There are 10 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. Fw: It's ALL TRUE! Islam Provoked to Fight too Soon (Like Japan)
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
2. A Dying Breed: Feeble Minded Fools and Dim-Witted Debunkers
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
3. Re-Packaging The 9/11 Fairytale
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
4. Bush Slips Social Security Privatization into 2007 US Budget !!!!
From: ranger116@webtv.net
5. Evidence Suggests Muslim Riots Are Staged Psyop
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
6. Russian General's Comments Need to be Taken With Healthy Dose of Skepticism
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
7. The Post 9/11 Saturation Of Our Culture In Torture
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
8. Donation of Bayer papers to U.S. Holocaust Museum
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
9. Police Found Suspected Bombs In WTC On 9/11
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
10. Bush Plays Terror Card With Bogus LA Attack Plot
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:11:09 -0500
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: Fw: It's ALL TRUE! Islam Provoked to Fight too Soon (Like Japan)
----- Original Message -----
From: Lloyd Miller
To: a-albionic@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 9:48 AM
Subject: [prj] It's ALL TRUE! Islam Provoked to Fight too Soon (Like Japan)
Most analysts see the 3 points-of-view of my previous posts to be
mutually incompatible or contradictory, but they aren't.
Sure, Zionists are probably behind the cartoon scandal with the
intent to both show the primitive nature of Islam (incompatible with
any version of the New World Order) and provoke Islamicists to
violence to justify the Clash of Civilizations (World War IV).
Sure, Islamicists are taking the opportunity to promote Jihad,
traveling to Muslim countries to fan the flames of Jihad.
Sure, the reaction to the cartoons show Islam IS NOT and NEVER HAS
BEEN a religion of peace. It is and always has been a religion
explicitly dedicated to conquest. Other relgions have been so
misused, but military conquest is not essential to their
nature. . . further, other religions have moderated, moving away
from "State Religion" status. . . no so Islam.
Clearly, Islam is being provoked to fight now while the West can
still win. Islam is taking the bait and will be no more within a
decade or so. Some "moderate" "sanitized" version of Islam, of
course, will survive.
Lloyd Miller, Research Director, A-albionic Research
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:55:24 -0500
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: A Dying Breed: Feeble Minded Fools and Dim-Witted Debunkers
A Dying Breed: Feeble Minded Fools and Dim-Witted Debunkers
It's easier to believe what the government says, buy a six pack and fall asleep in front of American Idol
Paul Joseph Watson | January 7 2006
We recently received an e mail which compared us with Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda minister, and called us outright liars for stating that the federal government was involved in gun confiscation in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina.
In response to that misguided individual, we took this opportunity to open out an analysis of the nature of denial and why people still cling in fear to the establishment dictated version of reality.
The e mail was originally sent to the Stop the Lie website and reads as follows.
I see that your motto is "Stop the Lie." You post an article that implies the Federal government was responsible for gun confiscations in New Orleans during the Katrina disaster. However, it was the New Orleans Superintendent and the Deputy Chief of Police who gave that order. It was carried out by New Orleans police, those that didn't abandon the city, and the National Guard, from Oklahoma, not Federal troops. It was a Federal judge who issued a temporary injunction to stop the gun confiscations.
But who brought this urban legend to you? Weren't Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson the "investigative journalists" who claimed that a 4-star general was sacked for upsetting Bush's plans for staging a nuclear attack on the US in order to declare war on Iran? This is in addition to their claims that both the Oklahoma City bombing and 911 were US government operations. Didn't they also claim that the Reagan assassination attempt was also a Bush family endeavor? And aren't they also claiming that vaccines are being contaminated with mercury by the government?
I think you guys would make Joseph Goebbels proud. Maybe it time you look at yourselves and determine if your cause is so critical that is justifies lying. Perhaps it is time for you to Stop the Lies.
If this individual had bothered to read Alex Jones' article on the New Orleans gun confiscation he would have read the following.
"The federal government has been chomping at the bit for decades to disarm the American people, and now an amalgamation of state and local police led by the BATF are having their deepest desire fulfilled in New Orleans."
The BATF Federal Stormtroopers led the gun confiscation and made arrests. The BATF made the very first gun confiscations and arrests of those accused of shooting at rescue helicopter and army volunteers, though the rationale for doing so was later brought into question when the LA Times reported that innocent people were shot at.
New Orleans was declared a federal city two weeks after the hurricane hit. Quoting from the GovExec website,
"Two weeks after Hurricane Katrina unleashed her wrath, causing immense devastation and killing an as-yet-uncounted number of people, New Orleans has become, for all intents and purposes, a federal city.
A metropolis that once bustled with busy residents and tourists who partied on Bourbon Street is now occupied by U.S. military forces and a dozen federal agencies working side by side, street by street, with state and local authorities. It seems that every agency wants a piece of this action."
New Orleans was a giant benchmark for how all natural disasters will be dealt with in future.
FEMA and the federal government deliberately sabotaged relief efforts in order to deepen the crisis, including blocking water and fuel supplies.
FEMA cut communication lines in one parish, causing Sheriff Harry Lee to reconnect the lines and place armed guards around them to thwart FEMA.
The federal government deliberately hampered relief and recovery efforts in order to provide the justification for Americans to accept gun confiscation and foreign troops on US soil.
Our debunker friend is completely wrong to suggest that federal forces were not involved in New Orleans gun confiscation.
Furthermore, does it even matter whether it is regular police or federal agents taking your guns? Isn't the fact that they're taking your guns period something to be concerned about?
We have to remember that such sentiments are held by a dwindling minority, a dying breed who are still ruled by fear. Out of a thousand e mails we will only receive one that calls us liars. Contrast that to five years ago and it's obvious that the era of manifest enlightenment is truly upon us.
The author claims Mercury in vaccines is a conspiracy theory.
He evidently doesn't know how to do a Google search.
The CDC itself admits it puts Mercury in vaccines. Here's a television news report telling us how great it is. Is this a conspiracy theory?
If we report that the sun came up this morning then it becomes a conspiracy theory. The unparalleled ineptness of the debunkers is quite pathetic to behold and their maladroit arguments wouldn't stand up in a debate with a three-year-old child.
Many of these feeble minded individuals cite Snopes.com as if it was some kind of bible. When Snopes says something is an urban legend they are above reproach and have the monopoly on truth.
The fact is that Snopes.com is run by two individuals who are attempting to cover every topic under the sun and verify the merits of each in turn.
Consequently, there are holes in their 'explanations' that you could fly a 747 through.
Well, Snopes.com says it's an urban legend so they must be right!
Bill Clinton also said "I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
Just because somebody says it does not make it so.
A great deal of this mentality stems from laziness. It's much easier to swallow the government's version of events, buy a six pack and fall asleep in front of American Idol. Taking time to actually question something, use your own discernment and come to a conclusion takes time and energy, which is better spent in their estimation watching 24 or Threat Matrix.
Joe Six Pack also highlights the Bush connection to John W. Hinckley Jnr., Reagan's would be assassin, as being another one of our fantasies.
Is it a fantasy that the Associated Press reported on March 31st 1981 that the Hinckley family were scheduled to have dinner with the Bush family?
Is this another urban legend?
On the subject of 9/11, anyone who still believes that the attack was perpetrated by nineteen 'fundamental jihadists hell bent on destroying America' who, the night before the grandest terror attack of all time, were getting shitfaced drunk in a tit bar, at the behest of a dying man spending his time equally between being on a kidney dialysis machine and in a cave, would have been sorely disappointed recently when Santa Claus didn't drop down their chimney and leave bundles of gifts.
Anyone who still believes the 'official' fairytale of 9/11, a yarn that we are told vaporized the bodies of two thirds of the victims yet produced photo ID's within hours at two of the different crash sites identifying the hijackers, would do well to remove their baby teeth from under the pillow.
The lies promulgated about 9/11 are so legion that the deceivers are starting to trip over their own twisted tongues. Larry Silverstein claims his "pull it" comment meant to evacuate firefighters from WTC Building 7 and yet Popular Mechanics' own 9/11 debunking special stated that there were no firefighters in the building whatsoever.
The tooth fairy doesn't exist. It's time to grow up and face reality. We have a government criminally hell bent on destroying America, a government that openly and brazenly lied a country into a war that cost the lives of thousands of US soldiers and countless hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis, 'liberated' out of their very existence.
Judging from recent history alone, we should automatically disbelieve anything government tells us and let them do the work to prove otherwise. Their track record on telling the truth would put a used car salesman to shame.
The catalyst of the blossoming rise of the alternative media was the fact that the mainstream media deliberately engaged in spin and deception by regurgitating state mantra as gospel. This became abundantly clear and people started to search for sources of information that at least tried to tell the truth.
This has bolstered our credibility and the catcalls of the cynics who bleat and scream about the Internet being poisoned by tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists fall on deaf ears. Their time has passed and the baying crowds that once lapped up their incessant drivel have all but dispersed.
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:28:22 -0500
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re-Packaging The 9/11 Fairytale
Re-Packaging The 9/11 Fairytale
Hollywood gears up in 2006 to bolster the crumbling official state approved paradigm
Paul Joseph Watson | January 13 2006
The official 9/11 story has about as much basis in fact as Humpty Dumpty.
And just like Humpty Dumpty, all the king's horses and all the king's men certainly can't put the official story of 9/11 back together again. It's a yarn that has already been decimated by the alternative media time and time again.
It's a fairytale that a 5 year-old could decipher. Based on paper passports floating out of exploding planes surviving intact when a third of the bodies were totally vaporized and the buildings were turned into dust.
Based on the fairytale that jet fuel is hot enough to take down steel buildings.
Based on the fairytale that fire damage can cause steel buildings, including ones not hit by planes, to collapse for the first and only time in history, while any other building, if its not owned by Mr. Silverstein, miraculously survives with just a few scapes.
The fallacy of the orthodox fairytale is why the establishment, through its avenues of propaganda, needs to constantly re-apply band aids to keep people from seeing the awful truth.
So whereas as the alternative media can shatter an illusion instantly and permanently in the mind of the individual, the establishment has to keep re-applying the propaganda to keep the sheep in line and prevent doubt from creeping in.
Which is clearly why we are about to see a rash of 9/11 movies which reinforce the official version of events.
Consider the very first made for TV movie about 9/11, called DC 9/11. A film which portrays president Bush on Air Force one on 9/11, exclaiming his frustration in not being able to have a fist fight with Osama bin Laden.
Now contrast that to the actual demeanour of Bush on the day of 9/11, doe eyed, unsure, taking the decision to read an upside down book about a pet goat for half an hour after he's told about the biggest attack on America since Pearl Harbor.
It's pro-war, pro-government pro official version of 9/11 down to a tee.
And who wrote and produced the film? Lionel Chetwynd, a big establishment neo-con and government apologist, perhaps the most politically connected producer in the world today.
Chetwynd privately met with George Bush, Karl Rove and a bunch of top Republicans to have them vet the script before he shot the film.
This is the same Lionel Chetwynd who jabbed his finger at Alex Jones and barked "we're going to get you," in the bathroom before a taping of TNN's Conspiracy Zone show that they both featured on as guests.
So the very first movie about 9/11 is made by a high level Bush administration stooge. And the film wholeheartedly backs up lock step the official version of events.
The movie that's getting the most attention in the press at the moment is called 'Flight 93' - no prizes for guessing what it's about. It is due to be released in the spring and is directed by Paul Greengrass. Click here to see the trailer.
There's no evidence to suggest the director is anywhere near as odious as Linonel Chetwynd but still the consequence of the movie remains the same.
It reinforces the "let's roll" myth of Flight 93 and pushes aside the fact that experienced pilots on the ground saw that the plane was shot down with their own eyes.
It ignores the fact that we have an 8 mile wide debris field for a plane that we are led to believe was fully intact in the seconds before it hit the ground.
We've had contact with credible individuals who have personally talked with the pilots who shot the plane down.
Flight 93 is replete with its cast of hijackers, again sidestepping the difficult fact that several of these hijackers later turned up alive and that they could barely even get puddle jumping cessnas off the ground, never mind execute moves that crack fighter pilots couldn't pull off, as was the case at the Pentagon.
One of the major human flaws that these social engineers play on is laziness. If somebody entertains the notion of an alternative truth behind 9/11, then they start to ask questions about other things, which means making a conscious effort to inform yourself, a lot of people just don't want to make the effort.
Easier therefore to swallow the version of events as spoon fed to you by the government and the media, and in this case Hollywood, so that will again only reinforce that mindset.
Just look at the basic science of watching television or movies itself.
Decades old psychological studies confirm that when you're watching television the higher brain regions (like the midbrain and the neo-cortex) are shut down, and most activity shifts to the lower brain regions. These lower brain regions cannot distinguish reality from fabricated images (a task performed by the neo-cortex), so they react to television content as though it were real.
And if you've ever tried to communicate with someone while their eyes are transfixed on a TV you know how difficult it is, that's the lower brain in action.
The inability to differentiate fact from fiction is only going to add another layer of believeability on top of these 9/11 movies, and leave people wth the impression as they're walking away from the theatre that they've actually seen a documentary and not a fictional movie which is based on a totally fabricated version of events.
9/11 related movies are going to be huge and there are several already in the can and set to hit the big screen in 2006. As the watchdogs of coercive manipulation and cultural steam valves of state worshipping propaganda, we the alternative media need to step up our efforts to ensure that the 9/11 truth movement remains fresh, catalystic and fertile.
-----------------------------
Related: Hollywood, Iraq and 9/11: Reinforcing the Party Line
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 04:21:13 -0500
From: ranger116@webtv.net
Subject: Bush Slips Social Security Privatization into 2007 US Budget !!!!
Bush Slips Social Security Privatization into 2007 US Budget !!!!
Subject: Sleight of Hand... Shrub attempts again to pull a fast one on
Congress and the American People
Here's one uncovered by Allan Sloan at Newsweek... after Shrub's
proposed turning of the Social Security safety net into a Wall Street
crapshoot (which went over like a lead balloon, and for good reasons),
Shrub snuck it into his 2400+ page budget proposal anyhow...
squandering an apparently 'spare' 715 BILLION dollars on a miserable and
unwanted program when we're already trillions of dollars in hock to
Communist China... and apparently hoping that nobody would notice until
it was a 'done deal" (just as so often happens with huge omnibus bills
sent to Congress).
[quote]
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11235990/site/newsweek/
Sleight of Hand
Bush buried detailed Social Security privatization proposals in his
budget. Can the surprise move jump-start bipartisan reform?
By Allan Sloan
Updated: 12:09 p.m. ET Feb. 8, 2006
Feb. 8, 2006 - If you read enough numbers, you never know what you'll
find. Take President Bush and private Social Security accounts.
Last year, even though Bush talked endlessly about the supposed joys
of private accounts, he never proposed a specific plan to Congress and
never put privatization costs in the budget. But this year, with no
fanfare whatsoever, Bush stuck a big Social Security privatization plan
in the federal budget proposal, which he sent to Congress on Monday.
His plan would let people set up private accounts starting in 2010
and would divert more than $700 billion of Social Security tax revenues
to pay for them over the first seven years.
If this comes as a surprise to you, have no fear. You're not alone.
Bush didn't pitch private Social Security accounts in his State of the
Union Message last week.
First, he drew a mocking standing ovation from Democrats by saying
that "Congress did not act last year on my proposal to save Social
Security," even though, as I said, he'd never submitted specific
legislation.
Then he seemed to be kicking the Social Security problem a few years
down the road in typical Washington fashion when he asked Congress "to
join me in creating a commission to examine the full impact of baby-boom
retirements on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid," adding that the
commission would be bipartisan "and offer bipartisan solutions."
But anyone who thought that Bush would wait for bipartisanship to
deal with Social Security was wrong. Instead, he stuck his own
privatization proposals into his proposed budget.
"The Democrats were laughing all the way to the funeral of Social
Security modernization," White House spokesman Trent Duffy told me in an
interview Tuesday, but "the president still cares deeply about this."
Duffy asserted that Bush would have been remiss not to
include in the budget the cost of something that he feels so strongly
about, and he seemed surprised at my surprise that Social Security
privatization had been written into the budget without any advance
fanfare.
Duffy said privatization costs were included in the midyear budget
update that the Office of Management and Budget released last July 30,
so it was logical for them to be in the 2007 budget proposals. But I
sure didn't see this coming—and I wonder how many people outside of
the White House did.
Nevertheless, it's here. Unlike Bush's generalized privatization talk
of last year, we're now talking detailed numbers. On page 321 of the
budget proposal, you see the privatization costs: $24.182 billion in
fiscal 2010, $57.429 billion in fiscal 2011 and another $630.533 billion
for the five years after that, for a seven-year total of $712.144
billion.
In the first year of private accounts, people would be allowed to
divert up to 4 percent of their wages covered by Social Security into
what Bush called "voluntary private accounts." The maximum contribution
to such accounts would start at $1,100 annually and rise by $100 a year
through 2016.
It's not clear how big a reduction in the basic benefit Social
Security recipients would have to take in return for being able to set
up these accounts, or precisely how the accounts would work.
Bush also wants to change the way Social Security benefits are
calculated for most people by adopting so-called progressive indexing.
Lower-income people would continue to have their Social Security
benefits tied to wages, but the benefits paid to higher-paid people
would be tied to inflation.
Wages have typically risen 1.1 percent a year more than inflation,
so over time, that disparity would give lower-paid and higher-paid
people essentially the same benefit. However, higher-paid workers would
be paying substantially more into the system than lower-paid people
would.
This means that although progressive indexing is an attractive idea
from a social-justice point of view, it would reduce Social Security's
political support by making it seem more like welfare than an earned
benefit.
Bush is right, of course, when he says in his budget proposal that
Social Security in its current form is unsustainable. But there are
plenty of ways to fix it besides offering private accounts as a
substitute for part of the basic benefit.
Bush's 2001 Social Security commission had members of both parties, but
they had to agree in advance to support private accounts. Their report,
which had some interesting ideas, went essentially nowhere.
What remains to be seen is whether this time around Bush follows
through on forming a bipartisan commission and whether he can get
credible Democrats to join it. Dropping numbers onto your opponents is a
great way to stick your finger in their eye. But will it get the Social
Security job done? That, my friends, is a whole other story.
Sloan is NEWSWEEK's Wall Street editor. His e-mail is sloan@panix.com.
[end quote]
Gordon Peterson
http://personal.terabites.com/ 1977-2002 Twenty-fifth anniversary year
of Local Area Networking! Support free and fair US elections!
http://stickers.defend-democracy.org 12/19/98: Partisan Republicans
scornfully ignore the voters they "represent". 12/09/00: the date the
Republican Party took down democracy in America.
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:48:20 -0500
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: Evidence Suggests Muslim Riots Are Staged Psyop
New Evidence Suggests Muslim Riots Are Staged Psyop
As news breaks of four more demonstrators being shot dead in Kabul, fresh evidence has surfaced lending credibility to the assertion that the Muslim riots are a staged psyop or at the very least based on false pretenses.
Yesterday leading Russian MP Vladimir Zhirinovsky said that the riots were a manufactured psychological operation on the part of the US in an attempt to enlist hardened EU support for a military strike against Iran.
As first highlighted by this website and others, more evidence has come to light that confirms fake and misleading caricatures were bundled in with the more tame cartoons that were printed in Danish newspapers. Muslims were misled into believing that all the images were printed in newspapers when they were not.
World Net Daily reports,
"One of three especially inflammatory but undocumented Muhammad images distributed by a Danish imam as an example of an "anti-Muslim environment" in the European country turns out to be a poorly reproduced copy of an Associated Press photo taken at a French pig-squealing contest."
"The weblog NeanderNews pointed out the image used by Imam Ahmad Abu Laban was a faxed copy of AP's Aug. 15 photo of Jacques Barrot competing at the annual French Pig-Squealing Championships in Trie-sur-Baise."
Another two images which were erroneously added to the caricatures that were actually carried by the newspapers depict Muhammad as a pedophile demon and a dog raping a praying Muslim.
Were the misleading images intended to add fuel to the fire? Many have pointed out that depictions of Muhammad appear universally throughout the world. A stone sculpture in the US depicting Muhammad has been in place since the 1930's. An Australian newspaper piece lists depictions of Muhammad, both flattering and insulting that appear regularly in the West and beyond.
"From Ottoman religious icons to market stalls in Iran, from the US Supreme Court building to the South Park cartoon, Mohammed has been frequently portrayed in flattering and unflattering lights."
Many painters, including William Blake, Gustave Dore, Auguste Rodin and Salvador Dali, have depicted Mohammed in illustrations of Dante's Inferno, where the Muslim prophet ends up in hell with his entrails hanging out."
Why the outrage now? And why were more degrading images that were not even printed thrown into the mix?
The US government is no stranger to using falsely attributed paraphernalia to fan the flames of racial tension. During the Vietnam era civil rights struggle, the FBI mass mailed coloring books that were attributed to the Black Panthers. The books portrayed white people as pigs and encouraged blacks to violently attack and kill them. Primarily mailed to white neighborhoods, the books had the effect of turning middle class sentiment against the black rights movement and leading to support of enhanced authoritarian crackdown.
The feasibility of demonstrators in Gaza having immediate access to a plethora of pristine Danish flags as soon as the furore began has also been put under scrutiny.
A CNN International news anchor reported that the United Nations had foreknowledge that protests in Beirut were going to erupt on Sunday.
"ANTHONY MILLS, CNN INTERNATIONAL: My understanding is, as well, that UN sources were reporting this morning that this was going to be a chaotic day, if you will... Or, certainly they were reporting --they were suggesting -- their workers shouldn't go to work today."
So, indications in advance, I think, probably that something was going to happen here, that some form or sort of violent protest might erupt."
As we reported on Monday, images of Muslims with signs that read "freedom go to hell" and "Europe, take some lessons from from 9/11" are playing right into the hands of the Globalists by enabling them to hold up examples of how the Muslims are dangerous barbarians who wish to take away our liberties and need to be dealt with.
Violent Muslim demonstrators should be aware that they are sowing the seeds of their own destruction by allowing the media to portray them as freedom hating, brutal and out of control. This ensures increased support for future wars that primarily target Muslim and Persian majority countries.
The seemingly artificial origins of the protests betray the true agenda behind the very real chaos that we now see engulfing the Middle East and Europe.
~~~
Muslim Riots Aid Neo-Con Global Agenda
"Clash of Civilizations" Advanced by Naive and Controlled Groups
The riots that are currently sweeping across Europe and the Middle East in response to caricatures of Mohammed that were originally printed in Danish newspapers are staged managed and are helping the Neo-Cons advance the "clash of civilizations" that they need to impose world order and imperial hegemony.
Images of Muslims with signs that read "freedom go to hell" and "Europe, take some lessons from from 9/11" are playing right into the hands of the Globalists by enabling them to hold up examples of how the Muslims are dangerous barbarians who wish to take away our liberties and need to be dealt with.
The elite is encouraging and fostering the spread of Islamofascism throughout Europe by allowing mass immigration in increasing levels year after year. It is in their interests to create a balkanized melting pot so they can use divide and conquer tactics to enslave all races under a centralized new world order.
The elite want us to be at each others throats while they dominate over the downtrodden and befuddled warring tribes. Race is the ultimate touchstone hot button issue and the Globalists have enacted policies of rampant uncontrolled immigration in order to force hostile cultures to intermingle. The outcome is always tribal warfare, as we saw in Bosnia and Kosovo.
The right of newspapers to publish these caricatures is unwavering and freedom of speech takes precedence over everything else. Violent Muslim demonstrators should be aware that they are sowing the seeds of their own destruction by allowing the media to portray them as freedom hating, brutal and out of control. This ensures increased support for future wars that primarily target Muslim and Persian majority countries.
During collection of material that is posted on this website, we regularly scan political cartoon and artwork archives such as Daryl Cagle's Professional Cartoonists Index. This is an archive for cartoons that appear in US newspapers nationwide on a daily basis. On numerous occasions over the past five years we have seen cartoons and caricatures that depict Mohammed. Why the sudden outrage now?
As Kurt Nimmo points out, the three most offensive cartoons that caused the outrage were not even printed in the Danish Jyllands-Posten newspaper but were added in and handed out by Danish imams who "circulated the images to brethren in Muslim countries," according to the London Telegraph.
It also appears highly suspicious that Muslims in Gaza City and other places had gained access to a plentiful supply of Danish flags to burn in front of the waiting world media as soon as the controversy broke out.
We have tirelessly documented previous cases where Muslim clerics and leaders were proven to be acting on behalf of Western intelligence agencies. Early indications strongly suggest that the original riots that led to worldwide demonstrations were staged managed.
Last November's French riots were used to advance a similar agenda that we see unraveling today.
The melting pot of multiculturalism does not work, it has never worked and it was never intended to work. The Algerians in France do not want to be part of the Western fabric because they fundamentally hate it to its very core. This is not helped by promotion of decadent and hedonistic lifestyles pumped out from every cultural and media orifice.
A sizeable proportion of the secular humanist Westerners who like to think of themselves as part of the establishment, when in reality they are unwitting tools of the true elite, have bought into the cuddly utopian philosophy that the West is a global village which welcomes all comers and has the enlightened innate ability to homogenize millions of different people of all different colors and creeds into one giant melting pot.
The reality couldn't be further from the truth and images of flaming buses, schools, nurseries, terror and panic betrayed that fact in France last November.
Establishment controlled Mexican groups such as Aztlan and Mecha advocate killing all whites and blacks and driving them out of the southern states by means of brutal ethnic cleansing. Flags and placards carried at marches depict white people having their heads cut off, as seen in the picture below.
Those that protest such groups are then attacked by the establishment media and labeled as racists, despite the fact that the Plan of San Diego, a rallying cry for the Hispanic Klan groups, advocates total eradication of any race but Hispanics.
Mecha's own slogan reads, "For the race everything. For those outside the race, nothing."
Again, this racial warfare only benefits a smug elite who are content to sit back and watch all the chaos unfold, leaving a terrified middle class to beg for a choking police state to be instituted as the only solution to the problem, a problem manufactured by elite control of so-called minority groups in the first place.
Violent Muslim demonstrators need to take a step back and consider what is important in the long term. The ability of western media to exercise freedom of speech and print cartoons, or unwittingly greasing the skids for a giant engineered backlash against the Muslim world that will see all Muslim nations subjugated and dominated under a tyrannical world government, along with every other race, color and creed.
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:31:26 -0500
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: Russian General's Comments Need to be Taken With Healthy Dose of Skepticism
Russian General's Comments Need to be Taken With Healthy Dose of Skepticism
Paul Joseph Watson | January 25 2006
General Leonid Ivashov, Russia's armed forces Chief of Staff when 9/11 occurred, recently went public with astounding comments concerning the destruction of the World Trade Center and the war on terrorism.
Ivashov made clear his conviction that the entire war is a manufactured ruse and that 9/11 was an inside job carried out by the new world elite, who he calls 'the Atlantists', designed to light the touch paper for a global government and the elimination of sovereign borders.
On the face of it this is another highly credible whistleblower and one who would be in a position to know exactly what he's talking about.
Ivashov goes in depth about the modern face of terrorism and its symbiosis with how the media report it. This is key because an act only becomes terrorism if it's defined as that by the media. If we can define killing innocent people in the pursuit of a political agenda as terrorism then what do you call slaughtering innocent people in their own homes in recent US government orchestrated bombing raids in Pakistan and Iraq?
Ivashov elaborates on the fact that the secret service and intelligence elements of any major power always control the high echelons of any extremist movement.
From Operation Gladio, to the Neo-Nazis in Germany, to the London bombing mastermind Aswat being an MI6 asset, to Israel's creation of Hamas. This pattern has been consistently proven.
However, Ivashov's solutions to the problem of worldwide engineered chaos are ambiguous and their wording should raise alarm bells for those who understand the long term agenda of the Illuminati.
As his solution to global dictatorship, Ivashov encourages the creation of a pseudo-world government, run under UN auspices.
In essence he is offering a Hobson's choice, a left-wing world government to counter the advance of the right-wing world government. The end result is the same, a world government which is unelected and not representative of the people of any sovereign nation.
Then the General states his desire to, "associate (under the United Nations) the scientific elites in the design and promotion of the philosophical concepts of the Human Being of the 21st Century."
That reads like secular humanism and it wouldn't be out of place in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. So without the luxury of the general going into any further depth on this, at face value what he is proposing appears to be something quite distasteful.
Ivashov then outlines his wish to, "organize the interaction of all religious denominations in the world, on behalf of the stability of humanity's development, security and mutual support."
Again, this is too ambiguous not to rule out the possibility that he's advocating a global religion as the savior of mankind, which again is another mechanism whereby power could be centralized under a world government that is completely unelected and not representative of the people.
Does he just mean religious figureheads getting together and talking? We know that when powerful people have get togethers, they set policy. They don't waste each other's time by partaking in talking shops.
In the absence of further clarification, a certain healthy dose of skepticism needs to be afforded to the General's comments. If Ivashov's solutions are just a mirror image of the problems he clarifies, then with how much credibility should he be bestowed?
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:46:34 -0500
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: The Post 9/11 Saturation Of Our Culture In Torture
The Post 9/11 Saturation Of Our Culture In Torture
Torture Doublethink At All Time High
So much torture, bloodshed, deceit. You cannot make your young people practice torture twenty-four hours a day and not expect to pay a price for it.
Jean Paul-Sartre
Hundreds of stories and reports are now emerging everyday concerning renditioning, secret prisons, camps on foreign soil and fresh detainee abuse. Such reports are continually framed by endless "debates" in the media of when is the right time to use torture and who do we use it on? Add all this to the TV dramas that depict torture as necessary and the government hanging sword that is the "terrorist threat", and it is clear to see that our culture has become saturated in torture.
The fact that we are even having to face the question of whether torture is a consideration of any modern civilized State is mind-blowing in itself. Even the most heinous of bloodthirsty empires throughout history have dismissed the use of and even outlawed torture.
According to an AP poll released today, most Americans and a majority of people in Britain, France and South Korea say torturing terrorism suspects is justified at least in rare instances. Almost two-thirds in the United States support such interrogations in the U.S. by their own government. Unbelievable.
The attitude of "if it saves lives any measures of interrogation should be permissible" is fundamentally flawed. Under torture a person will say anything he thinks his captors want to hear, whether it is true or false, if he believes it will relieve his suffering. Torture never produces reliable results, it only creates false leads and implicates the wrong people. Furthermore, and this perhaps the most critical and bone chillingly dangerous point, torture is the MOST degrading, demoralizing, hideous thing one human being can do to another. Almost two-thirds in the United States support such interrogations in the U.S. by their own government. Unbelievable.
There is a coordinated, outlined agenda underway at the hands of the globalist crazy Neo-Cons to redefine the meaning of torture for a "post 9/11 world" and make it commonplace within our culture. Torture has always existed since the dawn of time, yet no authority throughout the history of the planet has ever openly admitted to its practice - until now. Not even the Nazis had the gall to go as far as the Neo-Cons have.
Manfred Nowak, the U.N.'s Special Rapporteur on Torture has said that
"Now we have for the first time both an academic and a political debate saying 'We are living under new conditions. Sept. 11 has changed the rules of the game and that's why we have to rethink the absolute prohibition on torture.'"
The Orwellian Newspeak emanating from the globalist Neocons is literally redefining and undermining the entire ethical beliefs system of the Western world. Washington says the Geneva Convention does not apply to foreign captives in its "war on terrorism" because they are "enemy combatants". Human rights activists say the US is still bound by the 1984 U.N. "Convention against Torture," to which it is a signatory. Yet the Neocons say they are not torturing, preferring to refer to a practice of "torture lite" or "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques". And so round and round the false debate goes on whilst the agenda sinks into the cultural mindset.
Amid the furor of the rendition issue, the weekend saw the release of the "CIA Guide to torture" which revealed several techniques employed by officials.
The most severe of such Enhanced Interrogation techniques is known as "water boarding", whereby a prisoner is bound to a board, feet raised and head slightly below the feet, ABC said. Cellophane is wrapped over the prisoner's face and water is poured over him, inducing a feeling of drowning.
"The cellophane is a modern addition to a technique that had its origins in the Spanish Inquisition," said Tom Malinowski of Human Rights Watch, adding that the State Department itself defines the technique as torture.
Not only is this another admission of torture, it contains another admission that the CIA under globalist control is torturing people TO DEATH as it was revealed that more detainees in Afghanistan and Iraq have died because "inexperienced officers miscalculated the time detainees could endure under the treatment."
According to Human Rights First, the U.S. Government has acknowledged 28 confirmed or suspected homicides of detainees in U.S. custody. Only one of these homicides occurred at Abu Ghraib. The Government admits 108 People Have Died in U.S. Custody. 63 of the 108 detainee deaths occurred at locations other than Abu Ghraib. Many stories of torture, leading to death have also emerged from Guantanamo Bay.
Think about that for a minute, the government is openly killing people. TORTURING PEOPLE TO DEATH.
The LA Times reported that no leaders of Al-Qaeda were found at Guantanamo Bay. Most of them were shoemakers, farmers who had never even heard of America and people who were given guns by the Taliban and shoved onto the front lines.
The official army report on Abu Ghraib said that between seventy five and ninety percent of prisoners were totally innocent and just hadn't had their papers in order. The Former General there, Janis Karpinski, confirmed this in a recent interview on the Alex Jones show:
"That's correct and I believe that it remains so today because they are still doing these raids, these round ups where they will go out and target an individual, and whoever happens to be around that individual, they bring them all in. And then there is no avenue to release them, once they are tagged as security detainees, they fall into this relatively new and unsupervised category."
Karpinski also revealed that the torture has continued, long after the scandal broke.
Human Rights First has also voiced deep concern over the amount of other secret detention centres all over the world in which torture is very much operational and continuing full speed ahead.
And as if this wasn't enough, the renditioning issue, which we have been reporting on for around two years now, has broken into the mainstream and is much larger operation than at first thought.
Over 300 flights operated by US intelligence agency CIA that we know of have landed at European airports, whilst revelations of camps in eastern Europe have come to light.
Specially designated torture planes transport nameless victims of the faux 'war on terror' between different third world dictatorships for their security services to work the cattle prod magic on poor bewildered goat herders and shoemakers.
Meanwhile, the real Al-Qaeda or Al-CIAda miraculously escape from maximum security prisons.
Condoleeza Rice has indicated that these camps are not even secret, and that they operate with the full cooperation of elements of the respective Sovereign Governments in the different countries they are located. Once again this is all out in the open. Rice does not deny rendition flights are taking place, she simply denies they are secret. Furthermore Rice is adamant that the detainees are not being moved to be tortured. This is in some bizarre and twisted way true because the Administration is redefining the meaning of torture.
When Donald Rumsfeld was asked about the force feeding of detainees at Guantanamo Bay recently, a brutal practice that involves inserting tubes as wide as fingers directly through stomachs and nostrils without any anesthetic as prisoners convulse and vomit blood, Rummy replied, "I'm not a doctor."
Rumsfeld didn't deny that this torture was taking place, he simply claimed ignorance of the exact nature of the procedure. The Administration is twisting and contorting what torture actually is, just as they did with preemptive war and preventive war, just as they do with everything. If something does not fit the agenda, the attitude is not to alter the agenda to work around it, but rather to alter the real meaning of something to fit it into the agenda.
Condoleeza Rice this week asked the world to "trust her" on the issue of torture. This is a woman who said that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction capable of producing a "mushroom cloud" over an American city. A woman who said Saddam Hussein sheltered al Qaeda terrorists in Baghdad and helped train some in chemical weapons development.
By not denying anything Rice is as good as admitting it.
"The Bush administration has made it abundantly clear that it believes, with no apologies, that the ends justify the means. Lying is simply a means to an end. What Condi Rice is telling Europeans is "pay no attention to our lies; just accept that we are liars for a good and proper cause." Says Paul Craig Roberts, former US Secretary of the Treasury and Wall St. Journal editor.
When directly questioned by MPs on the CIA flights this week, British Prime Minister Tony Blair said he has accepted US assurances and the practice of transporting terror suspects for questioning in foreign countries is a long-standing U-S policy. If Tony Blair knows this to be the case, and he knew British airports were being used for stop offs, then why is the British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw writing to Condoleeza Rice demanding to know what is going on with these flights? These two actions do not add up. The reality may be that Tony Blair's authority has been overruled by his elite higher ups whilst Straw is acting under pressure as he is directly under the spotlight of all European Foreign Offices with Britain currently chairing the EU presidency. Blatent covert activity is influencing the actions of politicians at the highest levels.
So we should trust the Administration over the renditioning then. OK, what about the admitted botch job involving the innocent German citizen Khaled al-Masri who was grabbed whilst on vacation in Europe, shipped away on the rendition plane and shoved into a cell in Afghanistan and tortured for five months?
Or what about Mamdouh Habib, an innocent Australian citizen, a former cafe owner who was grabbed and moved between Egypt, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay until his release at the beginning of 2005? Habib told the BBC he was "brain-washed, beaten and given electric shocks." "I just repeated what they wanted me to say," he admitted.
There are countless other stories of torture from Guantanamo Bay, where the military intend to build court and execution chambers, once they are done torturing detainees.
Our culture is now saturated with the torture agenda, it is everywhere and it is dangerously sinking into reality. Scott McClellan tells us that the Bush administration is unequivocally against torture under any circumstances and yet it is Bush and his handler Dick Cheney, the Vice President for torture, publicly blocking the legislation that would outlaw torture.
Former CIA chiefs, military Commanders and Generals and Government officials have asserted that the government is now in the hands of torturing psychopaths.
In the meantime, the most popular talk show host in America calls Gitmo a holiday home and says that the Abu Ghraib prison guards were "just blowing off some steam" when they raped children and beat detainees to death. The BBC's Flagship radio news program also backs torture by the CIA and MSNBC like to debate torturing children.
24, Threat Matrix, and the British drama Spooks, which is a drama about the British MI5, feature plots in which the use of torture is advocated as a morally just measure.
When the evidence for the Iraq war was revealed as LIES, the back up was to claim the removal of Saddam alone was worthy justification. This was because he was a brutal torturer and that is unacceptable. Yet we now have the same group who told us torture is bad, telling us it is OK when they do it. In what way can torture be unacceptable in one instance and acceptable in another?
Torture is torture, it involves inflicting severe pain and distress, and in some cases killing people. No rational thinking person could ever think that is acceptable, especially when in use by a group that claims its aim is to spread freedom throughout the world.
The Doublethink that people are engaging in here is vast and out of hand. All over the US and Europe people are advocating torture. Almost two-thirds in the United States support the use of torture on a suspect by their own government IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY.
There is a deliberate agenda at hand to reflect an image of America to the world as a corrupt, evil, deceiving, hypocritical and brutal power. The Bush administration is being played like a fiddle and as each horror story scandal emerges, America sinks further into the waiting jaws of its 'savior' - the dark stalker of global government.
We can only attempt to fight against this agenda by exposing the deceit, lies and downright incredulity of those who are pushing it. The enslavement of the minds of the American and European people and the attempt to make them think in the same way these crazies do is hideous and we will continue to expose their agenda until we defeat it or are wiped out in the effort of defeating it.
You can chain me, you can torture me, you can even destroy this body, but you will never imprison my mind.
Mohandas Gandhi
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:58:30 -0500
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: Donation of Bayer papers to U.S. Holocaust Museum
The Jewish Chronicle of Pittsburgh, January 04, 2006
Rosenberg gives Bayer papers to U.S. Holocaust Museum
A 13-year effort by a Pittsburgh man, and a committee that worked with him, to show Bayer AG's culpability in the Holocaust produced a collection of minutes, notes, transcripts, videotapes and photos that scholars everywhere may now study. Bayer AG is a German corporation whose American operations are based in Pittsburgh.
David Rosenberg of Pittsburgh, who chaired the Committee for Appropriate Acknowledgment, recently donated those records - enough to fill 11 boxes - to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM) AG in Washington, D.C.
Rosenberg signed the deed of gift agreement on Dec. 16, which formally donates the collection to the museum and grants it permission to make the papers available for study. "They're available now (for study)," said USHMM Archivist Rebecca Erbelding. "It's a pretty quick turn-around."
Rosenberg, an archivist at the Archives Service Center of the University of Pittsburgh, said he had been looking into Bayer's role for years on his own with support from his friends. The committee itself began work in 1998 as a response to contributions the Bayer Foundation made to local Jewish organizations, including the Holocaust Center of the United Jewish Federation and the Jewish Community Center's capital campaign.
Between 1990 and 2003, working in Pittsburgh, Rosenberg, and later the six-member committee, researched and documented Bayer AG's corporate culpability during the Holocaust and pushed for its acknowledgment and atonement.
Bayer was part of I.G. Farben during the Holocaust. Farben used slave labor from Auschwitz to build a factory there that was intended to produce artificial rubber. Farben also had a hand in production of Zyklon B, the gas used to systematically murder Jews and other peoples in the gas chambers. Farben also used forced labor at its Leverkuesen plant near Cologne, Rosenberg said. Today, Leverkusen is the corporate headquarters for Bayer, AG.
Rosenberg's effort produced resolutions by the Greater Pittsburgh Rabbinic Association in 1990 and 1991 recommending that references to Bayer's role in the Holocaust be included if and when Bayer made donatons to the Jewish community.
Bayer USA President and CEO Helge Wehmeier made a dramatic, but personal, apology to Elie Wiesel on Dec. 13, 1995, before the Nobel laureate and Holocaust survivor lectured at the Carnegie Music Hall in Oakland. To date, though, Bayer has never issued a corporate apology, despite a trip Rosenberg made to Germany in April 1999 to speak at a Bayer stockholders meeting in Cologne.
"They stuck to their guns [saying], 'we're not the same company,'" Rosenberg said. "This is the game they played - the shell and pea game." Bayer, like other German companies from that era did pay into a settlement fund for survivors of forced or slave labor.
With the committee disbanded, Erbelding said, the collection can do more good at the Holocaust Museum than in Pittsburgh. "At least here the papers will continue to be part of the discussion and an active scholarly debate," Erbelding said. In addition to Rosenberg, the members of the committee were Sandra M. Fox, Dr. Edward S. Friedman, Meir Israelowitz, James Kramer, Ivan Frank, Wendy Goldman and the late Steven Sapolsky. While it was in existence, the committee received support from several congregation mens' clubs, the Greater Pittsburgh Rabbinic Association, Tree of Life Congregation, the Ohio-Allegheny Valley Region of B'nai B'rith and the Three Rivers Community Foundation.
Rosenberg's gift is an unusual one. The Holocaust Museum's archives typically receive collections of authentic Holocaust era material and scholarly notes as gifts. "As far as I know this is the first collection from a nonauthor of a committee's work to address this issue," Erbelding said.
While Bayer never officially acknowledged any culpability in the Holocaust, Rosenberg said the committee had an impact. "I think we succeeded in bringing this issue to public attention in Pittsburgh and linking up with German groups and other like-minded people," he said, "but, they (Bayer) could have gone farther and could still go farther."
(By Lee Chottiner, Executive Editor, lchottiner@pittchron.com.)
please also read:
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: Jew, Christian team up to stress German firms' culpability for war horrors
Reuters: Wartime slave workers seek cash from German firms
Materials About Bayer´s Nazi-past
Coalition against BAYER-dangers (Germany)
www.CBGnetwork.org
http://www.cbgnetwork.org/1289.html
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:41:27 -0500
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: Police Found Suspected Bombs In WTC On 9/11
Police Found Suspected Bombs In WTC On 9/11
Reports surfaced of truck parked in building
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | December 5 2005
The report you will see was filed by an MSNBC news anchor Rick Sanchez on the morning of September 11th 2001. It can be downloaded here.
The details contained therein seem to have slipped under the radar amidst the huge body of evidence proving controlled demolition brought down both the twin towers and Building 7.
Sanchez states,
"Police have found what they believe to be a suspicious device and they fear that it may lead to another explosion."
"I spoke with some police officials moments ago, Chris, and they told me they have reason to believe that one of the explosion at the besides the ones made with the planes, may have been caused by a van that was parked on the building that may have had an explosive device in it."
It would make sense that police would find at least some of the bombs that tore down the only steel buildings to collapse from fire damage in history at speeds that defied physics. There would have been so many devices involved in the demolition that stumbling across some was inevitable.
This report mirrors those that emerged in the hours following the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, where bomb squads removed numerous unexploded secondary devices from the Alfred P. Murrah building.
The twin towers were wired to the brim with highly powerful explosives, some of which exploded before the collapse of the buildings and some during.
This is why people like construction worker Philip Morelli, working in the fourth sub-basement of the north tower, were thrown around like rag dolls in an earthquake.
With the sheer volume of evidence and basic straightforward common sense proving controlled demolition, the possibility still remains that the federal government, backed by FEMA, will come forward and announce that another Al-Qaeda cell placed the explosives days before the attack.
This of course is ridiculous, it takes highly trained explosives experts weeks and sometimes months to correctly rig buildings many times smaller than the twin towers, and with varying degrees of success. The towers imploded perfectly and fell down right in their own footsteps, as did Building 7 which wasn't hit by a plane. Any building not owned by Larry Silverstein, despite having closer proximity to the towers, strangely stood its ground.
Larry Silverstein admitted that Building 7 was "pulled," an industry term for demolition, in a September 2002 PBS documentary, but has failed to respond to a firestorm of subsequent questions.
Others argue that the powers that be will simply continue to ignore the evidence now being certified by such credible individuals as Professor Steven Jones and former chief economist for the US Department of Labor under George W. Bush, Morgan Reynolds.
To change such a major element of the official version of events would throw into question all the other pieces of the puzzle and the whole house of cards would come tumbling down.
Nevertheless, the report that police did find explosives in the World Trade Center before the collapse of the towers is another giant smoking gun to add to all the rest proving that the collapse of the buildings and 9/11 was an inside job.
----------------------------------------
Related: Alex Jones at Ground Zero: The Use Of Explosives In the 9/11 Attack
In this 22 minute clip Alex reports from ground zero and talks to eyewitnesses who were there on the day who reported bombs.
Related: Bombs in the World Trade Center
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 10
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:47:29 -0500
From: "norgesen" <norgeson@hotmail.com>
Subject: Bush Plays Terror Card With Bogus LA Attack Plot
Bush Plays Terror Card With Bogus LA Attack Plot
Bootlicking news networks follow suit with dramatic images of Library Tower being destroyed
In an orchestrated set-up, George W. Bush announced that a plan to fly a plane into the LA Library Tower was thwarted in 2002 and within minutes news networks were showing footage of the same building being destroyed in the movie Independence Day.
Bush stated that the attack was prevented only with the help of NSA surveillance of communications, an attempt to shut up critics of the spying scandal in a move about as sophisticated as a 300lb Pittsburgh Steelers fan after a heavy drinking session.
The mayor of Los Angeles, Antonio Villaraigosa, immediately went public with comments of his absolute bewilderment concerning the alleged plot.
"I'm amazed that the president would make this (announcement) on national TV and not inform us of these details through the appropriate channels," the mayor said in an interview with The Associated Press. "I don't expect a call from the president - but somebody."
Within minutes of the President's speech, news networks were showing images from the movie Independence Day (pictured), where the Library Tower is destroyed as part of the alien invasion.
We have to understand that the Mayor being completely oblivious to the supposed terror plot most likely means that it was completely invented by Karl Rove and his fellow scriptwriters. That meant that a target had to be chosen and they chose the Library Tower knowing full well that news networks would show images of it being destroyed from the movie Independence Day.
In the mind of the passive viewer this information enters the brain as if it is real, and they suspend disbelief to embrace the notion that the building was destroyed by terrorists. This residue remains in the viewer's psyche and the validity of the government's response to the 'attack,' in this instance passing the soon to expire Patriot Act and justifying spying on Americans, is unquestionable.
This isn't another tin-foil hat conspiracy theory, the suggestibility of television is a scientific fact that has been accepted for decades.
This represents an organized campaign of mind control and fearmongering. They have played the terror card so many times that the fingerprints of deception can be lifted and verified almost immediately.
These are the same people that brought you fake fat bin Laden 'confession' tapes found in a shack in Jalalabad and could psychically predict tapes tying Osama to Saddam airing on Al Jazeera days before they surfaced.
Furthermore, as Kurt Nimmo points out, one of the supposed ringleaders of the operation, Riduan Isamuddin, was "operations chief" of Jemaah Islamiyah, which was a creation of Indonesian intelligence and is widely acknowledged to wholly controlled by the CIA.
If the government has really thwarted an attack on LA you can bet your bottom dollar that they would have waved it in front of the anti-war crowd's face before invading Iraq in March 2003.
This is as obvious a political points scoring move as you're ever going to see. It has been deliberately and synthetically concocted to stifle heated criticism of the NSA spying.
This, despite the fact that the spying debate still circles around foreign phone calls, when the real issue is the admitted fact that the Pentagon and other government agencies have been caught and continue to spy on peaceful anti-war and activist groups entirely made up of American citizens.
~~~
Twenty-Three Intel Experts Say LA Terror Plot a Sham
Following yesterday's highly suspiciously timed announcement that the US government had foiled a 2002 terror plot against the Los Angeles Library Tower, intelligence experts and White House reporters have uniformly debunked the story.
As we reported yesterday, in an orchestrated set-up, George W. Bush announced that a plan to fly a plane into the LA Library Tower was thwarted in 2002 and within minutes news networks were showing footage of the same building being destroyed in the movie Independence Day.
After the mayor of LA, Antonio Villaraigosa, immediately went public with comments of his absolute bewilderment concerning the alleged plot, no fewer than twenty three intelligence experts told Capitol Hill Blue that President Bush was "cheapening and politicizing their work" by creating a "fantasy world" of discredited terror alerts and using them for political points scoring.
Both current and former NSA and FBI officials vented their fury with George Bush, one telling Capitol Hill Blue that he was "full of shit."
