Re: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Why is gatekeeper lecturing at anti-gatekeeper NYC march?

Whether or not they used planes is not a "Fine Detail."

It so happens that there IS NO PLANE in the first hit footage that
claims to show the plane.
The sort of drones the CIA brags about using in Afghanistan are shown,
but everybody seems to conspire together to pretend that this media hoax
is a 'small detail.'
The plump American puppy gassed by CIA-stooges in terrorist costumes got
more notice and attention than the missing plane.
So did Fat Bin Ladin, and Animated Osama.

Whether a plane can squeeze like toothpaste or fold like an umbrella or
do Karate Chops, and carries a little shovel in it's pod to dig with is
part of the infantalization of thought that has left humanity
intellectually disarmed as they imagine a universe that acts like cartoons.

inphoman911 wrote:
> Physical analysis is not Tarpley's specialty and its not fair to
> attack him for making such small errors. I can generally support
> anyone who endorses artificial demoltion MIHOP thesis and don't make
> such a big deal about the finer details about the other issues. The
> way I see it, we have to sell live cremation of Americans for Public
> Relations purposes before our time runs out. How will we know when
> our time has run out? We will know when we get a nuclear false flag
> attack and then martial law to shut down all our legitimate protest
> organizations and forums like these. The finer details of the 9/11
> scam can always be worked out in the future, but selling controlled
> demoltion to the general public is of time sensitive importance,
> unlike fleshing out the planehugger vs. bluescreen issues. When you
> stop to realize that we don't have all the time in the world, you
> can begin seing things from my point of view. Eric Hufschmid also
> made this point recently on one of Daryl Bradford Smiths shows.
>
>
> Hicks 9/11 analysis is LIHOP and I thought he was an agent after
> reading his Big Wedding book. It's starting to look like he might
> just be going through a learning process and is recovering from his
> LIHOP indoctrination. I don't think he is going to ruin the march.
> Who made the decision to give him a platform though?
>
>
> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable
> <webfairy@...> wrote:
>
>> Synthetic Terror does an excellent job at "Big Picture"
>>
> theoretics, but
>
>> then when it comes down to the nittygritty of actual events, the
>>
> poor
>
>> sucker has planes climbing into holes and covering themselves up.
>> I was hoping that this sort of drooling idiocy is what the event
>>
> was
>
>> against.
>>
>>
>> inphoman911 wrote:
>>
>>> The Hicks book is really bad. He even shows the Pentagon
>>>
> picture
>
>>> after the roof collapse and makes the reader think it is the
>>>
> only
>
>>> picture. He is now promoting 9/11 Synthetic Terror at his site,
>>>
> so
>
>>> maybe he had just been a disinfo dupe when he put out his book.
>>> Don't you think he should be scrambling to put out a new edition
>>>
> of
>
>>> the Big Wedding with massive corrections?
>>>
>>> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "perpetualynquisitive"
>>> <perpetualynquisitive@> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Daniel Hopsicker Jr., err, I mean Sander Hicks, now that is
>>>>
> funny.
>
>>>> With original research and interviews, The Big Wedding provides
>>>>
> a
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> new
>>>
>>>
>>>> level of proof that Bush's advisors had detailed foreknowledge
>>>>
> of
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> 9/11.
>>>
>>>
>>>> The book dispenses with the hypothetical and the realm of
>>>>
> maybe. It
>
>>>> attacks the kooky conspiracy theories, like "no-plane-hit-the-
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Pentagon,"
>>>
>>>
>>>> which distract from certain suppressed historical truths: the
>>>>
> CIA
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> has
>>>
>>>
>>>> had a controlling, client relationship with the powerful
>>>>
> Pakistani
>
>>>> intelligence group, ISI. The ISI has proven links to 9/11; they
>>>>
>>>>
>>> were key
>>>
>>>
>>>> funders, trainers, and supporters. Therefore, it's impossible
>>>>
> that
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> the
>>>
>>>
>>>> CIA and White House didn't have detailed foreknowledge of 9/11.
>>>>
>>>> From here <http://www.drenchkiss.com/>
>>>>
>>>> The Big Wedding is almost as bad as Crossing The Rubes I've
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Conned, by
>>>
>>>
>>>> Mike "The CIA tried to Kill Me, Peak Oiler" Ruppert.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "angiesept11"
>>>>
>>>>
>>> <angiesept11@>
>>>
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, then why is 911 Gatekeeper Sander Hicks one
>>>>> of the 2 people listed as speaking at your march,
>>>>> you being the other? Hicks is a 911 Gatekeeper!!
>>>>> This is both hilarious and disgusting at the same time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Angie
>>>>> 911 Truth Movement Musings (Watching the Watchers)
>>>>> http://www.Angieon911.com
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> From: greg nixon nxngrg@
>>>>> Date: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:46 pm
>>>>> Subject: Re: [911InsideJobbers] WING TV announced Greg Nixon
>>>>>
> as
>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> guest
>>>
>>>
>>>>> (02/17) nxngrg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> She is a planehugger huh? I am not. I want the message to
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> be f--k
>>>
>>>
>>>>> the gatekeepers I hope that's what comes across.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/