I understand. Video manipulation is probably a much better term than
--- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "Nico Haupt" <nicohaupt@...>
> > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> > Von: "Rob" <robertjcash@...>
> > An: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> > Betreff: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Several new videos of second hit on
> > Terrorize-- are all fake?
> > Datum: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:19:29 -0000
> be careful. Using the word "fake" is confusing the issue.
> If rendered productions are used, they're as 'real' as the broadcast.
> It's about media deception we're generally talking.
> They used bluescreen tech for this deception, this is a 'real process'.
> joe six pack-no planer would use occasionally use
> the word fakery (what we're also doing among us), but if we are precise:
> only his view of the reality was faked-manipulated instead.
> Or better they used a replacement of the reality.
> 2nd step, this email here:
> If a product is re-altered after the fact, it's like debating about
> of a cover-version of a dance tune.
> i know that word debating sounds like harrassment, but that is
> can be used against this research.
> Staging is not faking, and remodelling a "fake" (slang) doesn't make the
> original less fake (slang), but an original, first product.
> If i'm sounding too bizarre, please help out with the better
> >>>>Orbs. Sorta like these wierd little thingys...
> DSL-Aktion wegen großer Nachfrage bis 28.2.2006 verlängert:
> GMX DSL-Flatrate 1 Jahr kostenlos* http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: