There is 1 message in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. Recreation of Ballistic 'Cheney Shooting Party' Pepperings
From: "Ozzy bin Oswald" <hisholiness@rome.com>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:43:16 +0800
From: "Ozzy bin Oswald" <hisholiness@rome.com>
Subject: Recreation of Ballistic 'Cheney Shooting Party' Pepperings
[IMAGE]
"My family and I are are deeply sorry for everything that Vice President
Cheney and his family had to go through this week," Whittington said,
appearing emotional in front of television cameras.
http://news.google.ca/news?hl==en&ned=Ê&q==Whittington+sorry
[IMAGE]
Cheney's shotgun
February 14, 2006
- Vice President Cheney was using a 28-gauge shotgun loaded with shells
containing hundreds of tiny pellets when he accidentally shot Texas
lawyer Harry Whittington on Saturday while quail hunting in Texas.
On Tuesday, doctors said some of the birdshot had moved into
Whittington's heart, and he suffered a minor heart attack.
Here's a general look at the gun and pellets involved:
Barrel diameter of 28-gauge shotgun: .550 inch, one of the smallest
shotgun barrel bores. A shotgun's gauge is determined by the number of
round lead balls with the diameter of the bore that would be needed, when
weighed collectively, to equal one pound. The higher the number of balls,
the smaller the bore. Cheney was using a Perazzi shotgun made by Brescia,
an Italian firm.
28-gauge shells: Each is 2.75 inches long. The shells Cheney was using
were packed with size 7-1/2 shot, a tiny pellet recommended by some
hunting experts for shooting small birds like quail or grouse. Size 2 is
used for shooting larger birds, such as Canada geese.
Number of pellets per shell: About 262.
Size of each pellet: Much smaller than BBs, each pellet is about .095
inches in diameter, or about the size of a single grape seed. From the
25- to 30-foot distance from which Whittington was shot, dozens of
pellets could have penetrated his skin.
http://www.knoxstudio.com/shns/story.cfm?pk==CHENEY-PELLETS-02-14-06&cat==AN
Cheney's shotgun a 'rising star'
February 15, 2006
- Size of each pellet: Much smaller than BBs, each pellet is about .095
inches in diameter, or about the size of a single grape seed. From the
25- to 30-yard distance from which Whittington was shot, dozens of
pellets could have penetrated Whittington's skin.
http://www.recordonline.com/archive/2006/02/15/news-rashotgun-02-15.html
Cheney account questioned
February 16, 2006
WASHINGTON Veteran hunters and shooting experts said Thursday that they
still did not understand how the vice president injured his fellow
hunting partner so badly if he was actually 30 yards away as Cheney says.
"It just doesn't add up," said John Kelly, a quail hunter from New York
with more than 36 years of experience. "With a shotgun, the pellets
spread out the further you get, and for that many pellets to hit such a
small part of this man's body means Mr. Cheney was far closer" than the
27-meter distance cited.
On Saturday, while quail hunting, Cheney accidentally shot and wounded
another hunter, Harry Whittington. Witnesses said Cheney, a practiced
hunter, swiveled around and fired at a bird, but hit Whittington with a
tight grouping of pellets in the face, neck and chest.
Estimates of the number of pellets that hit Whittington have ranged from
a half-dozen to nearly 200. Dr. David Blanchard, who has worked on
Whittington at the Corpus Christi, Texas, hospital, said it was not
"medically relevant" how many pellets had been found.
Cheney was using an Italian-made 28-gauge Perazzi shotgun with size 7½
shot. A three-quarter-ounce load of that size ammunition would normally
contain about 260 pellets, experts say. Each steel pellet is barely the
size of a peppercorn. Most hunters agreed that it was probably the tiny
size of ammunition that spared Whittington more critical injuries. But
they also said that raised troubling questions about Cheney's version of
the events.
Whittington suffered a "minor heart attack," a hospital official said,
because one of the pellets had lodged in his heart. For one of the
pellets to enter Whittington's heart, the pellet had to go through four
layers of clothing, including a jacket with thick cushioning, before
entering the chest cavity.
