Bill just made 2 important points.
This debate doesn't do anything to help the prep. face justice.
and it doesn't do anything to indentify who was behind the crime.
Based on those 2 points alone, it can be easily argued that the
debate is a distraction. I don't go as far as calling it a
distraction, but I think these matters do not belong at the
forefront of our movement, just like the pod theory didn't belong at
the forefront.
--- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable
<webfairy@...> wrote:
>
> Whether or not they used planes is not a "Fine Detail."
>
> It so happens that there IS NO PLANE in the first hit footage that
> claims to show the plane.
> The sort of drones the CIA brags about using in Afghanistan are
shown,
> but everybody seems to conspire together to pretend that this
media hoax
> is a 'small detail.'
> The plump American puppy gassed by CIA-stooges in terrorist
costumes got
> more notice and attention than the missing plane.
> So did Fat Bin Ladin, and Animated Osama.
>
> Whether a plane can squeeze like toothpaste or fold like an
umbrella or
> do Karate Chops, and carries a little shovel in it's pod to dig
with is
> part of the infantalization of thought that has left humanity
> intellectually disarmed as they imagine a universe that acts like
cartoons.
>
>
>
> inphoman911 wrote:
> > Physical analysis is not Tarpley's specialty and its not fair to
> > attack him for making such small errors. I can generally
support
> > anyone who endorses artificial demoltion MIHOP thesis and don't
make
> > such a big deal about the finer details about the other issues.
The
> > way I see it, we have to sell live cremation of Americans for
Public
> > Relations purposes before our time runs out. How will we know
when
> > our time has run out? We will know when we get a nuclear false
flag
> > attack and then martial law to shut down all our legitimate
protest
> > organizations and forums like these. The finer details of the
9/11
> > scam can always be worked out in the future, but selling
controlled
> > demoltion to the general public is of time sensitive importance,
> > unlike fleshing out the planehugger vs. bluescreen issues. When
you
> > stop to realize that we don't have all the time in the world,
you
> > can begin seing things from my point of view. Eric Hufschmid
also
> > made this point recently on one of Daryl Bradford Smiths shows.
> >
> >
> > Hicks 9/11 analysis is LIHOP and I thought he was an agent after
> > reading his Big Wedding book. It's starting to look like he
might
> > just be going through a learning process and is recovering from
his
> > LIHOP indoctrination. I don't think he is going to ruin the
march.
> > Who made the decision to give him a platform though?
> >
> >
> > --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable
> > <webfairy@> wrote:
> >
> >> Synthetic Terror does an excellent job at "Big Picture"
> >>
> > theoretics, but
> >
> >> then when it comes down to the nittygritty of actual events,
the
> >>
> > poor
> >
> >> sucker has planes climbing into holes and covering themselves
up.
> >> I was hoping that this sort of drooling idiocy is what the
event
> >>
> > was
> >
> >> against.
> >>
> >>
> >> inphoman911 wrote:
> >>
> >>> The Hicks book is really bad. He even shows the Pentagon
> >>>
> > picture
> >
> >>> after the roof collapse and makes the reader think it is the
> >>>
> > only
> >
> >>> picture. He is now promoting 9/11 Synthetic Terror at his
site,
> >>>
> > so
> >
> >>> maybe he had just been a disinfo dupe when he put out his
book.
> >>> Don't you think he should be scrambling to put out a new
edition
> >>>
> > of
> >
> >>> the Big Wedding with massive corrections?
> >>>
> >>> --- In
911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "perpetualynquisitive"
> >>> <perpetualynquisitive@> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Daniel Hopsicker Jr., err, I mean Sander Hicks, now that is
> >>>>
> > funny.
> >
> >>>> With original research and interviews, The Big Wedding
provides
> >>>>
> > a
> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> new
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> level of proof that Bush's advisors had detailed
foreknowledge
> >>>>
> > of
> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> 9/11.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> The book dispenses with the hypothetical and the realm of
> >>>>
> > maybe. It
> >
> >>>> attacks the kooky conspiracy theories, like "no-plane-hit-the-
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Pentagon,"
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> which distract from certain suppressed historical truths: the
> >>>>
> > CIA
> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> has
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> had a controlling, client relationship with the powerful
> >>>>
> > Pakistani
> >
> >>>> intelligence group, ISI. The ISI has proven links to 9/11;
they
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> were key
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> funders, trainers, and supporters. Therefore, it's impossible
> >>>>
> > that
> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> the
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> CIA and White House didn't have detailed foreknowledge of
9/11.
> >>>>
> >>>> From here <http://www.drenchkiss.com/>
> >>>>
> >>>> The Big Wedding is almost as bad as Crossing The Rubes I've
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Conned, by
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Mike "The CIA tried to Kill Me, Peak Oiler" Ruppert.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "angiesept11"
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> <angiesept11@>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Yeah, then why is 911 Gatekeeper Sander Hicks one
> >>>>> of the 2 people listed as speaking at your march,
> >>>>> you being the other? Hicks is a 911 Gatekeeper!!
> >>>>> This is both hilarious and disgusting at the same time.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Angie
> >>>>> 911 Truth Movement Musings (Watching the Watchers)
> >>>>> http://www.Angieon911.com
> >>>>> ------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From: greg nixon nxngrg@
> >>>>> Date: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:46 pm
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [911InsideJobbers] WING TV announced Greg Nixon
> >>>>>
> > as
> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>> guest
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> (02/17) nxngrg
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> She is a planehugger huh? I am not. I want the message
to
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> be f--k
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> the gatekeepers I hope that's what comes across.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment