BluegrassReport.org: ***SPECIAL REPORT*** Fletcher Administration Reveals Re-Election Strategy As Told To Business Leaders -- Can You Say 'Scorched Earth'?
Blogger Thoughts: Woo hoo!
Wednesday, November 16, 2005
Wow, Had no idea Tucker would be such a jerk?
Below is a link to the video the previous night...
http://www.911blogger.com/2005/11/byu-professor-steven-jones-on.html
Tags 9/11 Truth Controlled Demo Cover-Up Steven Jones BYU WTC7
Anxiety Culture: Newsletter
Anxiety Culture: Newsletter
Sample newsletter (from December 2001):
(Emailed in plain text, with no ads or attachments)
:::::: NEWS & DISTRACTION ::::::
LATEST NEWS• After September 11, Clear Channel, America's biggest owner of radio stations, sent out an internal memorandum with a list of songs the stations were forbidden to play, including John Lennon's "Imagine". In response, Yoko Ono, took out a full page ad in the New York Times with lyrics from the song. Ono said: "I think they (Clear Channel) wanted everyone to be in a kind of attack mode."
• During the first Gulf war, a TV ad featuring a cartoon-sexy languorous female bunny rabbit offering Cadbury's Caramel to soldier ants was banned from UK TV. Presumably the unstated message "lazy sex & chocolate is better than marching to war" was deemed inappropriate by those authorities who know what's best for us.
• Gore Vidal, the political historian and dissenter, said he can't find a publisher willing to print his book on US foreign policy (BBC2 Newsnight 7/12/01). Vidal has previously commented that his criticisms of US policy are excluded from public debate.
• One in seven people aged over 65 in the UK are malnourished, or at severe risk of malnutrition, according to the Malnutrition Advisory Group (MAG).
• According to Dr Sadie Plant, the cellphone has become a "psychosexual symbol of performance". (Guardian 1/12/2001)
DIARY OF DISTRACTIONS9th December 2001 - Some voices of "reason and moderation" from the respectable US media:
Michael Kelly (Washington Post): "American pacifists... are on the side of future mass murders of Americans", they are "objectively pro-terrorist", "evil" and "liars".
Steve Dunleavy (New York Post) "The response to this unimaginable 21st-century Pearl Harbor should be as simple as it is swift - kill the bastards... A gunshot between the eyes, blow them to smithereens, poison them... As for cities or countries that host these worms, bomb them into basketball courts".
Rich Lowry (National Review): "If we flatten part of Damascus or Tehran or whatever it takes, that is part of the solution".
Jonathan Alter (Newsweek): Urged dissenters to shut up because "it's kill or be killed".
A.M. Rosenthal (Washington Times): In addition to Afghanistan, wants to bomb Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Iran, and Syria.
Ann Coulter (ex-National Review): Her response to terrorism is to "invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity".
WEBSITE REVIEWInteresting survey by FAIR of imbalances in the US press coverage following September 11th (http://www.fair.org/activism/nyt-wp-opeds.html)
Here's a brief excerpt:"In polls that offered a choice between a military response or nothing, it's true that overwhelming majorities chose war. But given the choice between either a military assault or pressing for the extradition and trial of those responsible (eg Christian Science Monitor, 9/27/01), a substantial minority either chose extradition (30 percent) or were undecided (16 percent). These people had next to no representation in the op-ed debate; in fact, it's likely that many people asked to choose whether or not to go to war had never seen an alternative to war articulated in a mainstream outlet."
QUOTE OF THE WEEK(From Robert Anton Wilson)"In the feudal age, people once fought wars over Land, when Land served as the source of wealth. Those who had Land wanted more, on the usual addictive rule that we want more of what makes us feel very very good. They also worried that others wanted to take their Land away. Then paper Money appeared, almost as abstract as pure information in communication theory. For over 400 years now, the world has struggled over Money -- working for it, swindling and robbing for it, conspiring to monopolize it, going to war over it. Since less than one percent of Earthians owns 99 percent of the Money, the [approximately] 6 billion of the rest of us struggle evermore desperately over the one percent of the green magick not yet monopolized".
Sample newsletter (from December 2001):
(Emailed in plain text, with no ads or attachments)
:::::: NEWS & DISTRACTION ::::::
LATEST NEWS• After September 11, Clear Channel, America's biggest owner of radio stations, sent out an internal memorandum with a list of songs the stations were forbidden to play, including John Lennon's "Imagine". In response, Yoko Ono, took out a full page ad in the New York Times with lyrics from the song. Ono said: "I think they (Clear Channel) wanted everyone to be in a kind of attack mode."
• During the first Gulf war, a TV ad featuring a cartoon-sexy languorous female bunny rabbit offering Cadbury's Caramel to soldier ants was banned from UK TV. Presumably the unstated message "lazy sex & chocolate is better than marching to war" was deemed inappropriate by those authorities who know what's best for us.
• Gore Vidal, the political historian and dissenter, said he can't find a publisher willing to print his book on US foreign policy (BBC2 Newsnight 7/12/01). Vidal has previously commented that his criticisms of US policy are excluded from public debate.
• One in seven people aged over 65 in the UK are malnourished, or at severe risk of malnutrition, according to the Malnutrition Advisory Group (MAG).
• According to Dr Sadie Plant, the cellphone has become a "psychosexual symbol of performance". (Guardian 1/12/2001)
DIARY OF DISTRACTIONS9th December 2001 - Some voices of "reason and moderation" from the respectable US media:
Michael Kelly (Washington Post): "American pacifists... are on the side of future mass murders of Americans", they are "objectively pro-terrorist", "evil" and "liars".
Steve Dunleavy (New York Post) "The response to this unimaginable 21st-century Pearl Harbor should be as simple as it is swift - kill the bastards... A gunshot between the eyes, blow them to smithereens, poison them... As for cities or countries that host these worms, bomb them into basketball courts".
Rich Lowry (National Review): "If we flatten part of Damascus or Tehran or whatever it takes, that is part of the solution".
Jonathan Alter (Newsweek): Urged dissenters to shut up because "it's kill or be killed".
A.M. Rosenthal (Washington Times): In addition to Afghanistan, wants to bomb Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Iran, and Syria.
Ann Coulter (ex-National Review): Her response to terrorism is to "invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity".
WEBSITE REVIEWInteresting survey by FAIR of imbalances in the US press coverage following September 11th (http://www.fair.org/activism/nyt-wp-opeds.html)
Here's a brief excerpt:"In polls that offered a choice between a military response or nothing, it's true that overwhelming majorities chose war. But given the choice between either a military assault or pressing for the extradition and trial of those responsible (eg Christian Science Monitor, 9/27/01), a substantial minority either chose extradition (30 percent) or were undecided (16 percent). These people had next to no representation in the op-ed debate; in fact, it's likely that many people asked to choose whether or not to go to war had never seen an alternative to war articulated in a mainstream outlet."
QUOTE OF THE WEEK(From Robert Anton Wilson)"In the feudal age, people once fought wars over Land, when Land served as the source of wealth. Those who had Land wanted more, on the usual addictive rule that we want more of what makes us feel very very good. They also worried that others wanted to take their Land away. Then paper Money appeared, almost as abstract as pure information in communication theory. For over 400 years now, the world has struggled over Money -- working for it, swindling and robbing for it, conspiring to monopolize it, going to war over it. Since less than one percent of Earthians owns 99 percent of the Money, the [approximately] 6 billion of the rest of us struggle evermore desperately over the one percent of the green magick not yet monopolized".
Media Monitor - TWA 800 Special Misses the Mark - November 14, 2005
Media Monitor - TWA 800 Special Misses the Mark - November 14, 2005
Blogger Thoughts: What, National Geographic may not have tackled the hard questions?
Blogger Thoughts: What, National Geographic may not have tackled the hard questions?
Amman Bombings: More Suspicious Details
Another Day in the Empire: "Amman Bombings: More Suspicious Details "
No other blogger that I noticed said this....(about this Newsweek Article)
Terror For Export - Newsweek World News - MSNBC.com
Maybe we are begin fed a load of manure about what really happened in Jordan? Maybe the entire premise of the Newsweek article is not grounded in any reality?
Maybe we are begin fed a load of manure about what really happened in Jordan? Maybe the entire premise of the Newsweek article is not grounded in any reality?
Civil Commotion � Original Sin
Civil Commotion � Original Sin
Blogger Thoughts: I don't know Bob Felton. I don't claim that his shortcomings of understanding are representative for a huge populace of deranged, confused, and dangerous thinkers/politicos.
I have to say, however, that it certainly appears to be the case.
Blogger Thoughts: I don't know Bob Felton. I don't claim that his shortcomings of understanding are representative for a huge populace of deranged, confused, and dangerous thinkers/politicos.
I have to say, however, that it certainly appears to be the case.
Phosphorous was used at times in Fallujah as an incendiary weapon against enemy combatants.
Pentagon Used White Phosphorous in Iraq
Blogger Thoughts: Based on reports such as this, it seems to me Rumsfeld should be first in line at the War Crimes Court. Maybe Bush / Cheney didn't know these details?
Blogger Thoughts: Based on reports such as this, it seems to me Rumsfeld should be first in line at the War Crimes Court. Maybe Bush / Cheney didn't know these details?
Bonfire of the Vanities: Why not fight for Oil?
Bonfire of the Vanities: Why not fight for Oil?
Blogger Thoughts: I'm aware that there's a shortage of Priests, but surely there has to be a higher standard?
Blogger Thoughts: I'm aware that there's a shortage of Priests, but surely there has to be a higher standard?
@LL Robot Radio - Virus Hoax Alert # 4 - WTC Survivor
@LL Robot Radio - Virus Hoax Alert # 4 - WTC Survivor
Blogger Thought: Why would anybody have a hoax like this?
Blogger Thought: Why would anybody have a hoax like this?
My email to springerontheradio.com
Date: 11/15/05 11:59:08
To: springerontheradio@yahoo.com
Subject: Call in Comment / Quesiton wtc
Stephanie,
Please forward this if I don't have it addressed correctly.
Approx. about six months ago, I was glad to receive your emails in response
to my comments.
Your first email to me shows that you had sent it around mid-night. And, it
was in response to a not so positive email that I had sent in to the show.
Even though the net result of our correspondence seems to be nil, I was
impressed with your dedication to the show, your position, and the
justification of Jerry's opinions.
In summary I'm trying to be objective and give you and the Show every
benefit of the doubt.
Today when I called in, I was forthright in my explanation that I was
calling about WTC demolition issues. You said it was not on topic. I respect
that in fairness to your guest, you have a defensible point. On the other
hand, to the extent that the public has been lied to about 9/11, and most
likely is being lied to about the Jordan bombing, I think you are part of
the cover up with your screening, knowingly or unknowingly.
I am doing my best to not be accusatory. I have absolutely no evidence that
you personally have an agenda to suppress facts. I realize your job
requires screening. I've never been in your shoes.
So much for history. Could I ask this favor? Could you let me know if the
Springer Show is planning to have any future show where discussion the The
Lies of 9/11 will be on topic. Do you personally think those of us who have
concerns are just bonkers? Others on Air America have broached the subject,
right? Is the topic anathema for Jerry?
I respect that you may be caught in the middle.
If you do pen a response to this email, may I have your permission to post
on my blog: http://bgtruth.blogspot.com
To: springerontheradio@yahoo.com
Subject: Call in Comment / Quesiton wtc
Stephanie,
Please forward this if I don't have it addressed correctly.
Approx. about six months ago, I was glad to receive your emails in response
to my comments.
Your first email to me shows that you had sent it around mid-night. And, it
was in response to a not so positive email that I had sent in to the show.
Even though the net result of our correspondence seems to be nil, I was
impressed with your dedication to the show, your position, and the
justification of Jerry's opinions.
In summary I'm trying to be objective and give you and the Show every
benefit of the doubt.
Today when I called in, I was forthright in my explanation that I was
calling about WTC demolition issues. You said it was not on topic. I respect
that in fairness to your guest, you have a defensible point. On the other
hand, to the extent that the public has been lied to about 9/11, and most
likely is being lied to about the Jordan bombing, I think you are part of
the cover up with your screening, knowingly or unknowingly.
I am doing my best to not be accusatory. I have absolutely no evidence that
you personally have an agenda to suppress facts. I realize your job
requires screening. I've never been in your shoes.
So much for history. Could I ask this favor? Could you let me know if the
Springer Show is planning to have any future show where discussion the The
Lies of 9/11 will be on topic. Do you personally think those of us who have
concerns are just bonkers? Others on Air America have broached the subject,
right? Is the topic anathema for Jerry?
I respect that you may be caught in the middle.
If you do pen a response to this email, may I have your permission to post
on my blog: http://bgtruth.blogspot.com
Republican Senate leader Bill Frist thinks Bush is doing a "very good job" in Iraq
AMERICAblog: Because a great nation deserves the truth: "Republican Senate leader Bill Frist thinks Bush is doing a 'very good job' in Iraq "
Nail the 9-11 ghouls in their coffin
news from Daryl Bradford Smith
Nail the 9-11 ghouls in their coffin
by Eric Hufschmid 6 Nov 2005
Jon Carlson frequently writes about the 9-11 attack. His latest article is at Rense: http://www.rense.com/general68/911jh.htm
Jon Carlson, Tom Flocco, Mike Ruppert, Karl Schwarz, and most other "9-11 investigators" include a little bit of truth in their articles, but their primary goal is to put all the blame for 9-11 on a small number of Americans, mainly Bush and Cheney. Some also blame Pakistan's ISI or Saudi Arabia's royal family.
These "Truth Seekers" ignore very important aspects of 9-11, such as:
The World Trade Center towers and Building 7 were demolished by explosives, not fire. Who did that demolition? And who is keeping the media quiet about it?
About 120 Israeli art students were arrested after 9/11, but they were quietly sent back to Israel rather than taken to court. Haaretz has a story on it.
Five Israelis who were celebrating the attack were arrested on September 11, and they were reported to have explosive residue in their van and Arab clothing, but they were also quietly deported to Israel. WRH has an article on it.
There is a lot of evidence that shows that some Israelis were deeply involved in the attack on September 11. In fact, they appear to have been the masterminds of 9-11, especially in regards to the attack and demolition of the World Trade Center. The Zionists also have tremendous control over the media, so without their approval, the attack could never be covered up.
However, most of the 9-11 truth tellers find a way to divert attention away from Israel. For example, in Wayne Madsen's verbose article about the Israeli art students who were arrested, he makes the remark:
"If the Israelis were stalking the hijackers, they would have also likely known about their interest in the World Trade Center." http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/Artstudents.htm
Madsen implies the Israelis were following the hijackers because they suspected the evil Arabs were planning nefarious deeds.
Madsen ignores the fact that the Arabs were patsies, not hijackers. Why would Israelis follow patsies? And why would Madsen ignore this crucial information?
The only sensible explanation is that the Israelis were their handlers and protectors; that the Israelis were deeply involved in the attack. And that Wayne Madsen is diverting attention away from Israel.
Jon Carlson's newest article also diverts attention away from Israel, but Carlson starts his article with a deception technique that I had not mentioned in my other articles on deception, so I thought I should mention it. Specifically, he starts his article with what we refer to as "name dropping".
His article begins by creating the impression that Nelson Thall (also known as Lenny Bloom) is a very important person because he has the e-mail address of Andreas von Bulow. Carlson includes a copy of Thall's email to prove this to us and further impress us.
Most people define "name dropping" as the casual mentioning of important people to impress the listener. However, in Carlson's article, the remarks about the e-mail address of von Bulow is so irrelevant to the topic of 9-11 that I would not call it a "casual" mentioning an important person. Rather, I would say it is a "blatant" attempt to impress us. We need a new expression for this, such as "name pushing".
When someone tries to impress you, watch out for deception
If a person has an intelligent analysis of 9-11, he will start the article in an intelligent manner. When somebody starts a 9-11 article by pushing names of famous people, you should assume that he has nothing of value to say, and that he is trying to impress you so that you don't notice that the remainder of his article is disinformation.
Getting back to Carlson's article, he tells us that Lenny Bloom and Sherman Sholnick interviewed von Bulow in 2004 for their radio show, and that von Bulow believes the 9/11 attack was an operation of the US government, not an attack by Arabs.
A bit further along in the article we find a remark that NBC is owned by General Electric, and that General Electric benefits from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
That sentence implies that General Electric executives were involved in 9-11 because they profit from war, and that NBC is submissive to these evil General Electric executives. This deflects attention away from the NBC executives, and the media in general, and shifts blame to the mysterious and evil entity known as the "military industrial complex".
The article then gets ridiculous. Carlson explains that a small, white jet that probably took off from an aircraft carrier was guiding a Boeing 737 into the South Tower by remote control.
He shows a photograph of the South Tower a few moments after it was hit, and we can see a white trail, which Carlson claims is the vapor trail of the jet.