"It does seem like a lot of pellets in a small space," said Phil
Bourjaily of Field & Stream magazine. "But it doesn't seem impossible
that it could have happened as they say."
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/02/16/news/shot.php
Cheney Hunting Companion Is Released From Hospital
February 18, 2006
Jim Wilson, the retired sheriff from Crockett County in West Texas and
the handguns editor at Shooting Times, said that he doubted Whittington
was that far from Cheney.
"At 30 yards that shot pattern is going to have spread quite a bit," he
said. "You could put a person's eye out, but hitting a person's body, the
shot won't penetrate very far."
Nonetheless, Wilson, like other hunters in Texas, said persistent
questions about the accident belied an ignorance of how investigations
are conducted in Texas.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/17/AR2006021701888.html
Media Ignores Cheney 'Smoking Gun'
A 28-gauge shotgun fired at 30 yards is too weak to cause Whittington's
injuries
How can a weapon that has little more power than a kids BB gun fire
projectiles that in most cases don't penetrate further than an inch into
a bird's breast and yet in this instance tore through a hunting vest,
clothes underneath, the chest cavity and into the muscle of Whittington's
heart? http://www.uruknet.info/?p==m20674&l==i&size==1&hd==0
SYNOPSIS OF VIDEO NEWS REPORT DOCUMENTING SHOOTING TEST
SCIENTIFIC PROOF CHENEY'S SHOOTING STORY A LIE
Infowars | February 15 2006
by Alex Jones
Below is a ten minute "see-for-yourself" report that conclusively shows
that Vice President Dick Cheney's claims to Kennedy County Sheriff's
Deputies in south Texas is a total fabrication.
A massive cover-up has been conducted concerning the shooting. We know
that most of the facts that have been told to the public are manufactured
frauds.
Cheney claims that he shot Whittington at 90 feet, ballistic tests from
the spread of the shotgun pellets to their penetration depth is 100%
conclusive.
Harry Whittington was shot at close range, between 15 and 18 feet, not
the 90 claimed by Dick Cheney and the Secret Service. It is now clear why
they refused to let Sheriff's Deputies interview Cheney for over 13 hours
and why they claimed that Whittington's injuries were superficial when in
truth they were grievous.
The mainstream media is ignoring this literal smoking gun evidence.
Anytime they wish, the local police can conduct their own ballistics
tests and they will have the exact same findings. The media can conduct
their own tests. The ballistics of shotguns and birdshot is well known to
tens of millions of Americans who hunt fowl.
We have now scientifically proved with an engineer and a police officer
on-site conducting the test that the American people are being lied to
and a cover-up is in progress.
Here are some images from the video (click to enlarge):
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/cheney_shooting_scientific_proof_stills.htm
*Cheney Goes Ballistic:
http://media.putfile.com/Alex-Jones---Cheney-gun-recreation Streaming
video Download: ballistics_test_bb.wmv 22.7 Mb
Texas Sheriff Barred From Interviewing Cheney About Shooting Incident
---------------------------------------------------------------------
February 13, 2006
CBS News reports that local law enforcement officials were prevented from
interviewing Vice President Cheney after he accidentally shot a
78-year-old man during a hunting trip:
CBS News White House correspondent Peter Maer reports Texas
authorities are complaining that the Secret Service barred them from
speaking to Cheney after the incident. Kenedy County Texas Sheriffs
Lt. Juan Guzman said deputies first learned of the shooting when an
ambulance was called.
McClellan was asked about it at the press briefing but played dumb:
QUESTION: Scott, there’s a report coming out of a sheriff’s deputy
there who said that he was prevented from interviewing the vice
president by the Secret Service. Do you know anything about that? And
is that appropriate?
MCCLELLAN: No, I don’t know anything about that. You have got to
direct that to the Secret Service. My understanding was that Secret
Service took the appropriate steps to inform law enforcement.
Of course, the question is not whether the Secret Service informed law
enforcement, but whether law enforcement was permitted to speak with
Cheney. As Talk Left notes, although the incident was an accident, it
could constitute criminal negligence.
UPDATE: National Journal reports that, after initial resistance, Cheney
was interviewed by law enforcement sometime on Sunday.
UPDATE II: At the breifing McClellan refuses to “speculate” as to whether
the accidental shooting was a criminal offense:
QUESTION: Under Texas law, is this kind of accidental shooting a
possible criminal offense?
MCCLELLAN: I won’t even speculate on that, but I think the sheriff’s
office or the local law enforcement office has already commented on
that and said it was a hunting accident.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/13/sheriff-barred-from-interviewing
More Questions Raised About Delay in Reporting Cheney Misfire
February 14, 2006
The more than 18-hour delay in news emerging that the vice president of
the United States had shot a man, sending him to an intensive care unit
with his wounds, grew even more curious Monday with word from the White
House that President Bush had been informed of the incident Saturday but
not immediately about Dick Cheney's role.
By Greg Mitchell
NEW YORK
Earlier, E&P had learned that the official confirmation of the shooting
came about only after a local reporter in Corpus Christi, Texas, received
a tip from the owner of the property where the shooting occurred and
called Vice President Cheney's office for confirmation.
The confirmation was made but it is not known for certain that Cheney's
office, the White House, or anyone else intended to announce the shooting
if the reporter, Jaime Powell of the Corpus Christi Caller-Times, had not
received word from the ranch owner.
One of Powell's colleagues at the Corpus Christi paper, Beth Francesco,
told E&P that Powell had built up a strong source relationship with the
prominent ranch owner, Katharine Armstrong, which led to the tip. Powell
is chief political reporter for the paper and also covers the area where
the ranch is located south of Sarita, about 60 miles from Corpus Christi.
Armstrong did not notify reporters at larger papers in Dallas, Houston,
Austin, or other cities.
Armstrong called the paper Sunday morning looking for Powell, who was not
at work. When they did talk, Armstrong revealed the shooting of prominent
Austin attorney Harry Whittington, who is now in stable condition in a
hospital. Powell then called Cheney's office for the confirmation around
midday. The newspaper broke the story at mid-afternoon -- not a word
about it had appeared before then.
The Cheney spokesman with whom Powell spoke, Lea Anne McBride, would not
comment on whether the Cheney office or the White House would have ever
released the information had the Caller-Times not contacted them.
"I’m not going to speculate," McBride said, according to Powell. "When
you put the call into me, I was able to confirm that account."
White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan, peppered with questions
about the incident at his Monday morning press "gaggle," explained that
the White House had deferred to the Vice President's office in the
matter, and the latter deferred to the ranch owner.
McClellan said that the first reports that came to the White House only
said that a member of Cheney's party had been shot but did not indicate
that Cheney was the shooter. Top Bush aide Karl Rove later informed the
president of Cheney's involvement but McClellan refused to say precisely
when, beyond saying it was "in a relatively reasonable" amount of time.
The New York Times observed Monday that reporters "seemed frustrated that
Mr. McClellan could not tell them exactly when Mr. Bush learned that the
vice president himself had shot Mr. Whittington." As for McClellan's
knowledge--he said that he did not know about Cheney as triggerman until
Sunday morning.
Francesco, at the Corpus Christi paper, said she felt it was a bit odd
that her newsroom had not received any information about the shooting
since "we often call law enforcement in the area, even on weekends. We
checked in and didn’t hear anything about it." In some states, all
serious shooting incidents must be immediately reported to police.
Hospital officials on Monday continued to offer few details on the
victim's condition, but said he was "very stable" and that pellets were
possibly still being removed. Sally Whittington told The Dallas Morning
News her father was being observed because of swelling from some of the
welts on his neck. His face "looks like chicken pox, kind of," she said.
A hospital spokesman said Whittington was in the intensive care unit
because his condition warranted it, but he didn't elaborate. Whittington
sent word that he would have no comment on the incident out of respect
for Cheney.
While E&P was first to raise questions about the delay Sunday afternoon,
Frank James, reporter in the Chicago Tribune's Washington bureau, put his
own spin on it later in the day, asking, "How is it that Vice President
Cheney can shoot a man, albeit accidentally, on Saturday during a hunting
trip and the American public not be informed of it until today?"
Indeed, others raised questions as well. "There was no immediate reason
given as to why the incident wasn't reported until Sunday," the Dallas
Morning News observed. "The sheriff's office in Kenedy County did not
respond to phone calls Sunday."
The president, who was at the White House over the weekend, was informed
about the incident in Texas after it happened Saturday by Chief of Staff
Andrew Card and Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove and was updated on
Sunday, press secretary Scott McClellan said.
But neither the White House nor the vice president's staff announced the
shooting. The Washington Post reported late Sunday that Cheney's office
did not make a public announcement.
Asked by The New York Times why it did not make the news known, Cheney
spokeswoman McBride said, "We deferred to the Armstrongs regarding what
had taken place at their ranch."
Armstrong said later, according to The Associated Press, that everyone at
the ranch was so "focused" on Whittington's health Saturday that it
wasn't until Sunday she called the Caller-Times to report the accident.
"It was accidental, a hunting accident," Sheriff Ramon Salinas III of
Kenedy County told The New York Times, adding that the Secret Service
notified him Saturday of the episode. "They did what they had to
according to law."
In an odd disparity, Armstrong told the Houston Chronicle that
Whittington, 78, was "bruised more than bloodied" in the incident and
"his pride was hurt more than anything else." Yet he was airlifted to a
hospital and has spent more than a day in an intensive care unit.
The Chronicle also reports Monday that hunting accidents are very rare in
Texas. In 2004, it said, the state's one million-plus hunters were
involved in only 29 hunting-related accidents (19 involving firearms),
four of which were fatal.
Time magazine on its Web site observed that Cheney is scheduled to join
President Bush on Monday afternoon when he takes questions from reporters
in the Oval Office, following a meeting with United Nations Secretary
General Kofi Annan. "White House aides can be expected to say that the
Vice President did not shoot Whittington, which suggests a bullet, but
rather sprayed him with birdshot, a type of ammunition made up of tiny
pieces of lead or steel," Time predicted.
On Sunday, the Chicago Tribune's James wrote on the Washington bureau's
blog at the newspaper's site, "When a vice president of the U.S. shoots a
man under any circumstance, that is extremely relevant information. What
might be the excuse to justify not immediately making the incident
public?
"The vice president is well known for preferring to operate in secret.
... Some secrecy, especially when it comes to the executing the duties of
president or vice president, is understandable and expected by Americans.
"But when the vice president's office, or the White House, delays in
reporting a shooting like Saturday's to the public via the media, it
needlessly raises suspicions and questions of trust. And it may just
further the impression held by many, rightly or wrongly, that the White
House doesn't place the highest premium on keeping the public fully and
immediately informed."
The New York Times reported late Sunday that Whittington was commissioner
of the state's Funeral Service Commission. In 1999, George W. Bush, then
governor of Texas, named Whittington to head the Commission, which
licenses and regulates funeral directors and embalmers in the state.
"When he was named," the Times revealed, "a former executive director of
the commission, Eliza May, was suing the state, saying that she had been
fired because she investigated a funeral home chain that was owned by a
friend of Mr. Bush.
"The suit was settled in 2001, but the details were not disclosed."
___
Latest update, Monday p.m.
White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan explained Monday that the
White House knew about the accidental shooting of a fellow hunter on
Saturday night, but deferred to the vice president's office, which did
not announce it. The vice president's office in turn deferred to
Katharine Armstrong, the ranch owner in Texas where the shooting took
place. She called a Corpus Christi reporter at midday Sunday and only
then did the news come out.
McClellan also said Monday, according to The Associated Press, that "Bush
and senior aides were told Saturday night by the staff of the White House
Situation Room that somebody in the Cheney's hunting party was shot, but
he said he was not told until Sunday morning that Cheney was the shooter.
He said he contacted the vice president's office and everyone agreed they
needed to get the information to the public quickly."
Reviewing the late-morning press briefing today, the National Journal's
Hotline site said that reporters reacted with "astonishment" to
McClellan's admission about not knowing about Cheney's role in the
shooting until Sunday. It noted that McClellan did everything possible to
imply that the responsibility for any bungling resides in the vice
president's office.
McClellan also said he did not know about a report that the Secret
Service prevented a deputy sheriff from interviewing Cheney.
Courtesy of USAtoday.com, here is a sampling of the briefing, featuring
NBC's David Gregory.
GREGORY: "The vice president of the United States shoots a man, and he
feels that it's appropriate for a ranch owner who witnessed this to tell
a local Corpus Christi newspaper, not the White House press corps at
large or notify the public in a national way."
MCCLELLAN: "Well, I think we all know that once it is made public, then
it's going to be news, and all of you are going to be seeking that
information. The vice president's office was ready to provide additional
information to reporters. There was no traveling White House press corps
with the vice president, as there is with the president in a situation
like this, so there are some different circumstances. And the other
circumstance was here that someone was injured and needed medical care.
And the vice president's team was making sure he was getting taken care
of, and that he got to the hospital and received additional treatment."
Armstrong told the AP today that her family realized Sunday morning that
it would be a story and decided to call the local newspaper, the Corpus
Christi Caller-Times. She said she then discussed the news coverage with
Cheney for the first time.
"I said, Mr. Vice President, this is going to be public, and I'm
comfortable going to the hometown newspaper," she told the AP. "And he
said you go ahead and do whatever you are comfortable doing."
Earlier Monday morning, McClellan had said, “The first priority… was
making sure that Mr. Whittington was getting the medical care that he
needed. The first priority Saturday night was making sure he receiving
medical care and getting to the hospital and being taken care of, and
that’s what happened. The vice president’s office was taking the lead on
making sure the information got out, and it did. The vice president’s
office worked with Mrs. Armstrong to get that information out.’’
Matt Cooper, the Time magazine reporter, said on CBS's "The Early Show"
today, "It's clearly an accident, but the fact that the White House
didn't release this information, that it sat around for almost a day is
in itself, bizarre."
In an online chat at the Washington Post site, the paper's White House
reporter Peter Baker said reporters in D.C. are "flabbergasted" by the
shooting. He indicated that the Post was looking deeply into how it was
reported to the local sheriff and the exact condition of the victim.
"It sure woke up a lot of folks here in Washington on a quiet, snowy
Sunday," Baker said. "Whether the story has legs I suppose remains to be
seen." He said the delay question is "being asked a lot in Washington
today...
"I'm not sure there is a standard protocol when the vice president shoots
someone, but it's fair to say reporters prefer that news be disclosed in
a timely fashion."
In response to another query he revealed, "we are looking today into the
issue of the local sheriff's office and what involvement they had in
this. Stay tuned, more to come."
Asked if knew of any other vice president shooting a man, Baker replied:
"Obviously there was Aaron Burr shooting Alexander Hamilton in a duel in
1804, but that was actually intentional and in that case the victim
died."
http://mathaba.net/0_index.shtml?x=R3702
[IMAGE]
Dick 'Bwana' Cheney
[IMAGE]
Harry Whittington
Dick Whittington
Dick WhittingtonAKA Richard Whittington
Born: ?
Died: 1423
Location of death: London, England
Cause of death: unspecified
Gender: Male
Ethnicity: White
Sexual orientation: Straight
Occupation: Politician
Nationality: England
Executive summary: Mayor of London
Richard Whittington, Mayor of London, described himself as son of William
and Joan. This enables him to be identified as the third son of Sir
William Whittington of Pauntley in Gloucestershire, a knight of good
family, who married after 1355 Joan, daughter of William Mansel, and
widow of Thomas Berkeley of Cubberley. Consequently Richard was a very
young man when he is mentioned in 1379 as subscribing five marks to a
city loan. He was a mercer by trade, and clearly entered on his
commercial career under favorable circumstances. He married Alice,
daughter of Sir Ivo Fitzwaryn, a Dorset knight of considerable property.
Whittington sat in the common council as a representative of Coleman
Street Ward, was elected alderman of Broad Street in March 1393, and
served as sheriff in 1393-94. When Adam Bamme, the mayor, died in June
1397, Whittington was appointed by the king to succeed him, and in
October was elected mayor for the ensuing year. He had acquired great
wealth and much commercial importance, and was mayor of the staple at
London and Calais. He made frequent large loans both to Henry IV and
Henry V, and according to the legend, when he gave a banquet to the
latter king and his queen in 1421, completed the entertainment by burning
bonds for £60,000, which he had taken up and discharged. Henry V employed
him to superintend the expenditure of money on completing Westminster
Abbey. But except as a London commercial magnate Whittington took no
great part in public affairs. He was mayor for a third term in 1406-07,
and for a fourth in 1419-20. He died in March 1423. His wife had
predeceased him leaving no children [All Whittington descendents through
a brother, Robert, physician to Henry V], and Whittington bequeathed the
whole of his vast fortune to charitable and public purposes. In his
lifetime he had joined in procuring Leadenhall for the city, and had
borne nearly all the cost of building the Greyfriars Library. In his last
year as mayor he had been shocked by the foul state of Newgate prison,
and one of the first works undertaken by his executors was its
rebuilding. His executors, chief of whom was John Carpenter, the famous
town clerk, also contributed to the cost of glazing and paving the new
Guildhall, and paid half the expense of building the library there; they
repaired St. Bartholomew's hospital, and provided bosses for water at
Billingsgate and Cripplegate. But the chief of Whittington's foundations
was his college at St. Michael, Paternoster church, and the adjoining
hospital. The college was dissolved at the Reformation, but the hospital
or almshouses are still maintained by the Mercers' Company at Highgate.
Whittington was buried at St. Michael's church. John Stow relates that
his tomb was spoiled during the reign of Edward VI, but that under Mary
the parishioners were compelled to restore it. Whittington had a house
near St. Michael's church; it is doubtful whether he had any connection
with the so-called Whittington Palace in Hart Street, Mark Lane. There is
no proof that he was ever knighted; Stow does not call him Sir Richard.
Much of Whittington's fame was probably due to the magnificence of his
charities. But a writer of the next generation bears witness to his
commercial success in A Libell of English Policy by styling him "the
sunne of marchaundy, that lodestarre and chief-chosen flower."
Pen and paper may not me suffice
Him to describe, so high he was of price.
The Richard Whittington of history is thus very different from the Dick
Whittington of popular legend, which makes him a poor orphan employed as
a scullion by the rich merchant, Sir Hugh Fitzwarren, who ventures the
cat, his only possession, on one of his master's ships. Distressed by
ill-treatment he runs away, but turns back when he hears from Holloway
the prophetic peal of Bow bells. He returns to find that his venture has
brought him a fortune, marries his master's daughter, and succeeds to his
business. The legend is not referred to by Stow, whose love for exposing
fables would assuredly have prompted him to notice it if it had been well
established when he wrote. The first reference to the story comes with
the licensing in 1605 of a play, now lost, The History of Richard
Whittington, of his lowe byrth, his great fortune. Thomas Heywood in 1606
makes one of the characters in If you know not me you know nobody, allude
to the legend, to be rebuked by another because "they did more wrong to
the gentleman." "The legend of Whittington", probably meaning the play of
1605, is also mentioned by Beaumont and Fletcher in 1611 in The Knight of
the Burning Pestle. The story was then no doubt popular. When a little
later Robert Elstracke, the engraver, published a supposed portrait of
Whittington with his hand resting on a skull, he had in deference to the
public fancy to substitute a cat; copies in the first state are very
rare. Attempts have been made to explain the story as possibly referring
to vessels called "cats", which were employed in the North Sea trade, or
to the French achat (purchase). But Thomas Keightley traced the cat story
in Persian, Danish and Italian folklore at least as far back as the 13th
century. The assertion that a carved figure of a cat existed on Newgate
jail before the great fire is an unsupported assumption.
Father: Sir William Whittington
Mother: Joan Mansel
Wife: Alice Fitzwaryn
http://www.nndb.com/people/219/000103907
Richard Whittington, the Lord Mayor of London in 1419, who was famed for
his love of cats. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/13741/13741.txt
http://www.toymania.com/custom/Galleries/Joshua/Joshua3/The%20Penguin.jpg
http://www.hillcity-comics.com/toys/batman_penguin_import_2.jpg
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Quotes_of_the_Imperium
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/september_eleven_vreeland/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
september_eleven_vreeland-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment