[september_eleven_vreeland] Digest Number 1326

There are 4 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. Implant ID chips called big advance, Big Brother (Spy Chips Are So Convenient)
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
2. NSA program broader than previously described
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
3. video - Alex Jones Rocks CNN
From: "smacko" <smacko9@comcast.net>
4. CNN wants your input on 9/11 story and further research on their part
From: ranger116@webtv.net

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:51:04 -0500
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: Implant ID chips called big advance, Big Brother (Spy Chips Are So Convenient)

Implant ID chips called big advance, Big Brother

By Jonathan Sidener
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
March 12, 2006

Doctors implanted a radio ID tag under Sean Darks' skin that allows the executive to enter restricted areas of his Ohio security company.
Jack Schmidig, the police chief in Bergen County, N.J., has a similar chip that doctors can use to find his medical records in an emergency.

And in a somewhat renegade use of the technology, Washington state entrepreneur Amal Graafstra unlocks his home and car and logs on to his computer using a chip he bought online and had implanted near his thumb.

All three say putting radio-frequency identification chips under the skin can improve people's lives. An implant is like having a set of keys, or an ID card, that can't be lost, they say. Graafstra jokes that he could end up naked in the alley outside his house and still get inside using the electronic key embedded in his hand.

�People ask me why I don't just carry an RFID card in my wallet,� Graafstra said. �I don't want to have to remember whether I have my card or my keys with me. I can leave my house and not carry anything with me.�

Privacy advocates say today's voluntary use is a step toward a future in which employers or the government mandate implants.

�It's creepy,� said Beth Givens, director of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse in San Diego. �People realize in their gut that if we require implanted chips, we've become the kind of society where people can be tracked by their government.�

Good or bad, the technology is having a breakout year in the United States.

Last month, Darks' security video company, Citywatcher.com, became the first in the nation to use RFID implants to control who has access to a restricted area.

Nationwide, about 70 hospitals � none in San Diego � are developing or have begun programs to make the implants available to patients and to put RFID scanners in emergency rooms to scan all unconscious patients.

Those applications use the only radio ID chip approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration for implanting in humans, a product from Florida-based VeriChip that's about the size of a grain of rice. Doctors use a syringe and a local anesthetic to insert them under the skin.

Critics say the devices offers the government, employers or corporations a potentially nefarious tool to track citizens. There are several types of RFID, but the technology available from VeriChip and the versions used by the do-it-yourself crowd don't provide a signal that can be tracked.

The chips don't use batteries or any other power source. To work, the they must be held within a few inches of a scanner. Through a process called induction, the scanner temporarily powers the chip by generating a magnetic field that passes through the skin. While it has power, the chip transmits a signal that's picked up by the scanner.

VeriChip says about 70 people in the United States have been implanted with its chips, which cost about $200, including doctors' fees.

In addition, an estimated 80 people have had unauthorized �hobbyist� chips implanted. Like Graafstra, they buy them over the Internet to experiment with the technology, which has been used for years to track lost pets. The technology enthusiasts describe themselves as the �do-it-yourself tagged community.�

The United States lags other countries in adopting radio ID implants. In Mexico in 2004, more than 100 employees in the organized-crime division of the Attorney General's Office received implants giving them access to secure areas.

That same year in Spain, the Baja Beach Club in Barcelona launched a VIP zone for patrons with radio ID implants. VIP members use them to authorize credit-card payments for their drinks. The club's owners have expanded the program to a bar they own in the Netherlands.

At Citywatcher.com, which operates security cameras and stores video for the Cincinnati Police Department, Darks wanted to beef up security for the area where the video is stored.

Biometric systems, which measure unique physical characteristics such as fingerprints or facial structure, were too expensive for his small company, Darks said. So he decided to use the VeriChip system.

He had a radio ID chip placed in his tricep and gave his employees the option of getting chipped.

Three volunteered. Two others carry RFID cards.

�It was completely voluntary,� Darks said. �I wouldn't ask my employees to do something that I wouldn't do myself.�

The implanted device is essentially just an unseen key card, he said.

�I'm not worried about the government or anyone else tracking me through the chip in my arm,� Darks said. �If they wanted to, they could use the GPS information from my cell phone or the trail of places where I've used my credit card. That's much more of a threat.�

Schmidig, the New Jersey police chief, got a VeriChip implant for other reasons. He said a friend's daughter had an episode of diabetic shock and was unable to speak, which delayed medical treatment. At about the same time, he heard about a nearby hospital implementing the VeriChip system.

So Schmidig decided to have a medical ID chip implanted in his arm.

�I have a vacation home in Florida, and there are hospitals down there using this system,� he said. �All my medical records are up here. If something happens to me in Florida, this could speed up access to my medical records.�

Schmidig said he has no concerns about privacy as a result of his implant. His chip doesn't contain any personal information, only an ID number for a medical database.

�I'm not a Big Brother fanatic,� he said. �This is not GPS that can be used to follow me around.�

Graafstra of Bellingham, Wash., is a technology enthusiast and author of �RFID Toys: 11 Cool Projects for Home, Office and Entertainment,� published this year.

A year ago, he decided to take his interest in radio ID technology to a new level, becoming the founding member of the do-it-yourself RFID world. Graafstra bought a chip on the Internet and had a doctor insert it in the tissue between his thumb and index finger.

Graafstra said it's unlikely that anyone would go to the trouble of trying to hack his chip to get the code to his front door. It would be easier to force the door open, he said.

�There's very little possibility that anyone could sneak up and get within a couple of inches of my tag to read it,� he said.

While he's comfortable having the code to open his front door and car in a radio transponder in his hand, Graafstra says the technology may not be secure enough to protect credit-card information or access to sensitive government offices.

Although difficult, it's still possible to record and clone the signal from an implanted chip, he said.

Critics say the practice opens a door that would be best left closed.

�RFID has the potential to produce some wonderful applications,� said Givens, the San Diego privacy advocate. �It also has the potential to be a technology with which a government-issued ID number can be read promiscuously.

�It's being rushed to the marketplace without understanding the consequences,� she said. �The privacy implications have not been thoughtfully explored.�

Liz McIntyre, co-author of �Spychips: How Major Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every Move with RFID,� said she isn't swayed by technical arguments that implanted chips are benign.

�There may be limits on what the technology can do today, but we don't know what the technology will be capable of tomorrow,� McIntyre said. �Yes, it's a step on that slippery slope. You wouldn't walk down the street with your Social Security number printed on your shirt. Why would you want an RFID chip capable of transmitting an identification number?�

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/computing/20060312-9999-1n12chip.html

~~~

�Big Brother� firms keep eye on workers

By Patricia Kitchen
Newsday

An employee enters an unauthorized area of the company, his smart-chip badge triggering a hidden surveillance camera. That sends an alert to a security officer, who uses his laptop or cell phone to monitor what the intruder is up to.

Once the realm of Tom Cruise movies, scenes such as this one are playing out at a worksite near you.

What�s more, employer surveillance of workers and property extends beyond the video screen: The boss can tell what Web sites you�ve visited on office computers, the content of e-mail you haven�t even sent, even your every move through cell phones equipped with global positioning. And coming soon: Employee identification through biometrics � measuring such biological components as fingerprints and voice pattern � as well as grain-of-wheat-sized chips implanted under the skin, turning you, in effect, into an EZPass.

All of which might lead the unsuspecting employee to ask: Just what privacy rights do I have when it comes to electronic monitoring? Darn few, says L. Camille Hebert, law professor at Ohio State University and author of �Employee Privacy Law� (Thomson West).

Certainly, bosses can cite significant reasons for tracking worker activity: Monitoring can go a long way toward cutting down on sexual harassment, workplace accidents and goofing off. Plus, in lawsuits, courts expect employers to be able to hand over electronic evidence.

So such surveillance is on the increase: The use of video monitoring for theft, violence and sabotage rose last year to 51 percent of 526 employers surveyed by the American Management Association and ePolicy Institute; only 33 percent were using such monitoring four years earlier.

The federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 � amended in 2001 � gives employers what privacy experts call pretty much carte blanche. Nancy Flynn, executive director of the ePolicy Institute in Columbus, Ohio, says the provisions of the act can be translated this way: �The computer system is the property of the employer and as such the employer has the right to monitor Internet activity and e-mail. Employees should have no reasonable expectation to privacy.�

Still, the exchange of privacy for more efficiency and security carries costs when it comes to employee morale, says Lewis Maltby, president of the National Workrights Institute in Princeton, N.J. He poses these real and potential situations: A woman who found out she was pregnant visited an expectant mothers� Web site and then got confronted by her boss later that day. Or a worker who sends her doctor an e-mail containing terminology that could also have sexual meaning. Or those subjected to video surveillance in restrooms or changing rooms.

Most employers who use forms of surveillance say they notify their employees. The American Management/ePolicy Institute research found that 80 percent let workers know they�re being monitored for computer content, keystrokes and keyboard time; 82 percent let them know computer files are stored and reviewed; 86 percent, that e-mail is tracked; and 89 percent, that Web visits are monitored.

Despite its potential for abuse, electronic monitoring can and does serve valuable workplace purposes.

Supporters of workplace surveillance point to evidence of its value:

Fourteen nursing home employees in Rochester, N.Y., were charged last month by state Attorney General Eliot Spitzer with fraud and falsifying records because they had moved call bells out of patients� reach so they could watch television or socialize. Their activity was captured when the room of a 70-year-old man with dementia was monitored through video surveillance cameras.

Tracking workers

Percentage of employers monitoring some or all of their employees in the following ways:

�Monitoring and reviewing Web Sites visited: 76 percent

�Storing and reviewing e-mail messages: 55 percent

�Using smart-card technology to control building/data center access: 53 percent

�Monitor time spent on the phone and numbers called: 51 percent

�Using video surveillance to counter theft, violence, sabotage: 51 percent

�Saving and reviewing employees� computer files: 50 percent

�Monitoring time employees spend on computer, content, keystrokes entered: 36 percent

�Taping employee phone conversations: 22 percent

�Using video surveillance to monitor performance: 16 percent

�Taping and reviewing voice mail messages: 15 percent

�Using GPS technology to monitor/track employee ID/smart cards: 8 percent

�Using fingerprints scans to control building/data center access: 5 percent

�Using GPS technology to monitor/track company cell phones: 5 percent

�Using iris scan technology to control building access: 0.5 percent

http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/journalgazette/business/14087399.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

~~~

[March 17, 2006]
The bugs in the carpet are RFID

(InfoWorld Daily Via Thomson Dialog NewsEdge)

One of Germany's best-known makers of vacuum cleaners and carpets aims to tap a new market: intelligent flooring embedded with wireless chips.

Vorwerk & Co. Teppichwerke is launching a textile flooring underlay equipped with RFID (radio frequency identification) tags, Vorwerk spokesman Thomas Weber said Friday.

"After three years of research, we're launching field tests with several companies that intend to use our smart-floor technology," he said. "We're now able to mass-produce the product."

The RFID-enabled flooring underlay is the result of a "thinking carpet" project launched together with German chip maker Infineon Technologiesin 2003.

The smart-floor underlay can be used to perform a number of tasks, such as navigating automated transport systems in buildings, according to Weber.

In a first step, together with InMach Intelligente Maschinen, a robot manufacturer, Vorwerk is offering a bundled "smart-floor" package consisting of the RFID-enabled underlay, robots, and software.

The underlay enables robots to orient themselves in a room and move toward precise targets on the floor, using information stored in the embedded RFID tags, according to Weber. Systems administrators can manage the robots from a central point, sending data to them from a control PC via Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, he said.

The RFID tags consist of a microchip joined to an antenna coil and attached to an ultra-thin sheet of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic. Each tag has its own ID number, which can be detected and identified by the robot's integrated RFID reader from up to 10 centimeters. The power required for reading the tags is supplied by the robot; the tags are passive, requiring no electrical voltage.

Industrial floor cleaning could be one application. Data stored in the chips direct the robot to areas that have to be cleaned and away from those already cleaned.

Vorwerk intends to market its smart-floor system to numerous groups, including building managers, hospitals and nursing homes.

In a next step, the company aims to connect the RFID tags to form an intelligent network that can track movements and respond, according to Weber. The networked tags could be used to help secure floors from intruders or detect nursing home patients who have fallen on the floor, he said.

The smart-floor technology was demonstrated at the Cebit trade show in Hanover, Germany, which ended Wednesday.

http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2006/03/17/1469625.htm

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:45:17 -0500
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: NSA program broader than previously described

NSA program broader than previously described

By Shane Harris, National Journal
March 17, 2006

The Bush administration has assiduously avoided any talk about the actual workings of its program to intercept the phone calls and e-mails of people in the United States who are suspected of having links to terrorists abroad. Officials' unwavering script goes like this: Present the legal justifications for the president to authorize domestic electronic surveillance without warrants, but say nothing about how the National Security Agency actually does it -- or about what else the agency might be doing.

But when Attorney General Alberto Gonzales appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee on February 6 to answer questions about the program, what he didn't say pulled back the curtain on how the NSA decides which calls and e-mails to monitor. The agency bases those decisions on a broad and less focused surveillance than officials have publicly described, a surveillance that may, or may not, be legal.

In a hearing that lasted more than eight hours, Gonzales, who didn't testify under oath, dutifully batted away senators' inquiries about "operational details" and stayed silent, under determined questioning by some Democrats, about other warrantless programs that the president might have secretly authorized. When the hearing finally ended, so did Gonzales's comments on the program.

Until 22 days later. On February 28, Gonzales sent committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., a six-page letter, partly to respond to questions he was unprepared to answer at the hearing, but also "to clarify certain of my responses" in the earlier testimony. In the letter, Gonzales took pains to correct any "misimpressions" that he might have created about whether the Justice Department had assessed the legality of intercepting purely domestic communications, for example, as opposed to those covered by the NSA program, in which one party is outside the United States. The attorney general didn't say that Justice had contemplated the legality of purely domestic eavesdropping without a warrant, but he also didn't say it hadn't.

Gonzales's letter was intriguing for what else it didn't say, especially on one point: With exacting language, he narrowed the scope of his comments to address only "questions relating to the specific NSA activities that have been publicly confirmed by the president." Then, as if to avoid any confusion, Gonzales added, "Those activities involve the interception by the NSA of the contents of communications" involving suspected terrorists and people in the United States.

Slightly, and with a single word, Gonzales was tipping his hand. The content of electronic communications is usually considered to be the spoken words of a phone call or the written words in an electronic message. The term does not include the wealth of so-called transactional data that accompany every communication: a phone number, and what calls were placed to and from that number; the time a call was placed; whether the call was answered and how long it lasted, down to the second; the time and date that an e-mail message was sent, as well as its unique address and routing path, which reveals the location of the computer that sent it and, presumably, the author.

Considering that terrorists often talk and write in code, the transactional data of a communication, properly exploited, could yield more valuable intelligence than the content itself.

"You will get a very full picture of a person's associations and their patterns of activity," said Jim Dempsey, the policy director of the Center for Democracy and Technology, an electronic-privacy advocacy group. "You'll know who they're talking to, when they're talking, how long, how frequently.... It's a lot [of information]. I mean, a lot."

According to sources who are familiar with the details of what the White House calls the "terrorist surveillance program," and who asked to remain anonymous because the program is still classified, analyzing transactional data is one of the first and most important steps the agency takes in deciding which phone calls to listen to and which electronic messages to read.

Far from the limited or targeted surveillance that Gonzales, President Bush, and intelligence officials have described, this traffic analysis examines thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands, of individuals, because nearly every phone number and nearly every e-mail address is connected to a person.

Patterns in the Sea

Analysis of telephone traffic patterns helps analysts and investigators spot relationships among people that aren't always obvious. For instance, imagine that a man in Portland, Ore., receives a call from someone at a pay phone in Brooklyn, N.Y., every Tuesday at 9 a.m. Also every Tuesday, but minutes earlier, the pay phone caller rings up a man in Miami.

An investigator might look at that pattern and suspect that the men in Portland and Miami are communicating through the Brooklyn caller, who's acting as a kind of courier, to mask their relationship. Patterns like this have led criminal investigators into the inner workings of drug cartels and have proved vital in breaking these cartels up.

Terrorists employ similar masking techniques. They use go-betweens to circuitously route calls, and they change cell phones often to avoid detection. Transactional data, however, capture those behaviors. If NSA analysts -- or their computers -- can find these patterns or signatures, then they might find the terrorists, or at least know which ones they should monitor.

Just after 9/11, according to knowledgeable sources, the NSA began intercepting the communications of specific foreign persons and groups named on a list. The sources didn't specify whether persons inside the United States were monitored as part of that list. But a former government official who is knowledgeable about NSA activities and the warrantless surveillance program said that this original list of people and groups, or others like it, could have formed the base of the NSA's surveillance of transactional data, the parts of a communication that aren't considered content.

If the agency started with a list of phone numbers, it could find all the numbers dialed from those phones. The NSA could then learn what numbers were called from that second list of numbers, and what calls that list received, and so on, "pushing out" the lists until the agency had identified a vast network of callers and their transactional data, the former official said.

The agency might eavesdrop on only a few conversations or e-mails. But starting with even an initial target list of, say, 10 phone numbers quickly yields a web of hundreds of thousands of communications, because the volume increases exponentially with every new layer of callers.

To find meaningful patterns in transactional data, analysts need a lot of it. They must set baselines about what constitutes "normal" behavior versus "suspicious" activity. Administration officials have said that the NSA doesn't intercept the contents of a communication unless officials have a "reasonable" basis to conclude that at least one party is linked to a terrorist organization.

To make any reasonable determination like that, the agency needs hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of call records, preferably as soon as they are created, said a senior person in the defense industry who is familiar with the NSA program and is an expert in the analytical tools used to find patterns and connections. Asked if this means that the NSA program is much broader and less targeted than administration officials have described, the expert replied, "I think that's correct."

In theory, finding reasonable connections in data is a straightforward and largely automated process. Analysts use computer programs based on algorithms -- mathematical procedures for solving a particular problem -- much the same way that meteorologists use data models to forecast the weather. Counter-terrorism algorithms look for the transactional indicators that match what analysts recognize as signs of a plot.

Of course, those algorithms must be sophisticated enough to spot many not-so-obvious patterns in a mass of data that are mostly uninteresting, and they work best when the data come from many sources. Algorithms have proven useful for detecting frequent criminal activity, such as credit card fraud.

"Historical data clearly indicate that if a credit card turns up in two cities on two continents on the same day, that's a useful pattern," says Jeff Jonas, a computer scientist who invented a technology to connect known scam artists who are on casinos' watch lists with new potential grifters, and is now the chief scientist of IBM Entity Analytics.

"The challenge of predicting terrorism is that unlike fraud, we don't have the same volume of historical data to learn from," Jonas said. "Compounding this is the fact that terrorists are constantly changing their methods and do their best to avoid leaving any digital footprints in the first place."

The obvious solution would be to write an algorithm that is flexible and fast enough to weigh millions of pieces of evidence, including exculpatory ones, against each other. But according to technology experts, and even the NSA's own stated research accomplishments, that technology has not been perfected.

The Bleeding Edge

The NSA began soon after the 9/11 terrorist attacks to collect transactional data from telecommunications companies. Several telecom executives said in press accounts that their companies gave the NSA access to their switches, the terminals that handle most of the country's electronic traffic. One executive told National Journal that NSA officials urged him to hand over his company's call logs. When he resisted, the officials implied that most of his competitors had acceded to the agency's request.

Not long after the surveillance program started, in October 2001, the NSA began looking for new tools to mine the telecom data. The agency, the industry expert said, considered some that the Defense Department's Total Information Awareness program was developing. TIA was an ambitious and controversial experiment to find patterns of terrorist activity in a much broader range of transactions than just telephone data.

But NSA officials rejected the TIA tools because they were "too brittle," the expert said, meaning that they failed to manage the torrent of data that the NSA wanted to analyze. He noted the irony of rejecting the TIA technologies -- which privacy advocates had characterized as huge, all-seeing, digital dragnets -- because they couldn't handle the size of the NSA's load.

In the fall of 2002, a federal research-and-development agency that builds technologies primarily for the NSA launched another search for pattern-detection solutions. The Advanced Research and Development Activity, ARDA, issued $64 million in contracts for the Novel Intelligence for Massive Data, or NIMD, program. Its goal was "to help analysts deal with information overload, detect early indicators of strategic surprise, and avoid analytic errors," according to ARDA's public call for proposals released last year.

In essence, NIMD is an early-warning system, which is how the administration has described the terrorist surveillance program. In 2003, ARDA also took over research of the tools being developed under TIA.

While the NSA was searching for the next generation of data-sifters, it continued to rely on less sophisticated tools. For an example, the former government official who spoke to NJ cited applications that organize data into broad categories, allowing analysts to see some relationships but obscuring some of the nuance in the underlying information. The results of this kind of category analysis can be displayed on a graph.

But the graph might reveal only how many times a particular word appears in a conversation, not necessarily the significance of the word or how it relates to other words. Technologists sarcastically call these diagrams BAGs -- big-ass graphs.

Such was the state of affairs when the NSA started looking for terrorist patterns in a telephonic ocean. So, instead of looking for a tool that could cull through the data, the agency decided to "reverse" the process, starting with the data set and working backward, looking for algorithms that could work with it.

The NSA has made some breakthroughs, the industry expert said, but its solution relies in part on a technological "trick," which he wouldn't disclose. Another data-mining expert, who also asked not to be identified because the NSA's work is classified, said that computer engineers probably started with the telecom companies' call data, looked for patterns, and then wrote algorithms to detect them as they went along, tweaking the algorithms as needed.

Such an ad hoc approach is brittle in its own right. For starters, if analysts are working with algorithms designed to detect only certain patterns, they could be missing others, the technology expert said. At the same time, the more dependent the algorithms are on identifying very specific patterns of behavior, the more vulnerable the NSA's monitoring is to being foiled if terrorists discover what the agency is watching for, or if they change their behavior. A more complex algorithm that considers thousands, or even millions, of patterns is harder to defeat.

The industry expert added that NSA officials have worried that "if you knew what the technical trick was they were doing [to make the surveillance program function], you wouldn't have to know what specific algorithms" the agency was using. This reliance on a "trick" makes the program very vulnerable to defeat and helps explain why the Bush administration is so keen on cloaking its inner workings.

"It's pretty bleeding-edge," the expert said, referring to a technology that's unperfected and therefore prone to instability. "We're talking about dumping hundreds of thousands or millions of records" into a system. In an unsophisticated system, connections among people can emerge that look suspicious but are actually meaningless. A book agent who represents a journalist who once interviewed Osama bin Laden, for example, doesn't herself necessarily know bin Laden. But she might turn up in an NSA search of transactional data. "False positives will happen," the expert said.

Gonzales and former NSA Director Michael V. Hayden have said that career agency employees decide to eavesdrop only if they have a "reasonable" basis to believe one party to a communication is a terrorist or connected to a terrorist organization.

But what determines reasonableness? In a January speech at the National Press Club, Hayden drew a distinction between the Fourth Amendment's requirement that "no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause," and its protection against "unreasonable searches and seizures."

When a journalist in the crowd questioned his logic, Hayden heatedly replied, "If there's any amendment to the Constitution that employees of the National Security Agency are familiar with, it's the Fourth. And it is a reasonableness standard in the Fourth Amendment.... I am convinced that we are lawful, because what it is we're doing [intercepting content] is reasonable."

He said that the terrorist attacks fundamentally altered the NSA's thinking. "The standard of what [information] was relevant and valuable, and therefore, what was reasonable, would understandably change, I think, as smoke billowed from two American cities and a Pennsylvania farm field. And we acted accordingly."

Aside from the question of whether NSA employees, rather than federal judges, are qualified to determine what constitutes a reasonable search, that determination provides much of the basis for deciding whose communications will be intercepted without a warrant. If the technology the NSA is using to determine what constitutes a reasonable search is unsophisticated, the industry expert said, "you're talking about tapping a phone based on a statistical correlation."

A New Legal Battle?

Gonzales's narrowly tailored letter to Sen. Specter raised more questions than it answered. Democrats were outraged by what they saw as the attorney general's attempt to alter his testimony and to obstruct senators' attempts to fully assess the program's legal basis.

"Much of your letter is devoted to not providing answers to the questions of a number of us regarding legal justifications for activities beyond those narrowly conceded by you to have already been confirmed by the president," Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the Judiciary Committee's ranking Democrat, wrote to the attorney general in a follow-up letter.

Leahy also raised the question of what else Gonzales hadn't told lawmakers. The attorney general's letter contained "disturbing suggestions ... that there are other secret programs," Leahy wrote.

In Gonzales's letter to Specter, the attorney general had referred to "other intelligence activities" and to his inability to discuss them; he left open the possibility that the president may not have authorized these activities. Gonzales wrote, "When I testified in response to questions from Sen. Leahy, 'Sir, I have tried to outline ... what the president has authorized, and that is all that he has authorized,' I was confining my remarks to the Terrorist Surveillance Program as described by the president."

Gonzales's testimony was meant to defend the program's legality. But as more about the NSA's operations become known, new legal questions arise, including one that goes to the heart of how officials reasonably identify suspected terrorists.

Under normal criminal law, content is defined as "any information concerning the substance, purport, or meaning of [a] communication," but the definition of content under the law that governs electronic eavesdropping on U.S. persons for intelligence purposes is different and is potentially in conflict with normal jurisprudence. That law, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, states that content "includes any information concerning the identity of the parties ... or the existence, substance, purport, or meaning of [their] communication."

A phone number can be used to identify a person, said Dempsey of the Center for Democracy and Technology, who for nine years was assistant counsel to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights. Does that mean that a phone number is "content" under the law?

FISA, enacted in 1978, didn't envision today's technology, when anyone with an Internet connection can use a phone number to find someone's name, address, and even an aerial photograph of his house, Dempsey said.

"I just cannot read [FISA] and figure out what it means in the context of analysis of [transactional] data," he added. "Presumably somebody in the administration thinks they understand it.... Whether that's providing any clear guidance" to the people working on the NSA program, "that's not clear."

http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=33631&dcn=e_ndw

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:55:36 -0800
From: "smacko" <smacko9@comcast.net>
Subject: video - Alex Jones Rocks CNN

From: Bond:

Alex Jones Rocks CNN
http://www.total911.info/2006/03/alex-jones-rocks-cnn_24.html

Video [23 MB] download link:
Alex Jones Rocks CNN
http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/ShowbizTonight20060323/ShowbizTonight20060323.wmv

Hannity & Colmes Cover Sheen's 9/11 Comments MOV [13MB]
http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/HannityColmes/hannity20060323.mov

============

Transcript of Alex Jones Appearance on CNN's Showbiz Tonight
CNN
March 23 2006

SHOWBIZ TONIGHT

Aired March 23, 2006 - 19:00:00 ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE
UPDATED.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0603/23/sbt.01.html

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:16:57 -0500
From: ranger116@webtv.net
Subject: CNN wants your input on 9/11 story and further research on their part

CNN wants your input on 9/11 story and further research on their part

( Tell CNN here what you think about their reporting on Charlie Sheen
and Alex Jones opinions and ask them to do more research and reporting
in this area.
Also please recommend to them that they make up a panel of the 5
men who have made up the DVD videos of the Truths of 9/11 and have them
on several times )

CNN.com - Contact Us
Address:http://www.cnn.com/feedback/confirmation/generic.html

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
CNN Reports More 9/11 Questions
Address:http://www.wanttoknow.info/060324cnnquestions911

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
State After State Repudiates Bush
Address:http://www.rense.com/general70/state.htm

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````
FEMA breaks Katrina contracts pledge - Hurricanes' Aftermath - MSNBC.com
Address:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11995762/
(note to self - When the Revolution starts - Kill anyone who was
receiving a government paycheck.)