However, the jets that crashed into the towers did not leave vapor trails, nor do any jets leave trails at low altitudes during warm weather.
Furthermore, every video clip and photo of that particular moment in time shows the white trail is coming from an object that is flying out of the South Tower, probably an engine or landing gear. You can see this white trail more clearly on page 39 of my book Painful Questions. If you don't have the book, you can see the object in this article by Christopher Bollyn, and in the video at HugeQuestions.com that is identified as being about Uranium for Bollyn.
Carlson also shows a few photographs of a helicopter near the towers, and claims that the helicopter is the white jet. However, you can determine that these objects are helicopters by watching the videos of that day. If there are any white jets in the area, they are higher up, not hovering near the towers.
A smorgasbord of disinformation
The cloak and dagger web site was (maybe still is) promoting the idea that the airplanes that crashed into the World Trade Center towers were holograms. John Carlson claims the airplane was a Boeing 737. So which was it? Was it a hologram or a Boeing 737?
These people don't care if anything they say makes sense. They just dump lot of ideas into the Internet, and they let each person pick what they like.
What is Carlson's problem?
Carlson's article is as stupid as Tom Flocco's article about the arrest of Barbara Olson. Why is Carlson writing such nonsense? As I mentioned in my article about Flocco, there are lots of possible reasons, so we may never know why, or who he works for.
Carlson's article ends with confusing remarks, and links to dozens of more articles, most of which are his articles, and most of which are packed with nonsense.
Why am I complaining about Carlson?
Carlson is trying to use Andreas von Bulow's remark to support the theory that the 9/11 attack was conducted by the CIA, US military, and a few other Americans. This might seem to be a valid conclusion, but one way to fool people is to give them some truthful remarks but not the entire story.
It is true that some US government officials had to be involved in the 9-11 attack, but the evidence shows that Zionists and British government officials were also involved.
Furthermore, Zionists have tremendous control of the American, Canadian, European, and Australian media, and without control over the media, none of these scams could be occurring.
Carlson appears to be a "Truth Teller" who is struggling to expose the 9/11 attack. In reality, he is diverting attention away from the extremely important role that the Zionists play in these phenomenal crimes, and the role they play in controlling our media, our public libraries, and our school system.
Perhaps they act stupid on purpose
Carlson, Flocco, and some other "9-11 Investigators" are giving 9-11 conspiracy theories a bad image because anybody who tries to verify their information will come to the conclusion that the 9-11 conspiracy theories are coming from morons who do not even have a high school-level understanding of geography, airplanes, or science.
Their deceptive articles get a lot of attention on the Internet, and a lot of people are passing them around by e-mail. When somebody looks on the Internet for 9-11 information, they are very likely to run across to one of these deceptive articles. These people are flooding the Internet with deception.
Chaim Kupferberg is another example. As it is true of many disinformation articles, Kupferberg's articles are somewhat confusing or annoying to read, but if you can get through them, notice that the primary emphasis is that Israel is innocent. For example, try finding the value in this goofy article:
There's Something About Omar: Truth, Lies, and The Legend of 9/11 http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/KUP310A.html
Some of these disinformation agents make Israel appear a victim of the evil Bush regime, or the evil neocon cabal, or the evil Illuminati organization.
Paul Thompson is another example. He created the 9-11 timeline, which is truthful, but at the same time it implies the evil Al-Qaeda was responsible for 9-11.
When you find a rat, follow him to his nest
Whenever you find one disinformation agent, take a close look at his friends, supporters, and associates, and you are likely to find even more rats.
For example, Carlson's article gives some support to Karl Schwarz, the Guerrilla News Network (GNN), Ariana Huffington, and Wayne Madsen. Do we really get a serious analysis of world affairs from any of those people?
In case you never noticed, the Guerrilla News Network is one of many groups who try to convince us that Pakistan's ISI was a significant participant in 9-11.
Don't worship a golden calf
The people I personally know remind me of a scene from the movie The Ten Commandments. There is a scene where Charlton Heston goes up the mountain to pick up the tablets with the Ten Commandments, and when he comes back he finds everybody worshiping a golden calf.
I find people around me worshipping Tom Flocco, and when I finally convince them that Flocco is a liar, I find that a week later they are worshiping Jon Carlson. After spending time explaining to them that Carlson is a liar, I discover a week later that they are worshiping Chaim Kupferberg. A week after that they are telling me that Pakistan's ISI funded the September 11 attack because Paul Thompson told them so.
America and Europe are perpetual victims because most people are terrible at selecting leaders. They select leaders who make them feel good, not leaders who provide the truth. The truth is too painful for most people to deal with.
People such as Tom Flocco, Jon Carlson, Sherman Sholnick, Chaim Kupferberg, and Mike Ruppert make everything seem simple. They tell us that all of our problems are due to George Bush, Dick Cheney, and the CIA. They tell us Patrick Fitzgerald will soon arrest Bush and Cheney, or that the lawsuit filed by Phil Berg will soon expose 9-11 and bring about the arrest of Bush and Cheney.
They imply that as soon as Bush and Cheney are arrested, we will run out into the streets, hold hands, sing songs, and live happily ever after, just like in a Hollywood movie.
These disinformation agents are similar to politicians who promise us that they will end crime, improve our schools, and reduce our taxes. The majority of people fall for these promises during every election.
Unfortunately, reality is not so simple. America's problems are not going to be solved by arresting Dick Cheney or George Bush. Even with a different president, America would continue to be dominated by Zionists, pedophiles, corrupt unions, selfish businessman, and incompetent university officials.
Have you seen the accusations from John DeCamp? If what DeCamp and the children are saying is true, the raping of boys at Boystown has been going on year after year, president after president. It makes no difference who the president is, nor what party he belongs to.The rapings also go on year after year regardless of whether Democrats control the Senate, or whether Republicans are in control.
However, do you ever hear remarks like this from Carlson, Flocco, Ruppert, Schwarz, Kupferberg, or any of the others Truth Seekers? Of course not. Instead, they promise that if you follow them, they will soon arrest Dick Cheney are George Bush, and everything will be wonderful.
Most of the Truth Seekers are Pied Pipers who are leading the naive people in the wrong direction.
We need better leaders in the "truth movement"
The only way this world is going to improve is if we start bringing better people into leadership of government, schools, businesses, and all other organizations.
All of the liars and incompetent nitwits must be driven out of the 9-11 movement. Once in a while you should send an email to the web sites, radio stations, and newspapers to stop promote the nonsense.
We also must drive the mainstream media out of business. People should stop buying their newspapers, magazines, and television channels.
Nail the 9-11 ghouls in their coffin
by Eric Hufschmid 6 Nov 2005
Jon Carlson frequently writes about the 9-11 attack. His latest article is at Rense: http://www.rense.com/general68/911jh.htm
Jon Carlson, Tom Flocco, Mike Ruppert, Karl Schwarz, and most other "9-11 investigators" include a little bit of truth in their articles, but their primary goal is to put all the blame for 9-11 on a small number of Americans, mainly Bush and Cheney. Some also blame Pakistan's ISI or Saudi Arabia's royal family.
These "Truth Seekers" ignore very important aspects of 9-11, such as:
The World Trade Center towers and Building 7 were demolished by explosives, not fire. Who did that demolition? And who is keeping the media quiet about it?
About 120 Israeli art students were arrested after 9/11, but they were quietly sent back to Israel rather than taken to court. Haaretz has a story on it.
Five Israelis who were celebrating the attack were arrested on September 11, and they were reported to have explosive residue in their van and Arab clothing, but they were also quietly deported to Israel. WRH has an article on it.
There is a lot of evidence that shows that some Israelis were deeply involved in the attack on September 11. In fact, they appear to have been the masterminds of 9-11, especially in regards to the attack and demolition of the World Trade Center. The Zionists also have tremendous control over the media, so without their approval, the attack could never be covered up.
However, most of the 9-11 truth tellers find a way to divert attention away from Israel. For example, in Wayne Madsen's verbose article about the Israeli art students who were arrested, he makes the remark:
"If the Israelis were stalking the hijackers, they would have also likely known about their interest in the World Trade Center." http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/Artstudents.htm
Madsen implies the Israelis were following the hijackers because they suspected the evil Arabs were planning nefarious deeds.
Madsen ignores the fact that the Arabs were patsies, not hijackers. Why would Israelis follow patsies? And why would Madsen ignore this crucial information?
The only sensible explanation is that the Israelis were their handlers and protectors; that the Israelis were deeply involved in the attack. And that Wayne Madsen is diverting attention away from Israel.
Jon Carlson's newest article also diverts attention away from Israel, but Carlson starts his article with a deception technique that I had not mentioned in my other articles on deception, so I thought I should mention it. Specifically, he starts his article with what we refer to as "name dropping".
His article begins by creating the impression that Nelson Thall (also known as Lenny Bloom) is a very important person because he has the e-mail address of Andreas von Bulow. Carlson includes a copy of Thall's email to prove this to us and further impress us.
Most people define "name dropping" as the casual mentioning of important people to impress the listener. However, in Carlson's article, the remarks about the e-mail address of von Bulow is so irrelevant to the topic of 9-11 that I would not call it a "casual" mentioning an important person. Rather, I would say it is a "blatant" attempt to impress us. We need a new expression for this, such as "name pushing".
When someone tries to impress you, watch out for deception
If a person has an intelligent analysis of 9-11, he will start the article in an intelligent manner. When somebody starts a 9-11 article by pushing names of famous people, you should assume that he has nothing of value to say, and that he is trying to impress you so that you don't notice that the remainder of his article is disinformation.
Getting back to Carlson's article, he tells us that Lenny Bloom and Sherman Sholnick interviewed von Bulow in 2004 for their radio show, and that von Bulow believes the 9/11 attack was an operation of the US government, not an attack by Arabs.
A bit further along in the article we find a remark that NBC is owned by General Electric, and that General Electric benefits from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
That sentence implies that General Electric executives were involved in 9-11 because they profit from war, and that NBC is submissive to these evil General Electric executives. This deflects attention away from the NBC executives, and the media in general, and shifts blame to the mysterious and evil entity known as the "military industrial complex".
The article then gets ridiculous. Carlson explains that a small, white jet that probably took off from an aircraft carrier was guiding a Boeing 737 into the South Tower by remote control.
He shows a photograph of the South Tower a few moments after it was hit, and we can see a white trail, which Carlson claims is the vapor trail of the jet.
However, the jets that crashed into the towers did not leave vapor trails, nor do any jets leave trails at low altitudes during warm weather.
Furthermore, every video clip and photo of that particular moment in time shows the white trail is coming from an object that is flying out of the South Tower, probably an engine or landing gear. You can see this white trail more clearly on page 39 of my book Painful Questions. If you don't have the book, you can see the object in this article by Christopher Bollyn, and in the video at HugeQuestions.com that is identified as being about Uranium for Bollyn.
Carlson also shows a few photographs of a helicopter near the towers, and claims that the helicopter is the white jet. However, you can determine that these objects are helicopters by watching the videos of that day. If there are any white jets in the area, they are higher up, not hovering near the towers.
A smorgasbord of disinformation
The cloak and dagger web site was (maybe still is) promoting the idea that the airplanes that crashed into the World Trade Center towers were holograms. John Carlson claims the airplane was a Boeing 737. So which was it? Was it a hologram or a Boeing 737?
These people don't care if anything they say makes sense. They just dump lot of ideas into the Internet, and they let each person pick what they like.
What is Carlson's problem?
Carlson's article is as stupid as Tom Flocco's article about the arrest of Barbara Olson. Why is Carlson writing such nonsense? As I mentioned in my article about Flocco, there are lots of possible reasons, so we may never know why, or who he works for.
Carlson's article ends with confusing remarks, and links to dozens of more articles, most of which are his articles, and most of which are packed with nonsense.
Why am I complaining about Carlson?
Carlson is trying to use Andreas von Bulow's remark to support the theory that the 9/11 attack was conducted by the CIA, US military, and a few other Americans. This might seem to be a valid conclusion, but one way to fool people is to give them some truthful remarks but not the entire story.
It is true that some US government officials had to be involved in the 9-11 attack, but the evidence shows that Zionists and British government officials were also involved.
Furthermore, Zionists have tremendous control of the American, Canadian, European, and Australian media, and without control over the media, none of these scams could be occurring.
Carlson appears to be a "Truth Teller" who is struggling to expose the 9/11 attack. In reality, he is diverting attention away from the extremely important role that the Zionists play in these phenomenal crimes, and the role they play in controlling our media, our public libraries, and our school system.
