
>     >
>     <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+contract&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=fTrsbvxC-m39UjtOdMcT-Q
>     <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+contract&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=fTrsbvxC-m39UjtOdMcT-Q>>
>
>     >       Government money
>     >
>     <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+money&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=HB73LsQrRnXy-2WkBh3LyA
>     <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+money&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=HB73LsQrRnXy-2WkBh3LyA>>
>
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>     >
>     >     *  Visit your group "911InsideJobbers
>     >       <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers>" on the web.
>     >      
>     >     *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>     >        911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>     >     
>     <mailto:911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>     >      
>     >     *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>     >       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Government procurement
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+procurement&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=S_3-2zVK9QQjTwxHvO91yw>
>       Government leasing
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+leasing&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=ZAuP_XFQBkNiVw-hPWWJ-Q>
>       Government grants for women
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+grants+for+women&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=R7KVvqXEVqN0Ct9WGPhKwg>
>
> Government lease
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+lease&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=FM8lkJddvatAkQNo00D_Cw>
>       Government contract
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+contract&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=fTrsbvxC-m39UjtOdMcT-Q>
>       Government money
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+money&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=HB73LsQrRnXy-2WkBh3LyA>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>     *  Visit your group "911InsideJobbers
>       <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers>" on the web.
>       
>     *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>        911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>       <mailto:911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>       
>     *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>





SPONSORED LINKS
Government procurement Government leasing Government grants for women
Government lease Government contract Government money


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




No comments: