[political-research] New Morgan Reynolds Article

http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=we_have_holes
<http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=we_have_holes>

We Have Some Holes in the Plane Stories*

By Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D.
March 2006
Where there is much desire to learn,
There of necessity will be much arguing,
Much writing, many opinions; for opinion
In good men is but knowledge in the making.
—John Milton
Jim Hoffman <http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/reynolds/index.html>
contends that my June 9 article
<http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=why_did_WTCs_collapse>
“provides an excellent summary of evidence for the controlled demolition
of the WTC skyscrapers” but that about a third of my article supports
“the dubious idea that neither the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, nor the
field in Shanksville, PA were the sites of the crashes of the jetliners
commandeered on 9/11/01.” My article “thus weds the thesis of controlled
demolition of the skyscrapers with the denial that Flights 11, 175, 77,
and 93 crashed where reported.” Hoffman believes that this is
“unfortunate because it functions to discredit the case for demolition
by associating it with ideas that lack scientific merit, are easily
debunked, and are inherently offensive to the victims of the attack —
especially the survivors of the passengers and crews of the crashed
flights.”
Hoffman’s critique uses intimidating language—“lack scientific merit,
easily debunked, inherently offensive”—to denounce someone of a contrary
mind about the government story of hi-jacked jetliners. This article
constitutes part II of my reply to him and here is part I
<http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/reynolds/replies/revisiting_p1.html>.
Many 9/11 researchers would be surprised to learn that the controversy
over the reported crashes of Flights 11, 175, 77, and 93 has been
scientifically resolved and settled in favor of the official story.
Whatever the state of disputation over crashes may be, the WTC
demolition theory is in no danger of being discredited. Let’s make this
statement in bold letters so that Hoffman and others worried about
“unity” within the vaunted 9/11 truth movement cannot fail to understand:
WTC demolition is truth inviolate, entirely separate from airliner
crashes, proven beyond reasonable doubt and newly supported by a BYU
physicist <http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635160132,00.html> who
calls for a serious investigation. It’s the linchpin establishing that
selected parts of the U.S. government, aided by certain outsiders,
committed the crimes of 9/11.

Article continues:
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=we_have_holes
<http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=we_have_holes>

Search the archives for political-research at http://www.terazen.com/

Subscribe to the RSS feed for political-research at http://rss.groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/rss

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political-research/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
political-research-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/