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Codename Grillfire
Address:http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/index.php?n=1&id=1

````````````````````````````````````````````````````

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/september_eleven_vreeland/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
september_eleven_vreeland-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Cat's Blog: BBC BETWEEN GOSSIP AND PROPAGANDA

The Cat's Blog: BBC BETWEEN GOSSIP AND PROPAGANDA


Dear Paul,

What a ‘good morning’ you have given me today! I have just read “Iraqi documents: Saddam's delusions” (Paul Reynolds, World Affairs Correspondent, BBC News website). After reading the long, detailed and analytical article, at the very bottom of it I read:
Caution

However, a note of caution is due here which is also introduced by the US Army unit releasing the documents. It says: "The US government has made no determination regarding the authenticity of the documents."
What a surprise (sic!) and reading it at the very end of the article! Why don’t you put the “caution” at the beginning and use “quotation marks” for your article’s title? People interested in gossip would be thrilled!

Have a good week-end.

Best wishes,
Gabriele Zamparini

***

Dear Gabriele

How nice to hear from you again.

May I ask you the following questions?

1. Have you read the Foreign Affairs magazine article?

2. Have you read the full report from USJSCOM?

3. Have you read any of the documents released by Joint Reserve Intelligence Center?

All are linked to from my article, so you should have no trouble in finding them.

When you have read them ( I assume you have not as your message to me said that you had 'just read' the article), we can discuss them further perhaps.

Thank you for your time.

with regards

Paul

***

Dear Paul,

“How nice to hear from you again” indeed.

You can of course ask all the questions you like. It would be nice though if you could answer first the questions I asked you.

Why did you put the “caution” at the end of the article? Being a “caution”, it’s simply logical to put it at the beginning. Which kind of “caution” comes after?!

Also, in the “caution” at the very end of your article, you write: “The US government has made no determination regarding the authenticity of the documents." The original text of the “caution” (PLEASE, NOTE THAT THE US GOVERNMENT WEBSITE PUTS THE CAUTION AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE), reads:
At the request of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the US Army Foreign Military Studies Office has created this portal to provide the general public with access to unclassified documents and media captured during Operation Iraqi Freedom. The US Government has made no determination regarding the authenticity of the documents, validity or factual accuracy of the information contained therein, or the quality of any translations, when available. Users who come across documents they feel are inappropriately released may contact the responsible officers at docex@center.osis.gov. The ODNI press release and public affairs contact information is available at http://www.odni.gov
They are very simple questions Paul.

1) Why didn’t you put the “caution” at the beginning?

2) Why does the “caution” used by the US government is more cautious of the one you used?

3) Why do you always use in your article verbs in certainty tenses and never in doubt tenses. For example “Among the documents is one that demonstrates how the Iraqis supported the al-Qaeda-linked Abu Sayyaf group in the Philippines.” Demonstrate? What about the “caution” Paul?

Will you be so kind to answer my questions? And what’s that “perhaps” supposed to mean?

Thank you for your time.

Best wishes,
Gabriele

PS Don’t worry Paul, you will have the pleasure to “hear from [me] again”. After all, the BBC is a public service paid for by public money. And I do all I can to make sure my money are well spent.

CNN.com QuickVote (9/11 Charlie Sheen)

CNN.com QuickVote

Do you agree with Charlie Sheen that the U.S. government covered up the real events of the 9/11 attacks? Yes 83% 29885 votes No 17% 5981 votes Total: 35866 votes

This QuickVote is not scientific and reflects the opinions of only those Internet users who have chosen to participate. The results cannot be assumed to represent the opinions of Internet users in general, nor the public as a whole. The QuickVote sponsor is not responsible for content, functionality or the opinions expressed therein.

Related: Send your questions and comments to "Showbiz Tonight"

[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1192

There are 22 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. Re: Mind Reading Devices?
From: janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com>
2. Re: We ain't out of the woods yet people!
From: "JP Liggett" <JP@JPLiggett.com>
3. Newsworthy
From: "botalerts" <botalerts@yahoo.ca>
4. Re: We ain't out of the woods yet people!
From: "hvncb" <hvncb@yahoo.com>
5. Re: Can anyone help me to answer William Blum's questions re. 9/11?
From: hvncb <hvncb@yahoo.com>
6. MarineMajor and Former U.S. Iraq Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter says
From: ranger116@webtv.net
7. CRITICAL URGENT: NEO-CON BLOGGERS ARE ATTEMPTING TO SABOTAGE THE POLL ON CNN !!!
From: "kennendyone" <kennendyone@yahoo.com>
8. RE: 9/11 Charlie sheen's charges of a government cover-up
From: APFN <apfn@apfn.org>
9. Re: Re: Can anyone help me to answer William Blum's questions re. 9/11?
From: mann david <dmann51@yahoo.com>
10. Tell Betsy Hart that Charlie Sheen is right!
From: "Cait" <ansith@gmail.com>
11. CNN wants your input on 9/11 story and further research on their part
From: ranger116@webtv.net
12. Re: We ain't out of the woods yet people!
From: Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com>
13. Remote Behavioral Influence Technology Evidence
From: Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com>
14. RE: We ain't out of the woods yet people!
From: "Scott Peden" <scotpeden@cruzio.com>
15. Re: Mind Reading Devices?
From: Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com>
16. is the sheen 9/11 story a real break for us?
From: Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com>
17. Re: is the sheen 9/11 story a real break for us?
From: "botalerts" <botalerts@yahoo.ca>
18. Re: Too Many Chips on the Old Block?
From: "mojo_j_2000" <mojo_j_2000@yahoo.com>
19. Re: We ain't out of the woods yet people!
From: "mojo_j_2000" <mojo_j_2000@yahoo.com>
20. excellent big picture -Amy Worthington: Police State USA - Part One Big Brother's Most Cool Tool (excerpt)
From: "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@nwinfo.net>
21. this is how one devout Zionist Jew answers Charlie Sheen
From: "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@nwinfo.net>
22. Forgotten History - Strike Against War
From: "Scott Peden" <scotpeden@cruzio.com>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:27:02 -0800 (PST)
From: janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Mind Reading Devices?

Tell me more.

Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com> wrote: this is NOTHING compared to the remote influencing technologies

janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com> wrote:
MIND READING DEVICES “Alan Yu, a former lieutenant colonel in the Taiwan National Defence Department, says that the United States has not only developed an operational mind control machine, but has also distributed models for use by allied countries. Yu states that such machines pose a great threat to human rights and the American way of life. He calls the device the “Mind Reading Machine” (Mind Machine).
“In the spring of 1984, Yu was a lieutenant colonel serving in the National Defence Department of Taiwan. At that time, Yu read a classified document from the department that he serviced under. The document said the Military Police Department of Taiwan had purchased several of the Mind Reading Machines from the United States (In Taiwan, it was called Psychological Language Machine).
Yu reports that before he left, this machine had become the most effective weapon for the security departments of Taiwan …
“Demonstrations of this equipment have shown encouraging results after exposure of less than one minute and have produced the ability to alter behavior on unwilling subjects.”
(Richard A. Miller, ‘Conciousness Technologies Conference’, July 2001)

---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.

SPONSORED LINKS
United state military United state coin United state flag United state government grant Trademark united state United state grant

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:15:46 -0500
From: "JP Liggett" <JP@JPLiggett.com>
Subject: Re: We ain't out of the woods yet people!

a very compelling read. I too had thought about this, but this article
hits the nail on the head. If there are gatekeepers sponsoring the
exposure, lets help them really get the word out.

It seems to me that if 9/11 starts getting mainstream, we may consider
using the 9/11 exposure force to truly change our society. Perhaps we can
use it on a global scale not just the USA.

We can all envision a more just society, with a strong social fabric, to
become a beacon of hope for positive social change. A real global golden
jubilee.

To that ends, we could consider nationalization of all energy, banking and
insurance companies, in the name of the 911 victims. These companies take
billions of dollars of our economy and our pockets, and corrupt/disrupt our
society. worldwide.

Let work for Public video and audio in every legislature, courtroom, bar
association and hearing room. Just a couple of ideas to keep it going.
Some people have said, OK, we know about 9-11 being an inside job, now what
do we do?

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 3
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:09:15 -0000
From: "botalerts" <botalerts@yahoo.ca>
Subject: Newsworthy

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/03/newsworthy.html

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 4
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:41:44 -0000
From: "hvncb" <hvncb@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: We ain't out of the woods yet people!

I agree and I don't know what I find more INcredible. That CNN
didn't know about this until now or that they are "oh, so surprised"
at the response this "story" is receiving.."your comments made us
look deeper!". They are bad liers at best. They've been sitting on
top of this and controling what gets through from Sept 11, 2001.

JP, when you say "dollars" do you understand that these are 'debt
instruments' printed by the Federal Reseve which is a private bank?
Look up what a 'dollar' is in the Constitution. Yeap, they've
cleaned us out!

I have a suggestion. Let's get rid of the 'middleman',
the "representatives" so called. We no longer need anyone to
make "laws" for us which for the most part are statutes and apply
only to DC Jurisdiction (Art 1, sect 8, clause 17 -10 square miles)
anyway. Let's take the big step and rid ourselves of the wizard
altogether, Democrats-Republicans-Libertarians, all of them!so that
we really become a government of the people.

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "JP Liggett" <JP@...> wrote:
>
>
> a very compelling read. I too had thought about this, but this
article
> hits the nail on the head. If there are gatekeepers sponsoring the
> exposure, lets help them really get the word out.
>
> It seems to me that if 9/11 starts getting mainstream, we may
consider
> using the 9/11 exposure force to truly change our society.
Perhaps we can
> use it on a global scale not just the USA.
>
> We can all envision a more just society, with a strong social
fabric, to
> become a beacon of hope for positive social change. A real global
golden
> jubilee.
>
> To that ends, we could consider nationalization of all energy,
banking and
> insurance companies, in the name of the 911 victims. These
companies take
> billions of dollars of our economy and our pockets, and
corrupt/disrupt our
> society. worldwide.
>
> Let work for Public video and audio in every legislature,
courtroom, bar
> association and hearing room. Just a couple of ideas to keep it
going.
> Some people have said, OK, we know about 9-11 being an inside job,
now what
> do we do?
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 5
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:55:29 -0800 (PST)
From: hvncb <hvncb@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Can anyone help me to answer William Blum's questions re. 9/11?

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, James Patton <james_patton@...> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I admire the work of William Blum, however he is skeptical about
> the various theories re. the events of September 11.
>
> Here are Blum's questions:
>
> 1. The complications [of staging 9/11] would have made it
> next to impossible to stage with such "success", and without
> making it obvious to virtually everyone.

IT IS OBVIOUS ISN'T IT? LOOK AT THE HOT-SPOTS THREE MONTHS AND MILLIONS OF GALLONS OF COLD WATER LATER...AND THE 'PUFFS' AND THE CONTROLLED DEMOLITION...AND THE CRATER OF BUILDING 6...AND THE ATTA "PASSPORT" AND THE PENTAGON HOLE AND LAWN....WHERE HAVE YOU AND BLUM BEEN FOR THE PAST FOUR YEARS?

> 2. Why would the government want to destroy building 7?

LARRY SILVERTEIN-GIULIANI-IRS-CIA-BOARD OF TRADE, FBI, ETC, ETC, ETC.

> 3. And the fact that Bush quietly spent time in a class with young students after hearing about the first plane -- If it was being staged he would have reacted in a different way.

HE DID REACT IN A "DIFFERENT WAY"...OK, I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU MEAN HERE...

> 4. Or that several of the hijackers turned up "alive" in the Middle East.
> Why couldn't their identity have been stolen?

GO TELL CNN THESE GUYS ARE ALIVE...HURRY!

> 5. And more things like that.

YEAH, BLUM SAYS THE GOVERNTMENT IS INNOCENT AND INCOMPETENT, THAT IS VERY ORIGINAL...IT'S CALLED A LIHOP THEORY...

---------------------------------
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 6
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 20:25:39 -0500
From: ranger116@webtv.net
Subject: MarineMajor and Former U.S. Iraq Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter says

MarineMajor and Former U.S. Iraq Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter says
Impeachment is the Only SOLUTION !

Address:http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m21862&l=i&size=1&hd=0

``````````````````````````````````````````````````
Guardian Unlimited | World Latest | U.S. Hiring Hong Kong Co. to Scan
Nukes
Address:http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0%2C%2C-5707111%2C00.html
Also see info on the Hong Kong Co. below

(The Chinese Sea and Airport in The Bahamas 60 Miles East of Miami /
Chinese Navy and Airforce Base)

Text of Secret U.S. Intelligence Report Re: Hutchison Whampoa
Address:http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=2000/1/19/04542&s=lh

````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Alex on Coast to Coast about Charlie Sheen, Thursday night/Friday
Morning
Alex Jones' Infowars :: Because there is a war on for your mind
Address:http://www.infowars.com/

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 7
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 01:56:07 -0000
From: "kennendyone" <kennendyone@yahoo.com>
Subject: CRITICAL URGENT: NEO-CON BLOGGERS ARE ATTEMPTING TO SABOTAGE THE POLL ON CNN !!!

Hannity & Colmes Piece on Sheen 9/11 Comments

Prison Planet.com | March 24 2006
<http://www.prisonplanet.com/index.html>

The CNN poll showing 82% support
<http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/240306supportsheen.htm>
for Charlie Sheen directly contradicts a line of attack used in this
Hannity and Colmes piece Thursday night which claimed that Sheen's views
didn't reflect the mainstream of America. If we are to treat an 82%
majority as the mainstream then that accusation is completely
fraudulent.

Go to
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/240306hannitycolmes.htm
<http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/240306hannitycolmes.htm>
to view the video!

KEEP VOTING IN THE CNN POLL TO SUPPORT CHARLIE SHEEN. NEO-CON BLOGGERS
ARE ATTEMPTING TO SABOTAGE THE POLL - CLICK HERE
<http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight/> TO VOTE!

ALSO SIGN THE PETITION HERE FOR THE 9-11 BASIC RELEASE INFORMATION AND
TO TO EVERYBODY TO DO THE SAME !

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/929981172?ltl=1141667399
<http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/929981172?ltl=1141667399>

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 8
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:53:07 -0700
From: APFN <apfn@apfn.org>
Subject: RE: 9/11 Charlie sheen's charges of a government cover-up

[This message is not in displayable format]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 9
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:53:16 -0800 (PST)
From: mann david <dmann51@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Can anyone help me to answer William Blum's questions re. 9/11?

Good reply. I too have had great respect for Blum,
i.e., his encyclopedic studies of CIA intervention
over several decades - "Killing Hope". I've made good
use of that - but that is History - understanding and
responding to events in real time is apparently not
his forte. After the revolution we'll make him some
kind of archivist but definitely not a leader.

--- hvncb <hvncb@yahoo.com> wrote:

> --- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, James Patton
> <james_patton@...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I admire the work of William Blum, however he is
> skeptical about
> > the various theories re. the events of September
> 11.
> >
> > Here are Blum's questions:
> >
> > 1. The complications [of staging 9/11] would have
> made it
> > next to impossible to stage with such "success",
> and without
> > making it obvious to virtually everyone.
>
> IT IS OBVIOUS ISN'T IT? LOOK AT THE HOT-SPOTS
> THREE MONTHS AND MILLIONS OF GALLONS OF COLD WATER
> LATER...AND THE 'PUFFS' AND THE CONTROLLED
> DEMOLITION...AND THE CRATER OF BUILDING 6...AND THE
> ATTA "PASSPORT" AND THE PENTAGON HOLE AND
> LAWN....WHERE HAVE YOU AND BLUM BEEN FOR THE PAST
> FOUR YEARS?
>
> > 2. Why would the government want to destroy
> building 7?
>
> LARRY SILVERTEIN-GIULIANI-IRS-CIA-BOARD OF TRADE,
> FBI, ETC, ETC, ETC.
>
> > 3. And the fact that Bush quietly spent time in
> a class with young students after hearing about the
> first plane -- If it was being staged he would have
> reacted in a different way.
>
> HE DID REACT IN A "DIFFERENT WAY"...OK, I DON'T
> UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU MEAN HERE...
>
> > 4. Or that several of the hijackers turned up
> "alive" in the Middle East.
> > Why couldn't their identity have been stolen?
>
> GO TELL CNN THESE GUYS ARE ALIVE...HURRY!
>
> > 5. And more things like that.
>
> YEAH, BLUM SAYS THE GOVERNTMENT IS INNOCENT AND
> INCOMPETENT, THAT IS VERY ORIGINAL...IT'S CALLED A
> LIHOP THEORY...
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone
> Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 10
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 20:55:58 -0600 (Central Standard Time)
From: "Cait" <ansith@gmail.com>
Subject: Tell Betsy Hart that Charlie Sheen is right!

The Fox News Channel show "Hannity and Colmes" voiced their opinions about
the Charlie Sheen comments. Needless to say they were not positive. (Video
can be watched at Prisonplanet.tv)

Betsy Hart, a syndicated columnist basically stated that he was full of crap
and creating this delusion because its "more comfortable to think the
American Government staged 9/11 because at least then we'll have a real
enemy to go after, as opposed to mysterious Islamic Terrorists." WTF is this
woman on? She refused to even entertain the ideas he presented and cited
that he "did not have a degree in civil engineering". Well does she? No, so
how exactly is she an expert on what happened on 9/11? Grrr..

Anyway, you can leave messages on her blog site in response to her
commentary, maybe we can get her to actually READ one of the 9/11 truth
websites out there, who knows! At least we can tell her what we think.

Here is her blog where messages can be left: http://www.betsysblog.com/
I have yet to discover an email address for her, but I'm trying to find one.

Stand up! Speak your mind!
My weblog:

"US Constitution, The Bill of Rights 12/15/1791";
'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
petition the government for a redress of grievances.'

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 11
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:12:33 -0500
From: ranger116@webtv.net
Subject: CNN wants your input on 9/11 story and further research on their part

CNN wants your input on 9/11 story and further research on their part

( Tell CNN here what you think about their reporting on Charlie Sheen
and Alex Jones opinions and ask them to do more research and reporting
in this area.
Also please recommend to them that they make up a panel of the 5
men who have made up the DVD videos of the Truths of 9/11 and have them
on several times )

CNN.com - Contact Us
Address:http://www.cnn.com/feedback/confirmation/generic.html

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
CNN Reports More 9/11 Questions
Address:http://www.wanttoknow.info/060324cnnquestions911

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
State After State Repudiates Bush
Address:http://www.rense.com/general70/state.htm

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````
FEMA breaks Katrina contracts pledge - Hurricanes' Aftermath - MSNBC.com
Address:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11995762/
(note to self - When the Revolution starts - Kill anyone who was
receiving a government paycheck.)

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Codename Grillfire
Address:http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/index.php?n=1&id=1

````````````````````````````````````````````````````

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 12
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 20:54:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: We ain't out of the woods yet people!

reading all the stuff regarding history and 9/11 related stuff has lead me to be cyincally paranoid.

um the federal reserve and private central banking IS the thing that feeds the military industrial complex, that's one of the main reasons why america became so powerful is because americans always said FOOK YOU to the central inbred banksters, we were captured in 1913 with the passing of the federal reserve banking system. main cause for the american revolutionary war was the fact that we were forced to go to a debt based money system which wrecked the prosperity of the colonies, adding further to the injury was a stupid tax which is made to appear to be the straw that broke the camels back for the colonists and is touted in history books as taxes being the main reason for going to war with england instead of the changing the economic system the colonies had.

look up the colonial scrip for further information.

the main reason for getting real story of 9/11 out is that the motherfuxors that be couldn't have passed the patriot act, couldn't have invaded pipeghanistan, couldn't have invaded iraq w/o the traumatic public opinion catalyzing event of 9/11, and last but not least they couldn't have hoisted the farce of the homeland insecurity system w/o 9/11. if we can deny them 9/11 the whole whore on terrorism falls apart because you've caused a paradigm shift in people, otherwise the people would happily go along with what ever plans you had of enslaving them, this to me illustrates the power of the masses and why the mofos that be cannot win a fair fight therefore they have to "dumb us down"


for myself learning about 9/11 fraud lead me to question the validity of other paradigms and provided me the momentum to shatter other paradigms that otherwise i would have left alone

JP Liggett <JP@JPLiggett.com> wrote:
a very compelling read. I too had thought about this, but this article hits the nail on the head. If there are gatekeepers sponsoring the exposure, lets help them really get the word out.

It seems to me that if 9/11 starts getting mainstream, we may consider using the 9/11 exposure force to truly change our society. Perhaps we can use it on a global scale not just the USA.

We can all envision a more just society, with a strong social fabric, to become a beacon of hope for positive social change. A real global golden jubilee.

To that ends, we could consider nationalization of all energy, banking and insurance companies, in the name of the 911 victims. These companies take billions of dollars of our economy and our pockets, and corrupt/disrupt our society. worldwide.

Let work for Public video and audio in every legislature, courtroom, bar association and hearing room. Just a couple of ideas to keep it going. Some people have said, OK, we know about 9-11 being an inside job, now what do we do?

SPONSORED LINKS
United state government grant United state grant United state coin United state army United state flag Trademark united state

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC for low, low rates.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 13
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 20:55:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com>
Subject: Remote Behavioral Influence Technology Evidence

http://www.datafilter.com/mc/remoteBehavioralInfluence.html


Remote Behavioral Influence Technology Evidence John J. McMurtrey, M. S.[a], Copyright 2003, 23 Dec. 2003[b]


People discerning remote manipulation by technology capable of such influence have formed protest organizations across the world.[1] [2] [3] [4] Educated society is uninformed regarding authentic documentation of the development and existence of these technologies, and unaware of the dangers. Complaint of ‘hearing voices’ and perception of other remote manipulation must receive appropriate scientific and legal investigation with protection. Professional awareness is virtually absent with eminent texts and opinion being presumptuous, without appraisal of the evidence.

Herein is substantiated:

1. Human wireless internal voice transmission and tracking technologies.
2. Reports of electroencephalographic (EEG) thought reading capacity, evidence of covert development, and remote EEG capture technology.
3. References to the use of these, or similar technologies against humans.

MICROWAVE HEARING

The first American[c] [5] to publish on the microwave hearing effect was Allan H. Frey in 1962,[6] yet radar technicians had anecdotes of microwave perception in World War II.[7] Deaf and normal subjects, even with earplugs, can hear appropriately pulsed microwaves at least up to thousands of feet from the transmitter.[8] Transmitter parameters above those producing the effect result in a severe buffeting of the head with dizziness and nausea, while parameters below the effect induce a pins and needles sensation. Peak power is the major determinant of loudness, though there is some dependence on pulse width. Pulse modulation appears to influence pitch and timbre. The effect “is the most easily and reliably replicated of low power density (microwave) illumination.” [9] Review of human and animal microwave hearing confirmation by independent investigators of the effect establishes validity.[10] [11] [12] [13] [14] Designs for scaring birds away from aircraft or other hazards by
microwave hearing[15] and induction of vertigo[16] exist.[17] [18]

While working for the Advanced Research Projects Agency at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Sharp and Grove discovered “receiverless” and “wireless” voice transmission. [19] Their method was simple: the negative deflections of voiceprints from recorded spoken numbers were caused to trigger microwave pulses. Upon illumination by such verbally modulated energy, the words were understood remotely. The discovery’s applications are “obviously not limited to therapeutic medicine” according to James C. Lin in Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications.[20]

A Defense Intelligence Agency review of Communist literature affirmed microwave sound and indicated voice transmission. The report states, “Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be originating intracranially (within the head) can be induced by signal modulation at very low average power densities.” [21] Among microwave weapon implications are “great potential for development into a system for disorientating or disrupting the behavior patterns of military or diplomatic personnel.” An Army Mobility Equipment Research and Development Command report affirms microwave speech transmission with applications of “camouflage, decoy, and deception operations.” [22] “One decoy and deception concept presently being considered is to remotely create noise in the heads of personnel by exposing them to low power, pulsed microwaves . . . By proper choice of pulse characteristics, intelligible speech may be created” quotes the report.

The Brunkan Patent # 4877027 “Hearing system” is a device capable of verbal microwave hearing. [23] The invention converts speech for remote introduction into the head by parabolic antenna with indication of direct microwave influence on neural activity. The microwave spectrum granted is broad: 100-10,000 MHz (0.1-10 GHz.) Pulse characteristics are essential to perception. Bursts of narrowly grouped, evenly spaced pulses determine sound intensity by their amount per unit time. Although a wide spectrum is patented, with ranges of pulse and burst duration, preferred operation has burst duration at 2 microseconds, and pulse duration at 100 nanoseconds. Operation is at 1000 MHz, which is the frequency of optimal tissue penetration.[24] Another patent application based on microwave bursts is “designed in such a way that the burst frequencies are at least virtually equal to the sound frequencies of the sounds picked up by the microphone,” though the transducer here is not
remote.[25]

Stocklin Patent # 4858612 “Hearing device” 7 affirms the microwave hearing effect. Stocklin gives exposition to the concept that a microwave component is part of neurophysiology and electroencephalogram (EEG) potentials.[26] Microwaves are considered both emitted and absorbed by nerve cell membrane proteins. Microwaves generally excite the brain[27] perhaps by influencing calcium,[28] a central ion in nerve firing.[29] Stocklin represents the auditory cortex as normally producing microwave energy, which the device simulates, thus eliciting sound sensation. Each acoustic tone is weighted for several microwave frequencies by a formula called the mode matrix, which is used to calculate best perception requirements. Observation of EEG desynchronization, delta waves, and brain wave amplitudes helps calibrate the device.[30] The lowest frequency for hearing is estimated by the cephalic index. Microwave speech transmission in this patent is unremote with the antenna over and sized
for the auditory cortex. Other patents have non-remote transducers of radiowave elicited hearing. [31] [32]

Descriptions in the above patents attribute microwave hearing to direct neural influence. However, the most accepted mechanism in review is by thermoelastic expansion,12 most likely inducing bone conducted hearing. The cochlea does appear to be involved, but not the middle ear.14 This divergence of mechanism illustrates the non-thermal/thermal controversy. US exposure standards are based on thermal effects, yet there are effects very difficult to explain by thermodynamics.13 [33] All accept thermal effects at some level, yet the thermal only school is rather dogmatic related to liability issues of commercial[34] and national security concern.[35] It must be said that the open literature regarding microwave hearing indicates a thermo-acoustic mechanism.

“Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect.” is the title of a small business contract for the Department of Defense. Communication initial results are: “The feasibility of the concept has been established” using both low and high power systems.[36] A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request as to the project’s outcome met with denial on the part of the Air Force, on the grounds that disclosure “could reasonably be expected to cause damage to national security.” [37] Though the Air Force denied the FOIA disclosure, such a contract’s purpose is elaborated by the Air Force’s “New World Vistas” report: “It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction . . . . If a pulse stream is used, it should be possible to create an internal acoustic field in the 5-15 kilohertz range, which is audible. Thus it may be possible to ‘talk’ to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be
most disturbing to them.” [38] Robert Becker, whose eminence was enough to have been twice nominated for the Nobel Prize in biological electromagnetic fields research, is more explicit: “Such a device has obvious applications in covert operations designed to drive a target crazy with “voices” or deliver undetectable instructions to a programmed assassin.” [39]

The above Army efforts had results. A microwave voice transmission non-lethal weapon is referenced in the thesaurus of the Center for Army Lessons Learned, which is a military instruction website.18 The military thesaurus entry lists analogous devices using “silent sound.” [d] [40]

ULTRASOUND TRANSMISSION OF VOICE

Internal voice capability, without discernment by others nearby. is also evident in ultrasound-based technology. Lowrey Patent # 6052336 “Apparatus and method of broadcasting audible sound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier” clearly focuses on non-lethal weapon application against crowds or directed at an individual.[41] Communication is understood as an inner voice with loss of the directional quality of sound perception. “Since most cultures attribute inner voices either as a sign of madness, or as messages from spirits or demons, both of which . . . evoke powerful emotional reactions”, quotes the Lowrey patent’s effect on people. Replaying speech, with a delay impedes talking and causes stuttering. Normal brain wave patterns can be changed (or entrained), which “may cause temporary incapacitation, intense feelings of discomfort.” This technique is detailed by Monroe Patent # 5356368 “Method of and apparatus for inducing desired states of consciousness”, with license to
Interstate Industries and involves an auditory replication of brainwave patterns to entrain the EEG as desired.[42]

Norris Patent # 5889870 “Acoustic heterodyne device and method”, directionally produces sound on interference (or heterodyning) of two ultrasound beams.[43] The cancellation leaves the carried audible sound perceivable. The effect becomes apparent particularly within cavities such as the ear canal. An individual readily understands communication across a noisy crowed room without nearby discernment. Sound can also be produced from mid-air or as reflecting from any surface.

American Technology Corporation, which licensed this patent, has an acoustic non-lethal weapons technology,[44] a cooperative agreement with the Army Research & Development Command,[45] and is working with numerous other government agencies.[46] The corporation’s Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRADTM) account for 60% of military sales, and have integration into the Navy’s situational awareness & radar surveillance systems[47] with deployment on naval vessels and fleet harbors.[48] A popular magazine writer describes the device’s inner nature of sound perception.[49] From separate references, non-lethal weapons treatments affirm sound localization and individual ultrasound effect limitation[50] with obvious lack of nearby discernment;[51] the latter by a non-lethal weapons program director. A similar ultrasound method of limiting sound to one person, Audio Spotlight is marketed, with exhibition at Boston’s Museum of Science and the Smithsonian National Air & Space Museum.[52] Both
the American Technology device and Audio Spotlight are discussed in an article with some history of ultrasound acoustics, which has origins in sonar.[53] Other acoustic influence methods may utilize ultrasound.[e] [54]

TARGET TRACKING TECHNOLOGY

The maintenance of effects on people requires obstacle penetration and target tracking. These internal voice capable energy forms penetrate obstruction and can be localized. Sound transmission through enclosures is commonly experienced. An inaudible ultrasound high intensity carrier wave is unnoticed. Solid defect inspection is one use of ultrasound, which is being developed to discern movement through walls.[55] Common technology utilizes the microwave hearing spectrum, which partly or completely encompasses cell phone,[56] [57] TV, and radar frequencies. [58] Commercial signals are not perceived, since the hearing effect requires pulsation within the limits that elicit perception. A variety of antennae localize the structurally penetrating microwave illumination with collimation or focusing.[59] [60] A patent, “compatible for mobile platforms with DEWs,” (Directed Energy Weapons) includes a modified Luneburg lens emitting parallel rays with over 50 years utilization.[61]

Hablov Patent # 5448501 “Electronic life detection system” is for microwave radar within the hearing spectrum that finds and distinguishes individuals through obstruction.[62] Therein is stated: “the modulated component of the reflected microwave signal . . . subjected to frequency analysis . . . forms a type of “electronic fingerprint“ of the living being with characteristic features, which . . . permits a distinction between different living beings.” Though this patent has use in trapped victim rescue, another Hablov et. al. Patent # 5530429 “Electronic surveillance system” detects interlopers with security emphasis.[63] Other literature describes the basic method.[64]

The Hablov et. al. patents discern people thru structures by vital organ motion, but others offer more detailed imaging. Fullerton et. al. Patent # 6400307 “System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array” is such a design,[65] and is commercially available as RadarVision by Time Domain. [66] Further designs for imaging within structures include: a portable system determining suspect distance,[67] and presentations by the International Society for Optical Engineering.[68] [69] Software for displaying radar detection on a personal computer is sold.[70]

Rowan Patent # 4893815 “Interactive transector device commercial and military grade” describes the acquisition, locking onto, and tracking of human targets.[71] Stated therein: “Potentially dangerous individuals can be efficiently subdued, apprehended and appropriately detained.” The capability of “isolating suspected terrorists from their hostages . . . or individuals within a group without affecting other members of the group” is stated. Laser, radar, infrared, and acoustic sensor fusion is utilized to identify, seek, and locate targets. Locking illumination upon the target until weapons engagement accomplishes tracking. Among available non-lethal weapons is an incapacitating electromagnetic painful pulse. Another target tracking system is the Manportable Surveillance and Target Acquisition Radar by Systems & Electronics, Inc., which is capable of tracking moving targets including personnel. This system has an auto target track feature, and lists moving target detection as
12 km for a walking man.[72]

A track initiation processor acquires a target, while a data association filter maintains a tracking lock on the target.[73] An original method for target tracking is the Kalman filter. Numerous weapons guidance examples utilize similar processes and illuminate targets for tracking. Laser illumination is also used for non-human targets.[74] Other examples utilize microwave beam target recognition and weapons guidance.[75] [76] Target illumination tracking systems have nanosecond to microsecond response times. Such responses do not require a wide scan area to lock illumination upon persons at achievable speeds. At 90 miles per hour an auto travels less than 1/100 of an inch in a microsecond.

DISCUSSION

Ultrasound voice transmission technology is publicly demonstrated in museum exhibits. The numerous microwave voice transmission citations rest on a considerable foundation of microwave hearing literature. Internal voice non-lethal weapon applications are discussed in many of the citations. There are are examples of either existence or sales of non-lethal weapons based on both technologies. Numerous designs involving human location, identification, and tracking methods, have long demonstrated the feasibility of constructing devices capable of producing internal voice continuously in isolated individuals. To deny such technological capabilities in the face of extensive complaint is willfully to ignore documented development of the relevant technologies and engineering competence for complete integration.

THOUGHT READING CAPACITY

Many people who report experiencing remote behavioral influence also perceive mind reading. Thought reading capacity, or brain wave analysis word recognition, is seriously reported. Publications by a Stanford group support and report recognition of specific words from brain waves,[77] [78] [79] [80] with recent enhanced success. [81] Other investigators publish above chance magnetoencephalographic (MEG) word recognition.[82] The current publications lack reference to a 1975 US government technical report of prior results from Stanford comparable to the recent articles,[83] and an apparent Russian report of specific EEG word recognition before 1981.[84] Electroencephalographic (EEG) instant detection by syllables of “a content of category which the testee wishes to speak” quotes Kiyuna et. al. Patent # 5785653 “System and method for predicting internal condition of live body.” [85] A stated use: “the present invention may be use (sic) to detect the internal condition of
surveillance in criminal investigation” by EEG. NEC Corporation licensed this patent. Remote EEG communication with Armed Forces or clandestine application are the cited uses for Mardirossian Patent # 6011991 “Communication system and method including brain wave analysis and/or use of brain activity.” [86] This patent affirms EEG word recognition, proposes transmitter capable skin implants, utilizes neural networks (artificial intelligence), and is licensed by Technology Patents, LLC.

Activation of brain cell assemblies provides a theoretical framework[87] for the above word recognition reports, and extensive publications of averaged EEG word category differentiation. These differentiation reports themselves are consistent with specific word recognition, since their basis is by visual analysis of averaged categories, without the use of sophisticated computer programs as are essential for specific word recognition. Based on EEG/MEG responses, words can be differentiated as to length, [88] and visual nouns can be differentiated from action verbs.[89] [90] [91] [92] [93] Brain wave patterns distinguish proper names from common nouns, [94] animal names from numerals,[95] or content from function words.[96] [97] [98] [99] Face, arm, or leg action verbs are reported distinguished by brain waves as well.[100] [101] Concrete versus abstract words,[102] and unambiguous versus ambiguous noun/verbs[103] have distinctive EEG patterns.

Some of these word category differentiation reports are consistent with both the specific recognition reports, and/or the differentiation of non-verbal cognition. Based on EEG/MEG responses, words are readily distinguished from non-words,[104] [105] [106] or pictures.[107] EEG differentiation of words rated as to affective meaning such as good-bad, strong-weak, or active-passive is reported.[108] [109]

Other literature indicates EEG differentiation of completely non-verbal cognition. Emotion differentiation by EEG is patented, referencing Air Force research.[110] Movement anticipation potentials (bereitschaftspotential) and those of actual movement are detectable by EEG.[111] [112] EEG movement signals have been used to move a cursor left or right,[113] and just the imagination of movement is sufficiently distinguished by EEG to control switches,[114] or control prosthesis grasp.[115] Guiding robots through simulated rooms by EEG detection of imagining the spinning of cubes or arm rising of appropriate direction is reported.[116] [117] [118] Even more complex grasping and reaching robot arm control has been achieved by signals from implanted brain electrodes in monkeys without body arm movement.[119] A number of groups have developed procedures to detect deception based on the P300 (positive @ 300 millisec.) event related potential (ERP) from EEG.[120] [121] [122] [123]
[124] [125] A commercial system, Brain Fingerprinting,[126] which includes analysis of a late negative ERP potential and frequency analysis in addition to the P300, even asserts 100% accuracy over five separate studies.[127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [f]

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies also report differentiation of cognitive states. Different fMRI brain activation loci for face, natural and manufactured object recognition are reviewed.[132] Neural network differentiation of fMRI response to noun categories for fish, four legged animals, trees, flowers, fruits, vegetables, family members, occupations, tools, kitchen items, dwellings, and building parts is reported.[133] Distinguishing truthful from deceptive responses by fMRI is also reported.[134] [135] [136] [137] The ability to discern the state of romantic love towards an individual by fMRI has report as well.[138]

The research arm of agencies with missions to covertly acquire information would certainly develop to operational capability any technologic thought reading potential. Assertions that such development has progressed are multiple, and two are confirmed by details of the 1975 government EEG specific word recognition report, which itself is evidence of development covert to open databases.83 An International Committee of the Red Cross Symposium synopsis states EEG computer mind reading development by Lawrence Pinneo in 1974 at Stanford.[139] A letter by the Department of Defense Assistant General Counsel for Manpower, Health, and Public Affairs, Robert L. Gilliat in 1976 affirmed brain wave reading by the Advanced Research Projects Agency.[140] “Thought reading or synthetic telepathy” communications technology procurement is considered in a 1993 Jane’s[g] Special Operations Forces (SOF) article: “One day, SOF commandos may be capable of communicating through thought processes.”
[141] Descriptive terms are “mental weaponry and psychic warfare” Although contemplated in future context, the availability of a technology without adaptation to troop level requirements is implied, since anticipation of mobile deployment would have to assume prior development.

In 1976, the Malech Patent # 3951134 “Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves” was granted.[142] Example of operation is at 100 and 210 MHz; frequencies penetrating obstruction. “The individual components of the system for monitoring and controlling brain wave activity may be of conventional type commonly employed in radar”; and “The system permits medical diagnosis of patients, inaccessible to physicians, from remote stations” are quotes indicating remote capacity. License is to Dorne & Margolin Inc., but now protection is expired with public domain. The Malech patent utilizes interference of 210 and 100 MHz frequencies resulting in a 110 MHz return signal, which is demodulated to give EEG waveform.

The capability of remote EEG is predicted by electromagnetic scattering theory using ultrashort pulses, which are not part of the Malech patent.[143] Ultrashort pulses are currently defined in the range of 10-12 to 10-15 second. Considering that EEG word elicited potentials are comparatively long (hundreds of milliseconds), indicates that remote radar EEG capture is adequate to word recognition, with ultrashort pulses allowing some 109 or more radar reflections in a millisecond (10-3 sec.)

The possibility of impressing an ‘experience set’ on an individual by ultrashort pulses is also contemplated.143 The above patent can alter brain waves as well as detect them. Microwave non-lethal weapon brain wave disruption[144] and behavioral change including unconsciousness[145] are known.35

The above EEG telemetry patent and ultrashort pulse method are by active radar probe. Yet a passive field extends as far as 12 feet from man as detected by a cryogenic antenna.[146] A technical article maintains this device as entirely adaptable to clandestine applications, and pointedly comments on the disappearance of physiological remote sensing literature since the 1970’s for animals and humans, while all other categories of remote sensing research greatly expanded.[147]

DISCUSSION

Complete rejection of assertions of a remote mind reading capability is just as presumptuous, in the face of complaints, as has been the dismissal of internal voice capacity. Considerable capacity to detect and differentiate mental states is evident from literature reports particularly by EEG. The fact that EEG movement imagination signals are detected for robot guidance on a voluntary unprompted basis116 117 118 suggests a similar capacity is feasible for specific EEG word identification, which has only been reported for word prompted responses. Though references to remote EEG are less, they provide plausibly exploitable mechanisms, which may be covertly developed.

LEGAL AND INTERNATIONAL REFERENCES TO BEHAVIORAL INFLUENCE TECHNOLOGIES

References to behavioral influence weapon use by government bodies and international organizations are numerous. Negotiation submissions to the United Nations Committee on Disarmament affirm the reality of microwave weapon nervous system effects.[148] European Parliament passage of resolutions calling for conventions regulating non-lethal weapons and the banning of “weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings” [149] includes neuro-influence capability.[150] A resolution relates to HAARP, High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project, which has environmental consequences, and although utilizing high frequency, ionospheric extra low frequencies (ELF) emanation results. Since ELF is within brain wave frequencies the project has capacity to influence whole populations.[151] [152] President Carter’s National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, predicted development of such capacity.[153] Nature News reports concern by a French government panel about the
potential for thought reading and such a remote capacity.[154] An American draft law prohibiting land, sea, or space-based weapons using electromagnetic, psychotronic (behavioral influence), and sound technologies “directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control” has not yet passed.[155] Russian electromagnetic standards are nearly 1000 times lower than the West, so their weapon law forbidding electromagnetic weapons exceeding Health Department parameters is strict.[156] The Russian draft law explicitly references behavioral influence non-lethal weapons, and development in several countries.[157] Resolutions by the International Union of Radio Science recognize criminal use of electromagnetic technology, though largely relevant to use against infrastructure.[158]

MICROWAVE AND ULTRASOUND USE AGAINST HUMANS

The microwave irradiation of the American Embassy in Moscow received little publicity until the winter of 1976 instillation of protective screening, but irradiation was known since 1953.34 Original frequencies were 2.56-4.1 GHz with additional intermittent 0.6-9.5 GHz signals being permanent by 1975 in a wide band frequency hopping[h] consistent pattern with one signal pulsating. The irradiation was directional from nearby buildings and modulated. Complaint to the Soviets had no avail, but the signals disappeared in January 1979 “reportedly as a result of a fire in one or more of the buildings.” [159] A 9-11 GHz signal recurred in 1988.[160] Observed frequencies are basically within the microwave hearing spectrum, and pulsation is required. Psychiatric cases occurred during the exposure period, though no epidemiologic relationship was revealed with fully a quarter of the medical records unavailable, and comparison with other Soviet Bloc posts.159 The CIA had Dr. Milton Zaret
review medical Soviet microwave literature to determine the purpose of the irradiation. He concluded the Russians “believed the beam would modify the behavior of the personnel.” [161] In 1976 the post was declared unhealthful and pay raised 20% 140

The most documented citizen microwave irradiation was of peace protesters at Greenham Common American Air Force Base in Berkshire England, who prompted investigation of unusual symptoms.[162] Radiation measurements exhibited microwaves with symptom experience up to a hundred times the background level, and rose sharply on protests nearer the base.160 Symptoms became pronounced on cruise missile transport, a protest focus.160 Recorded were wide ranging complaints: skin burns; ‘severe’ headaches; drowsiness; temporary paralysis; incoordinated speech; two late (5 mos.) spontaneous abortions; an apparent circulatory failure; and unlike usual menstrual synchronization, irregular or postmenopausal menstruation. The symptom complex fits well with electromagnetic exposure syndrome 160 It has also been reported that some of the women ‘heard voices.’[163] The base closed finally in 1991.

Criminal directed energy weapon use has been reported in Germany.[164] In a number of cases there is similarity of circumstances, complaints, and symptoms. In at least one case microwave fields have been measured with exclusion of the usual sources (cell phone towers, etc.)[165] Plans for construction of a crude device from a microwave oven are sold.164

Measurement of non-ionizing radiation fields in the vicinity of an Australian victim is described.[166] The intensity ranged from 7 mV in an adjacent room to 35 mV next to the head. The victim suffered from multiple personality disorder attributed to ritual abuse, and claimed an implant with radiological evidence.

Ultrasound behavioral influence technology use in Northern Ireland is cited [167] The device could focus on one person; and utilized ultrasound cancellation like those patented. It was employed in Vietnam by the Americans, and is known as the squawk box. Mentioned infrasound frequency (ultrasound carrier directed) is like Loos 1/25/00 patent, with psychological effects summarized as ‘spooky.’ More detail by a defense journalist is quoted: “When the two frequencies mix in the human ear they become intolerable. Some people exposed to the device are said to feel giddy or nauseous and in extreme cases they faint. Most people are intensely annoyed by the device and have a compelling wish to be somewhere else.” [168] British police inventories list the specific device, though a spokesman denied use.160

Sophisticated behavioral influence capability is confirmed by ex-intelligence officers. Julianne McKinney, Director of The National Security Alumni Electronic Surveillance Project is prominent. This is a largely classified employee victim study with internal voice transmission avowal.[169]

CONCLUSION

The logic in the prediction by Brzezinski[i] of the appearance of a more controlled and directed society dominated by a power elite willing to use the latest modern techniques for influencing behavior without hindrance by liberal democratic values is compelling.153 Potential behavioral influence targets are multiple. Since those supposedly expert regard a victim’s perceptions as psychotic, all complaints are disregarded, not to mention capability to bear witness. Targets may include anyone worth neutralization: domestic adversaries;[170] security risks, which may only comprise classified disclosures; persons witnessing serious improprieties; and those prone to committing advantageous felonies. Legality is readily circumvented by executive orders, (particularly declaration of a crisis or emergency situation), which can be sealed, and this prerogative is only accountable to co-equal branches of government as is now the case with terrorism suspects. Internal voice technology is
most applicable within the same language and culture. Space here limits more than mention of remote EEG influence capacity, hypnosis, and footnoting remote subliminal technique. Hypnotic or subliminal message presentation represent particularly insidious means of influencing thought, mood, behavior, and undermining civil liberties.

Most complainants allege public sector involvement or sub-contracted private companies.[171] Remote behavioral influence research has long been funded by the US,39 with evidence of development19 22 36 45 46 and weapons,18 44 47 48 51 though denying on national security grounds project results37 and foreign literature analyses.[172] Some thirty countries evidence active behavioral influence weapon research.[173]

Though there is some scant psychoanalytical acknowledgement,[174] current medical awareness ensures effective neutralization of the afflicted. Not all those affected are stigmatized. However phenomena of ‘hearing voices’, or perception of remote manipulation, when recounted to health professionals results in various stigmatizing diagnoses, [175] [176] totally without investigation. Determination of relevant fields around complainants is mandatory, or abatement by proven shielding of such phenomena. Professional opinions formed without excluding these technologies are negligent.

The medical community has long heard either identical or similar complaint[177] to that above delineated as known internal voice technology from numerous victims. This fact indicts the scholarship and presumption of impossibility evident in the pertinent medical literature. In addition, microwave bioeffects have considerable congruence with reported symptoms of major psychosis other than ’voices.’ [178] All of society should be disturbed at the prospect of technologic induction of voice, since the unaware subject would perceive such voices as his own natural thought, without such an assault as to provoke complaint.

It is difficult to deny the level of substantiation for the possibility that a thought reading capacity exists, even with references that support a remote basis. The logic that in the thirty years since the Pinneo work started, this capability has had full development is too sound to dismiss victim corroboration. It would have to be admitted that funding for projects by the defense and security agencies is considerably greater than for open science, and that thought reading would be a priority area. Educated democracies should not be complacent at this prospect, given the potential for political control, and existence of a remote EEG method in the public domain.

Acknowledgements: Thanks are given to God for inspiration, and a benefactor of Christians Against Mental Slavery for financial support. There is gratitude also to Dr. Paul Canner, and Dr. Allen Barker for their suggestions.

All patents are printable from the U. S. Patent Office website.
EEG word recognition articles are printable thru Pubmed as designated.
Each is free
Pinneo LR and Hall DJ. “Feasibility Study for Design of a Biocybernetic Communication System” is available from Christians Against Mental Slavery at info@slavery.org.uk.


REFERENCES

---------------------------------
[a] Address: 903 N. Calvert St., Baltimore MD 21202. Email- Johnmcmurt@aol.com Phone- 410-539-5140.

[b] Financial contribution to this article was made by fellow members of Christians Against Mental Slavery.

[c] American discovery may not be the first. Soviet and East European electromagnetic bioeffect literature is prior, more extensive, and transparent. A translated Russian treatment is the next text reference, which refers to F. Cazzamalli, an Italian, who mentioned radiofrequency hallucination about 1920.

[d] Also called S-quad, Silent Sounds, Inc. licensed Lowery Patent #5159703 “Silent subliminal presentation system”, and has advanced brain wave entrainment technology (vide infra) with several classified patents. (See http://www.mindspring.com/~silent/menu.htm and links.) Unessential is individual direction, but possible by ultrasound.

[e] Loos Patent # 6017302 “Subliminal acoustic manipulation of nervous system” can “cause relaxation, drowsiness, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise acoustic frequency near ½ Hz used. The effects of the 2.5 Hz resonance include slowing of certain cortical processes, sleepiness, and disorientation.”

[f] Referred to, but unavailable, however are a CIA Office of Technology Assessment report, a security industry publication, and a doctoral dissertation.

[g] Jane’s is the most respected and authoritative of defense reporting services.

[h] A means evading detection.

[i] National Security Advisor to President Carter.

---------------------------------
[1] Citizens Against Human Rights Abuse, Director, Cheryl Welsh, 915 Zaragoza Street, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Website at http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/ Email is welsh@dcn.davis.ca.us

[2] Christians Against Mental Slavery, Secretary, John Allman, 98 High Street, Knaresbourough, N. Yorks HG5 0HN, United Kingdom. Email is info@slavery.org.uk

[3] Moscow Committee for the Ecology of Dwellings, Chairman, Emile Sergeevne Chirkovoi, Korpus 1006, Kvrtira 363, Moscow Zelenograd, Russia 103575. . Website at http://www.moskomekologia.narod.ru Email is moskomekologia@narod.ru

[4] International Movement for the Ban of Manipulation of the Human Nervous System by Technologic Means, Founder, Mojmir Babacek, P. O. Box 52, 51101 Turnov, Czech Republic, Europe. Website at http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm Email is mbabacek@iol.cz

[5] Presman AS. Electromagnetic Fields and Life Plenum, New York-London, 1970. Presman mentions Cazzimalli and another English reference to this Italian work is at http://www.datafilter.com/mc/jaski.html p 2, a semi-popular treatment with references.

[6] Frey AH. “Human Auditory System response to modulated electromagnetic energy” J Applied Physiol 17 (4): 689-92, 1962. Also at http://www.raven1.net/frey.htm

[7] Stocklin PL. Patent #4858612 “Hearing device” USPTO granted 8/22/89.

[8] Frey AH and Messenger R. “Human Perception of Illumination with Pulsed Ultrahigh-Frequency Electromagnetic Energy” Science 181: 356-8, 1973.

[9] Eichert ES and Frey AH. “Human Auditory System Response to Lower Power Density Pulse Modulated Electromagnetic Energy: A Search for Mechanisms” J Microwave Power 11(2): 141, 1976.

[10] Michaelson SM. “Sensation and Perception of Microwave Energy” In: Michaelson SM, Miller MW, Magin R, and Carstensen EL (eds.) Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Nonionizing Radiation Plenum Press, New York, p 213-24, 1975.

[11] Puranen L and Jokela K. “Radiation Hazards Assessment of Pulsed Microwave Radars” J Microwave Power Electromagn Energy 31(3): 165-77, 1996.

[12] Hermann DM and Hossman K-A. “Neurological effects of microwave exposure related to mobile communication” J Neurol Sci 152: 1-14, 1997.

[13] Lai H. “Neurological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation” In: Lin JC (ed.) Advances in Electromagnetic Fields in Living Systems vol 1, Plenum, N Y & London, p 27-80, 1994.

[14] Elder JA and Chou CK. “Auditory Responses to Pulsed Radiofrequency Energy” Bioelectromagnetics Suppl 8: S162-73, 2003. Also at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/106565261/PDFSTART and http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/scc28/sc4/Human%20Perception%20FINAL.pdf

[15] Kreithen ML. Patent #5774088 “Method and system for warning birds of hazards” USPTO granted 6/30/98.

[16] Lenhadt ML and Ochs AL. Patent #6250255 “Methods and apparatus for alerting and/or repelling birds and other animals” USPTO granted 6/26/01.

[17] Nordwall BD. “Radar Warns Birds of Impending Aircraft” Aviation Wk Space Technol March 10, p 65-6, 1997.

[18]Center for Army Lessons Learned Thesaurus at http://call.army.mil/products//thesaur/00016275.htm

[19] Justesen DR. “Microwaves and Behavior” Am Psychologist, 392(Mar): 391-401, 1975. Excerpted reference at http://www.raven1.net/v2succes.htm

[20] Lin JC. Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications Thomas, Springfield Ill, p 176, 1978.

[21] “Surveillance Technology, 1976: policy and implications, an analysis and compendium of materials: a staff report of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee of the Judiciary. United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, second session, p 1280, US GOV DOC Y 4.J 882:SU 7/6/976.

[22] Oskar KJ. “Effects of low power microwaves on the local cerebral blood flow of conscious rats” Army Mobility Equipment Command Report,. # AD-A090426, 1980. Available form NASA Technical Reports. Abstract at http://www.raven1.net/v2s-nasa.htm

[23] Brunkan WB. Patent #4877027 “Hearing system” USPTO granted 10/31/89.

[24] Frey AH. “Behavioral Biophysics” Psychol Bull 63(5): 322-37, 1965.

[25] Thijs VMJ. Application #WO1992NL0000216 “Hearing Aid Based on Microwaves” World Intellectual Property Organization Filed 1992-11-26, Published 1993-06-10. Also at http://www.delphion.com/details?pn=WO09310730A1 Not a US Patent.

[26] Stocklin PL and Stocklin BF. “Possible Microwave Mechanisms of the Mammalian Nervous System” T-I-T J Life Sci 9: 29-51, 1979.

[27] Beason RC and Semm P. “Responses of neurons to an amplitude modulated microwave stimulus” Neurosci Lett 333: 175-78, 2002.

[28] Adey WR. “Biological Effects of Low Energy Electromagnetic Fields On the Central Nervous System” NATO Advanced Study Institute on Advances in Biological Effects and Dosimetry of Low Energy Electromagnetic Fields Erice Italy, Plenum, p 359-391, 1981.

[29] Shepherd GM. Neurobiology 2nd ed. Oxford Univ. Press, New York-Oxford, p146-7, 1988.

[30] Bise W. “Low power radio-frequency and microwave effects on human electroencephalogram and behavior” Physiol Chem Phys 10(5): 387-98, 1978.

[31] Puharich HK and Lawrence JL. Patent #3629521“Hearing systems” USPTO granted 12/21/71.

[32] Flanagan GP. Patent #3393279 “Nervous System Excitation Device” USPTO granted 7/16/68.

[33] Frolich H. “The Biological Effects of Microwaves and Related Quiestions” Adv Electonics Electron Physics 53: 85-152, 1980.

[34] Steneck NH. The Microwave Debate MIT Press Cambridge, Mass, London Eng, 1984.

[35] Becker RO. Cross Currents Jeremy P. Tarcher, Inc, Los Angeles, St Martin’s Press, p 297-304 & p 303-4, 1990.

[36] Kohn B. “Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect” Defense Department Awarded SBIR Contract # F41624-95-C9007, 1993. Also at http://es.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/sbir/other/monana/kohn.html & http://www.raven1.net/v2s-kohn.htm

[37] Margo P. Cherney Freedom of Information Act Memorandum at http://www.raven1.net/usafletr.jpg

[38] Castelli CJ. “Questions Linger about Health Effects of DOD’s ‘Non-Lethal Ray’ Inside the Navy 14(12): 1-6, 2001. http://globalsecurity.org/org/news/2001/e20010327questions.htm

[39] Becker RO and Selden G. The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life Quill William Morrow, New York, p 319 & 320, 1985.

[40] Lowery OM. Patent #5159703 “Silent subliminal presentation system” USPTO granted 10/27/92.

[41] Lowrey A. Patent #6052336 “Apparatus and method of broadcasting audible sound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier” USPTO granted 4/18/00.

[42] Monroe RA. Patent #5356368 Method of and apparatus for inducing desired states of conscisousness” USPTO granted 10/18/94.

[43] Norris EG. Patent #5889870 “Acoustic Heterodyne device and method” USPTO granted 3/20/99.

[44] American Technology Corporation Announces Acoustic Non-Lethal Acoustical Weapon Technology for Military and Law Enforcement, press release of 10/30/01.

[45] American Technology Corporation Shareholder Alert, press release of 4/23/03 at http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/04_23_03.html .

[46] American Technology Corporation Announces Generation II HSSR Emitter at Annual General Meeting, press release of 5/30/03 at http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/05_30_03.html

[47] American Technology Corporation Awarded Key Military Contract to Deliver Modified Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRADTM) press release of 10/21/03 at http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/10_21_03.html

[48] American Technology Corporation Announces Expansion of Military Business press release of 6/30/03 at http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/06_30_03.html

[49] Sparrow D. “Best of What’s New Grand Award Winner: Hypersonic Sound” Popular Science, Dec, p 94, 2002. Also at http://www.popsci.com/popsci/bown/article/0,16106,388134,00.html

[50] Bunker RJ (ed.) Less-than-lethal Weapons: Reference Guidebook Los Angles Calif {National Law Enforcemnt and Corrections Technology, Western Region}, 2000. Similar treatment is Bunker RJ (ed.) “Nonlethal Weapons Terms and References” INSS Occasional Paper 15, USAF Institute for National Security Studies, USAF Academy, Colorodo at http://www.usafa.af.mil/inss/OCP/ocp15.pdf

[51] Alexander JB. Future War: Non-Lethal Weapons in Twenty-First-Century Warfare, St. Martin’s Press, New York, p. 101, 1999.

[52] Audio Spotlight, Holosonic Research Labs, 51 Water Street Watertown, MA 02472 at http://www.holosonics.com/

[53] Lawton G. “They are playing my tune” New Scientist 9 Sept. p 38-42, 2000.

[54] Loos HG. Patent #6017302 “Subliminal acoustic manipulation of nervous systems” USPTO granted 1/25/00.

[55]Hunt A, Tillery C, and Wild N. “Through-the-Wall Surveillance Technologies” Corrections Today 63(4): 132-3, 2001. Also at http://www.ojp.gov/nij/sciencetech/aca/07_01.pdf

[56] Frey AH. “Headaches from Cellular Telephones: Are They Real and What Are the Implications” Environ. Health Perspect. 106(3): 101-3, 1998.

[57] Lin JC, “Cellular Telephones and Their Effect on the Human Brain” Mob Comput and Comm Review, 3(3): 34-5, July, 1999. Also at http://www.eecs.uic.edu/eecspeople/lin_acm3.htm

[58] Nolan PJ, Fundaments of College Physics Wm. C. Brown: Dubuque, Iowa, Melbourne, Australia, Oxford England, p 716, 1993.

[59] Reits BJ. Patent #5736966 “Adjustable microwave antenna” USPTO granted 4/7/98.

[60] Maier G and Harrison D. Patent #5825554 “Lenses with a variable refraction index” USPTO granted 10/20/98.

[61] Jasper LJ. Patent #6407708 “Microwave generator/radiator using photoconductive switching and dielectric lense” USPTO granted 6/18/02.

[62] Hablov DV, Fisun OI, Lupichev LN, Osipov VV, Schestiperov VA, and Schimko R. Patent #5448501 ”Electronic life detection system” USPTO granted 9/5/95.

[63] Hablov DV, Fisun OI, Lupichev LN, Osipov VV, Schestiperov VA, and Schimko R. Patent #5530429 “Electronic surveillance system” USPTO granted 6/25/96.

[64] Giori FA and Winterberger AR. “Remote Physiological Monitoring Using a Microwave Interferometer” Biomed Sci Instr 3: 291-307, 1967.

[65] Fullerton LW and Richards JI. Patent #6400307 “System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array” USPTO granted 6/4/02.

[66] Time Domain Corporation, Cummings Research Park, 7057 Old Madison Pike, Suite 250, Huntsville, AL 35806 at http://www.radarvision.com/ , company website is at http://www.timedomain.com/

[67] Nacci P. “Radar-Based Through-the-Wall Surveillance System” National Law Enforcement and Corrections Center at http://www.raven1.net/nij_p26.htm

[68] Ferris DD. “Microwave and millimeter-wave systems for wall penetration” SPIE Proceedings 3375: 269-79, 1998.

[69] Frazier LM. “Surveillance through walls and other opaque materials” SPIE Proceedings 2497: 115-19, 1995.

[70] Radar PC at http://www.salsburg.com/product/radar.html

[71] Rowan L. Patent #4893815 “Interactive transector device commercial and military grade” USPTO granted 1/16/90.

[72] Systems & Electronics Inc., 201 Evans Ave., St. Louis MO 63121, Manportable Surveillane and Target Acquisition Radar at http://www.seistl.com/images/pdf/mstar.pdf Company website is at http://www.seistl.com/directions.html

[73] Brookner E. Tracking and Kalman Filtering Made Easy Wiley, New York, 1998.

[74] Tisdale GE and Lindemann HB. Patent #4497065 “Target recognition system enhanced by active signature measurements” USPTO granted 1/29/85.

[75] Peralta EA and Reitz KM. Patent #4562439 “Imaging radar seeker” USPTO granted 12/31/85.

[76] Ahlstrom LGW. Patent #4796834 “Method for combating of targets and projectile or missile for carrying out the method” USPTO granted 1/10/89.

[77] Suppes P, Lu Z, and Han B. “Brain wave recognition of words” Proc Natl Acad Sci 94: 14965-69, 1997. Printable free online thru Pubmed or at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/94/26/14965

[78] Suppes P, Han B, and Lu Z. “Brain-wave recognition of sentences” Proc Natl Acad Sci 95: 15861-66, 1998. Printable free online thru Pubmed or at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/95/26/15861

[79] Suppes P, Han B, Epelboim J, and Lu Z. “Invariance of brain-wave representations of simple visual images and their names” Proc Natl Acad Sci 96: 14658-63, 1999. Printable free online thru Pubmed or at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/25/14658

[80] Suppes P, Han B, Epelboim J, and Lu ZL. “Invariance between subjects of brain wave representations of language” Proc Natl Acad Sci 96(22): 12953-8, 1999. Printable free online thru PubMed or at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/22/12953

[81] Suppes P and Han B. “Brain-wave representation of words by superposition of a few sine waves” Proc Natl Acad Sci 97: 8738-43, 2000. Printable free online thru Pubmed or at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/97/15/8738

[82] Assadullahi R and Pulvermuller F. “Neural Network Classification of Word Evoked Neuromagnetic Brain Activity” In: Wermter S, Austin J, and Willahaw D (eds.) Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence: Emergent Neurocomputational Architechures Based on Neuroscience Heidelberg Springer, p 311-20, 2001. More limited preliminary communication at http://www.his.sunderland.ac.uk/durhamab/ramin.doc

[83] Pinneo LR and Hall DJ. “Feasibility Study for Design of a Biocybernetic Communication System” Report #ADA017405 National Technical Information Service, 1975. Prepared for the Advanced Research Projects Agency Order #2034, Program Code #2D20, Contractor: Stanford Research Institute Contract dates: 2/9/72-8/31/76, SRI Project LSU-1936. (US cost ~$50.)

[84] Selden G. “Machines That Read Minds” Sci Digest Oct 89: 60-6, 1981. Also at http://www.datafilter.com/mc/machinesThatReadMinds.html

[85] Kiyuna T, Tanigawa T, and Yamazaki T. Patent #5785653 “System and method for predicting internal condition of live body” USPTO granted 7/28/98.

[86] Mardirossian A. Patent #6011991 “Communication system and method including brain wave analysis and/or use of brain activity” USPTO granted 1/4/00.

[87] Pulvermuller F. “Words in the brain’s language” Behav Brain Sci 22: 253-336, 1999.

[88] Assadollahi R and Pulvermuller F. “Neuromagnetic evidence for early access to cognitive represtentations” Cog Neurosci Neurophysiol 12(2): 207-13, 2001.

[89] Preissl H, Pulvermuller F, Lutzenberger W, and Birbaumer N. “Evoked potentials distinguish between nouns and verbs” Neurosci Lett 197: 81-3, 1995.

[90] Pulvermuller F, Mohn B, and Schleichert H. “Semantic or lexico-syntactic factors: what determines word-class specific activity in the human brain?” Neurosci Lett 275: 81-4, 1999.

[91] Pulvermuller F, Lutzenberger W, and Preissl H. “Nouns and Verbs in the Intact Brain: Evidence from Event-retlated Potentials and High-frequency Cortical Responses” Cerebral Cortex 9(5): 497-506, 1999.

[92] Pulvermuller F, Preissl H, Lutzenberger W, and Birbaumer N. “Brain Rhythms of Language: Nouns Versus Verbs” Eur J Neurosci 8: 917-41, 1996.

[93] Kellenbach ML, Wijers AA, Hovius M, Mulder J, and Mulder G. “Neural Differentiation of Lexico-Syntactic Categories or Semantic Features? Event-Related Potential Evidence for Both” J Cog Neurosci 14(4): 561-77, 2002.

[94] Muller HM and Kutas M. “What’s in a name? Electrophysiological differences between spoken nouns, proper names and one’s own name” Neuroreport 8: 221-5, 1996.

[95] Dehaene S. “Electrophysiological evidence for category-specific word processing” Neuroreport 6: 2153-7, 1995.

[96] Neville HJ, Mills D, and Lawson DS. “Fractionating Language: Different Neural Subsystems with Different Sensitive Periods” Cerebral Cortex 2: 244-58, 1992.

[97] Pulvermuller F, Lutzenberger W, and Birbaumer N. “Electrocortical distinction of vocabulary types” Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 94: 357-70, 1995.

[98] Mohr B, Pulvermuller F, and Zaidel E. “Lexical Decision After Left, Right, and Bilateral Presentation of Function Words, Content Words, and Non-Words: Evidence For Interhemispheric Interaction” Neuropsychologia 32(1): 105-24, 1994.

[99] Munte TF, Wieringa BM, Weyerts H, Szentkuti A, Matzke M, and Johannes S. “Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: class and frequency effects” Neuropsychologia 39: 91-102, 2001.

[100] Pulvermuller F, Harle M, and Hummel F. “Walking or Talking? Behavioral and Neruophysiological Correlates of Action Verb Processing” Brain Lang 78: 143-68, 2001.

[101] Pulvermuller F, Harle M, and Hummel F. “Neurophysiological distinction of verb categories” Cog Neurosci 11(12): 2789-93, 2000.

[102] Kounios J and Holcomb PJ. “Concreteness Effects in Semantic Processing: ERP Evidence Supporting Dual-Coding Theory” J Exp Psychol 20(4): 804-23, 1994.

[103] Federmeier KD, Segal JB, Lombrozo T, and Kutas M. “Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context” Brain 123(12): 2552-66, 2000.

[104] Krause CM, Korpilahti P, Porn B, Joskim J, and Lang HA. “Automatic auditory word perception as measured by 40 Hz EEG responses” Encephal Clin Neurophysiol 107: 84-7, 1998.

[105] Diesch E, Biermann S, and Luce T. “The magnetic mismatch field elicited by words and phonological non-words” Neuroreport 9(3): 455-60, 1998.

[106] Lutzenberger W, Pulvermuller F, and Birbaumer N. “Words and pseudowords elicit distinct patterns of 30-Hz EEG responses” Neurosci Lett 176: 115-18, 1994.

[107] Kiefer M. “Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization” Mem Cog 29(1): 100-16, 2001.

[108] Skrandies W. “Evoked potential correlates of semantic meaning—A brain mapping study” Cog Brain Res 6: 175-183, 1998.

[109] Skrandies W and Chiu MJ. “Dimensions of affective meaning – behavioral evoked potential correlates in Chinese subjects” Neurosci Lett 341: 45-8, 2003.

[110] Patton RE. Patent #6292688 “Method and apparatus for analyzing neurological response to emotion-inducing stimuli” USPTO granted 9/18/01.

[111] Deeke L. “Bereitschaftspotential as an indicatory of movement preparation in supplementary motor area and motor cortex” Ciba Found Symp 182:132-231, 1987.

[112] Chen R. and Hallett M. “The Time Course of Changes in Motor Cortex Excitability Associated with Voluntary Movement” Can J Neurol Sci 26(3): 163-9, 1999.

[113] Pfurtscheller G, Kalcher J, Neuper CH, Flotzinger D, and Pregenzer M. “On-line EEG classification during externally-paced hand movements using a neural network classifier” Electrophysiol and Neurophysiol 99: 416-25, 1996.

[114] Birch GE. “Initial On-Line Evaluations of the LF-ASD Brain-Computer Interface With Able Bodied and Spinal-Cord Subjects Using Imagined Voluntary Motor Potentials” IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 10(4): 219-24, 2002.

[115] Guger C, Harkam W, Hertnacs C, and Pfurtscheller G. “Prosthetic Control by an EEG-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)” In: Bühler C and Knops H (eds.) Assistive Technology on the Threshold of the new Millennium, 2003 :at http://www.gtec.at/research/Publications/aaate.pdf

[116] Millan JR. “Adaptive Brain Interfaces” Communications of the ACM 46(3): 74-80, 2003. Abstract at http://www.idiap.ch/publications/millan-2003-comm-acm.bib.abs.html

[117] Millan JR and Mourifio J. “Asynchronous BCI and Local Neural Classifiers: An Overview of the Adaptive Brain Interface Project” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (Brain-Computer Interface Technology) 11(2): 159-61, 2003. Article also at ftp://ftp.idiap.ch/pub/reports/2003/millan_2003_nsre.pdf

[118] Millan JR, Renkens F, Mourifio J, and Gerstner W. “Non-Invasive Brain-Actuated Control of a Mobile Robot” Proceedings of the 18th Joint International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Aug 9-15, in press, 2003. Article also at ftp://ftp.idiap.ch/pub/reports/2003/millan_2003_ijcai.pdf

[119] Carmens JM, Lebedev MA, Crist RE, O’Doherty JE, Santucci DM, Dimitrov DF, Patil PG, Henriques CS, and Nicolelis MAL. “Learning to Control a Brain-Machine Interface for Reaching and Grasping by Primates” Public Library of Science, Biology Oct 1(1). 2003 at http://www.plosbiology.org/archive/1545-7885/1/2/pdf/10.1371_journal.pbio.0000042-L.pdf

[120] Farwell LA and Donchin E. “The Truth Will Out: Interrogative Polygraphy (“Lie Detection”) With Event-Related Brain Potentials” Psychophysiology 28(5): 531-47, 1991.

[121] Johnson MM and Rosenfeld JP. “Oddball-evoked P300-based method of deception detection in the laboratory II. Utilization of non-selective activation of relevant knowledge” Int J Psychophysiol 12: 289-306, 1992.

[122] Rosenfeld JP, Ellwanger J, and Sweet J. “Detecting simulated amnesia with event-related brain potentials” Int J Psychophysiol 19: 1-11, 1995.

[123] Allen JJB and Iacono WG. “A Comparison of methods for the analysis of event-related potentials in deception detection” Psychophysiology 34: 234-40, 1997.

[124] Lorenz J, Kunze K, and Bromm B. “Differentiation of conversive sensory loss and malingering by P300 in a modified oddball task” Neuroreport 9: 187-91, 1998.

[125] Tardif HP, Barry RJ, and Johnstone SJ. “ Event-related potentials reveal processing differences in honest vs. malingered memory performance” Int J Psychophysiol 46: 147-58, 2002.

[126] Brain Fingerprinting Laboratories, Inc., 108 West Palm Drive, Fairfield, IA 52556 at http://www.brainwavescience.com/

[127] Farwell LA and Smith SS. “Using Brain MERMER Testing to Detect Knowledge Despite Efforts to Conceal” J Forensic Sci 46(1): 135-46, 2001.

[128] Farwell LA. “Two new twists on the truth detector: brain-wave detection of occupational information” Psychophysiology 29(4A): S3, 1992.

[129] Farwell LA. Patent #5363858 “Method and apparatus for multifaceted electroencephalographic response analysis” USPTO granted 11/15/94.

[130] Farwell LA and Conte FL. Patent #5406956 “Method and apparatus for truth detection” USPTO granted 4/18/95.

[131] Farwell LA and Conte FL. Patent #5467777 “Method for electroencephalographic information detection” USPTO granted 11/21/95.

[132] Joseph JE. “Functional Neuroimaging studies of category specificity in object recognition: A critical review and meta-analysis” Cog Affect Behav Neurosci 1(2): 119-36, 2001.

[133] Mitchell TM, Hutchinson R, Just MA, Niculescu RS, Percira F, and Wang X. “Classifying Instantaneous Cognitive States from fMRI Data” Am Med Informatics Assoc November, 2003. Also at http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~tom/amia2003-final.pdf

[134] Spence SA, Farrow TF, Herford AE, Wilkinson ID, Zheng Y, and Woodruff PW. “Behavioral and functional anatomical correlates of deception” Neuroreport 12(13): 2849-53, 2001.

[135] Lee TM, Liu HL, Tan LH, Chan CC, Mahankali S, Feng CM, Hou J, Fox PT, and Gao JH. “Lie detection by functional magnetic resonance imgaging” Hum Brain Mapp 15(3): 157-64, 2002.

[136] Langleben DD, Schrneder L, Maldjian JA, Gur RC, McDonald S, Ragland JD, O’Brien CP, and Childress AR. “Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study” Neuroimage 15(3): 727-32, 2002.

[137] Ganis G, Kosslyn SM, Stose S, Thompson WL, and Yurgelun-Todd DA. “Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation” Cereb Cortex 13(8): 830-6, 2003.

[138] Bartels A and Zeki S. “The neural basis of romantic love” Neuroreport 11(17): 3829-34, 2000.

[139] Guyatt DG. “Some Aspects of Anti-Personnel Electromagnetic Weapons” International Committee of the Red Cross Symposium: The Medical Profession and the Effects of Weapons, ICRC publication ref. 06681996 (The paper is available from the Health Division of the ICRC.) Also at http://www.mahlers.com/wompaoapew.htm

[140] Brodeur, P. The Zapping of America Norton, New York, p 299 & 105, 1977.

[141] Lopez R. “Special operations survives Pentagon budget constraints” Jane’s International Defense Review 26(3): 247-51, 1993.

[142] Malech RG. Patent #3951134 “Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves” USPTO granted 4/20/76.

[143] Department of the Army, USAF Scientific Advisory Board. “New World Vistas: air and space for the 21st century” 14 vol. (Ancillary Volume) p 89-90, 1996. Also at http://www.azstarnet.com/~freetht/biologic.htm

[144] Morehouse DA. Nonlethal Weapons: War without Death Praeger, p 20, 1996.

[145] Dando M. A New Form of Warfare: The Rise of Non-Lethal Weapons Brassey’s, London, Washington, p 22, 1996

[146] Taff BE and Stoller KP. Patent #49400558 “Cryogenic remote sensing physiograph” USPTO granted 7/10/90.

[147] Stoller KP and Taff BE. “Remote Physiological Sensing: Historical Perspective, Theories and Preliminary Developments” Med Instrum 20(5): 260-5, 1986.

[148] Soviet Union Draft Agreement on the Prohibition of the Development and Manufacture of New Types of Weapons of Mass Destruction and New Systems of Such Weapons. UN Committee on Disarmament, CCD/511/Rev.1, Aug 1977. Also at http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/9.htm

[149] European Parliament, 28.1.99 Enviroment, security, and foreign affairs , A4-0005/99 EP1159, resolutions 23, 24, & 27, January 28, 1999 . Limited excerpts at http://www.raven1.net/europar.htm

[150] Wright S. “Future Sub-lethal, Incapacitating & Paralysing Technologies—Their Coming Role in the Mass Production of Torture, Cruel, Inhumane & Degrading Treatment. Presented to The Expert Seminar On Security Equipment & The Prevention of Torture 25-26 October 2002 London, UK and The 16th ISODARCO Winter Course On "The Surge in Non-State Violence: Roots Impacts & Countermeasures" 9 - 16 February, 2003, Andalo, Trento, Italy. Also at http://www.statewatch.org/news/2002/nov/torture.pdf & http://www.isodarco.it/html/andalo03-wright.html

[151] Begich N and Manning J. Angels Don’t Play This HAARP: Advances in Telsa Technology Earthpulse Press, Anchorage Alaska, p 176-8, 1995.

[152] Persinger MA. “On te Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain By Elcctromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorithims” Percept Motor Skills 80: 791-799, 1995.

[153] Brzezinski Z. Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era Viking Press, New York, p 57 & 252, 1970. Article also at http://www.bariumblues.com/persinger.htm

[154] Butler D. “Advances in neuroscience ‘may threaten human rights’” Nature 22 January 391: 316, 1998. Also at http://raven1.net/nature1.htm

[155] Space Preservation Act of 2001 (Introduced in the House) HR 2977 IH, 107th Congress 1st Session Introduced by Hon. Dennis J. Kucinich. Also at http://www.raven1.net/govptron.htm

[156] Federal Law “About Weapons” Federal Laws of the Russian Federation from 21.07.98 [1998] No. 117-F3, from 31.07.98 [‘98] No. 156-F3 , from 17.12.98 [‘98] No. 187-F3, from 19.11.99 [‘99] No. 194-F3, from 10.04.2000 [’00] No. 52-F3, from 26.07.01 [‘01] ISBN 5-86894-393-7 Translation at http://www.raven1.net/1-02-5.htm

[157] Gurov AI. Federal Assembly—Parliament of the Russian Assembly, Govermental Duma, Committee on Safety, “Resolution: Regarding the draft of the Federal Law ‘About the Sumission of addendum to Article 6 of the Federal Law ‘About Weapons” No 28/3 Nov. 30, 2000. Also at http://www.raven1.net/1-02-6.htm

[158] General Assembly. International Union of Radio Science “USRI Resolution on Criminal Activities Using Electromagnetic Tools” In: Records of the USRI General Assembly, Toronto, 25: 178-9, 1999. Also at http://www.intec.rug.ac.be/ursi/Tor99ResolENG.htm

[159] Microwave irradiation of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow: review of its history and studies to determine whether or not related health defects were experienced by employees assigned in the period 1953-1977. United States, Congress, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. US GOV. DOC. Y 4.C 73/7: IR 7.

[160] Smith CW and Best S. Electromagnetic Man J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd., London p 211, 233, & 235, 1989.

[161] Schiefelbein S. “The Invisible Threat: The Stifled Story of Electric Waves” Saturday Review Sept. 15: 16-20, p 17, 1979.

[162] Parry G. “Doctors investigating claims of Greenham radiation cases: Peace women fear electronic zapping at base” (Manchester) Guardian, Mar. 10: 3, 1986.

[163] Ramsay R. “ELF: from Mind Control to Mind Wars” Lobster 19: 23, 1990.

[164] Munzert R. “High-Tech Waffe Mikrowelle - Kriminelle Anwendungen von Mikrowellen” Aufklärungsarbeit, Heft 9, April, S. 25-31, 2003. English treatment “Targeting of the Human with Directed Energy Weapons” is at http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/munzert6902.doc

[165] Munzert R. personal communication.

[166] Gillin LM and Gillin L. “Subtle Energies, Intentionality and the Healing of Traumatically Abused Persons” International Conference on Trauma, Attachment and Dissociation, Melborne, Australia, Sept 12-14, 2003. Internet availability of victim field measurements are “Submission to Coroner: Additional Information on Possible Cause of Death of Ms. Deva Denise Paul on 10th September 2000, Case Reference 2958/00.” at http://www.globaltwa.com/SUBMISSION%20TO%20CORONER.pdf CAT scan indication on an implant is “Mind Control Using Holography and Dissociation a Process Model” at http://www.globaltwa.com/documents/MindControl.pdf

[167] Lewer N and Schofield S. Non-Lethal Weapons: A Fatal Attraction? : Military Strategies and Technologies for 21st-Century Conflict Zed Books, London & New Jersey, p 62, 1997.

[168] Rodwell R. defense correspondent report “Army tests new riot weapon” New Scientist Sept. 20, p 684, 1973.

[169] McKinney J. “Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation” Unclassified, June-July1992 4(3): 1-20. Also at http://www.webcom.com/~pinknoiz/coldwar/microwave.html

[170] Lamb C, and Swett C. Department of Defense Directive, Non-Lethal Weapons Policy Draft of 21 July 1994. athttp://www.heart7.net/mcf/mindnet/mn168.htm particularly last paragraph of p 7 onto p 8.

[171] McKinney J. Letter to President Clinton at http://www.heart7.net/mcf/mckinney.htm

[172] Cheryl Welsh Freedom of Information Act request reply for review of Soviet literature, March 19, 1997 at http://www.raven1.net/nsa1.gif

[173] Lopatin VN, and Tsygankov VD. Psychotronic War and the Security of Russia Moscow, 1999. See research abroad section in translation at http://www.raven1.net/russtran.htm

[174] Smith C. “On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology” J Psycho-Social Studies 2(2) #3, 2003. Article at http://www.btinternet.com/~psycho_social/Vol3/JPSS-CS2.html

[175] American Psychiatric Association DSM-IV Task Force. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV-TRTM) American Psychiatric Association, 2000.

[176] Flaum M and Schultz SK. “The Core Symptoms of Schizophrenia” Ann Med 28(6): 525-31, 1996.

[177] Isselbacher, KJ, Adams RD, Brunwald E, Petersdorf RG, and Wilson JD. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine Ninth Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, p 150, 1980.

[178] McMurtrey JJ. “Microwave Bioeffect Congruence with Schizophrenia” In press, 2003. Available at http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/microwav.rtf

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC for low, low rates.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 14
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:34:00 -0800
From: "Scott Peden" <scotpeden@cruzio.com>
Subject: RE: We ain't out of the woods yet people!

Naveed used slightly different words than I use, but it is exactallly the
same idea.

The destruction of the economy for the profit of a few has been the driving
force for more than a century in our country, the same reasons we had a
revolution in the first place.

We couldn’t have a reduction in rights, a loss of our Constitution and our
Bill of Rights without a well scripted pearl harbor and the 9/11 Conspiracy
was just the thing to bring the sheepeople under control, but we are
weakening their control on most everyone but the weak minded, who are likely
to take up arms to kill anyone that doesn’t allow them to kill or enslave
us……

-----Original Message-----
From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Naveed
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 8:54 PM
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] We ain't out of the woods yet people!

reading all the stuff regarding history and 9/11 related stuff has lead me
to be cyincally paranoid.

um the federal reserve and private central banking IS the thing that feeds
the military industrial complex, that's one of the main reasons why america
became so powerful is because americans always said FOOK YOU to the central
inbred banksters, we were captured in 1913 with the passing of the federal
reserve banking system. main cause for the american revolutionary war was
the fact that we were forced to go to a debt based money system which
wrecked the prosperity of the colonies, adding further to the injury was a
stupid tax which is made to appear to be the straw that broke the camels
back for the colonists and is touted in history books as taxes being the
main reason for going to war with england instead of the changing the
economic system the colonies had.

look up the colonial scrip for further informatio! n.

the main reason for getting real story of 9/11 out is that the motherfuxors
that be couldn't have passed the patriot act, couldn't have invaded
pipeghanistan, couldn't have invaded iraq w/o the traumatic public opinion
catalyzing event of 9/11, and last but not least they couldn't have hoisted
the farce of the homeland insecurity system w/o 9/11. if we can deny them
9/11 the whole whore on terrorism falls apart because you've caused a
paradigm shift in people, otherwise the people would happily go along with
what ever plans you had of enslaving them, this to me illustrates the power
of the masses and why the mofos that be cannot win a fair fight therefore
they have to "dumb us down"

for myself learning about 9/11 fraud lead me to question the validity of
other paradigms and provided me the momentum to shatter other paradigms that
otherwise i would have left alone

JP Liggett <JP@JPLiggett.com> wrote:
a very compelling read. I too had thought about this, but this article hits
the nail on the head. If there are gatekeepers sponsoring the exposure, lets
help them really get the word out.

It seems to me that if 9/11 starts getting mainstream, we may consider using
the 9/11 exposure force to truly change our society. Perhaps we can use it
on a global scale not just the USA.

We can all envision a more just society, with a strong social fabric, to
become a beacon of hope for positive social change. A real global golden
jubilee.

To that ends, we could consider nationalization of all energy, banking and
insurance companies, in the name of the 911 victims. These companies take
billions of dollars of our economy and our pockets, and corrupt/disrupt our
society. worldwide.

Let work for Public video and audio in every legislature, courtroom, bar
association and hearing room. Just a couple of ideas to keep it going. Some
people have said, OK, we know about 9-11 being an inside job, now what do we
do?
_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

* Visit your group " 911TruthAction
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .

_____

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and
hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it
costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904
_____

New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman4/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/ev
t=39666/*http://beta.messenger.yahoo.com%20> Call regular phones from your
PC for low, low rates.
SPONSORED LINKS
United state grant
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+grant&w1=United+state+gran
t&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+coin&w4=United+state+military&w5
=United+state+citizenship&w6=United+state+government+grant&c=6&s=167&.sig=N4
b7xIeensoGou0u0Wl%20>
Trademark united state
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Trademark+united+state&w1=United+state+
grant&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+coin&w4=United+state+militar
y&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=United+state+government+grant&c=6&s=167&.si
g=fORJyOAnZ3kkfl-%20>
United state coin
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+coin&w1=United+state+grant
&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+coin&w4=United+state+military&w5=
United+state+citizenship&w6=United+state+government+grant&c=6&s=167&.sig=ekN
NsQZqgyaJYrrTqbms%20>
United state military
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+military&w1=United+state+g
rant&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+coin&w4=United+state+military
&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=United+state+government+grant&c=6&s=167&.sig
=qm8R_fIyZRB3QfUR%20>
United state citizenship
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+citizenship&w1=United+stat
e+grant&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+coin&w4=United+state+milit
ary&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=United+state+government+grant&c=6&s=167&.
sig=yzDTsKlhBdFGD%20>
United state government grant
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+government+grant&w1=United
+state+grant&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+coin&w4=United+state+
military&w5=United+state+citizenship&w6=United+state+government+grant&c=6&s=
167&.sig=Oftm3KZ6%20>

_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

* Visit your group " 911TruthAction
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .

_____

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 15
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:22:13 -0800 (PST)
From: Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Mind Reading Devices?

http://www.datafilter.com/mc/remoteBehavioralInfluence.html Remote Behavioral Influence Technology Evidence John J. McMurtrey, M. S.[a], Copyright 2003, 23 Dec. 2003[b]


People discerning remote manipulation by technology capable of such influence have formed protest organizations across the world.[1] [2] [3] [4] Educated society is uninformed regarding authentic documentation of the development and existence of these technologies, and unaware of the dangers. Complaint of ‘hearing voices’ and perception of other remote manipulation must receive appropriate scientific and legal investigation with protection. Professional awareness is virtually absent with eminent texts and opinion being presumptuous, without appraisal of the evidence.

Herein is substantiated:

1. Human wireless internal voice transmission and tracking technologies.
2. Reports of electroencephalographic (EEG) thought reading capacity, evidence of covert development, and remote EEG capture technology.
3. References to the use of these, or similar technologies against humans.

MICROWAVE HEARING

The first American[c] [5] to publish on the microwave hearing effect was Allan H. Frey in 1962,[6] yet radar technicians had anecdotes of microwave perception in World War II.[7] Deaf and normal subjects, even with earplugs, can hear appropriately pulsed microwaves at least up to thousands of feet from the transmitter.[8] Transmitter parameters above those producing the effect result in a severe buffeting of the head with dizziness and nausea, while parameters below the effect induce a pins and needles sensation. Peak power is the major determinant of loudness, though there is some dependence on pulse width. Pulse modulation appears to influence pitch and timbre. The effect “is the most easily and reliably replicated of low power density (microwave) illumination.” [9] Review of human and animal microwave hearing confirmation by independent investigators of the effect establishes validity.[10] [11] [12] [13] [14] Designs for scaring birds away from aircraft or other hazards by
microwave hearing[15] and induction of vertigo[16] exist.[17] [18]

While working for the Advanced Research Projects Agency at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Sharp and Grove discovered “receiverless” and “wireless” voice transmission. [19] Their method was simple: the negative deflections of voiceprints from recorded spoken numbers were caused to trigger microwave pulses. Upon illumination by such verbally modulated energy, the words were understood remotely. The discovery’s applications are “obviously not limited to therapeutic medicine” according to James C. Lin in Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications.[20]

A Defense Intelligence Agency review of Communist literature affirmed microwave sound and indicated voice transmission. The report states, “Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be originating intracranially (within the head) can be induced by signal modulation at very low average power densities.” [21] Among microwave weapon implications are “great potential for development into a system for disorientating or disrupting the behavior patterns of military or diplomatic personnel.” An Army Mobility Equipment Research and Development Command report affirms microwave speech transmission with applications of “camouflage, decoy, and deception operations.” [22] “One decoy and deception concept presently being considered is to remotely create noise in the heads of personnel by exposing them to low power, pulsed microwaves . . . By proper choice of pulse characteristics, intelligible speech may be created” quotes the report.

The Brunkan Patent # 4877027 “Hearing system” is a device capable of verbal microwave hearing. [23] The invention converts speech for remote introduction into the head by parabolic antenna with indication of direct microwave influence on neural activity. The microwave spectrum granted is broad: 100-10,000 MHz (0.1-10 GHz.) Pulse characteristics are essential to perception. Bursts of narrowly grouped, evenly spaced pulses determine sound intensity by their amount per unit time. Although a wide spectrum is patented, with ranges of pulse and burst duration, preferred operation has burst duration at 2 microseconds, and pulse duration at 100 nanoseconds. Operation is at 1000 MHz, which is the frequency of optimal tissue penetration.[24] Another patent application based on microwave bursts is “designed in such a way that the burst frequencies are at least virtually equal to the sound frequencies of the sounds picked up by the microphone,” though the transducer here is not
remote.[25]

Stocklin Patent # 4858612 “Hearing device” 7 affirms the microwave hearing effect. Stocklin gives exposition to the concept that a microwave component is part of neurophysiology and electroencephalogram (EEG) potentials.[26] Microwaves are considered both emitted and absorbed by nerve cell membrane proteins. Microwaves generally excite the brain[27] perhaps by influencing calcium,[28] a central ion in nerve firing.[29] Stocklin represents the auditory cortex as normally producing microwave energy, which the device simulates, thus eliciting sound sensation. Each acoustic tone is weighted for several microwave frequencies by a formula called the mode matrix, which is used to calculate best perception requirements. Observation of EEG desynchronization, delta waves, and brain wave amplitudes helps calibrate the device.[30] The lowest frequency for hearing is estimated by the cephalic index. Microwave speech transmission in this patent is unremote with the antenna over and sized
for the auditory cortex. Other patents have non-remote transducers of radiowave elicited hearing. [31] [32]

Descriptions in the above patents attribute microwave hearing to direct neural influence. However, the most accepted mechanism in review is by thermoelastic expansion,12 most likely inducing bone conducted hearing. The cochlea does appear to be involved, but not the middle ear.14 This divergence of mechanism illustrates the non-thermal/thermal controversy. US exposure standards are based on thermal effects, yet there are effects very difficult to explain by thermodynamics.13 [33] All accept thermal effects at some level, yet the thermal only school is rather dogmatic related to liability issues of commercial[34] and national security concern.[35] It must be said that the open literature regarding microwave hearing indicates a thermo-acoustic mechanism.

“Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect.” is the title of a small business contract for the Department of Defense. Communication initial results are: “The feasibility of the concept has been established” using both low and high power systems.[36] A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request as to the project’s outcome met with denial on the part of the Air Force, on the grounds that disclosure “could reasonably be expected to cause damage to national security.” [37] Though the Air Force denied the FOIA disclosure, such a contract’s purpose is elaborated by the Air Force’s “New World Vistas” report: “It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction . . . . If a pulse stream is used, it should be possible to create an internal acoustic field in the 5-15 kilohertz range, which is audible. Thus it may be possible to ‘talk’ to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be
most disturbing to them.” [38] Robert Becker, whose eminence was enough to have been twice nominated for the Nobel Prize in biological electromagnetic fields research, is more explicit: “Such a device has obvious applications in covert operations designed to drive a target crazy with “voices” or deliver undetectable instructions to a programmed assassin.” [39]

The above Army efforts had results. A microwave voice transmission non-lethal weapon is referenced in the thesaurus of the Center for Army Lessons Learned, which is a military instruction website.18 The military thesaurus entry lists analogous devices using “silent sound.” [d] [40]

ULTRASOUND TRANSMISSION OF VOICE

Internal voice capability, without discernment by others nearby. is also evident in ultrasound-based technology. Lowrey Patent # 6052336 “Apparatus and method of broadcasting audible sound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier” clearly focuses on non-lethal weapon application against crowds or directed at an individual.[41] Communication is understood as an inner voice with loss of the directional quality of sound perception. “Since most cultures attribute inner voices either as a sign of madness, or as messages from spirits or demons, both of which . . . evoke powerful emotional reactions”, quotes the Lowrey patent’s effect on people. Replaying speech, with a delay impedes talking and causes stuttering. Normal brain wave patterns can be changed (or entrained), which “may cause temporary incapacitation, intense feelings of discomfort.” This technique is detailed by Monroe Patent # 5356368 “Method of and apparatus for inducing desired states of consciousness”, with license to
Interstate Industries and involves an auditory replication of brainwave patterns to entrain the EEG as desired.[42]

Norris Patent # 5889870 “Acoustic heterodyne device and method”, directionally produces sound on interference (or heterodyning) of two ultrasound beams.[43] The cancellation leaves the carried audible sound perceivable. The effect becomes apparent particularly within cavities such as the ear canal. An individual readily understands communication across a noisy crowed room without nearby discernment. Sound can also be produced from mid-air or as reflecting from any surface.

American Technology Corporation, which licensed this patent, has an acoustic non-lethal weapons technology,[44] a cooperative agreement with the Army Research & Development Command,[45] and is working with numerous other government agencies.[46] The corporation’s Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRADTM) account for 60% of military sales, and have integration into the Navy’s situational awareness & radar surveillance systems[47] with deployment on naval vessels and fleet harbors.[48] A popular magazine writer describes the device’s inner nature of sound perception.[49] From separate references, non-lethal weapons treatments affirm sound localization and individual ultrasound effect limitation[50] with obvious lack of nearby discernment;[51] the latter by a non-lethal weapons program director. A similar ultrasound method of limiting sound to one person, Audio Spotlight is marketed, with exhibition at Boston’s Museum of Science and the Smithsonian National Air & Space Museum.[52] Both
the American Technology device and Audio Spotlight are discussed in an article with some history of ultrasound acoustics, which has origins in sonar.[53] Other acoustic influence methods may utilize ultrasound.[e] [54]

TARGET TRACKING TECHNOLOGY

The maintenance of effects on people requires obstacle penetration and target tracking. These internal voice capable energy forms penetrate obstruction and can be localized. Sound transmission through enclosures is commonly experienced. An inaudible ultrasound high intensity carrier wave is unnoticed. Solid defect inspection is one use of ultrasound, which is being developed to discern movement through walls.[55] Common technology utilizes the microwave hearing spectrum, which partly or completely encompasses cell phone,[56] [57] TV, and radar frequencies. [58] Commercial signals are not perceived, since the hearing effect requires pulsation within the limits that elicit perception. A variety of antennae localize the structurally penetrating microwave illumination with collimation or focusing.[59] [60] A patent, “compatible for mobile platforms with DEWs,” (Directed Energy Weapons) includes a modified Luneburg lens emitting parallel rays with over 50 years utilization.[61]

Hablov Patent # 5448501 “Electronic life detection system” is for microwave radar within the hearing spectrum that finds and distinguishes individuals through obstruction.[62] Therein is stated: “the modulated component of the reflected microwave signal . . . subjected to frequency analysis . . . forms a type of “electronic fingerprint“ of the living being with characteristic features, which . . . permits a distinction between different living beings.” Though this patent has use in trapped victim rescue, another Hablov et. al. Patent # 5530429 “Electronic surveillance system” detects interlopers with security emphasis.[63] Other literature describes the basic method.[64]

The Hablov et. al. patents discern people thru structures by vital organ motion, but others offer more detailed imaging. Fullerton et. al. Patent # 6400307 “System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array” is such a design,[65] and is commercially available as RadarVision by Time Domain. [66] Further designs for imaging within structures include: a portable system determining suspect distance,[67] and presentations by the International Society for Optical Engineering.[68] [69] Software for displaying radar detection on a personal computer is sold.[70]

Rowan Patent # 4893815 “Interactive transector device commercial and military grade” describes the acquisition, locking onto, and tracking of human targets.[71] Stated therein: “Potentially dangerous individuals can be efficiently subdued, apprehended and appropriately detained.” The capability of “isolating suspected terrorists from their hostages . . . or individuals within a group without affecting other members of the group” is stated. Laser, radar, infrared, and acoustic sensor fusion is utilized to identify, seek, and locate targets. Locking illumination upon the target until weapons engagement accomplishes tracking. Among available non-lethal weapons is an incapacitating electromagnetic painful pulse. Another target tracking system is the Manportable Surveillance and Target Acquisition Radar by Systems & Electronics, Inc., which is capable of tracking moving targets including personnel. This system has an auto target track feature, and lists moving target detection as
12 km for a walking man.[72]

A track initiation processor acquires a target, while a data association filter maintains a tracking lock on the target.[73] An original method for target tracking is the Kalman filter. Numerous weapons guidance examples utilize similar processes and illuminate targets for tracking. Laser illumination is also used for non-human targets.[74] Other examples utilize microwave beam target recognition and weapons guidance.[75] [76] Target illumination tracking systems have nanosecond to microsecond response times. Such responses do not require a wide scan area to lock illumination upon persons at achievable speeds. At 90 miles per hour an auto travels less than 1/100 of an inch in a microsecond.

DISCUSSION

Ultrasound voice transmission technology is publicly demonstrated in museum exhibits. The numerous microwave voice transmission citations rest on a considerable foundation of microwave hearing literature. Internal voice non-lethal weapon applications are discussed in many of the citations. There are are examples of either existence or sales of non-lethal weapons based on both technologies. Numerous designs involving human location, identification, and tracking methods, have long demonstrated the feasibility of constructing devices capable of producing internal voice continuously in isolated individuals. To deny such technological capabilities in the face of extensive complaint is willfully to ignore documented development of the relevant technologies and engineering competence for complete integration.

THOUGHT READING CAPACITY

Many people who report experiencing remote behavioral influence also perceive mind reading. Thought reading capacity, or brain wave analysis word recognition, is seriously reported. Publications by a Stanford group support and report recognition of specific words from brain waves,[77] [78] [79] [80] with recent enhanced success. [81] Other investigators publish above chance magnetoencephalographic (MEG) word recognition.[82] The current publications lack reference to a 1975 US government technical report of prior results from Stanford comparable to the recent articles,[83] and an apparent Russian report of specific EEG word recognition before 1981.[84] Electroencephalographic (EEG) instant detection by syllables of “a content of category which the testee wishes to speak” quotes Kiyuna et. al. Patent # 5785653 “System and method for predicting internal condition of live body.” [85] A stated use: “the present invention may be use (sic) to detect the internal condition of
surveillance in criminal investigation” by EEG. NEC Corporation licensed this patent. Remote EEG communication with Armed Forces or clandestine application are the cited uses for Mardirossian Patent # 6011991 “Communication system and method including brain wave analysis and/or use of brain activity.” [86] This patent affirms EEG word recognition, proposes transmitter capable skin implants, utilizes neural networks (artificial intelligence), and is licensed by Technology Patents, LLC.

Activation of brain cell assemblies provides a theoretical framework[87] for the above word recognition reports, and extensive publications of averaged EEG word category differentiation. These differentiation reports themselves are consistent with specific word recognition, since their basis is by visual analysis of averaged categories, without the use of sophisticated computer programs as are essential for specific word recognition. Based on EEG/MEG responses, words can be differentiated as to length, [88] and visual nouns can be differentiated from action verbs.[89] [90] [91] [92] [93] Brain wave patterns distinguish proper names from common nouns, [94] animal names from numerals,[95] or content from function words.[96] [97] [98] [99] Face, arm, or leg action verbs are reported distinguished by brain waves as well.[100] [101] Concrete versus abstract words,[102] and unambiguous versus ambiguous noun/verbs[103] have distinctive EEG patterns.

Some of these word category differentiation reports are consistent with both the specific recognition reports, and/or the differentiation of non-verbal cognition. Based on EEG/MEG responses, words are readily distinguished from non-words,[104] [105] [106] or pictures.[107] EEG differentiation of words rated as to affective meaning such as good-bad, strong-weak, or active-passive is reported.[108] [109]

Other literature indicates EEG differentiation of completely non-verbal cognition. Emotion differentiation by EEG is patented, referencing Air Force research.[110] Movement anticipation potentials (bereitschaftspotential) and those of actual movement are detectable by EEG.[111] [112] EEG movement signals have been used to move a cursor left or right,[113] and just the imagination of movement is sufficiently distinguished by EEG to control switches,[114] or control prosthesis grasp.[115] Guiding robots through simulated rooms by EEG detection of imagining the spinning of cubes or arm rising of appropriate direction is reported.[116] [117] [118] Even more complex grasping and reaching robot arm control has been achieved by signals from implanted brain electrodes in monkeys without body arm movement.[119] A number of groups have developed procedures to detect deception based on the P300 (positive @ 300 millisec.) event related potential (ERP) from EEG.[120] [121] [122] [123]
[124] [125] A commercial system, Brain Fingerprinting,[126] which includes analysis of a late negative ERP potential and frequency analysis in addition to the P300, even asserts 100% accuracy over five separate studies.[127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [f]

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies also report differentiation of cognitive states. Different fMRI brain activation loci for face, natural and manufactured object recognition are reviewed.[132] Neural network differentiation of fMRI response to noun categories for fish, four legged animals, trees, flowers, fruits, vegetables, family members, occupations, tools, kitchen items, dwellings, and building parts is reported.[133] Distinguishing truthful from deceptive responses by fMRI is also reported.[134] [135] [136] [137] The ability to discern the state of romantic love towards an individual by fMRI has report as well.[138]

The research arm of agencies with missions to covertly acquire information would certainly develop to operational capability any technologic thought reading potential. Assertions that such development has progressed are multiple, and two are confirmed by details of the 1975 government EEG specific word recognition report, which itself is evidence of development covert to open databases.83 An International Committee of the Red Cross Symposium synopsis states EEG computer mind reading development by Lawrence Pinneo in 1974 at Stanford.[139] A letter by the Department of Defense Assistant General Counsel for Manpower, Health, and Public Affairs, Robert L. Gilliat in 1976 affirmed brain wave reading by the Advanced Research Projects Agency.[140] “Thought reading or synthetic telepathy” communications technology procurement is considered in a 1993 Jane’s[g] Special Operations Forces (SOF) article: “One day, SOF commandos may be capable of communicating through thought processes.”
[141] Descriptive terms are “mental weaponry and psychic warfare” Although contemplated in future context, the availability of a technology without adaptation to troop level requirements is implied, since anticipation of mobile deployment would have to assume prior development.

In 1976, the Malech Patent # 3951134 “Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves” was granted.[142] Example of operation is at 100 and 210 MHz; frequencies penetrating obstruction. “The individual components of the system for monitoring and controlling brain wave activity may be of conventional type commonly employed in radar”; and “The system permits medical diagnosis of patients, inaccessible to physicians, from remote stations” are quotes indicating remote capacity. License is to Dorne & Margolin Inc., but now protection is expired with public domain. The Malech patent utilizes interference of 210 and 100 MHz frequencies resulting in a 110 MHz return signal, which is demodulated to give EEG waveform.

The capability of remote EEG is predicted by electromagnetic scattering theory using ultrashort pulses, which are not part of the Malech patent.[143] Ultrashort pulses are currently defined in the range of 10-12 to 10-15 second. Considering that EEG word elicited potentials are comparatively long (hundreds of milliseconds), indicates that remote radar EEG capture is adequate to word recognition, with ultrashort pulses allowing some 109 or more radar reflections in a millisecond (10-3 sec.)

The possibility of impressing an ‘experience set’ on an individual by ultrashort pulses is also contemplated.143 The above patent can alter brain waves as well as detect them. Microwave non-lethal weapon brain wave disruption[144] and behavioral change including unconsciousness[145] are known.35

The above EEG telemetry patent and ultrashort pulse method are by active radar probe. Yet a passive field extends as far as 12 feet from man as detected by a cryogenic antenna.[146] A technical article maintains this device as entirely adaptable to clandestine applications, and pointedly comments on the disappearance of physiological remote sensing literature since the 1970’s for animals and humans, while all other categories of remote sensing research greatly expanded.[147]

DISCUSSION

Complete rejection of assertions of a remote mind reading capability is just as presumptuous, in the face of complaints, as has been the dismissal of internal voice capacity. Considerable capacity to detect and differentiate mental states is evident from literature reports particularly by EEG. The fact that EEG movement imagination signals are detected for robot guidance on a voluntary unprompted basis116 117 118 suggests a similar capacity is feasible for specific EEG word identification, which has only been reported for word prompted responses. Though references to remote EEG are less, they provide plausibly exploitable mechanisms, which may be covertly developed.

LEGAL AND INTERNATIONAL REFERENCES TO BEHAVIORAL INFLUENCE TECHNOLOGIES

References to behavioral influence weapon use by government bodies and international organizations are numerous. Negotiation submissions to the United Nations Committee on Disarmament affirm the reality of microwave weapon nervous system effects.[148] European Parliament passage of resolutions calling for conventions regulating non-lethal weapons and the banning of “weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings” [149] includes neuro-influence capability.[150] A resolution relates to HAARP, High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project, which has environmental consequences, and although utilizing high frequency, ionospheric extra low frequencies (ELF) emanation results. Since ELF is within brain wave frequencies the project has capacity to influence whole populations.[151] [152] President Carter’s National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, predicted development of such capacity.[153] Nature News reports concern by a French government panel about the
potential for thought reading and such a remote capacity.[154] An American draft law prohibiting land, sea, or space-based weapons using electromagnetic, psychotronic (behavioral influence), and sound technologies “directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control” has not yet passed.[155] Russian electromagnetic standards are nearly 1000 times lower than the West, so their weapon law forbidding electromagnetic weapons exceeding Health Department parameters is strict.[156] The Russian draft law explicitly references behavioral influence non-lethal weapons, and development in several countries.[157] Resolutions by the International Union of Radio Science recognize criminal use of electromagnetic technology, though largely relevant to use against infrastructure.[158]

MICROWAVE AND ULTRASOUND USE AGAINST HUMANS

The microwave irradiation of the American Embassy in Moscow received little publicity until the winter of 1976 instillation of protective screening, but irradiation was known since 1953.34 Original frequencies were 2.56-4.1 GHz with additional intermittent 0.6-9.5 GHz signals being permanent by 1975 in a wide band frequency hopping[h] consistent pattern with one signal pulsating. The irradiation was directional from nearby buildings and modulated. Complaint to the Soviets had no avail, but the signals disappeared in January 1979 “reportedly as a result of a fire in one or more of the buildings.” [159] A 9-11 GHz signal recurred in 1988.[160] Observed frequencies are basically within the microwave hearing spectrum, and pulsation is required. Psychiatric cases occurred during the exposure period, though no epidemiologic relationship was revealed with fully a quarter of the medical records unavailable, and comparison with other Soviet Bloc posts.159 The CIA had Dr. Milton Zaret
review medical Soviet microwave literature to determine the purpose of the irradiation. He concluded the Russians “believed the beam would modify the behavior of the personnel.” [161] In 1976 the post was declared unhealthful and pay raised 20% 140

The most documented citizen microwave irradiation was of peace protesters at Greenham Common American Air Force Base in Berkshire England, who prompted investigation of unusual symptoms.[162] Radiation measurements exhibited microwaves with symptom experience up to a hundred times the background level, and rose sharply on protests nearer the base.160 Symptoms became pronounced on cruise missile transport, a protest focus.160 Recorded were wide ranging complaints: skin burns; ‘severe’ headaches; drowsiness; temporary paralysis; incoordinated speech; two late (5 mos.) spontaneous abortions; an apparent circulatory failure; and unlike usual menstrual synchronization, irregular or postmenopausal menstruation. The symptom complex fits well with electromagnetic exposure syndrome 160 It has also been reported that some of the women ‘heard voices.’[163] The base closed finally in 1991.

Criminal directed energy weapon use has been reported in Germany.[164] In a number of cases there is similarity of circumstances, complaints, and symptoms. In at least one case microwave fields have been measured with exclusion of the usual sources (cell phone towers, etc.)[165] Plans for construction of a crude device from a microwave oven are sold.164

Measurement of non-ionizing radiation fields in the vicinity of an Australian victim is described.[166] The intensity ranged from 7 mV in an adjacent room to 35 mV next to the head. The victim suffered from multiple personality disorder attributed to ritual abuse, and claimed an implant with radiological evidence.

Ultrasound behavioral influence technology use in Northern Ireland is cited [167] The device could focus on one person; and utilized ultrasound cancellation like those patented. It was employed in Vietnam by the Americans, and is known as the squawk box. Mentioned infrasound frequency (ultrasound carrier directed) is like Loos 1/25/00 patent, with psychological effects summarized as ‘spooky.’ More detail by a defense journalist is quoted: “When the two frequencies mix in the human ear they become intolerable. Some people exposed to the device are said to feel giddy or nauseous and in extreme cases they faint. Most people are intensely annoyed by the device and have a compelling wish to be somewhere else.” [168] British police inventories list the specific device, though a spokesman denied use.160

Sophisticated behavioral influence capability is confirmed by ex-intelligence officers. Julianne McKinney, Director of The National Security Alumni Electronic Surveillance Project is prominent. This is a largely classified employee victim study with internal voice transmission avowal.[169]

CONCLUSION

The logic in the prediction by Brzezinski[i] of the appearance of a more controlled and directed society dominated by a power elite willing to use the latest modern techniques for influencing behavior without hindrance by liberal democratic values is compelling.153 Potential behavioral influence targets are multiple. Since those supposedly expert regard a victim’s perceptions as psychotic, all complaints are disregarded, not to mention capability to bear witness. Targets may include anyone worth neutralization: domestic adversaries;[170] security risks, which may only comprise classified disclosures; persons witnessing serious improprieties; and those prone to committing advantageous felonies. Legality is readily circumvented by executive orders, (particularly declaration of a crisis or emergency situation), which can be sealed, and this prerogative is only accountable to co-equal branches of government as is now the case with terrorism suspects. Internal voice technology is
most applicable within the same language and culture. Space here limits more than mention of remote EEG influence capacity, hypnosis, and footnoting remote subliminal technique. Hypnotic or subliminal message presentation represent particularly insidious means of influencing thought, mood, behavior, and undermining civil liberties.

Most complainants allege public sector involvement or sub-contracted private companies.[171] Remote behavioral influence research has long been funded by the US,39 with evidence of development19 22 36 45 46 and weapons,18 44 47 48 51 though denying on national security grounds project results37 and foreign literature analyses.[172] Some thirty countries evidence active behavioral influence weapon research.[173]

Though there is some scant psychoanalytical acknowledgement,[174] current medical awareness ensures effective neutralization of the afflicted. Not all those affected are stigmatized. However phenomena of ‘hearing voices’, or perception of remote manipulation, when recounted to health professionals results in various stigmatizing diagnoses, [175] [176] totally without investigation. Determination of relevant fields around complainants is mandatory, or abatement by proven shielding of such phenomena. Professional opinions formed without excluding these technologies are negligent.

The medical community has long heard either identical or similar complaint[177] to that above delineated as known internal voice technology from numerous victims. This fact indicts the scholarship and presumption of impossibility evident in the pertinent medical literature. In addition, microwave bioeffects have considerable congruence with reported symptoms of major psychosis other than ’voices.’ [178] All of society should be disturbed at the prospect of technologic induction of voice, since the unaware subject would perceive such voices as his own natural thought, without such an assault as to provoke complaint.

It is difficult to deny the level of substantiation for the possibility that a thought reading capacity exists, even with references that support a remote basis. The logic that in the thirty years since the Pinneo work started, this capability has had full development is too sound to dismiss victim corroboration. It would have to be admitted that funding for projects by the defense and security agencies is considerably greater than for open science, and that thought reading would be a priority area. Educated democracies should not be complacent at this prospect, given the potential for political control, and existence of a remote EEG method in the public domain.

Acknowledgements: Thanks are given to God for inspiration, and a benefactor of Christians Against Mental Slavery for financial support. There is gratitude also to Dr. Paul Canner, and Dr. Allen Barker for their suggestions.

All patents are printable from the U. S. Patent Office website.
EEG word recognition articles are printable thru Pubmed as designated.
Each is free
Pinneo LR and Hall DJ. “Feasibility Study for Design of a Biocybernetic Communication System” is available from Christians Against Mental Slavery at info@slavery.org.uk.


REFERENCES

---------------------------------
[a] Address: 903 N. Calvert St., Baltimore MD 21202. Email- Johnmcmurt@aol.com Phone- 410-539-5140.

[b] Financial contribution to this article was made by fellow members of Christians Against Mental Slavery.

[c] American discovery may not be the first. Soviet and East European electromagnetic bioeffect literature is prior, more extensive, and transparent. A translated Russian treatment is the next text reference, which refers to F. Cazzamalli, an Italian, who mentioned radiofrequency hallucination about 1920.

[d] Also called S-quad, Silent Sounds, Inc. licensed Lowery Patent #5159703 “Silent subliminal presentation system”, and has advanced brain wave entrainment technology (vide infra) with several classified patents. (See http://www.mindspring.com/~silent/menu.htm and links.) Unessential is individual direction, but possible by ultrasound.

[e] Loos Patent # 6017302 “Subliminal acoustic manipulation of nervous system” can “cause relaxation, drowsiness, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise acoustic frequency near ½ Hz used. The effects of the 2.5 Hz resonance include slowing of certain cortical processes, sleepiness, and disorientation.”

[f] Referred to, but unavailable, however are a CIA Office of Technology Assessment report, a security industry publication, and a doctoral dissertation.

[g] Jane’s is the most respected and authoritative of defense reporting services.

[h] A means evading detection.

[i] National Security Advisor to President Carter.

---------------------------------
[1] Citizens Against Human Rights Abuse, Director, Cheryl Welsh, 915 Zaragoza Street, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Website at http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/ Email is welsh@dcn.davis.ca.us

[2] Christians Against Mental Slavery, Secretary, John Allman, 98 High Street, Knaresbourough, N. Yorks HG5 0HN, United Kingdom. Email is info@slavery.org.uk

[3] Moscow Committee for the Ecology of Dwellings, Chairman, Emile Sergeevne Chirkovoi, Korpus 1006, Kvrtira 363, Moscow Zelenograd, Russia 103575. . Website at http://www.moskomekologia.narod.ru Email is moskomekologia@narod.ru

[4] International Movement for the Ban of Manipulation of the Human Nervous System by Technologic Means, Founder, Mojmir Babacek, P. O. Box 52, 51101 Turnov, Czech Republic, Europe. Website at http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm Email is mbabacek@iol.cz

[5] Presman AS. Electromagnetic Fields and Life Plenum, New York-London, 1970. Presman mentions Cazzimalli and another English reference to this Italian work is at http://www.datafilter.com/mc/jaski.html p 2, a semi-popular treatment with references.

[6] Frey AH. “Human Auditory System response to modulated electromagnetic energy” J Applied Physiol 17 (4): 689-92, 1962. Also at http://www.raven1.net/frey.htm

[7] Stocklin PL. Patent #4858612 “Hearing device” USPTO granted 8/22/89.

[8] Frey AH and Messenger R. “Human Perception of Illumination with Pulsed Ultrahigh-Frequency Electromagnetic Energy” Science 181: 356-8, 1973.

[9] Eichert ES and Frey AH. “Human Auditory System Response to Lower Power Density Pulse Modulated Electromagnetic Energy: A Search for Mechanisms” J Microwave Power 11(2): 141, 1976.

[10] Michaelson SM. “Sensation and Perception of Microwave Energy” In: Michaelson SM, Miller MW, Magin R, and Carstensen EL (eds.) Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Nonionizing Radiation Plenum Press, New York, p 213-24, 1975.

[11] Puranen L and Jokela K. “Radiation Hazards Assessment of Pulsed Microwave Radars” J Microwave Power Electromagn Energy 31(3): 165-77, 1996.

[12] Hermann DM and Hossman K-A. “Neurological effects of microwave exposure related to mobile communication” J Neurol Sci 152: 1-14, 1997.

[13] Lai H. “Neurological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation” In: Lin JC (ed.) Advances in Electromagnetic Fields in Living Systems vol 1, Plenum, N Y & London, p 27-80, 1994.

[14] Elder JA and Chou CK. “Auditory Responses to Pulsed Radiofrequency Energy” Bioelectromagnetics Suppl 8: S162-73, 2003. Also at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/106565261/PDFSTART and http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/scc28/sc4/Human%20Perception%20FINAL.pdf

[15] Kreithen ML. Patent #5774088 “Method and system for warning birds of hazards” USPTO granted 6/30/98.

[16] Lenhadt ML and Ochs AL. Patent #6250255 “Methods and apparatus for alerting and/or repelling birds and other animals” USPTO granted 6/26/01.

[17] Nordwall BD. “Radar Warns Birds of Impending Aircraft” Aviation Wk Space Technol March 10, p 65-6, 1997.

[18]Center for Army Lessons Learned Thesaurus at http://call.army.mil/products//thesaur/00016275.htm

[19] Justesen DR. “Microwaves and Behavior” Am Psychologist, 392(Mar): 391-401, 1975. Excerpted reference at http://www.raven1.net/v2succes.htm

[20] Lin JC. Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications Thomas, Springfield Ill, p 176, 1978.

[21] “Surveillance Technology, 1976: policy and implications, an analysis and compendium of materials: a staff report of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee of the Judiciary. United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, second session, p 1280, US GOV DOC Y 4.J 882:SU 7/6/976.

[22] Oskar KJ. “Effects of low power microwaves on the local cerebral blood flow of conscious rats” Army Mobility Equipment Command Report,. # AD-A090426, 1980. Available form NASA Technical Reports. Abstract at http://www.raven1.net/v2s-nasa.htm

[23] Brunkan WB. Patent #4877027 “Hearing system” USPTO granted 10/31/89.

[24] Frey AH. “Behavioral Biophysics” Psychol Bull 63(5): 322-37, 1965.

[25] Thijs VMJ. Application #WO1992NL0000216 “Hearing Aid Based on Microwaves” World Intellectual Property Organization Filed 1992-11-26, Published 1993-06-10. Also at http://www.delphion.com/details?pn=WO09310730A1 Not a US Patent.

[26] Stocklin PL and Stocklin BF. “Possible Microwave Mechanisms of the Mammalian Nervous System” T-I-T J Life Sci 9: 29-51, 1979.

[27] Beason RC and Semm P. “Responses of neurons to an amplitude modulated microwave stimulus” Neurosci Lett 333: 175-78, 2002.

[28] Adey WR. “Biological Effects of Low Energy Electromagnetic Fields On the Central Nervous System” NATO Advanced Study Institute on Advances in Biological Effects and Dosimetry of Low Energy Electromagnetic Fields Erice Italy, Plenum, p 359-391, 1981.

[29] Shepherd GM. Neurobiology 2nd ed. Oxford Univ. Press, New York-Oxford, p146-7, 1988.

[30] Bise W. “Low power radio-frequency and microwave effects on human electroencephalogram and behavior” Physiol Chem Phys 10(5): 387-98, 1978.

[31] Puharich HK and Lawrence JL. Patent #3629521“Hearing systems” USPTO granted 12/21/71.

[32] Flanagan GP. Patent #3393279 “Nervous System Excitation Device” USPTO granted 7/16/68.

[33] Frolich H. “The Biological Effects of Microwaves and Related Quiestions” Adv Electonics Electron Physics 53: 85-152, 1980.

[34] Steneck NH. The Microwave Debate MIT Press Cambridge, Mass, London Eng, 1984.

[35] Becker RO. Cross Currents Jeremy P. Tarcher, Inc, Los Angeles, St Martin’s Press, p 297-304 & p 303-4, 1990.

[36] Kohn B. “Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect” Defense Department Awarded SBIR Contract # F41624-95-C9007, 1993. Also at http://es.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/sbir/other/monana/kohn.html & http://www.raven1.net/v2s-kohn.htm

[37] Margo P. Cherney Freedom of Information Act Memorandum at http://www.raven1.net/usafletr.jpg

[38] Castelli CJ. “Questions Linger about Health Effects of DOD’s ‘Non-Lethal Ray’ Inside the Navy 14(12): 1-6, 2001. http://globalsecurity.org/org/news/2001/e20010327questions.htm

[39] Becker RO and Selden G. The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life Quill William Morrow, New York, p 319 & 320, 1985.

[40] Lowery OM. Patent #5159703 “Silent subliminal presentation system” USPTO granted 10/27/92.

[41] Lowrey A. Patent #6052336 “Apparatus and method of broadcasting audible sound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier” USPTO granted 4/18/00.

[42] Monroe RA. Patent #5356368 Method of and apparatus for inducing desired states of conscisousness” USPTO granted 10/18/94.

[43] Norris EG. Patent #5889870 “Acoustic Heterodyne device and method” USPTO granted 3/20/99.

[44] American Technology Corporation Announces Acoustic Non-Lethal Acoustical Weapon Technology for Military and Law Enforcement, press release of 10/30/01.

[45] American Technology Corporation Shareholder Alert, press release of 4/23/03 at http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/04_23_03.html .

[46] American Technology Corporation Announces Generation II HSSR Emitter at Annual General Meeting, press release of 5/30/03 at http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/05_30_03.html

[47] American Technology Corporation Awarded Key Military Contract to Deliver Modified Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRADTM) press release of 10/21/03 at http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/10_21_03.html

[48] American Technology Corporation Announces Expansion of Military Business press release of 6/30/03 at http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/06_30_03.html

[49] Sparrow D. “Best of What’s New Grand Award Winner: Hypersonic Sound” Popular Science, Dec, p 94, 2002. Also at http://www.popsci.com/popsci/bown/article/0,16106,388134,00.html

[50] Bunker RJ (ed.) Less-than-lethal Weapons: Reference Guidebook Los Angles Calif {National Law Enforcemnt and Corrections Technology, Western Region}, 2000. Similar treatment is Bunker RJ (ed.) “Nonlethal Weapons Terms and References” INSS Occasional Paper 15, USAF Institute for National Security Studies, USAF Academy, Colorodo at http://www.usafa.af.mil/inss/OCP/ocp15.pdf

[51] Alexander JB. Future War: Non-Lethal Weapons in Twenty-First-Century Warfare, St. Martin’s Press, New York, p. 101, 1999.

[52] Audio Spotlight, Holosonic Research Labs, 51 Water Street Watertown, MA 02472 at http://www.holosonics.com/

[53] Lawton G. “They are playing my tune” New Scientist 9 Sept. p 38-42, 2000.

[54] Loos HG. Patent #6017302 “Subliminal acoustic manipulation of nervous systems” USPTO granted 1/25/00.

[55]Hunt A, Tillery C, and Wild N. “Through-the-Wall Surveillance Technologies” Corrections Today 63(4): 132-3, 2001. Also at http://www.ojp.gov/nij/sciencetech/aca/07_01.pdf

[56] Frey AH. “Headaches from Cellular Telephones: Are They Real and What Are the Implications” Environ. Health Perspect. 106(3): 101-3, 1998.

[57] Lin JC, “Cellular Telephones and Their Effect on the Human Brain” Mob Comput and Comm Review, 3(3): 34-5, July, 1999. Also at http://www.eecs.uic.edu/eecspeople/lin_acm3.htm

[58] Nolan PJ, Fundaments of College Physics Wm. C. Brown: Dubuque, Iowa, Melbourne, Australia, Oxford England, p 716, 1993.

[59] Reits BJ. Patent #5736966 “Adjustable microwave antenna” USPTO granted 4/7/98.

[60] Maier G and Harrison D. Patent #5825554 “Lenses with a variable refraction index” USPTO granted 10/20/98.

[61] Jasper LJ. Patent #6407708 “Microwave generator/radiator using photoconductive switching and dielectric lense” USPTO granted 6/18/02.

[62] Hablov DV, Fisun OI, Lupichev LN, Osipov VV, Schestiperov VA, and Schimko R. Patent #5448501 ”Electronic life detection system” USPTO granted 9/5/95.

[63] Hablov DV, Fisun OI, Lupichev LN, Osipov VV, Schestiperov VA, and Schimko R. Patent #5530429 “Electronic surveillance system” USPTO granted 6/25/96.

[64] Giori FA and Winterberger AR. “Remote Physiological Monitoring Using a Microwave Interferometer” Biomed Sci Instr 3: 291-307, 1967.

[65] Fullerton LW and Richards JI. Patent #6400307 “System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array” USPTO granted 6/4/02.

[66] Time Domain Corporation, Cummings Research Park, 7057 Old Madison Pike, Suite 250, Huntsville, AL 35806 at http://www.radarvision.com/ , company website is at http://www.timedomain.com/

[67] Nacci P. “Radar-Based Through-the-Wall Surveillance System” National Law Enforcement and Corrections Center at http://www.raven1.net/nij_p26.htm

[68] Ferris DD. “Microwave and millimeter-wave systems for wall penetration” SPIE Proceedings 3375: 269-79, 1998.

[69] Frazier LM. “Surveillance through walls and other opaque materials” SPIE Proceedings 2497: 115-19, 1995.

[70] Radar PC at http://www.salsburg.com/product/radar.html

[71] Rowan L. Patent #4893815 “Interactive transector device commercial and military grade” USPTO granted 1/16/90.

[72] Systems & Electronics Inc., 201 Evans Ave., St. Louis MO 63121, Manportable Surveillane and Target Acquisition Radar at http://www.seistl.com/images/pdf/mstar.pdf Company website is at http://www.seistl.com/directions.html

[73] Brookner E. Tracking and Kalman Filtering Made Easy Wiley, New York, 1998.

[74] Tisdale GE and Lindemann HB. Patent #4497065 “Target recognition system enhanced by active signature measurements” USPTO granted 1/29/85.

[75] Peralta EA and Reitz KM. Patent #4562439 “Imaging radar seeker” USPTO granted 12/31/85.

[76] Ahlstrom LGW. Patent #4796834 “Method for combating of targets and projectile or missile for carrying out the method” USPTO granted 1/10/89.

[77] Suppes P, Lu Z, and Han B. “Brain wave recognition of words” Proc Natl Acad Sci 94: 14965-69, 1997. Printable free online thru Pubmed or at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/94/26/14965

[78] Suppes P, Han B, and Lu Z. “Brain-wave recognition of sentences” Proc Natl Acad Sci 95: 15861-66, 1998. Printable free online thru Pubmed or at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/95/26/15861

[79] Suppes P, Han B, Epelboim J, and Lu Z. “Invariance of brain-wave representations of simple visual images and their names” Proc Natl Acad Sci 96: 14658-63, 1999. Printable free online thru Pubmed or at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/25/14658

[80] Suppes P, Han B, Epelboim J, and Lu ZL. “Invariance between subjects of brain wave representations of language” Proc Natl Acad Sci 96(22): 12953-8, 1999. Printable free online thru PubMed or at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/22/12953

[81] Suppes P and Han B. “Brain-wave representation of words by superposition of a few sine waves” Proc Natl Acad Sci 97: 8738-43, 2000. Printable free online thru Pubmed or at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/97/15/8738

[82] Assadullahi R and Pulvermuller F. “Neural Network Classification of Word Evoked Neuromagnetic Brain Activity” In: Wermter S, Austin J, and Willahaw D (eds.) Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence: Emergent Neurocomputational Architechures Based on Neuroscience Heidelberg Springer, p 311-20, 2001. More limited preliminary communication at http://www.his.sunderland.ac.uk/durhamab/ramin.doc

[83] Pinneo LR and Hall DJ. “Feasibility Study for Design of a Biocybernetic Communication System” Report #ADA017405 National Technical Information Service, 1975. Prepared for the Advanced Research Projects Agency Order #2034, Program Code #2D20, Contractor: Stanford Research Institute Contract dates: 2/9/72-8/31/76, SRI Project LSU-1936. (US cost ~$50.)

[84] Selden G. “Machines That Read Minds” Sci Digest Oct 89: 60-6, 1981. Also at http://www.datafilter.com/mc/machinesThatReadMinds.html

[85] Kiyuna T, Tanigawa T, and Yamazaki T. Patent #5785653 “System and method for predicting internal condition of live body” USPTO granted 7/28/98.

[86] Mardirossian A. Patent #6011991 “Communication system and method including brain wave analysis and/or use of brain activity” USPTO granted 1/4/00.

[87] Pulvermuller F. “Words in the brain’s language” Behav Brain Sci 22: 253-336, 1999.

[88] Assadollahi R and Pulvermuller F. “Neuromagnetic evidence for early access to cognitive represtentations” Cog Neurosci Neurophysiol 12(2): 207-13, 2001.

[89] Preissl H, Pulvermuller F, Lutzenberger W, and Birbaumer N. “Evoked potentials distinguish between nouns and verbs” Neurosci Lett 197: 81-3, 1995.

[90] Pulvermuller F, Mohn B, and Schleichert H. “Semantic or lexico-syntactic factors: what determines word-class specific activity in the human brain?” Neurosci Lett 275: 81-4, 1999.

[91] Pulvermuller F, Lutzenberger W, and Preissl H. “Nouns and Verbs in the Intact Brain: Evidence from Event-retlated Potentials and High-frequency Cortical Responses” Cerebral Cortex 9(5): 497-506, 1999.

[92] Pulvermuller F, Preissl H, Lutzenberger W, and Birbaumer N. “Brain Rhythms of Language: Nouns Versus Verbs” Eur J Neurosci 8: 917-41, 1996.

[93] Kellenbach ML, Wijers AA, Hovius M, Mulder J, and Mulder G. “Neural Differentiation of Lexico-Syntactic Categories or Semantic Features? Event-Related Potential Evidence for Both” J Cog Neurosci 14(4): 561-77, 2002.

[94] Muller HM and Kutas M. “What’s in a name? Electrophysiological differences between spoken nouns, proper names and one’s own name” Neuroreport 8: 221-5, 1996.

[95] Dehaene S. “Electrophysiological evidence for category-specific word processing” Neuroreport 6: 2153-7, 1995.

[96] Neville HJ, Mills D, and Lawson DS. “Fractionating Language: Different Neural Subsystems with Different Sensitive Periods” Cerebral Cortex 2: 244-58, 1992.

[97] Pulvermuller F, Lutzenberger W, and Birbaumer N. “Electrocortical distinction of vocabulary types” Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 94: 357-70, 1995.

[98] Mohr B, Pulvermuller F, and Zaidel E. “Lexical Decision After Left, Right, and Bilateral Presentation of Function Words, Content Words, and Non-Words: Evidence For Interhemispheric Interaction” Neuropsychologia 32(1): 105-24, 1994.

[99] Munte TF, Wieringa BM, Weyerts H, Szentkuti A, Matzke M, and Johannes S. “Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: class and frequency effects” Neuropsychologia 39: 91-102, 2001.

[100] Pulvermuller F, Harle M, and Hummel F. “Walking or Talking? Behavioral and Neruophysiological Correlates of Action Verb Processing” Brain Lang 78: 143-68, 2001.

[101] Pulvermuller F, Harle M, and Hummel F. “Neurophysiological distinction of verb categories” Cog Neurosci 11(12): 2789-93, 2000.

[102] Kounios J and Holcomb PJ. “Concreteness Effects in Semantic Processing: ERP Evidence Supporting Dual-Coding Theory” J Exp Psychol 20(4): 804-23, 1994.

[103] Federmeier KD, Segal JB, Lombrozo T, and Kutas M. “Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context” Brain 123(12): 2552-66, 2000.

[104] Krause CM, Korpilahti P, Porn B, Joskim J, and Lang HA. “Automatic auditory word perception as measured by 40 Hz EEG responses” Encephal Clin Neurophysiol 107: 84-7, 1998.

[105] Diesch E, Biermann S, and Luce T. “The magnetic mismatch field elicited by words and phonological non-words” Neuroreport 9(3): 455-60, 1998.

[106] Lutzenberger W, Pulvermuller F, and Birbaumer N. “Words and pseudowords elicit distinct patterns of 30-Hz EEG responses” Neurosci Lett 176: 115-18, 1994.

[107] Kiefer M. “Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization” Mem Cog 29(1): 100-16, 2001.

[108] Skrandies W. “Evoked potential correlates of semantic meaning—A brain mapping study” Cog Brain Res 6: 175-183, 1998.

[109] Skrandies W and Chiu MJ. “Dimensions of affective meaning – behavioral evoked potential correlates in Chinese subjects” Neurosci Lett 341: 45-8, 2003.

[110] Patton RE. Patent #6292688 “Method and apparatus for analyzing neurological response to emotion-inducing stimuli” USPTO granted 9/18/01.

[111] Deeke L. “Bereitschaftspotential as an indicatory of movement preparation in supplementary motor area and motor cortex” Ciba Found Symp 182:132-231, 1987.

[112] Chen R. and Hallett M. “The Time Course of Changes in Motor Cortex Excitability Associated with Voluntary Movement” Can J Neurol Sci 26(3): 163-9, 1999.

[113] Pfurtscheller G, Kalcher J, Neuper CH, Flotzinger D, and Pregenzer M. “On-line EEG classification during externally-paced hand movements using a neural network classifier” Electrophysiol and Neurophysiol 99: 416-25, 1996.

[114] Birch GE. “Initial On-Line Evaluations of the LF-ASD Brain-Computer Interface With Able Bodied and Spinal-Cord Subjects Using Imagined Voluntary Motor Potentials” IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 10(4): 219-24, 2002.

[115] Guger C, Harkam W, Hertnacs C, and Pfurtscheller G. “Prosthetic Control by an EEG-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)” In: Bühler C and Knops H (eds.) Assistive Technology on the Threshold of the new Millennium, 2003 :at http://www.gtec.at/research/Publications/aaate.pdf

[116] Millan JR. “Adaptive Brain Interfaces” Communications of the ACM 46(3): 74-80, 2003. Abstract at http://www.idiap.ch/publications/millan-2003-comm-acm.bib.abs.html

[117] Millan JR and Mourifio J. “Asynchronous BCI and Local Neural Classifiers: An Overview of the Adaptive Brain Interface Project” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (Brain-Computer Interface Technology) 11(2): 159-61, 2003. Article also at ftp://ftp.idiap.ch/pub/reports/2003/millan_2003_nsre.pdf

[118] Millan JR, Renkens F, Mourifio J, and Gerstner W. “Non-Invasive Brain-Actuated Control of a Mobile Robot” Proceedings of the 18th Joint International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Aug 9-15, in press, 2003. Article also at ftp://ftp.idiap.ch/pub/reports/2003/millan_2003_ijcai.pdf

[119] Carmens JM, Lebedev MA, Crist RE, O’Doherty JE, Santucci DM, Dimitrov DF, Patil PG, Henriques CS, and Nicolelis MAL. “Learning to Control a Brain-Machine Interface for Reaching and Grasping by Primates” Public Library of Science, Biology Oct 1(1). 2003 at http://www.plosbiology.org/archive/1545-7885/1/2/pdf/10.1371_journal.pbio.0000042-L.pdf

[120] Farwell LA and Donchin E. “The Truth Will Out: Interrogative Polygraphy (“Lie Detection”) With Event-Related Brain Potentials” Psychophysiology 28(5): 531-47, 1991.

[121] Johnson MM and Rosenfeld JP. “Oddball-evoked P300-based method of deception detection in the laboratory II. Utilization of non-selective activation of relevant knowledge” Int J Psychophysiol 12: 289-306, 1992.

[122] Rosenfeld JP, Ellwanger J, and Sweet J. “Detecting simulated amnesia with event-related brain potentials” Int J Psychophysiol 19: 1-11, 1995.

[123] Allen JJB and Iacono WG. “A Comparison of methods for the analysis of event-related potentials in deception detection” Psychophysiology 34: 234-40, 1997.

[124] Lorenz J, Kunze K, and Bromm B. “Differentiation of conversive sensory loss and malingering by P300 in a modified oddball task” Neuroreport 9: 187-91, 1998.

[125] Tardif HP, Barry RJ, and Johnstone SJ. “ Event-related potentials reveal processing differences in honest vs. malingered memory performance” Int J Psychophysiol 46: 147-58, 2002.

[126] Brain Fingerprinting Laboratories, Inc., 108 West Palm Drive, Fairfield, IA 52556 at http://www.brainwavescience.com/

[127] Farwell LA and Smith SS. “Using Brain MERMER Testing to Detect Knowledge Despite Efforts to Conceal” J Forensic Sci 46(1): 135-46, 2001.

[128] Farwell LA. “Two new twists on the truth detector: brain-wave detection of occupational information” Psychophysiology 29(4A): S3, 1992.

[129] Farwell LA. Patent #5363858 “Method and apparatus for multifaceted electroencephalographic response analysis” USPTO granted 11/15/94.

[130] Farwell LA and Conte FL. Patent #5406956 “Method and apparatus for truth detection” USPTO granted 4/18/95.

[131] Farwell LA and Conte FL. Patent #5467777 “Method for electroencephalographic information detection” USPTO granted 11/21/95.

[132] Joseph JE. “Functional Neuroimaging studies of category specificity in object recognition: A critical review and meta-analysis” Cog Affect Behav Neurosci 1(2): 119-36, 2001.

[133] Mitchell TM, Hutchinson R, Just MA, Niculescu RS, Percira F, and Wang X. “Classifying Instantaneous Cognitive States from fMRI Data” Am Med Informatics Assoc November, 2003. Also at http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~tom/amia2003-final.pdf

[134] Spence SA, Farrow TF, Herford AE, Wilkinson ID, Zheng Y, and Woodruff PW. “Behavioral and functional anatomical correlates of deception” Neuroreport 12(13): 2849-53, 2001.

[135] Lee TM, Liu HL, Tan LH, Chan CC, Mahankali S, Feng CM, Hou J, Fox PT, and Gao JH. “Lie detection by functional magnetic resonance imgaging” Hum Brain Mapp 15(3): 157-64, 2002.

[136] Langleben DD, Schrneder L, Maldjian JA, Gur RC, McDonald S, Ragland JD, O’Brien CP, and Childress AR. “Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study” Neuroimage 15(3): 727-32, 2002.

[137] Ganis G, Kosslyn SM, Stose S, Thompson WL, and Yurgelun-Todd DA. “Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation” Cereb Cortex 13(8): 830-6, 2003.

[138] Bartels A and Zeki S. “The neural basis of romantic love” Neuroreport 11(17): 3829-34, 2000.

[139] Guyatt DG. “Some Aspects of Anti-Personnel Electromagnetic Weapons” International Committee of the Red Cross Symposium: The Medical Profession and the Effects of Weapons, ICRC publication ref. 06681996 (The paper is available from the Health Division of the ICRC.) Also at http://www.mahlers.com/wompaoapew.htm

[140] Brodeur, P. The Zapping of America Norton, New York, p 299 & 105, 1977.

[141] Lopez R. “Special operations survives Pentagon budget constraints” Jane’s International Defense Review 26(3): 247-51, 1993.

[142] Malech RG. Patent #3951134 “Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves” USPTO granted 4/20/76.

[143] Department of the Army, USAF Scientific Advisory Board. “New World Vistas: air and space for the 21st century” 14 vol. (Ancillary Volume) p 89-90, 1996. Also at http://www.azstarnet.com/~freetht/biologic.htm

[144] Morehouse DA. Nonlethal Weapons: War without Death Praeger, p 20, 1996.

[145] Dando M. A New Form of Warfare: The Rise of Non-Lethal Weapons Brassey’s, London, Washington, p 22, 1996

[146] Taff BE and Stoller KP. Patent #49400558 “Cryogenic remote sensing physiograph” USPTO granted 7/10/90.

[147] Stoller KP and Taff BE. “Remote Physiological Sensing: Historical Perspective, Theories and Preliminary Developments” Med Instrum 20(5): 260-5, 1986.

[148] Soviet Union Draft Agreement on the Prohibition of the Development and Manufacture of New Types of Weapons of Mass Destruction and New Systems of Such Weapons. UN Committee on Disarmament, CCD/511/Rev.1, Aug 1977. Also at http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/9.htm

[149] European Parliament, 28.1.99 Enviroment, security, and foreign affairs , A4-0005/99 EP1159, resolutions 23, 24, & 27, January 28, 1999 . Limited excerpts at http://www.raven1.net/europar.htm

[150] Wright S. “Future Sub-lethal, Incapacitating & Paralysing Technologies—Their Coming Role in the Mass Production of Torture, Cruel, Inhumane & Degrading Treatment. Presented to The Expert Seminar On Security Equipment & The Prevention of Torture 25-26 October 2002 London, UK and The 16th ISODARCO Winter Course On "The Surge in Non-State Violence: Roots Impacts & Countermeasures" 9 - 16 February, 2003, Andalo, Trento, Italy. Also at http://www.statewatch.org/news/2002/nov/torture.pdf & http://www.isodarco.it/html/andalo03-wright.html

[151] Begich N and Manning J. Angels Don’t Play This HAARP: Advances in Telsa Technology Earthpulse Press, Anchorage Alaska, p 176-8, 1995.

[152] Persinger MA. “On te Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain By Elcctromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorithims” Percept Motor Skills 80: 791-799, 1995.

[153] Brzezinski Z. Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era Viking Press, New York, p 57 & 252, 1970. Article also at http://www.bariumblues.com/persinger.htm

[154] Butler D. “Advances in neuroscience ‘may threaten human rights’” Nature 22 January 391: 316, 1998. Also at http://raven1.net/nature1.htm

[155] Space Preservation Act of 2001 (Introduced in the House) HR 2977 IH, 107th Congress 1st Session Introduced by Hon. Dennis J. Kucinich. Also at http://www.raven1.net/govptron.htm

[156] Federal Law “About Weapons” Federal Laws of the Russian Federation from 21.07.98 [1998] No. 117-F3, from 31.07.98 [‘98] No. 156-F3 , from 17.12.98 [‘98] No. 187-F3, from 19.11.99 [‘99] No. 194-F3, from 10.04.2000 [’00] No. 52-F3, from 26.07.01 [‘01] ISBN 5-86894-393-7 Translation at http://www.raven1.net/1-02-5.htm

[157] Gurov AI. Federal Assembly—Parliament of the Russian Assembly, Govermental Duma, Committee on Safety, “Resolution: Regarding the draft of the Federal Law ‘About the Sumission of addendum to Article 6 of the Federal Law ‘About Weapons” No 28/3 Nov. 30, 2000. Also at http://www.raven1.net/1-02-6.htm

[158] General Assembly. International Union of Radio Science “USRI Resolution on Criminal Activities Using Electromagnetic Tools” In: Records of the USRI General Assembly, Toronto, 25: 178-9, 1999. Also at http://www.intec.rug.ac.be/ursi/Tor99ResolENG.htm

[159] Microwave irradiation of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow: review of its history and studies to determine whether or not related health defects were experienced by employees assigned in the period 1953-1977. United States, Congress, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. US GOV. DOC. Y 4.C 73/7: IR 7.

[160] Smith CW and Best S. Electromagnetic Man J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd., London p 211, 233, & 235, 1989.

[161] Schiefelbein S. “The Invisible Threat: The Stifled Story of Electric Waves” Saturday Review Sept. 15: 16-20, p 17, 1979.

[162] Parry G. “Doctors investigating claims of Greenham radiation cases: Peace women fear electronic zapping at base” (Manchester) Guardian, Mar. 10: 3, 1986.

[163] Ramsay R. “ELF: from Mind Control to Mind Wars” Lobster 19: 23, 1990.

[164] Munzert R. “High-Tech Waffe Mikrowelle - Kriminelle Anwendungen von Mikrowellen” Aufklärungsarbeit, Heft 9, April, S. 25-31, 2003. English treatment “Targeting of the Human with Directed Energy Weapons” is at http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/munzert6902.doc

[165] Munzert R. personal communication.

[166] Gillin LM and Gillin L. “Subtle Energies, Intentionality and the Healing of Traumatically Abused Persons” International Conference on Trauma, Attachment and Dissociation, Melborne, Australia, Sept 12-14, 2003. Internet availability of victim field measurements are “Submission to Coroner: Additional Information on Possible Cause of Death of Ms. Deva Denise Paul on 10th September 2000, Case Reference 2958/00.” at http://www.globaltwa.com/SUBMISSION%20TO%20CORONER.pdf CAT scan indication on an implant is “Mind Control Using Holography and Dissociation a Process Model” at http://www.globaltwa.com/documents/MindControl.pdf

[167] Lewer N and Schofield S. Non-Lethal Weapons: A Fatal Attraction? : Military Strategies and Technologies for 21st-Century Conflict Zed Books, London & New Jersey, p 62, 1997.

[168] Rodwell R. defense correspondent report “Army tests new riot weapon” New Scientist Sept. 20, p 684, 1973.

[169] McKinney J. “Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation” Unclassified, June-July1992 4(3): 1-20. Also at http://www.webcom.com/~pinknoiz/coldwar/microwave.html

[170] Lamb C, and Swett C. Department of Defense Directive, Non-Lethal Weapons Policy Draft of 21 July 1994. athttp://www.heart7.net/mcf/mindnet/mn168.htm particularly last paragraph of p 7 onto p 8.

[171] McKinney J. Letter to President Clinton at http://www.heart7.net/mcf/mckinney.htm

[172] Cheryl Welsh Freedom of Information Act request reply for review of Soviet literature, March 19, 1997 at http://www.raven1.net/nsa1.gif

[173] Lopatin VN, and Tsygankov VD. Psychotronic War and the Security of Russia Moscow, 1999. See research abroad section in translation at http://www.raven1.net/russtran.htm

[174] Smith C. “On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology” J Psycho-Social Studies 2(2) #3, 2003. Article at http://www.btinternet.com/~psycho_social/Vol3/JPSS-CS2.html

[175] American Psychiatric Association DSM-IV Task Force. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV-TRTM) American Psychiatric Association, 2000.

[176] Flaum M and Schultz SK. “The Core Symptoms of Schizophrenia” Ann Med 28(6): 525-31, 1996.

[177] Isselbacher, KJ, Adams RD, Brunwald E, Petersdorf RG, and Wilson JD. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine Ninth Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, p 150, 1980.

[178] McMurtrey JJ. “Microwave Bioeffect Congruence with Schizophrenia” In press, 2003. Available at http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/microwav.rtf

janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com> wrote: Tell me more.

Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com> wrote: this is NOTHING compared to the remote influencing technologies

janet phelan <jcphelan10@yahoo.com> wrote:
MIND READING DEVICES “Alan Yu, a former lieutenant colonel in the Taiwan National Defence Department, says that the United States has not only developed an operational mind control machine, but has also distributed models for use by allied countries. Yu states that such machines pose a great threat to human rights and the American way of life. He calls the device the “Mind Reading Machine” (Mind Machine).
“In the spring of 1984, Yu was a lieutenant colonel serving in the National Defence Department of Taiwan. At that time, Yu read a classified document from the department that he serviced under. The document said the Military Police Department of Taiwan had purchased several of the Mind Reading Machines from the United States (In Taiwan, it was called Psychological Language Machine).
Yu reports that before he left, this machine had become the most effective weapon for the security departments of Taiwan …
“Demonstrations of this equipment have shown encouraging results after exposure of less than one minute and have produced the ability to alter behavior on unwilling subjects.”
(Richard A. Miller, ‘Conciousness Technologies Conference’, July 2001)

---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 16
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:42:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com>
Subject: is the sheen 9/11 story a real break for us?

I'm on the cautious side of this, are we really kicking that much inbred satanist ass?

Have we halted the terrorist dreadnaught known as a the shrub administration?


I'm just wanting everyone's input

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 17
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 06:50:42 -0000
From: "botalerts" <botalerts@yahoo.ca>
Subject: Re: is the sheen 9/11 story a real break for us?

If we use the Sheen story as a STARTING POINT, we have a chance.

If we rest on our laurels, we'll lose.

Got to re-triple our efforts (re-double ain't enough)!!!!

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, Naveed <flanker12k@...> wrote:
>
> I'm on the cautious side of this, are we really kicking that much
inbred satanist ass?
>
> Have we halted the terrorist dreadnaught known as a the shrub
administration?
>
>
> I'm just wanting everyone's input
>
>
> In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave,
and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him,
for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
> - Notebook, 1904
>
> ---------------------------------
> New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC
and save big.
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 18
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 06:53:00 -0000
From: "mojo_j_2000" <mojo_j_2000@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Too Many Chips on the Old Block?

de gauss

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, janet phelan <jcphelan10@...>
wrote:
>
> EU withdraws proposal for biometric chips in visas
> The technological problems associated with introducing
biometric chips into visas have proved insurmountable, forcing the
Commission to drop the proposal altogether. Background: At a
conference organised by the Centre for European Policy Studies on
21 and 22 of March, Marc Meznar of the US Mission to the EU and
Kristian Bartholin from the Commission discussed this issue in the
context of a discussion on EU-US cooperation and border management.
Issues: Biometrics The problem with chips in visas, which would
normally be inserted into passports, is that these clash with any
biometric chip contained in the passport itself, preventing both
from working. Since no technological solution has been found, the
proposal has been dropped. A modified proposal, published by the
Commission on 10 March 2006, concerning residence permits, whereby
the insertion of chips will be optional, makes public the decision
to drop the chip requirement for visas.
>
> EurActiv.com Justice & Security
> Date: 2006-03-23
>
> ---------------------------------
> New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC
and save big.
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 19
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 06:52:01 -0000
From: "mojo_j_2000" <mojo_j_2000@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: We ain't out of the woods yet people!

Sometimes a cigar, is jus a cigar.

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, Naveed <flanker12k@...> wrote:
>
> http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Sheen.html
>
>
>
> Back to The French Connection
>
>
> Charlie Sheen exposes 9-11 Is the truth finally
coming out? Or is this more deception? 23 March 2006
> On Monday, 20 March 2006, Charlie Sheen was interviewed
on the Alex Jones radio show. He is the first famous person -- and
the first Hollywood star -- to expose 9/11.
> That interview is attracting attention all over the world. For
example, two days later CNN broadcast excerpts of that interview,
and they invited two people on the show to add details to Sheen's
comments. Furthermore, CNN selected the prime evening hours for this
exposé, not the middle of the night.
> CNN exposed the world to the 9-11 issue on their
Showbiz Tonight program. You can watch the video at this site:
> http://www.911blogger.com/
> Even the Boston Herald reported the Charlie Sheen interview:
> http://thetrack.bostonherald.com/moreTrack/view.bg?
articleid=131750 Although their article makes a snide remark about
Sheen's "affinity for prostitutes and gambling", the article exposed
a lot of people to the fact that the World Trade Center towers were
demolished with explosives.
>
>
> Thank you, Alex Jones! It would seem as if Alex Jones, CNN,
Charlie Sheen, and others are finally exposing the 9/11 scam. This
is truly a time to rejoice and thank these courageous Truth Seekers.
Or is it? Why the rapid response? Thousands of people around the
world have been struggling for years to expose 9/11, often at a
significant personal expense, but CNN and all other "mainstream"
media companies ignored and suppressed us. On Monday, 20 March
2006, Charlie Sheen is interviewed on the Alex Jones radio show, and
only two days later CNN broadcast some excerpts of that interview.
Why did CNN react so quickly to the Sheen interview? People have
been interviewed by Alex Jones, and numerous other radio shows, for
years. Why did CNN ignore all of us for all of these years and then
suddenly promote Charlie Sheen? More importantly, why is CNN --
and the other media companies -- continuing to ignore us? If CNN is
sincere about exposing 9/11, wouldn't they move beyond Charlie
> Sheen and bring out some real 9/11 investigators?
>
> Why Showbiz Tonight? CNN selected Showbiz Tonight -- a
program about Hollywood gossip -- to expose 9/11. Why didn't they
select a more serious news show? You might assume that the reason
they selected Showbiz Tonight is because Charlie Sheen is an
entertainer, in which case Showbiz Tonight seems to be an
appropriate venue. However, this brings us back to the issue of
why they selected Charlie Sheen as the expert on 9/11. If you were
going to expose 9/11 on prime time television, would you select
Charlie Sheen?
> Why Charlie Sheen? Many people may assume that CNN selected
Charlie Sheen to expose 9/11 because he was the first (and only)
famous Hollywood entertainer to talk about 9-11. This implies that
CNN doesn't care about the research of engineers, scientists,
professors, architects, carpenters, machinists, or other people.
It also implies that the reason CNN has not bothered to expose the
attack on the USS Liberty -- or any other crime -- is because no
Hollywood star has come forward to expose it.
>
> Why excerpts of Sheen's interview? CNN did not interview
Charlie Sheen. Rather, they played some audio excerpts of an
interview he did with Alex Jones. If they were truly interested in
what Sheen had to say about 9/11, why didn't they send a television
crew to interview him? Why did they play audio excerpts from a radio
show that is unknown to most people? Is there budget too small to
allow a real interview?
> Why interview Webster Tarpley and Mike Berger? CNN selected
two people to bring on the show as 9/11 experts: Webster Tarpley and
Mike Berger.
> Webster Tarpley wrote the book "9/11 Synthetic Terror:
Made in the USA", in which he implies that a few American government
officials are responsible for 9/11. CNN sent a car to the
Maryland suburbs to pick up Webster Tarpley and take him to the CNN
studios in Washington, DC. They put only 15 seconds of his
interview on television. Since they can afford to drive the almost
unknown Tarpley to the studio for only 15 seconds of television
exposure, why couldn't they afford to send a camera crew to
interview the star of their show, Charlie Sheen?
> Mike Berger appeared on the show live to discuss Sheen's
remarks. Mike Berger is one of the members of
911truth.org, which for years has been trying to suppress the
evidence that the World Trade Center towers and Building 7 were
demolished with explosives. Why did CNN select these two
particular men as experts on 9/11? Before you try to answer that
question, please take a look at some of our documents in which we
explain that Tarpley and everybody in 911truth.org should be
investigated as possible members of the criminal network. For
example, try these:
> • The Deception Dollar
> • To get away with crimes
> National Geographic defended the government Nicole
Rittenmeyer also appeared on the show live, but her role was to
defend the official government story.
> Nicole Rittenmeyer was the supervising producer for a
National Geographic television show about 9/11 called "Inside 9/11:
Zero Hour" This show supported the official story.
> Rittenmeyer was probably selected to defend the official story
of 9-11 because she is involved with the criminal network, as are
most of the management of National Geographic.
>
>
>
> What is going on?
> Our guess about what is happening is that the truth about 9/11
is spreading quickly around the world, and the criminals are
panicking. Charlie Sheen was never involved in the research or
exposure of 9/11. During his interview with Alex Jones, he merely
mimicked information he picked up from web sites, videos, or books.
Jones could have gotten this type of low quality interview by
telling a high school student to look at Hufschmid's book and video
and then give a report on it. Charlie Sheen fits the profile of a
Useful Idiot, not an intelligent researcher. The reason is that
Charlie Sheen seems to have a lot of problems with drugs, sex,
pornography, relationships, and gambling. For example, Sheen is
wasting $150,000 per week on gambling, according to this report:
>
http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_27264116.shtml
He is trying to use Heather Locklear to spy on his ex-wife,
according to this report:
>
http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_27263710.shtml
Charlie Sheen's real name is Carlos Irwin Estevez. The Sheen family
may be Crypto Jews. Some biographical information about him is here:
> http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000221/bio Kay Griggs describes how
the criminal network looks for people with emotional disorders, and
tries to take advantage of their problems. The people who turn out
to be controllable are put into important positions. (You can find
her interview at the bottom of our Einstein article.) Charlie
Sheen and his father are probably working with the criminal network.
Or course, Charlie is probably one of their Useful Idiots who
follows orders, rather than a manager who makes decisions.
> Who is Alex Jones? Charlie was probably told by the criminal
network to contact Alex Jones. This implies that Alex Jones is
somehow connected with the crime network, which we suspected for a
long time. But what is his connection? Some people have noticed
that Alex Jones is somehow involved in an organization
called "RSICC". The heading at the page for Jones has this:
> Remnant Saints Inter-Continental Congress
> Toward the Establishment of the Government of God on Earth
http://www.rsicc.org/Members/AlexJones/index.html
>
> Look at heading at the main page:
> Remnant Saints
> For the Triumph of the Lord's People Providing tools and
contacts to prepare for difficult times, that the remnant might
survive these calamities and establish Zion.
> http://www.remnantsaints.com/index.html
>
> What do they mean by "establish Zion"? What do they mean
by "Toward the Establishment of the Government of God on Earth"?
Why is their web site so vague and mysterious? How do we know this
is not just another variation of the Project for a New American
Century?
> http://www.newamericancentury.org/ Why should we trust any of
these people or their organizations? Getting back to the interview
Alex Jones did with Charlie Sheen, they probably wanted to let Alex
Jones do the interview in order to bring Jones some publicity
because his popularity is decreasing as people realize that he is
suppressing a lot of important information about Zionism,
pedophilia, and Israel. Two articles with more information about
Jones and his deception:
> • Crypto Zionists
> • myspace The CNN employees were undoubtedly told by top
management to broadcast excerpts of the Jones interview on their
Hollywood gossip show rather than send a camera crew to interview
Charlie Sheen because Sheen is not a real 9/11 investigator, so they
did not want to waste money interviewing him. It would be as silly
is sending a camera crew to interview a high school student who read
Hufschmid's book. Webster Tarpley and Mike Berger were selected as
9-11 experts because they are also part of this network of
criminals. You should also notice that these criminals are also
pushing the videos Loose Change, In Plane Site, and 911 Eyewitness,
and ignoring Painful Deceptions. Coincidence? The evidence suggests
that this is a big crime network, and they are promoting each other.
>
>
> Update!
> Alex Jones was invited on Showbiz Tonight! On 23 March
2006 Alex Jones was invited on the show and given virtually free
reign. You can watch the video at this site:
> http://www.911blogger.com/
>
>
> Why would criminals expose their own crime? The criminals
want to expose 9/11 because they want to be in the role of hero,
investigator, truth seeker, and savior when 9-11 is finally exposed
to the public. They want to push aside the truly honest
investigators so that the criminal network can remain in control.
They may have to sacrifice a few of their team members, such as
George Bush, Dick Cheney, and possibly even Larry Silverstein, but
it is better to sacrifice a Useful Idiot and a few old men rather
than let the entire crime network go down. The lower level
criminals, such as Nicole Rittenmeyer, can fake stupidity when 9-11
is exposed, or they can claim that they were just low level workers
who were following orders.
> The criminals may fight with each other For the past several
years both CNN and National Geographic were suppressing 9/11.
However, if 9/11 is exposed, the criminals may start fighting with
each other over which of them is sacrificed, and which of them gets
control of America. Actually, the fight may already be occurring.
The people at National Geographic may be fighting with the people at
CNN. Why did CNN select a Hollywood gossip show to expose 9-11?
Probably because they consider the viewers of such a show to be
easier to manipulate compared to the viewers of a news show. CNN
may be trying to deceive the tens of millions of people who idolize
Hollywood stars into thinking that Charlie Sheen, Alex Jones,
Webster Tarpley, Mike Berger, and 911truth.org are the honest 9-11
investigators. This would give the criminals at CNN a very large
support base. What will the criminals at Fox, ABC, BBC, the New
York Times, and other groups do? Will they join with CNN? Will they
> help National Geographic? Or will they select some other members
of the criminal network to expose 9/11? Will fights break out among
the criminals?
>
>
> Will Americans be fooled again? The American people have
allowed this criminal network to assassinate many of their political
leaders, military leaders, scientists, and other citizens. The
American people have also allowed the USS Liberty to be attacked,
and they have done nothing yet about the attack on September 11.
They ignored the mysterious breaking of the New Orleans levees, and
they have done nothing about the mysterious Oklahoma City
bombing. The American people have also ignored the strange
massacres at schools, such as Columbine, which appear to be much
more than just a couple of teenagers on a rampage. The American
people have also ignored the mysterious burnings of churches, and
mysterious explosions at oil refineries, and numerous mysterious
forest and grassland fires. It now appears that the information
about 9/11 is coming out, and it appears that the criminal network
is selecting some of their members to expose 9/11. Will the
Americans and Europeans be
> fooled by this deception? If the criminals can fool most of the
Americans and Europeans into believing that George Bush is
responsible for 9/11, and that Charlie Sheen, Webster Tarpley, Alex
Jones, and Mike Berger are heroes, then the criminals will remain in
control of the media of Europe and North America, our schools, the
Federal Reserve, our banking system, our military, and the European
Union. The only way to fight back at this criminal network is to
bypass their control of information. They dominate the media,
including the Internet. It is up to each of us to spread information
to our friends, relatives, neighbors, and coworkers. We must ignore
their deceptive web sites, television programs, and magazines.
> Investigate the Truth Seekers If 9/11 is exposed, we must
investigate everybody involved, not just George Bush. All of the
9/11 investigators need to be investigated. Don't be intimidated by
these people! Here is an article about this issue:
> http://www.EricHufschmid.net/InvestigateTheTruthSeekers.htm
> Watch out for the deceptive web sites There are not many web
sites that provide honest information. Here are a few that we can
recommend: • http://www.iamthewitness.com
> • http://www.HugeQuestions.com
> • http://www.EricHufschmid.net
> • http://judicial-inc.biz/1_master_supreme.htm
> Information is the only way to counteract their propaganda, so
please take a look at the articles on these sites, and put pressure
on your friends, relatives, co-workers, and neighbors to join us as
we face the corruption and try to make a better world.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and
brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid
join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
> - Notebook, 1904
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and
30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 20
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:17:41 -0800
From: "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@nwinfo.net>
Subject: excellent big picture -Amy Worthington: Police State USA - Part One Big Brother's Most Cool Tool (excerpt)

> Police State USA - Part One
> Big Brother's Most Cool Tool
>
>
> By Amy Worthington
> 3-9-6
>
> Senate Minority leader Harry Reid (D-NV) calls this Congress the "most
> corrupt" in history.(1) U.S. Representative Ron Paul (R-TX) often uses the
> term "police state" to describe our national state of affairs. George Bush
> is making the most expansive claims to unbridled power since America's War
> for Independence, according to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT).(2) Former U.S.
> Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who proved Bush/Cheney lied to launch us into war
> with Iraq, says "fascist forces have seized control of the levers of
> power."(3)
>
> Americans are being told that their Republic has become a fascist police
> state-they just need ears to hear. In a fascist police state, the dictator
> secures his power with support from private corporations which are given
> special privileges and thus benefit from doing business with dictators.
>
> Continuously bribed by 28,000 corporate lobbyists (4) in D.C., Congress is
> doing its part to build a fascist system in America. During President Bush's
> recent State of the Union speech, these tainted legislators perpetually rose
> to their feet to applaud the spewing of what a New York Times editorial
> called "misleading analogies, propaganda slogans and false choices."(5)
> Their bootlicking recalls a by-gone Soviet era when endless rows of robotic
> Central Party members applauded the likes of Stalin to ensure their next
> breath of oxygen.
>
> After passage of the Patriot Act of 2001, Rep. Paul told Insight Magazine
> that the 2,200-page bill was not made available to Congress to read before
> the vote.(6) So the most corrupt Congress in history rubber-stamped the most
> fascist legislation they had never read. Our constitution enumerates
> inalienable rights that are emphatically restated in the first 10 amendments
> known as "The Bill of Rights." Under the Patriot Act, the "right" to free
> speech, peaceable assembly and security in one's person, papers and effects
> have been relegated to "privileges" that government can take away at whim.
> Patriot Act authority has suspended the right to due process and a prompt
> and public trial; it even cancels protection against cruel and unusual
> punishment. Agents serving the fascist state can freely wire-tap our phones,
> enter our homes/offices, search and seize without warrant and detain us
> indefinitely without charges-ostensibly to keep America safe.
>
> The ink had barely dried on the Patriot Act when Congress passed the
> Homeland Security Act of 2002. Rep. Paul stated that Congress also did not
> read the 500-page bill that gave birth to the Department of Homeland
> Security (DHS).(7) DHS, a creepy intelligence gathering apparatus
> reminiscent of the Nazi SS, has merged 22 federal agencies and their
> databases, employing nearly a quarter million workers. The New York Times
> columnist William Safire told the American people that, under DHS, "You are
> a suspect."(8) Rep. Paul confirms that "the Department represents a huge new
> increase in the size and scope of the federal government that will mostly
> serve to spy on the American people."(9)
>
> Michael Chertoff was appointed by Bush in 2004 to head DHS. Chertoff appears
> to be an identical twin of founding Soviet dictator Vladimir Lenin, giving
> us a stark flashback to the Russian Revolution of 1917. That lucrative Wall
> Street operation, which unleashed murderous communist tyranny upon hundreds
> of millions of people for nearly the entire 20th
> century, was funded and directed from New York by a clique of Yale-graduated
> Skull and Bones members in business with the Averell Harriman family.(10)
> George Herbert Walker, great grandfather of the Skull and Bones fascist now
> occupying the White House, was a Harriman partner when Lenin granted to
> Harriman's Wall Street syndicate lucrative Russian resource concessions.(11)
> Lenin also made Harriman partner Max May of Wall Street's Guaranty Trust the
> first vice president of Russia's Soviet Ruskombank.(12)
>
> Yale's powerful Skull and Bones network also has a predilection for fascism,
> as clearly illustrated by the Harriman-Bush involvement in secret funding of
> the German Nazis during the 1930s.(13) Our present commander-in-chief's
> grandfather, Prescott Sheldon Bush, was a Bonesman and a Harriman partner
> involved in business dealings with Hitler's war machine even after WWII
> began.(14) Prescott shamelessly failed to divest himself of more than a
> dozen "enemy national" relationships that continued as late as 1951.(15)
>
> As we witness the progression of runaway fascism under the administration of
> Prescott's grandson, we must recall that the Skull and Bones syndicate, so
> adept at bringing nations to heel with war and revolution, created the CIA
> in 1947 under direction of Bonesman Robert A. Lovett.(16) Kitty Kelley
> reveals in her Bush dynasty expose, The Family, that Bonesmen refer to the
> CIA as their "home office." Our burgeoning fascist state is a raging
> metastasis of the syndicate's obsession with power, made possible by it's
> ritualistic secrecy and iron-fisted control of U.S. intelligence for the
> last 60 years. Our present generation of ruling Bonesmen is now brazenly
> merging the hideous Soviet and Nazi models into a hybrid for the new U.S.
> Homeland Security state.
>
> In 2004, a clueless and/or compromised Congress rubber-stamped the
> Intelligence Reform Act, a bill weighing in at over 3,000 pages. This
> Orwellian horror created the Department of National Intelligence (DNI). All
> 15 U.S. intelligence agencies now report to DNI mega-commissar John
> Negroponte, a veteran of the Iran-Contra scandal. This shady new law also
> establishes a counter-terrorism center and provides for a spy satellite
> network capable of monitoring private communications systems. It mandates
> that all drivers licenses and birth certificates be standardized, thereby
> creating a national ID system. Some provisions of the Intelligence Reform
> Act were classified "top secret" and congressmen were not allowed to read
> them.(17) Americans have yet to discover what malignant ramifications the
> DNI may hold for the future.
>
> In June, 2005, George Bush placed a portion of the FBI under his personal
> control, creating the National Security Service. This secret police
> apparatus, to be operated by the White House, will have no congressional
> oversight.(18) In October, 2005, Bush created by executive order the
> National Clandestine Service, a new sticky arm of the CIA empowered to carry
> out covert operations and dirty tricks within the United States.(19) How
> many Gestapo units does a Fuhrer need?
>
> Meantime, we saw the true fascist face of Chertoff's Homeland Security
> megalith last year when he called together some 50 large corporations,
> including Microsoft, Oracle and Verizon, to enlist their help in watching
> and tracking the activities of Americans. He told them that Homeland
> Security was considering hiring a non-profit group to gather information on
> citizens and send their names for scrutiny to Homeland Security.(20)
>
> This is the classic fascist formula-corporations invited by Homeland
> Security to enrich themselves by keeping 300 million Americans under
> surveillance as suspicious characters. The Department is now collecting a
> gargantuan amount of information on every citizen-from every imaginable
> source- with its new "dataveillance" system called "Analysis, Dissemination,
> Visualization, Insight and Semantic Enhancement (ADVISE)." By sifting
> through mountains of computerized information, Chertoff's Gestapo may now
> identify our "critical patterns of behavior" in order to assess our "motives
> and intentions."(21)
>
> Homeland Security is also grooming law enforcement agencies across the
> nation to keep a suspicious eye on everyone. A 2004 Homeland Security
> memo(22) sent to police departments and sheriffs' offices all over the
> nation instructed law enforcement personnel to watch the masses for body
> language since a scratch here, a twitch there could give away a would-be
> terrorist attempting to blend into everyday American life while planning an
> attack. The memo warned of anyone who shows arrogance or expresses "dislike
> of attitudes and decisions of the U.S. government," implying that dissent is
> synonymous with terrorism. It advised that agents should consider as
> suspect an emotionless face or "a pale face from the recent shaving of a
> beard." It even warned that a terrorist might find waiting in a grocery
> store line intolerable. So we learn that to prevent suspicion, good Homeland
> citizens must refrain from twitching or scratching in public and maintain a
> happy face at the grocery store.
>
> The Washington Post noted that each of the U.S. military branches is also
> spying domestically on American citizens. This has been confirmed by Senator
> Ron Wyden (D-OR), a member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
> who was outraged when he told The Washington Post last November, "We are
> deputizing the military to spy on law-abiding Americans in America."(23)
>
> One tentacle of this domestic military spy apparatus is the Pentagon's
> Counterintelligence Field Activity (CIFA), a conglomeration of powerful
> directorates which collect and analyze names of persons considered a threat
> to the infrastructure of the fascist state.(24)
>
> Professor of politics Christopher Pyle explains that the Joint Terrorism
> Task Forces (JTTF) unite local military analysts with law enforcement agents
> as part of "one big club effectively destroying the Fourth Amendment against
> unlimited search and seizure."(25) Commentator Steve Weissman confirms that
> the JTTF, FBI and local cops are quietly building their own ad-hoc secret
> police.(26)
>
> The Pentagon-with its huge network of intelligence agencies-is reportedly
> engaged in a power struggle with Congress and the new DNI. Defense Secretary
> Rumsfeld is infamous for trying to make his own foreign policy.(27) He has
> created a new intelligence apparatus of his very own, the Strategic Support
> Branch (SSB). According to The New York Times, Rumsfeld's SSB networks, now
> deployed in nations across the globe, are immune from both congressional
> oversight and media examination.(28)
>
> Special operations teams now roam the planet to perpetrate Rumsfeld's
> personal black ops missions with no records kept and no questions asked.(29)
> Some of these operations are headed up by Lt. General William Boykin(30) who
> calls the U.S. Army the "House of God"-war, militarism and coercive
> surveillance being a sort of fascist religion, you see.
>
> The Pentagon also controls the National Security Agency which was authorized
> by Bush, in violation of the law, to conduct illegal and warrantless
> wire-tapping of American citizens before 9/11. About the minute he seized
> the White House, Bush directed NSA to launch a frenetic illegal domestic spy
> program, depriving Americans of their Fourth Amendment protection from
> unjustified government intrusion.(31) That was long before he could use the
> excuse of terrorism. To his credit, Senator Russ Feingold said he felt shame
> during the 2006 State of the Union speech when his fellow legislators wildly
> applauded as Bush defended this illegal surveillance. "Since when do we
> start to stand up and cheer for breaking the law?" Feingold asked.(32)
>
> The New York Times reported that after 9/11, NSA went hysterical, sending
> the names, addresses and emails of thousands Americans to the FBI for
> investigation.(33) In Idaho (and throughout the nation), law abiding Muslims
> were harassed and questioned incessantly by the FBI. Finally the ACLU held a
> seminar to teach these people how to defend themselves during endless
> interrogations.(34)The FBI was overwhelmed with NSA demands-yet we now know
> that the FBI located no terrorist cells inside the U.S.(35) and managed
> mainly to terrify innocent citizens and invade their privacy.(36)
>
> Additional police state spawn known as the "Project Bioshield Act of 2004,"
> authorizes the secretaries of the DHS and the Department of Health and Human
> Services (DHHS) to take virtual control of the bodies of all American
> citizens during a national emergency. Health officials are empowered to
> compel everyone to receive state-mandated medications or vaccinations and to
> comply with quarantine orders.(37) With lavish Project Bioshield funding,
> state and local agencies have been drilling for the day when citizens are
> commanded to line up for the bio-terrorism counter measures being brewed for
> them by large pharmaceutical companies under lucrative federal contracts.
>
> Absolute liability protection for those companies was inserted into The
> Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act passed in December, 2005.
> According to outraged congressional witnesses, Senate Majority Leader Bill
> Frist and House speaker Dennis Hastert used devious chicanery to sneak this
> provision into the language without approval of the House-Senate conference
> committee responsible for the final draft.(38) Now if citizens are sickened
> or killed by Homeland's compulsory bio-warfare drugs and vaccines, they can
> neither sue the manufacturer nor seek compensation from the government.
>
> This safety net for the pharmas is vital because the new recombinant
> vaccines contain deadly squalene adjuvants like MF59, or other lipid-based
> additives such as MPL. These non-soluble lipids cause extreme inflammation
> as they gradually go rancid in the body. Test animals injected with
> lipid-based adjuvants always develop incurable auto-immune conditions
> symptomatic of multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic
> lupus.(39) Hundreds of military personnel injected with experimental lots of
> squalene-contaminated anthrax vaccines have also developed painful,
> incurable chronic illnesses.(40) When Homeland needle Nazis start forcibly
> whacking the population with the new lipid-laced vaccines, Americans will
> truly understand the meaning of "bioterrorism."
>
> Meantime, as Homeland fascism deeply ripens, reports of Gestapo-like
> surveillance and intrusions are coming from everywhere.
>
> · Doug Thompson, a longtime D.C. reporter with deep connections-whose
> website Capitol Hill Blue has kept readers apprised of the increasingly
> bizarre and erratic behavior of George W. Bush-recently discovered that the
> FBI has collected over 100 pages of trivial information on him since 9/11. A
> friend in the Justice Department actually showed him the data.(41)
>
> · Another award-winning news correspondent James Moore, who co-authored a
> book critical of Bush, went to the airport to catch his reserved flight and
> was told he is now on the Transportation Security Administration's no-fly
> list. He has never been given a reason why. If you anger the dictator in a
> police state, you have no rights. Moore has no recourse; no appeal.(42)
>
> · Homeland Security is now freely opening private mail.(43) Internet
> providers, universities and city governments across the nation are being
> forced to overhaul their internet computer networks to make it easier for
> law enforcement to monitor on-line communications.(44)
>
> · The Washington Post informs us that the FBI is still hand-delivering
> thousands of national security letters to banks, libraries and commercial
> enterprises across the nation demanding they turn over their records on
> their patrons, thus allowing inquisitors to secretly learn every intimate
> detail of our finances.(45)
>
> ·The absurdity of such snooping was recently revealed when a retired couple
> in Rhode Island was informed by J.C. Penney Platinum MasterCard that because
> they paid off their credit card debt with a check for $6,522, Homeland
> Security had been notified. Credit to their account was delayed while DHS
> agents investigated the possible "terrorist" ramifications of such a large
> payment.(46)
>
> ·Anti-war protestors across the nation report that they are being watched
> and harassed by the National Security Agency and by certain National Guard
> and local police units working with federal agencies.(47)
>
> · The most outrageous report is that of a young high school student in North
> Carolina given an assignment to illustrate his rights under the Bill of
> Rights. He took a photo of a George Bush poster hanging on the wall next to
> a "thumbs down" sign. A Walmart employee freaked when he developed the photo
> and called the police, who then called the Secret Service. The Secret
> Service went ballistic. They grilled the principal and the civics teacher,
> confiscated the photo poster and threatened to indict the terrified
> student.(48) Now this kid truly understands the new Bill of no Rights in
> Fascist America.
>
> Especially galling is that all of this lunacy has blossomed since the
> so-called terrorist attack of 9/11. As millions of Americans now know-the
> official 9/11 fable violates the laws of natural science.
>
> · A jet liner can't disappear into a hole less than half its size without
> leaving wreckage (Pentagon).
>
> · Hijackers can't be killed in plane crashes and later be found alive and
> living lawfully in various locations throughout the world.
>
> · Smoldering fires too cool to bend, let alone melt steel girders can't
> collapse two skyscrapers simultaneously at the speed of gravity (Twin
> Towers).
>
> Brigham Young University physics professor Steven Jones has demonstrated
> mathematically that pre-positioned explosives, detonated in precise
> sequence, were necessary to bring the Trade Center buildings down.(49)
> Former German Minister Andreas von Buelow has explained to the entire world
> why the complex 9/11 attack was impossible without U.S. government and
> corporate backing.(50) Russian General Leonid Ivashov said recently that the
> 9/11 attack was faked by government and corporate officials who have
> invented the war on terror as a tool for global political and economic
> manipulation.(51)
>
> Hundreds of 9/11 families know this and in May 2002, they filed suit against
> the feds for the sacrificial death of their loved ones.(52) Their attorney,
> Stanley Hilton, has stated that he went to school years ago with Paul
> Wolfowitz and other Bush advisors who even then were planning a fake Pearl
> Harbor-like attack to grease the skids for a presidential dictatorship.(53)
> Because these sociopaths got away with 9/11, the door remains wide open for
> them to unleash future fake attacks to leap frog their fascist plans
> forward.
>
> The most corrupt Congress in history has collaborated with 9/11 perpetrators
> in a shameful cover-up of this horrible genocide project. Perhaps they
> tolerate treason because they are afraid to end up like the late Senator
> Paul Wellstone, who died in a suspicious plane crash after leading
> opposition to the Bush gang's war in Iraq.(54) Or they are afraid of getting
> an anthrax message as did the staffs of Tom Daschle and Pat Leahy after
> those two senators sassed the president back in 2001.(55) According to
> research of Dr. Len Horowitz and others, the anthrax strain mailed to
> enemies of the state originated in a CIA research program. It is apparent
> that even the anthrax scare was an inside job.(56) If America gets the flu,
> will it be from "the birds"-or from "the boys?"
>
> In October 2005, Bush announced that he was considering plans for federal
> military personnel to enforce quarantines in the event of a bird flu
> outbreak. Bush believes that he has the power to waive the 1878 Posse
> Comitatus Act, which prohibits federal military personnel from committing
> law enforcement within the United States. John Brinkerhoff, deputy director
> of FEMA, has developed martial law implementation plans to be enforced by
> U.S military personnel. Bush has reportedly signed executive orders giving
> himself sole authority to impose martial law and suspend habeas corpus with
> no checks and balances during a national emergency.(57) When implemented,
> the declaration of martial law will completely trump the sovereign powers of
> the several states.
>
> The authority to decide what constitutes a national emergency apparently
> rests solely with this impaired little man who needs antidepressants to
> control his moods and temper.(58) Our cherished Constitution now dangles by
> a thread from the unstable hand of a man professionally diagnosed as a
> paranoid megalomaniac.(59) The lives of our children now depend upon a man
> who has authorized the Pentagon's use of flesh-burning white phosphorus and
> napalm weapons against the people of Iraq in the name of bringing them
> "democracy."(60)
>
> The Pentagon has ordered U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM) at Peterson Air
> Force Base to prepare a series of CONPLANS, which are super secret
> strategies designed for rapid military takeover of the USA when the dictator
> gives the word.(61) These are the same planners who, under the command of
> Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld were, "unable" to get a single plane off
> the ground to intercept the attack they launched against their own
> headquarters, engendering the fascism we now suffer.(62)
>
> William Arkin, writing for The Washington Post, explains that the CONPLANS
> have arisen from a series of special authorities given to the Pentagon by
> the White House. The Pentagon's full scale exercise of CONPLAN 0400 (Granite
> Shadow) capabilities are slated to begin in April 2006.(63) A preview of
> such operations was seen late last year when fully armed Visible Intermodal
> Protection and Response (VIPER) teams launched exercises in U.S. mass
> transit facilities. As noted by writer Steve Watson, VIPER exercises
> involved "federally brainwashed goons stomping around with machine guns and
> vicious dogs, getting in everyone's face and randomly grabbing and searching
> people on the subway."(64) We must not forget that many U.S. troops were
> also trained in the late 1990's, during Operation Urban Warrior exercises,
> to execute domestic sweeps and round-up operations in our cities.
>
> General Tommy Franks assured us in 2003 that, after a major
> casualty-producing event anywhere in the Western world, the American people
> would "question our own constitution" and consent to a militarization of the
> United States for security.(65) The Pentagon is said to be a tad worried,
> however, that a military takeover at home might diminish its ability to
> kill and torture abroad.(66)
>
> Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR) has been awarded a $385
> million dollar contract by Homeland Security for construction of detention
> and processing facilities to be made ready in the event of a national
> emergency.(67) Brown and Root was part of the Skull and Bones nexus since
> its inception at the turn of last century.(68) Like Halliburton, KBR has
> grown fat on blood-money gleaned through decades of perpetual wars abroad,
> including the present conflagration in the Middle East. If the fascists
> batten down totalitarian power domestically, KBR and Halliburton will
> profit from the erection and maintenance of prison camps expected to dot
> the land if the fascists launch a military takeover.
>
> Homeland Security camps could be bulging at the seams overnight when the
> U.S. falls under "emergency" military rule. Would a criminal regime, which
> brazenly murdered over 3000 people on 9/ll, hesitate to send thousands
> of others to the gulag? The U.S. already has the highest per capita
> incarceration rate in the world. During martial law, when no one is free to
> move around at will, just about EVERYONE is under a form of "house" arrest.
> Americans got a taste of this grim future when, during the 2004 Republican
> National Convention protests, 1,806 demonstrators were rounded up,
> imprisoned without charges and kept in filthy conditions for 24 hours or
> more.(69)
>
> The grand finale of American fascism is yet to come. No totalitarian ruling
> structure would be complete without an oppressive identification system that
> allows the dictator's henchmen to access birth-to-death information on every
> citizen listed in a national database. It's becoming obvious that no one is
> intended to escape the dictator's dynamic plans to force upon us national ID
> cards and, eventually, under-the-skin identification implants with a
> satellite tracking system able to keep each of us under round-the-clock
> surveillance.
>
> The CIA admits that for years it has supported the rise of numerous U.S.
> technology companies for the development of hardware and software useful for
> surveillance and tracking of the masses.(70) Oracle Corporation, the world's
> largest database software maker, is one of these CIA receptacles.(71) As a
> voice for spooks everywhere, Oracle's billionaire chairman Larry Ellison has
> long demanded that Americans be encumbered with digital identification
> cards, complete with biometric markers such hand prints and iris scans.(72)
> Immediately after 9/11, Ellison presented to federal officials his proposal
> to create a national ID system with Oracle's expertise and technology. This
> system will provide ruling fascists with utmost efficiency at sucking
> detailed personal information on every citizen into what Ellison calls a
> "single comprehensive national security file."(73)
>
> The U.S. Intelligence Reform Bill of 2004 made a portion of Ellison's
> proposal into law. It requires that each new U.S. citizen born be issued a
> Social Security number to be included on his birth certificate along with
> his DNA biomarkers. All of this information will be stored in the national
> data base and no child will enroll in public school or receive any
> entitlement benefit without first presenting his Homeland Security birth
> certificate.(74)
>
> The Real ID Act passed by Congress in December 2005 completely solidified
> Ellison's ID plan. This new law establishes a massive, centrally-coordinated
> federal ID database. It forces all 50 states to spend millions of dollars to
> update their equipment so that by 2008, all holders of U.S. drivers licenses
> and state licensed ID cards will have their biometric data and other
> personal information fed directly into the national data base. Congressman
> Paul says the new ID cards could eventually contain radio frequency
> identification tracking technology, allowing the governments of U.S., Canada
> and Mexico to quickly locate any card-bearing American.(75)
>
> We are told that banks and credit card companies applaud a national ID
> system.(76) Instead of using bank credit and debit cards, people may
> eventually make purchases by showing their biometric Homeland ID cards.
> These financial transactions will then end up in the federal database,
> permitting fascists to assess our motives and intentions by monitoring all
> cashless sales and purchases.
>
> One day soon, officials at all levels will be able to feed a citizen ID
> number into a wireless handheld or laptop device that connects to the
> national database. They may then instantly access that person's financial
> transactions, credit reports, medical and vaccination records, school
> records, driving records, political and religious affiliations and anything
> else that might have been inserted into his file by Homeland spies. If this
> were 2008, the boy who created the thumbs down poster would likely have his
> politically incorrect behavior duly recorded in the national data base under
> his ID number. And conversely, while Americans are being set up to surrender
> every shard of personal privacy, their fascist government is withholding
> from them more information than ever and continually expanding ways of
> shrouding data, according to a coalition of watchdog groups.(77)
>
> National ID cards are only the beginning. America's fascist police state is
> demonstrably anxious to ensure that each citizen have his identification
> number permanently attached to his body. For many years, U.S. intelligence
> agencies have been working with private corporations and covens of
> scientists from Princeton University and other enclaves to develop subdermal
> radio frequency devices that can be injected under the skin of humans for
> identification purposes. Syringe implantable ID transponders were readied
> years ago, as illustrated by the prototype fully developed in 1995 by
> CIA-connected Hughes Aircraft Company.(78)
>
> The corporate gargoyle chosen by the fascists to market ID implant devices
> for our new security state is Applied Digital Solutions (ADS). With
> corporate offices in Florida, ADS and its web of subsidiaries are now
> unleashing upon the world a vast variety of injectable ID chips, plus the
> sensors and scanners needed to read them.(79)
>
> A leading ADS backer is IBM, which promotes a global identity system.(80)
> It's a matter of public record that IBM's New York Office provided the
> German Nazi's with technology and equipment that allowed Hitler to number
> and track concentration camp prisoners as well as others caught in his
> fascist web.(81) If he could he see his old partners now, Adolph might be
> green with envy, having been consigned to the barbaric practice of simply
> tattooing ID numbers on his slaves.
>
> While many European nations are also setting up electronic identity systems
> as a foundation for future ID chip implants, it is especially pertinent that
> ADS has been given a prestigious award for its sinister implant technology
> by the World Economic Forum (WEF).(82) WEF is a clique of wealthy corporate
> and political elitists who dictate global agendas. One of its most famous
> members is Bill Gates of Microsoft. Gates travels the world spending
> millions to promote injections for people of Third World nations. ID
> microchip implants are the MOTHER of all injections. Microsoft recently
> patented a way to use human skin as a power conduit for electronic
> devices.(83)
>
> In 2004, Tommy Thompson, at that time the Secretary of Health and Human
> Services under Homeland Security, invited ADS to a government showcase to
> promote the implantation of subdermal microchips as part of the U.S. health
> care system.(84) Requiring no medical control studies on the health effects
> of microchip implantation, the FDA, which also gave us silicone breast
> implants, aspartame and Vioxx, has approved the marketing of certain ADS
> chips.(85)
>
> Tommy Thompson has now joined the ADS board. He told Americans during an
> interview with CBS Market Watch that ID chips inserted into our bodies will
> be a giant step towards achieving an electronic medical record for all
> Americans.(86) While ADS is donating to medical facilities expensive
> scanners required to read its subdermal chips,(87) the Department of Health
> and Human Services is providing grants to medical providers who will help
> build electronic health records for Americans within a decade.(88)

(end of excerpt -- about half of part one)

[This message contained attachments]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 21
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:40:22 -0800
From: "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@nwinfo.net>
Subject: this is how one devout Zionist Jew answers Charlie Sheen

this is how one devout Zionist Jew answers Charlie Sheen

----- Original Message -----
From: "razl dazl" <razldazl@iinet.net.au>
To: <ctrl@yahoogroups.com>; <a-albionic@yahoogroups.com>;
<Conspiracy-Theory@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:46 PM
Subject: [Conspiracy-Theory] Cheating Charlie Sheen's Got the POX? --
Richards Takes HIV Test After Sheen Cheats

> Scary stuff! I wonder if Alex, god nut, whack-job Jones will be having
> his blood tested after his encounter with "honest-to-god, all I'm about
> is the truth," cheating Charlie!?
>
> He did numerously promise the lovely wife Denise that he wasn't a lying,
> cheating sack of shit -again, and again, and ...!
>
> Yet, even after the evidence of cheating Charlie's continued and
> obsessive lying and cheating and adultery and hookers, gambling and
> such-like vice, and well, you know, all that stuff we sinners get up
> to, but sins; that sanctimonious, goofy god nuts like
> Alex-whack-job-Jones vociferously claim to "abhor," -and that such acts
> are the evil works of a possessed demoniac; jubilant Jones then drags
> out cheating Charlie, and props him up as an angel of light no less!
>
> --Ha!ha!ha!
>
> Now? I really don't know whether to throw up or laugh? aren't these god
> nuts just the most vile; in terms of their phoney drivel about
> "morality" and "ethics," hypocrites and cretins, you've ever come across.
>
> As always, when necessary, they have a warm spot in their bed for
> the devil; and we have these crazy goons for god splattering their
> fanatical zealotry all over these forums literally idolising cheating
> Charlie! who, if was not singing to their goofy god choir, would be
> instantly demonised to the veritable depths of their fictional hell!
>
> --Ha!ha!ha!
>
> Just way, way too funny! Some of you conspiracy addicts, are way more
> hilarious than watching the Comedy Channel!
>
> Aren't *these* goofy god nuts just *the* most vile and cretinous
> hypocrites you couldn't even imagine.
>
> Jut too rib-cracking funny! -and shyte, don't you feel sorry for Denise!
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Richards Takes HIV Test After Sheen Cheats
>
> By WENN| Thursday, February 09, 2006
>
> Denise Richards and Charlie Sheen
> Photo Gallery
>
> HOLLYWOOD - Actress Denise Richards reportedly rushed to a medical
> clinic for testing after finding out husband Charlie Sheen cheated on
> her during their marriage.
>
> A representative for the actress has confirmed to publication US Weekly
> that the actress was tested for sexually transmitted diseases at a
> Thousand Oaks, California, clinic on January 27.
>
> Richards was tested for HIV, and a string of other blood tests were
> conducted to detect "every disease known to man," according to a source.
>
> The 35-year-old star had been trying to reconcile with her estranged
> husband for the last 10 months. According to Us Weekly, she finally
> decided to end the relationship for good after the couple took a holiday
> in Barbados in December, and Sheen was caught kissing another woman on
> the beach.
>
> Both parties filed a request on Jan. 4 to have a private judge appointed
> to their divorce case. Sheen is seeking joint custody of their two
> children, Sam, 23 months, and Lola, eight months, while Richards is
> asking for sole custody.
>
> Article Copyright World Entertainment News Network All Rights Reserved.
>
> Razz
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 22
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:29:08 -0800
From: "Scott Peden" <scotpeden@cruzio.com>
Subject: Forgotten History - Strike Against War

Forgotten History - Tuesday, March 21, 2006
"Little known facts and overlooked history"

------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe/unsubscribe links at the BOTTOM of the page.
------------------------------------------------------------

I was trying to find something for the anniversary of
the war in Iraq and decided that Helen Keller's speech
illustrates some of the same problem we face today. Have
a read. Denis Mueller

Strike Against War

by Helen Keller

Speech at Carnegie Hall, New York City, January 5, 1916,
under the auspices of the Women's Peace Party and the
Labor Forum

To begin with, I have a word to say to my good friends, the
editors, and others who are moved to pity me. Some people
are grieved because they imagine I am in the hands of
unscrupulous persons who lead me astray and persuade me to
espouse unpopular causes and make me the mouthpiece of their
propaganda. Now, let it be understood once and for all that
I do not want their pity; I would not change places with
one of them. I know what I am talking about. My sources of
information are as good and reliable as anybody else's.

I have papers and magazines from England, France, Germany
and Austria that I can read myself. Not all the editors I
have met can do that. Quite a number of them have to take
their French and German second hand. No, I will not
disparage the editors. They are an overworked, misunderstood
class. Let them remember, though, that if I cannot see the
fire at the end of their cigarettes, neither can they thread
a needle in the dark. All I ask, gentlemen, is a fair field
and no favor. I have entered the fight against preparedness
and against the economic system under which we live. It is
to be a fight to the finish, and I ask no quarter.

The future of the world rests in the hands of America. The
future of America rests on the backs of 80,000,000 working
men and women and their children. We are facing a grave
crisis in our national life. The few who profit from the
labor of the masses want to organize the workers into an
army which will protect the interests of the capitalists.
You are urged to add to the heavy burdens you already bear
the burden of a larger army and many additional warships.
It is in your power to refuse to carry the artillery and
the dread-noughts and to shake off some of the burdens, too,
such as limousines, steam yachts and country estates. You
do not neet to make a great noise about it. With the silence
and dignity of creators you can end wars and the system of
selfishness and exploitation that causes wars. All you need
to do to bring about this stupendous revolution is to
straighten up and fold your arms.

We are not preparing to defend our country. Even if we were
as helpless as Congressman Gardner says we are, we have no
enemies foolhardy enough to attempt to invade the United
States. The talk about attack from Germany and Japan is
absurd. Germany has its hands full and will be busy with
its own affairs for some generations after the European war
is over.

------------------------------------------------------------
~*~*~*~*~ KOREA - THE FORGOTTEN WAR on video ~*~*~*~*~

For the millions of servicemen who served in Korea, it can
never be forgotten. It was one of the most hard-fought and
bloody wars of all time, over 2,000,000 lives were lost,
including over 33,000 Americans. Now comes this unprecedent-
ed video that is undoubtedly one of the best videos ever
produced on Korea. This is the most complete record of the
war ever made -- from the land, air and sea you will see it
all unfold before your very eyes. The battle footage is gut-
wrenching and the stories unforgettable. Revisit a little
known chapter in American History. To order for $19.98
(92 minutes) visit:
http://rd.gophercentral.com/al/a?aid=521&ent=26
<a href="http://rd.gophercentral.com/al/a?aid=521&ent=26">
Korea The Forgotten War</a>
------------------------------------------------------------

With full control of the Atlantic Ocean and the
Mediterranean Sea, the allies failed to land enough men to
defeat the Turks at Gallipoli; and then they failed again
to land an army at Salonica in time to check the Bulgarian
invasion of Serbia. The conquest of America by water is a
nightmare confined exclusively to ignorant persons and
members of the Navy League.

Yet, everywhere, we hear fear advanced as argument for
armament. It reminds me of a fable I read. A certain man
found a horseshoe. His neighbor began to weep and wail
because, as he justly pointed out, the man who found the
horseshoe might someday find a horse. Having found the
shoe, he might shoe him. The neighbor's child might some
day go so near the horse's hells as to be kicked, and die.
Undoubtedly the two families would quarrel and fight, and
several valuable lives would be lost through the finding
of the horseshoe. You know the last war we had we quite
accidentally picked up some islands in the Pacific Ocean
which may some day be the cause of a quarrel between our-
selves and Japan. I'd rather drop those islands right now
and forget about them than go to war to keep them. Wouldn't
you?

Congress is not preparing to defend the people of the United
States. It is planning to protect the capital of American
speculators and investors in Mexico, South America, China,
and the Philippine Islands. Incidentally this preparation
will benefit the manufacturers of munitions and war
machines.

------------------------------------------------------------
~*~*~ The Speeches of Abraham Lincoln ~*~*~

This is one of the most unique videos you will ever see.
Not only will you experience Lincoln's most famous speeches,
you will be treated to speeches that NEVER made it into
history books that will shock you. From the Gettysburg
Address to his controversial views on race, you will also
be treated to exclusive Civil War photographs. You will not
see this at your local video store. Just $19.98 To order or
for more info visit:
http://rd.gophercentral.com/al/a?aid=521&ent=92
<a href="http://rd.gophercentral.com/al/a?aid=521&ent=92">
Speeches of Abraham Lincoln on video</a>
------------------------------------------------------------

Until recently there were uses in the United States for
the money taken from the workers. But American labor is
exploited almost to the limit now, and our national
resources have all been appropriated. Still the profits
keep piling up new capital. Our flourishing industry in
implements of murder is filling the vaults of New York's
banks with gold. And a dollar that is not being used to
make a slave of some human being is not fulfilling its
purpose in the capitalistic scheme. That dollar must be
invested in South America, Mexico, China, or the
Philippines.

It was no accident that the Navy League came into
prominence the same time that the National City Bank of
New York established a branch in Buenos Aires. It is not
a mere coincidence that six business associates of J.P.
Morgan are officials of defense leagues. And chance did
not dictate that Mayor Mitchel should appoint to his
Committee of Safety a thousand men that represent a fifth
of the wealth of the United States. These men want their
foreign investments protected.

Every modern war has had its root in exploitation. The
Civil War was fought to decide whether to slaveholders of
the South or the capitalists of the North should exploit
the West. The Spanish-American War decided that the United
States should exploit Cuba and the Philippines. The South
African War decided that the British should exploit the
diamond mines. The Russo-Japanese War decided that Japan
should exploit Korea. The present war is to decide who
shall exploit the Balkans, Turkey, Persia, Egypt, India,
China, Africa. And we are whetting our sword to scare the
victors into sharing the spoils with us. Now, the workers
are not interested in the spoils; they will not get any of
them anyway.

------------------------------------------------------------
Questions...Comments..Email us at: mailto:dennis@gophercentral.com
<a href="mailto:dennis@gophercentral.com">Email Forgotten History</a>
------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHIVES: http://archives.gophercentral.com/newsletter_6.html
<a href="http://archives.gophercentral.com/newsletter_6.html">
Forgotten History Archives</a>

Here's the link to the Forgotten History Blog:
http://blog.gophercentral.com/history.html
<a href="http://blog.gophercentral.com/history.html">
Forgotten History Blog</a>

To SUBSCRIBE visit: http://www.gophercentral.com/sub/history.html
<a href="http://www.gophercentral.com/sub/history.html">Subscribe</a>

To UNSUBSCRIBE: http://news.gophercentral.com/s/?a=u&n=435&s=28328058
<a href="http://news.gophercentral.com/s/?a=u&n=435&s=28328058">
Unsubscribe</a>

You are subscribed as: scotpeden@cruzio.com

Change Your Email Address by Visiting:
<a href=" http://scripts.gophercentral.com/email_update/start.asp ">
Change your email address</a>

------------------------------------------------------------
Want some Fun and Amusements in your email box F-R-E-E?
Visit: http://www.gophercentral.com
<a href="http://www.gophercentral.com">More Fun and Amusements</a>
------------------------------------------------------------

END OF FORGOTTEN HISTORY
Copyright 2006 by PENN LLC. All rights reserved.
Go ahead and forward this, in its entirety, to others.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------