I would have nothing printable to say to such nonsense.
YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE THE RIGHT PERPS identified.
You sound just as stupid as those who were so willing to rush over to
afghanistan to murder innocent women and children cos 911 was "their" fault.
The FACT that there is NO PLANE in the first hit crime scene is the most
important singular fact for identification of the perps, but instead
you'd rather laud these perps on the nightly news and nod along.
To me this makes every sucker who thinks the Weapon of Mass Destruction
Used really doesn't matter is a perp in it's shrinky little heart and
even smaller brain.
inphoman911 wrote:
> Bill just made 2 important points.
>
> This debate doesn't do anything to help the prep. face justice.
>
> and it doesn't do anything to indentify who was behind the crime.
>
> Based on those 2 points alone, it can be easily argued that the
> debate is a distraction. I don't go as far as calling it a
> distraction, but I think these matters do not belong at the
> forefront of our movement, just like the pod theory didn't belong at
> the forefront.
>
> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable
> <webfairy@...> wrote:
>
>> Whether or not they used planes is not a "Fine Detail."
>>
>> It so happens that there IS NO PLANE in the first hit footage that
>> claims to show the plane.
>> The sort of drones the CIA brags about using in Afghanistan are
>>
> shown,
>
>> but everybody seems to conspire together to pretend that this
>>
> media hoax
>
>> is a 'small detail.'
>> The plump American puppy gassed by CIA-stooges in terrorist
>>
> costumes got
>
>> more notice and attention than the missing plane.
>> So did Fat Bin Ladin, and Animated Osama.
>>
>> Whether a plane can squeeze like toothpaste or fold like an
>>
> umbrella or
>
>> do Karate Chops, and carries a little shovel in it's pod to dig
>>
> with is
>
>> part of the infantalization of thought that has left humanity
>> intellectually disarmed as they imagine a universe that acts like
>>
> cartoons.
>
>>
>> inphoman911 wrote:
>>
>>> Physical analysis is not Tarpley's specialty and its not fair to
>>> attack him for making such small errors. I can generally
>>>
> support
>
>>> anyone who endorses artificial demoltion MIHOP thesis and don't
>>>
> make
>
>>> such a big deal about the finer details about the other issues.
>>>
> The
>
>>> way I see it, we have to sell live cremation of Americans for
>>>
> Public
>
>>> Relations purposes before our time runs out. How will we know
>>>
> when
>
>>> our time has run out? We will know when we get a nuclear false
>>>
> flag
>
>>> attack and then martial law to shut down all our legitimate
>>>
> protest
>
>>> organizations and forums like these. The finer details of the
>>>
> 9/11
>
>>> scam can always be worked out in the future, but selling
>>>
> controlled
>
>>> demoltion to the general public is of time sensitive importance,
>>> unlike fleshing out the planehugger vs. bluescreen issues. When
>>>
> you
>
>>> stop to realize that we don't have all the time in the world,
>>>
> you
>
>>> can begin seing things from my point of view. Eric Hufschmid
>>>
> also
>
>>> made this point recently on one of Daryl Bradford Smiths shows.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hicks 9/11 analysis is LIHOP and I thought he was an agent after
>>> reading his Big Wedding book. It's starting to look like he
>>>
> might
>
>>> just be going through a learning process and is recovering from
>>>
> his
>
>>> LIHOP indoctrination. I don't think he is going to ruin the
>>>
> march.
>
>>> Who made the decision to give him a platform though?
>>>
>>>
>>> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable
>>> <webfairy@> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Synthetic Terror does an excellent job at "Big Picture"
>>>>
>>>>
>>> theoretics, but
>>>
>>>
>>>> then when it comes down to the nittygritty of actual events,
>>>>
> the
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> poor
>>>
>>>
>>>> sucker has planes climbing into holes and covering themselves
>>>>
> up.
>
>>>> I was hoping that this sort of drooling idiocy is what the
>>>>
> event
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> was
>>>
>>>
>>>> against.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> inphoman911 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The Hicks book is really bad. He even shows the Pentagon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> picture
>>>
>>>
>>>>> after the roof collapse and makes the reader think it is the
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> only
>>>
>>>
>>>>> picture. He is now promoting 9/11 Synthetic Terror at his
>>>>>
> site,
>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> so
>>>
>>>
>>>>> maybe he had just been a disinfo dupe when he put out his
>>>>>
> book.
>
>>>>> Don't you think he should be scrambling to put out a new
>>>>>
> edition
>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> of
>>>
>>>
>>>>> the Big Wedding with massive corrections?
>>>>>
>>>>> --- In
>>>>>
> 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "perpetualynquisitive"
>
>>>>> <perpetualynquisitive@> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel Hopsicker Jr., err, I mean Sander Hicks, now that is
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> funny.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> With original research and interviews, The Big Wedding
>>>>>>
> provides
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> a
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> new
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> level of proof that Bush's advisors had detailed
>>>>>>
> foreknowledge
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> of
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> 9/11.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> The book dispenses with the hypothetical and the realm of
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> maybe. It
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> attacks the kooky conspiracy theories, like "no-plane-hit-the-
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Pentagon,"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> which distract from certain suppressed historical truths: the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> CIA
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> has
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> had a controlling, client relationship with the powerful
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> Pakistani
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> intelligence group, ISI. The ISI has proven links to 9/11;
>>>>>>
> they
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> were key
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> funders, trainers, and supporters. Therefore, it's impossible
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> that
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> the
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> CIA and White House didn't have detailed foreknowledge of
>>>>>>
> 9/11.
>
>>>>>> From here <http://www.drenchkiss.com/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Big Wedding is almost as bad as Crossing The Rubes I've
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Conned, by
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike "The CIA tried to Kill Me, Peak Oiler" Ruppert.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "angiesept11"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> <angiesept11@>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, then why is 911 Gatekeeper Sander Hicks one
>>>>>>> of the 2 people listed as speaking at your march,
>>>>>>> you being the other? Hicks is a 911 Gatekeeper!!
>>>>>>> This is both hilarious and disgusting at the same time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Angie
>>>>>>> 911 Truth Movement Musings (Watching the Watchers)
>>>>>>> http://www.Angieon911.com
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: greg nixon nxngrg@
>>>>>>> Date: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:46 pm
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [911InsideJobbers] WING TV announced Greg Nixon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> as
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> guest
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> (02/17) nxngrg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> She is a planehugger huh? I am not. I want the message
>>>>>>>>>>>>
> to
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> be f--k
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> the gatekeepers I hope that's what comes across.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment