Tuesday, February 07, 2006

[911InsideJobbers] [Fwd: RE: [news_sense] 9/11]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [news_sense] 9/11
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 11:52:35 +1100
From: Gerard Holmgren <holmgren@iinet.net.au>
To: 'Rosalee Grable' <webfairy@thewebfairy.com>, 'Nico Haupt'
<nicohaupt2@yahoo.com>

PWS wrote

[[Follow the silences. The things nobody wants to discuss.]]

You mean like the BTS findings which indicate that neither flight 11 nor 77
existed?

http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/1177.html

Hofffman's response

How Mark Rabinowitz and Jim Hoffman lied about the BTS database.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/rabidbts.html

And the fake passenger lists for the mythical AA 11 ?

http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/fake.html

Total words written by Hoffman on this subject - zero.

You mean that even if one believes that there were hijacked planes that the
airforce would have to been stood down ?

Jim Hoffman trashes the Sept 11 stand down evidence
http://members.iinet.au/~holmgren/hoffmanstanddown.html

You mean that big old jet, which all just *know* flew into the Pentagon,
squeezing through a hole many times smaller than itself, after doing a
miraculous spine bending arch maneuver over the cable spools in the way, and
then disappearing into planehugger land ?

HOFFMAN AND THE PENTAGON

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/06/320469.shtml?discuss#186921

HOW HOFFMAN DISTORTS EVIDENCE

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/06/320469.shtml?discuss#186929

You mean the fact that no planes hit any buildings?

http://members,iinet.net.au/~holmgren/noplanework.html

The (Phantom )planes meme. Adapted from 911review.com

http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/meme.html

Hoffman the plagiarist

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/06/320469.shtml?discuss#186867

Hoffman the spook.

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/06/320469.shtml?discuss#186880

But PWS accidentally said something true

[[Do not let anybody
>> mislead you about Jim Hoffman...his main concern has always seemed to me
to be the truth]]

Indeed. Hoffman is very concerned about what might happen if the truth comes
out. After all, it's his job to make sure that it doesn't and his employers
tend to play a little rough with those who fail.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rosalee Grable [mailto:webfairy@thewebfairy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2006 9:44 AM
To: Gerard Holmgren; Nico Haupt
Subject: Re: [news_sense] 9/11

>
>
> On 5-Feb-06, at 9:02 AM, Peter Wakefield Sault wrote:
>
>> The following is the text of an e-mail written to Peter Meyer of
>> serendipity.li on 2nd Feb 2006. All comments welcome.
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------
>>
>> The Israelis are trying to split those **/sane/** 9/11 researchers
>> who are getting too close to the truth and to set them against one
>> another. It's the tactic of first recourse. Do not let anybody
>> mislead you about Jim Hoffman. I have had 1-2-1 conversations with
>> him and his main concern has always seemed to me to be the truth come
>> what may. I have a copy of one of his books, 'Waking up from Our
>> Nightmare - The 9/11/01 Crimes in NYC' (with Don Paul), which he very
>> kindly gave to me and I thoroughly recommend it. You have to remember
>> - Larry Silverstein is protected by the libel laws. Unless one can
>> **/prove/** in a court of law that he secretly allowed Mossad
>> demolition experts into the buildings he owned for the purpose of
>> setting demolition charges, one is very much going out on a limb by
>> accusing him of that. I do so myself by even so much as *suggesting*
>> that is what *might* have happened. In fact I risk not so much a
>> libel suit as a knock at the door in the middle of the night and
>> probably only increase my risk of it by saying as much.
>>
>> The Israelis are terrified of the truth about Larry Silverstein's
>> role as a Mossad sayan and his connection with all three, and only
>> those three, buildings which were demolished being openly discussed.
>> Larry Silverstein, president of the Israel Export Development
>> Corporation; an open admission of Zionism and a classic cover for a
>> Mossad agent. Larry Silverstein who was quoted in the Newark NJ Star
>> Ledger only 8 weeks before the atrocities of 9/11 as having said (I
>> paraphrase but accurately) while looking out of his penthouse suite
>> atop WTC7 (which he himself had *built*) at WTC1 and WTC2 that he
>> "would not be overshadowed for long by the Towers". That was the day
>> he got the symbolic key to the Towers. There was a big picture of
>> him, holding this giant golden key (about a yard long), alongside the
>> article. It should still all be there in the Star Ledger archives.
>> Unfortunately I no longer live in NJ so cannot volunteer to go
>> through the microfiche. I might just be able to persuade a friend to
>> get a facsimile for us, although she does live way over on the PA border.
>>
>> I think it distinctly possible that the demolitions were a Mossad
>> plot riding on the back of the airplane hijacking plot, which they
>> could not fail to have known all about, the US gov being both behind
>> the 'hijackings' and full of Pollards and Franklins (not to mention
>> Dov Zakheim!!!). What is the US gov, which engineered the hijackings,
>> going to say about it EVEN IF IT KNOWS? They let the Five Dancing
>> Israelis (i.e. Mossad monitoring team) go in the end, if you recall.
>> Essentially that was the day the USA got the BIG FINGER from Israel,
>> right up its backside, as a warning not to interfere in Palestine.
>> And George W. Bush duly did a u-turn on Palestine that very day, a
>> fact never mentioned by the Israel-friendly mass media.
>>
>> Follow the silences. The things nobody wants to discuss.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> After sending, it occurred to me that even if the Mossad demolition
>> crew theory is correct, Larry Silverstein himself may not have known
>> about the demolition charges and may have thought Mossad was
>> installing only surveillance equipment. However, Peter Meyer pointed
>> out that this would be inconsistent with the notion that the
>> demolition plot was at least in part an insurance scam.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

No comments: