Discussion about 09/11/2001: [911TruthAction] Digest Number 1239

Friday, April 21, 2006

[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1239

There are 25 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. The Secret Relationship Between Israel and Oil
From: "Thomas Potter" mr_thomas_potter@yahoo.com
2. Puppetmasters and the shut down of the motor analyzer
From: "copernicus122223" copernicus122223@yahoo.com
3. A Day in the LIfe: 4/20/6
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
4. 9-11 truth fails politically because it doesn't fill pockets -- the
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
5. Puppetmasters and the shut down of the motor analyzer
From: "copernicus122223" copernicus122223@yahoo.com
6. ***SOS***Mushroom Cloud in Nevada, CIA & Michael Moore***
From: "MarshaMcClelland" mofmars3@sbcglobal.net
7. articles: Zundel Trial - Round Two -=- How to celebrate Passover
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
8. Fw: China, Russia welcome Iran into Shanghai Cooperation Organizatio
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
9. Should Bush Be Tried For War Crimes? New Poll
From: "MarshaMcClelland" mofmars3@sbcglobal.net
10. $500K Seized; Strange Situation Reported At Nuclear Plant
From: "S Miles Lewis" yahoolists@elfis.net
11. Steven Jones Lecture on WTC explosives
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
12. items: Hopsicker-Plane w/5 tons cocaine has Republican Links, once
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
13. Re: [catapult] [Fwd: Re: No plane at WTC? Re-thinking my "concessio
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
14. Jew Talk -- Had enough?
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
15. Adolf Hitler (1889 - )
From: "The Jewish History Series" joohistory@yahoo.com
16. I've just banned two posters & this should be end of despicable hate
From: "angiesept11" angiesept11@yahoo.com
17. Re: I've just banned two posters & this should be end of despicable
From: "scol202" yahooboxx@ntlworld.com
18. Re: How successful has the 911 truth movement been?
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
19. Re: I've just banned two posters & this should be end of despicable
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
20. Rolling Stone-Bush Worst President In HISTORY ! One of America's Le
From: "ranger116@webtv.net" ranger116@webtv.net
21. Re: I've just banned two posters & this should be end of despicable
From: "Naveed" flanker12k@yahoo.com
22. Zionist Gatekeeper Angie911 has always worked against investigators
From: "Dick Eastman" de1949@nwinfo.net
23. Fw: Compared to Kissinger, Hitler was a boy scout.
From: "Dick Eastman" de1949@nwinfo.net
24. Re: Fw: Compared to Kissinger, Hitler was a boy scout.
From: "Scott Peden" scotpeden@cruzio.com
25. Von Bülow, Former German Minister Says Building 7 Used To Run 9/1
From: "Dick Eastman" de1949@nwinfo.net

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 1
From: "Thomas Potter" mr_thomas_potter@yahoo.com
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 9:42am(PDT)
Subject: The Secret Relationship Between Israel and Oil

The Secret Relationship Between Israel and Oil:
What the US Media Hides

http://www.serendipity.li/zionism/campbell/11720.htm

Most Americans don't even know what Zionism is. In a
nutshell, it is a racist, nationalistic, political
ideology conceived by Theodor Hertzl, an Austrian Jew
in the 1890s, that maintains that there must be a
Jewish state in Palestine, although that means and
always has meant policies of ethnic-cleansing,
apartheid and general persecution of the indigenous
non-Jews of that land, the Arab Muslim and Christian
Palestinians. In a nutshell, advocates of this racist
Zionist ideology are driving our US foreign policy.
What ever happened to separation of synagogue/church
and state? Isn't it time to openly discuss this? Why
are double standards allowed for Israel and for
Zionists?

However the US media does not want Americans to even
think about these things, never mind discuss them!
Certainly, the pro-Israel media does not want
Americans to question our government's support of
Zionist Israel. That is why there is never any mention
in mainstream US media of the Israeli connection to
9-11, to the war on Iraq, to the so-called "war on
terror", and to the subject of Israel's quest for oil.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 2
From: "copernicus122223" copernicus122223@yahoo.com
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:13am(PDT)
Subject: Puppetmasters and the shut down of the motor analyzer

Puppetmasters and the shut down of the motor analyzer

Please browse the references first before reading my article:

Interesting references come from the puppetmasters
http://www.nlptraining.com/index.asp
http://www.nlpschool.com/
http://www.nlpand.co.uk/
http://www.nlpworks.com/
http://www.nlpca.com/
http://www.rediscoverthejoyoflearning.com/nlpclassroom.cfm

Interesting sites from people who do not like NLP
http://members.aol.com/KHoeck777/NLP.html

conspiracy whitewash
http://www.olliverlyle.com/Churchidx/Documents/GCN/may96.html

Here is an interesting article about the rothschilds using
mindcontrol
http://educate-yourself.org/mc/illumformula12chap.shtml
Mindcontrol using children
http://www.nlp-mindcontrol.com/cia_children_mind_control.htm
history of NLP includes articles on pavlov
http://freespace.virgin.net/changing.states/behavioural_approaches.ht
ml

ANother subject I want to talk about is eugenics
http://www.africa-talk.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=151
http://www.eugenics.net/papers/3rdreich.html
http://www.tribalmessenger.org/t-secret-gov/eugenics.htm
http://www.sovereignty.net/p/gov/timeline.html
http://www.iahf.com/world/globaliz.html
http://www.emmerich1.com/EUGENICS.htm
http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac/green.htm

A lot of the articles have a man named Maurice Strong but did you
know he was Paul Martins Advisor?
http://www.fathersforlife.org/articles/gunter/Strong_Martin_2.htm
http://iresist.com/cbg/strong.html
http://www.cbc.ca/canadavotes/leadersparties/leaders/bio_martin.html

I will be Blunt Neurolinguistic programming is brain washing and
Eugenics is a polite term for mass murder. Is it true we need
eugenics, of course not it is as phony as the pyramids on the U.S
dollar bill.

http://www.lufa.ca/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=999
http://groups.msn.com/psycologicalwarfare
http://www.scarletandthebeast.com/william%20morgan.htm
I have given you a lot of information but have not mentioned what
they want. Actually they keep telling us what they want but we are
so busy we are not listening. They want a 80% reduction in
population and right now you are probably wondering if your one of
the lucky ones. You are probably not one of the lucky ones unless
your last name is rothschild. Freemasonry utilizes the ancient
brainwashing techniques with rituals replacing the NlP lessons.
Jesuits use spiritual exercizes and the CATHOLIC Church just uses
repetitive mantras and no thinking required. So why is NLP or
freemason rituals or Spiritual exercizes so effective. The brain
has a motor analyzer which goes through the material and decides
which information is relevant and which will be discarded. Ancient
secret societies have figured out how to bypass the Motor analyzer
and feed information directly into the brain. MKultra experiments
are a product of the study. Most people do not know that ritalin
came from the studies which hurt so many. Now the studies are in
your childrens class room disguised as Attention Deficit Disorder.
Look it up if you want to that is what your computer and your motor
analyzer is for. For those of you that have stumbled accross
www.stopcovertwar.com you will find a lot of victims of strange
practices. This is simply the ancient mindcontrol at work on the
not so willing myself included. The not so secret agenda of the
Catholic Church disguised as the new world order has been practiced
in small experiments. One would be the Jonestown massacre and the
other would be the incident at waco texas. Insiders call it a
celebration and then anhialation involving 80% of the population. I
watched a very scary movie called Puppet masters where people who
fell asleep never awakened. I was comforted to know none of it was
real. Until the government wanted me to work for them. Every day
is a contest to see who will win the day and they have an unlimited
supply of people and money. If they do win and no citizens rise up
to the challenge we will have a lot of changes. Already we can find
the elite working on ways of policing a sleeping public.
http://roboticnation.blogspot.com/2004/04/future-of-robotic-
police.html
I played a game called Deus X which mentions the Illuminati as
good people in a desparate struggle to govern the people. The game
shows a desparate struggle against man made diseases and around
every corner automated turrets decide wether you can be there or
not. This reality is close at hand as more and more citizens decide
to be guinea pigs for the implanted computer chips which now can do
more than just track you. if you think the illuminatti just want to
govern just visit my site :

http://groups.msn.com/psycologicalwarfare/columbineconnectedtofreemas
ons.msnw
It is 3:00 am and my illuminatti neighbours are sleeping once
again I will try to rest in between the harrassment. My site
reveals the elite have always owned law enforcement and the judges
and use rituals to keep them under control. There is a cure but it
will take great courage and you have to decide wether or not you
want to wake everyone up or not. I find analogies or stories will
explain better. A baby elephant is tied by a rope to a stake. All
his or her attempts to break the rope fail and the aelephant
realizes it is futile to break the rope. The elephant does not
realize when he or she is an adult they are more powerful. The
adult elephant fully trained from childhood is now chained because
the rope could easily break. One mouse can break the chains of the
elephant and free the creature forever. My hope is that one of
these days I write the article that allows you to break your chains
and join me in a fight for our right to exist....Thanks for your
Time Dean Roger RAy

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 3
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:44am(PDT)
Subject: A Day in the LIfe: 4/20/6

GOVERNMENT OF THE USA IN EXILE
Free Americans Reaching
Out to Amerika's Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free

Via <prez@usa-exile.org>

April 20, 2006

From: "CLG News" <clg_news@legitgov.org>
Date: April 20, 2006 12:59:03 AM EST
To: "CLG News" <clg_news@legitgov.org>
Subject: 20,000 kidnapped in Iraq in 2006 19 Apr 2006

Breaking News and Commentary from Citizens for Legitimate Government
20 April 2006
http://www.legitgov.org/

All links to articles as summarized below are available here:
http://www.legitgov.org/index.html#breaking_news

20,000 kidnapped in Iraq in 2006 19 Apr 2006 Nearly 20,000 people have
been kidnapped in Iraq since the beginning of the year alone, according
to a report published today on violence in the war-torn country. The
survey, which underscores the massive social upheaval caused by rebel
activity and increasing sectarian conflict, does not give the number of
people killed. However, it says 15,462 people have been wounded.

With the expected passage this spring of the largest emergency
spending bill in history, annual war expenditures in Iraq will have
nearly doubled since the U.S. invasion. War Bill Grows With Extra Costs
20 Apr 2006 The cost of the war in Iraq in treasure continues to rise,
from $48 billion in 2003 to $59 billion in 2004 to $81 billion in 2005
to an anticipated $94 billion in 2006, according to the Center for
Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. The U.S. government is now
spending nearly $10 billion a month in Iraq and Afghanistan, up from
$8.2 billion a year ago, a new Congressional Research Service report
found.

Sex and money bought Iraq contracts 20 Apr 2006 A contractor [Philip
Bloom] in Iraq has pleaded guilty to providing money, sex and designer
watches to US officials in exchange for more than $US8 million ($10.8
million) in reconstruction contracts. [Last paragraph of article:] Also
in Baghdad yesterday, separate groups of gunmen entered two primary
schools and beheaded two teachers in front of their students, the
Ministry of State for National Security said.

Wasted Funds? $190 Million Spent, Only 6 Iraq Health Centers Completed
19 Apr 2006 In March 2004, the Pentagon awarded the California-based
company Parsons Global a contract to build 150 health care centers
throughout Iraq. Two years later, almost all of them sit idle,
including one ABC News visited in the Sadr City section of Baghdad.
According to a government audit obtained by ABC News, only six of the
promised health care centers have been completed.

UK fights to safeguard immunity of officials accused of torturing
Britons --Confessions to bombings made after beatings 17 Apr 2006 The
government will argue in Britain's highest court next week that foreign
officials who commit torture abroad should be immune from civil action
in the English courts. Christopher Greenwood QC will argue for the
British government, which has intervened in support of Saudi Arabian
officials accused of detaining and torturing four Britons in Saudi
jails.

Briton jailed for 15 years in Iraq 20 Apr 2006 A British student who
claims he was on a humanitarian mission to Iraq when he was arrested by
US forces has been jailed for 15 years for passport violations. It is
not known exactly what charges were brought against him by the court,
or on what grounds US forces held him. His lawyers claim he did not
have a fair hearing as charges were only brought on April 15.

[snip]

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: "Indra Lubis" <ilubis@cbn.net.id>
Date: April 19, 2006 9:25:23 PM EST
To: <viacam17april@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [viacam17april] Fw: Urgent Appeal from Palestinian Farmers

From: Ghada Zghier [mailto:ghada@pal-arc.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 7:52 PM
To: International Peasant Movement
Subject: Urgent Appeal from Palestinian Farmers

On the Occasion of the International Day of
Peasants’ Struggle[1][1]:

PARC Urges Immediate Support for the
Palestinian Farmers

April 16, 2006

The Palestinian Agricultural Relief Committees (PARC) issues this
statement on the farmers’ grave conditions in the Occupied Palestinian
Territories in order to call international attention to the insecurity,
lawlessness and flagrant aggression inflicted on Palestinian
defenseless farmers by Israeli army and settlers. PARC wishes to
implore the international farmers’ and social movements to take an
immediate action in support of the Palestinian farmers.

Since the new Hamas-led Cabinet of the Palestinian Authority has sworn
in on March 30, 2006 following the landslide victory of the Islamic
Resistance Movement (Hamas) in the legislative (parliamentary)
elections last January, Israel, the United States, Canada and the
European Union declared a politically motivated war against the poverty
stricken Palestinian people; Israel by freezing the transfer of the tax
revenues ($50 million monthly) and ceasing all kinds of contacts with
the Palestinian new government including security coordination, and the
rest countries by curtailing aid to the Palestinian Authority who
employs approximately 140,000 people. This hasty and unjustified action
against the vulnerable Palestinians will deepen the already existing
economic crisis and people’s distress. It will lead to an inevitable
humanitarian catastrophe and widespread food shortages that will
drastically hit the Palestinian population (approximately 3.2 million)
including destitute farmers.

Palestinian farmers, men and women, have suffered for four consecutive
decades from an Israeli deep-rooted and systematic policy of land
expropriation, destruction of agricultural land and trees, closing
pastures and fishing harbor, attacks and intimidation by Israeli army
and settlers, additional to strict closure and restriction of farmers’
movement into farms and markets.

Israel’s escalation of oppressive measures and hostilities against
Palestinian farmers during the last four years culminated by the
construction of the Wall commenced in 2002. The Wall has created
further economic hardships to farmers due to expropriation of arable
land and restriction of access to the agricultural land from which
farmers earn a living. The State Information Service stated in their
report of March 14, 2006 that 244,494 dunums of West Bank land have
been confiscated by the Israeli occupation authorities since 29 March
2003[2][2].

A total of 49.400 West Bank Palestinians predominantly farmers living
in 38 villages will be residing in closed areas i.e. between the Wall
and the Green Line once the Wall is completed[3][3]. This means that
farmers will need a special permit to access to their farms in order to
cultivate, harvest and graze their animals. Palestinian farmers will
have to present documents to prove their legal ownership of the land to
the Israeli military authority so as the latter will issue a special
permission that will enable farmers to reach their land through tens of
agricultural gates existing in the Wall that are manned and controlled
by Israeli soldiers.

Since the outbreak of the second Intifada in September 2000 and up till
February 2006 during which Israel escalated its air strikes, shelling
and bombardment against Palestinian civilian population and property,
16,195 farmers have lost their income and livelihood due to the
destruction of their farmed land[4][4]. Moreover, 76,867 dunums of
agricultural land were bulldozed rendering thousands of farmers
landless[5][5]. Approximately 13% of Gaza’s agricultural land has been
leveled[6][6]. 1,355,290 trees were uprooted, 756 poultry farms were
destroyed, 14,749 goats and 12,132 cows died due to the destruction of
animals barns, 403 wells were destroyed and 207 farmers’ houses were
demolished[7][7].

At the onset of its occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip in 1967,
Israel intensified its on the ground operations to destroy the
Palestinian agricultural sector and economy in order to subjugate the
Palestinians to the Israeli economy. Palestinian farmers on the other
hand, have courageously fought against land confiscation. They resisted
the construction of Israeli settlements (200 settlements housing
400,000 settlers with a built-up area of 181 square km) on their land.
Palestinian unarmed and peaceful farmers clashed with armed settlers
who occasionally attacked their farms, burned or stole their crops.
Many Palestinian farmers were shot killed or got injured during
harvesting crops by Israeli army and settlers’ fire. 42 Palestinians
were killed by Israeli settlers during the period 2000- 2005[8][8].
Thousands of dunums of olive groves were burned down by the ardent
settlers depriving hundreds of Palestinian families of subsistence
income.

Despite of the Israeli atrocities and systematic policies, agriculture
continues to play an important role in the economies of the Occupied
Palestinian Territories. It ensures the minimal food production
required to prevent mass starvation and total devastation considering
the indispensable importance of food security in enhancing the
Palestinian people’s existence. The importance of agriculture stems
from its input to the labor market. The contribution of agriculture to
employment has risen from 12.7% in 1995 to about 16% in 2005[9][9]. In
addition, it provided work for more than 39% of those who work in
informal sectors[10][10]. Palestinian farmers and rural households have
been using self coping mechanisms to survive the economic hardship
caused by the Israeli occupation. Rural women who are actively engaged
in agriculture (65% of the agriculture labor is done by women) have
been of great help in ensuring subsistence living through cultivating
their house gardens and establishing small- scale poultry and rabbit
farms as well as other modest agro-industry and food- processing
projects. Though these coping mechanisms assisted rural families
during curfews and closures, yet, they are unstable and at constant
risk of destruction by the Israeli military troops and fanatic settlers
who pay no heed to the international humanitarian law and to the
Palestinian humanitarian requirements for food supplies.

Taking into consideration the aforementioned appalling facts, we wish
to express our deep concern about the uncontrolled and devastating
social and economic consequences that will be caused by freezing the
foreign aid to the Palestinian Authority.

Seizing the opportunity of April 17th momentum, we wish to stress the
urgent need of the Palestinian farmers for a vast movement of human
solidarity. We are confident that international farmers’ movements will
not fail us down. We urge you to use your influence across the world to
stop the imposition of the collective sanctions against the Palestinian
people through writing to concerned parties; the UN, USA, EU, and
Canada inviting them to carry out a drastic review of their positions
toward suspending foreign aid. Furthermore, we highly appreciate your
efforts to bring to light the disastrous situations of the Palestinian
farmers in the OPT through the vigils you are organizing in
commemoration of April 17.

We demand a pressure campaign on Israel, the occupying power, to
immediately stop its flagrant violation of Palestinian human rights
particularly farmers’ rights to life and livelihood.

Key Contacts:

Kofi Annan

UN Secretary-General

Office of the Spokesman for the Secretary-General
United Nations, S-378
New York, NY 100178
Fax. 212-963-7055

[snip]

[1][1] On April 17, 1996, the Brazilian military police opened fire on
a group of landless demonstrators, killing 19 immediately and wounding
many others. All but two of the 149 police were acquitted and those who
were found guilty were not detained
(http://www.mstbrazil.org/?q=node/308). Since then, the International
Peasant Movement “La Via Campesina” as well as farmers’ groups and
organizations across the world commemorate the 17th of April each year
to bring farmers’ struggle for their legitimate rights to the
international attention. This year marks the ten-year commemoration of
this massacre.

[snip]

========================================================================
===============================================================

From: Henri the Celt <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Date: April 20, 2006 6:37:33 AM EST
To: AAAHenri <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Subject: Pump up your bicycle tires!

Published: Tuesday, April 18, 2006
Bylined to: Dr. Joe Duarte

http://vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=54315

Chavez taking decisive steps to turn off oil taps to the US

RigZone.com (Dr. Joe Duarte): Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez is
taking decisive steps to turn off the oil taps to the United States of
America.

Venezuela's state owned oil company PDVSA has inked a key deal with
India, taking the first key step away from the U.S. as its major oil
buyer.

At the same time, PDVSA has announced that it will no longer reveal
oil statistics to the SEC after paying off its debts.

The India deal and the refusal to disclose information are not just
strategic, but also send a message to the US about Venezuela's future
plans with regard to supplying the US with oil.

No More Disclosure

According to the BBC: "Venezuela's state oil firm has said it will no
longer disclose information to US financial regulators after paying off
debts in the US. PDVSA said it was no longer obliged to be regulated
by the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) after buying up $83
million in US-traded bonds."

At the same time Venezuela has begun to ship two million barrels of
oil to India per month, making use of India's heavy crude refineries,
for which Venezuela's sulfur laden oil is no problem.

According to Stratfor.com: "While the new deal with India is
relatively small, given that Venezuela produces more than 2 million
barrels of oil in a single day, it nevertheless represents a step down
a sustainable path toward diversifying Caracas' oil markets."

Venezuela has been working on diversifying its dependence on US oil
purchases for some time, having nurtured relationships with Iran and
China, as well as India. But because the US and India are two of the
few countries with existing refineries able to process heavy crude, the
Chavez regime has had a difficult time getting beyond the conceptual
stage with the strategy.

The India deal is small, considering the fact that Venezuela ships 1.5
million barrels of oil to the US per day ... but it is a big signal,
nevertheless.

According to Stratfor: "the April 12 deal with India is just one part
of a nascent multi-tier cooperation between the two nations in which
Venezuela is helping India develop its own heavy crude fields, and
India is in turn purchasing Venezuelan heavy crude and investing in the
facilities necessary to refine heavy crude."

The Chevron Wildcard

The oil world, though, takes strange turns, as Chevron recently
announced a stake in an Indian refinery that will be processing heavy
crude shipped from Venezuela, and will provide products to Asia.

According to the BBC: "5% of Reliance Petroleum, a company set up by
Indian conglomerate Reliance Industries to operate a new export
refinery in north-west India. The 580,000 barrels-per-day site in
Jamnagar will process heavy crude and is due to open in December 2008."

There has been no mention of any intention of Chevron's intentions to
divert any gasoline from its India projects toward the US.

Conclusion

There are several key factors in this story, not the least of which is
the international aspect of the oil market, and the effect of
unintended consequences of any one party's actions.

PDVSA cuts a deal with an Indian oil company in order to move away from
the US as its primary source of oil revenues. Yet, Chevron, a US
company, slipped into the deal through the back door. Chevron is
playing it cool, noting that this venture will concentrate on providing
oil to Asia. Yet, all gasoline looks, feels, and smells similarly,
which means that while ideologues will try to manipulate the markets,
money will always win out.

Who's to know where the gasoline we put in our gas tank in 2008 will
come from?

The only thing that is certain is that because of geopolitics, it will
take a lot more money to take oil out of the ground, send it somewhere
to get refined, and eventually deliver it to gas stations.

Futures markets predict even higher prices ahead

The mainstream press has finally tuned into the fact that crude oil is
selling above $70 per barrel, but they have yet to note that the
December 2006 crude contract is now testing the $75 area.

Meanwhile, gasoline and heating oil prices remain above $2 and natural
gas has made a bottom, and looks to be heading higher as well.

A look ahead in natural gas shows that the December Natural gas
contract is trading near $11 while the May contract is working on the
$8 mark. In other words traders are starting to place a significant
premium for energy into the winter months, as they begin to speculate
on potential supply disruptions.

• Dr. Joe Duarte is author of the book "Futures And Options For
Dummies," and "Successful Energy Sector Investing."

========================================================================
================================================================

From: Henri the Celt <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Date: April 20, 2006 6:00:38 AM EST
To: AAAHenri <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Subject: Fw: [UrukNet] - [Daily Information from Occupied Iraq] -
[newsletter 19 Apr 2006]

uruknet.info

WOMEN AND GAYS DON’T COUNT
Malcom Lagauche

...During the Ba’athist years, Iraqi women dressed in styles as diverse
as those in the west. If a woman wanted to "take the veil," she was
allowed. But no woman was ordered to perform such a ritual (...)
Today’s Iraq is totally different. I don’t have to repeat some of the
horror stories of women now not being able to leave their houses
without two male family members, or women being beaten because of their
style of dress. There have been many reported incidents. In add! ition
to the regression of women in Iraqi society at the hands of a few
fundamentalist U.S.-appointed stooge politicians, many Iraqi women have
been humiliated and even raped by U.S. troops. Again, there are many
published articles concerning these abhorrent actions. So, Iraqi women
are doubly-damned: with the fall of a government that held them in high
esteem, they must put up with social mores that are against their own
beliefs; and add to that the presence of the military personnel who
forced the old government out...

Read the full article / Leggi l'articolo completo:
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=22717

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
DAILY WAR NEWS FOR WEDNESDAY, April 19, 2006
Today in Iraq

A U.S. soldier died from wounds sustained on Tuesday when his vehicle
was struck by a roadside bomb north of Baghdad, the U.S. military said
on Wednesday. Bomb targeting police patrol blows up in the neighborhood
of Harthiya, killing one civilian and injuring 11 people, including two
policemen and an Iraqi soldier. Roadside bomb explodes near al-Kindi
hospital in eastern Baghdad, killing one civilian and wounding four
others. In the Amariyah district, gun! men kill medic as he walked from
house to house administering vaccinations. In three separate attacks,
gunmen in the neighborhood of Dora kill a construction worker, a trade
ministry employee and three power plant workers who had been snatched
from their car an hour earlier. In the suburb of Rustamiyah, police
discover five bodies of Iraqis, handcuffed and blindfolded. Late
Tuesday, police had found 11 corpses in various parts of the capital...

Read the full article / Leggi l'articolo completo:
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=22714

------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
The Billion-Dollar Baghdad Embassy
Leigh Saavedra, POAC

That's the estimate, though only half of it has been appropriated so
far, a billion dollars to build a new embassy in Iraq . It will be the
largest on the globe, the largest the world has ever seen, the size of
Vatican City in Italy. U.S. embassies typically cover ten acres. This
one, a 104-acre complex, will be comprised of 21 buildings, its own
water wells, an electricity plant and wastewaster-treatment facility
that makes the huge compound completely i! ndependent of Iraq , whose
"interim government" sold the land to the U.S. in October 2004. Terms
of the agreement do not appear to be readily accessible...

Read the full article / Leggi l'articolo completo:
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=22708

[snip]
========================================================================
================================================================

China, Russia Welcome Iran into Shanghai Cooperation Organization

Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:16:41 +0300 From: "Erooth Mohamed"
<ekunhan@gmail.com>

By M K Bhadrakumar http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/HD18Ad02.html

The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which maintained it had no
plans
for expansion, is now changing course. Mongolia, Iran, India and
Pakistan, which
previously had observer status, will become full members. SCO's
decision to
welcome Iran into its fold constitutes a political statement.
Conceivably, SCO
would now proceed to adopt a common position on the Iran nuclear issue
at its
summit meeting June 15.

Speaking in Beijing as recently as January 17, the organization's
secretary
general Zhang Deguang had been quoted by Xinhua news agency as saying:
"Absorbing new member states needs a legal basis, yet the SCO has no
rules
concerning the issue. Therefore, there is no need for some Western
countries to
worry whether India, Iran or other countries would become new members."

The SCO, an Intergovernmental organization whose working languages are
Chinese
and Russian, was founded in Shanghai on June 15, 2001 by China, Russia,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgystan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. The SCO's change of
heart
appears set to involve the organization in Iran's nuclear battle and
other
ongoing regional issues with the United States.

Visiting Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mohammadi told
Itar-TASS in
Moscow that the membership expansion "could make the world more fair".
And he
spoke of building an Iran-Russia "gas-and-oil arc" by coordinating their
activities as energy producing countries. Mohammadi also touched on
Iran's
intention to raise the issue of his country's nuclear program and its
expectations of securing SCO support.

The timing of the SCO decision appears to be significant. By the end of
April
the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency is
expected to
report to the United Nations Security Council in New York regarding
Iran's
compliance with the IAEA resolutions and the Security Council's
presidential
statement, which stresses the importance of Iran "reestablishing full,
sustained
suspension of uranium-enrichment activities".

The SCO membership is therefore a lifeline for Iran in political and
economic
terms. The SCO is not a military bloc but is nonetheless a security
organization
committed to countering terrorism, religious extremism and separatism.
SCO
membership would debunk the US propaganda about Iran being part of an
"axis of
evil".

The SCO secretary general's statement on expansion coincided with
several
Chinese and Russian commentaries last week voicing disquiet about the US
attempts to impose UN sanctions against Iran. Comparison has been drawn
with the
Iraq War when the US seized on sanctions as a pretext for invading Iraq.

A People's Daily commentary on April 13 read: "The real intention
behind the US
fueling the Iran issue is to prompt the UN to impose sanctions against
Iran, and
to pave the way for a regime change in that country. The US's global
strategy
and its Iran policy emanate out of its decision to use various means,
including
military means, to change the Iranian regime. This is the US's set
target and is
at the root of the Iran nuclear issue."

The commentary suggested Washington seeks a regime change in Iran with
a view to
establishing American hegemony in the Middle East. Gennady Yefstafiyev,
a former
general in Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service, wrote: "The US's long
term
goals in Iran are obvious: to engineer the downfall of the current
regime; to
establish control over Iran's oil and gas; and to use its territory as
the
shortest route for the transportation of hydrocarbons under US control
from the
regions of Central Asia and the Caspian Sea bypassing Russia and China.
This is
not to mention Iran's intrinsic military and strategic significance."

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said: "I would not be in a hurry
to draw
conclusions, because passions are too often being whipped up around
Iran's
nuclear program ... I would also advise not to whip up passions."

Sergei Kiriyenko, head of Russia's nuclear power agency and a former
prime
minister, said Iran was simply not capable of enriching uranium on an
industrial
scale. "It has long since been known that Iran has a 'cascade' of only
164
centrifuges, and obtaining low-grade uranium from this 'cascade' was
only a
matter of time. This did not come as a surprise to us."

Yevgeniy Velikhov, president of Kurchatov Institute, Russia's nuclear
research
center, told Tier-TASS, "Launching experimental equipment of this type
is
something any university can do."

By virtue of SCO membership, Iran can partake of the various SCO
projects, which
in turn means access to technology, increased investment and trade,
infrastructure development such as banking, communication, etc. It
would also
have implications for global energy security.

The SCO was expected to set up a working group of experts ahead of the
summit in
June with a view to evolving a common "energy strategy" and jointly
undertaking
pipeline projects, oil exploration and related activities.

A third aspect of the SCO decision to expand its membership involves
regional
integration processes. Sensing that the SCO was gaining traction,
Washington had
sought observer status at its summit meeting last June, but was turned
down.
This rebuff - along with SCO's timeline for a reduced American military
presence
in Central Asia, the specter of deepening Russia-China cooperation and
the
setbacks to US diplomacy in Central Asia as a whole - prompted a policy
review
in Washington.

Following a Central Asian tour in October by US Secretary of State
Condoleezza
Rice, Washington's new regional policy began surfacing. The
re-organization of
the US State Department's South Asia Bureau (created in August 1992) to
include
the Central Asian states, projection of US diplomacy in terms of
"Greater
Central Asia" and the push for observer status with the South Asian
Association
for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) should be seen in perspective.

US diplomacy is working toward getting Central Asian states to
orientate toward
South Asia - weaning them away from Russia and China. (Hamid Karzai's
government
in Kabul has also failed to respond to SCO's overtures but has instead
sought
full membership in SAARC.)

But US diplomacy is not making appreciable progress in Central Asia.
Washington
pins hopes on Astana (Kazakhstan) being its pivotal partner in Central
Asia. The
US seeks an expansion of its physical control over Kazakhstan's oil
reserves and
formalization of Kazakh oil transportation via Baku-Ceyhan pipeline,
apart from
carving out a US role in Caspian Sea security.

But Kazakhstan is playing hard to get. President Nurusultan
Nazarbayev's visit
to Moscow on April 3 reaffirmed his continued dependence on Russian oil
pipelines.

Meanwhile, Washington's relations with Tashkent (Uzbekistan) remain in
a state
of deep chill. The US attempt to "isolate" President Islam Karimov is
not
working. (Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is visiting Tashkent on
April
25.) Again, Tajikistan relies heavily on Russia's support. In
Kyrgyzstan,
despite covert US attempts to create dissensions within the regime,
President
Burmanbek Bakiyev's alliance with Prime Minister Felix Kulov (which
enjoys
Russia's backing) is holding.

The Central Asians have also displayed a lack of interest in the idea of
"Greater Central Asia". This became apparent during the conference
sponsored by
Washington recently in Kabul focusing on the theme.

The SCO's enlargement move, in this regional context, would frustrate
the entire
US strategy. Ironically, the SCO would be expanding into South Asia and
the Gulf
region, while "bypassing" Afghanistan.

This at a time when the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is stepping
up its
presence in Afghanistan. (General James L Jones, supreme allied
commander
Europe, said recently that NATO would assume control of Afghanistan by
August.)

So far NATO has ignored SCO. But NATO contingents in Afghanistan would
shortly
be "surrounded" by SCO member countries. NATO would face a dilemma.

If it recognizes that SCO has a habitation and a name (in Central Asia,
South
Asia and the Gulf), then, what about NATO's claim as the sole viable
global
security arbiter in the 21st century? NATO would then be hard-pressed
to explain
the raison d'etre of its expansion into the territories of the former
Soviet
Union.

M K Bhadrakumar served as a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign
Service for
more than 29 years, with postings including India's ambassador to
Uzbekistan
(1995-1998) and to Turkey (1998-2001).

========================================================================
================================================================

From: Henri the Celt <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Date: April 19, 2006 4:33:52 PM EST
To: AAAHenri <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Subject: Waco and the Bipartisan Police State

Waco and the Bipartisan Police State

Anthony Gregory | April 19 2006

Every year around this time, I find it worthwhile to reflect on the
siege at Mt. Carmel, just outside of Waco, Texas, which began on
February 28, 1993, when an ATF publicity stunt went awry, and ended 51
days later on April 19 with about 80 civilians killed.

Waco is still important, because it illustrates the violent nature of
the state, the fact that political power flows from the barrel of a
gun, and the scary truth that the U.S. government is ultimately no
different from all others in this respect. Many people, including many
libertarians, would just as soon forget the debacle. But we must
remember.

Thirteen years ago the federal government of the United States ended
its altercation with a group of peaceful religious separatists – a
conflict the government had initiated – by driving a tank through the
Branch Davidians’ home and church, pumping the interior with poisonous
gas, and keeping the fire engines at a distance while the building and
the people inside burned.

For many Americans, Waco represented the nightmare their government had
become. In those days, it was the right that spoke out against
unchecked government power, erosions of the Bill of Rights, and the
imperial executive. Such criticism was tempered in its radicalism over
the next decade, for a variety of reasons. The most dramatic was
probably the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City,
which occurred on Waco's two-year anniversary, saving the Clinton
presidency from a populace becoming wary of government power as its
partisans successfully blamed the terrorist attack on anti-government
attitudes. We were to believe that even the mild criticism of
government heard on mainstream conservative radio was aiding the
terrorists. In more recent times, as I discussed a year ago in my
article “Waco, Oklahoma City, and the Post-9/11 Left-Right Dynamic,” we
have seen a similar trend going in the opposite direction, with the
right siding with the omnipotent state and accusing the left of siding
with those who want to destroy America.

Yet Waco is neither a leftwing nor rightwing issue. It is instead an
issue that transcends such political categories and cuts to the most
profound of questions as to what kind of country this is, what kind it
should be, and the very meanings of liberty and tyranny.

At Waco, the U.S. government treated the Branch Davidians as any total
state might treat its most alienated subjects. It broke into their home
aggressively, shot at them recklessly and mockingly defiled their
graves. It blocked off their water and their communications with
family, counsel and the press. It waged psychological warfare on them.
It showed no mercy on the little children that it gassed. It imprisoned
the survivors, including one man who wasn’t even in the building during
the siege. The Davidians were effectively dehumanized by the central
state's lapdog press, and so all too few voices, even on the
hyper-sensitive left, came to their defense when Clinton and Reno’s
federal police stampeded them under their weight.

There are always groups that receive less sympathy when they go head to
head with the state, and the ruling class knows it and thrives off it.
During the 1990s, there was more hatred of the militia types and more
fear of the rightwing separatists. Nowadays, the scapegoat is Arabs and
Muslims. For years, in different ways and to varying extents, it’s also
been illegal drug users, non-citizens, foreigners, gun owners,
home-schoolers, prostitutes, tobacco smokers, divorced fathers, and
independent entrepreneurs among others. It can be one group that
endures the jackboot today and a seemingly opposing group that suffers
tomorrow.
But the primary concern for a free society is not which kinds of people
should have their freedom smashed. The real concern is liberty for all.
The capacity of the state to divide peaceful people into groups and set
them against one another is its capacity to oppress. When anyone is
victimized by the state, all who believe in and love the universal
values of freedom, as well as the finer principles on which America was
founded, have a moral obligation to oppose it.

A government than can get away with what it did at Waco is essentially
unleashed, constrained only by its own whim. Waco is a reflection of a
greater problem. Look at the many laws and policies in America leading
up to Waco, and Waco shouldn’t be any surprise. Look at Waco, and
Bush’s fascist policies all fall into place.

The continuity between the Clinton and Bush presidencies on issues of
civil liberties demonstrates something that many people don’t want to
wrap their minds around. America’s police state is utterly bipartisan.
It is designed to persist and indeed extend its reach with each
administration, no matter the party in charge. In fact, the political
party illusion serves to distract people from the real issues, the
state’s trampling of our liberties, and instead devote their hopeful
attention and energy to getting one dictatorial gang elected rather
than the other.

Both Clinton and Bush have gotten away with massive prosecutorial
abuses, federal police brutality and dramatic attacks on due process
for the accused, all while the people have argued over which side is
the worse liar and central manager and not how best to restore liberty
in America. So Bush’s Patriot Act is condemned by the left while
Clinton’s assaults on privacy were ignored or encouraged. The right
called Clinton’s seizure of Elian Gonzalez tyrannical, but think Bush
has the “inherent authority” to detain and abuse people without trial
or due process. The left laments how loyally the mainstream media toed
Bush’s line on WMD in Iraq, but wasn’t nearly as critical when the
media parroted Clinton’s Kosovo war propaganda. Clinton’s gun grabbing
was decried as totalitarian by the right, whereas the Bush federal
government got away with door-to-door gun confiscations in New Orleans
after Katrina. (The federal response to Katrina alone should have lost
Bush all of his support among those who found Waco unacceptable. Or is
the militarization of domestic policy and law enforcement only a
nuisance if its instigator is a known liar about his past with sex and
drugs?)

The worst of this problem of the bipartisan police state is seen in the
“they did it, so why can’t we?” form of argument. How many times in the
last four or five years have we heard Bush’s defenders cite something
horrifying that Clinton did or said as evidence that Bush's actions
aren't as beyond the pale as his critics claim, after all? This is a
disingenuous line of argument coming from those who lambasted Clinton
last decade. But it is effective so long as Americans care more about
their team winning the electoral championship every four years than
about the fact that the whole game is fixed.

If Clinton's officials conducted a large civilian massacre on American
soil, should Bush be allowed to as well? One interesting thought
experiment is to ponder what would have happened if it had been Bush
who torched the Branch Davidian home. My guess is that he’d get away
with it just as Clinton did. In contrast, however, the American right
would not be nearly as outraged as it was, or pretended to be, in the
early 1990s. The left, on the other hand, would be quite enraged, far
more than it actually was 13 years ago. It might even point out that
half of Bush’s victims at the Waco siege were persons of color. As it
actually happened, the left didn’t even notice the demographics of the
slaughtered. You see, the establishment left typically saves the race
card to play in partisan games.

America’s had this bipartisan police state for a long time. It was
Republican Abraham Lincoln who waged war on half the country and
suspended the Bill of Rights in the other half. It was Democrat Woodrow
Wilson who really honed the art of imprisoning dissenters. It was the
Republicans in the 1920s who adamantly enforced alcohol prohibition.
Democrat Franklin Roosevelt tossed the Japanese Americans in
concentration camps. When Republicans turned the heat on leftists
during the Cold War, they were only emulating their Democrat
predecessors' surveillance and harassment of Old-Right and far-left
dissenters in the 30s and 40s. The war on drugs has been advanced,
expanded and internationalized by members of both parties. Both
Republicans and Democrats are fervently pro-gun control. Neither party
has ever done anything significant to rein in the IRS. And just as
Clinton’s men helped to whitewash the massacre at Ruby Ridge, which
occurred on the first Bush's watch, Republican fixers were eager to
cover up the Clinton administration’s wrongdoing at Waco.

The trend continues today. We can make a strong case that Bush and his
cadre have set some precedents, but the Democratic opposition offers
little hope. Bush spies on Americans with no regard for the Bill of
Rights or even the meager statutory restraints imposed on him, and all
the Democrats do is whine that they weren’t in on the snooping, and
that next time they want to be informed. Of course, they have an
interest in keeping the police state healthy and strong. The idea that
Hillary Clinton would be more sensitive to civil liberties if she were
at the empire’s helm is too absurd for words.

Waco should remind us that Democrats are no more restrained than the
Republicans when it comes to being “tough on crime,” if all that
entails is using the bludgeon of state power against all social
elements the ruling class has deemed less than human. It should also
remind us that that bludgeon is no more surgically precise or
benevolent no matter who wields it, and how corrupting it is for those
who do. This should really be obvious by now, as the Bush government
has turned Iraq into one big Branch Davidian compound and now appears
poised to give the Waco treatment to Tehran.

If ever Americans are to have their rightful liberty, a political
realignment must emerge that shatters the dishonest and distracting
constructs of left and right, Democrat and Republican, and focuses
instead on liberty versus the state. Asking a liberal what he thinks of
Waco might give you an idea of whether he tends toward liberty or
statism. Asking a conservative about Iraq may provide similar
illumination. The atrocity apologists on left and right should be seen
as on the same side on the general issue of absolute power. And those
of us who oppose mass murder should work together against the
bipartisan police state.

========================================================================
=================================================================

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 4
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:23am(PDT)
Subject: 9-11 truth fails politically because it doesn't fill pockets -- the

The world turns on the labors of the activists -- diddling on your computer keyboard is not activism -- and activism is motivated only by immediate payoff -- benifits derived from gaining control of production and its fruits. The common good is too remote, too indirect to motivate anyone except exceptional (oddball) men, if any -- and they alone are wholly ineffective. There is one solution:

9-11 investigation findings have to be wedded with the problem of debt-slavery injustice to get any political traction -- to defeat the interests that control this country's institutions.

The 9-11 truth advocate must become populist.

Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 5
From: "copernicus122223" copernicus122223@yahoo.com
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:41am(PDT)
Subject: Puppetmasters and the shut down of the motor analyzer

Puppetmasters and the shut down of the motor analyzer

Please browse the references first before reading my article:

Interesting sites from people who do not like NLP
http://members.aol.com/KHoeck777/NLP.html

conspiracy whitewash
http://www.olliverlyle.com/Churchidx/Documents/GCN/may96.html

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 6
From: "MarshaMcClelland" mofmars3@sbcglobal.net
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 0:45pm(PDT)
Subject: ***SOS***Mushroom Cloud in Nevada, CIA & Michael Moore***

***SOS***Mushroom Cloud in Nevada, CIA & Michael Moore***

Mushroom cloud coming to Nevada & Michael Moore's doing a
documentary on bush's Horrors of Medicare...This is soooo serious
and could be coming to a loved one near you

Randi Rhodes from Air America Radio was on CNN's, Lou Dobbs last
night...She called forth all media to be in Nevada at the nuclear
reactor to watch the testing of 1.4 million tons of explosives to be
blown up so they can do the math to make a tactical nuke for
Iran...Yes, our majority now knows they are insane, for sure...If
this mushroom cloud is allowed to be exploded in Nevada, it is said
there will be no hope for our people in America or anywhere else for
that matter

See the video and hear for
yourself>>>mediahttp://www.therandirhodesshow.com/live/

Click on >>>Randi on Lou Dobbs last night video

Michael Moore is doing a documentary on the horrors of Medicare & on
a personal note:

Been through a Medicare nightmare and very ill with ear and
respiratory infections all month...Not to mention constant battling
with thwarting all the cia hackers have been up to, trying to keep
me from civil and human rights activities

I have that beat, for the moment, anyway...Unbelievable what they
can do in the fictitious name of making America more safe

I heard on the news bush just ordered cia agents to be increased by
50%...The report said "These guys are tech savvy global trotters
working right along side the spies and operative officials"...They
even said "They are trained to go out and get their feet dirty", too

Maybe I'll get lucky and they will pay me a visit when they see they
haven't slowed me...Actually, they helped divert my attention
elsewhere it was needed

I'm set back up and hitting it hard in cyberworld as well as locally
so we shall see what they'll do next

When aol violated my freedom of speech and terminated my account
with wmconnect last month they didn't cease to stop taking the
payment out of my checking account which of course made my rent
check bounce...

Then there was another strange phone call which helps prove the tap
that's believed to be on my phone, is there

I won't go into this as I'm sending this message to many who won't
be up to date understanding what has transpired against my activity
in the way of the attacks on me via the cia and bush's illegal
practices with the nsa spying...Some would and could not believe the
reality and depth of what others would and do or stoop to, to stop
our succeeding in taking back our country

Any of my friends who want to know details can call or email and ask
about the last call...

All month I've been ill...No meds with these infections due to
Medicare losing me in the computer with this new Medicare change the
bush administration is so proud of...In the past few months, six
times the computer lost me...I actually enrolled in six separate
programs...I think there are forty three of them

I took notes recording the differing programs I was signed up for,
for documentation just in case they'd be helpful because Michael
Moore is doing that documentary on the horrors of Medicare...

I take little meds compared to all doctors were trying to force feed
me through the years for several physical conditions

Two blood pressure pills and previcid for my hyatel hernia and
stomach is all I take...I don't even take the osteoporosis
med>>>Fosomax due to fear of what it would do to further deteriorate
my stomach conditions

I've worked 25 years and feel like a second class citizen being on
welfare now...What a nightmare this having to depend on Medicare and
Medicaid, bull, has been...

About 18 months ago Medicaid decided not to pay for one of the few
drugs I did have to take and they started switching one on me with
no notice...It started with the pharmacy announcing my long time and
much needed prilosec was no longer covered

Going cold turkey and then trying to get used to one that wouldn't
work after another was cruel for anyone who suffers with multiple
serious stomach complications...Then finally getting used to one and
it happens again...I can usually take pain and suffering very well
but I have cried from the frustration of these hurtful hurdles

I can't help but blame my further deterioration (and it is serious
for many) on this switching of needed meds

I live in a disability complex and many are suffering here with
their own Medicare stories...One guy is going to die soon and they
have just now began switching his meds...He told me this just the
other day...I feel so bad for him...He's only in his forties and
loses his memory but is very intelligent and with it most of the time

I hope and pray the transition from one med to another doesn't do
him in...

With these unexpected infections I've had for weeks and getting no
antibiotics, compounded by stress, Medicare almost killed me this
time...It makes me really worry for others, especially the disabled
and elderly without ability to speak for themselves...I'm pretty
good at speaking for myself but it did me little good...I had to
plea and cry to strangers for almost three months now to help and
for some reason each new enrollment in Medicare would just disappear

Oh, and then there was a freezing point I was told of due to prior
enrollment which prevented another new enrollment from taking
place...They couldn't find my enrollment detailed information but
the freeze was there...Dizzy and with dumb hands, fearing a stroke,
I did survive all this time as prayer got me through, as always

What if someone can't speak for themselves and have no one to help
them?...I guess they just die?

The stress alone was bad enough at having to enroll six times for
the mandatory program and being lost as it had become an ongoing
thing just as the hack jobs on my computer has been ongoing

The infections got so bad that I could barely hear out of one ear
before I was helped...I can almost hear completely now and doing
quite well

To get the needed help I had to call Congressman Sherrod Brown here
in Ohio and his staff helped me...Our old Congressman Tom Sawyer
(personal friend of my Dad) is running for Sherrod's old seat, I
found out...And that's very good

I thank God that there are those in the wings who are not bad guys
because they'll be among those that save us all...Them and those
honest and concerned in media

Sincerely,
Marsha

Note from Marsha...
For those who don't know me>>>I'm a human and civil rights activist
working to help unite organizations, projects and groups with
important issues for one loud voice and strength in numbers

We are spiritual and secular people from many walks of life,
learning to put differences aside enough to work together for the
good of mankind

I have not been able to keep up with scanning the digests of almost
500 yahoo groups I network with...I have to delete my email
continually so if you want me to see something important pertaining
to a productive and positive nature please put>>>***SOS***in the
subject box and send to me personally...mofmars3@sbcglobal.net

Please contact me with your group link if you are an owner and would
like it added to our awesome website

Sneak peek at our website under construction that belongs to "We The
people" from everywhere...Please know we are already many groups who
have united beginning in 2003...As you will soon see when we load
the multitude of groups standing with us

>>> Click here: Home Page
http://www.wethepeopleunited.com/

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 7
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:11pm(PDT)
Subject: articles: Zundel Trial - Round Two -=- How to celebrate Passover

From: "Peter Myers" <myers@cyberone.com.au>

April 20, 2006

A corrected version of the Dostoievsky material is at
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/dostoievsky.html

(1) Hilton St. Petersburg hotel rented by Orthodox Jews for Passover holiday
(2) The Zündel Trial - Round Two: The Genie is Out of the Bottle, by Horst Mahler

(1) Hilton St. Petersburg hotel rented by Orthodox Jews for Passover holiday

Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:40:39 +0200 From: "Marek Glogoczowski"
<mglogo@poczta.fm>

The High Holy Hilton

The entire St. Petersburg hotel is clean, kosher and booked by a group for the
Jewish holiday.

By WAVENEY ANN MOORE, Times Staff Write, April 12, 2006

http://www.sptimes.com/2006/04/12/news_pf/Southpinellas/The_High_Holy_Hilton.shtml

ST. PETERSBURG - Orthodox Jews from across the nation and overseas have rented
the entire Hilton St. Petersburg Bayfront for Passover, which begins at sundown.

Until late next week, 700 Jews will celebrate the holidays there, following a
religious regimen that required special training for the hotel staff. At a large
cost shared by the hotel and the Jewish tour group that organized the stay, the
kitchen has been made kosher with new equipment and special cleansings.

The hotel has made many specific accommodations for the Orthodox Jews, who are
barred from labor on four of the days of Passover and on the Sabbath.

Elevators are programmed to stop automatically on each floor, because pushing
the buttons is labor.

Using card keys to open a room is labor, so hotel staffers will be stationed on
each floor to let guests into their rooms. There will be no Bibles in the rooms.

Bathrooms are stocked with boxes of tissue, since tearing squares from a roll of
toilet paper would be considered labor.

The groundfloor Starbucks, scoured and made kosher for Passover, is closed to
outsiders. So is the hotel restaurant, which will become a temporary tea room.
The bar will serve snacks, not alcohol.

Windows overlooking the pool will have their sheer curtains pulled tight and
pinned to protect the modesty of women going for a swim.

Such efforts are a first for the St. Petersburg Hilton, but are part of a
growing trend in Passover travel. The holiday, which commemorates the
Israelites' deliverance from bondage and their exodus from Egypt, traditionally
has been a time of family gatherings. More and more, though, families are
leaving home for the celebration, which can require intensive cleaning, food
preparation in accordance with special dietary rules and designated Passover
dishes and cutlery.

Jews are commanded to purge their homes of all leavened products, or hametz.
This is based on the hasty departure from Egypt of the Israelites, who did not
have time to allow their dough to rise and ate only unleavened bread. In the
Orthodox tradition, in particular, Passover cleaning can mean cleaning the house
from top to bottom, emptying pockets, dusting books, turning mattresses, washing
curtains, moving furniture, buying new toothbrushes and kitchen sponges.

Matzo, an unleavened bread, is substituted for yeast bread, cereal, pasta and
other foods. Dishes, spoons, forks, glasses, anything that may have touched
these foods, must be thoroughly cleaned or put out of sight. Many people have
just-for-Passover dishes. Even away from Passover, meat and dairy dishes and
pots must be separate.

Palm Harbor's Westin Innisbrook Resort is hosting a Passover group again this
year, but other guests also are staying at the resort.

The Passover travel business is growing.

"The simple reason is that it is a huge undertaking to make the Passover seder
at home," said Beryl Phillips of Palace Tours in Hollywood, who is bringing 500
people to the Westin Innisbrook. "One is that it is a tremendous effort to
convert the house from regular dishes to the Passover dishes and pots and so
forth."

Travel packages also are convenient for families. "We have tables for 20 or 30
or more at some of the family tables," he said. "As families have dispersed,
Passover is a time for ingathering and everyone gets together."

Dr. Norman Goldwasser of Miami Beach, director of Eden Tours, which arranged the
Passover package at the Hilton, estimated that about 20,000 people in Florida
are leaving their homes for Passover. Larger, multigenerational families want to
celebrate in comfortable quarters, he said.

"Besides, husbands want to give their wives a break," Goldwasser said in the
bustling hotel lobby, where women, many in traditional long dresses and heads
covered, pushed baby strollers or marshalled young children to elevators or
outdoors.

This is Eden Tour's first Passover package to St. Petersburg. Its Web site tells
travelers to "picture the four-star elegance of the luxuriously renovated"
Hilton, along with "all of the extraordinary recreational activities that the
Tampa Bay area has to offer."

Packages started at $2,500 a room for the 10-day stay.

Goldwasser said he chose St. Petersburg to get out of the Miami area and because
he "fell in love with the area and hotel."

The Hilton staff has "bent over backward to accommodate our special needs," he
said.

Indeed, both the restaurant and banquet kitchens have been made kosher to meet
dietary guidelines. During the group's stay, the banquet kitchen will be
designated for meat dishes and the restaurant kitchen for dairy. Special
Passover dishes and utensils will be used.

The Hilton is guaranteed at least a second year of the group's business, said
Cindy Krieg, director of catering and convention services.

As she gave a tour of the hotel Tuesday, Krieg said Eden Tours began making
arrangements to come to St. Petersburg about nine months ago. It helped prepare
hotel employees by giving them orientation sessions about the meaning and
significance of Passover. Since only kosher for Passover food will be allowed on
the property during the group's stay, hotel staff will eat meals prepared by the
catering service hired by Eden Tours.

An important part of preparing for the group was removing everything with
leavening from the premises. Carpets have been shampooed and rooms thoroughly
cleaned, Krieg said. Items such as coffee packages, which were not kosher, were
removed from rooms, she said.

In the grand ballroom Tuesday, tables had been set up to accommodate each
family. Some were round with only a few chairs, while others were long and
banquet-style. Each family will be served by the same person throughout their
stay. Ritual handwashing stations will be set up in long corridors nearby.

Communal seders will be held on the first two nights of the holiday, as well as
several private family seders, Goldwasser said. Three different synagogue
services will be held twice a day in one of the ballrooms, where lattice topped
partitions will separate men and women during worship.

(2) The Zündel Trial - Round Two: The Genie is Out of the Bottle, by Horst
Mahler

Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:27:15 +0100 From: Rowan Berkeley
<rowan.berkeley@googlemail.com>

The Zündel Trial - Round Two: The Genie is Out of the Bottle by Horst Mahler
Translated from the German by James Damon and Patrick McNally
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Iran/mahler.htm

Zündel's defense attorney Sylvia Stolz, responding to the statement by the
Mannheim Holocaust Judiciary:

"The Holocaust Laws of the OMF-Bundesrepublik (Organizational Form of a Modality
of Foreign Rule of the Federal Republic of Germany) are pure treason!"

On the first business day of the recently resumed show trial against Ernst
Zündel for "Denying the Holocaust," Dr. Meinerzhagen (pottering about as head
judge) proved to be extremely irritable. After numerous but fruitless attacks
against Sylvia Stolz (chief defense lawyer for Ernst Zündel), he finally lost
his composure and muzzled the defense. Unprecedented events have indeed taken
place. After the rather timid reading of the charges against Zündel by two
prosecutors, the assistant defense lawyer, Attorney Schaller of Vienna, had
responded with an eloquent appeal for observance of the rules that characterize
court procedure in a state of laws, which the Mannheim justices are obligated to
observe.

Following Schaller, Sylvia Stolz addressed the court as follows:

"The defense rejects the accusations against Ernst Zündel, a citizen of the
German Reich. This is not a legal prosecution under the laws of the Reich or any
other legal system. It is an exercise of power that is illegal under
international law, by a puppet government called "Federal Republic of
Germany."[1] To use the expression coined by the professor of international law,
Dr. Carlo Schmid, the Federal Republic of Germany is an "Organizational Form of
a Modality of Foreign Rule." Henceforth we shall refer to this foreign
occupation government as "OMF-FRG."

I described the legal structure of OMF-FRG in the court document dated 18
October 2005, complete with lengthy quotations from the founding speech of the
OMF-FRG Parliamentary Council presented by Prof. Dr. Carlo Schmid. I also quoted
pertinent remarks by the professors of International Law Prof. Friedrich Berger
and Prof. Otto Kimminich and elucidated the conclusions to be drawn as they
relate to the case of Ernst Zündel. In its meeting outside the main trial, that
is, in the absence of the presiding judges, the "Sixth Superior Criminal Court
of Mannheim District has given notice that it intends to simply ignore the duly
submitted argument made by the defense. The decision of the Criminal Court
states that "The legal profferings that the defendant submitted in his petition
cannot be accepted by this Chamber. They and the conclusions at which they
arrive, appear to be ultimately devoid of judicial relevance."

The defense refuses to accept this peremptory dismissal. Every layman with at
least a primary school education should be able to understand the arguments
developed therein, as well as the significance of their conclusions for the
Zündel trial. As counterproposal, the defense will read its submission dated 18
October 2005 in the main trial, including basis for its arguments, so that the
hesitant attitude of the 'professional judges' will be recognizable and the
court of appeals will be able to correct their capricious refusal to accept our
submissions.

The signers of the ruling of 7 November 2005, Dr. Meinerzhagen, Dr. Hamm, and
Mrs. Krebs-Dörr are conducting themselves in the tradition of the International
Military Tribunal of the victors over the German Reich, who agreed to disregard
all discussion about whether their actions were violations of international law.
Those so-called 'judges' and 'prosecutors' resolved that 'we will simply declare
what international law is so that there can be no discussion of whether it is
international law or not.'[2] The persons responsible for that atrocity
propaganda show had expressly abandoned any quest for truth and concept of
justice in order to make their lynchings of leading Reich personalities appear
to be legal. I shall return to this later in my presentations.

In my motion of 18 October 2005 (page 26) I gave notice that the defense would
attack the dogma of 'Offenkundigkeit' (Manifest Obviousness) of the 'Holocaust'
with all the resources at its disposal. I said the defense would show that in
the continuing war against Germany by the enemies of the Reich, 'manifest
obviousness' has been feigned and assumed from the very beginning.

The above mentioned jurists have taken this statement as occasion to, express
their intent for mendacious procedure in the main trial as follows:

'As far as manifest obviousness of the Holocaust is concerned, the motion
recapitulates familiar pseudo arguments that have been proffered and continue to
be proffered by so-called revisionists (see BGHSt 47,278) without raising bona
fide doubt about the historically proven and therefore manifestly obvious
genocide, particularly of the Jews, by the National Socialist Dictatorship
(stdg. Rspr. des Bundesverfassingsgerichts und des Bundesgerichthofs vgl.
BVerfGE 90, 241, 249; BGHSt 40,97, 99,; 46, 36, 46 f.; 47, 278.) This genocide
is factually assumed in Paragraph 130 III of the Penal Code (See
BundesGerichthofStrafsachen, Reports of the High Court in Criminal Matters, 47,
278). Thus any evidentiary exhibit that would deny this is forbidden in Reports
of the High Court in Criminal Matters and other publications.

With this reasoning, Dr. Meinerzhagen and his colleagues have obviously
abandoned the dogma of Manifest Obviousness. That is the good news. The bad news
is the withdrawal of permission to submit evidence, which took place despite the
abandonment of 'manifest obviousness.' What is going on inside the heads of
these judges? What is the definition of Scheinargumente (show arguments)? In
imitation of the Nuremberg Tribunals, these jurists use the term 'show
arguments' to designate arguments that are likely to prove, in support of the
will of the foreign occupation government, any previously established 'verdict'
as illegal and unjust. Such arguments have to be repressed. And what are
'familiar show arguments?' 'Familiar show arguments' are apparently arguments on
which OMF/FRG judicial arbitrariness has been successfully tested.

And what in Heaven's name are 'factual presuppositions? The term 'factual
presupposition' or 'presumed factuality' refers to the court's complete
disregard of the criminal law. In criminal law, punishment is court ordered
compensation for a debt. Debt is a deficit appearing in a transaction that
should not be there. But if there is no transaction, there can be no debt. In
order to distinguish terror from punishment, the penal code typifies certain
transactions as punishable by designating them "Tatbestandsmerkmale" (factual
characteristics), thereby separating them from permissible activity. The facts
of the case extend to the transaction in the narrower sense of an act or failure
to act, as well as to accompanying circumstances that are significant for
determination of the demerit. In a narrower sense, the action classified in
Paragraph 3 of the Penal Code is an expression of opinion. The circumstance
accompanying the misdeed is a certain contemporary historical fact (called
'Holocaust.')

It is the task of the judge to determine the given life circumstances involved
in the case.) In the present instance this consists of a certain expression of
opinion, along with accompanying circumstances. The judge must determine what is
to be considered as "given" and whether the facts of the case correspond to an
action that can be classified as punishable. The citizen under the law can adapt
his intent to avoidance of the classified action.

The statement of facts of a punishment norm also guarantees the freedom from
punishment of all actions that do not meet the criteria of punishable (nulla
poena sine lege ? "no punishment without law.") Within the realm of actions
classified as nonpunishable, one can live free from fear of being punished. This
is what distinguishes a nation of laws from tyranny. However, the statute of the
victors' tribunal at Nuremberg violated this basic principle (that is unanimous
opinion.) Egged on by the High Court of the OMF/FRG, Dr. Meinerzhaben and his
colleagues are likewise engaged in tearing down the boundary between justice and
tyranny. Where "Holocaust" is concerned, they intend to set aside the burden of
proof that is obligatory on the judge. They intend to do this with allegation of
a fiction that does not even appear as such in "the law" (Paragraph 130 III of
Penal Code.)

What is the source of this legalistic and dogmatic mistake of Dr. Meinerzhagen
and the High Court of OMF/FRG? In their "argumentation," they dogmatically
assume that the so called Holocaust is a given fact in time and space. They
postulate that any and all doubts concerning "Holocaust" are unthinkable. They
have defected from the ranks of the truth-seekers and joined the ranks of the
religion-founders. Religion requires that we rule out doubt and substitute
belief in its stead. The true believer vehemently crushes every attempt to
introduce reason into his consideration, since reason is the harbinger of doubt.
Believing demands unquestioning trust in the priestly caste, which functions
simultaneously as the faith police.

Within the hazy realm of Holocaust religion, the legal apparatus of the OMF/FRG
has degenerated into an inquisition. There is a cynical calculation of power in
this. Following World War II, world Jewry recognized the possibility of using
the Holocaust lie to found Israel and create a world empire to support and
secure it against all opposition. World Jewry knows from experience that almost
everyone can be made to believe almost anything if it can be suggested to them
that most people believe it. Through the power of suggestion combined with
Jewish control of world media the "Holocaust" has indeed become the suggested
belief of almost everyone.

When he was still Cardinal Ratzinger, Pope Benedict XVI said the following on
the subject of this power of world Jewry:

'The feeling that democracy is not yet the proper form of freedom is rather
common, and is continuing to spread. Is there not an oligarchy consisting of
those who determine what is "modern" and "progressive," and what the enlightened
person should think? The cruelty of this oligarchy, and its power to make the
public do its will, is all too familiar. Whoever blocks its path is an "enemy of
freedom" for the reason that he is allegedly hindering free expression of
opinion. Who can have doubts about the power of these interests, whose dirty
hands become more visible all the time? And besides: is the system of majority
vs. minority a system of true freedom?'[3]

If it is to be suggested that the Holocaust lie is to be "believed by nearly
everyone," then the real truth must be sunk in a bottomless spiral of silence.
And this can succeed only if the contradiction of the "Holocaust" lie is
forcibly suppressed -- obviously through a modern inquisition. Criminal law
serves the cause of justice through atonement for crime by punishment, while
inquisition serves the enforcement of a particular belief through destruction of
heretics. However, it is the general will of Western civilization that
involuntary belief of all kinds should be abolished. That is precisely what
comprises the substance of freedom of belief, the nucleus of recognizing the
individual as a person. This general will constitutes the difference between
modern and medieval times.

Inquisition is the purest atrocity, since it destroys freedom of belief.

Inquisition has nothing to do with the application or reestablishment of justice
through punishment. The enforcement of "Holocaust" law is inquisition, hence
unmitigated crime. As Plato pointed out, inquisitory law is in fact the worst
kind of injustice because it pretends to be justice.

Exclaiming " Enough of that!" Dr. Meinerzhagen then interrupted Attorney Stolz,
taking away her right to speak and terminating the session. He fled into the
conference room with his colleagues and returned after a quarter hour. Dr.
Meinerzhagen then proclaimed the directive of the court that in future, Attorney
Stolz would have to submit all her motions in writing, and would not be allowed
to read them aloud before the court.

With this ruling, the show trial has become another "Ghost Trial" (Rainer Hamm,
Counsel for Defense, 94, 457.) The public will no longer be allowed to hear the
arguments of the defense. The Holocaust judges are attempting to introduce the
"silence of the grave" in the courtroom (see Scheffler, Neue Juristische
Wochenschrift 94, 2194.) However, their attempt to disguise their illegal action
as legal procedure is still doomed to failure. They are chanting the allegation
that the Holocaust has been "proven many times" into empty space. The undeniable
fact that the opposite has long been proven, is enough to completely disqualify
it.

The court appointed expert witness Prof. Dr. Gerhard Jagschitz of the University
of Vienna Institute for Contemporary History (A 1090 Wien, Rotenhausgasse 6)
demonstrated that the opposite is true in his written report submitted to the
Landesgericht für Strafsachen (District Criminal Court), Vienna, on 10 January
1991. See Az. (Archiv für Zivile Praxis): 26 b Vr (Verwaltungsrundshau)14
184/86.)

Prof. Jagschitz presented his findings as follows: ".in the course of research
into the literature on the subject, it developed that a relative scarcity of
scientific and objective literature is offset by an abundance of eyewitness
accounts and subjective summarizations. I found numerous contradictions,
retractions, omissions and inadequate references to sources. Furthermore,
substantial doubts about basic questions have been reinforced by a number of
court exonerations in relevant trials.

These exonerations resulted from expert reports presented to both national and
international courts. Thus the mere extrapolation of court verdicts and
evocation of judicial notoriety of the familiar stories of gassings of Jews at
Auschwitz no longer suffice as a basis for reaching verdicts -- at least not in
the context of any democratic concept of justice. Thus in this expert report, it
was proven necessary to undertake the necessary corrections of relevant
literature as well . In the course of this research it became clear that
resources from certain archives were inadequately utilized in previous research.
Thanks to political events of the last few years, resources that were heretofore
unavailable to us in the West have now been made available. I am referring in
particular to documents of the Reichssicherheitshauptamtes (Central Reich
Security Office) in Potsdam, a huge resource of Auschwitz documents (several
tons) that are stored in various archives in Moscow."

The historian Prof. Dr. Ernst Nolte also refers to the baselessness of using
this inquisitorial device of assumed manifest obviousness in order to protect
the Holocaust lie against consideration by the court:

"Not until the rules of examination of witnesses have been generally applied and
testimony is no longer evaluated according to political criteria, will secure
ground be won for any attempt at scientific objectivity regarding the 'final
solution'.[4] The widely disseminated notion that all doubt concerning the
prevailing concept of a 'Holocaust' with six million victims is to be
automatically treated as though it were maliciousness and inhumanity, and
therefore repressed by all means, can under no circumstances be accepted by
objective science. This is because of the fundamental significance of the maxim
'de omnibus dubitandum est' (everything is to be doubted) for objective science.
This attitude must be rejected as an attack on the principle of freedom of
research. [5]

Although I consider myself more challenged by 'Revisionism' than most
contemporary German historians, I soon arrived at the conviction that the
Revisionist school has been treated in a subjective and unscientific manner. In
established literature it has met rejection, suspicions about the motivation of
its authors and above all, dead silence.[6]

Radical revisionism is much more prevalent in France and the USA than in
Germany. There can be no doubt that its forerunners are well informed and have
carried out extensive investigations in the field.

As far as mastery of source material is concerned, and especially criticism of
source material, these investigations probably surpass those of established
historians in Germany.[7] At any rate we must give the radical Revionists and
their provocative theories credit for having forced established historiography
to reassess its positions and find firmer basis for their assumptions and
conclusions, as Raul Hilberg has done.[8] ".The questions about the reliability
of eyewitness testimony, the significance of documents, technical impossibility
of certain procedures, credibility of numbers quoted, the and persuasiveness of
the circumstances are permissible and legitimate. Not only are they permissible,
but they are procedurally indispensable, and every attempt to dispense with
Revisionist arguments and evidence by imposing total science or banishing them
from the world, has got to be illegitimate.[9]

If radical revisionism were correct in its assertion that there was no
'Holocaust' in the sense of a comprehensive and systematic program of
annihilation ordered by the highest levels of government, I would have to arrive
at the conclusion that National Socialism was not a 'bizarre copy of
Bolshevism,' but rather that it was simply leading the struggle for survival of
a Germany that had been forced into the defensive worldwide. No author wants to
admit that nothing of his work has survived except rubble and so I too have a
vital interest in proving that Revisionism is incorrect, at least in its most
radical manifestation.[10]

The above formulation provides the key to understanding our present world. It is
not just the scientific work of Ernst Nolte that would be lying in ruins. The
very foundations of the Jewish American world empire would be shaken. The German
Empire would again be perceived as the power that had defended the Christian
West "to the last drop of its blood" against talmudic mammonism (Satan.) Adolf
Hitler would no longer be the devil, he would be the savior. The world would
recognize the profound truth concerning the Nuremberg Tribunal as proclaimed by
the Portuguese expert on international law, Dr. Joao das Regas: "In actuality,
two mutually incomprehensible worlds faced each other at Nuremberg. The
materialistic world of Mammonism and hypocritical democracy opposed to the
idealistic and heroic conception of a nation that was defending its right to
exist. How could the sated and materialistic world understand the unflinching
and heroic will to survive of a nation that, despite its exasperation over
diminished territory, had presented our culture with immortal works for
centuries, and before the Second World War had stood at the forefront of
critical scientific progress in our century?

It was characteristic of the depraved mentality of the international press to
continue their attacks against the leaders of the German nation despite the
noble manner in which they conducted themselves throughout their disgraceful
treatment and unjust death sentences. As precursors of social justice built on a
national basis, the condemned German leaders went to their deaths at Nuremberg
with a glowing confession of love for their nation and their ideals. Theirs was
a truly heroic deportment, worthy of our highest admiration."[11]

The Evil Empire that, true to its nature, is forever demonizing others (the
goys) has mobilized all the material and intellectual resources at its disposal
in the effort to hinder dissemination of the truth. The truth can no longer be
held back, however. For the first time, the leader of a large and wealthy nation
is directing his country's national policy toward exposing the Holocaust lie.
His intention, born of self defense, is to remove the Zionist settler state of
Israel from the map, thereby making it possible for Jews and Arabs to once again
coexist in peace. It marks the beginning of the end for the Great Lie that has
long held our nation in bondage. The reaction of world Jewry to
Achmadinedschad's announcement of the convocation of an international commission
to investigate the "Holocaust" shows that the conspiracy of silence surrounding
Revisionism has finally been broken. The Jews are no longer able to suggest that
"nearly everybody believes in the Holocaust." We are witnessing the end of the
greatest lie in the history of mankind. He who still continues to defend the lie
and thereby soils his hands will be left behind. In the words of Michael
Gorbachev, "Life punishes those who get left behind."

Some other remarks by Prof. Dr. Ernst Nolte on the subject of Revisionism are
noteworthy: "I do indeed feel challenged by Revisionism, but I am unable to join
those who demand that the state and the police intervene to repress Revisionism.
For this very reason I find myself compelled to ask the question of whether
Revisionism has/represents real arguments, or really does consist of mere
deceptive agitation. The general all around quality of the individual historian
comes into play here. The real historian knows that revision is the daily bread
of scientific history.

Real historians also know that in the final analysis, some Revisionist theories
are going to be acknowledged by established historians, or at least taken into
the discussion. For example, during a recent congress of historians it was not
specifically mentioned that during the War and immediately afterwards there were
many allegations that the Germans had carried out mass executions by the use of
hot steam in sealed chambers, electric shocks on giant electrical plates, and
quicklime. By its complete silence, the congress declared these allegations to
be as irrelevant as the rumor of soap made from Jewish corpses. (Incidentally, a
well known film director has recently resurrected those rumors in German
newspaper announcements.)[12]

Even the testimony of the SS leader and Bekennende (Confessing) church member
Kurt Gerstein, probably the most widely circulated "Holocaust" account of the
1950s, is no longer accepted in documentary collections, even by the most
orthodox scholars. And it is well known that Jean-Claude Pressac, who despite
his peculiar precedents is still acknowledged to be a serious researcher,
recently reduced the number of Auschwitz gas chamber victims from four million
down to around half a million. Their abandoned allegations do not differ
fundamentally from individual corrections of the kind that, to my knowledge,
have been brought forward only by 'Revisionists:' The corrections that the first
confessions of the Auschwitz commandant Höß were extracted under torture; that
giant flames leaping from crematory chimneys, reported by numerous eyewitnesses,
are best explained by mistakes of visual perception; that the technical
prerequisites for cremating up to 24,000 corpses per day were simply not
available; and that the cellar morgues in crematories of camps that had to
accommodate around 300 "natural" deaths per day were indispensable during the
typhus epidemics of those days and could not have been utilized for mass
murders, at least not during epidemics.