Perhaps they act stupid on purpose
Carlson, Flocco, and some other "9-11 Investigators" are giving 9-11 conspiracy theories a bad image because anybody who tries to verify their information will come to the conclusion that the 9-11 conspiracy theories are coming from morons who do not even have a high school-level understanding of geography, airplanes, or science.
Their deceptive articles get a lot of attention on the Internet, and a lot of people are passing them around by e-mail. When somebody looks on the Internet for 9-11 information, they are very likely to run across to one of these deceptive articles. These people are flooding the Internet with deception.
Chaim Kupferberg is another example. As it is true of many disinformation articles, Kupferberg's articles are somewhat confusing or annoying to read, but if you can get through them, notice that the primary emphasis is that Israel is innocent. For example, try finding the value in this goofy article:
There's Something About Omar: Truth, Lies, and The Legend of 9/11 http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/KUP310A.html
Some of these disinformation agents make Israel appear a victim of the evil Bush regime, or the evil neocon cabal, or the evil Illuminati organization.
Paul Thompson is another example. He created the 9-11 timeline, which is truthful, but at the same time it implies the evil Al-Qaeda was responsible for 9-11.
When you find a rat, follow him to his nest
Whenever you find one disinformation agent, take a close look at his friends, supporters, and associates, and you are likely to find even more rats.
For example, Carlson's article gives some support to Karl Schwarz, the Guerrilla News Network (GNN), Ariana Huffington, and Wayne Madsen. Do we really get a serious analysis of world affairs from any of those people?
In case you never noticed, the Guerrilla News Network is one of many groups who try to convince us that Pakistan's ISI was a significant participant in 9-11.
Don't worship a golden calf
The people I personally know remind me of a scene from the movie The Ten Commandments. There is a scene where Charlton Heston goes up the mountain to pick up the tablets with the Ten Commandments, and when he comes back he finds everybody worshiping a golden calf.
I find people around me worshipping Tom Flocco, and when I finally convince them that Flocco is a liar, I find that a week later they are worshiping Jon Carlson. After spending time explaining to them that Carlson is a liar, I discover a week later that they are worshiping Chaim Kupferberg. A week after that they are telling me that Pakistan's ISI funded the September 11 attack because Paul Thompson told them so.
America and Europe are perpetual victims because most people are terrible at selecting leaders. They select leaders who make them feel good, not leaders who provide the truth. The truth is too painful for most people to deal with.
People such as Tom Flocco, Jon Carlson, Sherman Sholnick, Chaim Kupferberg, and Mike Ruppert make everything seem simple. They tell us that all of our problems are due to George Bush, Dick Cheney, and the CIA. They tell us Patrick Fitzgerald will soon arrest Bush and Cheney, or that the lawsuit filed by Phil Berg will soon expose 9-11 and bring about the arrest of Bush and Cheney.
They imply that as soon as Bush and Cheney are arrested, we will run out into the streets, hold hands, sing songs, and live happily ever after, just like in a Hollywood movie.
These disinformation agents are similar to politicians who promise us that they will end crime, improve our schools, and reduce our taxes. The majority of people fall for these promises during every election.
Unfortunately, reality is not so simple. America's problems are not going to be solved by arresting Dick Cheney or George Bush. Even with a different president, America would continue to be dominated by Zionists, pedophiles, corrupt unions, selfish businessman, and incompetent university officials.
Have you seen the accusations from John DeCamp? If what DeCamp and the children are saying is true, the raping of boys at Boystown has been going on year after year, president after president. It makes no difference who the president is, nor what party he belongs to.The rapings also go on year after year regardless of whether Democrats control the Senate, or whether Republicans are in control.
However, do you ever hear remarks like this from Carlson, Flocco, Ruppert, Schwarz, Kupferberg, or any of the others Truth Seekers? Of course not. Instead, they promise that if you follow them, they will soon arrest Dick Cheney are George Bush, and everything will be wonderful.
Most of the Truth Seekers are Pied Pipers who are leading the naive people in the wrong direction.
We need better leaders in the "truth movement"
The only way this world is going to improve is if we start bringing better people into leadership of government, schools, businesses, and all other organizations.
All of the liars and incompetent nitwits must be driven out of the 9-11 movement. Once in a while you should send an email to the web sites, radio stations, and newspapers to stop promote the nonsense.
We also must drive the mainstream media out of business. People should stop buying their newspapers, magazines, and television channels.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)