[Fwd: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?]

Controlled Demolition means you've got the goods on a particular subset
of the criminals.

Other equally dangerous 911 criminals get a free pass to set the agenda
and direct the course of the future.

We went to war over Cartoons.

The flight simulator origin of much of the second hit coverage is beyond
refute by anybody who actually believes in laws of nature like
conservaton of energy.
Professor Jones finds Laws of Nature to be arbitrary and situational and
is at least ready to ask the government to investigate whether gravity
is practical.

Wrong question false dichotomy timewaster.

Excuse to rebuild hatered toward arabs and islamics, since the planes
and hijackers part of the story is always assumed and perpetual excuse
for police state tactics.

I think Fetzer should go on national TV and tell people that the second
hit closeups have all proven to be cartoon footage of flight simulator
origin.
He's the guy with the reputation for video exploration.
Instead he stays tight on the Hoffman Trail, sticking to the rational
respectable but false hangout to keep the schnookies in thrall til
they're dead, or wishing they were.

From Infohman911:

Question for Rosalee Grable. Do you really want Professor Jones to
go on national TV and say that there was no plane crash and that the
planes hitting the towers were faked and edited in later on
videotape? What praytell would be the result of him taking that
action? What good would it do our truth movement if people of Jones
stature started doing things like that? I ask because you don't
sound like a stupid person and maybe you just havent thought these
things through. My position is simple. Controlled demolition means
we've got the goods on the criminals. Making the general public
aware of Controlled demolition (the deliberate cremation of fellow
citizens, and then automatic realistion that there was a
hypocritical manipulative coverup afterward.) is precisely what we
need to get the blood boiling for public outrage and subsequent mass
mobilization. Everything else, NO MATTER HOW TRUE IT MAY BE is a
waste of our time, and a diversion from nailing the crooks.
Wouldn't they just love for us to voluntarily marginalize controlled
demolition to advance other theories that are even harder for the
general public to swallow than controlled demolition itself?

--- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "Nico Haupt"
<nicohaupt@...> wrote:
>
> > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> > Von: "alexldent" <alexldent@...>
> > An: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> > Betreff: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited
Hangout?
> > Datum: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 23:15:50 -0000
> >
>
> He claimed it by himself.
> On you other point i would also agree.
> Many institutes receive military- or intel money.
>
> But this in the mix increases the case.
> Also, i personally believe he's more brainwashed and manipulated
> than really payrolled, but i wouldn't rule out more.
>
> nico
>
> >>>How do
> we know Jack Hoffman is Jim Hoffman's uncle? I can't find
anything on the
> web...<<<
>
> --
> 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
> +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
>

Yahoo! Groups Links

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/