Such ideas can hardly surprise a historian. He knows from his own day to day
experience that, since Herodotus' time, it has been necessary to treat large
figures with suspicion, insofar as they do not originate with official
statistical bureaus. The historian understands no less well that large groups of
people exposed to stressful circumstances and confusing events that are now and
have always been rumor incubators.[13]

The testimony of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höß was obtained under torture.
Without doubt, his confessions contributed greatly to the collapse of the
defense in the Nuremberg trials. His testimony would not have been admissible in
any court of law that complied with Western legal and judicial standards. The
so-called Gerstein documents contain so many contradictions and objective
impossibilities that they must be discarded as worthless, while the few actual
eyewitness accounts consist of hearsay and mere assumptions.

Thanks to the Soviet and Polish communists, a thorough investigation of
Auschwitz by an international commission of experts did not take place after the
end of the War. This stands in contrast to the case of the mass graves at Katyn
Forest discovered by the Wehrmacht in 1943. The publication of photographs of
crematoria and some cans with the label "Zyklon B Poison Gas" has no value as
proof of murder since crematoria had to be constructed near large camps and
Zyklon B was the best know disinfestant of the time. Zyklon B was indispensable
wherever masses of people were forced to live under crowded conditions.

The integrity of the scientific discipline of historiography demands that it be
allowed to question the established and "politically correct" version of history
? namely that mass murder in gas chambers has been proven by numerous eyewitness

accounts and incontrovertible facts, and therefore is not open to doubt. If
historiography is not allowed to do this, then science as such is
inadmissible.[14]

The basic issue is the assertion that on the basis of scientific findings or
technical facts, either there were no mass gassings or else they could not have
taken place, certainly not in the scope and number heretofore assumed. Here I am
referring to the chemical investigations or expert reports on the residues of
cyanide in the disinfection chambers on the one hand and the cellar morgues of
the crematoria on the other. I have in mind the reports of Leuchter, Rudolf, and
Luftl as well as the unusually detailed studies of Carlo Mattogno on extremely
detailed questions such as the length of time to burn corpses, the coke
required, et al.

No fundamental objection can be made against the Revisionist argument that the
scientifically or technically impossible cannot have occurred, even though
hundreds of witness reports and testimonies might have stated the opposite. The
conclusion is unavoidable that humanities people and ideological critics have
absolutely nothing to say in this matter."[15]

The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung expressed a similar opinion in the
following:[16]

"Raul Hilberg and Ernst Nolte agree that one must read the eye witness reports
of the celebrated Elie Wiesel with extremely critical attention. Hilberg`s most
recent book and grandiose work of his elder years, 'Sources of the Holocaust,
has silently taken leave of many of the most familiar but obviously unreliable
witnesses, such as Kurt Gersten and Jan Karsky. liars and propagandists must be
seen as complementary to our age."

What effect does the following confession of Raul Hilberg, the Pope of the
Holocaust Church, have on the minds of holocaust believers?

"But what began in 1941 was not a previously planned annihilation (of the Jews),
organized centrally by a single office, there were no plans and no budget for
these annihilation measures. These measures developed step by step, one after
the other; and not through the execution of a plan, but rather by an
extraordinary meeting of minds, a coincidence of views within a comprehensive
bureaucracy." [Quoted in Rudolf, Vorlesungen, Page 187.]

Did not all the world believe that the annihilation of the Jews was centrally
planned and decided in the "Wannsee Villa" on January 20, 1942? [18] How are we
to reconcile all this? The Jewish historian Yehuda Bauer, director of the
International Institute for Holocaust Research in Jerusalem, ridicules the fact
that ".Just as before, the public keeps repeating the foolish story that the
annihilation of the Jews was agreed upon at Wannsee."[19] Professor Dr. Eberhard
Jackel, co-editor of the official Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, addressed the
issue in the Frankfurter Allgemeine on 22 June 1992:

"Historian Jacke: Purpose of the Wannsee Conference Disputed: The decision to
murder the European Jews was made earlier. Jackel said that the protocol for the
Conference does not contain a single word about a decision to murder Jews.
Furthermore the participants at Wannsee lacked authority to do make such a
decision. He pointed out that the actual purpose of the Wannsee Conference is
disputed. He stated that an English colleague had remarked forty years before
that the Conference was simply 'a sociable lunch, and that the list of
participants proves the conference played no role whatsoever in the
deportations, since there were no representatives of the Wehrmacht or the Reich
Ministry for Transportation present. Jaeckel is of the opinion that a
corresponding order of Hitler's to annihilate the Jews followed the meeting that
took place between Hitler, Himmler, and Heydrich on September 24, 1941, i.e.
three months before the Wannsee Conference.

Conjectures, absurdities, forgeries, and lies - thus the foundations of the "
Manifestly Obvious Holocaust" were created, and now we are supposed to swallow
this swindle as "factually presumed." Just how stupid do you think that we
Germans really are, Dr. Meinerzhagen? Can't you see what you are representing to
the entire world, and for the history books yet to be written? Does the High
Court still want to hold fast to the assertion that the Holocaust has been
completely and undeniably proven? How are the "Redrobes" [High Court judges]
setting themselves up to be characterized in future? Dear Dr. Meinerzhagen, "the
emperor has no clothes." Or do you really see clothes where there are none? How
do you propose to cover your own nakedness? You should take to heart the
knowledge that there are insurmountable limit for every lawmaker: he can not
decree facts. This is what distinguishes politicians from magicians and Almighty
God.

Do you think this limitation does not apply to judges as well? The legislator --
not the judge -- can under certain circumstances manipulate facts. Legislative
fictions can never be used to establish guilt, however, since only real guilt --
not pretended guilt -- can be punished. Or do you want this principle to no
longer apply? Who are you to arrogate such power to yourself? Should German law
and justice be sacrificed to the delusions of a few jurists of that government
of foreign occupation, the Federal Republic of Germany?

Kleinmachnow,10 February 2006

Notes:

[1] zu diesem Begriff vgl. Berber, Friedrich, Lehrbuch des Völkerrechts, Band II
Kriegsrecht, 2. Aufl., C.H. Beck Verlag München 1969, S. 132 f. [2] Heydecker,
Leeb, Der Nürnberger Prozeß ? Bilanz der Tausend Jahre, 6. Aufl., Kiepenheuer &
Witsch, Köln 1962, S. 94 [3] Kardinal Ratzinger "Freiheit und Wahrheit" in
Jürgen Schwab, Otto Scrinzi, Über die Revolution von 1848 Aula-Verlag, Graz 1998
[4] Ernst Nolte, Das Vergehen der Vergangenheit, Ullstein, Frankfurt/Main 1987
S. 594 (Rudolf Vorlesungen S. 136) [5] Ernst Nolte, Streitpunkte, Ullstein,
Frankfurt am Main / Berlin 1993 S. 308 (Vorlesungen S. 137) [6] Ernst Nolte
a.a.O. S. 9 (Rudolf Vorlesungen S. 137) [7] Ernst Nolte a.a.O. S. 304 [8] Ernst
Nolte a.a.O. S. 31; (Rudolf Vorlesungen S.138) [9] Ernst Nolte a.a.O. S. 309
[10] Ernst Nolte, Frangois Furet, Feindliche Nähe, Herbig, München 1998 S.
222-224 [11] Joao das Regras, "Um nuovo Direito International, Nuremberg", 1947
zitiert bei Maurice Bardèche, "Nürnberg oder die Falschmünzer", Verlag Karl
Heinz Priester, Wiesbaden 1957 S. 62 [12] "Atze" Brauner, Frankfurter Allgemeine
Zeitung, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 6.5.1995. [13] Ernst Nolte, Feindliche Nähe, S.
74-79 (Rudolf Vorlesungen S. 138 f.) [14] Ernst Nolte, Der kausale Nexus,
Herbig. München 2002, . 96 f. (Rodolf Vorlesungen S. 140 f.) [15] Ernst Nolte
a.a.O. S. 122 (Rudolf Vorlesungen S. 141) [16] Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,
7.10.2003, S. L 37. [17] R. Hilberg, Die Quellen des Holocaust. Entschlüsseln
und Interpretieren, S. Fischer Verlag, Frankfurt am Main 2002; vgl. Jürgen Grafs
Rezension, "Der unheilbare Autismus des Raul Hilberg", VffG 7(1) (2003), S.
107-114. [18] vgl. die offizielle Enzyklopädie des Holocaust, Argon Verlag, Bd.
III, S. 1516ff. [19] Nachweis bei Rudolf, Vorlesungen S. 126

--
Peter Myers, 381 Goodwood Rd, Childers 4660, Australia ph +61 7 41262296
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers Mirror: http://mailstar.net/index.html I
use the old Mac OS; being incompatible, it cannot run Windows viruses or
transmit them to you. If my mail does not arrive, or yours bounces, please ring
me: this helps beat sabotage. To unsubscribe, reply with "unsubscribe" in the
subject line; allow 1 day.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 8
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:12pm(PDT)
Subject: Fw: China, Russia welcome Iran into Shanghai Cooperation Organizatio

From: "Peter Myers" <myers@cyberone.com.au>

April 20, 2006

(1) Kyrgyzstan may close US air base, says "foreign forces" stoking unrest
(2) China, Russia welcome Iran into Shanghai Cooperation Organization
(3) Hu Jintao meets Bill Gates & GW Bush - Michael T. Klare and Tom Engelhardt
(4) 9-11 - LARRY PULLS IT, by Barry Chamish

(1) Kyrgyzstan may close US air base, says "foreign forces" stoking unrest

Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 17:48:22 +0100 From: Rowan Berkeley
<rowan.berkeley@googlemail.com>

Kyrgyzstan may close US air base ISN SECURITY WATCH, 19 April 2006
http://www.isn.ethz.ch/news/sw/details.cfm?id=15541

Kyrgyz president Kurmanbek Bakiyev has announced that if a deal over rent prices
for a US air base in his country is not agreed to, the US will have to remove
the base. The US was invited to open the base, which was set up at Kyrgyzstan's
main civilian airport near Bishkek, during the US-led overthrow of the Taliban
in Afghanistan. The base is also near a Russian air base and houses some 1,000
personnel. In a televised speech on Wednesday, Bakiyev stated that the two
parties had until 1 June to come up with a solution. Kyrgyzstan wants to raise
fees paid to the US for the strategically located base. According to Defense
News, the base has been kept open due to "certain fears", in an apparent
reference to Russia. The report also quoted Bakiyev as saying during an
interview with a Russian newspaper that the central Asian country was seeking a
"100-fold" increase in what it receives for allowing the US to use the base,
which would come to US$207 million per year. The importance of the installation
increased last year after Uzbekistan closed a similar base the US was using in
that country. In other news, Kyrgyzstan has slammed a suggestion from the US
ambassador to that country that it signs up for debt relief. News reports say
that the Kyrgyz foreign ministry said Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch's statement
was tantamount to interfering in domestic affairs. Yovanovitch said during an
interview that Kyrgyzstan, which owes US$2 billion to creditors, would benefit
from joining a debt relief program run by the World Bank. The foreign ministry
said that the ambassador's efforts to put the experience of 28 countries who
have already joined the so-called Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative in
a positive light were misguided. Ria Novosti said that the Kyrgyz ministry
referred to a statements from Harvard University , the UN Trade Commission and
other groups that found that the countries in the program had not achieved
promised economic growth.

Kyrgyz leader says "foreign forces" stoking unrest By Olga Dzyubenko, Reuters,
19 April 2006 http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L19266807.htm

Kyrgyz President Kurmanbek Bakiyev, who came to power in a revolution last year
promising to bring democracy, accused "foreign forces" on Wednesday of stoking
unrest in his impoverished Central Asian country. Kyrgyzstan has been plagued by
instability and crime since a violent coup toppled veteran leader Askar Akayev
last year, in contrast to peaceful protests in Ukraine and Georgia which brought
new pro-Western governments to power. Speaking just hours after he threatened to
shut down a U.S. military base, Bakiyev said foreigners were playing their own
game against his interests in Kyrgyzstan -- striking a tone typical of
authoritarian leaders in other ex-Soviet states. "There are forces, specially
foreign forces, who see Kyrgyzstan as a territory for their own interests,"
Bakiyev told a group of opposition leaders who had gathered to express their
disagreement with his policies. "These foreign forces don't want us to develop
economically, they want to keep us on a short lead... We must not fall under any
country's influence." Officials in Uzbekistan, Belarus and other ex-Soviet
countries where dissent is tightly controlled frequently accuse un-named foreign
forces of trying to undermine their rule. Bakiyev is due to visit Russia --
which has long expressed concerns over the U.S. military presence in Central
Asia -- early next week for talks with President Vladimir Putin, who also has
blamed foreigners of trying to undermine Russia. The new Kyrgyz opposition --
spearheaded by Omurbek Tekebayev, a former speaker of parliament -- has accused
Bakiyev of backtracking on his pre-election pledges, and promised to hold a
countrywide protest on April 29. "What tyranny are you talking about? There is
no other country more democratic than Kyrgyzstan in the former Soviet bloc,"
said Bakiyev, who has vowed to use "the harshest methods" to prevent any repeat
of last year's unrest. Edil Baisalov, an activist who has criticised Bakiyev for
not doing enough to restore order, said: "This is what Akayev used to say when
he accused Bakiyev of being backed by the West. This is a clear attempt by
Bakiyev to seek Russian support in a situation when his position has weakened,"
he told Reuters. Earlier, Kyrgyzstan threatened to close the Manas military base
-- which U.S. forces set up during the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan -- if
Washington did not agree to a new contract. The U.S. embassy in Kyrgyzstan
declined to comment. The presence of U.S. troops in Central Asia, traditionally
a Russian sphere of influence, is a headache for Moscow which ruled Kyrgyzstan
until the Soviet collapse in 1991. The United States also set up a base in
Uzbekistan, but the authoritarian country last year told the Americans to leave
after Washington criticised Tashkent over the bloody suppression of a rebellion
in the eastern town of Andizhan.

(2) China, Russia welcome Iran into Shanghai Cooperation Organization

Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:16:41 +0300 From: "Erooth Mohamed" <ekunhan@gmail.com>

China, Russia welcome Iran into the fold

By M K Bhadrakumar http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/HD18Ad02.html

The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which maintained it had no plans
for expansion, is now changing course. Mongolia, Iran, India and Pakistan, which
previously had observer status, will become full members. SCO's decision to
welcome Iran into its fold constitutes a political statement. Conceivably, SCO
would now proceed to adopt a common position on the Iran nuclear issue at its
summit meeting June 15.

Speaking in Beijing as recently as January 17, the organization's secretary
general Zhang Deguang had been quoted by Xinhua news agency as saying:
"Absorbing new member states needs a legal basis, yet the SCO has no rules
concerning the issue. Therefore, there is no need for some Western countries to
worry whether India, Iran or other countries would become new members."

The SCO, an Intergovernmental organization whose working languages are Chinese
and Russian, was founded in Shanghai on June 15, 2001 by China, Russia,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgystan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. The SCO's change of heart
appears set to involve the organization in Iran's nuclear battle and other
ongoing regional issues with the United States.

Visiting Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mohammadi told Itar-TASS in
Moscow that the membership expansion "could make the world more fair". And he
spoke of building an Iran-Russia "gas-and-oil arc" by coordinating their
activities as energy producing countries. Mohammadi also touched on Iran's
intention to raise the issue of his country's nuclear program and its
expectations of securing SCO support.

The timing of the SCO decision appears to be significant. By the end of April
the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency is expected to
report to the United Nations Security Council in New York regarding Iran's
compliance with the IAEA resolutions and the Security Council's presidential
statement, which stresses the importance of Iran "reestablishing full, sustained
suspension of uranium-enrichment activities".

The SCO membership is therefore a lifeline for Iran in political and economic
terms. The SCO is not a military bloc but is nonetheless a security organization
committed to countering terrorism, religious extremism and separatism. SCO
membership would debunk the US propaganda about Iran being part of an "axis of
evil".

The SCO secretary general's statement on expansion coincided with several
Chinese and Russian commentaries last week voicing disquiet about the US
attempts to impose UN sanctions against Iran. Comparison has been drawn with the
Iraq War when the US seized on sanctions as a pretext for invading Iraq.

A People's Daily commentary on April 13 read: "The real intention behind the US
fueling the Iran issue is to prompt the UN to impose sanctions against Iran, and
to pave the way for a regime change in that country. The US's global strategy
and its Iran policy emanate out of its decision to use various means, including
military means, to change the Iranian regime. This is the US's set target and is
at the root of the Iran nuclear issue."

The commentary suggested Washington seeks a regime change in Iran with a view to
establishing American hegemony in the Middle East. Gennady Yefstafiyev, a former
general in Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service, wrote: "The US's long term
goals in Iran are obvious: to engineer the downfall of the current regime; to
establish control over Iran's oil and gas; and to use its territory as the
shortest route for the transportation of hydrocarbons under US control from the
regions of Central Asia and the Caspian Sea bypassing Russia and China. This is
not to mention Iran's intrinsic military and strategic significance."

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said: "I would not be in a hurry to draw
conclusions, because passions are too often being whipped up around Iran's
nuclear program ... I would also advise not to whip up passions."

Sergei Kiriyenko, head of Russia's nuclear power agency and a former prime
minister, said Iran was simply not capable of enriching uranium on an industrial
scale. "It has long since been known that Iran has a 'cascade' of only 164
centrifuges, and obtaining low-grade uranium from this 'cascade' was only a
matter of time. This did not come as a surprise to us."

Yevgeniy Velikhov, president of Kurchatov Institute, Russia's nuclear research
center, told Tier-TASS, "Launching experimental equipment of this type is
something any university can do."

By virtue of SCO membership, Iran can partake of the various SCO projects, which
in turn means access to technology, increased investment and trade,
infrastructure development such as banking, communication, etc. It would also
have implications for global energy security.

The SCO was expected to set up a working group of experts ahead of the summit in
June with a view to evolving a common "energy strategy" and jointly undertaking
pipeline projects, oil exploration and related activities.

A third aspect of the SCO decision to expand its membership involves regional
integration processes. Sensing that the SCO was gaining traction, Washington had
sought observer status at its summit meeting last June, but was turned down.
This rebuff - along with SCO's timeline for a reduced American military presence
in Central Asia, the specter of deepening Russia-China cooperation and the
setbacks to US diplomacy in Central Asia as a whole - prompted a policy review
in Washington.

Following a Central Asian tour in October by US Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice, Washington's new regional policy began surfacing. The re-organization of
the US State Department's South Asia Bureau (created in August 1992) to include
the Central Asian states, projection of US diplomacy in terms of "Greater
Central Asia" and the push for observer status with the South Asian Association
for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) should be seen in perspective.

US diplomacy is working toward getting Central Asian states to orientate toward
South Asia - weaning them away from Russia and China. (Hamid Karzai's government
in Kabul has also failed to respond to SCO's overtures but has instead sought
full membership in SAARC.)

But US diplomacy is not making appreciable progress in Central Asia. Washington
pins hopes on Astana (Kazakhstan) being its pivotal partner in Central Asia. The
US seeks an expansion of its physical control over Kazakhstan's oil reserves and
formalization of Kazakh oil transportation via Baku-Ceyhan pipeline, apart from
carving out a US role in Caspian Sea security.

But Kazakhstan is playing hard to get. President Nurusultan Nazarbayev's visit
to Moscow on April 3 reaffirmed his continued dependence on Russian oil
pipelines.

Meanwhile, Washington's relations with Tashkent (Uzbekistan) remain in a state
of deep chill. The US attempt to "isolate" President Islam Karimov is not
working. (Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is visiting Tashkent on April
25.) Again, Tajikistan relies heavily on Russia's support. In Kyrgyzstan,
despite covert US attempts to create dissensions within the regime, President
Burmanbek Bakiyev's alliance with Prime Minister Felix Kulov (which enjoys
Russia's backing) is holding.

The Central Asians have also displayed a lack of interest in the idea of
"Greater Central Asia". This became apparent during the conference sponsored by
Washington recently in Kabul focusing on the theme.

The SCO's enlargement move, in this regional context, would frustrate the entire
US strategy. Ironically, the SCO would be expanding into South Asia and the Gulf
region, while "bypassing" Afghanistan.

This at a time when the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is stepping up its
presence in Afghanistan. (General James L Jones, supreme allied commander
Europe, said recently that NATO would assume control of Afghanistan by August.)

So far NATO has ignored SCO. But NATO contingents in Afghanistan would shortly
be "surrounded" by SCO member countries. NATO would face a dilemma.

If it recognizes that SCO has a habitation and a name (in Central Asia, South
Asia and the Gulf), then, what about NATO's claim as the sole viable global
security arbiter in the 21st century? NATO would then be hard-pressed to explain
the raison d'etre of its expansion into the territories of the former Soviet
Union.

M K Bhadrakumar served as a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service for
more than 29 years, with postings including India's ambassador to Uzbekistan
(1995-1998) and to Turkey (1998-2001).

(3) Hu Jintao meets Bill Gates & GW Bush - Michael T. Klare and Tom Engelhardt

Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:17:08 -0400 From: "David Chiang"
<sino.economics@verizon.net>

Greeting Hu With a 21-Gun 'Salute'
by Michael T. Klare and Tom Engelhardt
http://www.antiwar.com/engelhardt/?articleid=8873

On Tuesday April 18, Chinese President Hu Jintao landed in the United States
and, after a tour of a Boeing plant, made his official way, with all due pomp
and ceremony, to the expectable "state banquet" in Washington. no, not at the
White House but at the Washington State home of Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates.
In fact, the Chinese leader came to Seattle, Wash., ready to toss money at
Microsoft goodies and Boeing jets in an atmosphere as celebratory as money can
make things.

Thursday, Hu will arrive in the "other" Washington in a less celebratory mood ?
at a time when Chinese relations with the Bush administration are in a state of
heightening tension and likely to get worse. He will arrive for a. Well, what is
it?

The Chinese insist that Hu is coming on an official "state visit" and point to
the traditional presidential greeting on the White House lawn and the 21-gun
salute for a state leader as evidence of that. The White House, which is
offering neither a state dinner nor a cabinet meeting for the Chinese president
to attend but a simple working lunch, begs to differ. What's happening is only a
visit-type visit, nothing more. ("'It's an official visit, it's a visit, is the
way I would describe it,' said White House spokesman Scott McClellan. We have
'one visit, different interpretations.'") At the micro-level of protocol, this
catches much about our East Asian moment.

China lies at the heart of many Bush conundrums, and the Bush administration
lies athwart numerous Chinese desires. To the extent that the Bush
administration still floats above the waves, it does so significantly on
borrowed dollars from China; just as the Chinese leadership ? with their
recently announced 10.2 percent first-quarter growth rate and their expanding
bubble of an export economy ? lives off the American market. Without Chinese
help, the administration's ability to deal with the other two axes of the Axis
of Evil, Iran and North Korea, seems problematic at best. Yet, when it comes to
Iran, China has just signaled that it's in a less than receptive mood. The weak
Chinese-Russian strategic alliance against the U.S. that goes by the name of the
Shanghai Cooperation Organization has just granted Iran full membership, a quiet
political statement of the first order.

China's recent economic surge into Southeast Asia threatens U.S. hegemony in the
region; from the Sudan to Venezuela, its oil envoys are already drilling into
America's imperial energy future (even as the price of a barrel of oil soars
over $70 a barrel). The Americans are sunk deep in the Iraq morass; the Chinese
are desperate for a little space and peace to deal with the endless problems
spinning off from their overheated economy. You might think it was a moment to
draw on some well-worn term like "peaceful coexistence"; but, as Michael Klare,
author of the indispensable Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of
America's Growing Dependency on Imported Petroleum, makes clear below, the Bush
administration is instead ramping up its military might in the Pacific and,
after two years trapped in Baghdad's Green Zone, once again putting China in its
strategic gun sights as America's future imperial competitor and enemy of
choice. Tom

Containing China

by Michael T. Klare

Slowly but surely, the grand strategy of the Bush administration is being
revealed. It is not aimed primarily at the defeat of global terrorism, the
incapacitation of rogue states, or the spread of democracy in the Middle East.
These may dominate the rhetorical arena and be the focus of immediate concern,
but they do not govern key decisions regarding the allocation of long-term
military resources. The truly commanding objective ? the underlying basis for
budgets and troop deployments ? is the containment of China. This objective
governed White House planning during the administration's first seven months in
office, only to be set aside by the perceived obligation to highlight
anti-terrorism after 9/11; but now, despite Bush's preoccupation with Iraq and
Iran, the White House is also reemphasizing its paramount focus on China,
risking a new Asian arms race with potentially catastrophic consequences.

President Bush and his top aides entered the White House in early 2001 with a
clear strategic objective: to resurrect the permanent-dominance doctrine spelled
out in the Defense Planning Guidance (DPG) for fiscal years 1994-99, the first
formal statement of U.S. strategic goals in the post-Soviet era. According to
the initial official draft of this document, as leaked to the press in early
1992, the primary aim of U.S. strategy would be to bar the rise of any future
competitor that might challenge America's overwhelming military superiority.

"Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival . that poses
a threat on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union," the document
stated. Accordingly, "we [must] endeavor to prevent any hostile power from
dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be
sufficient to generate global power."

When initially made public, this doctrine was condemned by America's allies and
many domestic leaders as being unacceptably imperial as well as imperious,
forcing the first President Bush to water it down; but the goal of perpetuating
America's sole-superpower status has never been rejected by administration
strategists. In fact, it initially became the overarching principle for U.S.
military policy when the younger Bush assumed the presidency in February 2001.

Target: China

When first enunciated in 1992, the permanent-dominance doctrine was nonspecific
as to the identity of the future challengers whose rise was to be prevented
through coercive action. At that time, U.S. strategists worried about a medley
of potential rivals, including Russia, Germany, India, Japan, and China; any of
these, it was thought, might emerge in decades to come as would-be superpowers,
and so all would have to be deterred from moving in this direction. By the time
the second Bush administration came into office, however, the pool of potential
rivals had been narrowed in elite thinking to just one: the People's Republic of
China. Only China, it was claimed, possessed the economic and military capacity
to challenge the United States as an aspiring superpower; and so perpetuating
U.S. global predominance meant containing Chinese power.

The imperative of containing China was first spelled out in a systematic way by
Condoleezza Rice while serving as a foreign policy adviser to then Governor
George W. Bush during the 2000 presidential campaign. In a much-cited article in
Foreign Affairs, she suggested that the PRC, as an ambitious rising power, would
inevitably challenge vital U.S. interests. "China is a great power with
unresolved vital interests, particularly concerning Taiwan," she wrote. "China
also resents the role of the United States in the Asia-Pacific region."

For these reasons, she stated, "China is not a 'status quo' power but one that
would like to alter Asia's balance of power in its own favor. That alone makes
it a strategic competitor, not the 'strategic partner' the Clinton
administration once called it." It was essential, she argued, to adopt a
strategy that would prevent China's rise as regional power. In particular, "The
United States must deepen its cooperation with Japan and South Korea and
maintain its commitment to a robust military presence in the region." Washington
should also "pay closer attention to India's role in the regional balance," and
bring that country into an anti-Chinese alliance system.

Looking back, it is striking how this article developed the allow-no-competitors
doctrine of the 1992 DPG into the very strategy now being implemented by the
Bush administration in the Pacific and South Asia. Many of the specific policies
advocated in her piece, from strengthened ties with Japan to making overtures to
India, are being carried out today.

In the spring and summer of 2001, however, the most significant effect of this
strategic focus was to distract Rice and other senior administration officials
from the growing threat posed by Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda. During her first
months in office as the president's senior adviser for national security
affairs, Rice devoted herself to implementing the plan she had spelled out in
Foreign Affairs. By all accounts, her top priorities in that early period were
dissolving the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty with Russia and linking Japan,
South Korea, and Taiwan into a joint missile defense system, which, it was
hoped, would ultimately evolve into a Pentagon-anchored anti-Chinese alliance.

Richard A. Clarke, the senior White House adviser on counter-terrorism, later
charged that, because of her preoccupation with Russia, China, and great power
politics, Rice overlooked warnings of a possible al-Qaeda attack on the United
States and thus failed to initiate defensive actions that might have prevented
9/11. Although Rice survived tough questioning on this matter by the 9/11
Commission without acknowledging the accuracy of Clarke's charges, any careful
historian, seeking answers for the Bush administration's inexcusable failure to
heed warnings of a potential terrorist strike on this country, must begin with
its overarching focus on containing China during this critical period.

China on the Back Burner

After Sept. 11, it would have been unseemly for Bush, Rice, and other top
administration officials to push their China agenda ? and in any case they
quickly shifted focus to a long-term neocon objective, the overthrow of Saddam
Hussein and the projection of American power throughout the Middle East. So the
"global war on terror" (or GWOT, in Pentagon-speak) became their major talking
point and the invasion of Iraq their major focus. But the administration never
completely lost sight of its strategic focus on China, even when it could do
little on the subject. Indeed, the lightning war on Iraq and the further
projection of American power into the Middle East was intended, at least in
part, as a warning to China of the overwhelming might of the American military
and the futility of challenging U.S. supremacy.

For the next two years, when so much effort was devoted to rebuilding Iraq in
America's image and crushing an unexpected and potent Iraqi insurgency, China
was distinctly on the back-burner. In the meantime, however, China's increased
investment in modern military capabilities and its growing economic reach in
Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America ? much of it tied to the procurement
of oil and other vital commodities ? could not be ignored.

By the spring of 2005, the White House was already turning back to Rice's global
grand strategy. On June 4, 2005, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld gave a
much-publicized speech at a conference in Singapore, signaling what was to be a
new emphasis in White House policymaking, in which he decried China's ongoing
military buildup and warned of the threat it posed to regional peace and
stability.

China, he claimed, was "expanding its missile forces, allowing them to reach
targets in many areas of the world" and "improving its ability to project power"
in the Asia-Pacific region. Then, with sublime disingenuousness, he added,
"Since no nation threatens China, one must wonder: Why this growing investment?
Why these continuing and expanding arms purchases? Why these continuing robust
deployments?" Although Rumsfeld did not answer his questions, the implication
was obvious: China was now embarked on a course that would make it a regional
power, thus threatening one day to present a challenge to the United States in
Asia on unacceptably equal terms.

This early sign of the ratcheting up of anti-Chinese rhetoric was accompanied by
acts of a more concrete nature. In February 2005, Rice and Rumsfeld hosted a
meeting in Washington with top Japanese officials at which an agreement was
signed to improve cooperation in military affairs between the two countries.
Known as the "Joint Statement of the U.S.-Japan Security Consultative
Committee," the agreement called for greater collaboration between American and
Japanese forces in the conduct of military operations in an area stretching from
Northeast Asia to the South China Sea. It also called for close consultation on
policies regarding Taiwan, an implicit hint that Japan was prepared to assist
the United States in the event of a military clash with China precipitated by
Taiwan's declaring its independence.

This came at a time when Beijing was already expressing considerable alarm over
pro-independence moves in Taiwan and what the Chinese saw as a revival of
militarism in Japan ? thus evoking painful memories of World War II, when Japan
invaded China and committed massive atrocities against Chinese civilians.
Understandably then, the agreement could only be interpreted by the Chinese
leadership as an expression of the Bush administration's determination to
bolster an anti-Chinese alliance system.

The New Grand Chessboard

Why did the White House choose this particular moment to revive its drive to
contain China? Many factors no doubt contributed to this turnaround, but surely
the most significant was a perception that China had finally emerged as a major
regional power in its own right and was beginning to contest America's long-term
dominance of the Asia-Pacific region. To some degree this was manifested ? so
the Pentagon claimed ? in military terms, as Beijing began to replace
Soviet-type, Korean War-vintage weapons with more modern (though hardly
cutting-edge) Russian designs.

It was not China's military moves, however, that truly alarmed American
policymakers ? most professional analysts are well aware of the continuing
inferiority of Chinese weaponry ? but rather Beijing's success in using its
enormous purchasing power and hunger for resources to establish friendly ties
with such long-standing U.S. allies as Thailand, Indonesia, and Australia.
Because the Bush administration had done little to contest this trend while
focusing on the war in Iraq, China's rapid gains in Southeast Asia finally began
to ring alarm bells in Washington.

At the same time, Republican strategists were becoming increasingly concerned by
growing Chinese involvement in the Persian Gulf and Central Asia ? areas
considered of vital geopolitical importance to the United States because of the
vast reserves of oil and natural gas buried there. Much influenced by Zbigniew
Brzezinski, whose 1997 book The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and
Geostrategic Imperatives first highlighted the critical importance of Central
Asia, these strategists sought to counter Chinese inroads. Although Brzezinski
himself has largely been excluded from elite Republican circles because of his
association with the much-despised Carter administration, his call for a
coordinated U.S. drive to dominate both the eastern and western rimlands of
China has been embraced by senior administration strategists.

In this way, Washington's concern over growing Chinese influence in Southeast
Asia has come to be intertwined with the U.S. drive for hegemony in the Persian
Gulf and Central Asia. This has given China policy an even more elevated
significance in Washington ? and helps explain its return with a passion despite
the seemingly all-consuming preoccupations of the war in Iraq.

Whatever the exact balance of factors, the Bush administration is now clearly
engaged in a coordinated, systematic effort to contain Chinese power and
influence in Asia. This effort appears to have three broad objectives: to
convert existing relations with Japan, Australia, and South Korea into a robust,
integrated anti-Chinese alliance system; to bring other nations, especially
India, into this system; and to expand U.S. military capabilities in the
Asia-Pacific region.

Since the administration's campaign to bolster ties with Japan commenced a year
ago, the two countries have been meeting continuously to devise protocols for
the implementation of their 2005 strategic agreement. In October, Washington and
Tokyo released the Alliance Transformation and Realignment Report, which is to
guide the further integration of U.S. and Japanese forces in the Pacific and the
simultaneous restructuring of the U.S. basing system in Japan. (Some of these
bases, especially those on Okinawa, have become a source of friction in
U.S.-Japanese relations, and so the Pentagon is now considering ways to downsize
the most objectionable installations.) Japanese and American officers are also
engaged in a joint "interoperability" study, aimed at smoothing the "interface"
between U.S. and Japanese combat and communications systems. "Close
collaboration is also ongoing for cooperative missile defense," reports Admiral
William J. Fallon, commander-in-chief of the U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM).

Steps have also been taken in this ongoing campaign to weld South Korea and
Australia more tightly to the U.S.-Japanese alliance system. South Korea has
long been reluctant to work closely with Japan because of that country's brutal
occupation of the Korean peninsula from 1910 to 1945 and lingering fears of
Japanese militarism; now, however, the Bush administration is promoting what it
calls "trilateral military cooperation" between Seoul, Tokyo, and Washington. As
indicated by Admiral Fallon, this initiative has an explicitly anti-Chinese
dimension. America's ties with South Korea must adapt to "the changing security
environment" represented by "China's military modernization," Fallon told the
Senate Armed Services Committee on March 7. By cooperating with the U.S. and
Japan, he continued, South Korea will move from an overwhelming focus on North
Korea to "a more regional view of security and stability."

Bringing Australia into this emerging anti-Chinese network has been a major
priority of Condoleezza Rice, who spent several days there in mid-March.
Although designed in part to bolster U.S.-Australian ties (largely neglected by
Washington over the past few years), the main purpose of her visit was to host a
meeting of top officials from Australia, the U.S., and Japan to develop a common
strategy for curbing China's rising influence in Asia. No formal results were
announced, but Steven Weisman of the New York Times reported on March 19 that
Rice convened the meeting "to deepen a three-way regional alliance aimed in part
at balancing the spreading presence of China."

An even bigger prize, in Washington's view, would be the integration of India
into this emerging alliance system, a possibility first suggested in Rice's
Foreign Affairs article. Such a move was long frustrated by congressional
objections to India's nuclear weapons program and its refusal to sign on to the
Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). Under U.S. law, nations like India that
refuse to cooperate in nonproliferation measures can be excluded from various
forms of aid and cooperation. To overcome this problem, President Bush met with
Indian officials in New Delhi in March and negotiated a nuclear accord that will
open India's civilian reactors to International Atomic Energy Agency inspection,
thus providing a thin gloss of nonproliferation cooperation to India's robust
nuclear weapons program. If Congress approves Bush's plan, the United States
will be free to provide nuclear assistance to India and, in the process,
significantly expand already growing military-to-military ties.

In signing the nuclear pact with India, Bush did not allude to the
administration's anti-Chinese agenda, saying only that it would lay the
foundation for a "durable defense relationship." But few have been fooled by
this vague characterization. According to Weisman of the Times, most U.S.
lawmakers view the nuclear accord as an expression of the administration's
desire to convert India into "a counterweight to China."

The China Buildup Begins

Accompanying all these diplomatic initiatives has been a vigorous, if largely
unheralded, effort by the Department of Defense (DoD) to bolster U.S. military
capabilities in the Asia-Pacific region.

The broad sweep of American strategy was first spelled out in the Pentagon's
most recent policy assessment, the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), released on
Feb. 5, 2006. In discussing long-term threats to U.S. security, the QDR begins
with a reaffirmation of the overarching precept first articulated in the DPG of
1992: that the United States will not allow the rise of a competing superpower.
This country "will attempt to dissuade any military competitor from developing
disruptive or other capabilities that could enable regional hegemony or hostile
action against the United States," the document states. It then identifies China
as the most likely and dangerous competitor of this sort. "Of the major and
emerging powers, China has the greatest potential to compete militarily with the
United States and field disruptive military technologies that could over time
offset traditional U.S. military advantages" ? then adding the kicker, "absent
U.S. counter strategies."

According to the Pentagon, the task of countering future Chinese military
capabilities largely entails the development, and then procurement, of major
weapons systems that would ensure U.S. success in any full-scale military
confrontation. "The United States will develop capabilities that would present
any adversary with complex and multidimensional challenges and complicate its
offensive planning efforts," the QDR explains. These include the steady
enhancement of such "enduring U.S. advantages" as "long-range strike, stealth,
operational maneuver and sustainment of air, sea, and ground forces at strategic
distances, air dominance, and undersea warfare."

Preparing for war with China, in other words, is to be the future cash cow for
the giant U.S. weapons-making corporations in the military-industrial complex.
It will, for instance, be the primary justification for the acquisition of
costly new weapons systems such as the F-22A Raptor air-superiority fighter, the
multi-service Joint Strike Fighter, the DDX destroyer, the Virginia-class
nuclear attack submarine, and a new, intercontinental penetrating bomber ?
weapons that would just have utility in an all-out encounter with another
great-power adversary of a sort that only China might someday become.

In addition to these weapons programs, the QDR also calls for a stiffening of
present U.S. combat forces in Asia and the Pacific, with a particular emphasis
on the Navy (the arm of the military least utilized in the ongoing occupation of
and war in Iraq). "The fleet will have greater presence in the Pacific Ocean,"
the document notes. To achieve this, "The Navy plans to adjust its force posture
and basing to provide at least six operationally available and sustainable
[aircraft] carriers and 60 percent of its submarines in the Pacific to support
engagement, presence and deterrence." Since each of these carriers is, in fact,
but the core of a large array of support ships and protective aircraft, this
move is sure to entail a truly vast buildup of U.S. naval capabilities in the
Western Pacific and will certainly necessitate a substantial expansion of the
American basing complex in the region ? a requirement that is already receiving
close attention from Admiral Fallon and his staff at PACOM. To assess the
operational demands of this buildup, moreover, this summer the U.S. Navy will
conduct its most extensive military maneuvers in the Western Pacific since the
end of the Vietnam War, with four aircraft carrier battle groups and many
support ships expected to participate.

Add all of this together, and the resulting strategy cannot be viewed as
anything but a systematic campaign of containment. No high administration
official may say this in so many words, but it is impossible to interpret the
recent moves of Rice and Rumsfeld in any other manner. From Beijing's
perspective, the reality must be unmistakable: a steady buildup of American
military power along China's eastern, southern, and western boundaries.

How will China respond to this threat? For now, it appears to be relying on
charm and the conspicuous blandishment of economic benefits to loosen
Australian, South Korean, and even Indian ties with the United States. To a
certain extent, this strategy is meeting with success, as these countries seek
to profit from the extraordinary economic boom now under way in China ? fueled
to a considerable extent by oil, gas, iron, timber, and other materials supplied
by China's neighbors in Asia. A version of this strategy is also being employed
by President Hu Jintao during his current visit to the United States. As China's
money is sprinkled liberally among influential firms like Boeing and Microsoft,
Hu is reminding the corporate wing of the Republican Party that there are vast
economic benefits still to be had by pursuing a non-threatening stance toward
China.

China, however, has always responded to perceived threats of encirclement in a
vigorous and muscular fashion as well, and so we should assume that Beijing will
balance all that charm with a military buildup of its own. Such a drive will not
bring China to the brink of military equality with the United States ? that is
not a condition it can realistically aspire to over the next few decades. But it
will provide further justification for those in the United States who seek to
accelerate the containment of China, and so will produce a self-fulfilling loop
of distrust, competition, and crisis. This will make the amicable long-term
settlement of the Taiwan problem and of North Korea's nuclear program that much
more difficult, and increase the risk of unintended escalation to full-scale war
in Asia. There can be no victors from such a conflagration.

Michael T. Klare is a professor of peace and world security studies at Hampshire
College and the author of Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of
America's Growing Dependency on Imported Petroleum (Owl Books, 2005).

(4) 9-11 - LARRY PULLS IT, by Barry Chamish

Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:56:01 +0100 From: Rowan Berkeley
<rowan.berkeley@googlemail.com>

As usual, Barry Chamish is confabulating wildly and relying on the
well-developed paranoid tendency among those who read him, which can be expected
to consider that, the more alarming a fantasy is, the more likely it is to be
true.

In this case, there is no evidence that Flight 63 was intended to target WTC7,
and, in any case, this building was not a skyscraper, and could not be expected
to 'topple' on being hit by a plane.

A better article about Silverstein is the one I sent you previously, 'Why Larry
Silverstein Can't Get It Up'::
http://www.onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_611.shtml

Comment (Peter M):

Wasn't WTC 7 49 stories high? Surely that makes it a skyscraper. ==

http://www.wtc7.net/

W T C 7

Building 7 was the third skyscraper to collapse into rubble on September 11,
2001. According to the government, small fires leveled this building, but fires
have never before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper.

The team who investigated the collapse were not allowed access to the crime
scene. By the time they published their inconclusive report, the evidence had
been destroyed.

Why did the government rapidly recycle the steel from the largest and most
mysterious engineering failure in world history, and why has the media remained
silent?

The unexplained collapse of Building 7 is the tip of the iceberg of unexplored
issues of the September 11th attack. 9 - 1 1 R e s e a r c h examines those
broader issues.

The new DVD 9/11 GUILT: THE PROOF IS IN YOUR HANDS by Don Paul, Jim Hoffman, and
Celestine Star proves that the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 were destroyed
through planned demolitions, and shows who benefited most from these crimes.

VERSION 1.40 2006-04-12 ------------- Copyright 200 ==

http://www.wtc7.net/background.html

What Was In Building 7?

Building 7 was one of New York City's larger buildings. A sleek bronze-colored
skyscraper with a trapezoidal footprint, it occupied an entire city block and
rose over 600 feet above street level.

Built in 1985, it was formerly the headquarters of the junk-bond firm Drexel
Burnham Lambert, which contributed to the Savings and Loans collapse, prompting
the $500-billion taxpayer-underwritten bailout of the latter 1980s. At the time
of its destruction, it exclusively housed government agencies and financial
institutions. It contained offices of the IRS, Secret Service, and SEC. ...

This list is based on a table published by CNN.com, which did not include CIA,
whose tenancy was disclosed after the attack in the New York Times article. 1

One of the most interesting tenants was then-Mayor Giuliani's Office of
Emergency Management, and its emergency command center on the 23rd floor. This
floor received 15 million dollars worth of renovations, including independent
and secure air and water supplies, and bullet and bomb resistant windows
designed to withstand 200 MPH winds. 2 The 1993 bombing must have been part of
the rationale for the command center, which overlooked the Twin Towers, a prime
terrorist target.

How curious that on the day of the attack, Guiliani and his Entourage set up
shop in a different headquarters, abandoning the special bunker designed
precisely for such an event. 3

References 1. List of World Trade Center tenants, CNN.com, 2. Terrorism and
Anti-Terrorism, Gotham Gazette, 9/12/01 3. Giuliani Improvises After Command
Center Gets Hit, Washington Technology, 10/08/01 [cached]

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 9
From: "MarshaMcClelland" mofmars3@sbcglobal.net
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:31pm(PDT)
Subject: Should Bush Be Tried For War Crimes? New Poll

Should Bush Be Tried For War Crimes? New Poll

>>>http://www.misterpoll.com/418257392.html

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 10
From: "S Miles Lewis" yahoolists@elfis.net
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 2:33pm(PDT)
Subject: $500K Seized; Strange Situation Reported At Nuclear Plant

"Never saw nothing at all" - Thursday, April 20, 2006

Everybody wears a halo, never saw nothing at all
So who put that bullet hole in Peggy's kitchen wall? - Bruce Cockburn

I was in the middle of writing something else when I saw this
<http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com/news/8821721/detail.html>. Read
it fast, while it lasts, because it's the kind of discomforting story
that disappears quickly with little follow-up and no national
attention.

Two Houston men
<http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/3806302.html>
driving a tractor-trailer pulled up to the gate of Pennsylvania's
Beaver Valley nuclear power station Tuesday afternoon. They said
they'd arrived from Chicago with an empty flatbed to pick up a large
tool container bound for Youngstown, Ohio.

There are at least a couple of accounts of what happened next. In one
<http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com/news/8821721/detail.html>, the
men drove away as soon as they were informed their vehicle would be
subject to routine inspection, prompting the security guards to
become suspicious and call police, "who pulled the truck over about a
mile from the plant." In the sleeping compartment, more than half a
million dollars in ten bundles of small bills wrapped in plastic and
duct tape was found stuffed in a locked duffel bag. In another
version <http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06110/683609-57.stm> the bag
is found by security before the truckers drive off and the search
warrant is executed. In both, the truckers claim they had no idea
what was in the bag, and offer no persuasive explanation for how it
got there. One trucker <http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06110/683609-
57.stm> claimed it was for a truck his boss hoped to purchase, "but
when <http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06110/683609-57.stm> the
security workers called the truckers' boss in Houston, he also said
he knew nothing about the money." In this account, it was the boss
who instructed the drivers to back away from the plant and return to
the road.

Three more things: A police dog sensed drug residue on the bills (Not
necessarily
<http://tafkac.org/drugs/cocaine.money/cocaine_tainted_money_aba.html>
exceptional, that: "The probability that every single person in the
United States is carrying drug-tainted money is almost certain.")
Though the truckers were said to be polite and cooperative, one of
them wasn't carrying identification, and told the dog-ate-my-homework
tale of it having been stolen from the truck the night before. (While
a duffel bag of cash was left behind?) And the "truckers worked for a
company hired by San Francisco-based Bechtel Corp., which is
performing construction work and replacing equipment at the plant."

The FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force was summoned and quickly sized up
the situation. The truckers were released, the money seized and, as
seen in this video
<http://mfile.akamai.com/12903/wmv/vod.ibsys.com/2006/0419/8832993.200
k.asx>, it was the reporters who were detained. The truckers were
allowed to leave because authorities claimed there was no indication
they had committed a crime. How quaint, and how selective the
presumption of innocence. That the men were from Houston rather than,
say, Bangla Desh <http://www.indiapost.com/members/story.php?
story_id=3218>, meant they didn't look like terrorists to the
security guards, even though Michael Meiring
<http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2004/10/michael-meiring-blast-
from-past.html> also lived in Houston for a time.

So what is going on here? Because something just had its cover blown.

Could the intention have been to purchase nuclear material, perhaps
for a dirty bomb to trigger the Iran war and make a US nuclear
assault less objectionable? Could be, but I'd also say this scene
appears too sloppy for such a task, and Bechtel wouldn't risk showing
its hand so close to such action.

It strikes me, rather, as aspects of a covert drug routine so
familiar that the players got lazy. Caught out, all they have to do
is forfeit the money back to the government from which it probably
came. In this old racket, Bechtel risks nothing.

On the other hand, terror and drugs are simply different
manifestations of the same Will to Control. So whatever was intended
will still endeavour to find its way, and the media will be looking
somewhere else, comprehending nothing.

posted by Jeff at 5:43 AM
<http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2006/04/never-saw-nothing-at-
all_20.html>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 11
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:12pm(PDT)
Subject: Steven Jones Lecture on WTC explosives

From: Peter Wakefield Sault
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 11:48 AM

Dick - Have you watched the Steven Jones Lecture on WTC explosives yet? It's *dynamite* - I am mailing a copy on a CD to my MP with a note saying he must make sure the whole of both Houses gets to see it.

You can download the pre-production release in four parts from
http://www.question911.com/links.php

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 12
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:59pm(PDT)
Subject: items: Hopsicker-Plane w/5 tons cocaine has Republican Links, once

From: civl ecco

April 20, 2006

(1) Hopsicker-Plane w/5 tons of cocaine has Republican connections & was once housed by Huffman Aviation - 'where 9/11 Atta learned to fly',
(2) & (3) Bush/Clinton Coke planes in Mena

(1) Plane with five tons of cocaine has Republican connections and was once housed by Huffman Aviation - 'where 9/11 Atta learned to fly'

'One of the two owners of the DC9 (tail number N900SA) busted at an airport in the Yucatan last week after lumbering in from Caracas, Venezuela carrying an astonishing 5.5 TONS of cocaine was appointed in 1993 to the Business Advisory Council of the National Republican Congressional Committee by then-Congressional Majority Leader Tom Delay, The MadCowMorningNews can exclusively report.

The plane's registered owner, "Royal Sons LLC," a Florida air charter company, was at one time housed in a hanger at the Venice Fl. Airport owned by infamous flight school Huffman Aviation.

Also of major significance is the fact that photos of the DC9, seized last Monday in Ciudad del Carmen, reveal that the plane is painted with the distinctive blue and white color color scheme of official U.S. Government planes.'

Read more ...

'5 TONS OF COKE' PLANE'S OWNERS:
'ROYAL SONS' & TOM DELAY APPOINTEE
WORLD EXCLUSIVE
APRIL 17 2006--Venice,FL.
by Daniel Hopsicker

One of the two owners of the DC9 (tail number N900SA) busted at an airport in the Yucatan last week after lumbering in from Caracas, Venezuela carrying an astonishing 5.5 TONS of cocaine was appointed in 1993 to the Business Advisory Council of the National Republican Congressional Committee by then-Congressional Majority Leader Tom Delay, The MadCowMorningNews can exclusively report.

The plane's registered owner, ¡°Royal Sons LLC,¡± a Florida air charter company, was at one time housed in a hanger at the Venice Fl. Airport owned by infamous flight school Huffman Aviation.

Moreover, to reinforce the effect, or subterfuge, the plane carries an official-looking Seal painted on its side, which reads: SKY WAY AIRCRAFT, PROTECTION OF AMERICA'S SKIES, around an image of a federal eagle clutching the familiar olive branch in its talons. Many have been fooled into concluding that the plane belongs to the U.S. Transportation Security Administration.

This has obvious and highly serious national security implications, which go well beyond the obvious glee involved in playing political "gotcha" with people caught face-down with their noses buried, Tony Montana-style, in over five tons of cocaine.

Who, exactly, are the "Royal Sons?"

The DC9 was purchased several years ago in a partnership between "Royal Sons Motor Yacht Sales, Inc. DBA Royal Sons" and a company owned by Brent Kovac called Skyway Communications Holding Corp, which jointly signed a loan with United Bank and Trust Company in St. Petersburg, FL. for $1.5 million.

Skyway Communication's principal Kovac must have been looking well forward to justify the purchase; the company was then in the middle of losing $40 million in less than three years, between 2002 and its last annual report before bankruptcy in January 2005.

Not that Tom DeLay seemed to mind. He and buddy Brent Kovac's press release deserves special mention.

"Congressman Tom Delay, Majority Leader, has appointed Brent C Kovar to serve as the Honorary Chairman, Business Advisory Council,¡± read the headline of an August 7, 2003 release from PrimeZone Media newswire and press release service.

The Business Advisory Council, explained the release, was part of the National Republican Congressional Committee, ¡°dedicated to making sure that small business has a voice in Washington.¡±

Kovar was appointed ¡°in recognition of his valuable contributions and dedication to the Republican Party,¡± and was "expected to play a crucial role in the party's efforts to involve top businesspeople in the process of government reform both at the state and federal levels."

While the release left the specific nature of Kovar's "crucial role in the GOP' efforts" a bit vague, a look at the other owner of the DC9, dubbed "Cocaine One," offers clues which help fill in the blanks.

"Protection of America's Skies?"
But the "Royal Sons" connection may prove even more enlightening...

While Huffman Aviation's familiar blue-awning flight school was at 400 E Airport, its hangar (see picture below) was several hundred feet down the runway, at 224 E Airport Ave. Royal Sons used this same address, apparently during the same time frame that the flight school was serving as the home-away-from-home of terrorist ringleader Mohamed Atta.

A close look at Royal Sons reveals evidence indicating that the firm is part of a cluster of related air charter firms being used as dummy front companies to provide ¡°cover¡± for CIA flights.

The companies involved include Royal Sons, Express One International, Genesis Aviation and United Flite Inc.

All four companies appear to be engaged in an inter-locking and time-honored Agency scheme going back 50 years: using frequent cosmetic transfers of aircraft title to make positively identifying the ownership of any one plane at any given time as difficult as finding the pea under the shell in a game of three-card Monte.

While none of the firms has been identified as a CIA aviation contractor, they have also not previously been the focus of the sort of unwelcome attention that getting caught with five tons of cocaine provides.

Tell us again...What happened to the pilot?

More- http://www.madcowprod.com/04172006.html

(2)

The Mena Arkansas Bush Clinton Drug Connection (new)

Updated, September 22nd, 1998, Read the response Senator Mazxine Walters

received from the CIA regarding Barry Seal

What I am about to share with you should cause you great concern because this is an example of the sort of thing that goes on in Washington.

On October 5, 1986 in Nicaragua, a CK123 Cargo plane, with weapons and CIA employees on board crashed. This was the beginning of what links what I am about to tell you together. This was the start of the Iran-Contra affair. It was proven that the weapons were supplied by the CIA and destined for the Nicaraguan Contras in of the Congressional Poland amendments. Special prosecutor Lawrence Walsh spent six years determining who in the Reagan administration was involved in the operation. Among those that were involved in this operation were George Bush, Oliver North, Dewey Clarridge, John Pointdexter and Caspar Weinberger.

However, lets go to Mena, Arkansas during this time. The training of pilots and loading of weapons and drugs was taking place. Who was the governor of Arkansas at the time and why is is that Kenneth Starr would not touch this area. That governor at the time is now our President.

In July 1994, in the Arkansas Crime Inc. paper, an editorial linked Clinton to Iran-Contra. In October, 1994 Clinton denied any knowledge of the operation at Mena. Shortly afterwards evidence started to surface that documented Clinton¡¯s link to Iran-Contra. People began coming forward and alleging under sworn statements that that Clinton profited from the operation at Mena by laundering money through the newly created Arkansas Development Finance Authority. That was just the tip of the iceberg regarding what was really going on at Mena. A larger number of people testified under oath that the airplanes returning from Central America were loaded with cocaine, which was then dropped over Arkansas for distribution to larger U.S. cities.

During 1995, mounting documented evidence continued to support the Mena claims. A KGB spy talks about his knowledge of Mena. The picture of the Mena operation became more clear. In July 1995, new information and evidence confirms drug smuggling is going on at Mena. Why? Because a State Trooper L.D. Brown and a Arkansas National Guardsmen, who were also pilots flying the planes put Clinton in the loop by testifying. In July 1995, Clinton responded to L.D. Brown¡¯s account with denial. We¡¯ve heard that before. In October, 1995 in formal hearings, now a former State Trooper, L.D. Brown elaborates in great detail, on his flights to Central America in the service of the CIA, on Clinton's link to the CIA. He also details the negative treatment he received from the American press. In August, 1996, Noriega attacks George Bush on Contra Drug dealing. And who is Barry Seal? ( read the article by Daniel Hopsicker for Washington Weekly ) How could this go on for years without detection? In February, 1995, the Washington Post is accused of a grand scale political coverup of the Mena affair.

However, a statement issued by Arkansas Supreme Court Justice Jim Johnson at this time reveals government efforts to block investigations of the Mena affair and investigations of Clinton's fraudulent Whitewater loans, and explains how business interests, news media, politicians, and courts in Arkansas manage to block the truth from coming out. Who is Terry Reed? Terry Reed describes how CNN concocted an interview with him, misquoting him all over place. In June, 1995, the Washington Post suppresses another story about the Mena investigations. In November, 1996, Caspar Weinberger is accused of participation in the Iran-Contra affair. However, prior to that in December, 1995, documents prove that the U.S. Government pressured Costa Rica to keep the Mena operations secret. Who Is Richard Ben-Veniste?

More- http://www.dldewey.com/mena.htm

Mena, Arkansas
Tons of cocaine were flown into the airport in Mena, Arkansas by Barry Seal, a CIA operative, and possibly others. Barry was immune to prosectution due to his connections in the George Bush White House and the CIA. Meanwhile, the governor of the state of Arkansas, Bill Clinton, rose from relative obscurity to become President of the United States. We'll probably never know the full story of what happened in Mena, but what we do know is incredible.

Mena: Deposition of Richard J. Brennekeby Richard J. Brenneke
I'll state further for the record, that the nature of this inquiry is confidential. And that it is - the evidence is intended to be used to produce for the benefit of the Special Prosecutor in the Iran-Contra case now pending in Washington and for other purposes.

Mena: Obstruction of Justice (Preview)
On August 23, 1987, seventeen-year-old Kevin Ives and sixteen-year-old Don Henry, were murdered in a rural community just south of Little Rock. Their bodies were placed on railroad tracks and run over by a passing train

Ollie North and the C-123 Storyby Bear Bottoms
Barry Seal made a decision to try and work off his legal problems. He started trying to get someone to work with him. He was having difficulty finding someone. Finally, in March of 1984 he flew his Lear Jet to Washington and received an audience with Vice President Bush's Anti-Drug Task Force...

Operation Red Rockby Stew Webb
The "Contragate" years teem with well documented accounts of illicit wholesale gun running and dope smuggling. The expose series published in Autumn 1996 by the San Jose Mercury Post, entitled the "Dark Alliance," openly finger-points at the CIA and the Reagan administration for turning a blind-eye to massive Cocaine smuggling. Moreover, the series of articles claim that the explosion of "crack Cocaine" in Los Angeles resulted entirely from the Contra leaders-cum-dope peddlers who made vast personal fortunes from their activities. Today, the official argument remains that the Contra's were "freelancing" without the knowledge or consent of their CIA "handlers" or North's so called "Enterprise."

Radio Interview with Mark Swaney
WBAI radio interview with Mark Swaney from "Faithful Arkansas" a citizens group, speaking of Bill Clinton's and George Bush's connection with the CIA covert drug smuggling operation in Mena Arkansas in support of the Contras.

South Central CIA Transcriptby Charles Overbeck
The following is a transcript of a Town Hall meeting between residents of South Central and other areas of Los Angeles and CIA Director John Deutch. The intense question-and-answer session was hosted by Rep. Juanita M. McDonald (D-California, 37th District) on the evening of Friday, November 15, 1996, at Locke High School in Los Angeles. The first part of McDonald's opening remarks was omitted for brevity, but otherwise, this transcript is a continuous verbatim record of the event. Transcription by Charles Overbeck, EASTERISLE@aol.com, for ParaScope, http://www.parascope.com/

The Crimes of Menaby Sally Denton and Roger Morris
Barry Seal - gunrunner, drug trafficker, and covert C.I.A. operative extraordinaire - is hardly a familiar name in American politics. But nine years after he was murdered in a hail of bullets by Medellin cartel hit men outside a Salvation Army shelter in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, he has come back to haunt the reputations of three American presidents.

The Mena Airport: Why Arkansas's Biggest Mystery Won't Dieby Mara Leveritt
First there was the investigation, the expectation of indictments-- and, to the amazement of many, the inaction. The plot thickened in 1986, when discovery of the Iran-Contra affair also revealed shadowy connections between Oliver North's gun-running operation to the Nicaraguan Contras and what appeared to be government-protected drug activity taking place at Mena.

http://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/mena/

(3)

ARKANSAS GOVERNOR BILL CLINTON
PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH
CIA DRUGS FOR GUNS CONNECTION
By
Paul DeRienzo

An independent group of researchers in Arkansas are charging that Governor Bill Clinton is covering up an airport used by the CIA and major cocaine smugglers in a remote corner of the Ozark mountains.

According to Deborah Robinson of In These Times, the Inter mountain Regional Airport in Mena,Arkansas continues to be the hub of operations for people like assassinated cocaine kingpin Barry Seal as well as government intelligence operations linked to arms and drug smuggling.

In the 1980's, the Mena airport became one of the world's largest aircraft refurbishing centers, providing services to planes from many countries.Researchers claim that the largest consumers of aircraft refurbishing services are drug smugglers and intelligence agencies involved in covert activities.In fact, residents of Mena, Arkansas, have told reporters that former marine Lt. Colonel Oliver North was a frequent visitor during the 1980's. Eugene Hasenfus, a pilot who was shot down in a Contra supply plane over Nicaragua in 1986, was also seen in town renting cargo vehicles.

A federal Grand Jury looking into activities at the Mena airport refused to hand down any indictments after drug running charges were made public.Deborah Robinson says that Clinton had "ignored the situation" until he began his presidential campaign." Clinton then said he would provide money for a state run investigation of the Mena airport. But according to Robinson, the promise of an investigation was never followed up by Clinton's staff. In fact, a local Arkansas state prosecutor blasted Clinton's promise of an investigation, comparing it to "spitting on a forest fire."

Clinton's involvement in the drug and arms running goes even further than a mere cover-up of the deplorable activities that went on, and are still going on, at the airport in Mena. A federal mail fraud case against an Arkansas pilot-trainer who participated in illegal arms exports to Central Americarelied on a key Clinton staffer as a chief witness. The case was dismissedfor lack of evidence when the CIA refused to allow the discussion of top secret information about the arms transfers.

Terry Reed, a former employee of the CIA's Air America operation in Laos during the Indochina war, claims to have been recruited as a pilot trainer into the Iran operation by Oliver North. In an article written by David Gallis and published last year by Covert Action Information Bulletin, Reed said that in 1983 he had agreed to supply North's operatives with "certain items."

In pursuit of the Reagan administration's Contra war against the Sandinistas, the CIA had planted mines in Nicaragua's harbors. In 1984, Congress passed the Boland Amendment, which cut off US aid to the Contras. According to Reed, it was during this period that North aided him to become involved in a covert operation called "Project Donation".

Reed was told he would be reimbursed for supplying the Contras by insurance companies that were linked to North's operation.,
Shortly afterwards, Reed reported the "theft" of Piper turbo-prop aircraft and he filed a $33,000 claim on which he eventually collected almost $7,000.

In late 1985, Reed received a phone call from an Air America buddy, William Cooper, a pilot working with Southern Air Transport, another CIA front company. Cooper also was working with soon to be murdered drug kingpin Barry Seal at the same time he was flying re-supply missions for the Contras. In 1986, he was shot down and killed over Nicaragua along with co-pilot Wallace Sawyer. The plane's cargo-kicker, Eugene Hasenfus, parachuted into the arms of waiting Sandinista soldiers.

Video images of his capture spanned the world and forced an airing of a tiny part of US covert operations.

Sandinistas who recovered the downed cargo plane searched Cooper's pockets and found phone numbers linking the re-supply operation with Felix Rodriguez, an associate of George Bush, best known for murdering Che Guevara after his capture in Bolivia. To this day, Rodriguez, who works for the CIA, wears Che's watch as a trophy.

More- http://www.ncoic.com/clinton.htm

More Govt Drugs - http://www.impiousdigest.com/mena%20arkansas%20Clinton.html

Results - about 220 for Bush/clinton coke planes in Mena, AK

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Bush%2Fclinton+coke+planes+in+Mena%2C+AK&btnG=Google+Search

New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/

Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss

SPONSORED LINKS Business intelligence Competitive intelligence Market intelligence
Emotional intelligence Military intelligence Critical thinking

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "political-research" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 13
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:15pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: [catapult] [Fwd: Re: No plane at WTC? Re-thinking my "concessio

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rosalee Grable" <webfairy@thewebfairy.com>
To: <catapultthepropaganda@yahoogroups.com>; <apfn-1@yahoogroups.com>;
<911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 12:55 PM
Subject: [catapult] [Fwd: Re: No plane at WTC? Re-thinking my
"concession"...]

>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: No plane at WTC? Re-thinking my "concession"...
> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:37:34 -0400
> From: Tim Canale <basement.dnai@rcn.com>
>
> Put it all into perspective:
>
> *At all four locations we have live video footage that didn't
> show us one piece of plane wreckage, yet for the past 50
> years whenever a plane crashes somewhere there are plane
> parts all over the place.

This is false. There are pictures of wreckage at the foot of the WTC
as well as at the Pentagon. At the Pentagon there were no big pieces
and there was one case where the planting of a piece of 757 was
detected and exposed -- here is a trivia test for experts -- what
piece am I talking about? --de
>
> *At all four locations there are very genuine-sounding
> witnesses saying that it looked to them like no plane hit.

There were very few witnesses who said it looked like the plane
didn't hit at the Pentagon -- and their wording is ambiguous.
>
> *At all four locations the people who claim they saw a plane
> are phony as a 3 dollar bill (the kind with George W.'s picture
> on it).

This is not true of the Pentagon case -- many many witnesses
saw the jetliner as it approached the Pentagon -- many more
than claimed to have seen the crash. I have read every one
I could get my hands on and they all sound sincere -- the
jetliner unquestionably approached the Pentagon -- the
question is was this the object that hit and caused the
explosion -- trivial quiz -- what do the investigators who
have concluded that a smaller aircraft and a missile were
involved what do they say happened to the jetliner that
everyone saw?

>
> *From 1971 - 1988 Mae Brussell was on the radio
> explaining why the Nazi war machine and the southern Texas-
> types are wiping out the eastern-Rockefeller-Kennedy power-
> money people, then on 9/11 the Rockefeller-built WTC goes
> boom, with very bad b-actors running around saying they saw
> planes and fabricated video clips showing planes.

Bullshit. Kissinger is Rockefeller, Perle is Rothschilds,
Gingrich (who was also on the Defence Policy Board
out of Wolfowitz's office is also a lifelong Rockefeller
minion).
>
> Maybe it's just me, but isn't this obvious?
>
> Tim
> www.maebrussell.com
>
You too good to talk to me, Tim -- how
should I know what's wrong with you?

DIck Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.
http://bedoper.com/eastman

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 14
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:35pm(PDT)
Subject: Jew Talk -- Had enough?

The Zionist Jews and their Jew Fellow Travellers are the curse of the
world. The Jews did 9-11 to get the genocidal wars on Arabs using our
ons -- and yet they talk as follows about those who have discovered and put
out the evidence proving their guilt. I doubt we have a chance against evil
so black that has grown so stupendously powerful -- but this side of torture
they cannot get me to wink at their genocides. Justice or death! -- Dick
Eastman
---------------------------------------------

From: "razl dazl" <razldazl@iinet.net.au>
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 11:38 PM
Subject: [Conspiracy-Theory] Noam Chomsky - More On The Mythical "Israel
Lobby"

*It seems the frothing racists and Judeophobes are quickly running out
of drool even with the much publicised Mearsheimer and Walt's pathetic
and puerile, mini-me "Protocols of Zion" shenanigans.*

*One wonders if any of these Judeophobic dullards have even read a
sentence from that surreptitious but patently transparent piece of
racist garbage.*

*Seems our little cross-dressing wolves in sheep's clothing have quickly
run out of their frenzied huff and puff. Almost a comical replay of
their feverish one-night fellatio dalliance with the violent,
hooker-addicted, mentally unhinged, woman basher, liar, fraud, coke
snorter, adulterer and scumbag, Cheating Charlie Sheen. These dolts
truly are the most pitiably desperate (and tremendously funny),
charlatans -aren't they folks? that one could encounter in cyber land!?*

*And much like their recent romp with their lower-than-dregs hero
Cheating Charlie, they'd take any paid-for whore they could get, except,
and as is plain; they have performed the part of the prostitute themselves.*

As the U.S. and Israel critic, Noam Chomsky politely summed up, in his
own peculiar manner of the mythical "Israel Lobby" carping from the M &
W screeching harpies, "we still have to ask how convincing their thesis
is. Not very, in my opinion."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The Israel Lobby?
Noam Chomsky
ZNet, March 28, 2006

I've received many requests to comment on the article by John
Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt (henceforth M-W), published in the London
Review of Books, which has been circulating extensively on the internet
and has elicited a storm of controversy. A few thoughts on the matter
follow.

It was, as noted, published in the London Review of Books, which is far
more open to discussion on these issues than US journals -- a matter of
relevance (to which I'll return) to the alleged influence of what M-W
call "the Lobby." An article in the Jewish journal Forward quotes M as
saying that the article was commissioned by a US journal, but rejected,
and that "the pro-Israel lobby is so powerful that he and co-author
Stephen Walt would never have been able to place their report in a
American-based scientific publication." But despite the fact that it
appeared in England, the M-W article aroused the anticipated hysterical
reaction from the usual supporters of state violence here, from the Wall
St Journal to Alan Dershowitz, sometimes in ways that would instantly
expose the authors to ridicule if they were not lining up (as usual)
with power.

M-W deserve credit for taking a position that is sure to elicit tantrums
and fanatical lies and denunciations, but it's worth noting that there
is nothing unusual about that. Take any topic that has risen to the
level of Holy Writ among "the herd of independent minds" (to borrow
Harold Rosenberg's famous description of intellectuals): for example,
anything having to do with the Balkan wars, which played a huge role in
the extraordinary campaigns of self-adulation that disfigured
intellectual discourse towards the end of the millennium, going well
beyond even historical precedents, which are ugly enough. Naturally, it
is of extraordinary importance to the herd to protect that self-image,
much of it based on deceit and fabrication. Therefore, any attempt even
to bring up plain (undisputed, surely relevant) facts is either ignored
(M-W can't be ignored), or sets off most impressive tantrums, slanders,
fabrications and deceit, and the other standard reactions. Very easy to
demonstrate, and by no means limited to these cases. Those without
experience in critical analysis of conventional doctrine can be very
seriously misled by the particular case of the Middle East(ME).

But recognizing that M-W took a courageous stand, which merits praise,
we still have to ask how convincing their thesis is. Not very, in my
opinion. I've reviewed elsewhere what the record (historical and
documentary) seems to me to show about the main sources of US ME policy,
in books and articles for the past 40 years, and can't try to repeat
here. M-W make as good a case as one can, I suppose, for the power of
the Lobby, but I don't think it provides any reason to modify what has
always seemed to me a more plausible interpretation. Notice incidentally
that what is at stake is a rather subtle matter: weighing the impact of
several factors which (all agree) interact in determining state policy:
in particular, (A) strategic-economic interests of concentrations of
domestic power in the tight state-corporate linkage, and (B) the Lobby.

The M-W thesis is that (B) overwhelmingly predominates. To evaluate the
thesis, we have to distinguish between two quite different matters,
which they tend to conflate: (1) the alleged failures of US ME policy;
(2) the role of The Lobby in bringing about these consequences. Insofar
as the stands of the Lobby conform to (A), the two factors are very
difficult to disentagle. And there is plenty of conformity.

Let's look at (1), and ask the obvious question: for whom has policy
been a failure for the past 60 years? The energy corporations? Hardly.
They have made "profits beyond the dreams of avarice" (quoting John
Blair, who directed the most important government inquiries into the
industry, in the '70s), and still do, and the ME is their leading cash
cow. Has it been a failure for US grand strategy based on control of
what the State Department described 60 years ago as the "stupendous
source of strategic power" of ME oil and the immense wealth from this
unparalleled "material prize"? Hardly. The US has substantially
maintained control -- and the significant reverses, such as the
overthrow of the Shah, were not the result of the initiatives of the
Lobby. And as noted, the energy corporations prospered. Furthermore,
those extraordinary successes had to overcome plenty of barriers:
primarily, as elsewhere in the world, what internal documents call
"radical nationalism," meaning independent nationalism. As elsewhere in
the world, it's been convenient to phrase these concerns in terms of
"defense against the USSR," but the pretext usually collapses quickly on
inquiry, in the ME as elsewhere. And in fact the claim was conceded to
be false, officially, shortly after the fall of the Berlin Wall, when
Bush's National Security Strategy (1990) called for maintaining the
forces aimed at the ME, where the serious "threats to our interests...
could not be laid at the Kremlin's door" -- now lost as a pretext for
pursuing about the same policies as before. And the same was true pretty
much throughout the world.

That at once raises another question about the M-W thesis. What were
"the Lobbies" that led to pursuing very similar policies throughout the
world? Consider the year 1958, a very critical year in world affairs. In
1958, the Eisenhower administration identified the three leading
challenges to the US as the ME, North Africa, and Indonesia -- all oil
producers, all Islamic. North Africa was taken care of by Algerian
(formal) independence. Indonesia and the were taken care of by Suharto's
murderous slaughter (1965) and Israel's destruction of Arab secular
nationalism (Nasser, 1967). In the ME, that established the close
US-Israeli alliance and confirmed the judgment of US intelligence in
1958 that a "logical corollary" of opposition to "radical nationalism"
(meaning, secular independent nationalism) is "support for Israel" as
the one reliable US base in the region (along with Turkey, which entered
into close relations with Israel in the same year). Suharto's coup
aroused virtual euphoria, and he remained "our kind of guy" (as the
Clinton administration called him) until he could no longer keep control
in 1998, through a hideous record that compares well with Saddam Hussein
-- who was also "our kind of guy" until he disobeyed orders in 1990.
What was the Indonesia Lobby? The Saddam Lobby? And the question
generalizes around the world. Unless these questions are faced, the
issue (1) cannot be seriously addressed.

When we do investigate (1), we find that US policies in the ME are quite
similar to those pursued elsewhere in the world, and have been a
remarkable success, in the face of many difficulties: 60 years is a long
time for planning success. It's true that Bush II has weakened the US
position, not only in the ME, but that's an entirely separate matter.

That leads to (2). As noted, the US-Israeli alliance was firmed up
precisely when Israel performed a huge service to the US-Saudis-Energy
corporations by smashing secular Arab nationalism, which threatened to
divert resources to domestic needs. That's also when the Lobby takes off
(apart from the Christian evangelical component, by far the most
numerous and arguably the most influential part, but that's mostly the
90s). And it's also when the intellectual-political class began their
love affair with Israel, previously of little interest to them. They are
a very influential part of the Lobby because of their role in media,
scholarship, etc. From that point on it's hard to distinguish "national
interest" (in the usual perverse sense of the phrase) from the effects
of the Lobby. I've run through the record of Israeli services to the US,
to the present, elsewhere, and won't review it again here.

M-W focus on AIPAC and the evangelicals, but they recognize that the
Lobby includes most of the political-intellectual class -- at which
point the thesis loses much of its content. They also have a highly
selective use of evidence (and much of the evidence is assertion). Take,
as one example, arms sales to China, which they bring up as undercutting
US interests. But they fail to mention that when the US objected, Israel
was compelled to back down: under Clinton in 2000, and again in 2005, in
this case with the Washington neocon regime going out of its way to
humiliate Israel. Without a peep from The Lobby, in either case, though
it was a serious blow to Israel. There's a lot more like that. Take the
worst crime in Israel's history, its invasion of Lebanon in 1982 with
the goal of destroying the secular nationalist PLO and ending its
embarrassing calls for political settlement, and imposing a client
Maronite regime. The Reagan administration strongly supported the
invasion through its worst atrocities, but a few months later (August),
when the atrocities were becoming so severe that even NYT Beirut
correspondent Thomas Friedman was complaining about them, and they were
beginning to harm the US "national interest," Reagan ordered Israel to
call off the invasion, then entered to complete the removal of the PLO
from Lebanon, an outcome very welcome to both Israel and the US (and
consistent with general US opposition to independent nationalism). The
outcome was not entirely what the US-Israel wanted, but the relevant
observation here is that the Reaganites supported the aggression and
atrocities when that stand was conducive to the "national interest," and
terminated them when it no longer was (then entering to finish the main
job). That's pretty normal.

Another problem that M-W do not address is the role of the energy
corporations. They are hardly marginal in US political life --
transparently in the Bush administration, but in fact always. How can
they be so impotent in the face of the Lobby? As ME scholar Stephen
Zunes has rightly pointed out, "there are far more powerful interests
that have a stake in what happens in the Persian Gulf region than does
AIPAC [or the Lobby generally], such as the oil companies, the arms
industry and other special interests whose lobbying influence and
campaign contributions far surpass that of the much-vaunted Zionist
lobby and its allied donors to congressional races."

Do the energy corporations fail to understand their interests, or are
they part of the Lobby too? By now, what's the distinction between (1)
and (2), apart from the margins?

Also to be explained, again, is why US ME policy is so similar to its
policies elsewhere -- to which, incidentally, Israel has made important
contributions, e.g., in helping the executive branch to evade
congressional barriers to carrying out massive terror in Central
America, to evade embargoes against South Africa and Rhodesia, and much
else. All of which again makes it even more difficult to separate (2)
from (1) -- the latter, pretty much uniform, in essentials, throughout
the world.

I won't run through the other arguments, but I don't feel that they have
much force, on examination.

The thesis M-W propose does however have plenty of appeal. The reason, I
think, is that it leaves the US government untouched on its high
pinnacle of nobility, "Wilsonian idealism," etc., merely in the grip of
an all-powerful force that it cannot escape. It's rather like
attributing the crimes of the past 60 years to "exaggerated Cold War
illusions," etc. Convenient, but not too convincing. In either case.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 15
From: "The Jewish History Series" joohistory@yahoo.com
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:01pm(PDT)
Subject: Adolf Hitler (1889 - )

ADOLF HITLER (1889 - )

He was born into humble circumstances, the son of an obscure civil servant in a remote corner of a crumbling empire, yet his name resounds throughout the world to this day.

He was rejected by the universities of his time for formal enrollment in art and in architecture, and yet he erected mighty buildings and monuments, and today a simple postcard that he drew in ink or charcoal fetches staggering sums at auction.

He never achieved more than a public school education, yet he wrote a book which has outsold every other book in history except for the Bible.

He fought as a front line soldier through all four years of the greatest war in history up to that time, never rising above the rank of corporal, but he won both of his country's highest decorations for bravery under fire and rose to command the
mightiest armies on earth.

Almost unique in the history of his century, he was not a lawyer or an aristocrat or a man of inherited wealth and privilege, but a man who once earned his daily bread with the labor of his hands, and yet he conquered politics and rose to the leadership of the most brilliant and creative nation on earth.

So that his people might travel across the land he loved quickly and cheaply, he created a simple and sturdy automobile still in use today, and a network of highways that still spans Germany.

His game and forestry laws are still in force, and are praised by ecologists as a model of environmental protection.

His economic program received the sincerest form of flattery from the loathsome Roosevelt, who stole it and copied it into the context of the American Depression as his own.

Every man who ever met him personally, even those who became his bitterest enemies, spoke of him forever afterwards with awe and admiration.

His courtesy and his gallantry toward women were legendary. With his power and his prestige he could have had any woman he wanted, but the woman he chose as his life's partner, and who eventually died by his side, was a simple and humble daughter of the people.

He did not drink. He did not smoke. He was a lifelong lover of animals and children and was happiest in the company of toddlers rather than statesmen and soldiers, and no one ever overheard him use a profane word or tell a smutty joke.

He lifted his people up from the mud of defeat and despair and alien domination, and he died trying to do the same for all of us.

To this day, his memory is kept green by the Aryan peoples of Germany and the world, even though it means prison, and in some countries death, to honor him or his legacy within the sight or hearing of the tyrant. He has been slandered, vilified, lied about, cursed, distorted, and damned every day since his death by the most powerful and evil tyranny mankind has ever known, and yet his name and his Symbol cannot be suppressed by force or by
propaganda.

As we begin this new Millennium, his book is read and his name
is on more lips than ever before and his image and his strength fills the hearts of a whole new generation of young Aryan men and women. He is invincible and immortal, and Victory shall one day be his.

He holds out his hand to us all. He offers us his strength and his wisdom, at a time when we so badly need both. Let us keep him always in our hearts and our minds and our souls, until the day comes when once more we may speak his name aloud and raise on high the sacred Banner for which he and so many millions more lived and died.

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 16
From: "angiesept11" angiesept11@yahoo.com
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:31pm(PDT)
Subject: I've just banned two posters & this should be end of despicable hate

I've just banned two posters, Dick Eastman,
for his "The Jews did 9-11" post and the
poster calling himself "joohistory" who posted
something on Adolf Hitler. I unfortunately rarely
get a chance to monitor or keep current with this
newsgroup for which I have some moderator privileges,
and to see this offensive stuff on a rare occasion when
I check in is worse that disturbing. Associating
any religion with the culprits of 9/11 is worse
than stupid, it's evil and I'm disgusted to see it
on this list. When I see it, I'll ban it - and this
shouldn't be any more cause for discussion either.
The topic is 9/11 PERIOD. It shouldn't be necessary
to point out that anyone involved in planning
the crime has NO true spirituality or religion. I hope
this list can be reborn into something where this stuff
isn't tolerated. If other moderators disagree, just let
me know & I'll be on my merry way because I cannot associate
with this filth, nor do I want to see any discussion
of it. 9/11 should never be used to further anyone's
anti-semitic agenda, nor should this list which is intended
to concern 911 truth activism.

Angie

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 17
From: "scol202" yahooboxx@ntlworld.com
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:47pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: I've just banned two posters & this should be end of despicable

Very interesting message Angie. I have a feeling someone was banned
from this list a few days ago for complaining in rather similar terms
to you.

If you find out who banned Leslie and ban him/her first you might
avoid getting banned yourself.

very amusing

My anti-Hitler diatribre got lost in the electronic stramash, never
mind, you've heard it before !!

It should only take you about a year to find all the 'mossad carried
out 9/11' messages and delete them (including mine)

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "angiesept11"
<angiesept11@...> wrote:
>
> I've just banned two posters, Dick Eastman,
> for his "The Jews did 9-11" post and the
> poster calling himself "joohistory" who posted
> something on Adolf Hitler. I unfortunately rarely
> get a chance to monitor or keep current with this
> newsgroup for which I have some moderator privileges,
> and to see this offensive stuff on a rare occasion when
> I check in is worse that disturbing. Associating
> any religion with the culprits of 9/11 is worse
> than stupid, it's evil and I'm disgusted to see it
> on this list. When I see it, I'll ban it - and this
> shouldn't be any more cause for discussion either.
> The topic is 9/11 PERIOD. It shouldn't be necessary
> to point out that anyone involved in planning
> the crime has NO true spirituality or religion. I hope
> this list can be reborn into something where this stuff
> isn't tolerated. If other moderators disagree, just let
> me know & I'll be on my merry way because I cannot associate
> with this filth, nor do I want to see any discussion
> of it. 9/11 should never be used to further anyone's
> anti-semitic agenda, nor should this list which is intended
> to concern 911 truth activism.
>
> Angie
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 18
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 6:55pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: How successful has the 911 truth movement been?

Welcome to the group, Angie. And yes I have seen quite a few bills with things written on them like 911 was an inside job and with related websites on them as well.

Kevin

www.fightthenwo.org

angela mvbride <fourddream@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi,
Angie here, new to this group, that's a lot of mail to read!
Do you all know the initiative to write webadresses on banknotes (as long as there is still cash to do it with). Every note that passes through your hands put a truth site adress on it before you spend it. Money Talks!

Jolly Roger <slicingthroats@yahoo.com> wrote:
Kitty -- if someone's not receptive to the info move on -- some people simply don't want to know the truth. Try to convinve one or two people close to you so you have someone to work with. And since the mainstream media has already convinced them that you're crazy for suggesting such a thing, it might be wise to first discredit the MSM by exposing some of their other lies, and that might pave the way to having a more receptive 9-11 Truth audience.

kitty285 <kitty285@charter.net> wrote: Kevin,im trying to work the Bible Belt without my head blown off by a red
neck !!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Hammond" <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com>
To: <911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] How successful has the 911 truth movement
been?

> The internet is NOT ENOUGH. There are millions that do NOT have access.
We are now getting down to the wire and must pull out ALL of the stops and
LITTERALLY do EVERYTHING that we can to get this information OUT! The
alternative is a MASSIVE one world police state the likes of which NO ONE
here can possibly fathom. PLEASE! everyone one this group that knows
ANYTHING about 9/11 and false flag terror MUST get out there and educate as
many people as possible! Otherwisw we are all up a creek without a paddle.
Go to the files section and download flyers and copy them and put them
EVERYWHERE! Burn copies of dvds and give them out. Do whatever you CAN to
get this information OUT!.
>
> Kevin
> www.fightthenwo.org
>
> Dick Eastman <olfriend@nwinfo.net> wrote:
>
>
> v\:* { BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML) } o\:* { BEHAVIOR:
url(#default#VML) } w\:* { BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML) } .shape {
BEHAVIOR: url(#default#VML) } I have always placed my faith on
using the internet to expose to the world what they are and what they have
done. The 9-11 frameup is a crime big enough that people can't brush it
aside. Our best hope is to show the world the ample evidence of the
false-flag attack -- and then enlarge that hole until their motives and
their other crimes are exposed. They cannot withstand public opinion.
>
> It is the only strategy I know -- and it is one I will keep pushing --
but I must admit, in five years I have not seen the people take what we
already know and use it to enlighten the world.
>
> Charlie Sheen is the best thing that has happened in five years. May
circumstances favor his efforts.
>
> Dick Eastman
> Yakima, Washington
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Scott Peden
> To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9:27 PM
> Subject: RE: [911TruthAction] How successful has the 911 truth movement
been?
>
>
> So, you are saying that it is hopeless?
>
> Or do you proscribe a course of action as the internet ad our freedoms
evaporate all at once?
>
> Or are you depending on the masses to rise up when their entertainment
is taken away?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Dick Eastman
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:10 AM
> To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] How successful has the 911 truth movement
been?
>
> The plague will not be like the attack on the Pentagon -- it will be
beyond our ability to investigate.
>
> Next the nuclear bomb that will be blamed on Iraq -- because there will
be no invasion right away, they are setting Iran up for blame for the
false-flag nuclear attack -- the bomb that will be blamed on Iran will not
leave evidence -- and the sudden loss of all freedoms by the declaration
of martial law, including the shutdown of the internet, will not permit
investigations of any kind.
>
> Or perhaps they will let the internet continue so they can guage our
thinking and trace our connections -- more for them to lose by cutting us
off.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Scott Legere
>
> To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 4:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] How successful has the 911 truth movement
been?
>
> It's amazing what a little awareness can do huh?
>
> mikemeyer1964 <mike.meyer@asm.com> wrote:
>
> With all of the saber rattling with Iran, I had the following
> thought. I believe that the 911 Truth Movement has been successful in
> one key area. While we have not broken through to main stream
> America, I believe that we have created enough awareness about 911
> that the gov't has to really think twice before they can stage another
> False Flag event.
>
> The gov't has gotten away with covering up 911 to date, in part
> because they effectively created a cover story and destroyed the
> evidence very quickly. With enough people aware of what our gov't is
> capable of now, if they try another False Flag, there will be a lot of
> people recording every news station and outlet; video and still
> camera's everywhere, and a lot more people asking a lot more questions
> right after the event. It will be more difficult to cover up
> evidence. I was curious as to everyone's thoughts on what I would
> call a small success for the movement.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+
countries) for 2¢/min or less.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.

"There comes a time when every man feels the urge to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and start slitting throats." -- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.

---------------------------------
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.

SPONSORED LINKS
United state citizenship United state government grant United state patent Trademark united state United state army United state grant

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org

---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 19
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:00pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: I've just banned two posters & this should be end of despicable

No argument from me. he was asked nicely more than just a couple of times to differentiate between judaism and zionism and he failed to do so.

Kevin
www.fightthenwo.org have you seen my site yet? Please check it out and give me any feedback as I respect your opinion.

angiesept11 <angiesept11@yahoo.com> wrote:
I've just banned two posters, Dick Eastman,
for his "The Jews did 9-11" post and the
poster calling himself "joohistory" who posted
something on Adolf Hitler. I unfortunately rarely
get a chance to monitor or keep current with this
newsgroup for which I have some moderator privileges,
and to see this offensive stuff on a rare occasion when
I check in is worse that disturbing. Associating
any religion with the culprits of 9/11 is worse
than stupid, it's evil and I'm disgusted to see it
on this list. When I see it, I'll ban it - and this
shouldn't be any more cause for discussion either.
The topic is 9/11 PERIOD. It shouldn't be necessary
to point out that anyone involved in planning
the crime has NO true spirituality or religion. I hope
this list can be reborn into something where this stuff
isn't tolerated. If other moderators disagree, just let
me know & I'll be on my merry way because I cannot associate
with this filth, nor do I want to see any discussion
of it. 9/11 should never be used to further anyone's
anti-semitic agenda, nor should this list which is intended
to concern 911 truth activism.

Angie

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

---------------------------------

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org

---------------------------------
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 20
From: "ranger116@webtv.net" ranger116@webtv.net
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:37pm(PDT)
Subject: Rolling Stone-Bush Worst President In HISTORY ! One of America's Le

Rolling Stone-Bush Worst President In HISTORY !
One of America's Leading Historians Accesses George W. Bush

Address:http://www.therandirhodesshow.com/live/

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Tim Russert says US Generals tell him that there is a Civil war going on
inside the Pentagon.
He says the Generals are trying to regain control of the war !
( Could a coup be far off ? )

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Chronicle Forced to issue retraction on claim America saw a plane fly
into the Pentagon on 9/11

SF Gate: Corrections Policy
Address:http://www.sfgate.com/pages/corrections/

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Hear Bush - I Am The Decider Song I'mThe Decider
Address:http://decider.cf.huffingtonpost.com/

2006Audio:http://decider.cf.huffingtonpost.com/decider.mp3

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Mr. President: They Didn't Die For Open Borders

Address:http://www.newswithviews.com/
Wooldridge/frosty146.htm

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Plans to "Sacrifice California" in early June? - 700 ton bomb test to
open San Andreas Fault ?

Address:http://earthboppin.net/cgi-bin/talkrec.cgi?submit=lt&baseurl=http://earthboppin.net/talkshop/national&msg_num=15083
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Re: US OIL DISCOVERY~LARGEST RESERVE IN THE WORLD

Address:http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=87888

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
US Troops - 'You Could Kill Whoever You Wanted'

Address:http://www.rense.com/general70/trrio.htm

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Illegal Hordes Bringing Disease, Death To America

Address:http://www.rense.com/general70/illegalhordesbringing.htm

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
The Truth Seeker - Physicist says heat substance felled WTC

Address:http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/print.asp?ID=4386

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
911, The Pentagon And The A3 Skywarrior Theory

Address:http://www.rense.com/general70/safe.htm

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Cheney Gets Booed, Sheen Gets Applauded

Address:http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/180406sheengetsapplauded.htm

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Don't Impeach Bush - Commit Him

Address:http://www.rense.com/general70/dont.htm

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
( Typical ! Just putting on a show, Where were you for the last ten
years ? )

Hundreds nabbed in immigration raid - U.S. Security - MSNBC.com

Address:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12393925/

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 21
From: "Naveed" flanker12k@yahoo.com
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:21pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: I've just banned two posters & this should be end of despicable

I trust your judgment angie, no disagreements from me. I think i lost track of the number of times I kept telling eastman to make the distinction between jews and zionists.....only once did i retract because he was trying to make a point.

Kevin Hammond <sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com> wrote: No argument from me. he was asked nicely more than just a couple of times to differentiate between judaism and zionism and he failed to do so.

Kevin
www.fightthenwo.org have you seen my site yet? Please check it out and give me any feedback as I respect your opinion.

Angie

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org
---------------------------------
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.

SPONSORED LINKS
United state coin United state patent United state government grant United state grant United state army United state military

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

---------------------------------

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

http://www.fightthenwo.org/

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 22
From: "Dick Eastman" de1949@nwinfo.net
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:00pm(PDT)
Subject: Zionist Gatekeeper Angie911 has always worked against investigators

Also, that little trick of having some anonymous first-time poster post a praise post on Hitler following right after mine so that Angie could ban me and a Hitlerist in the same breath -- very well thought out, Angie.

She made her career cataloging all the 9/11 investigators, always siding with the Zionists (e.g. Jared Israel) -- and always attacked the Pentagon evidence > Zionist Neocons > Mossad > Israel vector.

How did Angie get to be gatekeeper for this list?

Naveed and Kevin Hammond are just "yes men" to Jewish gatekeeping power.

I ask all of you who think that it is wrong to ban investigators who present evidence pointing to Zionist Neocons, Mossad and Israel to join me in a move to another list.

I ask also those of you who are already convinced of Zionist and Israeli guilt of 9-11 to unsubcribe from 911TruthAction and to rejoin at Eastman's list 911ZionistOp@yahoogroups.com.

911ZionistOp-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

Jolly Roger, I expect you to join 911ZionistOp -- you belong there. Please, I don't want to be cut off from your thinking.

I will begin sending all of the material to 911ZionistOp that I have been sending to the list that Angie has taken over, 911TruthAction -- which was a pretty good list until Angie somehow got herself made moderator and now Zionist gatekeeper.

Jolly Roger, I expect you to join 911ZionistOp -- you belong there.

(The 911ZionistOp list was created by me a year or two ago -- now it will come in handy as wise men are compelled to come out of the closet.)

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 23
From: "Dick Eastman" de1949@nwinfo.net
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:00pm(PDT)
Subject: Fw: Compared to Kissinger, Hitler was a boy scout.

Compared to Kissinger, Hitler was a boy scout.Kissinger, along with Richard Pearl and Paul Wolfowitz, were the American-end masterminds of the 9-11 false-flag mass-murder attack. Here is some information about Mr. Kissinger.

COMPARED TO KISSINGER, HITLER WAS A BOY SCOUT

by Henk Ruyssenaars

FPF - Amsterdam/Philadelphia - April 19th - 2006 - Coming Monday the first of May, one of the worst still vegetating war criminals on earth - Heinrich Kissinger - is by the thugs of the PNAC invited to "Gather in Philadelphia for the so called 'World Affairs Council of Philadelphia Conference ''Islam and the West,'' - Featuring some of the scum on earth, like Sen. Joe Biden, and Moderator Judy Woodruff.

For all his murdering in Chili and not seeing tons of evidence, the US Supreme Court refused last Monday to revive a lawsuit accusing this former Secretary of State of the mass murder he's guilty of, to start with general Schneider he had killed in Santiago de Chile.

I hope there's somebody with some connection to real Chileans who is at the luncheon on the first of May. She/he can take revenge between 11:30AM and 1:30PM - because then the other cretins, Kissinger and a senior Bush administration official (guess what other cretin?) will sat at the trough. Any action may also stop the following idiocy: a one-on-one conversation with PNAC propagandist Woodruff and the Dutch/Ethiopian misfit Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali is guilty by association for the murder of dutch film maker Theo van Gogh, by not informing him about the consequences of the film 'Submission' they made. The man who killed him was born and bred in Holland, but had Moroccan parents.- Url.: http://tinyurl.com/mssjy

Hirsi Ali is often falsely described as a 'liberal' Dutch politician, but there's nothing ' liberal' about this criminal political party she is a member of: the PNAC support group VVD (Vereniging Van Dieven). She's advertised as an 'expert' on Islam since she as a Somali refugee fled an arranged marriage.

IF SOMEBODY IN THE WORLD WOULD MAKE A FILM WITH THE PROJECTION OF SERIES OF SENTENCES FROM THE TORAH, EXPLICITLY PORTRAYING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN JEWISH SOCIETIES ON THE NUDE BODY OF AN ISRAELI GIRL, IT'S OBVIOUS WHAT WOULD HAPPEN. BUT WITH THE PRESENT OPPRESSION SUCH A MOVIE CAN'T EVEN BE MADE.

INSULTING A BILLION OR MORE PEOPLE IN THE ARAB WORLD IS OK, BUT IF YOU ASK SOMETHING ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST YOU'RE JAILED?

WHO'S A CRAZY FUNDAMENTALIST HERE?

The gang that runs this empire of slavery is psychopathic and must be jailed immediately. They are totally sick and the worst plague humanity ever has known. It is an eternal shame that 'Kissinger the Killer' still can appear and even is announced as something 'Honorable' - while everybody outside the PNAC propaganda sphere knows that this creature Kissinger is a psychopathic serial killer.

It's obvious that the hair raising injustice below by the US Supreme Court had to be drowned in the Easter holiday, and nothing else was expected. Those so called 'judges' are among the biggest crooks known on earth. Kissinger already for decades has been one of the worst cancers in our society, where inhuman cretins like Kissinger for ages create a totalitarian havoc for all of us, the others, until we stop them.

And Kissinger and his ilk must absolutely be stopped, like the other 'crazies' in Washington and Tel Aviv. We must get them before they kill all of us.

I've seen the results of the 'Kissinger's Cancer' already in Vietnam and later on, when living in Chili. based on what I've seen globally I sincerely hope that this creature and his kind will burn in Hell forever, and regret that he has not been jailed yet after all those years 'holocausting' humanity.

