| By Administrator on Uncategorized As a “liberal,” even “treasonous” newspaper, the New York Times has the curious ability to suck up to the racist sociopaths in Israel and here in America and make profuse if not nauseating excuses for mass murder. Consider Noah Feldman, not only a law professor at New York University but a “senior fellow” at the Council on Foreign Relations, who writes for the “newspaper of record,” or maybe it should be characterized as the newspaper of pro-Israel propaganda and scandalous apologia for crimes against humanity: For its part, Israel is gambling that the right strategy is to make the people who elected Hamas and a government that includes Hezbollah reckon the costs of their representatives’ recklessness. That is why Israel has targeted not only Hezbollah leaders and strongholds but has also bombed infrastructure that sustains daily life for everybody in Lebanon. From Israel’s standpoint, this is no longer a fight with nonstate terrorists who are holding their fellow citizens hostage to their tactics. It is, rather, war between Israel and countries that are pursuing (or tolerating) violent policies endorsed (or at least accepted) by their electorates.
How utterly and criminally disgusting. If we are to use Feldman’s reasoning, Israel deserves the fate decreed by its most fanatical and racist enemies—all the Jews should be pushed into the sea. Israelis have voted for the most vile criminals and sociopaths over the years, from David Ben-Gurion all the way to Ehud Olmert. Ben-Gurion thought the Zionists could bribe the Palestinians into selling their land and rights, although he eventually came around to the thinking of Ze’ev Jabotinsky, who advocated using violence against the Palestinians. Jabotinsky, the founder of Revisionist Zionism, a political movement that would eventually morph into Likud, had not only an affinity for fascism and Mussolini, but irredentism, that is to say stealing land from surrounding states. As the Israeli people have elected several Likudites over the years—Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Ariel Sharon—and they have consistently and enthusiastically pursued violent policies, and indeed ethnic cleansing, against the Palestinians, if we follow Feldman’s theory the Israeli people deserve likewise treatment, including the indiscriminate shooting their grade schoolers, blowing up and bulldozing their homes, throwing thousands of them into prison to be abused and tortured, destroying their agriculture, humiliating them daily at checkpoints, walling them into ghettos, denying them employment, medical assistance, clean water, food, etc. If we are to buy into Feldman’s criminal idea, this sort of monstrous behavior should be perpetuated against the Israeli people for the next sixty years because they made the mistake of voting for war criminals, in particular the butcher of Sabra and Shatila, responsible for the wholesale slaughter of more than 3,500 defenseless Palestinians. As well, if we are to use Feldman’s theory, the American people are responsible for similar crimes, as they sheepishly allow the government to not only arm and encourage Israel’s criminal behavior, but also sign a blank check allowing the government to slaughter Iraqis, currently surpassing the 200,000 mark. In addition, the American people, by allowing the neocons to steal two elections, and not bothering to march en masse on the capitol and demand these obviously rigged elections be reversed (in this regard, it would seem the average Mexican has more cojones), have allowed the United States military, apparently run by psychopaths, to poison the planet with depleted uranium. Obviously, Noah Feldman is an immoral Zionist apologist, devising excuses to permit the slaughter of Muslims and Arabs, who are considered untermenschen by the Zionists and their neocon collaborators. In this regard, he is no different than the moral sack of donkey manure Alan Dershowitz, who proposes, in an article published in the “liberal” Los Angeles Times, that we devise a “new vocabulary to reflect the realities of modern warfare,” a lexicon dismissive of innocent civilians, in fact justifying their murder. For Dersh, a Jewish grade schooler killed by a Katyusha is more important and worthy of compassion than his or her counterpart in a Lebanese village where Hezbollah may operate. “Both are technically civilians, but the former is far more innocent than the latter…. These differences and others are conflated within the increasingly meaningless word ‘civilian’—a word that carried great significance when uniformed armies fought other uniformed armies on battlefields far from civilian population centers. Today this same word equates the truly innocent with guilty accessories to terrorism.” Indeed, if we accept Dersh’s moral vapidity, the Lebanese children killed in Israel’s latest blitzkrieg—kids comprise fully one third of all victims—deserve to be killed, because of the probability their parents are “terrorists,” that is to say they resisted Israel’s illegal invasions of their country and its continued border provocations and habitual kidnapping of Lebanese (and thousands of Palestinians) to be held in squalid Israeli prisons and later used as “bargaining chips.” As the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, Dan Gillerman, told the reactionary loudmouth Bill O’Reilly, the Zionists consider all Muslims to be terrorists (see this video), thus, multiplied with the above, the conclusion should be fairly obvious—Feldman, Dershowitz, Gillerman, and likely thousands of other Zionists (and their American supporters, including millions of pretrib Christians) are no different than Nazis, who used national-ethnic identity markers to determine who lived and who suffered and died under, for instance, Fall Weiß, the blitzkrieg of Poland, eastern Europe, and the Soviet Union. In a prefect world, or one far less compromised, the Zionist Nazis, embarking on their version of Lebensraum, a reformulation (with religious overtones) of Karl Haushofer’s racist theories, would be facing a reconvened Nuremberg tribunal. Instead, “liberal” newspapers, and the fascist television network Fox and its emulators, allow them to spew their hatred and demented theories about Jewish civilians who deserve compassion while Muslims and Arabs deserve evisceration and mass graves. |
No comments:
Post a Comment