[political-researchp] Bloglines - Eraserheads

Bloglines user bill.giltner@gmail.com has sent this item to you.

Chris Floyd - Empire Burlesque - High Crimes and Low Comedy in the Bush Imperium Chris Floyd - Empire Burlesque - High Crimes and Low Comedy in the Bush Imperium.

Eraserheads By chris@chris-floyd.com Jonathan Schwarz at A Tiny Revolution points us to the ever-on-fire Dennis Perrin, who gives a brief masterclass on how the big-time media neatly erases American complicity in mass murder from the national consciousness: Airbrushing the Dead. Says Perrin: It takes a deft hand to not only erase an active sponsor of genocidal violence, but also hide some 200,000 butchered human beings. Yet Guido Guilliart of the Associated Press did so in a single sentence: "Indonesia invaded East Timor in 1975 and ruled the tiny half-island territory with an iron fist until 1999, when a U.N.-organized plebiscite resulted in an overwhelming vote for independence." The ol' "iron fist" line. Seemingly descriptive, but in this case, incredibly vague. An honest, accurate account would read: "Indonesia invaded East Timor on December 7, 1975, after receiving the green light from then-U.S. President Gerald Ford and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, who visited Jakarta on the eve of the Indonesian invasion. Indonesia ruled the tiny half-island territory through terror and mass murder, killing some 200,000 Timorese, nearly a third of East Timor's population, thanks to several billion in military and economic support from the United States. This state of siege lasted until 1999, when a U.N.-organized plebiscite resulted in an overwhelming vote for independence. The Clinton administration continued to finance the Indonesian military as it committed more atrocities in a last-ditch attempt to stem Timorese independence. As U.S. Ambassador to Jakarta, Stapleton Roy, told reporters at the time, 'Indonesia matters, East Timor does not.' International pressure and outrage in Congress finally forced President Clinton to halt military aid on September 10, 1999." Something tells me that if the Soviets or Saddam were financing these atrocities, especially over a 24 year period, their sponsorship would be mentioned. Indeed, we'd never hear the end of it. But knowing when to tell the whole story, if telling it at all, is one of the many tricks a journalist must learn in order to climb the mainstream ladder. An "iron rule," if you will. The Red State Son says a true word there. The story of the Ford-Kissinger greenlight for genocide was finally confirmed in June 2001, when the release of declassified documents from the period turned up the "smoking gun" message from the American statesmen to their partner in crime, Suharto. But Perrin's "iron rule" held firm; the story was promptly buried after a quick appearance in the Washington Post. More details below, from a piece I wrote in The St. Petersburg Times (Russia), on Dec. 18, 2001: "If it were done, when 'tis done, then 'twere well it were done quickly." Like everyone else in the world, we here at the Global Eye were shocked and horrified last week by the release of damning material that confirmed the complicity of terrorist leaders in the deaths of thousands of innocent people. We refer, of course, to the release of declassified documents showing that U.S. President Gerald Ford and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger gave their OK to Indonesia's invasion of East Timor in 1975 – an act of "state-sponsored terrorism" that killed more than 200,000 people. The documents were obtained through the Freedom of Information Act – in June, before George W. Bush gutted the law – but only reported last week by the Washington Post. Kissinger and Ford had long denied any prior knowledge of the murderous assault, even though they'd been feasting with the genocidal Indonesian tyrant Suharto the day before the troops went in. However, in a secret State Department cable, Ford and Kissinger actually told Suharto before the attack that "we understand the problem you have and the intentions you have" and "we will not press you on the issue." Kissinger, ever mindful of the media angle, added in another love note: "We understand your problem and the need to move quickly but I am only saying that it would be better if it were done after we returned." The murders were carried out with U.S. weaponry. Congress had restricted their use to defensive purposes only, but Kissinger blithely brushed this aside, assuring Suharto that America would "construe" the invasion as "self-defense rather than a foreign operation." Kinda like Hitler did with Poland. Naturally, this [2001] story was buried by the usual bull-roaring of Bush praise in the media. In fact, in the same issue of the Post in which it appeared, you might've been diverted from its revelations by a fascinating piece on the editorial page, a long disquisition on the new ordering of the world, penned by one of our most revered elder statesmen: Henry Kissinger. Postscript: On September 21, 1999, Sander Thoenes, a former colleague of mine at The Moscow Times, was murdered in East Timor, almost certainly by Indonesian military forces, while covering the last throes of Jakarta's fury before East Timor won its independence. .

SPONSORED LINKS

Politics	Traditions	American politics
Government

---

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

•  Visit your group "political-researchp" on the web.
   
•  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   political-researchp-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
   
•  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---

DailyOM: Embraceable You

This is the text version of DailyOM
To see it with graphics, click:
http://www.dailyom.com/articles/2006/3021.html

Today's DailyOM brought to you by: Whole Body Cleanse - Click here for a free brochure & coupon
http://www.dailyom.com/cgi-bin/display/sponsorlink.cgi?iid=43

May 2, 2006

Embraceable You
Comparing Yourself To Others

You are unique. There is no one else like you in the entire universe. In honor of your unique self, it is good to acknowledge and embrace the special qualities that make you the person that you are. One way to do this is to not compare yourself with other people.

It is human nature to want to see how we measure up in comparison to others - especially if we think that they are better than us or have more of something that we want. Yet the truth is that it is not a good use of time to compare ourselves with others because there is no one like us and this makes us incomparable. It is sometimes almost easier to look outside of ourselves and feel like we are deficient in comparison to other people rather than taking responsibility for our own progress in relation to the fulfillment of our life purpose. It actually takes more courage to be self-referential and look at ourselves to see whether we are measuring up to our standards or meeting our full potential. Each of us has very special gifts, and we are here for very specific reasons. We each have a life purpose to fulfill and with this come the lessons that we must learn and the circumstances that we must go through in order to evolve as spiritual beings. To compare our lives to other pe!
ople's lives when we have no idea of what they are here to learn or fulfill doesn't benefit anyone - especially you.

Instead, if we can accept ourselves, appreciate the special talents and qualities that we alone possess, and realize that each of us is going through certain kinds of experiences for a reason, we are less likely focus so much on what other people have or are doing. Realizing and valuing our uniqueness enables us to bring out the best in ourselves so we can get on with living rather than preoccupying ourselves with meaningless comparisons. Try to not compare yourself to others, and you will see how much you have and how special you are.

Click for your free DailyCD:
http://www.dailycd.com/cgi-bin/userinfo/settings.cgi?subscribe=1&from=dailyom

Share the OM: To email this to a friend, click:
http://www.dailyom.com/cgi-bin/email/emailfriend.cgi?articleid=3021

To discuss this article, click:
http://discuss.dailyom.com/cgi-bin/discuss/displaytopic.cgi?tid=692

Friend of OM:
Bloom Into a New You! Get rid of wintertime toxins with Whole Body Cleanse.*� This kit includes a unique fiber formula and works in harmony with your own natural detoxification process. It restores your body�s true balance both safely and naturally in just 14 days!*� Get a free informative brochure with a $3 coupon at: www.wbcleanse.com.

For more information visit: http://www.dailyom.com/cgi-bin/display/linktofriend.cgi?fid=570

DailyOM Website: http://www.dailyom.com/
Subscribe: http://www.dailyom.com/cgi-bin/userinfo/settings.cgi?subscribe=1
Unsubscribe: http://www.dailyom.com/cgi-bin/userinfo/settings.cgi?unsubscribe=1
Email Settings: http://www.dailyom.com/cgi-bin/userinfo/settings.cgi?settings=1

Copyright 2004-06 DailyOM - All rights reserved
No portion of this email can be reprinted without express permission.

Movie Flight 93 is a TOTAL LIE!

[political-researchp] Bloglines - Judy Miller, Stephen Hatfill and mobile weapons labs

Bloglines user bill.giltner@gmail.com has sent this item to you.

CRIMES AND CORRUPTIONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER NEWS CRIMES AND CORRUPTIONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER NEWS - LiveJournal.com

Judy Miller, Stephen Hatfill and mobile weapons labs Tuesday, May 02, 2006 summary: in light of the recent media about the fraudulent claims about iraq's 'mobile weapons labs' - this post intends to shed light on the role of stephen hatfill - and i posit that there may be some nefarious intentions behind his involvement in the design of secret mobile weapons labs. ---------- On April 12, 2006, we learned :   On May 29, 2003, 50 days after the fall of Baghdad, President Bush proclaimed a fresh victory for his administration in Iraq: Two small trailers captured by U.S. and Kurdish troops had turned out to be long-sought mobile "biological laboratories." He declared, "We have found the weapons of mass destruction." The claim, repeated by top administration officials for months afterward, was hailed at the time as a vindication of the decision to go to war. But even as Bush spoke, U.S. intelligence officials possessed powerful evidence that it was not true."   This sent people scurrying back to the reporting at the time - much of it focussed on Judy Miller's reporting - see emptywheel, and ron, for example. The trailers were found in April 2003, and Judy was reporting by May 11 that the investigators "were persuaded that it was a mobile lab for biological production" and then on May 21: "that two mysterious trailers found in Iraq were mobile units to produce germs for weapons, but they have found neither biological agents nor evidence that the equipment was used to make such arms" On June 7:   " American and British intelligence analysts with direct access to the evidence are disputing claims that the mysterious trailers found in Iraq were for making deadly germs."   Here's the thing - on July 2, 2003, Judy had another scoop about mobile weapons labs - sharing a byline with William J. Broad & David Johnston (judy was mentioned last on the byline - is that odd?): Three years ago, the United States began a secret project to train Special Operations units to detect and disarm mobile germ factories of the sort that Iraq and some other countries were suspected of building, according to administration officials and experts in germ weaponry. The heart of the effort, these officials said, was a covert plan to construct a mobile germ plant, real in all its parts but never actually "plugged in" to make weapons. In the months before the war against Iraq, American commandos trained on this factory. [snip] The secret trainer is similar to the mobile units that the Bush administration has accused Iraq of building to produce biological weapons. Curiously, this article doesn't even mention the labs found in Iraq (also curious, the article repeatedly refers to 'trainers', not 'trailers' (!)) The odd thing is that Stephen Hatfill was in charge of building these secret labs. Given the NYT's history with Hatfill, and given this article is by Judy, it's difficult to know what to believe (I've always presumed that Hatfill was set-up by Ashcroft et al). (note: for current purposes, I'm only interested in Iraq, although the unsolved/univestigated 2001 anthrax attacks are of much interest) The following day, July 3, the WaPo followed up with their own article - and they discuss two separate issues - that Hatfill was secretly designing mobile weapons labs, and that there was much tension about his involvement (and peripherally that Hatfill was supposed to go to Iraq) At the risk of a poor attempt to emulate emptywheel, let's go back to Judy's article first: "Even after the F.B.I. began investigating Dr. Hatfill, the Pentagon continued to draw on his expertise. But tensions arose between the Justice Department and the Defense Department over their access to the mobile unit, the weapons experts said."   Note the headfake here. According to Judy, the tension is about access to the mobile weapons lab. And if I can pull back a bit again here and remind you what Larisa said about Feith, Perle and Rhode etc getting security clearances: So it’s astounding that despite the FBI's concerns, despite the concerns of the security clearance staff (each agency has their own staff which does the security background checks), despite past activities, these guys still were able to get their clearances reinstated under this administration. There's only one person who can override all of these various agencies - Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld! No one else would have the authority to override the FBI and the security staff concerns, so he must have had interesting reasons for issuing the clearances. OK - now back to WaPo and why Hatfill's involvement in the project was of serious concern: Hatfill's involvement with the Pentagon as the anthrax investigation intensified created tension between the FBI and the Defense Department, sources close to the investigation said. [snip] To facilitate Hatfill's involvement in the training program, the DIA had to appeal to its training contractor, Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC), to allow the bioweapons expert, who had been stripped of his security clearance, to participate, Black said. A week before the session began, the SAIC had fired Hatfill amid mounting concern over the FBI's scrutiny of him. But after the DIA's request, the SAIC agreed to allow Hatfill to volunteer in the training program, a Hatfill associate said. The DIA was so pleased by Hatfill's performance in the specialized training that division leader Esteban Rodriguez wrote a letter of commendation on his behalf to managers at the SAIC. In the letter, dated May 1, 2002, Rodriguez said that Hatfill "consistently displayed unsurpassed technical expertise, unique resourcefulness, total dedication and consummate professionalism. I wish to express my most sincere gratitude to this ultimate biological weapons expert." Hatfill also secured a letter praising his work for the State Department's Diplomatic Security Service. That letter referred to a "counter-measures program" Hatfill developed for State Department personnel who might encounter biological weapons threats. In another effort with the State Department, Hatfill sat in on one meeting about embassy security in the spring of 2002 but was not sent to Afghanistan on an official mission, said a spokesman for the Diplomatic Security Service. Black said that "there is nothing to indicate that the FBI objected" to Hatfill's role in the secret training course... But other sources said the Pentagon's insistence on using Hatfill as an instructor even as the FBI intensified its investigation of him angered and puzzled some agents on the case.   Now - I'm not Laurie Mylroie (thank god) - but why do you desperately need the 'ultimate biological weapons expert' involved in this stuff? Presumably the ultimate expert would know how to make the stuff - but for the task at hand, all you'd need is some environmental monitoring and some ability to neutralize the situation. Ok - now looking at Hatfill's involvement in the designing of the labs (keep in mind that by just about every account (cf Hamel) nobody actually thought that Iraq had any WMD):   "Hatfill, who once conducted research at the Army labs at Fort Detrick, Md., played an intimate role in U.S. preparations for the hunt for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, designing special equipment and countermeasures that U.S. teams could use in hostile situations. In one top-secret project, he even helped design a replica of the mobile biological weapons production laboratories that the Pentagon believed troops might encounter in Iraq. [snip] A more sensitive part of his job was working with defense and intelligence agencies to design equipment and countermeasures that could be used in an encounter with weapons of mass destruction. One of Hatfill's most intriguing projects at the SAIC was his design of the mock mobile lab, which was assembled for training of the Delta Force, a commando unit of the U.S. Special Forces based at Fort Bragg. The nonfunctional lab was built on an 18-wheel trailer and fitted with a fermenter and other specialized equipment. Hatfill planned the equipment, designed the interior layout and stored construction materials in a warehouse before building began, said a source who has seen the vehicle. [snip] The trailer, known at the SAIC as the "can," was under construction in late 2001 at a shop in Frederick, where Hatfill once lived in an apartment near Fort Detrick. [snip] Col. Bill Darley, a spokesman for the U.S. Special Operations Command in Tampa, said that Hatfill also designed a fixed or "static" nonfunctional bioweapons lab for use in training Special Forces in an unspecified location in the western United States. Darley said he could not discuss details of how these labs have been used in training. The programs, he said, are at the heart of the "dark tactics, techniques and procedures" used to prepare troops for missions abroad.   it's all a bit curious huh? The narrative seems to be that they were trying to create a mock lab so that the 75th would recognize it if they stumbled across it in the Iraqi desert. Why do you need the most highly qualified expert in the world to design the thing? and why is it so uber-hush-hush? Let's use an analogy - imagine that there's a scientist who can make the best crystal meth on the planet. Now imagine the Feds employ him/her to help local cops all over the country to recognize a basement meth lab whenever they bust into some bobo-land home. It doesn't make any sense. Something else is going on. The expert has a set of skills - perhaps unique - to create the best 'shit' ever - but you don't need his/her refined skills to identify every generic attempt to create some home-made shit. You don't need an expert to create a 'mock' lab. I'll also note that according to wikipedia, Curveball's nonsense about mobile weapons labs started entering the official channels in January 2000 - Curveball being an official Chalabi plant - sanctioned by Rumsfeld & Feith et al, brought to you by Wayne Downing (INC) and Francis Brooke (Rendon/BKSH, then INC) and others. And I'll further note that the judge on the Hatfill case was none other than Judge Reggie Walton - he just happens to have Libby's case, and he keeps getting assigned to Sibel Edmonds' cases. In summary, I guess my question is this: is it possible that the egadministration was somehow planning to airlift Laurie Mylroie's wet-dream into Iraq in the shape of a perfectly-engineered anthrax-makin' mobile-weapons-lab? What became of it? Did Brewster Jennings somehow prevent its arrival? Were they running around trying to clean up the nefariousness? Why did Judy Miller break this story? What was she trying to pre-empt? so many questions... Comments

SPONSORED LINKS

Politics	Traditions	American politics
Government

---

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

•  Visit your group "political-researchp" on the web.
   
•  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   political-researchp-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
   
•  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---

[political-researchp] Bloglines - Mystery of 5.5 Ton Coke Flight Deepens: The CIA, 'Cocaine One' & Putting Planes in Suspense

Bloglines user bill.giltner@gmail.com has sent this item to you.

CRIMES AND CORRUPTIONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER NEWS CRIMES AND CORRUPTIONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER NEWS - LiveJournal.com

Mystery of 5.5 Ton Coke Flight Deepens: The CIA, 'Cocaine One' & Putting Planes in Suspense WORLD EXCLUSIVE May 2 2006--Venice,FL. by Daniel Hopsicker In the two weeks since an American DC9 airliner was busted by Mexican troops at a small airport in the Yucatan, carrying 5.5 tons of cocaine packed neatly into 128 identical black suitcases, (all somewhat hilariously marked 'private'), the search for the true owners of the plane has produced these startling new developments... The busted DC9, which we've dubbed "Cocaine One," had an identical twin. There was a second airliner painted with the same distinctive blue-and-white-with-gold-trim of official U.S. aircraft, the MadCowMorningNews can reveal exclusively, and under the control of the same company, or Company.  SkyWay Aircraft was the only tangible asset of SkyWay Communications Holding, basically nothing more than a meager excuse to run a penny stock fraud scam which successfully relieved investors of over $40 million dollars in only three years. During 2003 and 2004, both DC9's controlled by the firm (N-numbers N900SA & N120NE) boasted an official-looking Seal beside the door bearing the familiar image of an American eagle clutching olive branches and arrows in its talons, around which were emblazoned the words "SKYWAY AIRCRAFT, PROTECTION OF AMERICA'S SKIES." The Seal and paint job made the planes look like they belong to Homeland Security, specifically the TSA (Transportation Security Administration.) A cover story should at least provide a little,  you know...cover The tricked-out airliners were said to have been used to perform in-flight demonstrations of SKYWAYS AIRCRAFT and its corporate parent SKYWAY COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING CORP'S new technology. But that was not the point of the planes. SkyWay said it's patented technology promised to protect airplanes from terrorism, and provide high-speed Internet at 30,000 feet. To the shock and anger of investors who lost 30-40 million dollars, however, it did nothing of the kind. But even a cursory inspection of the company and its principals quickly reveals that SkyWays had nothing to demonstrate. No products. And no prospects. What they did have, though... was planes. Planes which looked like official U.S. aircraft. Imagine that. Vancouver stock scams make a sudden appearance in our tale SkyWay Aircraft wasn't in the business of in-flight entertainment or Homeland Security. They were in the business of putting out press releases. Were we being too harsh? Could the company’s management have just been over-enthusiastic and overly-optimistic? Not a chance... In fact, the company's principals ran almost the same penny fraud scam several years earlier with similarly gratifying (for them) results. At that time they were linked in the press with a Vancouver stock promoter who was kicked off the Vancouver Stock Exchange, Rene Hamouth, and a U.S. promoter described by Forbes magazine as a "persuasive scoundrel" found to have been guilty of "awarding himself millions in excessive compensation, siphoning off company funds to cover personal expenses and diverting company assets." The firm was called Satellite Access Systems,(SAS) which as best we can figure out ended up being worth about three one-thousands of a penny per share. Glenn and Brent Kovar, a father-and-son pair of scamsters and penny stock fraud specialists, "ran" (we used the word advisedly) SkyWay. But, as they say in TV-land: Here's the beauty part... Chairman Glenn Kovar liked to boast about his long-standing ties to the CIA. We took the seals off. Forget about the seals. Frederic Geffon from Royal Sons LLC, the Florida air charter company which the FAA said was the last registered American owner of the aircraft confiscated in Mexico, was happy to talk about the bankruptcy last year of Brent and Glenn Kovar. "Their company (Skyway Aircraft & Holding Co.) is a scam and he’s a scammer. I got sold a bill of goods about his stock. Everybody out here at the airport invested with him, and we all lost it all." In an exclusive interview, Geffon was quick to point out that as soon as the DC9 left the general aviation terminal at the Clearwater-St. Pete International Airport (where he maintains an office) on its way to Caracas and its ignominious rendezvous with destiny, it was no longer his concern. Moreover, he told us, the phony Homeland Security Seal had been removed before it left, a statement confirmed by photos of the plane taken in Mexico after its interdiction (see photo above.) 'N' numbers are like car registrations, only not as precise It was one of the Top Ten Drug Seizures in World History. But among the numerous mysteries surrounding the case is why the story of a mountain of cocaine headed straight downhill for the U.S. market had been received by U.S. officials and the major media with such stony silence. U.S. authorities made no statement about the identity of the organization involved in the massive drug move. Nor did they address a serious question freighted with obvious national security implications: What was an airliner impersonating an official Dept of Homeland Security aircraft owned by crooks boasting of American intelligence connections end up involved in drug smuggling? The question must be considered impolite: On whose behalf did all that coke take wing? Youth wants to know. Maybe "Cocaine One" was flown by remote control Even the identity of the co-pilot arrested with the plane (the pilot escaped  natch) remains something of a mystery. A theory was being floated by Venezuelan officials in Caracas this week that the airliner had switched crews somewhere after leaving Caracas but before being busted in Ciudad del Carmen in Mexico's state of Campeche.   Why has the owner of an airliner carrying 5.5 tons of cocaine remain unidentified?   Nobody’s saying. Not the FAA. And not the former owner of the plane, who refuses to divulge to whom it was sold. According to FAA registration information available online at the time the story broke, the DC-9 used by the smugglers on their flight from Caracas Venezuela had been registered to Royal Sons LLC, an aircraft broker in Clearwater owned by Frederic Geffon. But several days later the FAA announced that the DC9 in question had been  “delisted and exported to Venezuela,” retroactive to a date just two day after of its interdiction by the Mexican military. "The FAA been berry berry good to me" An email from an FAA official did little to clear up the confusion... “Our records show Douglas DC9-15, serial number 45775, formerly N900SA, was cancelled 04/13/2006, for export to Venezuela. The aircraft was last registered in the name of Royal Sons Inc, 15875 Fairchild Dr, Clearwater FL. The file will not be available to be sent out until it is updated in approximately 2 weeks.” We wondered: Had someone been caught with their hand in a cookie jar that the FAA was now clumsily trying to extricate? Was the FAA’s refusal to release ownership records for at least several more weeks indicate that the question of who owned "cocaine One" is a question,  like that of who had walked off with the half-trillion dollars that somehow “disappeared” during America’s Savings and Loan Scandal, fated to never  receive an answer? Out at the Clearwater-St. Pete International Airport, Royal Son’s owner Frederic Geffon could not agree more with the FAA’s statement, because it  exonerates Royals Sons LLC from any ownership responsibility for the plane as it was hauling 5.5 tons of cocaine across the Caribbean to the Yucatan from Caracas Venezuela. Like the song says: "It wasn't me" In an exclusive interview with the MadCowMorningNews, Geffon claimed he sold the DC9 weeks ago... “I had nothing at all to do with the plane by the time it was busted,” Geffon told us. “I sold it three weeks ago (in late March) to an aircraft broker, on behalf of someone in Venezuela.” “The airplane was out of my name,” he continued. “I sent a blank form to the title company. Another airplane broker was also involved. It was delisted on the same day as the incident." On other questions, however, Geffon proved less helpful. Asked the name of the Venezuelan buyer he sold the plane to, he responded, “I’m not at liberty to say. I’ve been asked not to say to whom the plane was sold.” Who asked him not to say? “I’ve been asked not to say who asked me not to say,” he said with a straight face. Place all our folders in "suspense" please We asked Geffon: Could he could tell us who was piloting the plane when it left Clearwater? “No, because I wasn’t looking out the window,” he replied. “I was focused on business.” Could all the confusion be deliberate? An aviation executive in Venice thought so... "When it comes to registering airplanes, it’s the Wild West out there," he explained. “An airplane is a mobile, big ticket item. Yet there are no airport police doing ramp checks, or checking N numbers at airports.” “The FAA system for registering airplanes is little-changed from when it was started back in the good ol boy days of the 1930’s. Each plane has a paper folder, for example, stuffed with all correspondence regarding airworthiness and ownership relating to that plane.” “Its an antiquated system which some feel is kept deliberately in place to encourage a certain ambiguity when a plane is interdicted. When a change of registration is mailed in, the FAA places a plane’s folder in what they call “suspense.” “That’s a tremendous inducement to anyone with a chance of having a plane nabbed to keep sales in progress. The CIA, for example, is very adept at keeping files on its planes “in suspense.” If the plane was mistaken for one belonging to the U.S. Government, our aviation source in Venice told us with a smirk, it would have definitely been an advantage if it was trafficking narcotics. Did somebody say… CIA? But wait. There's more... "One of us cannot be wrong" “Glenn Kovar told everybody he was with the CIA,” Frederic Geffon told us. “A lot of people at the airport believed him, and became investors in his scam.” Of course, questioning whether there could be a Central Intelligence Agency connection to 5.5 tons of cocaine is, to some, (Pope might be Catholic.and you know who you are) akin to asking out loud if the One of two things must be true: What we're looking at here is a pattern of systematic ambiguity meant to protect the privacy of the rich and famous. To keep their options open... A pattern which plays right into the hands of the unscrupulous, namely drug dealers, and/or, worse yet, terrorists. Or... we're fantasizing. And what the FAA is saying is true... is true, and 'Cocaine One' has already passed through several owners since it was owned by SkyWay Aircraft. If true, nothing about SkyWay is at all germane to a story about 128 suitcases filled with cocaine baking in the heat on a runway in the Yucatan. If true... you've wasted your time. You could have had a V8. Or been surfing for internet porn. Still here? Okay, we'll continue... But, fair warning: Enter at your own risk. Abandon all hope, all ye who enter here... Break up the Yankees, FEMA, & the FAA What first taught us to take the word of the FAA with at least a few pinches of salt had been the numerous occasions during the research for Welcome to TERRORLAND where we had learned of big-time corruption inside the FAA. The FAA had gone out of its way to protect terror flight school honcho Rudi Dekkers, for example. An aviation mechanic who worked for Dekkers said he'd been forced by law to report criminal acts which he witnessed Dekkers commit. "Dekkers did an import of an airplane," the mechanic explained. "We found dents on the front of a wing and replaced  sheet metal, and then we found ribs that were crushed, which renders an airplane un-airworthy. Yet Dekkers still sold the plane!" "And when I turned him in to the FAA, they didn’t do a damn thing." A second brief example should suffice. It also involved Rudi Dekkers. He had forged another aviation executive’s signature on a repair order to indicate required repair work on a helicopter had been completed. When that executive discovered it, he told us, he too was legally compelled to report it to the FAA. "I couldn’t believe it,” he said indignantly. "I called the FAA to report a violation and was warned to leave Dekkers alone. An FAA guy came out and sat me down and said: ‘I suggest you back out of this.'" Deconstructing the official story The official explanation so far appears to be that a shadowy and still-unnamed-but-obviously-very-unlucky Venezuelan company bought a DC9 airliner that used to use camouflage to appear to be a U.S. Government plane, and then got caught with 5 tons of cocaine. Those crazy Venezuelans! Muy stupido, non? On the off chance that things are not be what they seem in the explanation being offered to explain 5.5 tons of cocaine to the great unwashed masses who aren't on a need to know" basis, we decided to take a look at who had owned the plane before its epic flight... The two DC9’s were purchased several years ago by a still-unexplained partnership between Frederic Geffon’s Royal Sons LLC and SkyWay Aircraft, a  subsidiary (the only subsidiary) of SkyWay Communications Holdings Corp. Given the high level of intrigue surrounding the case, the revelation that we are no longer talking about the ownership of just one airliner tricked out to resemble a government plane but two... comes as something less than a shock. Why we believe Skyways Aircraft will be shown to have involvement in the story of the coke line to heaven is because they were the ones responsible for painting two DC9's to look like they belong to the US Dept of Homeland Security. It does not appear to have been an innocent act. Moreover, the airliners were parked at the general aviation terminal at the Clearwater St. Petersburg Airport, just a few hundred yards away from a major U.S. Coast Guard facility housed at the airport. Yet—despite America’s hyper-security conscious post-9.11 aviation environment—two airliners conspicuously painted to resemble government planes sitting beside a facility of a branch of the U.S. military apparently aroused no suspicion. How strange is that? We wanted to ask, about that, and other things too. Had they ever heard of elite deviance, or deep politics, or state-sponsored crime? Alas, although we remain hopeful, our calls to the Coast Guard Station at the Clearwater-St Petersburg Airport for comment have not yet been returned. Perhaps someone else might have better luck. http://www.madcowprod.com/05022006.html Comments

SPONSORED LINKS

Politics	Traditions	American politics
Government

---

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

•  Visit your group "political-researchp" on the web.
   
•  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   political-researchp-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
   
•  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---

[political-researchp] Bloglines - STEELE ON IRAQ

Bloglines user bill.giltner@gmail.com has sent this item to you, with the following personal message:

This is the sickness that lives amongst us.....

---

Chronicle of the Conspiracy Join us as we discover, document, expose and challenge the bad people, the bad institutions and the bad ideas that stand in the way of wealth creation -- and show you how to fight back!

STEELE ON IRAQ By Donald L. Luskin At last Shelby Steele's book White Guilt has been published. To kick it off, Steele has a terrific op-ed in the Wall Street Journal linking our military approach to Iraq to our historical shame in white supremacy: ...it is now unimaginable that we would use anything approaching the full measure of our military power (the nuclear option aside) in the wars we fight. And this seems only reasonable given the relative weakness of our Third World enemies in Vietnam and in the Middle East. But the fact is that we lost in Vietnam, and today, despite our vast power, we are only slogging along -- if admirably -- in Iraq against a hit-and-run insurgency that cannot stop us even as we seem unable to stop it. Yet no one -- including, very likely, the insurgents themselves -- believes that America lacks the raw power to defeat this insurgency if it wants to. So clearly it is America that determines the scale of this war. It is America, in fact, that fights so as to make a little room for an insurgency. Certainly since Vietnam, America has increasingly practiced a policy of minimalism and restraint in war. And now this unacknowledged policy, which always makes a space for the enemy, has us in another long and rather passionless war against a weak enemy... The collapse of white supremacy -- and the resulting white guilt -- introduced a new mechanism of power into the world: stigmatization with the evil of the Western past. And this stigmatization is power because it affects the terms of legitimacy for Western nations and for their actions in the world. In Iraq, America is fighting as much for the legitimacy of its war effort as for victory in war. In fact, legitimacy may be the more important goal. If a military victory makes us look like an imperialist nation bent on occupying and raping the resources of a poor brown nation, then victory would mean less because it would have no legitimacy. Europe would scorn. Conversely, if America suffered a military loss in Iraq but in so doing dispelled the imperialist stigma, the loss would be seen as a necessary sacrifice made to restore our nation's legitimacy. Europe's halls of internationalism would suddenly open to us. Because dissociation from the racist and imperialist stigma is so tied to legitimacy in this age of white guilt, America's act of going to war can have legitimacy only if it seems to be an act of social work -- something that uplifts and transforms the poor brown nation (thus dissociating us from the white exploitations of old). So our war effort in Iraq is shrouded in a new language of social work in which democracy is cast as an instrument of social transformation bringing new institutions, new relations between men and women, new ideas of individual autonomy, new and more open forms of education, new ways of overcoming poverty -- war as the Great Society. ...White guilt makes our Third World enemies into colored victims, people whose problems -- even the tyrannies they live under -- were created by the historical disruptions and injustices of the white West. We must "understand" and pity our enemy even as we fight him. And, though Islamic extremism is one of the most pernicious forms of evil opportunism that has ever existed, we have felt compelled to fight it with an almost managerial minimalism that shows us to be beyond the passions of war -- and thus well dissociated from the avariciousness of the white supremacist past.

SPONSORED LINKS

Politics	Traditions	American politics
Government

---

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

•  Visit your group "political-researchp" on the web.
   
•  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   political-researchp-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
   
•  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---

[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1263

There is 1 message in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. ! "Vermonters Deliver Bush Impeachment Resolutions" to "Congress"
From: "ranger116@webtv.net" ranger116@webtv.net

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 1
From: "ranger116@webtv.net" ranger116@webtv.net
Date: Tue May 2, 2006 0:39am(PDT)
Subject: ! "Vermonters Deliver Bush Impeachment Resolutions" to "Congress"

! "Vermonters Deliver Bush Impeachment Resolutions" to "Congress"

Address:http://www.vermontguardian.com/local/052006/ImpeachmentPetitions.shtml

``````````````````````````````````````````````````
Iran oil bourse starts next week
(aNukes Soon to Follow) - Persian Journal economy business Latest
Archaeology oil gas news & Iranian business newspaper gas

Address:http://www.iranian.ws/iran_news/publish/article_15158.shtml

````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Happy 3rd year Anniversary -
Iraq Cake !!

100_0572.jpg
Address:http://s31.photobucket.com/albums/c355/123LittleStar/100_0572.jpg

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````
See Loose Change 9-11 video #1 edition
Free here on line - Alex Jones Conspiracy - Google Video
Address:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2023320890224991194&q=loose+change

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Bush challenges hundreds of laws - The Boston Globe
Address:http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/04/30/bush_challenges_hundreds_of_laws/

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
USATODAY.com -
More states may hold DNA profiles of arrestees to form an anti-crime
data base.

( Idea ! - How about starting by getting DNA samples from all city,
county, state, federal employees and elected and appointed officials,
That would comprise a large percentage of the criminals ! Who would be
hard put to say No ? !)

Address:http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-04-30-dna-testing_x.htm

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[home - eitb24.com] HYDROCARBONS SECTOR: Spain expresses "deep concern" about Bolivian gas issue

The European Commission said it would also study the impact on Bolivia's economy and to foreign investors there.

Click here to view the original Webpage.