The LA attack plot arose from the same discredited informant who said that Washington and New York financial institutions were being targeted, which led the White House to raise the terror alert right as the 2004 election campaign was beginning.
In June 2004 John Pistole, the FBI's counterterrorism director, said he was "not sure what [the CIA] was referring to," after a CIA counterterrorism official who testified under the alias "Ted Davis" said that the US had prevented aviation attacks against the east and west coast.
Even former Homeland Security secretary Tom Ridge, before he was replaced by Michael Chertoff, stated that the White House would raise the terror alert with zeal based on the flimsiest evidence.
White House press reporters questioned the timing of the bogus attack claim Thursday evening in light of the NSA spying hearings, after Bush claimed NSA surveillance was key in preventing the alleged attack.
"But is it just a coincidence? You had February 6th circled on the calendar for the hearings, the NSA hearings. Is it just a pure coincidence that this comes out today?" asked one journalist.
McClellan was clearly ruffled and all he could do was repeat the same line about how the President likes to share information with the American people, a claim that would be funny if it were not so disturbingly tragic in light of today's report highlighting White House knowledge of levee breaks in New Orleans hours after Hurricane Katrina roared ashore.
"Scott, I wanted to just ask a follow-up about the LA plot. Is there something missing from this story, a practical application, a few facts? Because if you want to commandeer a plane and fly it into a tower, if you used shoe bombs, wouldn't you blow off the cockpit? Or is there something missing from this story?" asked another.
File this with the dozens of fake terror alerts, staged 'Al-Qaeda' arrests and hoax bin Laden tapes as another brazen attempt to frighten the American people into jettisoning their own liberty for the sake of a mythical security offered by an illegitimate occupational government.
~~~
Sycophantic Lamestream Media Marches to the Newspeak Drumbeat
In George Orwell's 1984, the purpose of Newspeak, according to a website devoted to its study, was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of IngSoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible.
Its vocabulary was so constructed as to give exact and often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could properly wish to express, while excluding all other meaning and also the possibility of arriving at them by indirect methods. This was done partly by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable words and stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and so far as possible of all secondary meaning whatever.
Media Matters carried two items today that provide examples of Newspeak not in the fictional world of 1984, but in the modern day news cycle of 2006.
During ABC News anchor Elizabeth Vargas' introduction of George Stephanopoulos's preview of the 2006 State of the Union address, ABC carried text beneath an onscreen picture (see above) of Bush labeled, "America's Agenda."
The boot-licking lapdogs' attempt to unify Americans behind Bush's mandate before his grandiose yet reality avoiding speech flies in the face of recent polls showing Bush's approval rating in the low 40's and a January 29 ABC News/Washington Post poll showing a majority of the American people disapproving of his performance on nearly every major issue.
In addition, White House spin strategists have embarked on a clear campaign to offset anger over revelations of the NSA illegally spying on American citizens by calling the action a 'terrorist surveillance program' - after all, who's against listening to Osama bin Laden's phone calls right? Let's just not mention the fact that only nine so-called terrorists, out of the thousands detained without trial, including American citizens, have even been charged and none of them charged with terrorist offences. Don't talk about the fact that 70-90% of those taken to internment camps in Iraq were terrorist suspects for the crime of not showing their papers at checkpoints.
By changing the terms of address from 'domestic spying' to 'terrorist surveillance' - the meaning is altered. This is classic Newspeak.
Imagine my shock when it came to light that Fox News had prostrated itself in front of the government and adopted lockstep the 'terrorist surveillance program' rhetoric on its news broadcasts.
On January 24th's Fox and Friends - a mish-mash of celebrity mindlessness with lavish breakfast helpings of government worship interspersed, the issue was referred to as the 'terrorist surveillance program' as it was on the following day's O'Reilly Factor.
E.D. Hill and Steven Doocy of Fox and Friends agreed that 'terrorist surveillance program' "sounded better" and resolved to use it in all future discussions of the issue. There is no truth to the rumor that during the same segment the co-hosts concurred that 'President' wasn't an adoring enough term for George W. Bush and that he should in future be referred to as 'Supreme Leader In All His Infinite Wisdom and Love.'
Watch the clip.
The origin of the 'terrorist surveillance program' term was tracked down to Internet blowhards Newsmax, who never came across an 'Iraqi WMD Moved To Syria, Let's Bomb 'Em' story they didn't like.
The White House included it ten times in a January 22nd press release and the sycophantic lackeys of the lamestream media have marched to the drumbeat ever since.
~~~
Getting the kids used to the cashless society
Mastercard introduces credit cards for children
Mastercard is to introduce credit cards directly aimed at children, encouraging them to go into debt and consume products without the use of cash.
Supporters regard the cards, which are issued by Bluecorner, as the natural step in an increasingly cashless society. They argue that the prepayment cards will familiarise children with plastic without spending too much. Says the London Times.
The cards are designed to get children used to the fact that cash is obsolete and their money, and the amount they are allowed to spend is controlled by someone else who also profits from their spending.
The cards, which have different designs based on popular teenagers' magazines and radio stations, have charges of £9.95 fee to open the account and 85p for each withdrawal from an ATM cash dispenser. There are penalty fees of £4.99 for cancelling an account or ordering a replacement card.
Phil Davies, the director of business development at MasterCard Europe, defended the cards saying: "Parents can control the amount of money their son or daughter spends on the card by limiting the amount of money placed on the card."
So in effect it is exactly the same as an adult credit card, except the controlling of the amount of money in adult life is carried out by the globalist bankers who profit from the cashless society.
A cashless society would mean total control over everyone as people would be forced to pay for everything electronically. Every purchase would be traceable and the ability to buy or sell could be halted immediately at any given moment.
We have previously seen how the concept is being seized upon and marketed to young people as cool. Cashless Coke vending machines for example integrated with wireless technology are all very cool, but not so cool when your credit is halted and you can't pop in a quarter for a can of your favourite soft drink to quench your thirst after a hard day's slaving.
Implantable microchips are very cool, you can use them to get into nightclubs and pay for drinks, and according to some they are the new body art.
But they are admittedly a device of control. You can only spend as much as the controlling authority wishes.
School children are being encouraged to thumbscan for their lunches, and amusement park goers are being biometrically scanned upon entry for payment and identification purposes.
We are constantly being told that the future is cashless, there are cashless lanes at the supermarket that move quicker and more efficiently, and with technology such as RFID we will receive a superior service at the price of being tracked, traced and having our personal data recorded at all times.
Of course the cashless society would mean a massive boost in control and wealth for the globalist taxers and the banking corporations. With even more charges and levies on everything we spend and the ability to lend out more than even more than they already do, the banking elite would profit on an unprecedented level. Taxes would also be easier to collect electronically.
The world has been expecting a global currency for over half a century now, and it is finally arriving, but not in the way it was expected. Economies are being "harmonized", in other words, taxes in all countries are being raised.
NewsMax last year exposed the OECD's scheme to penalize countries that offer (comparatively) low taxes. Nations that cut taxes and thereby boost their economies are supposedly unfair to Europe's socialist welfare states.
The argument is not that the welfare states should position themselves so as to be more competitive by also lowering their own tax rates. Rather it is the low-tax countries that are viewed as "unfair." Thus, everyone shares the misery, and the globalists profit to the max from a cashless society.
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/september_eleven_vreeland/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
september_eleven_vreeland-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment