Monday, January 16, 2006
Optional Reading: Pentagon Nonsense
A year ago, I wouldn't have been able to make a blog post with the claims that I am making here.
As reference, here's (from CNN/AOL's web site) the only video of the Pentagon crash that I'm aware of that has been released to the public.
One year ago, I imagined that the 9/11 Commission Report or some other source would provide more evidence showing what really happened.
As we now enter 2006, my judgement is that if further evidence were available to prove the govt. crazy cover story, that evidence would have been released.
With this in mind, check out the discussion forum that this post links to, and review the posters in light of the fact that we now know beyond any reasonable doubt the the Govt. story is a lie.
Also, check this out (just saw this):
Arrogant Deception - Or an Attempt to Expose a Cover-up?
09/11/2001
to be continued....
Iran: I wish I knew what the Pranksters were up to.
Humint Events Online: I Truly Do Not Perceive a Nuclear Iran as a Threat
Check out the link and its links. See what you think.
Some of you may recall with that Scott Ritter said in the 2005 that we were going to have a draft (perhaps it will still happen), and that we were going invade Iran in June, '05.
Ritter, the dubious activists for truth and peace, at last report, didn't even know the truth of the false flag nature of 9/11.
Just how many layers of deception do the propagandists heap on us?
Check out the link and its links. See what you think.
Some of you may recall with that Scott Ritter said in the 2005 that we were going to have a draft (perhaps it will still happen), and that we were going invade Iran in June, '05.
Ritter, the dubious activists for truth and peace, at last report, didn't even know the truth of the false flag nature of 9/11.
Just how many layers of deception do the propagandists heap on us?
Repost: Ben Partin.....9-11 Conspiracy Fact & Fiction
9-11
Conspiracy Fact & Fiction
BG: Disappointing Words from Partin.....is he being quoted correctly?
But Partin says the OKC and WTC incidents are completely different. The Murrah building was only nine stories tall and made of heavy steel-reinforced concrete. And, since the Ryder truck was outside the building, the damage it caused was primarily from the shock wave of pressurized air. The Twin Towers, on the other hand, were 110 stories tall, supported by steel columns, and the planes — which served as missiles — dumped large quantities of high-energy, hot fuel.
"The claims that the explosions and fires would not have generated enough heat to cause the building to collapse are nonsense," Partin told THE NEW AMERICAN. "Steel doesn't have to 'melt' as some of these people claim. The yield strength of steel drops very dramatically under heat, and the impact of the airliners would have severely impacted the support columns. When they could no longer support the upper stories and the top started coming down, the dynamic loading caused a very rapid collapse, or 'pancaking,' that would have very nearly approached free-fall rate. No demolition charges were needed to accomplish this."
Conspiracy Fact & Fiction
BG: Disappointing Words from Partin.....is he being quoted correctly?
But Partin says the OKC and WTC incidents are completely different. The Murrah building was only nine stories tall and made of heavy steel-reinforced concrete. And, since the Ryder truck was outside the building, the damage it caused was primarily from the shock wave of pressurized air. The Twin Towers, on the other hand, were 110 stories tall, supported by steel columns, and the planes — which served as missiles — dumped large quantities of high-energy, hot fuel.
"The claims that the explosions and fires would not have generated enough heat to cause the building to collapse are nonsense," Partin told THE NEW AMERICAN. "Steel doesn't have to 'melt' as some of these people claim. The yield strength of steel drops very dramatically under heat, and the impact of the airliners would have severely impacted the support columns. When they could no longer support the upper stories and the top started coming down, the dynamic loading caused a very rapid collapse, or 'pancaking,' that would have very nearly approached free-fall rate. No demolition charges were needed to accomplish this."
What Black Days We are Living In, and People Don't Seem to Know!
Terror conviction raises legal concerns - washingtonpost.com Highlights - MSNBC.com
Terror conviction raises legal concerns - washingtonpost.com Highlights - MSNBC.com
Terror conviction raises legal concerns - washingtonpost.com Highlights - MSNBC.com
www.freemarketnews.com embarrasses itself!
New 9/11 book, false conspiracy
Blogger Thoughts: I hope someone is being rewarded well to spout the lies.
Blogger Thoughts: I hope someone is being rewarded well to spout the lies.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)