---

Sent using R|mail.

[home - eitb24.com] FACTBOX: Five Facts about Edvard Munch and his pictures

A Norwegian court found three men guilty on Tuesday of the theft of Edvard Munch's masterpieces "The Scream" and "Madonna" from an Oslo museum in 2004 and acquitted three others.

Click here to view the original Webpage.

---

Sent using R|mail.

[political-researchp] Bloglines - United 93: When the FBI meddles with time

Bloglines user bill.giltner@gmail.com has sent this item to you.

Mustaqim - Musings of a flying Imam I'm a German living in England, a Muslim and a pilot - in today's oppressive neo-fascist climate this means walking a tight rope. And it requires speaking out. I have done so through articles, pamphlets and books, many of which are available on my website Mustaqim Islamic Art and Literature. I am also a regular contributor to the Mathaba News Network. To facilitate responding to current affairs more speedily I have set up this blog and hope readers find it useful.

United 93: When the FBI meddles with time By Mustaqim When I wrote about the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) transcript presented at the al-Moussaoui trial being a hoax every attempt was made to discredit my post, and because the BBC in their report had messed up and described the opening passage where the alleged hijackers announced having a bomb on board as being in Arabic (something they later corrected on their news website) a punter by the blogger name of Lenbrazil who busily tries to salvage the lost credibility of the official 9/11 story on numerous sites, thought he could turn this confusion into proof positive that I hadn't done my homework. I have therefore decided to revisit the topic to show that the evidence has been doctored. Since all information relating to 9/11 flights has been classified and none of the actual ATC and CVR recordings have been released there is very little evidence to go by, but the US government cannot hide behind this fact since all they have to do to dispel any accusations is to release the material. At the moment, courtesy of Airdisaster.com, we have a recording of communications between Cleveland Air Traffic Control and Flight 93 plus  some other flights sharing the same frequency together with a transcript of the same recording courtesy of Joe Vialls, whose website unfortunately disappears when clicked, but which has been preserved by thememoryhole.org. And we have the cockpit voice recorder transcript submitted by the prosecution during the al-Moussaoui trial. I had made the point that what Air Traffic can record and what the onboard cockpit voice recorder picks up will not be the same. The CVR will only pick up ATC communications to the aircraft and those from other aircraft if they have been switched to loudspeaker. Air traffic control, and other aircraft sharing the frequency, will only hear what is said inside the cockpit when the PTT (push to talk) button on the control column is being pressed. If we look at the CVR transcript it appears that the hijackers confused the PTT switch with the intercom switch for making public announcements to passengers. This would explain why their announcement about a bomb on board is picked up by air traffic control. So let's assume this is what happened. There are only two occasions where what was said on the flight deck of United 93 is being heard on the ATC tape, and on both occasions the alleged hijackers would have had to press the PTT button whilst not doing so at other times. However, since we can hear ATC communications from Cleveland and from other aircraft also at other times, those must have been switched to loudspeaker throughout. This implies that everything which can be heard on the ATC recording must also be recorded on the CVR. If some phrases don't match exactly we could put this down to difficulties in transcribing a tape of poor sound quality, although if you listen to it you will find that everything is quite clear and audible. But how do you explain missing bits? The exchange between Cleveland and Executive Jet 956, for example, is a lot lengthier on the ATC recording than on the CVR, including some heading instructions to move the aircrafts apart. Did the CVR record selectively? Was it editing what it heard? The CVR transcript provided by the prosecution has a continuous time stamp, so we must assume that it is the complete recording. Therefore, there shouldn't be any missing bits. But it is the time stamp which lets the authors of the transcript down badly. Not only does the CVR recording stop 3 minutes before impact as pointed out by Philadelphia Daily, on this occasion it also manages to alter time altogether! There are two occasions where the hijackers talk about having a bomb on board and they appear on both transcripts. Both start with "this is the captain" indicating that they were meant to be announcements to the passengers. If you listen to the recording, a total 50 seconds pass between them. According to the CVR transcript, however, the first announcement was made at 09:31:57, the second at 09:39:11, thus making the gap between them 7:14 minutes. In other words, whilst 50 seconds passed on the ground, seven minutes and fourteen seconds passed in the air. It is true that AirDisaster.com added the following warning to the recording they made available: "Please note that this tape is not chronologically accurate; periods of dead air (silence) have been removed for brevity". It is impossible, however, to find anywhere in those 50 seconds of recorded ATC communications where gaps as long as six minutes could have been, given that this is a period of heightened excitement and activity. After the first bomb announcement air traffic ask for confirmation from flight 93, no doubt straight away, and then Executive 956 tells them that they heard something like there being a bomb on board. I am sure it didn't take them more than a few seconds to relate that information. This is followed by an exchange between Cleveland and Executive 956 which runs without interruption. Then there is a traffic warning to another aircraft, followed by the next bomb announcement. This is the time least likely to contain any periods of silence. Can you imagine an aircraft announcing a bomb on board and everybody going on a tea break? So there are two crucial discrepancies, the timing and the fact that the CVR recording only picks up a fraction of what can be heard having been said on the ATC tape. Now if these transcripts had been the result of somebody taking notes it would be understandable that they may have missed one or the other remark, but we are talking about recording machines which cannot suffer from selective memory. I say it again: There is only one way the US authorities can dispel the charge that they are doctoring the evidence or telling outright lies, and that is releasing the actual recordings. There is no valid reason why they should not, except – to judge by the sloppy transcript job – that they will end up with even more egg on their faces.

SPONSORED LINKS

Politics	Traditions	American politics
Government

---

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

•  Visit your group "political-researchp" on the web.
   
•  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   political-researchp-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
   
•  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---

[home - eitb24.com] THREE-DAY VISIT: Japan gives Ethiopian-based AU millions for humanitarian works

Japan said on Monday it would give the African Union (AU) almost $19 million for its peacekeeping and humanitarian work in Sudan's Darfur region.

Click here to view the original Webpage.

---

Sent using R|mail.

[home - eitb24.com] ERIKSSON VS. FERGUSON: Should Rooney be included in the English World Cup squad?

Rooney broke a bone in his right foot playing for Manchester United at Chelsea on Saturday, and is expected to out of action for at least six weeks. That coincides with the start of the World Cup in Germany on June 9.

Click here to view the original Webpage.

---

Sent using R|mail.

[home - eitb24.com] NOT IN 2005: H5N1 will eventually arrive in US

John Oxford, a professor of virology at Queen Mary's University of London, agreed that Africa is a major concern, but said attention should not be diverted from Asia.

Click here to view the original Webpage.

---

Sent using R|mail.

[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1262

There are 25 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. How stupid do you want to be? Oh, so Zionists had nothing to do with
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
2. Fw: Zionism and Judaism and 9-11
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
3. Re: who on the internet am I thankful for -- endorsing the worthy
From: "Scott Peden" scotpeden@cruzio.com
4. Justin Raimondo: The case against intervention (Dafur etc.)
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
5. What freedom of thought? -- The Political Taboos that Zionist J-ws
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
6. Re: Zionism and Judaism
From: "Richard Pierce" phobicflyonthewall@yahoo.com
7. My Fax to the Lawbreaker President
From: "Bugs" brawny@twlakes.net
8. AFL-CIO Now: May Day Edition
From: "Bugs" brawny@twlakes.net
9. Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? By Steven E. Jones-Brigha
From: "Neo Mulder" neomulder1@yahoo.com
10. Bolivia smartens up -- occupies natural gas fields, demands new con
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
11. Turn on Your Computer, er, Brain, er, Computer...
From: "janet phelan" jcphelan10@yahoo.com
12. Have the MayDay Demonstrators shown Anti-War Leanings? What have yo
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
13. Universal's Flight 93 'Hijacked' By Truth Seekers
From: "Linda G. Richard" dazey@briskweb.net
14. Safer than What???
From: "janet phelan" jcphelan10@yahoo.com
15. 9/11 Hoax
From: "Thomas Potter" mr_thomas_potter@yahoo.com
16. lIES
From: "Bugs" brawny@twlakes.net
17. Re: 9/11 Hoax
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
18. Christopher Bollyn: 9-11 Lawsuits Stymied -- victim families under
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
19. Re: Universal's Flight 93 'Hijacked' By Truth Seekers
From: "JP Liggett" JP@JPLiggett.com
20. Fw: Kaminski Terminating the perpetual Holocaust / Barbra-ren��
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
21. This is disturbing!
From: "Caomhain {Kevin} Lee Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
22. Re: This is disturbing!
From: "Edward Pickersgill" edward@mytown.ca
23. Re: This is disturbing!
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
24. Re: This is disturbing!
From: "Edward Pickersgill" edward@mytown.ca
25. Re: Latino protesters made a huge public relations mistake
From: "NoRedCoats@aol.com" NoRedCoats@aol.com

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 1
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 9:38am(PDT)
Subject: How stupid do you want to be? Oh, so Zionists had nothing to do with

From: "Richard Pierce" <phobicflyonthewall@yahoo.com>
Subject: [populist-talk] Don't fall for the deceptions

Brian McDermott wrote:
The Jesuits,
the Vatican,
the Black Pope...
Masterminds of 9-11? No! Don't fall for the deception! updated 30 April 2006

Daryl Bradford Smith has a special audio message to help you understand the Black Pope theories: Click your right mouse button and select download: Smith on the Black Pope, April 30, 2006 <http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith-Black-Pope.mp3> 1.5 mb

Greg Szymanski, Eric Jon Phelps, and many others, are promoting the theory that the Black Pope ordered the 9/11 attacks:
www.arcticbeacon.com/20-Apr-2006.html <http://www.arcticbeacon.com/20-Apr-2006.html> Another of Szymanski's articles:
www.arcticbeacon.com/16-Jan-2006.html <http://www.arcticbeacon.com/16-Jan-2006.html>

The Vatican is not the mastermind to the world's corruption!



The pilots of the planes who attacked the USS Liberty were Israelis, not Jesuits. Take a look yourself: USSLiberty.org <http://www.ussliberty.org/> or judicial-inc liberty <http://judicial-inc.biz/uss_liberty.htm>

The "dancing Arabs" on 9-11 turned out to be Israelis with Arab clothing, not Jesuits with Arab clothing.

The "art students" that were picked up after 9-11 were Israeli Jews, not Italian Catholics.

The landlord of the World Trade Center is Jewish, not Catholic, and so are most all of the people pushing the Black Pope nonsense and trying to cover up the demolition of the towers.

The television, newspapers, and magazines that are suppressing evidence of these crimes are Jewish, not Italian or Catholic.

There are lots of reasons to believe Zionists are the problem:
www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_ZionSummary.html <http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_ZionSummary.html>

"We are watching you"

The criminals are not getting away with these crimes because they are too sneaky to leave clues. Rather, they get away with them because most people turn their head. We can easily identify many of the criminals; we are watching you, and recording your names. Some obvious examples:
Eric Jon Phelps is one of many people who are trying to convince us that Pope and other Catholic Church officials are the source of all evil in the world.
His site is vaticanassassins.org <http://www.vaticanassassins.org/> Here is one document. <http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/vatican-ny.html>
Sherman Skolnick, of skolnicksreport.com <http://www.skolnicksreport.com> <http://www.skolnicksreport.com/> and cloakanddagger.de <]/">">http://www.cloakanddagger.de> <http://www.cloakanddagger.de> , also promotes the Black Pope nonsense.
Here is one of his Jesuit articles <http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar42.html> . And here is one about the Black Pope <http://www.skolnicksreport.com/bvop2.html> .
Greg Szymanski, who often promotes the theory that the Vatican is behind the world's problems. He also promotes Eric Jon Phelps. His site is arcticbeacon.com <http://www.arcticbeacon.com/index.html>
The Catholic Church is impotent The Catholic Church may have had significant influence in European life in 1200 AD, but it has never been so impotent. For a few examples:




There are fewer priests and nuns than ever before.

The Catholic schools have to bring in lay teachers because there are too few Jesuits.

The Church is suffering serious damage because they are being hit with one charge of pedophilia after the next.

Catholic Churches around the world are losing attendance.

None of the top church officials have the intelligence or technical skills to plan or execute the demolition of the WTC towers, nor do the Church officials have the necessary control over the media of Europe, Australia, or America to suppress news of the scam.

The City of London,
British Freemasonry,
the Knights Templars... are these the world's evil masters?
Barry Chamish blames the world's problem on "British Freemasonry". In one article he claims that Israel was created by these "British Jewish Masonic families". In another article he tells us about the "Nazi Jesuits": "The destruction of the Jews is a primary goal of the Jesuits."
Barry Chamish wants us to believe that the British Jewish Masonic families are also Nazis. And they created Israel because they really want to destroy Jews. Sure.
Here is his article about the "Nazi Jesuits". <http://www.barrychamish.com/article_archive/2003/jul_03.html#July%2012>

Do these Jesuits have so much control over the media of Europe, Australia, and America that they can suppress those of us who expose them? If not, they cannot be said to be in control.

The Black Pup



Daryl Smith has decided to admit that his dog brought the WTC towers down. This evil dog is a British Jewish Nazi Freemason whose ultimate goal is....
Recent photograph of the Black Pup as he formulates his dastardly plans for world conquest.

Please ladies and gentlemen,
Watch out for the deception!



"By way of deception, thou shalt do war <http://www.la.unm.edu/~ann/quotes.html> ."

There is only one explanation for 9-11 and our current wars. All of the evidence points to this being a Zionist power grab.

Only the Zionists have the organization, motivation, technical skills, and financial backing to risk and execute such a phenomenal crime.

And only the Zionists have enough control of the media to cover up such a phenomenal crime.

All of the people who fall for this tripe about Black Popes and Jesuits should be told to pull their head out of that dark place.

Any journalist, author, government official, or web site that promotes this Black Pope nonsense is bought and paid for. Nobody is stupid enough to believe accusations that have zero supporting evidence.

It is time everybody warned their friends,


"Watch out for Sherman Skolnick, Barry Chamish, and other Truth Tellers who promote unsupported, vague, and confusing accusations, such as this crap about the Black Pope. Look for serious analyses.

Some of what these liars say is true, but their lies will hurt more than their truth helps."

Follow the Money

Specifically, the flow of money into the banking families, and the billion dollar per year river of money from Europe and America into Israel.

Don't become one of their useful idiots. Take a look at who -- and which nation -- has been benefiting from the wars, suffering, and hate crimes.

It ain't difficult to figure out the real masterminds of this misery. We may not know many of their names, but we know they are the people who control our banking system, our media, our military, and Israel.

.

.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 2
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 9:51am(PDT)
Subject: Fw: Zionism and Judaism and 9-11

There is the Rabbi Weise view of Zionism and the Dov Zakheim vkind of
Zionism (which says that 9-11-type black-ops against goys for Israel's
security are OK) Antoky is a Zakheim Zionist or I'm Mother Theresa.

Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington

----- Original Message -----
From: "mann david" <dmann51@yahoo.com>
To: <911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Zionism and Judaism

Well put.

--- Jolly Roger <slicingthroats@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I hate to keep beating a dead horse, but I'm
> catching up on old e-mails and I became very curious
> about something after reading Mr. Antoky's
> description of Zionism, because it directly
> contradicts what Rabbi Weiss says about Jews
> returning to the homeland.
> According to the Rabbi, Jews are forbidden to
> migrate back to the homeland until led there by the
> messiah, and anything they do in order to bring
> about such a migration is rebellion against God, and
> I think that would include "rising up against those
> who would attempt to destroy you or prevent you from
> achieving your legitimate objective," because he
> also states that Jews are to live in peace and are
> not to rebel against any government that hosts them.
> You can download Rabbi Weiss' explanation of zionism
> at www.iamthewitness.com
> Maybe this is a mere difference of religious
> opinion, but the Neutrei Karta organization
> (nkusa.org) seems very adamant about it.
> Jolly Roger -- goy from Brooklyn
>
> also -- Angie shouldn't be banned. She's one of
> the original owners of this group, but she shouldn't
> be censoring discussion unless it's blatantly
> offensive, either. I don't think there's any reason
> that religion can't be discussed in an intelligent
> manner, and since there is an Israeli connection to
> 9-11, it's on topic, and should be discussed in the
> interest of educating the people who lead this
> movement because I believe they have some
> responsibility for preventing any backlash of
> anti-semitism that might be born out of knowledge
> that Israel was involved.
> When the average redneck discovers the knowledge
> of the "dancing Israelis," he's likely to jump to
> the ridiculous assumption that "the Jews did 9-11,"
> because no one I've seen that exposes the dancing
> Israelis, takes the time to differentiate between
> the state of Israel, and the Jewish people. It's
> just another aspect of the truth that we have to get
> straightened out, and since the Jewish people have
> suffered greatly due to zionist's ambitions in the
> past, we have to deal with this aspect of 9-11 truth
> intelligently, to prevent any misplaced anger. I
> would be very ashamed to be a part of this movement
> if it resulted in a wave of racist anti-semitism,
> and I think a little bit of knowledge can prevent
> that.
>
>
> Ray Antoky <rayantoky@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Regarding the flap over Eastman and Angie.
> First of all I happen to be Jewish born, raised in
> an observant
> family, and do attend services regularly and enjoy
> and practice
> Judaism.
>
> For many outsiders and non practicing Jews such as
> Mark Bilk, Judaism
> is some incomprehensible black hole. From the
> inside, one attempts to
> develop a relationship with the creator based on the
> words of the
> scriptures and the commentaries. While Jews have met
> with and earned
> great success throughout the ages they have also
> suffered greatly,
> due to non-adherence to the tenets of our creed, so
> the explanation
> is given.
> Religious Jews always yearn for the return to Zion
> which would be the
> reinstatement of a Jewish theocratic state
> charcterized with the
> rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem and the coming
> of the Messiah
> (Mashiach). It has not happened. Jews are still in
> exile, even those
> living in the land where this redemption should take
> place. True
> Zionism is merely yearning for this redemption to
> take place. Rising
> up against those who would attempt to destroy you or
> prevent you from
> achieving your legitimate objective is required. Non
> practicing Jews
> whose motivation is unenlightened cannot represent
> those who
> understand that salvation and reinstatement into a
> homeland of peace
> cannot happen unless the nation of Jews is deemed
> worthy. If certain
> Jews happen to come to a type of position of power
> and influence and
> use that power to wreak havoc in the world certainly
> does not entitle
> them to be called Zionists. Kissinger is a Jew. Is
> he a Zionist? Is
> Wolfowitz a Zionist because he is a neocon? Are the
> Jewish members of
> the CFR whose agenda is unsanitary considered
> Zionists because of
> their Jewish roots?
> Too much merging is going on.
> As we can see from the ugly events that always seem
> to come to pass
> in the world, mankind has a war with its evil
> inclination. True
> Judaism encourages the conquering of that
> inclination.
> Zionism is merely an intrinsic part of Judaism which
> cannot be
> separated. You cannot be a true Zionist without full
> acceptance of
> the Truth of all the commandments of the Torah and
> its commentaries.
> This requires study and doing the research just like
> Charlie
> Sheen 'did the research'on 9/11. Anyone else
> claiming to be a Zionist
> is an imposter and anyone separating Zionism from
> Judaism does not
> understand either term. True Zionism is intrinsic to
> Judaism, like it
> or not.
>
> Ray Antoky
> Bklyn
>
> PS:If Eastman is 'allowed back in' Angie certainly
> is 'worthy' of
> reinstatement.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> United state citizenship United state flag
> United state patent United state army United
> state grant United state government grant
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
> to:
> 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> "There comes a time when every man feels the urge to
> spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and start
> slitting throats." -- H.L. Mencken
>
> http://www.fightthenwo.org/
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 3
From: "Scott Peden" scotpeden@cruzio.com
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 9:57am(PDT)
Subject: Re: who on the internet am I thankful for -- endorsing the worthy

Good positive project guys. It is great to see some positive stuff rather
than just mentioning who isn�����t to be trusted in each persons personal
opinion.

-----Original Message-----
From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Jolly Roger
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 7:10 AM
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] who on the internet am I thankful for --
endorsing the worthy -- let's see your list

For being listed among the trustworthy by two respected members of this
movement that is riddled with spies, I am honored more than either of you
can know.
Thank you Mr. Hammond and Mr. Eastman.

Dick Eastman <olfriend@nwinfo.net> wrote:
Kevin,

All good ones.

And now I have a better idea of who/what you are. "Birds of a
feather..etc."

Dick

----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Hammond <mailto:sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com>
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com <mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] who on the internet am I thankful for --
endorsing the worthy -- let's see your list

Don Paul, Jim hoffman, Alex jones. globalresearch.ca conspiracyarchive.com
and many others that I dont have time to name at the moment. Oh yeah one
more and one of the MEN that have inspired me the MOST are none other than
My dear friend and BROTHER that I have not yet met in person, Mr. JOLLY
ROGER.

Dick Eastman < olfriend@nwinfo.net <mailto:olfriend@nwinfo.net> > wrote:

start a new group on 9-11 and the first discussants to show up talk about
"reptilians" and their victimhood of mind control and what they were told by
their controllers about Cheney's sex life" , if the list survives, you can
expect the "pod" people and the "no-planes" posters to show up next -- you
know the story
but wait a minute-- let's count our blessings -- I've got several
here are mine off the top of my head:

Positive side -- who do I trust most on the internet? These are the real
thing -- I bet the farm on these people coming through every time:

J. Austin and Jolly Roger, Richard Pierce, Peter Meyers, Henry Makow, Guy
Heron, Peter Wakefield Sault, Carol Valentine, Joost van Stennis, Michale
Chossudovsky, Wayne Blanchard, DuneButts, APFN Ken Vard_n, Alex Jones

Personal friend humanitarian objective good hearted guy who differs with me
on many many things: Mark S. Bilk.

Honorable mention: , Brad M, Longspaugh, Key Dewdney, David K Griffen,
Tom Ascher, Kaminski, E Steele, Vicky Davis, V Thorn, Lisa Guliani, Barry
Chamish, Yaacov Ben Shmuel,Tom Valentine, Christopher Bollyn, Jacques Hardy,
Peter Rogers

Mixed bag: Sean McBride, Jeff Rense, Skolnick, Rivero, Lori Price, Morgan
Reynolds, Larry Lawson
RIP Giants: Boudewijn Wegerif, Brian Quig, Harry Browne

Now, don't critique my list -- show us yours!!! Whom do you trust? WHo is
putting out what you think is on-target for these dark times.

Endorse the worthy.

Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.
p.s. My brain is old -- I have known many great internet discussants in
days gone by -- their names don't come to me -- I no longer see their
messages

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org
_____

Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman9/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/ev
t=39666/*http://messenger.yahoo.com/> for just 2����/min with Yahoo! Messenger
with Voice.

"There comes a time when every man feels the urge to spit on his hands,
hoist the black flag, and start slitting throats." -- H.L. Mencken

http://www.fightthenwo.org/
_____

Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman9/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/ev
t=39666/*http://messenger.yahoo.com/> for just 2����/min with Yahoo! Messenger
with Voice.
SPONSORED LINKS
United state army
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+army&w1=United+state+army&
w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+flag&w4=United+state+military&w5=U
nited+state+government+grant&w6=United+state+patent&c=6&s=161&.sig=LddruzNPw
Fws94aLsnCnEQ>
Trademark united state
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Trademark+united+state&w1=United+state+
army&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+flag&w4=United+state+military
&w5=United+state+government+grant&w6=United+state+patent&c=6&s=161&.sig=CR6B
AuMf83RtjgPV2sTL4%20>
United state flag
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+flag&w1=United+state+army&
w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+flag&w4=United+state+military&w5=U
nited+state+government+grant&w6=United+state+patent&c=6&s=161&.sig=GRcHlJsp-
Pm0FVM7UCgAQw>
United state military
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+military&w1=United+state+a
rmy&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+flag&w4=United+state+military&
w5=United+state+government+grant&w6=United+state+patent&c=6&s=161&.sig=FZEs1
p2rVfajewTICuqlVQ%20>
United state government grant
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+government+grant&w1=United
+state+army&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+flag&w4=United+state+m
ilitary&w5=United+state+government+grant&w6=United+state+patent&c=6&s=161&.s
ig=ctuJIM-Ir_C0NQ%20>
United state patent
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+patent&w1=United+state+arm
y&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+flag&w4=United+state+military&w5
=United+state+government+grant&w6=United+state+patent&c=6&s=161&.sig=YsXpDMi
XKexl0oMBvvmKKQ>

_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

* Visit your group " 911TruthAction
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .

_____

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 4
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 10:54am(PDT)
Subject: Justin Raimondo: The case against intervention (Dafur etc.)

"What About Darfur?"
The case against intervention

by Justin Raimondo

Whenever I speak on campus, I always get the "But what about Darfur?" question. This usually comes in tandem with the inevitable Holocaust question, which goes something like this: "Yes, I agree with your opposition to the Iraq war, and your anti-interventionist sentiments in general, but what about our moral responsibility to prevent another Holocaust?" This is usually accompanied by a paean to "the good war," i.e., World War II, and the assertion that "of course" we had to intervene (and not just because of Pearl Harbor).

I will spare the reader my detailed answer to enthusiasts of "the good war," except to say that if we hadn't intervened in World War II at precisely the moment Hitler turned on Stalin, the likelihood of the two totalitarian monsters destroying each other is a bit more than mere speculation. I will also note that the Holocaust, far from being prevented by World War II, was instead hastened and accelerated by the conflict.

American intervention in the European war had nothing to do with the Holocaust, did nothing to prevent it, and may have worsened it.

In any case, to get back to the case of Darfur: my questioner, I should point out, is usually not some warmongering neocon, but the most well-meaning of all lefties, who is savagely critical of the neoconservative agenda of "democratizing" the Middle East at gunpoint, but, when it comes to Darfur, all discernment, all the lessons of the past, are thrown out the window, and emotions take over. It is like an alcoholic, who, after a long abstinence, quaffs a bit of wine, or has half a beer: after just a little sip, all caution is abandoned, and they find him the next day, passed out in the street.

Darfur, where as many as 300,000 may have been killed, has become an international cause c����l����bre and rallying cry for the internationalist liberals, the kind who pride themselves on having a conscience and who constantly invoke the tragedy of Darfur as a potential model for "humanitarian intervention." They think that they are different from the neocons in kind because they advocate intervention for a "good" cause, because they are motivated by kindness, benevolence, and all those other liberal internationalist virtues that make them such so much better people than Richard Perle and Bill Kristol.

This shows that whatever foreign policy debate occurs in this country is not about the policy ����� almost no one questions the wisdom and absolute necessity of global interventionism �����

but about motivation: President Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, and Condi Rice care about oil, money, Israel, and self-glorification, not necessarily in that order. We care about helping poor blacks, stopping genocide, and dispensing American treasure to the underprivileged albeit deserving peoples of the Third World.

To get a little perspective on this, let's look at what the invaluable John Laughland, a writer and longtime observer of the War Party, has to say:

"The Darfur crisis is following a pattern which is so well-worn now that it has almost become routine. Saturation reporting from a crisis region; emergency calls for help broadcast on the electronic media (such as the one recently on the BBC Radio 4 flagship 'Today' programme);

televised pictures of refugees; lurid stories of 'mass rapes', which are surely designed to titillate as much to provoke outrage; reproachful evocations of the Rwandan genocide; demands that something must be done ('How can we stand idly by?', etc.); editorials in the Daily Telegraph calling for a return to the days of Rudyard Kipling's benevolent imperialism; and, finally, the announcement that plans are indeed being drawn up for an intervention."

Writing in 2004, Laughland averred that Western intervention is "inevitable," and it looks like he was right on the money. The Washington Post carried a story, prominently featured in the Sunday edition, about the "growing outcry" to "do something" about Sudan:

"Massive 'Stop Genocide' rallies are planned on the Mall and across the nation today to urge the Bush administration to take stronger action to end the violence in Sudan's Darfur region. Thousands of people are expected to converge on Washington, including 240 busloads of activists from 41 states, local and national politicians and such celebrity speakers as actor George Clooney, Holocaust survivor and author Elie Wiesel, and Olympic speed skater Joey Cheek."

While early reports of plans for the demonstration reported an expected turnout of 100,000-plus, the rally permit obtained by the "Save Darfur Coalition" estimated 10,000-15,000, and the actual numbers were far less. Reuters generously reported "several thousands," but, never mind that: the sparse numbers were magnified by the star power of the celebrity speakers. Piggybacking on titans of Hollywood and the world of sports like Clooney and Cheek, Democratic party bigwigs �����

including Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California ����� sought to extract political benefits from this supposedly spontaneous upsurge of interventionist sentiment.

That, only a few days before, Osama bin Laden had made Sudan the focus of another of his tirades against the West �����

warning the Muslim world that Darfur would be the next entry point for the "Crusader-Zionists" ����� was surely a coincidence, albeit an enormously convenient one for the motley collection of liberal do-gooders, Hollywood glamour-pusses, and Christian zealots who make up the "Save Darfur Coalition." President Bush was glad to endorse the rally: "For those of you who are going out to march for justice, you represent the best of our country," Bush said at a meeting with persons described as "Darfur advocates" in news reports.

Before we send tens of thousands more American troops into a very troubled region of the world, let us examine what these "Darfur advocates" are advocating. Both Tony Blair and retired U.S. general Wesley Clark have argued in favor of intervention, raising the "successful" war and occupation in Kosovo as a model. That was one war we didn't hear much about from the great mass of present-day "antiwar" protesters, who apparently thought that attacking a country that represented no threat to the U.S. and had never attacked us was okay, so long as it was done by a Democratic president. By going into Darfur under the rubric of "humanitarianism," the War Party can sell to anti-Bush liberals the idea of opening up another front in the Muslim world.

More- http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8922

, , ,

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 5
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 11:09am(PDT)
Subject: What freedom of thought? -- The Political Taboos that Zionist J-ws

From: John Churchilly
]
May 1, 2006

The Taboos that Ashkenazi have Imposed upon Americans.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/togethernet/message/21783

Prior to the 1960s there were taboos in america,
as in many other western countries, against
discussing a range of social/private issues such
as homosexuality, incest, male rape, etc, etc.
Since those days these taboos have virtually disappeared
and today nobody would think twice about discussing
such issues. The only taboos in america these days
concern jewish power. The same is also true in other
western countries suggesting that the same political
forces are at work throughout the western world. America's
jewish elite, jewish dominated universities, the jewish
domination of the american media, jewish think tanks,
and the jewish owned political system, have succeeded
in establishing taboos over anything to do with jews.
These taboos are promoted and used deliberately to
protect and enhance jewish power in america and the
western world. There is a taboo about jewish funding
of american political parties (just as in britain). There
is a taboo over the influence of the jol in america.
There is even a taboo about mentioning the existence
of the jol. There is a taboo about jewish ownership of
the american media. There is a taboo about the tribute
payments that america makes to its jewish masters in
the jos. There is a taboo about jewish power in any
country around the world. There is a taboo about russia's
jewish oligarchs' take over of the russian economic and
political systems in the 1990's. There are even taboos
against the use of the words 'jew' or 'jewish'.

Americans are not permitted to talk about Jews Such
is the domination of america's ruling jewish elite that it
has made the word 'jew' a taboo. It is quite common
for the jewish dominated media to refer to an individual
as being 'black' or 'hispanic' or 'gay' or lesbian' or to
indicate their age or to describe them as being tall or
short or good/bad looking, but the one exception is
that, as always, it is not possible to describe anyone
as a jew. It is not possible to describe jewish hollywood
actors as american jews. To indicate that a jewish
hollywood actor is an american jew is deemed to be
anti-semitic and racist. Americans not permitted to
talk about the Influence of the Jol. The jol celebrates
its achievements in manipulating the american political
system but it denounces anyone else who points this out.

Americans not permitted to mention the Jol The same
point is true as regards the use of the phrase 'the jewish
lobby' or 'the israeli lobby'. Despite the fact that the
media in the jos uses these phrases, the jol denounces
anyone else for using them as a racist and anti-semite.
"In fact, anyone who says that there is an Israel Lobby
runs the risk of being charged with anti-Semitism, even
though the Israeli media themselves refer to America's
"Jewish Lobby." In effect, the Lobby boasts of its own
power and then attacks anyone who calls attention to it."
(John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt 'The Israel
Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy' rwp_06_011_walt.pdf
March 2006 p.24); "By the way, American guests in
Israel, who know that at home it is forbidden to mention
the influence of the Jewish-Israeli lobby, are dumbfounded
to see that here the lobby does not hide its power in
Washington but openly boasts of it." (Uri Avnery 'Who's
the dog? Who's the tail?'
http://world.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/29562
April 22 2006); "Americans are gradually being
indoctrinated to believe Islamists are today's Nazis
and that there is no "Israeli lobby" in America."
(Mike Scheuer 'Does Israel Conduct Covert Action in
America?'
http://www.antiwar.com/scheuer/?articleid=8827
April 8, 2006). One commentator entitled an article
'There is no Israel 'Lobby'' (David Gergen
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ideas_opinions/v-pfriendly/story/402910p-341257c.html
March 26th, 2006). Once again, this jewish taboo
does not exist solely in america. It also infects britain,
"A senior US diplomat in London has ruffled feathers
in Britain's foreign policy establishment by publicly
implying that a reference to the "Jewish lobby" in
the United States is an anti-Semitic remark." The
incident happened yesterday at a Royal Institute of
International Affairs (RIIA) lecture on US foreign policy
given by David Johnson, who is the second in command
at the American embassy in London. During the
question-and-answer session he was asked: "Will the US
ever be willing to impose an equitable peace settlement
in the Middle East, or is it perhaps that the Jewish lobby
in America is too strong to make that feasible?" Mr Johnson
responded indignantly, saying: "I am highly resentful of
the last part of your remarks, just because of its ethnic
slur." And he went on: "During my time here I have become
increasingly troubled by the willingness of European
audiences to skirt up to the side of anti-Semitic language
as a political criticism." (Mary Dejevsky ''Jewish lobby'
is an anti-Semitic term, says US diplomat'
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=483856
January 23rd 2004). Americans not permitted to talk about Aipac
"The myth of "war for oil" is circulated by almost all the
major progressive Jewish intellectuals and parroted by their
Gentile followers, who are in word and deed prohibited from
mentioning the AIPAC word in any public meetings or
manifestos." (James Petras 'The Ascendancy of Finance
Capital: Record Profits and Rising Authoritarianism -
March 28, 2006). Americans cannot talk about the Jos's
Nuclear Weapons Such is the power of the global jewish
empire that it has prevented the american government from
formally recognizing the existence of the jos's nuclear
weapons, "The U.S. government has never acknowledged
that Israel possesses nuclear weapons, even though the
world knows otherwise, thanks to the whistleblower,
Mordechai Vanunu. (London Sunday Times, Oct. 5, 1986)."
(Mark Gaffney 'Will Iran Be Next?'
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article3288.htm
May 8th 2003). Jews in america have exploited this
situation to establish a taboo over discussing the issue of
jewish nuclear weapons. However, to repeat a point made
above: such a taboo would not be possible if it wasn't for jewish
neolefties and jewish peaceniks who reinforce the taboo by saying
nothing about the issue. American Politicians cannot criticize
the Jos Although reputed to be the most democratic, and the
most open, political system in the world, jewish taboos have
festered over the decades until they are now able to
prevent american politicians/commentators from criticizing
the jos. "University of Michigan Professor Juan Cole further
writes: Some readers have suggested that I have exaggerated
AIPAC's hold on the US Congress. But I have direct knowledge
of senators and congressmen being afraid to speak out on
Israeli issues because of AIPAC's reputation for targeting
representatives for un-election if they dare do so. And, it is
easy to check. Look in the Congressional record. Is there
ever/any/ speech given on the floor critical of Israeli policy,
given by a senator or representative who goes on to win the
next election? And look at the debates in every other
parliament in the world; there are such criticisms elsewhere.
The US Congress is being held hostage by a single-issue
lobbying organization that often puts Israeli interests above
US interests..."" (Quoted in Jeffrey Blankfort 'Damage
Control: Noam Chomsky and the Israel-Palestine Conflict
- April 2005); "Congress, they (M/W) point out, virtually
never criticizes Israel: It is an untouchable subject. And
this taboo has had enormous consequences, which are
themselves off limits for discussion. Above all, they seek
to end the taboo, enforced by knee-jerk accusations of
anti-Semitism, that has prevented a full and open discussion
of these issues." (Juan Cole 'Breaking the silence'
http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/fuj/salon5.htm
Apr. 18, 2006); "The Congress, the Executive branch, state
and local governments, and national and local media have
all come under the influence of the Jewish "lobby's" pro-Israel
agenda to the point that none or few dare to criticize Israel or
its US representatives." (James Petras 'The meaning of war:
A heterodox perspective'
http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=12606 January 2005);
"One must also ask why is it always possible to criticize a
US president on the floor of Congress but never an Israeli
prime minister?" (Jeffrey Blankfort's comments on Mitchell
Plitnick's 'Myth and Reality: Jewish Influence on US Middle
East Policy' May 24th 2005); "A key pillar of the Lobby's
effectiveness is its influence in the U.S. Congress, where
Israel is virtually immune from criticism. This is in itself a
remarkable situation, because Congress almost never shies
away from contentious issues. Whether the issue is abortion,
affirmative action, health care, or welfare, there is certain to
be a lively debate on Capitol Hill.

Where Israel is concerned, however, potential critics fall
silent and there is hardly any debate at all."
(John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt 'The Israel
Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy' rwp_06_011_walt.pdf
March 2006 p.17); "Although criticism of specific Israeli
policies is permissible in the United States, it is more or
less forbidden to express fundamental criticism of the
Zionist state, of America's basic policy of support for Israel,
or of the Jewish-Zionist grip on the US media or America's
political and academic life. (Remarkably, this is in contrast
to the situation in Israel itself, where Jews and even Arab
citizens of the Zionist state have much greater freedom than
Americans publicly to criticize Zionism and Israeli policies.)
Prominent persons who dare to violate this prohibition are
immediately castigated as "anti-Semitic" (that is, anti-Jewish),
and pay a heavy price in damage to their reputations or
careers. Politicians who publicly speak out against America's
support for Zionism risk almost certain political ruin."
(Abdullah Mohammad Sindi 'How the Jewish-Zionist Grip on
American Film and Television Promotes Bias Against Arabs
and Muslims' Institute for Historical Review
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n5p-2_Sindi.html c1999).

Americans cannot be allowed to discover the Jos's Racist
Treatment of Palestinians. There is a taboo over jewish racism
in the jos. "With their allegations of anti-Semitism, American-Jewish
elites seek, above all, to convince everybody that critics of Israel are
really anti-Semites in disguise. Reports on what it is like for
Palestinians to live under occupation, reports on their oppression
and their suffering must remain taboo - only Israel is entitled to
victim status. Thus reality is being inverted, in order to make sure
that Israel enjoys immunity."

(Felicia Langer 'Preface to the German edition of Beyond
Chutzpah' March 27 2006). Americans cannot criticize Jos
in the Jewish Media. .. "but anything more than the mildest
criticism of Israel is taboo in the mainstream media." (Michael
Lind 'The Israel Lobby' April 1, 2002). Americans cannot talk
about Jewish Political Power. There is also a jewish taboo
against discussing jewish political power. Ralph nader was one
of the few to break this taboo, "The subservience of our
congressional and White House puppets to Israeli military
policy has been consistent. They're almost all puppets. There
are two sets: Congressional puppets and White House puppets.
When the chief puppeteer (Sharon) comes to Washington, the
puppets prance." (Pat Buchanan 'Ralph Nader: Conservatively
Speaking' The American Conservative
http://www.amconmag.com/2004_06_21/cover.html June

21, 2004). Nader never repeated this statement or elaborated
upon it or sought to use it as the basis for policies to counter
such distortions of political power. Perhaps the reason
for this is that nobody came to his defence when the jol
accused him of anti-semitism. It has been dumped quietly
into the dustbin of history. Carbonomics is a global Carbon
audit of the Earth's Carbon spiral which can be used to determine
countries' Carbon status. It can also be used to formulate a
global Carbon budget to stabilize the Earth's climate. The Earth's
Carbon spiral is used to develop a geocentric philosophy and
politics - thus putting the Earth First!

http:www.geocities.com/carbonomics/index.html __________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 6
From: "Richard Pierce" phobicflyonthewall@yahoo.com
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 11:49am(PDT)
Subject: Re: Zionism and Judaism

I believe you are correct here. Jews are not supposed to have a homeland of their own until there is peace on earth, Christ comes and especially not by force. All 3 covenants are being broken by the zionists.

Jolly Roger <slicingthroats@yahoo.com> wrote: I hate to keep beating a dead horse, but I'm catching up on old e-mails and I became very curious about something after reading Mr. Antoky's description of Zionism, because it directly contradicts what Rabbi Weiss says about Jews returning to the homeland.
According to the Rabbi, Jews are forbidden to migrate back to the homeland until led there by the messiah, and anything they do in order to bring about such a migration is rebellion against God, and I think that would include "rising up against those who would attempt to destroy you or prevent you from achieving your legitimate objective," because he also states that Jews are to live in peace and are not to rebel against any government that hosts them. You can download Rabbi Weiss' explanation of zionism at www.iamthewitness.com
Maybe this is a mere difference of religious opinion, but the Neutrei Karta organization (nkusa.org) seems very adamant about it.
Jolly Roger -- goy from Brooklyn

also -- Angie shouldn't be banned. She's one of the original owners of this group, but she shouldn't be censoring discussion unless it's blatantly offensive, either. I don't think there's any reason that religion can't be discussed in an intelligent manner, and since there is an Israeli connection to 9-11, it's on topic, and should be discussed in the interest of educating the people who lead this movement because I believe they have some responsibility for preventing any backlash of anti-semitism that might be born out of knowledge that Israel was involved.
When the average redneck discovers the knowledge of the "dancing Israelis," he's likely to jump to the ridiculous assumption that "the Jews did 9-11," because no one I've seen that exposes the dancing Israelis, takes the time to differentiate between the state of Israel, and the Jewish people. It's just another aspect of the truth that we have to get straightened out, and since the Jewish people have suffered greatly due to zionist's ambitions in the past, we have to deal with this aspect of 9-11 truth intelligently, to prevent any misplaced anger. I would be very ashamed to be a part of this movement if it resulted in a wave of racist anti-semitism, and I think a little bit of knowledge can prevent that.


Ray Antoky <rayantoky@aol.com> wrote:

Regarding the flap over Eastman and Angie.
First of all I happen to be Jewish born, raised in an observant
family, and do attend services regularly and enjoy and practice
Judaism.

For many outsiders and non practicing Jews such as Mark Bilk, Judaism
is some incomprehensible black hole. From the inside, one attempts to
develop a relationship with the creator based on the words of the
scriptures and the commentaries. While Jews have met with and earned
great success throughout the ages they have also suffered greatly,
due to non-adherence to the tenets of our creed, so the explanation
is given.
Religious Jews always yearn for the return to Zion which would be the
reinstatement of a Jewish theocratic state charcterized with the
rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem and the coming of the Messiah
(Mashiach). It has not happened. Jews are still in exile, even those
living in the land where this redemption should take place. True
Zionism is merely yearning for this redemption to take place. Rising
up against those who would attempt to destroy you or prevent you from
achieving your legitimate objective is required. Non practicing Jews
whose motivation is unenlightened cannot represent those who
understand that salvation and reinstatement into a homeland of peace
cannot happen unless the nation of Jews is deemed worthy. If certain
Jews happen to come to a type of position of power and influence and
use that power to wreak havoc in the world certainly does not entitle
them to be called Zionists. Kissinger is a Jew. Is he a Zionist? Is
Wolfowitz a Zionist because he is a neocon? Are the Jewish members of
the CFR whose agenda is unsanitary considered Zionists because of
their Jewish roots?
Too much merging is going on.
As we can see from the ugly events that always seem to come to pass
in the world, mankind has a war with its evil inclination. True
Judaism encourages the conquering of that inclination.
Zionism is merely an intrinsic part of Judaism which cannot be
separated. You cannot be a true Zionist without full acceptance of
the Truth of all the commandments of the Torah and its commentaries.
This requires study and doing the research just like Charlie
Sheen 'did the research'on 9/11. Anyone else claiming to be a Zionist
is an imposter and anyone separating Zionism from Judaism does not
understand either term. True Zionism is intrinsic to Judaism, like it
or not.

Ray Antoky
Bklyn

PS:If Eastman is 'allowed back in' Angie certainly is 'worthy' of
reinstatement.

"There comes a time when every man feels the urge to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and start slitting throats." -- H.L. Mencken

http://www.fightthenwo.org/
---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1����/min.

SPONSORED LINKS
United state citizenship United state flag United state military United state army Trademark united state United state government grant

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 7
From: "Bugs" brawny@twlakes.net
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 0:42pm(PDT)
Subject: My Fax to the Lawbreaker President

From: xmjmac My Fax to the Lawbreaker President

To President Bush,
May 1, 2006

I first want to wish you a Happy Immigrants Labor Day where human beings
are being targeted in this country. They are after all the scape goats
to distract what is really wrong with this country and that is your
presidency. Who are we to label any of them as being illegal when one
reads that you can decide to break the law?

I was just reading an article that states: "President Bush has
quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than 750 laws enacted
since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside any
statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his interpretation of
the Constitution." I want to remind you that no one is above the
law and gets to break any law in this nation and that includes
presidents. We all saw what it did to the late President Nixon who had
at least the integrity to resign the office. Your sole interpretation
of the Constitution does not deem any action taken by you as being
legal. After all that Constitution is all of ours to uphold and a
sacred document in which patriot blood was spilled and continues to be
spilled upholding all the amendments contained within it.

I have taught my children that it is wrong to break any law, so if they
read of you breaking the law: What am I to tell them given the fact that
you have broken the law repeatedly: Do I tell them that it is okay to
use drugs, drink before the age of 21, and carry a loaded handgun to
school assault and possibly kill others? Do I tell them that it is okay
for them to break into people's homes and take what they want? What
a fine and upstanding president you turned out to be and I mean that
sarcastically. You are no child's moral compass and through these
illegal actions, you again have left many children behind.

Since you have chosen to break the law: Do we start freeing prisoners
from the prisons that now hold them? Do we stop prosecuting those who
have broken the law? How about the death row inmates? At one time you
were the governor of the state that held the record on executions. Do
we now set them free?

In closing, this country would fall into an anarchist state if anyone
were allowed to break the law. I sure hope that congress remedies this
when the Democrats take back control of both houses and where Senator
Byrd stated of any possible impeachment: "Congress retains all its
original powers under the Constitution.. You better read that again in
the Constitution" and where he reminded you of the Senate powers
which include, "serving as a court of impeachment." But, here is
my favorite message sent to you by Senator Byrd: "You better believe
it, Mr. President.The Senate can send you home. You better believe
that."

Mary MacElveen

Circulated around the Internet

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 8
From: "Bugs" brawny@twlakes.net
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 0:47pm(PDT)
Subject: AFL-CIO Now: May Day Edition

AFL-CIO Now, 5/1/06From: Working Families e-Activist Network
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 11:02 AM
Subject: AFL-CIO Now: May Day Edition

May 1, 2006

Here are some of the latest headlines from AFL-CIO Now, the daily news blog that's all about working people and unions. Be sure to check the blog every day for new stories.

Celebrating May Day
On the 120th anniversary of rallies for the eight-hour workday, immigrant workers continue the fight for their rights.
Read the full story....

Lack of Oxygen and Communication Killed Sago Miners-Families 'Deserved Better'
Mine Workers president says withdrawal of federal rules, close industry ties to safety agency put miners in danger.
Read the full story....

Job Death Rate Up for the First Time in 10 Years
Workplace fatality rate increases in 2004; Bush safety policies cozy with employers.
Read the full story....

Workers Memorial Day 2006
Jobs claim more than 5,700 workers' lives; got to keep fighting for the living.
Read the full story....

Port Security ID Checks Need to Protect Workers, Too
System must balance rights with security concerns.
Read the full story....

Thousands Tell Wal-Mart: Health Care Claims a Sham
New and improved health care? No, just more Wal-Mart spin.
Read the full story....

Rally Shines Light on Pfizer CEO's Greed
Stock tanks as Pfizer fizzles, but CEO's pay sizzles.
Read the full story....

Three More Backers Needed for Bill to Aid Union Formation
House nears co-sponsor majority for card-check legislation.
Read the full story....

Workers Earning $20,000-$40,000 Likely Don't Have the Health Care They Need
Bush says "solution" is for workers to pay more, corporations less.
Read the full story....

On Equal Pay Day, Women Seeing Red
Women in the red with paychecks-still behind by 23 percent.
Read the full story....

Affordable Health Care: Wisconsin Getting Close
Wisconsin plan covers all and shares costs between workers and employers.
Read the full story....

Black Evacuees Disenfranchised in New Orleans Vote
First their homes, now their right to vote lost.
Read the full story....

Former UAW Member in Tough Primary Fight in Ohio
Republican big bucks attack candidate-in Democratic primary.
Read the full story....

Read more important news of the day on the issues working families care about on AFL-CIO Now.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 9
From: "Neo Mulder" neomulder1@yahoo.com
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 2:08pm(PDT)
Subject: Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? By Steven E. Jones-Brigha

The WTC towers were solidly constructed with 47 steel core
columns and 240 perimeter steel columns. 287 steel-columns total.
Many doubt that random fires/damage could cause them to
collapse straight down (official theory), and suspect explosives

.



Steel-frame: Huge core (left) is an enormous heat sink. Notice workers standing on floor pan which is
firmly attached to the interconnected core columns.



Top ~ 30 floors of South Tower topple over.
What happens to the block and its angular momentum?

Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?



Prof. Jones is an invited speaker at an upcoming conference on this subject:

�����9/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming Our Future�����An International Education and Strategy Conference.�����
It will be held at the Embassy Suites Hotel Chicago-O'Hare Rosemont, June 2-4, 2006.




DRAFT 5.9

The views in this paper are the sole responsibility of the author (not Brigham Young University).


The paper (below) has undergone modifications and a second set of peer reviews and has been accepted for publication in a volume edited by David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott.

Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?


By Steven E. Jones
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602





ABSTRACT

In this paper, I call for a serious investigation of the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges. I consider the official FEMA, NIST, and 9-11 Commission reports that fires plus impact damage alone caused complete collapses of all three buildings. And I present evidence for the controlled-demolition hypothesis, which is suggested by the available data, testable and falsifiable, and yet has not been analyzed in any of the reports funded by the US government.



Introduction

We start with the fact that large quantities of molten metal were observed in basement areas under rubble piles of all three buildings: the Twin Towers and WTC7. A video clip provides eye-witness evidence regarding this metal at ground zero:
http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/red_hot_ground_zero_low_quality.wmv .



The photograph below by Frank Silecchia shows a chunk of the hot metal being removed from the North Tower rubble about eight weeks after 9-11. Notice the color of the lower portion of the extracted metal -- this tells us much about the temperature of the metal and provides important clues regarding its composition, as we shall see.

See URL- http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html




Snip- Mr. Miller captured two ladder-like structures in his photograph (lower left of the right-most photograph above; a cleaner photo is being sought), consistent with steel structures observed in the core of WTC 1. Observe the grayish-white plumes trailing upward from white "blobs" at the left-most extremities of the upper structure. (The lower structure is mostly obscured by dust.) It is possible that thermite cut through structural steel and that what we now observe is white-hot iron from the reaction adhering to the severed ends of the steel, with grayish-white aluminum oxide still streaming away from the reaction sites. The observations are consistent with the use of thermite or one of its variants. However, further analysis of this and additional photographs from the series is necessary before any firm conclusions can be drawn about this line of evidence.
Dramatic footage reveals yellow-to-white hot molten metal dripping from the South WTC Tower shortly before its collapse: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2991254740145858863&q=cameraplanet+9%2F11.
Snip

Next, as a basis for discussion, I invite you to consider the collapse of the 47-story WTC 7, which was never hit by a jet. Here is the building prior to and on September 11, 2001:


WTC 7: 47 - Story, steel-frame building..

WTC 7 on afternoon of 9-11-01. WTC 7 is the tall
sky-scraper in the background, right. Seen from WTC plaza area.




WTC 7 collapsed completely, onto its own footprint




Now that you have seen the still photographs, it is important to the discussion which follows for you to observe video clips of the collapse of this building, so go to: http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html



Click on the three photos at the top of this web-site page in order to see the videos of the collapse of WTC 7. It helps to have sound.


Then consider a video close-up of the same building, SW corner, as this corner begins its steady drop to the ground:

http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/Flashes/squibs_along_southwest_corner.htm



What did you observe?
Symmetry: did the building collapse straight down (nearly symmetrically) ����� or did it topple over?


Speed: How fast did the southwest corner of the roof fall? (Students and I measure [6.5 +- 0.2] seconds; time it!)


Smoke/debris-jets: Did you observe puffs of smoke/debris coming out of the building? Please note for yourself the sequence and fast timing of observed puffs or �����squibs.����� Note that reference to web pages is used in this paper due largely to the importance of viewing motion picture clips, thus enhancing consideration of the laws of motion and physics generally. High-quality photographs showing details of the collapses of WTC 7 and the WTC Towers can be found in books (Hufschmid, 2002; Paul and Hoffman, 2004), magazines (Hoffman, 2005; Baker, 2005) and at http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/collapses.html .



On the basis of photographic and video evidence as well as related data and analyses, I provide thirteen reasons for rejecting the official hypothesis, according to which fire and impact damage caused the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC 7, in favor of the controlled-demolition hypothesis. The goal is to promote further scrutiny of the official government-sponsored reports as well as serious investigation of the controlled-demolition hypothesis. (No rebuttal of my argument can be complete, of course, unless it addresses all of these points.)



Thirteen Reasons to Challenge Government-sponsored Reports and Investigate the Controlled-demolition Hypothesis

Click to join catapultthepropaganda
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/catapultthepropaganda/join


Click to join openmindopencodenews

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openmindopencodenews/join

1. Molten Metal: Flowing and in Pools


There are several published observations of molten metal in the basements of all three buildings, WTC 1, 2 (�����Twin Towers�����) and 7. For example, Dr. Keith Eaton toured Ground Zero and stated in The Structural Engineer,

�����They showed us many fascinating slides����� [Eaton] continued, �����ranging from molten metal which was still red hot weeks after the event, to 4-inch thick steel plates sheared and bent in the disaster�����. (Structural Engineer, September 3, 2002, p. 6; emphasis added.)


The observation of molten metal at Ground Zero was emphasized publicly by Leslie Robertson, the structural engineer responsible for the design of the World Trade Center Towers, who reported that �����As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running.����� (Williams, 2001, p. 3; emphasis added.)


Sarah Atlas was part of New Jersey's Task Force One Urban Search and Rescue and was one of the first on the scene at Ground Zero with her canine partner Anna. She reported in Penn Arts and Sciences, summer 2002,

�����Nobody's going to be alive.' Fires burned and molten steel flowed in the pile of ruins still settling beneath her feet. (Penn, 2002; emphasis added.)


Notice that the molten metal was flowing down in the rubble pile early on; so it is not the case that the molten metal pools formed due to subterranean fires after the collapses. Dr. Allison Geyh was one of a team of public health investigators from Johns Hopkins who visited the WTC site after 9-11. She reported in the Late Fall 2001 issue of Magazine of Johns Hopkins Public Health, "In some pockets now being uncovered they are finding molten steel.�����


A video clip provides eye-witness evidence regarding this metal at ground zero: http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/red_hot_ground_zero_low_quality.wmv .

The observer notes that the observed surface of this metal is still reddish-orange some six weeks after 9-11. This implies a large quantity of a metal with fairly low heat conductivity and a relatively large heat capacity (e.g., iron is more likely than aluminum) even in an underground location. Like magma in a volcanic cone, such metal might remain hot and molten for a long time --

once the metal is sufficiently hot to melt in large quantities and then kept in a fairly-well insulated underground location. Moreover, as hypothesized below, thermite reactions may have resulted in substantial quantities (observed in pools) of molten iron at very high temperatures ����� initially above 2,000 ����C (3,632 ����F).

At these temperatures, aluminum materials from the buildings should continue to undergo exothermic oxidation reactions with materials also entrained in the molten metal pools including metal oxides, which will then keep the pools molten and even growing for weeks despite radiative and conductive losses.


Thus, molten metal was repeatedly observed and formally reported in the rubble piles of the WTC Towers and WTC 7, metal that looked like molten steel or perhaps iron. Scientific analysis would be needed to conclusively ascertain the composition of the molten metal in detail.

I maintain that these observations are consistent with the use of high-temperature cutter-charges such as thermite, HMX or RDX or some combination thereof, routinely used to melt/cut/demolish steel. Thermite is a mixture of iron oxide and aluminum powder. The end products of the thermite reaction are aluminum oxide and molten iron. So the thermite reaction generates molten iron directly, and is hot enough to melt and even evaporate steel which it contacts while reacting. Here is the thermite-reaction equation for a typical mixture of aluminum powder iron oxide powder:
2Al + Fe2O3 = Al2O3 + 2Fe (molten iron), DH = - 853.5 kJ/mole.


Thermite contains its own supply of oxygen and so the reaction cannot be smothered, even with water. Use of sulfur in conjunction with the thermite, for example in thermate, will accelerate the destructive effect on steel, and sulfidation of structural steel was indeed observed in some of the few recovered members from the WTC rubble, as reported in Appendix C of the FEMA report. (FEMA, 2002; see also, http://www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/metallurgy/index.html.)


On the other hand, falling buildings (absent incendiaries such as thermite) have insufficient directed energy to result in melting of large quantities of metal.

The government reports admit that the building fires were insufficient to melt steel beams --

then where did the molten metal come from? Metals expert Dr. Frank Gayle (working with NIST) stated:


Your gut reaction would be the jet fuel is what made the fire so very intense, a lot of people figured that's what melted the steel. Indeed it did not, the steel did not melt. (Field, 2005; emphasis added.)


None of the official reports tackles this mystery. Yet this is evidently a significant clue to what caused the Towers and WTC 7 to collapse. So an analysis of the composition of the previously-molten metal is required by a qualified scientific panel. This could well become an experiment crucis.


Prof. Thomas Eagar explained in 2001 that the WTC fires would NOT melt steel:

"The fire is the most misunderstood part of the WTC collapse. Even today, the media report (and many scientists believe) that the steel melted. It is argued that the jet fuel burns very hot, especially with so much fuel present. This is not true....

The temperature of the fire at the WTC was not unusual, and it was most definitely not capable of melting steel.



In combustion science, there are three basic types of flames, namely, a jet burner, a pre-mixed flame, and a diffuse flame.... In a diffuse flame, the fuel and the oxidant are not mixed before ignition, but flow together in an uncontrolled manner and combust when the fuel/oxidant ratios reach values within the flammable range. A fireplace is a diffuse flame burning in air, as was the WTC fire. Diffuse flames generate the lowest heat intensities of the three flame types...

The maximum flame temperature increase for burning hydrocarbons (jet fuel) in air is, thus, about 1000 ����C -- hardly sufficient to melt steel at 1500 ����C."

"But it is very difficult to reach [even] this maximum temperature with a diffuse flame. There is nothing to ensure that the fuel and air in a diffuse flame are mixed in the best ratio... This is why the temperatures in a residential fire are usually in the 500 ����C to 650 ����C range [Cote, 1992]. It is known that the WTC fire was a fuel-rich, diffuse flame as evidenced by the copious black smoke....

It is known that structural steel begins to soften around 425 ����C and loses about half of its strength at 650 ����C [Cote, 1992]. This is why steel is stress relieved in this temperature range. But even a 50% loss of strength is still insufficient, by itself, to explain the WTC collapse...

The WTC, on this low-wind day, was likely not stressed more than a third of the design allowable... Even with its strength halved, the steel could still support two to three times the stresses imposed by a 650 ����C fire." (Eagar and Musso, 2001; emphasis added.)



We will return to the question of fire-induced stresses and WTC collapses later.

Even without a direct elemental analysis, we can rule out some metals based on available data. The photograph in the introduction shows a chunk of hot metal being extracted at ground zero. The hottest portion of the chunk is the lower portion, which was deepest down in the slag, and the metal is seen to be yellow-hot, certainly above cherry-red hot. The following table (see
http://www.processassociates.com/process/heat/metcolor.htm ) provides data regarding the melting temperatures of lead, aluminum, structural steel and iron, along with approximate metal temperatures by color. Note that the approximate temperature of a hot metal is given by its color, quite independent of the composition of the metal.

(A notable exception is aluminum, which due to low emissivity and high reflectivity appears silvery-gray in daylight conditions, at all temperatures whether in solid or liquid forms. Aluminum does incandesce like other metals, but faintly, so that in broad daylight conditions in air, it appears silvery-gray according to experiments done at BYU.)




We see from the photograph above that solid metal from the WTC rubble existed at salmon-to-yellow-hot temperature (approx. 1550 - 1900 oF, 845 - 1040 oC.) The temperature is well above the melting temperatures of lead and aluminum, and these metals can evidently be ruled out since they would be runny liquids at much lower (cherry-red or below) temperatures. However, the observed hot specimen could be structural steel (from the building) or iron (from a thermite reaction) or a combination of the two. Additional photographs of the hot metal could provide further information and advance the research.
The following photograph has become available, evidently showing the now-solidified metal with entrained material, stored (as of November 2005) in a warehouse in New York:

The abundance of iron (as opposed to aluminum) in this material is indicated by the reddish rust observed.

More- http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2����/min or less.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 10
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 2:22pm(PDT)
Subject: Bolivia smartens up -- occupies natural gas fields, demands new con

LA PAZ, Bolivia (AP) -- President Evo Morales ordered soldiers to immediately occupy Bolivia's natural gas fields Monday and threatened to evict foreign companies unless they sign new contracts within six months giving Bolivia majority control over the entire chain of production.
Morales said soldiers and engineers with Bolivia's state-owned oil company would be sent to installations operated by foreign petroleum companies.
"The time has come, the awaited day, a historic day in which Bolivia retakes absolute control of our natural resources," Morales said in a speech from the San Alberto petroleum field in southern Bolivia to decree what he called a nationalization of the natural gas industry. The field has been operated by Brazil's Petroleo Brasileiro SA in association with the Spanish-Argentine Repsol YPF SA and France's Total SA.
Bolivia has South America's second largest natural gas reserves after Venezuela, and all foreign companies must turn over most production control to Bolivia's cash-strapped state-owned oil company, Yacimientos Petroliferos Fiscales Bolivianos, Morales said.



Multinational companies that produced 100 million cubic feet of natural gas daily last year in Bolivia will be able to retain only 18 percent of their production, with the rest being given to YPFB, he said. Morales did not name the companies.
Morales has acknowledged that nationalization will not mean a complete state takeover, because Bolivia lacks the ability to tap all its natural gas on its own.
Last week, Morales told Brazil's Valor Economico newspaper that Bolivia would have to "set up a new battalion, a new army of oil and gas specialists to exert the property right" for a complete state takeover of petroleum production.
Other major petroleum companies doing business in Bolivia, besides Petroleo Brasileiro and Repsol, include Britain's BG Group PLC and BP PLC and U.S.-based Exxon Mobil Corp.







A Repsol spokesman said the company could not respond because it had not received official word of the announcement. Petrobras officials did not immediately return messages seeking comment on Monday, a national holiday in Brazil.
Morales said the government would begin negotiations immediately with the companies to make sure they are willing to comply, but said they could be stripped of their rights to operate in Bolivia if they don't sign new contracts within the six-month deadline.
In the past, YPFB produced Bolivia's natural gas, but it was reduced to an administrative role in the mid-1990s after the country's gas exploration and production business was privatized. Experts have warned that the company is incapable of becoming a producer again without a massive infusion of cash.
Morales, a strident leftist, won the presidency in a landslide late last year after saying the country's natural resources had been "looted" by foreign companies and must be nationalized so that Bolivians could benefit from the profits that were being sent overseas.
Morales chose May 1, International Day of the Workers, to announce the nationalization plan. He wore a YPFB helmet as he gave his speech. Afterwards, a soldier unfurled a Bolivian flag from atop the natural gas installation.
Morales also said the state would retake control of Bolivian hydrocarbon companies that were partially privatized in the 1990s, with the state taking a majority stake.
With the nationalization announcement, Morales is following the path of Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez, his populist political mentor, said Pietro Pitts, editor-in-chief for the Venezuela-based LatinPetroleum.com.
Chavez has also taken moves to exert greater control over his country's vast petroleum reserves. Most foreign companies have decided to keep producing in Venezuela, though some announced they would abandon some production.
"You can call Bolivia Venezuela Part II because it seems like he (Morales) is going to try to do the same thing that Chavez is doing," said Pitts, namely giving the state majority control in its fossil fuel wealth.
----
AP Business Writers Frank Bajak and Alan Clendenning contributed to this story from Bogota, Colombia and Mexico City.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BOLIVIA_GAS?SITE=MIDTF&SECTION=HOME

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 11
From: "janet phelan" jcphelan10@yahoo.com
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 2:23pm(PDT)
Subject: Turn on Your Computer, er, Brain, er, Computer...

The latest computer plug-in: your brain
Leo Shanahan
April 25, 2006

To view the entire article, click on:
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/04/24/1145861286779.html

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2����/min or less.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 12
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 2:26pm(PDT)
Subject: Have the MayDay Demonstrators shown Anti-War Leanings? What have yo

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 13
From: "Linda G. Richard" dazey@briskweb.net
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 3:04pm(PDT)
Subject: Universal's Flight 93 'Hijacked' By Truth Seekers

*Universal's Flight 93 'Hijacked' By Truth Seekers
*Forum moderators deleting entire threads in real time

*Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | April 29 2006
<http://www.prisonplanet.com/index.html>*

Universal Studio's Flight 93 movie online forum has been completely
infiltrated by people opposing the official government 9/11 fable and
its moderators are having to delete entire threads in real time deeming
them, "inappropriate."

A cursory *visit to the forum*
<http://www.universalpictures.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=1> confirms that
the entire website has been turned into a battle ground for countering
the government apologist propaganda being regurgitated in an impetuous
lunge to give credibility to a tale about as reality-based as Humpty
Dumpty.

The establishment press is spewing forth hit pieces as fast as its
antiquated 'one column per columnist per week' ratio can muster. *USA
Today*
<http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-04-27-conspiracies-sept-11_x.htm>
were the latest to use this shockudrama screen drivel as a pugel to try
and bash a truth movement spreading like wildfire across the four
corners of the cyber globe.

I have a policy of issuing rebuttals to the most distasteful hit pieces
but now I'm content to sit back and just lap up the hilarity of their
desperation as every attack piece is met with thousands of angry and
informed responses.

Neo-Con *conspiracy theorist Betsy Hart *
<http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/310306fearofmuslims.htm>reckoned
all the evidence could be explained away by saying that people who
question the official story "fear Islamic terrorism." Her forum was
overrun with cyber patriots putting her in her place and she threatened
to shut it down.

Befuddled liberal turned Bushite Cinnamon Stillwell gave us all a
chuckle when she claimed that, "the whole country witnessed the horrific
sight of planes flying into....the Pentagon."

When this website pointed out that no such video exists of a plane
flying into the Pentagon, Stillwell was left reeling and red-faced after
the San Francisco Chronicle were forced to *issue a retraction
<http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/200406issueretraction.htm>*
to the fairy tale story.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Find out the truth about 9/11: Subscribe to Prison Planet.tv and watch
all of Alex Jones' films!* <http://www.prisonplanet.tv/subscribe.html>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Despite multiple large websites encouraging people to help Stillwell
with her homework by e mailing her, she backed down from the subject and
her next article was about immigration.

The Universal website carries a message at the top of the page stating,
"We apologize for the removal of the message boards - due to technical
difficulties all previous threads have been inadvertantly deleted. We
invite you to renew your dialog and discuss your thoughts on the film."

Yeah and the moon is made of cheese.

They deleted a whole backlog of threads because they uniformly exposed
the fact that Greengrass' shill excuse for a movie is just another
manufactured movie script, much like the government's version of 9/11.

"Inappropriate posts which include profanity, defamations, or threats
will be removed. Posts that are not deemed appropriate for a particular
thread may be moved by the moderator, says the site." By 'defamation'
they mean defamation of the official yarn that would put Hans Christian
Anderson to shame and truly is an insult to the victims of 9/11.

On the flip side websites like *Counterpunch*
<http://www.counterpunch.org/ridgeway04282006.html> and even the
*Philadelphia Daily News*
<http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/attytood/archives/003187.html> are
carrying balanced pieces highlighting unanswered questions about Flight
93 that were carefully avoided in the new release.

Universal are removing dissenting posts so fast that children who suck
their thumbs and believe the establishment Jack and Jill version of 9/11
are now starting to look like the majority. *Visit the forum*
<http://www.universalpictures.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=1> and show them
that a committed and educated minority will always triumph over an
ignorant brainwashed mass of stupefied zombies.

* <http://www.prisonplanet.tv/subscribe.html>*

*Prison Planet.tv: The Premier Multimedia Subscription Package: Download
and Share the Truth! <http://www.prisonplanet.tv/subscribe.html>*

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 14
From: "janet phelan" jcphelan10@yahoo.com
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 3:27pm(PDT)
Subject: Safer than What???

Firms: Biometrics are really safer
When Kim Malinger shops, she'd rather give retailers plastic than her finger. For the North Aurora resident, keeping her personal identity personal takes priority over the convenience of shopping with biometrics ����� the automated recognition of human traits. Such programs are popping up locally in grocery stores and school cafeterias. In January, the San Francisco-based company Pay By Touch installed biometric scanners in 180 Jewel-Osco stores throughout the Chicagoland area, including Kane County. The company is making an effort to convince skeptical consumers such as Malinger that biometrics are safer than the credit cards and checks they use.

Kane County Chronicle
Date: 2006-04-19

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2����/min or less.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 15
From: "Thomas Potter" mr_thomas_potter@yahoo.com
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 5:03pm(PDT)
Subject: 9/11 Hoax

The only time the illuminati fooled me was to make me
believe that WTC was done with remote controlled
planes.

http://www.911hoax.com/Table_Contents.asp

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 16
From: "Bugs" brawny@twlakes.net
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 7:00pm(PDT)
Subject: lIES

PLEASE PASS TO ALL YOU KNOW...

NEWS YOU WON'T FIND ON CNN

Was The Iraq War Legal, Or Illegal, Under International Law?

"Advantage is a better soldier than rashness." -Montjoy in Wm. Shakespeare's Henry V, 3.6.120

Evan Augustine Peterson III, J.D.

09/17/04 "ICH" -- During a BBC radio interview on Wednesday, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan created a controversy by reiterating his long-held position that the Iraq War was illegal because it breached the United Nations Charter. [1] On Thursday, the imperial leaders of the "Coalition of the Willing" retaliated by vehemently arguing that their Iraq War was, to the contrary, legal. [2]

Obviously, this dispute raises a legal question: "Whose opinion is correct, and whose is incorrect?" Additionally, we should be asking ourselves: "Who decides? (i.e., 'Whose jurisprudential opinion shall be dispositive for purposes of resolving this dispute?')"

It seems eminently reasonable -- even for the disputants -- to conclude that the optimal source of guidance on this question of international law would have to be the world's foremost experts in the field of international law. Hence, the UN's chief and the coalition's leaders need to know how the world's top international law experts would resolve their jurisprudential dispute. And we, the people, need to know who's right and who's wrong here.

Realistically, one cannot seriously expect the disputants -- much less their national electorates -- to wade through numerous legal documents, most of which contain rigorous and not-occasionally tedious reasoning, to find the correct answer. Thus, it seems prudent to proceed directly to the world's most authoritative answer to our pressing question du jour: "Was the Iraq War legal, or illegal, under international law?"

And The World's Most Authoritative Answer Is ... Among the world's foremost experts in the field of international law, the overwhelming jurisprudential consensus is that the Anglo-American invasion, conquest, and occupation of Iraq constitute three phases of one illegal war of aggression. [3]

Moreover, these experts in the international law of war deem both preventive wars and preemptive strikes to be euphemistic subcategories of outlawed wars of aggression.

And the experts' answer would hold true regardless of whether their governing legal authority was: (A) the UN Security Council Resolutions that were passed to implement the conflict-resolution provisions of the UN Charter; or (B) prior treaties and juridical holdings which have long since become general international law. [4]

Readers who need to "trust but verify" (i.e., to corroborate) for themselves that the experts' overwhelming opinion is exactly as stated above should read a document entitled "15 January 2003." (Find it by scrolling down approximately one-fourth of the way, after you've clicked onto this ES website: http://www.eurolegal.org/useur/bbiraqwar.htm "The Legality Of The Iraq War" .) Why?

That document was drafted and signed by the world's foremost international law experts -- the prestigious International Commission of International Law Jurists -- to provide ultimate proof of their authoritative opinion concerning the legal status of war against Iraq. Furthermore, this large body of eminent international law experts explicitly stated that they'd drafted their legal document in order to advise Messrs. Bush and Blair prior to the invasion: (1) that it would be blatantly illegal under international law for the Anglo-American belligerents to invade Iraq; and (2) that their joint decision as Commanders-in-Chief to commence hostilities would constitute prosecutable war crimes.

Skeptical readers who don't regard this highly-authoritative conclusion as an adequate answer are invited to undertake the legal reasoning for themselves at the ES website. Note that every applicable Article in the UN Charter, and every relevant UN Security Council Resolution, is cited and analyzed therein. And readers who continue to scroll down the ES website will find a succession of articles which summarize the opinions of noteworthy individual experts on international law. These, too, strongly confirm that the invasion of Iraq constituted an illegal war of aggression under international law. [5]

Finally, ambitious readers will learn what non-credible source was most responsible for propagating the fictitious pre-war claim that Saddam Hussein's Iraq was involved in the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon (hint: yet another uncredentialed neocon think-tanker from the thoroughly-discredited American Enterprise Institute).

Three Conclusions It is the overwhelming consensus of the world's foremost international law experts that: (1) UN Secretary General Annan's opinion is correct (i.e., true) because the Iraq War was, indeed, illegal; and

(2) the opinion of the "Coalition of the Willing's" leaders is incorrect (i.e., false) because their Iraq War was NOT legal.

(3) Therefore, Americans must break free of the neocons' self-delusional groupthink mentality by learning to differentiate between fact and truth, which are all-too-easily confused. For instance, it's an undeniable fact that Messrs. Bush and Cheney have been arguing along the campaign trail that "The Iraq War was legal!" Nevertheless, the mere fact that they've been vehemently arguing that point certainly does NOT make it true! Their argument is flawed by a logical fallacy called an ipse dixit (i.e., "something asserted but not proved"). As we've already seen, their argument is just plain WRONG AS A MATTER OF LAW! Therefore, Messrs. Bush and Cheney are making a false argument (i.e., deceptively asserting something that is untrue).

The Bottom Line Americans should reject the temptation to vote for Messrs. Bush and Cheney, because: (1) both men were advised beforehand that their decision to commence the invasion of Iraq would be blatantly illegal under international law; (2) they invaded nonetheless, and now they're cynically attempting to mislead the public again by falsely arguing that "The Iraq War was legal!"; (3) however, their argument is legally-meritless nonsense -- the current equivalent of their earlier false argument that torture is a legal method for the US military's interrogation of prisoners; (4) they've repeatedly demonstrated their disdain for universal human rights and democratic governance under the rule of law; and

(5) the 21st-century world isn't Tombstone's OK Corral and they certainly aren't Wyatt Earp and Doc Holliday -- however much they might wish us to believe that they are! [6]

ENDNOTES

[1] Read this 9-16-04 PI article by clicking on these blue words: http://www.politinfo.com/articles/article_2004_09_16_4815.html "UN Says Nothing New In Annan's 'Illegal War' Comment". Also see this 9-17-04 GU article, which contends that UN Secretary General Annan's statement wasn't his long-held opinion, but is new and belated: http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1306642,00.html "The War Was Illegal"

[2] Read this 9-17-04 JO article by clicking on these blue words: http://snipurl.com/94y0 "Bush Joins Coalition Leaders In Defending War Against Iraq"

[3] Read the 9-15-04 ES's indispensable analysis by clicking on these blue words: http://www.eurolegal.org/useur/bbiraqwar.htm#TOP Legality of the Iraq War. If the click-on doesn't link, paste this URL into your webserver: http://www.eurolegal.org/useur/bbiraqwar.htm [Skeptical readers should not read to confirm their biases, but instead should set their biases aside until they've finished reading all of the legal arguments on this website, which will take awhile.]

[4] There seems to be one relevant omission from the ES website. General international law could have been be cited as an alternative basis for proving the Iraq War's illegality by analyzing these authoritative precedents: (A) the Kellogg-Briand Pact of Paris (1928); and (B) the Charters, Principles, Indictments, and Holdings from the International Military Tribunals at N����remberg and Tokyo (1945-48).

[5] Generally speaking, legal opinions offered by government attorneys are NOT considered to be authoritative because: (a) they're drafted in the adversarial mode of an advocate, often under self-interested political pressure from the executive branch; (b) even at its best, their reasoning tends toward casuistry, reflecting Cicero's injudicious maxim,"salus populi suprema lex esto" (De Legibus, III, 3.8: "Let the welfare of the people be the supreme law!" Or the Bushites' tortuous translation thereof: "We feel that we can legally torture our prisoners now if it might save our people later!"); and (c) for an apt example, see the history of the Third Reich's attorneys Hans Frank and Wilhelm Frick, whose pre-war legal advice to Reichsf����hrer Hitler was that Germany could use the pretext of an imminent threat to "preemptively" invade Poland, for which war crime they were both tried, sentenced, and hanged to death by the International Military Tribunal at N����remberg. Note bene, Attorney General Ashcroft and Bush administration "torture memo" attorneys Bybee, Chertoff, Gonzales, Haynes and Woo!

[6] Read Douglas Jehl's 9-16-4 CD/SPI article by clicking on these blue words: http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0916-02.htm "CIA Analysis Holds Bleak Vision For Iraq's Future". Also see the 9-16-04 Dreyfuss Report column: http://tompaine.com/archives/the_dreyfuss_report.php "Annan For President"

Author: Evan Augustine Peterson III, J.D., is the Executive Director of the American Center for International Law ("ACIL"). <EvPeters8@aol.com>

����2004EAPIII
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

Join our Daily News Headlines Email Digest

Fill out your emailaddress
to receive our newsletter!

SubscribeUnsubscribe
Powered by YourMailinglistProvider.com
Information Clearing House

Daily News Headlines Digest

HO

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 17
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 7:11pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: 9/11 Hoax

From: "Thomas Potter" <mr_thomas_potter@yahoo.com>
To: <911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 5:03 PM
Subject: [911TruthAction] 9/11 Hoax

> The only time the illuminati fooled me was to make me
> believe that WTC was done with remote controlled
> planes.

Then you are accept the hijackers-did-it story.

Now what about the Pentagon attack?

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 18
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 8:45pm(PDT)
Subject: Christopher Bollyn: 9-11 Lawsuits Stymied -- victim families under

From: Thomas R. Ascher

http://www.americanfreepress.net/
9-11 Lawsuits Stymied

By Christopher Bollyn, American Free Press, 04/24/06

While the media plays up the significance of the government show trial of the seemingly deranged "20th hijacker" Zacharias Moussaoui, not one 9-11 victim's lawsuit has been allowed to be heard in a trial by jury. Why have the 9-11 victims' families not been given the same right to have their cases heard in an open trial?

Ellen Mariani, who lost her husband Neil on United Air Lines (UAL) Flight 175, filed the first 9-11 wrongful death lawsuit against UAL on Dec. 20, 2001. Mariani was interviewed on national television in May 2002 by Bill O'Reilly of Fox News, who repeatedly questioned her about why she had chosen to pursue litigation instead of accepting the government fund. "I want justice," Mariani said. "I want accountability. Who is responsible? I want the truth."

Today, Mariani, like the other 9-11 plaintiffs, is under a gag order which prevents her from speaking about her ongoing lawsuit. Likewise, thousands of employees of federal agencies like the Federal Aviation Administration have received gag orders in the mail keeping them from telling what they know about the events of 9-11.

After more than four years, however, Mariani's determined pursuit for the truth about 9-11 through the court system has failed to yield any answers or discovery about who is responsible for 9-11. Today, she is no closer to obtaining what she has stated she wanted from the beginning-a trial by jury.

Why have the many victims' cases like Mariani's, brought by relatives of loved ones lost on 9-11, not been allowed to be heard in a trial by jury-a basic American right? And why have the foreign-owned security companies involved in the shocking security lapses, which enabled the attacks of 9-11, been granted immunity by the U.S. Congress?

All of the relatives' wrongful death criminal lawsuits against the airlines and their security companies have been consolidated by the presiding judge into a negligence lawsuit, which is a civil case and much less likely to be argued or investigated in an open trial with a jury. The 9-11 wrongful death and personal injury cases against American Air Lines (AA) or UAL or any of the foreign security companies, namely Argenbright Security (British), Globe Aviation Services Corp. (Swedish) and Huntleigh USA Corp. (Israeli) are being handled by U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein of the Southern District of New York.

In the case of at least one of these security defendants, Huntleigh, there would seem to be a conflict of interest for the judge because the airline security company who is responsible for the shocking security lapses at both the Boston and Newark airports on 9-11 is a wholly-owned subsidiary of an Israeli company (ICTS) headed by men with clear ties to Israel's military intelligence agency, Mossad.

Hellerstein, 73, on the other hand, has deep and longstanding Zionist connections and close family ties to the state of Israel. A Zionist is a supporter of the state of Israel.

Hellerstein's wife is a former senior vice president and current treasurer of a New York-based Zionist organization called AMIT. AMIT promotes Jewish immigration to Israel and stands for Americans for Israel and Torah. AMIT's motto is "Building Israel-One Child at a Time." Hellerstein is a member of the Jewish Center of New York and a former president of the Board of Jewish Education of Greater New York.

This raises the obvious question about why, in the 9-11 terror case in which an Israeli security company is a key defendant and in which individuals from Israeli military intelligence are suspected of being involved, was Hellerstein chosen to preside over all 9-11 victim lawsuits?

Huntleigh USA is a wholly owned subsidiary of an Israeli company called International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS) International N.V., a Netherlands-based aviation and transportation security firm headed by "former [Israeli] military commanding officers and veterans of government intelligence and security agencies."

Menachem Atzmon, convicted in Israel in 1996 for campaign finance fraud, and his business partner Ezra Harel, took over management of security at the Boston and Newark airports when their company ICTS bought Huntleigh USA in 1999. UAL Flight 175 and AA 11, which allegedly struck the twin towers, both originated in Boston, while UAL 93, which purportedly crashed in Pennsylvania, departed from the Newark airport. ICTS also operates the German port of Rostock on the Baltic Sea.

Some victims' families brought lawsuits against Huntleigh claiming the security firm had been grossly negligent on 9-11. While these relatives have a right to discovery and to know what Huntleigh did or did not do to protect their loved ones on 9-11, Huntleigh, along with the other security companies, was granted complete congressional protection in 2002 and will not be called to account for its actions on 9-11 in any U.S. court.

Hellerstein, however, is not the only player overseeing the 9-11 litigation process who has close ties to Israel. In fact, all of the key players and law firms involved are either active Zionists or work for firms that do a great deal of business representing Israeli companies and/or the state of Israel.

Kenneth R. Feinberg, for example, the special master of the federally funded Victims' Compensation Fund, is also a dedicated Zionist. Feinberg single-handedly administered the $7 billion fund that paid out U.S. taxpayer money to some 97 percent of the families who could have sued to recover tort damages for monetary loss and pain and suffering. Those who accepted funds signed away their right to litigate against the government, the airlines or the security companies.

The Kenneth Feinberg Group is listed as one of the top 10 supporters of the Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies for 2004-2005. The Jerusalem Institute is an Israel-based Zionist organization that, among other things, supports the building of the illegal separation wall across Palestine.

The Feinberg Group also lists as its clients major insurance and re-insurance companies such as Lloyd's of London. These are the companies who stood to lose billions of dollars if 9-11 victims' lawsuits had gone forward.

Feinberg was appointed special master by then Attorney General John Ashcroft. Ashcroft, a dedicated Christian Zionist and supporter of such groups as Stand for Israel, is today working as a lobbyist for Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI), Israel's major military aerospace company, which hired the former U.S. attorney general to help secure the U.S. government's approval to sell an Israeli weapons system to the South Korean Air Force.

The Israelis hired Ashcroft to improve their chances against a system built by Chicago-based Boeing.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 19
From: "JP Liggett" JP@JPLiggett.com
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 9:14pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Universal's Flight 93 'Hijacked' By Truth Seekers

IMHO, universal's censorship in real time, and releasing the DVD
simultaneously (saw it for sale this weekend in retail) seems so desperate,
it going to help expose the truth even more. And all the cover-up
conspirators will know we've got their fingerprints, for the 911 truth
trials to come. We should use F93 in every means possible to spread the
word, perhaps some little stickers on the F93 dvd boxes would be a nice
touch.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 20
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 9:36pm(PDT)
Subject: Fw: Kaminski Terminating the perpetual Holocaust / Barbra-ren��

The end game strategy

The purpose of our quest:
Terminating the perpetual Holocaust

By John Kaminski
skylax@comcast.net

for B-r and Maisoon

"The minute you let her under your skin, then you begin to make it better."
����� The Beatles, Hey Jude

"Anyone who criticises Israel's actions or argues that pro-Israel groups have significant influence over US Middle East policy," the authors have written, "...stands a good chance of being labelled an anti-Semite. Indeed, anyone who merely claims that there is an Israeli lobby runs the risk of being charged with anti-Semitism ... Anti-Semitism is something no-one wants to be accused of." This is strong stuff in a country where - to quote the late Edward Said - the "last taboo" (now that anyone can talk about blacks, gays and lesbians) is any serious discussion of America's relationship with Israel.
����� Robert Fisk, Breaking the Last Taboo,
The United States of Israel

The woman I love speaks of the need for "an end game," something that will begin to resolve this cancerous impasse that separates spin from reality and gives us wars for profit and misery for all those not on the inside of the big money game.

She more than I knows that the Jewish question ����� and its manipulative influence on every aspect of human endeavor ����� is the pivot point of any possible solution. The actual Jewish question is simply this: How dangerous is it for everybody else when one group, acting only in the interests of itself because this is its stated goal ����� gains ascendance over every other group when this stated goal is the destruction or subjugation of every other group?

How dangerous is it? Just look at the world.

The epiphany that triggers the "end game" investigation is realizing that this calculated ascendance has already happened, and that the preponderance of people in the world are ruled by the vicious mercy of those who control the money. If you have any question about who controls the money then you are deficient in history, as is most of the world�����s human population.

The necessity for "an end game" strategy, she told me, was to avoid a worldwide Jewish holocaust ����� a new, real one, not like the fake, old one ����� because once everybody found out what was really going on ����� and what had been done to them and those they love ����� every Jew anywhere would be in very serious trouble. The backlash when you realize the monstrous magnitude of the manipulation and the thievery ����� not to mention the outright senseless slaughter ����� would be chilling.

Now, you may ask, what have Jews done to deserve such rancor and alarm?

The answer depends on how much of the story you think you know ����� how much of the history of destabilized societies (think Bolshevik Revolution, a wholly Jewish enterprise), of gaining control of other religions (think Scofield Bible and Martin Luther, not to mention those televangelists who profane their pulpits), and think most relevantly about who presently dominates world wide media.

Do you know about Palestine, really? Jewish media flipped the labels: the real story is Palestinian freedom fighters and Jewish terrorists. Israel is a �����country����� founded on terror and maintained in the same way.

Most importantly, remember this. Use of the word "holocaust" triggers a pre-programmed response in everyone, due to four decades of intense propaganda about the abuse of Jews by Germans. The dumbed-down American populace (you know! the bunch that accepts torture as part of democracy) now fully endorses the fabricated Jewish media view of the events of World War II, even though it was principally invented and embellished in the 1960s. The mainstream accounts of the Holocaust are so phony that many countries controlled by Jews have passed laws making it illegal to even discuss these matters as a way to stifle the debate, maintain the mindset, and conceal the fraud.

Yet a majority of the world's people ����� especially savvy politicians who realize what it takes to get ahead ����� accept this fiction as the cost of doing business. It is called selling your soul.

The dead children of Palestine and the radioactive families of Iraq are an acceptable cost of doing business to the creeps who push the buttons and drop the bombs ����� all of them guilty of genocide under the terms of Nuremburg and Geneva. At whose behest were these crimes committed? That is the question everyone in the world needs to ask.

Remember? When Poppy Bush told reporter Sarah MacClendon: "If people really knew what we're doing, they'd drag us out into the streets and hang us." This is the future each Jew faces when the general public finally learns what has been done to them over time by a small group which, through control of money and media, has finally managed to turn the society of humans into a fluoride-numbed herd of programmable consumers with consciences permanently anesthetized.

Those who would defend the Hebrew tribe would counter: It has always been this way. Why blame Jews?

Because Judaism and its unnatural offspring Christianity and Islam are at the center of all this turmoil back to time immemorial. And because today, Jewish money controls all of the banks and newspapers in the entire Western world, at least through advertising pressure, but principally by actual ownership.

The answer would be (and the knowledge every member of the tribe seeks to conceal) that "yes, it has always been this way", is precisely BECAUSE OF the history of the tribe, which even in the days before Babylon was establishing itself as a divisive force in ancient India before it brought the scourge of religious mind control into the palaces of Western civilization. Now we see it clearly in the depleted uranium dust now wafting around the world as America strangles itself for the profit of its Jewish overlords.

The report by Walt and Mearsheimer referred to by Robert Fisk at the top of this essay was a recent brouhaha created for media consumption to test the public's perception of Israel's rule of the United States. Now, of course, Israel doesn't rule the United States, the Jewish community that lives in the U.S. and supports Israel rules the United States.

The Walt-Mearsheimer report merely restates the obvious: that no one gets elected to Congress without Jewish support. Thus we have a one-sided view of events in the world which is shaped by bought-off legislators and reinforced by media, all controlled by the Jewish community.

Public response to these conclusions has been muted and in fact barely heard as big media has stifled its dissemination except in some obvious cases of character assassination, principally by Alan Dershowitz and other kneejerk Jewish spin doctors.

The public can't understand the events of the world because virtually all the information disseminated about it is controlled by Jewish partisans, from twisted schoolbooks to dangerous medical myths to popular movies that denigrate the family and promote irresponsible promiscuity and betrayal.

Worse, otherwise principled news outlets are intimidated not run stories germane to this critical theme because of potential and inevitable losses to their profitmaking future.

And principled historians who attempt to point out the fraud of this Jewish Holocaust mystique remain moldering in European jails, imprisoned for "defaming the memory of the dead." Free speech crushed under the Jewish media heel.

What will happen when everybody finds out about Jewish control of medicine through the invention of psychology? Or how the American family system was undermined and destroyed by Jewish media and a wholly Jewish women�����s liberation movement? What will happen when everybody finds out that America's higher educational system is now completely controlled by those who control the thoughts of those young malleable minds it molds? And feeds them fatal drugs as it does so.

How do we stop this madness? By identifying what is being done to us, and who is doing it.

When the world does that (IF the world ever does that), then Jews will certainly need protection from the surviving irate victims of the harm they have done with their selfish social engineering schemes.

But the alternative to considering potential "end game" strategies is even worse.

It means we will never find out who we really are, or what kind of world we really live in. It means a perpetual future of semi-conscious slavery, with no chance of transcending the controls that diminish our lives.

It means we give up the last chance we�����ll ever have to attain genuine, self-actualized freedom, because every single second and every single cell in our bodies will have been taken over and polluted by the forces of evil now running the world.

And if you don�����t believe that, just sit back and listen to the bombs until it�����s your turn to cry.

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida. �����Recipe for Extinction,����� his latest collection of Internet essays which are seen on hundreds of websites around the world, is now available for purchase at http://www.johnkaminski.com/

See also Barbra-ren����e Brighenti�����s �����The End Game�����
http://www.warfolly.com/articles/endgame.html
which contains the ideas that motivated my commentary.

As the Holocaust Revisionists uproot the tree of guilt and entitlement, as South America calls attention to the IMF and thus the 13 jewish families of the Federal Reserve, as the Arab Street wakens, as Iran points out the hypocrisy of the jewish stranglehold, as the bloggers challenge the manufactured lies of history-we are seeing a revolution, even in our darkest hours, know that the rumble in the distance is the herd rousing. Gandhi told the British to go home; can we tell the jews the same?

The End Game (edited version)

By Barbra-ren����e Brighenti
realtor44@comcast.net

4-30-06

There are voices in the wilderness now. Messengers for the message. Howls that get our attention. John the Baptist was a messenger, an empty bowl that talked of the message that would arrive and change our goblets of water into wine. He was beheaded for a jewesses delight. Talk of a Talmud special. And then there is the Rabbi who said anti-semitism was a good thing for jews, kept them cohesive. And a catch 22 for us. To talk or not to talk, and either way, it�����s a win-win for them. Tell them of their faults and it propels them to build their tower of Babel even higher, don�����t say anything and the silence translates into acceptance. What is the sound of one hand clapping?

The Palestinians will take the fall for us. They are the truly Chosen People, chosen because their faith and truth is strong and they will not acquiesce. And the fabled Chosen Ones? Well their chosen ness is to be the scions of Satan- a mirror for the rest of us, their hatred and ruthlessness will propel us to get it right this time or suffer the consequences. We sit on the shoulders of eons; this show has been written and rewritten. Masters and slaves. And when the slaves find out, well you get a lot of dead people.

The supposed Holocaust that has become our nightly bed time story will backfire. The gates of hell have been opened and legitimized. The lies of course tell more about the liars, their Freudian slip. Call wolf too often and you get eaten.

But the End Game is the point- what is it that you want? The cat is coming out of the bag-the jews can control the media, banques, and education, take over our churches and politicians, but they can�����t take away that sneaking suspicion that we have been had. And people talk. And then they get angry. And all those video games and gaz chamber stories will light the fires for revenge. And revenge in this society means killing. Do we want a real holocaust? The jews know that it is now or never- they are closing the net. Our children will not stand a chance- you know it and I know it. Their weapons of control have enmeshed us to the point that confusion and/or apathy reign. Given one more generation and we will be forever slaves- that is if they don�����t eliminate most of the population first.

But do you want to do what the Romans did when they found out who Nero was (a jew)? When they saw their culture corrupted, their young legions fighting for the money changers (jews).Their Senate bought and sold (by jews)? Do you want the order to be given to march to Jerusalem and kill every last man, woman and child that is a jew? It has happened before, it is happening here and the results will be the same, and the cycle will continue. As we become the messengers, and howl above the raging tempest that is drowning us, can we do it without acknowledging that we are helping to unleash the furies? Or can we envision an End Game based upon our beliefs and dreams? The responsibility is ours and now is the time to talk and decide. So far these are the results: the Egyptians got killed, the Romans killed (and in doing so lost their innocence), the Russians lost their people and culture and the Germans are being bled to death slowly. The Palestinians even in the deafening silence of world opinion have not lost their humanity, but generational post dramatic stress will create havoc on an individual level. And now it is us. Some have suggested to destroy the religion itself and leave the people be. Others have suggested to gather the worlds jews and give them Palestine and wall them in their jewish state forever. All the jewish lands, homes, and businesses that will be left behind will be given to the Palestinians as compensation. Others have suggested that jews and any variation of jewish lineage be forbidden in those professions that have any impact on the cultures they live in: education, science, politics, and banqueing.

Remember those that fight by the sword will die by the sword. Let us not at the end of the nightmare become like the jews themselves and say an eye for an eye. If we become like them by fighting them on their terms than we will be their Frankenstein-no more, no less. And the jews themselves need have no say in this. For 3000 years they have cried wolf. If they have not seen the errors of their ways, than they have been self-serving. The forgiveness courts of South Africa will not work; they, the jews, are the masters of deception. They were already asked to depart from Spain or convert and ended up with what we call the Spanish Inquisition- so we have been there and tried that and it didn�����t work. But there must be a solution.

As the Holocaust Revisionists uproot the tree of guilt and entitlement, as South America calls attention to the IMF and thus the 13 jewish families of the Federal Reserve, as the Arab Street wakens, as Iran points out the hypocrisy of the jewish stranglehold, as the bloggers challenge the manufactured lies of history-we are seeing a revolution. Even in our darkest hours, know that the rumble in the distance is the herd rousing. Gandhi told the British to go home; can we tell the jews the same? Remember this problem has been the problem for ages; it is neither new nor unique to us. But the test to our humanity is again being offered. The solution to the jewish problem is in direct correlation to the awareness we have about the sacredness of life we have been given.

The divisions between us have become irrelevant as our house is on fire. The End Game will either be a rerun or a tremendous gift. It is time for our quantum leap, the names we give this jackal, the dates and terms of his historical life are but blueprints of failures once used to tame this beast. Let us take responsibility as we unleash this floodgate- let us be creative and responsible and thankful for this test that the End Game offers each and every one of us.

Barbra-ren����e Brighenti is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida.
More of her work can be found at-
http://www.crescentandcross.com/index.php?page=articles&author=barbra-renee_brighenti

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 21
From: "Caomhain {Kevin} Lee Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 10:22pm(PDT)
Subject: This is disturbing!

I tried to go to that www.911sites.org site and it had been hacked and
I could not get on to the site. Has anyone else had this problem?

Kevin

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 22
From: "Edward Pickersgill" edward@mytown.ca
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 10:34pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: This is disturbing!

Yep. Its been hacked. By relative friendlies though.... it says

[If You Want Patch Your Server Bugs We Can Help You Free]:

H1r4x[at]Hackermail[dot]com

----- Original Message -----
From: Caomhain {Kevin} Lee Hammond
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:22 AM
Subject: [911TruthAction] This is disturbing!

I tried to go to that www.911sites.org site and it had been hacked and
I could not get on to the site. Has anyone else had this problem?

Kevin

SPONSORED LINKS United state coin United state government grant United state flag
United state army United state military Trademark united state

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 23
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 10:46pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: This is disturbing!

""relative friendlies?!""

Edward Pickersgill <edward@mytown.ca> wrote: Yep. Its been hacked. By relative friendlies though.... it says


[If You Want Patch Your Server Bugs We Can Help You Free]:
H1r4x[at]Hackermail[dot]com

----- Original Message -----
From: Caomhain {Kevin} Lee Hammond
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:22 AM
Subject: [911TruthAction] This is disturbing!

I tried to go to that www.911sites.org site and it had been hacked and
I could not get on to the site. Has anyone else had this problem?

Kevin

SPONSORED LINKS
United state patent United state flag United state citizenship United state military United state coin Trademark united state

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2����/min or less.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 24
From: "Edward Pickersgill" edward@mytown.ca
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 10:50pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: This is disturbing!

run of the mill hackers. the site obviously did not have its security features up-to-date. Hopefully the webwizard will have all her or his files backed up. Shouldn't take long to get it back in gear.

----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Hammond
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:46 AM
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] This is disturbing!

""relative friendlies?!""

Edward Pickersgill <edward@mytown.ca> wrote:
Yep. Its been hacked. By relative friendlies though.... it says

[If You Want Patch Your Server Bugs We Can Help You Free]:
H1r4x[at]Hackermail[dot]com

----- Original Message -----
From: Caomhain {Kevin} Lee Hammond
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:22 AM
Subject: [911TruthAction] This is disturbing!

I tried to go to that www.911sites.org site and it had been hacked and
I could not get on to the site. Has anyone else had this problem?

Kevin

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2����/min or less.

SPONSORED LINKS United state government grant United state coin United state grant
United state flag United state military Trademark united state

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 25
From: "NoRedCoats@aol.com" NoRedCoats@aol.com
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 11:43pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Latino protesters made a huge public relations mistake

The mistake was to threaten families with the prospect of deportation for
some family members, a girlfriend, a mom, etc. The irony is that those who are
writing this legislation, are themselves sons and daughters of immigrants who
also came here illegally! Just ask Native Americans. You think Native
Americans liked having their lands stolen, their cultures annihilated by Europeans
claiming freedom from tyranny? Creating another "Diary of Anne Frank" for
putting food from farm fields on our tables is a mean spirited action that
contradicts our bragging about justice, freedom and democracy to other countries.
Sure there is some crime and no one wants that, just as no one wants
organized crime. Crime happens with all cultures and is not prone to Latinos my
friend. The attitude of having some immigrants work for crap wages in hot fields,
cleaning bathrooms and trusting them with our kids, then telling them to get
the hell out after, is disingenuous, selfish, arrogant and thankless to say
the least. The whole world is watching just how America is going to act on
this. You can't talk about how fair and civil you are to other countries then
turn around by attacking some of the weakest members of our society. We did
that to Iraq and it's a mess for years to come. Do unto others as you would do
unto yourself.

Let's face it, this is just another sign of a failed administration that
just keeps shooting itself in the political foot! They cheated Americans out of
their vote since 2000 and here we are with high gas prices, fighting a failed
war in Iraq, over 8 trillion in debt, attacking women's right, attacking
immigrants, attacking wages, cutting down working hours and 9-11 hysteria is
pushing us to internal domestic infighting. The vast majority of immigrants are
nothing but hard working people and deserve respect and equality. Xenophobia
is not an answer.

This new immigrant issue is a threat to those Neo-Cons who engineered such a
stupid mean spirited approach with a bulldozer mentality. Many immigrants
are now fighting and dying in the middle east for a wrong-headed war based on a
lie and threatening them with a police state approach is frightening to
anyone. Remember what the Nazis did with their "Brown Shirt" thugs during World
War Two! By the way, most flags waved were American in all these
demonstrations!

The border issue certainly needs to be improved by developing a winning
system for controlled border crossings and identification checks. I grant you
that. Waving one's flag of heritage and pride are a long standing tradition
throughout our country's history. Italians, Irish, and other groups have done it
not to downgrade our American Flag but to reflect their own sense of cultural
pride. America is a great country and let's show our bigness by making it a
point to take a civil approach to solve problems.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------