[911TruthAction] Digest Number 1232

There are 25 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "Naveed" flanker12k@yahoo.com
2. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "scol202" yahooboxx@ntlworld.com
3. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "space2force" space2force@yahoo.ca
4. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "space2force" space2force@yahoo.ca
5. MARKBINGHAM.ORG
From: "Thomas Potter" mr_thomas_potter@yahoo.com
6. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "space2force" space2force@yahoo.ca
7. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "space2force" space2force@yahoo.ca
8. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "kenny318east3" kenny318east3@yahoo.com
9. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "space2force" space2force@yahoo.ca
10. The Brutal Zionist Role in the Holocaust
From: "Space" space2force@yahoo.ca
11. America's Gift - Charlie Sheen
From: "Space" space2force@yahoo.ca
12. Welcome! To all the new members!
From: "Caomhain {Kevin} Lee Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
13. Labor Economist Morgan Reynolds to Demolish 9/11 Big Lie at UWisc -
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
14. Re: GET IT ! its about OIL
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
15. articles: Soviet Union's ambiguous relationship with Israel -=- Reti
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
16. articles: silent Nuclear subs add to Iran tensions -=- China builds
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
17. articles: Israel's 'demographic problem' - its Arabs -=- confessions
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
18. Fw: Israel's 'demographic problem' - its Arabs -=- confessions of a
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
19. killing has turned into a trading asset in Iraq -- no way to escape
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
20. Re: Berlin Newspaper asks: Is US Govt liable for 911 damages?
From: "botalerts" botalerts@yahoo.ca
21. A Day in the Life: 4/16/6
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
22. Re: articles: silent Nuclear subs add to Iran tensions -=- China bui
From: "Scott Peden" scotpeden@cruzio.com
23. A Day in the LIfe: 4/17/6
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
24. Re: articles: silent Nuclear subs add to Iran tensions -=- China bui
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
25. 9-11 was a black-op of combined China, Israel and Anglo-American cap
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 1
From: "Naveed" flanker12k@yahoo.com
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 5:55am(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL

since when did kenny become personnally responsible for the state of israel?

theodore herzl was a rothschild bitch/puppet

zionism merged with british imperialist aims with the balfour declaration.

A long time ago i remember reading that a suicide bomber killed a peace activist's son....talk about the ultimate test of one's convictions......

there is a difference between jewish and israeli, ya gotta be careful with the terms

more on this later, gotta run to class.

scol202 <yahooboxx@ntlworld.com> wrote:
"Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to oust
these criminal Zionists from our midst. Israeli refusnik soldiers are
just the tip of the iceberg.

The Arabs are human beings and they deserve to be treated as such."

To be blunt, that is nowhere near good enough. Real Arabs (not
American paid for politicians) want the Jews out of the middle east
permanently and won't rest until it happens. Zionism as a philosophy
and a goal has to be relinquished. As far as I'm concerned Jews were
blackmailed into leaving Europe by a combination of American desire
to dominate the middle east and a Jewish financial elite who wanred
to set up a gangster state of their own.

I have just read my third pro holocaust book by a witness in the
Irving trial and it's a load of ridiculous nonsense. Irving might be
a racist and a closet Nazi but it doesn't mean he's wrong. I have
never read Irving just his opponents by the way, that's what has made
me a revisionist.

It's pretty clear that the Jewish lobby now has massive influence on
Anglo American foreign policy. The idea that Britain would fight such
a war (Iraq) on its own volition just isn't remotely credible.
Seventy five percent were against it.

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "kenny318east3"
<kenny318east3@...> wrote:
>
> --- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@>
wrote:
>
> << There are many many Jews, who protect the Zionist perpetrators
of 9-11 --
> whose loyalty to fellow Jews, even mass murders, is so great that
they will defend
> them knowing they are wrong. They discover the true guilt of the
Zionist neo-cons
> and Mossad yet they pretend they do not believe it -- I'd say 90
percent of Jews who
> are in any way involved with 9-11 discussion are at this stage.
They are defending
> their people from justice -- all other people be damned. >>
>
> it doesn't matter how much I am horrified by the behavior of
Israel, I am still
> a Jew.
>
> Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to
oust these
> criminal Zionists from our midst.
>
> Israeli refusnik soldiers are just the tip of the iceberg.
>
> The Arabs are human beings and they deserve to be treated as such.
>
> Ken, the grandson of Samuel and Charlotte Goncharow. I am a former
student
> at the Flatbush Jewish Center on Church Avenue and Ocean Parkway,
and I was
> a recipient of the book "Vocabulary of Jewish Life," by Rabbi
Abraham M. Heller.
>
> > > I suspect Leslie Schwartz is going to be like that. I've seen
too many not to think
> so -- and that is the extent to which I have become a collective-
Jewish guilt-until-
> proven-innocent-on-an-individual-basis "anti-Semite" -- literally
a man suspicious
> of Jews in general. It is unjust -- but my instinct for survival
overrides my higher
> impulses.
> >
> > Dick Eastman
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Naveed
> > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > Cc: lhs_emf@
> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 5:50 PM
> > Subject: RE: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
> >
> >
> > for the last time
> >
> > all JEWS ARE NOT ZIONISTS!
> >
> > ALL ZIONISTS ARE NOT JEWS!
> >
> > There is a ZIONIST ELEMENT to the 9/11 conspiracy!!! Maybe you
can't handle
> that............
> > did you even read the damn post i posted about ISRAELI spy
rings awash in
> america? I POSTED IT TWICE.......
> >
> > this below come from my friend ryan!
> >
> > 'A Clean Break' JINSA/PNAC Neocons associated with AIPAC
espionage:
> >
> > washingtonpost.com
> > Leak Inquiry Includes Iran Experts in Administration
> >
> > By Robin Wright and Dan Eggen
> > Washington Post Staff Writers
> > Saturday, September 4, 2004; Page A04
> >
> >
> > FBI counterintelligence investigators have in recent weeks
questioned current and
> former U.S. officials about whether a small group of Iran
specialists at the Pentagon
> and in Vice President Cheney's office may have been involved in
passing classified
> information to an Iraqi politician or a U.S. lobbying group allied
with Israel, according
> to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
> >
> > In their interviews, the FBI agents have also named two Israeli
diplomats stationed
> in Washington and asked whether they would be willing recipients of
sensitive
> intelligence, the sources added.
> >
> > The investigators have asked questions about personnel in the
office of Pentagon
> Undersecretary for Policy Douglas J. Feith as well as members of
the influential
> Defense Policy Board, an advisory panel for Defense Secretary
Donald H. Rumsfeld,
> according to former U.S. officials who have been questioned and
others familiar with
> the case.
> >
> > Investigators have specifically asked about a group of
neoconservatives involved
> in defense issues, including Feith, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul
D. Wolfowitz, Iraq
> and Iran specialist Harold Rhode and others at the Pentagon. FBI
agents also have
> asked current and former officials about Richard Perle of the
defense board and David
> Wurmser, an Iran specialist and principal deputy assistant for
national security affairs
> in Cheney's office, according to sources familiar with or involved
in the case.
> >
> > "The initial interest was: Do you believe certain people would
spy for Israel and
> pass secret information?" said one source interviewed by the FBI
about the defense
> officials.
> >
> > It remains unclear, however, how specific investigators'
suspicions have become.
> And one official, a Feith ally, has said the investigation is an
effort by some
> intelligence officials to discredit Pentagon hawks.
> >
> > The sources interviewed for this article requested anonymity
because it involves
> classified information or because of the ongoing investigation.
> >
> > Perle, Rhode and Wolfowitz did not return telephone calls
placed to their homes
> and offices late Friday. Reached at home, Feith declined comment,
citing the ongoing
> investigation.
> >
> > But Pentagon officials insisted yesterday that FBI questions
about key
> policymakers did not mean they were the subjects of the
intelligence leak
> investigation. Senior Pentagon officials have said they were told
by the FBI that the
> investigation is focused on just one suspect in the Defense
Department, Lawrence A.
> Franklin, an Iran specialist in Feith's office.
> >
> > The FBI investigation first came to light last week with
reports of a probe into
> whether Franklin passed a draft presidential directive on Iran to
the American Israel
> Public Affairs Committee, and whether the directive was then passed
to Israel,
> sources have said. AIPAC has strongly denied any involvement in
espionage.
> >
> > A federal grand jury in Alexandria may take up the Franklin
case as early as next
> week, law enforcement sources said.
> >
> > The questioning of Franklin is a recent part of an
investigation that dates back
> more than two years and includes diverse threads, U.S. officials
and people close to
> the case said. One aspect of the probe concerns AIPAC and another
looks at whether
> intelligence on Iran ended up in the hands of Iraqi National
Congress leader Ahmed
> Chalabi, a longtime Pentagon favorite once considered a possible
replacement for
> Saddam Hussein.
> >
> > Iran has been a particularly controversial issue within the
Bush administration,
> which still does not have a formal policy more than 3 1/2 years
after taking office. A
> small group of Pentagon neoconservatives opposed a draft directive
because it did
> not support a change of governments in Tehran, which they
advocated, current and
> former U.S. officials said.
> >
> > The officials whose names came up during questioning have
strong ties to Israel.
> They also share a long-standing position on Iran and other radical
regimes. Wurmser,
> Feith and Perle were co-authors of a 1996 policy paper for then-
Israeli Prime Minister
> Binyamin Netanyahu titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for
Securing the Realm." It
> called for removing Hussein from power in Iraq as part of a broad
strategy to
> transform the region and remove radical regimes.
> >
> > But current and former U.S. officials, including some who were
interviewed by the
> FBI, are still puzzled by the nature of the investigation involving
Israel, because its
> profoundly close ties with the United States date back six decades
and have involved
> sharing sensitive intelligence. Yet officials also concede that
Israel is one of the three
> countries most active in spying on the United States. Israel denies
conducting
> espionage in the United States.
> >
> > Also yesterday, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary
Committee
> demanded that a new prosecutor be assigned to investigate the
alleged leaks,
> questioning the "political leanings" of the U.S. attorney in
Alexandria who is handling
> the criminal portion of the case.
> >
> > In a letter to Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Rep. John
Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.)
> said the role of U.S. Attorney Paul J. McNulty in the case
has "obvious political
> implications" in an election year, and Conyers cited anonymous
allegations in a news
> report that McNulty had "put the brakes on" the probe.
> >
> > "While I have no reason to question Mr. McNulty's integrity, he
is not a career
> prosecutor, but instead is a political appointee whose previous
employment was
> principally with Republican politicians," Conyers wrote.
> >
> > Conyers suggested that either a special counsel or U.S.
Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald
> of Chicago, who is overseeing a separate probe into the disclosure
of CIA operative
> Valerie Plame, should take over the Pentagon probe.
> >
> > Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo declined to comment
on the specifics
> of Conyers's allegations. "We will review the congressman's letter
and give it the
> attention it is due," Corallo said. A spokesman for McNulty also
declined comment,
> referring a reporter to Corallo's statement.
> >
> > Several law enforcement officials have said in recent days that
the FBI had initially
> considered making rapid arrests in the Franklin probe when it
became clear that news
> of the investigation was about to become public last week. But,
these officials said,
> prosecutors urged caution, arguing that investigators needed more
time to gather
> evidence and assess the case.
> >
> > Franklin has been cooperating in the probe for several weeks,
officials familiar
> with the investigation said. He has not responded to numerous
requests for comment
> at his office and his home in West Virginia.
> >
> >
> >
> > All in the Neocon Family
> > By Jim Lobe, AlterNet
> > Posted on March 27, 2003, Printed on April 16, 2006
> > http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
> > What do William Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, and
Robert Kagan have
> in common? Yes, they are all die-hard hawks who have gained control
of U.S. foreign
> policy since the 9/11 attacks. But they are also part of one big
neoconservative family
> -- an extended clan of spouses, children, and friends who have
known each other for
> generations.
> > Neoconservatives are former liberals (which explains the "neo"
prefix) who
> advocate an aggressive unilateralist vision of U.S. global
supremacy, which includes a
> close strategic alliance with Israel. Let's start with one of the
founding fathers of the
> extended neocon clan: Irving Kristol. His extensive resume includes
waging culture
> wars for the CIA against the Soviet Union in the early years of the
Cold War and
> calling for an American "imperial" role during the Vietnam War.
Papa Kristol, who has
> been credited with defining the major themes of neoconservative
thought, is married
> to Gertrude Himmelfarb, a neoconservative powerhouse on her own.
Her studies of
> the Victorian era in Britain helped inspire the men who sold Bush
on the idea of
> "compassionate conservatism."
> > The son of this proud couple is none other that William
Kristol, the crown prince
> of the neoconservative clique and editor of the Rupert Murdoch-
owned Weekly
> Standard. In 1997, he founded the Project for the New American
Century (PNAC), a
> front group which cemented the powerful alliance between right-wing
Republicans
> like Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, Christian and Catholic Right
leaders like Gary
> Bauer and William Bennett, and the neocons behind a platform of
global U.S. military
> dominance.
> > Irving Kristol's most prominent disciple is Richard Perle, who
was until Thursday
> the Defense Policy Board chairman, is also a "resident scholar" at
the American
> Enterprise Institute, which is housed in the same building as PNAC.
Perle himself
> married into neocon royalty when he wed the daughter of his
professor at the
> University of Chicago, the late Alfred Wohlstetter -- the man who
helped both his
> son-in-law and his fellow student Paul Wolfowitz get their start in
Washington more
> than 30 years ago.
> > Perle's own protege is Douglas Feith, who is now Wolfowitz's
deputy for policy and
> is widely known for his right-wing Likud position. And why not? His
father,
> Philadelphia businessman and philanthropist Dalck Feith, was once a
follower of the
> great revisionist Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky, in his
native Poland back in the
> 1930s. The two Feiths were honored together in 1997 by the right-
wing Zionist
> Organization of America (ZOA).
> > The AEI has long been a major nexus for such inter-familial
relationships. A long-
> time collaborator with Perle, Michael Ledeen is married to Barbara
Ledeen, a founder
> and director of the anti-feminist Independent Women's Forum (IWF),
who is currently
> a major player in the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill.
Richard Perle, Douglas
> Feith, and another neo-con power couple -- David and Meyrav
Wurmser -- co-
> authored a 1996 memorandum for Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu
outlining how to
> break the Oslo peace process and invade Iraq as the first step to
transforming the
> Middle East.
> > Though she doesn't focus much on foreign-policy issues, Lynne
Cheney also
> hangs her hat at AEI. Her husband Dick Cheney recently chose
Victoria Nuland to
> become his next deputy national security adviser. Nuland, as it
turns out, is married
> to Robert Kagan, Bill Kristol's main comrade-in-arms and the co-
founder of PNAC.
> > Bob's father, Donald Kagan, is a Yale historian who converted
from a liberal
> Democrat to a staunch neocon in the 1970s. On the eve of the 2000
presidential
> elections, Donald and his other son, Frederick, published "While
America Sleeps," a
> clarion call to increase defense spending. Since then, the three
Kagan men have
> written reams of columns warning that the currently ballooning
Pentagon budget is
> simply not enough to fund the much-desired vision of U.S. global
supremacy.
> > And which infamous ex-Reaganite do the Kagans and another
leading neocon
> family have in common? None other than Iran-contra veteran Elliott
Abrams.
> > Now the director of Near Eastern Affairs in Bush's National
Security Council,
> Abrams worked closely with Bob Kagan back in the Reagan era. He is
also the son-in-
> law of Norman Podhoretz, long-time editor of the influential
conservative Jewish
> publication Commentary, and his wife, Midge Decter, a fearsome
polemicist in her
> own right.
> > Podhoretz, like Kristol Sr., helped invent neo-conservatism in
the late 1960s. He
> and Decter created a formidable political team as leaders of the
Committee on the
> Present Danger in 1980, when they worked with Donald Rumsfeld to
pound the last
> nail into the coffin of detente and promote the rise of Ronald
Reagan. In addition to
> being Abrams' father-in-law, Norman Podhoretz is also the father of
John Podhoretz,
> a columnist for the Murdoch-owned New York Post and frequent guest
on the
> Murdoch-owned Fox News channel.
> > As editor of Commentary, Norman offered writing space to rising
stars of the
> neocon movement for more than 30 years. His proteges include former
U.N.
> ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and Richard Pipes, who was Ronald
Reagan's top
> advisor on the "Evil Empire," as the president liked to call the
Soviet Union. His son,
> Daniel Pipes, has also made a career out of battling "evil," which
in his case is Islam.
> And to tie it all up neatly, in 2002, Podhoretz received the
highest honor bestowed by
> the AEI: the Irving Kristol award.
> > This list of intricate, overlapping connections is hardly
exhaustive or perhaps even
> surprising. But it helps reveal an important fact. Contrary to
appearances, the
> neocons do not constitute a powerful mass political movement. They
are instead a
> small, tighly-knit clan whose incestuous familial and personal
connections, both
> within and outside the Bush administration, have allowed them grab
control of the
> future of American foreign policy.
> > © 2006 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
> > View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
> >
> >
> > Home : WRH Store : WRH Index : Reader Letters :
Archives : Advertise : Donate
> >
> > On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin
> Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli
relations. His quick
> reply was: "It's very good...Well, it's not good, but it will
generate immediate
> sympathy (for Israel)"
> >
> >
> >
> > The Five Dancing Israelis
> > Arrested On 9-11
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > As the world watched in disbelief and asked the
question...
> >
> > ...Mossad operatives were seen dancing with joy.
> >
> >
> >
> > A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle
of themselves on 9-
> 11.
> > The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and
trained them on the
> twin towers. (1)
> >
> > Police received several calls from angry New Jersey
residents claiming
> "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster
with shouts of
> joy and mockery. (2)
> > "They were like happy, you know . They didn't look
shocked to me" said a
> witness. (3)
> > [T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept.
11 making fun of the
> World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph
themselves in
> front of the wreckage. (4)
> >
> > Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park
after the initial
> impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a
roof in Weehawken,
> and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives
in a Jersey City
> parking lot. (6)
> >
> > "It looked like they're hooked in with this. It
looked like they knew what
> was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (7)
> >
> > One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led
them to close down
> all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the
9-1-1 dispatcher
> that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white
van headed for the
> Holland Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:
> > Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
> > Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in
there, they look like
> Palestinians and going around a building.
> > Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the
Holland tunnel, I see the guy
> by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.
> > Dispatcher: He has what?
> > Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (8)
> >
> > (*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller
specifically say that these
> "Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians
usually dress in
> western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")
> >
> > Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-
the-Lookout" alert for
> a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from
New Jersey. When a
> van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing
into New York, the
> suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the
surprise of the police
> officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!
> > According to ABC's 20/20, when the van belonging to the
cheering Israelis
> was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg,
told the officers:
> >
> > "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your
problems are our
> problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (9)
> >
> > Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?
> > The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious
when they found maps
> of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same
items that the
> hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and
foreign passports.
> Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were
brought to the van
> and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (10)
> > The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of
which shows Sivan
> Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering
ruins in an apparently
> celebratory gesture. (11)
> >
> > The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a
bomb was stopped
> as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of
the suspects was
> not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September
12, 2001:
> > American security services overnight stopped a car
bomb on the George
> Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on
an approach
> ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to
blow up the main
> crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (12)
> >
> > TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down
with tonnes of
> explosives (13).
> > What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (14), the
New York Post (15), and
> the New Jersey Bergen Record (16) all clearly and unambiguously
reported that a
> white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3,
which leads directly
> to the Lincoln Tunnel.
> > But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz
Sheva) (17), and Yediot
> America, (18) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that
a white van with
> Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington
Bridge, which is
> several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.
> > It appears as if there may actually have been two
white vans involved, one
> stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the
conflicting reports as to
> the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so
many credible eye-
> witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in
so many different
> locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon
(lawyer for the 5
> Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but
later increased the
> total to five.
> > Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while
the other was meant
> to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New
Jersey? If a van was
> to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly
the drivers would
> need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And
notice how the van
> (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland
Tunnel- which was
> where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-
Palestinian 9-1-1
> "mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.
> >
> > From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious.
The Israelis worked
> for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An
American
> employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey
that a majority
> of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the
attacks.
> > The employee, who declined to give his name
said: "I was in tears. These
> guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were like, "Now
America knows
> what we go through." (19)
> >
> > A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's
Israeli owner, Dominick
> Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was
in such a hurry to
> flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left
with their
> furniture stranded in storage facilities (20).
> > It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis
were in fact Mossad
> agents (21). They were held in custody for 71 days before being
quietly released.
> Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40
days. (22)
> > [S]everal of the detainees discussed their
experience in America on an
> Israeli talk show after their return home.
> > Said one of the men, denying that they were
laughing or happy on the
> morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from
a country that
> experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."
(23)
> >
> > How did they know there would be an event to document on
9-11?
> > It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of
the dancing Israeli
> Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:
> > 1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to
celebrate the
> successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled
off in history.
> > 2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-
1 police dispatcher to
> report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the
Holland Tunnel.
> > 3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with
this phone call, the Israeli
> bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where
they will drop
> off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.
> > 4. But the police react very wisely and proactively
by closing off ALL
> bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move
inadvertently foils
> the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and
40 day torture.
> > 5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice
Department rounds up over 1000
> Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York
area jails. The
> Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and
media can now
> claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in
the same dragnet as
> many other Arabs.
> > 6. After several months, FBI and Justice
Department "higher-ups" are able
> to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis
quietly.
> >
> > Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9-11
attacks even though
> he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale.
Immediately after the
> Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
> > CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin
Laden's fingerprints all
> over it." (24)
> > The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the
Israeli connection.
> Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with
stories linking the
> attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers
of every stripe
> spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most
outrageous
> propaganda imaginable.
> > We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA
was because he
> hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval"
and they wanted
> to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter
about the Crusades,
> and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all
over the place!
> > But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and
suggested that
> Zionists orchestrated the
> > 9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of
denial in which he
> said:
> > "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in
the United States nor
> did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government
within a government
> within the United States. The United States should try to trace the
perpetrators of
> these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the
present century a
> century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret
government must be
> asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is
totally in control
> of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United
States." (25)
> >
> > You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did
you?
> > [A] number of intelligence officials have raised
questions about Osama bin
> Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and
he's running this
> operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't
have done it alone." A
> senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other
documentation
> needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major
foreign intelligence
> service might also have been involved. (26)
> >
> > Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of the 9-11
attacks by the FBI:
> > USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE
AUGUST 7,
> 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM,
TANZANIA,
> AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN
ADDITION, BIN
> LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.
(27)
> >
> > To date, the only shred of "evidence" to be uncovered
against bin Laden is a
> barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened
to find "lying
> around" in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake.
(28)
> > There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to
link the Al Qaeda
> "terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a
mountain of evidence, both
> hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been
very busy framing
> Arabs for terror plots against America.
> >
> > One final point - at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that
the Democratic Front
> for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the
attacks (29). This claim
> was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said
it had always
> opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the
occupied
> territories." (30)
> > 9-11 CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a
Palestinian claim of
> responsibility
> >
> > Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less
than 500 people (31)
> make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for
the attacks?
> > Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to
fulfill what the goals of the
> political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century
ago: to turn all of
> historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central
tenet of the Zionist
> ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people
for a people
> without a land." (32)
> >
> > The implication of Palestinians in the 9-11 attacks would
have handed
> Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all
Palestinians would
> have been labelled terrorists.
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
> > "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I
cannot tell you about
> evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."
> > US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on
the Israeli spy ring.
> > "By way of deception, thou shalt do war"
> > Motto of the Mossad
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
> > See also:
> > Israel and 9/11 - Index of What Really Happened
> > Zionist Circles Benefit From WTC Collapse
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
> > What Really Happened
> >
> >
> > Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@> wrote:
> > Bugs,
> >
> > Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with
people who think its all a
> Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
> >
> > Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are
deranged, I just read
> one of their histories, Hitler you know was a good guy, Jews forced
him to carry out
> the holocaust.
> >
> > Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad
control the world along
> with Jewish international bankers, etc.
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Jews
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Zionists
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Mossad
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Sharon
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.
> >
> > Just plain demented hate.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ----
> > From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bugs
> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:30 AM
> > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
> >
> >
> > TRY RUMSFELD FOR TREASON
> >
> > The oath is to stand against all domestic and foreign enimies
and
> > what Rumsfeld has done to the American Troops is a crime in
and onto
> > itself.
> >
> > Uraium dust has been spread all over Iraq due to the Uranium
used in
> > Penatrator Bombs and Bullets.
> >
> > Villages and the City of Fulluja have been razed to the
ground.
> >
> > 100,000 Iraqi civillians mostly women and children have been
killed
> > as collateral damage.
> >
> > All of this has occured because Rumsfeld and Bush elected to
lie the
> > American Soldiers into an unnecessary war.
> >
> > Why did Bush and Rumsfeld do this ?
> >
> > They did it to steal the Iraqi oil sell it to china and put
the cash
> > into Chinese banks.
> >
> > And they are perpetuating the occupation by not having enough
troops
> > so they can stay in Iraq an keep on stealing the oil forever.
> >
> > The Maritine Ship movement logs will prove this.
> >
> > It is an OPEN and Shut Case.
> >
> > or in other words a "REAL SLAM DUNK"
> >
> > Bush's Brother and Uncle have been in and out of China for
years
> > lining up this traitorous deal.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Naveed
> > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:01 AM
> > Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Greg Palast Still DOESNT GET
IT !
> >
> >
> > didn't know paul bremer was a kissinger stooge.......
> >
> > mann david <dmann51@> wrote:
> > Read that piece in a hurry but didn't notice mention
> > of 9-11. Wow, pathetic trivial trip indeed.
> >
> > --- JIM <justpasenthru2012@> wrote:
> >
> > > Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
> > > Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
> > > The Guardian - Comment
> > > Friday, April 14, 2006
> > > By Greg Palast
> > >
> > > Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the
> > > gaggle of generals,
> > > safely
> > > retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week,
> > > six of them
> > > have called for
> > > the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
> > >
> > > Well, according to my watch, they're about four
> > > years too late --
> > > and they still
> > > don't get it.
> > >
> > > I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
> > > that the
> > > bemedalled boys in
> > > crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the
> > > rump, in public.
> > > But to me, it
> > > just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
> > > straight.
> > >
> > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up
> > > in front of the
> > > UN and
> > > identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons
> > > labs, was it,
> > > General
> > > Powell?
> > >
> > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us
> > > our next warning
> > > from Saddam
> > > could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
> > >
> > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
> > > that Al Qaeda
> > > and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
> > >
> > > Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
> > > arrogance, a
> > > duplicitous
> > > chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and
> > > Tinker-Toy Napoleon --
> > > but he didn't
> > > appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
> > >
> > > Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of
> > > Defense you didn't
> > > read in the
> > > New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner,
> > > the man our
> > > president
> > > placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion
> > > viceroy.
> > >
> > > Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
> > > under the
> > > mistaken notion
> > > that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq,
> > > the President
> > > meant the
> > > Iraqis could choose their own government.
> > > Misunderstanding the
> > > President's true
> > > mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold
> > > elections within
> > > 90 days and
> > > for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the
> > > cities to a desert
> > > base. "It's
> > > their country," the General told me of the Iraqis.
> > > "And," he added,
> > > most
> > > ominously, "their oil."
> > >
> > > Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
> > > Garner a 101-page
> > > plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons
> > > at the State
> > > Department, Treasury
> > > and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e.
> > > the sale)
> > > of "all state
> > > assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting
> > > industries."
> > > The General
> > > knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where
> > > the Iraqi sun
> > > don't shine.
> > > Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting
> > > of Iraqi tribal
> > > leaders to
> > > plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their
> > > own multi-ethnic
> > > government --
> > > and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were
> > > on talking
> > > terms -- knew he
> > > could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a
> > >
> > > welcomed "liberation"
> > > turned into a hated "occupation."
> > >
> > > But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition
> > > government would mean
> > > the
> > > death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets
> > > privatization grab.
> > >
> > > On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the
> > > very night
> > > General Garner
> > > arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington.
> > > It was Rumsfeld
> > > on the line.
> > > He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack,
> > > Jack, you're
> > > fired."
> > >
> > > Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of
> > > on-the-ground experience
> > > in Iraq,
> > > with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director
> > > of Kissinger
> > > Associates.
> > > Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
> > > postponed
> > > elections for a
> > > year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot
> > > pasha, selling
> > > off Iraq's
> > > economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
> > > Rumsfeld's neo-con
> > > clique had
> > > desired.
> > >
> > > Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the
> > > six generals' call
> > > for
> > > Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
> > >
> > > For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't
> > > shoot straight.
> > > They're
> > > wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've
> > > gunned down the
> > > puppet instead
> > > of the puppeteers.
> > >
> > > There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked
> > > General Garner from
> > > Baghdad
> > > without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or
> > > breathes or spits
> > > in the Bush
> > > Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
> > > approval. And
> > > ultimately, it's
> > > the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
> > >
> > > Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
> > > give them
> > > enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the
> > > cowboy from
> > > Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that
> > > we lacked
> > > troops -- the
> > > problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy
> > > this nation. A
> > > million
> > > troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would
> > > just have more
> > > targets.)
> > >
> > > President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
> > > today on the
> > > intercom with
> > > Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up."
> > > And Cheney
> > > replies, "Hey,
> > > just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until
> > > he's taken all
> > > their ammo."
> > >
> > > When Bush and Cheney read about the call for
> > > Rumsfeld's resignation
> > > today, I can
> > > just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission
> > > Accomplished."
> > >
> > > Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
> > > choosing a target:
> > > It's the
> > > President, stupid.
> > >
> > === message truncated ===
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man,
and brave, and hated
> and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then
it costs nothing to
> be a patriot.
> > - Notebook, 1904
> >
> > www.fightthenwo.org
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> --
> > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the
US (and 30+
> countries) for 2¢/min or less.
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> --
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/312 - Release
Date: 4/14/2006
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and
brave, and hated and
> scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it
costs nothing to be
> a patriot.
> > - Notebook, 1904
> >
> > www.fightthenwo.org
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously
low rates.
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS United state government grant United state
coin United state
> patent
> > United state flag United state army United state grant
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > a.. Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
> >
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
>

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

www.fightthenwo.org

---------------------------------
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 2
From: "scol202" yahooboxx@ntlworld.com
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 6:09am(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL

since when did kenny become personnally responsible for the state of
israel?

Nobody said he was.

theodore herzl was a rothschild bitch/puppet
No idea who he

zionism merged with british imperialist aims with the balfour
declaration.

No it didn't, a deal was done. British Israelism had a long history
before that.

A long time ago i remember reading that a suicide bomber killed a
peace activist's son....talk about the ultimate test of one's
convictions......

Was it Hamasa which was created by Israel ?

there is a difference between jewish and israeli, ya gotta be careful
with the terms

more on this later, gotta run to class

I don't need any lessons, thanks anyway.

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, Naveed <flanker12k@...> wrote:
>
> since when did kenny become personnally responsible for the state
of israel?
>
> theodore herzl was a rothschild bitch/puppet
>
> zionism merged with british imperialist aims with the balfour
declaration.
>
> A long time ago i remember reading that a suicide bomber killed a
peace activist's son....talk about the ultimate test of one's
convictions......
>
> there is a difference between jewish and israeli, ya gotta be
careful with the terms
>
> more on this later, gotta run to class.
>
> scol202 <yahooboxx@...> wrote:
> "Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to
oust
> these criminal Zionists from our midst. Israeli refusnik soldiers
are
> just the tip of the iceberg.
>
> The Arabs are human beings and they deserve to be treated as such."
>
> To be blunt, that is nowhere near good enough. Real Arabs (not
> American paid for politicians) want the Jews out of the middle east
> permanently and won't rest until it happens. Zionism as a
philosophy
> and a goal has to be relinquished. As far as I'm concerned Jews
were
> blackmailed into leaving Europe by a combination of American desire
> to dominate the middle east and a Jewish financial elite who wanred
> to set up a gangster state of their own.
>
> I have just read my third pro holocaust book by a witness in the
> Irving trial and it's a load of ridiculous nonsense. Irving might
be
> a racist and a closet Nazi but it doesn't mean he's wrong. I have
> never read Irving just his opponents by the way, that's what has
made
> me a revisionist.
>
> It's pretty clear that the Jewish lobby now has massive influence
on
> Anglo American foreign policy. The idea that Britain would fight
such
> a war (Iraq) on its own volition just isn't remotely credible.
> Seventy five percent were against it.
>
>
>
> --- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "kenny318east3"
> <kenny318east3@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@>
> wrote:
> >
> > << There are many many Jews, who protect the Zionist perpetrators
> of 9-11 --
> > whose loyalty to fellow Jews, even mass murders, is so great that
> they will defend
> > them knowing they are wrong. They discover the true guilt of the
> Zionist neo-cons
> > and Mossad yet they pretend they do not believe it -- I'd say
90
> percent of Jews who
> > are in any way involved with 9-11 discussion are at this stage.
> They are defending
> > their people from justice -- all other people be damned. >>
> >
> > it doesn't matter how much I am horrified by the behavior of
> Israel, I am still
> > a Jew.
> >
> > Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to
> oust these
> > criminal Zionists from our midst.
> >
> > Israeli refusnik soldiers are just the tip of the iceberg.
> >
> > The Arabs are human beings and they deserve to be treated as
such.
> >
> > Ken, the grandson of Samuel and Charlotte Goncharow. I am a
former
> student
> > at the Flatbush Jewish Center on Church Avenue and Ocean Parkway,
> and I was
> > a recipient of the book "Vocabulary of Jewish Life," by Rabbi
> Abraham M. Heller.
> >
> > > > I suspect Leslie Schwartz is going to be like that. I've
seen
> too many not to think
> > so -- and that is the extent to which I have become a collective-
> Jewish guilt-until-
> > proven-innocent-on-an-individual-basis "anti-Semite" --
literally
> a man suspicious
> > of Jews in general. It is unjust -- but my instinct for survival
> overrides my higher
> > impulses.
> > >
> > > Dick Eastman
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Naveed
> > > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > > Cc: lhs_emf@
> > > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 5:50 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
> > >
> > >
> > > for the last time
> > >
> > > all JEWS ARE NOT ZIONISTS!
> > >
> > > ALL ZIONISTS ARE NOT JEWS!
> > >
> > > There is a ZIONIST ELEMENT to the 9/11 conspiracy!!! Maybe
you
> can't handle
> > that............
> > > did you even read the damn post i posted about ISRAELI spy
> rings awash in
> > america? I POSTED IT TWICE.......
> > >
> > > this below come from my friend ryan!
> > >
> > > 'A Clean Break' JINSA/PNAC Neocons associated with AIPAC
> espionage:
> > >
> > > washingtonpost.com
> > > Leak Inquiry Includes Iran Experts in Administration
> > >
> > > By Robin Wright and Dan Eggen
> > > Washington Post Staff Writers
> > > Saturday, September 4, 2004; Page A04
> > >
> > >
> > > FBI counterintelligence investigators have in recent weeks
> questioned current and
> > former U.S. officials about whether a small group of Iran
> specialists at the Pentagon
> > and in Vice President Cheney's office may have been involved in
> passing classified
> > information to an Iraqi politician or a U.S. lobbying group
allied
> with Israel, according
> > to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
> > >
> > > In their interviews, the FBI agents have also named two
Israeli
> diplomats stationed
> > in Washington and asked whether they would be willing recipients
of
> sensitive
> > intelligence, the sources added.
> > >
> > > The investigators have asked questions about personnel in the
> office of Pentagon
> > Undersecretary for Policy Douglas J. Feith as well as members of
> the influential
> > Defense Policy Board, an advisory panel for Defense Secretary
> Donald H. Rumsfeld,
> > according to former U.S. officials who have been questioned and
> others familiar with
> > the case.
> > >
> > > Investigators have specifically asked about a group of
> neoconservatives involved
> > in defense issues, including Feith, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul
> D. Wolfowitz, Iraq
> > and Iran specialist Harold Rhode and others at the Pentagon. FBI
> agents also have
> > asked current and former officials about Richard Perle of the
> defense board and David
> > Wurmser, an Iran specialist and principal deputy assistant for
> national security affairs
> > in Cheney's office, according to sources familiar with or
involved
> in the case.
> > >
> > > "The initial interest was: Do you believe certain people
would
> spy for Israel and
> > pass secret information?" said one source interviewed by the FBI
> about the defense
> > officials.
> > >
> > > It remains unclear, however, how specific investigators'
> suspicions have become.
> > And one official, a Feith ally, has said the investigation is an
> effort by some
> > intelligence officials to discredit Pentagon hawks.
> > >
> > > The sources interviewed for this article requested anonymity
> because it involves
> > classified information or because of the ongoing investigation.
> > >
> > > Perle, Rhode and Wolfowitz did not return telephone calls
> placed to their homes
> > and offices late Friday. Reached at home, Feith declined comment,
> citing the ongoing
> > investigation.
> > >
> > > But Pentagon officials insisted yesterday that FBI questions
> about key
> > policymakers did not mean they were the subjects of the
> intelligence leak
> > investigation. Senior Pentagon officials have said they were told
> by the FBI that the
> > investigation is focused on just one suspect in the Defense
> Department, Lawrence A.
> > Franklin, an Iran specialist in Feith's office.
> > >
> > > The FBI investigation first came to light last week with
> reports of a probe into
> > whether Franklin passed a draft presidential directive on Iran to
> the American Israel
> > Public Affairs Committee, and whether the directive was then
passed
> to Israel,
> > sources have said. AIPAC has strongly denied any involvement in
> espionage.
> > >
> > > A federal grand jury in Alexandria may take up the Franklin
> case as early as next
> > week, law enforcement sources said.
> > >
> > > The questioning of Franklin is a recent part of an
> investigation that dates back
> > more than two years and includes diverse threads, U.S. officials
> and people close to
> > the case said. One aspect of the probe concerns AIPAC and another
> looks at whether
> > intelligence on Iran ended up in the hands of Iraqi National
> Congress leader Ahmed
> > Chalabi, a longtime Pentagon favorite once considered a possible
> replacement for
> > Saddam Hussein.
> > >
> > > Iran has been a particularly controversial issue within the
> Bush administration,
> > which still does not have a formal policy more than 3 1/2 years
> after taking office. A
> > small group of Pentagon neoconservatives opposed a draft
directive
> because it did
> > not support a change of governments in Tehran, which they
> advocated, current and
> > former U.S. officials said.
> > >
> > > The officials whose names came up during questioning have
> strong ties to Israel.
> > They also share a long-standing position on Iran and other
radical
> regimes. Wurmser,
> > Feith and Perle were co-authors of a 1996 policy paper for then-
> Israeli Prime Minister
> > Binyamin Netanyahu titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for
> Securing the Realm." It
> > called for removing Hussein from power in Iraq as part of a broad
> strategy to
> > transform the region and remove radical regimes.
> > >
> > > But current and former U.S. officials, including some who
were
> interviewed by the
> > FBI, are still puzzled by the nature of the investigation
involving
> Israel, because its
> > profoundly close ties with the United States date back six
decades
> and have involved
> > sharing sensitive intelligence. Yet officials also concede that
> Israel is one of the three
> > countries most active in spying on the United States. Israel
denies
> conducting
> > espionage in the United States.
> > >
> > > Also yesterday, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary
> Committee
> > demanded that a new prosecutor be assigned to investigate the
> alleged leaks,
> > questioning the "political leanings" of the U.S. attorney in
> Alexandria who is handling
> > the criminal portion of the case.
> > >
> > > In a letter to Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Rep. John
> Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.)
> > said the role of U.S. Attorney Paul J. McNulty in the case
> has "obvious political
> > implications" in an election year, and Conyers cited anonymous
> allegations in a news
> > report that McNulty had "put the brakes on" the probe.
> > >
> > > "While I have no reason to question Mr. McNulty's integrity,
he
> is not a career
> > prosecutor, but instead is a political appointee whose previous
> employment was
> > principally with Republican politicians," Conyers wrote.
> > >
> > > Conyers suggested that either a special counsel or U.S.
> Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald
> > of Chicago, who is overseeing a separate probe into the
disclosure
> of CIA operative
> > Valerie Plame, should take over the Pentagon probe.
> > >
> > > Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo declined to comment
> on the specifics
> > of Conyers's allegations. "We will review the congressman's
letter
> and give it the
> > attention it is due," Corallo said. A spokesman for McNulty also
> declined comment,
> > referring a reporter to Corallo's statement.
> > >
> > > Several law enforcement officials have said in recent days
that
> the FBI had initially
> > considered making rapid arrests in the Franklin probe when it
> became clear that news
> > of the investigation was about to become public last week. But,
> these officials said,
> > prosecutors urged caution, arguing that investigators needed more
> time to gather
> > evidence and assess the case.
> > >
> > > Franklin has been cooperating in the probe for several weeks,
> officials familiar
> > with the investigation said. He has not responded to numerous
> requests for comment
> > at his office and his home in West Virginia.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > All in the Neocon Family
> > > By Jim Lobe, AlterNet
> > > Posted on March 27, 2003, Printed on April 16, 2006
> > > http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
> > > What do William Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, and
> Robert Kagan have
> > in common? Yes, they are all die-hard hawks who have gained
control
> of U.S. foreign
> > policy since the 9/11 attacks. But they are also part of one big
> neoconservative family
> > -- an extended clan of spouses, children, and friends who have
> known each other for
> > generations.
> > > Neoconservatives are former liberals (which explains
the "neo"
> prefix) who
> > advocate an aggressive unilateralist vision of U.S. global
> supremacy, which includes a
> > close strategic alliance with Israel. Let's start with one of the
> founding fathers of the
> > extended neocon clan: Irving Kristol. His extensive resume
includes
> waging culture
> > wars for the CIA against the Soviet Union in the early years of
the
> Cold War and
> > calling for an American "imperial" role during the Vietnam War.
> Papa Kristol, who has
> > been credited with defining the major themes of neoconservative
> thought, is married
> > to Gertrude Himmelfarb, a neoconservative powerhouse on her own.
> Her studies of
> > the Victorian era in Britain helped inspire the men who sold Bush
> on the idea of
> > "compassionate conservatism."
> > > The son of this proud couple is none other that William
> Kristol, the crown prince
> > of the neoconservative clique and editor of the Rupert Murdoch-
> owned Weekly
> > Standard. In 1997, he founded the Project for the New American
> Century (PNAC), a
> > front group which cemented the powerful alliance between right-
wing
> Republicans
> > like Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, Christian and Catholic Right
> leaders like Gary
> > Bauer and William Bennett, and the neocons behind a platform of
> global U.S. military
> > dominance.
> > > Irving Kristol's most prominent disciple is Richard Perle,
who
> was until Thursday
> > the Defense Policy Board chairman, is also a "resident scholar"
at
> the American
> > Enterprise Institute, which is housed in the same building as
PNAC.
> Perle himself
> > married into neocon royalty when he wed the daughter of his
> professor at the
> > University of Chicago, the late Alfred Wohlstetter -- the man who
> helped both his
> > son-in-law and his fellow student Paul Wolfowitz get their start
in
> Washington more
> > than 30 years ago.
> > > Perle's own protege is Douglas Feith, who is now Wolfowitz's
> deputy for policy and
> > is widely known for his right-wing Likud position. And why not?
His
> father,
> > Philadelphia businessman and philanthropist Dalck Feith, was once
a
> follower of the
> > great revisionist Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky, in his
> native Poland back in the
> > 1930s. The two Feiths were honored together in 1997 by the right-
> wing Zionist
> > Organization of America (ZOA).
> > > The AEI has long been a major nexus for such inter-familial
> relationships. A long-
> > time collaborator with Perle, Michael Ledeen is married to
Barbara
> Ledeen, a founder
> > and director of the anti-feminist Independent Women's Forum
(IWF),
> who is currently
> > a major player in the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill.
> Richard Perle, Douglas
> > Feith, and another neo-con power couple -- David and Meyrav
> Wurmser -- co-
> > authored a 1996 memorandum for Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu
> outlining how to
> > break the Oslo peace process and invade Iraq as the first step to
> transforming the
> > Middle East.
> > > Though she doesn't focus much on foreign-policy issues, Lynne
> Cheney also
> > hangs her hat at AEI. Her husband Dick Cheney recently chose
> Victoria Nuland to
> > become his next deputy national security adviser. Nuland, as it
> turns out, is married
> > to Robert Kagan, Bill Kristol's main comrade-in-arms and the co-
> founder of PNAC.
> > > Bob's father, Donald Kagan, is a Yale historian who converted
> from a liberal
> > Democrat to a staunch neocon in the 1970s. On the eve of the 2000
> presidential
> > elections, Donald and his other son, Frederick, published "While
> America Sleeps," a
> > clarion call to increase defense spending. Since then, the three
> Kagan men have
> > written reams of columns warning that the currently ballooning
> Pentagon budget is
> > simply not enough to fund the much-desired vision of U.S. global
> supremacy.
> > > And which infamous ex-Reaganite do the Kagans and another
> leading neocon
> > family have in common? None other than Iran-contra veteran
Elliott
> Abrams.
> > > Now the director of Near Eastern Affairs in Bush's National
> Security Council,
> > Abrams worked closely with Bob Kagan back in the Reagan era. He
is
> also the son-in-
> > law of Norman Podhoretz, long-time editor of the influential
> conservative Jewish
> > publication Commentary, and his wife, Midge Decter, a fearsome
> polemicist in her
> > own right.
> > > Podhoretz, like Kristol Sr., helped invent neo-conservatism
in
> the late 1960s. He
> > and Decter created a formidable political team as leaders of the
> Committee on the
> > Present Danger in 1980, when they worked with Donald Rumsfeld to
> pound the last
> > nail into the coffin of detente and promote the rise of Ronald
> Reagan. In addition to
> > being Abrams' father-in-law, Norman Podhoretz is also the father
of
> John Podhoretz,
> > a columnist for the Murdoch-owned New York Post and frequent
guest
> on the
> > Murdoch-owned Fox News channel.
> > > As editor of Commentary, Norman offered writing space to
rising
> stars of the
> > neocon movement for more than 30 years. His proteges include
former
> U.N.
> > ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and Richard Pipes, who was Ronald
> Reagan's top
> > advisor on the "Evil Empire," as the president liked to call the
> Soviet Union. His son,
> > Daniel Pipes, has also made a career out of battling "evil,"
which
> in his case is Islam.
> > And to tie it all up neatly, in 2002, Podhoretz received the
> highest honor bestowed by
> > the AEI: the Irving Kristol award.
> > > This list of intricate, overlapping connections is hardly
> exhaustive or perhaps even
> > surprising. But it helps reveal an important fact. Contrary to
> appearances, the
> > neocons do not constitute a powerful mass political movement.
They
> are instead a
> > small, tighly-knit clan whose incestuous familial and personal
> connections, both
> > within and outside the Bush administration, have allowed them
grab
> control of the
> > future of American foreign policy.
> > > © 2006 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
> > > View this story online at:
http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
> > >
> > >
> > > Home : WRH Store : WRH Index : Reader Letters :
> Archives : Advertise : Donate
> > >
> > > On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli
> Prime Minister Benjamin
> > Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli
> relations. His quick
> > reply was: "It's very good...Well, it's not good, but it will
> generate immediate
> > sympathy (for Israel)"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Five Dancing Israelis
> > > Arrested On 9-11
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > As the world watched in disbelief and asked the
> question...
> > >
> > > ...Mossad operatives were seen dancing with joy.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle
> of themselves on 9-
> > 11.
> > > The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and
> trained them on the
> > twin towers. (1)
> > >
> > > Police received several calls from angry New Jersey
> residents claiming
> > "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the
disaster
> with shouts of
> > joy and mockery. (2)
> > > "They were like happy, you know . They didn't look
> shocked to me" said a
> > witness. (3)
> > > [T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept.
> 11 making fun of the
> > World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to
photograph
> themselves in
> > front of the wreckage. (4)
> > >
> > > Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State
Park
> after the initial
> > impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a
> roof in Weehawken,
> > and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high
fives
> in a Jersey City
> > parking lot. (6)
> > >
> > > "It looked like they're hooked in with this. It
> looked like they knew what
> > was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (7)
> > >
> > > One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually
led
> them to close down
> > all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told
the
> 9-1-1 dispatcher
> > that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white
> van headed for the
> > Holland Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:
> > > Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
> > > Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in
> there, they look like
> > Palestinians and going around a building.
> > > Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the
> Holland tunnel, I see the guy
> > by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh
uniform.
> > > Dispatcher: He has what?
> > > Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (8)
> > >
> > > (*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller
> specifically say that these
> > "Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians
> usually dress in
> > western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")
> > >
> > > Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-
> the-Lookout" alert for
> > a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from
> New Jersey. When a
> > van fitting that exact description was stopped just before
crossing
> into New York, the
> > suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the
> surprise of the police
> > officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!
> > > According to ABC's 20/20, when the van belonging to the
> cheering Israelis
> > was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg,
> told the officers:
> > >
> > > "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your
> problems are our
> > problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (9)
> > >
> > > Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the
NYPD?
> > > The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious
> when they found maps
> > of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the
same
> items that the
> > hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and
> foreign passports.
> > Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were
> brought to the van
> > and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (10)
> > > The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of
> which shows Sivan
> > Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering
> ruins in an apparently
> > celebratory gesture. (11)
> > >
> > > The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with
a
> bomb was stopped
> > as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity
of
> the suspects was
> > not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on
September
> 12, 2001:
> > > American security services overnight stopped a
car
> bomb on the George
> > Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped
on
> an approach
> > ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended
to
> blow up the main
> > crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported.
(12)
> > >
> > > TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down
> with tonnes of
> > explosives (13).
> > > What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (14), the
> New York Post (15), and
> > the New Jersey Bergen Record (16) all clearly and unambiguously
> reported that a
> > white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3,
> which leads directly
> > to the Lincoln Tunnel.
> > > But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz
> Sheva) (17), and Yediot
> > America, (18) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously,
that
> a white van with
> > Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington
> Bridge, which is
> > several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.
> > > It appears as if there may actually have been two
> white vans involved, one
> > stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the
> conflicting reports as to
> > the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so
> many credible eye-
> > witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van
in
> so many different
> > locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve
Gordon
> (lawyer for the 5
> > Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested
but
> later increased the
> > total to five.
> > > Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb
while
> the other was meant
> > to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into
New
> Jersey? If a van was
> > to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly
> the drivers would
> > need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And
> notice how the van
> > (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland
> Tunnel- which was
> > where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-
> Palestinian 9-1-1
> > "mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.
> > >
> > > From there, the story gets becomes even more
suspicious.
> The Israelis worked
> > for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An
> American
> > employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New
Jersey
> that a majority
> > of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the
> attacks.
> > > The employee, who declined to give his name
> said: "I was in tears. These
> > guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were
like, "Now
> America knows
> > what we go through." (19)
> > >
> > > A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's
> Israeli owner, Dominick
> > Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He
was
> in such a hurry to
> > flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were
left
> with their
> > furniture stranded in storage facilities (20).
> > > It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis
> were in fact Mossad
> > agents (21). They were held in custody for 71 days before being
> quietly released.
> > Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40
> days. (22)
> > > [S]everal of the detainees discussed their
> experience in America on an
> > Israeli talk show after their return home.
> > > Said one of the men, denying that they were
> laughing or happy on the
> > morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming
from
> a country that
> > experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."
> (23)
> > >
> > > How did they know there would be an event to document
on
> 9-11?
> > > It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of
> the dancing Israeli
> > Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:
> > > 1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks
to
> celebrate the
> > successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever
pulled
> off in history.
> > > 2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-
1-
> 1 police dispatcher to
> > report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the
> Holland Tunnel.
> > > 3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with
> this phone call, the Israeli
> > bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where
> they will drop
> > off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.
> > > 4. But the police react very wisely and
proactively
> by closing off ALL
> > bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move
> inadvertently foils
> > the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture
and
> 40 day torture.
> > > 5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice
> Department rounds up over 1000
> > Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New
York
> area jails. The
> > Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and
> media can now
> > claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in
> the same dragnet as
> > many other Arabs.
> > > 6. After several months, FBI and Justice
> Department "higher-ups" are able
> > to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the
Israelis
> quietly.
> > >
> > > Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9-11
> attacks even though
> > he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale.
> Immediately after the
> > Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
> > > CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin
> Laden's fingerprints all
> > over it." (24)
> > > The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the
> Israeli connection.
> > Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with
> stories linking the
> > attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers
> of every stripe
> > spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most
> outrageous
> > propaganda imaginable.
> > > We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA
> was because he
> > hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval"
> and they wanted
> > to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter
> about the Crusades,
> > and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all
> over the place!
> > > But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks
and
> suggested that
> > Zionists orchestrated the
> > > 9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement
of
> denial in which he
> > said:
> > > "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks
in
> the United States nor
> > did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government
> within a government
> > within the United States. The United States should try to trace
the
> perpetrators of
> > these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the
> present century a
> > century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret
> government must be
> > asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system
is
> totally in control
> > of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United
> States." (25)
> > >
> > > You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did
> you?
> > > [A] number of intelligence officials have raised
> questions about Osama bin
> > Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and
> he's running this
> > operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't
> have done it alone." A
> > senior military officer told me that because of the visas and
other
> documentation
> > needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major
> foreign intelligence
> > service might also have been involved. (26)
> > >
> > > Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of the 9-11
> attacks by the FBI:
> > > USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE
> AUGUST 7,
> > 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM,
> TANZANIA,
> > AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN
> ADDITION, BIN
> > LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE
WORLD.
> (27)
> > >
> > > To date, the only shred of "evidence" to be uncovered
> against bin Laden is a
> > barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just
happened
> to find "lying
> > around" in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake.
> (28)
> > > There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to
> link the Al Qaeda
> > "terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a
> mountain of evidence, both
> > hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been
> very busy framing
> > Arabs for terror plots against America.
> > >
> > > One final point - at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that
> the Democratic Front
> > for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the
> attacks (29). This claim
> > was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said
> it had always
> > opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside
the
> occupied
> > territories." (30)
> > > 9-11 CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a
> Palestinian claim of
> > responsibility
> > >
> > > Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less
> than 500 people (31)
> > make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for
> the attacks?
> > > Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to
> fulfill what the goals of the
> > political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century
> ago: to turn all of
> > historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central
> tenet of the Zionist
> > ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without
people
> for a people
> > without a land." (32)
> > >
> > > The implication of Palestinians in the 9-11 attacks
would
> have handed
> > Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all
> Palestinians would
> > have been labelled terrorists.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
> > ------
> > >
> > > "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified.
I
> cannot tell you about
> > evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."
> > > US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on
> the Israeli spy ring.
> > > "By way of deception, thou shalt do war"
> > > Motto of the Mossad
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
> > ------
> > >
> > > See also:
> > > Israel and 9/11 - Index of What Really Happened
> > > Zionist Circles Benefit From WTC Collapse
> > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
> > ------
> > >
> > > What Really Happened
> > >
> > >
> > > Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@> wrote:
> > > Bugs,
> > >
> > > Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with
> people who think its all a
> > Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
> > >
> > > Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are
> deranged, I just read
> > one of their histories, Hitler you know was a good guy, Jews
forced
> him to carry out
> > the holocaust.
> > >
> > > Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad
> control the world along
> > with Jewish international bankers, etc.
> > >
> > > Etc. etc, etc.
> > >
> > > Jews
> > >
> > > Etc. etc, etc.
> > >
> > > Zionists
> > >
> > > Etc. etc, etc.
> > >
> > > Mossad
> > >
> > > Etc. etc, etc.
> > >
> > > Sharon
> > >
> > > Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.
> > >
> > > Just plain demented hate.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
> > ----
> > > From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bugs
> > > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:30 AM
> > > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
> > >
> > >
> > > TRY RUMSFELD FOR TREASON
> > >
> > > The oath is to stand against all domestic and foreign
enimies
> and
> > > what Rumsfeld has done to the American Troops is a crime in
> and onto
> > > itself.
> > >
> > > Uraium dust has been spread all over Iraq due to the
Uranium
> used in
> > > Penatrator Bombs and Bullets.
> > >
> > > Villages and the City of Fulluja have been razed to the
> ground.
> > >
> > > 100,000 Iraqi civillians mostly women and children have
been
> killed
> > > as collateral damage.
> > >
> > > All of this has occured because Rumsfeld and Bush elected
to
> lie the
> > > American Soldiers into an unnecessary war.
> > >
> > > Why did Bush and Rumsfeld do this ?
> > >
> > > They did it to steal the Iraqi oil sell it to china and put
> the cash
> > > into Chinese banks.
> > >
> > > And they are perpetuating the occupation by not having
enough
> troops
> > > so they can stay in Iraq an keep on stealing the oil
forever.
> > >
> > > The Maritine Ship movement logs will prove this.
> > >
> > > It is an OPEN and Shut Case.
> > >
> > > or in other words a "REAL SLAM DUNK"
> > >
> > > Bush's Brother and Uncle have been in and out of China for
> years
> > > lining up this traitorous deal.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Naveed
> > > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:01 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Greg Palast Still DOESNT
GET
> IT !
> > >
> > >
> > > didn't know paul bremer was a kissinger stooge.......
> > >
> > > mann david <dmann51@> wrote:
> > > Read that piece in a hurry but didn't notice mention
> > > of 9-11. Wow, pathetic trivial trip indeed.
> > >
> > > --- JIM <justpasenthru2012@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
> > > > Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
> > > > The Guardian - Comment
> > > > Friday, April 14, 2006
> > > > By Greg Palast
> > > >
> > > > Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the
> > > > gaggle of generals,
> > > > safely
> > > > retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week,
> > > > six of them
> > > > have called for
> > > > the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
> > > >
> > > > Well, according to my watch, they're about four
> > > > years too late --
> > > > and they still
> > > > don't get it.
> > > >
> > > > I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
> > > > that the
> > > > bemedalled boys in
> > > > crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the
> > > > rump, in public.
> > > > But to me, it
> > > > just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
> > > > straight.
> > > >
> > > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up
> > > > in front of the
> > > > UN and
> > > > identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons
> > > > labs, was it,
> > > > General
> > > > Powell?
> > > >
> > > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us
> > > > our next warning
> > > > from Saddam
> > > > could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
> > > >
> > > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
> > > > that Al Qaeda
> > > > and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
> > > > arrogance, a
> > > > duplicitous
> > > > chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and
> > > > Tinker-Toy Napoleon --
> > > > but he didn't
> > > > appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
> > > >
> > > > Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of
> > > > Defense you didn't
> > > > read in the
> > > > New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner,
> > > > the man our
> > > > president
> > > > placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion
> > > > viceroy.
> > > >
> > > > Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
> > > > under the
> > > > mistaken notion
> > > > that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq,
> > > > the President
> > > > meant the
> > > > Iraqis could choose their own government.
> > > > Misunderstanding the
> > > > President's true
> > > > mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold
> > > > elections within
> > > > 90 days and
> > > > for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the
> > > > cities to a desert
> > > > base. "It's
> > > > their country," the General told me of the Iraqis.
> > > > "And," he added,
> > > > most
> > > > ominously, "their oil."
> > > >
> > > > Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
> > > > Garner a 101-page
> > > > plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons
> > > > at the State
> > > > Department, Treasury
> > > > and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e.
> > > > the sale)
> > > > of "all state
> > > > assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting
> > > > industries."
> > > > The General
> > > > knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where
> > > > the Iraqi sun
> > > > don't shine.
> > > > Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting
> > > > of Iraqi tribal
> > > > leaders to
> > > > plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their
> > > > own multi-ethnic
> > > > government --
> > > > and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were
> > > > on talking
> > > > terms -- knew he
> > > > could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a
> > > >
> > > > welcomed "liberation"
> > > > turned into a hated "occupation."
> > > >
> > > > But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition
> > > > government would mean
> > > > the
> > > > death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets
> > > > privatization grab.
> > > >
> > > > On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the
> > > > very night
> > > > General Garner
> > > > arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington.
> > > > It was Rumsfeld
> > > > on the line.
> > > > He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack,
> > > > Jack, you're
> > > > fired."
> > > >
> > > > Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of
> > > > on-the-ground experience
> > > > in Iraq,
> > > > with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director
> > > > of Kissinger
> > > > Associates.
> > > > Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
> > > > postponed
> > > > elections for a
> > > > year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot
> > > > pasha, selling
> > > > off Iraq's
> > > > economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
> > > > Rumsfeld's neo-con
> > > > clique had
> > > > desired.
> > > >
> > > > Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the
> > > > six generals' call
> > > > for
> > > > Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
> > > >
> > > > For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't
> > > > shoot straight.
> > > > They're
> > > > wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've
> > > > gunned down the
> > > > puppet instead
> > > > of the puppeteers.
> > > >
> > > > There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked
> > > > General Garner from
> > > > Baghdad
> > > > without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or
> > > > breathes or spits
> > > > in the Bush
> > > > Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
> > > > approval. And
> > > > ultimately, it's
> > > > the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
> > > >
> > > > Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
> > > > give them
> > > > enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the
> > > > cowboy from
> > > > Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that
> > > > we lacked
> > > > troops -- the
> > > > problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy
> > > > this nation. A
> > > > million
> > > > troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would
> > > > just have more
> > > > targets.)
> > > >
> > > > President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
> > > > today on the
> > > > intercom with
> > > > Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up."
> > > > And Cheney
> > > > replies, "Hey,
> > > > just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until
> > > > he's taken all
> > > > their ammo."
> > > >
> > > > When Bush and Cheney read about the call for
> > > > Rumsfeld's resignation
> > > > today, I can
> > > > just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission
> > > > Accomplished."
> > > >
> > > > Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
> > > > choosing a target:
> > > > It's the
> > > > President, stupid.
> > > >
> > > === message truncated ===
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection
> around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man,
> and brave, and hated
> > and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for
then
> it costs nothing to
> > be a patriot.
> > > - Notebook, 1904
> > >
> > > www.fightthenwo.org
> > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
> > --
> > > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to
the
> US (and 30+
> > countries) for 2¢/min or less.
> > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
> > --
> > >
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/312 - Release
> Date: 4/14/2006
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and
> brave, and hated and
> > scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it
> costs nothing to be
> > a patriot.
> > > - Notebook, 1904
> > >
> > > www.fightthenwo.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
> > ------
> > > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for
ridiculously
> low rates.
> > >
> > > SPONSORED LINKS United state government grant United state
> coin United state
> > patent
> > > United state flag United state army United state
grant
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
> > ------
> > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > >
> > > a.. Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
> > >
> > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms
> of Service.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
> > ------
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and
brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join
him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
> - Notebook, 1904
>
> www.fightthenwo.org
>
> ---------------------------------
> Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 3
From: "space2force" space2force@yahoo.ca
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:22am(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL

Zionist Terrorist
Attacks On Rense.com

12-12-5


It's time to make more of our listeners and site visitors aware of how vile, psychotic terrorist enemies of Freedom, Liberty and the American way of life continue to try to damage our program and news service.

The true nature of most Zionists who pretend to support freedom is actually one of libel, slander, character assassination, terrorism and death threats.

These arch traitors to the Bill of Rights will stop at nothing to take your freedoms away... especially if you dare to question, ever so slightly, their carefully-constructed view of 'history' and propaganda, or present even the most modest alternative viewpoint, facts or evidence contrary to their party line.

They are petrified that an open, honest investigation would be held to carefully examine the facts of history - and their plots and schemes - which would bring to light the enormity of the distance between their manipulative, suspect and terribly conflicted version of 'history' and the FACTS.

These dark entities are past masters of using the identical, heinous, tactics of Nazi Germany to hound and endeavor to destroy those who disagree with them. They would not hesitate for a moment to fill trains to US concentration camps, man *real* gas chambers and engage in genocide on American soil.

As we now know, the 'President' of the United States thinks our Constitution is nothing but a "goddamned piece of paper"...and so do the Zionist enemies of rense.com, The Jeff Rense Program, and other seekers of truth and reality in our clouded, deadly and troubled world.

They are the enemies of all freedom-loving peoples and will strip you of your Freedom of Speech and thought - and your liberties - at their first opportunity. They will, if given the chance, imprison you if you dare criticize their dogma or challenge their viewpoints. They are at the root of evil on our planet.

Their perpetual efforts to pass so-called 'hate laws' in the Congress came close to success again this year as they continue to seek to bring America firmly under the heel of their fascist boots. Their 'hate law' measure failed in the Senate...but they will be back again next year. The very idea of imprisoning someone for his or her thoughts or beliefs is nothing less than absolute INSANITY.

Zionist agents and fanatics freely and criminally accuse their targets of being "Nazis" while they themselves utilize the very same techinques of the master Nazi propagandists to condemn, defame, personally attack, and stereotype all those they fear may oppose or question their tactics.

Perhaps the most heart-breaking, evil side of Zionism is how it hides behind - and unmercifully uses - the great religion of Judaism...as if it were a some kind of blunt instrument used to deceive, threaten and then to beat those who differ with Zionism into submission.

Zionism has also cleverly hidden behind duped and deceived Christian fundamentalists...who are, just now, beginning to wake up to that fact - as are millions of Jews the world over who have suffered terribly because of it. Tragically, they continue to be used by expendable pawns in Zionism's vicious game of world domination.

Zionists come in all colors and sizes...there are Catholic zionists, Jewish supremacist zionists, Christian fundamentalist zionists, Communist/Socialist zionists, Fascist zionists and even Atheist zionists. Their general goal, however, remains the same: the geopolitical-industrial-media subjugation, domination and control of Western society.

That is why this site and program have supported such heroic and courageous organizations as Jews Against Zionism and countless, extraordinary Jews of great courage and vision. They KNOW what the game is and they are devoted to unmasking the the truth and freeing Jews of having to pay the price of Zionist manipulation.

See: http://www.rense.com/general54/thank.htm

Zionists profoundly agree with 'President' Bush's statement about the Constitution being a "goddamned piece of paper." We do not-- and we will continue to honor and protect our Constitution and Bill of Rights for all Americans of all religions, races and creeds.

Above all, keep in mind Zionism is NOT Judaism.

See: http://www.ladah.org/article48.htm

Here now, are a few of the multitude of crucial facts all Americans must consider and keep in mind in these dangerous and confusing times...

* The USAF white paper on Zionist Israel's thermonuclear blackmail of the U.S. is little-known but should be read by every American.

See: http://www.rense.com/general35/isrnuk.htm

* The fact that Zionist Israel has never and will never be forced to repay one dollar of the approximate one trillion in 'aid' US taxpayers have sent to the Zionist state of Israel since it was 'founded.'

* The fact that an heroic German rabbi worked out a deal with the Nazi government in 1942 for the safe passage of ALL Jewish people out of occupied Europe to Palestine for the tiny sum of $2 million dollars.

The rabbi sent an emissary to world Zionist headquarters in Switzerland with the incredible news and made the request. The Zionists said "NO" to their Jewish bretheren and said, in essence, "Go home, you're not getting the money. Unless large amounts of Jewish blood is spilled during the war in Europe, we won't easily be able to set up our state of Israel after the war."

That staggering documentation was unearthed by several notable historians such as Jewish scholars Lenni Brenner and Dr. Henry Makow, PhD.

See: http://www.rense.com/general31/zionist.htm and http://www.rense.com/general36/colb.htm

So, one might reasonably ask...who is actually, ULTIMATELY, responsible for the 'Holocaust' in WWII ...whatever, in fact, it actually was?

The threat and terror attacks on this program and site by Zionists and their dupes has not slackened for years, and cover a wide range of tactics and methodologies.

Hiding behind Judaism, Zionists have used the shop-worn, bogus charge of 'anti-semitism' for decades to try to destroy the lives and reputations of innocent people who simply believe that we have a birthright to hear ALL sides of any issue and to make up our own minds about history and the events of our times. These tenets are also called Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Thought and Freedom of the Press and Inquiry.

We either have these freedoms...or we don't. There is no partial Freedom of Speech, for example.

Zionist Terror And Threat Tactics

Through their often clever, hate-filled, mentally-disturbed psychopathic agents, sycophants and dupes, they have directly attacked and threatened the management and executives of the radio stations and networks which carry our program. They have also attacked and threatened the commerical sponsors of these stations and their programs with local and national 'boycotts.' They have even threatened the sponsors of our program itself.

Zoinist blackmail demands are simple: unless the station terminates the program, that radio station and all of its sponsors will be 'nationally-identified' as being 'anti-semitic' because they broadcast our program.

At one point, Zionist agents emailed us the actual threatening form letters they send out to our stations and sponsors, and then laughed and mocked us... saying "Just try to stop us."

Zionism is a ruthless and highly-sophisticated enemy of Freedom...and the American Constitution. These fanatics are the new Brown Shirts, Orwell's thought police, and they don't stop at mass-mailing threatening letters and emails to stations and sponsors...they carry their brand of terrorism much further. Like over the telephone.

For example, three of our most popular monthly guests (Alex Jones, Tim Rifat and George Filer) have all received telephone calls from someone claiming to be our program 'producer' and said "Jeff doesn't want you to be a guest on his program any longer, so you won't be needed any more."

Fortunately, these bogus calls were identified as such immediately. However, the simple fact that the enemies of Freedom are so afraid of the truth that they stooped to acts of impersonation says a great deal.

Zionist agents and sympathisers have also mounted an intense and never-ending email attack -- smearing and slandering the program, its guests and rense.com.

They have even emailed hoaxed letters allegedly from us to some rense.com visitors who have simply sent in Comments to rense.com articles Zionists fear.

In one such email, (and there are phone calls as well), the sender pretened to be Jeff and told the site visitor "never to email rense.com again."

Another Zionist act of terror occurred when our webmaster, James, received a death threat in the middle of the night on his home telephone which had received a new, unlisted number just that afternoon.

How was his new number obtained? The FBI is limited in what it can do. However, as some of you realize, the vast majority of all US phone billing is done by Israeli companies...so, powerful Zionists have instant access to essentially all telecommunications data and information they want.

James had to acquire the new unlisted number because of the harassing calls he had been receiving from someone calling himself a 'nazi hunter.' The FBI was brought in after the death threat and was asked how the new unlisted number was obtained so quickly. The Agent replied that the individual was a professional, that the threat was not a prank and should be considered dangerous.

This Zionist terrorist later also threatened the life of another well-known webmaster, following him to Hawaii where the Feds intercepted the man for questioning. But this partiular perpetrator turned out to be a Canadian citizen and his rights to such attacks were somehow protected. Canada has had the malignant Zionist yoke of 'hate speech' laws on its soul for many years now, and apparently condones its citizens committing crimes and making death threats against those they personally, arbitrarily label as 'nazis.'

Other vicious attacks have been mounted against numerous program guests...nearly all of whom have stood firm in the face of terrorism and come on the program as scheduled. From public confrontation to email, they use every venue to attempt to intimidate and generate fear. Here's an example of an email Subject line from one zionist net terrorist and hate-monger:

"NAZI Jeff Rense touts modern day Dr. Mengele's belief that there was no Holocaust."

Not only does Jeff not 'tout' Mengele but he has never doubted the Holocaust for a minute. He does question the total number claimed to have been killed and other key contentions of the story, and has called for open and serious academic, scientific investigations to learn the truth and to lay the rumors to rest once and for all. For example:

Even after three years of the most INTENSE research beginning at war's end, the US Army found NO evidence whatever of mass gassings inside or outside of Germany.

See: http://www.rense.com/general69/gassed.htm and http://www.rense.com/general69/evac.htm

And then there is the official 1948 Red Cross report on Nazi camps, which found no evidence of mass gassing.

See: http://thunderbay.indymedia.org/news/2005/01/18220

No one at rense.com is saying now or has ever said the 'Holocaust' never happened. There is no 'holocaust denial' here. However, the above realities demand a new and thorough public investigation of the commonly-perceived - and widely-believed - dynamics of the 'Holocaust' story and its many lurid claims.

Furthermore, when the Director of Archives of the Auschwitz state museum for 17 years goes on videotape and admits the gas chamber shown to millions of tourists each year is a hoax and was modified to pass for one by Stalin after the war ended, serious problems emerge.

See: http://www.rense.com/general53/aauz.htm

There is, unquestionably, an imposing body of evidence contradicting the official Hollywood and popularly- accepted version of WWII which MUST be seriously re-examined...something that Zionism cannot tolerate.

Other attacks on Rense radio guests include leaving threatening phone messages on answering services. We have one such recording on file, and it was immediately identified by James as the same criminal voice who threatened his life in the middle of the night on his home phone.

Rense.com Columnists and contributing writers have also been threatened. Columnist Judy Andreas recently wrote of current Zionist thug phone and email terror threats and intimidation directed at her in an article titled 'Calling Jude.'

See: http://www.rense.com/general69/hd.htm

See also: 'Jewdyisms' http://www.rense.com/general59/jdis.htm

The horrors of Zionists and Jewish/Christian fundamentalist supremacists know few bounds. They are the very fascist thugs and felons who are de-constucting and destroying the American way of life. They are the book-burners, the camp guards and staff, and the executioners-in-waiting.

We do NOT agree with George Bush that the American Constitution is "Just a goddamned piece of paper" and we will fight to preserve that hallowed and timeless document and our Bill Of Rights without cessation.

If you have not read the disclaimer at rense.com, please do. And keep in mind 'journalism' is traditionally supposed to report and present ALL sides and ALL voices of ALL issues to allow the PEOPLE to decide for themselves. Sadly, today's mass media corporate shill 'journalism' has all but totally abandoned these historic precepts.

We find censorship to be anathema to the American way of life and are not afraid to read the words of Hitler, Hussein, Sharon or anyone else. We believe devoutly that Americans are mature enough and wise enough to be able to weigh issues from all sources and come to their own conclusions.

Zionists, on the other hand, are committed to mass censorship, persecution, slander, intimidation, mind control and ultimately seek a prison camp police state built upon the souls of our Founding Fathers.

Our views on the Holocaust and all other Holocausts are well-known. We believe and continue to call for a full scholarly, scientific investigation to find out exactly, precisely WHAT did happen to European Jews, Gypsies, political dissidents, POWs and countless others on the wrong side of the Nazi regime. Until that happens, we will never know the full truth and will continue to be victimized by the 'Holocaust Industry' as depicted brilliantly in Prof Norman Finkelstein's book of the same name.

In the meantime, we will continue to present major arguments, research and opinion from a myriad of sources in an effort to bring you the full panorama of information regarding many of the crucial events of the last century.

NO, we do NOT agree with everything we post on the site. Some of it is utterly antithetical to our views. YES, we believe it is all worth reading. Know your surroundings, understand the positions of those with whom you disagree. Keep the dialogue and discourse free and open. And let the truth fall where it may.

One death is a holocaust in microcosm... and one death is too many no matter what the religion or political beliefs of the victim. We mourn the loss of ALL life EQUALLY and do not believe any one group is 'chosen' over another. Nor do we believe American taxpayers should fund museums to honor one group over any other which has suffered losses in the multitude of genocides in this and the last century. Nor do we believe US taxpayers should send money to a nation that uses thermonuclear blackmail against us.

You are urged to read the above embedded reference urls carefully and thoughtfully.

-- rense.com

scol202 <yahooboxx@ntlworld.com> wrote: I agree with Leslie. Jews never do anything wrong, they are always
the victims. That is why Jews always violently defend other Jews no
matter the circumstances.

Let's not forget the holocaust. Everyone who says anything against
Jews supports Hitler and wants to gas all the Jews again. The Jews
were totally within their right to kill the Arabs and take their
land. Jews are white. Israel is a democracy. The British are all anti-
semitic, the Jews had to kill them too. The Jews are G-d's chosen
people. So is jerry Falwell, the Jews gave him a private jet.

It was Pilate who killed Jesus not the Jews.

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Leslie Schwartz"
<lhs_emf@...> wrote:
>
> Bugs,
>
> Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with people who
think its all a Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
>
> Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are
deranged, I just read one of their histories, Hitler you know was a
good
> guy, Jews forced him to carry out the holocaust.
>
> Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad control the
world along with Jewish international bankers, etc.
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Jews
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Zionists
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Mossad
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Sharon
>
> Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.
>
> Just plain demented hate.
>
> _____
>
>

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

---------------------------------
Share your photos with the people who matter at Yahoo! Canada Photos
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 4
From: "space2force" space2force@yahoo.ca
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:32am(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL

Nazi Support of Zionism
---------------------------------
Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern Zionism, recognized that anti-Semitism would further his cause, the creation of a separate state for Jews. To solve the Jewish Question, he maintained “we must, above all, make it an international political issue.”[1]Herzl wrote that Zionism offered the world a welcome “final solution of the Jewish question.”[2]In his “Diaries”, page 19, Herzl stated “Anti-Semites will become our surest friends, anti-Semitic countries our allies.”

51 Documents:
Zionist Collaboration
with the Nazis Zionism was supported by the German SS and Gestapo.[3] [4] [5] [6] Hitler himself personally supported Zionism.[7] [8] During the 1930’s, in cooperation with the German authorities, Zionist groups organized a network of some 40 camps throughout Germany where prospective settlers were trained for their new lives in Palestine. As late as 1942 Zionists operated at least one of these officially authorized “Kibbutz” training camps[9] over which flew the blue and white banner which would one day be adopted as the national flag of “Israel”.[10]
The Transfer Agreement (which promoted the emigration of German Jews to Palestine) implemented in 1933 and abandoned at the beginning of WWII is an important example of the cooperation between Hitler’s Germany and international Zionism. [11] Through this agreement, Hitler’s Third Reich did more than any other government during the 1930’s to support Jewish development in Palestine and further the Zionist goals.
Hitler and the Zionists had a common goal: to create a world Jewish Ghetto as a solution to the Jewish Question.

The Transfer Agreement The Zionist so-called “World Jewish Congress” declared war on the country of Germany,[12] [13] knowing that it would affect their Jewish brothers residing in that country who would be left without protection. When others tried to help them escape to other countries, the Zionist movement took actions which caused those countries to lock their doors to Jewish immigration (read more in the books, “Perfidy” and “Min Hametzer”). As a result of the Zionist influence five ships of Jewish refugees from Germany arriving in the United States were turned back to the gas chambers.
The fundamental aim of the Zionist movement has been not to save Jewish lives but to create a “Jewish state” in Palestine.
On December 7, 1938, Ben Gurion, the first head of the Zionist ‘state of Israel’ declared “If I knew it was possible to save all the children in Germany by taking them to England, and only half of the children by taking them to Eretz Israel, I would choose the second solution. For we must take into account not only the lives of these children but also the history of the people of Israel.”[14]
On August 31, 1949, Ben Gurion stated: “Although we have realized our dream of creating a Jewish State, we are only at the beginning. There are still only 900,000 Jews in Israel, whereas the majority of the Jewish people still remains abroad. Our future task is to bring all the Jews to Israel.”
Of the two and a half million Jews seeking refuge from the Nazis between 1935 and 1943, less than 9% went to settle in Palestine. The vast majority, 75%, went to the Soviet Union. In the mid-70’s, more people emigrated out of ‘Israel’ than came in. The only surges of immigration to the Zionist state have occurred during anti-Semitic threats and persecution in foreign countries.[15]
It follows that for the Zionist state to achieve its goal of a Jewish world ghetto anti-Semitism must be promoted and encouraged, and as we have seen, by acts of violence if necessary.
“To attain its practical objectives, Zionism hopes it will be able to collaborate with a government that is fundamentally hostile to the Jews”.[16]
The use of anti-Semitism as a tool to coerce immigration to the Zionist state continues to the present day:
Prime Minister Sharon has stated that anti-Semitism is on the rise and that the only hope for the safety of Jews is to move to Israel under the protection of the Zionist state. “The best solution to anti-Semitism is immigration to Israel. It is the only place on Earth where Jews can live as Jews," he said.[17]
Those who continue to call the so-called “state of Israel” the “Jewish State” are not only promoting Zionism which is contrary to the beliefs of true Judaism, but also endorsing the promotion of worldwide anti-Semitism. In doing so they are endangering the lives of traditional Jews and denying their civil liberties and human rights.
When the British foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour (sponsor of the 1905 Aliens Act to restrict Jewish immigration to the UK), wanted the British government to commit itself to a Jewish homeland in Palestine, his declaration was delayed - not by anti-Semites but by leading figures in the British Jewish community. They included a Jewish member of the cabinet who called Balfour's pro-Zionism "anti-Semitic in result". In contrast, a great statesman like Secretary of State Colin Powell, a supporter of traditional Judaism, has the courage to separate Judaism from Zionism and to acknowledge that speaking out against the actions of the Zionist state is not “anti-Semitism”.
We call upon our leaders in Washington to disassociate the actions of the Zionist state from traditional Judaism by no longer referring to “Israel” as the “Jewish State” but as “the Zionist State” and to speak out against the Zionist actions which promote anti-Semitism.

---------------------------------
Bibliography:

“Zionism and the Third Reich”, Author: Mark Weber, The Journal for Historical Review
(http://www.ihr.org), July/August 1993, Volume 13, Number 4, page 29.

Hitlers Zweites Buch – ein Dokument aus dem Jahr 1928, Stuttgart, 1961. English translation: Hitler’s Secret Book, New York, 1961, pp 212-215.

Berlin Encyclopaedia Judaica (New York and Jerusalem: 1971), Vol. 5, p.648.
See also, J.-C. Horak, “Zionist Film Propaganda in Nazi Germany,” Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1984, pp 49-58.

Perfidy, Author: Ben Hecht, Milah Press, Incorporated; April 1, 1997

Min Hameitzer, Author:Rabbi Weissmandl; The book Unheeded Cry by Abraham Fuchs, is a partial translation.

Holocaust Encyclopedia, “Escape from German Occupied Europe”, http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/index.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005470

“Immigration Policies”, Jewish Virtual Library, http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/grobim.html

“The Tragedy of the S.S. St. Louis”, Jewish Virtual Library, http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/stlouis.html

[1] Quoted in: Ingrid Wecker, Feuerzeichen: Die “Reichskristallnacht” (Tubingen: Grabert, 1981), p. 212. See also: Th. Herzl, The Jewish State (New York: Herzl Press, 1970), pp 33, 35, 36, and Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement (New York: Macmillan, 1984), p.73

[2] Th. Herzl, “Der Kongress, “ Welt, June 4, 1897. Reprinted in: Theodore Herzls zionistische Schriften (Leon Kellner, ed.), ester Teil, Berlin: Judischer Verlag, 1920, p. 190 (and p.139)

[3] Francis R. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (1985), pp. 54-55.; Karl A. Schleunes, The Twisted Road to Auschwitz (Urbana: Univ. of Illinois, 1970, 1990) pp. 178-181

[4] Jacob Boas, “A Nazi Travels to Palestine,” History Today (London), January, 1980, pp. 33-38.

[5] Facsimile reprint of front page of Das Schwarze Korp, May 15, 1935, in: Janusz Piekalkiewicz, Israels Langer Arm (Frankfurt: Goverts, 1975), pp. 66-67.

[6] Das Schwarze Korps, Sept. 26, 1935. Quoted in: F. Nicosia, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question (1985), pp. 56-57

[7] F. Nicosia, Third Reich (1985), pp. 141-144; On Hitler’s critical view of Zionism in Mein Kapf, see. Esp. Vol. 1, Chap. 11. Quoted in: Robert Wistrich, Hitler’s Apocalypse (London: 1985), p. 155.;

[8] W. Feilchenfeld, et al., Haavra-Transfer (1972). Entire text in: David Yisraeli, The Palestine Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel: 1974), pp. 132-136.

[9] Y. Arad, et al., eds., Documents On the Holocaust (1981), p. 155. (The training kibbutz was at Neuendorf, and may have functioned even after March 1942.)

[10] Lucy Dawidowicz, The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945 (New York: Bantam, pb., 1976), pp 253-254; Max Nussbaum, “Zionism Under Hitler,” Congress Weekly (New York: American Jewish Congress), Sept. 11, 1942.; F. Nicosia, The Third Reich (1985), pp 58-60, 217.; Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984), p. 175.

[11] E. Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984), pp. 328, 337.

[12] “Judea Declares War on Germany!” – London Daily Express headline, March 24th, 1933

[13] “The worldwide boycott against Germany in 1933 and the later all-out declaration of war against Germany initiated by the Zionist leaders and the World Jewish Congress enraged Hitler so that he threatened to destroy the Jews…” (Rabbi Schwartz, New York Times, Sept. 30, 1997)

[14] Yvon Gelbner, “Zionist policy and the fate of European Jewry”, in Yad Vashem studies (Jerusalem, vol. XII, p. 199).

[15] Institute for Jewish Affairs of New York, quoted by Christopher Sykes in “Crossroads to Isarl”, London 1965, and by Nathan Weinstock, “Le sionisme contre Israel,” p. 146.

[16] Lucy Dawidovitch, “A Holocaust Reader”, p. 155.

[17] “Sharon Urges Jews to go to Israel”, BBC News, 17 Nov. 2003, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3275979.stm

Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@pacbell.net> wrote: Bugs,

Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with people who think its all a Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.

Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are deranged, I just read one of their histories, Hitler you know was a good guy, Jews forced him to carry out the holocaust.

Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad control the world along with Jewish international bankers, etc.

Etc. etc, etc.

Jews

Etc. etc, etc.

Zionists

Etc. etc, etc.

Mossad

Etc. etc, etc.

Sharon

Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.

Just plain demented hate.

---------------------------------
From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bugs
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:30 AM
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL

TRY RUMSFELD FOR TREASON

The oath is to stand against all domestic and foreign enimies and
what Rumsfeld has done to the American Troops is a crime in and onto
itself.

Uraium dust has been spread all over Iraq due to the Uranium used in
Penatrator Bombs and Bullets.

Villages and the City of Fulluja have been razed to the ground.

100,000 Iraqi civillians mostly women and children have been killed
as collateral damage.

All of this has occured because Rumsfeld and Bush elected to lie the
American Soldiers into an unnecessary war.

Why did Bush and Rumsfeld do this ?

They did it to steal the Iraqi oil sell it to china and put the cash
into Chinese banks.

And they are perpetuating the occupation by not having enough troops
so they can stay in Iraq an keep on stealing the oil forever.

The Maritine Ship movement logs will prove this.

It is an OPEN and Shut Case.

or in other words a "REAL SLAM DUNK"

Bush's Brother and Uncle have been in and out of China for years
lining up this traitorous deal.
----- Original Message -----
From: Naveed
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Greg Palast Still DOESNT GET IT !

didn't know paul bremer was a kissinger stooge.......

mann david <dmann51@yahoo.com> wrote: Read that piece in a hurry but didn't notice mention
of 9-11. Wow, pathetic trivial trip indeed.

--- JIM <justpasenthru2012@att.net> wrote:

> Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
> Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
> The Guardian - Comment
> Friday, April 14, 2006
> By Greg Palast
>
> Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the
> gaggle of generals,
> safely
> retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week,
> six of them
> have called for
> the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
>
> Well, according to my watch, they're about four
> years too late --
> and they still
> don't get it.
>
> I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
> that the
> bemedalled boys in
> crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the
> rump, in public.
> But to me, it
> just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
> straight.
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up
> in front of the
> UN and
> identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons
> labs, was it,
> General
> Powell?
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us
> our next warning
> from Saddam
> could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
> that Al Qaeda
> and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
>
> Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
> arrogance, a
> duplicitous
> chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and
> Tinker-Toy Napoleon --
> but he didn't
> appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
>
> Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of
> Defense you didn't
> read in the
> New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner,
> the man our
> president
> placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion
> viceroy.
>
> Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
> under the
> mistaken notion
> that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq,
> the President
> meant the
> Iraqis could choose their own government.
> Misunderstanding the
> President's true
> mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold
> elections within
> 90 days and
> for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the
> cities to a desert
> base. "It's
> their country," the General told me of the Iraqis.
> "And," he added,
> most
> ominously, "their oil."
>
> Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
> Garner a 101-page
> plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons
> at the State
> Department, Treasury
> and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e.
> the sale)
> of "all state
> assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting
> industries."
> The General
> knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where
> the Iraqi sun
> don't shine.
> Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting
> of Iraqi tribal
> leaders to
> plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their
> own multi-ethnic
> government --
> and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were
> on talking
> terms -- knew he
> could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a
>
> welcomed "liberation"
> turned into a hated "occupation."
>
> But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition
> government would mean
> the
> death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets
> privatization grab.
>
> On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the
> very night
> General Garner
> arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington.
> It was Rumsfeld
> on the line.
> He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack,
> Jack, you're
> fired."
>
> Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of
> on-the-ground experience
> in Iraq,
> with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director
> of Kissinger
> Associates.
> Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
> postponed
> elections for a
> year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot
> pasha, selling
> off Iraq's
> economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
> Rumsfeld's neo-con
> clique had
> desired.
>
> Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the
> six generals' call
> for
> Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
>
> For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't
> shoot straight.
> They're
> wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've
> gunned down the
> puppet instead
> of the puppeteers.
>
> There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked
> General Garner from
> Baghdad
> without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or
> breathes or spits
> in the Bush
> Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
> approval. And
> ultimately, it's
> the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
>
> Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
> give them
> enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the
> cowboy from
> Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that
> we lacked
> troops -- the
> problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy
> this nation. A
> million
> troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would
> just have more
> targets.)
>
> President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
> today on the
> intercom with
> Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up."
> And Cheney
> replies, "Hey,
> just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until
> he's taken all
> their ammo."
>
> When Bush and Cheney read about the call for
> Rumsfeld's resignation
> today, I can
> just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission
> Accomplished."
>
> Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
> choosing a target:
> It's the
> President, stupid.
>
=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

www.fightthenwo.org
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
---------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/312 - Release Date: 4/14/2006

SPONSORED LINKS
United state patent United state military United state coin United state grant United state citizenship Trademark united state

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

---------------------------------
Have a question? Yahoo! Canada Answers. Go to Yahoo! Canada Answers
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 5
From: "Thomas Potter" mr_thomas_potter@yahoo.com
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:37am(PDT)
Subject: MARKBINGHAM.ORG

http://www.kucinich.us/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6173

MARKBINGHAM.ORG

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 6
From: "space2force" space2force@yahoo.ca
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:40am(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL

The Zionist War on Nazi Germany
---------------------------------
Most people are not aware that in March, 1933, long before Hitler became the undisputed leader of Germany and began restricting the rights of German Jews, the American Jewish Congress announced a massive protest at Madison Square Garden and called for an American boycott of German goods.
London Daily Express
24 March 1933 The Daily Express (London) published an article on March 24, 1933 announcing that the Jews had already launched their boycott against Germany and described a forthcoming "holy war". The Express urged Jews everywhere to boycott German goods and demonstrate against German economic interests.
The Express said that Germany was "now confronted with an international boycott of its trade, its finances, and its industry....In London, New York, Paris and Warsaw, Jewish businessmen are united to go on an economic crusade."
The article went on, "worldwide preparations are being made to organize protest demonstrations."
On March 27, 1933 the planned protest at Madison Square Garden was attended by 40,000 protestors (New York Daily News headlines: "40,000 Roar Protest Here Against Hitler").
Similar rallies and protest marches were also held in other cities. The intensity of the Jewish campaign against Germany was such that the Hitler government vowed that if the campaign did not stop there would be a one-day boycott in Germany of Jewish-owned stores.
Hitler's March 28, 1933 speech ordering a boycott against Jewish stores and goods was in direct response to the declaration of war on Germany by the worldwide Jewish leadership.
That same spring of 1933 there began a period of private cooperation between the German government and the Zionist movement in Germany and worldwide to increase the flow of German-Jewish immigrants and capital to Palestine.
Growing anti-Semitism in Germany and by the German government in response to the boycott played into the hands of the Zionist leaders. Prior to the escalation of anti-Semitism as a result of the boycott the majority of German Jews had little sympathy for the Zionist cause of promoting the immigration of world Jewry to Palestine. Making the situation in Germany as uncomfortable for the Jews as possible, in cooperation with German National Socialism, was part of the Zionist plan to achieve their goal of populating Palestine with a Jewish majority.
"For all intents and purposes, the National Socialist government was the best thing to happen to Zionism in its history, for it "proved" to many Jews that Europeans were irredeemably anti-Jewish and that Palestine was the only answer: Zionism came to represent the overwhelming mjaority of Jews solely by trickery and cooperation with Adolf Hitler." [1]

____________________

Sources:
[1] Barnes Review, "The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany, The Economic Boycott of 1933"

Other Resources of interest:
The Transfer Agreement: The Dramatic Story of the Pact Between the Third Reich and Jewish Palestine,
by Edwin Black

Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@pacbell.net> wrote: That drew a laugh. thanks!

---------------------------------
From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of scol202
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 8:02 PM
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] Re: GET IT ! its about OIL

I agree with Leslie. Jews never do anything wrong, they are always
the victims. That is why Jews always violently defend other Jews no
matter the circumstances.

Let's not forget the holocaust. Everyone who says anything against
Jews supports Hitler and wants to gas all the Jews again. The Jews
were totally within their right to kill the Arabs and take their
land. Jews are white. Israel is a democracy. The British are all anti-
semitic, the Jews had to kill them too. The Jews are G-d's chosen
people. So is jerry Falwell, the Jews gave him a private jet.

It was Pilate who killed Jesus not the Jews.

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Leslie Schwartz"
<lhs_emf@...> wrote:
>
> Bugs,
>
> Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with people who
think its all a Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
>
> Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are
deranged, I just read one of their histories, Hitler you know was a
good
> guy, Jews forced him to carry out the holocaust.
>
> Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad control the
world along with Jewish international bankers, etc.
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Jews
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Zionists
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Mossad
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Sharon
>
> Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.
>
> Just plain demented hate.
>
> _____
>
>

SPONSORED LINKS
United state government grant Trademark united state United state military United state grant United state flag United state citizenship

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

---------------------------------
Make free worldwide PC-to-PC calls. Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger with Voice
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 7
From: "space2force" space2force@yahoo.ca
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:47am(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL

Rabbi Michael Dov Weissmandl ZT"L Dean of Nitra Yeshiva Rabbi Michael Dov Weissmandl ZT"L Dean of Nitra Yeshiva
TEN QUESTIONS TO THE ZIONISTS1. IS IT TRUE that in 1941 and again in 1942, the German Gestapo offered all European Jews transit to Spain, if they would relinquish all their property in Germany and Occupied France; on condition that:

a) none of the deportees travel from Spain to Palestine; and
b) all the deportees be transported from Spain to the USA or British colonies, and there to remain; with entry visas to be arranged by the Jews living there; and
c) $1000.00 ransom for each family to be furnished by the Agency, payable upon the arrival of the family at the Spanish border at the rate of 1000 families daily.
2. IS IT TRUE that the Zionist leaders in Switzerland and Turkey received this offer with the clear understanding that the exclusion of Palestine as a destination for the deportees was based on an agreement between the Gestapo and the Mufti.

3. IS IT TRUE that the answer of the Zionist leaders was negative, with the following comments:

a) ONLY Palestine would be considered as a destination for the deportees.
b) The European Jews must accede to suffering and death greater in measure than the other nations, in order that the victorious allies agree to a "Jewish State" at the end of the war.
c) No ransom will be paid
4. IS IT TRUE that this response to the Gestapo's offer was made with the full knowledge that the alternative to this offer was the gas chamber.

5. IS IT TRUE that in 1944, at the time of the Hungarian deportations, a similar offer was made, whereby all Hungarian Jewry could be saved.

6. IS IT TRUE that the same Zionist hierarchy again refused this offer (after the gas chambers had already taken a toll of millions).

7. IS IT TRUE that during the height of the killings in the war, 270 Members of the British Parliament proposed to evacuate 500,000 Jews from Europe, and resettle them in British colonies, as a part of diplomatic negotiations with Germany.

8. IS IT TRUE that this offer was rejected by the Zionist leaders with the observation "Only to Palestine!"

9. IS IT TRUE that the British government granted visas to 300 rabbis and their families to the Colony of Mauritius, with passage for the evacuees through Turkey. The "Jewish Agency" leaders sabotaged this plan with the observation that the plan was disloyal to Palestine, and the 300 rabbis and their families should be gassed.

10. IS IT TRUE that during the course of the negotiations mentioned above, Chaim Weitzman, the first "Jewish statesman" stated: "The most valuable part of the Jewish nation is already in Palestine, and those Jews living outside Palestine are not too important". Weitzman's cohort, Greenbaum, amplified this statement with the observation "One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Europe".

There are additional similar questions to be asked of these atheist degenerates known as "Jewish statesmen", but for the time being let them respond to the ten questions.
These Zionist "statesmen" with their great foresight, sought to bring an end two two-thousand years of Divinely ordained Jewish subservience and political tractability. With their offensive militancy, they fanned the fires of anti-Semitism in Europe, and succeeded in forging a bond of Jew-hatred between Nazi-Germany and the surrounding countries.
These are the "statesmen" who organized the irresponsible boycott against Germany in 1933. This boycott hurt Germany like a fly attacking an elephant - but it brought calamity upon the Jews of Europe. At a time when America and England were at peace with the mad-dog Hitler, the Zionist "statesmen" forsook the only plausible method of political amenability; and with their boycott incensed the leader of Germany to a frenzy. And then, after the bitterest episode in Jewish history, these Zionist "statesmen" lured the broken refugees in the DP camps to remain in hunger and deprivation, and to refuse relocation to any place but Palestine; only for the purpose of building their State.
The Zionist "statesmen" have incited and continue to incite an embittered Jewish youth to futile wars against world powers like England, and against masses of hundreds of millions of Arabs.
AND THESE SAME ZIONIST "STATESMEN" HEEDLESSLY PUSH THE WORLD TO THE BRINK OF ANOTHER TOTAL WAR - REVOLVING ENTIRELY AROUND THE HOLY LAND.
What may befall the Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, of the Arab crescent, Europe, or the USA; is of no concern to these Zionist leaders. The rising anti-Semitism in the Western World is the product of their "statesmanship".
Under the guise of "love of Israel", the Zionist "statesmen" seduced many Jews to replace devotion to the Torah and its Sages with devotion to the scoundrel who founded Zionism. It is of no little significance that Herzl originally sought conversion of the Jews as a solution to the problems of the Diaspora. When he realized that this was not acceptable to the Jewish masses, he contrived Zionism as a satisfactory alternative!

THE UNHEEDED CRY
The gripping story of Rabbi Weissmandl, valiant holocaust leader who battled both Allied indifference and Nazi hatred.
Available in our Bookstore A look into history reveals that this very same type of "statesmen" opposed the call of Jeremiah the prophet to yield to the minions of Nebuchadnezzar at the destruction of the first Temple. Five centuries later, Rabbi Yochonon Ben Zakai appealed to the people to surrender to Titus the Roman to avoid bloodshed. The "statesmen" rejected this appeal, and the second Temple was destroyed by the Romans. --- And now for the past fifty years, the Zionist "statesmen" rebuff the leadership of our Sages; and continue in their policy of fomenting anti-Semitism. When will they stop?? Must every Jew in America also suffer?? - Even the Nazi monsters had more sense, and gave up their war before all Germany was destroyed. The Zionist "statesmen" ridicule the sacred oath which the Creator placed upon the Jews in the Diaspora. Our Torah, in Tractate Ksubos, folio 111, specifies that the Creator, blessed be He, swore the Jews not to occupy the Holy Land by force,
even if it appears that they have the force to do so; and not rebel against the Nations. And the Creator warned that if His oath be desecrated, Jewish flesh would be "open property", like the animals in the forest!! These are words of our Torah; and these concepts have been cited in Maimonides' "Igeres Teimon", "Be'er HaGola", "Ahavas Yehonosson", and in "Toras Moshe" of the Chasam Sofer.
IT IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE THAT ALL THE SAGES AND SAINTS IN EUROPE AT THE TIME OF HITLER'S RISE DECLARED THAT HE WAS A MESSENGER OF DIVINE WRATH, SENT TO CHASTEN THE JEWS BECAUSE OF THE BITTER APOSTASY OF ZIONISM AGAINST THE BELIEF IN THE EVENTUAL MESSIANIC REDEMPTION.
Yidden - merciful sons of merciful fathers - how much longer must holy Jewish blood continue to be shed??
The only solution is:
The Jewish people must reject, outright, a "Jewish State".
The Jewish people should accept the US compromise.
We must depose the atheist-Zionist "statesmen" from their role as Jewish leaders, and return to the faithful leadership of our sages.
We beseech the Nations to open all doors to immigration - not only the doors of Palestine.
Peaceful, non-Zionist religious personalities in Palestine, (particularly from the native population) and their counterparts in the Diaspora, should engage in responsible, face-to face negotiations on behalf of the Jewish people, with the British and the Arabs; with an aim of amicable settlement of the Palestine issue.
Every Jew is obliged to pray to the Blessed creator, for in Him lies all our strength. Let us bear in mind that our prayers be forthright. One should not entreat the Creator to provide a banquet on Yom Kippur, and one can not perform a ritual ablution with a dead bug in his hand. Similarly, we should avoid the untenable position of the robber who prays for Divine help in carrying out his crime. We should pray that Zionism and its fruits vanish from the Earth, and that we be redeemed by the Messiah with dispatch.
A prisoner is released only when he has served his time, or if he is pardoned by the President for good behavior. If he attempts escape and is apprehended, his term is lengthened, besides the beating he receives when he is caught.
Faithful Jews- for over three and one-half thousand years, in all parts of the world, through all trials, our grandfathers and grandmothers marched through seas of blood and tears in order to keep the Faith of the Torah unswervingly. If we have compassion for ourselves, for our women and children, and for the Jewish people, we will maintain our golden legacy today. We have been sentenced to exile by the King of Kings because of our sins. The eternal blessed be He, has decreed that we accept the exile with humble gratitude until the time comes, or until we merit His pardon through repentance if we seek to end the exile with force, G-d will catch us, as our sages have forewarned, and our sentence becomes longer and more difficult.
Many times in the past have segments of our people been defrauded by false messiahs - but none of the false messiahs has been as fallacious and delusory as the lie of Zionism. With our historical experience as our guide, no retribution has been or will be greater than the retribution for giving credence to Zionism. If we wish our exile-sentence commuted, we must appeal through repentance; and through total physical and spiritual observance of the Sabbath, laws of family purity, and study of Torah.
Let it be clearly understood that never in Jewish history (even in the time of Jeroboam or Achav) have such hostile atheists stood at the helm of the Jewish people as today.
How can we plead to the Almighty for mercy while we tolerate these vile, "wicked" leaders as spokesmen! Beloved brothers - let us cleanse our ranks and cleanse our midst; let us entreat the Almighty through prayer, repentance, and fulfillment of mitzvos that He alone redeem us, immediately.

Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@pacbell.net> wrote: That drew a laugh. thanks!

---------------------------------
From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of scol202
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 8:02 PM
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] Re: GET IT ! its about OIL

I agree with Leslie. Jews never do anything wrong, they are always
the victims. That is why Jews always violently defend other Jews no
matter the circumstances.

Let's not forget the holocaust. Everyone who says anything against
Jews supports Hitler and wants to gas all the Jews again. The Jews
were totally within their right to kill the Arabs and take their
land. Jews are white. Israel is a democracy. The British are all anti-
semitic, the Jews had to kill them too. The Jews are G-d's chosen
people. So is jerry Falwell, the Jews gave him a private jet.

It was Pilate who killed Jesus not the Jews.

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Leslie Schwartz"
<lhs_emf@...> wrote:
>
> Bugs,
>
> Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with people who
think its all a Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
>
> Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are
deranged, I just read one of their histories, Hitler you know was a
good
> guy, Jews forced him to carry out the holocaust.
>
> Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad control the
world along with Jewish international bankers, etc.
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Jews
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Zionists
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Mossad
>
> Etc. etc, etc.
>
> Sharon
>
> Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.
>
> Just plain demented hate.
>
> _____
>
>

SPONSORED LINKS
United state government grant Trademark united state United state military United state grant United state flag United state citizenship

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

---------------------------------
Share your photos with the people who matter at Yahoo! Canada Photos
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 8
From: "kenny318east3" kenny318east3@yahoo.com
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:18am(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "scol202" <yahooboxx@...> wrote:
>
> "Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to oust
> these criminal Zionists from our midst. Israeli refusnik soldiers are
> just the tip of the iceberg.
>
> The Arabs are human beings and they deserve to be treated as such."
>
> To be blunt, that is nowhere near good enough. Real Arabs (not
> American paid for politicians) want the Jews out of the middle east
> permanently and won't rest until it happens. Zionism as a philosophy
> and a goal has to be relinquished.

There is actually quite a bit of opposition within the ranks of Jewish people,
especially among the ultra-orthodox who don't go along with the scheme and
never have, you just never hear about it because the same criminals are in
control of the newspapers and the television stations. I hope there is a way
out of this mess for everybody and that we can just go back to living in peace.

Ken.

> As far as I'm concerned Jews were
> blackmailed into leaving Europe by a combination of American desire
> to dominate the middle east and a Jewish financial elite who wanred
> to set up a gangster state of their own.
>
> I have just read my third pro holocaust book by a witness in the
> Irving trial and it's a load of ridiculous nonsense. Irving might be
> a racist and a closet Nazi but it doesn't mean he's wrong. I have
> never read Irving just his opponents by the way, that's what has made
> me a revisionist.
>
> It's pretty clear that the Jewish lobby now has massive influence on
> Anglo American foreign policy. The idea that Britain would fight such
> a war (Iraq) on its own volition just isn't remotely credible.
> Seventy five percent were against it.
>
>
>
> --- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "kenny318east3"
> <kenny318east3@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@>
> wrote:
> >
> > << There are many many Jews, who protect the Zionist perpetrators
> of 9-11 --
> > whose loyalty to fellow Jews, even mass murders, is so great that
> they will defend
> > them knowing they are wrong. They discover the true guilt of the
> Zionist neo-cons
> > and Mossad yet they pretend they do not believe it -- I'd say 90
> percent of Jews who
> > are in any way involved with 9-11 discussion are at this stage.
> They are defending
> > their people from justice -- all other people be damned. >>
> >
> > it doesn't matter how much I am horrified by the behavior of
> Israel, I am still
> > a Jew.
> >
> > Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to
> oust these
> > criminal Zionists from our midst.
> >
> > Israeli refusnik soldiers are just the tip of the iceberg.
> >
> > The Arabs are human beings and they deserve to be treated as such.
> >
> > Ken, the grandson of Samuel and Charlotte Goncharow. I am a former
> student
> > at the Flatbush Jewish Center on Church Avenue and Ocean Parkway,
> and I was
> > a recipient of the book "Vocabulary of Jewish Life," by Rabbi
> Abraham M. Heller.
> >
> > > > I suspect Leslie Schwartz is going to be like that. I've seen
> too many not to think
> > so -- and that is the extent to which I have become a collective-
> Jewish guilt-until-
> > proven-innocent-on-an-individual-basis "anti-Semite" -- literally
> a man suspicious
> > of Jews in general. It is unjust -- but my instinct for survival
> overrides my higher
> > impulses.
> > >
> > > Dick Eastman
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Naveed
> > > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > > Cc: lhs_emf@
> > > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 5:50 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
> > >
> > >
> > > for the last time
> > >
> > > all JEWS ARE NOT ZIONISTS!
> > >
> > > ALL ZIONISTS ARE NOT JEWS!
> > >
> > > There is a ZIONIST ELEMENT to the 9/11 conspiracy!!! Maybe you
> can't handle
> > that............
> > > did you even read the damn post i posted about ISRAELI spy
> rings awash in
> > america? I POSTED IT TWICE.......
> > >
> > > this below come from my friend ryan!
> > >
> > > 'A Clean Break' JINSA/PNAC Neocons associated with AIPAC
> espionage:
> > >
> > > washingtonpost.com
> > > Leak Inquiry Includes Iran Experts in Administration
> > >
> > > By Robin Wright and Dan Eggen
> > > Washington Post Staff Writers
> > > Saturday, September 4, 2004; Page A04
> > >
> > >
> > > FBI counterintelligence investigators have in recent weeks
> questioned current and
> > former U.S. officials about whether a small group of Iran
> specialists at the Pentagon
> > and in Vice President Cheney's office may have been involved in
> passing classified
> > information to an Iraqi politician or a U.S. lobbying group allied
> with Israel, according
> > to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
> > >
> > > In their interviews, the FBI agents have also named two Israeli
> diplomats stationed
> > in Washington and asked whether they would be willing recipients of
> sensitive
> > intelligence, the sources added.
> > >
> > > The investigators have asked questions about personnel in the
> office of Pentagon
> > Undersecretary for Policy Douglas J. Feith as well as members of
> the influential
> > Defense Policy Board, an advisory panel for Defense Secretary
> Donald H. Rumsfeld,
> > according to former U.S. officials who have been questioned and
> others familiar with
> > the case.
> > >
> > > Investigators have specifically asked about a group of
> neoconservatives involved
> > in defense issues, including Feith, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul
> D. Wolfowitz, Iraq
> > and Iran specialist Harold Rhode and others at the Pentagon. FBI
> agents also have
> > asked current and former officials about Richard Perle of the
> defense board and David
> > Wurmser, an Iran specialist and principal deputy assistant for
> national security affairs
> > in Cheney's office, according to sources familiar with or involved
> in the case.
> > >
> > > "The initial interest was: Do you believe certain people would
> spy for Israel and
> > pass secret information?" said one source interviewed by the FBI
> about the defense
> > officials.
> > >
> > > It remains unclear, however, how specific investigators'
> suspicions have become.
> > And one official, a Feith ally, has said the investigation is an
> effort by some
> > intelligence officials to discredit Pentagon hawks.
> > >
> > > The sources interviewed for this article requested anonymity
> because it involves
> > classified information or because of the ongoing investigation.
> > >
> > > Perle, Rhode and Wolfowitz did not return telephone calls
> placed to their homes
> > and offices late Friday. Reached at home, Feith declined comment,
> citing the ongoing
> > investigation.
> > >
> > > But Pentagon officials insisted yesterday that FBI questions
> about key
> > policymakers did not mean they were the subjects of the
> intelligence leak
> > investigation. Senior Pentagon officials have said they were told
> by the FBI that the
> > investigation is focused on just one suspect in the Defense
> Department, Lawrence A.
> > Franklin, an Iran specialist in Feith's office.
> > >
> > > The FBI investigation first came to light last week with
> reports of a probe into
> > whether Franklin passed a draft presidential directive on Iran to
> the American Israel
> > Public Affairs Committee, and whether the directive was then passed
> to Israel,
> > sources have said. AIPAC has strongly denied any involvement in
> espionage.
> > >
> > > A federal grand jury in Alexandria may take up the Franklin
> case as early as next
> > week, law enforcement sources said.
> > >
> > > The questioning of Franklin is a recent part of an
> investigation that dates back
> > more than two years and includes diverse threads, U.S. officials
> and people close to
> > the case said. One aspect of the probe concerns AIPAC and another
> looks at whether
> > intelligence on Iran ended up in the hands of Iraqi National
> Congress leader Ahmed
> > Chalabi, a longtime Pentagon favorite once considered a possible
> replacement for
> > Saddam Hussein.
> > >
> > > Iran has been a particularly controversial issue within the
> Bush administration,
> > which still does not have a formal policy more than 3 1/2 years
> after taking office. A
> > small group of Pentagon neoconservatives opposed a draft directive
> because it did
> > not support a change of governments in Tehran, which they
> advocated, current and
> > former U.S. officials said.
> > >
> > > The officials whose names came up during questioning have
> strong ties to Israel.
> > They also share a long-standing position on Iran and other radical
> regimes. Wurmser,
> > Feith and Perle were co-authors of a 1996 policy paper for then-
> Israeli Prime Minister
> > Binyamin Netanyahu titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for
> Securing the Realm." It
> > called for removing Hussein from power in Iraq as part of a broad
> strategy to
> > transform the region and remove radical regimes.
> > >
> > > But current and former U.S. officials, including some who were
> interviewed by the
> > FBI, are still puzzled by the nature of the investigation involving
> Israel, because its
> > profoundly close ties with the United States date back six decades
> and have involved
> > sharing sensitive intelligence. Yet officials also concede that
> Israel is one of the three
> > countries most active in spying on the United States. Israel denies
> conducting
> > espionage in the United States.
> > >
> > > Also yesterday, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary
> Committee
> > demanded that a new prosecutor be assigned to investigate the
> alleged leaks,
> > questioning the "political leanings" of the U.S. attorney in
> Alexandria who is handling
> > the criminal portion of the case.
> > >
> > > In a letter to Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Rep. John
> Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.)
> > said the role of U.S. Attorney Paul J. McNulty in the case
> has "obvious political
> > implications" in an election year, and Conyers cited anonymous
> allegations in a news
> > report that McNulty had "put the brakes on" the probe.
> > >
> > > "While I have no reason to question Mr. McNulty's integrity, he
> is not a career
> > prosecutor, but instead is a political appointee whose previous
> employment was
> > principally with Republican politicians," Conyers wrote.
> > >
> > > Conyers suggested that either a special counsel or U.S.
> Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald
> > of Chicago, who is overseeing a separate probe into the disclosure
> of CIA operative
> > Valerie Plame, should take over the Pentagon probe.
> > >
> > > Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo declined to comment
> on the specifics
> > of Conyers's allegations. "We will review the congressman's letter
> and give it the
> > attention it is due," Corallo said. A spokesman for McNulty also
> declined comment,
> > referring a reporter to Corallo's statement.
> > >
> > > Several law enforcement officials have said in recent days that
> the FBI had initially
> > considered making rapid arrests in the Franklin probe when it
> became clear that news
> > of the investigation was about to become public last week. But,
> these officials said,
> > prosecutors urged caution, arguing that investigators needed more
> time to gather
> > evidence and assess the case.
> > >
> > > Franklin has been cooperating in the probe for several weeks,
> officials familiar
> > with the investigation said. He has not responded to numerous
> requests for comment
> > at his office and his home in West Virginia.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > All in the Neocon Family
> > > By Jim Lobe, AlterNet
> > > Posted on March 27, 2003, Printed on April 16, 2006
> > > http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
> > > What do William Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, and
> Robert Kagan have
> > in common? Yes, they are all die-hard hawks who have gained control
> of U.S. foreign
> > policy since the 9/11 attacks. But they are also part of one big
> neoconservative family
> > -- an extended clan of spouses, children, and friends who have
> known each other for
> > generations.
> > > Neoconservatives are former liberals (which explains the "neo"
> prefix) who
> > advocate an aggressive unilateralist vision of U.S. global
> supremacy, which includes a
> > close strategic alliance with Israel. Let's start with one of the
> founding fathers of the
> > extended neocon clan: Irving Kristol. His extensive resume includes
> waging culture
> > wars for the CIA against the Soviet Union in the early years of the
> Cold War and
> > calling for an American "imperial" role during the Vietnam War.
> Papa Kristol, who has
> > been credited with defining the major themes of neoconservative
> thought, is married
> > to Gertrude Himmelfarb, a neoconservative powerhouse on her own.
> Her studies of
> > the Victorian era in Britain helped inspire the men who sold Bush
> on the idea of
> > "compassionate conservatism."
> > > The son of this proud couple is none other that William
> Kristol, the crown prince
> > of the neoconservative clique and editor of the Rupert Murdoch-
> owned Weekly
> > Standard. In 1997, he founded the Project for the New American
> Century (PNAC), a
> > front group which cemented the powerful alliance between right-wing
> Republicans
> > like Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, Christian and Catholic Right
> leaders like Gary
> > Bauer and William Bennett, and the neocons behind a platform of
> global U.S. military
> > dominance.
> > > Irving Kristol's most prominent disciple is Richard Perle, who
> was until Thursday
> > the Defense Policy Board chairman, is also a "resident scholar" at
> the American
> > Enterprise Institute, which is housed in the same building as PNAC.
> Perle himself
> > married into neocon royalty when he wed the daughter of his
> professor at the
> > University of Chicago, the late Alfred Wohlstetter -- the man who
> helped both his
> > son-in-law and his fellow student Paul Wolfowitz get their start in
> Washington more
> > than 30 years ago.
> > > Perle's own protege is Douglas Feith, who is now Wolfowitz's
> deputy for policy and
> > is widely known for his right-wing Likud position. And why not? His
> father,
> > Philadelphia businessman and philanthropist Dalck Feith, was once a
> follower of the
> > great revisionist Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky, in his
> native Poland back in the
> > 1930s. The two Feiths were honored together in 1997 by the right-
> wing Zionist
> > Organization of America (ZOA).
> > > The AEI has long been a major nexus for such inter-familial
> relationships. A long-
> > time collaborator with Perle, Michael Ledeen is married to Barbara
> Ledeen, a founder
> > and director of the anti-feminist Independent Women's Forum (IWF),
> who is currently
> > a major player in the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill.
> Richard Perle, Douglas
> > Feith, and another neo-con power couple -- David and Meyrav
> Wurmser -- co-
> > authored a 1996 memorandum for Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu
> outlining how to
> > break the Oslo peace process and invade Iraq as the first step to
> transforming the
> > Middle East.
> > > Though she doesn't focus much on foreign-policy issues, Lynne
> Cheney also
> > hangs her hat at AEI. Her husband Dick Cheney recently chose
> Victoria Nuland to
> > become his next deputy national security adviser. Nuland, as it
> turns out, is married
> > to Robert Kagan, Bill Kristol's main comrade-in-arms and the co-
> founder of PNAC.
> > > Bob's father, Donald Kagan, is a Yale historian who converted
> from a liberal
> > Democrat to a staunch neocon in the 1970s. On the eve of the 2000
> presidential
> > elections, Donald and his other son, Frederick, published "While
> America Sleeps," a
> > clarion call to increase defense spending. Since then, the three
> Kagan men have
> > written reams of columns warning that the currently ballooning
> Pentagon budget is
> > simply not enough to fund the much-desired vision of U.S. global
> supremacy.
> > > And which infamous ex-Reaganite do the Kagans and another
> leading neocon
> > family have in common? None other than Iran-contra veteran Elliott
> Abrams.
> > > Now the director of Near Eastern Affairs in Bush's National
> Security Council,
> > Abrams worked closely with Bob Kagan back in the Reagan era. He is
> also the son-in-
> > law of Norman Podhoretz, long-time editor of the influential
> conservative Jewish
> > publication Commentary, and his wife, Midge Decter, a fearsome
> polemicist in her
> > own right.
> > > Podhoretz, like Kristol Sr., helped invent neo-conservatism in
> the late 1960s. He
> > and Decter created a formidable political team as leaders of the
> Committee on the
> > Present Danger in 1980, when they worked with Donald Rumsfeld to
> pound the last
> > nail into the coffin of detente and promote the rise of Ronald
> Reagan. In addition to
> > being Abrams' father-in-law, Norman Podhoretz is also the father of
> John Podhoretz,
> > a columnist for the Murdoch-owned New York Post and frequent guest
> on the
> > Murdoch-owned Fox News channel.
> > > As editor of Commentary, Norman offered writing space to rising
> stars of the
> > neocon movement for more than 30 years. His proteges include former
> U.N.
> > ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and Richard Pipes, who was Ronald
> Reagan's top
> > advisor on the "Evil Empire," as the president liked to call the
> Soviet Union. His son,
> > Daniel Pipes, has also made a career out of battling "evil," which
> in his case is Islam.
> > And to tie it all up neatly, in 2002, Podhoretz received the
> highest honor bestowed by
> > the AEI: the Irving Kristol award.
> > > This list of intricate, overlapping connections is hardly
> exhaustive or perhaps even
> > surprising. But it helps reveal an important fact. Contrary to
> appearances, the
> > neocons do not constitute a powerful mass political movement. They
> are instead a
> > small, tighly-knit clan whose incestuous familial and personal
> connections, both
> > within and outside the Bush administration, have allowed them grab
> control of the
> > future of American foreign policy.
> > > © 2006 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
> > > View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
> > >
> > >
> > > Home : WRH Store : WRH Index : Reader Letters :
> Archives : Advertise : Donate
> > >
> > > On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli
> Prime Minister Benjamin
> > Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli
> relations. His quick
> > reply was: "It's very good...Well, it's not good, but it will
> generate immediate
> > sympathy (for Israel)"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The Five Dancing Israelis
> > > Arrested On 9-11
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > As the world watched in disbelief and asked the
> question...
> > >
> > > ...Mossad operatives were seen dancing with joy.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle
> of themselves on 9-
> > 11.
> > > The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and
> trained them on the
> > twin towers. (1)
> > >
> > > Police received several calls from angry New Jersey
> residents claiming
> > "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster
> with shouts of
> > joy and mockery. (2)
> > > "They were like happy, you know . They didn't look
> shocked to me" said a
> > witness. (3)
> > > [T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept.
> 11 making fun of the
> > World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph
> themselves in
> > front of the wreckage. (4)
> > >
> > > Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park
> after the initial
> > impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a
> roof in Weehawken,
> > and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives
> in a Jersey City
> > parking lot. (6)
> > >
> > > "It looked like they're hooked in with this. It
> looked like they knew what
> > was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (7)
> > >
> > > One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led
> them to close down
> > all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the
> 9-1-1 dispatcher
> > that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white
> van headed for the
> > Holland Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:
> > > Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
> > > Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in
> there, they look like
> > Palestinians and going around a building.
> > > Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the
> Holland tunnel, I see the guy
> > by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.
> > > Dispatcher: He has what?
> > > Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (8)
> > >
> > > (*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller
> specifically say that these
> > "Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians
> usually dress in
> > western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")
> > >
> > > Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-
> the-Lookout" alert for
> > a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from
> New Jersey. When a
> > van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing
> into New York, the
> > suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the
> surprise of the police
> > officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!
> > > According to ABC's 20/20, when the van belonging to the
> cheering Israelis
> > was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg,
> told the officers:
> > >
> > > "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your
> problems are our
> > problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (9)
> > >
> > > Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?
> > > The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious
> when they found maps
> > of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same
> items that the
> > hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and
> foreign passports.
> > Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were
> brought to the van
> > and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (10)
> > > The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of
> which shows Sivan
> > Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering
> ruins in an apparently
> > celebratory gesture. (11)
> > >
> > > The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a
> bomb was stopped
> > as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of
> the suspects was
> > not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September
> 12, 2001:
> > > American security services overnight stopped a car
> bomb on the George
> > Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on
> an approach
> > ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to
> blow up the main
> > crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (12)
> > >
> > > TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down
> with tonnes of
> > explosives (13).
> > > What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (14), the
> New York Post (15), and
> > the New Jersey Bergen Record (16) all clearly and unambiguously
> reported that a
> > white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3,
> which leads directly
> > to the Lincoln Tunnel.
> > > But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz
> Sheva) (17), and Yediot
> > America, (18) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that
> a white van with
> > Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington
> Bridge, which is
> > several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.
> > > It appears as if there may actually have been two
> white vans involved, one
> > stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the
> conflicting reports as to
> > the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so
> many credible eye-
> > witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in
> so many different
> > locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon
> (lawyer for the 5
> > Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but
> later increased the
> > total to five.
> > > Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while
> the other was meant
> > to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New
> Jersey? If a van was
> > to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly
> the drivers would
> > need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And
> notice how the van
> > (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland
> Tunnel- which was
> > where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-
> Palestinian 9-1-1
> > "mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.
> > >
> > > From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious.
> The Israelis worked
> > for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An
> American
> > employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey
> that a majority
> > of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the
> attacks.
> > > The employee, who declined to give his name
> said: "I was in tears. These
> > guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were like, "Now
> America knows
> > what we go through." (19)
> > >
> > > A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's
> Israeli owner, Dominick
> > Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was
> in such a hurry to
> > flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left
> with their
> > furniture stranded in storage facilities (20).
> > > It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis
> were in fact Mossad
> > agents (21). They were held in custody for 71 days before being
> quietly released.
> > Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40
> days. (22)
> > > [S]everal of the detainees discussed their
> experience in America on an
> > Israeli talk show after their return home.
> > > Said one of the men, denying that they were
> laughing or happy on the
> > morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from
> a country that
> > experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."
> (23)
> > >
> > > How did they know there would be an event to document on
> 9-11?
> > > It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of
> the dancing Israeli
> > Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:
> > > 1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to
> celebrate the
> > successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled
> off in history.
> > > 2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-
> 1 police dispatcher to
> > report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the
> Holland Tunnel.
> > > 3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with
> this phone call, the Israeli
> > bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where
> they will drop
> > off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.
> > > 4. But the police react very wisely and proactively
> by closing off ALL
> > bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move
> inadvertently foils
> > the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and
> 40 day torture.
> > > 5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice
> Department rounds up over 1000
> > Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York
> area jails. The
> > Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and
> media can now
> > claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in
> the same dragnet as
> > many other Arabs.
> > > 6. After several months, FBI and Justice
> Department "higher-ups" are able
> > to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis
> quietly.
> > >
> > > Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9-11
> attacks even though
> > he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale.
> Immediately after the
> > Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
> > > CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin
> Laden's fingerprints all
> > over it." (24)
> > > The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the
> Israeli connection.
> > Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with
> stories linking the
> > attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers
> of every stripe
> > spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most
> outrageous
> > propaganda imaginable.
> > > We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA
> was because he
> > hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval"
> and they wanted
> > to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter
> about the Crusades,
> > and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all
> over the place!
> > > But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and
> suggested that
> > Zionists orchestrated the
> > > 9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of
> denial in which he
> > said:
> > > "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in
> the United States nor
> > did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government
> within a government
> > within the United States. The United States should try to trace the
> perpetrators of
> > these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the
> present century a
> > century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret
> government must be
> > asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is
> totally in control
> > of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United
> States." (25)
> > >
> > > You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did
> you?
> > > [A] number of intelligence officials have raised
> questions about Osama bin
> > Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and
> he's running this
> > operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't
> have done it alone." A
> > senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other
> documentation
> > needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major
> foreign intelligence
> > service might also have been involved. (26)
> > >
> > > Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of the 9-11
> attacks by the FBI:
> > > USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE
> AUGUST 7,
> > 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM,
> TANZANIA,
> > AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN
> ADDITION, BIN
> > LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.
> (27)
> > >
> > > To date, the only shred of "evidence" to be uncovered
> against bin Laden is a
> > barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened
> to find "lying
> > around" in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake.
> (28)
> > > There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to
> link the Al Qaeda
> > "terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a
> mountain of evidence, both
> > hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been
> very busy framing
> > Arabs for terror plots against America.
> > >
> > > One final point - at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that
> the Democratic Front
> > for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the
> attacks (29). This claim
> > was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said
> it had always
> > opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the
> occupied
> > territories." (30)
> > > 9-11 CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a
> Palestinian claim of
> > responsibility
> > >
> > > Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less
> than 500 people (31)
> > make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for
> the attacks?
> > > Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to
> fulfill what the goals of the
> > political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century
> ago: to turn all of
> > historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central
> tenet of the Zionist
> > ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people
> for a people
> > without a land." (32)
> > >
> > > The implication of Palestinians in the 9-11 attacks would
> have handed
> > Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all
> Palestinians would
> > have been labelled terrorists.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > ------
> > >
> > > "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I
> cannot tell you about
> > evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."
> > > US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on
> the Israeli spy ring.
> > > "By way of deception, thou shalt do war"
> > > Motto of the Mossad
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > ------
> > >
> > > See also:
> > > Israel and 9/11 - Index of What Really Happened
> > > Zionist Circles Benefit From WTC Collapse
> > >
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > ------
> > >
> > > What Really Happened
> > >
> > >
> > > Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@> wrote:
> > > Bugs,
> > >
> > > Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with
> people who think its all a
> > Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
> > >
> > > Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are
> deranged, I just read
> > one of their histories, Hitler you know was a good guy, Jews forced
> him to carry out
> > the holocaust.
> > >
> > > Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad
> control the world along
> > with Jewish international bankers, etc.
> > >
> > > Etc. etc, etc.
> > >
> > > Jews
> > >
> > > Etc. etc, etc.
> > >
> > > Zionists
> > >
> > > Etc. etc, etc.
> > >
> > > Mossad
> > >
> > > Etc. etc, etc.
> > >
> > > Sharon
> > >
> > > Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> > etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
> etc, etc.
> > >
> > > Just plain demented hate.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > ----
> > > From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bugs
> > > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:30 AM
> > > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
> > >
> > >
> > > TRY RUMSFELD FOR TREASON
> > >
> > > The oath is to stand against all domestic and foreign enimies
> and
> > > what Rumsfeld has done to the American Troops is a crime in
> and onto
> > > itself.
> > >
> > > Uraium dust has been spread all over Iraq due to the Uranium
> used in
> > > Penatrator Bombs and Bullets.
> > >
> > > Villages and the City of Fulluja have been razed to the
> ground.
> > >
> > > 100,000 Iraqi civillians mostly women and children have been
> killed
> > > as collateral damage.
> > >
> > > All of this has occured because Rumsfeld and Bush elected to
> lie the
> > > American Soldiers into an unnecessary war.
> > >
> > > Why did Bush and Rumsfeld do this ?
> > >
> > > They did it to steal the Iraqi oil sell it to china and put
> the cash
> > > into Chinese banks.
> > >
> > > And they are perpetuating the occupation by not having enough
> troops
> > > so they can stay in Iraq an keep on stealing the oil forever.
> > >
> > > The Maritine Ship movement logs will prove this.
> > >
> > > It is an OPEN and Shut Case.
> > >
> > > or in other words a "REAL SLAM DUNK"
> > >
> > > Bush's Brother and Uncle have been in and out of China for
> years
> > > lining up this traitorous deal.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Naveed
> > > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:01 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Greg Palast Still DOESNT GET
> IT !
> > >
> > >
> > > didn't know paul bremer was a kissinger stooge.......
> > >
> > > mann david <dmann51@> wrote:
> > > Read that piece in a hurry but didn't notice mention
> > > of 9-11. Wow, pathetic trivial trip indeed.
> > >
> > > --- JIM <justpasenthru2012@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
> > > > Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
> > > > The Guardian - Comment
> > > > Friday, April 14, 2006
> > > > By Greg Palast
> > > >
> > > > Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the
> > > > gaggle of generals,
> > > > safely
> > > > retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week,
> > > > six of them
> > > > have called for
> > > > the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
> > > >
> > > > Well, according to my watch, they're about four
> > > > years too late --
> > > > and they still
> > > > don't get it.
> > > >
> > > > I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
> > > > that the
> > > > bemedalled boys in
> > > > crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the
> > > > rump, in public.
> > > > But to me, it
> > > > just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
> > > > straight.
> > > >
> > > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up
> > > > in front of the
> > > > UN and
> > > > identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons
> > > > labs, was it,
> > > > General
> > > > Powell?
> > > >
> > > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us
> > > > our next warning
> > > > from Saddam
> > > > could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
> > > >
> > > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
> > > > that Al Qaeda
> > > > and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
> > > > arrogance, a
> > > > duplicitous
> > > > chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and
> > > > Tinker-Toy Napoleon --
> > > > but he didn't
> > > > appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
> > > >
> > > > Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of
> > > > Defense you didn't
> > > > read in the
> > > > New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner,
> > > > the man our
> > > > president
> > > > placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion
> > > > viceroy.
> > > >
> > > > Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
> > > > under the
> > > > mistaken notion
> > > > that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq,
> > > > the President
> > > > meant the
> > > > Iraqis could choose their own government.
> > > > Misunderstanding the
> > > > President's true
> > > > mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold
> > > > elections within
> > > > 90 days and
> > > > for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the
> > > > cities to a desert
> > > > base. "It's
> > > > their country," the General told me of the Iraqis.
> > > > "And," he added,
> > > > most
> > > > ominously, "their oil."
> > > >
> > > > Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
> > > > Garner a 101-page
> > > > plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons
> > > > at the State
> > > > Department, Treasury
> > > > and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e.
> > > > the sale)
> > > > of "all state
> > > > assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting
> > > > industries."
> > > > The General
> > > > knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where
> > > > the Iraqi sun
> > > > don't shine.
> > > > Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting
> > > > of Iraqi tribal
> > > > leaders to
> > > > plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their
> > > > own multi-ethnic
> > > > government --
> > > > and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were
> > > > on talking
> > > > terms -- knew he
> > > > could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a
> > > >
> > > > welcomed "liberation"
> > > > turned into a hated "occupation."
> > > >
> > > > But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition
> > > > government would mean
> > > > the
> > > > death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets
> > > > privatization grab.
> > > >
> > > > On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the
> > > > very night
> > > > General Garner
> > > > arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington.
> > > > It was Rumsfeld
> > > > on the line.
> > > > He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack,
> > > > Jack, you're
> > > > fired."
> > > >
> > > > Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of
> > > > on-the-ground experience
> > > > in Iraq,
> > > > with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director
> > > > of Kissinger
> > > > Associates.
> > > > Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
> > > > postponed
> > > > elections for a
> > > > year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot
> > > > pasha, selling
> > > > off Iraq's
> > > > economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
> > > > Rumsfeld's neo-con
> > > > clique had
> > > > desired.
> > > >
> > > > Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the
> > > > six generals' call
> > > > for
> > > > Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
> > > >
> > > > For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't
> > > > shoot straight.
> > > > They're
> > > > wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've
> > > > gunned down the
> > > > puppet instead
> > > > of the puppeteers.
> > > >
> > > > There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked
> > > > General Garner from
> > > > Baghdad
> > > > without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or
> > > > breathes or spits
> > > > in the Bush
> > > > Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
> > > > approval. And
> > > > ultimately, it's
> > > > the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
> > > >
> > > > Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
> > > > give them
> > > > enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the
> > > > cowboy from
> > > > Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that
> > > > we lacked
> > > > troops -- the
> > > > problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy
> > > > this nation. A
> > > > million
> > > > troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would
> > > > just have more
> > > > targets.)
> > > >
> > > > President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
> > > > today on the
> > > > intercom with
> > > > Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up."
> > > > And Cheney
> > > > replies, "Hey,
> > > > just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until
> > > > he's taken all
> > > > their ammo."
> > > >
> > > > When Bush and Cheney read about the call for
> > > > Rumsfeld's resignation
> > > > today, I can
> > > > just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission
> > > > Accomplished."
> > > >
> > > > Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
> > > > choosing a target:
> > > > It's the
> > > > President, stupid.
> > > >
> > > === message truncated ===
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
> around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man,
> and brave, and hated
> > and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then
> it costs nothing to
> > be a patriot.
> > > - Notebook, 1904
> > >
> > > www.fightthenwo.org
> > >
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > --
> > > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the
> US (and 30+
> > countries) for 2¢/min or less.
> > >
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > --
> > >
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/312 - Release
> Date: 4/14/2006
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and
> brave, and hated and
> > scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it
> costs nothing to be
> > a patriot.
> > > - Notebook, 1904
> > >
> > > www.fightthenwo.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > ------
> > > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously
> low rates.
> > >
> > > SPONSORED LINKS United state government grant United state
> coin United state
> > patent
> > > United state flag United state army United state grant
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > ------
> > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > >
> > > a.. Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
> > >
> > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
> of Service.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > ------
> > >
> >
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 9
From: "space2force" space2force@yahoo.ca
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:53am(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL

British Jewry Tried
To Stop Zionism
Edwin Montagu

By Henry Makow PhD
3-12-6


When the British Cabinet issued the Balfour Declaration in 1917, it was over the strenuous objections of its only Jewish member, Edwin Montagu. But non-Jews, including many anti-Semites, tipped the scales. They saw Zionism as a way to advance British imperialism and the Masonic "New World Order."

Montagu, who was the Secretary of State for India, told Prime Minister Lloyd George. "All my life I have been trying to get out of the ghetto. You want to force me back there."

An assimilated Jew, Montagu regarded Judaism as only a religion, and viewed Zionism as a "mischievous political creed, untenable by any patriotic citizen of the United Kingdom."

His story suggests that the New World Order is an elite conspiracy led by specific members of certain Jewish and non-Jewish dynastic families who often intermarried. It is not "Jewish" in terms of the Jewish people as a whole, who historically prefer assimilation.

In May 1917, a committee representing the leading Jewish organizations published a statement in the "London Times" saying: "Emancipated Jews... have no separate political aspirations...the establishment of a Jewish nationality in Palestine founded on [the] theory of a Jewish homelessness, must have the effect of stamping the Jews as strangers in their native lands." ("Cousinhood", p.260)

The Balfour Declaration promised Jews a "national home" in Palestine. Partly, it was payment to Zionists for getting the USA into WWI on Britain's side. Zionist president Chaim Weismann fumed that Jewish opposition was the main stumbling block to consummating the deal.

("payment" http://www.savethemales.ca/000357.html)

The Jewish community was split. The Samuels and the Rothschilds favored the Balfour Declaration; Cohen, Magnus, Mountefiore and Montagu were against it.

"If it had been merely an issue between Zionist and non-Zionist factions within the community, there is little question that the latter would have won," writes Chaim Bermant in "The Cousinhood." "But there were the gentile Zionists to consider and they carried the day." (262)

These gentiles included Arthur Balfour, Lord Milner, Lord Lothian (Phillip Kerr) and Lord Robert Cecil. Chaim Weismann recognized that Zionism is part of a much larger game: "To [Cecil], the re-establishment of a Jewish Homeland in Palestine and the organization of the world in a great federation were complementary features in the next step in the management of human affairs..." (Reed, "Controversy of Zion," p. 249.)

Georgetown University professor Caroll Quigley lists about 100 participants in the world government conspiracy in the Appendix of "The Anglo American Establishment" (1981). They include the above names and Cecil Rhodes, Lionel Curtis, William T. Stead, Geoffrey Dawson and Earl Grey. I recognized only three Jews: Nathan Rothschild, Leopold Amery and Alfred Beit.

Quigley relates how a group of aristocratic families centered on the Cecils has dominated British politics for centuries. They spawned the secret society organized by Cecil Rhodes and Nathan Rothschild in 1891, which Rhodes called "a church for the extension of the British Empire." (34) Known as "The Round Table" and the "Milner group," its goal was world domination by the British elite and the re-colonization of the US.

The "church" was Freemasonry. The politicians that backed Zionism were all high-ranking Masons. Some were probably Illuminati. "World government" is dedicated to enthroning Lucifer as God of this world. Zionism and Communism are Masonic organizations dedicated to this agenda.

A HERO FOR ASSIMILATED JEWS

Edwin Montagu, the second son of the silver bullion dealer Samuel Montagu, was caught between his father's Orthodox Judaism and desire to be an Englishman. He rejected Judaism but was not about to abandon his Jewish identity. "I will always be a good Jew according to my lights," he wrote his father, "my definition differing from yours."

As a youth he chafed at having to observe the rituals and marry a Jewish girl. As an adult, he embraced the lifestyle of a highborn Englishman. On his country estate, he hunted and was a naturalist and ornithologist. "There was something... alien in the very depth of his affection for England," Bermant remarks. (259)

A tall nerdy-looking man who wore a monocle, Montagu suffered the gibes of friends and enemies in silence. His "ugliness was obliterated by his charms," wrote his friend Duff Cooper." He had a huge ungainly body, a deep soft voice and dark eyes that sparkled with kindliness." (253)

An able debater at Cambridge, Montagu caught the attention of H.H. Asquith, the President of the rival Oxford Union. He followed Asquith into politics and after the Liberal landslide of 1906 became his private secretary. An intelligent and persuasive speaker, Montagu seemed destined for great things.

Asquith became Prime Minister in 1908. He and Montagu were both infatuated with Venetia Stanley a friend of Asquith's daughter, and 35 years Asquith's junior. When the Prime Minister's attentions became too much, Venetia married Montagu, eight years her senior.

Like Montagu's love for England, his love for Venetia was unrequited. She had many affairs and burned through his fortune. But he ignored this and, on the eve of his premature death at age 45, wrote to her, "I am miserable at going. You have made me very happy and I hope you will be happy always." (267)

ON ZIONISM

In 1917, Montagu fought the Balfour Declaration in cabinet and circulated a document accusing the government of anti-Semitism for making all British Jews "aliens and foreigners." He said he would "willingly disenfranchise every Zionist [and was tempted to] proscribe the Zionist organization as illegal and against the national interest."

("document" http://student.cs.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/articles/ article0005337.html)

Of course he was right. But despite being a banker's son, he wasn't aware of the Masonic/Zionist plan for world government. They dedicated 1.2 million troops to securing Palestine, almost losing the European War as a consequence. They had to replace Asquith and the Army Chief-of-Staff Gen. William Robertson to get it done.

Montagu was one of those rare Jews who tried to understand the reasons for anti- Semitism instead of blaming "irrational hate."

"I have always recognized the unpopularity...of my community. We have obtained a far greater share of this country's goods and opportunities than we are numerically entitled to. We reach on the whole maturity earlier, and therefore with people of our own age we compete unfairly. Many of us have been exclusive in our friendships and intolerant in our attitude, and I can easily understand that many a non-Jew in England wants to get rid of us.

But just as there is no community of thought and mode of life among Christian Englishmen, so there is not among Jewish Englishmen. More and more we are educated in public schools and at the Universities, and take our part in the politics, in the Army, in the Civil Service, of our country. And I am glad to think that the prejudices against inter-marriage are breaking down. But when the Jew has a national home, surely it follows that the impetus to deprive us of the rights of British citizenship must be enormously increased. Palestine will become the world's Ghetto."

Montagu was probably responsible for inserting the provision in the Balfour Declaration that said: "Nothing shall be done that may prejudice the civil and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

FINALLY

Jews are taught that they are scapegoats but they don't learn it is the world government cabal that is using them. Using Zionist, Communist, Liberal, Feminist or Neo Con fronts, it dupes many Jews into advancing policies and beliefs that undermine society which is based on race, religion, nation and family. This gives the appearance Jews in general are responsible for the New World Order.

It doesn't help that many Jews ignorantly deny this conspiracy exists and cry "anti-Semitism" every time a banker is criticized. It doesn't help that many have been conned into thinking they need Israel. In fact Israelis are being used to secure the Middle East for the Masonic British elite. The new Israeli Supreme Court building, funded and designed by Rothschilds, is replete with Masonic symbolism. (http://www.thegoldenreport.com/asp/jerrysnewsmanager/anmviewer.asp? a=817&z=2)

Some of the Rothschilds and their Jewish allies are part of this satanic conspiracy. But most Jews put their countries first, and would want no part of world government. Edwin Montagu, a gentle, sincere civilized man, is an example of such a Jew and an inspiration to us all.

---------------

Related: "The Jewish Conspiracy is British Imperialism" http://www.savethemales.ca/000447.html

-----------

Henry Makow Ph.D. is the inventor of the game Scruples and author of "A Long Way to go for a Date." His articles exposing fe-manism and the New World Order can be found at his web site www.savethemales.ca He enjoys receiving comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only. hmakow@gmail.com

Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com> wrote: since when did kenny become personnally responsible for the state of israel?

theodore herzl was a rothschild bitch/puppet

zionism merged with british imperialist aims with the balfour declaration.

A long time ago i remember reading that a suicide bomber killed a peace activist's son....talk about the ultimate test of one's convictions......

there is a difference between jewish and israeli, ya gotta be careful with the terms

more on this later, gotta run to class.

scol202 <yahooboxx@ntlworld.com> wrote:
"Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to oust
these criminal Zionists from our midst. Israeli refusnik soldiers are
just the tip of the iceberg.

The Arabs are human beings and they deserve to be treated as such."

To be blunt, that is nowhere near good enough. Real Arabs (not
American paid for politicians) want the Jews out of the middle east
permanently and won't rest until it happens. Zionism as a philosophy
and a goal has to be relinquished. As far as I'm concerned Jews were
blackmailed into leaving Europe by a combination of American desire
to dominate the middle east and a Jewish financial elite who wanred
to set up a gangster state of their own.

I have just read my third pro holocaust book by a witness in the
Irving trial and it's a load of ridiculous nonsense. Irving might be
a racist and a closet Nazi but it doesn't mean he's wrong. I have
never read Irving just his opponents by the way, that's what has made
me a revisionist.

It's pretty clear that the Jewish lobby now has massive influence on
Anglo American foreign policy. The idea that Britain would fight such
a war (Iraq) on its own volition just isn't remotely credible.
Seventy five percent were against it.

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "kenny318east3"
<kenny318east3@...> wrote:
>
> --- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, "Dick Eastman" <olfriend@>
wrote:
>
> << There are many many Jews, who protect the Zionist perpetrators
of 9-11 --
> whose loyalty to fellow Jews, even mass murders, is so great that
they will defend
> them knowing they are wrong. They discover the true guilt of the
Zionist neo-cons
> and Mossad yet they pretend they do not believe it -- I'd say 90
percent of Jews who
> are in any way involved with 9-11 discussion are at this stage.
They are defending
> their people from justice -- all other people be damned. >>
>
> it doesn't matter how much I am horrified by the behavior of
Israel, I am still
> a Jew.
>
> Jewish people are basically good and decent and we are going to
oust these
> criminal Zionists from our midst.
>
> Israeli refusnik soldiers are just the tip of the iceberg.
>
> The Arabs are human beings and they deserve to be treated as such.
>
> Ken, the grandson of Samuel and Charlotte Goncharow. I am a former
student
> at the Flatbush Jewish Center on Church Avenue and Ocean Parkway,
and I was
> a recipient of the book "Vocabulary of Jewish Life," by Rabbi
Abraham M. Heller.
>
> > > I suspect Leslie Schwartz is going to be like that. I've seen
too many not to think
> so -- and that is the extent to which I have become a collective-
Jewish guilt-until-
> proven-innocent-on-an-individual-basis "anti-Semite" -- literally
a man suspicious
> of Jews in general. It is unjust -- but my instinct for survival
overrides my higher
> impulses.
> >
> > Dick Eastman
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Naveed
> > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > Cc: lhs_emf@
> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 5:50 PM
> > Subject: RE: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
> >
> >
> > for the last time
> >
> > all JEWS ARE NOT ZIONISTS!
> >
> > ALL ZIONISTS ARE NOT JEWS!
> >
> > There is a ZIONIST ELEMENT to the 9/11 conspiracy!!! Maybe you
can't handle
> that............
> > did you even read the damn post i posted about ISRAELI spy
rings awash in
> america? I POSTED IT TWICE.......
> >
> > this below come from my friend ryan!
> >
> > 'A Clean Break' JINSA/PNAC Neocons associated with AIPAC
espionage:
> >
> > washingtonpost.com
> > Leak Inquiry Includes Iran Experts in Administration
> >
> > By Robin Wright and Dan Eggen
> > Washington Post Staff Writers
> > Saturday, September 4, 2004; Page A04
> >
> >
> > FBI counterintelligence investigators have in recent weeks
questioned current and
> former U.S. officials about whether a small group of Iran
specialists at the Pentagon
> and in Vice President Cheney's office may have been involved in
passing classified
> information to an Iraqi politician or a U.S. lobbying group allied
with Israel, according
> to sources familiar with or involved in the case.
> >
> > In their interviews, the FBI agents have also named two Israeli
diplomats stationed
> in Washington and asked whether they would be willing recipients of
sensitive
> intelligence, the sources added.
> >
> > The investigators have asked questions about personnel in the
office of Pentagon
> Undersecretary for Policy Douglas J. Feith as well as members of
the influential
> Defense Policy Board, an advisory panel for Defense Secretary
Donald H. Rumsfeld,
> according to former U.S. officials who have been questioned and
others familiar with
> the case.
> >
> > Investigators have specifically asked about a group of
neoconservatives involved
> in defense issues, including Feith, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul
D. Wolfowitz, Iraq
> and Iran specialist Harold Rhode and others at the Pentagon. FBI
agents also have
> asked current and former officials about Richard Perle of the
defense board and David
> Wurmser, an Iran specialist and principal deputy assistant for
national security affairs
> in Cheney's office, according to sources familiar with or involved
in the case.
> >
> > "The initial interest was: Do you believe certain people would
spy for Israel and
> pass secret information?" said one source interviewed by the FBI
about the defense
> officials.
> >
> > It remains unclear, however, how specific investigators'
suspicions have become.
> And one official, a Feith ally, has said the investigation is an
effort by some
> intelligence officials to discredit Pentagon hawks.
> >
> > The sources interviewed for this article requested anonymity
because it involves
> classified information or because of the ongoing investigation.
> >
> > Perle, Rhode and Wolfowitz did not return telephone calls
placed to their homes
> and offices late Friday. Reached at home, Feith declined comment,
citing the ongoing
> investigation.
> >
> > But Pentagon officials insisted yesterday that FBI questions
about key
> policymakers did not mean they were the subjects of the
intelligence leak
> investigation. Senior Pentagon officials have said they were told
by the FBI that the
> investigation is focused on just one suspect in the Defense
Department, Lawrence A.
> Franklin, an Iran specialist in Feith's office.
> >
> > The FBI investigation first came to light last week with
reports of a probe into
> whether Franklin passed a draft presidential directive on Iran to
the American Israel
> Public Affairs Committee, and whether the directive was then passed
to Israel,
> sources have said. AIPAC has strongly denied any involvement in
espionage.
> >
> > A federal grand jury in Alexandria may take up the Franklin
case as early as next
> week, law enforcement sources said.
> >
> > The questioning of Franklin is a recent part of an
investigation that dates back
> more than two years and includes diverse threads, U.S. officials
and people close to
> the case said. One aspect of the probe concerns AIPAC and another
looks at whether
> intelligence on Iran ended up in the hands of Iraqi National
Congress leader Ahmed
> Chalabi, a longtime Pentagon favorite once considered a possible
replacement for
> Saddam Hussein.
> >
> > Iran has been a particularly controversial issue within the
Bush administration,
> which still does not have a formal policy more than 3 1/2 years
after taking office. A
> small group of Pentagon neoconservatives opposed a draft directive
because it did
> not support a change of governments in Tehran, which they
advocated, current and
> former U.S. officials said.
> >
> > The officials whose names came up during questioning have
strong ties to Israel.
> They also share a long-standing position on Iran and other radical
regimes. Wurmser,
> Feith and Perle were co-authors of a 1996 policy paper for then-
Israeli Prime Minister
> Binyamin Netanyahu titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for
Securing the Realm." It
> called for removing Hussein from power in Iraq as part of a broad
strategy to
> transform the region and remove radical regimes.
> >
> > But current and former U.S. officials, including some who were
interviewed by the
> FBI, are still puzzled by the nature of the investigation involving
Israel, because its
> profoundly close ties with the United States date back six decades
and have involved
> sharing sensitive intelligence. Yet officials also concede that
Israel is one of the three
> countries most active in spying on the United States. Israel denies
conducting
> espionage in the United States.
> >
> > Also yesterday, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary
Committee
> demanded that a new prosecutor be assigned to investigate the
alleged leaks,
> questioning the "political leanings" of the U.S. attorney in
Alexandria who is handling
> the criminal portion of the case.
> >
> > In a letter to Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Rep. John
Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.)
> said the role of U.S. Attorney Paul J. McNulty in the case
has "obvious political
> implications" in an election year, and Conyers cited anonymous
allegations in a news
> report that McNulty had "put the brakes on" the probe.
> >
> > "While I have no reason to question Mr. McNulty's integrity, he
is not a career
> prosecutor, but instead is a political appointee whose previous
employment was
> principally with Republican politicians," Conyers wrote.
> >
> > Conyers suggested that either a special counsel or U.S.
Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald
> of Chicago, who is overseeing a separate probe into the disclosure
of CIA operative
> Valerie Plame, should take over the Pentagon probe.
> >
> > Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo declined to comment
on the specifics
> of Conyers's allegations. "We will review the congressman's letter
and give it the
> attention it is due," Corallo said. A spokesman for McNulty also
declined comment,
> referring a reporter to Corallo's statement.
> >
> > Several law enforcement officials have said in recent days that
the FBI had initially
> considered making rapid arrests in the Franklin probe when it
became clear that news
> of the investigation was about to become public last week. But,
these officials said,
> prosecutors urged caution, arguing that investigators needed more
time to gather
> evidence and assess the case.
> >
> > Franklin has been cooperating in the probe for several weeks,
officials familiar
> with the investigation said. He has not responded to numerous
requests for comment
> at his office and his home in West Virginia.
> >
> >
> >
> > All in the Neocon Family
> > By Jim Lobe, AlterNet
> > Posted on March 27, 2003, Printed on April 16, 2006
> > http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
> > What do William Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, and
Robert Kagan have
> in common? Yes, they are all die-hard hawks who have gained control
of U.S. foreign
> policy since the 9/11 attacks. But they are also part of one big
neoconservative family
> -- an extended clan of spouses, children, and friends who have
known each other for
> generations.
> > Neoconservatives are former liberals (which explains the "neo"
prefix) who
> advocate an aggressive unilateralist vision of U.S. global
supremacy, which includes a
> close strategic alliance with Israel. Let's start with one of the
founding fathers of the
> extended neocon clan: Irving Kristol. His extensive resume includes
waging culture
> wars for the CIA against the Soviet Union in the early years of the
Cold War and
> calling for an American "imperial" role during the Vietnam War.
Papa Kristol, who has
> been credited with defining the major themes of neoconservative
thought, is married
> to Gertrude Himmelfarb, a neoconservative powerhouse on her own.
Her studies of
> the Victorian era in Britain helped inspire the men who sold Bush
on the idea of
> "compassionate conservatism."
> > The son of this proud couple is none other that William
Kristol, the crown prince
> of the neoconservative clique and editor of the Rupert Murdoch-
owned Weekly
> Standard. In 1997, he founded the Project for the New American
Century (PNAC), a
> front group which cemented the powerful alliance between right-wing
Republicans
> like Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, Christian and Catholic Right
leaders like Gary
> Bauer and William Bennett, and the neocons behind a platform of
global U.S. military
> dominance.
> > Irving Kristol's most prominent disciple is Richard Perle, who
was until Thursday
> the Defense Policy Board chairman, is also a "resident scholar" at
the American
> Enterprise Institute, which is housed in the same building as PNAC.
Perle himself
> married into neocon royalty when he wed the daughter of his
professor at the
> University of Chicago, the late Alfred Wohlstetter -- the man who
helped both his
> son-in-law and his fellow student Paul Wolfowitz get their start in
Washington more
> than 30 years ago.
> > Perle's own protege is Douglas Feith, who is now Wolfowitz's
deputy for policy and
> is widely known for his right-wing Likud position. And why not? His
father,
> Philadelphia businessman and philanthropist Dalck Feith, was once a
follower of the
> great revisionist Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky, in his
native Poland back in the
> 1930s. The two Feiths were honored together in 1997 by the right-
wing Zionist
> Organization of America (ZOA).
> > The AEI has long been a major nexus for such inter-familial
relationships. A long-
> time collaborator with Perle, Michael Ledeen is married to Barbara
Ledeen, a founder
> and director of the anti-feminist Independent Women's Forum (IWF),
who is currently
> a major player in the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill.
Richard Perle, Douglas
> Feith, and another neo-con power couple -- David and Meyrav
Wurmser -- co-
> authored a 1996 memorandum for Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu
outlining how to
> break the Oslo peace process and invade Iraq as the first step to
transforming the
> Middle East.
> > Though she doesn't focus much on foreign-policy issues, Lynne
Cheney also
> hangs her hat at AEI. Her husband Dick Cheney recently chose
Victoria Nuland to
> become his next deputy national security adviser. Nuland, as it
turns out, is married
> to Robert Kagan, Bill Kristol's main comrade-in-arms and the co-
founder of PNAC.
> > Bob's father, Donald Kagan, is a Yale historian who converted
from a liberal
> Democrat to a staunch neocon in the 1970s. On the eve of the 2000
presidential
> elections, Donald and his other son, Frederick, published "While
America Sleeps," a
> clarion call to increase defense spending. Since then, the three
Kagan men have
> written reams of columns warning that the currently ballooning
Pentagon budget is
> simply not enough to fund the much-desired vision of U.S. global
supremacy.
> > And which infamous ex-Reaganite do the Kagans and another
leading neocon
> family have in common? None other than Iran-contra veteran Elliott
Abrams.
> > Now the director of Near Eastern Affairs in Bush's National
Security Council,
> Abrams worked closely with Bob Kagan back in the Reagan era. He is
also the son-in-
> law of Norman Podhoretz, long-time editor of the influential
conservative Jewish
> publication Commentary, and his wife, Midge Decter, a fearsome
polemicist in her
> own right.
> > Podhoretz, like Kristol Sr., helped invent neo-conservatism in
the late 1960s. He
> and Decter created a formidable political team as leaders of the
Committee on the
> Present Danger in 1980, when they worked with Donald Rumsfeld to
pound the last
> nail into the coffin of detente and promote the rise of Ronald
Reagan. In addition to
> being Abrams' father-in-law, Norman Podhoretz is also the father of
John Podhoretz,
> a columnist for the Murdoch-owned New York Post and frequent guest
on the
> Murdoch-owned Fox News channel.
> > As editor of Commentary, Norman offered writing space to rising
stars of the
> neocon movement for more than 30 years. His proteges include former
U.N.
> ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and Richard Pipes, who was Ronald
Reagan's top
> advisor on the "Evil Empire," as the president liked to call the
Soviet Union. His son,
> Daniel Pipes, has also made a career out of battling "evil," which
in his case is Islam.
> And to tie it all up neatly, in 2002, Podhoretz received the
highest honor bestowed by
> the AEI: the Irving Kristol award.
> > This list of intricate, overlapping connections is hardly
exhaustive or perhaps even
> surprising. But it helps reveal an important fact. Contrary to
appearances, the
> neocons do not constitute a powerful mass political movement. They
are instead a
> small, tighly-knit clan whose incestuous familial and personal
connections, both
> within and outside the Bush administration, have allowed them grab
control of the
> future of American foreign policy.
> > © 2006 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
> > View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/
> >
> >
> > Home : WRH Store : WRH Index : Reader Letters :
Archives : Advertise : Donate
> >
> > On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin
> Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli
relations. His quick
> reply was: "It's very good...Well, it's not good, but it will
generate immediate
> sympathy (for Israel)"
> >
> >
> >
> > The Five Dancing Israelis
> > Arrested On 9-11
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > As the world watched in disbelief and asked the
question...
> >
> > ...Mossad operatives were seen dancing with joy.
> >
> >
> >
> > A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle
of themselves on 9-
> 11.
> > The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and
trained them on the
> twin towers. (1)
> >
> > Police received several calls from angry New Jersey
residents claiming
> "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster
with shouts of
> joy and mockery. (2)
> > "They were like happy, you know . They didn't look
shocked to me" said a
> witness. (3)
> > [T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept.
11 making fun of the
> World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph
themselves in
> front of the wreckage. (4)
> >
> > Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park
after the initial
> impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a
roof in Weehawken,
> and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives
in a Jersey City
> parking lot. (6)
> >
> > "It looked like they're hooked in with this. It
looked like they knew what
> was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (7)
> >
> > One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led
them to close down
> all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the
9-1-1 dispatcher
> that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white
van headed for the
> Holland Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:
> > Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
> > Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in
there, they look like
> Palestinians and going around a building.
> > Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the
Holland tunnel, I see the guy
> by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.
> > Dispatcher: He has what?
> > Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (8)
> >
> > (*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller
specifically say that these
> "Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians
usually dress in
> western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")
> >
> > Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-
the-Lookout" alert for
> a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from
New Jersey. When a
> van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing
into New York, the
> suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the
surprise of the police
> officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!
> > According to ABC's 20/20, when the van belonging to the
cheering Israelis
> was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg,
told the officers:
> >
> > "We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your
problems are our
> problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (9)
> >
> > Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD?
> > The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious
when they found maps
> of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same
items that the
> hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and
foreign passports.
> Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were
brought to the van
> and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (10)
> > The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of
which shows Sivan
> Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering
ruins in an apparently
> celebratory gesture. (11)
> >
> > The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a
bomb was stopped
> as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of
the suspects was
> not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September
12, 2001:
> > American security services overnight stopped a car
bomb on the George
> Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on
an approach
> ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to
blow up the main
> crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (12)
> >
> > TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down
with tonnes of
> explosives (13).
> > What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (14), the
New York Post (15), and
> the New Jersey Bergen Record (16) all clearly and unambiguously
reported that a
> white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3,
which leads directly
> to the Lincoln Tunnel.
> > But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz
Sheva) (17), and Yediot
> America, (18) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that
a white van with
> Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington
Bridge, which is
> several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.
> > It appears as if there may actually have been two
white vans involved, one
> stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the
conflicting reports as to
> the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so
many credible eye-
> witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in
so many different
> locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon
(lawyer for the 5
> Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but
later increased the
> total to five.
> > Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while
the other was meant
> to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New
Jersey? If a van was
> to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly
the drivers would
> need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And
notice how the van
> (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland
Tunnel- which was
> where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-
Palestinian 9-1-1
> "mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.
> >
> > From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious.
The Israelis worked
> for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An
American
> employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey
that a majority
> of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the
attacks.
> > The employee, who declined to give his name
said: "I was in tears. These
> guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were like, "Now
America knows
> what we go through." (19)
> >
> > A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's
Israeli owner, Dominick
> Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was
in such a hurry to
> flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left
with their
> furniture stranded in storage facilities (20).
> > It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis
were in fact Mossad
> agents (21). They were held in custody for 71 days before being
quietly released.
> Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40
days. (22)
> > [S]everal of the detainees discussed their
experience in America on an
> Israeli talk show after their return home.
> > Said one of the men, denying that they were
laughing or happy on the
> morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from
a country that
> experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."
(23)
> >
> > How did they know there would be an event to document on
9-11?
> > It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of
the dancing Israeli
> Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:
> > 1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to
celebrate the
> successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled
off in history.
> > 2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-
1 police dispatcher to
> report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the
Holland Tunnel.
> > 3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with
this phone call, the Israeli
> bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where
they will drop
> off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices.
> > 4. But the police react very wisely and proactively
by closing off ALL
> bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move
inadvertently foils
> the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and
40 day torture.
> > 5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice
Department rounds up over 1000
> Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York
area jails. The
> Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and
media can now
> claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in
the same dragnet as
> many other Arabs.
> > 6. After several months, FBI and Justice
Department "higher-ups" are able
> to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis
quietly.
> >
> > Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9-11
attacks even though
> he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale.
Immediately after the
> Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
> > CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin
Laden's fingerprints all
> over it." (24)
> > The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the
Israeli connection.
> Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with
stories linking the
> attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers
of every stripe
> spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most
outrageous
> propaganda imaginable.
> > We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA
was because he
> hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval"
and they wanted
> to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter
about the Crusades,
> and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all
over the place!
> > But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and
suggested that
> Zionists orchestrated the
> > 9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of
denial in which he
> said:
> > "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in
the United States nor
> did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government
within a government
> within the United States. The United States should try to trace the
perpetrators of
> these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the
present century a
> century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret
government must be
> asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is
totally in control
> of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United
States." (25)
> >
> > You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did
you?
> > [A] number of intelligence officials have raised
questions about Osama bin
> Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and
he's running this
> operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't
have done it alone." A
> senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other
documentation
> needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major
foreign intelligence
> service might also have been involved. (26)
> >
> > Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of the 9-11
attacks by the FBI:
> > USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE
AUGUST 7,
> 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM,
TANZANIA,
> AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN
ADDITION, BIN
> LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.
(27)
> >
> > To date, the only shred of "evidence" to be uncovered
against bin Laden is a
> barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened
to find "lying
> around" in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake.
(28)
> > There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to
link the Al Qaeda
> "terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a
mountain of evidence, both
> hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been
very busy framing
> Arabs for terror plots against America.
> >
> > One final point - at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that
the Democratic Front
> for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the
attacks (29). This claim
> was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said
it had always
> opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the
occupied
> territories." (30)
> > 9-11 CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a
Palestinian claim of
> responsibility
> >
> > Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less
than 500 people (31)
> make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for
the attacks?
> > Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to
fulfill what the goals of the
> political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century
ago: to turn all of
> historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central
tenet of the Zionist
> ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people
for a people
> without a land." (32)
> >
> > The implication of Palestinians in the 9-11 attacks would
have handed
> Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all
Palestinians would
> have been labelled terrorists.
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
> > "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I
cannot tell you about
> evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."
> > US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on
the Israeli spy ring.
> > "By way of deception, thou shalt do war"
> > Motto of the Mossad
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
> > See also:
> > Israel and 9/11 - Index of What Really Happened
> > Zionist Circles Benefit From WTC Collapse
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
> > What Really Happened
> >
> >
> > Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@> wrote:
> > Bugs,
> >
> > Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with
people who think its all a
> Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.
> >
> > Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are
deranged, I just read
> one of their histories, Hitler you know was a good guy, Jews forced
him to carry out
> the holocaust.
> >
> > Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad
control the world along
> with Jewish international bankers, etc.
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Jews
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Zionists
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Mossad
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.
> >
> > Sharon
> >
> > Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc,
> etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.
> >
> > Just plain demented hate.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ----
> > From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bugs
> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:30 AM
> > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL
> >
> >
> > TRY RUMSFELD FOR TREASON
> >
> > The oath is to stand against all domestic and foreign enimies
and
> > what Rumsfeld has done to the American Troops is a crime in
and onto
> > itself.
> >
> > Uraium dust has been spread all over Iraq due to the Uranium
used in
> > Penatrator Bombs and Bullets.
> >
> > Villages and the City of Fulluja have been razed to the
ground.
> >
> > 100,000 Iraqi civillians mostly women and children have been
killed
> > as collateral damage.
> >
> > All of this has occured because Rumsfeld and Bush elected to
lie the
> > American Soldiers into an unnecessary war.
> >
> > Why did Bush and Rumsfeld do this ?
> >
> > They did it to steal the Iraqi oil sell it to china and put
the cash
> > into Chinese banks.
> >
> > And they are perpetuating the occupation by not having enough
troops
> > so they can stay in Iraq an keep on stealing the oil forever.
> >
> > The Maritine Ship movement logs will prove this.
> >
> > It is an OPEN and Shut Case.
> >
> > or in other words a "REAL SLAM DUNK"
> >
> > Bush's Brother and Uncle have been in and out of China for
years
> > lining up this traitorous deal.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Naveed
> > To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:01 AM
> > Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Greg Palast Still DOESNT GET
IT !
> >
> >
> > didn't know paul bremer was a kissinger stooge.......
> >
> > mann david <dmann51@> wrote:
> > Read that piece in a hurry but didn't notice mention
> > of 9-11. Wow, pathetic trivial trip indeed.
> >
> > --- JIM <justpasenthru2012@> wrote:
> >
> > > Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
> > > Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
> > > The Guardian - Comment
> > > Friday, April 14, 2006
> > > By Greg Palast
> > >
> > > Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the
> > > gaggle of generals,
> > > safely
> > > retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week,
> > > six of them
> > > have called for
> > > the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
> > >
> > > Well, according to my watch, they're about four
> > > years too late --
> > > and they still
> > > don't get it.
> > >
> > > I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
> > > that the
> > > bemedalled boys in
> > > crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the
> > > rump, in public.
> > > But to me, it
> > > just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
> > > straight.
> > >
> > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up
> > > in front of the
> > > UN and
> > > identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons
> > > labs, was it,
> > > General
> > > Powell?
> > >
> > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us
> > > our next warning
> > > from Saddam
> > > could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
> > >
> > > It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
> > > that Al Qaeda
> > > and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
> > >
> > > Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
> > > arrogance, a
> > > duplicitous
> > > chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and
> > > Tinker-Toy Napoleon --
> > > but he didn't
> > > appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
> > >
> > > Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of
> > > Defense you didn't
> > > read in the
> > > New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner,
> > > the man our
> > > president
> > > placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion
> > > viceroy.
> > >
> > > Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
> > > under the
> > > mistaken notion
> > > that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq,
> > > the President
> > > meant the
> > > Iraqis could choose their own government.
> > > Misunderstanding the
> > > President's true
> > > mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold
> > > elections within
> > > 90 days and
> > > for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the
> > > cities to a desert
> > > base. "It's
> > > their country," the General told me of the Iraqis.
> > > "And," he added,
> > > most
> > > ominously, "their oil."
> > >
> > > Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
> > > Garner a 101-page
> > > plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons
> > > at the State
> > > Department, Treasury
> > > and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e.
> > > the sale)
> > > of "all state
> > > assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting
> > > industries."
> > > The General
> > > knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where
> > > the Iraqi sun
> > > don't shine.
> > > Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting
> > > of Iraqi tribal
> > > leaders to
> > > plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their
> > > own multi-ethnic
> > > government --
> > > and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were
> > > on talking
> > > terms -- knew he
> > > could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a
> > >
> > > welcomed "liberation"
> > > turned into a hated "occupation."
> > >
> > > But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition
> > > government would mean
> > > the
> > > death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets
> > > privatization grab.
> > >
> > > On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the
> > > very night
> > > General Garner
> > > arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington.
> > > It was Rumsfeld
> > > on the line.
> > > He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack,
> > > Jack, you're
> > > fired."
> > >
> > > Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of
> > > on-the-ground experience
> > > in Iraq,
> > > with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director
> > > of Kissinger
> > > Associates.
> > > Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
> > > postponed
> > > elections for a
> > > year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot
> > > pasha, selling
> > > off Iraq's
> > > economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
> > > Rumsfeld's neo-con
> > > clique had
> > > desired.
> > >
> > > Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the
> > > six generals' call
> > > for
> > > Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
> > >
> > > For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't
> > > shoot straight.
> > > They're
> > > wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've
> > > gunned down the
> > > puppet instead
> > > of the puppeteers.
> > >
> > > There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked
> > > General Garner from
> > > Baghdad
> > > without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or
> > > breathes or spits
> > > in the Bush
> > > Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
> > > approval. And
> > > ultimately, it's
> > > the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
> > >
> > > Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
> > > give them
> > > enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the
> > > cowboy from
> > > Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that
> > > we lacked
> > > troops -- the
> > > problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy
> > > this nation. A
> > > million
> > > troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would
> > > just have more
> > > targets.)
> > >
> > > President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
> > > today on the
> > > intercom with
> > > Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up."
> > > And Cheney
> > > replies, "Hey,
> > > just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until
> > > he's taken all
> > > their ammo."
> > >
> > > When Bush and Cheney read about the call for
> > > Rumsfeld's resignation
> > > today, I can
> > > just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission
> > > Accomplished."
> > >
> > > Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
> > > choosing a target:
> > > It's the
> > > President, stupid.
> > >
> > === message truncated ===
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man,
and brave, and hated
> and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then
it costs nothing to
> be a patriot.
> > - Notebook, 1904
> >
> > www.fightthenwo.org
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> --
> > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the
US (and 30+
> countries) for 2¢/min or less.
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> --
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/312 - Release
Date: 4/14/2006
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and
brave, and hated and
> scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it
costs nothing to be
> a patriot.
> > - Notebook, 1904
> >
> > www.fightthenwo.org
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously
low rates.
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS United state government grant United state
coin United state
> patent
> > United state flag United state army United state grant
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > a.. Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.
> >
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > 911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> ------
> >
>

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

www.fightthenwo.org
---------------------------------
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

---------------------------------
Share your photos with the people who matter at Yahoo! Canada Photos
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 10
From: "Space" space2force@yahoo.ca
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:54am(PDT)
Subject: The Brutal Zionist Role in the Holocaust

http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/antisemitism/holocaust/index.cfm

The Brutal Zionist Role in the Holocaust
The price of Zionism:

"If I am asked, "Could you give from the UJA moneys to rescue
Jews, 'I say, NO! and I say again NO!"

Izaak Greenbaum -- head of Jewish Agency Rescue Committee
February 18, 1943

Addressed to the Zionist Executive Council.

"One Cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland"
....Izaak Greenbaum

Zionism in the Age of the Dictators

"The old ones will pass. They will bear their fate or they will not."
Chaim Weizmann, the first president of Israel, made this Zionist
policy very explicit:
The hopes of Europe's six million Jews are centered on emigration. I
was asked: "Can you bring six million Jews to Palestine?" I
replied, "No." ... From the depths of the tragedy I want to save ...
young people [for Palestine]. The old ones will pass. They will bear
their fate or they will not. They are dust, economic and moral dust
in a cruel world ... Only the branch of the young shall survive.
They have to accept it.

Chaim Weizmann reporting to the Zionist Congress in 1937 on his
testimony before the Peel Commission in London, July 1937. Cited in
Yahya, p. 55.


Ben Gurion informed a meeting of Labor Zionists in Great Britain in
1938: "If I knew that it would be possible to save all the children
in Germany by bringing them over to England and only half of them by
transporting them to Eretz Israel, then I opt for the second
alternative." Ibid., p.149.


As late as 1943, while the Jews of Europe were being exterminated in
their millions, the U.S. Congress proposed to set up a commission
to "study" the problem. Rabbi Stephen Wise, who was the principal
American spokesperson for Zionism, came to Washington to testify
against the rescue bill because it would divert attention from the
colonization of Palestine.

This is the same Rabbi Wise who, in 1938, in his capacity as leader
of the American Jewish Congress, wrote a letter in which he opposed
any change in U.S. immigration laws which would enable Jews to find
refuge. He stated:

"It may interest you to know that some weeks ago the representatives
of all the leading Jewish organizations met in conference ... It was
decided that no Jewish organization would, at this time, sponsor a
bill which would in any way alter the immigration laws."

Exaggerated Stories of Starvation?? You decide...
Salli Mayer: ". . . what is happening in Poland are exaggerated
stories. . . the way of the Ost Yuden. . .always asking for money."

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 11
From: "Space" space2force@yahoo.ca
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 10:26am(PDT)
Subject: America's Gift - Charlie Sheen

America's Gift - Charlie Sheen
By Ted Lang
4-16-6

As of this moment in America's brief history, Actor Charlie Sheen is
its greatest living patriot. Cindy Sheehan has paid a much higher
price and has voiced her objections to the war in Iraq, thereby
establishing herself as being against the Bush regime and therefore
an American traitor by their definition. And make no mistake,
Charlie Sheen is seen as a traitor as well by the Washington
criminal elite.

Charlie eclipses Sheehan for one very major reason: the MSM has
marginalized her. She lives or dies with respect to her patriotic
efforts to hold the most dangerous criminals on Earth accountable
dependent upon the whim of the MSM. She fully understands her role
as a newsmaker. She goes out, attracts attention, and then hopes
she gets the media coverage she so desperately needs to get her
message across to the American people. She is dependent on the
media. Charlie Sheen is the media!

But Charlie isn't allowing the eight multi-zillionaire Zionists who
own, operate and control virtually all news and information outlets
in America to throttle him. Charlie sorely needed the "assist" from
Ed Asner's scheduled appearance on CNN, which the
Zionists "pulled." And all this happened within the same week of
the release of the now-famous Harvard University JFK School of
Government's report on "The Israel Lobby," proving not only Israel's
powerful pressure on the Bush regime in sending our troops to fight
and die for another nation's interests and not that of our own, but
exposing also the powerful pro-Israel leanings in the MSM as well.

When Cindy Sheehan pointed out the Israeli domination of the Bush
regime and the American Congress, she was lambasted by Bush
propaganda attack dogs: Limbaugh, O'Reilly and Hannity. The MSM
removed her from public view and spiked her public events. But
Charlie Sheen is another matter entirely. It is totally up to
Charlie how far he's willing to go, but indications are that he's
going to hang tough and see this thing through to its very final
conclusion. And Charlie's approach is the right one. Just as was
the case with Ed Asner, others will join him. Charlie is smashing
holes in the Bush defense and providing the lead blocks that open up
the holes and prepare the way for a touchdown.

During his appearance on ABC's Jimmy Kimmel Show April 14th
, the video of which is once again being supplied by yet another
great American patriot, Alex Jones, Charlie touched upon what will
easily be the number one argument that will undoubtedly be launched
by the Bush MSM propagandists. Their argument will simply offer
that Charlie is just another "Hollywood Kook." Think of buffoon
Clinton and how "Babs" Streisand, Alec Baldwin, and other Hollywood
celebs have supported him while lambasting Republicans. Limbaugh
and company wasted no time in marginalizing them. But now, it will
take a high profile individual, readily known and appreciated by the
American public, to bring the needed inquiry to the very foundation
of the criminal Bush regime's monumental strength. And that power
base is the fear generated by 9-11. Charlie Sheen is indeed the man
that can do this.

As Charlie pointed out to Kimmel, all that is needed is for someone
to articulate a little louder what others, namely, many extremely
qualified experts, have been saying for a very long time. And
Charlie himself is saying absolutely nothing accusatory. All he is
doing is inviting the American people to think outside the box, and
to just start asking questions instead of taking the nation's chief
executive liar's word. We listened to the liar before, and
heard "no nation building." We listened to the liar before and were
told the trailers held biochemical weapons. We listened to the liar
before and were told Iraq had "weapons of mass destruction," even
when US weapons inspectors and Hans Blix told US there were none.
We listened to the liar-in-chief when he told US Saddam was working
on nuclear weapons with Niger yellowcake. And do we believe him
again when he states he didn't out Valerie Plame? Are we going to
allow him to attack Iran and start World War III?

Who's the only one in America that is beginning to make a
difference? Sure, Cindy was there first, and God bless her for
that. But it is Charlie Sheen who's the "top gun!" And as for
marginalizing himself by telling Kimmel that he's just an actor, and
therefore not really an expert, I'd put more stock in him or his dad
running this country than the "highly experienced" politicians and
their bureaucrats that are being increasingly exposed as criminals
and traitors. I doubt if either of them ever called the United
States Constitution just "a god-damned piece of paper!"

Just look at the fraud behind the comment "no political
experience." What is "political experience?" Is it selling a
parcel of repossessed land held by the City of Newark, New Jersey,
to a political crony for a single dollar so that the political
favorite can turn around, build 55 homes on the plot, and then sell
them for $6 million? Is that political experience? Or is it
political experience to manufacture the falsehood of a "Gulf of
Tonkin" attack upon our navy by communists, when a real one launched
by Israel that killed 34 of our servicemen is ignored and guarded as
a "national secret?" Is that what "political experience" is about?
Is "political experience" when one who serves on the Senate Armed
Services Committee journeys to Tel Aviv to receive training on the
latest Israeli policy to be incorporated into the foreign policy of
the United Sates? Is it political know-how to lie to America during
the constitutionally mandated State of the Union Address? It seems
to me that the only real qualification, especially for the Office of
the President of the United States, is morality and honesty. And
from where I sit, Charlie Sheen is heavily endowed with both.

Think of me and my tiny, insignificant column in my local town
newspaper. White picket fences, a barking dog here and there, kids
laughing and playing, the lawn nut on his garden tractor, the guy
with his chainsaw ­ got the picture? How do I tell these gentle
uninformed folk that the Bush gang did 9-11? And knowing they'll
think I'm a screwball, and a left-wing nut, and a, G-d forbid it! a
Democrat, they won't even buy a more moderate version of a mere
accusation of a "government cover-up." But then, there's Charlie!
I'll say whatever the hell I want and put it all on Charlie! It
will be his "bad!" See how it works folks?

Same deal with the Harvard report. That's why America's number one
torture specialist, Alan Dershowitz, a teacher at Harvard Law who
was instrumental in getting JFK dean Stephen Walt fired for telling
the truth about Israel and its tax-exempt foreign agent lobby, is so
pissed off and screaming "anti-Semitism!" For it was none other
than teacher Dershowitz in his rant against the government scholars
that hyperlinks to the Harvard paper, which still shows the Harvard
University logo, that got Walt fired. I had thought Harvard
panicked and dropped their logo from the Mearsheimer and Walt
report. How come Dershowitz is still showing this? Time for
Harvard to seriously consider firing this traitor to America!

Now this prestigious report can be used in the same fashion as
Charlie Sheen's simple inquiries, which are finally being carried on
the fringe of the MSM. Think of these as the lead blocks initiating
a new and refreshing slant in all the local newspapers across the
country. Just blame the evil truth on Charlie Sheen, "screwball"
Cindy Sheen, Professors John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt. We just
may be able to get real America's attention before the lying anti-
American/pro-Israel genocidal maniac in the White House launches
World War III. And where's Fitzgerald on locking up zany Cheney?

Analyzing all this and putting it into some kind of perspective is
now in order. What latent anomaly can be noted regarding all the
forgoing? Can you see it? It is the fissure in the Bush wall
erected by the MSM! Elements of the MSM are, albeit ever so slowly,
beginning to come around and are beginning to give Charlie a shot in
the much-needed spotlight for truth. Why is that?

There can be several reasons, but the first cut should be the
recognition that the American people are rapidly catching on to the
media's act. More and more people are beginning to fall away from
the Limbaugh/O'Reilly/Hannity baloney of a "liberal" media. More
are beginning to see the agenda of Israel and its horrific control
of both our government and media. And conversely, the media suits
are also beginning to take notice. Whether the decreasing reliance
on TV cable and network news, or the plummeting print news
circulation numbers and dollars, Charlie's approach might generate
some really big-time revenue numbers. Or perhaps the media elites
will realize that the impending Bush destruction of America will
eradicate their massive holdings in a once profitable industry. Who
can say at this point?

All we can hope for is that Charlie stays the course, and Fitzgerald
carries the ball into the end zone.

http://www.rense.com

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 12
From: "Caomhain {Kevin} Lee Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 10:50am(PDT)
Subject: Welcome! To all the new members!

Please check out the links and files section of the group, and my
website www.fightthenwo.org as well.

Kevin

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 13
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:24am(PDT)
Subject: Labor Economist Morgan Reynolds to Demolish 9/11 Big Lie at UWisc -

"Governments throughout history have provoked or staged attacks on their own people to serve the powers behind the throne ('the money power'), glorify themselves, engage in vast government spending, reward friends, exert domestic control, stimulate the juices of war, annex neighbors and pursue vast geostrategic rearrangements (the 'global domination project)"

Bush Defector to Demolish 9/11 Big Lie in Madison -- May 6

Kevin Barrett

The former top economist in Bush's Department of Labor, Morgan Reynolds, will speak out on the 9/11 inside job at the State Historical Society, University of Wisconsin-Madison on Saturday, May 6th. The film Loose Change will be shown, and refreshments served, starting at 1 p.m, and Reynolds will speak at 3:00 p.m.

Dr. Reynolds, who holds three U.W.-Madison degrees, and who is currently Professor of Economics at Texas A&M University, will present evidence that top Bush Administration officials orchestrated the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center, and the murder of almost 2,500 Americans, as a pretext for initiating their pre-planned "long war" in the Middle East.

"While more Americans doubt the 9/11 story every week, evidence abounds that many have a mental block against rational examination of the evidence about 9/11" writes Dr. Reynolds in a recent article. This mental block, he thinks, amounts to willful ignorance-not just about 9/11, but about history.

"Governments throughout history have provoked or staged attacks on their own people to serve the powers behind the throne ('the money power'), glorify themselves, engage in vast government spending, reward friends, exert domestic control, stimulate the juices of war, annex neighbors and pursue vast geostrategic rearrangements (the 'global domination project)" Reynolds asserts. He notes that every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on the "Operation Northwoods" plan to murder Americans in fake "Cuban terrorist" attacks in 1962. The planned Operation Northwoods murders of ordinary Americans in fake terrorist bombings and a fake "airliner shoot-down" would have involved hundreds of military and intelligence personnel. Yet the existence of Operation Northwoods was successfully kept secret from the American people for forty years until James Bamford revealed it in his book Body of Secrets, published in January 2002.

Though government officials have historically been able to successfully conceal their fake or arranged war-trigger attacks long enough to avoid being hanged for treason, Reynolds thinks the 9/11 cover-up has already unraveled. "Skepticism about conspiracy, small or large, is somewhat beside the point in the case of 9/11 because the official Osama-and-Nineteen-Young-Arabs (ONYA) conspiracy tale is so farcical and impossible. Nearly everyone in America has easy access to the internet and hundreds of websites expose the 9/11 fraud." (Morgan Reynolds, "Conspiracy and Closed Minds on 9/11": http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911 )

Reynolds argues that the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7 were destroyed in a manner that can only be explained by controlled demolition with pre-planted explosives-which should not be surprising, since no steel framed high-rises have ever collapsed in the way the three World Trade Center buildings did for any other reason. In his article "Why Did the World Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse?" Reynolds writes that among the many features of the WTC demolitions that suggest explosives, rather than jet-fuel fires, are:

1. Fire had never before caused steel-frame buildings to collapse except for the three buildings on 9/11, nor has fire collapsed any steel high rise since 9/11.
2. The fires, especially in the South Tower and WTC-7, were small.
3. WTC-7 was unharmed by an airplane and had only minor fires on the seventh and twelfth floors of this 47-story steel building yet it collapsed in less than 10 seconds.
4. WTC-5 and WTC-6 had raging fires but did not collapse despite much thinner steel beams (pp. 68-9).
5. In a PBS documentary, Larry Silverstein, the WTC lease-holder, recalled talking to the fire department commander on 9/11 about WTC-7 and said, ".maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it," slang for demolish it.
6. FEMA, given the uninviting task of explaining the collapse of Building 7 with mention of demolition verboten admitted that the best it could come up with had "only a low probability of occurrence."
7. It's difficult if not impossible for hydrocarbon fires like those fed by jet fuel (kerosene) to raise the temperature of steel close to melting.

Professional demolition, by contrast, can explain all of these facts and more. Demolition means placing explosives throughout a building, and detonating them in sequence to weaken "the structure so it collapses or folds in upon itself". In conventional demolitions gravity does most of the work, although it probably did a minority on
9/11, so heavily were the towers honeycombed with explosives.

1. Each WTC building collapse occurred at virtually free-fall speed (approximately 10 seconds or less).
2. Each building collapsed, for the most part, into its own footprint.
3. Virtually all the concrete (an estimated 100,000 tons in each tower) on every floor was pulverized into a very fine dust, a phenomenon that requires enormous energy and could not be caused by gravity alone (".workers can't even find concrete. 'It's all dust,' [the official] said").
4. Dust exploded horizontally for a couple hundred feet, as did debris, at the beginning of each tower's collapse.
5. Collapses were total, leaving none of the massive core columns sticking up hundreds of feet into the air.
6. Salvage experts were amazed at how small the debris stacks were.
7. The steel beams and columns came down in sections under 30 feet long and had no signs of "softening"; there was little left but shorn sections of steel and a few bits of concrete.
8. Photos and videos of the collapses all show "demolition waves," meaning "confluent rows of small explosions" along floors (blast sequences).
9. According to many witnesses, explosions occurred within the buildings.
10. Each collapse had detectable seismic vibrations suggestive of underground explosions, similar to the 2.3 earthquake magnitude from a demolition like the Seattle Kingdome (p. 108).
11. Each collapse produced molten steel identical to that generated by explosives, resulting in "hot spots" that persisted for months (the two hottest spots at WTC-2 and WTC-7 were approximately 1,350o F five days after being continuously flooded with water, a temperature high enough to melt aluminum (p. 70). ("Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse?" by Morgan Reynolds: http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911 )

The apparent demolition of the three skyscrapers, and a perhaps inadvertent statement by heavily-insured WTC landlord Larry Silverstein that WTC-7 was "pulled" (slang for "demolished") can be viewed on many 9/11 truth DVDs and web-videos, including Loose Change, 9/11 Eyewitness, 9/11 and the American Empire, (Dr. David Griffin), and 9/11 Revisited (Dr. Steven Jones). Dr. Reynolds' articles on 9/11 and other matters can be found at http://nomoregames.net . The videos, and further information about Dr. Reynolds' May 6th speech, are available from the event's sponsor, the Madison-based Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth: http://mujca.com

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 14
From: "Kevin Hammond" sir_oglaigh@yahoo.com
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:42am(PDT)
Subject: Re: GET IT ! its about OIL

Leslie! No one her EVER said that Hitler was a ""GOOD GUY"" OR that he was ""FORCED"" by the jews to commit the holocaust! Either you are INTENTIONALLY twisting peoples words or are just not paying attention to what anyone is saying and are just being an IDIOT trying to cause trouble. PAY ATTENTION! Now I will not argue that there are a couple of people who REALLY NEED to chose their words much more carefully, But YOU nedd to pay much closer attention to what is being said here on this group.

www.fightthenwo.org

Kevin

Naveed <flanker12k@yahoo.com> wrote:
for the last time

all JEWS ARE NOT ZIONISTS!

ALL ZIONISTS ARE NOT JEWS!

There is a ZIONIST ELEMENT to the 9/11 conspiracy!!! Maybe you can't handle that............
did you even read the damn post i posted about ISRAELI spy rings awash in america? I POSTED IT TWICE.......

this below come from my friend ryan!

'A Clean Break' JINSA/PNAC Neocons associated with AIPAC espionage:

washingtonpost.com
Leak Inquiry Includes Iran Experts in Administration

By Robin Wright and Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, September 4, 2004; Page A04

FBI counterintelligence investigators have in recent weeks questioned current and former U.S. officials about whether a small group of Iran specialists at the Pentagon and in Vice President Cheney's office may have been involved in passing classified information to an Iraqi politician or a U.S. lobbying group allied with Israel, according to sources familiar with or involved in the case.

In their interviews, the FBI agents have also named two Israeli diplomats stationed in Washington and asked whether they would be willing recipients of sensitive intelligence, the sources added.

The investigators have asked questions about personnel in the office of Pentagon Undersecretary for Policy Douglas J. Feith as well as members of the influential Defense Policy Board, an advisory panel for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, according to former U.S. officials who have been questioned and others familiar with the case.

Investigators have specifically asked about a group of neoconservatives involved in defense issues, including Feith, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, Iraq and Iran specialist Harold Rhode and others at the Pentagon. FBI agents also have asked current and former officials about Richard Perle of the defense board and David Wurmser, an Iran specialist and principal deputy assistant for national security affairs in Cheney's office, according to sources familiar with or involved in the case.

"The initial interest was: Do you believe certain people would spy for Israel and pass secret information?" said one source interviewed by the FBI about the defense officials.

It remains unclear, however, how specific investigators' suspicions have become. And one official, a Feith ally, has said the investigation is an effort by some intelligence officials to discredit Pentagon hawks.

The sources interviewed for this article requested anonymity because it involves classified information or because of the ongoing investigation.

Perle, Rhode and Wolfowitz did not return telephone calls placed to their homes and offices late Friday. Reached at home, Feith declined comment, citing the ongoing investigation.

But Pentagon officials insisted yesterday that FBI questions about key policymakers did not mean they were the subjects of the intelligence leak investigation. Senior Pentagon officials have said they were told by the FBI that the investigation is focused on just one suspect in the Defense Department, Lawrence A. Franklin, an Iran specialist in Feith's office.

The FBI investigation first came to light last week with reports of a probe into whether Franklin passed a draft presidential directive on Iran to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and whether the directive was then passed to Israel, sources have said. AIPAC has strongly denied any involvement in espionage.

A federal grand jury in Alexandria may take up the Franklin case as early as next week, law enforcement sources said.

The questioning of Franklin is a recent part of an investigation that dates back more than two years and includes diverse threads, U.S. officials and people close to the case said. One aspect of the probe concerns AIPAC and another looks at whether intelligence on Iran ended up in the hands of Iraqi National Congress leader Ahmed Chalabi, a longtime Pentagon favorite once considered a possible replacement for Saddam Hussein.

Iran has been a particularly controversial issue within the Bush administration, which still does not have a formal policy more than 3 1/2 years after taking office. A small group of Pentagon neoconservatives opposed a draft directive because it did not support a change of governments in Tehran, which they advocated, current and former U.S. officials said.

The officials whose names came up during questioning have strong ties to Israel. They also share a long-standing position on Iran and other radical regimes. Wurmser, Feith and Perle were co-authors of a 1996 policy paper for then-Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm." It called for removing Hussein from power in Iraq as part of a broad strategy to transform the region and remove radical regimes.

But current and former U.S. officials, including some who were interviewed by the FBI, are still puzzled by the nature of the investigation involving Israel, because its profoundly close ties with the United States date back six decades and have involved sharing sensitive intelligence. Yet officials also concede that Israel is one of the three countries most active in spying on the United States. Israel denies conducting espionage in the United States.

Also yesterday, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee demanded that a new prosecutor be assigned to investigate the alleged leaks, questioning the "political leanings" of the U.S. attorney in Alexandria who is handling the criminal portion of the case.

In a letter to Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) said the role of U.S. Attorney Paul J. McNulty in the case has "obvious political implications" in an election year, and Conyers cited anonymous allegations in a news report that McNulty had "put the brakes on" the probe.

"While I have no reason to question Mr. McNulty's integrity, he is not a career prosecutor, but instead is a political appointee whose previous employment was principally with Republican politicians," Conyers wrote.

Conyers suggested that either a special counsel or U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald of Chicago, who is overseeing a separate probe into the disclosure of CIA operative Valerie Plame, should take over the Pentagon probe.

Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo declined to comment on the specifics of Conyers's allegations. "We will review the congressman's letter and give it the attention it is due," Corallo said. A spokesman for McNulty also declined comment, referring a reporter to Corallo's statement.

Several law enforcement officials have said in recent days that the FBI had initially considered making rapid arrests in the Franklin probe when it became clear that news of the investigation was about to become public last week. But, these officials said, prosecutors urged caution, arguing that investigators needed more time to gather evidence and assess the case.

Franklin has been cooperating in the probe for several weeks, officials familiar with the investigation said. He has not responded to numerous requests for comment at his office and his home in West Virginia.

All in the Neocon Family By Jim Lobe, AlterNet
Posted on March 27, 2003, Printed on April 16, 2006
http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/ What do William Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Elliot Abrams, and Robert Kagan have in common? Yes, they are all die-hard hawks who have gained control of U.S. foreign policy since the 9/11 attacks. But they are also part of one big neoconservative family -- an extended clan of spouses, children, and friends who have known each other for generations.
Neoconservatives are former liberals (which explains the "neo" prefix) who advocate an aggressive unilateralist vision of U.S. global supremacy, which includes a close strategic alliance with Israel. Let's start with one of the founding fathers of the extended neocon clan: Irving Kristol. His extensive resume includes waging culture wars for the CIA against the Soviet Union in the early years of the Cold War and calling for an American "imperial" role during the Vietnam War. Papa Kristol, who has been credited with defining the major themes of neoconservative thought, is married to Gertrude Himmelfarb, a neoconservative powerhouse on her own. Her studies of the Victorian era in Britain helped inspire the men who sold Bush on the idea of "compassionate conservatism."
The son of this proud couple is none other that William Kristol, the crown prince of the neoconservative clique and editor of the Rupert Murdoch-owned Weekly Standard. In 1997, he founded the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a front group which cemented the powerful alliance between right-wing Republicans like Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, Christian and Catholic Right leaders like Gary Bauer and William Bennett, and the neocons behind a platform of global U.S. military dominance.
Irving Kristol's most prominent disciple is Richard Perle, who was until Thursday the Defense Policy Board chairman, is also a "resident scholar" at the American Enterprise Institute, which is housed in the same building as PNAC. Perle himself married into neocon royalty when he wed the daughter of his professor at the University of Chicago, the late Alfred Wohlstetter -- the man who helped both his son-in-law and his fellow student Paul Wolfowitz get their start in Washington more than 30 years ago.
Perle's own protege is Douglas Feith, who is now Wolfowitz's deputy for policy and is widely known for his right-wing Likud position. And why not? His father, Philadelphia businessman and philanthropist Dalck Feith, was once a follower of the great revisionist Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky, in his native Poland back in the 1930s. The two Feiths were honored together in 1997 by the right-wing Zionist Organization of America (ZOA).
The AEI has long been a major nexus for such inter-familial relationships. A long-time collaborator with Perle, Michael Ledeen is married to Barbara Ledeen, a founder and director of the anti-feminist Independent Women's Forum (IWF), who is currently a major player in the Republican leadership on Capitol Hill. Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and another neo-con power couple -- David and Meyrav Wurmser -- co-authored a 1996 memorandum for Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu outlining how to break the Oslo peace process and invade Iraq as the first step to transforming the Middle East.
Though she doesn't focus much on foreign-policy issues, Lynne Cheney also hangs her hat at AEI. Her husband Dick Cheney recently chose Victoria Nuland to become his next deputy national security adviser. Nuland, as it turns out, is married to Robert Kagan, Bill Kristol's main comrade-in-arms and the co-founder of PNAC.
Bob's father, Donald Kagan, is a Yale historian who converted from a liberal Democrat to a staunch neocon in the 1970s. On the eve of the 2000 presidential elections, Donald and his other son, Frederick, published "While America Sleeps," a clarion call to increase defense spending. Since then, the three Kagan men have written reams of columns warning that the currently ballooning Pentagon budget is simply not enough to fund the much-desired vision of U.S. global supremacy.
And which infamous ex-Reaganite do the Kagans and another leading neocon family have in common? None other than Iran-contra veteran Elliott Abrams.
Now the director of Near Eastern Affairs in Bush's National Security Council, Abrams worked closely with Bob Kagan back in the Reagan era. He is also the son-in-law of Norman Podhoretz, long-time editor of the influential conservative Jewish publication Commentary, and his wife, Midge Decter, a fearsome polemicist in her own right.
Podhoretz, like Kristol Sr., helped invent neo-conservatism in the late 1960s. He and Decter created a formidable political team as leaders of the Committee on the Present Danger in 1980, when they worked with Donald Rumsfeld to pound the last nail into the coffin of detente and promote the rise of Ronald Reagan. In addition to being Abrams' father-in-law, Norman Podhoretz is also the father of John Podhoretz, a columnist for the Murdoch-owned New York Post and frequent guest on the Murdoch-owned Fox News channel.
As editor of Commentary, Norman offered writing space to rising stars of the neocon movement for more than 30 years. His proteges include former U.N. ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick and Richard Pipes, who was Ronald Reagan's top advisor on the "Evil Empire," as the president liked to call the Soviet Union. His son, Daniel Pipes, has also made a career out of battling "evil," which in his case is Islam. And to tie it all up neatly, in 2002, Podhoretz received the highest honor bestowed by the AEI: the Irving Kristol award.
This list of intricate, overlapping connections is hardly exhaustive or perhaps even surprising. But it helps reveal an important fact. Contrary to appearances, the neocons do not constitute a powerful mass political movement. They are instead a small, tighly-knit clan whose incestuous familial and personal connections, both within and outside the Bush administration, have allowed them grab control of the future of American foreign policy.

© 2006 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/15481/

Home : WRH Store : WRH Index : Reader Letters : Archives : Advertise : Donate
On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good…….Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)"

The Five Dancing Israelis
Arrested On 9-11

As the world watched in disbelief and asked the question... ...Mossad operatives were seen dancing with joy.

A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-11.
The men set up cameras by the Hudson River and trained them on the twin towers. (1)
Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming "middle-eastern" men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery. (2) "They were like happy, you know … They didn't look shocked to me" said a witness. (3)
[T]hey were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in front of the wreckage. (4)
Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot. (6)

"It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park." (7)
One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led them to close down all of New York's bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the 9-1-1 dispatcher that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel. Here's the transcript from NBC News:
Dispatcher: Jersey City police.
Caller: Yes, we have a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there, they look like Palestinians and going around a building.
Caller: There's a minivan heading toward the Holland tunnel, I see the guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh uniform.
Dispatcher: He has what?
Caller: He's dressed like an Arab. (8)
(*Writer's note: Why would this mystery caller specifically say that these "Arabs" were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians usually dress in western style clothes, not "sheikh uniforms")

Based on that phone call, police then issued a "Be-on-the-Lookout" alert for a white mini-van heading for the city's bridges and tunnels from New Jersey. When a van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing into New York, the suspicious "middle-easterners" were apprehended. Imagine the surprise of the police officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis! According to ABC’s 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers:

"We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem." (9)
Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD? The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (10)
The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture. (11)
The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:
American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported. (12)
TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down with tonnes of explosives (13). What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20 (14), the New York Post (15), and the New Jersey Bergen Record (16) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel. But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (17), and Yediot America, (18) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.
It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in so many different locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five. Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while the other was meant to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New Jersey? If a van was to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would need to have a "get-away van" to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland Tunnel- which was where the police had originally been directed to by
that anti-Palestinian 9-1-1 "mystery caller". A classic misdirection play.

From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.
The employee, who declined to give his name said: "I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered me." These guys were like, "Now America knows what we go through." (19)
A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's Israeli owner, Dominick Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was in such a hurry to flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left with their furniture stranded in storage facilities (20). It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis were in fact Mossad agents (21). They were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released. Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40 days. (22)
[S]everal of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home. Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event." (23)

How did they know there would be an event to document on 9-11? It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli Mossad agents - here's the most logical scenario:
1. The Israeli "movers" cheered the 9-11 attacks to celebrate the successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled off in history. 2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel. 3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with this phone call, the Israeli bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where they will drop off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices. 4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move inadvertently foils the Israelis' misdirection play and leads to their own capture and 40 day torture. 5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice Department rounds up over 1000 Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York area jails. The Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as
the government and media can now claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in the same dragnet as many other Arabs. 6. After several months, FBI and Justice Department "higher-ups" are able to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis quietly.

Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9-11 attacks even though he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale. Immediately after the Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
CIA Director George Tenet said "You know, this has bin Laden's fingerprints all over it." (24) The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the Israeli connection. Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with stories linking the attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, "experts", and scribblers of every stripe spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most outrageous propaganda imaginable. We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA was because he hates our "freedom" and "democracy". The Muslims were "medieval" and they wanted to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter about the Crusades, and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all over the place! But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that Zionists orchestrated the
9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden's statement of denial in which he said:
"I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States." (25)
You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did you?
[A] number of intelligence officials have raised questions about Osama bin Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he's running this operation?" one C.I.A. official asked. "It's so huge. He couldn't have done it alone." A senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other documentation needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major foreign intelligence service might also have been involved. (26)
Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of the 9-11 attacks by the FBI:
USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7, 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA, AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD. (27)
To date, the only shred of “evidence” to be uncovered against bin Laden is a barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened to find "lying around" in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake. (28) There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to link the Al Qaeda "terrorist network" to these acts of terror, but there is a mountain of evidence, both hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been very busy framing Arabs for terror plots against America.

One final point - at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the attacks (29). This claim was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said it had always opposed "terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the occupied territories." (30) 9-11 CNN streamed RealVideo item mentioning a Palestinian claim of responsibility

Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less than 500 people (31) make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for the attacks?
Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to fulfill what the goals of the political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century ago: to turn all of historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central tenet of the Zionist ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, "A land without people for a people without a land." (32)
The implication of Palestinians in the 9-11 attacks would have handed Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all Palestinians would have been labelled terrorists.

---------------------------------
"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information." US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring.

"By way of deception, thou shalt do war"
Motto of the Mossad

---------------------------------
See also: Israel and 9/11 - Index of What Really Happened
Zionist Circles Benefit From WTC Collapse

---------------------------------
What Really Happened

Leslie Schwartz <lhs_emf@pacbell.net> wrote:
Bugs,

Your wasting your breath here this list is infested with people who think its all a Jewish, Zionist conspiracy.

Don't waste your time responding to these people, they are deranged, I just read one of their histories, Hitler you know was a good guy, Jews forced him to carry out the holocaust.

Jews forced the CIA to attack the WTC, Jews and Mossad control the world along with Jewish international bankers, etc.

Etc. etc, etc.

Jews

Etc. etc, etc.

Zionists

Etc. etc, etc.

Mossad

Etc. etc, etc.

Sharon

Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc.
etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.Etc. etc, etc.

Just plain demented hate.

---------------------------------
From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bugs
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 10:30 AM
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] GET IT ! its about OIL

TRY RUMSFELD FOR TREASON

The oath is to stand against all domestic and foreign enimies and
what Rumsfeld has done to the American Troops is a crime in and onto
itself.

Uraium dust has been spread all over Iraq due to the Uranium used in
Penatrator Bombs and Bullets.

Villages and the City of Fulluja have been razed to the ground.

100,000 Iraqi civillians mostly women and children have been killed
as collateral damage.

All of this has occured because Rumsfeld and Bush elected to lie the
American Soldiers into an unnecessary war.

Why did Bush and Rumsfeld do this ?

They did it to steal the Iraqi oil sell it to china and put the cash
into Chinese banks.

And they are perpetuating the occupation by not having enough troops
so they can stay in Iraq an keep on stealing the oil forever.

The Maritine Ship movement logs will prove this.

It is an OPEN and Shut Case.

or in other words a "REAL SLAM DUNK"

Bush's Brother and Uncle have been in and out of China for years
lining up this traitorous deal.
----- Original Message -----
From: Naveed
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: [911TruthAction] Greg Palast Still DOESNT GET IT !

didn't know paul bremer was a kissinger stooge.......

mann david <dmann51@yahoo.com> wrote: Read that piece in a hurry but didn't notice mention
of 9-11. Wow, pathetic trivial trip indeed.

--- JIM <justpasenthru2012@att.net> wrote:

> Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
> Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
> The Guardian - Comment
> Friday, April 14, 2006
> By Greg Palast
>
> Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the
> gaggle of generals,
> safely
> retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week,
> six of them
> have called for
> the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
>
> Well, according to my watch, they're about four
> years too late --
> and they still
> don't get it.
>
> I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink
> that the
> bemedalled boys in
> crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the
> rump, in public.
> But to me, it
> just shows me that these boys still can't shoot
> straight.
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up
> in front of the
> UN and
> identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons
> labs, was it,
> General
> Powell?
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us
> our next warning
> from Saddam
> could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
>
> It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared
> that Al Qaeda
> and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
>
> Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious
> arrogance, a
> duplicitous
> chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and
> Tinker-Toy Napoleon --
> but he didn't
> appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
>
> Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of
> Defense you didn't
> read in the
> New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner,
> the man our
> president
> placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion
> viceroy.
>
> Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working
> under the
> mistaken notion
> that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq,
> the President
> meant the
> Iraqis could choose their own government.
> Misunderstanding the
> President's true
> mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold
> elections within
> 90 days and
> for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the
> cities to a desert
> base. "It's
> their country," the General told me of the Iraqis.
> "And," he added,
> most
> ominously, "their oil."
>
> Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed
> Garner a 101-page
> plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons
> at the State
> Department, Treasury
> and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e.
> the sale)
> of "all state
> assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting
> industries."
> The General
> knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where
> the Iraqi sun
> don't shine.
> Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting
> of Iraqi tribal
> leaders to
> plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their
> own multi-ethnic
> government --
> and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were
> on talking
> terms -- knew he
> could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a
>
> welcomed "liberation"
> turned into a hated "occupation."
>
> But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition
> government would mean
> the
> death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets
> privatization grab.
>
> On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the
> very night
> General Garner
> arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington.
> It was Rumsfeld
> on the line.
> He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack,
> Jack, you're
> fired."
>
> Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of
> on-the-ground experience
> in Iraq,
> with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director
> of Kissinger
> Associates.
> Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and
> postponed
> elections for a
> year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot
> pasha, selling
> off Iraq's
> economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as
> Rumsfeld's neo-con
> clique had
> desired.
>
> Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the
> six generals' call
> for
> Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
>
> For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't
> shoot straight.
> They're
> wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've
> gunned down the
> puppet instead
> of the puppeteers.
>
> There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked
> General Garner from
> Baghdad
> without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or
> breathes or spits
> in the Bush
> Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of
> approval. And
> ultimately, it's
> the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
>
> Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't
> give them
> enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the
> cowboy from
> Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that
> we lacked
> troops -- the
> problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy
> this nation. A
> million
> troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would
> just have more
> targets.)
>
> President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him
> today on the
> intercom with
> Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up."
> And Cheney
> replies, "Hey,
> just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until
> he's taken all
> their ammo."
>
> When Bush and Cheney read about the call for
> Rumsfeld's resignation
> today, I can
> just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission
> Accomplished."
>
> Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about
> choosing a target:
> It's the
> President, stupid.
>
=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

www.fightthenwo.org
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
---------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/312 - Release Date: 4/14/2006

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
- Notebook, 1904

www.fightthenwo.org
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.

SPONSORED LINKS
United state government grant United state coin United state patent United state flag United state army United state grant

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------

Saoirse go deo! www.fightthenwo.org

---------------------------------
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 15
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 0:01pm(PDT)
Subject: articles: Soviet Union's ambiguous relationship with Israel -=- Reti

From: "Peter Myers" <myers@cyberone.com.au>

April 17, 2006

(1) Retired colonel claims U.S. military operations are already 'underway' in Iran
(2) Iranian Ambassador to UN is vice-chair of UN Disarmament Commission
(3) Hong Kong and The Sassoon Opium Wars
(4) Soviet Union's ambiguous relationship with Israel
(5) Russia's Top Lawmaker Casts Doubt on WTO Entry

(1) Retired colonel claims U.S. military operations are already 'underway' in Iran

Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 02:30:14 -0400 From: ranger116@webtv.net (T Lee Buyea Fla
News Service)

Thanks to my good friend and colleague Larenzo236 for this submission, and the
article by the New York Times reporter Steven Weisman.

While the Bush administration is working together with Iranian terrorist
organizations to destabilize the Iranian regime, they are also looking for
"clean" civil society organizations that could serve them as conduits for their
misinformation and penetration campaign.

Retired colonel claims U.S. military operations are already 'underway' in Iran
Ron Brynaert

Raw Story

Saturday April 15, 2006

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Retired_colonel_claims_U.S._Military_operations_0415.html

During an interview on CNN Friday night, retired U.S. Air Force Colonel Sam
Gardiner claimed that U.S. military operations are already 'underway' inside
Iran, RAW STORY has found."I would say -- and this may shock some -- I think the
decision has been made and military operations are under way," Col. Gardiner
told CNN International anchor Jim Clancy (as noted by Digby at the blog
Hullabaloo).(Crooks and Liars has a video clip of the interview)

Gardiner, who designed a war game in November of 2004 for Atlantic Magazine
("Will Iran be next?") which simulated "preparations for a U.S. assault on
Iran," also claimed that Aliasghar Soltaniyeh, the Iranian ambassador to the
United Nation's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told him a few weeks
ago that units who had attacked the Revolutionary Guard had been captured and
confessed to working with Americans. "The secretary point is, the Iranians have
been saying American military troops are in there, have been saying it for
almost a year," Gardiner said. "I was in Berlin two weeks ago, sat next to the
ambassador, the Iranian ambassador to the IAEA. And I said, 'Hey, I hear you're
accusing Americans of being in there operating with some of the units that have
shot up revolution guard units.'" "He said, quite frankly, 'Yes, we know they
are. We've captured some of the units, and they've confessed to working with the
Americans,'" said the retired Air Force colonel. Last Thursday, Raw Story's
Larisa Alexandrovna reported (On Cheney, Rumsfeld order, US outsourcing special
ops, intelligence to Iraq terror group, intelligence officials say) that,
according to former and current intelligence officials, the Pentagon has been
using a right-wing terrorist organization known as Mujahedeen-e Khalq (MEK) as
an operational asset "to create strife in Iran in preparation for any possible
attack."

"[I]nstead of securing a known terrorist organization, which has been
responsible for acts of terror against Iranian targets and individuals all over
the world - including US civilian and military casualties - Rumsfeld under
instructions from Cheney, began using the group on special ops missions into
Iran to pave the way for a potential Iran strike," Larisa reported. "They are
doing whatever they want, no oversight at all," an intelligence source told
Larisa.Larisa reported that the MEK soldiers were told to "quit" their
organization and were "renamed" in accordance with a plan conceived by Secretary
of Defense Donald Rumsfeld so that they could be "converted" into a military
special ops team. According to a UN official close to the Security Council whom
Larisa interviewed, the "newly renamed MEK soldiers" were being employed in the
place of U.S. military advance teams to commit "acts of violence in hopes of
staging an insurgency of the Iranian Sunni population." "We are already at war,"
the UN official told RAW STORY. ==

U.S. Program Is Directed at Altering Iran's Politics

By STEVEN R. WEISMAN WASHINGTON

April 15, 2006

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/15/washington/15diplo.html?_r=4&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

As the Bush administration confronts the Tehran government over its suspected
nuclear weapons program and accusations that it supports terrorism, a newly
created office of Iranian affairs in the State Department is poring over
applications for a rapidly expanding program to change the political process
inside Iran.

The project, which will spend $7 million in the current fiscal year, would
become many times larger next year if Congress approves a broad request for $85
million that the Bush administration has requested for scholarships, exchange
programs, radio and television broadcasts and other activities aimed at shaking
up Iran's political system. The effort, overseen by Elizabeth Cheney, a deputy
assistant secretary of state who is a daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney,
has been denounced by Iran's leaders as meddling in their internal affairs. It
comes at a time of escalating confrontation between Iran and the United States
over Iran's nuclear program, exacerbated by reports, which the administration
has played down, that military contingency plans are being reviewed as well.

While the United States has marshaled international support for diplomatic
pressure on Iran, some Asian and European allies have expressed misgivings about
other avenues of pressure, which are seen as aimed at undermining the government
in Tehran. One Asian diplomat said the effort was reminiscent of the subsidies
the United States provided to Iraqi exile groups in the 1990's. "They don't call
it 'regime change,' but that is obviously what it is," he said. But he had to be
promised anonymity before he would discuss it, not wanting to create a public
rift between his country and the United States on a significant matter of
foreign policy.

To find people to promote change in Iran, the State Department has opened a
competition for grant applications. A Web site announcement says that applicants
"must outline activities linked to reform and demonstrate how the proposed
approach would achieve sustainable impact in Iran."

A State Department official said that numerous applications had come in and that
the department would have little trouble spending the $25 million in the next
year. But he acknowledged that various groups were squabbling over how best to
promote reform and who would be most effective in doing so.

"Iran is governed by an unelected clerical elite not accountable to the people,"
the official said, speaking anonymously under ground rules imposed by the
department. "But despite considerable personal risk, we are seeing some
activists willing to step forward."

The biggest problem for the applicants is the amount of risk they might incur.
There have been reports in Iran of advocates of change being arrested after
having met with American officials at conferences, though some experts charge
that Iran has exaggerated those reports in order to discourage contacts with the
West.

Other experts said that some of the people who were stepping forward might not
be the best ones to get the money.

"It sounds good to fund civil society groups, but not when you don't know who
the groups are," said Vali R. Nasr, an Iranian-born professor of national
affairs at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, Calif. "No real group
wants a direct affiliation with the United States. It will just get them into
trouble with the government."

Administration officials said a few top American officials had been traveling
the country, particularly to Los Angeles, to meet with Iranian exile
organizations, many of them supporters of the monarchy of Shah Reza Pahlavi, who
was overthrown in 1979. Some of the Los Angeles groups operate satellite radio
and television stations that beam programs into Iran. But State Department
officials said they were not likely to enlist groups associated with the
monarchy because, in their view, they do not seem to have much support in Iran.

Lorne W. Craner, president of the International Republican Institute, a
foundation linked to the Republican Party, said, "There are plenty of people out
there who have a checkered past who you would not want to work with."

The institute, which receives money from Congress and grants from the State
Department, has in the last couple of years linked up with groups and
individuals in Iran and offered them training at places outside the country. The
groups cannot be identified for fear of their safety, he said.

State Department officials and various advocates for change consulted by the
department said that for now the money would probably be concentrated on groups
seeking to document human rights abuses and promote women's and labor rights,
rather than groups seeking direct political change.

Recipients of such financing in the past said that in order to operate they had
to avoid the perception that they are tools of "regime change." "The
administration has consulted many Iranians just to find out who to talk to,"
said Roya Boroumand, co-director of the Abdorrahman Boroumand Foundation, which
seeks to document human rights abuses inside Iran. "We try not to be in touch
with too many people inside Iran because we know it could be fatal."

The Iran Human Rights Documentation Center, a new group based in New Haven, has
received $1 million from the State Department and could receive more, officials
said. But leaders of the group emphasize that while they have contacts with
people in Iran, it is not for the purpose of overthrowing the government.

"We are pro-human rights, but we are not directly seeking regime change," said
Maura Johnson, the center's executive director. "That's not our agenda. When you
look at many other countries, improved human rights can occur without regime
change, through reforms and stronger institutions."

(2) Iranian Ambassador to UN is vice-chair of UN Disarmament Commission

Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 07:19:22 +0100 From: Rowan Berkeley
<rowan.berkeley@googlemail.com>

Iranian Ambassador to UN is vice-chair of UN Disarmament Commission (excerpt
from an Arutz Sheva story, April 15 2006)
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=101999

[On April 11] the UN's Disarmament Commission elected Iran's Mehdi Danesh-Yazdi
as one of its three vice-chairs. "The continued existence of thousands of
nuclear warheads in the stockpiles of the nuclear-weapon States, which could
destroy the entire globe many times over, and the increasing resort to the
threat of their possible use, are the major sources of concern with regard to
global peace and security," Danesh-Yazdi said, adding that Israel was required
to place all of its "clandestine nuclear facilities" under UN nuclear watchdog
supervision. Jordan's representative added that Israel's refusal to renounce
nuclear weapons is a major source of tensions in the Middle East.

(3) Hong Kong and The Sassoon Opium Wars

Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:11:53 +0800 From: "Max" <max@mailstar.net>

The lesson of the Opium war is wrong. It points in the wrong direction.

Certainly the superior Western technology enabled the colonization throughout
history - that's why the Iran and other rogue nation should be prevented access
to nuclear weapons - which were sofar only used against mankind by the honorable
United States. It is not the nation but the people who run those nations which
make the decisions. Military superiority paired with ethnic superiority for
Global Governance is disastrous. Read the better story with more inside below:

"Hong Kong and The Sassoon Opium Wars"

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles9/Engel_Jew-and-Me.htm

The 99 year British lease on Hong Kong expired in July 1999 allowing the Red
Chinese to take over. Hundreds of newspaper stories and TV reports have covered
this event but not one revealed how England first gained control of Hong Kong!
The truth lies buried in the family line of David Sassoon, "The Rothschilds of
The Far East," and their monopoly over the opium trade. Britain won Hong Kong by
launching the opium Wars to give the Sassoons exclusive rights to drug an entire
nation!

David Sassoon was born in Baghdad, Iran in 1792. His father, Saleh Sassoon, was
a wealthy banker and the treasurer to Ahmet Pasha, the governor of Baghdad.
(Thus making him the "court Jew" - a highly influential position.) In 1829 Ahmet
was overthrown due to corruption and the Sassoon family fled to Bombay, India.
This was the strategic trade route to interior India and the gateway to the Far
East. In a brief time the British government granted Sassoon "monopoly rights"
to all manufacture of cotton goods, silk and most important of all - Opium -
then the most addictive drug in the world!

The Jewish Encyclopedia of 1905, states that Sassoon expanded his opium trade
into China and Japan. He placed his eight sons in charge of the various major
opium exchanges in China. According to the 1944 Jewish Encyclopedia: "He
employed only Jews in his business, and wherever he sent them he built
synagogues and schools for them. He imported whole families of fellow Jews. . .
and put them to work."

Sassoon's sons were busy pushing this mind-destroying drug in Canton, China.
Between 1830 - 1831 they trafficked 18,956 chests of opium earning millions of
dollars. Part of the profits went to Queen Victoria and the British government.
In the year 1836 the trade increased to over 30,000 chests and drug addiction in
coastal cities became endemic.

In 1839, the Manchu Emperor ordered that it be stopped. He named the
Commissioner of Canton, Lin Tse-hsu, to lead a campaign against opium. Lin
seized 2,000 chests of Sassoon opium and threw it into the river. An outraged
David Sassoon demanded that Great Britain retaliate. Thus, the Opium Wars began
with the British Army fighting as mercenaries of the Sassoons. They attacked
cities and blockaded ports. The Chinese Army, decimated by 10 years of rampant
opium addiction, proved no match for the British Army. The war ended in 1839
with the signing of "The Treaty of Nanking." This included provisions especially
designed to guarantee the Sassoons the right to enslave an entire population
with opium. The "peace treaty" included these provisions: "1) Full legalization
of the opium trade in China, 2) compensation from the opium stockpiles
confiscated by Lin of 2 million pounds, 3) territorial sovereignty for the
British Crown over several designated offshore islands.

Sassoon's Use British Army to Drug An Entire Nation British Prime Minister
Palmerston wrote Crown Commissiner Captain Charles Elliot that the treaty didn't
go far enough. He said it should have been rejected out of hand because: "After
all, our naval power is so strong that we can tell the Emperor what we mean to
hold rather than what he would cede. We must demand the admission of opium into
interior China as an article of lawful commerce and increase the indemnity
payments and British access to several additional Chinese ports." Thus, China
not only had to pay Sassoon the cost of his dumped opium but reimburse England
an unheard sum of 21 million pounds for the cost of the war!

This gave the Sassoon's monopoly rights to distribute opium in port cities.
However, even this was not good enough and Sassoon demanded the right to sell
opium throughout the nation. The Manchus resisted and the British Army again
attacked in the "Second Opium War fought 1858 - 1860. Palmerston declared that
all of interior China must be open for uninterrupted opium traffic. The British
suffered a defeat at the Taku Forts in June 1859 when sailors, ordered to seize
the forts, were run aground in the mud-choked harbor. Several hundred were
killed or captured. An enraged Palmerston said: "We shall teach such a lesson to
these perfidious hordes that the name of Europe will hereafter be a passport of
fear."

In October, the British besieged Peking. When the city fell, British commander
Lord Elgin, ordered the temples and other sacred shrines in the city sacked and
burned to the ground as a show of Britain's absolute contempt for the Chinese.
In the new "Peace Treaty" of Oct.25, 1860, the British were assigned rights to
vastly expanded opium trade covering seven-eights of China, which brought in
over 20 million pounds in 1864 alone. In that year, the Sassoons imported 58,681
chests of opium and by 1880 it had skyrocketed to 105,508 chests making the
Sassoons the richest Jews in the world. England was given the Hong Kong
peninsula as a colony and large sections of Amoy, Canton, Foochow, Ningpo and
Shanghai. The Sassoons were now licensing opium dens in each British occupied
area with large fees being collected by their Jewish agents. Sassoon would not
allow any other race to engage in "the Jews' business." However, the British
government would not allow any opium to be imported into Europe!

Sassoon "Monopoly Rights" Wrecked Lancashire - England's Textile Industry - Made
Roosevelt Wealthy Sir Albert Sassoon, the eldest of David Sassoon's sons took
over the family "business" empire. He constructed huge textile mills in Bombay
to pay slave labor wages. This expansion continued after World War One and ended
up putting mills in Lancashire, England out of business with thousands losing
their jobs. This did not stop Queen Victoria from having Albert knighted in
1872. Solomon Sassoon moved to Hong Kong and ran the family business there until
his death in 1894. Later, the entire family moved to England because with modern
communications they could operate their financial empire from their luxurious
estates in London. They socialized with royalty and Edward Albert. Sassoon
married Aline Caroline de Rothschild in 1887 which linked their fortune with
that of the Rothschilds. The Queen also had Edward knighted. All 14 of the
grandsons of David Sassoon were made officers during World War One and thus most
were able to avoid combat.

Franklin D. Roosevelt's fortune was inherited from his maternal grandfather
Warren Delano. In 1830 he was a senior partner of Russell & Company. It was
their merchant fleet which carried Sassoon's opium to China and returned with
tea. Warren Delano moved to Newburgh, N.Y. In 1851 his daughter Sara married a
well-born neighbor, James Roosevelt - the father of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
He always knew the origin of the family fortune but refused to discuss it.

The Sassoon opium trade brought death and destruction to millions and still
plagues Asia to this day. Their company was totally operated by Jews ONLY!

The corrupt British monarchy honored them with privilege and knighthood - to the
disgrace of the Crown! To this day the Sassoons are in the history books as
"great developers" of India but the source of their vast wealth is never
mentioned!"

(4) Soviet Union's ambiguous relationship with Israel

Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:16:52 -0400 From: Michael Hudson
<michael.hudson@earthlink.net>

This from Johnson's Russia List, April 16

HISTORICAL ESSAY

7. STALIN AND ISRAEL

SOURCE. Leonid Mlechin, Zachem Stalin sozdal Izrail? [Why Did Stalin Create
Israel?] (Moscow: Yauza / EKSMO, 2005)

Your reaction to this book title may be similar to mine when I first spotted it
in a catalogue of the MIPP book-selling company: puzzlement and suspicion. Why
did Stalin create Israel? DID he create Israel? Wasn't this like asking: "When
did you stop beating your wife?"

Later I decided to order the book after all. On reading it I concluded that the
author was not the crackpot I had taken him for. That is not to say he is much
good as a historian. He does not carefully weigh evidence in support of
alternative hypotheses. He is, rather, a popular writer with a dramatic story to
tell. From the confidence with which he explains Stalin's motives you would
think he had telepathic insight into the late dictator's thoughts. He also has a
strong emotional bias in favor of "the Jews," Zionism, and Israel.

Although these flaws are reasons to approach some of Mlechin's interpretations
with due caution, they probably do not invalidate the main points in his
narrative, which are backed up by fascinating documents from both Soviet and
Israeli foreign ministry archives. However, if you know of any serious
historical study of this early period in Soviet-Israeli relations I would like
to hear from you.

Accounts I recall reading of the developments that led to the creation of Israel
do make some mention of Soviet bloc support for the emergent state.
Specifically, they mention that the Jewish forces in Palestine received some
arms from Czechoslovakia and note that this could not have happened without
Stalin's consent. But this is almost in passing, conveying the impression of a
brief episode of minor significance.

>From Mlechin I learned that Soviet support of Israel was extensive and
multifaceted, played a vital role in Israel's emergence and survival, and
continued for a number of years. Now I ask myself: how come I wasn't aware of
this before? After all, I thought I knew a fair bit about both Soviet and
Israeli diplomatic history. And I suspect that we have here a piece of history
that has been rewritten out of recognition.

Later, of course, alignments switched to the pattern that is more familiar to us
all: Israel on the Western side of the Cold War, Egypt and Syria on the Soviet
side. Then all parties concerned must have found it convenient to "forget" that
Israel had begun its life as a Soviet client state. Wiping the slate clean
helped Israel establish its credentials as an outpost of Western civilization.
It also made plausible Israel's founding myth of its War of Independence as a
miraculous triumph against overwhelming odds. Arab leaders surely did not want
to embarrass their new superpower patron by pointing out (in public, at any
rate) its responsibility for creating the problem of the "Zionist entity" in the
first place. And so on.

As Winston Smith, hero of George Orwell's 1984, reminded himself following the
reassignment of enemy status from Eurasia to Eastasia: "Oceania is at war with
Eastasia. Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia." (1)

*

Of course, surveying the full sweep of Bolshevik and Soviet history the
predominant attitude to the Zionist movement is clearly one of hostility.
However, signs of the possibility of a different stance were there from quite
early on.

In the mid-1920s Felix Dzerzhinsky, founder of the Cheka (secret police),
circulated a series of memos in which he argued that it would be in the regime's
interests to tolerate Zionist activity in Russia. If left alone the Zionists had
no inclination to interfere in Russian politics; all they cared about was
Palestine. Why make unnecessary enemies? As for Palestine, let the Comintern
deal with it. These memos did not convince Dzerzhinsky's colleagues in either
the Cheka or the party leadership, and the Zionists continued to be persecuted,
though perhaps a little less thoroughly than other political opponents.

In the inter-war period representatives of the Zionist movement cultivated
contacts with Soviet diplomats. (2) They made all the right noises about the
common fight against British imperialism and its Arab client regimes. The
responses they obtained were extremely cautious but not entirely discouraging.

In the period 1944-47 the USSR continued to avoid taking any public position in
the dispute between Zionism and Arab nationalism. Soviet analysts interpreted
the situation in Palestine in terms of "inter-imperialist contradictions," (3)
with the US using the Zionists to push Britain out of the Middle East. The
foreign policy line was that the British mandate should be terminated and
replaced by a UN protectorate.

A reassessment of policy on Palestine took place in March and April 1947. On
March 6 senior foreign ministry adviser Boris Shtein sent a memo to first deputy
foreign minister Andrei Vyshinsky. (4) In it he argued that it was necessary to
clarify the Soviet position, that a UN protectorate was impracticable, and that
the USSR should support "full independence for Palestine."

The new policy in favor of the partition of Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab
state was unveiled at the UN on April 28 by the young Andrei Gromyko, later to
be foreign minister. Exactly how and when this policy was established remain
unclear. The final decision was apparently made, doubtless by Stalin himself,
only shortly before the UN session.

The crucial UN vote legitimizing the creation of the State of Israel was the
adoption of Resolution No. 181 on November 29, 1947. The resolution could not
have obtained the required two-thirds majority without the support of both the
Western and the Soviet bloc. In this sense Stalin and Truman shared the decisive
role. Gromyko delivered a powerful speech in support of the right of the Jewish
people to a state of their own. It won him great personal popularity in Israel.
The idea was even raised of naming a street in his honor.

The importance of Soviet diplomatic support for the newborn State of Israel
becomes clearer when we broaden our focus from Resolution No. 181 itself to
diplomatic activity at the UN during the War of Independence and in its
aftermath. At this crucial period Israel received much more consistent support
from the USSR than from the US. (5) Specifically, Soviet diplomats at the UN
blocked initiatives to impose a UN protectorate on Palestine, to change Israel's
borders to its disadvantage, and to require Israel to allow the return of
Palestinian refugees who had fled or been deported during the fighting. The
author aptly observes that Stalin found nothing abnormal in ethnic cleansing.
(6)

Turning from diplomacy to war, it must be noted that at this time an
international embargo against the sale of arms to the Middle Easy was in force,
although it was violated on both sides. To avoid open defiance of the embargo,
Stalin prevailed upon Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia (7) to supply arms to the
Jewish forces. The latter were also helped by gasoline deliveries from Romania.

The main airlift involved planes setting off from an airport near Bratislava in
Slovakia, stopping over in southern Yugoslavia, and landing on an airfield in
Lebanon's Bekaa Valley, where they were met by Jewish unloading crews. Most of
the pilots were American volunteers with war experience. (8)

The arms airlifted included artillery, mortars, ammunition, and disassembled old
British Spitfire and captured German Messerschmidt-109 fighter planes. The
following episode shows the decisive impact of these planes on the course of
hostilities:

"On March 29, 1948, the Palestinian Jews unpacked and assembled the first four
Messerschmidts. On the same day an Egyptian column, including tanks, was just a
few dozen kilometers from Tel Aviv. There was talk of evacuating the city. If
Tel Aviv were lost, all would be lost. Ben Gurion had no troops available to
defend the city. He sent the only thing he had: the four planes. Only one of
them returned from combat. But seeing that the Jews had aircraft the Egyptians
halted and did not try to take the defenseless city (p. 173)."

But it was not just a matter of arms supplies. Perhaps of at least equal
importance was military training. At the Bratislava airport Czech and Soviet
instructors trained pilots for the fledgling Israeli air force. Many other
Israeli military personnel received training in Czechoslovakia: tank crews,
paratroops, radio and telegraph operators, electrical mechanics, medics, and
some 3,500 infantry.

It seems that the author does not greatly exaggerate when he states that "the
sole ally to give Israel practical help was the Soviet Union" (p. 180).

After winning its independence Israel strove to strengthen its military ties
with the USSR. Besides seeking more arms, Israeli diplomats repeatedly raised
the issue of sending Israeli officers to study at Soviet military academies.

Apart from diplomatic and military support for Israel, there is the murky
question of cooperation between Israeli and eastern-bloc secret services.
Mlechin suggests that the Soviet Union was involved in the assassination of the
UN mediator Count Folke Bernadotte by Zionist extremists on September 17, 1948.

*

There was, finally, an ideological dimension to the Soviet-Israeli alliance. The
fighters who trained in Czechoslovakia attended lectures by Soviet political
instructors. Some units went into battle to cries (in Russian) of "For Stalin,
for Ben Gurion!" (9) It was not uncommon to see a portrait of Stalin hanging on
the wall in an Israeli home. Naturally, expressions of pro-Soviet sentiment were
more typical of the "left" of the Israeli political spectrum -- not only
Communists but also supporters of left-Zionist parties such as Mapam.

Within the Soviet Union itself, official support for Israel led to a measure of
ideological confusion as it clashed with the traditional Bolshevik designation
of Zionism as an anti-Soviet ideology. Israel's first ambassador in Moscow,
Golda Meir (later to become prime minister) astutely observed that the Soviet
line was "pro-Israel but anti-Zionist." How could anyone not find this
confusing? After all, the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine was the entire
raison d'etre of the Zionist movement.

I think that the Soviet line at this time is best defined as "semi-Zionist."
Stalin supported the creation of the Jewish state and he had no objection to
Jews in other parts of the world identifying with Israel or emigrating there --
but he did draw the line at Soviet Jews doing likewise.

This was, in fact, the initial bone of contention when Israeli-Soviet relations
began to sour in 1949. Israeli leaders were very interested in Soviet Jews as
potential immigrants. They needed rapidly to increase Israel's Jewish population
to fill up territory captured in the war, and -- being mainly of Russian origin
themselves -- found Soviet Jews especially attractive for this purpose.

On February 7, 1949, deputy foreign minister Valerian Zorin delivered an oral
warning to Ambassador Meir. He complained that the Israeli embassy was sending
Soviet Jews copies of its information bulletin, containing news about the
settlement in Israel of Jews from around the world. The Soviet Union considered
this "illegal enlistment of [its] citizens and incitement for them to renounce
Soviet citizenship." It was "inconsistent with a loyal attitude to the Soviet
Union." Meir bowed to Zorin's demands; the embassy severed all its contacts with
Soviet Jews. (10)

One very striking circumstance is the coincidence in time of Stalin's efforts on
Israel's behalf in the sphere of foreign policy and his virulent anti-Semitic
campaign at home. Both straddled the late 1940s and early 1950s. "The struggle
for the creation of Israel was accompanied by a purge of Jews from the
apparatus" (p. 128).

Evidently, for Stalin there was no inconsistency involved. Sponsoring a Jewish
client state in the Middle East served certain geopolitical purposes: it
weakened Britain's positions in the region and impeded American efforts to take
Britain's place there. As for the anti-Semitic campaign, it too had a purpose:
that of neutralizing a perceived security threat from an ethnic minority now
regarded as unreliable.

If there was a link, it was this: the anti-Semitic campaign was (at least in
part) a response to unwanted domestic effects of the pro-Israel campaign. Many
Soviet Jews responded to the latter with great enthusiasm. For example, Jewish
war veterans volunteered to be sent to "fight British imperialism" in Palestine.
The celebrated Jewish tank general Dragunsky even wanted to form an armed
formation of Soviet Jews and send it to reinforce the Zionist forces in
Palestine. These proposals were not welcome. It was one thing for the Soviet
state to support Israel as a matter of geopolitical calculation, and quite
another for Soviet Jews to support Israel out of ethnic solidarity. The official
attitude was: "WE support Israel, but we won't allow YOU to do so."

An interesting detail: the victims of Stalin's anti-Semitic campaign were
accused of being "rootless cosmopolitans" or agents of the Western powers, but
not of being Zionists. Anti-Semitism in the guise of anti-Zionism was a
phenomenon of the post-Stalin era. At the period under discussion, Soviet
patronage of Israel meant that Zionism could not be officially and unequivocally
defined as an enemy.

*

Zorin's warning was followed by further complaints. Israeli ostensibly neutral
foreign policy was shifting in a pro-US direction. Anti-Soviet propaganda was
appearing in the Israeli press. (Soviet officials could not believe that a
country's government might lack control over its press.)

But despite growing tension, the Soviet-Israeli relationship remained largely
cooperative until late 1952. The USSR continued to support Israel at the UN. New
trade agreements were signed as late as March 1952: Israel was to send fruit and
receive oil products in exchange. Then three developments culminated in a
definite break:

* In July 1952 Nasser's Young Officers came to power in Egypt. While no
immediate effect on Soviet-Israeli relations was apparent, the emergence of an
"anti-imperialist" Arab regime objectively gave the USSR an alternative option
for exerting its influence in the region -- an option it was later to pursue
(under Khrushchev).

* In December 1952 and January 1953 the "exposure of the doctors' plot" opened a
new phase in the Soviet anti-Semitic campaign. Although the campaign did not
indicate a diminished Soviet willingness to support Israel, it did make the
alliance with the USSR increasingly unpalatable to Israeli public opinion. With
the doctors' plot affair, Ben Gurion decided that it was no longer politically
possible to stay silent.

* On February 9, 1953 a bomb exploded on the grounds of the Soviet embassy in
Tel Aviv. Three Soviet citizens were badly wounded and the building damaged.
Whoever may have organized the terrorist act, Moscow insisted that the Israeli
government must have been complicit in it and broke off diplomatic relations.

Did Stalin create Israel? To the extent that any one individual can be held
responsible for the creation of a state, it does seem, on the basis of the
evidence presented by Mlechin, that Stalin has a better claim than any other
individual to this particular honor. Why did he do it? Apparently it was a
gamble in the context of the more assertive Soviet foreign policy that followed
victory over Nazi Germany, made in the hope of establishing a lasting Soviet
presence in the Middle East. It failed, but it can be seen as a precursor of
similar and more successful efforts in the post-Stalin era, this time backing
the other side in the Israel-Arab conflict. It does show that the standard view
of Soviet penetration of the Third World as a post-Stalin development is not
quite accurate. (11)

The episode also helps us fill in a broad historical view of the nature of
Zionism-Israel as an international phenomenon. What made possible the remarkable
rise of the Zionist community from a small and vulnerable minority in
Ottoman-ruled Palestine at the beginning of the 20th century to a nuclear-armed
regional superpower in that century's last quarter? Many things, to be sure. The
Holocaust had a decisive impact. But we should not underplay the significance of
the Zionist movement's ideologically flexible and repeatedly successful search
for great power patrons. As the relationship with one patron becomes less
viable, a new patron is always found:

1. Britain with the Balfour Declaration of 1917, whose Mandate provided a roof
for building an autonomous quasi-state (the Yishuv).

2. Stalin's Soviet Union played the crucial role in the creation and initial
consolidation of an independent Zionist state.

3. France gave Israel nuclear weapons.

4. US support was crucial in creating a Greater Israel.

5. Next great power patron -- China, perhaps?

NOTES

(1) In the world of 1984, there were three great totalitarian powers: Oceania,
Eurasia, and Eastasia. Two of these were always at war with the third, but every
so often the pattern of alignment changed.

(2) They approached Ivan Maisky, the ambassador in London, and members of the
Soviet embassy in Ankara. At this time there was no Soviet diplomatic presence
in Palestine.

(3) Stalinist doctrine placed great emphasis on such contradictions. It was held
that they would inevitably lead to war.

(4) Better known as the state prosecutor in the great purge trials of the 1930s.

(5) President Truman was wholeheartedly pro-Israel, but the US State Department
had a different attitude.

(6) In fall 1948 Dmitry Manuilsky, representative of Soviet Ukraine in the UN
Security Council, suggested that the Palestinian refugees be resettled in Soviet
Central Asia.

At about this time Israeli foreign minister Moshe Shertok reported to his
government that "in the Security Council the Russians work not simply as our
allies but as our emissaries. They assume any task" (p. 208).

(7) This was before the Stalin-Tito split.

(8) On the return flight the volunteer pilots brought back oranges. The US
government threatened to deprive them of their citizenship. The planes they flew
were also American.

(9) "Za Stalina, za Ben Guriona!" This was an extension of the cry "Za Stalina!"
with which Soviet soldiers went into battle against the Nazis. On this point I
am indebted to Marina Aptekman.

(10) When it became clear that Soviet Jews would not be allowed to go, they had
to satisfy themselves with "inferior" substitutes -- that is, Jews from the Arab
countries.

(11) That depends, of course, on whether we count Palestine in the late 1940s as
still being part of the Third World.

(5) Russia's Top Lawmaker Casts Doubt on WTO Entry

Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 06:40:27 +0100 From: Rowan Berkeley
<rowan.berkeley@googlemail.com>

Report: Russia's Top Lawmaker Casts Doubt on WTO Entry AP via Yahoo Biz, April
15, 2006 http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060415/russia_wto.html

MOSCOW (AP) -- Russia's parliament speaker on Saturday expressed doubts about
the country's entry into the World Trade Organization, the RIA Novosti news
agency reported, reflecting annoyance in Moscow at what it sees as political
obstacles from the United States. "We need to assess objectively the undoubted
advantages of membership and the risks. We don't need the WTO on any terms,"
Boris Gryzlov, also head of the pro-Kremlin United Russia party, was quoted as
saying by RIA Novosti. "There shouldn't be any compromises here," he said.
Russia has signed agreements with the European Union, China and Japan among
others, but has yet to reach deals with the United States, Colombia and
Australia.

In March, President Vladimir Putin expressed frustration at the pace of
negotiations, charging the U.S. with coming up with ungrounded demands that were
hindering talks. U.S. senators visiting Moscow said on Monday that Russia's
democracy record and the Kremlin's stance in the Iranian nuclear crisis would
influence the U.S. Congress as it considers Moscow's bid to join the 149-member
global commerce body. Russia has sought to join the WTO since 1994. It has had
to embark on a major set of legislative reforms to fall in line with WTO rules,
including introducing a new customs code, and has set a new target date of
spring this year for joining. Gryzlov criticized U.S. demands that foreign banks
should be allowed to open directly owned branches in the country and said that
Russia's agriculture sector could suffer from WTO entry.

--
Peter Myers, 381 Goodwood Rd, Childers 4660, Australia ph +61 7 41262296
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers Mirror: http://mailstar.net/index.html I
use the old Mac OS; being incompatible, it cannot run Windows viruses or
transmit them to you. If my mail does not arrive, or yours bounces, please ring
me: this helps beat sabotage. To unsubscribe, reply with "unsubscribe" in the
subject line; allow 1 day.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 16
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 0:03pm(PDT)
Subject: articles: silent Nuclear subs add to Iran tensions -=- China builds

I thought I sent this yesterday -- sorry for delay

From: "Peter Myers" <myers@cyberone.com.au>

April 16, 2006

(1) Silent Nuclear Submarines Add to Iran Tensions
(2) Editorials and opinion pieces calling for war on Iran - Jim Lobe
(3) China sending an envoy to Tehran over nuclear standoff
(4) Lessons of the Opium Wars
(6) Guess who "discovered" the Judas manuscript?
(The plot to deceive Christianity.)

(1) Silent Nuclear Submarines Add to Iran Tensions

Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 05:36:30 +0100 From: Rowan Berkeley
<rowan.berkeley@googlemail.com>

Silent Nuclear Submarines Add to Iran Tensions

Dave Eberhart, NewsMax, April 13, 2006
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/4/12/222400.shtml

[tell me, Jeff B or anyone else, does Izzy really have nuclearised SLCMs, or is
this bluff?]

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The silent submarine forces of the United States, Israel and
Iran are all ramping up for a hot war, adding yet more tension to an already
volatile Middle East - made all the more uneasy by Iran's relentless march to
become a nuclear power.

Leading off the always lurking and deadly wolfpacks is Israel's fleet of
Dolphin-class submarines, each carrying U.S.-supplied Harpoon cruise missiles -
armed with nuclear warheads.

The Israel submarines can remain at sea for a month and are equipped with six
torpedo tubes appropriate for conventional torpedoes. The tubes can also be used
to launch the nuclear-tipped cruise missiles - missiles that could reach some of
the targeted sites in Iran critical to its nuclear development. Starting with
just three of these Dolphin-class undersea intruders, the Israeli inventory
quickly went to a fourth and a fifth. And there are reportedly at least a
half-dozen in the pipeline - two being built by the People's Republic of China.

Although most particulars of Iran's military assets - both personnel and
hardware - are closely held by that country, military experts opine that Iran
has up to six Russian-built SSK or SSI Kilo-class diesel submarines prowling the
Gulf. Most recently, Iran's armed forces added to this fleet by deploying a new
locally built submarine in Persian Gulf waters, state television reported. The
vessel was christened the Nahang, meaning whale. Built by the Iranian Defense
Ministry, the sub has the capability "to carry multipurpose weapons for
different missions," according to Iranian Rear Adm. Sajjad Kouchaki. "The
submarine is fully adapted to the Persian Gulf," he said, adding that the
Iranian navy is pursuing a policy of deterrence in the strategic waters.

Perhaps even more significant, is the recent Iranian deployment of a super
high-speed torpedo. The new torpedo was reportedly successfully tested last
month during war games that Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards held in the
Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea. State news sources touted the successfully
test-firing of the new torpedo, called the "Hoot." The development ups the
profile of Iran's power in the Gulf, where the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet is based
to, among other things, safeguard the flow of oil. Gen. Ali Fadavi, deputy head
of the Revolutionary Guards' navy, said that the torpedo, speeding at 223 miles
per hour, was too fast to elude. "It has a very powerful warhead designed to hit
big submarines," Fadavi told state television.

Meanwhile, the Bush administration recently announced plans to add conventional
ballistic missiles to the armory of its nuclear Trident submarines ?- adding yet
another potential arm to any military option considered against Iran, if
diplomacy and/or sanctions fail to persuade that country to give up its nuclear
designs. According to Defense Daily last January, four ultra-stealthy Ohio-class
Strategic Nuclear Submarines, or SSBNs, were having their 24 Trident II D-5
nuclear ballistic missiles removed and replaced with up to 154 Tomahawk cruise
missiles.

(2) Editorials and opinion pieces calling for war on Iran - Jim Lobe

Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 06:33:13 -0400 From: Don <NX7933@hotmail.com>

Keep in mind that The Register is not a very reliable source. The article may be
referring to "reactive armor", which is not as new as The Register is portraying
it:

http://www.defense-update.com/features/du-1-04/reactive-armor.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactive_armour

[quote] Explosive Reactive armor (ERA) is a common form of add-on armor, used on
many Armored Fighting Vehicles (AFV). This concept is combat proven. Protection
by explosive modules was deployed by the Israel Defense Forces in the late
1970s, and was first, and successfully used in combat with the Israeli Army
M-60s and Centurion tanks in the 1982 War, and later, by the Russian Army by the
mid 80s. Reactive armor utilize add-on protection modules conforming of thin
metal plates and a sloped explosive sheath, which explode when sensing an impact
of an explosive charge (such as High Explosive Anti-Tank - HEAT projectile).
[endquote]

(3) China sending an envoy to Tehran over nuclear standoff

Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 08:20:08 -0000 From: "justicequest2000"
<justicequest2000@yahoo.com>

More war for Israel coming right down the pipe at US:

US in warning to 'defiant' Iran The US has warned Iran that it must face the
consequences of its defiance over its nuclear programme. Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice said the UN Security Council would have to look at options to
compel Iran to "obey the international system". Iran says it has succeeded in
enriching uranium. The visiting head of the UN nuclear watchdog failed to
convince it to freeze its nuclear programme.

China is now sending an envoy to Tehran to try to help resolve the crisis.
Chinese Assistant Foreign Minister Cui Tiankai is due in Tehran for talks on
Friday. A Chinese foreign ministry spokesman China was worried about the way the
situation was developing, and the visit was aimed at facilitating dialogue among
the parties concerned. Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA) who visited Tehran on Thursday, said both sides had agreed
to continue an intensive dialogue over the next few weeks.

'Reasonable and logical'

Ms Rice on Thursday raised publicly the possibility that Iran might face
punitive sanctions at the UN Security Council if it did not change course.

She said that when the council reconvened on the issue at the end of the month
there could not be a repeat of March's "presidential statement" in which Iran
had been told to halt all sensitive atomic activities within 30 days.

Iran has so far refused to comply. "There will have to be some consequence for
that action and that defiance. We will look at a whole range of options
available to the Security Council," Ms Rice said. She said the council would
have to look at a Chapter 7 resolution - which UN members are mandated to comply
with. It could possibly lead to sanctions and eventually even the use of force.

But the BBC's Justin Webb in Washington says council members Russia and China
believe that talk of punishment and coercion is premature. Beijing hopes its
envoy will help defuse the situation. BBC China correspondent Daniel Griffiths
says Beijing would like to avoid sanctions and wants to take a higher profile
over Iran to strengthen its credentials as a responsible, international player.

'Confidence-building'

Western nations suspect Iran of wanting to develop a nuclear weapon, but Tehran
insists its plans are for a peaceful, civilian energy programme only.

NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE

Mined uranium ore is purified and reconstituted into solid form known as
yellowcake Yellowcake is chemically processed and converted into a gas by
heating it to above 64C (147F) Gas is fed through centrifuges, where its
isotopes separate and process is repeated until uranium is enriched Low-level
enriched uranium is used for nuclear fuel Highly enriched uranium can be used in
nuclear weapons

On his visit, Mr ElBaradei said he had had a good discussion about
"confidence-building measures". He said there was still time to negotiate a
settlement by which "Iran's needs for nuclear power is assured and the concern
of the international community is also... put to rest". But Iran's nuclear
negotiator, Ali Larijani, who met Mr ElBaradei, said the UN's demand for a
return to a freeze of its nuclear programme was not the way to solve the
problem. "Every action must be reasonable and logical. We are co-operating in a
constructive manner" with the IAEA, "so such a proposal is not very important to
solve the problem," he said. Earlier, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
said: "Our answer to those who are angry about Iran obtaining the full nuclear
cycle is one phrase, we say: Be angry and die of this anger. "We will not hold
talks with anyone about the Iranian nation's right [to enrichment] and no-one
has the right to step back, even one iota," he said.

Story from BBC NEWS:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/4908820.stm

Scroll down to the 'Comments' at the following URL:

Larry Johnson: Bush "Tried To Cherry Pick Intelligence And Feed The Line To
Gullible Reporters"...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/04/09/larry-johnson-bush- trie_n_18779.html

(4) Lessons of the Opium Wars

Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:30:52 +0100 From: Rowan Berkeley
<rowan.berkeley@googlemail.com>

It's interesting that the piece on the Opium Wars quoted here from
http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/CHING/OPIUM.HTM simply describes the Trade as 'British'.
Compare this:

Hong Kong Founded as Sassoon Drug Center (1997)
http://www.stormfront.org/truth_at_last/sassoon.htm

{a website I don't normally use - but the article originated there}

Hong Kong and The Sassoon Opium Wars

The 99 year British lease on Hong Kong expired in July allowing the Red Chinese
to take over. Hundreds of newspaper stories and TV reports have covered this
event but not one revealed how England first gained control of Hong Kong! The
truth lies buried in the family line of David Sassoon, "The Rothschilds of The
Far East," and their monopoly over the opium trade. Britain won Hong Kong by
launching the opium Wars to give the Sassoons exclusive rights to drug an entire
nation!

David Sassoon was born in Baghdad, Iran in 1792. His father, Saleh Sassoon, was
a wealthy banker and the treasurer to Ahmet Pasha, the governor of Baghdad.
(Thus making him the "court Jew" - a highly influential position.) In 1829 Ahmet
was overthrown due to corruption and the Sassoon family fled to Bombay, India.
This was the strategic trade route to interior India and the gateway to the Far
East. In a brief time the British government granted Sassoon "monopoly rights"
to all manufacture of cotton goods, silk and most important of all - Opium -
then the most addictive drug in the world!

The Jewish Encyclopedia of 1905, states that Sassoon expanded his opium trade
into China and Japan. He placed his eight sons in charge of the various major
opium exchanges in China. According to the 1944 Jewish Encyclopedia: "He
employed only Jews in his business, and wherever he sent them he built
synagogues and schools for them. He imported whole families of fellow Jews. . .
and put them to work."

Sassoon's sons were busy pushing this mind-destroying drug in Canton, China.
Between 1830 - 1831 they trafficked 18,956 chests of opium earning millions of
dollars. Part of the profits went to Queen Victoria and the British government.
In the year 1836 the trade increased to over 30,000 chests and drug addiction in
coastal cities became endemic.

In 1839, the Manchu Emperor ordered that it be stopped. He named the
Commissioner of Canton, Lin Tse-hsu, to lead a campaign against opium. Lin
seized 2,000 chests of Sassoon opium and threw it into the river. An outraged
David Sassoon demanded that Great Britain retaliate. Thus, the Opium Wars began
with the British Army fighting as mercenaries of the Sassoons. They attacked
cities and blockaded ports. The Chinese Army, decimated by 10 years of rampant
opium addiction, proved no match for the British Army. The war ended in 1839
with the signing of "The Treaty of Nanking." This included provisions especially
designed to guarantee the Sassoons the right to enslave an entire population
with opium. The "peace treaty" included these provisions: "1) Full legalization
of the opium trade in China, 2) compensation from the opium stockpiles
confiscated by Lin of 2 million pounds, 3) territorial sovereignty for the
British Crown over several designated offshore islands.

Sassoon's Use British Army to Drug An Entire Nation

British Prime Minister Palmerston wrote Crown Commissiner Captain Charles Elliot
that the treaty didn't go far enough. He said it should have been rejected out
of hand because: "After all, our naval power is so strong that we can tell the
Emperor what we mean to hold rather than what he would cede. We must demand the
admission of opium into interior China as an article of lawful commerce and
increase the indemnity payments and British access to several additional Chinese
ports." Thus, China not only had to pay Sassoon the cost of his dumped opium but
reimburse England an unheard sum of 21 million pounds for the cost of the war!

This gave the Sassoon's monopoly rights to distribute opium in port cities.
However, even this was not good enough and Sassoon demanded the right to sell
opium throughout the nation. The Manchus resisted and the British Army again
attacked in the "Second Opium War fought 1858 - 1860. Palmerston declared that
all of interior China must be open for uninterrupted opium traffic. The British
suffered a defeat at the Taku Forts in June 1859 when sailors, ordered to seize
the forts, were run aground in the mud-choked harbor. Several hundred were
killed or captured. An enraged Palmerston said: "We shall teach such a lesson to
these perfidious hordes that the name of Europe will hereeafter be a passport of
fear."

In October, the British besieged Peking. When the city fell, British commander
Lord Elgin, ordered the temples and other sacred shrines in the city sacked and
burned to the ground as a show of Britain's absolute comtempt for the Chinese.
In the new "Peace Treaty" of Oct.25, 1860, the British were assigned rights to
vastly expanded opium trade covering seven-eights of China, which brought in
over 20 million pounds in 1864 alone. In that year, the Sassoons imported 58,681
chests of opium and by 1880 it had skyrocketed to 105,508 chests making the
Sassoons the richest Jews in the world. England was given the Hong Kong
peninsula as a colony and large sections of Amoy, Canton, Foochow, Ningpo and
Shanghai. The Sassoons were now licensing opium dens in each British occupied
area with large fees being collected by their Jewish agents. Sassoon would not
allow any other race to engage in "the Jews' business."

However, the British government would not allow any opium to be imported into
Europe!

Sassoon "Monopoly Rights" Wrecked Lancashire - England's Textile Industry - Made
Roosevelt Wealthy

Sir Albert Sassoon, the eldest of David Sassoon's sons took over the family
"business" empire. He constructed huge textile mills in Bombay to pay slave
labor wages. This expansion continued after World War One and ended up putting
mills in Lancashire, England out of business with thousands losing their jobs.
This did not stop Queen Victoria from having Albert knighted in 1872.

Solomon Sassoon moved to Hong Kong and ran the family business there until his
death in 1894. Later, the entire family moved to England because with modern
communications they could operate their financial empire from their luxurious
estates in London. They socialized with royalty and Edward Albert. Sassoon
married Aline Caroline de Rothschild in 1887 which linked their fortune with
that of the Rothschilds. The Queen also had Edward knighted. All 14 of the
grandsons of David Sassoon were made officers during World War One and thus most
were able to avoid combat.

Franklin D. Roosevelt's fortune was inherited from his maternal grandfather
Warren Delano. In 1830 he was a senior partner of Russell & Company. It was
their merchant fleet which carried Sassoon's opium to China and returned with
tea. Warren Delano moved to Newburgh, N.Y. In 1851 his daughter Sara Married a
well-born neighbor, James Roosevelt - the father of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
He always knew the origin of the family fortune but refused to discuss it.

The Sassoon opium trade brought death and destruction to millions and still
plagues Asia to this day. Their company was totally operated by Jews ONLY! The
corrupt British monarchy honored them with privilege and knighthood - to the
disgrace of the Crown! To this day the Sassoons are in the history books as
"great developers" of India but the source of their vast wealth is never
mentioned!

(6) Guess who "discovered" the Judas manuscript?

Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:05:03 EDT From: EagleRevisionist@aol.com

Frieda Tchacos NUSSBERGER, a Khazarian chosen one.

"I think I was chosen by Judas to rehabilitate him."

She's been involved in artifact fraud in the past.

{Can you substantiate that claim? - Peter M.}

All my best,

Harrell Rhome

How the Gospel of Judas Emerged

By BARRY MEIER and JOHN NOBLE WILFORD

York Times April 13, 2006

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/13/science/13judas.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

When the National Geographic Society announced to great fanfare last week that
it had gained access to a 1,700-year-old document known as the Gospel of Judas,
it described how a deteriorating manuscript, unearthed in Egypt three decades
ago, had made its way through the shady alleys of the antiquities market to a
safe-deposit box on Long Island and eventually to a Swiss art dealer who
"rescued" it from obscurity.

Frieda Tchacos Nussberger could gain as much as $2 million from deals involving
the Gospel of Judas, said her lawyer, Mario Roberty, left.

But there is even more to the story.

The art dealer was detained several years ago in an unrelated Italian
antiquities smuggling investigation. And after she failed to profit from the
sale of the gospel in the private market, she struck a deal with a foundation
run by her lawyer that would let her make about as much as she would have made
on that sale, or more.

Later, the National Geographic Society paid the foundation to restore the
manuscript and bought the rights to the text and the story about the discovery.
As part of her arrangement with the foundation, the dealer, Frieda Tchacos
Nussberger, stands to gain $1 million to $2 million from those National
Geographic projects, her lawyer said. There may even be more.

Details of how the manuscript was found are clouded. According to National
Geographic, it was found by farmers in an Egyptian cave in the 1970's, sold to a
dealer and passed through various hands in Europe and the United States. Legal
issues in its transit are equally vague.

No one questions the authenticity of the Judas gospel, which depicts Judas
Iscariot not as a betrayer of Jesus but as his favored disciple.

But the emerging details are raising concerns among some archaeologists and
other scholars at a time of growing scrutiny of the dealers who sell antiquities
and of the museums and collectors who buy them. The information also calls into
question the completeness of National Geographic's depiction of some individuals
like Ms. Tchacos Nussberger and its disclosure of all the financial
relationships involved.

Terry Garcia, the vice president for mission programs at National Geographic,
which is based in Washington, said that the organization had "heard some rumors"
about possible legal problems involving Ms. Tchacos Nussberger but could not
confirm them. He also noted that the organization had disclosed its relationship
with the foundation, the Maecenas Foundation for Ancient Art.

Mr. Garcia emphasized that he believed that issues like Ms. Tchacos Nussberger's
financial relationship with the foundation or questions about other antiquities
she sold were not relevant to the story of the Gospel of Judas. He added that
National Geographic had taken on the project because it saw an opportunity to
help save a unique document.

"It is not every day that you find a lost gospel," Mr. Garcia said.

But scholars who have campaigned against the trade in artifacts of questionable
provenance said they were troubled by the whole episode.

"We are dealing with a looted object," said Jane C. Waldbaum, president of the
Archaeological Institute of America, a professional society. "The artifact was
poorly handled for years because the people holding it were more concerned with
making money than protecting it."

For her part, Ms. Tchacos Nussberger rejected any suggestion that she was trying
to profit from the Gospel of Judas. She described her run-in with Italian
officials as inconsequential.

"I went through hell and back, and I saved something for humanity," Ms. Tchacos
Nussberger said in a telephone interview. "I would have given it for nothing to
someone who would have saved it."

Last week, National Geographic began a large campaign for the Gospel of Judas,
featuring it in two new books, a television documentary, an exhibition and the
May issue of National Geographic magazine.

The organization did not buy the document. Instead, it paid $1 million to the
Maecenas Foundation, effectively for the manuscript's contents. Part of the
revenues generated by the National Geographic projects go to the foundation.

The foundation was set up some years ago by Ms. Tchacos Nussberger's lawyer,
Mario Roberty, well before it became involved with the Gospel of Judas. Mr.
Roberty is the only official of the foundation, which he said was involved in
projects like returning antiquities to their countries of origin. He said that
when Ms. Tchacos Nussberger turned over the document to the foundation in 2001,
he quickly contacted officials in Egypt and assured them that the manuscript
would be returned there. He said the foundation had clear legal title to the
document.

In National Geographic's narratives, the manuscript takes a long journey through
the antiquities trade. Those stories describe Ms. Tchacos Nussberger efforts to
sell the Gospel of Judas privately soon after buying it and her subsequent role
in its restoration. She is portrayed as driven by religious conviction to save
the document.

"I think I was chosen by Judas to rehabilitate him," Ms. Tchacos Nussberger, 65,
is quoted as saying in one of the society's books, "The Lost Gospel," by Herbert
Krosney. Mr. Krosney is also an independent television producer who brought the
gospel project to National Geographic.

Missing from the book is any mention of an incident in 2001 when Ms. Tchacos
Nussberger was detained in Cyprus at the request of Italian officials, who
wanted to question her as part of a broader investigation into antiquities that
had been illegally taken out of Italy and sold elsewhere. Paolo Ferri, the
Rome-based prosecutor in the case, said she was charged with several violations
involving antiquities but was given a reduced sentence that was suspended
because she had, among other things, previously agreed to return an artifact
claimed by Italy.

Both the dealer and her lawyer said the issues involved were far less serious
than those described by Mr. Ferri, the prosecutor. They also said that all of
Ms. Tchacos Nussberger's dealings in antiquities in Italy and elsewhere had been
lawful. Her record will be erased in 2007 if she is not charged by Italian
authorities with another antiquities violation.

Ms. Tchacos Nussberger said that she, like other dealers, had run into problems
because laws governing the antiquities trade had sharply changed in recent
years.

According to National Geographic, she bought the Judas document for about
$300,000 in 2000 from another dealer who had placed it in a safe-deposit box in
Hicksville, N.Y., on Long Island. She tried to sell it to the Beinecke Rare Book
and Manuscript Library at Yale University.

Yale officials have not specified why they did not buy the document. But Robert
Babcock, curator of early books at the library, said through a spokeswoman that
"there were unresolved questions about the provenance."

Then in 2001, Ms. Tchacos Nussberger sold it to an antiquities dealer in Ohio
for $2.5 million, but the deal fell apart when the dealer did not make good on
the payments.

Aided by her lawyer, Mr. Roberty, she regained ownership of the document and at
his suggestion turned it over to the Maecenas Foundation. Under the deal, she is
entitled to receive a sum from revenues generated by the Gospel of Judas
essentially equivalent to what she would have received from the Ohio dealer,
minus the value of several pages of the manuscript that dealer bought. In
addition, she is entitled to get back about $800,000 she lent to the foundation
for expenses like legal costs and early restoration efforts, Mr. Roberty said.

Mr. Roberty said the foundation had already started paying money to the dealer,
but he declined to say how much she had received to date.

Mr. Garcia, the National Geographic executive, said that a critical aspect of
the society's contract with the Maecenas Foundation was the group's pledge to
return the document to Egypt. Mr. Krosney, the writer, said he was convinced
from his discussions with Ms. Tchacos Nussberger that she had acted out of the
best of motives.

He said he had raised with Mr. Roberty the rumors he had heard about Ms. Tchacho
Nussberger and Italy, and added that the lawyer was "dismissive"of them. He said
he never asked the dealer about it.

Hershel Shanks, editor of the Biblical Archaeology Review, said there was
inherent tension between the need to conserve ancient objects and deter trade in
looted artifacts.

"If you want to learn from the material, you have got to deal," Mr. Shanks said.
"I am in favor of rescuing these unprovenanced things because they have
important information to impart."

But other scholars remain disturbed. "The owners are trying to take monetary
value out of something they don't really own," said Patty Gerstenblith, a law
professor at DePaul University in Chicago who specializes in the antiquities
trade. "The people with control over the manuscript don't appear to be the
rightful owners."

Elisabetta Povoledo contributed reporting from Rome for this article.

--
Peter Myers, 381 Goodwood Rd, Childers 4660, Australia ph +61 7 41262296
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers Mirror: http://mailstar.net/index.html I
use the old Mac OS; being incompatible, it cannot run Windows viruses or
transmit them to you. If my mail does not arrive, or yours bounces, please ring
me: this helps beat sabotage. To unsubscribe, reply with "unsubscribe" in the
subject line; allow 1 day.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 17
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 0:32pm(PDT)
Subject: articles: Israel's 'demographic problem' - its Arabs -=- confessions

From: "Peter Myers" <myers@cyberone.com.au>

April 17, 2006

(1) Ilan Pappe on Israel's election and its 'demographic problem'
(2) Ross & Indyk as pro-Israel advocates - The Israel Lobby Redux, by Ira Glunts
(3) Judas - Coptic Orthodox Church recognized him as a saint
(4) American Jewish Committee compliments Javier Solana on EU Policy re Hamas
(5) Confessions of a Jewish refugee
(6) Silent Nuclear Submarines Add to Iran Tensions

(1) Ilan Pappe on Israel's election and its 'demographic problem'

Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 23:10:48 -0700 From: Jeff Blankfort
<jblankfort@earthlink.net>

The London Review of Books, again! This time an important article by Ilan Pappe.
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n08/print/papp01_.html

LRB | Vol. 28 No. 8 dated 20 April 2006 | Ilan Pappe

Ilan Pappe on the Israeli election and the 'demographic problem'

>From left to right, the manifestos of all the Zionist parties during the recent
Israeli election campaign contained policies which they claimed would counter
the 'demographic problem' posed by the Palestinian presence in Israel. Ariel
Sharon proposed the pull-out from Gaza as the best solution to it; the leaders
of the Labour Party endorsed the wall because they believed it was the best way
of limiting the number of Palestinians inside Israel. Extra-parliamentary
groups, too, such as the Geneva Accord movement, Peace Now, the Council for
Peace and Security, Ami Ayalon's Census group and the Mizrachi Democratic
Rainbow all claim to know how to tackle it.

Apart from the ten members of the Palestinian parties and two eccentric
Ashkenazi ultra-Orthodox Jews, all the members of the new Knesset (there are 120
in all) arrived promising that their magic formulae would solve the 'demographic
problem'. The means varied from reducing Israeli control over the Occupied
Territories ? in fact, the plans put forward by Labour, Kadima, Shas (the
Sephardic Orthodox party) and Gil (the pensioners' party) would involve Israeli
withdrawal from only 50 per cent of these territories ? to more drastic action.
Right-wing parties such as Yisrael Beytenu, the Russian ethnic party of Avigdor
Liberman, and the religious parties argued for a voluntary transfer of
Palestinians to the West Bank. In short, the Zionist answer is to reduce the
problem either by giving up territory or by shrinking the 'problematic'
population group.

None of this is new. The population problem was identified as the major obstacle
in the way of Zionist fulfilment in the late 19th century, and David Ben-Gurion
said in December 1947 that 'there can be no stable and strong Jewish state so
long as it has a Jewish majority of only 60 per cent.' Israel, he warned on the
same occasion, would have to deal with this 'severe' problem with 'a new
approach'. The following year, ethnic cleansing meant that the number of
Palestinians dropped below 20 per cent of the Jewish state's overall population
(in the area allocated to Israel by the UN plus the area it occupied in 1948,
the Palestinians would originally have made up around 60 per cent of the
population). Interestingly, but not surprisingly, in December 2003 Binyamin
Netanyahu recycled Ben-Gurion's magic number ? the undesirable 60 per cent. 'If
the Arabs in Israel form 40 per cent of the population,' Netanyahu said, 'this
is the end of the Jewish state.' 'But 20 per cent is also a problem,' he added.
'If the relationship with these 20 per cent is problematic, the state is
entitled to employ extreme measures.' He did not elaborate.

Israel boosted its population with two massive Jewish immigrations, each of
about a million people, in 1949 and in the 1980s. This kept the Palestinian
proportion of the population down and today Palestinians account for nearly 20
per cent of the population of Israel (not counting the Occupied Territories).
Ehud Olmert, the leader of Kadima and acting prime minister, thinks that if
Israel stays in the Occupied Territories and its inhabitants are included in the
Israeli population, Palestinians will outnumber Jews within 15 years. So he
advocates hitkansut ? meaning 'convergence' or, better, 'ingathering' ? a policy
that would leave several populous Palestinian areas outside direct Israeli
control. But even if this consolidation takes place, there will still be a very
large Palestinian population inside the 88 per cent of Palestine in which Olmert
hopes to build the future, stable Jewish state. How large exactly we don't know:
demographers in Israel belonging to the centre or the left provide a low
estimate, which makes disengagement seem a reasonable solution, while those on
the right tend to exaggerate the figure. But they all seem to agree that the
demographic balance will not stay the same, given the higher birth-rate of
Palestinians compared to Jews. Thus Olmert may well come to the conclusion that
pull-outs are not the solution.

Once the 'Arabs' in Israel and the Palestinians in the Occupied Territories came
to be thought of in the West as 'Muslims' it was easy to elicit support for
Israel's demographic policies, at least where it counted: on Capitol Hill. But
even in Europe there was no need, after 9/11, to explain why Israel has a
'demographic problem'. On 2 February 2003 the popular daily Maariv carried a
typical headline: 'A quarter of the children in Israel are Muslims.' The piece
went on to describe this fact as Israel's next 'ticking bomb'. The increase in
the 'Muslim' population ? 2.4 per cent a year ? was not a problem anymore, but a
'danger'.

In the run-up to the election, pundits discussed this question using language
akin to that employed in Europe and the United States in debates over
immigration. Here, however, it is the immigrant community that decides the
future of the indigenous population, not vice versa. On 7 February 1948, after
driving to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv and seeing the first villages that had been
emptied of Palestinians on the western outskirts of Jerusalem, a jubilant
Ben-Gurion reported to a gathering of Zionist leaders: 'When I come nowadays to
Jerusalem I feel it is a Hebrew city. This was a feeling I only had in farms and
in Tel Aviv. Not all Jerusalem is Hebraic but there is already a huge Hebraic
bloc ? no Arabs in it. One hundred per cent Jewish. If we can persevere,'
Ben-Gurion added, this miracle will happen elsewhere.

But despite their perseverance, a sizable community of Palestinians remained.
They are students at my university, where they attend lectures by professors who
talk about the grave demographic problem. Palestinian law students ? the lucky
ones who constitute an informal quota ? in the Hebrew University may well come
across Ruth Gabison, a former head of the Association for Civil Rights and a
candidate for the Supreme Court, who has come out recently with strong views on
the subject, views that probably seem to her to reflect a consensus. 'Israel has
the right to control Palestinian natural growth,' she has declared.

Away from the campuses, these students can't escape the knowledge that they are
seen as a problem. Whether from the Zionist left or the hard right, they hear
daily that Jewish society is longing to get rid of them. And they will worry,
and rightly so, whenever they hear they have become a 'danger'. While still only
a problem they are protected by a certain pretence to democracy and liberalism.
Once they constitute a danger, however, they could be faced with emergency
policies based on the British Mandate's emergency regulations. Houses could be
demolished, newspapers shut down and people expelled under such a regime.

The 2006 elections have brought to the Knesset a solid coalition determined to
deal with the demographic problem: first and foremost, by disengaging from more
of the West Bank; and second, by completing the network of walls around the rest
of the Palestinian areas. The border between Israel and the West Bank is 370
kilometres long, but the serpentine wall will be double that length, and will
strangle large Palestinian communities. In the Palestinian areas within Israel,
segregation is ensured by construction programmes approved when Sharon was
minister of national infrastructures: Jewish settlements overlook and encircle
large Palestinian areas such as Wadi Ara and Lower Galilee.

On 31 July 2003, the Knesset passed a law prohibiting Palestinians from
obtaining citizenship, permanent residency or even temporary residency when they
marry Israeli citizens. The initiator of the legislation was a liberal Zionist,
Avraham Poraz of the centrist party Shinui. He described it as a 'defence
measure'. Only 25 members of the Knesset opposed it and Poraz declared that
those already married and with families 'will have to go to the West Bank',
regardless of how long they had been living in Israel.

The Arab members of the Knesset were among those who appealed to the Supreme
Court against this racist law. When the Supreme Court turned down the appeal,
their energy petered out. The Arab members come from three parties: the
Communist Party (Hadash), the National Party of Azmi Bishara (Balad) and the
United Arab List drawn up by the more pragmatic branch of the Islamic movement.
The Supreme Court ruling made clear their irrelevance, in the eyes of both the
parliamentary and judicial systems. We're always told that Palestinians should
be pleased to live in the only democracy in the region, to have the right to
vote, but that vote brings no power.

In the dead of night on 24 January this year, an elite unit of the border police
seized the Israeli Palestinian village of Jaljulya. The troops burst into
houses, dragging out 36 women and eventually deporting eight of them. The women
were ordered to go to their old homes in the West Bank. Some had been married
for years to Palestinians in Jaljulya, some were pregnant, many had children,
but the soldiers were demonstrating to the Israeli public that when a
demographic problem becomes a danger, the state will act swiftly and without
hesitation. One Palestinian member of the Knesset protested, but the action was
backed by the government, the courts and the media.

The ten members of the new Knesset from Palestinian parties will not be included
in any coalition and will probably be sidelined and forgotten, as they were in
the previous parliament (there are two other Arab members and two Druze members
from Labour and Kadima). Haaretz sent a journalist to live for a few days in the
'Arab areas' in order to write ? as an anthropological tourist ? on the
Palestinians' reaction to the elections. Apart from this piece of reportage, the
Israeli media had nothing to say about how the Palestinians voted. After all,
they are the problem, not the solution. And if disengagement doesn't 'stop' the
growth in their numbers the Jaljulya operation could show the future.

No wonder many Palestinians now want the international community to intervene.
But Israel ignored the ruling of the international court on the wall, and is
unlikely to be moved by what it will see as interference in its internal
affairs. There is another call coming, still hesitant, although it will grow in
volume: a call for the creation of an autonomous parliament for the Palestinians
in Israel. In a world that has marginalised this community twice over ? both in
the overall Palestinian polity and within Jewish society ? the 1,300,000
Palestinian citizens of Israel have very little to lose by shunning the Knesset
and opting for autonomy. Who knows, they may even convince the Jewish majority
that they are 'only' a problem, not a danger.

7 April

Ilan Pappe is a senior lecturer at the University of Haifa. His most recent
books are A History of Modern Palestine and The Modern Middle East.

(2) Ross & Indyk as pro-Israel advocates - The Israel Lobby Redux, by Ira Glunts

Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:25:01 -0700 From: Jeff Blankfort
<jblankfort@earthlink.net>

Another interesting commentary on the Mearsheimer-Walt paper. One correction:
While AIPAC was responsible for initiating the Washington Inst. for Near East
Policy, one of its most successful Fifth Column operations, it was important
that it would exist as a separate entity and be privately funded from other
sources which no doubt include the same ones that fund....AIPAC.

http://www.selvesandothers.org/article13772.html

The Israel Lobby Redux

Colin Powell Disagrees With David Gergen's Claim That There Is No Israel "Lobby"

by Ira Glunts 8th April 2006

Two Israeli prominent journalists wrote that Colin Powell understood and feared
the power of the lobby. In an op-ed column critical of his Harvard colleagues,
ludicrously titled "There Is No Israel 'Lobby'" the well-known political
consultant David Gergen proclaimed, "Over the course of four tours in the White
House, I never once saw a decision in the Oval Office to tilt U.S. foreign
policy in favor of Israel at the expense of America's interest." [1] America's
massive financial support of Israel's territorial expansion in the West Bank is
very much contrary to its own interests, his two colleagues would respond.
Gergen's blanket denial is one of the most preposterous statements in the
ongoing media reporting that impugn the motivations of Stephen Walt and John
Mearsheimer, two academics who recently published the "Israel Lobby." Their
essay described what the writers understand to be the many deleterious effects
of pro-Israel activists upon the formulation of American foreign policy. [2] In
his critique of the essay, Gergen displays a level of chutzpah which would
astound even the most blindly loyal devotee of the Israeli cause, when he
excoriates Walt and Mearsheimer for "impugn[ing] the unstinting service to
America's national security by public figures like Dennis Ross, Martin Indyk
...."

The truth is that Ross and Indyk are two government officials that best
illustrate the presence of pro-Israel advocates in the US government. Ross, who
was the lead negotiator at the Camp David Peace talks, was publicly criticized
for his lack of objectivity by his own deputy Aaron Miller. Miller in a
Washington Post op-ed called "Israel's Lawyer" wrote that during the
negotiations Ross and his team, instead of facilitating compromise, which would
have been in America's best interest, chose to act as an advocate for the
Israelis. [3] Dennis Ross is currently the director of the Washington Institute
for Near East Policy (WINEP), a pro-Israel think-tank which is funded by the
American Israel Policy Action Committee (AIPAC). Martin Indyk, who founded WINEP
and served as its first executive director, was later both US Ambassador to
Israel and Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs. He is a long
time uncritical supporter of Israeli government policy.

In their recent best-selling book, Boomerang: The Failure of Leadership In the
Second Intifada, presently only available in Hebrew, Raviv Drucker and Ofer
Shelah, two respected Israeli journalists, described a meeting between the then
Secretary of State Colin Powell, who the lobby considered to be the "weak link"
in the chain of more Israel- friendly Bush Administration officials, and Abraham
Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai Brith, who is a prominent
member of what in Israel is called the Jewish lobby. The following selection
indicates in a dramatic way that Gergen's view of the influence of the Israel
lobby may not be shared by all ex-government officials.

In his [Powell's] own State Department there was a keen awareness of the
strength of the Jewish lobbyists. Secretaries of State did not usually meet with
lobbyists, but both Jewish officials and Jews that did not officially represent
specific groups from Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League to Ronald Lauder,
could meet with Powell on short notice.... At the State Department, Foxman had
an aura of omnipotence. He was held responsible for the appointment of Indyk as
Undersecretary of State under Clinton, and was thought to have played a role in
the appointments of Secretaries of State Christopher and Albright. Powell
related to Foxman almost as if he were someone to whom he must capitulate. Once
Foxman told one of his deputies that Powell was the weak link. When the
Secretary of State heard this he began to worry. He knew that in Washington a
confrontation with the Jewish lobby would make his life difficult. Once he
arranged a meeting with Foxman, but the busy Foxman postponed the meeting three
times. When they eventually met, the head of the Anti-Defamation League
apologized to the Secretary of State [for the postponements]. "You call, we
come," replied Powell, paraphrasing a well known advertisement for a freight
company. That statement had much more meaning than just a humorous polite reply.
[4]

Unfortunately, the American press has thus far been largely complicit in the
unwarranted attacks on two professors who have written a generally well-argued
essay on the disadvantages of the current American/Israeli relationship. Most
press accounts of the article feature the negative criticism, but tend to ignore
or downplay positive comment. In the present political climate it is not a
surprise that there is not a groundswell of support for the two embattled
scholars. Abe Foxman called the essay "a classic conspiratorial anti-Semitic
analysis invoking the canards of Jewish power and Jewish control." [5] I, as a
Jew, agree with the Jewish editor, Mary-Kay Wilmers, who published the article.
She feels, as paraphrased in The Observer, "that the most angry denunciations of
anti-Semitism - while designed to serve the purpose of censorship by those
attempting to forestall criticism of Israel - may actually encourage
anti-Semitism in the long run." [6]

The American media does no favor to the many American Jews and Israelis who are
critical of Israel's self-defeating expansionism and its suppression of the
Palestinian right of self-determination. The Israel lobby in the United States
does not represent the opinions of many American Jews. The pressure it exerts on
government officials to blindly and unconditionally support present Israeli
policies, in the end will help neither the United States nor Israel itself.

Ira Glunts first visited the Middle East in 1972, where he taught English and
physical education in a small rural community in Israel. He was a volunteer in
the Israeli Defense Forces in 1992. Mr. Glunts lives in Madison, New York where
he operates a used and rare book business.

Notes:

[1] http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ideas_opinions/story/402910p-341257c.html

[2] http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html

[3]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/22/AR2005052200883.html

[4] Drucker, Raviv and Shelah, Ofer, Boomerang..., Keter, 2005, pps. 132-133.
Translation and text emphasized or enclosed in brackets, mine.

[5] http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...

[6] http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,1744960,00.html?gusrc=rss

(3) Judas - Coptic Orthodox Church recognized him as a saint

Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 09:44:01 EDT From: EagleNewsTips@aol.com

The very last part of the article was that of which I spoke. I have no need to
research her any further, but you can get the basic ideas from her past
dealings.

And, I am not saying that the Judas gospel is not a valid ancient writing. It
probably is yet another Gnostic writing. The Gnostics were among the earliest
Christians until they were displaced by the emerging Roman church. Some, like
Gerald Massey and others, even maintain that St. Paul was a Gnostic whose
writings were later altered to conform to Romanism. I don't want to open up the
whole Acharya thing again, but some mention of all of this seems appropriate.

I first heard about the revisionist theory of Judas when I studied at an
Episcopal (Anglican) seminary now so many years ago. The Coptic Orthodox Church
(or at least some branches of it) have recognized Judas as a saint since he was
the key part of the plan. But, it seems unlikely that the Temple police who
arrested Jesus needed anyone to point him out. He was well-known around
Jerusalem, esp. after he overturned the money changers in the stock exchange
(oops, I mean temple). Jesus tells us this himself, when he was apprehended:
"Have you come out as against a robber with swords and clubs? When I was with
you day after day in the temple, you did not lay hands upon me, [they knew him]
but this is your hour and the power of darkness." Luke 22:52-54. Was Judas
essential to the arrest, or was this added to the story later? The volumnious
series of writings known as the Phoenix Journals also maintained that they real
Judas was a friend and confidant of Jesus.

But, enough of all of this. Frohes Osterfest to all my comrades.

Harrell Rhome

(4) American Jewish Committee compliments Javier Solana on EU Policy re Hamas

Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:20:50 -0700 From: Jeff Blankfort
<jblankfort@earthlink.net>

AJC Praises EU Policy on Hamas-led Government

http://www.ajc.org/site/apps/nl/content2.asp?c=ijITI2PHKoG&b=849241&ct=2167143

April 11, 2006 ? New York ? The American Jewish Committee has praised the
decision of the Council of the European Union to suspend assistance to the
Hamas-led Palestinian government. At the same time, in a letter to Javier
Solana, secretary general of the council, AJC welcomed the European body's
decision to continue providing humanitarian assistance.

AJC has long supported a negotiated two-state solution. "We continue to hope
that responsible Palestinian leadership will ultimately emerge, and that a
peaceful coexistence will one day take root between Israel and the
Palestinians," wrote AJC President E. Robert Goodkind and Executive Director
David A. Harris.

The full text of the AJC letter to Javier Solana follows: His Excellency Javier
Solana Secretary General/High Representative for Common Foreign and Security
Policy Council of the European Union

Dear Javier:

We are writing to express the American Jewish Committee's appreciation for the
decision adopted yesterday by the Council of the European Union to suspend
assistance to the Hamas-led Palestinian government. We thank you for your
personal role in this important decision. We also welcome the Council's decision
to continue the provision of humanitarian assistance to meet the basic needs of
the Palestinian people through non-governmental channels.

Ursula Plassnik, President of the Council, said in a statement after the
adoption of the decision that the European Union's "aim is to see all parties
contribute to a positive development in the Middle East by peaceful means." We
fully share this sentiment. As you know, we have long supported a peaceful
resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with two states living side by
side in peace and security. Regrettably, the recent victory by Hamas in the
Palestinian Legislative Council elections presents a major setback to the
prospects of peace. We continue to hope, nevertheless, that responsible
Palestinian leadership will ultimately emerge, and that a peaceful coexistence
will one day take root between Israel and the Palestinians.

We firmly believe that the international community must remain consistent and
united in its stance toward Hamas ? dealing with it only if it agrees to
recognize Israel's right to exist, to abandon terrorism, and to respect existing
agreements and obligations. Any deviation from these principles, which have been
set by the Quartet, would only strengthen the radicals who are opposed to peace,
and further marginalize moderates. The European Union can ? as it has since the
Palestinian elections ? play a crucial role in preventing any erosion in the
international community's united stance on this issue.

We have always valued our relations with the European Union and with you
personally. We fondly remember our meetings with you in the past, and look
forward to our continued cooperation in advancing trans-Atlantic understanding
and the cause of peace in the Middle East and around the world.

Respectfully, E. Robert Goodkind, President David A. Harris, Executive Director

(5) Confessions of a Jewish refugee

Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 00:41:50 +0200 From: "Kristoffer Larsson"
<kristoffer.larsson@sobernet.nu>

Confessions of a Jewish refugee

By Bradley Burston

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=%20705562&contrassID=2

Nobody likes to talk about it.

In fact, there is nothing that enemies hate more, than to be told that they are
alike.

But just this once ...

Since it's Pesach on our side, it might be the right time to bring up the
central obsession of both Jewish tradition and Palestinian culture: exile, and
the hope for return.

It was the experience of exile that forged the Jews and the Palestinians both.
We are who we are, in no small part, for the hardships and longings and
insecurities that displacement from home confers.

The story we are commanded as Jews to tell on the seder night has everything to
do with exile and its curses, the pain of the loss of freedom, the humiliation
of the loss of humanity and choice, the fear of loss of collective memory, the
strife - much of it self-imposed - of seeking redemption through return.

So crucial to us is the experience of exile, that every week we cite the exodus
from Egypt in the Sabbath kiddush, in the same breath as the very creation of
the world.

Certainly, for Palestinians, exile exerts no less commanding a power over the
national personality. For many Palestinians, the issue of eventual return home
of refugees is the one question before which all other Israeli-Palestinian
disputes pale.

Palestinians the world over treasure the keys to former family homes in the Holy
Land, many or most of which may no longer be standing.

On six continents, Palestinians and Jews, awash in the alienation of diaspora,
dream of an ancestral home so idealized that it may well never have existed.

The insecurity of the refugee stalks all of us. It is in our blood. We all
suffer from it, Jew and Palestinian, even as we deny the right of our enemy to
suffer, even as we blame our enemy for his own suffering.

For the Jews, the insecurity manifests itself as fear, fear of being
annihilated, fear of being cast out of here by force.

For the Palestinians, the insecurity finds expression in humiliation, a profound
loss of honor that stretches over the decades that the state of Israel has
existed.

Our fear is such that the very steps we take to protect ourselves - at
checkpoints, in airport searches, in wall-building, in military raids - only
deepen the humiliation of the Palestinians.

Their humiliation is such that the very steps they take to redeem themselves -
suicide bombings, drive-by killings, Qassam salvos, masked paramilitary
posturing - only serve tom deepen our fear.

Then there is the refugee's ultimate weapon, one that figures in the arsenals of
both sides. It is the wily stubbornness that is the child of the union of memory
and rage. In the Jewish refugee it is as old as Joseph in Egypt. It is called
the trait of a stiff-necked people, a people who will even stand up and defy God
if they so choose, and the trait has been ours since the Exodus.

In the Palestinians it is called sumud, or steadfastness. It is a trait that
makes Palestinians defiant, rather than compliant, as we throw shell after shell
at them.

It is this trait that makes victory impossible here. We will literally die to
deny our enemy a victory, and our enemy is certainly prepared to return the
favor.

So it is, that more than half a century of conflict has done little to change
the lot of refugees, except to create more and more of them.

It was perhaps more inevitable than ironic, that the creation of the state of
Israel, born in large part to solve the refugee catastrophe in the wake of the
Holocaust, gave rise to new refugee catastrophes.

The wars in 1948 and 1967 sparked the Palestinian refugee problem, and also
spurred the exile of masses of Jewish refugees from Muslim lands.

It might be said that all members of a people are refugees, until all of their
refugee brethren are able to come home. No peoples on this earth have more
experience with the status of refugees than do the residents of the Holy Land.
And no two peoples on this earth have a greater problem with finding a way to
solve their refugee problems.

Over the past year, we in Israel ceded the Palestinians an amount of territory
which, in the space of six days, gave them rule over an additional 50 percent of
the total territory they comtrolled in the Gaza Strip.

In the process, we created another 8,000 refugees. We expelled the Jews of Gush
Katif, northern Gaza and northern Samaria from their homes, and then we failed
them. We have yet to be able to see to their needs. This alone may delay for
years and years the plan to create 70,000 more Jewish refugees in the West Bank.

The war in the territories continues to create Palestinian refugees as well,
people, whose houses we demolished for various reasons and in various ways.

It's a matter of time, and the extent to which all of us can stand to continue
to be refugees.

We are, all of us here, Jew and Arab, victims of our refugee mentality, the one
we cannot shake, the one that makes us into villain and victim both.

We are, all of us, still dor hamidbar, the Generation of the Wilderness, still
adrift in our dreams, still holding on, still holding out for dear life,
unwilling to part with the refugees' fervent illusions about how this eventual
state of ours should look. Of how it must look, in order to somehow justify and
give meaning to our decades and decades of suffering.

For many on the Palestinian side, it is preferable by far to hold out and hold
on to the illusion that all will return to former homes, than to have an
independent Palestine that confirms the compromise, and thus, the defeat.

For many on the Israeli side, it is preferable by far to hold out and hold on to
the illusion that we can keep all of our bibically deeded land, Shilo and
Shechem and Beit El and Hebron, than to live within the real, internationally
recognized, final borders that define an independent state.

In the process, though, we are disheartedned. We are ground down by the burden
of being permanent refugees. We are ground down by living in this place of
colossal disappointment. We are ground down by the ways our brethren disappoint
us, either because they do not share our vision for the eventual state, or
because their actions make the vision in our heads that much more unreal, that
much more distant.

We know the price of living together, what it would cost to part our peoples.
The price is still too high for us, Arab and Jew. The price is nothing less than
the death of our incompatible dreams, at root, the idea that one of our peoples
can have all of this all to itself, river to the sea, Jerusalem and its sacred
heart.

We will all of us here, Jew and Arab, be refugees until we can bring ourselves
to accept that the other has rights, legitimate grievances, and valid claims.

We cannot have a truly independent, viable, Jewish state until our borders and
our capital are recognized by the world community. With the Palestinian issue
unsolved, we cannot even convince our closest ally to recognize our capital
city.

We are not yet independent. As long as we are in a state without borders, we
remain stateless ourselves, internal refugees, in limbo at home.

Our enemies the Palestinians have a similar problem. They will not be free of
the curse of the refugee soul until they can relinquish the idea that respect
can only be gained through the barrel of a gun. If the Palestinians can someday
put aside their honor issues long enough to stop firing rockets and exalting
holy resistance as a sacrament, Israel will withdraw in the West Bank, and a
state will arise.

Sooner or later, there will be two states. Even the extremists know this. If
they didn't, they wouldn't have to work so hard to prevent it. It's a matter of
time. It could take another 20 years and terrible trauma, but it will happen.

Until then, we'll all continue to be adrift. Mired with one another, and with
ourselves. Refugees, right here at home.

(6) Silent Nuclear Submarines Add to Iran Tensions

Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:42:29 -0400 From: Don <NX7933@hotmail.com>

[tell me, Jeff B or anyone else, does Izzy really have nuclearised SLCMs, or is
this bluff?]

Israel has diesel-electric (not nuclear) submarines provided by Germany.
Reportedly they may have nuclear SLBMs (submarine launched ballistic missiles).

http://fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/index.html
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/nuke/farr.htm
http://fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/nuke/index.html
http://fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/missile/index.html

Popeye submarine-launched missile:

http://fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/missile/popeye-t.htm

"In May 2000 Israel is reported to have secretly carried out its first test
launches from two German-built MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt
from ".." claiming to be Dolphin-class submarines of cruise missiles capable of
carrying nuclear warheads. The missiles launched from vessels off Sri Lanka in
the Indian Ocean are said to have hit a target at a range of about 1,500
kilometers [about 930 statute miles]. Israel is reported to possess a 200kg
nuclear warhead, containing 6kg of plutonium, that could be mounted on cruise
missiles. "

http://fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/sub/index.html

"According to some reports the submarines may be capable of carrying
nuclear-armed MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from ".."
claiming to be Popeye Turbo cruise missiles, with a goal of deterring an enemy
from trying to take out its nuclear weapons with a surprise attack. "

So maybe no one knows for sure and it may be bluff. But Israel sure has nukes
even if it doesn't have submarine nukes yet.

The article says Israel has Harpoon missiles. FAS doesn't seem to have those
listed under Israel's nuclear weapons.

Here is information on the harpoon:

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/agm-84.htm

The above doesn't appear to mention any nuclear capabilities for the missile. It
also doesn't appear on the US's nuclear weapons list:

http://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/slbm/index.html

Perhaps the article erred and the harpoon is strictly a conventional missile? It
would be easy to confuse with the popeye.

--
Peter Myers, 381 Goodwood Rd, Childers 4660, Australia ph +61 7 41262296
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers Mirror: http://mailstar.net/index.html I
use the old Mac OS; being incompatible, it cannot run Windows viruses or
transmit them to you. If my mail does not arrive, or yours bounces, please ring
me: this helps beat sabotage. To unsubscribe, reply with "unsubscribe" in the
subject line; allow 1 day.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 18
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 0:36pm(PDT)
Subject: Fw: Israel's 'demographic problem' - its Arabs -=- confessions of a

From: "Peter Myers" <myers@cyberone.com.au>

April 17, 2006

(1) Ilan Pappe on Israel's election and its 'demographic problem'
(2) Ross & Indyk as pro-Israel advocates - The Israel Lobby Redux, by Ira Glunts
(3) Judas - Coptic Orthodox Church recognized him as a saint
(4) American Jewish Committee compliments Javier Solana on EU Policy re Hamas
(5) Confessions of a Jewish refugee
(6) Silent Nuclear Submarines Add to Iran Tensions

(1) Ilan Pappe on Israel's election and its 'demographic problem'

Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 23:10:48 -0700 From: Jeff Blankfort
<jblankfort@earthlink.net>

The London Review of Books, again! This time an important article by Ilan Pappe.
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n08/print/papp01_.html

LRB | Vol. 28 No. 8 dated 20 April 2006 | Ilan Pappe

Ilan Pappe on the Israeli election and the 'demographic problem'

>From left to right, the manifestos of all the Zionist parties during the recent
Israeli election campaign contained policies which they claimed would counter
the 'demographic problem' posed by the Palestinian presence in Israel. Ariel
Sharon proposed the pull-out from Gaza as the best solution to it; the leaders
of the Labour Party endorsed the wall because they believed it was the best way
of limiting the number of Palestinians inside Israel. Extra-parliamentary
groups, too, such as the Geneva Accord movement, Peace Now, the Council for
Peace and Security, Ami Ayalon's Census group and the Mizrachi Democratic
Rainbow all claim to know how to tackle it.

Apart from the ten members of the Palestinian parties and two eccentric
Ashkenazi ultra-Orthodox Jews, all the members of the new Knesset (there are 120
in all) arrived promising that their magic formulae would solve the 'demographic
problem'. The means varied from reducing Israeli control over the Occupied
Territories ? in fact, the plans put forward by Labour, Kadima, Shas (the
Sephardic Orthodox party) and Gil (the pensioners' party) would involve Israeli
withdrawal from only 50 per cent of these territories ? to more drastic action.
Right-wing parties such as Yisrael Beytenu, the Russian ethnic party of Avigdor
Liberman, and the religious parties argued for a voluntary transfer of
Palestinians to the West Bank. In short, the Zionist answer is to reduce the
problem either by giving up territory or by shrinking the 'problematic'
population group.

None of this is new. The population problem was identified as the major obstacle
in the way of Zionist fulfilment in the late 19th century, and David Ben-Gurion
said in December 1947 that 'there can be no stable and strong Jewish state so
long as it has a Jewish majority of only 60 per cent.' Israel, he warned on the
same occasion, would have to deal with this 'severe' problem with 'a new
approach'. The following year, ethnic cleansing meant that the number of
Palestinians dropped below 20 per cent of the Jewish state's overall population
(in the area allocated to Israel by the UN plus the area it occupied in 1948,
the Palestinians would originally have made up around 60 per cent of the
population). Interestingly, but not surprisingly, in December 2003 Binyamin
Netanyahu recycled Ben-Gurion's magic number ? the undesirable 60 per cent. 'If
the Arabs in Israel form 40 per cent of the population,' Netanyahu said, 'this
is the end of the Jewish state.' 'But 20 per cent is also a problem,' he added.
'If the relationship with these 20 per cent is problematic, the state is
entitled to employ extreme measures.' He did not elaborate.

Israel boosted its population with two massive Jewish immigrations, each of
about a million people, in 1949 and in the 1980s. This kept the Palestinian
proportion of the population down and today Palestinians account for nearly 20
per cent of the population of Israel (not counting the Occupied Territories).
Ehud Olmert, the leader of Kadima and acting prime minister, thinks that if
Israel stays in the Occupied Territories and its inhabitants are included in the
Israeli population, Palestinians will outnumber Jews within 15 years. So he
advocates hitkansut ? meaning 'convergence' or, better, 'ingathering' ? a policy
that would leave several populous Palestinian areas outside direct Israeli
control. But even if this consolidation takes place, there will still be a very
large Palestinian population inside the 88 per cent of Palestine in which Olmert
hopes to build the future, stable Jewish state. How large exactly we don't know:
demographers in Israel belonging to the centre or the left provide a low
estimate, which makes disengagement seem a reasonable solution, while those on
the right tend to exaggerate the figure. But they all seem to agree that the
demographic balance will not stay the same, given the higher birth-rate of
Palestinians compared to Jews. Thus Olmert may well come to the conclusion that
pull-outs are not the solution.

Once the 'Arabs' in Israel and the Palestinians in the Occupied Territories came
to be thought of in the West as 'Muslims' it was easy to elicit support for
Israel's demographic policies, at least where it counted: on Capitol Hill. But
even in Europe there was no need, after 9/11, to explain why Israel has a
'demographic problem'. On 2 February 2003 the popular daily Maariv carried a
typical headline: 'A quarter of the children in Israel are Muslims.' The piece
went on to describe this fact as Israel's next 'ticking bomb'. The increase in
the 'Muslim' population ? 2.4 per cent a year ? was not a problem anymore, but a
'danger'.

In the run-up to the election, pundits discussed this question using language
akin to that employed in Europe and the United States in debates over
immigration. Here, however, it is the immigrant community that decides the
future of the indigenous population, not vice versa. On 7 February 1948, after
driving to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv and seeing the first villages that had been
emptied of Palestinians on the western outskirts of Jerusalem, a jubilant
Ben-Gurion reported to a gathering of Zionist leaders: 'When I come nowadays to
Jerusalem I feel it is a Hebrew city. This was a feeling I only had in farms and
in Tel Aviv. Not all Jerusalem is Hebraic but there is already a huge Hebraic
bloc ? no Arabs in it. One hundred per cent Jewish. If we can persevere,'
Ben-Gurion added, this miracle will happen elsewhere.

But despite their perseverance, a sizable community of Palestinians remained.
They are students at my university, where they attend lectures by professors who
talk about the grave demographic problem. Palestinian law students ? the lucky
ones who constitute an informal quota ? in the Hebrew University may well come
across Ruth Gabison, a former head of the Association for Civil Rights and a
candidate for the Supreme Court, who has come out recently with strong views on
the subject, views that probably seem to her to reflect a consensus. 'Israel has
the right to control Palestinian natural growth,' she has declared.

Away from the campuses, these students can't escape the knowledge that they are
seen as a problem. Whether from the Zionist left or the hard right, they hear
daily that Jewish society is longing to get rid of them. And they will worry,
and rightly so, whenever they hear they have become a 'danger'. While still only
a problem they are protected by a certain pretence to democracy and liberalism.
Once they constitute a danger, however, they could be faced with emergency
policies based on the British Mandate's emergency regulations. Houses could be
demolished, newspapers shut down and people expelled under such a regime.

The 2006 elections have brought to the Knesset a solid coalition determined to
deal with the demographic problem: first and foremost, by disengaging from more
of the West Bank; and second, by completing the network of walls around the rest
of the Palestinian areas. The border between Israel and the West Bank is 370
kilometres long, but the serpentine wall will be double that length, and will
strangle large Palestinian communities. In the Palestinian areas within Israel,
segregation is ensured by construction programmes approved when Sharon was
minister of national infrastructures: Jewish settlements overlook and encircle
large Palestinian areas such as Wadi Ara and Lower Galilee.

On 31 July 2003, the Knesset passed a law prohibiting Palestinians from
obtaining citizenship, permanent residency or even temporary residency when they
marry Israeli citizens. The initiator of the legislation was a liberal Zionist,
Avraham Poraz of the centrist party Shinui. He described it as a 'defence
measure'. Only 25 members of the Knesset opposed it and Poraz declared that
those already married and with families 'will have to go to the West Bank',
regardless of how long they had been living in Israel.

The Arab members of the Knesset were among those who appealed to the Supreme
Court against this racist law. When the Supreme Court turned down the appeal,
their energy petered out. The Arab members come from three parties: the
Communist Party (Hadash), the National Party of Azmi Bishara (Balad) and the
United Arab List drawn up by the more pragmatic branch of the Islamic movement.
The Supreme Court ruling made clear their irrelevance, in the eyes of both the
parliamentary and judicial systems. We're always told that Palestinians should
be pleased to live in the only democracy in the region, to have the right to
vote, but that vote brings no power.

In the dead of night on 24 January this year, an elite unit of the border police
seized the Israeli Palestinian village of Jaljulya. The troops burst into
houses, dragging out 36 women and eventually deporting eight of them. The women
were ordered to go to their old homes in the West Bank. Some had been married
for years to Palestinians in Jaljulya, some were pregnant, many had children,
but the soldiers were demonstrating to the Israeli public that when a
demographic problem becomes a danger, the state will act swiftly and without
hesitation. One Palestinian member of the Knesset protested, but the action was
backed by the government, the courts and the media.

The ten members of the new Knesset from Palestinian parties will not be included
in any coalition and will probably be sidelined and forgotten, as they were in
the previous parliament (there are two other Arab members and two Druze members
from Labour and Kadima). Haaretz sent a journalist to live for a few days in the
'Arab areas' in order to write ? as an anthropological tourist ? on the
Palestinians' reaction to the elections. Apart from this piece of reportage, the
Israeli media had nothing to say about how the Palestinians voted. After all,
they are the problem, not the solution. And if disengagement doesn't 'stop' the
growth in their numbers the Jaljulya operation could show the future.

No wonder many Palestinians now want the international community to intervene.
But Israel ignored the ruling of the international court on the wall, and is
unlikely to be moved by what it will see as interference in its internal
affairs. There is another call coming, still hesitant, although it will grow in
volume: a call for the creation of an autonomous parliament for the Palestinians
in Israel. In a world that has marginalised this community twice over ? both in
the overall Palestinian polity and within Jewish society ? the 1,300,000
Palestinian citizens of Israel have very little to lose by shunning the Knesset
and opting for autonomy. Who knows, they may even convince the Jewish majority
that they are 'only' a problem, not a danger.

7 April

Ilan Pappe is a senior lecturer at the University of Haifa. His most recent
books are A History of Modern Palestine and The Modern Middle East.

(2) Ross & Indyk as pro-Israel advocates - The Israel Lobby Redux, by Ira Glunts

Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:25:01 -0700 From: Jeff Blankfort
<jblankfort@earthlink.net>

Another interesting commentary on the Mearsheimer-Walt paper. One correction:
While AIPAC was responsible for initiating the Washington Inst. for Near East
Policy, one of its most successful Fifth Column operations, it was important
that it would exist as a separate entity and be privately funded from other
sources which no doubt include the same ones that fund....AIPAC.

http://www.selvesandothers.org/article13772.html

The Israel Lobby Redux

Colin Powell Disagrees With David Gergen's Claim That There Is No Israel "Lobby"

by Ira Glunts 8th April 2006

Two Israeli prominent journalists wrote that Colin Powell understood and feared
the power of the lobby. In an op-ed column critical of his Harvard colleagues,
ludicrously titled "There Is No Israel 'Lobby'" the well-known political
consultant David Gergen proclaimed, "Over the course of four tours in the White
House, I never once saw a decision in the Oval Office to tilt U.S. foreign
policy in favor of Israel at the expense of America's interest." [1] America's
massive financial support of Israel's territorial expansion in the West Bank is
very much contrary to its own interests, his two colleagues would respond.
Gergen's blanket denial is one of the most preposterous statements in the
ongoing media reporting that impugn the motivations of Stephen Walt and John
Mearsheimer, two academics who recently published the "Israel Lobby." Their
essay described what the writers understand to be the many deleterious effects
of pro-Israel activists upon the formulation of American foreign policy. [2] In
his critique of the essay, Gergen displays a level of chutzpah which would
astound even the most blindly loyal devotee of the Israeli cause, when he
excoriates Walt and Mearsheimer for "impugn[ing] the unstinting service to
America's national security by public figures like Dennis Ross, Martin Indyk
...."

The truth is that Ross and Indyk are two government officials that best
illustrate the presence of pro-Israel advocates in the US government. Ross, who
was the lead negotiator at the Camp David Peace talks, was publicly criticized
for his lack of objectivity by his own deputy Aaron Miller. Miller in a
Washington Post op-ed called "Israel's Lawyer" wrote that during the
negotiations Ross and his team, instead of facilitating compromise, which would
have been in America's best interest, chose to act as an advocate for the
Israelis. [3] Dennis Ross is currently the director of the Washington Institute
for Near East Policy (WINEP), a pro-Israel think-tank which is funded by the
American Israel Policy Action Committee (AIPAC). Martin Indyk, who founded WINEP
and served as its first executive director, was later both US Ambassador to
Israel and Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs. He is a long
time uncritical supporter of Israeli government policy.

In their recent best-selling book, Boomerang: The Failure of Leadership In the
Second Intifada, presently only available in Hebrew, Raviv Drucker and Ofer
Shelah, two respected Israeli journalists, described a meeting between the then
Secretary of State Colin Powell, who the lobby considered to be the "weak link"
in the chain of more Israel- friendly Bush Administration officials, and Abraham
Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai Brith, who is a prominent
member of what in Israel is called the Jewish lobby. The following selection
indicates in a dramatic way that Gergen's view of the influence of the Israel
lobby may not be shared by all ex-government officials.

In his [Powell's] own State Department there was a keen awareness of the
strength of the Jewish lobbyists. Secretaries of State did not usually meet with
lobbyists, but both Jewish officials and Jews that did not officially represent
specific groups from Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League to Ronald Lauder,
could meet with Powell on short notice.... At the State Department, Foxman had
an aura of omnipotence. He was held responsible for the appointment of Indyk as
Undersecretary of State under Clinton, and was thought to have played a role in
the appointments of Secretaries of State Christopher and Albright. Powell
related to Foxman almost as if he were someone to whom he must capitulate. Once
Foxman told one of his deputies that Powell was the weak link. When the
Secretary of State heard this he began to worry. He knew that in Washington a
confrontation with the Jewish lobby would make his life difficult. Once he
arranged a meeting with Foxman, but the busy Foxman postponed the meeting three
times. When they eventually met, the head of the Anti-Defamation League
apologized to the Secretary of State [for the postponements]. "You call, we
come," replied Powell, paraphrasing a well known advertisement for a freight
company. That statement had much more meaning than just a humorous polite reply.
[4]

Unfortunately, the American press has thus far been largely complicit in the
unwarranted attacks on two professors who have written a generally well-argued
essay on the disadvantages of the current American/Israeli relationship. Most
press accounts of the article feature the negative criticism, but tend to ignore
or downplay positive comment. In the present political climate it is not a
surprise that there is not a groundswell of support for the two embattled
scholars. Abe Foxman called the essay "a classic conspiratorial anti-Semitic
analysis invoking the canards of Jewish power and Jewish control." [5] I, as a
Jew, agree with the Jewish editor, Mary-Kay Wilmers, who published the article.
She feels, as paraphrased in The Observer, "that the most angry denunciations of
anti-Semitism - while designed to serve the purpose of censorship by those
attempting to forestall criticism of Israel - may actually encourage
anti-Semitism in the long run." [6]

The American media does no favor to the many American Jews and Israelis who are
critical of Israel's self-defeating expansionism and its suppression of the
Palestinian right of self-determination. The Israel lobby in the United States
does not represent the opinions of many American Jews. The pressure it exerts on
government officials to blindly and unconditionally support present Israeli
policies, in the end will help neither the United States nor Israel itself.

Ira Glunts first visited the Middle East in 1972, where he taught English and
physical education in a small rural community in Israel. He was a volunteer in
the Israeli Defense Forces in 1992. Mr. Glunts lives in Madison, New York where
he operates a used and rare book business.

Notes:

[1] http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ideas_opinions/story/402910p-341257c.html

[2] http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html

[3]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/22/AR2005052200883.html

[4] Drucker, Raviv and Shelah, Ofer, Boomerang..., Keter, 2005, pps. 132-133.
Translation and text emphasized or enclosed in brackets, mine.

[5] http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...

[6] http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,1744960,00.html?gusrc=rss

(3) Judas - Coptic Orthodox Church recognized him as a saint

Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 09:44:01 EDT From: EagleNewsTips@aol.com

The very last part of the article was that of which I spoke. I have no need to
research her any further, but you can get the basic ideas from her past
dealings.

And, I am not saying that the Judas gospel is not a valid ancient writing. It
probably is yet another Gnostic writing. The Gnostics were among the earliest
Christians until they were displaced by the emerging Roman church. Some, like
Gerald Massey and others, even maintain that St. Paul was a Gnostic whose
writings were later altered to conform to Romanism. I don't want to open up the
whole Acharya thing again, but some mention of all of this seems appropriate.

I first heard about the revisionist theory of Judas when I studied at an
Episcopal (Anglican) seminary now so many years ago. The Coptic Orthodox Church
(or at least some branches of it) have recognized Judas as a saint since he was
the key part of the plan. But, it seems unlikely that the Temple police who
arrested Jesus needed anyone to point him out. He was well-known around
Jerusalem, esp. after he overturned the money changers in the stock exchange
(oops, I mean temple). Jesus tells us this himself, when he was apprehended:
"Have you come out as against a robber with swords and clubs? When I was with
you day after day in the temple, you did not lay hands upon me, [they knew him]
but this is your hour and the power of darkness." Luke 22:52-54. Was Judas
essential to the arrest, or was this added to the story later? The volumnious
series of writings known as the Phoenix Journals also maintained that they real
Judas was a friend and confidant of Jesus.

But, enough of all of this. Frohes Osterfest to all my comrades.

Harrell Rhome

(4) American Jewish Committee compliments Javier Solana on EU Policy re Hamas

Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:20:50 -0700 From: Jeff Blankfort
<jblankfort@earthlink.net>

AJC Praises EU Policy on Hamas-led Government

http://www.ajc.org/site/apps/nl/content2.asp?c=ijITI2PHKoG&b=849241&ct=2167143

April 11, 2006 ? New York ? The American Jewish Committee has praised the
decision of the Council of the European Union to suspend assistance to the
Hamas-led Palestinian government. At the same time, in a letter to Javier
Solana, secretary general of the council, AJC welcomed the European body's
decision to continue providing humanitarian assistance.

AJC has long supported a negotiated two-state solution. "We continue to hope
that responsible Palestinian leadership will ultimately emerge, and that a
peaceful coexistence will one day take root between Israel and the
Palestinians," wrote AJC President E. Robert Goodkind and Executive Director
David A. Harris.

The full text of the AJC letter to Javier Solana follows: His Excellency Javier
Solana Secretary General/High Representative for Common Foreign and Security
Policy Council of the European Union

Dear Javier:

We are writing to express the American Jewish Committee's appreciation for the
decision adopted yesterday by the Council of the European Union to suspend
assistance to the Hamas-led Palestinian government. We thank you for your
personal role in this important decision. We also welcome the Council's decision
to continue the provision of humanitarian assistance to meet the basic needs of
the Palestinian people through non-governmental channels.

Ursula Plassnik, President of the Council, said in a statement after the
adoption of the decision that the European Union's "aim is to see all parties
contribute to a positive development in the Middle East by peaceful means." We
fully share this sentiment. As you know, we have long supported a peaceful
resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with two states living side by
side in peace and security. Regrettably, the recent victory by Hamas in the
Palestinian Legislative Council elections presents a major setback to the
prospects of peace. We continue to hope, nevertheless, that responsible
Palestinian leadership will ultimately emerge, and that a peaceful coexistence
will one day take root between Israel and the Palestinians.

We firmly believe that the international community must remain consistent and
united in its stance toward Hamas ? dealing with it only if it agrees to
recognize Israel's right to exist, to abandon terrorism, and to respect existing
agreements and obligations. Any deviation from these principles, which have been
set by the Quartet, would only strengthen the radicals who are opposed to peace,
and further marginalize moderates. The European Union can ? as it has since the
Palestinian elections ? play a crucial role in preventing any erosion in the
international community's united stance on this issue.

We have always valued our relations with the European Union and with you
personally. We fondly remember our meetings with you in the past, and look
forward to our continued cooperation in advancing trans-Atlantic understanding
and the cause of peace in the Middle East and around the world.

Respectfully, E. Robert Goodkind, President David A. Harris, Executive Director

(5) Confessions of a Jewish refugee

Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 00:41:50 +0200 From: "Kristoffer Larsson"
<kristoffer.larsson@sobernet.nu>

Confessions of a Jewish refugee

By Bradley Burston

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=%20705562&contrassID=2

Nobody likes to talk about it.

In fact, there is nothing that enemies hate more, than to be told that they are
alike.

But just this once ...

Since it's Pesach on our side, it might be the right time to bring up the
central obsession of both Jewish tradition and Palestinian culture: exile, and
the hope for return.

It was the experience of exile that forged the Jews and the Palestinians both.
We are who we are, in no small part, for the hardships and longings and
insecurities that displacement from home confers.

The story we are commanded as Jews to tell on the seder night has everything to
do with exile and its curses, the pain of the loss of freedom, the humiliation
of the loss of humanity and choice, the fear of loss of collective memory, the
strife - much of it self-imposed - of seeking redemption through return.

So crucial to us is the experience of exile, that every week we cite the exodus
from Egypt in the Sabbath kiddush, in the same breath as the very creation of
the world.

Certainly, for Palestinians, exile exerts no less commanding a power over the
national personality. For many Palestinians, the issue of eventual return home
of refugees is the one question before which all other Israeli-Palestinian
disputes pale.

Palestinians the world over treasure the keys to former family homes in the Holy
Land, many or most of which may no longer be standing.

On six continents, Palestinians and Jews, awash in the alienation of diaspora,
dream of an ancestral home so idealized that it may well never have existed.

The insecurity of the refugee stalks all of us. It is in our blood. We all
suffer from it, Jew and Palestinian, even as we deny the right of our enemy to
suffer, even as we blame our enemy for his own suffering.

For the Jews, the insecurity manifests itself as fear, fear of being
annihilated, fear of being cast out of here by force.

For the Palestinians, the insecurity finds expression in humiliation, a profound
loss of honor that stretches over the decades that the state of Israel has
existed.

Our fear is such that the very steps we take to protect ourselves - at
checkpoints, in airport searches, in wall-building, in military raids - only
deepen the humiliation of the Palestinians.

Their humiliation is such that the very steps they take to redeem themselves -
suicide bombings, drive-by killings, Qassam salvos, masked paramilitary
posturing - only serve tom deepen our fear.

Then there is the refugee's ultimate weapon, one that figures in the arsenals of
both sides. It is the wily stubbornness that is the child of the union of memory
and rage. In the Jewish refugee it is as old as Joseph in Egypt. It is called
the trait of a stiff-necked people, a people who will even stand up and defy God
if they so choose, and the trait has been ours since the Exodus.

In the Palestinians it is called sumud, or steadfastness. It is a trait that
makes Palestinians defiant, rather than compliant, as we throw shell after shell
at them.

It is this trait that makes victory impossible here. We will literally die to
deny our enemy a victory, and our enemy is certainly prepared to return the
favor.

So it is, that more than half a century of conflict has done little to change
the lot of refugees, except to create more and more of them.

It was perhaps more inevitable than ironic, that the creation of the state of
Israel, born in large part to solve the refugee catastrophe in the wake of the
Holocaust, gave rise to new refugee catastrophes.

The wars in 1948 and 1967 sparked the Palestinian refugee problem, and also
spurred the exile of masses of Jewish refugees from Muslim lands.

It might be said that all members of a people are refugees, until all of their
refugee brethren are able to come home. No peoples on this earth have more
experience with the status of refugees than do the residents of the Holy Land.
And no two peoples on this earth have a greater problem with finding a way to
solve their refugee problems.

Over the past year, we in Israel ceded the Palestinians an amount of territory
which, in the space of six days, gave them rule over an additional 50 percent of
the total territory they comtrolled in the Gaza Strip.

In the process, we created another 8,000 refugees. We expelled the Jews of Gush
Katif, northern Gaza and northern Samaria from their homes, and then we failed
them. We have yet to be able to see to their needs. This alone may delay for
years and years the plan to create 70,000 more Jewish refugees in the West Bank.

The war in the territories continues to create Palestinian refugees as well,
people, whose houses we demolished for various reasons and in various ways.

It's a matter of time, and the extent to which all of us can stand to continue
to be refugees.

We are, all of us here, Jew and Arab, victims of our refugee mentality, the one
we cannot shake, the one that makes us into villain and victim both.

We are, all of us, still dor hamidbar, the Generation of the Wilderness, still
adrift in our dreams, still holding on, still holding out for dear life,
unwilling to part with the refugees' fervent illusions about how this eventual
state of ours should look. Of how it must look, in order to somehow justify and
give meaning to our decades and decades of suffering.

For many on the Palestinian side, it is preferable by far to hold out and hold
on to the illusion that all will return to former homes, than to have an
independent Palestine that confirms the compromise, and thus, the defeat.

For many on the Israeli side, it is preferable by far to hold out and hold on to
the illusion that we can keep all of our bibically deeded land, Shilo and
Shechem and Beit El and Hebron, than to live within the real, internationally
recognized, final borders that define an independent state.

In the process, though, we are disheartedned. We are ground down by the burden
of being permanent refugees. We are ground down by living in this place of
colossal disappointment. We are ground down by the ways our brethren disappoint
us, either because they do not share our vision for the eventual state, or
because their actions make the vision in our heads that much more unreal, that
much more distant.

We know the price of living together, what it would cost to part our peoples.
The price is still too high for us, Arab and Jew. The price is nothing less than
the death of our incompatible dreams, at root, the idea that one of our peoples
can have all of this all to itself, river to the sea, Jerusalem and its sacred
heart.

We will all of us here, Jew and Arab, be refugees until we can bring ourselves
to accept that the other has rights, legitimate grievances, and valid claims.

We cannot have a truly independent, viable, Jewish state until our borders and
our capital are recognized by the world community. With the Palestinian issue
unsolved, we cannot even convince our closest ally to recognize our capital
city.

We are not yet independent. As long as we are in a state without borders, we
remain stateless ourselves, internal refugees, in limbo at home.

Our enemies the Palestinians have a similar problem. They will not be free of
the curse of the refugee soul until they can relinquish the idea that respect
can only be gained through the barrel of a gun. If the Palestinians can someday
put aside their honor issues long enough to stop firing rockets and exalting
holy resistance as a sacrament, Israel will withdraw in the West Bank, and a
state will arise.

Sooner or later, there will be two states. Even the extremists know this. If
they didn't, they wouldn't have to work so hard to prevent it. It's a matter of
time. It could take another 20 years and terrible trauma, but it will happen.

Until then, we'll all continue to be adrift. Mired with one another, and with
ourselves. Refugees, right here at home.

(6) Silent Nuclear Submarines Add to Iran Tensions

Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:42:29 -0400 From: Don <NX7933@hotmail.com>

[tell me, Jeff B or anyone else, does Izzy really have nuclearised SLCMs, or is
this bluff?]

Israel has diesel-electric (not nuclear) submarines provided by Germany.
Reportedly they may have nuclear SLBMs (submarine launched ballistic missiles).

http://fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/index.html
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/nuke/farr.htm
http://fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/nuke/index.html
http://fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/missile/index.html

Popeye submarine-launched missile:

http://fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/missile/popeye-t.htm

"In May 2000 Israel is reported to have secretly carried out its first test
launches from two German-built MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt
from ".." claiming to be Dolphin-class submarines of cruise missiles capable of
carrying nuclear warheads. The missiles launched from vessels off Sri Lanka in
the Indian Ocean are said to have hit a target at a range of about 1,500
kilometers [about 930 statute miles]. Israel is reported to possess a 200kg
nuclear warhead, containing 6kg of plutonium, that could be mounted on cruise
missiles. "

http://fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/sub/index.html

"According to some reports the submarines may be capable of carrying
nuclear-armed MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from ".."
claiming to be Popeye Turbo cruise missiles, with a goal of deterring an enemy
from trying to take out its nuclear weapons with a surprise attack. "

So maybe no one knows for sure and it may be bluff. But Israel sure has nukes
even if it doesn't have submarine nukes yet.

The article says Israel has Harpoon missiles. FAS doesn't seem to have those
listed under Israel's nuclear weapons.

Here is information on the harpoon:

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/agm-84.htm

The above doesn't appear to mention any nuclear capabilities for the missile. It
also doesn't appear on the US's nuclear weapons list:

http://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/slbm/index.html

Perhaps the article erred and the harpoon is strictly a conventional missile? It
would be easy to confuse with the popeye.

--
Peter Myers, 381 Goodwood Rd, Childers 4660, Australia ph +61 7 41262296
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers Mirror: http://mailstar.net/index.html I
use the old Mac OS; being incompatible, it cannot run Windows viruses or
transmit them to you. If my mail does not arrive, or yours bounces, please ring
me: this helps beat sabotage. To unsubscribe, reply with "unsubscribe" in the
subject line; allow 1 day.

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 19
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 1:05pm(PDT)
Subject: killing has turned into a trading asset in Iraq -- no way to escape

Mass killing

By Kadhim al-Miqdadi

Azzamman, April 8, 2006

The scenes of murder, destruction and terror we see every day can be summarized in a daily television program under the title: Killing off everyone.”

Such a program will probably encourage publishers to issue a new book under the title: “Give up life and start with death.”

In this book we will have an overview of the new philosophy of killing. That is, if you have not yet been killed by sword, you will certainly be killed by a car bomb, an explosive charge or a mortar attack.

In antiquity, Greek philosophers used to say that life is the art of training how to die.

Today, the Americans have succeeded in translating this philosophy into reality by training us on how to be ready to die round the clock.

Thus, no Iraqi man today leaves home without reciting al-Fatiha (saying his prayers) over his own soul, the souls of his family and his neighbors.

Our ancestors of the Mesopotamian era used to carry amulets around their necks as a charm against evil or injury.

Amulets are no good for us, their descendents. No amulet or talisman has the power to protect the bearer from the evils and arrogance of an American cowboy or a terrorist emir (prince).

We are today between two fires: the fire of occupation and the fire of terror.

Because the idea of death haunts us day and night, we have drastically restrained our social relations, once the pride of our society.

We spend most of our time crouching over the floor of our houses. Our houses have turned into jails and we have become both the jailers and the inmates.

Our contacts with the world outside our homes are now confined to informing the loved ones and close friends when a relative is killed. And they are too many.

We need to make sure that they attend at least the funeral and come and offer their condolences.

Killing is so rampant in Iraq that there has been a boom in funeral-related merchandize. Shops offering funeral and mourning services today vie with those selling furniture or wedding articles.

In fact killing has even turned into a trading asset in Iraq. It is indeed the only lucrative trade remaining in the country.

Killing, my friend, has become a hobby in my country like hunting, stamp collecting or bird-watching.

It spares no one. There is no way to evade death whether you were a construction worker, a teacher, a barber, a professor, a baker, a doctor, a dentist, a man, a woman, a child, or an elderly.

All this happens and the minister of interior is still there, the government is still there, and the minister of defense is still there and the U.S. troops are still there.
http://www.azzaman.com/english/index.asp?fname=opinion\2006-04-08\145.htm

(end)
-------------------------------------------

THANK A ZIONIST

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 20
From: "botalerts" botalerts@yahoo.ca
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 2:10pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: Berlin Newspaper asks: Is US Govt liable for 911 damages?

Go, John, go!!!

--- In 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com, John Leonard <jpleonard@...> wrote:
>
> Berliner Zeitung - The Berlin News
> http://www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/politik/542218.html
>
> English translation by John Leonard
>
> Thursday, April 13, 2006
>
>
> 9/11 Skeptics gain strength
> Critics in the USA doubt the official version
>
> by Andreas Förster
>
> BERLIN. Is the US Government liable for the
> damages from the terror attacks of September
> 11th? The American publisher John Leonard demands
> this, because he is convinced Washington knew in
> advance about the attack plans, but did nothing
> to prevent them. Leonard wants to get Munich
> Reinsurance to investigate the possibility of US
> government sharing the liability.
>
> This is the sense of the shareholder's
> countermotion that the Californian has filed with
> the next general meeting of Munich Re next
> Wednesday. Two subsidiary frims of the German
> insurance concern have to pay billion-dollar
> damage claims for the destruction of the World
> Trade Center. Leonard accuses the supervisory and
> managing boards of failure to investigate the
> background of the attacks thoroughly enough, and
> of depending too much on the official version of
> the events as publicized by the US Government.
>
> A New Commission
>
> Unlike the situation in Germany, four and a half
> years after the attacks, in the US there is
> growing respect for 9/11 skeptics. An independent
> commission of scientist, come of them well known,
> has been analysing the sequence of events before
> and on Sept. 11 and investigating the
> circumstances which led to the collapse of the
> WTC Twin Towers. New York Magazine devoted its
> lead story to "Ground Zero Grassy Knoll" three
> weeks ago, focusing on the contradictions in the
> official version and the many unanswered
> questions. "Grassy Knoll" is the American
> journalistic term for alternative theories about
> the background to the assassination of US President John F. Kennedy.
>
> The American TV network CNN also took up the
> Grassy Knoll story. In an interview that aroused
> a great deal of attention, Hollywood actor
> Charlie Sheen expressed massive doubts about the
> official 9/11 version and challenged the
> government to answer the questions - for
> instance, why the Pakistani secret service wired
> $100,000 to the alleged death pilot Mohammed
> Atta, why a building at some distance from the
> Twin Towers, occupied by the CIA, was also
> destroyed in the attacks, and what is behind the
> unusual share trading on international stock exchanges just before 9/11.
>
> Photo: Should the US Government pay for the 9/11 damages?
>
> ----------------------
> German original
> ===========
>
> Donnerstag, 13. April 2006
>
>
>
> Skeptiker des 11. Septembers erhalten Zulauf
> Kritiker in den USA bezweifeln offizielle Version
>
> Andreas Förster
>
> BERLIN. Muss die US-Regierung für die bei den
> Terroranschlägen vom 11. September 2001
> entstandenen Schäden haften? Der amerikanische
> Verleger John Leonard fordert dies, weil
> Washington seiner Überzeugung nach vorab von den
> Attentatsplänen gewusst, aber nicht eingegriffen
> habe. Leonard will jetzt die Münchner
> Rückversicherung dazu bewegen, eine mögliche
> Mithaftung der US-Regierung zu prüfen.
>
> Einen entsprechenden Antrag hat der Kalifornier
> als Aktionär des Versicherungsunternehmens zur
> nächsten Hauptversammlung der Münchner Rück am
> kommenden Mittwoch eingebracht. Zwei
> Tochterunternehmen des deutschen
> Versicherungskonzerns müssen wegen der Zerstörung
> des World Trade Centers Schadensersatzansprüche
> in Milliardenhöhe begleichen. Leonard wirft
> Aufsichtsrat und Vorstand jetzt vor, die
> Hintergründe der Attacken auf das World Trade
> Center in New York nicht gründlich genug
> untersucht und sich zu sehr auf die von der
> US-Regierung verbreitete offizielle Version der Ereignisse verlassen
zu haben.
>
> Kommission eingesetzt
>
> Anders als in Deutschland nimmt in den USA
> viereinhalb Jahre nach den Anschlägen die
> öffentliche Aufmerksamkeit für die
> 9/11-Skeptiker, die Zweifel an der offiziellen
> Version der Attentate äußern, zu. Eine
> unabhängige Kommission von zum Teil namhaften
> Wissenschaftlern analysiert seit einigen Monaten
> den Ablauf der Ereignisse vor und am 11.
> September und untersucht die technische Umstände,
> die zum Zusammenbrechen der Zwillingstürme des
> World Trade Centers geführt haben könnten. Das
> New York Magazine widmete dem "Ground Zero Grassy
> Knoll" vor drei Wochen eine Titelgeschichte, in
> deren Mittelpunkt alle Widersprüche der
> offiziellen Version und die vielen noch
> ungeklärten Fragen stehen. Der Begriff "Grassy
> Knoll" (Grashügel) steht im US-Journalismus als
> Synonym für die alternativen Theorien über die
> Hintergründe des Mordanschlags auf den US-Präsidenten John F. Kennedy.
>
> Auch der US-Fernsehsender CNN befasste sich im
> März mit dem "Grassy Knoll". In einem viel
> beachteten Interview äußerte der
> Hollywood-Schauspieler Charlie Sheen massive
> Zweifel an der offiziellen 9/11-Version und
> forderte die Regierung auf, noch offene Fragen zu
> klären. Dabei geht es unter anderem darum,
> weshalb der pakistanische Geheimdienst dem
> mutmaßlichen Todesflieger Mohammed Atta 100 000
> Dollar überwiesen hat, warum ein von den
> Zwillingstürmen des World Trade Centers weiter
> entfernt stehendes Gebäude des US-Geheimdienstes
> bei den Anschlägen zerstört wurde und worauf die
> auffälligen Aktienbewegungen an internationalen
> Börsen unmittelbar vor dem 11. 9. zurückzuführen sind.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Foto: Muss die US-Regierung für die Schäden des 11. Septembers 2001
haften?
>

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 21
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 2:31pm(PDT)
Subject: A Day in the Life: 4/16/6

GOVERNMENT OF THE USA IN
EXILE
Free Americans
Reaching Out to Amerika's Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free
        
Via <prez@usa-exile.org>

April 16, 2006

From: "Graham Jukes" <grahamjukes@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: April 14, 2006 2:30:28 AM EST
Subject: JUST HOW LOUD MUST I SHOUT ON THIS PEACEFUL DAY?

Never mind H5N1: virulent outbreaks of bird flu "PHOBIA" are on the
horizon!

Even if bird flu does spread in Britain, you could not catch it from
eating infected chicken — unless you like your white meat red raw. The
chances of anybody here falling ill from bird flu will be, according to
the Government’s Chief Scientist, 100 million to one. (Compare that
with winning the lottery 46m:1 or the Euro-Lottery at 76m:1 if you want
to think " positively!") So you can see the relevence of the quote
below!!

QUOTE OF THE DAY

'The epicentre of the outbreak of official bird flu phobia lies in
government offices pursuing the policy of organised paranoia' Mick Hume
                               

                                
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,6-2133391,00.html
 
Now ask yourself and illustrate it to the half dead in our Society; why
would a Government want to do that, if not with malice?
 
========================================================================
=================================================================

From: "Graham Jukes" <grahamjukes@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: April 14, 2006 11:17:10 AM EST
Subject: Do like the French and Fight!

----- Original Message -----
From: FPF
To: ifj@ifj.org
Cc: The New York Times Direct
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 5:22 PM
Subject: Do like the French and Fight!

DO LIKE THE FRENCH AND FIGHT!

by Henk Ruyssenaars

FPF - Amsterdam/Paris - April 14th 2006 - While Paris and the rest of
France was still smoldering, the international propaganda press like
the BBC, ABC, CNN, CBS, AP, Reuters, ANP, UPI and all the others
criminally collaborating in the 'Project for a Profitable American
Century', kept explaining that in France people fought for their 'de
luxe' social system which the State could not afford. ''They were
egoistically defending their privileges'', it was said. Which was
absolutely not true: also the French want to avoid the inhuman American
style labor misery.

They fought and demonstrated in the streets of more than 200 cities
across the country, in factories, offices and universities,  - and will
keep fighting their social struggle one hopes - to avoid an abuse of
mankind such as is clearly seen in the United States and many of the
colonies in its malignant sphere of influence. The French labor law
would make it possible again to let 14 year olds work for free, and
have 15 year olds working night shifts. All sold to the cheapest
bidder, who can fire any slave at will, because that's the overall plan
for this European part of the PNAC empire for profit too. -
[http://tinyurl.com/laopc]

EASY FIRED, EASY HIRED?

When the explanation was given that 'Easy fired, is easy hired' - all
human beings with common sense first shook their heads in disbelief,
and now still shake their fists at those French ministerial crooks
advocating this nefarious nonsense. - [http://tinyurl.com/gbdft] - It
was the same sound reaction as when the French - and later on the Dutch
- voted NO to the European Superstate - [http://tinyurl.com/b8w9s] -
which apart from more illegal wars guaranteed lower wages for
everybody, because that's what the whole trick is about.

In the May issue of 'The Progressive' Barbara Ehrenreich correctly
writes about American employees as 'Kleenex Workers' and defends the
French protests: "Throughout the month of March and beyond, they were
demonstrating, rioting, and burning up cars to preserve a right
Americans can only dream of: the right not to be fired at an employer's
whim. What [PNAC] corporations call "flexibility"- the right to dispose
of workers at will - is what workers experience as disposability, not
to mention insecurity and poverty. The French students who were tossing
Molotov cocktails didn't want to become what they call "a Kleenex
generation"- used and tossed away when the employer decides he needs a
fresh one. - [http://tinyurl.com/eelxb]

SUPPORTING THE ILLEGAL WARS SACRIFICING PEOPLE, NATO $BILLIONS, MENTAL
AND OTHER HEALTH

The Netherlands suffers now openly as a PNAC colony, with a strongly
rising poverty rate (11%+) in one of the richest countries on
earth--and as #3 after England concerning The Group's 'bleeding' a
modern society and supporting the illegal wars sacrificing people on
the battlefields and by DU radiation, NATO $billions, mental and other
health - in The Netherlands the wages are--like in the UK and US--going
down steadily. The National Health Services have been privatized and
turned into life/death lotteries if one can't afford treatment and/or
medicines.

It's getting like in the United States, which send - as The Los Angeles
Times described this creature - US #1 usurer Arnall - a Bush
contributor - as 'ambassador' to The Netherlands. ''A straight slap in
the face'', many in Holland called it. The puppets in The Hague were
silent.

WORK FOR 10 CENTS AN HOUR?

The 'managers' running the 'royal' SHELL fiefdom with its 16 million
abused inhabitants, have now decided to start opening up the borders
coming May 1st for everybody - even if desperate people want to work
for 10 cents an hour. There will be no legal obligation for an employer
anymore to check whether a job can be given to an unemployed Dutch
citizen first. People will not get help from anybody but the
volunteers, but as long as they can work and are profitable they will
be squeezed out as lemons and then thrown away.

The creatures running this usury do absolutely not care whether people
live or die, nor how they die, as long as they produce profit at the
lowest possible wages: "We are becoming the sewer of Europe" Dutch
Socialist Party leader Jan Marijnissen said in a comment on the inhuman
acts by the so-called 'government' - the group of war criminals which
is fronting for the PNAC group of multinationals, scavenging the earth.
- [SP/Dutch: http://tinyurl.com/h56t3]

UNIONS: INFILTRATED AND CORRUPTED

The defense of the workers rights, would normally in Europe too be
expected from unions, but they've become so infiltrated and corrupted,
that - as was shown in France the first weeks - those so-called unions
do as little as is possible, and never more than a symbolic
demonstration, while thousands upon thousands have been fired the past
weeks in The Netherlands for instance. The lame unions are a disgrace,
with the people paying and losing all the time.  

In a very good article called "Empire¹s War on Labor" Charles Sullivan
writes: "Our government is killing millions of innocent civilians,
people like us in every part of the planet, while laying waste to the
world for the private gain of a few. The people should be up in arms.
But there is hardly a whimper of protest. We can hardly pry the average
citizen away from American Idol and Survivor; much less get them into
the streets to demand an end to wage slavery and to fight for social
justice.

"WHY DO WE CHOOSE TO LIVE ON OUR KNEES RATHER THAN STAND ON OUR FEET
AND FIGHT FOR WHAT WE KNOW IS RIGHT?

"Millions of workers in France are filling the streets and committing
acts of civil disobedience because they can be fired by their employers
without reason. They have joined the ranks of at will employees. Have
we regressed into a nation of obedient sheep, incapable of making
trouble? American workers should be in the streets demonstrating
solidarity with our French brethren. We should be in the streets with
our Latino brothers and sisters razing hell. We should be there with
Cindy Sheehan.

"Why does ninety-nine percent of the population consent to be ruled by
the other one percent? Why are we so damned polite and servile? Were
our backbones removed at birth? Were we born without conscience,
without a sense of right and wrong?

"DO WE EXIST ONLY TO CONSUME GOODS; TO SERVE AS CANNON FODDER IN
IMPERIALISM¹S WARS?

"FREEDOM IS NOT GIVEN, IT IS WON.

"WIN OR LOSE, WE MUST FIGHT THE FIGHT."

Sullivan and all other people using their brain are right:

When you are up against ''the crazies'', as the PNAC pack is called in
Washington: you got to fight!

AND SINCE THEY ILLEGALLY USE VIOLENCE, WE'RE LAWFULLY ENTITLED TO DO
THE SAME.

Start loading!

HENK RUYSSENAARS

Do yourself a favor and read the rest at of this very good article by
Sullivan: Information Clearing House - Click to read or post comments
on this article - Url.:
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article12706.htm

* Victory! France scraps anti-labor law - French President Jacques
Chirac bowed April 10 to the pressure of millions of students and
workers marching across France and withdrew a hated law. - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/zrbco

* LE MONDE DIPLOMATIQUE - ''LIBERTY, EQUALITY, SECURITY'' - By Ignacio
Ramonet - English - ''Far from being ³the sick man of Europe² that the
right detects, France is strong enough to resist the attempted takeover
by financial institutions. Almost uniquely in Europe, the majority of
French wage-earners fiercely oppose the government¹s attempt to wash
its hands of them and let unrestrained globalisation serve them up to
business.'' - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/k3cbe

* Special for US editors, journalists etc. (the few real ones which are
left) on how the new owner wrecks the 'Village Voice' and as an example
how people are treated as 'Kleenex workers' - The last ten minutes is
about how they (the PNAC Group) intend to apply their usury on Internet
and you - DemocracyNow video - Url.: http://www.democracynow.org/

* The last ten minutes (from 50") of the DemocracyNow broadcast
concerns this article: ''The End of the Internet?'' - by JEFF CHESTER -
Ul.: http://tinyurl.com/gb7l5

THE 'PROJECT FOR A POOR AMERICANS CENTURY':

JEFFREY ST. CLAIR, coeditor of the newsletter CounterPunch, is the
author of a new book, Grand Theft Pentagon: Tales of Corruption and
Profiteering in the War on Terror. Who or what is responsible for the
crooked system in Washington. - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/z6jrm

* US CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL CONFIRMING THE CREATION OF A WORLD GOVERNMENT
- "He asked if there was an international conspiracy to overthrow our
government: The answer is ''Yes" - Short video - Url.:
http://100777.com/media/RonPaul-NewWorldOrder.wmv

* THE 'WHY' OF GLOBAL RESISTANCE - HOW IT IS DONE BY THE PNAC'S CIA
JACKALS & THE WORLD BANK's SERIAL KILLER WOLFOWITZ - Confessions of an
economic 'hit man'.  World Bank insider Perkins explains: "Jackals' are
C.I.A. - sanctioned people that come in and try to foment a coup or
revolution. If it doesn't work, they perform assassinations, or try
to." - They steal billions for the World Bank, IMF, USAID, UNDP, AID
etc. - Perkins web site - Url.: http://tinyurl.com/jvhbu - It's your
life too: Must watch Video Url.:
www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8171.htm

* "Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we
Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets
and lynched."  -  George Bush Senior speaking in an interview with
Sarah McClendon in December 1992. - How The Bush Family Made Its
Fortune From The Nazis - THE DUTCH CONNECTION - by John Loftus - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/omczx  -  

* GLOBAL PREDATORS - ŒFRAUDS-R-US¹ - The Bush Family Saga - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/elarx

* The 9/11 drama was the 'trigger' used by the PNAC Group, killing
Americans to further their inhuman goals: Anybody who after seeing this
video - '9/11 revisited' - still believes the version from the 'PNAC
pack'  - the Washington cabal - is beyond all professional help - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/r5sx4

* The MAD COW MORNING NEWS is one of the absolutely best 9/11 sites on
Internet - by Daniel Hopsicker - Url.:
http://www.madcowprod.com/01042004.html

* PSYOPS: How to make anybody say and see anything - William M. Arkin's
"The U.S. Military Online" - When Seeing and Hearing Isn't Believing -
Special to the Washington Post - already on Feb. 1, 1999  -
Url.:http://tinyurl.com/hvnrq  - FOX: Video - 49 min. - The example
how viewers are brainwashed and 'outfoxed' - Url.:
http://tinyurl.com/b2zzl

* All the more reason to read the FIGHTIN' COCK FLYER - Url.:
http://fightincockflyer.blogspot.com/

* THE ONLY SOLUTION? - Help all the troops - of whatever nationality -
to come back from abroad! - AND WITH ALL THEIR WEAPONS, WHICH WE ARE
FORCED TO PAY FOR BY TAXES - [http://www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm] -
We need them badly at home in many countries to fight with us against
our so called 'governments' and their malignant managers - Url.:
http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/

The Dutch author this far has lived and worked abroad for more than 4
decades for international media - when they still knew what honest
journalism was - as an independent foreign correspondent. Of which 10
years - also during Gulf War I - in the 'Arab World' and the Middle
East. Seeing worldwide that every bullet and every bomb breeds more
terrorism !

* IT'S VERY UNLIKELY, but if you indeed would prefer to unsubscribe
from the FPF-list: just send an email in return with the word
'unsubscribe'.

* FPF-COPYRIGHT NOTICE - In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section
107 - any copyrighted work in this message is distributed by the
Foreign Press Foundation under fair use, without profit or payment, to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the information.
Url.: http://liimirror.warwick.ac.uk/uscode/17/107.html

FOREIGN PRESS FOUNDATION
http://forpressfound.blogspot.com/
Editor: Henk Ruyssenaars
http://tinyurl.com/amn3q
The Netherlands
fpf@chello.nl

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: "Graham Jukes" <grahamjukes@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: April 15, 2006 6:32:23 AM EST
Subject: Fascism Alert: Some clues to What they have done to our dear
America

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 10:43 PM
Subject: Fascism Alert: Some clues to What they have done to our dear
America

 

Quotable Quotes from Famous
Fascists

by Gary G. Kohls, MD, for Every Church A Peace Church (www.ecapc.org)

 “Why of course the people don’t want war. Why should some poor slob on
a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of
it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common
people don’t want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in
America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the
leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple
matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a
fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.
Voice or no voice the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”--
Hermann Goering, head of the Nazi army’s equivalent of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff and Head of the Luftwaffe, April 18, 1946. (From the book
Nuremberg Diary (Farrar, Straus & Co 1947), by psychologist Gustave
Gilbert, who visited daily with Goering and other Nazis war criminals
during the Nuremberg trials.)

 ”Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who COUNT the votes
decide everything.”-- Joseph Stalin

 “It also gives us a very special, secret pleasure to see how unaware
the people around us are of what is really happening to them.”-- Adolf
Hitler

 “It is not necessary to bury the truth.  It is sufficient merely to
delay it until nobody cares.”--    Napolean Bonaparte

  "This so-called ill treatment and torture in detention centers,
stories of which were spread everywhere among the people, and later by
the prisoners who were freed . were not, as some assumed, inflicted
methodically, but were excesses committed by individual prison guards,
their deputies, and men who laid violent hands on the detainees."--
Rudolf Hoess, the SS commandant at Auschwitz.

 “We had the moral right, we had the duty to our own people, to kill
this people that wanted to kill us. We can say that we have performed
this most difficult task out of love for our people. And we have
suffered no harm from it in our inner self, in our soul, in our
character.”-- Heinrich Himmler (1943)

 ”The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing
it.”-- Joseph Mengele, MD, “Angel of Death” at Auschwitz

“What good fortune for those in power that the people do not think.”--
Adolf Hitler

"Through clever and constant application of propaganda people can be
made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way around, to
consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise."-- Adolf Hitler,
Mein Kampf, 1923

 “The fascist state must not forget that all means must serve the ends;
it must not let itself be confused by the drivel about so-called
“freedom of the press”…it must make sure that (the media) is placed in
the service of the state.”-- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

 "An evil exists that threatens every man, woman, and child of this
great nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and
protect our homeland."-- Adolf Hitler, proposing the creation of his
homeland security group, the Gestapo

 “I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the
Almighty Creator; by defending myself against the Jews, I am fighting
for the Lord.”-- Adolf Hitler

“The streets of our country are in turmoil! The universities are filled
with students rebelling and rioting! Communists are seeking to destroy
our country! Russia is threatening us with her might! Our republic is
in danger, yes, danger from within and without! WE NEED LAW AND
ORDER!"--Original quote from Adolf Hitler (indistinguishable from the
rhetoric of Ronald Reagan several decades later).

 "Today Christians stand at the head of our country.  We want to fill
our culture again with the Christian spirit.  We want to burn out all
the recent immoral developments in literature, in the theatre, and in
the press -- in short, we want to burn out the poison of immorality
which has entered into our whole life and culture as a result of
LIBERAL excess during the past years."-- Adolph Hitler

 "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will
eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such
time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic
and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally
important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent,
for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension,
the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."-- Joseph Goebbels,
German Nazi "Minister of Propaganda and Public Enlightenment”

The conflict is for us is a holy war against Communist aggression to
free the peoples of Asia from the Red peril and assure peace in the Far
East…Our struggle aims to find peace in new order and in a great and
just spirit…New and strong foundations are being laid for world peace
and the welfare of humanity.”-- Matsuzo Nagai, Japanese Minister of
Transport, November 25, 1936, in a message to Joseph Goebbels, Nazi
Germany’s Minister of Propaganda and Public Enlightenment

 "Fascism should rightly be called corporatism as it is a merger of
state and corporate power"-- Benito Mussolini

 “We stand for the maintenance of private property ... We shall protect
free enterprise as the most expedient, or rather the sole possible
economic order.”—Adolf Hitler

"The people want wholesome dread. They want to fear something. They
want someone to frighten them and make them shudderingly submissive."--
Ernst Rohm, the chief of the SA, later to be betrayed and murdered on
Hitler’s orders during the Night of the Long Knives, 1934

“First we will kill all the subversives, then we will kill their
collaborators, then…their sympathizers, then…those who remain
indifferent, and finally, we will kill the timid.”-- Iberico Saint Jean
(1977), right wing governor of the Province of Buenos Aires,
threatening those who failed to show the necessary enthusiasm for
Argentina’s newly formed but un-elected government, that gained power
by coup d’etat.

“The Jewish people are to be exterminated,” says every party member.
That’s clear, it’s part of our program, elimination of the Jews,
extermination; right, we’ll do it. The wealth that they [the Jews] had,
we have taken from them. I have issued a strict command…that this
wealth is as a matter of course to be delivered in its entirety to the
Reich.”— Heinrich Himmler (1943)

========================================================================
================================================

http://context.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2006/04/14/120.html

Dead Cities

By Chris Floyd
Published: April 14, 2006

Of all the war crimes that have flowed from the originating crime of
President George W. Bush's unprovoked invasion of Iraq, perhaps the
most flagrant was the destruction of Fallujah in November 2004. Now, as
ignominious defeat looms for Bush's Babylonian folly, some of the key
players in fomenting the war are urging that the "Fallujah Option" be
applied to an even bigger target: Baghdad.

What these influential warmongers openly call for is the "pacification"
of Baghdad: a brutal firestorm by U.S. forces, ravaging both Sunni
insurgents and Shiite militias in a "horrific" operation that will
inevitably lead to "skyrocketing body counts," as warhawk Reuel Marc
Gerecht cheerfully wrote last week in the ever-bloodthirsty editorial
pages of The Wall Street Journal. Gerecht's war whoop quickly
ricocheted around the right-wing media echo chamber and gave public
voice to the private counsels emanating from a group whose members now
comprise the leadership of the U.S. government: The Project for the New
American Century.

As oft noted here, PNAC was founded by Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld,
Paul Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush, Zalmay Khalilzad and the now-indicted Lewis
Libby, among others. In September 2000, they publicly called for
sending U.S. forces into Iraq -- even if Saddam Hussein was already
gone -- as well as planting new bases in Central Asia, putting weapons
in space, building new nukes and funding a vast militarization of
American society. Being such savvy inside players and all, they
recognized that this lunatic program would not be accepted by the
American people -- unless, of course, the nation was struck by a
"catalyzing event" like "a new Pearl Harbor." Who says dreams don't
come true?

Gerecht, an ex-CIA man, is a senior fellow at PNAC. He was one of the
many munchkins who laid the groundwork for the mass deception that led
to the war by constantly undermining any CIA report that failed to
conform to the warmongers' highly profitable fantasies of America's
imminent destruction by the broken, toothless regime of Saddam Hussein.
The intelligence services' many caveats about this bogus threat were
placed directly on Bush's desk, as the National Journal reports, but
the P-Nackers in the White House tossed them aside. They dreamed of
war, and they got it.

But the natives failed to play their part in the imperial masque
macabre. As noted here last week, they have churlishly failed to show
proper appreciation for being slaughtered, looted, tortured and
controlled. Even the Shiites, hailed by the Bushists just a few weeks
ago as salt-of-the-earth lovers of moderate democracy, are now
denounced as hate-filled sectarians, even worse than the Sunni
insurgents -- who are suddenly being courted by Bush's man in Baghdad,
the P-Nacker Khalilzad, the BBC reports.

Not that the Shiite death squads -- backed by the U.S.-backed Iraqi
government -- have been all bad, mind you. Sure, they've been
kidnapping Sunni civilians, drilling holes in their skulls, beheading
them and then dumping the corpses on city streets or burying them in
schoolyards. But all of this been "healthy," says Gerecht, because it
has made the Sunnis and Kurds fear "Shiite power." Or something. To be
honest, Gerecht's column is filled with so many canards, delusions and
logical inconsistencies that it often leaves the plane of rational
discourse altogether. But its import is clear: By daring to defy
Washington's edicts, the Shiites have gotten too big for their britches
and must be brought to heel, along with the rest of the scum who are
making the Dear Leader look bad back home.

You think that's a joke, but it's not. One of Gerecht's main reasons
for "pacifying" Baghdad in a hydra-headed war on every ethnic faction
is because "the U.S. media will never write many optimistic stories
about Iraq if journalists fear going outside" the city's fortified
Green Zone. There you have the Bushist vision in a nutshell. The war is
not actually happening in the real world, where real people are dying
by the tens of thousands; no, it's really being fought on the monitors
of Fox News, CNN and NBC, in the flimsy pages of The New York Times and
The Washington Post, and on the overheated airwaves of talk radio.
Baghdad must be pacified -- like Grozny, like Guernica -- so that
Americans can see a few more peppy stories on the tube on their way to
the ballgame or the mall.

The fate of Fallujah provides a template of the grim fate awaiting
Baghdad if Gerecht and the government P-Nackers have their way.
Fallujah was encircled in a ring of iron; water, electricity and food
supplies were cut off, a flagrant war crime. The city was bombed for
eight weeks, then hit by an all-out ground attack with both
conventional and chemical weapons -- white phosphorous and napalm --
that killed thousands of civilians and left more than 200,000 homeless.
Among the first targets were Fallujah's hospitals and clinics, another
flagrant war crime. Some were destroyed, killing doctors and patients
alike, others seized and closed, all in order to prevent any stories
about civilian casualties from reaching the Western media, the
Pentagon's "information warfare" specialists told The New York Times.
Once again, manufactured image trumped bloodstained reality.

Perhaps this cup will pass from Baghdad. Perhaps Bush and his P-Nackers
will instead move forward with their frenzied plans for a nuclear
strike on Iran, as The New Yorker reported last week. But Gerecht's
article is a perfect snapshot of the depraved minds that now rule
America. Somewhere, somehow -- and soon -- another city is going to
die.

Annotations:

Returning to the Scene of the Crime (Fallujah)
TomDispatch, April 4, 2006

Can the Shiite Center Hold?
Wall Street Journal, April 3, 2006

The Iran Plans
The New Yorker, April 10, 2006

US 'in talks with Iraq militants'
BBC, April 7, 2006

Fallujah: The Flame of Atrocity
Empire Burlesque, Nov. 11, 2005

Ring of Fire: The Fallujah Inferno
Empire Burlesque, Nov. 19, 2004

Cutting and Running in Iraq
TomDispatch.com, April 6, 2006

Rebuilding America's Defenses
Project for a New American Century, September 2000

Inside Fallujah: One Family-s Diary of Terror
Scotland Sunday Herald, Nov. 14, 2004

Iraq Hospitals Could be Used as Propaganda Centers, says Pentagon
New York Times, Nov. 8, 2004

US Strikes Raze Fallujah Hospital
BBC, Nov. 6, 2004

Ghost City Calls for Help
BBC, Nov. 13, 2004

Fallujah a Sea of Rubble and Death After Offensive
Reuters, Nov. 14, 2004

A City lies in Ruins, Along with the Lives of the Wretched Survivors
The Independent, Nov. 15, 2004

Running Out of Patients: Fallujah Hospital Bombing
The Village Voice, Nov. 7, 2004

Smoke and Corpses
BBC, Nov. 11, 2004

20 Doctors Killed in Strike on Clinic: Red Crescent
UN Integrated Regional Information Network, Nov. 10, 2004

US Rolls out Nuclear Plan
Los Angeles Times, April 6, 2006

========================================================================
================================================

From: editor@onlinejournal.com
Date: April 14, 2006 10:16:06 PM EST
To: ojnews@gatorgraphics.net (Online Journal News Alerts Mailing List)
Subject: Online Journal News Alerts: Week of Apr. 9, 2006
Reply-To: editor@onlinejournal.com

Online Journal needs your financial support

Please make a secure credit card donation to help us continue the fight
against the forces of madness.
<https://www.applyweb.com/public/contribute?oj>

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_42.shtml

Thompson's dog won't hunt
By Sheila Samples
Online Journal Contributing Writer

When I first read the March 31 Capitol Hill Blue headline, "9/11
conspiracy
theories don't pass the smell test," I thought editor Doug Thompson was
pulling an April Fool's joke on us a day early. Buoyed by Thompson's
well-deserved reputation for being out there first with "damn the
torpedoes
-- full speed ahead" -- truth no matter where it takes him, I read
avidly to
the end of the rant, poised to burst into laughter at his "Gotcha!"
punch
line. It wasn't there.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_678.shtml

Black Box Voting opposes Rush Holt bill, calling it "dangerous"
By Bev Harris
Online Journal Guest Writer

There is a major push right now to pass H.B. 550, a bill put forth by
Rep.
Rush Holt to mandate a paper trail (along with a flimsy audit that no
accountant would agree is adequate).

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_677.shtml

Incidents show that neocons everywhere are desperate
By Wayne Madsen
Online Journal Contributing Writer

Upcoming elections around the world are pinning neocons against the
wall and
are heralding a return to democratic socialism and progressive
populism, much
to the anger and angst of international bankers, militarists, and
reactionary
Abrahamic tradition religious sects and movements.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_676.shtml

The sages are divided
By Michael J. Smith
Online Journal Contributing Writer

So just how big a deal is this Israel lobby, anyway? Here's Joseph
Massad,
with what is probably the majority Left view:

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_675.shtml

America's "noble" cause: Preserving its right to murder, exploit,
torture,
and impoverish with impunity
By Jason Miller
Online Journal Contributing Writer

“Why are we over there in Iraq?”

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_674.shtml

Springtime in the Republic of Larry
By Joe Bageant
Online Journal Contributing Writer

Spring has truly arrived when I once again find myself in the garden
shed
with my dog Bingo while pretending to fix the lawn mower. Meaning that
I need
to clean out the stale gas that I purposefully leave in the tank each
fall so
my wife will have to ask me to tinker with the mower every spring.
Screwing
around in the garden shed, pretending to do maintenance only a man is
supposed to be capable of, is one of the many ruses that keep me from
having
to do actual yard work. I love to watch a woman do yard work, what with
the
bending over in shorts and all.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_683.shtml

“Middat Sdom”: Lou Sheldon, Fred Phelps, and George W. Bush
By Mel Seesholtz, Ph.D.
Online Journal Contributing Writer

America's two most flaming homophobes – Rev. Lou Sheldon and Rev. Fred
Phelps
– now have something else in common: the language they use to describe
those
they fear and loathe.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_682.shtml

Are mainstream churches finally standing up to the GOP's hateful
“Christian”
blitzkrieg?
By Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
Online Journal Guest Writers

Right-wing church movements have been a staple of American politics
since
well before the 1692 witch trials at Salem. But only in the past few
decades
has the extremist church served as the grassroots base for a new breed
of
corporate totalitarianism. That unholy union has been nowhere more
powerful
than here in Ohio, and it has finally provoked a response from the
state's
mainstream churches.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_681.shtml

Pentagon thievery: An interview with Jeffrey St. Clair
By Joshua Frank
Online Journal Contributing Writer

Jeffrey St. Clair is the co-editor of CounterPunch (online at
CounterPunch.org) and the author of numerous books, most recently Grand
Theft
Pentagon: Tales of Corruption and Profiteering in the War on Terror
(Common
Courage Press 2006). He recently spoke with this reporter about his
latest
book.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_680.shtml

Is veneration of the military good for the republic?
By Ivan Eland
Online Journal Guest Writer

Since the Vietnam War, in which returning draftees were shunned by much
of
American society, critics of U.S. foreign policy, including the Iraq
war,
have bent over backwards not to criticize U.S. military forces and
sometimes
have even praised soldiers' willingness to fight for their country.
And, of
course, journalists and politicians have slathered nothing but praise on
American boys and girls in Iraq. But this flattery is not good for the
republic, and it's not good for the troops.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_679.shtml

An open letter to voters clarifying H.R. 550
From Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ)

I would like to thank Bev Harris for her work to improve the integrity
of
elections. In fact, it was through Bev Harris' work that I first became
aware
of the virtual monopoly that only a few voting system vendors have over
the
vote count in the United States. Her work, and that of many others in
the
grassroots community, played an important role in my development of a
solution to the problem of an increasingly privatized vote count.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_688.shtml

Strike Iran? US can't be serious
By Linda S. Heard
Online Journal Contributing Writer

As occupied Iraq is now arguably in a state of civil war, the Taliban
regroups in Afghanistan and Palestine is under a Western-led economic
siege,
a growing number of Washington insiders say Iran is next on the list of
death
and destruction.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_687.shtml

Do you believe in GOD (Good Old Days)?
By Mickey Z.
Online Journal Contributing Writer

Mythology, for most Americans, evokes images of Jupiter, Hercules, and
Thor;
it's something the primitive ancients engaged in before modernity
reared its
enlightened head. But the US is a nation built upon a foundation of
myth and
many forms of mythology have taken hold: free markets, Western
supremacy, the
cult of science and technology, and fundamentalist demagoguery to name
a few.
Such deeply held tenets could only become acceptable in a society
consciously
and purposefully conditioned to worship wealth, consumerism, and the
unquestioned preservation of power at any cost.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_686.shtml

Loser nation
By Greg Palast
Online Journal Guest Writer

America is a nation of losers. It's the best thing about us. We're the
dregs
-- what the rest of the world barfed up and threw on our shores.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_685.shtml

Immigration and occupations
By Seth Sandronsky
Online Journal Contributing Writer

The U.S. Congress has delayed discussion of a new immigration bill for
two
weeks. Now is a useful time to put into a broader context what the
congressional debate on foreign workers has covered and covered up,
with help
from the mainstream press.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_684.shtml

Imminent decline of the American empire?
By Ramzy Baroud
Online Journal Contributing Writer

The miscalculated policies of the US administration in the Middle East
are
quickly depleting the country's ability to sustain its once unchallenged
global position. Winds of change are blowing everywhere, and there is
little
that Washington's ideologues can do to stop it.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_693.shtml

Dems and integrity, the moon and green cheese -- detect a pattern here?
By Mark Drolette
Online Journal Contributing Writer

Stop it, stop it, stop it, stop it, stop it, stop it, stop it.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_692.shtml

Newspeak and the corruption of politics
By Ernest Partridge
Online Journal Guest Writer

Language is the constant yet unnoticed current that carries our
thoughts.
Thus, in the game of politics, the party which controls the language,
controls the contest.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_691.shtml

How US foreign policies fuel Anti-American feelings abroad
By Linda S. Heard
Online Journal Contributing Writer

The US is hardly winning friends or influencing anybody, except
negatively,
these days. Certainly, within my lifetime, anti-American feeling has
never
been as rife or on such a worldwide scale. At the same time, the Bush
administration is spending billions on propaganda so as to run TV and
radio
stations directed at altering the perceptions of peoples of the Middle
East,
while the Pentagon has actually paid journalists in the region to append
their bylines to US-generated stories.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_690.shtml

Silence kills and silence is complicity -- email to United for Peace and
Justice
By Gabriele Zamparini
Online Journal Contributing Writer

United for Peace and Justice, on your website, a legislative action,
“Keep
the Pressure On” reads:

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_689.shtml

Bush administration NSA caught red-handed spying on US citizens
By Larry Chin
Online Journal Associate Editor
Whistleblowers have exposed that the Bush administration's NSA (National
Security Agency) is blatantly spying on US citizens, through AT&T,
which gave
operatives direct access to their networks in "secret rooms" located in
AT&T
offices. The EFF link below provides the full legal case.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_699.shtml

Painwashing the Moussaoui jury and us
By Jerry Mazza
Online Journal Contributing Writer

Painwashing is brainwashing: repeating the same painful stories over
and over
again to individuals (in this case a jury) till their resistance to
questioning gives in. The hurtful repetition induces a kind of trance.
And in
the flood of emotionally-charged 9/11 recollections, rational logical
questioning of who was responsible for what is disappeared. Repeating
the
effects of the tragedy becomes a false proof of guilt for the patsy
Zacarias
Moussaoui. It also attempts to hypnotize the country into the 9/11
trance
once again.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_698.shtml

Fear is the weapon of mass destruction
By Gary Simon
Online Journal Contributing Writer

If some of us aren't expressing it, we're at least privately
questioning the
breakdown in federal and state law and the failure of leading officials
to
restore accountability to a system designed to represent, at least on
the
surface, a majority of its people. We're flabbergasted that politicians
of
Faustian proportion could disrupt our checks and balances as
effectively as
they do and are just as astounded at the range of criminal activity
within
our federal, state and local governments. We're even more dismayed at
the
public's limp reaction to this usurpation of power.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_697.shtml

Iraqis' resistance to civil war
By Ghali Hassan
Online Journal Contributing Writer

The current propaganda campaign of distortion and disinformation
perpetuated
by Western journalists and media pundits that Iraqis “are being murdered
solely because of their religious identity” is a falsehood. Iraq is not
a
sectarian society. The violence in Iraq is a US-generated criminal
killing
instigated by different groups of militia created, financed and armed
by the
US and its allies. The aim is to justify the ongoing Occupation, and
draw
attention away from the US violent crimes in Iraq.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_696.shtml

Now Colin Powell says he never believed the lies he told about Iraq
By Evelyn Pringle
Online Journal Contributing Writer

This week I read an article by Robert Sheer, that said former Secretary
of
State Colin Powell now says that he and his department's top experts
never
believed that Iraq posed an imminent nuclear threat, but that Bush
followed
misleading advice from Dick Cheney and the CIA in making the claim.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_695.shtml

The language of the machine(s)
By Phil Primeau
Online Journal Contributing Writer

We're plugged in. Digitalized. As of 2000, some 54 million American
households had at least one computer, with many having two or three.
That
number is only on the rise. At school, computer and Internet use occurs
on a
“leveled
playing field” with nearly equal access regardless of “income,
ethnic, [or] racial groups.” [1] Sixty-five persent of all children
ages 3 to
17 have a PC.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_694.shtml

For your convenience, we have added a new feature: NewsLinks -- your
one stop
for links to other sources of news and commentary.
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_390.shtml

Editors' Blog
http://onlinejournal.com/blog/blogger.html

The Mailbag
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_52.shtml

Copyright © 1998–2006 Online Journal™. All rights reserved

========================================================================
================================================================
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 22
From: "Scott Peden" scotpeden@cruzio.com
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 2:40pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: articles: silent Nuclear subs add to Iran tensions -=- China bui

How does Iran have nuclear subs, if they aren’t even to the point on having
nuclear energy yet?

-----Original Message-----
From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Dick Eastman
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:59 AM
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Subject: [911TruthAction] articles: silent Nuclear subs add to Iran
tensions -=- China builds two more subs for Israel -=- China sending envoy
to Tehran over nuclear standoff

I thought I sent this yesterday -- sorry for delay

From: "Peter Myers" < myers@cyberone.com.au <mailto:myers@cyberone.com.au> >

April 16, 2006

(1) Silent Nuclear Submarines Add to Iran Tensions
(2) Editorials and opinion pieces calling for war on Iran - Jim Lobe
(3) China sending an envoy to Tehran over nuclear standoff
(4) Lessons of the Opium Wars
(6) Guess who "discovered" the Judas manuscript?
(The plot to deceive Christianity.)

(1) Silent Nuclear Submarines Add to Iran Tensions

Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 05:36:30 +0100 From: Rowan Berkeley
< rowan.berkeley@googlemail.com <mailto:rowan.berkeley@googlemail.com> >

Silent Nuclear Submarines Add to Iran Tensions

Dave Eberhart, NewsMax, April 13, 2006
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/4/12/222400.shtml
<http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/4/12/222400.shtml>

[tell me, Jeff B or anyone else, does Izzy really have nuclearised SLCMs, or
is
this bluff?]

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The silent submarine forces of the United States, Israel
and
Iran are all ramping up for a hot war, adding yet more tension to an already
volatile Middle East - made all the more uneasy by Iran's relentless march
to
become a nuclear power.

Leading off the always lurking and deadly wolfpacks is Israel's fleet of
Dolphin-class submarines, each carrying U.S.-supplied Harpoon cruise
missiles -
armed with nuclear warheads.

The Israel submarines can remain at sea for a month and are equipped with
six
torpedo tubes appropriate for conventional torpedoes. The tubes can also be
used
to launch the nuclear-tipped cruise missiles - missiles that could reach
some of
the targeted sites in Iran critical to its nuclear development. Starting
with
just three of these Dolphin-class undersea intruders, the Israeli inventory
quickly went to a fourth and a fifth. And there are reportedly at least a
half-dozen in the pipeline - two being built by the People's Republic of
China.

Although most particulars of Iran's military assets - both personnel and
hardware - are closely held by that country, military experts opine that
Iran
has up to six Russian-built SSK or SSI Kilo-class diesel submarines prowling
the
Gulf. Most recently, Iran's armed forces added to this fleet by deploying a
new
locally built submarine in Persian Gulf waters, state television reported.
The
vessel was christened the Nahang, meaning whale. Built by the Iranian
Defense
Ministry, the sub has the capability "to carry multipurpose weapons for
different missions," according to Iranian Rear Adm. Sajjad Kouchaki. "The
submarine is fully adapted to the Persian Gulf," he said, adding that the
Iranian navy is pursuing a policy of deterrence in the strategic waters.

Perhaps even more significant, is the recent Iranian deployment of a super
high-speed torpedo. The new torpedo was reportedly successfully tested last
month during war games that Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards held in the
Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea. State news sources touted the successfully
test-firing of the new torpedo, called the "Hoot." The development ups the
profile of Iran's power in the Gulf, where the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet is
based
to, among other things, safeguard the flow of oil. Gen. Ali Fadavi, deputy
head
of the Revolutionary Guards' navy, said that the torpedo, speeding at 223
miles
per hour, was too fast to elude. "It has a very powerful warhead designed to
hit
big submarines," Fadavi told state television.

Meanwhile, the Bush administration recently announced plans to add
conventional
ballistic missiles to the armory of its nuclear Trident submarines ?- adding
yet
another potential arm to any military option considered against Iran, if
diplomacy and/or sanctions fail to persuade that country to give up its
nuclear
designs. According to Defense Daily last January, four ultra-stealthy
Ohio-class
Strategic Nuclear Submarines, or SSBNs, were having their 24 Trident II D-5
nuclear ballistic missiles removed and replaced with up to 154 Tomahawk
cruise
missiles.

(2) Editorials and opinion pieces calling for war on Iran - Jim Lobe

Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 06:33:13 -0400 From: Don < NX7933@hotmail.com
<mailto:NX7933@hotmail.com> >

Keep in mind that The Register is not a very reliable source. The article
may be
referring to "reactive armor", which is not as new as The Register is
portraying
it:

http://www.defense-update.com/features/du-1-04/reactive-armor.htm
<http://www.defense-update.com/features/du-1-04/reactive-armor.htm>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactive_armour
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactive_armour>

[quote] Explosive Reactive armor (ERA) is a common form of add-on armor,
used on
many Armored Fighting Vehicles (AFV). This concept is combat proven.
Protection
by explosive modules was deployed by the Israel Defense Forces in the late
1970s, and was first, and successfully used in combat with the Israeli Army
M-60s and Centurion tanks in the 1982 War, and later, by the Russian Army by
the
mid 80s. Reactive armor utilize add-on protection modules conforming of thin
metal plates and a sloped explosive sheath, which explode when sensing an
impact
of an explosive charge (such as High Explosive Anti-Tank - HEAT projectile).
[endquote]

(3) China sending an envoy to Tehran over nuclear standoff

Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 08:20:08 -0000 From: "justicequest2000"
< justicequest2000@yahoo.com <mailto:justicequest2000@yahoo.com> >

More war for Israel coming right down the pipe at US:

US in warning to 'defiant' Iran The US has warned Iran that it must face the
consequences of its defiance over its nuclear programme. Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice said the UN Security Council would have to look at options
to
compel Iran to "obey the international system". Iran says it has succeeded
in
enriching uranium. The visiting head of the UN nuclear watchdog failed to
convince it to freeze its nuclear programme.

China is now sending an envoy to Tehran to try to help resolve the crisis.
Chinese Assistant Foreign Minister Cui Tiankai is due in Tehran for talks on
Friday. A Chinese foreign ministry spokesman China was worried about the way
the
situation was developing, and the visit was aimed at facilitating dialogue
among
the parties concerned. Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA) who visited Tehran on Thursday, said both sides had
agreed
to continue an intensive dialogue over the next few weeks.

'Reasonable and logical'

Ms Rice on Thursday raised publicly the possibility that Iran might face
punitive sanctions at the UN Security Council if it did not change course.

She said that when the council reconvened on the issue at the end of the
month
there could not be a repeat of March's "presidential statement" in which
Iran
had been told to halt all sensitive atomic activities within 30 days.

Iran has so far refused to comply. "There will have to be some consequence
for
that action and that defiance. We will look at a whole range of options
available to the Security Council," Ms Rice said. She said the council would
have to look at a Chapter 7 resolution - which UN members are mandated to
comply
with. It could possibly lead to sanctions and eventually even the use of
force.

But the BBC's Justin Webb in Washington says council members Russia and
China
believe that talk of punishment and coercion is premature. Beijing hopes its
envoy will help defuse the situation. BBC China correspondent Daniel
Griffiths
says Beijing would like to avoid sanctions and wants to take a higher
profile
over Iran to strengthen its credentials as a responsible, international
player.

'Confidence-building'

Western nations suspect Iran of wanting to develop a nuclear weapon, but
Tehran
insists its plans are for a peaceful, civilian energy programme only.

NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE

Mined uranium ore is purified and reconstituted into solid form known as
yellowcake Yellowcake is chemically processed and converted into a gas by
heating it to above 64C (147F) Gas is fed through centrifuges, where its
isotopes separate and process is repeated until uranium is enriched
Low-level
enriched uranium is used for nuclear fuel Highly enriched uranium can be
used in
nuclear weapons

On his visit, Mr ElBaradei said he had had a good discussion about
"confidence-building measures". He said there was still time to negotiate a
settlement by which "Iran's needs for nuclear power is assured and the
concern
of the international community is also... put to rest". But Iran's nuclear
negotiator, Ali Larijani, who met Mr ElBaradei, said the UN's demand for a
return to a freeze of its nuclear programme was not the way to solve the
problem. "Every action must be reasonable and logical. We are co-operating
in a
constructive manner" with the IAEA, "so such a proposal is not very
important to
solve the problem," he said. Earlier, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
said: "Our answer to those who are angry about Iran obtaining the full
nuclear
cycle is one phrase, we say: Be angry and die of this anger. "We will not
hold
talks with anyone about the Iranian nation's right [to enrichment] and
no-one
has the right to step back, even one iota," he said.

Story from BBC NEWS:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/4908820.stm
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/4908820.stm>

Scroll down to the 'Comments' at the following URL:

Larry Johnson: Bush "Tried To Cherry Pick Intelligence And Feed The Line To
Gullible Reporters"...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/04/09/larry-johnson-bush
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/04/09/larry-johnson-bush> -
trie_n_18779.html

(4) Lessons of the Opium Wars

Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:30:52 +0100 From: Rowan Berkeley
< rowan.berkeley@googlemail.com <mailto:rowan.berkeley@googlemail.com> >

It's interesting that the piece on the Opium Wars quoted here from
http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/CHING/OPIUM.HTM
<http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/CHING/OPIUM.HTM> simply describes the Trade as
'British'.
Compare this:

Hong Kong Founded as Sassoon Drug Center (1997)
http://www.stormfront.org/truth_at_last/sassoon.htm
<http://www.stormfront.org/truth_at_last/sassoon.htm>

{a website I don't normally use - but the article originated there}

Hong Kong and The Sassoon Opium Wars

The 99 year British lease on Hong Kong expired in July allowing the Red
Chinese
to take over. Hundreds of newspaper stories and TV reports have covered this
event but not one revealed how England first gained control of Hong Kong!
The
truth lies buried in the family line of David Sassoon, "The Rothschilds of
The
Far East," and their monopoly over the opium trade. Britain won Hong Kong by
launching the opium Wars to give the Sassoons exclusive rights to drug an
entire
nation!

David Sassoon was born in Baghdad, Iran in 1792. His father, Saleh Sassoon,
was
a wealthy banker and the treasurer to Ahmet Pasha, the governor of Baghdad.
(Thus making him the "court Jew" - a highly influential position.) In 1829
Ahmet
was overthrown due to corruption and the Sassoon family fled to Bombay,
India.
This was the strategic trade route to interior India and the gateway to the
Far
East. In a brief time the British government granted Sassoon "monopoly
rights"
to all manufacture of cotton goods, silk and most important of all - Opium -
then the most addictive drug in the world!

The Jewish Encyclopedia of 1905, states that Sassoon expanded his opium
trade
into China and Japan. He placed his eight sons in charge of the various
major
opium exchanges in China. According to the 1944 Jewish Encyclopedia: "He
employed only Jews in his business, and wherever he sent them he built
synagogues and schools for them. He imported whole families of fellow Jews.
. .
and put them to work."

Sassoon's sons were busy pushing this mind-destroying drug in Canton, China.
Between 1830 - 1831 they trafficked 18,956 chests of opium earning millions
of
dollars. Part of the profits went to Queen Victoria and the British
government.
In the year 1836 the trade increased to over 30,000 chests and drug
addiction in
coastal cities became endemic.

In 1839, the Manchu Emperor ordered that it be stopped. He named the
Commissioner of Canton, Lin Tse-hsu, to lead a campaign against opium. Lin
seized 2,000 chests of Sassoon opium and threw it into the river. An
outraged
David Sassoon demanded that Great Britain retaliate. Thus, the Opium Wars
began
with the British Army fighting as mercenaries of the Sassoons. They attacked
cities and blockaded ports. The Chinese Army, decimated by 10 years of
rampant
opium addiction, proved no match for the British Army. The war ended in 1839
with the signing of "The Treaty of Nanking." This included provisions
especially
designed to guarantee the Sassoons the right to enslave an entire population
with opium. The "peace treaty" included these provisions: "1) Full
legalization
of the opium trade in China, 2) compensation from the opium stockpiles
confiscated by Lin of 2 million pounds, 3) territorial sovereignty for the
British Crown over several designated offshore islands.

Sassoon's Use British Army to Drug An Entire Nation

British Prime Minister Palmerston wrote Crown Commissiner Captain Charles
Elliot
that the treaty didn't go far enough. He said it should have been rejected
out
of hand because: "After all, our naval power is so strong that we can tell
the
Emperor what we mean to hold rather than what he would cede. We must demand
the
admission of opium into interior China as an article of lawful commerce and
increase the indemnity payments and British access to several additional
Chinese
ports." Thus, China not only had to pay Sassoon the cost of his dumped opium
but
reimburse England an unheard sum of 21 million pounds for the cost of the
war!

This gave the Sassoon's monopoly rights to distribute opium in port cities.
However, even this was not good enough and Sassoon demanded the right to
sell
opium throughout the nation. The Manchus resisted and the British Army again
attacked in the "Second Opium War fought 1858 - 1860. Palmerston declared
that
all of interior China must be open for uninterrupted opium traffic. The
British
suffered a defeat at the Taku Forts in June 1859 when sailors, ordered to
seize
the forts, were run aground in the mud-choked harbor. Several hundred were
killed or captured. An enraged Palmerston said: "We shall teach such a
lesson to
these perfidious hordes that the name of Europe will hereeafter be a
passport of
fear."

In October, the British besieged Peking. When the city fell, British
commander
Lord Elgin, ordered the temples and other sacred shrines in the city sacked
and
burned to the ground as a show of Britain's absolute comtempt for the
Chinese.
In the new "Peace Treaty" of Oct.25, 1860, the British were assigned rights
to
vastly expanded opium trade covering seven-eights of China, which brought in
over 20 million pounds in 1864 alone. In that year, the Sassoons imported
58,681
chests of opium and by 1880 it had skyrocketed to 105,508 chests making the
Sassoons the richest Jews in the world. England was given the Hong Kong
peninsula as a colony and large sections of Amoy, Canton, Foochow, Ningpo
and
Shanghai. The Sassoons were now licensing opium dens in each British
occupied
area with large fees being collected by their Jewish agents. Sassoon would
not
allow any other race to engage in "the Jews' business."

However, the British government would not allow any opium to be imported
into
Europe!

Sassoon "Monopoly Rights" Wrecked Lancashire - England's Textile Industry -
Made
Roosevelt Wealthy

Sir Albert Sassoon, the eldest of David Sassoon's sons took over the family
"business" empire. He constructed huge textile mills in Bombay to pay slave
labor wages. This expansion continued after World War One and ended up
putting
mills in Lancashire, England out of business with thousands losing their
jobs.
This did not stop Queen Victoria from having Albert knighted in 1872.

Solomon Sassoon moved to Hong Kong and ran the family business there until
his
death in 1894. Later, the entire family moved to England because with modern
communications they could operate their financial empire from their
luxurious
estates in London. They socialized with royalty and Edward Albert. Sassoon
married Aline Caroline de Rothschild in 1887 which linked their fortune with
that of the Rothschilds. The Queen also had Edward knighted. All 14 of the
grandsons of David Sassoon were made officers during World War One and thus
most
were able to avoid combat.

Franklin D. Roosevelt's fortune was inherited from his maternal grandfather
Warren Delano. In 1830 he was a senior partner of Russell & Company. It was
their merchant fleet which carried Sassoon's opium to China and returned
with
tea. Warren Delano moved to Newburgh, N.Y. In 1851 his daughter Sara Married
a
well-born neighbor, James Roosevelt - the father of Franklin Delano
Roosevelt.
He always knew the origin of the family fortune but refused to discuss it.

The Sassoon opium trade brought death and destruction to millions and still
plagues Asia to this day. Their company was totally operated by Jews ONLY!
The
corrupt British monarchy honored them with privilege and knighthood - to the
disgrace of the Crown! To this day the Sassoons are in the history books as
"great developers" of India but the source of their vast wealth is never
mentioned!

(6) Guess who "discovered" the Judas manuscript?

Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:05:03 EDT From: EagleRevisionist@aol.com
<mailto:EagleRevisionist@aol.com>

Frieda Tchacos NUSSBERGER, a Khazarian chosen one.

"I think I was chosen by Judas to rehabilitate him."

She's been involved in artifact fraud in the past.

{Can you substantiate that claim? - Peter M.}

All my best,

Harrell Rhome

How the Gospel of Judas Emerged

By BARRY MEIER and JOHN NOBLE WILFORD

York Times April 13, 2006

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/13/science/13judas.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
<http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/13/science/13judas.html?_r=1&oref=slogin>

When the National Geographic Society announced to great fanfare last week
that
it had gained access to a 1,700-year-old document known as the Gospel of
Judas,
it described how a deteriorating manuscript, unearthed in Egypt three
decades
ago, had made its way through the shady alleys of the antiquities market to
a
safe-deposit box on Long Island and eventually to a Swiss art dealer who
"rescued" it from obscurity.

Frieda Tchacos Nussberger could gain as much as $2 million from deals
involving
the Gospel of Judas, said her lawyer, Mario Roberty, left.

But there is even more to the story.

The art dealer was detained several years ago in an unrelated Italian
antiquities smuggling investigation. And after she failed to profit from the
sale of the gospel in the private market, she struck a deal with a
foundation
run by her lawyer that would let her make about as much as she would have
made
on that sale, or more.

Later, the National Geographic Society paid the foundation to restore the
manuscript and bought the rights to the text and the story about the
discovery.
As part of her arrangement with the foundation, the dealer, Frieda Tchacos
Nussberger, stands to gain $1 million to $2 million from those National
Geographic projects, her lawyer said. There may even be more.

Details of how the manuscript was found are clouded. According to National
Geographic, it was found by farmers in an Egyptian cave in the 1970's, sold
to a
dealer and passed through various hands in Europe and the United States.
Legal
issues in its transit are equally vague.

No one questions the authenticity of the Judas gospel, which depicts Judas
Iscariot not as a betrayer of Jesus but as his favored disciple.

But the emerging details are raising concerns among some archaeologists and
other scholars at a time of growing scrutiny of the dealers who sell
antiquities
and of the museums and collectors who buy them. The information also calls
into
question the completeness of National Geographic's depiction of some
individuals
like Ms. Tchacos Nussberger and its disclosure of all the financial
relationships involved.

Terry Garcia, the vice president for mission programs at National
Geographic,
which is based in Washington, said that the organization had "heard some
rumors"
about possible legal problems involving Ms. Tchacos Nussberger but could not
confirm them. He also noted that the organization had disclosed its
relationship
with the foundation, the Maecenas Foundation for Ancient Art.

Mr. Garcia emphasized that he believed that issues like Ms. Tchacos
Nussberger's
financial relationship with the foundation or questions about other
antiquities
she sold were not relevant to the story of the Gospel of Judas. He added
that
National Geographic had taken on the project because it saw an opportunity
to
help save a unique document.

"It is not every day that you find a lost gospel," Mr. Garcia said.

But scholars who have campaigned against the trade in artifacts of
questionable
provenance said they were troubled by the whole episode.

"We are dealing with a looted object," said Jane C. Waldbaum, president of
the
Archaeological Institute of America, a professional society. "The artifact
was
poorly handled for years because the people holding it were more concerned
with
making money than protecting it."

For her part, Ms. Tchacos Nussberger rejected any suggestion that she was
trying
to profit from the Gospel of Judas. She described her run-in with Italian
officials as inconsequential.

"I went through hell and back, and I saved something for humanity," Ms.
Tchacos
Nussberger said in a telephone interview. "I would have given it for nothing
to
someone who would have saved it."

Last week, National Geographic began a large campaign for the Gospel of
Judas,
featuring it in two new books, a television documentary, an exhibition and
the
May issue of National Geographic magazine.

The organization did not buy the document. Instead, it paid $1 million to
the
Maecenas Foundation, effectively for the manuscript's contents. Part of the
revenues generated by the National Geographic projects go to the foundation.

The foundation was set up some years ago by Ms. Tchacos Nussberger's lawyer,
Mario Roberty, well before it became involved with the Gospel of Judas. Mr.
Roberty is the only official of the foundation, which he said was involved
in
projects like returning antiquities to their countries of origin. He said
that
when Ms. Tchacos Nussberger turned over the document to the foundation in
2001,
he quickly contacted officials in Egypt and assured them that the manuscript
would be returned there. He said the foundation had clear legal title to the
document.

In National Geographic's narratives, the manuscript takes a long journey
through
the antiquities trade. Those stories describe Ms. Tchacos Nussberger efforts
to
sell the Gospel of Judas privately soon after buying it and her subsequent
role
in its restoration. She is portrayed as driven by religious conviction to
save
the document.

"I think I was chosen by Judas to rehabilitate him," Ms. Tchacos Nussberger,
65,
is quoted as saying in one of the society's books, "The Lost Gospel," by
Herbert
Krosney. Mr. Krosney is also an independent television producer who brought
the
gospel project to National Geographic.

Missing from the book is any mention of an incident in 2001 when Ms. Tchacos
Nussberger was detained in Cyprus at the request of Italian officials, who
wanted to question her as part of a broader investigation into antiquities
that
had been illegally taken out of Italy and sold elsewhere. Paolo Ferri, the
Rome-based prosecutor in the case, said she was charged with several
violations
involving antiquities but was given a reduced sentence that was suspended
because she had, among other things, previously agreed to return an artifact
claimed by Italy.

Both the dealer and her lawyer said the issues involved were far less
serious
than those described by Mr. Ferri, the prosecutor. They also said that all
of
Ms. Tchacos Nussberger's dealings in antiquities in Italy and elsewhere had
been
lawful. Her record will be erased in 2007 if she is not charged by Italian
authorities with another antiquities violation.

Ms. Tchacos Nussberger said that she, like other dealers, had run into
problems
because laws governing the antiquities trade had sharply changed in recent
years.

According to National Geographic, she bought the Judas document for about
$300,000 in 2000 from another dealer who had placed it in a safe-deposit box
in
Hicksville, N.Y., on Long Island. She tried to sell it to the Beinecke Rare
Book
and Manuscript Library at Yale University.

Yale officials have not specified why they did not buy the document. But
Robert
Babcock, curator of early books at the library, said through a spokeswoman
that
"there were unresolved questions about the provenance."

Then in 2001, Ms. Tchacos Nussberger sold it to an antiquities dealer in
Ohio
for $2.5 million, but the deal fell apart when the dealer did not make good
on
the payments.

Aided by her lawyer, Mr. Roberty, she regained ownership of the document and
at
his suggestion turned it over to the Maecenas Foundation. Under the deal,
she is
entitled to receive a sum from revenues generated by the Gospel of Judas
essentially equivalent to what she would have received from the Ohio dealer,
minus the value of several pages of the manuscript that dealer bought. In
addition, she is entitled to get back about $800,000 she lent to the
foundation
for expenses like legal costs and early restoration efforts, Mr. Roberty
said.

Mr. Roberty said the foundation had already started paying money to the
dealer,
but he declined to say how much she had received to date.

Mr. Garcia, the National Geographic executive, said that a critical aspect
of
the society's contract with the Maecenas Foundation was the group's pledge
to
return the document to Egypt. Mr. Krosney, the writer, said he was convinced
from his discussions with Ms. Tchacos Nussberger that she had acted out of
the
best of motives.

He said he had raised with Mr. Roberty the rumors he had heard about Ms.
Tchacho
Nussberger and Italy, and added that the lawyer was "dismissive"of them. He
said
he never asked the dealer about it.

Hershel Shanks, editor of the Biblical Archaeology Review, said there was
inherent tension between the need to conserve ancient objects and deter
trade in
looted artifacts.

"If you want to learn from the material, you have got to deal," Mr. Shanks
said.
"I am in favor of rescuing these unprovenanced things because they have
important information to impart."

But other scholars remain disturbed. "The owners are trying to take monetary
value out of something they don't really own," said Patty Gerstenblith, a
law
professor at DePaul University in Chicago who specializes in the antiquities
trade. "The people with control over the manuscript don't appear to be the
rightful owners."

Elisabetta Povoledo contributed reporting from Rome for this article.

--
Peter Myers, 381 Goodwood Rd, Childers 4660, Australia ph +61 7 41262296
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers <http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers>
Mirror: http://mailstar.net/index.html <http://mailstar.net/index.html> I
use the old Mac OS; being incompatible, it cannot run Windows viruses or
transmit them to you. If my mail does not arrive, or yours bounces, please
ring
me: this helps beat sabotage. To unsubscribe, reply with "unsubscribe" in
the
subject line; allow 1 day.

_____

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

* Visit your group " 911TruthAction
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .

_____

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 23
From: "President, USA Exile Govt." prez@usa-exile.org
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 2:44pm(PDT)
Subject: A Day in the LIfe: 4/17/6

GOVERNMENT OF THE USA IN EXILE
Free Americans
Reaching Out to Amerika's Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free
        
Via <prez@usa-exile.org>

April 17, 2006

From: David West <davidgordonwest@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: April 15, 2006 10:52:23 PM EST
To: prez@usa-exile.org
Subject: Kucinich Demands Answers from Administration About US Troops
in Iran

Kucinich Demands Answers from Administration About US Troops in  Iran

Kucinich Demands
Answers From Administration
About US Troops  In Iran
4-15-6  

WASHINGTON - Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich  (D-OH), Ranking Democrat
on the House Government Reform Subcommittee on  National Security,
Emerging Threats and International Relations, sent the  following
letter to President George W. Bush today about the presence of US 
troops in Iran:  

Dear President Bush:   

Recently, it has been reported that U.S. troops are conducting 
military operations in Iran. If true, it appears that you have already 
made the decision to commit U.S. military forces to a unilateral
conflict  with Iran, even before direct or indirect negotiations with
the government  of Iran had been attempted, without UN support and
without authorization  from the U.S. Congress.  

The presence of U.S. troops  in Iran constitutes a hostile act against
that country. At a time when  diplomacy is urgently needed, it
escalates an international crisis. It  undermines any attempt to
negotiate with the government of Iran. And it will  undermine U.S.
diplomatic efforts at the U.N.  

Furthermore, it places U.S. troops occupying neighboring Iraq in
greater  danger. The achievement of stability and a transition to Iraqi
security  control will be compromised, reversing any progress that has
been cited by  the Administration.  

It would be hard to believe that  such an imprudent decision had been
taken, but for the number and variety of  sources confirming it. In the
last week, the national media have reported  that you have in fact
commenced a military operation in Iran. Today, retired  Air Force Col.
Sam Gardiner related on CNN that the Iranian Ambassador to  the IAEA,
Aliasghar Soltaniyeh, reported to him that the Iranians have  captured
dissident forces who have confessed to working with U.S. troops in 
Iran. Earlier in the week, Seymour Hersh reported that a U.S. source
had  told him that U.S. marines were operating in the Baluchi, Azeri
and Kurdish  regions of Iran.  

Any military deployment to Iran  would constitute an urgent matter of
national significance. I urge you to  report immediately to Congress on
all activities involving American forces  in Iran. I look forward to a
prompt response.  

Sincerely,  
Dennis J. Kucinich  
Member of  Congress

http://rense.com/general70/kuch.htm

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: "CLG News" <clg_news@legitgov.org>
Date: April 15, 2006 10:20:49 PM EST
To: "CLG News" <clg_news@legitgov.org>
Subject: National Guard troops dispatched to cities facing possible
'insurrection' - U.S. plan for flu pandemic

News Update from Citizens for Legitimate Government
15 April 2006
http://www.legitgov.org/
 http://www.legitgov.org/index.html#breaking_news

I knew the Bush regime would drop a bombshell on Easter Sunday, when
everyone was busy hunting for Easter eggs! Buried in this PentaPost
article is this nugget from Homeland Suckyourity's Chief Medical
Officer: National Guard troops could be dispatched to cities facing
possible "insurrection." U.S. Plan For Flu Pandemic Revealed
--Multi-Agency Proposal Awaits Bush's Approval 16 Apr 2006 Dictator
Bush is expected to approve soon a national pandemic influenza response
plan that identifies more than 300 specific tasks for federal
agencies... the Bush administration would tap into its secure stash of
medications [?!?], cancel large gatherings... National Guard troops
could be dispatched to cities facing possible "insurrection," said
Jeffrey W. Runge, chief medical officer at the Department of Homeland
Security. [See: The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878.]

Address to receive newsletter: http://www.legitgov.org/#subscribe_clg
Please write to: signup@legitgov.org for inquiries. lrp/mdr

CLG Newsletter editor: Lori Price, General Manager. Copyright © 2006,
Citizens For Legitimate Government ® All rights reserved. CLG Founder
and Chair is Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D.
 =======================================================================
==================================================================

From: Henri the Celt <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Date: April 15, 2006 7:08:25 PM EST
To: AAAHenri <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Subject: It's a great show, but worth $1 Trillion?

Fitzgerald Probe Headed To
Switzerland, Marc Rich, Vince Foster
And At Least A Trillion Dollars
Of Stolen U.S. Treasury Money
By The Bush-Clinton Mob; Treasury
Agent Leo Wanta, Sent To Arrest
Rich, Tells What Really
'Went Down' In Switzerland
By Greg Szymanski
4-16-6 
http://www.rense.com/general70/fizz.htm
 

The Patrick Fitzgerald investigation is spilling over across the pond
to Switzerland, trying to trace the bank swindling and dirty dealings
of Clinton-Bush bagman and Mossad agent, Marc Rich.

Sources near Fitzgerald claim the crime-busting Chicago special
prosecutor is delving into why Rich was tipped off and able to evade a
1993 arrest attempt, ordered by FBI director William Sessions.

Those watching the Plamegate investigation hope Fitzgerald is the 'real
deal' and not just providing a neo con dog and pony show, but sources
claim the investigation is now meticulously looking into bank swindles
by the Bush-Clinton mob, amounting to more than a trillion dollars,
involving money earmarked for the U.S. Treasury.

And bank account records - tracing more than $750 billion of missing or
stolen money - have already    provided as public record by Leo Wanta,
the former U.S. Treasury agent assigned by Sessions to put the finger
on Rich. (See accounts listed below).

 In a telephone conversation Friday, Wanta said he still keeps the
official 1993 Rich arrest warrant, as proof-positive the events took
place as he reported.

However, in a strange turn of events, Wanta was jailed for his efforts,
placed for 134 days in a Swiss dungeon, as Rich was allowed to slip
free in a move, according to Wanta, leading to the theft of hundreds of
billions- if not trillions - of U.S. Treasury funds by the Bush-Clinton
mob.

After Wanta was framed and put in jail, reports linking Hillary Clinton
to dipping into the Wanta-controlled accounts were recently verified by
overseas investigators.
Investigators claim the First Lady travelled to Grenada, ordering a
bank transfer from Bank Crozier Limite, Grand Anse P.O. Box 1005, St
George's Grenada, West Indies.

Although the amount Clinton pilfered is unknown, estimates are she
withdrew approximately $250 milliion from a Leo Wanta-controlled
account, an account to be transferred to the U.S. Treasury listed under
Marvelous Investment Limited, bank account number A/C 374-250.

Wanta, released from a long jail term last October, also said this week
in a telephone conversation he has provided new information to overseas
investigators in an effort to uncover even more of the stolen money, as
he is fast on the trail on the vast sum of money with the help of
foreign investigators and sophisticated computer software

For rest of story and more informative articles, go to
www.arcticbeacon.com

 =======================================================================
==================================================================

From: Henri the Celt <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Date: April 15, 2006 10:48:11 PM EST
To: AAAHenri <henrithecelt@gci.net>
Subject: A Defiant Sheen Challenges Official 9/11 Fable on National TV

"The bottom line is that people resonate with Charlie Sheen's courage.
The average man or woman understands that Sheen is taking a risk by
saying aloud what they have only thought about in secret: 9/11 was an
inside job and the foundational event for the police state growing in
America and the pretext for the ongoing wars for global empire.”

A Defiant Sheen Challenges Official 9/11 Fable on National TV
Dares Millions of Viewers to "Do [their] own research"

Prison Planet | April 15 2006

Actor Charlie Sheen made history when he first questioned the official
story of 9/11, calling it the "biggest conspiracy theory of them all."
Sheen's comments sent shockwaves across the alternative media and have
been one of the biggest stories on the internet for weeks. The story
also garnered prime time coverage by major news outlets including CNN,
FOX News, and hundreds of newspapers worldwide.

Following his brave step into the spotlight over his 9/11 questions and
the ensuing backlash of attacks and hit pieces, Sheen issued an email
statement to the media demanding that he be challenged on the facts
instead of junior high name-calling. Not one single mainstream media
outlet has had the nerve to take Sheen up on his challenge.

Only a few days after Sheen's story broke in the mainstream press,
sources within FOX News and CNN told Alex Jones off-the-record that
there was a concerted effort from their companies' management to "kill"
the Sheen story and to end any favorable coverage of the 9/11 Truth
Movement. Producers were given this dictate despite the record high
ratings and positive audience feedback that was received from coverage
of the Sheen 9/11 story.

On Friday, April 14th on ABC's Jimmy Kimmel Live talk show, Sheen once
again brought forward his questions about the official story to tens of
millions of Americans. When asked by host Jimmy Kimmel about the
statements he made on The Alex Jones radio show, Sheen succinctly
remarked, "I just had questions, I had a lot of questions."

He went further, decrying the media's treatment of his statements,
noting that "[the mainstream media] didn't really take a look at any of
the stuff I was asking them to look at, any of the evidence or any of
the stuff that generated those questions..." instead they spun it into
the story of whether or not he was "qualified" to question the
government.

"I felt the only real validation that I needed was being a tax paying
citizen that loves my country," Sheen expressed to a powerful round of
applause from the studio audience. Sheen continued, "What happed to the
time in this country when we were entitled, when we had a
constitutional and a God-given right to be curious about things that
didn't make sense."

When asked by Kimmel what had brought him to pose his questions about
the official story, Sheen replied, "I've done a lot of research," then
referred to the growing number of high-profile individuals who have
already bravely stepped forward to ask questions about 9/11, stating
"...its not just me, its the people that have come before me - the
experts and the engineers, the physicists and the scientists and the
scholars, that raised a lot of these things and I took a look at their
research and said yeah, it doesn't add up, a lot of it doesn't add up,
hence these questions."

Before Kimmel moved the discussion to another topic, Sheen was careful
to remind the audience, "There are two areas: Building 7 and the five
frames from the Pentagon. Don't listen to me, do your own research."

Following the broadcast of the Jimmy Kimmel Live show, Alex Jones spoke
with Sheen about his views concerning the interview. Sheen made the
following statement:

"This is a landmark moment in the 9/11 Truth Movement. We have fired a
flaming arrow into the heart of the myopic propaganda posing as the
irrefutable official story. Come one, come all, the floodgates have
opened! Reveal your patriotism."

In response Alex Jones stated, "In my 12 years of broadcast, I have
broken hundreds of stories that have gained national attention, but
none have captured the imagination of the people like Charlie Sheen's
statements on 9/11. Universally people recognize that his courageous
stand has smashed the floodgates and the tide has now turned. The 9/11
Truth Movement saw its birth over four and a half years ago and it
witnessed an unprecedented infusion when Charlie Sheen spoke out. "

"The bottom line is that people resonate with Charlie Sheen's courage.
The average man or woman understands that Sheen is taking a risk by
saying aloud what they have only thought about in secret: 9/11 was an
inside job and the foundational event for the police state growing in
America and the pretext for the ongoing wars for global empire.”

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: NoSpam <no-reply@verizon.net>
Date: April 10, 2006 4:46:12 AM EST
To: waronfreedom@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [WarOnFreedom] Was WTC 7 a Dud?

Was WTC 7 a Dud?
Facts support the theory that World Trade Center Building 7
was originally meant to implode seconds after the North Tower's collapse

Jeremy Baker

[The following is a condensed version of the main
premise presented in the original article "Silverstein, Giuliani,
WTC 7 and 20-20 Hindsight."]

The strange circumstances surrounding the suspicious collapse of
World Trade Center Building 7 have become a focal point for the
researchers, writers and activists who have committed themselves to
reopening the books on 9/11. Many of these people believe that the
anomalous collapse of Building 7 is a 9/11 smoking gun, the Achilles'
heel in the official version of what occurred on that day. The
obvious controlled demolition of the building, proven so conclusively
in several videos we have of its collapse, has been supported by
other key pieces of evidence as well. These points taken together
have proven to the satisfaction of most 9/11 researchers that WTC 7
was brought down not by fires weakening its superstructure, as
claimed by the authorities, but was instead destroyed by an explosive
system that could only have been installed in the building prior to
9/11.
After allegedly being struck by the North Tower's plummeting
debris, fires were said to have been ignited in WTC 7 that grew
throughout the day and finally compromised the building's steel
structure, causing it to suddenly drop like a stone late in the
afternoon. But gaping holes in this scenario have done nothing but
arouse suspicion and disbelief in those who've carefully examined the
evidence. Rather than presenting a viable scenario for Building 7's
destruction, the inexplicable features of its collapse have instead
helped to fuel broader speculation that 9/11 was essentially an
inside job, an attempt by traitors within our own ranks to generate
support for imperialist agendas that could otherwise never withstand
the light of day.
So, for those who agree that WTC 7 was indeed brought down
with a preplanted explosives system - the last act in a "psy-op" that
included the destruction of the entire World Trade Center complex on
9/11 - then the next question becomes: Why did the conspirators wait
until the end of the day to do it? What possible reason would they
have to keep WTC 7 up all day long? In the four years or so since the
unofficial citizens investigation into 9/11 began, no one has offered
any sensible answers to this question. But the list of compelling
reasons why waiting seven hours after the attacks to bring Building 7
down was not a good idea is long and hard to ignore.
If keeping WTC 7 up for so long after the attacks has proven
so threatening to the plot's success and its subsequent coverup, why
would the plotters have done it? Only two possibilities logically
present themselves; 1) there was some absolutely critical but, as
yet, undetermined reason to keep the building intact for so long, or
2) it wasn't originally meant to come down when it did. Since
absolutely no compelling case has been made for the former
possibility, circumstances appear to support the latter. Is it
possible that WTC 7's explosive system didn't operate as planned, a
disastrous glitch in an otherwise well conceived plan? The following
is a presentation of points that appear to support this theory, one
that paints a dramatically different picture of what theorists
previously thought had occurred throughout the day on 9/11.
Piecing together a factual account of what happened that
afternoon is certainly difficult without confirmation from inside
sources, but surely the known facts support a scenario similar to
this one: The conspirators, possibly operating out of the mayor's
Office of Emergency Management (OEM) on the 23rd floor of WTC 7,
first, orchestrated the collision of the planes into their targets,
igniting fires that spread throughout the upper floors of both towers
and allegedly causing structural damage to the building's steel
superstructure. They then armed and programmed the explosive system
in the safely distant South Tower and, at the optimum moment, pushed
the button and brought the building crashing to the ground. The
debris cloud kicked up by its collapse lingered for hours,
significantly reducing visibility in the surrounding area.
Next, they programmed the explosives in the North Tower and,
if the conspirators were indeed situated in the mayor's emergency
bunker, chose this moment to exit WTC 7 and move to a secure location
before taking the next steps in their plan. This scenario is
supported by comments Rudy Giuliani made to ABC News and Peter
Jennings; "We were operating out of there [the OEM] when we were told
that the World Trade Center was gonna collapse, and it did collapse
before we could get out of the building." This confirms that Giuliani
was indeed manning his OEM bunker and that Tower Two (the first
building to fall) collapsed before the mayor and his people were able
to (or chose to) exit WTC 7.
The perpetrators, now relocated to a backup position, then
prepared for the demolition of the North Tower and WTC 7. This
secondary control center may also have been referred to in another
report that the mayor was operating out of "a makeshift command post
at 75 Barkley Street," just north of and adjacent to WTC 7. There,
the conspirators waited for the appropriate moment and then remotely
detonated the explosives in the North Tower and brought it down as
well, the building shredding itself in a way oddly identical to the
South Tower's collapse.
As the North Tower fell, a massive cloud of debris shot into
the sky and enshrouded most of lower Manhattan. This dense cloud of
powdered debris quckly rose and obscured the surrounding buildings,
adding significantly to the thick haze still hanging in the air from
the first collapse. Then, as most of WTC 7 was hidden from view, the
conspirators pushed the button on the explosive system in this
building as well, the thick cloud of debris obscuring any signs that
WTC 7 was being intentionally demolished.
After the smoke had cleared and the events of the day were
relegated to history, any lingering questions as to why WTC 7 came
down seconds after Tower One's collapse would be easily fielded with
a list of invented but plausible excuses that, in the absence of
visual evidence to the contrary, would be quite believable. In the
wake of the attacks, the stories about debris from Tower One
impacting the electrical substation and 40,000 gallon deisel tank
located on Building 7's ground floors - causing massive internal
explosions that kicked the building's feet out from under it -
would've made good sense, providing a satisfactory if implausible
excuse for those who had doubts about Building 7's demise. The 32
story Marriott Vista hotel, located between the Twin Towers, was
completely leveled by the collapse of these buildings and has been
all but forgotten in a world that barely recalls the life and times of
WTC 7.
But, as fate would have it, things didn't go according to
plan. Incredibly, when the conspirators pushed the button on WTC 7,
nothing happened. For whatever reason, the explosive system in WTC 7
had failed and the building stubbornly remained intact. In an
instant, the success of an elaborate plot to entirely destroy a New
York City landmark (one that, according to many people who lived and
worked in the area, had been obsolete for years and become a blight
on lower Manhattan) had fallen into confusion.
Faced with a plan that had gone terribly awry, the
conspirators then scrambled to bring the demolition system in WTC 7
back online, a task that may have taken hours, well past the time
when the handy cloud of debris had dissipated. In the meantime, a new
scenario had to be concocted to "cover" what would otherwise be the
forthcoming but completely unexplained collapse of WTC 7. In their
desperation and haste, the perps finally made the decision to reenter
Building 7 and set fires that they hoped would spread and eventually
serve as a pretext for the building's collapse. The
fire-caused-the-collapse scenario would likely serve them well
considering the fact that they'd used the same scheme in the towers
earlier that day.
Though its difficult to pin down exactly what happened next,
some facts support the following scenario, or variations thereof: The
perpetrators reentered WTC 7 and climbed to the 7th floor, the
location of the OEM's emergency generators (this floor would become
the scene of the lower of the two fires that were soon to be burning
in the building). If, as many theorists suggest, the conspirators
were indeed OEM men, they would not only have had access to this
floor (in a building that had been evacuated and presumably secured),
they would also have had deisel fuel in abundance to use as an
accelerant to spark their dummy fire.
Next, they ascended to floor 12, one of three floors
occupied by the SEC, and sparked blazes in this location as well
(floor 12 was the location of the upper of the two fires that were
photographed burning in the building). Besides creating another flash
point for fire, this may have been done to assure that, in case the
explosive system failed again, incriminating evidence in this
location was certain to be destroyed no matter what might occur. The
conspirators then exited the building and watched the fires grow,
hopefully to a crescendo that would serve as a plausible pretext for
the building's collapse.
Eventually the explosive system was brought back online and
the only thing left to do was wait for the fires to build. But, as we
saw, the fires never grew to convincing proportions. Despite their
best efforts and training, the conspirators were completely
unprepared for this contingency, and it showed. Even as late as 3 PM,
the fires in WTC 7 were still marginal and struggling. Unlike the
towers, these fires were oxygen starved by windows that hadn't been
shattered and couldn't be opened. In fact, the fires remained so
small they were barely visible from outside the building until quite
late in the day and never approached the size necessary to pass them
off as the catalyst for the building's collapse.
The insignificant fires burning in WTC 7 have always been a
sticking point for 9/11 researchers who rightfully doubt that fires
so small could ever have brought the building down. Indeed, in all
the history of firefighting, no steel framed high-rise has ever
collapsed due to fire. Even in the case of major infernos that
entirely engulfed such buildings in the past, no office fire had ever
burnt hot enough to compromise the strength of the massive steel
beams that support these structures. The physics simply do not
support this phenomenon - that is, of course, with one exception. On
9/11, the laws of physics were apparently suspended and three such
anomalies occurred. Those who argue that the towers fell because the
planes caused structural damage in addition to fire damage cannot,
however, apply this theory to the anomalous collapse of WTC 7.
But, despite the difficulties confronting the
perpetrators, the bottom line was that Building 7 had to go. If WTC 7
was indeed an operations and control center for this sprawling
conspiracy, it was, essentially, a crime scene that needed to be
destroyed. It was also the only WTC building left standing, making
the plan to level the entire complex incomplete. This theory is
supported by the fact that, throughout the day, absolutely no effort
was made to save this extremely sensitive and valuable building (one
that housed several key governmental and intelligence agencies in
addition to millions of files relating to possibly devastating open
investigations into money laundering, terrorism, organized crime,
etc.) that was being threatened by only modest fires. This is all the
more baffling when you consider that WTC 7 must have had a built in
fire suppression system of some kind as well, one that presumably
would have made short work of such a marginal threat.
So, despite the fact that, even towards the end of the day,
the fires in WTC 7 remained barely significant (from a fire
engineering standpoint), the culprits finally made the decision to
pull the plug on WTC 7 and rely on their formidable propaganda
machinery to bulldoze any doubts that might arise. The conspirators
couldn't logically wait any longer because a burgeoning army of
firefighters and rescue workers had recovered from their shock and
were descending on Ground Zero to begin the lengthy search and rescue
effort that began that evening. For those who desperately needed the
building destroyed, it was then or never and, in an effort to finally
wrap things up, they put the demolition process in motion by clearing
personnel from around the base of Building 7. Then, when they could
wait no longer, they put an end to the spectacle at 5:25 PM, dropping
Building 7 neatly within it's footprint, an obvious controlled
implosion so perfect it would have earned any demolition company a
bonus.
Needless to say, the theory outlined above is a significant
departure from beliefs previously held by the broad community of 9/11
conspiracy advocates concerning what happened to WTC 7 that
afternoon. Any paradigm shift of this magnitude relating to an event
as grave as 9/11 will likely undergo intense scrutiny, as it should.
But we needn't go far to find precedent for the scenario outlined
above. All we need do is go back in time six years, to 1995.
There are many intriguing correlations between the September
11th attacks on the WTC and the bombing of the Murrah Building in
Oklahoma City. Both events enabled draconian domestic security
provisions to be signed into law shortly thereafter. Both sites were
quickly and discretely cleaned up by the same company, Controlled
Demolition, Inc., whose conduct, in both cases, sparked criticism
from fire investigators who felt that not enough had been done to
examine the evidence. In addition, both attacks employed much the
same scheme: a primary event "covered" the real cause of the
destruction - explosive systems preplanted in the buildings. In OK
City, a rental truck packed with crude explosives "covered" the
simultaneous detonation of bombs planted in the Murrah Building. In
Manhattan, two passenger jets caused destruction that "covered" the
tower's eventual demolition - again, the result of bombs previously
planted throughout the Twin Towers.
But there's another parallel that bears examination, one
that does much to support the theory at hand. After the smoke had
cleared in downtown OK City, it was discovered that two of the bombs
planted in the Murrah Building had failed to explode, a fact that was
reported nightly on local TV news programs for a week or two after
the bombing. And these reports were more than just rumors. Sources
included FBI agents, police and firefighters. The OK City bomb squad
was called out as well and got to work disarming these charges before
they could do any more damage. Even Oklahoma governor Frank Keating
confirmed the story to the media before it disappeared from the
airwaves forever (Alex Jones presents an excellent montage of these
reports in his video 9/11 The Road to Tyranny).
Consider how this astonishing fact conflicts with what are
by now historical accounts that the building was destroyed only by
the crude fertilizer bomb constructed and detonated by lone wolf
Timothy McVeigh. And any allusions we may have had that the guys who
orchestrated the attacks of 9/11 were criminal masterminds who had
covered every angle is neatly dispelled when we consider this
previously botched job. Certainly this kind of breakdown on the part
of shady, covert operatives is not unprecedented.
Imagine the state of mind of the conspirators as they
watched their plan to destroy one of the world's most recognizable
landmarks (and, of course, violently murder thousands of innocent
people) unfold before their eyes. Even the most jaded covert
operative wouldn't likely remain unrattled after having perpetrated
such an outrage. Again, the idea that these guys were able to calmly
meet every contingency or work magic under that kind of pressure
certainly shouldn't be taken for granted. And let's not forget what
Deepthroat said to Bob Woodward during his investigation into yet
another botched "op": "Truth is, these aren't very bright guys and
things got out of hand."
And well they may have. Reentering Building 7 in a spur of
the moment attempt to ignite crude fires is a potentially dangerous
enterprise. Whatever the conspirators may have used to spark their
blazes, the potential for trouble with an impulsive plan for arson is
high. Reports that a body was found in the remains of Building 7 are
intriguing for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that
other reports claim that there were no casualties in WTC 7
whatsoever. Nonetheless, the US House of Representatives website
posts a tribute to Secret Service Special Officer Craig Miller whose
body was found in the rubble of Building 7 after he'd apparently
perished during the "rescue effort" that day. But what really
happened to Officer Miller - Secret Service Special Officer Miller?
Not a firefighter. Not a rescue worker or cop - a secret service
special agent.
Who on earth were you rescuing, Officer Miller? WTC 7 had
been evacuated. Could this man have been an amateur arsonist who got
too close to his fire? Could he have sabotaged the explosive system
in WTC 7 because he got cold feet about his role in one of the
cruelest deceptions in history and paid for it with his life? This
man's autopsy records might shed some light on the matter. The story
of WTC lessee Larry Silverstein claiming to have 'pulled' WTC 7 is
well known among 9/11 researchers. The only explanation that's ever
been offered in his defense was that he meant 'pull' the firefighters
out of the "dangerously burning" building. But if that were true, why
didn't Officer Miller get the message?
Not only were the suspicious facts of his death ignored by
the media but Officer Miller was then posthumously granted hero
status as someone who had allegedly died during the phantom "rescue
effort" in this empty building. We saw this phenomenon applied to
many key governmental figures in the wake of 9/11 - officials who,
instead of being held accountable for their criminal proximity to the
attacks, were subsequently repackaged as "American heroes" and
sometimes even promoted. And, as you'll see, nowhere was this ploy
more at work than in the case of "Man of the Year" and "America's
Mayor," Rudy Giuliani.
WTC 7, or the Solomon Brothers Building, had been owned by
Manhattan real estate mogul Larry Silverstein since the '80s and was
the HQ for his development company, Westfield America, for years.
Building 7 was also the NYC home of the Secret Service, SEC, DoD,
IRS, CIA and a handful of private financial institutions. But WTC 7
also housed Rudy Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management (OEM),
long considered by theorists as a possible operations center for the
attacks. This $13 million doomsday bunker, meant to be used in the
event of a catastrophe like a terrorist attack or natural disaster,
was oddly located in the midst of the number one terrorist target in
the western hemisphere. Isn't one ill-advised to locate their
emergency command facility where it will likely be destroyed in the
event of an actual attack? This incomprehensible decision is even
more troubling when you consider the fact that the WTC had already
been attacked once in 1993. This extremely unheroic plan to locate
the OEM at the WTC then went on to prove its absurdity on 9/11 when,
according to the official account, the occupants of the OEM were
forced to abandon it after the first tower collapsed. This and other
compelling points support the hypothesis mentioned above, that the
OEM was just a front for the conspirators attack operations center.
Now that would explain the poor choice of locations.
Many researchers believe that shadowy elements within the
agencies housed in WTC 7 are prime suspects in this sprawling
conspiracy. To these theorists, Building 7 is a kind of nexus for the
planning and execution of what may well have been the most audacious
"black-op" or, more accurately, "false flag" operation in the history
of covert actions. If they are correct, Building 7 was literally a
nest of suspicious activity and its remaining intact may well have
been a catastrophe for those who were counting on its destruction.
As 9/11 researchers are well aware, Larry Silverstein took
over control of the entire World Trade Center just a few weeks before
the attacks of 9/11, the first time the WTC had changed hands in
thirty years and the first time it had come under private control. In
an interview in a 2002 PBS documentary called America Rebuilds, he
described being on the phone with the FDNY commander on the afternoon
of 9/11 and suggesting that there had "been such terrible loss of
life maybe the smartest thing to do is, is 'pull' it," (referring to
WTC 7). Then, according to Silverstein, "they made that decision to
'pull' and we watched the building collapse" (the same documentary
quotes a demo worker, "well, we're getting ready to 'pull' building
6," moments before its burnt out carcass was demolished - a comment
that appears to connect the word "pull" even more closely to the
actual act of demolition).
Many have asked how he could possibly have been so careless
as to make such an admission publicly. But what if circumstances
compelled him to do so? What if his comments were a discrete response
to growing suspicions surrounding the botched attempt to destroy
WTC 7 earlier in the day? The powers-that-be have brazenly used PBS
programming to spin other aspects of 9/11. The NOVA program that
espoused the theory of the "pancaking" of the Twin Tower's floors is
infamous in the 9/11 skeptics community. PBS programs relating to
9/11 typically feature "experts" who unanimously support the party line.
With WTC 7's obvious demolition caught on film from several
excellent perspectives, it's an understatement to say that the
conspirators had a big problem on their hands. Could it be that
Silverstein's comments about 'pulling' WTC 7 were a carefully
choreographed "hang out" of the issue? Using Karl Rove-like sleight
of hand, he offers a vague accounting of the anomaly delivered to us
on an almost subconscious level. Paradoxically, his comments may have
been intended to steer us in the exact opposite direction - that,
despite how it may have appeared, heroes in high places stepped up
and made the tough choices.
Silverstein's simple and concise phrasing - that "...they
made that decision to 'pull' and we watched the building collapse" -
has impressed many of the finest 9/11 researchers as being clear and
unambiguous, and for good reason. But, as mentioned above, some
dissenters insist that he used the word 'pull' to indicate instead
the cautious evacuation of the area immediately surrounding WTC 7
late that afternoon. I spoke to one of the producers of America
Rebuilds on the phone and he predictably supported this
interpretation of Silverstein's cryptic comments. But I believe that
this usage of the word 'pull' is just as damning as if he had in fact
used it as a synonym for demolition, and this is why.
If Silverstein did use the word 'pull' to mean evacuation,
the best we can say in his defense is that he was referring to the
suspicious order to withdraw personnel from around the base of WTC 7
shortly before its bizarre suicide, a precaution more likely taken in
the case of a building soon to be demolished, not a building whose
superstructure couldn't possibly have been compromised by fire alone.
A photographer on the scene described the evacuation of firefighters
as they "...prepared for the collapse of Building 7...[my emphasis] I
was 150 yards away when I saw the firefighters raising the flag."
What? It's perhaps understandable that, given the events of the day,
the authorities might consider preparing for the extremely remote
possibility that Building 7 might collapse, just to be safe. But for
these guys to 'pull' Building 7 and then have it fall right on cue
when physics doesn't support the phenomenon, there's absolutely no
precedent for such an occurrence and the building was, at best, only
marginally involved is simply too much of an implausibility to take
seriously - yet another outrageous "coincidence" defenders of the
official account ask us to stomach.
This alternate take on Silverstein's use of the word 'pull'
- the only explanation that has ever been offered by anyone in his
defense - is not only just as damning as if he did intend the word to
mean demolition, it also wholly ties Silverstein into the suspicious
events of the day at the highest levels, yet another direct and
convincing connection to be made between this inscrutable Manhattan
real estate developer and insider complicity in the attacks of
September 11th.
There are other factors to be considered as well. The
alleged damage to Building 7's south face, caused by debris from the
collapse of Tower One, was the official cause of the fires that the
authorities then sanctioned as being the "likely" cause of WTC 7's
collapse. Hundreds of photos of Ground Zero taken throughout the day
show every detail of the devastation, yet pictures of Building 7's
damaged south face, "raging" fires and billowing smoke are
conspicuously absent. Certainly this spectacle would have caught the
eye of any photographer recording the aftermath of the attacks.
Doesn't this lack of photographic evidence support the idea that,
after things went wrong that morning, photographers on the scene
would have their materials confiscated and vetted by the authorities,
much as they had been at the Pentagon (and Oklahoma City for that
matter)? Any photographs of the suspicious lack of damage to Building
7 (evidence that would prove the official account untenable) would
disappear forever. Isn't it extremely suspicious that absolutely no
pictures of WTC 7's "damaged" south face have ever been released to
the public, an astounding revelation when you consider the key role
this alleged debris impact played in the days events.
In addition, aerial photos of Ground Zero appear to confirm
that the debris raining down from Tower One's collapse fell well
short of WTC 7. These photos show a huge crater in the roof of WTC 6
(the low-rise building standing between Tower One and Building 7),
the result of damage caused by this debris. This crater provides a
clear imprint of the limits of the destruction and, despite some bits
and pieces of rubble that made their way across a full city block to
WTC 7's location, the bulk of the truly destructive wreckage clearly
fell safely short of Building 7.
And what about the debris from the identical South Tower (or Tower
Two)? Did it cause similar damage to its neighbors? Apparently not.
The photos in question also show that the Banker's Trust Building, a
building similar in size to WTC 7 (but not a WTC building), standing
just across the street from the South Tower, suffered no such
catastrophic damage and it certainly didn't catch on fire and collapse.
Another even more stunning fact is that pictures of the two
buildings flanking WTC 7 clearly show that they were barely scratched
by the debris that had somehow, according to Popular Mechanics
magazine, "scooped out" 25% of Building 7's depth. In fact, both of
these structures still stand in near pristine condition, shoulder to
shoulder with WTC 7, despite their being well within the same radius
of destruction.
And another thing. We all remember 9/11. The eyes of the
world were focused on lower Manhattan. Helicopters were circling the
area all day long, the television coverage never let up, not even for
commercials. Are we really to believe that no aerial video exists of
WTC 7 going down, especially when the FDNY was apparently preparing
for its collapse - film clips that would surely tell the story of
what happened to Building 7 and clearly show the damage (or lack
thereof) on the south face of WTC 7? As mentioned before, Building
7's fires (meager though they were) and its billowing cloud of black
smoke would surely have attracted the attention of videographers
recording the aftermath of the attacks from above - dramatic images
reminiscent of the smoking towers aired earlier that day. It's always
been a keen frustration to 9/11 researchers (and a chilling example
of media suppression) that the only videos we do have of Building 7
falling to the ground were all distant shots taken from the north,
precisely the wrong angle to shed light on the matter.
If dropping Building 7 late in the day on 9/11 was really
part of the conspirator's plan, wouldn't they have concocted a far
more believable and well-constructed scenario to "cover" its collapse
(much as they had for the Twin Towers and the Murrah Building),
especially when they knew that Ground Zero would be center stage on
every TV and computer screen on the planet that night? Instead we got
tiny, insignificant fires, and a long list of nagging questions that
have only served to arouse widespread suspicion.
What does the body of a Secret Service Special Agent in the
rubble of WTC 7 most likely indicate; 1) that a well-planned scheme
had just gone off without a hitch, or 2) that some kind of major
breakdown had occurred that day? How could Officer Miller have died
except by malfeasance? WTC 7 had been evacuated before it was hit by
falling debris and the lazy fires building in its belly couldn't
possibly have caught a healthy Secret Service agent off-guard. Under
the circumstances, isn't the absurd claim that this man died during
the "rescue effort" that day clearly a cover story for something
that's carefully being kept under wraps?
Isn't it odd that the FDNY seemingly just gave up on such an
exceedingly important and valuable building as WTC 7, one that had
only marginal fires burning on two floors? Wouldn't the conspirators
have preferred wrapping things up in one fell swoop that morning
rather than prolonging the spectacle any longer than necessary? Why
wasn't Rudy Giuliani kept well away from what was obviously an attack
on lower Manhattan? And the bewildering notion that the conspirators
originally planned to spend the day in the OEM orchestrating the
aftermath of the attacks in the upper floors of a burning building is
really stretching credulity to the breaking point.
All of the anomalies listed above and the many disturbing
questions following in the wake of WTC 7's suspicious collapse would
have been neatly and easily dispensed with had the building been
demolished while hidden beneath the dust cloud kicked up by Tower
One's collapse. But with clear video footage of Building 7's belated
and obvious demolition, the talk of the electrical substation and
deisel tank exploding and causing the collapse has always rung hollow
and has generated rather than mollified suspicion.
Nothing about WTC 7 remaining intact throughout the day
before finally and obviously being demolished has ever made any sense
at all. But if WTC 7 was brought down as it was hidden by the debris
cloud rising from the rubble of Tower One, no one would have asked
another question about it and what many theorists consider to be a
9/11 smoking gun would have vanished into obscurity. Certainly this
theory is supported by the evidence and deserves consideration by the
broad community of 9/11 skeptics.

[This article is part of an ongoing investigation into the
theory outlined above. If you have additional information that
supports this new take on WTC 7's last hours, please contact me:
web_wender@hotmail.com]

Copyright Darkprints, July 2005
Thanks to David Ray Griffin for his invaluable assistance
For a video of Silverstein's comments about 'pulling' WTC 7, go
to; www.infowars.com/print/Sept11/FDNY.htmTo see three excellent
videos of WTC 7 imploding, go to; www.wtc7.net/videos.html

=====

Comments to author:

btw did you see the article trashing silverstein in the same issue of
new york mag that had the grassy knolls article?
http://newyorkmetro.com/news/politics/powergrid/16467/index1.html
i commented then that the timing of the two articles looked
coordinated, as a counteroffensive against the neocons
the NY Mag piece depicts him as an "abject greedhead" whom nobody in
nyc can say a good word about
interesting implications of irrational greed in explaining the
decision to go ahead in broad daylight?
of course, after dark it would be too easy to see the explosions
inside - thus 5:30 pm

the part about "there's been so much loss of life already" to me
translates to,
hey, i can make my killing of a billion profit without even killing
anybody - a nobrainer!

btw my own assumption has always been that the shanksville flight was
the dud, that global hawk malfunctioned, and that it was meant to hit
wtc7
it's a little bit simpler theory - only one malfunction instead of
two - and global hawk would presumably be more cutting edge, more
likely to have a blip, than a trusted technology like classic demolition
also from the psy-op pov, the traumatic impact of 3 planes hitting 3
towers should have been total, three's the charm, they say
speculation that flight 93 was intended for the white house may be
subconsciously entertaining the notion that it was a politically
motivated terrorist attack rather than a sheer exercise in televised
trauma (you know, like the infantile propaganda after 9/11 to steer
clear of disneyland :-) )
as well as the notion that the president is really the seat of power

all the same i found your thesis and treatment very interesting

========================================================================
=================================================================

From: "Mr.. Marky Smith" <gonerail@yahoo.com>
Date: April 14, 2006 12:54:51 PM EST
To: WarOnFreedom@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [WarOnFreedom] The Rise of Fascism in America.

Fascism in America won't come with jackboots, book burnings,
mass rallies, and fevered harangues, nor will it come with black
helicopters or tanks on the street. It won't come like a storm-but as a
break
in the weather, that sudden change of season you might feel when the
wind
shifts on an October evening: Everything is the same, but everything
has changed.
Something has gone, departed from the world, and a new reality will have
taken its place. All the old forms will still be there: legislatures,
elections, campaigns-plenty of bread and circuses. But "consent of the
governed" will no longer apply; actual control of the state will have
passed to a small and privileged group who rule for the benefit of
their wealthy
peers and corporate patrons.
To be sure, there will be factional conflicts among the elite,
and a degree of debate will be permitted; but no one outside the
privileged
circle will be allowed to influence state policy. Dissidents will be
marginalized-usually by "the people" themselves. Deprived of historical
knowledge by a thoroughly impoverished educational system designed to
produce complacent consumers, left ignorant of current events by a
corporate media devoted solely to profit, many will internalize the
force-fed
values of the ruling elite, and act accordingly. There will be little
need for
overt methods of control.
The rulers will act in secret, for reasons of "national
security,"
and the people will not be permitted to know what goes on in their name.
Actions once unthinkable will be accepted as routine: government by
executive fiat, state murder of "enemies" selected by the leader,
undeclared wars, torture, mass detentions without charge, the looting
of the
national treasury, the creation of huge new "security structures"
targeted at the
populace. In time, this will be seen as "normal," as the chill of autumn
feels normal when summer is gone. It will all seem normal.

--Chris Floyd, November 10, 2001 Moscow Times (English
edition)

========================================================================
===============================================================

From: NoSpam <jpleonard@verizon.net>
Date: April 16, 2006 3:09:23 AM EST
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [911TruthAction] Berlin Newspaper asks: Is US Govt liable for
911 damages?
Reply-To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com

Berliner Zeitung - The Berlin News
http://www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/politik/542218.html

English translation by John Leonard

Thursday, April 13, 2006

9/11 Skeptics gain strength
Critics in the USA doubt the official version

by Andreas Förster

BERLIN. Is the US Government liable for the
damages from the terror attacks of September
11th? The American publisher John Leonard demands
this, because he is convinced Washington knew in
advance about the attack plans, but did nothing
to prevent them. Leonard wants to get Munich
Reinsurance to investigate the possibility of US
government sharing the liability.

This is the sense of the shareholder's
countermotion that the Californian has filed with
the next general meeting of Munich Re next
Wednesday. Two subsidiary frims of the German
insurance concern have to pay billion-dollar
damage claims for the destruction of the World
Trade Center. Leonard accuses the supervisory and
managing boards of failure to investigate the
background of the attacks thoroughly enough, and
of depending too much on the official version of
the events as publicized by the US Government.

A New Commission

Unlike the situation in Germany, four and a half
years after the attacks, in the US there is
growing respect for 9/11 skeptics. An independent
commission of scientist, come of them well known,
has been analysing the sequence of events before
and on Sept. 11 and investigating the
circumstances which led to the collapse of the
WTC Twin Towers. New York Magazine devoted its
lead story to "Ground Zero Grassy Knoll" three
weeks ago, focusing on the contradictions in the
official version and the many unanswered
questions. "Grassy Knoll" is the American
journalistic term for alternative theories about
the background to the assassination of US President John F. Kennedy.

The American TV network CNN also took up the
Grassy Knoll story. In an interview that aroused
a great deal of attention, Hollywood actor
Charlie Sheen expressed massive doubts about the
official 9/11 version and challenged the
government to answer the questions - for
instance, why the Pakistani secret service wired
$100,000 to the alleged death pilot Mohammed
Atta, why a building at some distance from the
Twin Towers, occupied by the CIA, was also
destroyed in the attacks, and what is behind the
unusual share trading on international stock exchanges just before 9/11.

Photo: Should the US Government pay for the 9/11 damages?

========================================================================
================================================================
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 24
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 2:45pm(PDT)
Subject: Re: articles: silent Nuclear subs add to Iran tensions -=- China bui

The U.S. subs are nuclear. The Israelis have nuclear warheads for their non-nuclear subs. The Iraqis have non-nuclear subs that can fire conventional missiles -- including effective anti-ship weapons.
----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Peden
To: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 2:40 PM
Subject: RE: [911TruthAction] articles: silent Nuclear subs add to Iran tensions -=- China builds two more subs for Israel -=- China sending envoy to Tehran over nuclear standoff

How does Iran have nuclear subs, if they aren't even to the point on having nuclear energy yet?

-----Original Message-----
From: 911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com [mailto:911TruthAction@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Dick Eastman
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:59 AM
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Subject: [911TruthAction] articles: silent Nuclear subs add to Iran tensions -=- China builds two more subs for Israel -=- China sending envoy to Tehran over nuclear standoff

I thought I sent this yesterday -- sorry for delay

From: "Peter Myers" <myers@cyberone.com.au>

April 16, 2006

(1) Silent Nuclear Submarines Add to Iran Tensions
(2) Editorials and opinion pieces calling for war on Iran - Jim Lobe
(3) China sending an envoy to Tehran over nuclear standoff
(4) Lessons of the Opium Wars
(6) Guess who "discovered" the Judas manuscript?

(The plot to deceive Christianity.)

(1) Silent Nuclear Submarines Add to Iran Tensions

Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 05:36:30 +0100 From: Rowan Berkeley
<rowan.berkeley@googlemail.com>

Silent Nuclear Submarines Add to Iran Tensions

Dave Eberhart, NewsMax, April 13, 2006
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/4/12/222400.shtml

[tell me, Jeff B or anyone else, does Izzy really have nuclearised SLCMs, or is
this bluff?]

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The silent submarine forces of the United States, Israel and
Iran are all ramping up for a hot war, adding yet more tension to an already
volatile Middle East - made all the more uneasy by Iran's relentless march to
become a nuclear power.

Leading off the always lurking and deadly wolfpacks is Israel's fleet of
Dolphin-class submarines, each carrying U.S.-supplied Harpoon cruise missiles -
armed with nuclear warheads.

The Israel submarines can remain at sea for a month and are equipped with six
torpedo tubes appropriate for conventional torpedoes. The tubes can also be used
to launch the nuclear-tipped cruise missiles - missiles that could reach some of
the targeted sites in Iran critical to its nuclear development. Starting with
just three of these Dolphin-class undersea intruders, the Israeli inventory
quickly went to a fourth and a fifth. And there are reportedly at least a
half-dozen in the pipeline - two being built by the People's Republic of China.

Although most particulars of Iran's military assets - both personnel and
hardware - are closely held by that country, military experts opine that Iran
has up to six Russian-built SSK or SSI Kilo-class diesel submarines prowling the
Gulf. Most recently, Iran's armed forces added to this fleet by deploying a new
locally built submarine in Persian Gulf waters, state television reported. The
vessel was christened the Nahang, meaning whale. Built by the Iranian Defense
Ministry, the sub has the capability "to carry multipurpose weapons for
different missions," according to Iranian Rear Adm. Sajjad Kouchaki. "The
submarine is fully adapted to the Persian Gulf," he said, adding that the
Iranian navy is pursuing a policy of deterrence in the strategic waters.

Perhaps even more significant, is the recent Iranian deployment of a super
high-speed torpedo. The new torpedo was reportedly successfully tested last
month during war games that Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards held in the
Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea. State news sources touted the successfully
test-firing of the new torpedo, called the "Hoot." The development ups the
profile of Iran's power in the Gulf, where the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet is based
to, among other things, safeguard the flow of oil. Gen. Ali Fadavi, deputy head
of the Revolutionary Guards' navy, said that the torpedo, speeding at 223 miles
per hour, was too fast to elude. "It has a very powerful warhead designed to hit
big submarines," Fadavi told state television.

Meanwhile, the Bush administration recently announced plans to add conventional
ballistic missiles to the armory of its nuclear Trident submarines ?- adding yet
another potential arm to any military option considered against Iran, if
diplomacy and/or sanctions fail to persuade that country to give up its nuclear
designs. According to Defense Daily last January, four ultra-stealthy Ohio-class
Strategic Nuclear Submarines, or SSBNs, were having their 24 Trident II D-5
nuclear ballistic missiles removed and replaced with up to 154 Tomahawk cruise
missiles.

(2) Editorials and opinion pieces calling for war on Iran - Jim Lobe

Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 06:33:13 -0400 From: Don <NX7933@hotmail.com>

Keep in mind that The Register is not a very reliable source. The article may be
referring to "reactive armor", which is not as new as The Register is portraying
it:

http://www.defense-update.com/features/du-1-04/reactive-armor.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactive_armour

[quote] Explosive Reactive armor (ERA) is a common form of add-on armor, used on
many Armored Fighting Vehicles (AFV). This concept is combat proven. Protection
by explosive modules was deployed by the Israel Defense Forces in the late
1970s, and was first, and successfully used in combat with the Israeli Army
M-60s and Centurion tanks in the 1982 War, and later, by the Russian Army by the
mid 80s. Reactive armor utilize add-on protection modules conforming of thin
metal plates and a sloped explosive sheath, which explode when sensing an impact
of an explosive charge (such as High Explosive Anti-Tank - HEAT projectile).
[endquote]

(3) China sending an envoy to Tehran over nuclear standoff

Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 08:20:08 -0000 From: "justicequest2000"
<justicequest2000@yahoo.com>

More war for Israel coming right down the pipe at US:

US in warning to 'defiant' Iran The US has warned Iran that it must face the
consequences of its defiance over its nuclear programme. Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice said the UN Security Council would have to look at options to
compel Iran to "obey the international system". Iran says it has succeeded in
enriching uranium. The visiting head of the UN nuclear watchdog failed to
convince it to freeze its nuclear programme.

China is now sending an envoy to Tehran to try to help resolve the crisis.
Chinese Assistant Foreign Minister Cui Tiankai is due in Tehran for talks on
Friday. A Chinese foreign ministry spokesman China was worried about the way the
situation was developing, and the visit was aimed at facilitating dialogue among
the parties concerned. Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA) who visited Tehran on Thursday, said both sides had agreed
to continue an intensive dialogue over the next few weeks.

'Reasonable and logical'

Ms Rice on Thursday raised publicly the possibility that Iran might face
punitive sanctions at the UN Security Council if it did not change course.

She said that when the council reconvened on the issue at the end of the month
there could not be a repeat of March's "presidential statement" in which Iran
had been told to halt all sensitive atomic activities within 30 days.

Iran has so far refused to comply. "There will have to be some consequence for
that action and that defiance. We will look at a whole range of options
available to the Security Council," Ms Rice said. She said the council would
have to look at a Chapter 7 resolution - which UN members are mandated to comply
with. It could possibly lead to sanctions and eventually even the use of force.

But the BBC's Justin Webb in Washington says council members Russia and China
believe that talk of punishment and coercion is premature. Beijing hopes its
envoy will help defuse the situation. BBC China correspondent Daniel Griffiths
says Beijing would like to avoid sanctions and wants to take a higher profile
over Iran to strengthen its credentials as a responsible, international player.

'Confidence-building'

Western nations suspect Iran of wanting to develop a nuclear weapon, but Tehran
insists its plans are for a peaceful, civilian energy programme only.

NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE

Mined uranium ore is purified and reconstituted into solid form known as
yellowcake Yellowcake is chemically processed and converted into a gas by
heating it to above 64C (147F) Gas is fed through centrifuges, where its
isotopes separate and process is repeated until uranium is enriched Low-level
enriched uranium is used for nuclear fuel Highly enriched uranium can be used in
nuclear weapons

On his visit, Mr ElBaradei said he had had a good discussion about
"confidence-building measures". He said there was still time to negotiate a
settlement by which "Iran's needs for nuclear power is assured and the concern
of the international community is also... put to rest". But Iran's nuclear
negotiator, Ali Larijani, who met Mr ElBaradei, said the UN's demand for a
return to a freeze of its nuclear programme was not the way to solve the
problem. "Every action must be reasonable and logical. We are co-operating in a
constructive manner" with the IAEA, "so such a proposal is not very important to
solve the problem," he said. Earlier, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
said: "Our answer to those who are angry about Iran obtaining the full nuclear
cycle is one phrase, we say: Be angry and die of this anger. "We will not hold
talks with anyone about the Iranian nation's right [to enrichment] and no-one
has the right to step back, even one iota," he said.

Story from BBC NEWS:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/4908820.stm

Scroll down to the 'Comments' at the following URL:

Larry Johnson: Bush "Tried To Cherry Pick Intelligence And Feed The Line To
Gullible Reporters"...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/04/09/larry-johnson-bush- trie_n_18779.html

(4) Lessons of the Opium Wars

Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:30:52 +0100 From: Rowan Berkeley
<rowan.berkeley@googlemail.com>

It's interesting that the piece on the Opium Wars quoted here from
http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/CHING/OPIUM.HTM simply describes the Trade as 'British'.
Compare this:

Hong Kong Founded as Sassoon Drug Center (1997)
http://www.stormfront.org/truth_at_last/sassoon.htm

{a website I don't normally use - but the article originated there}

Hong Kong and The Sassoon Opium Wars

The 99 year British lease on Hong Kong expired in July allowing the Red Chinese
to take over. Hundreds of newspaper stories and TV reports have covered this
event but not one revealed how England first gained control of Hong Kong! The
truth lies buried in the family line of David Sassoon, "The Rothschilds of The
Far East," and their monopoly over the opium trade. Britain won Hong Kong by
launching the opium Wars to give the Sassoons exclusive rights to drug an entire
nation!

David Sassoon was born in Baghdad, Iran in 1792. His father, Saleh Sassoon, was
a wealthy banker and the treasurer to Ahmet Pasha, the governor of Baghdad.
(Thus making him the "court Jew" - a highly influential position.) In 1829 Ahmet
was overthrown due to corruption and the Sassoon family fled to Bombay, India.
This was the strategic trade route to interior India and the gateway to the Far
East. In a brief time the British government granted Sassoon "monopoly rights"
to all manufacture of cotton goods, silk and most important of all - Opium -
then the most addictive drug in the world!

The Jewish Encyclopedia of 1905, states that Sassoon expanded his opium trade
into China and Japan. He placed his eight sons in charge of the various major
opium exchanges in China. According to the 1944 Jewish Encyclopedia: "He
employed only Jews in his business, and wherever he sent them he built
synagogues and schools for them. He imported whole families of fellow Jews. . .
and put them to work."

Sassoon's sons were busy pushing this mind-destroying drug in Canton, China.
Between 1830 - 1831 they trafficked 18,956 chests of opium earning millions of
dollars. Part of the profits went to Queen Victoria and the British government.
In the year 1836 the trade increased to over 30,000 chests and drug addiction in
coastal cities became endemic.

In 1839, the Manchu Emperor ordered that it be stopped. He named the
Commissioner of Canton, Lin Tse-hsu, to lead a campaign against opium. Lin
seized 2,000 chests of Sassoon opium and threw it into the river. An outraged
David Sassoon demanded that Great Britain retaliate. Thus, the Opium Wars began
with the British Army fighting as mercenaries of the Sassoons. They attacked
cities and blockaded ports. The Chinese Army, decimated by 10 years of rampant
opium addiction, proved no match for the British Army. The war ended in 1839
with the signing of "The Treaty of Nanking." This included provisions especially
designed to guarantee the Sassoons the right to enslave an entire population
with opium. The "peace treaty" included these provisions: "1) Full legalization
of the opium trade in China, 2) compensation from the opium stockpiles
confiscated by Lin of 2 million pounds, 3) territorial sovereignty for the
British Crown over several designated offshore islands.

Sassoon's Use British Army to Drug An Entire Nation

British Prime Minister Palmerston wrote Crown Commissiner Captain Charles Elliot
that the treaty didn't go far enough. He said it should have been rejected out
of hand because: "After all, our naval power is so strong that we can tell the
Emperor what we mean to hold rather than what he would cede. We must demand the
admission of opium into interior China as an article of lawful commerce and
increase the indemnity payments and British access to several additional Chinese
ports." Thus, China not only had to pay Sassoon the cost of his dumped opium but
reimburse England an unheard sum of 21 million pounds for the cost of the war!

This gave the Sassoon's monopoly rights to distribute opium in port cities.
However, even this was not good enough and Sassoon demanded the right to sell
opium throughout the nation. The Manchus resisted and the British Army again
attacked in the "Second Opium War fought 1858 - 1860. Palmerston declared that
all of interior China must be open for uninterrupted opium traffic. The British
suffered a defeat at the Taku Forts in June 1859 when sailors, ordered to seize
the forts, were run aground in the mud-choked harbor. Several hundred were
killed or captured. An enraged Palmerston said: "We shall teach such a lesson to
these perfidious hordes that the name of Europe will hereeafter be a passport of
fear."

In October, the British besieged Peking. When the city fell, British commander
Lord Elgin, ordered the temples and other sacred shrines in the city sacked and
burned to the ground as a show of Britain's absolute comtempt for the Chinese.
In the new "Peace Treaty" of Oct.25, 1860, the British were assigned rights to
vastly expanded opium trade covering seven-eights of China, which brought in
over 20 million pounds in 1864 alone. In that year, the Sassoons imported 58,681
chests of opium and by 1880 it had skyrocketed to 105,508 chests making the
Sassoons the richest Jews in the world. England was given the Hong Kong
peninsula as a colony and large sections of Amoy, Canton, Foochow, Ningpo and
Shanghai. The Sassoons were now licensing opium dens in each British occupied
area with large fees being collected by their Jewish agents. Sassoon would not
allow any other race to engage in "the Jews' business."

However, the British government would not allow any opium to be imported into
Europe!

Sassoon "Monopoly Rights" Wrecked Lancashire - England's Textile Industry - Made
Roosevelt Wealthy

Sir Albert Sassoon, the eldest of David Sassoon's sons took over the family
"business" empire. He constructed huge textile mills in Bombay to pay slave
labor wages. This expansion continued after World War One and ended up putting
mills in Lancashire, England out of business with thousands losing their jobs.
This did not stop Queen Victoria from having Albert knighted in 1872.

Solomon Sassoon moved to Hong Kong and ran the family business there until his
death in 1894. Later, the entire family moved to England because with modern
communications they could operate their financial empire from their luxurious
estates in London. They socialized with royalty and Edward Albert. Sassoon
married Aline Caroline de Rothschild in 1887 which linked their fortune with
that of the Rothschilds. The Queen also had Edward knighted. All 14 of the
grandsons of David Sassoon were made officers during World War One and thus most
were able to avoid combat.

Franklin D. Roosevelt's fortune was inherited from his maternal grandfather
Warren Delano. In 1830 he was a senior partner of Russell & Company. It was
their merchant fleet which carried Sassoon's opium to China and returned with
tea. Warren Delano moved to Newburgh, N.Y. In 1851 his daughter Sara Married a
well-born neighbor, James Roosevelt - the father of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
He always knew the origin of the family fortune but refused to discuss it.

The Sassoon opium trade brought death and destruction to millions and still
plagues Asia to this day. Their company was totally operated by Jews ONLY! The
corrupt British monarchy honored them with privilege and knighthood - to the
disgrace of the Crown! To this day the Sassoons are in the history books as
"great developers" of India but the source of their vast wealth is never
mentioned!

(6) Guess who "discovered" the Judas manuscript?

Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:05:03 EDT From: EagleRevisionist@aol.com

Frieda Tchacos NUSSBERGER, a Khazarian chosen one.

"I think I was chosen by Judas to rehabilitate him."

She's been involved in artifact fraud in the past.

{Can you substantiate that claim? - Peter M.}

All my best,

Harrell Rhome

How the Gospel of Judas Emerged

By BARRY MEIER and JOHN NOBLE WILFORD

York Times April 13, 2006

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/13/science/13judas.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

When the National Geographic Society announced to great fanfare last week that
it had gained access to a 1,700-year-old document known as the Gospel of Judas,
it described how a deteriorating manuscript, unearthed in Egypt three decades
ago, had made its way through the shady alleys of the antiquities market to a
safe-deposit box on Long Island and eventually to a Swiss art dealer who
"rescued" it from obscurity.

Frieda Tchacos Nussberger could gain as much as $2 million from deals involving
the Gospel of Judas, said her lawyer, Mario Roberty, left.

But there is even more to the story.

The art dealer was detained several years ago in an unrelated Italian
antiquities smuggling investigation. And after she failed to profit from the
sale of the gospel in the private market, she struck a deal with a foundation
run by her lawyer that would let her make about as much as she would have made
on that sale, or more.

Later, the National Geographic Society paid the foundation to restore the
manuscript and bought the rights to the text and the story about the discovery.
As part of her arrangement with the foundation, the dealer, Frieda Tchacos
Nussberger, stands to gain $1 million to $2 million from those National
Geographic projects, her lawyer said. There may even be more.

Details of how the manuscript was found are clouded. According to National
Geographic, it was found by farmers in an Egyptian cave in the 1970's, sold to a
dealer and passed through various hands in Europe and the United States. Legal
issues in its transit are equally vague.

No one questions the authenticity of the Judas gospel, which depicts Judas
Iscariot not as a betrayer of Jesus but as his favored disciple.

But the emerging details are raising concerns among some archaeologists and
other scholars at a time of growing scrutiny of the dealers who sell antiquities
and of the museums and collectors who buy them. The information also calls into
question the completeness of National Geographic's depiction of some individuals
like Ms. Tchacos Nussberger and its disclosure of all the financial
relationships involved.

Terry Garcia, the vice president for mission programs at National Geographic,
which is based in Washington, said that the organization had "heard some rumors"
about possible legal problems involving Ms. Tchacos Nussberger but could not
confirm them. He also noted that the organization had disclosed its relationship
with the foundation, the Maecenas Foundation for Ancient Art.

Mr. Garcia emphasized that he believed that issues like Ms. Tchacos Nussberger's
financial relationship with the foundation or questions about other antiquities
she sold were not relevant to the story of the Gospel of Judas. He added that
National Geographic had taken on the project because it saw an opportunity to
help save a unique document.

"It is not every day that you find a lost gospel," Mr. Garcia said.

But scholars who have campaigned against the trade in artifacts of questionable
provenance said they were troubled by the whole episode.

"We are dealing with a looted object," said Jane C. Waldbaum, president of the
Archaeological Institute of America, a professional society. "The artifact was
poorly handled for years because the people holding it were more concerned with
making money than protecting it."

For her part, Ms. Tchacos Nussberger rejected any suggestion that she was trying
to profit from the Gospel of Judas. She described her run-in with Italian
officials as inconsequential.

"I went through hell and back, and I saved something for humanity," Ms. Tchacos
Nussberger said in a telephone interview. "I would have given it for nothing to
someone who would have saved it."

Last week, National Geographic began a large campaign for the Gospel of Judas,
featuring it in two new books, a television documentary, an exhibition and the
May issue of National Geographic magazine.

The organization did not buy the document. Instead, it paid $1 million to the
Maecenas Foundation, effectively for the manuscript's contents. Part of the
revenues generated by the National Geographic projects go to the foundation.

The foundation was set up some years ago by Ms. Tchacos Nussberger's lawyer,
Mario Roberty, well before it became involved with the Gospel of Judas. Mr.
Roberty is the only official of the foundation, which he said was involved in
projects like returning antiquities to their countries of origin. He said that
when Ms. Tchacos Nussberger turned over the document to the foundation in 2001,
he quickly contacted officials in Egypt and assured them that the manuscript
would be returned there. He said the foundation had clear legal title to the
document.

In National Geographic's narratives, the manuscript takes a long journey through
the antiquities trade. Those stories describe Ms. Tchacos Nussberger efforts to
sell the Gospel of Judas privately soon after buying it and her subsequent role
in its restoration. She is portrayed as driven by religious conviction to save
the document.

"I think I was chosen by Judas to rehabilitate him," Ms. Tchacos Nussberger, 65,
is quoted as saying in one of the society's books, "The Lost Gospel," by Herbert
Krosney. Mr. Krosney is also an independent television producer who brought the
gospel project to National Geographic.

Missing from the book is any mention of an incident in 2001 when Ms. Tchacos
Nussberger was detained in Cyprus at the request of Italian officials, who
wanted to question her as part of a broader investigation into antiquities that
had been illegally taken out of Italy and sold elsewhere. Paolo Ferri, the
Rome-based prosecutor in the case, said she was charged with several violations
involving antiquities but was given a reduced sentence that was suspended
because she had, among other things, previously agreed to return an artifact
claimed by Italy.

Both the dealer and her lawyer said the issues involved were far less serious
than those described by Mr. Ferri, the prosecutor. They also said that all of
Ms. Tchacos Nussberger's dealings in antiquities in Italy and elsewhere had been
lawful. Her record will be erased in 2007 if she is not charged by Italian
authorities with another antiquities violation.

Ms. Tchacos Nussberger said that she, like other dealers, had run into problems
because laws governing the antiquities trade had sharply changed in recent
years.

According to National Geographic, she bought the Judas document for about
$300,000 in 2000 from another dealer who had placed it in a safe-deposit box in
Hicksville, N.Y., on Long Island. She tried to sell it to the Beinecke Rare Book
and Manuscript Library at Yale University.

Yale officials have not specified why they did not buy the document. But Robert
Babcock, curator of early books at the library, said through a spokeswoman that
"there were unresolved questions about the provenance."

Then in 2001, Ms. Tchacos Nussberger sold it to an antiquities dealer in Ohio
for $2.5 million, but the deal fell apart when the dealer did not make good on
the payments.

Aided by her lawyer, Mr. Roberty, she regained ownership of the document and at
his suggestion turned it over to the Maecenas Foundation. Under the deal, she is
entitled to receive a sum from revenues generated by the Gospel of Judas
essentially equivalent to what she would have received from the Ohio dealer,
minus the value of several pages of the manuscript that dealer bought. In
addition, she is entitled to get back about $800,000 she lent to the foundation
for expenses like legal costs and early restoration efforts, Mr. Roberty said.

Mr. Roberty said the foundation had already started paying money to the dealer,
but he declined to say how much she had received to date.

Mr. Garcia, the National Geographic executive, said that a critical aspect of
the society's contract with the Maecenas Foundation was the group's pledge to
return the document to Egypt. Mr. Krosney, the writer, said he was convinced
from his discussions with Ms. Tchacos Nussberger that she had acted out of the
best of motives.

He said he had raised with Mr. Roberty the rumors he had heard about Ms. Tchacho
Nussberger and Italy, and added that the lawyer was "dismissive"of them. He said
he never asked the dealer about it.

Hershel Shanks, editor of the Biblical Archaeology Review, said there was
inherent tension between the need to conserve ancient objects and deter trade in
looted artifacts.

"If you want to learn from the material, you have got to deal," Mr. Shanks said.
"I am in favor of rescuing these unprovenanced things because they have
important information to impart."

But other scholars remain disturbed. "The owners are trying to take monetary
value out of something they don't really own," said Patty Gerstenblith, a law
professor at DePaul University in Chicago who specializes in the antiquities
trade. "The people with control over the manuscript don't appear to be the
rightful owners."

Elisabetta Povoledo contributed reporting from Rome for this article.

--
Peter Myers, 381 Goodwood Rd, Childers 4660, Australia ph +61 7 41262296
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers Mirror: http://mailstar.net/index.html I
use the old Mac OS; being incompatible, it cannot run Windows viruses or
transmit them to you. If my mail does not arrive, or yours bounces, please ring
me: this helps beat sabotage. To unsubscribe, reply with "unsubscribe" in the
subject line; allow 1 day.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "911TruthAction" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message 25
From: "Dick Eastman" olfriend@nwinfo.net
Date: Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:00pm(PDT)
Subject: 9-11 was a black-op of combined China, Israel and Anglo-American cap

9-11 was a black-op of combined China, Israel and Anglo-American capitalism (big business and big finance)

The link to China was Kissinger Associates. Recall Kissinger was on the Defense Policy Board chaired by Richard Perle, with Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith etc. Recall when Paul Bremer took over the Iraq occupation and opened up the privatization pillage/rape of that nation all we knew about him was that he was the former managing director of Kissinger Associates. Kissinger Associates of course specializes in selling connections with Red China's corrupt triad Princelings who control the Chinese economy. Also remember that GW Bush initially wanted Kissinger to head his 9-11 Commission.

9-11 was an international organized crime black op that included Chinese, Israeli and Anglo-American criminal power elites.

Remember it is already proven that the Zionist Neo-con leadership of the Pentagon were behind 9-11, especially the Defense Policy Board. In this case the Pentagon was above the White House in (criminal) power and authority.

Instant proof of 9/11 false-flag crime:
http://bedoper.com/eastman (this is the only page on this site that I endorse)

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911TruthAction/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911TruthAction-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------