Tuesday, February 07, 2006

[911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited Hangout?

Disclaimer: I am not a supporter/defender of Hoffman, and I am not
really up to speed on who is suspected of being compromised and who
is not, but commonsense wise something is ringing terribly wrong to
my ears.

Rosalee Grable claims the government is ready to concede to
conventionally demolishing the towers. A defacto admission that the
NIST reports and the 9/11 Commission were elaborate hoaxes. This
unprecedented sacrifice/total loss of credibility is to cover up
secret microwave weapon technology, they are saving for a False Flag
Alien invasion that is not yet fully set up.

Why do I find that so hard to believe? Why risk exposing such
technology on 9/11 and not just use high powered explosives or
mininukes instead? IOW why does the false flag destruction of a
building require secret microwave technology? Are they trying to
hide this technology from only us or from foreign powers as well?
Using the secret raygun on 9/11 wouldn't have been too smart in the
latter case now would it?

alexldent claims the government may be ready to concede to
conventionally demolishing the towers and cremating thousands of
civillians alive in side. He thinks they can get away with it by
claiming they wanted to save additional lives in the streets of
lower manhattan, even though they didn't evacuate the towers
beforehand, but rather told people to remain inside. He also thinks
they can get away with the fact that they designed their controlled
demolition to simulate a building pancaking after a plane had hit it
by claiming they wanted to keep their preplanted explosive
countermeasures secrets from the terrorists!

Folks, there is no volunatry backpedalling from the official 9/11
narrative. Why do you think they panicked and slammed the lid shut
on able danger? Tarpley goes into what Able danger was really about
here in the new preface to his 9/11 Synthetic Terror.

http://www.waronfreedom.org/synth/synter2ed.pdf

You better believe the official fiction is meant to stay. Anybody
thinking that they are ready to voluntarily concede to controlled
demolition is literally out of their mind.

Question for Rosalee Grable. Do you really want Professor Jones to
go on national TV and say that there was no plane crash and that the
planes hitting the towers were faked and edited in later on
videotape? What praytell would be the result of him taking that
action? What good would it do our truth movement if people of Jones
stature started doing things like that? I ask because you don't
sound like a stupid person and maybe you just havent thought these
things through. My position is simple. Controlled demolition means
we've got the goods on the criminals. Making the general public
aware of Controlled demolition (the deliberate cremation of fellow
citizens, and then automatic realistion that there was a
hypocritical manipulative coverup afterward.) is precisely what we
need to get the blood boiling for public outrage and subsequent mass
mobilization. Everything else, NO MATTER HOW TRUE IT MAY BE is a
waste of our time, and a diversion from nailing the crooks.
Wouldn't they just love for us to voluntarily marginalize controlled
demolition to advance other theories that are even harder for the
general public to swallow than controlled demolition itself?

--- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "Nico Haupt"
<nicohaupt@...> wrote:
>
> > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> > Von: "alexldent" <alexldent@...>
> > An: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> > Betreff: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Controlled Demolition Limited
Hangout?
> > Datum: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 23:15:50 -0000
> >
>
> He claimed it by himself.
> On you other point i would also agree.
> Many institutes receive military- or intel money.
>
> But this in the mix increases the case.
> Also, i personally believe he's more brainwashed and manipulated
> than really payrolled, but i wouldn't rule out more.
>
> nico
>
> >>>How do
> we know Jack Hoffman is Jim Hoffman's uncle? I can't find
anything on the
> web...<<<
>
> --
> 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
> +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
>


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

No comments: