WTC7 seems to be a classic controlled demolition. WTC 1 &2 destruction appears to have been enhanced by thermate (a variation of thermite) in addition. Pentagon was not struck by a passenger aircraft. It was a drone or missle.
Wednesday, June 15, 2005
Great Sarcastic New Item Blogged (911 Truth)
Another Day in the Empire: "
Questions about Nine Eleven? You�re Drug-addled
Monday June 13th 2005, 1:33 am
Filed under: Politics
Andrew Walden, editor and publisher of the Hawaii Free Press, writes on the Moonbat slander blog that the left's drug-addled base supporters� believe �paranoid conspiracy theories� about the nine eleven attacks, namely that there is absolutely no evidence a handful of medieval Muslims squirreled away in a cave in Afghanistan did the terrible deed, as is generally accepted. There is nothing short of a complete paucity of evidence Osama and his cobbled together crew pulled off this elaborate crime (especially considering the fact such complicated operations are strictly the province of state intelligence agencies, as Andreas von Bulow, former overseer of the three branches of the German secret service while a member of the Bundestag from 1969 to 1994, has noted on numerous occasions). Strangely, Walden, from his refuge on the Hawaiian Islands, believes a large number of New Yorkers are leftists with fried brains (maybe due to the toxicity of ground zero?) because they answered a �Zogbyesque question� about Bush foreknowledge in the affirmative, a natural conclusion when one takes a good hard look at the facts surrounding the event. But then maybe New Yorkers read more newspapers than Mr. Walden.
Professor Emeritus David Ray Griffin, a professor of theology, could hardly be considered drug-addled, or even a leftist with a fried brain. Griffin has based his findings that all is not right with the official version of the nine eleven story on mainline stories from The New York Times, The Boston Globe and The Guardian and so on. These reports tend to, more or less, contradict the official theory,� Griffin recently told Hustler Magazine. �Cumulative evidence would seem to suggest that it was people s"
Questions about Nine Eleven? You�re Drug-addled
Monday June 13th 2005, 1:33 am
Filed under: Politics
Andrew Walden, editor and publisher of the Hawaii Free Press, writes on the Moonbat slander blog that the left's drug-addled base supporters� believe �paranoid conspiracy theories� about the nine eleven attacks, namely that there is absolutely no evidence a handful of medieval Muslims squirreled away in a cave in Afghanistan did the terrible deed, as is generally accepted. There is nothing short of a complete paucity of evidence Osama and his cobbled together crew pulled off this elaborate crime (especially considering the fact such complicated operations are strictly the province of state intelligence agencies, as Andreas von Bulow, former overseer of the three branches of the German secret service while a member of the Bundestag from 1969 to 1994, has noted on numerous occasions). Strangely, Walden, from his refuge on the Hawaiian Islands, believes a large number of New Yorkers are leftists with fried brains (maybe due to the toxicity of ground zero?) because they answered a �Zogbyesque question� about Bush foreknowledge in the affirmative, a natural conclusion when one takes a good hard look at the facts surrounding the event. But then maybe New Yorkers read more newspapers than Mr. Walden.
Professor Emeritus David Ray Griffin, a professor of theology, could hardly be considered drug-addled, or even a leftist with a fried brain. Griffin has based his findings that all is not right with the official version of the nine eleven story on mainline stories from The New York Times, The Boston Globe and The Guardian and so on. These reports tend to, more or less, contradict the official theory,� Griffin recently told Hustler Magazine. �Cumulative evidence would seem to suggest that it was people s"
Daily Howler: Why was Clinton hated so much? Blogger Pangloss knows the drill
Daily Howler: Why was Clinton hated so much? Blogger Pangloss knows the drillNew York Times continues its attempt to minimize the importance of Downing Street memo and its detailed companion memo—this earlier document which appeared in Sunday’s Times of London. Yesterday, David Sanger tortured the lengthy new document, picking out a single phrase to suggest that the Bush Admin hadn’t decided on war by July 2002.
Blackstone buys Wyndham for $3.2 billion - Yahoo! News
Blackstone buys Wyndham for $3.2 billion - Yahoo! News
BG: That Blackstone Group, They Get Around.... (See below)
Blackstone, Pete Peterson, CFR, 911
BG: That Blackstone Group, They Get Around.... (See below)
Blackstone, Pete Peterson, CFR, 911
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)