Saturday, February 18, 2006

[911InsideJobbers] Re: Why is gatekeeper lecturing at anti-gatekeeper NYC march?

Physical analysis is not Tarpley's specialty and its not fair to
attack him for making such small errors. I can generally support
anyone who endorses artificial demoltion MIHOP thesis and don't make
such a big deal about the finer details about the other issues. The
way I see it, we have to sell live cremation of Americans for Public
Relations purposes before our time runs out. How will we know when
our time has run out? We will know when we get a nuclear false flag
attack and then martial law to shut down all our legitimate protest
organizations and forums like these. The finer details of the 9/11
scam can always be worked out in the future, but selling controlled
demoltion to the general public is of time sensitive importance,
unlike fleshing out the planehugger vs. bluescreen issues. When you
stop to realize that we don't have all the time in the world, you
can begin seing things from my point of view. Eric Hufschmid also
made this point recently on one of Daryl Bradford Smiths shows.

Hicks 9/11 analysis is LIHOP and I thought he was an agent after
reading his Big Wedding book. It's starting to look like he might
just be going through a learning process and is recovering from his
LIHOP indoctrination. I don't think he is going to ruin the march.
Who made the decision to give him a platform though?

--- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, Rosalee Grable
<webfairy@...> wrote:
>
> Synthetic Terror does an excellent job at "Big Picture"
theoretics, but
> then when it comes down to the nittygritty of actual events, the
poor
> sucker has planes climbing into holes and covering themselves up.
> I was hoping that this sort of drooling idiocy is what the event
was
> against.
>
>
> inphoman911 wrote:
> > The Hicks book is really bad. He even shows the Pentagon
picture
> > after the roof collapse and makes the reader think it is the
only
> > picture. He is now promoting 9/11 Synthetic Terror at his site,
so
> > maybe he had just been a disinfo dupe when he put out his book.
> > Don't you think he should be scrambling to put out a new edition
of
> > the Big Wedding with massive corrections?
> >
> > --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "perpetualynquisitive"
> > <perpetualynquisitive@> wrote:
> >
> >> Daniel Hopsicker Jr., err, I mean Sander Hicks, now that is
funny.
> >>
> >> With original research and interviews, The Big Wedding provides
a
> >>
> > new
> >
> >> level of proof that Bush's advisors had detailed foreknowledge
of
> >>
> > 9/11.
> >
> >> The book dispenses with the hypothetical and the realm of
maybe. It
> >> attacks the kooky conspiracy theories, like "no-plane-hit-the-
> >>
> > Pentagon,"
> >
> >> which distract from certain suppressed historical truths: the
CIA
> >>
> > has
> >
> >> had a controlling, client relationship with the powerful
Pakistani
> >> intelligence group, ISI. The ISI has proven links to 9/11; they
> >>
> > were key
> >
> >> funders, trainers, and supporters. Therefore, it's impossible
that
> >>
> > the
> >
> >> CIA and White House didn't have detailed foreknowledge of 9/11.
> >>
> >> From here <http://www.drenchkiss.com/>
> >>
> >> The Big Wedding is almost as bad as Crossing The Rubes I've
> >>
> > Conned, by
> >
> >> Mike "The CIA tried to Kill Me, Peak Oiler" Ruppert.
> >>
> >>
> >> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "angiesept11"
> >>
> > <angiesept11@>
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yeah, then why is 911 Gatekeeper Sander Hicks one
> >>> of the 2 people listed as speaking at your march,
> >>> you being the other? Hicks is a 911 Gatekeeper!!
> >>> This is both hilarious and disgusting at the same time.
> >>>
> >>> Angie
> >>> 911 Truth Movement Musings (Watching the Watchers)
> >>> http://www.Angieon911.com
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> From: greg nixon nxngrg@
> >>> Date: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:46 pm
> >>> Subject: Re: [911InsideJobbers] WING TV announced Greg Nixon
as
> >>>
> > guest
> >
> >>> (02/17) nxngrg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> She is a planehugger huh? I am not. I want the message to
> >>>>>>>>
> > be f--k
> >
> >>> the gatekeepers I hope that's what comes across.
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

No comments: