Re: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Request for Critique from Group: Blog Post about Michael B. Green

Nothing says those are "wings cutting through the building." That's WAY
TOO Cartoon.
More likely the side of the building is being raked by a tesla cannon or
even preplanted explosives from some hollywood special effects department.
Farking wings would not stay attached and would not be karate-chopping
their way through floors and walls intact like superman.
That's silly stuff.

ron_winn wrote:
> Anything launched like that is too small, Nico.
> The clips "Plane In/Missile Out" gives us the size. And it had small
> wings that can be seen cutting through the building on the outside not
> small fins.
> Missiles could have been used as a distraction when looking outward
> there is no looking inward.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Nico Haupt <mailto:nicohaupt@gmx.li>
> *To:* 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com>
> *Cc:* alexldent@yahoo.com <mailto:alexldent@yahoo.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 10, 2006 5:03 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Request for Critique from
> Group: Blog Post about Michael B. Green
>
> > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> > Von: "alexldent" <alexldent@yahoo.com <mailto:alexldent@yahoo.com>>
> > An: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com>
> > Betreff: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Request for Critique from Group:
> Blog Post
> > about Michael B. Green
> > Datum: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:59:44 -0000
> >
>
>
> I don't believe, they came from a ship. Too many witnesses, too long
> distance.
>
> I believe, the missiles were handshouldered or from a device in a
> downtown
> building. Unfortunately we never really mapped that area,
> comparing with the
> video clips, so that everything is a kind of speculation, but my
> favourite
> buildings are still woolworth building, wtc 7 or maybe even one of
> the US
> Military Helicopters, operated by a mercenary, who later got
> killed in a
> third country.
>
>
> >>>>Okay. Now-- what are you saying about what the F16s were
> doing going
> out to the ocean? And are you saying the missiles came from a US Navy
> ship or not?<<<
>
> --
> DSL-Aktion wegen großer Nachfrage bis 28.2.2006 verlängert:
> GMX DSL-Flatrate 1 Jahr kostenlos* http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Okay. Now-- what are you saying about what the F16s were doing going
> out to the ocean? And are you saying the missiles came from a US Navy
> ship or not?
>
> --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "ron_winn" <ron_winn@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > It's this word elements within that needs a definition. Many are
> naming the element within as people in the administration but there
> are of course other elements. Religious, political, military,
> environmentalists, business & criminal elements.
> >
> > Not only does the word terrorism need defining but inside job needs
> one too. A few have defined what they mean as an inside job. But other
> use an inside job to encompass all the above elements which only
> infers that that excludes those accused in the official story. It
> might help the "movement" if an "inside job" was defined. It might be
> more of a selling point if what was put to the people was "al Qaida
> didn't do 9/11. How could they when 67(?) times in the past smaller
> aircraft have been located in American skies and got themselves a
> fighter escort."
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: alexldent
> > To: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:39 PM
> > Subject: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Request for Critique from Group:
> Blog Post about Michael B. Green
> >
> >
> > You are touching on a fascinating idea-- that the navy shot the
> missiles that
> > were used on 9/11 and the F16s were sent out to check out what the
> navy
> > was doing (?)-- but I really don't follow your overall point.
> Maybe the problem
> > is just semantics on what "inside job" means. What is your
> definition of "inside
> > job"? Mine is simply that some elements of the USG were involved
> actively in
> > the attacks.
> >
> > --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "ron_winn" <ron_winn@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > We know that F16's were sent out to sea which has never really
> been
> > explained. In fact it seems such a stupid thing to do. Or else too
> obvious
> > sending them on a wild goose chase as if to get them away from
> where they
> > might hinder the "inside job". NORAD say that every defence system
> was
> > pointing outwards towards an external threat. What forms of
> external threat is
> > there? Well, many speak of missiles. Missiles have to be
> lauched from
> > somewhere. Also why was the US Navy made ready soon after 9/11 was
> all
> > but over? What was the Navy going to do that the airforce couldn't
> and
> > apparently didn't on the day? The threats, we are told were purely
> domestic
> > flights. The atc's, the FAA and all other agencies were
> concentrating of
> > domestic flights. So NORAD sends out the F16's out to sea [and
> Lord knows
> > where the F15's got to] sounds very stupid, right. Do you think
> the pilots would
> > have been so silent if they knew they had been sent on a fools'
> errand?
> > >
> > > IMO F16's were not sent on a wild goose chase and the Navy
> wasn't made
> > ready for a "domestic" inside job that was all but over. You can
> speak of
> > missiles but they had to come in from somewhere. And F16's sent up
> must
> > have been sent up with a purpose and that wasn't surely to get
> them out of the
> > way. The threat was "in your face" domestic. The military are not
> dumb. That
> > fits in too conveniently with the case of negligence that gets the
> admin off the
> > hook. You think the airforce F16's would have done a "victory"
> flyover at the
> > Pentagon if they had just come back from a wild goose chase.
> > >
> > > You see, it looks too obviously an inside job although that is
> not to say
> > assistance had to be obtained from insiders. This goes to the
> point and the
> > question - why if it was an purely an inside job wouldn't 767's
> >from their
> > graveyard in the desert have been used. If they had we wouldn't be
> here
> > today engaged in our search for the truth.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: alexldent
> > > To: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 3:04 AM
> > > Subject: [911InsideJobbers] Re: Request for Critique from
> Group: Blog
> > Post about Michael B. Green
> > >
> > >
> > > >>> I've never been convinced of an inside job although I have
> an open
> > > mind.<<<
> > >
> > > Wha????? If it wasn't an inside job, what were they
> covering up?
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com, "ron_winn"
> <ron_winn@>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Your link doesn't work.
> > > > Unfortunately the other one does.
> > > > Interesting statement because if two real 767's or
> substitutes were
> > > in the plan then "11" would have been a scheduled flight. And
> so would
> > > "77". Or both flights would have been reported to be private
> charters.
> > > >
> > > > Something flew into the north tower and to hastily cover up
> what it
> > > was flight "11" was used.
> > > >
> > > > I've never been convinced of an inside job although I have
> an open
> > > mind. So far there is enough to support a hasty cover up. The
> Pentagon
> > > attack being the most speedily concocted one, I believe.
> Although 93
> > > is running a close second.
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Bill Giltner
> > > > To: 911InsideJobbers@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 7:19 PM
> > > > Subject: [911InsideJobbers] Request for Critique from
> Group: Blog
> > > Post about Michael B. Green
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Check out my blog post here:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > http://bgtruth.blogspot.com/2006/02/we-believe-that-senior-
> > government.HTML
> > > >
> > > > Here's my main point:
> > > >
> > > > Additional Commentary by this Blogger:
> > > >
> > > > Where Dr. Green goes horribly wrong: (is this on purpose?)
> > > >
> > > > "To put matters plainly: any substitute plane would be an
> exact
> > > duplicate of
> > > > AA11 or UA175. To do anything else would be inviting
> disaster. "
> > > >
> > > > http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/green/loose_change.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > SPONSORED LINKS Government procurement Government
> leasing
> > > Government grants for women
> > > > Government lease Government contract Government
> money
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > > >
> > > > a.. Visit your group "911InsideJobbers" on the web.
> > > >
> > > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> Terms of
> > > Service.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > SPONSORED LINKS Government procurement Government leasing
> > Government grants for women
> > > Government lease Government contract Government
> money
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > >
> > > a.. Visit your group "911InsideJobbers" on the web.
> > >
> > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> Terms of Service.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > SPONSORED LINKS Government procurement Government leasing
> Government grants for women
> > Government lease Government contract Government money
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >
> > a.. Visit your group "911InsideJobbers" on the web.
> >
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Government procurement
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+procurement&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=S_3-2zVK9QQjTwxHvO91yw>
> Government leasing
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+leasing&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=ZAuP_XFQBkNiVw-hPWWJ-Q>
> Government grants for women
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+grants+for+women&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=R7KVvqXEVqN0Ct9WGPhKwg>
>
> Government lease
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+lease&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=FM8lkJddvatAkQNo00D_Cw>
> Government contract
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+contract&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=fTrsbvxC-m39UjtOdMcT-Q>
> Government money
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+money&w1=Government+procurement&w2=Government+leasing&w3=Government+grants+for+women&w4=Government+lease&w5=Government+contract&w6=Government+money&c=6&s=154&.sig=HB73LsQrRnXy-2WkBh3LyA>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "911InsideJobbers
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
911InsideJobbers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/