'PNAC JUSTICE' - US COURT DECLINES TO TAKE KISSINGER LAWSUIT

he's been the death and misery for hundreds of millions of human beings, and he has an ocean of blood on his hands, because it doesn't fit under his yarmulke. But his fellow criminals are everywhere since centuries, and that's why the corrupted so called Supreme Court refused to handle another Kissinger murder case. According to the propaganda press AP: ''The Supreme Court refused Monday to revive a lawsuit accusing former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger of responsibility in the 1970 death of the head of the Chilean army. Family members of Gen. Rene Schneider filed the lawsuit in 2001, claiming that U.S. officials encouraged a plot to kidnap Schneider, in which he was killed.

The suit claimed that the U.S. government and Kissinger, then President Nixon's national security adviser, were guilty of violating U.S., Chilean and international law. A lower court dismissed the case. The case is Schneider v. Kissinger, 05-743. - [enditem] - AP = Associated Propaganda - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/qnlvt

Web Results 1-10 of about 112,000 for Kissinger +murderer - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/rh976

Killers Conference - Philadelphia May 1st - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/o3ydp

BBC - Gunman kills Dutch film director - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/5ht8f

KISSINGER & THE PNAC CLAN: THE 'PROJECT FOR A NAZI AMERICAN CENTURY':

* US BABY GENOCIDE DEFENDED: Former U.S. PNAC-Secr. of State Madeleine Albright-Korbel, 10 years ago in her comment on the at least HALF A MILLION dead children in Iraq, which now is estimated at ONE MILLION MORE BY UNICEF: "WE THINK THE PRICE IS WORTH IT" - On CBS '60 Minutes' - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/2vmc8

* Iraq: Pictures from the front line: What the U.S. Press Won't Show You. - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/qxbxn

* HOLODOMOR = HOLOCAUST 0F MORE THAN 6 MILLION IN UKRAINE - Writer Eric Margolis: "genocide accounted for at least 40 million victims, not including 20 million war dead. Kaganovitch and many senior OGPU officers (later, NKVD) were Jewish." - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/kycrw - Stalin's Terminator: LAZAR KAGANOVITCH - Url.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

* US CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL CONFIRMING THE CREATION OF A WORLD GOVERNMENT - "He asked if there was an international conspiracy to overthrow our government: The answer is ''Yes" - Short video - Url.: http://100777.com/media/RonPaul-NewWorldOrder.wmv

* CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN THE US? - 'IT CAN'T HAPPEN HERE!' - But of you don't react now... - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/o6lpx

* BEING DEMONIZED c.q. 'KILLED' BY THE PNAC CRIMINALS, BECAUSE THEY WROTE THIS: Prof. John J. Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago's Department of Political Science and Prof. Stephen M. Walt of Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government: 'The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy' - Working Paper Number: RWP06-011 - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/fsl7h

* THE 'WHY' OF GLOBAL RESISTANCE - HOW IT IS DONE BY THE PNAC'S CIA JACKALS & THE WORLD BANK's SERIAL KILLER WOLFOWITZ - Confessions of an economic 'hit man'. World Bank insider Perkins explains: "Jackals' are C.I.A. - sanctioned people that come in and try to foment a coup or revolution. If it doesn't work, they perform assassinations, or try to." - They steal billions for the World Bank, IMF, USAID, UNDP, AID etc. - Perkins web site - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/jvhbu - It's your life too: Must watch Video Url.: www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8171.htm

* PRESENT AND PAST - UNICEF reports on another PNAC HOLOCAUST: that the under-5 infant mortality for 2003 was 110,000 in occupied Iraq, 292,000 in occupied Afghanistan. Gideon Polya: 'Non-reportage of US-linked infant mass mortality' - December 23, 2004 - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/rb3rx

* The 'PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY's is HOLOCAUSTING MORE TODDLERS: Children Continue To Be the Main Victims Of the U.S. War Crimes - By Dr. César Chelala - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/oys87

* 'PROJECT FOR A NUCLEAR AMERICAN CENTURY': NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST FOR YOU TOO - Depleted Uranium for Dummies - Url.: http://www.notinkansas.us

* THE NEW SCIENTIST ABOUT ONE OF THE PNAC'S WEAPONS AGAINST US: SWEEPING STUN GUNS TO TARGET AND CONTROL YOU AND/OR CROWDS - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/kbx58

* THIS IS A VERY INFORMATIVE ARTICLE - AN EYE-OPENER - After working around the globe for more than forty years, I can not find anything wrong with this eloquent description of the state of affairs: ''Just six simple words that carry the weight of the world upon them, six simple words that act as the engine for so much turmoil and unrest.'' - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/gj4x5

* WHO RULES AMERICA - AND OUR LIVES? - Please read the following article with an open mind, and if you don't believe it you can verify it for yourself, as the author suggests. Keep in mind the intense and non-stop psychological conditioning already for ages being used by major media - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/evpf

* 6 MILLION PEOPLE WERE KILLED? - ANOTHER HOLOCAUST - THIS IS ONE OF MANY BY THE PNAC's CIA: John Stockwell, former CIA Station Chief in Angola in 1976, working for then Director of the CIA, George Bush. ''How 6 million People Were killed in CIA secret wars against Third World countries'' - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/gpcg

* "Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - George Bush Senior speaking in an interview with Sarah McClendon in December 1992.

* How The Bush Family Made Its Fortune From The Nazis - THE DUTCH CONNECTION - by John Loftus, a former U.S. Department of Justice Nazi War Crimes prosecutor, the President of the Florida Holocaust Museum and the highly respected author of numerous books on the CIA-Nazi connection including The Belarus Secret and The Secret War Against the Jews, both of which have extensive material on the Bush-Rockefeller-Nazi connection. - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/omczx -

* GLOBAL PREDATORS - OFRAUDS-R-US¹ - The Bush Family Saga - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/elarx

* The 9/11 drama was the 'trigger' used by the PNAC Group, killing Americans to further their inhuman goals: Anybody who after seeing this video - '9/11 revisited' - still believes the version from the 'PNAC pack' - the Washington cabal - is beyond all professional help - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/jn5jx

* The MAD COW MORNING NEWS is one of the absolutely best 9/11 sites on Internet - by Daniel Hopsicker - Url.: http://www.madcowprod.com/01042004.html

* PSYOPS: How to make anybody say and see anything - William M. Arkin's "The U.S. Military Online" - When Seeing and Hearing Isn't Believing - Special to the Washington Post - already on Feb. 1, 1999 - Url.:http://tinyurl.com/hvnrq

* FOX: Video 49 min. - The example how viewers are brainwashed and 'outfoxed' - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/b2zzl

* All the more reason to read the FIGHTIN' COCK FLYER - Url.: http://fightincockflyer.blogspot.com/

* THE ONLY SOLUTION? - Help all the troops - of whatever nationality - to come back from abroad! - AND WITH ALL THEIR WEAPONS, WHICH WE ARE FORCED TO PAY FOR BY TAXES - [http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm] - We need them badly at home in many countries to fight with us against our so called 'governments' and their malignant managers - Url.: http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/

The Dutch author this far has lived and worked abroad for more than 4 decades for international media - when they still knew what honest journalism was - as an independent foreign correspondent. Of which 10 years - also during Gulf War I - in the 'Arab World' and the Middle East. Seeing worldwide that every bullet and every bomb breeds more terrorism !

* IT'S VERY UNLIKELY, but if you indeed would prefer to unsubscribe from the FPF-list: just send an email in return with the word 'unsubscribe'.

* FPF-COPYRIGHT NOTICE - In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107 - any copyrighted work in this message is distributed by the Foreign Press Foundation under fair use, without profit or payment, to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the information. Url.: http://liimirror.warwick.ac.uk/uscode/17/107.html

FOREIGN PRESS FOUNDATION
http://forpressfound.blogspot.com/
Editor: Henk Ruyssenaars
http://tinyurl.com/amn3q
The Netherlands
fpf@chello.nl

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 24
From: "Scott Peden" scotpeden@cruzio.com
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:21pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Fw: Compared to Kissinger, Hitler was a boy scout.

Kissinger, claimed to come in peace, and yet there were riots and warfare
every time he left.

He obviously told each party in the conflict some other story, assuring them
that he was the only impartial person that cared for them.

-----Original Message-----
From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Dick Eastman
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 9:57 PM
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] Fw: Compared to Kissinger, Hitler was a boy scout.

Kissinger, along with Richard Pearl and Paul Wolfowitz, were the
American-end masterminds of the 9-11 false-flag mass-murder attack. Here is
some information about Mr. Kissinger.

COMPARED TO KISSINGER, HITLER WAS A BOY SCOUT

by Henk Ruyssenaars

FPF - Amsterdam/Philadelphia - April 19th - 2006 - Coming Monday the first
of May, one of the worst still vegetating war criminals on earth - Heinrich
Kissinger - is by the thugs of the PNAC invited to "Gather in Philadelphia
for the so called 'World Affairs Council of Philadelphia Conference ''Islam
and the West,'' - Featuring some of the scum on earth, like Sen. Joe Biden,
and Moderator Judy Woodruff.

For all his murdering in Chili and not seeing tons of evidence, the US
Supreme Court refused last Monday to revive a lawsuit accusing this former
Secretary of State of the mass murder he's guilty of, to start with general
Schneider he had killed in Santiago de Chile.

I hope there's somebody with some connection to real Chileans who is at the
luncheon on the first of May. She/he can take revenge between 11:30AM and
1:30PM - because then the other cretins, Kissinger and a senior Bush
administration official (guess what other cretin?) will sat at the trough.
Any action may also stop the following idiocy: a one-on-one conversation
with PNAC propagandist Woodruff and the Dutch/Ethiopian misfit Ayaan Hirsi
Ali.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali is guilty by association for the murder of dutch film maker
Theo van Gogh, by not informing him about the consequences of the film
'Submission' they made. The man who killed him was born and bred in Holland,
but had Moroccan parents.- Url.: http://tinyurl.com/mssjy

Hirsi Ali is often falsely described as a 'liberal' Dutch politician, but
there's nothing ' liberal' about this criminal political party she is a
member of: the PNAC support group VVD (Vereniging Van Dieven). She's
advertised as an 'expert' on Islam since she as a Somali refugee fled an
arranged marriage.

IF SOMEBODY IN THE WORLD WOULD MAKE A FILM WITH THE PROJECTION OF SERIES OF
SENTENCES FROM THE TORAH, EXPLICITLY PORTRAYING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN
JEWISH SOCIETIES ON THE NUDE BODY OF AN ISRAELI GIRL, IT'S OBVIOUS WHAT
WOULD HAPPEN. BUT WITH THE PRESENT OPPRESSION SUCH A MOVIE CAN'T EVEN BE
MADE.

INSULTING A BILLION OR MORE PEOPLE IN THE ARAB WORLD IS OK, BUT IF YOU ASK
SOMETHING ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST YOU'RE JAILED?

WHO'S A CRAZY FUNDAMENTALIST HERE?

The gang that runs this empire of slavery is psychopathic and must be jailed
immediately. They are totally sick and the worst plague humanity ever has
known. It is an eternal shame that 'Kissinger the Killer' still can appear
and even is announced as something 'Honorable' - while everybody outside the
PNAC propaganda sphere knows that this creature Kissinger is a psychopathic
serial killer.

It's obvious that the hair raising injustice below by the US Supreme Court
had to be drowned in the Easter holiday, and nothing else was expected.
Those so called 'judges' are among the biggest crooks known on earth.
Kissinger already for decades has been one of the worst cancers in our
society, where inhuman cretins like Kissinger for ages create a totalitarian
havoc for all of us, the others, until we stop them.

And Kissinger and his ilk must absolutely be stopped, like the other
'crazies' in Washington and Tel Aviv. We must get them before they kill all
of us.

I've seen the results of the 'Kissinger's Cancer' already in Vietnam and
later on, when living in Chili. based on what I've seen globally I sincerely
hope that this creature and his kind will burn in Hell forever, and regret
that he has not been jailed yet after all those years 'holocausting'
humanity.

'PNAC JUSTICE' - US COURT DECLINES TO TAKE KISSINGER LAWSUIT

he's been the death and misery for hundreds of millions of human beings, and
he has an ocean of blood on his hands, because it doesn't fit under his
yarmulke. But his fellow criminals are everywhere since centuries, and
that's why the corrupted so called Supreme Court refused to handle another
Kissinger murder case. According to the propaganda press AP: ''The Supreme
Court refused Monday to revive a lawsuit accusing former Secretary of State
Henry Kissinger of responsibility in the 1970 death of the head of the
Chilean army. Family members of Gen. Rene Schneider filed the lawsuit in
2001, claiming that U.S. officials encouraged a plot to kidnap Schneider, in
which he was killed.

The suit claimed that the U.S. government and Kissinger, then President
Nixon's national security adviser, were guilty of violating U.S., Chilean
and international law. A lower court dismissed the case. The case is
Schneider v. Kissinger, 05-743. - [enditem] - AP = Associated Propaganda -
Url.: http://tinyurl.com/qnlvt

Web Results 1-10 of about 112,000 for Kissinger +murderer - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/rh976

Killers Conference - Philadelphia May 1st - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/o3ydp

BBC - Gunman kills Dutch film director - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/5ht8f

KISSINGER & THE PNAC CLAN: THE 'PROJECT FOR A NAZI AMERICAN CENTURY':

* US BABY GENOCIDE DEFENDED: Former U.S. PNAC-Secr. of State Madeleine
Albright-Korbel, 10 years ago in her comment on the at least HALF A MILLION
dead children in Iraq, which now is estimated at ONE MILLION MORE BY UNICEF:
"WE THINK THE PRICE IS WORTH IT" - On CBS '60 Minutes' - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/2vmc8

* Iraq: Pictures from the front line: What the U.S. Press Won't Show You. -
Url.: http://tinyurl.com/qxbxn

* HOLODOMOR = HOLOCAUST 0F MORE THAN 6 MILLION IN UKRAINE - Writer Eric
Margolis: "genocide accounted for at least 40 million victims, not including
20 million war dead. Kaganovitch and many senior OGPU officers (later, NKVD)
were Jewish." - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/kycrw - Stalin's Terminator:
LAZAR KAGANOVITCH - Url.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

* US CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL CONFIRMING THE CREATION OF A WORLD GOVERNMENT -
"He asked if there was an international conspiracy to overthrow our
government: The answer is ''Yes" - Short video - Url.:
http://100777.com/media/RonPaul-NewWorldOrder.wmv

* CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN THE US? - 'IT CAN'T HAPPEN HERE!' - But of you
don't react now... - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/o6lpx

* BEING DEMONIZED c.q. 'KILLED' BY THE PNAC CRIMINALS, BECAUSE THEY WROTE
THIS: Prof. John J. Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago's Department of
Political Science and Prof. Stephen M. Walt of Harvard University's Kennedy
School of Government: 'The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy' - Working
Paper Number: RWP06-011 - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/fsl7h

* THE 'WHY' OF GLOBAL RESISTANCE - HOW IT IS DONE BY THE PNAC'S CIA JACKALS
& THE WORLD BANK's SERIAL KILLER WOLFOWITZ - Confessions of an economic 'hit
man'. World Bank insider Perkins explains: "Jackals' are C.I.A. -
sanctioned people that come in and try to foment a coup or revolution. If it
doesn't work, they perform assassinations, or try to." - They steal billions
for the World Bank, IMF, USAID, UNDP, AID etc. - Perkins web site - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/jvhbu - It's your life too: Must watch Video Url.:
www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8171.htm

* PRESENT AND PAST - UNICEF reports on another PNAC HOLOCAUST: that the
under-5 infant mortality for 2003 was 110,000 in occupied Iraq, 292,000 in
occupied Afghanistan. Gideon Polya: 'Non-reportage of US-linked infant mass
mortality' - December 23, 2004 - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/rb3rx

* The 'PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY's is HOLOCAUSTING MORE TODDLERS:
Children Continue To Be the Main Victims Of the U.S. War Crimes - By Dr.
César Chelala - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/oys87

* 'PROJECT FOR A NUCLEAR AMERICAN CENTURY': NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST FOR YOU TOO -
Depleted Uranium for Dummies - Url.: http://www.notinkansas.us

* THE NEW SCIENTIST ABOUT ONE OF THE PNAC'S WEAPONS AGAINST US: SWEEPING
STUN GUNS TO TARGET AND CONTROL YOU AND/OR CROWDS - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/kbx58

* THIS IS A VERY INFORMATIVE ARTICLE - AN EYE-OPENER - After working around
the globe for more than forty years, I can not find anything wrong with this
eloquent description of the state of affairs: ''Just six simple words that
carry the weight of the world upon them, six simple words that act as the
engine for so much turmoil and unrest.'' - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/gj4x5

* WHO RULES AMERICA - AND OUR LIVES? - Please read the following article
with an open mind, and if you don't believe it you can verify it for
yourself, as the author suggests. Keep in mind the intense and non-stop
psychological conditioning already for ages being used by major media -
Url.: http://tinyurl.com/evpf

* 6 MILLION PEOPLE WERE KILLED? - ANOTHER HOLOCAUST - THIS IS ONE OF MANY BY
THE PNAC's CIA: John Stockwell, former CIA Station Chief in Angola in 1976,
working for then Director of the CIA, George Bush. ''How 6 million People
Were killed in CIA secret wars against Third World countries'' - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/gpcg

* "Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we
Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and
lynched." - George Bush Senior speaking in an interview with Sarah
McClendon in December 1992.

* How The Bush Family Made Its Fortune >From The Nazis - THE DUTCH
CONNECTION - by John Loftus, a former U.S. Department of Justice Nazi War
Crimes prosecutor, the President of the Florida Holocaust Museum and the
highly respected author of numerous books on the CIA-Nazi connection
including The Belarus Secret and The Secret War Against the Jews, both of
which have extensive material on the Bush-Rockefeller-Nazi connection. -
Url.: http://tinyurl.com/omczx -

* GLOBAL PREDATORS - ŒFRAUDS-R-US¹ - The Bush Family Saga - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/elarx

* The 9/11 drama was the 'trigger' used by the PNAC Group, killing Americans
to further their inhuman goals: Anybody who after seeing this video - '9/11
revisited' - still believes the version from the 'PNAC pack' - the
Washington cabal - is beyond all professional help - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/jn5jx

* The MAD COW MORNING NEWS is one of the absolutely best 9/11 sites on
Internet - by Daniel Hopsicker - Url.:
http://www.madcowprod.com/01042004.html

* PSYOPS: How to make anybody say and see anything - William M. Arkin's "The
U.S. Military Online" - When Seeing and Hearing Isn't Believing - Special to
the Washington Post - already on Feb. 1, 1999 -
Url.:http://tinyurl.com/hvnrq

* FOX: Video 49 min. - The example how viewers are brainwashed and
'outfoxed' - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/b2zzl

* All the more reason to read the FIGHTIN' COCK FLYER - Url.:
http://fightincockflyer.blogspot.com/

* THE ONLY SOLUTION? - Help all the troops - of whatever nationality - to
come back from abroad! - AND WITH ALL THEIR WEAPONS, WHICH WE ARE FORCED TO
PAY FOR BY TAXES - [http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm] - We need them
badly at home in many countries to fight with us against our so called
'governments' and their malignant managers - Url.:
http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/

The Dutch author this far has lived and worked abroad for more than 4
decades for international media - when they still knew what honest
journalism was - as an independent foreign correspondent. Of which 10
years - also during Gulf War I - in the 'Arab World' and the Middle East.
Seeing worldwide that every bullet and every bomb breeds more terrorism !

* IT'S VERY UNLIKELY, but if you indeed would prefer to unsubscribe from the
FPF-list: just send an email in return with the word 'unsubscribe'.

* FPF-COPYRIGHT NOTICE - In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107 -
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed by the Foreign Press
Foundation under fair use, without profit or payment, to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the information. Url.:
http://liimirror.warwick.ac.uk/uscode/17/107.html

FOREIGN PRESS FOUNDATION
http://forpressfound.blogspot.com/
Editor: Henk Ruyssenaars
http://tinyurl.com/amn3q
The Netherlands
fpf@chello.nl

SPONSORED LINKS
United state patent
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+patent&w1=United+state+pat
ent&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+military&w4=United+state+grant
&w5=United+state+flag&w6=United+state+citizenship&c=6&s=157&.sig=5BFtT-CH-Rl
fFsg1jByjYw>
Trademark united state
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Trademark+united+state&w1=United+state+
patent&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+military&w4=United+state+gr
ant&w5=United+state+flag&w6=United+state+citizenship&c=6&s=157&.sig=SpOlQLUf
vjnLXBEaZygMxQ>
United state military
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+military&w1=United+state+p
atent&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+military&w4=United+state+gra
nt&w5=United+state+flag&w6=United+state+citizenship&c=6&s=157&.sig=xCjnDZT0O
w-U6g6oGrIZHA>
United state grant
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+grant&w1=United+state+pate
nt&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+military&w4=United+state+grant&
w5=United+state+flag&w6=United+state+citizenship&c=6&s=157&.sig=24NC6v46tuo0
m5BC09Vr2A>
United state flag
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+flag&w1=United+state+paten
t&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+military&w4=United+state+grant&w
5=United+state+flag&w6=United+state+citizenship&c=6&s=157&.sig=DUFyCcShpfu5L
2NPLW_ocQ>
United state citizenship
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+state+citizenship&w1=United+stat
e+patent&w2=Trademark+united+state&w3=United+state+military&w4=United+state+
grant&w5=United+state+flag&w6=United+state+citizenship&c=6&s=157&.sig=y4D8n3
kRek-HV92kA5f-gg>

_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

* Visit your group " 911TruthAction
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .

_____

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 25
From: "Dick Eastman" de1949@nwinfo.net
Date: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:26pm(PDT)
Subject: Von Bülow, Former German Minister Says Building 7 Used To Run 9/1

Former German Minister Says Building 7 Used To Run 9/11 Attack
Guide the planes in, then destroy the crime scene

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | April 21 2006

Former Helmut Schmidt cabinet member, 25-year German Parliamentarian and global intelligence expert Andreas Von Bülow says that the 9/11 attack was run by the highest levels of the US intelligence apparatus using WTC Building 7 as a command bunker which was later demolished in order to destroy the crime scene.

Speaking to The Alex Jones Show on the GCN Radio Network, Von Bülow said that "the official story is so wrong, it must be an inside job."

Von Bülow discussed the special software programs that allow the CIA to track suspicious stock market movements in real time. Record put options placed on United and American Airlines in the week before 9/11, a speculation that the stock would crash, clearly indicated inside foreknowledge of the impending attack.

"If the stock market has very strange movements immediately they take care of this and they had a lot of tapes and the lawyers told the people destroy these tapes."

"The Bush administration is in a deep defensive [mode] and probably they would like to come out with a new offensive," said Von Bülow as he considered whether a new staged false flag terror attack could be launched to further an interventionist agenda.

"I would hope that one 'new Pearl Harbor' is enough," said Von Bülow, "but I cannot be sure."

Von Bülow commented on the disputed identities of the named hijackers.

"The names of these nineteen [hijackers] never came up in the official passenger list, until now there's no proof they were on the planes."

Von Bülow also pointed out how the alleged hijacker's flight instructors told investigators that they couldn't even fly Cessna's, never mind complex large commercial airliners.

Von Bülow also touched upon the implausible collapse of the buildings.

"The towers came down in the velocity of free fall which is totally impossible, they fall down in 8, 9, or 10 seconds, the pancake theory is ridiculous," he said.

Von Bülow also highlighted the fact that there were 67 successful intercepts of errant aircraft in the year of 2001 before 9/11 and yet four planes were allowed to veer wildly off course without any being intercepted on that one day.

Rudolph Giuliani opened a $13 million emergency Command Center (pictured) on the 23rd floor of World Trade Center Building 7 in June 1999 in part to respond to and manage terrorist attacks.

Von Bülow referenced the command bunker in Building 7, calling it the "optimal place" to run the attacks using remote control technology to guide the planes in and then destroying the crime scene by imploding the building.

"There were two procedures, one was flying in the aircraft the second was the explosions," he said.

When asked precisely which parties carried out the attack Von Bülow said it must have been a "very small group" within the CIA with the help of Saudi Arabian and Pakistani secret service intelligence.

Von Bülow outlined his view that one reason for the execution of 9/11 was to provide the justification for US military bases in the near and Middle East to be built in anticipation for a future confrontation with China, whom the Neo-Cons believe have grown too powerful and need to have their geopolitical wings clipped.

Click here to listen to Von Bülow's interview.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/210406runattack.htm

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Discussion about 09/11/2001

Friday, April 21, 2006

[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1239

No comments:

About Me

Last posts